222: ‘Pseudorandom Gibberish’ With Rene Ritchie
00:00:00
◼
►
We gotta pack a three hour show into about 90 minutes here,
00:00:03
◼
►
- We can do it.
00:00:04
◼
►
- I think we can.
00:00:04
◼
►
No baseball, no sports, no movies, nothing like that.
00:00:08
◼
►
We gotta get right to work.
00:00:10
◼
►
- Got a good list of topics.
00:00:12
◼
►
I'm gonna say number one, I wanna talk about
00:00:15
◼
►
MacBook keyboard failures.
00:00:18
◼
►
It's a recurring theme on the show.
00:00:20
◼
►
And in between the last episode of this show
00:00:22
◼
►
and us talking today, a fellow I know
00:00:28
◼
►
got hit by the speck of dust of doom.
00:00:31
◼
►
And that fellow would be you.
00:00:34
◼
►
- Yeah, like you, I think we both had a bunch
00:00:37
◼
►
of different review units since they came out in 2016.
00:00:41
◼
►
They were the original Skylake ones,
00:00:43
◼
►
they were last year's Kaby Lake ones.
00:00:45
◼
►
Between MacBooks and MacBook Pros, my own and Apple's,
00:00:48
◼
►
I've probably gone through eight,
00:00:50
◼
►
and I've used two or three of them consistently,
00:00:52
◼
►
and I never had any problem, and then two weeks ago,
00:00:56
◼
►
the control key stopped working.
00:00:59
◼
►
And I don't use the control key often.
00:01:00
◼
►
I use it for terminal and ludicrously to pick up,
00:01:03
◼
►
to pull out the emoji keyboard picker.
00:01:05
◼
►
- Yes, yes, yes. - Yeah.
00:01:07
◼
►
And I wasn't able to do that anymore.
00:01:10
◼
►
- For people who do not know, you can type on a Mac,
00:01:15
◼
►
you can type control command space
00:01:18
◼
►
and it brings up the emoji picker.
00:01:19
◼
►
And it's a fantastic feature.
00:01:23
◼
►
It's funny, I've kind of gotten away from tips and tricks
00:01:25
◼
►
in recent years. I don't know why, but it's like I've started, I'll get to some later
00:01:30
◼
►
that are on the show notes, but that's another one. And it's like, I know that there's some
00:01:35
◼
►
cool third party utilities that help with emoji and stuff like that. But I think if
00:01:38
◼
►
people knew about the command control space and the fact that you can search, yes, it's,
00:01:45
◼
►
it's a fantastic feature. It's so it's like, you know, you type flower and it's like all
00:01:49
◼
►
the flower emoji show up. Oh, I love this feature. Anyway, I can't reassign it. So if
00:01:54
◼
►
control key is gone you just you can't use it which exact model was this it was
00:02:03
◼
►
a MacBook Pro correct yeah it was a 13 inch MacBook Pro with the touch bar all
00:02:08
◼
►
right almost so what's the current status you made a video I have it in the
00:02:11
◼
►
show notes it will be there and you can you know you went through the rigmarole
00:02:15
◼
►
with the Apple support document where you hold the the MacBook at a precise 61
00:02:21
◼
►
degree angle and then hold the can of air at a 57 degree angle.
00:02:27
◼
►
Yeah, and you can't go too far because then it'll push cold out and not dust and you'll
00:02:31
◼
►
get, not that I did this too often, but you'll get like frozen stuff all over your keyboard.
00:02:35
◼
►
I think that's why some people like, you know, it's just like everything in life where it's
00:02:40
◼
►
like you can go really cheap or really expensive. But I know some people have those, instead
00:02:45
◼
►
of buying the aerosol cans of compressed air, you can get like an actual mechanical device
00:02:51
◼
►
know, which I think solves that problem of when you hold it at a weird angle, it turns
00:02:55
◼
►
to ice and you worry that you're about to give yourself frostbite or something like
00:03:00
◼
►
Ben Stuart Yeah, no, I went through all of that and it
00:03:02
◼
►
worked-ish. If I hit the control key a little more briskly than I usually hit keys and I
00:03:08
◼
►
bias towards the left side, it works, but it's not comfortable. I have been shown how
00:03:15
◼
►
to take the key off. I have friends in the industry and they've shown like an easy way
00:03:19
◼
►
taking the key off. So I'll probably do that next. Pop it off, clean it more thoroughly,
00:03:22
◼
►
pop it back on.
00:03:23
◼
►
You know, I've heard that taking the keys off this model of keyboard, it's in the
00:03:28
◼
►
litany of things that are bad about this keyboard design. What I've heard is that it is a precarious,
00:03:35
◼
►
it is very precarious and that you can damage it. You know, and that in fact, it's so
00:03:41
◼
►
easy to do that even people who take it in for service, like the genius or might try
00:03:46
◼
►
to do it and therefore it's covered but then it's like oh broke a little piece of plastic
00:03:50
◼
►
now the whole top piece has to go back and be replaced yeah like apparently the space
00:03:54
◼
►
bar is just impossible because it will break if you try to take it that's what i've heard
00:03:57
◼
►
yeah yeah some of the other keys aren't as dangerous um so i might try that or i might
00:04:02
◼
►
just take it to the gym i i use my space bar yes so does casey nice that apparently he
00:04:10
◼
►
had huge complaints about the space bar all right so your current status is you haven't
00:04:14
◼
►
- You haven't taken it in for service.
00:04:15
◼
►
You're thinking about performing surgery.
00:04:17
◼
►
And you know what the worst part is?
00:04:18
◼
►
Control is the one, you know,
00:04:20
◼
►
there's option and command on both sides,
00:04:22
◼
►
but only one control key.
00:04:23
◼
►
- Yeah, absolutely.
00:04:24
◼
►
And I should preface this by saying that
00:04:26
◼
►
I didn't have any problems at all with these keyboards.
00:04:29
◼
►
My previous generation MacBook before this new keyboard,
00:04:31
◼
►
the scissor switch one, I had the E key fail
00:04:34
◼
►
and I took it in and I had, it was like $500
00:04:38
◼
►
because they had to swap out the entire top case
00:04:40
◼
►
and battery assembly as well.
00:04:42
◼
►
And it took 24 hours.
00:04:43
◼
►
It was covered by AppleCare.
00:04:45
◼
►
So I just thought I was lucky, but now apparently there's no generation of MacBook whose keys
00:04:50
◼
►
I can tolerate.
00:04:51
◼
►
Darrell Bock Well, and we have WWDC next week, so you need
00:04:54
◼
►
this thing, right?
00:04:55
◼
►
I mean, do you have like a Plan B?
00:04:57
◼
►
David Schanzer Yeah, I still have the review unit they gave
00:05:01
◼
►
us last year for Mac OS High Sierra, which I haven't used very much.
00:05:06
◼
►
But it's 15 inches, which I don't usually travel with, but I might do that and just
00:05:09
◼
►
bring my MacBook Pro with me.
00:05:11
◼
►
Darrell Bock Comfortable on the near.
00:05:12
◼
►
my iMac Pro. Well, I would just use it. Sorry. I use the iPad Pro on the airplane now because
00:05:16
◼
►
the seats have gotten so small. It feels like they're not Mac friendly.
00:05:19
◼
►
No, that's true. It's very true. I can't remember the last time I used to. I guess
00:05:23
◼
►
the only time I sometimes use a Mac on a plane is very specifically the return flight home
00:05:31
◼
►
after an Apple event if I haven't finished writing about it. That's like the one time.
00:05:35
◼
►
Like I don't do any kind of general productivity with a Mac on an airplane. It's just too
00:05:41
◼
►
unwieldy. Even when I get upgraded and I'm in first class and there's plenty of room,
00:05:48
◼
►
it's just ungainly. It's not your shorter room, but there's no good place to put it.
00:05:54
◼
►
You can literally put it on your lap and it's not really a great angle. And then you put
00:05:59
◼
►
it on the tray and I feel like I'm a little kid at the lunch table and my arms are up
00:06:03
◼
►
at my shoulders. It's too high.
00:06:05
◼
►
- And the funny thing for me is I'm keyboard agnostic.
00:06:08
◼
►
Like I can use the iPad Pro fine.
00:06:10
◼
►
I do tons of writing on it.
00:06:12
◼
►
I can use the old MacBook keyboard, the new one.
00:06:14
◼
►
I was setting up the review unit
00:06:16
◼
►
that I hadn't used in a long time.
00:06:17
◼
►
And those keys are just super tight.
00:06:19
◼
►
And then I went back to the 2016 one
00:06:20
◼
►
that I've been using for two years.
00:06:22
◼
►
Like all these butterfly keys feel all loosey goosey now.
00:06:24
◼
►
It's amazing how fast your brain acclimatizes.
00:06:27
◼
►
- Oh yeah, I totally, I mean,
00:06:28
◼
►
I've never really used the new one.
00:06:30
◼
►
And Ben Thompson and I talked about this,
00:06:31
◼
►
I think on the last episode.
00:06:32
◼
►
I've never really used one as my main machine.
00:06:34
◼
►
I've only used review units.
00:06:36
◼
►
My personal MacBook Pro is still a 2014.
00:06:38
◼
►
But even after just a few minutes with the other one,
00:06:41
◼
►
this keyboard, I love it because I feel it's 100% reliable.
00:06:45
◼
►
But it does feel like the keys are all ready to fall off.
00:06:50
◼
►
They're so jaded. - See, they both betrayed me
00:06:52
◼
►
now, so I have no safe harbor.
00:06:53
◼
►
- All right.
00:06:56
◼
►
- But it is, I mean, a lot of people are complaining
00:06:59
◼
►
that you do have to replace the entire top assembly.
00:07:02
◼
►
And that's an industry-wide problem,
00:07:04
◼
►
it's a trans industry problem because Apple made unibodies and
00:07:07
◼
►
they're much better structurally, but they're huge
00:07:08
◼
►
things you have to replace. And your car now has these huge
00:07:11
◼
►
crash panels and crumple zones. If you get a little dent, you've
00:07:14
◼
►
got to replace the entire panel. And as we get better and better
00:07:17
◼
►
manufacturing, stronger and more efficient devices, we lose we
00:07:21
◼
►
lose the miniature like the modularity of them.
00:07:24
◼
►
You know, this is I'll hear from it. And I know that there are
00:07:28
◼
►
people listening to the show who are on the other side of the
00:07:30
◼
►
fence and who are angry if you know better to have very strong
00:07:35
◼
►
feelings about the entire industry but Apple and Apple
00:07:39
◼
►
specifically is move away from modular devices meaning you know
00:07:47
◼
►
the best example this primary example is room removable
00:07:50
◼
►
batteries right i mean again it was a topic on my show one of
00:07:55
◼
►
the most recent episodes but it's funny the way that it used
00:07:57
◼
►
be like it seems so antiquated now but part of like the pre WWDC trip checklist is make
00:08:06
◼
►
sure both of your MacBook batteries are fully charged. Right? Where's that spare? Where's
00:08:10
◼
►
the spare that I haven't used since the last time I went on a big trip? Oh, there it is.
00:08:13
◼
►
What's the charge on that one? You know, it just seems so ridiculous now. Now it's the
00:08:19
◼
►
external USB C battery. Right. But you know, and it's the same, you know, with the phone,
00:08:24
◼
►
It's just, you know, there's just something goes wrong
00:08:27
◼
►
and usually a lot of it has to be replaced.
00:08:29
◼
►
And I get it, you know, and there's trade-offs, you know.
00:08:32
◼
►
There were advantages to being able to just swap out
00:08:35
◼
►
the keyboard without swapping out everything else,
00:08:37
◼
►
but there's also disadvantages.
00:08:39
◼
►
And like you said, you know, the structural integrity
00:08:41
◼
►
of the unibody designs is incredible.
00:08:42
◼
►
Like, you pick up an old, you know, MacBook
00:08:46
◼
►
from 10, 15 years ago, and not only does it feel
00:08:49
◼
►
thick and heavy, but it just feels sort of--
00:08:51
◼
►
- It's creaky.
00:08:51
◼
►
- Junk, yeah, creaky, exactly.
00:08:53
◼
►
It's like, man, I can't believe that we tolerated this.
00:08:56
◼
►
We were spending $3,500 on these things back then
00:08:59
◼
►
and they creak.
00:09:00
◼
►
- And that's the opportunity cause.
00:09:01
◼
►
It's like everybody wants everything, but you can't.
00:09:03
◼
►
Everything's a trade-off.
00:09:04
◼
►
Apple can design for structural integrity
00:09:06
◼
►
or they can design for modularity.
00:09:08
◼
►
You can't have both.
00:09:09
◼
►
You gotta have trade-offs.
00:09:10
◼
►
- So I'm on board with that.
00:09:12
◼
►
That's the trend.
00:09:14
◼
►
I see that the train left the station years ago.
00:09:16
◼
►
I'm on board with it.
00:09:18
◼
►
But that to me, it's not an argument
00:09:20
◼
►
that Apple should go somehow figure out a way
00:09:24
◼
►
to make a keyboard that can be swapped in
00:09:26
◼
►
if the keyboard goes bad.
00:09:28
◼
►
The argument is that they, with this design,
00:09:31
◼
►
the keyboard needs to be more reliable than ever.
00:09:33
◼
►
- Yes. - Right?
00:09:34
◼
►
Like, it's not just that this keyboard
00:09:36
◼
►
isn't reliable enough, it's that it really should be,
00:09:39
◼
►
given how hard it is to replace
00:09:41
◼
►
and how integrated it is with the whole top piece.
00:09:44
◼
►
It really oughta be more reliable than the previous design.
00:09:48
◼
►
- And that was the worst part.
00:09:49
◼
►
Apple Insider did a great job with the numbers,
00:09:51
◼
►
but almost nobody actually bothered to read the article.
00:09:53
◼
►
It didn't say that there were more,
00:09:56
◼
►
so just to back up for a second,
00:09:58
◼
►
in every way the new MacBook Pro
00:10:00
◼
►
looks to be way more reliable than previous generations.
00:10:03
◼
►
The number of incidents in their sampling pool
00:10:04
◼
►
were way down in everything except for keyboard.
