PodSearch

The Talk Show

215: ‘The “Press Real Hard” Era’ With Marco Arment

 

00:00:00   You see all this crap about how Facebook is using people's two-factor numbers to basically

00:00:05   spam them into more engagement?

00:00:07   Yeah, it's awful.

00:00:08   Why would you do that?

00:00:09   And you're literally punishing people.

00:00:11   You're punishing people for doing the right thing.

00:00:15   If you think that the right thing is setting up two-factor, which I actually think is sort

00:00:19   of debatable if one of the factors is your cell phone.

00:00:23   Yeah, it seemed like a good idea at the time it was first started being used.

00:00:29   what almost 10 years ago but I think that's as we've seen like security-wise

00:00:35   that's actually not that great not as great as we think it is no you know

00:00:41   butcher his name Mac Jay Cichlowski that the pinboard guy mm-hmm so he was in

00:00:48   town over the summer I think and we met up and he sort of he's sort of like

00:00:54   thrown himself in head over heels into the world of best practices for personal security.

00:01:01   And he's doing it. He's an activist for a bunch of Democratic candidates for Congress

00:01:08   for this coming year.

00:01:09   Tim Cynova Oh, yeah, the Great Slate.

00:01:11   Dave Asprey Yeah, the Great Slate. It's absolutely

00:01:13   fantastic including the district that's my—the home district where Amy and I grew

00:01:19   up, which is arguably, literally, in the entire country, the single most gerrymandered congressional

00:01:24   district in the country. It's unbelievable. If you grew up in the area, like if you just

00:01:29   look at the map, it truly has got these little tiny slivers that connect areas. But if you

00:01:35   grew up in the area like I did and think about how disparate the areas are, it's absolutely

00:01:43   preposterous. And anyway, there's a great candidate that the great slate is running

00:01:47   for there. And I'm thinking about really putting some significant promotional effort

00:01:52   into it on the during fireball this year to get her elected anyway he came by and and

00:01:59   you know he's doing things with these Democratic candidates to teach them like hey what's the

00:02:03   best way to protect your email so that the you know Russians can't get into your Gmail

00:02:07   like they did you know two years ago and one of his big things and I believe it he totally

00:02:12   convinced me is go through if you have a Google account you know you could use Gmail as your

00:02:19   Google account. Not, you know, relatively safe. But if you use two factor, get it off

00:02:23   yourself. Don't don't let Google know your cell phone. Just completely disconnect your

00:02:28   cell phone from your Google account. Because as soon as you hook up your cell phone as

00:02:33   this as a factor and two factor, you're at the mercy of your carrier and the carriers

00:02:37   are awful, just awful. Somebody calls up and says, Hey, I'm Marco Armond. And I'm having

00:02:43   trouble with my my cell phone. You know, all of a sudden, they've got like a SIM card with

00:02:48   with your phone number on it.

00:02:49   And then, boom, game over for two-factor

00:02:52   if they also know your email.

00:02:54   It's really terrible.

00:02:54   It happens all the time.

00:02:56   - Yeah, it's one of those things like,

00:02:59   the foundation of that being secure was on the assumption

00:03:03   that, well, nobody else can get my phone number

00:03:05   except me, obviously, right?

00:03:06   But I don't think people realize,

00:03:08   no, that's actually fairly easy for people

00:03:10   to clone your phone number and start receiving things

00:03:12   that are supposed to be going to your phone number.

00:03:14   - Right, and it's not quite as easy

00:03:16   going in with the name, but I mean,

00:03:18   you don't need much information to go into your local AT&T

00:03:21   or Verizon or whatever, T-Mobile,

00:03:24   and just have some $11 an hour clerk print up a SIM card.

00:03:28   (laughing)

00:03:31   There you go.

00:03:32   I mean, it happens, it's really crazy.

00:03:35   So anyway, get your, think about that, anyway.

00:03:38   And anyway, that's what Facebook has done,

00:03:40   is they got people to sign up with Two Factor,

00:03:43   And then the longer you go without signing in to Facebook,

00:03:47   the more often they send you text messages asking you.

00:03:51   And it's so stupidly passive aggressive.

00:03:56   It's like, are you having trouble signing in?

00:03:59   It's like, no, I haven't signed in.

00:04:01   - Yeah, it's worded as though, like, obviously,

00:04:05   if you haven't signed in recently,

00:04:07   there must be something wrong with your account.

00:04:08   It's not that you don't wanna sign into Facebook.

00:04:11   I saw one guy who got hit by this and he tweeted that he's texting, you know, he's getting

00:04:18   these text messages and he's trying like the, those SMS bot interfaces. So he's trying things

00:04:24   like stop. I forget what else he tried. And then he went and checked and Facebook, I swear

00:04:31   to God, posted his things that he texted back to the SMS bot. They posted him to his wall

00:04:37   and Facebook.

00:04:38   So it was also, I felt like, stop, opt out, unsubscribe?

00:04:42   Yes, yeah.

00:04:43   That's amazing.

00:04:44   It all caps.

00:04:45   It's interesting because, you know, I famously, or perhaps not famously, I've still never

00:04:52   signed up for Facebook.

00:04:53   I do have an Instagram account, though, so I don't know, you know, I don't know how,

00:04:57   it's, I can't, I can't claim any sort of, you know, holiness in this regard.

00:05:05   But I never signed up for Facebook. Certainly as the years go on, it's looking like a better

00:05:11   and better decision. It, to me, is reminiscent of my decision to never put comments on Daring

00:05:16   Fireball. There were some early years where it seemed like, "Hmm, maybe I'm missing out.

00:05:21   I don't know." And then it crossed a certain threshold and it was like, "Dodged a bullet

00:05:25   on that one."

00:05:26   Yeah, you're playing the long game on Facebook. You're going to have 10 years of people saying,

00:05:34   how can you not be on Facebook, but you know,

00:05:36   it's starting to appear like a reasonable choice recently.

00:05:39   - But--

00:05:40   - I mean, like Tiff, so you know,

00:05:41   my wife Tiff deactivated her account on Facebook

00:05:44   over a year ago, I think, and really hasn't missed anything.

00:05:48   I have an account there, but I don't really ever use it

00:05:53   for much of anything, and all I get is like,

00:05:56   emails basically spamming me with like,

00:05:59   "Somebody commented on the Overcast page.

00:06:01   "You should really log in and read it

00:06:03   and respond to increase your rate of whatever.

00:06:05   And then I get emails from like strange members

00:06:08   of my family, like look at their comments.

00:06:10   I don't want to look at their comments.

00:06:12   I'm not speaking to them.

00:06:13   And it's like all I get is like this is like,

00:06:17   either spam about engagement on my Overcast page

00:06:19   or like stuff with people that like Facebook

00:06:23   just doesn't get the hint that like I actually

00:06:25   don't want to interact with some people.

00:06:27   And it's just like, and you know,

00:06:30   I read something earlier on Twitter.

00:06:32   I forget who it was, I'm sorry, but it was like,

00:06:34   it was somebody who was saying like,

00:06:36   she's getting these spam text messages from Facebook

00:06:39   and it's all about like her ex-boyfriend who like she,

00:06:41   you know, it kind of hurts to hear about him

00:06:43   and you know, it's like Facebook just doesn't,

00:06:45   either they, you know, their algorithms don't get it,

00:06:48   which is certainly likely,

00:06:50   but also I think they just don't care.

00:06:52   You know, they're shameless and they will spam the crap

00:06:56   out of everybody relentlessly because they know that,

00:07:00   you know, it works for X percent of people

00:07:02   to get X more page clicks and more engagement

00:07:05   and they need to keep their numbers up

00:07:06   because they're apparently bleeding users.

00:07:08   - Yeah, that's the thing is that it's the,

00:07:11   I'm not gonna say that they're in trouble

00:07:13   or that they're to bring out everybody's favorite

00:07:16   classic Apple word, beleaguered.

00:07:18   - Doomed.

00:07:20   - They're making more money than ever,

00:07:22   but that's really more that they're getting more efficient

00:07:28   at getting more money per user,

00:07:30   not that they're getting more users.

00:07:32   Like, logins in the US are actually down for the first time,

00:07:36   which if I were on Facebook,

00:07:37   would probably keep me up at night,

00:07:39   because I would be very concerned about that.

00:07:43   - Isn't that actually also kind of what's happening to Apple?

00:07:46   Like, you know, basically making more money from users

00:07:49   rather than growing the user base itself?

00:07:51   - That's very possible.

00:07:52   I read an article today,

00:07:54   'cause I tried trying to write less and less

00:07:56   about the financial stuff, and we can get into it.

00:07:59   I find it excruciatingly boring.

00:08:01   - There was a great Walt Mossberg tweet

00:08:03   I'll probably get to later in the show

00:08:04   just about focusing on the financial stuff

00:08:07   is the wrong way to look at it.

00:08:09   If you're really trying to look at it from the,

00:08:13   is Apple making good products?

00:08:15   Which is really what I'm interested in.

00:08:17   But I read a thing that, it was just some,

00:08:21   somebody was like, "You should file this as claim chowder."

00:08:23   And it was just some shitty Forbes columnist

00:08:25   who's saying that Warren Buffett at Berkshire Hathaway

00:08:30   has upped his investment in Apple in the last year,

00:08:33   and this guy was making the argument

00:08:34   that that's a huge mistake,

00:08:36   and that instead, if he wants to invest in a tech company,

00:08:39   he should invest in Amazon.

00:08:40   And I don't like to get into the investment type stuff,

00:08:46   but I actually think that this guy maybe has a point

00:08:48   because I kind of feel like Apple,

00:08:50   if I were going to give investment advice,

00:08:53   I think it's quite possible that Apple's growth is over,

00:08:57   or at least slowed down significantly.

00:08:59   And this is his argument from the last two years

00:09:00   that Apple's only grown at like six or seven percent

00:09:03   the last two years, which is fine growth

00:09:05   for a giant company or the biggest company in the world,

00:09:08   but it's not, you know, if you want,

00:09:10   trying to be super aggressive with your investments,

00:09:13   it's probably not, whereas Amazon, who knows?

00:09:15   I don't know what the hell backs up their stock

00:09:17   other than the fact that, you know,

00:09:19   it has nothing to do with profits.

00:09:20   It has just to do with their,

00:09:22   the idea that whenever they get into something,

00:09:24   they dominate.

00:09:26   I think it's possible that Amazon stock could go up

00:09:28   way more than Apple's in the next, say,

00:09:30   two, three, four years, I don't know.

00:09:31   But I don't think that's a ridiculous argument.

00:09:34   But anyway, I think the argument that Apple's sort of

00:09:37   reached peak Apple is possible, at least in terms of reach.

