PodSearch

Upgrade

568: A Persona of a Bearded Man

 

00:00:00   This is Upgrade. Episode 568. Today's show is brought to you by Squarespace, Delete Me, and Factor.

00:00:18   My name is Mike Hurley. I'm joined by Jason Snell. Hi, Jason Snell.

00:00:21   Hi, Mike Hurley. My name is Jason Snell, and I'm joined by Mike Hurley.

00:00:26   I have a Snell talk question for you. It comes from Mike, and Mike wants to know,

00:00:30   Jason? Mike with an I? Different. This one isn't me. Usually when I say it's from Mike,

00:00:35   it's me, but this one is not me. Okay. All right. Just to be clear. All right.

00:00:38   Mike wants to know, how much did you enjoy using the AirPods Max for the recording of last week's

00:00:44   episode? I like how this is phrased. How did I like it? How did you like it? Mike, I did not like it.

00:00:51   I know. Listeners may know, Jason doesn't like wearing over-ear headphones of any kind.

00:00:57   I hate it. I hate it so much. Somebody, was it Lauren or Jamie, asked me, what's the deal

00:01:04   with those headphones? Are those your headphones? And I was like, no. I said, I've only ever worn

00:01:11   AirPods Max at Apple Park because they supply them if you're doing a podcast there. And again,

00:01:20   very generous of them, not saying anything about their generosity, just saying I don't like over-ear

00:01:26   headphones. It doesn't matter who makes them, even the greatest ones of all time. I'm never going to

00:01:31   like them. It makes my ears sweaty. I find them weird and uncomfortable. I've just, I've never liked

00:01:37   using them. Um, I find the whole experience unpleasant. So no is how I like them. I, I like

00:01:44   them zero. Um, yeah, I was just mentioning to you before we started the show. Cause, uh, my,

00:01:50   my travel is, is getting in place for September this year for the podcast.com where we'll be hanging

00:01:55   out and hopefully talking about new iPhones and, uh, and doing a better live in-person episode than we

00:02:01   did last year where we didn't wear headphones and we're off access and sounded like a disaster,

00:02:06   like amateurs. Ruined one of the best, one of the most important episodes of the year,

00:02:10   but we try not to think about that. We're not going to do that. We're not going to do that again.

00:02:13   Cause we're both going to be wearing headphones this time, but this is the thing for me. Uh,

00:02:16   my travel headphones are an original pair of AirPods Max. And this is the, I think the first trip

00:02:23   that I'll be taking, maybe the first trip since Apple updated the AirPods Max. Um, and especially

00:02:29   since they got them to the point where it was actually somewhat on par with the previous version.

00:02:33   Like there is a cable that you can use now, which there wasn't for many months when they

00:02:37   introduced the USB-C, uh, version. Right. Yes. And I just, I think I'm like super over the AirPods Max,

00:02:45   but the question is, do I move to the new Sonys or not? This is like the question I have for myself.

00:02:51   I saw those just came out. Cause that's what I was waiting for. Cause the last ones,

00:02:54   the last Sonys, they didn't get the kind of like overwhelming. These are really good, uh, reviews

00:03:00   that the Sony headphones usually get. Um, but I watched a MKBHD video. This is the WH-1000XM6.

00:03:11   Uh, and, and he's like, Oh yeah, no, they, they did it again. Um, and like they do a lot of what I

00:03:16   want. They fold and all that kind of stuff. And you compare multiple devices, but I just don't think

00:03:20   it's, I just, I, this is the thing I'm never going to get exactly what I want. Cause what I like about

00:03:25   the AirPods Max is they do the automatic switching, which I love with Apple products and AirPods. It

00:03:30   works really great for me. And it's not going to do that. You can have multiple devices, but it's not

00:03:34   going to do the switching. Um, yeah, but, but then I also don't get a lot of what I want from the

00:03:40   AirPods experience from the AirPods Max because it uses an old chip. So you don't get like transparent,

00:03:46   the, um, adaptive mode. You don't get the, the voice modes and stuff like that. So I just don't

00:03:51   know. I don't know what to do. They're old. I, I actually realized, um, I do have a little bit of a

00:03:56   story here, which is that I, I did buy a, some generation of those Sony headphones at one point.

00:04:00   The story was I had, um, really just kind of a weird inner ear, um, thing that we thought that I had,

00:04:07   which I think I, I do have. And it means that sometimes when I travel, um, I'm, uh, I get to my

00:04:14   destination and I'm kind of, I feel kind of sick for like a day afterward. And one of the things that

00:04:19   my audiologist and my doctor suggested was, um, don't, don't use my plug your ear in ear headphones

00:04:27   because they exacerbate the pressure in your ears and instead use, uh, use cans, you use the big over

00:04:34   ear headphones. And so I bought a pair and we were about to go to Hawaii. I bought a pair of Sony of the

00:04:40   Sony noise canceling headphones. They sounded great. There are quirks cause it's Sony and it does things

00:04:46   that I'm like, Hmm, you know, I spend enough time with Apple products and I'm like, this is janky.

00:04:51   Like, Oh, you could update the firmware with this. It's just like, it was weird, but they, they were,

00:04:54   they were really nice. And, um, I ended up giving them to my son because, uh, he wanted them and he

00:05:01   likes them and he, he used them until they died. Um, and, you know, brutalize them in a way only a

00:05:08   teenager can do to the point where they, they died a violent death. But, um, what the reason I didn't

00:05:15   use them anymore is cause then Apple came out with AirPods pro. And one of the features of AirPods pro,

00:05:21   in addition to doing noise canceling, which was really nice on an airplane is they have, they made a point of

00:05:28   saying that they have airflow control in the headphones and the air passes through and it doesn't block your

00:05:34   ears. The air moves through and the pressure would move through. And I've used those on the airplane

00:05:39   since and, uh, have not had any effect. I don't wear the in-ears. I wear the AirPods instead. Um, but

00:05:46   anyway, so I, I did buy them. I appreciate that people like them. Um, I wouldn't recommend people

00:05:52   buying AirPods max right now either. So, so you think about that and we'll, we'll, uh, we'll,

00:05:58   we'll look at each other in September and we'll see what we're wearing.

00:06:01   I've got a few months. Cause it's also like, I like the, the AirPods pro work fantastic. Like

00:06:06   the noise cancellation on a plane is just superbly good. Um, but I just find most comfortable when

00:06:15   flying to be personally to be wearing over ears. I just find that to be more comfortable.

00:06:19   This is one of those ergonomics things as we have more and more products that are designed for us to

00:06:24   wear ergonomics matter. And everybody's ergonomics are a little bit different. Everybody's going to

00:06:29   have different preferences. This is why I say I have no problem with the AirPods max other than the fact

00:06:33   that I don't want that category. I just don't like that product category at all, but, but it works for

00:06:39   you. And for me, I would choose AirPods pro over AirPods max every time. And we have friends who would

00:06:44   choose regular AirPods over either. So, I mean, it is what it is, but, um, uh, yeah, looking forward to

00:06:51   seeing in September though. Uh, listening, you may have thought to yourself, why is the music different, uh, for this

00:06:57   episode of upgrade? And that is because it is the summer of fun. Summer of fun. Summer of fun. I thought I would,

00:07:05   we would test take a moment for any new listeners, uh, who wonder why we're shouting, uh, and what the summer of fun

00:07:13   is, uh, well, this started honestly too many years ago for me to remember now, uh, where basically

00:07:19   during this period of time in between kind of like, kind of more like late June up until September for

00:07:26   the iPhone, uh, things can get a bit quiet news wise. And there was just some years we were really

00:07:32   struggling with what to talk about. And we decided we're just going to start doing some weird stuff and

00:07:36   throwing in some fun episodes and some creative projects throughout the year. This became the summer of

00:07:40   fun. So the summer of fun starts when the week after WWDC, it runs up to the draft, uh, for the

00:07:47   iPhone event. That will be the summer of fun. We're in it now. And we're in it now and it's meant to be

00:07:53   fun. It is. I refer to this period sometimes as the, the, the cruise toward the iPhone event because we

00:07:59   have the peak of WWDC and then there's, it's very busy afterward, but it's not busy in a, oh my God,

00:08:07   oh my God, oh my God, every week. Instead, it's more like, uh, every, everybody's, you know, the

00:08:12   betas will come and we'll have conversations about things that are in them and we'll have rumors about

00:08:17   the iPhone, but it's like, it's a different pace and you almost have to pace yourself. And, and, uh,

00:08:23   summer of fun actually is a way for us to kind of pace ourself, do creative things to talk about

00:08:29   during that time when we're all kind of just anticipating the new iPhones and whatever else comes in the

00:08:34   fall and reflecting on, you know, the, the stuff that got dropped at WWDC, but that we've got,

00:08:40   you know, a few months to reflect on that. So it's a, and we'll throw in some ideas and I will say

00:08:45   in our show document, I collected a bunch of great ideas that had been sent in by people

00:08:50   kind of as, as ask upgrades, um, that, uh, while Mike was gone, I just sort of, I created a new section

00:08:57   called good ideas in our documents. So we'll probably pull some of those good ideas and we'll

00:09:02   do, you know, we'll do a tier list and we'll do a weird, just draft for fun and stuff like that.

00:09:08   That's, that's what we do.

00:09:09   We have had multiple people right. And now to say, will you do a new tier list for the icons?

00:09:16   Now they've all been redesigned. That is maybe that's high up on my list, but we, we, we would

00:09:21   want to have to leave that until later in the summer if we're going to do it, I think.

00:09:25   Yeah. I had a great idea for an audio themed segment where I will play sounds for you. Uh,

00:09:36   and I'm not actually going to go further than that and saying what it is, but I had, I had,

00:09:39   and the more that I think about it, the more I like this idea. So that might happen this summer.

00:09:44   We'll see. Part of the summer of fun is it gives us permission to try and get a little creative with

00:09:49   things we do in the show, knowing that we've kind of got the summer gives us a little more space to do

00:09:54   that. So I hope people enjoy it. Uh, we certainly enjoy it, but I think it, I think it, um, provides

00:09:59   a little variety, uh, in a period where otherwise it could be kind of samey, right? Cause it's not,

00:10:04   not like we don't have stuff to talk about. It's just that we don't have any, we have the same stuff

00:10:08   to talk about for like 10 weeks. And, and so you try to space it out and intersperse it with other

00:10:13   stuff. Now I want to talk about something that's summer related, but not fun, but there's no way I

00:10:19   could kind of let us talk about the summer of fun because without mentioning this,

00:10:23   cause the summer of fun, uh, in, you know, encapsulates surf vibes. And to me,

00:10:29   surf vibes come from Brian Wilson and we lost Brian Wilson in the past week. Brian Wilson was

00:10:35   the creative driving force behind the Beach Boys. Uh, I think one of the greatest songwriters of all

00:10:39   time. Uh, he passed away, um, this week and it means a lot to me. I I've loved the Beach Boys music

00:10:45   since, since, since I was a kid and I've had the pleasure of seeing Brian Wilson in concert three

00:10:51   times, uh, incredibly emotional experience. His music just hits me to my heart. Uh, and Peter wrote

00:10:58   in to say, uh, to ask in the wake of Brian Wilson's passing mic, what Beach Boys related tracks are on your

00:11:04   mind. Mine include include include in my room and surfs up in my room. It's just Brian Wilson had this

00:11:10   duality where he can create the happiest music, but also the saddest music. It's a fascinating and he's

00:11:17   lived a fascinating, he lived a very difficult and interesting life. Uh, for me though, one of the

00:11:23   songs that just never leaves is God Only Knows. It's just, I think one of the greatest songs ever

00:11:27   written. It was, uh, the first dance that me and Idina had at our wedding. Jason, you got to see that

00:11:32   dance in person. Uh, we, we did that because that, you know, that song is, is so beautiful and I love it

00:11:38   so much, but just the majority of the Pet Sounds album has been in my head because it has more of a

00:11:43   somber tone than the majority of the Beach Boys catalog. And so, yeah, I just wanted to mark that

00:11:48   here because, uh, he means so much to me and, uh, I feel like it's, it is summer. The Beach Boys to me

00:11:56   are summer. Um, and so, uh, rest in peace, Brian Wilson. Let's move on with some follow-up. We've got

00:12:04   a bunch today. An anonymous person wrote in Jason to let us know about something you might be excited

00:12:08   about. And they said the enterprise release notes for Mac OS 26 say that privacy and security

00:12:13   security settings can now be migrated to migration system.

00:12:17   Fantastic. Let's hope that that means that if you migrate, you don't have to approve

00:12:21   15,000 different, uh, dialogue boxes.

00:12:24   That is what it would appear, right? And, and as we spoke about before, is the obvious thing that

00:12:29   should happen, right? Like there's no reason that getting a new computer means you've forgotten.

00:12:33   Once I say it's okay, you should never ask me again.

00:12:36   Yes. Uh, Patrick wrote in and says, as I've been watching all the interviews in WWDC,

00:12:41   I've noticed one particular person has been missing from the media coverage this year.