00:10:08
◼
►
In 2016, they were way up.
00:10:09
◼
►
In 2017, they looked like they approached 2015 levels again,
00:10:14
◼
►
but that's when the rest of the computer
00:10:15
◼
►
got way, way better and the keyboard really didn't.
00:10:18
◼
►
So we're just left to see that maybe it was worse,
00:10:21
◼
►
maybe they've slowly improved it,
00:10:22
◼
►
but it hasn't seen anywhere near the improvements
00:10:24
◼
►
of the rest of the body.
00:10:25
◼
►
- Yeah, the one that I like the most is the hinge.
00:10:29
◼
►
And when they first came out with these devices,
00:10:32
◼
►
and I had my briefing, and they said,
00:10:34
◼
►
"This is, you know, we can't put everything in a keynote."
00:10:36
◼
►
And there's some things that would sound silly
00:10:38
◼
►
in a keynote, like bragging about the hinge,
00:10:40
◼
►
but that the new hinge compared to like my 2014,
00:10:44
◼
►
A, the biggest difference is that it's so much easier
00:10:47
◼
►
to open the screen without like with just a thumb,
00:10:50
◼
►
without the bottom moving and to with like one finger
00:10:54
◼
►
to position it at exactly the angle you want
00:10:57
◼
►
and it'll stay there, right?
00:10:59
◼
►
Like, so it's easier to move, you know,
00:11:02
◼
►
to adjust the angle that it's open,
00:11:04
◼
►
but yet also just as stable in terms of,
00:11:08
◼
►
oh, it's not gonna droop a little bit when you let go.
00:11:10
◼
►
It's truly a fantastic hinge
00:11:11
◼
►
and I believe it's actually more reliable.
00:11:13
◼
►
I think that's one of the,
00:11:15
◼
►
Because it's a common source of failure.
00:11:18
◼
►
Because there's so much that goes,
00:11:19
◼
►
passes between the display and the bottom part.
00:11:23
◼
►
All right, that's it for the keyboard.
00:11:28
◼
►
Oh, here's one.
00:11:29
◼
►
Here's a tip and trick I posted over the weekend.
00:11:32
◼
►
I've avoided this feature my entire life.
00:11:34
◼
►
There's a feature in iOS that you can turn on in security,
00:11:37
◼
►
in the settings,
00:11:39
◼
►
that after 10 failed passcode attempts, wipe the device.
00:11:45
◼
►
And I forget when they added that.
00:11:46
◼
►
I think it was back around IS4.
00:11:49
◼
►
- It's when they added the hardware encryption
00:11:51
◼
►
'cause they could just throw the keys away.
00:11:53
◼
►
- They didn't have to actually wipe the device.
00:11:54
◼
►
- Right, that's the way that works is it,
00:11:57
◼
►
everything on your SSD and your phone is encrypted.
00:12:01
◼
►
And rather than sit there and wait for a 256 gigabyte drive
00:12:08
◼
►
to be wiped, they can just throw away the key
00:12:11
◼
►
and without the key, there's no way
00:12:13
◼
►
It's effectively unreadable.
00:12:15
◼
►
- It's pseudo random gibberish to anybody who looks at it.
00:12:19
◼
►
I avoided this feature for the reason
00:12:23
◼
►
that it seemed like a good idea.
00:12:25
◼
►
And I'm trying to think, what are the hypothetical cases?
00:12:30
◼
►
Like personally, I'm not really worried
00:12:33
◼
►
about law enforcement to my knowledge.
00:12:36
◼
►
I have broken any laws other than the speed limit
00:12:39
◼
►
in a number of years, but it's possible.
00:12:42
◼
►
It's, you know, I don't know, something could happen, you know. And if my phone were taken by,
00:12:49
◼
►
you know, I don't know, TSA agents or something. Even just a thief who wants to not have to bother
00:12:54
◼
►
with activation lock to get into the phone. But the most common scenario for me would be a thief,
00:13:00
◼
►
you know, and it could be something like it falls out of my pocket in a cab and I leave it and
00:13:05
◼
►
somebody else picks it up. In theory, I don't want to be paranoid. But, you know, remember when Matt
00:13:11
◼
►
Honan from now at BuzzFeed got targeted as a journalist a couple of years ago and had
00:13:16
◼
►
his iCloud account hacked. And once his iCloud account was hacked because they had access
00:13:20
◼
►
to his email and he used that email for a whole bunch of other services, you know, he
00:13:24
◼
►
got owned in a bunch of ways. It's possible that somebody, you know, WWDC who knows who
00:13:29
◼
►
I am could try to take my phone or something like that. I never turned it on. But then
00:13:35
◼
►
I looked at it and I just have been reevaluating my security stuff overall, just sort of a
00:13:41
◼
►
a self-audit on what do I do. I'm looking at two-factor stuff too, like how do I keep
00:13:47
◼
►
track of those one-time codes. But I looked at this feature and I realized that I had
00:13:52
◼
►
misinterpreted it all along, ever since until this weekend. I thought that if you turn this
00:13:57
◼
►
on, somebody who got your phone, like a prankster at a bar, a "friend" who just leaves your
00:14:04
◼
►
phone, that they could sit there and enter "1234 1234 1234 1234 1234" 10 times and then
00:14:10
◼
►
and boom, your phone's erased. Turns out it doesn't work like that at all. And the difference
00:14:17
◼
►
is—well, number one, I asked in a poll on Twitter, which I find fun sometimes, "Do
00:14:22
◼
►
you enable the feature?" And I got, "Do you use that feature?" And out of 4,700
00:14:29
◼
►
votes plus a bunch of Tweetbot users who just wrote yes or no, no problem. But it seemed
00:14:37
◼
►
to run like this. Almost exactly, it was 34% and 66%, so exactly one-third, two-third.
00:14:43
◼
►
One-third enable it, two-third don't. And the number one reason people gave for not
00:14:48
◼
►
is no, I have kids. Meaning they don't want their kid, you know, you're sleeping, kid
00:14:53
◼
►
comes into bedroom, picks up your phone, starts playing with it, trying to unlock it, and
00:14:56
◼
►
then all of a sudden your phone's erased. Well, here's the thing that this feature is
00:14:59
◼
►
so much more clever than I had thought, and I shouldn't be surprised. You get five free
00:15:06
◼
►
attempts at your passcode. Five as fast as you can enter them. But after that fifth failed
00:15:12
◼
►
one, you're putting a one-minute timeout where the only thing you can do with your
00:15:15
◼
►
phone is make a 911 call. And if the sixth one fails, you go to a five-minute timeout.
00:15:22
◼
►
And if that one fails, you go to a 15-minute timeout. And I think it—I didn't press
00:15:28
◼
►
my luck further than that. But apparently, the timeouts escalate to the point where no
00:15:33
◼
►
matter how long you wait between tries, it takes at least three and a half hours to get
00:15:37
◼
►
10th to enter the 10th one. Once I realized that, I turned it on instantly on every iOS
00:15:45
◼
►
device I have because I cannot imagine a scenario where the phone is out of my hands without
00:15:53
◼
►
my knowledge for three and a half hours and where I wouldn't want this feature enabled.
00:16:00
◼
►
No, I mean, there's a classic debate
00:16:01
◼
►
and I have to credit Dave Nainian, a super duper,
00:16:03
◼
►
for opening my eyes to it.
00:16:04
◼
►
I was all about everything has to be encrypted,
00:16:07
◼
►
everything has to be safe, everything has to be secure.
00:16:09
◼
►
And when I was talking to him for an article,
00:16:11
◼
►
he said, "Well, no, because in a lot of cases,
00:16:14
◼
►
you don't want fail secure, you want fail safe."
00:16:16
◼
►
There are circumstances where your worst nightmare
00:16:19
◼
►
is information being stolen from you.
00:16:21
◼
►
But in other situations, your worst nightmare
00:16:23
◼
►
is you losing access to that information.
00:16:25
◼
►
And it's why some people will never encrypt backup drives
00:16:28
◼
►
because if those have your wedding photos
00:16:30
◼
►
or the photos of your children being born,
00:16:32
◼
►
you cannot do disc recovery on an encrypted drive.
00:16:35
◼
►
So if somebody else deals those photos,
00:16:36
◼
►
yeah, they have your photos,
00:16:37
◼
►
but if you lose them, you're getting divorced.
00:16:39
◼
►
Like there's just no way to come back from that.
00:16:41
◼
►
And this to me, I think people were worried
00:16:43
◼
►
that they would lose their data.
00:16:45
◼
►
Someone like their kid would type it in,
00:16:46
◼
►
but this is really a case where you can have that security.
00:16:49
◼
►
You're not risking the deletion of your information.
00:16:51
◼
►
- One of my favorite tips along those lines,
00:16:53
◼
►
and I remember when I first read it, I was just like,
00:16:57
◼
►
No, but it was because it was from somebody who I trust implicitly, Bruce
00:17:02
◼
►
Schneier, security expert, great writer. But he wrote a couple of years back and
00:17:08
◼
►
he's referenced it since that for a lot of typical users a great way to keep
00:17:13
◼
►
track of your passwords, especially important ones, is to write them down on
00:17:17
◼
►
a piece of paper. And you think like, "No!" But his explanation, it makes sense, is
00:17:24
◼
►
is that people have been good at keeping physical objects,
00:17:29
◼
►
important physical objects secure
00:17:32
◼
►
and in a known location forever.
00:17:35
◼
►
Like we're kind of hooked up evolutionarily
00:17:37
◼
►
to be able to keep a physical object safe.
00:17:40
◼
►
It's the digital stuff that we can make goofy,
00:17:44
◼
►
absent-minded mistakes or be tricked into fishing
00:17:47
◼
►
or something like that.
00:17:48
◼
►
But like if you keep your passport safe,
00:17:52
◼
►
Why not keep a piece of paper with your most important passwords wherever you keep your
00:17:58
◼
►
It's probably way safer than any digital and less likely to be victimized by phishing
00:18:04
◼
►
or something than anything you could do digitally.
00:18:07
◼
►
And this is also part of when you listen to Apple's rationale for why they stay in countries
00:18:11
◼
►
like China or the data repatriation thing, France wants citizens' data to be local
00:18:16
◼
►
to that country.
00:18:17
◼
►
And you can understand this on a global scale.
00:18:19
◼
►
In some countries we happen to like better than others or we are less afraid of than
00:18:23
◼
►
others but no one really likes the idea of a foreign government having ownership of their
00:18:26
◼
►
data but one of the things that big companies have to factor in is for an average citizen
00:18:31
◼
►
even in China, even in the EU, even in North America, South America, whatever, some of
00:18:35
◼
►
them care less about security than they do about backup and them keeping access to iCloud
00:18:40
◼
►
photo library as silly as it sounds is so much more important to them than them having
00:18:45
◼
►
Access to a VPN app. Yeah, and they have to balance the interests of a very large customer base. Hmm. Totally true
00:18:52
◼
►
All right. Let me take a break here and thank our first sponsor. It is one of my favorite sponsors
00:18:56
◼
►
What a fabulous product these people sell away away makes
00:19:01
◼
►
Suitcases really travel bags and accessories
00:19:06
◼
►
And they're just fantastic
00:19:09
◼
►
They use high quality materials and have a much lower price compared to other brands because they're one of these
00:19:14
◼
►
you know, internet companies, you know, typical podcast advertisers, they sell direct, they make
00:19:19
◼
►
them, they make these things themselves, they design them themselves, and they sell them direct
00:19:23
◼
►
to you. So there's no retail markup like you get when you buy a suitcase at a, you know, retail
00:19:27
◼
►
store. Truly, truly low prices for really high quality suitcase. They have over 10 colors and
00:19:34
◼
►
five sizes. The sizes are the most aptly named sizes I could imagine. They're called the carry
00:19:42
◼
►
carry-on, the bigger carry-on, the medium, the large, and the kids carry-on. You know
00:19:47
◼
►
exactly how big these things are just from the names, right? All their suitcases are
00:19:52
◼
►
made with premium German polycarbonate that's very lightweight. I can verify this and bends
00:19:57
◼
►
but never breaks. The interior features a patent pending compression system useful for
00:20:02
◼
►
overpackers. This is one of my favorite features about this suitcase because my previous carry-on
00:20:07
◼
►
was effectively just a big rectangle.
00:20:09
◼
►
I had it for years and years and years.
00:20:11
◼
►
I mean, maybe close to 20 years.
00:20:13
◼
►
But you just opened it up
00:20:16
◼
►
and it's just a big rectangle of volume
00:20:19
◼
►
and I would just stuff everything in there.
00:20:21
◼
►
The little features, it's not a lot, it's not complicated,
00:20:24
◼
►
but the couple of features they have in here,
00:20:27
◼
►
like a little panel that you can secure down with a belt,
00:20:31
◼
►
keeps your shirts from getting wrinkled up.
00:20:34
◼
►
have a little bag that's perfect for storing your dirty clothes so your dirty clothes aren't
00:20:39
◼
►
getting mixed in with clean. It's really great. It's a really great system. They've got four
00:20:45
◼
►
360 degree spinner wheels. They're great wheels. Really, I've had this bag. If you can, if
00:20:50
◼
►
you're a longtime listener, you know that a ways been sponsoring this show for a while.
00:20:54
◼
►
And they sent me one of these suitcases back when I first started sponsoring and the thing
00:20:57
◼
►
still looks brand new. It looks like I could take it back. Honest to God, it looks like
00:21:02
◼
►
I can take it back and get a refund. It's in such great shape. And that's not like I
00:21:05
◼
►
baby it, but the wheels are as good as they were on the first day. It's really great.
00:21:12
◼
►
And the other thing is the carry-ons come with a built-in battery that you can use as
00:21:17
◼
►
USB ports and you can use it to charge whatever, anything that charges over USB. And I know
00:21:23
◼
►
that there's some rules on certain airlines now about these built-in batteries. You can
00:21:27
◼
►
take it out very easily. So if you're flying somewhere and they're like, you know, you
00:21:31
◼
►
you gotta take the battery out.
00:21:32
◼
►
You can just take it out.