00:09:41   - I mean, maybe not peak, but just like,

00:09:43   it's like they've transitioned, I think,

00:09:45   I mean, granted neither of us are financial analysts,

00:09:47   or really even experts in this field,

00:09:49   but it does seem like they have transitioned

00:09:51   from a growth company to a stable, long-term,

00:09:56   like a high-risk stock to a low-risk stock, basically,

00:10:00   in the sense that I don't expect them,

00:10:04   whatever their price is now, I don't know,

00:10:06   100-something, I don't even follow.

00:10:08   I don't expect it to be 200 next year.

00:10:10   I wouldn't expect that kind of growth anymore.

00:10:13   - And you're just never gonna--

00:10:14   - They're so big.

00:10:16   - You're just never gonna see the sort of

00:10:17   quarter over quarter, year over year,

00:10:19   every single, for a whole series of years

00:10:22   after the iPhone came out, it was every single quarter

00:10:25   was up 28% year over year, up 30% year over year,

00:10:30   up 50% year over year.

00:10:31   Just quarter after quarter after quarter,

00:10:34   every single quarter of the year,

00:10:35   year after year after year,

00:10:36   were these insane consistent growth numbers

00:10:39   because the iPhone was growing insanely.

00:10:43   But you don't have to be a genius to realize

00:10:46   that the iPhone is possibly never going to be replicated

00:10:51   by any company in our lifetimes in terms of being a product

00:10:55   that will be used by such an incredibly large percentage

00:11:00   of the people who might reasonably buy one

00:11:04   and sells for a relatively high price,

00:11:07   what the average selling price now is up to 800 bucks,

00:11:11   and gets replaced every two to three years by normal people.

00:11:15   Like there's no other product in the world like that.

00:11:18   - Yeah, I mean, especially now that the subsidy thing

00:11:22   in the US has largely shifted and kind of gone away

00:11:26   or at least changed, like the price of the phones

00:11:28   is more visible to people.

00:11:30   Well, I guess maybe you could argue it isn't

00:11:32   'cause now everyone's just paying

00:11:33   on these monthly installment plans.

00:11:34   But it's remarkable that people find a way,

00:11:39   whether it's subsidized or parceled up by months

00:11:43   or whatever it is, that people are buying a brand new

00:11:48   $800 plus phone every one to three years

00:11:53   in pretty large quantities.

00:11:54   That's remarkable.

00:11:56   - Yeah, they just accept it.

00:11:58   - Because people never bought computers at that rate.

00:12:01   Even people like me who are like,

00:12:04   I'll buy lots of things 'cause I like them

00:12:06   and I like computers a lot,

00:12:07   and I don't buy a new computer every year.

00:12:11   - Now wait a second.

00:12:12   - Well, if you exclude laptops.

00:12:15   - That's only because Apple doesn't come out with them

00:12:17   frequently enough.

00:12:18   You buy a new Pro desktop as frequently as Apple

00:12:21   comes out with them.

00:12:22   - No, that's not true.

00:12:23   I had my 2014 iMac, the same one that you, I think,

00:12:27   are still using.

00:12:28   - Yes.

00:12:29   - I bought that in 2014, and there were three other updates

00:12:32   to it that I didn't buy before the iMac Pro came out.

00:12:36   - Hmm.

00:12:38   - I mean, they were minor updates, really, but.

00:12:40   - Yeah, none of them have even vaguely tempted me

00:12:43   to be truthful.

00:12:43   - Well, like changing a desktop is a pain in the ass.

00:12:46   Like, I don't wanna have to change that very often.

00:12:48   - Oh, I hate it.

00:12:49   - It's a big deal.

00:12:49   And again, and you know, when the gains to be had

00:12:53   are fairly incremental, then it's kind of dumb

00:12:57   to go through the expense and logistical crap

00:13:01   of replacing your desktop every year

00:13:03   when you're getting, what, a 5% increase

00:13:05   in performance maybe?

00:13:06   Like, that's not enough to make that worth it.

00:13:08   - Yeah, and it's also, I mean, this has been a recurring

00:13:11   theme on the show ever since I started it with old Dan

00:13:15   back in the day.

00:13:16   I mean, I just hate setting up a new Mac.

00:13:18   - Old Dan.

00:13:19   - Yeah, I just hate setting up a new Mac, I really do.

00:13:22   I liked, so I just, whether it's a desktop or a laptop,

00:13:27   I just buy the best one I can afford, which, you know,

00:13:31   now that I'm older is actually like the best one they make.

00:13:33   So like the iMac, 5K iMac I bought in, what was that,

00:13:37   - 2014 or 2015?

00:13:39   - Yep, 2014.

00:13:40   - I just bought the maximum everything.

00:13:43   I just got the fastest i7 chip.

00:13:47   I put, what is it, 32 gigs of RAM?

00:13:50   It's gotta be 32. - 32 gigs of RAM,

00:13:51   one terabyte SSD.

00:13:53   - One terabyte SSD. - And very young,

00:13:54   something 290, I think, or 90, something like that.

00:13:56   - I don't know if I upgraded the video.

00:13:58   I'd have to double check on that.

00:13:59   - It was a small additional expense,

00:14:01   and I think I did it just because I didn't,

00:14:04   like I'd upgraded everything else, same as you,

00:14:06   and I'm like, I don't wanna regret this later,

00:14:08   and so I did it.

00:14:09   Although I didn't, on the iMac Pro,

00:14:10   now I didn't get the fancy GPU for that,

00:14:12   because the number, it was like $600 more,

00:14:16   and I don't do anything with the GPU, really,

00:14:19   so I got the base GPU.

00:14:20   - So back to the iPhone,

00:14:25   there's just never gonna be anything like that again.

00:14:28   Or if there is, whatever it is is unforeseen at this point.

00:14:33   There's nothing on the market that's going to be like that.

00:14:36   And so I just, like the insane growth for Apple is over.

00:14:41   The fact that they're sustaining it,

00:14:42   the fact that like the numbers

00:14:43   that I just linked to a thing today,

00:14:46   that for the first time ever, Apple, some group,

00:14:49   who knows if it's accurate or not,

00:14:50   but some groups at Apple took 51% of the revenue

00:14:54   in the global smartphone market,

00:14:57   which is insane for a product that sells for $800

00:15:01   on average, and all competing devices sell

00:15:04   for an average of 300, and Apple has 51% of the revenue.

00:15:08   It's crazy.

00:15:09   - I mean, look, Apple is really good

00:15:11   at making lots of money.

00:15:13   Like, they are really good at that.

00:15:15   You know, we can get into lots of debates,

00:15:17   and we probably will, about things like, you know,

00:15:19   competitiveness and market share in certain areas,

00:15:21   but like, they're really good at making money

00:15:23   with whatever market share they have in something.

00:15:25   - Yeah.

00:15:26   That's very true.

00:15:28   Same thing with the watch, really.

00:15:31   - Yeah. - Which is funny,

00:15:32   'cause the watch are coming at it a different way,

00:15:34   where there was a story this week

00:15:35   that they sold more watches

00:15:37   than the entire Swiss watch industry combined,

00:15:40   I think last quarter, not last year.

00:15:43   But holiday quarter's a big one for watches,

00:15:45   'cause people get 'em as gifts.

00:15:47   And I think that they said that the average Swiss watch

00:15:51   sells for something like $780,

00:15:54   and the average selling price of an Apple watch,

00:15:57   I think both by common sense and by Horace Dedue's estimates, which have some actual

00:16:04   factual analysis of Apple's financials behind them, pegs at around like $330. And by common

00:16:12   sense, I mean a $330 average selling price for Apple Watch means the average Apple Watch

00:16:17   is the base model made out of aluminum.

00:16:19   Yeah, because you figure like they probably sell more of the 42 size than 38 size.

00:16:24   Right.

00:16:25   And what does that cost? 300 for the 42 base model?

00:16:27   - Something like that, yeah.

00:16:28   And you know-- - Yeah, so that makes sense.

00:16:30   - And you know, whether or not you get it

00:16:31   with the cellular or whatever.

00:16:33   - Yeah, yeah.

00:16:34   - But it's all centered around the base models

00:16:36   and the total number of people buying

00:16:38   the stainless steel ones, let alone the edition,

00:16:41   are so few that it hardly even moves,

00:16:44   hardly even nudges the average selling price.

00:16:46   And anecdotally, from what I see on people's wrists,

00:16:49   that's exactly it.

00:16:50   And it's, you know, makes common sense.

00:16:52   For most people, a $300 watch is a really expensive watch.

00:16:56   - Oh yeah, especially one that you basically

00:16:58   have to replace every two years or so,

00:17:00   because its battery becomes useless.

00:17:01   - Right, I mean--

00:17:02   - Is there gonna be a battery gate for the watch?

00:17:05   (laughing)

00:17:06   - I wonder.

00:17:07   - I hope not.

00:17:08   I don't wanna have to talk about that for six months.

00:17:10   - Anecdotally, it does seem like Series Zero watches,

00:17:14   like the original Apple Watch,

00:17:16   they're getting worse battery life.

00:17:18   Like, we got Jonas one when it was brand new,

00:17:20   and he's worn it, he's worn it pretty much every day,

00:17:25   or certainly like every school day,

00:17:27   ever since they came out,

00:17:28   and his battery life has gotten worse recently.

00:17:31   And it makes sense.

00:17:33   It's what, two and a half years of charge cycles,

00:17:36   of nightly charge cycles in,

00:17:38   and I think the battery's worn out.

00:17:40   - Yeah, yeah, I think as a developer,

00:17:45   it's really hard to support the first gen Apple Watch,

00:17:48   and I think a big thing holding back

00:17:51   what watchOS can offer for developers,

00:17:54   like API-wise and backgrounding-wise,

00:17:56   things like my background audio requests.

00:17:59   I think a lot of that is being held back

00:18:01   by the first generation watch hardware,

00:18:03   but it's kind of, from that angle,

00:18:05   it's not so nice if you have one,

00:18:07   but it's kind of nice from that angle

00:18:08   that these watches are just really becoming

00:18:12   not very useful anymore en masse this year,

00:18:16   because the batteries are now so old in them

00:18:18   that they're not holding a charge

00:18:20   throughout the whole day anymore,

00:18:21   for most people who have them.

00:18:23   - Yeah, I think that's true.

00:18:25   I don't know if it's gonna be a scandal or not.

00:18:27   I don't know, it's hard to predict.

00:18:30   - Probably not.

00:18:31   - I do feel like-- - The first generation

00:18:32   watch was so slow, like can you even tell

00:18:34   if it's being throttled?

00:18:35   - Yeah, I don't know, I don't know about that.

00:18:38   It felt like maybe they just turned on throttling

00:18:42   right out of the factory.