00:12:45   Is it odd that at one of Apple's biggest events of the year, the CEO is absent? Why do you think

00:12:50   this is? I don't think it's odd at all because Tim, this is about software and product and it's not

00:12:56   about Tim. Tim is a big picture strategy guy. If he's, if he's anything, I mean, he's steering the

00:13:03   company. And so, you know, I think he made his appearance, his token appearance, but like in terms

00:13:08   of a Q and a, he doesn't do a lot of those, they tend to be out of band. They're at weird times

00:13:13   with interesting, uh, interesting outlets and they are more often, they're more kind of like soft,

00:13:20   uh, or they're more business focused. Like I didn't, I don't think it's, it's a notable at all.

00:13:26   This is the, like this, this is, they, they always will card out your VPs for, uh, things like this

00:13:33   event. I've heard this in a few places, like on a couple of podcasts that I listened to. I think

00:13:37   there's people trying to find a story where there isn't one like Tim's hiding. No, this, if this was

00:13:43   the iPhone event and he was not on good morning America, then you've got a problem, right? Like if,

00:13:49   cause that's when we see him, like Tim is always around in September. Yeah. Thing where

00:13:54   he wanders around, but yeah, it's an OS thing. It's developers. It's just not a big, Tim, Tim makes

00:13:59   his appearances. He, he hasn't vanished, but this is, I, yeah, there are other people to do this kind

00:14:05   of coverage right now. Also last year, I think it was at WWC last year, they had him doing some stuff

00:14:11   and it just didn't go well. Like he did that, um, interview on KBHD and it just, it's, it didn't,

00:14:19   it's the trying too hard part of last year. Last year tried too hard and cart now Tim to talk about

00:14:24   Apple intelligence is, is part of the trying too hard. It's part of the, um, they were desperate

00:14:30   to be seen as strategic about AI. And this year was a retrenchment and Tim not being front and center

00:14:39   makes perfect sense for that. Yeah. Honestly. Yeah. Uh, Joe Lynn writes in and says in the WWDC draft

00:14:47   pick episode, Jason asked if math notes was called maths notes in the UK. I said, no, I was wrong.

00:14:55   It is called maths notes in the British English version of all of Apple's platforms. Uh, I missed

00:15:02   this and I looked at it as like, Oh my God, yes it is. It just completely, I just don't see it. Right.

00:15:07   Like it's, that is such an ugly thing to say. Maths notes. Uh, so, but yes, it is, it is correctly,

00:15:14   uh, what's the word that you use? Localized is correctly localized.

00:15:18   It's localized. Yes. Cause it's, it's short for mathematics. Note to Maddox.

00:15:22   Or something. Yep. That's what it is. That's what it is. From now on, I defy you to not look

00:15:33   at the notes app and think, ah, Notamatics. My old friend. I saved a Notamatic today.

00:15:40   Oh, and Apple is on the defensive about Apple intelligence. Uh, and seemingly, I think quite

00:15:49   specifically about John Gruber's article, uh, Joanna Stern got the interview this year. Uh,

00:15:55   Joanna gets interviews frequently, but. She does. Joanna got the sit down with Federighi and

00:16:00   Jaws, which I think was, was positioned as a, this is the canonical place in which we will

00:16:07   give our responses. Um, the one thing that I wanted to pick out on this was, uh, Jaws says,

00:16:15   there's this narrative out there that this was demo wear only. I like the out there. There's a

00:16:21   narrative out there. What could it be? Nobody knows. Essentially, in case you missed it,

00:16:26   Apple is saying that they had two architectures last year for how the more personal Siri and the

00:16:34   personal context stuff would work. They said it was working on one of them at the time of the demo.

00:16:40   They then subsequently realized that this path was not the right one and it was switched to the other

00:16:45   one. And it's going to take time. Uh, understandably, John Gruber wrote a piece about this. And as he

00:16:54   points out the features in question that were never actually demoed at all, like they, you know,

00:16:59   Jaws and Craig talk about like there being, uh, Oh, the things that we were showing at the time that

00:17:06   we were demoing at the time. It's like, they were never demoed. Like the features were spoken about

00:17:12   as if they were happening on the presenter's phone, but we never saw them happen. Like it kept cutting

00:17:16   away, showing animations and stuff like that. And I want to read a quote from, uh, John's piece. Um,

00:17:22   but at this point, based on Federighi and Jaws react public statements and some other things I've

00:17:26   heard from little birdies this week, I'm willing to stipulate that there was, let's call it

00:17:31   working code for the personalized Siri feature a year ago. At least one reason why the feature

00:17:36   as presented in last year's keynote was edited. Like it was, is that the latency was so bad

00:17:42   that whatever state it was in, it couldn't be shown in a single take. So I think we can kind of put it

00:17:47   to bed now where as with a lot of these things are kind of two truths, right? Like Apple is true in

00:17:52   saying it was working, but John is kind of right in that it was not showable because they never showed

00:18:00   it to anyone, which is still going back to the original point he made in the first place.

00:18:03   Exactly. This is, this is a distinction kind of without a difference that allows Apple to kind of

00:18:08   like push back on, on something that is by redefining what the statement was, because what Gruber says is

00:18:16   nobody he knew at Apple had ever seen this feature running before they announced it. And I'll just

00:18:22   flag that and say, that's unusual. Yeah. Right. That's unusual. So nobody saw it. And what Apple

00:18:29   is saying is, well, no, we had it running and it's like, okay, did you have it running? What state was

00:18:36   it in? Was it running before the demo or was it running later? I mean, that's one of the scenarios

00:18:41   here is that they, they, they got it running. I have a hard time believing they would show it without

00:18:47   believing that they could ship it. And that's something Federighi said in the interview that I think

00:18:50   absolutely rings true. Right. Obviously just passes a logical test that he's like, we wouldn't have put

00:18:56   it in the video if we didn't think we could ship it. And so we did have it. What happened is they had

00:19:02   something that was like running in a small group on, you know, somebody's computer somewhere. And they're

00:19:09   like, yeah, we can get this over the top. But it was like, not as far along as generally a feature that

00:19:14   gets put in the keynote would, would be. And even the, the idea that maybe the things in the video

00:19:22   were generated by actual code. Like there are so many edits. It's this idea that, that even if they

00:19:27   were generated by actual code, they were generated in a more artificial way than one had come to expect

00:19:33   from features that got introduced. So I understand Apple wanting to push back here because they,

00:19:40   they, what they want to say is, look, we weren't lying. What they don't want to say is we weren't

00:19:45   lying. We just, uh, stretched it way more than we usually do because we were desperate. So they leave

00:19:52   that part out. So like, are they telling the truth here? I think they probably are, but what they've done

00:19:57   is redefine the argument to something that they can explain away, uh, by saying it's a narrative that this

00:20:03   was demo where only where the truth is it wasn't demo where only a small group saw it, but it was

00:20:08   totally broken. And then we could never get it working, which they don't want to say. So they

00:20:13   just kind of leave it at this. Uh, Joanna Stern was with, uh, joined Nilay Patel as the guests for the

00:20:19   talk show this year. Um, yep. I got shouted out from the stage. You did. It was hilarious.

00:20:25   Hilarious. Plus they mentioned Doggletown. Nilay mentioned my name and mentioned Doggletown. I love it.

00:20:30   There is a problem with Doggletown. I think there was a simultaneous creation problem between us and

00:20:34   the verge. Oh yeah. No, we didn't create it, but we, we were a popularizer of it and he was doing the

00:20:39   Chinatown thing, right? Forget it. It's, it's Doggletown. He said, which the Chinatown, I don't

00:20:43   care. Cause I, I am a citizen of Doggletown. So I was happy to, happy to see it. I just want to say

00:20:48   like, in case people haven't heard the episode, cause maybe it's like, Oh, you know, I listened for the

00:20:53   interview. This was the best episode of the talk show from WWDC in years, in my opinion. It's

00:20:59   actually, I'm like, Oh, this is what I would prefer to hear. Like they talked about real

00:21:02   stuff. Yes. I just want to hear them talk about it. I think that from my tastes, I prefer the

00:21:08   executives in an environment like Joanne I've got, where it's like, let's just make this the

00:21:12   tightest it can be because you're not going to give us a lot of the information that we

00:21:16   want anyway. So we may as well make this 10 minutes rather than 90 minutes. I don't know.

00:21:21   We got some feedback by the way, somebody said, Oh, you, you say that the, you know, the Gruber

00:21:25   Gruber does his interviews the way he does because he's, you know, he, he needs to try and ask

00:21:31   questions that they're going to answer and all of that. And, but Joanna just went for it. I'm

00:21:34   like, okay, well, I think that's a good point. Except what I'll say is John Gruber, um, rented

00:21:41   out a theater, filled it with people and is trying to put on a show. Whereas, whereas

00:21:50   Joanna is, uh, is doing an interview, by the way, on a, on a moment's notice. Cause she got

00:21:56   told the day before and her people were like, her video people are like going to the airport

00:21:59   and she's like, no, no, we must stay. They've given this thing. So, so it was really at the

00:22:04   drop of a hat and she had very little time to prepare, but like, it's a, it's a TV interview,

00:22:08   essentially. I know it's wall street journal, but I mean, she used to work at what ABC, like

00:22:12   it's a, it is a TV interview where it's going to be edited. In fact, they dropped the Siri

00:22:17   part first because they didn't have time to edit the whole thing. So they just put that

00:22:20   out immediately. And, you know, in that scenario, like the whole point is to do the give and take

00:22:27   and ask those questions directly in a way that I would say you are less likely to do when

00:22:31   you've sold out a theater and you're trying to put on a show. It's a different, it's a

00:22:35   totally different experience. And I think that you would feel if you're in, if you're

00:22:40   in Joanna's shoes, you would absolutely feel more free asking those questions in that way.

00:22:45   So yeah. Plus she's the wall street journal. Honestly, the wall street journal, as much

00:22:50   as we love John Gruber, the wall street journal has a weight that during fireball can't because

00:22:55   the wall street journal is more easily ask that. Like I, I feel like maybe some people wouldn't

00:23:00   understand the thinking behind that, but like she has the shielding of, and like the confidence

00:23:06   of this entire massive organization behind her rather than it being just one person.

00:23:11   Plus it's not live. It's not live. There's no audience. And I mean the audience factor too,

00:23:17   like I think one of the reasons they skipped the talk show was to punish Gruber. I think one of the

00:23:21   reasons they skipped the talk show is the last thing they wanted was an audience of developers

00:23:25   to be free to boo the statements of Apple executives during a bad year. So, uh, yeah, I, but it's a very

00:23:34   different scenario.

00:23:35   I would say, I don't know how these things go, but my expectation is when Joanna sat down, she knew she

00:23:39   could ask that question and they were going to give her an answer. And that is not a thing that would

00:23:45   have happened on the talk show because it's a more of a conversation. It's a podcast. Like it's a longer

00:23:51   drawn out thing. They have a very specific thing they're going to say, and that's all they're going to say.

00:23:55   And they can say, we're not going to talk about that anymore. And that's fine because it can then

00:23:59   be edited out of the video because it's fine. Right. And that's the venue they chose, which is a

00:24:04   kind of control. I mean, they didn't control Joanna, but they control the venue. They did that in that

00:24:07   little perch that they have above the Steve Jobs theater. That's got the view of the, of the,

00:24:12   the ring and all of that. Like they had this whole setup. They also controlled it in the sense that

00:24:16   they didn't tell her that she could do it until the day before there was no suggestion. That is an

00:24:21   aspect of control is keeping people kind of out of, out of balance. Um, but they did, you know,

00:24:28   it was, it was great in the sense that we don't usually hear executives talk in detail about any

00:24:33   of this. It's actually great for a lot of the same ways. The talk show is great is if you can get,

00:24:36   or any Apple interview on a podcast is great. If you can get something out of it that allows you to

00:24:41   glean something about the way they're thinking. And Joanna did that. And I'm very glad that she did.

00:24:46   She's so good at her job. I, that's the thing I actually took away from the talk show is boy,

00:24:52   Joanna and Neelay are both, they're, they're both so good.

00:24:57   Joanna brings a sense of professionalism that is so strong. Like she has such a weight behind her words.

00:25:05   She's very, she's, she's a very impressive like media personality. Yeah. And she has fun and she's got a

00:25:11   great personality and she tells stories from her life and that are, that are often hilarious. I,

00:25:16   sometimes I wonder what her wife thinks of getting brought up. I think she doesn't know all the time.

00:25:21   I guess it's just part of the, or she doesn't know. Um, but, uh, but like, yeah, she's just,

00:25:26   yeah, Jo, Joanne is great. And Neelay is, is also, uh, really just super smart and we can make fun of his,

00:25:32   you know, sometimes he, he like had the headphone jack and stuff like that, but like, he is really sharp.

00:25:37   I got to talk to him the night before, uh, at a dinner for a little bit. And we were talking about

00:25:42   the Apple in China book, which is on our list of things to talk about this summer, I think. Um,

00:25:46   yeah, I want to read that book. Yeah, you should read it and we should do a little book club because

00:25:50   I just finished it and it's a really good book. Actually. I highly recommend it to everybody. It's,

00:25:54   it's, uh, it's, it's the guy's a good writer. Um, and it's, and it's a, there are, I've read a lot of

00:26:00   bad Apple books and this is not one of them. Um, but anyway, I, I got a chance to chat with Neelay about that.