00:21:32
◼
►
It's not a problem.
00:21:33
◼
►
It's not like you can't take your suitcase on the plane
00:21:35
◼
►
because you have a battery.
00:21:36
◼
►
It comes right out.
00:21:38
◼
►
But it's just such a convenient thing.
00:21:40
◼
►
So it's like every seat in the airport now has,
00:21:42
◼
►
for me, has a charger because I've got my bag with me.
00:21:45
◼
►
You don't have to hunt around for the seats
00:21:47
◼
►
that happen to be near an outlet or something like that.
00:21:50
◼
►
Anyway, they have a 100-day free trial.
00:21:52
◼
►
So you buy it, use it for three months,
00:21:54
◼
►
and if you don't like it, you can get a refund.
00:21:56
◼
►
No reason to worry about it.
00:22:00
◼
►
And they have free shipping on any order
00:22:02
◼
►
within the contiguous US.
00:22:04
◼
►
So sorry, Alaska.
00:22:05
◼
►
Anyway, it's a great product.
00:22:09
◼
►
I use it, I'll be packing it for WWDC over the weekend.
00:22:12
◼
►
Wouldn't wanna travel without it.
00:22:16
◼
►
It's a really great bag.
00:22:17
◼
►
Very lightweight, great wheels, everything like that.
00:22:19
◼
►
Here's the deal for listeners of the show.
00:22:20
◼
►
You've saved 20 bucks at awaytravel.com/talkshow.
00:22:24
◼
►
Awaytravel.com/talkshow.
00:22:27
◼
►
And remember that promo code talk show.
00:22:29
◼
►
know the just talk show and you can save 20 bucks at checkout. So there you go.
00:22:34
◼
►
Save 20 bucks at away travel.com/talk show.
00:22:37
◼
►
Next on the list. We got to keep going. We got so much, so much.
00:22:44
◼
►
Do you know what I, while we're talking about security,
00:22:49
◼
►
there's these apps. One of the things that I've done,
00:22:54
◼
►
I just isn't even on the notes, but
00:22:56
◼
►
One of the things that I've been convinced of is that using your phone number as a second
00:23:03
◼
►
factor in two-factor auth, meaning you say, "Oh, I'll use two-factor with this service
00:23:09
◼
►
and I'll enter my name, my password, and then it'll send me an SMS message with a code and
00:23:16
◼
►
I can enter the code." It's better than not having two-factor, but SMS, I've been convinced,
00:23:25
◼
►
not something you should rely upon because of how many times I've seen stories of people,
00:23:31
◼
►
their carrier getting social engineered effectively. So somebody who wants to steal Renee Richie's,
00:23:39
◼
►
you know, Dropbox account, and they know your phone number, they could call your carrier
00:23:44
◼
►
and say, Hey, this is Renee Richie, is it my phone number? I need to, you know, I need
00:23:49
◼
►
to get a new SIM because I got this new phone, you know, what do you know, and you'd think
00:23:53
◼
►
that shouldn't work. But and I don't think it's easy. I don't think it always works.
00:23:58
◼
►
But I've read enough horror stories that it's not trustworthy.
00:24:01
◼
►
Jared Ranerel I'll go a step further. I mean, I refuse to
00:24:03
◼
►
use that because I've heard stories about people who are traveling and you know, they
00:24:07
◼
►
have their tickets on their phone, they present it, and the custom person will just seize
00:24:10
◼
►
the phone and then they see two factor, they can type in a request for it, get it on the
00:24:15
◼
►
phone and get into your account. So it's I just don't think it's secure at all. It's
00:24:19
◼
►
out of band, but it's doesn't add doesn't add any security to your device.
00:24:22
◼
►
Yeah, that's interesting
00:24:24
◼
►
And it's also the case I I you know and it's rare
00:24:30
◼
►
I mean it's it's you know
00:24:31
◼
►
This is not something you want to optimize for but it is an issue is you're in an airplane or you're overseas
00:24:38
◼
►
Where you're just on Wi-Fi, so you don't have to incur roaming fees
00:24:43
◼
►
And you've got Wi-Fi, but you can't get an SMS right? It's because you can't get a phone call up in the air
00:24:52
◼
►
It's just not great. So I've tried to get rid of my phone number as a second factor
00:24:58
◼
►
on any service that will let me, including Google. Like my Google accounts, I have a
00:25:03
◼
►
few, but my Google accounts, none of them know my phone number anymore. I don't use
00:25:08
◼
►
my phone for anything related to my accounts if I can. But then what do you use for a second
00:25:15
◼
►
factor. Well, Apple uses Apple lets you not think about it because Apple uses just the
00:25:23
◼
►
devices themselves, right? The assumption is if you have more than one Apple device
00:25:27
◼
►
and you can say that you trust one, it will send push notifications. You may know people
00:25:33
◼
►
out there may not even realize they're not using SMS for this, that it's just sort of
00:25:37
◼
►
a magic right to your device. You know, if your phone's your trusted device and you're
00:25:42
◼
►
setting up a new iPad and you're logging into iCloud, it'll send a push notification
00:25:47
◼
►
to your other trusted devices. You might get the same thing on your Mac and your phone,
00:25:53
◼
►
but then you answer it on one, put the code in, and then it's all good. And then the
00:25:56
◼
►
new device is added to your list of trusted devices. That's something Apple can do,
00:26:03
◼
►
and I think they've done a great job and it's sort of unheralded, but it wouldn't
00:26:07
◼
►
for somebody like Dropbox or something like that. So what you can do, and again, I'm not
00:26:14
◼
►
an expert on this, but they have these things, I forget the name of the protocol, it's like
00:26:18
◼
►
T-O-T something, but effectively it's a standardized way to get one-time expiring passwords that
00:26:27
◼
►
only last for like 30 seconds. Google has an app called Google Authenticator. Have you
00:26:32
◼
►
ever used that?
00:26:33
◼
►
I used to I use aussie now. That's where and that was what I'm switching to. That's exactly
00:26:38
◼
►
great minds think alike. So but they generate the same type of codes. There are six digit
00:26:44
◼
►
numbers, they only last for 30 seconds. And then the apps, all the apps I've tried,
00:26:49
◼
►
show you like so if you have, you know, whatever your name is, at gmail.com,
00:26:54
◼
►
you open up the app, and it'll say whatever your name at gmail.com. And it might say, you know,
00:27:01
◼
►
729123. But it'll tell you that it's got 20 seconds left. So if it says it only has three
00:27:07
◼
►
seconds left, just wait three seconds. It'll give you the new one for the next 30 seconds,
00:27:12
◼
►
then enter it in and you're in. So I've been using Google Authenticator for this for about
00:27:19
◼
►
a year. And as part of my reevaluating my security stuff, the one thing that annoys
00:27:26
◼
►
me about it is that Google Authenticator is tied to one phone. So like I have it on my
00:27:34
◼
►
iPhone but then when I get a new iPhone it's like I have to kind of be careful because
00:27:40
◼
►
I don't want to wipe the old phone until I've set up the new phone and used the old phone
00:27:45
◼
►
to get the Google Authenticator codes because they're only being generated on that one device.
00:27:54
◼
►
If I lost the phone, if somebody stole it, if it broke, if I dropped it and it just shattered,
00:27:59
◼
►
somebody steals it, whatever. You're not locked out of your accounts. There's recovery codes
00:28:05
◼
►
that you can print. And again, like the thing I just said, like keep them in a secure location.
00:28:11
◼
►
There's ways to recover, but there's no easy way to get right in. Wouldn't it be better
00:28:16
◼
►
if you could get it from any device? And that's what Authy does. Authy syncs these things
00:28:20
◼
►
so you can install the Authy app, A-U-T-H-Y. And then you can get the same codes on multiple
00:28:29
◼
►
devices. So I'm in the midst of moving everything from Google Authenticator to Authy for that
00:28:35
◼
►
I use 1Password for passwords and they now have two factor built into them. They didn't
00:28:41
◼
►
at the time, so I just got started with Authy and I stayed that way because I like having
00:28:45
◼
►
a separate app for that.
00:28:46
◼
►
Yeah, well, I know a couple of people, Ben Thompson, in particular, he uses one password,
00:28:50
◼
►
and he uses authy for the one time fee. He's the one who kind of pushed me towards this.
00:28:54
◼
►
And his explanation is exactly what he's just it. Maybe it's not even logical, but he just
00:28:59
◼
►
doesn't want to have the password and the second factor in the same app. You know, like it somehow
00:29:06
◼
►
feels more compartmentalized to have your password and one password and have your, you know, one time
00:29:13
◼
►
authentication code in a separate app. I looked at one, I don't use one password for my passwords,
00:29:18
◼
►
I just use the keychain. But I looked at one password as a rival to Authy, because I could
00:29:27
◼
►
have it on my phone and my Mac and get, you know, just use it for these one-time keys. And it's a
00:29:34
◼
►
great app, I could see why people like it, but it doesn't make sense to use it only, in my opinion,
00:29:39
◼
►
to use it only for the one-time things.
00:29:41
◼
►
Like you're either buying into the one password lifestyle
00:29:43
◼
►
and putting everything in one password or it's overkill.
00:29:47
◼
►
- So for me, I didn't, I liked the idea of iCloud Keychain,
00:29:50
◼
►
but until iPhone 10 and Face ID,
00:29:53
◼
►
they never put any sort of security intercept
00:29:55
◼
►
between the device and the password.
00:29:58
◼
►
So let's just say, you know, someone's lost
00:30:00
◼
►
and they wanna use your phone or you're at a conference
00:30:01
◼
►
and someone wants to show you a website,
00:30:03
◼
►
you hand them your phone and they have immediate access
00:30:06
◼
►
to your passwords and your credit cards,
00:30:08
◼
►
where with something like 1Password or LastPass
00:30:11
◼
►
or Dashlane, all those things,
00:30:13
◼
►
they'd have to enter in another password
00:30:14
◼
►
or use Touch ID or Face ID to get it.
00:30:17
◼
►
But now with iPhone 10 and the Face ID thing,
00:30:19
◼
►
if it had launched like that,
00:30:20
◼
►
if it had launched with Touch ID support,
00:30:22
◼
►
I would have probably gone all in on it.
00:30:24
◼
►
- Well, I get away from that
00:30:25
◼
►
because I don't let anybody use my phone.
00:30:28
◼
►
- That's fair.
00:30:30
◼
►
- Not really a problem.
00:30:31
◼
►
But anyway, Authi, I recommend it.
00:30:34
◼
►
So the takeaway from this segment of the show
00:30:37
◼
►
is if you're using SMS as a second factor
00:30:39
◼
►
on various services, I say look into taking an afternoon,
00:30:43
◼
►
cleaning this up, get rid of SMS as your second factor.
00:30:46
◼
►
There's also just the fact that SMS isn't encrypted.
00:30:50
◼
►
And again, what, is the Russian spy agency gonna come in
00:30:55
◼
►
and put a tap on the line and intercept this unencrypted SMS?
00:31:01
◼
►
I really doubt it, but still, it is unencrypted.
00:31:06
◼
►
It just seems wrong in principle to use an unencrypted protocol to send something that
00:31:14
◼
►
should definitely be encrypted.
00:31:17
◼
►
And we're living in a time when we have vast data storage capabilities and it seems like
00:31:22
◼
►
organizations just collect this data and sit on it.
00:31:25
◼
►
And no one's doing anything criminal here, but you never know when something's going
00:31:29
◼
►
to happen, an accident will happen, or a lawsuit or a criminal prosecution will ensue, and
00:31:33
◼
►
they'll be able to go backwards in time and just look at all the data they collected on
00:31:37
◼
►
you and find something to support whatever they want to get you on. And I don't even
00:31:40
◼
►
want to risk that.
00:31:41
◼
►
Right. All right. Next topic. Anyway, so take away, get rid of SMS as a factor and look
00:31:48
◼
►
into Aussie if you're looking for a client to sync these things. I suppose there's some
00:31:55
◼
►
mild security trade off between the way that Aussie syncs these things. Now what they sync
00:32:00
◼
►
to the server is encrypted. So there's nothing on Authy's server. It's end-to-end encrypted,
00:32:05
◼
►
so it's not like your code—somebody can log into your Authy account and see your codes,
00:32:12
◼
►
or if their server was compromised, that your codes would be exposed. I suppose there's
00:32:17
◼
►
some kind of security advantage to Google authenticators only on one device thing, but
00:32:22
◼
►
it's just so inconvenient when that's the device you're looking to replace.
00:32:25
◼
►
— especially if you lose it, then you're done.
00:32:27
◼
►
Right. Especially if you lose it. Right. Anyway, next topic. Gotta get this out. I don't
00:32:35
◼
►
think I talked about it. I think this whole thing erupted in between the last show and
00:32:38
◼
►
this show. I've had a bit of a gap in the programming schedule. But this whole thing
00:32:44
◼
►
with Google's duplex demo on stage at I/O, which I raised some questions about.
00:32:50
◼
►
I hadn't even thought about it until you said it. I was just all hooked right in.
00:32:54
◼
►
I it took me a day the first day I watched and it was in my opinion
00:32:59
◼
►
I know that there for Android, you know, I owe is Google's version of WWDC and there's two types of news
00:33:06
◼
►
There's you know it to
00:33:08
◼
►
Use two very broad buckets. There's general-purpose news
00:33:12
◼
►
Of interest to anybody who uses the platform and then there's developer news
00:33:17
◼
►
And so the developer news for Android is a bit outside my wheelhouse
00:33:22
◼
►
Like I don't know how big a deal the new Android and Chrome OS features are app slices
00:33:28
◼
►
But in terms of stuff that broke through out of you know, developer news into mainstream news
00:33:34
◼
►
I don't think there's any question that this duplex demo was the one that got the most attention
00:33:39
◼
►
It for two reasons it seemed like just the fact that it
00:33:45
◼
►
Supposedly worked that you could say, you know, hey dingus
00:33:49
◼
►
Call whatever hair salon and try to get me an appointment Wednesday afternoon
00:33:54
◼
►
And that it would actually place a phone call and have this interaction and make a phone call according to the recordings
00:34:02
◼
►
They played that's interesting enough because that's that that's a serious
00:34:06
◼
►
Break, that would be a serious breakthrough in
00:34:09
◼
►
In this voice driven assistant stuff like nobody has anything that does that does that right now?