00:18:44   (laughing)

00:18:46   It's funny, I was thinking about that recently,

00:18:50   and I was thinking about it in, we can get to it,

00:18:54   in light of the balance between shipping stuff

00:18:59   on a schedule, shipping stuff with a certain number

00:19:05   of features, and shipping stuff with a certain quality level

00:19:08   that those three things, it's not, you pick one,

00:19:11   you wanna balance all three.

00:19:14   And I don't know, I kind of, Apple Watch did ship late,

00:19:19   I think a little bit later than even Apple hoped.

00:19:21   I mean, there were reports that they were,

00:19:23   that the year that they announced it in September

00:19:26   and even said then it'll ship next year.

00:19:29   And it didn't ship the next year until like May.

00:19:33   And even then it was like six weeks back ordered

00:19:36   for most people.

00:19:37   - Yeah, it was like immediately back ordered

00:19:39   for most configurations.

00:19:40   - Right.

00:19:41   - For up until, like I think it officially launched

00:19:44   in April, but you couldn't really get

00:19:46   a lot of the configurations until like June or July.

00:19:48   - Right, and it was a product that by several accounts,

00:19:53   Apple had been hoping until pretty late in the game

00:19:58   that they might get out for the holidays the year before.

00:20:02   And it came out as late as it did

00:20:03   and really was sort of a subpar,

00:20:06   both software and hardware thing.

00:20:10   I honestly, in hindsight, I'm, in hindsight,

00:20:14   I've been wondering, should they have waited another year?

00:20:18   should like what we now call the Series 1 watch

00:20:21   have been the original Apple Watch.

00:20:23   I kind of see why they did it,

00:20:26   and the other factor you have to recall at the time

00:20:29   is they were facing a daily battery of,

00:20:33   Apple hasn't released anything new

00:20:34   since Steve Jobs died, reports.

00:20:36   - Oh yeah, 'cause that was not that long after the

00:20:41   can't innovate anymore my ass thing.

00:20:43   That was like, what, about a year later?

00:20:45   And you know, 'cause that really was,

00:20:47   that was the narrative back then was Apple can't innovate anymore, Samsung was doing

00:20:50   all the innovation and it turned out that was mostly about big phones. It turned out

00:20:55   that Apple wasn't making big enough phones and then they started making big enough phones

00:20:58   and everyone stopped talking about that. So that was kind of BS, it turns out. But the

00:21:04   Apple Watch Series 1, or the first generation Apple Watch had so many problems with just

00:21:10   like focus. You know, like the software was a disaster, it was a total mess. The third

00:21:16   party app implementation was horrible with like the watch kit where like the

00:21:21   everything was running on the phone and just kind of sent like basically

00:21:24   drawing commands to the watch that would end it was so slow almost nothing worked

00:21:29   everything would time out or fail like it was it was really rough and then all

00:21:34   of the you know marketing focus on things like they wanted you to like be

00:21:38   browsing like news feeds on your watch and and all the stuff about like that

00:21:42   like the digital touch sending people your heartbeat and doodling little

00:21:45   pictures and poking your friends through their wrists.

00:21:48   Like there was so much weird stuff

00:21:50   in that first watch release that fortunately

00:21:52   they've mostly moved past or mostly fixed.

00:21:55   There's still some of that weirdness in the watch.

00:21:57   Like, you know, like I think the honeycomb screen

00:21:59   is still terrible and there's like digital,

00:22:02   at least digital touch stuff,

00:22:03   they like buried pretty well now.

00:22:05   You don't usually find it.

00:22:06   But yeah, there's still so much about watchOS

00:22:11   that seems like it was made on a different planet

00:22:14   than Apple's other products?

00:22:15   - I definitely think that they should have, in hindsight,

00:22:18   maybe they should have released it

00:22:19   when they did as a product,

00:22:21   and maybe it was useful enough,

00:22:23   and maybe by releasing it when they did

00:22:26   and getting feedback from real people

00:22:29   that the subsequent watchOS 2, 3, and 4

00:22:32   were better than they would have been

00:22:34   if they'd waited a year.

00:22:35   They would have been a year behind

00:22:36   on sort of zeroing in on, okay,

00:22:39   notifications and fitness tracking, that's it.

00:22:43   That's what people like and use about this product.

00:22:46   So I get being wrong about things like digital touch,

00:22:51   you know, was that a thing or not?

00:22:53   But the one thing that they clearly should have known

00:22:56   before they released it was that the original SDK

00:22:58   was garbage.

00:22:59   This is, that this is, this is, yeah.

00:23:02   Just in, it's the only time I can ever recall.

00:23:06   And now it's, you know, it's been a long time.

00:23:10   I don't know, however long.

00:23:12   The first review product I ever got from Apple

00:23:15   was the Verizon iPhone 4, so I think that was 2010.

00:23:19   So since 2010, I've been getting products to review,

00:23:23   and every time I've gotten--

00:23:25   - It was early 2011, I think.

00:23:26   - Maybe it was 2011, maybe it was like--

00:23:28   - The 4S was fall of 2011, right before Steve died.

00:23:31   So I believe that came out like January or something.

00:23:33   - All right, you're right then, so 2011,

00:23:34   so seven years of me getting products from Apple to review.

00:23:42   And every time I've gotten a product to review from Apple,

00:23:47   and everybody I know who gets products to review from Apple,

00:23:52   when you get it, they don't just ship it to you.

00:23:55   Every once in a while, there's an exception,

00:23:57   like with the MacBook Pros, the new MacBook Pros.

00:24:01   I did have a briefing, but they didn't have--

00:24:05   - Their new MacBook Pros?

00:24:06   - No, the last time when they came out

00:24:08   with the Touch Bar ones.

00:24:10   Every time I've gotten a review product,

00:24:11   I've had a product briefing with somebody

00:24:13   from product marketing and somebody from Apple PR,

00:24:16   either by myself or in a very small group,

00:24:18   like say just me and Dalrymple together.

00:24:21   And they show you what they wanna show you

00:24:25   and they take your questions, which is great.

00:24:28   But they never just give you the product

00:24:32   in like a PDF pamphlet or something like that.

00:24:35   They wanna tell you about it.

00:24:36   And like the exception I was gonna say

00:24:39   with the MacBook Pros is I had a product briefing,

00:24:41   They didn't give me like all of them and then because they weren't ready yet

00:24:44   And so they did ship me like the 15 inch like a week later or something something like that

00:24:49   So it's not like they're gonna make you if they're gonna give you two or three MacBook pros to review

00:24:54   That's right

00:24:54   Like everyone only got the MacBook escape to review right first time and then like the touch bar 15 came later, right?

00:25:01   So yeah, exactly

00:25:02   So the escape and and there was a briefing where we could play with the touch bar

00:25:06   But they didn't have them for us to take with us and so they shipped them to us a week later

00:25:11   But there was a briefing where we had the touch bar thing in front of us and could ask questions about it

00:25:15   So it's I would call that like the podcast equivalent of a footnote

00:25:20   It's a minor exception. Anyway, the only product I can ever

00:25:24   Remember where the briefing was mostly

00:25:28   Apologizing for problems with the product was the original Apple watch

00:25:32   It was like this is gonna be slow like even in the product briefing with a prepared Apple watch and their prepared demo

00:25:39   There were things, aspects of it that they were like,

00:25:42   this is gonna be slow, we're working on it.

00:25:45   And it's just so unusual.

00:25:47   - Like in so many ways it was kind of the opposite

00:25:50   of the first generation iPhone.

00:25:51   Where like the first generation iPhone,

00:25:53   it was similarly to the watch,

00:25:55   it had like extreme technical constraints

00:25:57   to try to get an acceptable amount of processing power

00:26:00   and battery life into something that size,

00:26:01   running this kind of advanced OS.

00:26:04   But with the original iPhone,

00:26:05   they chose to basically have it do less,

00:26:08   but have the things it does be executed very well.

00:26:12   Whereas the first generation watch,

00:26:14   and to this day I think still kind of the entire watch,

00:26:17   it's not as bad now, but the first generation watch

00:26:20   had the kind of the opposite approach of like,

00:26:22   we're gonna have this do a whole bunch of crap

00:26:24   even though we don't actually think it can do

00:26:26   a lot of it very well because we wanna

00:26:29   kinda see what sticks.

00:26:30   And that was, it's a fundamentally different approach

00:26:32   and you know, it's easy for us to argue in hindsight,

00:26:34   like well, turns out it's only used for notifications

00:26:38   fitness or whatever, you know, whatever the use case is,

00:26:43   it's easy for us to look back on it now and say,

00:26:45   launching that first SDK was almost certainly a mistake.

00:26:48   Like, it should have launched without third-party apps

00:26:52   because it was clearly not able to handle third-party apps

00:26:55   yet in both hardware or software.

00:26:58   So it should have launched that.

00:27:01   But it's hard, like thinking back,

00:27:01   like when you're actually in the process of making these

00:27:04   products, it's really hard to make the right call on that

00:27:06   that kind of thing every time.

00:27:07   Like, do you support third-party apps or not?

00:27:08   And I think at some point during some interview,

00:27:11   I think somebody asked Schiller about that.

00:27:13   It might have been on your show at WBC.

00:27:15   I can't remember whether it was that or not,

00:27:17   but it seemed kind of like Schiller,

00:27:20   in the most verbose way that he ever will,

00:27:26   said something along the lines of,

00:27:28   it was a hard decision and maybe we picked wrong

00:27:30   on whether to ship with support for third-party apps.

00:27:34   - Yeah, I don't remember if it was on my show or not,

00:27:35   I have terrible podcast amnesia.

00:27:37   But that sort of feels true, and in hindsight,

00:27:39   that's sort of how I feel.

00:27:41   And they could have gotten away with

00:27:43   the third party interaction with the watch,

00:27:45   could have been, on that first version of the watch,

00:27:48   could have been entirely through the mirroring

00:27:50   of notifications from your phone.

00:27:53   - Oh yeah, and in fact, I think a lot of apps

00:27:55   are actually doing that now.

00:27:56   A lot of apps are realizing now that

00:27:58   actually just using rich notification functionality

00:28:01   from the phone provides a better overall watch experience

00:28:04   than making a watch app.

00:28:05   - Yep, it's the only thing I ever use, honestly,

00:28:07   other than playback controls for my AirPods, really.

00:28:10   And it would've been fine, I think, in the first year.

00:28:17   Anyway, that's sort of a sidetrack.

00:28:18   While you're here, it's so funny, too,

00:28:22   'cause I have other people on the show

00:28:24   who have their own podcasts,

00:28:25   and I listen to them on their shows.

00:28:27   But you're the only one, possibly because ATP,

00:28:30   and I'm not just here to butter your toast,

00:28:32   but it's the only show I can think of

00:28:34   where I try to listen to every episode.

00:28:37   So I listen to a lot of it.

00:28:40   I keep thinking tonight that you sound

00:28:41   like you're talking real slow.