00:26:05   Yeah. I mean, he views, he, he views things from a certain perspective. And I think that one of the

00:26:10   challenges of a lot of people working in general tech today is that they end up focusing a little

00:26:15   too much on like AI related issues and not other things because AI is such a big topic right now.

00:26:21   And I think even Neelay is a little bit guilty of that, although he, he brings a skepticism to it that

00:26:27   I really appreciate. So, so anyway, that was part of the joy of the talk show for me. And I was there in

00:26:31   the first row, uh, not watching the F1 movie because I was supporting independent, uh, tech

00:26:36   media and my friend, John, uh, just to say, uh, good guests and really smart people and having

00:26:44   a bunch of smart people turn over what Apple was trying to do this past week. Uh, I thought that

00:26:51   was really smart. Yeah. Good, good show. Um, just to wrap this whole thing up, Apple keeps saying that

00:26:56   these Apple intelligence features that we didn't get will be coming quote in the coming year,

00:27:00   but apparently that the coming year does not mean 2025. It means 2026, like coming as in the year that

00:27:07   is yet to come, which is a super weird way to say that when if pressed, apparently they will tell you

00:27:13   they mean 2026, so they should just say 2026 rather than the coming year. I, I look, I know why they're

00:27:20   doing it, but I wish they would stop doing it. Here's, here's the way that I viewed that, which is

00:27:25   what Craig Federighi said was essentially the same thing they said in their, in their

00:27:30   announcement about delaying the features right down to the fact that it didn't meet their high

00:27:33   quality bar. Um, uh, which is a weird, anyway, I have issues with the whole statement and in the

00:27:40   coming year, it's a very particular way of, of phrasing all of it that felt a little, you know,

00:27:46   obfuscating, but here's the thing, Apple jaws, you can change those words. You could approve some new

00:27:56   things to say at WWDC about it to provide a little more color, if you will, to the idea of like what

00:28:03   you're planning. You don't, there's no law on the books that the statement that you released

00:28:08   surreptitiously, you know, on a Friday in the spring needs to be the words you cling to for the

00:28:14   next year. Right. You could be more clear and it would be okay. I don't know why they didn't do that

00:28:21   and why they're acting like, uh, we're just going to keep parroting our statement. Like there was no,

00:28:26   there's no reason. It's not like they're like, well, you know, we didn't get it cleared with the

00:28:30   bosses. Like the bosses are right there. Like be, be, be clearer. Like be clear about this. If you

00:28:37   have to clarify it with everybody, you didn't clarify it. It suggests to me, there is still a

00:28:42   little bit of nervousness. Like there's like this feeling of being behind that they want to like say,

00:28:50   Hey, no, it's come in. Like, Oh, it's come in. Like, I don't know. It's because it's weird. Anyway,

00:28:55   Mark Gurman reports that, uh, internally Apple is targeting iOS 26.4 for these features, which we

00:29:02   would expect to be in the spring. Right now. So, so something just to a tangent on this, uh, before

00:29:08   we move on, and I know I'm pretty sure we mentioned it last week. I got to be honest, Mike, what we

00:29:13   talked about last week is just a blur to me. I mean, it was keynote and then that, and then I had

00:29:19   briefings and then I had another podcast. We did a six colors podcast, uh, which is on YouTube and

00:29:24   posted on six colors for anybody who wants to see it. Uh, usually that's a members only thing,

00:29:29   but I posted the video. Anybody can watch it. If you want to see me and Dan sit in chairs and talk.

00:29:34   Um, we, we, we did, we nailed it to the second on the little countdown timer, but then, and then I had

00:29:39   more briefings and like, it was, it was bananas. So I don't, I don't remember everything about what

00:29:44   we said in there. Uh, but I will say again, I was surprised that even though they didn't really

00:29:50   talk about it, it was very clear that everything Apple showed is in existence is in the betas

00:29:59   and we'll ship this fall. Yeah. And, and they didn't, I don't think they made a big deal about

00:30:06   it, but that is as close as an apology as you're ever going to get, which is everybody beat them up

00:30:14   for the fact that they showed a bunch of stuff they couldn't ship or couldn't ship until very late in

00:30:19   the game. And they've been doing that for a few years where they've showed stuff that they couldn't

00:30:22   ship. But this year it was the worst and they were running ads about features that weren't ready. And

00:30:26   that turns out didn't even ship and haven't shipped. And so this year's rollout was about stuff that's

00:30:33   real stuff. That's in betas and stuff that it's going to ship in the fall. That says a lot. I think

00:30:40   there was some Mark Gurman reporting on this a while ago about the idea of like, they were going

00:30:48   to try and basically make sure now that they would just show what they had. And so they cut it off at

00:30:52   a certain point. I think you can trace what happened with these WWC features back multiple years to when

00:31:00   it started to be like, things started to slip, you know, there'd be features that would slip and then it

00:31:06   kind of became what we're showing will be available within the release cycle. And then once you kind

00:31:12   of start expanding out further and further from that, you get to the point of like, hey, we hope

00:31:17   we're going to ship this and then they don't. And so now they've tightened it back up again.

00:31:23   And I think that's okay. And you know what? I think people will be forgiving if something doesn't

00:31:27   end up shipping in the fall, but ships like in the late fall or early winter, right? Like in

00:31:31   in a November, December update where they're like, okay, you know, quality bar, et cetera,

00:31:35   et cetera. But the idea that you are by default announcing features that you won't even be able

00:31:41   to ship until spring. I think they have realized we can't do that because if it slips further,

00:31:48   we are dead. And, and so we, we just need to not promise. And the fact is Apple has a lot of big

00:31:53   platforms. If they've got some fun features that they want to roll out next spring or next winter,

00:31:59   they can announce them. It's fine. Like they don't, they can hold them until next June or

00:32:06   they can just roll those features in. They're working on them in the background and then roll

00:32:10   them in, uh, as they do OS releases. Uh, I've definitely sat on calls where they've had a beta

00:32:17   release coming and they've wanted to talk about the features that are going to be in the beta release.

00:32:21   like it can be done. So I think that's where they're, that's where they're going now is just

00:32:27   like, if they've got some features that they think that they can get in, in this cycle, but not yet,

00:32:32   they're not going to talk about it. And I'm okay with that.

00:32:37   This episode is brought to you by our friends over at Squarespace, the all in one website platform

00:32:42   designed to help you stand out and succeed online. Whether you're just starting out or you're scaling

00:32:47   your business, Squarespace gives you everything you need to claim your domain, showcase your offerings

00:32:51   of a professional website, grow your brand and get paid all in one place. One of the things that I love

00:32:58   about Squarespace is how they can grow alongside the business that you're trying to grow. So let's say

00:33:04   you start out and you set up a website that you want to, I don't know, like you've got a gallery

00:33:09   of products that you want to show to people. You've got some, some imagery and, and, you know,

00:33:13   you're building out some artwork. And then over time, you're like, you know what? I actually want

00:33:17   to sell these things. I want to sell them on my website. You can do that with Squarespace. They

00:33:20   make it super easy for you to do that. You can set up an online store for physical goods, digital goods,

00:33:25   even like courses and content you can sell through Squarespace. And then maybe at a certain point,

00:33:30   you're like, you know what? I want to take commissions too. They can do that. You can,

00:33:34   set it up so you can get invoices sent out and everything. It's really incredible from

00:33:37   consultations to events and experiences. You're able to showcase your offerings for customizable

00:33:42   website that is designed to attract clients and grow your business. We are looking at built in

00:33:47   appointment scheduling, email marketing tools, and more. Plus you can keep everything cohesive

00:33:51   with on-brand invoices and get paid easily with online payments. I don't know how to build a website.

00:33:56   I don't know any of the code stuff that you would need to do to build a website. It doesn't make any

00:34:01   sense to me. It's one of the things I've loved about Squarespace for the last 15 years that I've

00:34:05   been using them for a variety of projects. Because when I have something that I want to do, I want to

00:34:10   get it done quickly. And Squarespace is amazing for that. Like even with SEO stuff, because you don't

00:34:14   want to build a website and nobody sees it. That's why every Squarespace website is optimized to be

00:34:19   indexed with method descriptions and auto-generated sitemap and more. So people can find your site

00:34:24   through search engine results. Go to squarespace.com slash upgrade and you can

00:34:28   sign up today for a free trial. When you're ready to launch, use the offer code upgrade. You'll save

00:34:32   10% of your first purchase of a website or domain. That is squarespace.com slash upgrade and the offer

00:34:38   code upgrade to get 10% of your first purchase and show your support for the show. Our thanks to

00:34:43   Squarespace for the support of this show and all of Relay.

00:34:47   So we'll talk about the betas in a little bit, but kind of like a week out from WWDC, I wanted to get

00:34:53   a vibe check from you now. Like, you know, we were right after the keynote, you know, you're in the

00:34:58   kind of like your head swimming with everything you've seen and it was a big WWDC. So how are you

00:35:03   feeling now about what was announced last week?

00:35:07   Again, forgive me because I said some of this, I'm sure, last week, right? But it was just in the

00:35:13   aftermath, right? It's so hard. I'm impressed that I walked away from a WWDC keynote excited about the

00:35:22   Mac and the iPad because then it feels like that never happens. That feels like a real kind of meat

00:35:28   and potatoes. Um, I wrote a piece on this, um, about called Apple intelligence shifts gears,

00:35:36   but one of my feelings about it is it's not a piece so much about Apple intelligence as it is about

00:35:43   Apple's priorities this year, where I felt like Apple, it's like Apple said, Oh, let's go back to

00:35:49   what we're good at last year. It's like, they lost their minds and they're like, we gotta, we gotta

00:35:54   impress the market and, and the, the Valley and show that we're on this AI thing. And it said a lot,

00:36:02   I think about their insecurity about it because they, they missed LLMs and have been struggling to

00:36:07   catch up. And this year it felt much more like, Oh yeah, what, what does Apple best at? We make products

00:36:13   people like, and they use them and they integrate them in their lives and they use them to do stuff.

00:36:17   And so some of the ML announcements, AI announcements are a little bit more like classic, like we're

00:36:21   applying this technology to do a thing. They're like, we're going to let developers use this. We're

00:36:27   going to let users use it in shortcuts. We did all of these product Mac productivity boosters

00:36:31   inside spotlight, including, you know, clipboard manager, which they've never, ever, ever had in the

00:36:37   whole 41 year history of the Mac baked in. Um, and then on the iPad rolling out there entirely

00:36:44   redone windowing model, like to get excited about Mac OS and iPad OS at a WWDC keynote to me is,

00:36:52   it just is really interesting because it shows that Apple is tending to its platforms instead of sort of

00:36:56   freaking out. And like the AI story is there. And I think, you know, I don't want to minimize that they

00:37:03   have challenges there, but like the steps they took are encouraging the fact that there's that

00:37:10   they put chat GPT into image playground, right? Which is just like, yes, because your model isn't

00:37:14   very good. The fact that they are letting third-party developers use the on-device model and shortcuts to

00:37:19   use the on-device model and private cloud compute and chat GPT. There are so many examples like that,

00:37:25   where they are, um, they feel a little less defensive and a little more understanding of the fact that

00:37:30   tending the platform doesn't mean that it all has to be invented by Apple. And my, my top example is actually

00:37:36   the most esoteric for a general audience, but just to throw it out probably again, because I probably

00:37:42   mentioned it last time, I think the Xcode announcement is enormous because they didn't shift

00:37:46   Swift, Swift assist last year. We saw it. And then John Voorhees and I ended up in the same room.

00:37:52   This happened Tuesday. So I know I didn't talk about this. We ended up in the same room with the same

00:37:57   two guys who gave us the Swift assist demo that last, you know, in, in the spring earlier this

00:38:03   year, people were like, did anybody see that after the, that we were talking about the other stuff

00:38:08   that hadn't shipped that nobody had seen. We got a demo in that room of Swift assist didn't ship

00:38:14   this year in that room, we got a demo of Xcode. And what they didn't do is say, well, we've got Swift

00:38:20   assist now running with our LLM. What they said is we've got Swift assist running now with

00:38:25   chat GPT by default. And if you go to the settings, you can literally put in any LLM you want local

00:38:36   remote, put in the URL and the API key, or do the setting to use a local binary. And it just works.

00:38:45   And it works with Xcode passing all the information about the project. And, you know,

00:38:51   and on top of that, they specifically worked with chat GPT with open AI to have it used by default,

00:38:58   a model that is smart about Xcode and about Swift. So like, I think that is a great example of Apple

00:39:07   this year being a little more relaxed, a little more understanding of its limitations, a little more

00:39:13   open to the idea that people are picking up all sorts of AI tools so fast that Apple baking something

00:39:20   in is just a bad idea. And that is the reality of it. So like getting a real dose of, of what's really

00:39:28   happening on the ground, you know, and, and seeing that Apple gets that, I think that's a really good

00:39:34   sign. So, so, uh, you know, I, I feel like they're in a much better place. It just puts

00:39:39   last year into stark relief about how desperate they were to just, you know, telegraph that they

00:39:44   got it. And this year it feels much more like an Apple that I understand.

00:39:48   It makes me wish that the hype cycle was just knocked on by three months. So they wouldn't

00:39:52   have been forced to do what they did at WWDC last year. And we got the full year to now.