00:34:15
◼
►
That's that's a breakthrough and then the second factor
00:34:18
◼
►
is the vocal intonations where the assistant was doing these umms and you know these verbal tics
00:34:29
◼
►
that gave it a life rather uncanny lifelikeness like and you could hear gasps from the audience
00:34:38
◼
►
and I think that's why it was so engaging and I realized and and day one the the you know the
00:34:45
◼
►
takes were wow, Google has this amazing voice assistant that can make phone calls and it
00:34:49
◼
►
sounds human. And immediate 15 minutes later, followed up by wow, this thing is really creepy.
00:34:56
◼
►
You know, yes. Right. And I get that take the Hey, this is creepy. We shouldn't is,
00:35:04
◼
►
you know, some people were outright some people just reasonably just reasonably asking it.
00:35:09
◼
►
it ethical to create an AI that would trick the receptionist?
00:35:18
◼
►
It tries to masquerade as human.
00:35:19
◼
►
Right, but is that ethical? I don't know.
00:35:24
◼
►
It's such a nuanced argument because for a normal person using it, maybe it isn't. But if you have
00:35:32
◼
►
accessibility issues, like you don't speak the language, or you have a speech impediment, or
00:35:35
◼
►
you're mute? Is it ethical to force someone to disclose that they're using an assistant?
00:35:39
◼
►
Dave Asprey And what is the difference? What is the difference
00:35:42
◼
►
between using it as an accessibility thing? To me, those ethical questions are not clear
00:35:50
◼
►
cut. And we're running right up to questions that science fiction writers have been dealing
00:35:59
◼
►
with since the dawn of science fiction.
00:36:02
◼
►
I think that's what was off-putting about at least for me
00:36:04
◼
►
What was off-putting about the discussion is that Google was sort of treating it as cocky
00:36:08
◼
►
What look at we can do with technology and they didn't exhibit any humanness any respect any
00:36:12
◼
►
I didn't give us any idea that they understood the responsibility of what they were doing, right?
00:36:16
◼
►
It seems very clear to me that they hadn't really thought about that. Yeah, and and again
00:36:21
◼
►
even if the conclusion is
00:36:24
◼
►
That a service like this shouldn't masquerade as human
00:36:31
◼
►
without at least disclosing it up front, like this is a call from the Google, your Google assistant,
00:36:36
◼
►
you know, I'm working on behalf of a client or something, you know, whatever
00:36:39
◼
►
preface they would say to make clear that this is what's going on.
00:36:41
◼
►
In the aftermath of that ethical criticism, Google came out with the statement that, oh, yeah, yeah,
00:36:48
◼
►
we're going to have it, we're going to have it to disclose itself. But if they were thinking of that,
00:36:53
◼
►
why would they have added all of these ums and ahs that make it sound human?
00:36:57
◼
►
Right. And if you had any basic, like even basic PR, anyone who's doing a keynote, you go through
00:37:01
◼
►
objection handling, you go segment by segment, and you realize what the reaction will be to each
00:37:05
◼
►
segment as you try to get the best language possible. So either they were completely inept
00:37:10
◼
►
and didn't think about it, or they didn't care. Yeah, I don't know. But put all that aside,
00:37:16
◼
►
put the ethical questions aside. It is damn cool, if it works as they're recording shows, which I
00:37:24
◼
►
do believe as time goes on is a bigger and bigger if, but put it aside as to whether it should do
00:37:30
◼
►
that. And maybe it shouldn't, but if the fact that they could do it is amazing, it really is the
00:37:37
◼
►
stuff of science fiction. I mean, it is... Could be one of the most fundamental technologies of
00:37:42
◼
►
our time. Yeah, it's really a very cool thing if it works. Well, just to add further to it,
00:37:50
◼
►
to this whole issue, what happens if something goes wrong? Like, you're calling to make a
00:37:54
◼
►
hair appointment. I spoke about this with Steve Aquino on his show, and all of a sudden
00:37:58
◼
►
it books you a perm and a blonde dye job, and that's not what you want. And should
00:38:01
◼
►
it just—at that point, when it's failing, does it have to tell you it's not human?
00:38:04
◼
►
Dave: Right. Or, you know, I don't know. I just imagine there's so many ways that
00:38:08
◼
►
it could fail. But anyway, the next day—I don't know what made me go back to it, but
00:38:14
◼
►
I was like, you know, sometimes that's how I start the day is I just review, "Well,
00:38:18
◼
►
what the hell did I write about yesterday?" And I thought about it, and I watched that
00:38:22
◼
►
segment of the keynote again, and my spidey sense just went nuts. Like, as I studied it
00:38:30
◼
►
the second time and stopped, wasn't, you know, no longer was wowed by the humanness of the thing,
00:38:35
◼
►
I just actually listened to the details of the call. And I thought, and the fact that Sundar
00:38:42
◼
►
Pichai said, "This is a actual call to an actual hair salon," that, you know, he emphasized it
00:38:48
◼
►
multiple times that this is these are real calls. And they were just so many red flags to me,
00:38:54
◼
►
like the way that they didn't answer the phone with the name of the establishment.
00:38:58
◼
►
Like the fact that like, I, you know, I don't I haven't done a survey of 100 hair salons,
00:39:06
◼
►
but I, you know, there's places that you can just walk into without an appointment. And then there's
00:39:10
◼
►
places where you need an appointment. And when you book an appointment, they usually ask like,
00:39:15
◼
►
you know, if there's a particular stylist who you want, you know, like your reg, if you're a
00:39:19
◼
►
regular customer or something like that, you know, and I'm sure you could say, I'll just take whoever
00:39:25
◼
►
is available, you know, at one o'clock on Wednesday. But that that that just wasn't
00:39:30
◼
►
brought up in the call, you know, and just, and then I there was a CNET store, I forget who wrote
00:39:37
◼
►
it, but somebody at CNET got access to this a couple of days before IO, which is, you know,
00:39:43
◼
►
a very typical PR move for tech companies. Apple, to my knowledge, doesn't do it before
00:39:51
◼
►
keynotes because they're so super secretive about keynotes. But they'll have stuff ready
00:40:00
◼
►
They'll sometimes see a wired piece or some big magazine thing.
00:40:02
◼
►
But Matthew Panzareno recently got access to... What was it that he got access to?
00:40:11
◼
►
The Mac Pro.
00:40:14
◼
►
That's right.
00:40:15
◼
►
And Infinity War.
00:40:16
◼
►
The man is intolerable.
00:40:18
◼
►
The Mac Pro and the Mac Pro team and the Pro Tools team that has, you know, and you got
00:40:25
◼
►
this scoop on how they've hired actual professional music producers and film editors and have
00:40:34
◼
►
hired them as contractors to just work right across the hall from like the Final Cut Pro
00:40:38
◼
►
team and the logic team. When they run into a problem, to be able to just grab an engineer
00:40:46
◼
►
or one of the managers or somebody and say, "Here, here. This annoys me. I clicked this
00:40:51
◼
►
button. I clicked this menu." Every time, it takes eight seconds for the menu to finish
00:40:56
◼
►
filling in, and I clicked this menu 30 times a day. That was an actual example that they
00:41:03
◼
►
came up with. Then they figured out what the bottleneck is, and then all of a sudden, they
00:41:05
◼
►
it so the menu just opens instantly. Companies do this. They'll seed an exclusive to somebody.
00:41:13
◼
►
So this guy for CNET got an exclusive on Duplex a couple of days before I/O, but all he got to do
00:41:20
◼
►
was hear recordings. He didn't get to hear a live call happen. It just seems very strange to me.
00:41:27
◼
►
And I realized, I mean, it's like, I don't know if you saw the Twitter debate on this, but it was
00:41:35
◼
►
so bifurcated between people who are like, "Hmm, you're right. This is a little fishy.
00:41:42
◼
►
I wonder what's going on." And the people who are like, "You're nuts." The comparison that kept
00:41:48
◼
►
coming up was that I had gone full birther. Well, that's a reference to the…birthers are the people
00:41:55
◼
►
who think Barack Obama was not born in the United States. But the people who insisted that he had to
00:42:03
◼
►
show a birth certificate to prove that he wasn't born in Kenya or whatever.
00:42:09
◼
►
At the Apple events, if they showed you Face ID on stage, they have working examples backstage
00:42:14
◼
►
and people explain how they work and walk you through it and you see live. Even if you
00:42:17
◼
►
don't get to do it yourself all the time, you get to see it done yourself.
00:42:21
◼
►
Right. Again, I wasn't comparing it to Apple at all. It's just, I guess, because that's
00:42:27
◼
►
what I typically write about everybody makes it about Apple, especially the Googler type
00:42:33
◼
►
people who read my stuff. But they're like readers. Well, what
00:42:37
◼
►
you know, what about HomePod? HomePod? You know, where's the
00:42:40
◼
►
to HomePod support? Well, which is actually
00:42:42
◼
►
to see that at WWDC. They walked us in the back and they showed
00:42:45
◼
►
it. Right. We got to hear it at WWDC. And even when HomePod
00:42:50
◼
►
first shipped earlier this year, at the product briefings, you
00:42:55
◼
►
know, and you know, it famously Airplay two didn't ship until
00:42:58
◼
►
literally yesterday. Yeah, I think right. It's been a long
00:43:02
◼
►
week. It's been a long week. So yes, HomePod shipped and spent months on the market without
00:43:08
◼
►
any of the AirPlay 2's features, which include pairing two of them in stereo or pairing multiple
00:43:15
◼
►
ones throughout a home to play the same music simultaneously in multiple named rooms, you
00:43:21
◼
►
know, and being able to tell your dingus to move the song to the dining room or whatever.
00:43:27
◼
►
of those features shipped with HomePod because AirPlay 2 didn't ship. But at the briefing when
00:43:34
◼
►
HomePod shipped, and I think you did too, got to see ones running obviously beta software,
00:43:44
◼
►
but paired in stereo or in multiple rooms, and could see it in action and could tell Siri to
00:43:50
◼
►
play a certain song and it all worked. I mean, again, it wasn't shipping. Nobody said it was
00:43:56
◼
►
shipping. Everybody said this is coming. But there were, you
00:43:59
◼
►
know, everybody who was everybody in the media who got a
00:44:02
◼
►
briefing got to see that it actually live demo, right? Yeah.
00:44:06
◼
►
It's very strange not to play a recording and not have a demo.
00:44:11
◼
►
And and again, there are certain types of demos that don't scale.
00:44:14
◼
►
So self a perfect example is self driving car. There's no
00:44:18
◼
►
they can't bring a self driving car on stage at IO and have the
00:44:21
◼
►
car drive around the I mean, I guess I could have it move
00:44:25
◼
►
forward six inches or something, but you can't do a road test for an audience of 4,000 I/O
00:44:32
◼
►
attendees. That's why the trusted people in the media exist, that somebody who writes
00:44:40
◼
►
for whatever website and you know them, they have a body of work behind them and they say,
00:44:45
◼
►
"I got invited to Google's test track or whoever's test track and I got to see this
00:44:50
◼
►
car and it did this and it did that and I was in the back seat and this is what happened.
00:44:57
◼
►
That's why the media are there. You don't just take the company's word for it, but somebody
00:45:01
◼
►
gets a demo and gets to report on how it went. This duplex thing, nobody did it. And there's
00:45:06
◼
►
still to this day, as of May 30th, to my knowledge, there's still not one person in the media
00:45:13
◼
►
who has seen or heard a duplex call take place live, which really makes me think that something
00:45:20
◼
►
really, really screwed up. A number of mistakes were made in between "Let's put this in the
00:45:27
◼
►
I/O keynote and here's what Sundar is actually going to say." I think there were a number
00:45:32
◼
►
of mistakes. My guess is that it doesn't sound nearly as good as the recordings they played.
00:45:42
◼
►
Either longer pauses between segments, either more awkward inability to parse certain questions
00:45:50
◼
►
like, do you have a particular stylist in mind or something like that. And I wouldn't
00:45:54
◼
►
even be surprised if the human-like audio, you know, voice quality doesn't sound like
00:45:59
◼
►
the recordings. That this was sort of, these recordings were sort of idealized versions
00:46:05
◼
►
of what they're trying to build and somehow between making them and then Sundar getting
00:46:11
◼
►
up on stage, it turned into these are actual calls. And once they realized this and, you
00:46:17
◼
►
know about the only one raising questions there was a great story at
00:46:19
◼
►
axios with a bunch of just just perfect I love axios because they just they have
00:46:24
◼
►
this style of like just getting right to the point and if the whole point is only
00:46:29
◼
►
200 words it's a 200 word story and there's no padding but they just had a
00:46:33
◼
►
great list of questions of you know you know just more or less how do we know
00:46:37
◼
►
that this actually is is real because you guys said it's for Google is
00:46:40
◼
►
answering right which is the astounding part because usually yeah you you talk
00:46:45
◼
►
to the—and even if you don't get a statement on the record, you get enough background information
00:46:49
◼
►
to be able to convey, like, yes, it really is working, or no, or this. And it's astounding
00:46:53
◼
►
for two reasons, because first, like, there's this whole trust but verify thing, and Google
00:46:58
◼
►
has enormous credibility with assistants, but you can't go on stage and show a product
00:47:03
◼
►
that's not real. That's just—you lose so much credibility. But also, you can't
00:47:08
◼
►
not demo it at all for anybody. That product is not real unless you've shown it to somebody
00:47:13
◼
►
outside the company.
00:47:14
◼
►
- Right, and it's like I wrote in my last,
00:47:16
◼
►
hopefully last piece on this
00:47:17
◼
►
until something actually ships.
00:47:19
◼
►
As far as I'm concerned,
00:47:23
◼
►
unless it comes out maybe in the next week or so,
00:47:26
◼
►
I was right.
00:47:29
◼
►
It wasn't listenable as recorded in May.