00:28:43   (laughing)

00:28:45   - You sound the same way to me.

00:28:47   - I just keep thinking, God, why is he so slow?

00:28:51   Is he tired?

00:28:53   And then I realize it's, you know, we don't have.

00:28:55   Wait, smart speed is where it takes all the gaps

00:29:00   in my sentences.

00:29:02   What's the other feature?

00:29:02   Just speed up.

00:29:03   Is there a name for that?

00:29:04   - Well, there's, yeah, there's variable playback speed.

00:29:07   Every podcast app offers that.

00:29:09   Yeah, so that's just literally speeding up all the audio

00:29:11   by a certain rate, and smart speed is what shortens

00:29:13   the silence is more than the surrounding audio.

00:29:15   - You know what, that's one reason why I don't mind

00:29:18   at the moment that I can't just tell HomePod

00:29:23   to play something from Overcast.

00:29:26   Like, I wrote about it in my HomePod review,

00:29:29   but I tried out the built-in play a podcast thing.

00:29:34   You just tell it an episode of a podcast

00:29:36   and it gets it from iTunes library and it works pretty well.

00:29:39   And there's too many podcasts that have ambiguous names,

00:29:42   including mine, unfortunately.

00:29:43   But although it kind of worked for my show, I don't know.

00:29:48   Some people said that it say that it doesn't.

00:29:50   Some people, speaking of old Dan,

00:29:51   some people say that when they try to get my show to play,

00:29:53   it plays like an old episode with me and Dan Benjamin.

00:29:57   I tried it with my show and it played the newest episode with Moltz or whoever it was.

00:30:03   But then other times it just plays like some other show that's called a talk show or something.

00:30:07   Anyway, it works. But because I use Overcast to follow the podcasts I listen to, I don't

00:30:14   want to listen to anything outside it and then not have it be marked as read or for

00:30:18   like long shows like ATP to keep my playback position for when I return. So I just use

00:30:24   you know, and the nice thing about podcasts is that unlike a song, which is only three minutes,

00:30:31   three, four minutes, and if you're doing it by airplay, you've only got three minutes before the

00:30:38   next thing is up, you know, whereas a podcast tell it to play an hour or two hour podcast.

00:30:43   I don't care if you know, because I can still talk to the HomePad and tell it to

00:30:47   pause or play or something like that. And it'll keep going. But doing it with airplay through

00:30:52   through overcast, I still like having the variable speed too. It's ruined me, really.

00:31:00   I can't listen to any kind of audio show, like radio thing, and not feel like they're

00:31:06   talking too slow. Even the morning news feature where you come down and you're making coffee

00:31:11   and you're like, "Hey, HomePod, tell me the news," and it's like, "Why do these people

00:31:16   on NPR talk so slow?"

00:31:19   - What's really hard for me is watching YouTube videos

00:31:22   because obviously there's no audio manipulation

00:31:24   going on there.

00:31:25   Although why they don't add a dynamics compressor

00:31:28   to make everyone's volume high, I don't know.

00:31:31   Why is that not an option in either production or playback?

00:31:34   I have no idea.

00:31:35   'Cause YouTube volume levels are all over the place.

00:31:38   So that's a huge problem that they should solve.

00:31:41   But yeah, it's really hard for me to watch YouTube videos

00:31:43   because they just move so much more slowly

00:31:46   than what I'm accustomed to hearing,

00:31:48   which is podcasts with smart speed at like 1.25x.

00:31:52   So it isn't a huge difference,

00:31:55   but it's noticeable enough that it just,

00:31:57   every YouTube video to me seems really slow paced.

00:32:01   It also doesn't help that nobody seems to edit.

00:32:05   (laughing)

00:32:07   - I don't know, we can get into YouTube later

00:32:10   when we talk about their Apple TV app.

00:32:12   But anyway, I listen to your show all the time.

00:32:14   - I am a little curious though,

00:32:15   Like with the HomePod and podcasting, like, so you know, I would love so much, and I talk

00:32:20   about this everywhere, so I'm not gonna dwell on it too long, but I would love so much for

00:32:23   there to be an audio Siri intent, which would also enable things like Spotify, just to be

00:32:29   able to tell, you know, "Hey, Dingus, play, you know, play the latest episode of the talk

00:32:34   show in Overcast."

00:32:35   You know, the same way you can tell Siri to add things to your to-do list in other apps,

00:32:42   in things, in OmniFocus.

00:32:43   You can use other app names for certain intents,

00:32:46   and they work pretty well.

00:32:48   So I would love to have that kind of thing with Siri,

00:32:52   just to have an audio intent.

00:32:53   The main challenge to this IC is, I guess, twofold.

00:32:58   One is you have to build some kind of indexing interface

00:33:03   so that the audio app can provide Siri

00:33:07   with a list of what content is available in it.

00:33:11   And for something like Overcast, that is fairly easy,

00:33:14   because if you limit it to only things

00:33:17   that you already subscribe to in the app,

00:33:19   that might only be between two and 30 entries

00:33:22   for most people.

00:33:24   But for something like Spotify, it's like,

00:33:26   well, are you gonna ask Spotify

00:33:28   for all the music that they have?

00:33:30   Like, that's a bit of a challenge to implement that,

00:33:33   and maybe they don't wanna tell you

00:33:34   all the music that they have,

00:33:35   so there's challenges there.

00:33:37   So that's why I think they probably haven't done

00:33:39   something like this.

00:33:40   But another thing is, and this is kind of a bigger problem

00:33:45   I think with the HomePod, is that Siri is still very

00:33:48   device specific with what you're asking it

00:33:52   when it comes to those APIs.

00:33:55   The HomePod has a built-in Apple Music client,

00:33:57   so it can directly query Apple Music with no phone nearby,

00:34:00   and it can get songs and things from Apple Music

00:34:04   and from the podcast directory.

00:34:07   But if they built something, if they built the Siri audio intent

00:34:09   that would allow Overcast and Spotify and things like that,

00:34:12   if they built it the way that these things are built so far,

00:34:15   they're only running on the phone.

00:34:17   And so that phone would have to be nearby

00:34:20   for it to say, hey phone, play this thing,

00:34:22   and the phone would have to look at its own

00:34:24   locally stored index of what's available

00:34:27   and then tell the HomePod, okay, play this thing.

00:34:30   And doing it that way would provide something like,

00:34:32   well, maybe would provide something like Smart Speed.

00:34:35   Because if the app is just running on the phone

00:34:38   and the Siri command just tells it what to play,

00:34:43   and preconfigures the AirPlay output

00:34:46   to say send to the HomePod, that's great.

00:34:48   But a much more powerful way to do this

00:34:50   is the way that I think all of the other assistants work,

00:34:52   and the way Sonos works,

00:34:55   which is, and Google's Chromecast protocol,

00:34:57   or casting protocol,

00:35:01   is like if you have some kind of scalar integration

00:35:02   with the voice assistant,

00:35:07   you tell it, play this thing in Overcast,

00:35:06   and it queries overcast's web service.

00:35:09   And doesn't involve any phones or iPads at all.

00:35:11   It queries the web service and the web service tells it,

00:35:14   here's a URL, start playing this URL.

00:35:18   And it fetches that and plays it

00:35:19   without the involvement of phones.

00:35:21   That is a much more versatile and resilient way

00:35:25   to do things, but that's not how Siri Kit

00:35:29   works right now at all.

00:35:30   And when you're just talking about Siri on the phones,

00:35:34   the iPad on the watch, that's kind of okay, although it does limit the watch over LTE,

00:35:38   but that's otherwise that's kind of okay. But now that you have the HomePod, it kind

00:35:43   of raises the question like, is that the right design for this? And, and, you know, would

00:35:48   they be better off doing something that's more web service based? But honestly, I don't

00:35:54   think I see Apple doing that or being good at that.

00:35:57   It just seems outside their DNA. It's like they're so app centric, you know, like, I

00:36:02   I don't think that the reason that this thing comes out of the box not being able to support

00:36:06   Spotify, I really don't think it's pure competitive spite.

00:36:10   You know, like, screw Spotify, we want everybody to sign up for Apple Music, so we're only going

00:36:15   to support Apple Music.

00:36:16   I think it's way more complex than that.

00:36:18   I think that it's entirely possible that they want, like what you said, an audio intent for

00:36:24   SiriKit that would let Overcast hook up to it and would let somebody like Spotify hook

00:36:31   up to it if they wanted to, through the phone app and only work when the phone is at home

00:36:38   on the network. I don't see them, but like most of these other devices, and I'm a bit

00:36:46   of a rube when it comes to Spotify, but I've learned since Ombod came out, you know, that

00:36:52   what's it called Spotify Connect or something is the name of their cast like service.

00:36:56   Yeah, that sounds awesome.

00:36:57   - Right, but it's like you said,

00:36:58   it's driven by the truth is,

00:37:02   as Steve Jobs said, the truth is in the cloud.

00:37:05   And so you can give the direction from your phone

00:37:08   and the direction goes from the Spotify phone app

00:37:12   to Spotify server.

00:37:14   And the direction is play whatever playlist

00:37:17   and play it on my kitchen speaker.

00:37:20   And the server says, okay,

00:37:22   and then pings your kitchen speaker,

00:37:24   which is already signed into your account

00:37:25   and says, yeah, like you said, here, play this URL.

00:37:28   And then it plays.

00:37:29   And so it's going from whatever device

00:37:31   you issued the directive on to Spotify in the cloud,

00:37:35   from Spotify in the cloud to whatever device that is,

00:37:37   which might be the same device, you know,

00:37:39   could just come right back, but then it plays right there.

00:37:41   - And then from that point forward,

00:37:43   once the playback has started,

00:37:44   the source device is not involved.

00:37:47   - Right, but I don't see Apple,

00:37:49   I don't blame Apple at all for not supporting Spotify's

00:37:54   own proprietary connection thing.

00:37:59   It's not just as much, it's not simple,

00:38:03   we're not gonna let any third party audio play at all.

00:38:06   So I could see them adding support for this

00:38:11   and I don't know if Spotify would do it though

00:38:12   if it's not Spotify Connect, who knows?

00:38:14   - Ultimately, I don't know what Apple's strategy here is

00:38:20   but I think they could sell a lot more of these

00:38:24   probably high profit $350 speakers

00:38:27   and presumably there's probably gonna be

00:38:29   more than one HomePod model in the future

00:38:31   so they could probably sell many different items

00:38:33   in the family of HomePods.

00:38:35   Selling a lot of high profit hardware

00:38:38   if they covered more use cases

00:38:41   and supported more third party services.

00:38:44   And I would imagine,

00:38:46   while there is a lot of long term strategic value

00:38:50   to boosting Apple Music, Apple Music itself

00:38:52   is probably not much of a money maker.

00:38:54   You know, music streaming is famously unprofitable,

00:38:57   as Spotify knows very well.