00:39:57   And like, this was their set of features that then I'll be so much happier.

00:40:01   I understand why they did what they did last year. I think, I think in the details, in hindsight,

00:40:05   all of us, including them would say they didn't do it right. They made a bunch of mistakes, but like

00:40:10   the AI hype was so great. And the pressure on Apple was so enormous that I understand that they needed

00:40:15   to say, look, yes, yes, we get it. And clearly if Apple was, I mean, one, Apple was behaving

00:40:20   complacently before. I get that. And, and, and clearly there's an issue with the fact that of

00:40:27   what I'm going to say, but like, I'll say it anyway, which is classic Apple maneuvering.

00:40:31   They wouldn't have talked about AI almost at all last year because it wasn't ready. And they were

00:40:37   still trying to figure it out, but they felt they had to talk about it anyway. And so we got

00:40:41   Apple intelligence branding and they tried to, I mean, they try to market their way through it

00:40:46   in a way with all those ads. And, you know, we all saw how it went for them. So, but I understand why

00:40:54   they did it. I mean, they felt under enormous pressure, but then I look at this year and I think,

00:40:58   oh, not only does it seem like more, a more familiar Apple, but if you look at some very particular places,

00:41:08   I think it shows that they've spent the last year plus learning a lot more about where AI is being

00:41:18   used, thinking a lot more about how they want to use it in their products and getting over,

00:41:24   I think expediently because of all the famous kind of issues that are going on behind the scenes inside

00:41:29   of Apple. But getting over there, we need to invent everything thing when like, it's just not, maybe

00:41:37   someday their model will be cutting edge, especially the on-device model. I think, I think that's where they

00:41:45   should put their greatest effort because I think that they have the biggest wins there. But like, I don't know,

00:41:50   it just, to me, it felt familiar.

00:41:51   Yeah. Yeah. It was, this is, uh, this WWDC, my, my vibes are basically the same as they were last week,

00:42:00   which is, it's either a good sign or a bad sign. Like this year, it's a good sign. Like last year,

00:42:06   my vibes were similar and it was a bad sign because I was upset. But this year, like I was super happy

00:42:13   with what was announced. And then the things that I've tried, I'm like, I agree. Like, which is not always

00:42:19   the case where like you, they show something like stage manager, right? When they showed stage manager,

00:42:24   like they did it and then you used it and it's like, oh no, they didn't do it. Right. And it,

00:42:30   and it wasn't very good. Like it was just two, three years ago. Um, but I feel like I feel great about

00:42:36   this and there's things that I feel even better about than before. Uh, I watched the two and these are,

00:42:41   I thoroughly recommend that people watch to develop a video, meet liquid glass. Yeah. Uh, even if you're not a

00:42:49   developer, it's not a developer session, it's the design session. So they're just talking like

00:42:53   about design, which you might not like, right? Some people don't like hearing people talk about design,

00:42:58   but I do. Um, and I found this to be fascinating and I thought really informative. And I think like there's

00:43:05   been, you know, I think the prevailing thing that people are talking about is like Apple aren't even

00:43:09   thinking about accessibility with this when they are like, if you watch the videos,

00:43:13   videos, they, they spend a significant portion of the time talking about the ways in which they are

00:43:20   thinking about accessibility. Now you may disagree on whether you think it's accessible. I mean,

00:43:26   I've read from two strong disability, like accessibility advocates who think that Apple are doing a decent

00:43:33   job with liquid glass, but you know, everybody will have their own take on this. Um, but I think that

00:43:40   this video does a very good job of showing their thinking. And it also shows like best, lots of,

00:43:48   lots more best case scenario kind of design, because what is in the current versions of the operating

00:43:54   systems is absolutely not the best case version of this design. Like there's things that they've

00:44:00   got to fix. And I think when you watch that video, if you watch that video, you, I think you'll get a

00:44:05   better sense of, of what I'm talking about, of what they're actually trying to do because a developer

00:44:09   beta is not a final. And I've heard some people are like, no, we can complain about what's in beta one

00:44:14   because the criticism, you know, it's like, okay, but it, they're not done. I mean, it's very clear from

00:44:18   the videos that a lot of this is not entirely implemented yet because it's developer beta one.

00:44:23   Um, but I agree. I, uh, Shelly Brisbane was pointing out, um, that, uh, when iOS seven came

00:44:30   out, there were like, weren't a lot of accessibility features that we have now. Um, which I think is

00:44:35   really interesting. I think this design was absolutely, you can see it in the videos made

00:44:40   with accessibility settings in mind. Now we can talk about whether they belong in accessibility

00:44:44   or like display options or whatever, but like, regardless what they're saying is they're building

00:44:50   a primary design, but they're building all of the ways that you can adjust it based on your own

00:44:56   preference. And that preference might be, I can't see it. And that preference might be, I don't like

00:45:01   it, but that's okay. Giving people options to change how the design behaves to please them. I mean,

00:45:08   I know people who have all sorts of accessibility interface features turned on because they don't like

00:45:12   how it looks and they like it better the way that with those things turned on. And it's like, that's

00:45:16   fine too. I think the, the, the big question for me is if you, if everybody has to reach for the

00:45:26   accessibility settings to, to make this design work, they failed. Yeah. But, but Apple has such a huge

00:45:35   user base that they can't please everybody. So what they want to do is please a large number of

00:45:42   people who will like the interface and find it usable and also be there for the people who think it's too

00:45:49   much and let them turn on those features. And you want to hit a sweet spot. And there is a real

00:45:55   gradient. There's a real spectrum between a hundred percent of iPhone users turn on accessibility features

00:46:02   and 5% of iPhone users turn on accessibility features in order to mitigate the design.

00:46:08   And if a hundred percent turn on the usability features, that design was a failure, right?

00:46:13   Because the default should work for most people. If, uh, and that would be that they, they, they pushed

00:46:18   it too far and everybody hates it. And what are you even doing? And if it's 5%, let's say maybe that

00:46:25   number is 10 or maybe it's, you know, whatever that number is a small number, you'd say, well, you know

00:46:29   what? People are people and everybody's got a different opinion and that's okay. That's totally okay.

00:46:33   In between those two numbers. That's the question is like, I think that's how you measure how successful

00:46:40   the interface is. Because if the interface is so bad that a very large number of people have to turn

00:46:45   it off or, you know, turn it into something different, then you blew it. But some people, but, but designing

00:46:52   it so that people can choose is good. Like you just want to hit the default to have it be, uh, a crowd

00:46:58   pleaser and not like a super aggressive, everybody hates it kind of thing. And so I think that's part

00:47:03   of their challenge in doing this, but, uh, there's certainly thinking about it because those videos

00:47:07   were all made before anybody saw this and it shows that they were thinking about it. Also that video,

00:47:13   the videos that are the, you know, kind of backstage videos, WWDC, the sessions, as it were, um,

00:47:21   that video is much more, I mean, it's, it's very scripted, but it's much more, Hey, we're designers

00:47:28   who built this and this is how we think it should be used. Whereas the stuff that's in the keynote that

00:47:33   I think turned a lot of people off, that's marketing storytelling for the design videos. And I don't

00:47:38   think there is helpful. Um, I made this, uh, parallel on, I think six colors podcast and I'll make it here,

00:47:45   which is I read uni watch, which is a blog about like sports uniform stuff. And every time a new

00:47:52   uniform design comes out, there's this just impenetrable storytelling that goes with it, where

00:47:57   it's like, we chose the white of the San Francisco fog, the orange of the golden gate bridge and the

00:48:02   gold representing the gold miners in the gold rush of 1949 or of 1849. And you're like, okay,

00:48:09   what I really want to see is the designer saying, all right, here, we need to make a new uniform for

00:48:14   the giants. And here were our options. And here's how we did it. Like I find the storytelling stuff

00:48:19   just sickening. It's just PR and it's dumb and I hate it. And, and the keynote description of liquid

00:48:25   glass reminded me of that. And that's bad, right? That's in a bad way where it's. And so somebody was

00:48:30   like, but the, but the storytelling or, but the PR, they said this thing. And I'm like, you just got to

00:48:34   forget it. You got to let it go in one ear and out the other. Cause that is nonsense. It's just PR.

00:48:39   about liquid glass, watch that liquid glass session. And you'll get a better sense of what

00:48:43   they're actually trying to do where, you know, and I, I mean, again, judge it how you like, but

00:48:48   as a veteran media person, I'll just say the way they rolled that design out in the keynote,

00:48:55   that's just marketing. Like, don't just don't even listen to it. Cause there's no point. If you want

00:49:01   to understand how this design works and what they intended, the storytelling is not going to,

00:49:06   the people moving around their pieces of, of, of liquid glass or of glass on top of that,

00:49:11   like, forget it, just forget about it. But that session is a much more realistic thing about

00:49:16   what they're trying to communicate to developers about how they design their apps in this new system.

00:49:21   It makes a lot more sense. Not to say that it can't be criticized. It absolutely can,

00:49:25   but you get a much better sense of what they're trying to do than you do from the kind of highfalutin

00:49:30   marketing speak happening in the, in the keynote.

00:49:33   Yeah, that was much more high level and it's very high level. And a lot of people do struggle

00:49:39   with hearing that kind of stuff. I like it. I mean, I just like hearing people talk about the decisions

00:49:44   that they made, even if those decisions are like, they feel detached from a sense of reality,

00:49:50   right? Like in that, what you're saying is like, we chose gold to represent that. It's like,

00:49:54   why, like there were decisions that had to be made. People made those decisions and then maybe

00:50:01   they gave them a reason for why they were making that decision and maybe it came after. But I like

00:50:06   that kind of stuff. Like in the same way that I like hearing actors talk about acting. Like I just

00:50:12   always find that kind of stuff interesting. I like to hear people's craft, but it, it is inherently

00:50:18   stuck up maybe is the phrase I'm looking for, right? Like I can't, I can't think of a better phrase,

00:50:24   but it is, you're very much like highfalutin, as you would say, where like you're talking about

00:50:29   these are the reasons I make my decisions. It's like, it can be a bit heavy for people. I,

00:50:35   I loved when they had all the physical, but see, I loved the physical representations of things.

00:50:40   I get what they're going for. I thought it was adorable. I loved it.

00:50:43   I get what they're going for there, but again, it's showbiz, right? That's what,

00:50:45   that's what they're doing there. It's marketing. You gotta, you can like it. I'm just saying,

00:50:49   don't, don't, don't think that that is their serious explanation of, of the design. Cause

00:50:55   that's not what it is. It's storytelling. It's in fact, I would argue that's the stuff

00:50:59   you craft after you've done it in order to explain it to people, which is not the same

00:51:04   as saying, here's why we did it. It's a, and how to use it. It's a different purpose, which

00:51:10   is why I really liked that, uh, that session video. Cause it was much clearer about what they're

00:51:16   trying to achieve. And it was therefore to the people that need it, right? Like that was a

00:51:20   session for developers, uh, the people making the apps. If you want to understand how it's supposed

00:51:25   to look in your apps, watch the session where they show you, right? Rather than just the keynote,

00:51:29   which love it or not, you know, like it or hate it or love it or not, like whatever the keynote is as

00:51:36   much marketing as it is telling developers about the stuff that's coming.

00:51:40   It is absolutely marketing. That's why they do the state of the union is that it's like,

00:51:43   and now that everybody else is gone, I can talk to developers. Now the keynote is the part of the

00:51:48   developer conference where they're talking to the people that are going to use the software on their

00:51:51   phones, right? I feel like we should know this by now that that is where they are telling customers.

00:51:56   This is what we have made, right? Where then the rest of the content is for the people making the

00:52:03   software. Like that's how WWC goes. Anyway, uh, I wanted to touch on some of the little bits and

00:52:08   bobs that, uh, we've been digging up over the intervening time since the last episode. Now

00:52:13   it's just a few things that I found interesting. Uh, we're going to talk about the, uh, recording

00:52:17   podcast on iPad thing, uh, in a little bit, but the audio input controls are on the iPhone now as well.

00:52:23   Um, so you could always like plug a microphone into, uh, your iPhone and record on it, but you were never

00:52:32   sure which microphone was being picked up by the app that you were using. Uh, but the audio input

00:52:38   selector will be on the iPhone. Um, yes, iPhone and iPad get that where you basically, um, there's a

00:52:44   default, but you can also set it per app. Yeah. Uh, and it happens in the system. The apps don't have

00:52:51   to write an input control, which I don't think they even could. Um, I, in my mind, this makes it

00:52:58   potentially better than on the Mac because there's a system level per app audio control.

00:53:04   That's, um, you know, app developers on the Mac have to build their own audio picker in and on the

00:53:10   iPad, it just is an iPhone. It's just being done for you. And that means, yeah, the, the, um, a lot

00:53:16   of talk about iPad, but like iPhone has a little portable audio thingy. Um, that's very capable is,

00:53:21   uh, it's a real thing. Do you know, does the, can the iPhone do the recording that the iPad can do?