00:47:34
◼
►
Like if it ended up that it's shipping
00:47:35
◼
►
in some limited means in August,
00:47:39
◼
►
that doesn't mean that I was wrong
00:47:40
◼
►
that it wasn't ready in May, right?
00:47:42
◼
►
Like it famously, and people aren't angry about it,
00:47:45
◼
►
but back in 2002, there was a New York Times story
00:47:48
◼
►
that claimed that Apple was working on a cell phone
00:47:53
◼
►
that ran Mac OS X.
00:47:55
◼
►
And I wrote, it was really one of the first articles
00:47:59
◼
►
at Daring Fireball 2002 was the year I started the site,
00:48:01
◼
►
and I called it iPhony.
00:48:04
◼
►
And I just tried to explain,
00:48:05
◼
►
this is, what they're describing is impossible.
00:48:10
◼
►
Then people stumble on that site that it's four years before the iPhone
00:48:15
◼
►
People stumble on that article and they're like, you know, usually in good in good cheer, but they're like, wow you really blew that one
00:48:22
◼
►
Because it's you know, what they're describing does sound a lot like the iPhone
00:48:26
◼
►
It's a cell phone that runs a modified version of OS 10
00:48:29
◼
►
But I wasn't wrong in 2002
00:48:32
◼
►
It literally was impossible to get Mac OS 10 back Mac OS 10 barely ran on piece on Macs in 2002
00:48:39
◼
►
right? It was barely running on Macs. That was pre-Lobot, pre-Purple, pre-everything.
00:48:47
◼
►
Right. And it was a technical miracle that it ran in 2006, or 2007, I guess,
00:48:56
◼
►
when it actually shipped. It was unbelievable feats of hardware and software engineering to
00:49:04
◼
►
to get it working the way it was in 2006.
00:49:06
◼
►
In 2002, ARM hardware and mobile GPUs
00:49:11
◼
►
and display technology, none of it was there.
00:49:14
◼
►
Like, just because it happened four years later
00:49:17
◼
►
doesn't mean that I wasn't right in 2002.
00:49:19
◼
►
And I feel like the same thing is gonna happen
00:49:20
◼
►
with this Google Assistant, where again,
00:49:22
◼
►
I don't dispute that among all companies
00:49:25
◼
►
or include university AI labs and stuff like that,
00:49:31
◼
►
that if anybody's close to getting a vocal assistant
00:49:35
◼
►
that can do this, I would bet on Google.
00:49:37
◼
►
There's no doubt in my mind.
00:49:38
◼
►
I think you'd be a fool not to make them the odds on favorite
00:49:41
◼
►
to get something like this working first.
00:49:43
◼
►
Like that's where it's so exasperating
00:49:47
◼
►
where it felt like, you know,
00:49:49
◼
►
there'd be people on Twitter telling me
00:49:51
◼
►
that I'm just bent out of shape
00:49:53
◼
►
because Siri is so far behind.
00:49:56
◼
►
I, you know, I don't understand
00:49:57
◼
►
how far ahead Google Assistant is.
00:49:59
◼
►
It's like, no, that has nothing to do with it.
00:50:00
◼
►
I just smell a fishy demo.
00:50:02
◼
►
- There was a whole feeling about that show.
00:50:04
◼
►
They mentioned the word AI so often
00:50:06
◼
►
that they thought we were afraid,
00:50:07
◼
►
like it felt like they were afraid
00:50:07
◼
►
we were gonna forget that AI existed.
00:50:09
◼
►
And the entire thing was so cocky
00:50:11
◼
►
and so full of hubris that they were just,
00:50:14
◼
►
it felt like we wanna show off our technology,
00:50:16
◼
►
we wanna show that we're the leaders.
00:50:18
◼
►
And that's not what these things should be about,
00:50:19
◼
►
at least in my opinion, they should be about,
00:50:21
◼
►
like again, like the responsibility
00:50:22
◼
►
that comes with these things.
00:50:23
◼
►
I think that's the gist of why
00:50:24
◼
►
we felt uncomfortable with it.
00:50:26
◼
►
- Well, and think about it this way too,
00:50:27
◼
►
in terms of how would they get there?
00:50:29
◼
►
You know if you're thinking like I am like that they probably made some kind of catastrophic not catastrophic but a terrible
00:50:34
◼
►
Mistake in terms of overselling where they were and like one way to think about it is just which tense
00:50:40
◼
►
Verb do you use you know like you know nobody was saying in February HomePod?
00:50:47
◼
►
Includes do present tense include the support for stereo pairing. Yeah
00:50:53
◼
►
Everybody wrote it in the future tense that Apple says it will ship an update later this year to enable
00:51:00
◼
►
dual speakers whereas the headlines for this duplex thing I have I cited a whole bunch of examples and I don't blame them I
00:51:08
◼
►
Kind of got hooked into that
00:51:10
◼
►
Present tense on day one where I just kind of trusted Google
00:51:13
◼
►
But they're all written in the present tense Google assistant can now make phone calls, you know to make appointments for you
00:51:19
◼
►
And that's I really think that's wrong. They didn't show that
00:51:23
◼
►
that and I think it makes a difference. Yeah, no, totally. I mean, AirPower still hasn't
00:51:28
◼
►
shipped but they were sitting there on the tables when we went backstage. Right, and
00:51:32
◼
►
you could pick up the phone and see that it stopped charging and put it back down and
00:51:36
◼
►
see that it started charging and pick up their sample watch that was on it and, you know,
00:51:41
◼
►
it was there for us to play with and, you know, again, it was obviously a prototype
00:51:47
◼
►
but they had prototypes that, you know, and again, I didn't have a stopwatch to see,
00:51:51
◼
►
know, how fast it charged. I don't know. But I mean, at least in terms of what you could
00:51:55
◼
►
do in five minutes hands on time, it was, it was there to play with. All right, enough
00:52:00
◼
►
on that. Let me let me take another break here and thank our good friends, such good
00:52:04
◼
►
friends, longtime sponsors of the show Squarespace. Look, Squarespace is your all in one place
00:52:11
◼
►
to make a website, right? You can register the domain you pick from a whole bunch of
00:52:15
◼
►
really beautiful templates. They're customizable out the wazoo. So you can do this if you're,
00:52:21
◼
►
let's say you're not a web developer, you don't really have those chops at all, but you are a
00:52:27
◼
►
designer. You know how to make logos, you know how to pick colors, you know how to pick fonts
00:52:30
◼
►
and stuff like that. And you know how to, you're a graphic designer. You can use Squarespace to make
00:52:37
◼
►
a branded website that fits with the design that you want. And again, they have templates to get
00:52:45
◼
►
get you started. But you're not locked into them where your site is going to end up looking
00:52:50
◼
►
exactly like one of these templates. You can customize it out the wazoo. There are so many
00:52:54
◼
►
websites that you encounter on a daily basis that are made with Squarespace and you'd never
00:52:59
◼
►
know it unless you look at the DoView source and start looking to see whether stuff is
00:53:03
◼
►
being served from the Squarespace domain. It's really amazing. A ton of my favorite
00:53:07
◼
►
even restaurant sites in particular notoriously used to be terrible. I mean, it was a joke,
00:53:13
◼
►
but it was actually true where you go to a restaurant website and they wouldn't even
00:53:17
◼
►
have the hours listed. It's nuts. When you go to a restaurant website and it's actually
00:53:22
◼
►
like a nice website, looks good, loads fast, has all the stuff you'd want, I swear at least
00:53:28
◼
►
two out of three times you view source, it's a Squarespace site. You're encountering Squarespace
00:53:32
◼
►
sites all the time. And the reason why is it's so much easier than doing it by hand
00:53:38
◼
►
and they take care of all the technical stuff,
00:53:41
◼
►
the actual hosting, making sure it's reliable,
00:53:44
◼
►
providing great analytics in a simple,
00:53:48
◼
►
it's just like everything else at Squarespace,
00:53:50
◼
►
the presentation of the analytics you get
00:53:51
◼
►
from a Squarespace site, where people are going,
00:53:55
◼
►
where they're getting to your site from,
00:53:56
◼
►
it's all beautiful, really logically designed reports.
00:54:00
◼
►
I can't recommend it enough.
00:54:02
◼
►
And it means that you don't have to worry
00:54:04
◼
►
about any of those details.
00:54:05
◼
►
So if you are running a restaurant
00:54:07
◼
►
or you're setting up something for, you know,
00:54:10
◼
►
your kid's Little League team or your church
00:54:13
◼
►
or something like that, you don't have to worry
00:54:16
◼
►
about the technical aspects.
00:54:17
◼
►
You don't waste time with stuff
00:54:19
◼
►
that you shouldn't be wasting time on.
00:54:21
◼
►
Really, really can't recommend enough
00:54:23
◼
►
that the next time you need to make a new website
00:54:25
◼
►
or somebody you know comes to you for help making a website,
00:54:28
◼
►
push them to Squarespace first and see how far you can go.
00:54:32
◼
►
You're probably gonna stay there.
00:54:34
◼
►
So make your next move, get your own unique domain
00:54:36
◼
►
and create a beautiful website at Squarespace.
00:54:39
◼
►
And you can start a free trial today
00:54:41
◼
►
at squarespace.com/talkshow.
00:54:44
◼
►
Squarespace.com/talkshow, you get a free trial.
00:54:47
◼
►
And when you do decide to sign up and start paying,
00:54:50
◼
►
use that same URL, squarespace.com/talkshow,
00:54:53
◼
►
and the offer code talk show.
00:54:55
◼
►
Once again, no the, just talk show.
00:54:56
◼
►
That'll get you 10% off your first purchase.
00:54:59
◼
►
You could prepay for a whole year, save 10%.
00:55:02
◼
►
It's like getting a couple of months free.
00:55:04
◼
►
So my thanks to Squarespace for their continuing support.
00:55:06
◼
►
of the talk show.
00:55:08
◼
►
Do you see this thing where there was Motherboard got some court documents on the iPhone 6 bendgate
00:55:16
◼
►
and the story, the headline they use, "Internal documents show Apple knew the iPhone 6 would bend."
00:55:22
◼
►
Which, I mean, I didn't, I wasn't a huge fan of how the story got covered. Like, my understanding is
00:55:28
◼
►
Apple has this materials department and they understand materials. So, for example, when they move from
00:55:33
◼
►
moved from the aluminum iPhone to the plastic iPhone 2G,
00:55:37
◼
►
they knew that plastic was more likely to crack,
00:55:39
◼
►
but it had some benefits over aluminum for them.
00:55:41
◼
►
Then when they moved to glass,
00:55:42
◼
►
they knew that glass was more likely to break,
00:55:44
◼
►
but there were benefits to moving to glass anyway.
00:55:47
◼
►
Same thing when they moved from the iPhone 5 design,
00:55:51
◼
►
which had the, I forget if it was aluminum
00:55:52
◼
►
or stainless steel band on it, and the aluminum back,
00:55:55
◼
►
they knew that the larger surface and the lack of the frame
00:55:59
◼
►
was gonna allow it to bend more because physics.
00:56:01
◼
►
They knew these things, but they were trade-offs
00:56:04
◼
►
that they thought were important to make.
00:56:05
◼
►
And over the course of the iPhone 6 lifespan,
00:56:09
◼
►
when they had millions of people using it,
00:56:11
◼
►
they found out exactly where those issues were.
00:56:13
◼
►
And just like they made every product,
00:56:14
◼
►
like the iPhone 8 glass is way better
00:56:16
◼
►
than the iPhone 4S glass,
00:56:18
◼
►
the iPhone 6S aluminum frame is way better than the 6.
00:56:22
◼
►
So it's like they knew
00:56:22
◼
►
because they understand material sciences,
00:56:24
◼
►
but this made it sound very conspiratorial.
00:56:27
◼
►
- Right, it makes it sound conspiratorial.
00:56:29
◼
►
And the problem starts right in the headline,
00:56:30
◼
►
where it says Apple knew the iPhone 6 would bend.
00:56:33
◼
►
Well, everything can bend.
00:56:36
◼
►
- Well, like ceramics shatters, right?
00:56:38
◼
►
Every material has a problem.
00:56:40
◼
►
- The problem is that you need to say relative to what?
00:56:43
◼
►
And the article does then go on to say
00:56:45
◼
►
that it bends more easily than the iPhone 5S,
00:56:48
◼
►
which is the model it was replacing
00:56:50
◼
►
at the top of the product line.
00:56:51
◼
►
Well, duh, of course it bends more easily than the 5S.
00:56:55
◼
►
I mean, we know that, right?
00:56:56
◼
►
We know that from all the videos.
00:56:57
◼
►
Like you can, a strong person can take an iPhone 6,
00:57:01
◼
►
or at least the ones that shipped originally,
00:57:03
◼
►
and if they really try hard,
00:57:04
◼
►
they could bend it with their own hands.
00:57:07
◼
►
And an iPhone 5S doesn't bend like that.
00:57:09
◼
►
Of course it bends more easily than a 5S.
00:57:11
◼
►
It's bigger, it has a bigger surface area.
00:57:13
◼
►
- And it's metal.
00:57:15
◼
►
- The comparison isn't does it bend more easily
00:57:18
◼
►
than the 5S, it's, the comparison is does it bend too easily
00:57:22
◼
►
to have shipped as the design?
00:57:24
◼
►
That's the question.
00:57:25
◼
►
and it's not answered at all in these documents.
00:57:28
◼
►
And I would say that the fact that the iPhone 6
00:57:31
◼
►
remained in the product line until last year
00:57:34
◼
►
would suggest that it was fine.
00:57:36
◼
►
It was obviously a con to the new design,
00:57:41
◼
►
but not catastrophic.
00:57:44
◼
►
- Yeah, and again, the iPhone 3G cracked.
00:57:49
◼
►
The plastic would crack along the buttons.
00:57:51
◼
►
The iPhone 4 had the antenna issues,
00:57:53
◼
►
and Apple kept that in the lineup after the 4S.
00:57:55
◼
►
All of design is compromised, material science is compromised, and this is a normal process
00:57:59
◼
►
of development for a product.