00:38:59   So it, like, I would imagine Apple is probably better suited

00:39:03   making sure their hardware sells really well,

00:39:06   rather than trying to artificially hamper the hardware sales

00:39:11   to boost an unprofitable web service.

00:39:13   That doesn't really sound like Apple.

00:39:15   - Well, anyway, we can keep talking about HomePod

00:39:17   in a minute, but I wanna take a break here.

00:39:19   But it reminded me with you on the show,

00:39:22   and I've been meaning to say this on the show,

00:39:25   I just posted on "Daring Fireball" yesterday

00:39:27   about sponsorships and sponsoring a podcast in particular,

00:39:31   that I never, the podcast has been doing,

00:39:33   my podcast has been doing well.

00:39:35   I think ATP's been doing well.

00:39:38   Lots of shows, you guys do 52 shows a year, which is nuts,

00:39:42   but lots of shows, three sponsors a week,

00:39:45   and it's great, and I'm very happy about it.

00:39:47   And I love all the sponsors that have come back.

00:39:49   I love sponsors that have been with me for years

00:39:52   and I'd like it because it seems to me like validation

00:39:57   that it actually works, that paying money for me

00:40:00   to tell you about such and such company

00:40:03   and then years later, they're still sponsoring

00:40:05   an episode, one episode a month or even more than that

00:40:09   shows that they must be getting good results,

00:40:11   so that's great.

00:40:11   But then I never have to, I don't have to pimp it

00:40:15   for lack of a better word.

00:40:16   I never say, hey, you know, like if you have an app

00:40:19   or a service, or you work at a company

00:40:21   where you think their thing would do well

00:40:23   with the talk show or Daring Fireball audience,

00:40:26   you should think about sponsoring the show.

00:40:28   And I almost, in the back of my head,

00:40:30   I think that I've got a lack of variety

00:40:35   on the sponsors on the podcast.

00:40:38   And I think, duh, because I never tell anybody

00:40:40   that you can sponsor it because I don't have to.

00:40:43   And so I'm taking a moment here

00:40:44   before I introduce our first sponsor,

00:40:48   who happens to be a new sponsor, which is very cool.

00:40:50   But just to you, the listener, to think about it,

00:40:54   if you've got an app or something like that,

00:40:56   the rates for the podcast are less than half the rate

00:41:00   to sponsor the weekly sponsorship thing at Daring Fireball.

00:41:02   So it's more affordable.

00:41:04   It is, to me, I think a terrific audience.

00:41:08   And just to me, just to sell it,

00:41:11   the number of sponsors who come back over and over again

00:41:13   is sort of my proof that it's a pretty good,

00:41:17   effective way of spending your ad money.

00:41:19   And the other thing too that I run into both

00:41:21   with the podcast and when I sell the weekly sponsorships

00:41:24   in particular is that a lot of the sort of indie type

00:41:28   companies that sponsor it, the whole idea of buying ads

00:41:33   is new to you and therefore weird.

00:41:36   Just to name a company, like Squarespace knows

00:41:42   how to buy ads.

00:41:43   - Yeah, they're pretty good at it.

00:41:45   - Right.

00:41:46   You know and it can be scary to say I'm gonna spend a couple thousand bucks to sponsor a podcast I get it

00:41:54   But you know if you've ever been thinking about it, seriously, it's not hard and you can just go to

00:42:00   For me I had the landing page for me if you're interested

00:42:03   Is that neat any AT fm? That's Jesse char who handles booking the the spots here?

00:42:11   Because I'm too disorganized to to keep that together

00:42:16   But she's very nice and you can go there and I think at least through the end of March

00:42:22   I think you guys are doing the same thing but for new sponsors if you never sponsored the show we're offering a discount

00:42:27   And I would love to have some new sponsors just for variety's sake

00:42:32   not yep, same deal with ATP through the same site through the same nice person Jesse char and

00:42:37   Yeah, it's and what I would say is

00:42:42   Podcast listeners, just business-wise,

00:42:44   how you're gonna spend your money,

00:42:46   podcast listeners are a little bit expensive

00:42:49   to get relative to other listeners.

00:42:51   - CPM, right. - Because we are so valuable.

00:42:54   - Right. - And so where this pays off

00:42:57   is if you stand to make more than a couple bucks

00:42:59   per new customer.

00:43:00   So I actually don't recommend it.

00:43:02   We occasionally get inquiries from people

00:43:04   who are selling apps for $3 on iOS,

00:43:07   and I actually tell them, you probably shouldn't do this.

00:43:09   - I do too. - Because that,

00:43:11   Where podcast really pays off is like podcasts,

00:43:16   especially our podcast because we are so awesome,

00:43:21   have an audience of people who are willing to spend

00:43:23   good money for good products.

00:43:27   And so that's why you have something like Squarespace

00:43:29   because this is like a nice web hosting platform

00:43:33   and the value of a customer to Squarespace

00:43:36   is probably in the hundreds of dollars over time range.

00:43:38   If you're buying a nice mattress from our friends at Casper,

00:43:41   you're spending like $800 on a mattress.

00:43:44   Basically, our audiences are willing to pay for good stuff.

00:43:49   So if you're selling something where you stand to make

00:43:54   like 30 bucks per customer, let's talk.

00:43:56   If the most you can make from somebody is like a dollar

00:44:00   from the app store, that's probably not a good fit.

00:44:03   There's lots of businesses where this is a good fit.

00:44:06   things like subscriptions and nice priced items,

00:44:09   like nice things, and for that, please contact us.

00:44:13   - Yeah, I completely agree, and I've done the same thing

00:44:16   with like two or three dollar apps.

00:44:18   There was somebody who just came out with a,

00:44:20   it's a pretty cool puzzle game.

00:44:23   I don't even play games on my phone,

00:44:24   but I kinda, this one sucked me in for at least 20 minutes.

00:44:27   But at three bucks a pop, and if you really are hoping

00:44:32   that you're gonna multiply that by whatever number

00:44:35   to at least break even, it's probably not gonna happen.

00:44:38   You're gonna sell some copies of the app,

00:44:41   but it's probably going to leave you in the red,

00:44:43   and it may not, in the long run, help you get in the black,

00:44:47   because it's just not that type of thing.

00:44:50   So I do the same thing.

00:44:51   I never, ever, ever, and hopefully I've never,

00:44:54   in all the years I've been selling sponsorships and ads,

00:44:56   I've never taken a dollar from somebody who I thought,

00:44:59   like, ooh, they shouldn't be spending this.

00:45:03   I sleep like a baby every night.

00:45:05   So I'm--

00:45:06   - Exactly.

00:45:07   On a castor mattress, on a hollow pillow.

00:45:10   - Right, by certain standards,

00:45:11   I am a terrible businessman because that's,

00:45:14   there's, you know, I don't think there's any salespeople

00:45:17   who listen to our shows, but if somebody out there

00:45:20   is like a professional car salesman or something like that,

00:45:23   they're like, "What the hell are you talking about?

00:45:25   "Somebody wants to spend money

00:45:26   "and you tell 'em not to buy your thing?"

00:45:28   But I, you know, I would rather sleep well.

00:45:31   - I think it's also a good long-term business.

00:45:35   If you take someone's money knowing

00:45:36   they're gonna not see a return on that,

00:45:39   then maybe down the road, if they were gonna buy something,

00:45:44   if they're selling something down the road

00:45:45   that could benefit from it,

00:45:46   or they could make money from it,

00:45:47   they're gonna be less likely to go to you.

00:45:48   Or if they tell a friend,

00:45:49   they're gonna be less likely to recommend you,

00:45:51   or they're gonna actually trash you,

00:45:52   or the idea of podcast advertising to their friends

00:45:55   or their company or whatever else.

00:45:57   It's not good long-term business

00:46:00   to take people's money knowing that you're

00:46:02   kind of burning them.

00:46:02   - Right, exactly, like it could show up on a Quora

00:46:05   forum thread a year later where somebody would be like,

00:46:08   "Hey, is sponsoring the talk show a good idea?"

00:46:10   And somebody would be like, "Yeah, I spent a couple

00:46:12   "thousand dollars and got $20 in sales."

00:46:16   No, it's terrible.

00:46:17   - Or like, you know, they could go work for an ad agency.

00:46:19   Who like is, you know, some client asks them,

00:46:22   "Hey, should we be buying podcast ads?"

00:46:24   And they'll say, "Oh no, they're a terrible deal."

00:46:26   Like, it's much better to actually like,

00:46:28   Keep people happy and not take their money when you know that they're not going to see

00:46:31   a return.

00:46:32   Well, anyway, our first sponsor this week is a new sponsor.

00:46:36   I can't do the read right now.

00:46:37   It is a company called Tres Pontas.

00:46:39   Tres Pontas, they're a Brazilian company and they sell coffee and olive oil, which is the

00:46:45   most intriguing mix of products I've ever seen from a company.

00:46:50   And tomorrow, I'm getting by FedEx some of their coffee and I'm going to make it and

00:46:55   I'm gonna and then I'm gonna through the magic of editing. I'm gonna jump in right around right here and

00:47:00   I'm not gonna lie to you. I'm not gonna cheat you Marco and I recording on Thursday night, but on Friday

00:47:06   I'm gonna jump in here with the recording and I'm gonna tell you what their coffee tastes like

00:47:20   Okay, this is next day John Gruber

00:47:23   I'm recording this about 12 hours after the show last night with Marco. I got my shipment of tres Pontes coffee this morning

00:47:30   They sent me their cut to a and I'm probably butchering the pronunciation of that. It's Portuguese cat

00:47:37   you a I and

00:47:39   They sent it to me in four roasts light medium dark and French roast. I've had two pots of this coffee

00:47:46   I've made two for some a/b testing with the dark roast light roast. It's excellent coffee. I love it

00:47:51   I've drank way too much of it

00:47:54   Quite frankly, it's really good

00:47:58   I think I prefer the light roast did a lot of done up did a lot of a/b testing between the light and the dark

00:48:03   I guess I'll do medium and French tomorrow

00:48:06   It's really good stuff. So here's the deal trace

00:48:10   Pontus coffee, you've probably heard of single origin coffee

00:48:13   Well, tres pon tas coffee is takes it to a new level. It's single farm

00:48:18   coffee

00:48:21   all of it comes from

00:48:23   the

00:48:24   race re is race family farm

00:48:27   Just underneath the peaks of the tres pon tas mountains in Brazil

00:48:32   For over a hundred years and three generations the race family has been growing some of the best coffee in Brazil previously

00:48:40   They only sold it to local roasters

00:48:43   Recently, they've only recently started exporting it

00:48:46   here to the United States.

00:48:48   And so this is a new product

00:48:49   that you really couldn't get before,

00:48:50   and you can get it now, and it's just excellent.