00:53:27   It can. So you do all of it. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. You could do, I did, Dan and I did a six dollars

00:53:32   podcast where I phoned him. He was like in Seattle at a convention and, uh, I just used the phone audio

00:53:39   and I realized, oh yeah, situations like that. You can say, bring a USB mic and plug it into your iPhone

00:53:43   and start recording, do a podcast and then stop recording and, you know, send the file. And it's a

00:53:50   complete local recording just off of an iPhone. Pretty cool. Uh, Apple podcasts got a few new features.

00:53:56   One of them is an amplify voices option in the podcast app. So that's like the, was voice boost

00:54:04   in overcast, I assume, which I think is great. Uh, trying to level out the audio and podcasts,

00:54:10   which can sometimes be not great. Uh, launch pad. So this is the thing on Mac OS where you could

00:54:17   get a grid of big icons, like a, like a springboard, like your home screen.

00:54:22   Yeah. Like the iPhone home screen, uh, is now gone. Uh, it's actually applications,

00:54:27   which is kind of like the app library, which is in spotlight. Yeah. That's how it's been replaced.

00:54:34   So basically there is a list of all of your apps in spotlight. Uh, so if you do, I think it's command

00:54:40   shift and then command one, you get applications view, which is all your apps on your system. But the,

00:54:46   the launch pad thing that they made that was meant to be sort of easier and for people who liked

00:54:52   an iPhone style app launching kind of thing, I am, I can't imagine that very many people use this

00:54:58   feature.

00:54:59   No, I feel like that was part of the back to the Mac initiative, right? Yeah.

00:55:03   It's like, we're bringing a bunch of features back to the Mac from that we learned from iOS.

00:55:07   From the iPhone. Uh, so yeah, but I'm happy that I've actually thought that through again

00:55:12   because I figured that it's probably one of the least used features of Mac OS, but was something

00:55:16   that was important because the applications or just being in a folder is weird. Like when you

00:55:22   think about it, like if you think about it, that is really strange. So having them have a more

00:55:26   elevated place in the operating system makes sense. It makes so much sense to put them here.

00:55:31   Uh, Mac OS 26 Tahoe is the last version of Mac OS that will run on Intel machines. There will be

00:55:38   three more years of security updates though for Tahoe. Um, and for the other devices that were,

00:55:44   that have been knocked off, they're going to still be on a three year security update.

00:55:48   Do you have any kind of reflection on Intel going away? Do you have any feelings about it?

00:55:53   I think it's great that they have supported it for as long as they have.

00:55:57   Yep. And, uh, it feels like a longer goodbye than they did previously. I think somebody did the

00:56:05   math and it is actually a little bit longer of a goodbye. Um, it's fine. I mean, it needs to happen.

00:56:11   This is, this is the way of things. Um, and it's been a while now since they started shipping Apple

00:56:17   Silicon. And I know that, and again, it's not like those Intel systems are going to be sent a kill

00:56:22   order and stop working. They're just not going to get updates. Uh, and they will still get security

00:56:27   updates for three years after that. And that, that takes it through the lifetime of that, um,

00:56:32   of those devices. So I think it's fine. I think, I think Apple didn't need to be this generous with

00:56:39   their compatibility here. And I also am actually as a Apple Silicon Mac user looking forward to what

00:56:46   will be accomplished by them not having to support Intel anymore.

00:56:50   And I'm pleased that they're telegraphing it. And I'm being very clear. Oh, sure. Communication a year

00:56:56   in advance and four years in advance of security updates ending. It's very responsible. It's the

00:57:02   right thing to do. I'm glad they did it.

00:57:03   iOS 26 offers a new adaptive power mode that will detect how you use your phone and make more

00:57:10   performance updates throughout the day to extend your battery life. Uh, this is part of a big overhaul of

00:57:15   the battery screen. It looks different. You've got information about your current charge level when

00:57:20   you last charged and it has daily usage information. So it can be like, Hey, you're using your, it seems

00:57:25   like you're burning more battery than usual. Uh, this all feels like set up for there's a phone

00:57:31   of a smaller battery coming. Uh, yeah, that's the, that's the speculation. Yeah. That's not,

00:57:36   that's, uh, not unreasonable. Um, people wrote in to say that this is my draft pick and it may be,

00:57:42   but the way they pitch it, um, and the way we envisioned it, uh, it's not like, it's not clear

00:57:48   enough. I was doing, I thought they were going to kind of shout, Oh, we're using AI to, and they,

00:57:53   they didn't do any of that, even though that that is probably what's happening.

00:57:56   It's absolutely some form of machine learning, but this is like this weird thing where there's

00:58:00   still stuff that Apple could easily claim as Apple intelligence, but isn't doing that.

00:58:04   Um, exactly. It's weird. We'll step, we'll step back from that, but it's, it's good in general

00:58:10   because, um, learning how you use your phone and adjusting how, you know, the battery settings are

00:58:18   set. It's, I mean, it sounds good to me. And yeah, if there is a, a thin phone with a small battery,

00:58:23   this becomes a necessary feature for that. Obviously the swipe to go back gesture that you have. So you

00:58:29   can kind of like swipe from the left edge of your iPhone and it will take you back to the previous

00:58:34   page that you were on. Um, it's, you know, like in any app or whatever, this is now going to work

00:58:39   from anywhere on screen, not just the edge. I think this is fantastic. I've not used this yet. I'll say,

00:58:44   but in my experience of trying out of having an Android phone over the last few months, I like that

00:58:50   you can do the swipe gesture from both sides of the phone and it will take you back. I like this more

00:58:56   because it's more logical, um, that you would just swipe in one direction to go back and one

00:59:00   direction to go forward. It can be a bit weird on Android sometimes, but I like that you can do this.

00:59:05   This is great for one handed use of any phone of any size. So basically if there's not swipable,

00:59:10   uh, if there's not a swipable thing on the screen, you know, like you're not like swiping through a

00:59:15   carousel, it's not going to take you back. But if you're swiping on a piece of UI that is like static,

00:59:19   it will take you back. I think this is fantastic. Yeah. No, I'm, I'm doing it right now and it's,

00:59:23   it's, it's very nice because yeah, even on a, uh, even on an interface element that you can tap,

00:59:29   if you swipe on it, it just goes back. It just takes you back. Love it. Uh, I saw an example

00:59:36   of a developer using the on-device intelligence models that I wanted to share. Charlie Chapman,

00:59:41   who makes dark noise, which was featured in the keynote, which was amazing.

00:59:44   Right. Which, which means, which means his official upgrade name is Charlie dark noise.

00:59:48   Charlie dark noise. Thank you. Sorry. Charlie dark noise. Um, says I was able to hack in a magic mix

00:59:53   feature into dark noise in about an hour that creates a mix from a prompt that you can edit and

00:59:58   then save really quickly. And this is fantastic. So one of the things that dark noise does, it's like,

01:00:03   it's a, um, background sound, white noise app. There's like a bunch of them, a bunch, a bunch of

01:00:08   sounds. You can actually combine them. So you could take rain noise and a plane and you could put them

01:00:13   together. But with this, uh, like Charlie, one of the things he types in is like rain forest cafe

01:00:18   is the problem. And it's got like rain and like people noise frogs and cricket. And like, I just

01:00:26   think that's, this looks incredible. This looks incredible. One of the, one of the sessions that

01:00:31   I watched, cause I'm still going through them. I still have a bunch of bookmarked is about how you

01:00:36   use these models in apps. And one of the things that it appears you can do and that, that Charlie

01:00:43   dark noise did is you can say sort of like, here are the things that I've got. So obviously his

01:00:51   feature is like, here are all of the sounds that I can do. And then, and then basically you can tell

01:00:58   the model. So what you're doing is picking from these and, and build it. Cause it's like, how does

01:01:04   it know that there are frogs in the app? And it's like, well, because dark noise has said here, you know,

01:01:09   here's all the stuff, all the sounds that I can make now using that. And this prompt craft,

01:01:15   uh, uh, craft, a bunch of sounds and then pass them back to me in a way that I can then take them

01:01:22   and make a, a playlist is it's, it's really cool. And you see that the kind of like the,

01:01:26   the, the, the smart of it is that like, he didn't make a specific description. Like it's not that he

01:01:32   said, give me rain and animals. And he put in an abstract concept, the rainforest cafe,

01:01:39   and it produced something. Now, did it just make a rainforest sounds? You know, I don't know. Right.

01:01:47   But like it took a prompt, it took his answers and it gave a response. It's like, yeah, that feels like

01:01:52   really good technology that developers can have access to. And it just runs on the devices. Like,

01:01:57   I'm so excited to see more examples of this. Like this is so early and people have got to try and

01:02:03   get their heads around it. But like seeing again, like how quickly Charlie dark noise was able to get

01:02:08   this in place is also like, you know, like a quick version of it. It's very exciting. I think it's

01:02:14   very exciting. Yeah, I agree. Also there was some new parental control features, uh, added to, uh, iOS,

01:02:21   which Apple did like a whole separate press release on. So there's a few things I want to

01:02:25   touch on here. So one, there is now a new API. Well, one of the things they're doing is tidying

01:02:29   up age range ages, uh, for children inside of a family group. Um, so you can go in and like actually

01:02:37   state the ages and that UI is better. Apparently it was awkward before and you can go in and set the

01:02:43   age of your children and it will then change their experience a little bit. One of the reasons they're

01:02:48   doing this is because they've introduced something called the declared range API that a developer

01:02:53   could integrate with. And what that will mean is that the system will say, this person is kind of

01:02:59   about this age. They don't get the exact age. They don't get the birth date, but they get the like,

01:03:04   here's the rough age. Now what Apple doesn't say, and I'm not sure about is if this is maybe some of

01:03:11   their response to some of the legislation that people are trying to put in place around social media.

01:03:14   Like, I think this could kind of be one of their answers of like, Hey, well, here's an API.

01:03:19   Cause I think, I think app makers want the app stores to do it and app stores want the app makers

01:03:26   to do it. Right. If I'm, if I'm remembering that correctly from like a, yeah, I think that's how it's

01:03:30   going. Um, so this is, I guess this is for many reasons, but they can be like, Hey, look, we have an API

01:03:36   now. Like we did all this work, but anyway.

01:03:38   And I think, I think Apple wants parents to do it and then doesn't want that information to be

01:03:44   disclosed to app makers or their, you know, or their services so that they can protect privacy.

01:03:51   And there are now laws coming out about this. This is them trying to say, look, this is what we built.

01:03:54   We would really like to use this for everything.

01:03:57   Yeah. I, I mean, without knowing enough, I think this is a pretty decent way of handling this.

01:04:04   Like, so then, you know, you don't have to have someone going in and setting an age and like 12

01:04:09   different applications. Anyway, the app store is getting more variants in age ratings. So apps can

01:04:14   be available for 13 plus 16 plus 18 plus. This was not a thing that hadn't exist before.

01:04:20   A quote from the press release, community safety, sorry, communication safety expands to intervene

01:04:26   when nudity is detected in FaceTime, video calls, and to blur out nudity in shared albums and photos.

01:04:31   They had some features like this in iMessage and stuff before. This is now going to expand into more

01:04:37   places. And they've previously the, the experience for people under the age of 13 on the iPhone came

01:04:45   with a set of restrictions about web content and stuff like that. There is now a new set of

01:04:50   restrictions for 13 to 17 specifically, which is like, from what I could understand is a

01:04:56   different set of web content restrictions by default, which, you know, you can go in and change,

01:05:01   but they set defaults. But for, they also have a new feature where children would need to request

01:05:08   that their parents approve new contacts to be added. And like, so you could use them in messages and

01:05:14   stuff like that. So if you want to send a message to someone that they've not sent a message to

01:05:18   before, it will ping the parent and be like, will you approve this? And then the child can say like,

01:05:23   you know, this is what this is for. And they're all Apple's also launching permission kit for

01:05:28   developers to be able to integrate and do the same that like, if you wanted to follow someone on

01:05:33   Instagram, for example, it could pop up to the parent and tell them if they wanted to integrate

01:05:38   that. So I just thought this is interesting. Obviously, I now pay more attention to parental

01:05:43   control than I've ever done before. Well, like before it was an abstract concept, but for now is part of

01:05:48   my future, I guess, is thinking about parental controls for devices. So yeah, I just thought

01:05:53   this is an interesting suite of stuff that they were doing. And I do believe it is important for

01:06:00   Apple to provide tools to make it easier for parents and children to have better experiences with their

01:06:06   devices and to kind of make it easier for those decisions to be made and less like granular and,

01:06:14   you know, less like, you know, you can maybe feel more comfortable that a device is with a child and

01:06:19   it's going to be set up the way they want. I think this is good stuff. And it is responsible

01:06:21   from Apple to provide these features. So pretty cool.

01:06:25   This episode is brought to you by DeleteMe. DeleteMe makes it easy, quick and safe to remove

01:06:32   your personal data online at a time when surveillance and data breaches are common enough to make

01:06:37   everybody vulnerable. It does all of the hard work of wiping you and your family's personal

01:06:41   information from data broker websites. And it's not just a one time service. DeleteMe is always

01:06:46   working for you constantly monitoring and removing the personal information you don't want on the

01:06:51   internet. While I am a public person who wants to be online and visible online, there is parts of my

01:06:56   life that I don't. Your contact information, I have personal email addresses that I don't need to be

01:07:00   and don't want to be in databases. And it's possible to and I was super happy to find out that my

01:07:05   information could be removed. But I don't know how to do it. I don't know who these databases are.