00:58:02
◼
►
There is, now there is the case that they did somewhat, at some point in the iPhone
00:58:08
◼
►
6's product lifespan, they did alter it with some kind of reinforcement at the bend point.
00:58:16
◼
►
But I believe, I think that anybody who had problems up until that point, if it was still
00:58:21
◼
►
under warranty could get it replaced, I believe, right? I think it was covered.
00:58:28
◼
►
I believe so. I mean—
00:58:30
◼
►
And if not, then that's—
00:58:32
◼
►
I guess that's a problem, but I believe it was covered.
00:58:35
◼
►
Yeah, Apple is usually pretty good. And this is the same thing with the keyboard issue.
00:58:39
◼
►
They have internal metrics, and when something becomes an issue, it's an automatic alert,
00:58:43
◼
►
and then people have to make a decision about it. But it has to reach that level. Apple
00:58:46
◼
►
is just too big a company. Sad to say this, but like 1% of Apple users is a huge amount
00:58:50
◼
►
of people, but if an issue fluctuates one to two to three percent within a product lifestyle,
00:58:55
◼
►
that's not exploding phones. There's always some battery failure in every phone. It's
00:58:59
◼
►
when it's catastrophic that it becomes a problem.
00:59:02
◼
►
Dave Asprey The iPhone 4 and Tennegate is my favorite
00:59:05
◼
►
example of that because it's like the tech press became—it was like blood in the water,
00:59:12
◼
►
a bunch of sharks attacking it. I mean, the extraordinary—truly extraordinary in hindsight
00:59:19
◼
►
that Apple held the special press event
00:59:20
◼
►
just to address Antennagate.
00:59:23
◼
►
- I mean, they had to because Antennagate was reproducible.
00:59:26
◼
►
You could take any iPhone 4 and reproduce attenuation.
00:59:30
◼
►
It didn't affect everybody
00:59:32
◼
►
because it would only lower the signal by a certain amount.
00:59:34
◼
►
And if you had a good signal, you didn't even notice it.
00:59:36
◼
►
But if you were barely online,
00:59:39
◼
►
you could use it as a play/pause button.
00:59:40
◼
►
- Right, to me, it's a casebook example
00:59:43
◼
►
of how to handle a PR crisis, right?
00:59:45
◼
►
It's take your time, get your ducks in a row,
00:59:47
◼
►
but then get out in front of it, as far out in front of it as you can.
00:59:51
◼
►
But the thing in hindsight that to me proves that it wasn't really a catastrophic or scandalous
00:59:56
◼
►
problem is that the iPhone 4 was the top of the line iPhone for a longer stretch of time
01:00:04
◼
►
without any alteration to the antenna design than any other phone because it was the last
01:00:10
◼
►
one that shipped in late June and then the iPhone 4S was the first one that shipped in
01:00:17
◼
►
the fall and I think even that one that was late and shipped in October yes so
01:00:24
◼
►
it was the top-selling iPhone for like 16 or 17 months on the market for years
01:00:29
◼
►
especially and then stayed on the market for years afterwards as a lower priced
01:00:34
◼
►
option in the line with a completely undesired unchanged antenna design now
01:00:41
◼
►
yes they did change that style of antenna design starting with the Verizon
01:00:47
◼
►
iPhone 4 that came out, you know, like six months off cycle, and then they used that
01:00:52
◼
►
Verizon-style antenna with the 4S, and that was better. And it's, you know, to me very
01:00:58
◼
►
much analogous to the way that the iPhone 6S used a higher grade aluminum than the iPhone
01:01:05
◼
►
6. That's just progress, you know? Yeah. But was it bad enough that it never should
01:01:09
◼
►
have shipped in the first place? No.
01:01:11
◼
►
Yeah, but at the same token if if a hundred percent if you could show keyboard failure to 100% level like you could go to
01:01:17
◼
►
An Apple store and make any Apple keyboard fail or you could go to an Apple store and make every iPhone 6 Bend
01:01:23
◼
►
You'd have to treat it similarly
01:01:24
◼
►
But these things have so so few instances compared to something like the like the antenna issue
01:01:30
◼
►
That you just can't hold them in the same sphere
01:01:34
◼
►
All right, let's move on Apple accepts then rejects valves steam link app boy
01:01:42
◼
►
This is a weird story. Yes, cuz it's not like
01:01:46
◼
►
you know like it, you know me and you decide to make an app and we're indie developers and we have a
01:01:53
◼
►
rejection problem over questionable grounds
01:01:56
◼
►
You know, which is bad enough and as often, you know something that we'll write about or talk about or whatever
01:02:02
◼
►
But this is Steam.
01:02:03
◼
►
This is not-- or Valve.
01:02:04
◼
►
You know, this is not like a little indie developer.
01:02:07
◼
►
This is a huge game developer.
01:02:12
◼
►
Probably one of the most important game developers
01:02:15
◼
►
in the world.
01:02:16
◼
►
And they don't interact with Apple the way
01:02:18
◼
►
that indie developers interact with Apple
01:02:21
◼
►
through the black hole of the iTunes submission thing.
01:02:25
◼
►
And both sides are pros.
01:02:31
◼
►
Valve is so far, at least publicly, is taking this with a stiff upper lip.
01:02:34
◼
►
They didn't make it public. They did bring the negotiations public.
01:02:40
◼
►
Well, they had to though. They had to because the part that's so weird is it seems clear. I don't,
01:02:48
◼
►
this isn't fair, but it seems clear that they had been in contact with Apple in advance while
01:02:53
◼
►
they were working on bringing Steam Link. And just, I'm not an expert on these things, but
01:02:58
◼
►
Basically, my understanding is that Steam Link is like VNC for gaming.
01:03:03
◼
►
So if you have a Mac or PC in your house with Steam installed, and Steam is like a Netflix
01:03:08
◼
►
for video games type thing, except you can buy, but you can go there, you can publish,
01:03:14
◼
►
it's like their own little app store for games, for PC games.
01:03:18
◼
►
Very well respected company, people love it.
01:03:19
◼
►
There's all sorts of cool indie games that are on Steam.
01:03:24
◼
►
It's a great service.
01:03:25
◼
►
Steam Link is a way you have your Mac or PC somewhere on your land, in your house, with
01:03:31
◼
►
Steam installed. You put Steam Link on your iPhone and now you can play these games. And
01:03:36
◼
►
I guess where it would really be cool would be on Apple TV where you could use a controller.
01:03:41
◼
►
But then you can play these games and it just streams over your Wi-Fi. And you can't do
01:03:48
◼
►
it outside your house. You can't like go to three blocks away and then get on cellular
01:03:54
◼
►
and do it from anywhere. It's not streaming from Valve's servers. It's only a way to connect
01:04:01
◼
►
to the thing that's already in your house when you're in your house. It seems pretty
01:04:05
◼
►
clear that somebody, some connections at some levels, Valve and Apple were in communication
01:04:11
◼
►
on this in advance. Then they finished and submitted it and it was accepted. And that's
01:04:17
◼
►
when Valve announced it. And then the next day, it's it, you know, see, again, we don't
01:04:23
◼
►
know this but it seems pretty clear that some other you know it was like the left
01:04:26
◼
►
hand at Apple was like yeah yeah this is great can't wait to have it we'll
01:04:29
◼
►
promote it we've got a you know we've probably had like an App Store promotion
01:04:32
◼
►
ready to go and then the right hand was like what is this and then it got
01:04:38
◼
►
cancelled and I kind of feel like apples in the wrong on this one I get it and
01:04:43
◼
►
again this isn't about whether they should be protecting the App Store's 30%
01:04:49
◼
►
you know, revenue share for any kind of in-app purchase in general. Let's just say for the
01:04:54
◼
►
sake of argument that we all agree that that's fine, and it's a good business practice, and
01:04:59
◼
►
you know, Apple is well warranted to protect it. I don't think this is that. I don't think
01:05:04
◼
►
this is an end around the app store's 30/70 split.
01:05:08
◼
►
Yeah, it's super interesting to me. Famously, when in-app purchases first came out, you
01:05:14
◼
►
couldn't do it with free apps because Apple didn't want an end run around the app store.
01:05:18
◼
►
They thought maybe paranoid or maybe not
01:05:21
◼
►
that the minute you could make transactions
01:05:25
◼
►
outside the app store, everyone would make a free app.
01:05:27
◼
►
They would have their own commerce running on their backend.
01:05:30
◼
►
And Apple would essentially be maintaining
01:05:31
◼
►
the world's largest free app store for no money.
01:05:33
◼
►
And Apple doesn't operate things at a loss.
01:05:35
◼
►
So then when they did make it free,
01:05:37
◼
►
apps could use in-app purchases.
01:05:38
◼
►
They said you can't run your own store
01:05:40
◼
►
because again, they knew that everyone would just make
01:05:41
◼
►
a placeholder app and do all their commerce.
01:05:44
◼
►
This has some slight flavor to that
01:05:47
◼
►
because you can go and buy all your games on Steam
01:05:49
◼
►
and then play them on iPhone.
01:05:50
◼
►
And games is by far the biggest revenue generator
01:05:53
◼
►
for the App Store.
01:05:55
◼
►
But I think with Apple, it's not always about money.
01:05:57
◼
►
It's about control of the platform.
01:05:59
◼
►
And the only thing I can see with this
01:06:01
◼
►
is that they don't wanna cede control of iPhone gaming
01:06:05
◼
►
And in a paranoid world, this might be that.
01:06:07
◼
►
- Games might be number one overall,
01:06:09
◼
►
but I did look, I was curious the other day,
01:06:12
◼
►
and I looked at the top grossing,
01:06:13
◼
►
which you can't get to on the iPhone anymore
01:06:16
◼
►
far as I can tell. They have top paid apps and top free apps on the iPhone App Store,
01:06:21
◼
►
but they don't list top grossing anymore. But they still do have it on the website and
01:06:27
◼
►
I guess in iTunes. And I thought it was pretty interesting in the top five. And this is related
01:06:32
◼
►
to something Ben Thompson and I were talking about, which is that these pay-to-play games
01:06:36
◼
►
like Candy Crush are kind of an ethically questionable territory.
01:06:40
◼
►
- Yeah, the casino game.
01:06:41
◼
►
- Yeah, it's like a casino game.
01:06:43
◼
►
And it's kinda off-brand for Apple
01:06:46
◼
►
to be involved in that to any degree.
01:06:49
◼
►
And my analogy to that would be like,
01:06:52
◼
►
you go on a cruise ship,
01:06:54
◼
►
and they usually have a,
01:06:56
◼
►
almost always have a casino somewhere on board the ship,
01:06:59
◼
►
because once you're in international waters,
01:07:01
◼
►
there's no laws, and I don't know if you've ever heard this,
01:07:04
◼
►
but casinos can be rather profitable for the casino owner.
01:07:08
◼
►
The Disney Cruise Line does not have casinos.
01:07:12
◼
►
Not because it's not profitable, but because I believe that they've concluded, probably
01:07:18
◼
►
correctly, that it's too off-brand for them, for the Disney brand.
01:07:27
◼
►
But anyway, I looked at the top grossing apps, and number one was Netflix.
01:07:32
◼
►
Hulu was like five, and Pandora was three.
01:07:36
◼
►
So three of the top five.
01:07:38
◼
►
Again, I don't know how that goes with the long tail.
01:07:41
◼
►
I bet the long tail has a lot more games than streaming services.
01:07:48
◼
►
There just aren't that many streaming services like Netflix and Pandora and Hulu.
01:07:53
◼
►
But I thought that was a pretty good sign in terms of there's a source of revenue where
01:07:57
◼
►
there's no moral qualms about it.
01:08:00
◼
►
When you pay 10 bucks or 12 bucks a month for Netflix and you get Netflix, that's a
01:08:06
◼
►
You knew exactly what you're getting into.
01:08:08
◼
►
You're not getting badgered.
01:08:10
◼
►
Give us another dollar and we'll take out the commercial.
01:08:15
◼
►
You're getting what you paid for.
01:08:17
◼
►
So anyway, I'm not quite sure.
01:08:18
◼
►
- They figured out early on in the app store,
01:08:22
◼
►
they, I mean, game developers,
01:08:23
◼
►
that people would not pay $10 for a game.
01:08:25
◼
►
They wouldn't even pay $5 for a game,
01:08:27
◼
►
but they would pay $50 to $100
01:08:29
◼
►
to have a better farm than their friends.
01:08:30
◼
►
They'd lord it over them,
01:08:31
◼
►
or to get their car back on the track faster
01:08:34
◼
►
'cause they were bored.
01:08:35
◼
►
We will pay for ego gratification and instant gratification,
01:08:38
◼
►
and that's the best way to separate a human being
01:08:40
◼
►
from their money.
01:08:41
◼
►
And everyone has gone all in on this,
01:08:43
◼
►
and it's led to the detriment of the gaming industry.
01:08:46
◼
►
But to your point, yeah, Disney does not have casinos.
01:08:48
◼
►
Usually profitable does not have them.
01:08:50
◼
►
And there's an argument to be made
01:08:51
◼
►
that Apple could run an app store that's very different
01:08:54
◼
►
than this just by policy decisions alone.
01:08:56
◼
►
But to the previous thing,
01:08:58
◼
►
this whole thing with Valve is so bizarre
01:09:00
◼
►
because you have Phil Schiller commenting on it now
01:09:02
◼
►
saying that they're discussing it with Valve,
01:09:04
◼
►
and they're working on problems in the app store.
01:09:06
◼
►
And I like to give Apple, not the benefit of the doubt,
01:09:09
◼
►
but I like to assume that I don't know everything.
01:09:10
◼
►
Like famously, everyone got super upset
01:09:13
◼
►
when Apple banned a popular app from the app store.
01:09:15
◼
►
And it turned out that that developer
01:09:16
◼
►
had a ton of shady stuff going on as well.
01:09:19
◼
►
And we just all thought Apple was guilty immediately
01:09:22
◼
►
until all of that came out.
01:09:23
◼
►
So you never know if there's like a privacy concern
01:09:25
◼
►
or a security risk or something like the VPN connection
01:09:28
◼
►
isn't secure and they wanna work on it.