00:48:52   You have two ways to find out more information

00:48:57   and to order it.

00:48:57   You can go to their website, traspontas.com,

00:49:00   T-R-E-S-P-O-N-T-A-S.com/coffee.

00:49:04   You can find out all sorts of more information

00:49:06   about their coffee.

00:49:06   You can order it right there.

00:49:07   And when you order their coffee, that's when they roast it,

00:49:11   and then they ship it to you immediately.

00:49:13   The coffee I got, it's stamped,

00:49:14   it was roasted yesterday, which is insane.

00:49:17   But getting fresh roasted coffee

00:49:20   is probably the number one way

00:49:21   that you can up your coffee game.

00:49:23   Just about any coffee you get in a grocery store,

00:49:26   even a quote unquote gourmet store

00:49:28   that's been sitting on shelves,

00:49:30   even for just a couple of weeks, loses freshness.

00:49:33   Roasted coffee is a commodity that goes,

00:49:40   just loses its flavor quickly.

00:49:43   Fresh roasted coffee really does make a difference

00:49:46   and Tres Pontas coffee only gets roasted once you order it.

00:49:49   The other thing you can do is you can go to Amazon.

00:49:51   This is so much easier if you just wanna try it.

00:49:53   Go to Amazon and search for Tres Pontas.

00:49:55   T-R-E-S-P-O-N-T-I-S and their coffee

00:49:59   will be the first thing you see.

00:50:00   And when you buy on Amazon,

00:50:01   your coffee will still be roasted fresh to order

00:50:04   and shipped out from Tres Pontas right away.

00:50:06   When you get it from Amazon,

00:50:07   it's not like it's sitting pre-bagged in warehouses

00:50:10   or something like that.

00:50:11   It's just a front end.

00:50:12   The order goes through to Tres Pontas.

00:50:14   They roast the coffee and they ship it to you.

00:50:16   You can get it in any one of those four roasts,

00:50:19   light, medium, dark French roast,

00:50:20   and you can get it pre-ground or whole bean.

00:50:22   I recommend whole bean, quite frankly.

00:50:25   And all orders enjoy free shipping,

00:50:27   regardless of where you order it.

00:50:28   I don't, that seems too good to be true.

00:50:31   The other thing you can do,

00:50:33   if you get it, you like it, you wanna get more,

00:50:34   is you can sign up for a coffee subscription

00:50:36   from Tres Pontas and get roasted beans

00:50:38   to you every one, two or four weeks, your choice. And when you sign up for a coffee subscription,

00:50:43   you save 10% off every bag of coffee. Now here's the really good deal. Listeners of the talk show

00:50:49   can get an extra 10% off using the code "THETALKSHOW" with the "the" at checkout when you buy a coffee

00:50:55   subscription. This means you get a total of 20% off every bag of coffee in your subscription in

00:51:00   perpetuity with that code. Just remember to enter the code "ATCHECKOUTTHETALKSHOW" when you sign up

00:51:05   subscription. So my thanks to Trace Pontas for sponsoring the show and for

00:51:10   sending me this excellent coffee to sample. Now we're back. We're back

00:51:15   after my magically inserted review of Trace Pontas coffee. I do know one thing

00:51:22   about their coffee. I do know how I'm going to grind it and that will be with

00:51:27   what's the name of the thing I have, Marco? The Baratza Virtuoso. The only

00:51:31   - The burrata grinder you should have.

00:51:32   - The burrata virtuoso.

00:51:33   This was a source of conflict in our friendship

00:51:38   for years and years because I had a piece of crap burr,

00:51:43   well no, a burr grinder is what I have now.

00:51:45   I just had like, it was just like a little--

00:51:47   - Yeah, you had the spinning blade.

00:51:48   - Yeah, a little spinning--

00:51:49   - The kind that everybody has, yeah.

00:51:50   - A little spinning propeller from KitchenAid, I believe,

00:51:54   for years, and I said, "Well, what should I buy?"

00:51:59   And then you told me what to buy,

00:52:00   and I figured out how big it was,

00:52:02   and it literally wouldn't fit in our old kitchen.

00:52:04   But now we have a new kitchen,

00:52:06   and it's a much bigger kitchen,

00:52:07   and it's so big that I have my own cubby hole

00:52:11   where I'm allowed to put stuff.

00:52:12   (laughing)

00:52:13   So I have the Baratza Virtuoso,

00:52:18   and I like it, I like it every day.

00:52:21   I don't know--

00:52:22   - I still remember,

00:52:23   you gave me one of my favorite compliments of all time.

00:52:27   when I visited you in your old kitchen

00:52:30   and your old place a few years back,

00:52:32   and I brought some of my own coffee that I roasted.

00:52:35   Oh no, no, it wasn't even that,

00:52:36   it was when I mailed it to you at some point.

00:52:38   - Oh yeah. - And you told me

00:52:39   after you tried it, you said,

00:52:42   "I almost wanna say fuck you, this is so good."

00:52:45   (laughing)

00:52:46   I was like so, so perfect.

00:52:49   And there's been times in my life

00:52:50   where I have said that now to other people about things,

00:52:53   because it's just so, it's so perfect.

00:52:55   - It was good coffee.

00:52:56   It was very good coffee, I have to admit.

00:52:59   I don't know that I could Pepsi challenge the difference

00:53:03   between fresh ground coffee,

00:53:05   ground with the Baratza Virtuoso,

00:53:07   versus the old crappy grinder that I used to have.

00:53:12   I think I probably could.

00:53:13   I do feel that on a daily basis,

00:53:16   I'm giving my coffee more Bs and As,

00:53:23   and fewer Cs and Bs,

00:53:25   in terms of how good I think it tastes.

00:53:28   I don't know how much of it's due to that,

00:53:29   but it just works better.

00:53:32   I like that I can just set the dial and walk away.

00:53:35   And the way that it cuts it up,

00:53:38   even if it doesn't taste better,

00:53:40   it's a much neater grind for,

00:53:43   I do pour over almost every day.

00:53:45   But even when I make, I think I use a finer,

00:53:48   I always have to look it up.

00:53:49   I think I use a finer grind for the plunger thing,

00:53:53   the AeroPress. - The AeroPress.

00:53:54   - Yeah, you should.

00:53:55   But on the AirPress, you should be setting that dial

00:53:57   to roughly like 10.

00:54:01   - I think I do 12. - The dial goes like zero

00:54:03   to 40, and yeah, for the AirPress, you should be around 10.

00:54:06   - I do like 12, and I do 20 for pour over.

00:54:09   - Yeah, that's about right.

00:54:11   - But the bigger difference, whether it tastes better or not

00:54:14   is it's way neater.

00:54:16   Like it comes right out of that little plastic thing,

00:54:20   and there's just a couple of little pieces of the husk

00:54:23   that are sort of floaters, you know.

00:54:25   - But Jeff, yeah.

00:54:26   - Right, but they clean up real easy,

00:54:28   just like one swipe with a wet towel

00:54:30   and they're off the counter.

00:54:31   - Yeah, most of that's just static.

00:54:32   - But there's no dust, it's not like dust

00:54:34   like the old grinder.

00:54:36   - Well, it's also, it's a much more consistent grind size,

00:54:40   like the grains that come out are much more consistent size.

00:54:42   Like the problem with the spinning blade grinders,

00:54:45   it's kind of similar, if you ever use a food processor

00:54:47   or a blender, like you try to blend something

00:54:50   that's like a little bit thick or chunky,

00:54:52   like vegetables or a smoothie or something.

00:54:54   And the part near the blade gets totally pureed

00:54:58   and then the stuff around the edges

00:55:00   that just kind of sticks to the walls

00:55:01   just kind of stays all clumpy and everything,

00:55:04   it doesn't get blended.

00:55:05   So you have this huge variety between

00:55:07   the stuff in the middle, which is super finely blended,

00:55:09   and the stuff on the outside, which is really not.

00:55:11   That's what a blade grinder does to coffee.

00:55:13   So you have some of the grounds

00:55:16   that are really finely ground

00:55:18   and some that are really coarse.

00:55:19   And depending on how you're brewing it,

00:55:22   this may matter or it may not.

00:55:24   Typically, like the pour over or drip methods

00:55:27   are pretty forgiving of grind size.

00:55:29   AeroPress and French press are really not.

00:55:33   For French press, you want them to be really big

00:55:36   so they don't seep through the filter.

00:55:38   And for AeroPress, you want them to be really small

00:55:40   because one of the great advantages of the AeroPress

00:55:42   over any other method is that you can have

00:55:43   a really fine grind and get tons of dense flavor

00:55:47   packed into a small amount of liquid

00:55:49   without having all the grounds seep through the filter.

00:55:52   - Yeah.

00:55:54   I tried French press years ago

00:55:55   when I first started getting even semi-serious about coffee

00:55:59   and I think compared to you who roast your own beans,

00:56:03   I still can only say I'm semi-serious about it.

00:56:05   Way more serious than anybody else in my family

00:56:08   and way less serious than a lot of people.

00:56:11   But I thought, well--

00:56:13   - By the way, I'm way less serious than a lot of people.

00:56:15   - I know.

00:56:16   - The way I roast is pretty casual.

00:56:19   Like I don't get into like, you know,

00:56:20   custom roasting profiles and tweaking the temperatures

00:56:24   just right to like during the roast

00:56:25   to get these right curves.

00:56:26   I don't do any of that.

00:56:27   I basically do like the stock preset on the roaster

00:56:31   of how to roast and I just decide like,

00:56:33   how far do I go before I stop it?

00:56:35   That's it, that's the only decision I make.

00:56:37   - I do think though, I did try French Pest years ago

00:56:45   and I fucking hated it.

00:56:47   But it was because it was too much of the coffee

00:56:50   was getting into the, you know, the beverage.

00:56:54   - Yeah, 'cause you had the wrong grinder.

00:56:55   - Right, I had the wrong grinder.

00:56:57   And I was like, yeah.

00:56:57   - French press can be amazing.

00:56:59   The reasons that I don't like it are mainly

00:57:02   that it's a pain in the butt to clean,

00:57:04   which everyone has this problem.

00:57:06   And also that I prefer the, like,

00:57:09   AeroPress gives a little bit stronger of a flavor,

00:57:11   and I just prefer that.

00:57:12   But French press is also very good, very respectable.

00:57:15   If I'm at a restaurant that has some kind of

00:57:17   nice coffee as a French press option

00:57:19   that you can order after the meal.

00:57:21   I'll sometimes do that and share it with somebody

00:57:23   'cause it is kinda nice.

00:57:24   - Yeah, but it definitely has to be ground right.

00:57:26   Otherwise it's like you're drinking mud.

00:57:28   Oh, I had one other coffee related thing.

00:57:32   Oh, I know.