01:07:09   I don't know who operates them. I don't know the myriad of different ways in which you have to

01:07:14   submit requests to get it removed. That is why I'm a very happy DeleteMe customer. It's super easy for

01:07:19   me to go in and tell them, hey, here's some information about me. Remove this. Don't remove this. And let me

01:07:25   know what you're doing. And then every month or two, they send me a report. And it tells me this is

01:07:31   where you are with the information that you've requested. But from these data brokers, it's been removed.

01:07:36   From these data brokers, it's in progress. And from these, we're still monitoring them. It's

01:07:41   already been done in the past. I love it. They're in my corner. They're always out there. And they're

01:07:45   making sure that my private life is remaining private. And this is something you should do to

01:07:49   take control of your data and keep your private life private by signing up for DeleteMe. With a special

01:07:54   offer for listeners of this show, you can get 20% of your DeleteMe plan and you go to

01:07:59   joinDeleteMe.com slash Upgrade20 and use the promo code Upgrade20 at checkout. That is

01:08:04   J-O-I-N-D-E-L-E-T-E-M-E dot com slash Upgrade20 and the code Upgrade20 at checkout. That is the only

01:08:11   way to get that 20% off. One last time, joinDeleteMe.com slash Upgrade20 and the code Upgrade20.

01:08:18   Our thanks to DeleteMe for the support of this show and all of Relay.

01:08:21   What betas are you running? Oh, wait, hang on a second. Welcome to the B-Tails.

01:08:27   Woo-hoo. I was going to say, are we finally at the B-Tails?

01:08:31   We're finally back at the B-Tails again.

01:08:32   Ah, it's going to be summer of B-Tails, isn't it?

01:08:35   Um, I am on, let's see, I have, my old Mac Studio is running Mac OS. My, uh, review unit

01:08:44   iPhone 16e is running iOS. My Vision Pro is running Vision OS. And my primary M4 iPad Pro that I use

01:08:54   every day, I, I charged up the older iPad as a fallback, but I put it on there. So that,

01:09:03   that was the big gamble, right? It's like, am I, am I just committing to this thing being broken all

01:09:07   summer? And I'm going to either have to use a different iPad or just use it broken. Um, but

01:09:10   it's not on, so it's not on my primary iPhone. It's not on my primary Mac. Vision Pro exists to

01:09:17   be on the cutting edge. So it's there. And, uh, so the, the thing I've spent the most time with

01:09:22   is iPad OS actually. Yeah, same. I've only put the B-Tails in two places. One is Vision Pro for the

01:09:32   same reason. The Vision Pro is such a cutting edge device. You may as well just put the

01:09:35   B-Tails on it and just see what's going on. Um, it's also not a critical device for me that if

01:09:40   things don't work the way I expect, that's fine. Um, and I put it on, I have, uh, I have two iPads

01:09:46   Pros. I have the 11 inches, my kind of home machine. And then I have, um, I have a 13 inch here at the

01:09:53   studio, which I use for Cortex brand design work. I put the B-Tail on that one because I wanted to,

01:09:58   I was most interested in trying out the, uh, the new windowing system and it made sense to

01:10:03   have the bigger screen to really get, uh, the full use of that. And, uh, I would say that the 13 inch

01:10:09   iPad Pro has actually been the computer I have used the most, uh, since WWDC because I find it so

01:10:17   exciting. Um, I guess we could start with that maybe then if we're both loving it the most. I think that

01:10:22   this windowing system is just superb. I think it is absolutely superb. And it was made even better

01:10:28   for me by Federico. Um, I was mentioning this on connected, uh, you can actually still use stage

01:10:35   manager and get all of the benefits of all the windowing. Stage manager is divorced from the

01:10:39   windowing system. Now the windowing system is just what it is. And the way they put it to me was it's

01:10:43   just like the Mac stage manager is an optional way to collect windows. That's it. And I love it because

01:10:48   while you can have lots of windows on screen, because the screen is small, it's like smaller

01:10:54   than my studio display or whatever. Uh, I find it not comfortable to have like 12 overlapping windows,

01:11:01   right? If all the apps open that I might want to see. Um, but now when I use stage manager,

01:11:05   I have like five different stages. This is the same as how I use it on my Mac, five different stages.

01:11:10   We have apps that I use together, together all the time. They're always open and I can move between

01:11:15   them and I can still fully resize them, overlap them. It genuinely is like, Oh, this is for me

01:11:21   the absolutely perfect way to use an iPad. Like they crushed it. I love it. And it's fun. And I'm reminded

01:11:29   of all of the reasons I, the iPadOS was my preferred platform for a long time, because I, I do find it to be

01:11:37   just a more enjoyable computer to use. Like it is more fun to use for me than a Mac is. Uh, and yeah,

01:11:46   I've just been having a fantastic time. I bought a, um, a smart keyboard. Yeah, of course you did.

01:11:51   Not thrilled about really. Like I think the smart keyboard kind of ruins what's good about the

01:11:57   new iPads. Like it makes it so heavy and so bulky, but it really makes this system sing. Like having

01:12:06   a keyboard and trackpad just built into the experience. Like it really has made it feel

01:12:11   fantastic. And then you just take it off and, and then it's then a light again. Yeah. But then you've

01:12:15   got to have a second cover like lying around somewhere that you've got a trip. Yeah. Welcome to my world.

01:12:20   Yeah. I don't like it. I don't, I don't like it, but I love the keyboard experience. Um, I would

01:12:25   love it if Apple built a, like a combo somehow, like of a smart folio and a, and a keyboard and

01:12:32   trackpad kind of thing where you could just like, like kind of like surface, like, you don't like

01:12:36   you detach it. I don't want to kickstand though. Like I like that. That's the problem. So I don't

01:12:40   know how they would do it. But yeah. What, what have been your experiences with the, with

01:12:44   iPadOS so far? Uh, I really like, um, I've been very slowly kind of putting my thoughts

01:12:50   out there. So I wrote a piece about, about the iPad. Um, and it just feels to me like

01:12:55   Apple has gotten over a lot of its hangups. I think we talked about this last week, the

01:12:59   idea that the iPad was in this weird interim state of like, well, it needs to be more Mac

01:13:05   like, but it can't be more like the Mac. It needs to be its own thing. And then they're

01:13:09   just over it. And they're like, yeah, you know, the Mac is pretty good. We, we could just

01:13:12   use those windowing concepts over here. And I really like it. I think, um, it's not for

01:13:20   everyone. I also go back into single window mode when I'm doing a lot of stuff because I

01:13:25   don't need those windows then. And that's fine. But then it's actually very easy to just get

01:13:30   back. And, and my brain kind of clicks with it. And when I'm using it either in the case

01:13:34   or attached to the studio display, which I also did. And it's, it's eerie cause it really

01:13:39   is just like using a Mac now when you're using it in the studio attached to a studio display.

01:13:44   Um, it's, it's weird cause it's just windows on the screen. Like there's really, can you

01:13:49   close the iPad? You can't, they didn't, they didn't get lid closed in there. Um, so it's

01:13:55   got to stay open. There's like your little buddy on the side. Um, not, not your workout

01:13:59   buddy. No, uh, second screen buddy. Yeah. So, uh, impressed by that. You have also used

01:14:09   it a lot and I would say I've, I've found it surprisingly stable every now and then something

01:14:17   weird happens and I'm like, it's a beta, whatever. I've restarted it a couple of times when weird

01:14:21   things happened, but for the most part, it's been perfectly useful. I had to think where

01:14:25   just, I wasn't getting email for a whole day and then it just started again. It's like, okay,

01:14:29   yeah. Thanks. Yeah. I had a moment where I looked and I was like, is there no, is the

01:14:33   email, like this is the old email. What, what is happening? And you know, eventually it just

01:14:37   kind of came back. So that's bug. There's bugs. It's developer beta one for Pete's sake, but

01:14:41   in general, pretty usable. Even so, um, I like that you can resize those windows to be any size.

01:14:46   They don't, they don't stop at various break points. They're just like Mac windows.

01:14:50   And they're just moving. They can be any size. I mean, this is what is most

01:14:54   vision OS, like, uh, of, of all of the designs. Like there are a lot of things, whatever size you

01:14:59   want. It worked in vision OS and they're doing it here too. Like, and it looks just like it and

01:15:04   acts just like it. And it's, it's, it's interesting to me in a way that like, I don't understand how

01:15:10   this is working based on what I thought I knew about the way that iOS and iPadOS apps are made.

01:15:16   Um, but I'm like, I, I didn't know that they could do this, that you could have an app be kind of any

01:15:22   physical size that it wants to be. Well, they're supposed to be able to adjust like this because

01:15:28   there are so many variations now that they're supposed to be more flexible. And then if you

01:15:32   carry them over to catalyst, they have to be more flexible still. Yeah. I'm, I'm holding onto the old

01:15:37   size classes mentality, which was how it was for a long time. And that's sort of what, um, the old

01:15:43   windowing system did too, but you know, it's not necessary now. And they, they threw it away and

01:15:50   built something different. Um, you know, my understanding is they, you know, they, they took

01:15:54   a little team and they took a few years and they, they completely rebuilt the entire windowing approach

01:15:58   for the iPad. And that's why it's new and runs on every iPad. And like, and it's just, this is what

01:16:04   it is now. And it's very good. Like, that's the thing is I don't look at it and think, well, it's kind

01:16:08   of janky and broken. It's like, no, it's really good already in developer beta one. There are a lot

01:16:13   of things about it that are really strong. Um, I did. Okay. One thing that I've heard from people

01:16:19   that I totally get is that some people really liked split view. Yeah. And it's interesting that Apple

01:16:25   built split view sort of, if you take two windows and tile them, they look like split view and there's

01:16:34   a little split in the center and you can resize them to any size you want. And I thought this is a case

01:16:40   where I wonder if there should be an affordance for people who want that, where there's like a

01:16:46   shortcut of some sort. Yeah. I mean, the way that it works right now is you just have to drag it to

01:16:51   each side and it will, and it will put on one half or the other half. Like I, yeah, I don't think it's

01:16:57   too difficult. Like now there isn't slide over. There's nothing like slide over anymore.

01:17:02   Nothing like slide over. Well, I mean a window over another window is what that is, but yeah.

01:17:07   Yeah. And I would expect slide over was probably the least used. Uh, I just wonder if they'll get

01:17:12   feedback that like, is there a way to take a user who's in single window mode and give them a shortcut

01:17:18   of some sort? I don't mean necessarily a shortcut literally, but something gestural that allows them

01:17:24   to say, I actually want this window. That's my whole window over there on half. And then I want to pick

01:17:29   another app that could, because I know that some people really do like that feature. Harry

01:17:33   McCracken was talking about it. I was on Twitter yesterday and he really likes that feature and

01:17:38   feels like this is a step backward because he thought that that was a nice kind of like simple

01:17:41   way of doing it. And I don't know how much of that is. It's what people are used to. And I think

01:17:47   it's interesting. I think genuinely this is a much more logical way of initiating split view than the

01:17:51   existing system. I agree. Also, did you notice all of the tiling shortcuts? Because that's the other

01:17:57   thing about this that has not been talked about as much is like all of those tiling shortcuts that

01:18:00   Apple added to Mac OS last year. So you can do like globe, uh, globe shift arrow left, and it just

01:18:06   takes a window and pops it in half on the left half of the screen, um, or globe F for a full screen or

01:18:13   not. All of those keyboard shortcuts work on the iPad. So it's actually, and, and shortcuts has access

01:18:20   to tell a windows to do that. And they're all under the green, uh, button and the spotlight

01:18:25   too. Uh, the traffic lights, they're, they're all in there too. Just like they are on the Mac.

01:18:30   Yeah. Yeah. So, so all that window management and tiling and stuff is there too. Um, yeah. So I think

01:18:37   it's, I think it's really good. Dan Morin and I recorded last Friday's six colors podcast on,

01:18:43   uh, entirely on iPad. And how did it go? I'm desperate to know.

01:18:47   It worked great. There's nothing, nothing to it. We did. I mean the, the issues were a lot of times

01:18:54   we do live streams like we're doing now. You can't do that on an iPad because you need another app for

01:18:59   that. Um, and we were doing that in discord, which is our live stream. And so we used a different

01:19:08   workflow where we both went in discord and talk to each other on a stage in discord and then recorded

01:19:14   locally. But the files were all fine. They were all good. They're like lossless 48 kilohertz in a,

01:19:22   in an MP4 enclosure, but there, there were lossless audio, I believe. Um, and so that part totally

01:19:28   worked. And then I, I actually thought about editing it together on my iPad, but I didn't,

01:19:32   I edited it on a Mac cause I want to move on to the next thing, but, uh, we did it and it worked great.

01:19:37   So like, that's a, that's a real, uh, possibility for people who are doing podcasts and video stuff.

01:19:45   Like we, we, I just, I'm looking forward to the day where I can say, if you've got your, uh, like if Dan

01:19:51   is going away for a long weekend and we still want to record the podcast on a Friday, but he's going to be in,

01:19:57   I don't know, Delaware, I can say, you know, you just bring your microphone and your iPhone.