01:09:30
◼
►
I just don't know here,
01:09:31
◼
►
but I'd like to find out what's happening.
01:09:32
◼
►
- The Schiller thing came in an email to a Joe Random customer
01:09:37
◼
►
who just wrote to Schiller knowing that he's the direct,
01:09:42
◼
►
the app store, the buck stops with him,
01:09:44
◼
►
with the app store.
01:09:45
◼
►
And when people like Phil Schiller
01:09:48
◼
►
write back to somebody like that,
01:09:49
◼
►
they know there's a chance that the guy's gonna turn around.
01:09:51
◼
►
And he actually sent it to me too.
01:09:53
◼
►
I didn't realize till yesterday
01:09:54
◼
►
'cause I was catching up on email.
01:09:56
◼
►
But he sent it to me, he sent it to MacRumors.
01:09:58
◼
►
I don't, you know, I wouldn't do that personally,
01:10:01
◼
►
But it's clear from the way Schiller wrote the email,
01:10:03
◼
►
he knew that I could leak.
01:10:05
◼
►
And it was written very carefully.
01:10:07
◼
►
There's nothing embarrassing.
01:10:08
◼
►
I thought it was interesting that he listed
01:10:10
◼
►
user-generated content as a problem.
01:10:12
◼
►
And I don't know enough about Steam.
01:10:13
◼
►
I don't know if they've got games
01:10:14
◼
►
where you get to dress up as a Nazi or--
01:10:18
◼
►
- Or adult content or something.
01:10:19
◼
►
- Yeah, or something like that.
01:10:20
◼
►
But that user-generated content,
01:10:23
◼
►
it sounds like it might be a little bit more than just,
01:10:26
◼
►
"Hey, we think it's an end around the 70/30 split."
01:10:29
◼
►
So there have been issues with apps that include discussion groups previously.
01:10:33
◼
►
Like it's interesting because Apple has Safari and you can get anything in the world on Safari.
01:10:38
◼
►
But when it comes to the app store, even embedding web views for a while was controversial.
01:10:41
◼
►
They wanted you to put that 18 and over sticker on it and then it was discussion groups.
01:10:45
◼
►
What was the content of the discussion groups?
01:10:47
◼
►
So it seems like that's something they still wrestle with.
01:10:49
◼
►
All right, let me take a third and final break here and thank our third sponsor.
01:10:54
◼
►
This is really a trifecta of great sponsors on this episode.
01:10:57
◼
►
This one is for Eero.
01:10:59
◼
►
Now Eero is a Wi-Fi system for consumers that lets you build out what's called a mesh network.
01:11:09
◼
►
That basically, you've probably heard about this, but you get a couple of pieces of hardware.
01:11:14
◼
►
They're all about little puck size things about the size of an Apple TV, the main ones.
01:11:18
◼
►
You put a couple of them throughout your house and their website will make it clear.
01:11:22
◼
►
You give it the square footage or how many floors you have or something like that.
01:11:26
◼
►
they'll help you decide how many you might need.
01:11:28
◼
►
You set up, one of them is the main one
01:11:31
◼
►
that connects to like your cable modem
01:11:33
◼
►
or your files connection or whatever,
01:11:34
◼
►
but it's the same, it doesn't matter which one you pick,
01:11:37
◼
►
it's the same hardware.
01:11:38
◼
►
And then the other ones in the house,
01:11:40
◼
►
they just talk to each other and they create one network.
01:11:44
◼
►
So it's not like you've got like three,
01:11:46
◼
►
if you've got three of them that you have three networks
01:11:48
◼
►
and your phone has to be ready to switch
01:11:50
◼
►
from one network to another.
01:11:51
◼
►
The way these mesh networks work is three devices
01:11:55
◼
►
work together to create the illusion of one network
01:11:58
◼
►
that your devices use and it could just fill your house
01:12:01
◼
►
with really solid wifi.
01:12:02
◼
►
There is no way in my current house
01:12:04
◼
►
that one base station could ever,
01:12:07
◼
►
it's a row home in Philly and it just goes up
01:12:11
◼
►
and it just, signals don't go through floors very well.
01:12:14
◼
►
There's just no way that one base station would work.
01:12:19
◼
►
It just wouldn't.
01:12:20
◼
►
So we've switched to Eero a while ago.
01:12:22
◼
►
Apple's out of the base station game now.
01:12:25
◼
►
I really can't think of a better one
01:12:29
◼
►
than Eero to recommend.
01:12:30
◼
►
I know they're the sponsor,
01:12:31
◼
►
I'm getting paid to tell you this,
01:12:32
◼
►
but I'm telling you, even if they weren't,
01:12:34
◼
►
it's what I would tell you to look at first.
01:12:36
◼
►
You set it up with a really nice iPhone app.
01:12:39
◼
►
They have an Eero iPhone app,
01:12:40
◼
►
you manage the network with it,
01:12:42
◼
►
but you don't feel like you're a junior network engineer.
01:12:46
◼
►
It really is a setup process
01:12:48
◼
►
that an Apple user would appreciate.
01:12:51
◼
►
You're not typing in weird 192.168 IP addresses to log into a skanky web server running on
01:13:00
◼
►
the thing. It's a really nice app. You can name the devices, tell them which room they're
01:13:04
◼
►
in, all very graphical. You could even run like a speed test to see what type of performance
01:13:10
◼
►
you're getting right within the app. And the second generation products that Eero has include
01:13:18
◼
►
something called the Eero Beacon. It's half the size of the regular Eero base station,
01:13:23
◼
►
which is already pretty small, but it's even more. It's half the size and you can simply
01:13:27
◼
►
plug it into a wall outlet to expand coverage into any room. So if you just need a little
01:13:32
◼
►
oomph just to get to like the fourth floor of your house or something like that, you
01:13:35
◼
►
can just add as many of these beacons as you want. If there's an outlet, there's Wi-Fi.
01:13:40
◼
►
And since the beacon doesn't have an Ethernet port, you do need at least one regular Eero
01:13:47
◼
►
to connect at the modem. But other than that, you could just use these beacons. And they're
01:13:52
◼
►
even included, you think it sounds like a nightlight, you just put it in a socket. Well,
01:13:55
◼
►
guess what? They have an LED nightlight in the device, so you could use it as a nightlight.
01:13:59
◼
►
And of course, if you don't want to, you can turn it off very easily right in the app.
01:14:05
◼
►
They even have an ambient light sensor though, so that if you want to use it, it'll just
01:14:09
◼
►
intelligently adjust the brightness automatically depending on the time of day and how much
01:14:13
◼
►
light there actually is in the room where you have it. Just a great idea, really a great
01:14:17
◼
►
way to go. The second generation is such a great upgrade in terms of just being easy
01:14:22
◼
►
and small and convenient. I really love this product, I love the company. Very happy customer,
01:14:30
◼
►
me. They even have incredible customer support so if you do need help, and you probably won't,
01:14:36
◼
►
but you can get a hold of a WiFi expert in 30 seconds or less most times of the day.
01:14:42
◼
►
I have one running right now. I'm talking to Renee over in euro Wi-Fi network.
01:14:46
◼
►
Really recommend it. So here's the deal. Their code is the talk show. They have the the.
01:14:53
◼
►
So what you do is go to euro.com. Remember that code, the talk show,
01:14:58
◼
►
and you can get free overnight shipping to the US or Canada. Hello, Renee. Just visit
01:15:05
◼
►
euro.com and at checkout, select overnight shipping and enter that promo code, the talk show,
01:15:10
◼
►
and you'll get the shipping for free. So overnight you'll have it tomorrow listening to you. Whatever
01:15:15
◼
►
day of the week you're listening to me right now, you could have an Eero network in your house
01:15:18
◼
►
tomorrow with free shipping. So my thanks to Eero. Mine actually just arrived yesterday. I haven't
01:15:24
◼
►
set it up yet, but the box came yesterday. Isn't it nice? It's nice packaging too. Yeah,
01:15:29
◼
►
it's beautiful. Looking forward to it. Really, it's great stuff. I was just looking at it the
01:15:34
◼
►
other day in my bedroom and I was like, you know how you know this is nice is that my wife doesn't
01:15:38
◼
►
complain that we have a Wi-Fi base station in our bedroom. Well, we were just talking about it after
01:15:44
◼
►
Apple discontinued the airport line. Like, which company do you trust? Because this is your data.
01:15:48
◼
►
It's your data on the front line of the internet. And there's a lot of companies whose business is
01:15:52
◼
►
predicated on the collection and use of your data, to put it delicately. And Apple was a company that
01:16:00
◼
►
you could trust. They didn't care what data you had. And it was hard finding another company like
01:16:03
◼
►
that but Euro is so former Apple engineer and Apple's mindset centric that it was an easy choice.
01:16:10
◼
►
Yeah. Anyway, before we move on to WWDC rumors, of which there's not a lot to talk about really,
01:16:20
◼
►
which is kind of exciting, iOS 11.4 and AirPlay 2 shipped yesterday. And finally, I think this is
01:16:28
◼
►
truly an unironic finally. But in my practice so far, we have two home pods in the house.
01:16:36
◼
►
I moved the one from the bedroom down into the kitchen, so we have two in the kitchen
01:16:40
◼
►
to play with the stereo. Everything works exactly as it says on the tin. It was just
01:16:46
◼
►
as easy to set up a stereo pair as Apple had promised, even with one that had already been
01:16:52
◼
►
configured in another room. Once I got the software update on the home pod, it immediately
01:16:57
◼
►
prompted me, "Hey, I see you're in the same room as the other HomePod. Do you want to
01:17:01
◼
►
set them up as a stereo pair?" And I was like, "Yes." And then I immediately said, "Play
01:17:05
◼
►
whatever," and whatever immediately started playing in stereo on the two devices. I cannot
01:17:12
◼
►
imagine how it could be easier to set them up. I really can't because if it was any more
01:17:17
◼
►
automatic it might do it when you didn't want it to.
01:17:20
◼
►
And you can go in and tweak it. Like you can go in and switch the left and right and make
01:17:23
◼
►
them say tones to test and you can do all that. But the automatic setup is amazing.
01:17:27
◼
►
Yeah, the automatic setup is amazing. You know, it's a shame it took as long as it did,
01:17:32
◼
►
but apparently they wanted to get it right. And I have to say, day one, it works seamlessly.
01:17:37
◼
►
I mean, it's exactly as promised.
01:17:40
◼
►
The interesting thing is they made a conscious decision to have Siri only respond from one
01:17:44
◼
►
of them. So by default, the left channel will be the one that has Siri. You can change it.
01:17:48
◼
►
Like when you ask Siri something, the docs, I think, say you hold down on it and it will
01:17:52
◼
►
I couldn't get that to work, but if I went to the right
01:17:54
◼
►
HomePod and I said turn on Siri it would switch Siri to there and stay there so you can move it back and forth
01:18:01
◼
►
But that was an interesting choice. I the way I it is interesting that they don't both talk at once I can see why
01:18:07
◼
►
And it seems like it's a little smarter than that. It seems like in in in
01:18:12
◼
►
Like when I was up in New York yesterday for a demo of this
01:18:16
◼
►
And they had it set up like on two ends of a yeah of a table against a wall
01:18:21
◼
►
Which I think is a very typical distance for stereo speakers in my kitchen. I set them up on different sides of the room and
01:18:28
◼
►
It seems to me whichever one I'm facing is the one that answers me which makes sense
01:18:34
◼
►
Like because I'm not I can't face both of them at the same time
01:18:38
◼
►
So if I turn around and look at the one that doesn't seem to answer by default when I'm in a neutral physical position
01:18:45
◼
►
It that's the one that answers me though because my voice is coming right at it
01:18:48
◼
►
- That's interesting.
01:18:49
◼
►
So when I pair it, as far as I know,
01:18:51
◼
►
once you pair them, it just picks one,
01:18:53
◼
►
but it does use the microphone system
01:18:55
◼
►
from both of them all the time to make sure it hears you.
01:18:57
◼
►
- Yeah, well, try putting them on opposite sides of a room,
01:18:59
◼
►
and I suspect you'll see that.
01:19:01
◼
►
I think it's just that if your voice is coming
01:19:03
◼
►
at both of them more or less
01:19:05
◼
►
like from an equilateral triangle position,
01:19:08
◼
►
there is a default one that always seems to answer.
01:19:12
◼
►
I like, some of it is just so cool.
01:19:13
◼
►
Like you can do with Apple TV, you can do it with iPhone,
01:19:15
◼
►
but then you put them in other rooms
01:19:17
◼
►
And you can just say play whatever song in the bedroom or play this song in the living room
01:19:21
◼
►
And it just I mean like people who are not Apple people who've been doing this with the Amazon or Google forever
01:19:27
◼
►
They're laughing
01:19:27
◼
►
But there's something about having it so deeply embedded in the Apple ecosystem and the way that Apple handles interface that makes it just as a very
01:19:34
◼
►
fluid experience yeah, I don't want I wouldn't have a lot of time so I'm not gonna go on with it more but
01:19:43
◼
►
WWDC rumors or lack thereof is my heading in the show notes. They double down
01:19:48
◼
►
so who knows you know that stuff is the closer we get the more likely stuff is to leak because it's just the nature of
01:19:55
◼
►
The game that they you know
01:19:57
◼
►
rehearsals and who know and marketing material
01:20:01
◼
►
Start getting finalized and more people are exposed to it
01:20:05
◼
►
And you know, it's no coincidence that like in the 48 hours before a keynote. There's often last-minute leaks
01:20:11
◼
►
Which is I think attributable simply to the fact that people who are less invested in it
01:20:16
◼
►
I've suddenly have access to it and you know are willing to spoil the surprise, but we'll see you know Apple famously is as
01:20:24
◼
►
you know issued that report earlier this year about leaking and how many leakers they've caught and
01:20:34
◼
►
So we'll see I don't know
01:20:37
◼
►
I'm really hopeful though that not much more will leak because I think this is more exciting
01:20:42
◼
►
I think it's way more exciting to like kind of not even to know what's coming
01:20:47
◼
►
I mean do I don't there's I don't know if you know anything
01:20:50
◼
►
There's two sorts of leaks like there are leaks when something is doing something wrong and you it needs to get out like people who?