00:57:33   Everybody had always told me for years,

00:57:36   and I believe it, but the optimal water temperature

00:57:40   for pour over is, I don't know,

00:57:42   like 185 degrees Fahrenheit, somewhere around there.

00:57:46   - Depends who you ask.

00:57:47   - Yeah, I guess it depends who you ask,

00:57:48   but definitely not 212.

00:57:50   - Right, although a lot of coffee pros

00:57:55   think it actually isn't that far off 212.

00:57:57   Like, I think, I forget what the SCAA,

00:58:01   the Specialty Coffee Association of America,

00:58:03   they have like a bunch of standards.

00:58:04   I think their temperature is 204.

00:58:07   So it doesn't need to be that much off.

00:58:09   Like, I use an electric kettle,

00:58:11   and it has presets for basically every 10 degrees,

00:58:14   And I use the 200 preset and it's fine.

00:58:17   - So I don't have an electric kettle

00:58:18   and I don't feel like, you know,

00:58:21   I do have my own cubby hole but I'm running out of space

00:58:24   in there with that and a SodaStream.

00:58:26   So I just-- - Trust me,

00:58:28   I was an electric kettle skeptic for a long time

00:58:31   and what happened basically,

00:58:33   like my favorite glass kettle finally broke.

00:58:36   - The one that had the-- - Somebody had the,

00:58:38   I did, the aerial printing.

00:58:39   - The aerial printing. (laughs)

00:58:41   - Yes, I called it the Helvetic Kettle for years,

00:58:44   friends with you and later learned that it was actually printed in Arial.

00:58:47   Right. And the problem was that if you get the same kettle it's the

00:58:51   Medelko like glass kettle and the problem is if you get it after a few

00:58:55   years ago they changed the font that it's printed and it's now printed in

00:59:00   something that was kind of like italic comic sans. Like it's completely the

00:59:04   opposite of what you'd want. Wait what's it called? It's Medelko and it's like just

00:59:10   the Medelko glass kettle. It's like 12 bucks and and like and and then and the

00:59:15   picture on Amazon did not reflect the font change for a long time. I don't know

00:59:18   if it does now. Let me see. I don't know. Hold on. No, I don't think so.

00:59:27   Although there's two. So see here. So this is so there are two that like

00:59:31   there's one that still shows the old font and it's M-E-D-E-L-C-O if you search

00:59:37   Medelko kettle one so she was the old font and right next to it is one that shows oh

00:59:41   Oh my god, it's it's as though somebody at that company

00:59:48   Who doesn't it does not see the difference between Helvetica and and

00:59:54   Ariel and enough people like me wrote to them to complain and they were like, oh, yeah

01:00:00   You want to complain about the font? Fuck you buddy. Here you go

01:00:05   Exactly. So it went from almost Helvetica to

01:00:09   To knock off Comic Sans. It's not even

01:00:13   Better if it was actually Comic Sans

01:00:16   There might be some because like if you look at where it says 12 cup capacity that looks almost exactly like Comic Sans

01:00:21   Oh, it almost looks like it's doing a fake italic. We're just slanting the text

01:00:25   Whistling kettle looks correct. Yeah, maybe that was like an actual italic. Maybe I don't know what Comic Sans italic is

01:00:33   Maybe that's just Comic Sans italic. I'm sorry. The problem is like imagine so like, you know, imagine God even the numbers you order the aerial

01:00:40   It's amazing it's like who would want this

01:00:45   That's so funny though, because I literally did not buy it even though you said that you recommended it

01:00:51   I literally didn't buy it years ago because it was printed in aerial and now they've done this. It's so much worse. Oh my god

01:00:58   I've since moved on to because yeah when that broke I knew I couldn't get a new one

01:01:03   and so I dug out an electric kettle

01:01:05   I had bought a while ago for a camping trip

01:01:07   and we've been using that since.

01:01:08   And Europeans laugh at me whenever I would say

01:01:12   like how I boil things in the kettle,

01:01:13   they're like, "Wait, what?

01:01:14   "Like on your stove?

01:01:15   "What are you doing?

01:01:16   "Like that's barbaric."

01:01:17   'Cause like most of the rest of the world

01:01:18   has figured out by now that electric kettles

01:01:20   are way better at boiling things,

01:01:22   boiling water for coffee and tea.

01:01:24   - Why?

01:01:25   - We are the only, first of all, they're way faster.

01:01:28   - Oh, I don't know about that.

01:01:29   I got it, we have a new range and I'll tell you what,

01:01:32   that fucker boils water fast.

01:01:34   - You have induction, right?

01:01:37   That's pretty crazy.

01:01:38   - No, well, we do have induction,

01:01:40   but I just boil it right over a big old gas flame.

01:01:43   - Oh, so you have gas, okay.

01:01:46   - Yeah, we have gas.

01:01:47   - We also have a really heavy-duty gas stove,

01:01:50   and so it would boil pretty fast in the aerial kettle,

01:01:53   but it's either the same speed or it's faster

01:01:58   in the electric kettle.

01:01:59   It's super fast and electric

01:02:01   because they just draw tons of power

01:02:02   and are pretty efficient at converting that to heat.

01:02:05   And then what's nice about it is that first of all,

01:02:07   you can set it to a certain temperature

01:02:09   and have it hold it at that temperature,

01:02:10   which is very nice.

01:02:11   Especially if you're doing something

01:02:12   that's not a full boil,

01:02:14   if you're doing green tea,

01:02:16   green tea has to be 170, 175,

01:02:19   you don't want it to be any hotter than that.

01:02:20   And it's always kind of a pain to do that

01:02:23   with a kettle on the stove.

01:02:24   - Right, or if you're halfway--

01:02:25   - So you can hold it at certain temperatures.

01:02:26   - If you're halfway through making coffee

01:02:27   and get interrupted 'cause the UPS guy shows up or something.

01:02:30   - Right, exactly.

01:02:31   It can also hold it at a certain temperature

01:02:33   for like a half hour.

01:02:34   So if you're like, if you wanted to just start it

01:02:36   while you prepare everything else,

01:02:38   by the time you're done assembling the AeroPress

01:02:41   and grinding up the coffee and everything,

01:02:43   it's boiling, it's ready.

01:02:44   And it's holding it at the temperature you requested.

01:02:46   So that's really nice.

01:02:47   It also just boils it, it's really fast,

01:02:49   it holds a ton of water.

01:02:50   The one I have holds like one and a half liters at once.

01:02:53   So if you're making a lot, it's great.

01:02:55   If you're making back to back, it's great.

01:02:57   And then finally, you can do it

01:02:59   in a different part of the kitchen.

01:03:00   you're not taking up a burner on the stove.

01:03:02   So what I found is it allowed me to like

01:03:05   compact my coffee preparation area

01:03:08   from like this big triangle that like spanned

01:03:11   from the cabinet to the stove to the sink.

01:03:13   It was basically like my whole kitchen.

01:03:14   Now I can do it like all in this one little countertop

01:03:17   next to the sink.

01:03:18   'Cause it's all like I'm able to have it wherever I want.

01:03:20   So that part's nice too.

01:03:21   And also it just saves wear and tear

01:03:22   out of my stupid gas burners that break constantly.

01:03:24   Never get a Viking stove or a house

01:03:26   that has a Viking stove already in it.

01:03:28   - Ugh. (laughs)

01:03:30   - So, go electric.

01:03:32   It seems a little weird for the first day,

01:03:35   and then you're like, how did I ever use the stove

01:03:38   every day like an ape?

01:03:40   - Where do you put it?

01:03:41   I mean, it's just like on a countertop?

01:03:44   - Yeah, you basically put it where you make your coffee.

01:03:47   - No way, yeah.

01:03:48   I like cooking. - 'Cause you already have

01:03:49   a grinder plugged in, so put it next to your grinder.

01:03:51   - Nah, I don't have room for it over there.

01:03:53   No, I like cooking-- - Don't you have like

01:03:54   four sinks in there?

01:03:56   - Nah, two sinks.

01:03:57   And there's no room by my sink.

01:04:00   No, I figured out in my optimal solution

01:04:02   is I put just the right amount of coffee in the kettle.

01:04:05   I put it on the high flame.

01:04:08   And then as I grind the coffee and get it prepared,

01:04:11   by the time I'm ready for it, it's boiling.

01:04:14   And then here's my trick.

01:04:16   My trick is, and I go over and I get two ice cubes

01:04:21   and throw two ice cubes in,

01:04:23   and it immediately turns the 212 water

01:04:25   into a better temperature, which I have measured precisely

01:04:29   with my Thermapim, and it's exactly like 188

01:04:33   or 190 or something.

01:04:34   - All right, that's, I mean, as long as you can do that

01:04:38   in like a repetitive way, which just sounds like you can,

01:04:41   then that's fine, I guess.

01:04:42   - I'm not even fully awake, and I've got the ice cubes

01:04:45   in my hand ready to toss 'em in.

01:04:47   And I don't know--

01:04:47   - It's a little easier to just hit a button

01:04:48   that says 185 and just move on.

01:04:51   - I don't know, to me, there's something cool

01:04:52   about throwing ice cubes into boiling water.

01:04:55   (laughing)

01:04:56   - Fair enough.

01:04:57   - Where were we?

01:05:01   We were talking about HomePod.

01:05:01   How about this thing with the HomePod

01:05:03   leaving rings on people's furniture?

01:05:05   I'm astounded by this.

01:05:07   I really am.

01:05:08   - It just seems, yeah.

01:05:10   - Do you know how much fucking trouble I would be in if--

01:05:15   (laughing)

01:05:16   - Oh yeah.

01:05:17   - Like we've got, I don't even know what material they are,

01:05:20   there's some kind of stone type material that are countertops in the kitchen.

01:05:24   I, you know, they're not marble,

01:05:28   but they're some marble like material that we've either granted or courts. Yeah.

01:05:32   One of those and it might, I forget, but it's something like that. And, uh,

01:05:36   you know, meticulously picked out at, you know,

01:05:40   some input by me, but you know, the whole thing was designed by Amy. Um,

01:05:45   and I mean, you've been, you've seen, it's a really nice, it's,

01:05:49   She did good work. It's it's a really designed kitchen if I'll tell and that's where I set up the home pod and

01:05:54   When I first got to review it, I'll tell you what if I left a fucking ring on that counter from that home pod

01:06:00   You have any much I'd I would be fucking dead. I I cannot I

01:06:04   Mean she would literally kill you we would not be told doing this podcast right? I mean literally killed I

01:06:09   And I realize it doesn't leave rings on that material. Thank fuck. Thank God, but

01:06:16   You know, I've seen pictures of some of the people like who've had it on

01:06:21   You know the the tables and and shelves that that they've left these rings on they all seem like perfectly reasonable

01:06:28   Places to put a home pod. Yeah. Well, and you know, it's a really popular countertop material butcher block oiled wood, right?