01:20:03   You don't even need your iPad and plug it in and wherever you are and then do a local recording and

01:20:08   send it to me. And then you're done. And you've got a podcast at full quality, essentially. That's exciting.

01:20:13   So it, it removes a bunch of barriers, not all, but a bunch of barriers to, uh, certainly to the stuff

01:20:23   that I do where I'm traveling and I need to have extra stuff that I don't want to bring, um, that I

01:20:29   can do a very slim down version of this.

01:20:31   Like a USB-C mic only, right? Interfaces don't seem to work.

01:20:34   Interfaces do work, but they only work when they're sending a stereo signal down and it

01:20:39   gets mixed down to mono. So you could do it with, uh, you can plug six microphones in onto a zoom

01:20:45   recorder and do it, but you're going to get one track out of it, which if, I mean, recording

01:20:50   multi-track in a room together, there's kind of not a lot you can do with it anyway, but yes,

01:20:55   it will, it will not be, um, it works, but, and that's a, that's a, I filed a feedback about that.

01:21:02   It's like, you, um, if you do a multi-channel interface right now, it doesn't do anything.

01:21:05   It like, it's like, I don't even know what that is. So I feel like they need to do some work there.

01:21:10   Um, you know, they don't have to record, mix down all six tracks in a multi-track interface or

01:21:15   something, but they probably need better UI. And then the one thing that we really noticed,

01:21:19   Dan plugged in his Audio-Technica ATR 2100X to his iPad running beta one. And it was horribly

01:21:28   over-modulated and that microphone, it's hard to adjust gain and volume. It has limited gain controls.

01:21:34   And we realized that the system has no gain controls. And it's interesting because there's a,

01:21:40   there's also a preview, this like blobby kind of sound preview that doesn't do anything. So I think

01:21:45   there's some stuff that's just not hooked up, but I, I filed a feedback that said the system,

01:21:49   if you're going to let me pick a microphone, you should also probably let me adjust the volume

01:21:54   in software. But, um, I used, we used for the podcast, we used a microphone. Each of us used a,

01:22:00   a MV7 from Shure that has on-device gain control. And with that mic, it wasn't a problem at all.

01:22:08   Yeah. I'm thinking about picking one of those up, the MV7.

01:22:11   A new world, a new world. Yeah. That you can do stuff like that. So it's exciting. I mean,

01:22:18   I big thumbs up to iPadOS right now is basically what I have to say. I'm really happy with it. I'm

01:22:25   using it full-time with my iPad and, uh, I have, I have, uh, no real complaints.

01:22:31   I wanted to touch on VisionOS a little bit because, um, there's some interesting stuff going on there too.

01:22:37   Uh, so one of the things that I wanted to try out, uh, is to see what the new personas look like

01:22:44   and to see if it fixed the beard issue that I have. So long-time listeners will remember that,

01:22:49   uh, I can set up in a persona in VisionOS, but I believe because of my beard, uh, the sensors do

01:22:58   not pick up my mouth moving. And so my chin kind of moves, but my mouth doesn't open unless I open my

01:23:05   mouth, uh, unusually large. Uh, so I wanted to try it out for two things. One, the new personas are

01:23:13   stupendous, like kind of cannot believe how good they are. Like I already thought the spatial personas

01:23:22   looked very convincing. Now it just literally looks like it just actually looks like me on a bad video

01:23:29   call, like a compressed video call. Right. One of the, one of the things as, as good as the old

01:23:34   spatial personas were, if they, if you like turned your head a little bit, it looked kind of like a

01:23:39   face on a box. Uh, it was, you could, you could see that there wasn't a lot of depth there. And now

01:23:44   the, like the sides of your face and stuff are, um, are accurate. And the skin tone is more accurate.

01:23:51   And the, the, they say the like eyebrows and eyelashes are, are more accurate. Like it,

01:23:56   it just looks way better. Um, way it's already, they made great strides. Um, they also told me the

01:24:04   spatial personas are all the default now. Like they're so good that they're like that there's no reason to

01:24:08   have it in another way, uh, in a box. Um, but so yeah, I wanted to do it and I, and I, uh,

01:24:13   I have a blog now, um, called the enthusiast. Yeah. We'll talk about it later. Yeah. Uh,

01:24:17   we'll talk about it. And, uh, I, I put together there some images before and after and some videos

01:24:23   that I uploaded. Um, so yeah, as good as it looks, the mouse still doesn't move. Uh, so, uh, yeah,

01:24:29   it doesn't. They gotta, they gotta figure out a way. Somebody suggested, why don't you,

01:24:33   why don't you shave and capture a persona and then grow your beard back? It's like, no, no, no,

01:24:37   no, no, no, no. You misunderstand. It's the, it's the reverse of that. It's, it's the,

01:24:42   captures his beard once and for all, then shaves off. And then he lives entirely in a persona

01:24:46   of a bearded man. Um, they, you got, there's gotta be a way. I can't believe that this is the

01:24:53   case. Like, I just can't believe that this is the case. Whether it's a training thing where they're

01:24:57   like, open your mouth really wide, whether they do something like kind of fake it, uh, in some way,

01:25:02   just pick up. I mean, there, there is your, your chin jiggles, right? But it never opens all the way.

01:25:09   So like they're picking up signal. It feels like there's just something that they need to do to

01:25:13   detect that it's a beard and more kind of like, uh, uh, expansively, uh, react to that signal in some

01:25:21   way. So I hope that maybe they'll fix that eventually. I, I will say having been in spatial

01:25:25   persona calls with you, you know, you get over it, but it's, it's still not ideal. It's still like a

01:25:30   weird sci-fi thing.

01:25:31   I love spatial persona calls, but I know I have a vastly better experience than anybody that I'm

01:25:36   talking with. Um, like when I posted this, I often have calls of underscore this way. Uh, and

01:25:43   when he saw the post, he was like, Oh man, like I was really hoping this was going to fix it.

01:25:49   Uh, but it didn't fix it. So yeah, but I, I, I can't believe how good it looks. And then just in

01:25:55   general, uh, with vision OS, the widgets are really nice. Uh, they look really good. They pin to the

01:26:00   walls. You can pin apps to surfaces now too. Yeah. Geographic persistence is really, uh, a feature that

01:26:06   needed to exist.

01:26:07   And I wanted to give a clarification cause I've heard people say like, Oh, finally, when you open it up,

01:26:13   windows are in the same place. Two things have happened. They already did that, but just not for

01:26:18   reboot. So like this was a vision OS two point something feature that every time you, as long as

01:26:24   you, you didn't completely discharge the battery, every time you, you put on your vision pro, your

01:26:29   apps were in the right places. They've done this a long time ago, but they wouldn't persist across a

01:26:34   reboot and now it, and now you can, and now you can, there's a new feature where you can lock a window

01:26:39   or a widget to a, uh, surface. Yeah. So you can also say, I want it on this wall and it will put

01:26:46   it on the wall. And then yes, if you go, so that's one of the things that I had in my demo is they took

01:26:51   me in another room and I stepped into the room. And as I stepped into the room, all of these windows

01:26:56   appeared on the walls and widgets and stuff. They all appeared on the walls. And that was because,

01:27:02   uh, it knew that it had been in there before. And so it loaded all the things that were in there.

01:27:09   Um, so that was really, that was really clever. And they had, they had some windows pinned to the

01:27:13   walls too. And I asked them like, what's the deal with, uh, with opening multiple apps in different

01:27:21   places and like, how does it get mixed up and all that? And they said, it's not really a big deal.

01:27:26   Like if, cause the window, like if you're far away from there, the windows aren't actually open,

01:27:31   right? They aren't actually open over there. It opens them when you get there and restores the state.

01:27:36   And so if you're in Safari, you can't be like, I left, it's that classic. I left my Safari in

01:27:40   another room. You don't have to do that still running, you know? Yeah. Yeah. And you just

01:27:45   open Safari and then, and then Safari is in front of you too. And it's okay. They, they, they kind of

01:27:49   smoothed all that out. But if we're, if we're headed for a world down the road and that's what vision

01:27:53   OS is all about where future products need to have this kind of persistence, I think they do the,

01:27:59   if you leave an object, if you, if you set up a, if you set up a TV from the, that sandwich app about

01:28:06   television, if you set that up in a room somewhere, every time you come back to that room, it should

01:28:11   be there. Right? Like that, that, that just makes sense. And this goes for widgets and anything. So

01:28:16   yeah, they did a, they did a really good job. I did get also in that demo, a, uh, an example of what

01:28:22   happens when two people with a vision pro are in the same room together where they're basically doing

01:28:26   share play. They're using stuff that they already have. But what, one of the things that I think

01:28:31   they're sharing, I think these are all connected, right? It's not, it's not three things. Are you

01:28:35   getting it yet? Is geographic persistence also means, uh, it has knowledge of that particular room

01:28:44   geography. So you can share that room geography with another, they didn't say this, but like,

01:28:50   this has to, has to be what's happening is you've got the room geography in common, but

01:28:54   for that to be the case, the device needs to know what the room geography is. So you need

01:28:59   to have that geographical persistence. And then on top of that, you use share play. So like

01:29:04   I had an object shared with me by, uh, an Apple marketing person, and it was like a statue of

01:29:10   an astronaut, but like, you know, he scaled it up and turned it around and I walked around

01:29:16   it and I looked at it and I could, and like we were collaborating on, on this little 3d

01:29:22   model. But the point again, if you're looking at the future, if a lot of people have Apple

01:29:28   vision powered devices, even if it's like 10, 15 years in their air glasses or whatever, there

01:29:34   will come a point when everybody not seeing the same hallucinations is going to be a problem.

01:29:43   You need the ability to work on or see things with other people. And so they, but they had

01:29:50   to build it eventually. And this is when they built it.

01:29:52   The other feature that I wanted to try was look to scroll. I just can't get it to work. I don't

01:29:59   know if it's okay. Like there was one moment where I could see that it was in, like it could,

01:30:05   it knew I was looking and nothing happened. So, okay.

01:30:08   Mark Gurman said in his column on Sunday that he thought he used it and he thought it was great.

01:30:12   And I'm like, I have, I have not succeeded at using look to scroll.

01:30:16   Okay. I know it's in there. There's a setting that's on, but I can't do it. I was going mad

01:30:21   today. I'm like, I'm looking, I'm looking. Nothing was scrolling.

01:30:25   No.

01:30:26   And we'll come back to the beard.

01:30:27   Your beard blocked.

01:30:28   Maybe, you know what?

01:30:29   Beard to scroll.

01:30:30   Maybe.

01:30:30   There we go.

01:30:31   Beard to scroll. I just stroked my beard and then the webpage goes down.

01:30:34   That's amazing.

01:30:35   This episode is brought to you by Factor. Summer is finally here and it's fun. As listeners know,

01:30:42   this show, more sun, more fun, more light, more time to do all of the things that make

01:30:47   summer so special. But here's what you won't be doing. Spending hours cooking inside because

01:30:52   that's where Factor comes in. Factor's chef crafted dietitian approved meals are ready in

01:30:57   just two minutes, taking the hassle out of eating well. Factor meals arrive fresh and ready to eat

01:31:02   perfect for any active lifestyle over summer and beyond. With 45 weekly menu options, you can

01:31:09   pick gourmet meals that fit your summer gains and goals. Choose some options like calorie

01:31:13   smart, protein plus keto and more. Factor powers your day sun up to sun down with nutritious

01:31:19   breakfasts, on the go lunches, premium dinners and guilt free snacks and desserts. Factor has your

01:31:24   whole day covered. Enjoy this summer. Get Factor if you want all the flavor and none of the fuss.

01:31:30   Jason, do you love flavor and hate fuss?

01:31:33   Sure, I do. Good.

01:31:37   You know, the person who really hates fuss is my mom.

01:31:41   Yes.

01:31:41   So we, she doesn't, she's, I think we are concerned that she's losing weight because she has struggled

01:31:48   to make meals for herself. She lives alone. She making meals for one person is not the best thing

01:31:53   in the world to do. So we got her Factor meals. So she gets Factor meals every week and we're

01:31:59   learning like what she prefers and what she doesn't prefer. But I think we're all very happy that

01:32:04   she's got some easy to prepare, tastes good, are healthy and nutritious.

01:32:10   That's great.

01:32:11   And, uh, and I will say again that when we get them here, um, Lauren steals them and takes them to work.

01:32:17   And she is, uh, I would say that if they didn't taste good, she wouldn't do that. She would say,

01:32:22   you eat your, you eat your podcast meals, podcast boy. But instead she takes them to work with her

01:32:26   because they are remarkably good. Um, after heating them up for just a couple of minutes, they, they,

01:32:31   I don't know what the magic is that they've got, but, uh, they actually taste good and not

01:32:36   like, I won't mention other things other than to say that I, they, they vastly surpassed my

01:32:42   expectations for a little thing that you would heat up for a couple of minutes. It, it, it is,

01:32:47   uh, actually good. So good that I, I, uh, I, I buy it for my mom.