01:20:56
◼
►
Are whistleblowers and stuff like that, but this is always more like spoilers, right?
01:21:00
◼
►
Do I want to read the plot to the next Marvel movie or the next?
01:21:02
◼
►
Star Wars movie and then go see it and think the whole thing is boring. So already know it. No, I really don't
01:21:07
◼
►
I have to monitor these things because it's my job, but if I didn't have to do this
01:21:11
◼
►
I wouldn't want to know anything about the show
01:21:12
◼
►
I'd want to go in there and really enjoy the hell out of it
01:21:15
◼
►
So I'm kind of happy when stuff doesn't leak because it makes the show more exciting for me
01:21:19
◼
►
I wrote something this week or that Koi Vinh friend of the show had a really nice article about the custom illustration work that
01:21:27
◼
►
They're doing in the App Store and that he you know had when I first this is with the iOS 11 App Store that debuted
01:21:36
◼
►
Effectively, they're running it as a periodical.
01:21:40
◼
►
I don't think I know anybody in particular who's on that team, but I know that they've hired people from actual magazines.
01:21:48
◼
►
People who worked at like Cone Nast and other really high-end design magazines.
01:21:52
◼
►
It's run as a real editorial operation.
01:21:55
◼
►
And they have, I don't know if they're on staff or if they're all contract work, but they hire, pay real illustrators to do real custom illustrations to accompany the articles that they write.
01:22:05
◼
►
that they write. And it's really nice. And it's, as Coy says, in this world, it's so
01:22:10
◼
►
many people just go write the clip art instead of commissioning original artwork. It's nice
01:22:13
◼
►
to see somebody do that. And I just wrote offhandedly that one of the things I'm looking
01:22:17
◼
►
forward to at WWDC is seeing the iOS App Store 2.0 come to the Mac. And somebody, I think
01:22:24
◼
►
it was like 9 to 5 Mac, was like, "Oh, maybe Gruber knows something that we don't know."
01:22:30
◼
►
often coyly drops them like that. This isn't the secret. I don't know if it's coming this
01:22:36
◼
►
year. I don't. But it was on my show last year where I asked Phil Schiller about it.
01:22:44
◼
►
And he just said, "We thought it was the right thing to do to bring it to iOS first, but
01:22:48
◼
►
we're invested in the Mac App Store. It's important to us." He didn't say it'll come
01:22:53
◼
►
next year, but he said, he very strongly suggested that it will come, this sort of thinking will
01:22:59
◼
►
come to the Mac App Store.
01:23:01
◼
►
- I thought it was almost understood
01:23:02
◼
►
'cause during the briefings last year,
01:23:04
◼
►
I think everybody asked about it
01:23:05
◼
►
and they said it was being worked on
01:23:07
◼
►
and it feels like a this year thing.
01:23:10
◼
►
- So it wasn't, you know what I mean?
01:23:11
◼
►
This isn't like a deep dark secret little birdie.
01:23:14
◼
►
This was Phil Schiller on stage at a public event,
01:23:18
◼
►
strongly insinuating that they were already
01:23:20
◼
►
at work on the Mac one.
01:23:21
◼
►
- And they're doing all of them.
01:23:22
◼
►
Like the bookstore is getting,
01:23:23
◼
►
every store is gonna get this makeover.
01:23:25
◼
►
- Right, and I completely agree with him.
01:23:28
◼
►
I think it's very obvious that it was very, you know, it's the biggest and most important
01:23:32
◼
►
store to store. So of course the iOS one got the treatment first. So that's something I
01:23:39
◼
►
expect next week. I mean, I wouldn't be surprised if maybe it's more than the Mac App Store.
01:23:44
◼
►
Maybe there is a new bookstore and other stuff. What else? There's rumors about a Beats branded
01:23:52
◼
►
Siri speaker sort of like a little brother to the home pod that would come at a lower price
01:23:57
◼
►
yeah, I guess the same way that the
01:24:00
◼
►
W1 chip went into beats products and made air pod equivalents. There'll be some beats equivalent of the home pod, right?
01:24:06
◼
►
there's the the
01:24:10
◼
►
Thing from months ago that Mark Gurman called marzipan
01:24:14
◼
►
Which he says was is some sort of secret effort to get iPhone apps
01:24:20
◼
►
running on the Mac, and there were certain people who got very excited about this. I
01:24:24
◼
►
don't believe that's coming next week, and B, I don't believe it actually is a
01:24:31
◼
►
way to get iOS apps running on the Mac. I think it's more of like a cross-platform
01:24:38
◼
►
UI toolkit that would help you share code and components between Mac apps and iOS apps,
01:24:44
◼
►
I don't think it's like, boom, here's your iOS app running on the Mac with a recompile
01:24:51
◼
►
and Xcode or something like that.
01:24:53
◼
►
My understanding is that since Apple did that reorg, they've had this problem.
01:24:56
◼
►
The iMessage team has to build iMessage for iOS and iMessage for app and they've across
01:25:00
◼
►
the company, they've built new and undisclosed tools that helps them do all this.
01:25:04
◼
►
And they're going to pick one.
01:25:05
◼
►
I don't think it's ready for this year either, but they're going to pick the ones that are
01:25:07
◼
►
best and write them as public tools, not internal tools, which are often, you know, see to your
01:25:12
◼
►
pants stuff and then we'll get this.
01:25:14
◼
►
but there's several interplaying projects.
01:25:16
◼
►
- Yeah, I've been talking, bottom line is that Apple's,
01:25:19
◼
►
you'd think that they would have internalized this by now,
01:25:23
◼
►
but Apple, when they ship the stuff
01:25:27
◼
►
that they actually use themselves,
01:25:29
◼
►
it's the best developer stuff that they ship.
01:25:31
◼
►
And when they ship stuff that's like,
01:25:33
◼
►
good enough for you people, but we don't use it,
01:25:36
◼
►
it's buggy. - Including frameworks.
01:25:39
◼
►
- It's buggy and incomplete.
01:25:43
◼
►
The best example I could think of, or just, well, maybe it's not the best example, but
01:25:47
◼
►
a simple example is that a year after the iPhone shipped and the App Store came, you
01:25:52
◼
►
know, was announced, you know, in February or whatever, and by the time the one year
01:25:56
◼
►
anniversary rolled around, they opened the App Store and developers had had three or
01:26:00
◼
►
four months. The, you know, the App Store, you know, the eight, the public APIs for writing
01:26:05
◼
►
iPhone apps in 2008 right away, it didn't include everything Apple could do because
01:26:09
◼
►
obviously Apple has to write the system level software that operates at the lowest levels.
01:26:15
◼
►
But for the most part, though, it gave third party developers ability to write apps as
01:26:20
◼
►
good as Apple's apps. And that, you know, maybe a lot of maybe some of Apple's apps
01:26:24
◼
►
were written completely within the API limitations of the public APIs. Compare and contrast with
01:26:32
◼
►
the original Apple Watch, where the original watch kit wasn't really native at all, but
01:26:36
◼
►
All the apps that Apple had on the watch were native.
01:26:39
◼
►
And so you'd launch one of Apple's apps on the watch
01:26:41
◼
►
and it would open up and you could use it.
01:26:43
◼
►
And you'd launch a third party app
01:26:45
◼
►
and it would spin for 30 or 40 seconds and maybe open.
01:26:50
◼
►
- But I mean, iOS, iPhone OS too, that was a complete,
01:26:53
◼
►
Henri Lamoureux's team had to do
01:26:54
◼
►
a second forest march basically.
01:26:56
◼
►
And I think Scott Forestall wrote scroll and table
01:26:58
◼
►
and they had to rewrite UI scroll and UI table
01:27:01
◼
►
and make them public.
01:27:02
◼
►
They were in no shape for public at first.
01:27:03
◼
►
- Right, so the thing I've heard from a few
01:27:05
◼
►
developer friends about this cross-platform UI toolkit, whatever it's called, is that
01:27:11
◼
►
they hope it's something that Apple themselves are using, because there's a good chance
01:27:15
◼
►
then it'll be good, and they really hope it is not a, "Well, we don't use this,
01:27:19
◼
►
but you dummies who want a shared UI code between two platforms can, here you go."
01:27:23
◼
►
It's my understanding that there's a bunch of stuff Apple's using that they're going
01:27:26
◼
►
to sort of rewrite for public consumption over the next year or two.
01:27:31
◼
►
Other than that, man, what the hell else is coming?
01:27:34
◼
►
to me because like there was rumors of the new MacBook Air but that sounds like
01:27:37
◼
►
it was pushed off there were rumors of the new iPad pros but there have been
01:27:40
◼
►
zero leaks and usually there are some hardware leaks from from the supply
01:27:44
◼
►
chain right and a curious thing if they don't do iPad pros is then presumably
01:27:50
◼
►
the next time it could happen would be September typically Apple these days
01:27:55
◼
►
they used to sometimes have August event but they don't have it in years and even
01:28:00
◼
►
then they were like software like for iLife apps or something so if they don't
01:28:04
◼
►
do it at WWDC, then they're pushed back to September, and that would mean that the iPad
01:28:08
◼
►
Pro either skips an entire generation of A11 processors and goes right to the A12, or the
01:28:18
◼
►
iPad Pro gets the A11 an entire year late and remains a year behind CPU-wise the iPhone
01:28:26
◼
►
whatever comes after the iPhone X and 8. It's just curious.
01:28:33
◼
►
And the Macs are a huge question mark now because Intel is just having the worst, ever
01:28:37
◼
►
since they went to 14 nanometer, they've had the worst time.
01:28:39
◼
►
They went from TikTok, TikTok to TikTok, optimize, optimize, optimize.
01:28:43
◼
►
And I've talked about this before, but every time I fall asleep, I'm afraid I'm going to
01:28:46
◼
►
wake up and they will have sandwiched another lake in between Coffee Lake and Cannon Lake.
01:28:51
◼
►
So they've been, a lot of the Mac delays we've seen lately are entirely because Intel hasn't
01:28:55
◼
►
had the chips ready.
01:28:56
◼
►
And I don't know if the Coffee Lake Mac chips are ready at this point.
01:28:58
◼
►
insert we don't have time to go on a long tangent about the hypothetical move to ARM
01:29:04
◼
►
for the Mac except to just say that at a certain level you can wave your hands over some of
01:29:11
◼
►
the technical complexities. It certainly would make sense for the MacBook. The MacBook would
01:29:16
◼
►
actually get a performance bump, I think. My guess is that a MacBook running an Apple
01:29:22
◼
►
a 12 processor or even an A11 processor would get a nice performance boost across the board.
01:29:28
◼
►
The problem would be that there's no known ARM chips that compete with Intel at the high end,
01:29:35
◼
►
for let's just say the iMac Pro, the Mac Pro, devices that Apple has publicly recommitted to
01:29:41
◼
►
very recently. So it's not like the story is, well, they're getting out of the pro hardware game.
01:29:46
◼
►
theory apples chip team could have secretly been working on arm based chips that actually do compete at the highest levels of
01:29:56
◼
►
But that would be shocking. I mean it would be great news. It'd be terribly exciting, but
01:30:01
◼
►
It would be a thunderbolt out of the sky in terms of being
01:30:05
◼
►
shaking up the industry and and
01:30:08
◼
►
Just to put a little bow on it. I think it would be really difficult for Apple to move
01:30:14
◼
►
to arm without moving the entire platform to arm I
01:30:18
◼
►
Think it could also be super interesting if the MacBook and maybe sort of an Apple TV Mac mini hybrid
01:30:24
◼
►
We're running purely on arm if the intermediary devices were fusion cores where you had arm cores for
01:30:29
◼
►
Look for power efficiency and you still had legacy Intel cores for compatibility and performance and on the high end
01:30:36
◼
►
They stay at Xeon because if there's one area that Intel is investing in it's still the Xeon chips
01:30:42
◼
►
Yeah, so it's possible that they have something it would be terribly exciting. But again, there's no there's no leaks about it
01:30:48
◼
►
I mean, it's all just spike. It's just
01:30:53
◼
►
Podcasters and Twitter users saying well, maybe they'll switch to arm
01:30:55
◼
►
Yeah, no, I mean they've had the same way they had Intel Mac. They had Intel Macs in the closet for years
01:31:02
◼
►
They've had arm maps in the closet for years. It just depends
01:31:05
◼
►
They hold them over Intel's head to say what you guys aren't done yet, but actually shipping it raises a lot of
01:31:12
◼
►
implementation questions right and every other time that they've switched from 68k to power PC and then from power PC to Intel
01:31:18
◼
►
There was like a one year transition period and then after that your tradition transition period everything was running the new platform
01:31:25
◼
►
Yeah, it just and again they could do it
01:31:27
◼
►
You know, it doesn't have to go that way but for a bunch of reasons that we just don't have time to expand upon in
01:31:32
◼
►
Detail it just makes a lot more sense though that if you're going to move you move the entire platform from top to bottom
01:31:37
◼
►
So I don't know
01:31:38
◼
►
It also depends on they position it because you can do pitch you could position it as an iOS clamshell
01:31:42
◼
►
And then you nicely sidestep a lot of the Mac issues. So what are we we're got Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday
01:31:48
◼
►
So we're five days out from the keynote. I'm gonna say five days out from the keynote
01:31:53
◼
►
We have less we have fewer rumors about what might be in the keynote than any year. I can remember. Yeah
01:31:59
◼
►
Terribly exciting. Yeah
01:32:02
◼
►
I'm thrilled. All right, anything else? I got it. Yeah. Yeah, you got to go
01:32:07
◼
►
- I know, so I'm looking forward to seeing you on Monday.
01:32:09
◼
►
- All right, yeah, I can't wait to see you eat too.
01:32:12
◼
►
It'll be fun.
01:32:13
◼
►
Everybody can follow René on Twitter @RenéRichie.
01:32:18
◼
►
And of course, you can see all the fine work from him
01:32:21
◼
►
and his very talented staff at iMore.com.
01:32:24
◼
►
I'm sure they'll have extensive coverage of the keynote
01:32:27
◼
►
and all the news on Monday.