01:32:51   We'll be very good for new parents to factor. Ah, yes. We could give for someone, uh, you can get

01:32:56   started today at factor meals.com slash upgrade 50 off and use the code upgrade 50 off to get 50%

01:33:03   off plus free shipping on your first box. That's code upgrade five zero O F F at factor meals.com

01:33:10   slash upgrade 50 off to get 50% off plus free shipping. That's F A C T O R M E A L S.com slash upgrade

01:33:19   50 off. A thanks to factor for their support of this show and relay. Let's finish out with some

01:33:27   ask upgrade questions today. John wrote in and said, I watched upgrade on YouTube for the first time

01:33:33   today. I'm normally a listener. My snow talk question, this is an ask upgrade question, but

01:33:37   nevertheless, uh, is what trainers slash sneakers was Jason wearing? They want to know your, your fit check,

01:33:43   Jason. Yes. We had our initial, uh, version and we posted a later version with a better angle,

01:33:48   but the initial version, it's like, I'm far away and sitting in a chair, full body.

01:33:52   That was, that was the view I had of you just far on Jason all the way over there. There is this one

01:33:57   point. I don't know if it's in the video. I hope that it is where you knock over a water bottle.

01:34:01   Yes. And I assume it is. I don't know. And I had to just really, really hold it together as I'm

01:34:08   watching Jason with this tumbling water bottle. I adjusted the, the, uh, I moved the cord to be

01:34:16   behind my back, but to do that, I had to move the boom arm and the boom arm was so long that it just

01:34:21   swept the water bottle right off the table. Fortunately, the water bottle was capped,

01:34:24   no water was spilled, but I was just, I felt like so trapped in that chair with that arm and the whole

01:34:30   thing. Um, anyway, my shoes are Brooks addiction, walking shoes. It's kind of boring. I have them in

01:34:41   white. I have them in blue. I have them in black. Wow. Uh, yeah, they're just my shoes. They're

01:34:49   walking shoes. They're added stability for, to make my feet happy. That's it. You found the one pair and

01:34:55   you're like, never, never another pair. You know, that's my pair. Well, I had a podiatrist say you

01:34:59   should wear one of these three brands and this is the one I ended up with. So yeah. I'm currently

01:35:03   scrolling through the video to see, is there a point where the, the, the bottle is gone? I think you put

01:35:09   it back on, didn't you? Uh, yeah, yeah, I did. I did. No, you have to look for the moment where the

01:35:15   cord that's in front of my shoulder moves to behind my shoulder. And in between those two points is

01:35:20   where I knocked it over. Um, I think I edited it out of the new angle video. Yeah. Um, and cut to,

01:35:28   it's one of the places where it cuts to you full video. I don't know. Anyway, there was a whole thing

01:35:31   there. We did two versions of the video. We got lots of angles, but again, you know,

01:35:38   posting a WWDC reaction video a week later is silly. So yeah, we just did the fast version and

01:35:45   then the slightly slower version. Yeah. I, I found them. It's not in there. I found a moment where,

01:35:52   uh, there's the bottles on the table and then it cuts to me for a bit and the bottles on the floor.

01:35:58   Yeah. You put it down on the floor. Uh, so there you go. That'll be, that'll be one for me and for

01:36:04   technically I picked it up off the floor and then put it back down on the floor, but, but I, I made

01:36:10   it not be on the table that could easily be swept by the mic arm. Yeah. Tom writes in and says we have

01:36:16   macOS Tahoe being the last Intel, uh, release. Do you think there will be a bump in Mac sales within the

01:36:22   next couple of years? Or are people still on Intel waiting for the wheels to fall off and not likely to

01:36:27   upgrade until then? I mean, I think it's a bell curve. I think probably the number of people still

01:36:32   on Intel is re you know, reduced every day. Yeah. And so will there be a bump? I don't know. I think

01:36:38   any bump will probably be missed by the fact that it's fewer and fewer people every time.

01:36:45   Um, because so many, I mean, there's so many tempting reasons to do Apple Intel or not Apple

01:36:50   intelligence to do Apple Silicon over the last five years. I think maybe the, the, the pull forward as

01:36:55   they called it during COVID may have actually accelerated their timeline on cutting Intel

01:37:01   because they sold so many Macs. They, well, that helps. Um, and, but we know Apple still talks about,

01:37:08   you know, comparing laptops to Intel. They know that they're still out there. I'm sure there will be an

01:37:14   increase. I'm sure there will be people who, when they can't get the new version, will be like, I guess

01:37:19   I need to update. Those are very slow updaters, but they have value and they're going to get a great,

01:37:26   you know, M five M six kind of Mac when they do. And it's going to be awesome for them. Um, but I don't

01:37:34   know. I feel like that number just keeps going down. If you're running like an Intel MacBook air and you

01:37:40   move to like the M five MacBook air, my word, that's going to be a good time for people.

01:37:46   Yeah. It's going to be wild. So anyway, I, I don't know how big that bump is going to be. I think it'll

01:37:50   be, it will lead some people to decide to update. In fact, the announcement that it's happening next

01:37:55   year will lead some people to update in the meantime. I can imagine it would, it would move some

01:37:59   enterprise buyers, um, to, to start making some decisions potentially. I don't know.

01:38:03   But, but I mean, you're talking about computers that are already five or six years old. So they

01:38:09   were probably at the end of the cycle. So yeah, I, I'm not saying that there won't be one, but I don't

01:38:13   think it's going to be massive because I think we already saw a couple of massive bumps driven by the

01:38:17   pandemic and driven by Apple Silicon in general. Um, but I also know, I mean, yeah, there are people out

01:38:23   there hold a Mac for five or six or seven years and you know, and they will, I mean, I'm not trying

01:38:28   to call out John Syracuse, but there I said it, I was just about to, I was going to say, I love John

01:38:33   Syracuse. So he's a good friend and I care about him a lot, but it would be hilarious to me. I would

01:38:38   find it very, very funny if they do not update the Mac Pro before the next version of Mac OS, that would

01:38:43   be very funny to me. Yeah. And then you just have to, so, so they're there. I don't know if it's

01:38:49   going to be a huge number. Yeah. Yeah. We'll find out.

01:38:53   Sam writes in and says, uh, downloaded the iPadOS 26 beta and I love it. However, I'm disappointed

01:39:00   about the lack of spotlight upgrades. Any idea on if we'll see these, uh, like what's coming to Mac OS

01:39:07   on iPadOS? I mean, no, that's a Mac, that's a Mac feature. Gotta leave something for next year,

01:39:13   hopefully. Like this is something that I do want, especially at the shortcut stuff. I'm like,

01:39:17   oh man, would I love that. And a clipboard? Oh, come on. Maybe I'm misguided here, but I feel like

01:39:23   once Apple implements all of that stuff in spotlight for Mac, I have a hard time imagining it won't come

01:39:29   to iPad. Yeah. Especially. But it won't be this year. I mean, next year. We're in this weird spot now

01:39:36   with the iPad where it's like, oh, they just added all these iPhone features. They'll come to the iPad

01:39:40   next year. And now also they've just added these Mac features to the iPad next year. Is that where

01:39:46   we are now? That appears to be. Yeah. Well, and keep in mind that that would include clipboard

01:39:50   history, which I think would be amazing on iPad and iPhone as well. They should do it. They've got an

01:39:56   interface for it now. That spotlight stuff feels very iOS-y, right? It does. The shortcuts and all that.

01:40:02   I know. I think they built it on Mac as proof of concept and then it will go back to the iPad.

01:40:09   Including like launching shortcuts with keyboard commands. Come on, man. Are you kidding me?

01:40:15   Because that solves the problem of global shortcuts on iPadOS. Exactly. The iPad

01:40:21   had a lot this year, right? I could see where they're like, you know, this is what we're focusing

01:40:26   on with iPad. And then on the Mac, they're like, we've got this thing where we're going to really

01:40:30   update Spotlight. But Spotlight is everywhere. So I have a hard time imagining those Spotlight

01:40:34   upgrades won't come to the other platforms. It requires some, you know, different kind of

01:40:40   engineering for that platform. But I have a hard time imagining that that isn't a future plan.

01:40:44   And Andy says, regarding the iPad audio updates with iPadOS, the audio system is hardly more

01:40:50   flexible than before. Apple hasn't provided a new set of rich APIs to let audio apps flourish and

01:40:56   inject new ideas into the platform. They just fixed a popular gripe of podcasting.

01:41:00   Are we giving up on hoping for changes that give us an API and a future development area and just

01:41:06   be happy when Apple throws us a bone? I mean, yeah, I am happy they threw me a bone.

01:41:11   I think fundamentally, here's what I'll say. I don't think Apple wants audio hijacked to work

01:41:18   on the Mac or iPad. I just don't think it does. I think it does not want to give that level of

01:41:24   system control to apps running as utilities. And so what it's decided to do is build in solutions to

01:41:32   these problems at a system level. And like if Apple is integrating recording of audio, selecting of input

01:41:40   devices at a system level that suggests to me that, uh, they don't want to let audio apps flourish.

01:41:50   I will also say a lot of what they're doing. I mean, I mentioned this earlier, a lot of what they're

01:41:55   doing is superior to what's on the Mac because on the Mac, I mean, Mac audio, like low level built in Mac

01:42:05   audio is terrible. Like it's been terrible for years. The fact that you need all of those utilities

01:42:11   to do things that the system should probably just let you do, you should probably be able to route

01:42:16   audio and record specific apps. And like, you should probably just be able to do that. And, and the sound

01:42:23   system preference panel is so limited. And that's why audio hijack and sound source and a bunch of these

01:42:29   other apps have to exist is because Apple just doesn't do it and doesn't think it's important

01:42:35   on the Mac. I find that baffling, but that's just how it is. The fact that they built these things for

01:42:40   iPad and I, and, and iOS too, is I think really interesting because it's Apple actually having to,

01:42:48   to conceptualize those features that they just never bothered with on the Mac side, where there's just

01:42:55   like a default and we, they don't care. So I don't know. I, I, I am, are we giving up on hoping

01:43:02   for changes that give us an API and a future development area? Yes. I think they're not going

01:43:07   to do it. I think that, I think that they have the audio routing is like a bridge too far and that what

01:43:12   they're going to do is build some system features in instead. Um, I, what I hope will change in the long

01:43:19   run is that the iPad and iPhone, especially the iPad with multi windows and all of that,

01:43:25   they still need to do more work in terms of if I've got multi windows and one of them's, you know,

01:43:31   playing and one of them's recording or two of them are playing audio simultaneously, like I should,

01:43:36   that should work. Right. Cause that's how the Mac works. And right now you still have those instances

01:43:40   where you're watching video and then streaming through scrolling through your timeline and a video

01:43:45   auto plays and it stops the video you're watching in the other window. It's just, it's stupid. Like a

01:43:49   question. I don't know. Like some, you know, when we're recording, I'm building show notes, right? And

01:43:53   sometimes one of the show notes is a YouTube video that starts playing. If I'm recording a podcast on my

01:43:58   iPad and that happens, what happens? Like I genuinely don't know. It stops recording. Jeez. I believe.

01:44:05   See that is like that as bad. This is the thing of like, am I happy that they've thrown me a bone with

01:44:11   this? Yes. Cause it's something I wanted. It's a pet feature that I wanted and they give me that

01:44:15   feature, which is great. But what I, I don't, I don't, I'm not particularly holding a candle for

01:44:20   them to create a set of APIs so people can make audio recording apps. It'd be nice, but like,

01:44:25   whatever, I'm going to take what I can get, but I want the general system feature of multiple audio

01:44:31   sources being played at one time to be possible. Like, you know, I mentioned this before, but like

01:44:37   being able to watch a live stream of someone reacting to a video whilst also watching the

01:44:42   main video. So like I can watch a sporting event and watch a YouTuber talk about it at the same time.

01:44:47   I don't need both sets of audio to be playing at the same time, but I just need the system to

01:44:52   understand the concept of multiple sources playing media at the same time. And then I can handle those

01:44:57   because sometimes if most apps, it will pause one and play another. It's like, well, I don't want you

01:45:02   to do that. You are capable of doing both of these. Yeah. So don't get me wrong. I mean, I would love it

01:45:07   if Apple were able to enable sophisticated or willing to enable sophisticated audio routing

01:45:15   and recording and other utilities like that on iPad. But I think these features suggest that they would

01:45:22   rather just build some functionality in that solves some problems and then moves on. And, uh, and they do

01:45:29   have other audio issues as Mike just detailed, like there are other, uh, there's a lack of

01:45:34   sophistication in terms of audio on the iPad that still needs to be addressed.

01:45:38   If you would like to send in a question of your own, or you would like to send us in some feedback

01:45:44   or follow up, you can go to upgradefeedback.com. Uh, thank you to our members to support us who

01:45:50   upgrade plus, uh, this week, I think we might talk about my blog a little bit and some other behind

01:45:55   the scenes, WWDC stuff. You can get longer ad free versions and bonus content every week by going

01:46:01   to get upgrade plus.com. If you want to find this show on YouTube, where you can sometimes see Jason's

01:46:07   shoes, uh, you can go on YouTube and search for the upgrade podcast. Uh, thank you to factor delete me

01:46:12   and Squarespace for the support of this show. But most of all, thank you for listening. We'll be back

01:46:17   next time. Until then, say goodbye, Jason Snow. Goodbye, Mike Early.