01:06:34   Exactly really popular right and that's just it is that in some alternate universe, you know

01:06:40   I could very easily imagine that that would have been the direction we would have gone

01:06:45   You know it maybe if I picked it would have been the direction we would have gone

01:06:49   I you know I've been in you know new kitchens that or even old kitchens

01:06:54   But you know nice kitchens that have that type of material. I could totally see it I

01:06:59   That's it's just crazy to me that that that product didn't ship with a

01:07:05   I mean if there's some kind of thing of that that's that

01:07:11   That's the way to go with the silicon material at the base and I realize there's an acoustic component to that right that this

01:07:18   That the home pod the way that it shoots audio in all directions including down

01:07:23   that the

01:07:25   material and how it

01:07:27   Rests on the thing it's sitting on has some kind of an effect on that and there might there might be that they were well

01:07:32   aware of this and went with it anyway, but the fact that it didn't ship with a

01:07:36   discrete

01:07:38   warning about it along the lines of the way that they said like hey if you buy the jet black iPhone 7

01:07:44   It's gonna pick up scratches all micro abrasions or whatever. They called them all over the back, you know, just let people know

01:07:50   Yeah, like like the the the iPhone 7 micro abrasion thing

01:07:55   I think was that is the best parallel to like how they should have gone like assuming that

01:07:59   assuming that they didn't want to or weren't able to

01:08:01   Change the material before this thing shipped which that's a big assumption

01:08:06   I think they probably should have found this during their apparently widespread and long-standing

01:08:11   test of these home pods that were in employees' homes and being tested.

01:08:15   This had to have come up.

01:08:18   So there's possibly a process issue there where either this wasn't found in the test

01:08:25   because they didn't do enough testing, or it was found and they decided to ignore it

01:08:28   for whatever reason.

01:08:29   Maybe they had good reasons, who knows?

01:08:31   But either way, there's probably a process problem there.

01:08:35   And then there's definitely a communication problem

01:08:38   both in the fact that we weren't warned ahead of time,

01:08:40   that it's not like a little note

01:08:41   in the instruction manual or anything.

01:08:44   And honestly, I thought their response

01:08:45   to these claims yesterday was kind of dismissive

01:08:49   and almost as bad as the, you know,

01:08:51   you're holding it wrong thing.

01:08:53   It was really not, I think, a good moment in Apple PR.

01:08:57   But it just seems like, you know,

01:09:00   it's such a dumb little thing.

01:09:03   This is not a big deal.

01:09:05   This is, like I said on ATP, it's not a big deal.

01:09:07   It's not gonna like sink the home pod.

01:09:10   It's not going to result in like a massive recall

01:09:13   in all likelihood.

01:09:14   I mean, you know, Watson announced it tomorrow

01:09:16   and put me wrong, but like I don't think

01:09:17   they're gonna do anything about it.

01:09:18   I think it's gonna be like a footnote

01:09:20   in the support documents basically says like,

01:09:22   hey, don't put this on certain services

01:09:24   without some kind of protection.

01:09:27   And you know, but you know, like the response of,

01:09:31   well, you should probably just refinish your table.

01:09:33   (laughing)

01:09:34   - That's not a good response.

01:09:36   - Right, and you know, it's--

01:09:37   - And it seems like it's kind of like an unforced error

01:09:40   because like lots of other products

01:09:44   sit on these surfaces without leading marks.

01:09:47   And it's not to say that like,

01:09:49   I think I saw something earlier today

01:09:51   that apparently the Sonos One leaves very, very faint marks

01:09:55   on its four corners, like four little L-shaped corner pads,

01:09:58   and apparently it leaves some mild version

01:10:00   of the same thing.

01:10:01   So like it's not that the HomePod

01:10:02   is the only thing that does this.

01:10:04   You know, similar to how like the iPhone 4

01:10:06   was not the only phone where you hold it a certain way

01:10:08   to block the antenna.

01:10:10   And they spent a lot of that press conference

01:10:12   telling you that.

01:10:13   But it is Apple's problem in the sense that, you know,

01:10:17   this is the big story about it.

01:10:18   This is something that the HomePod seems to do more

01:10:21   than anything else.

01:10:22   And I don't think it's reasonable to expect people

01:10:27   to know this ahead of time.

01:10:30   Like just to automatically know,

01:10:32   oh, you shouldn't put things with rubber feet

01:10:36   on your oiled wood countertops.

01:10:38   To me, something with rubber feet

01:10:40   seems like it would be totally fine.

01:10:41   - Clean, especially. - It's not totally inert.

01:10:43   It seemed like that would be protecting

01:10:45   the surface from damage.

01:10:46   - Right, and I'm even-- - And even though--

01:10:47   - I'm even careful about things

01:10:49   like getting my finger grease on something.

01:10:50   So when I took the HomePod out of the box,

01:10:53   I was careful to only touch it by the sides

01:10:56   and from Shenzhen, China, until it touched my countertop,

01:11:01   the bottom had never been touched by human hands.

01:11:04   You know, and I thought like, well, that's clean.

01:11:06   You know, it's a clean countertop

01:11:08   and the HomePod is certainly clean

01:11:10   because I just took it out of the box and never touched it.

01:11:13   It never would have occurred to me in a million years

01:11:15   not to put it on wood kitchen countertops

01:11:18   if we had had wood kitchen countertops.

01:11:20   Just wouldn't have even entered my mind as like a,

01:11:24   hmm, maybe I shouldn't put it there.

01:11:26   You know, like things like, hey, maybe I shouldn't put it,

01:11:29   you know, I would think of things like,

01:11:32   well, maybe I shouldn't put it next to a sink

01:11:34   because, you know, an accidental spill could happen here.

01:11:37   Like, you know, I just put it next to where our echo was.

01:11:42   So, but that spot was chosen because, you know,

01:11:45   it seemed like a spot that is almost always dry

01:11:48   and doesn't have accidental spills.

01:11:51   So that occurred to me.

01:11:53   The idea that it would leave rings

01:11:54   never would have even occurred to me.

01:11:56   - Yeah, and it's the kind of thing like,

01:11:58   Obviously, like Apple should know,

01:12:00   and I'm sure they do know,

01:12:01   that this category of product,

01:12:04   as much as they are trying really hard

01:12:07   in the marketing and the PR

01:12:09   to make this about audio quality

01:12:10   while it's sitting in your living room,

01:12:12   the fact is this category of product

01:12:14   is very often used in kitchens.

01:12:16   And a very common place to put it is on a countertop.

01:12:20   And so they should have, and I hope did,

01:12:24   test it on every popular countertop material

01:12:27   that's available.

01:12:28   And they would have found this if they did that

01:12:31   because butcher block is very, very popular

01:12:33   and very common because it's really nice

01:12:36   and pretty inexpensive.

01:12:37   And so they should have found this and they didn't

01:12:40   or they decided to ship it anyway.

01:12:42   And so it's just, again, this isn't a huge problem.

01:12:47   There's already like 10,000 awesome little coasters

01:12:50   that people will sell you for $30 made out of leather

01:12:52   and metal and stuff and custom engraved,

01:12:55   artisanally hand-stitched leather coasters for it.

01:12:58   And maybe Apple will sell their own this fall

01:13:02   for $100, this little leather circle

01:13:04   with an Apple logo in the middle of it.

01:13:05   But it isn't a big problem,

01:13:09   but it's just kind of embarrassing,

01:13:10   and I think it does reveal some potential process flaws

01:13:14   in how this got out without even a warning.

01:13:17   - Just seems very surprising to me.

01:13:20   I think the two most, I don't know,

01:13:24   Everybody's different, I don't know.

01:13:26   But to me, the two most natural places for one of these

01:13:30   are a kitchen and a bedroom.

01:13:31   'Cause I don't think it's a great living room product

01:13:34   if your living room is your TV room.

01:13:36   Like I use that interchangeably.

01:13:39   So I realize that in like a lifestyle magazine,

01:13:42   people don't have a TV in their living room

01:13:44   because it's meant for hosting parties and everybody.

01:13:48   - In the magazines, they also have white couches.

01:13:50   - Right, everybody, all the chairs face around each other

01:13:53   so you can talk to each other and there's no place for a TV.

01:13:56   Well, our living room has a TV.

01:13:58   But because it is, you know, if you have a TV,

01:14:01   a TV room is not a great place for a home pod

01:14:03   unless you really listen to enough music

01:14:05   independent of your TV that having a sound system

01:14:09   that's completely independent of your

01:14:11   home entertainment system makes sense to you.

01:14:14   It doesn't really make sense to me that way.

01:14:17   Kitchen though is perfect because traditionally

01:14:19   most people don't have a good sound system in their kitchen.

01:14:24   And a lot of people spend a lot of time in their kitchens.

01:14:27   A lot of families eat their meals in the kitchen.

01:14:30   So it's a great place for that.

01:14:33   And a bedroom would be another place

01:14:35   where maybe you don't have a good sound system.

01:14:38   But that's another place where you might have wood.

01:14:41   I'm still not sure about the details of what types of wood,

01:14:44   what types of treatment.

01:14:46   It's like ones that have a polyurethane coating are safe,

01:14:49   and ones that are just sort of oiled aren't.

01:14:52   But it seems to me like a lot of people

01:14:54   might have bedroom furniture

01:14:55   that exactly is along those lines too.

01:14:58   - Yeah, it seems like the problem is that,

01:15:01   it's in surfaces that their main treatment is just oil

01:15:06   that is like slightly seeped into the wood.

01:15:09   And that the problem therefore is that

01:15:10   when you stick the silicone on top of it,

01:15:13   that the silicone absorbs some of that oil into itself,

01:15:16   pulling it out of the wood

01:15:17   and creating basically an unfinished circle in the wood.

01:15:21   And that's why it goes away after a few days,

01:15:23   'cause the oil has time to reabsorb

01:15:24   into that area of the wood.

01:15:26   - So I had a tweet the other day, yesterday actually,

01:15:30   that went semi-viral for me, at least, 1,322 likes.

01:15:34   It was an interaction I had.

01:15:35   It was with a HomePod in my office.

01:15:37   The entire tweet-- - Oh, the courts thing?

01:15:40   - Yeah, the entire tweet is just my, the playback.

01:15:45   And I believe it's word-for-word accurate.

01:15:46   So here's me, hey Siri, oh I shouldn't say that, I'm sorry.

01:15:49   Hey, you know.

01:15:50   - No, if Phil Schiller said it on your show,

01:15:52   you can say it on your show.

01:15:53   - Well, I'm gonna say, hey HomePod,

01:15:54   hey HomePod, how many quarts are in a gallon?

01:15:57   And HomePod said, what would you like me

01:15:59   to convert one gallon to?

01:16:02   And I already knew we were off to a rough start,

01:16:04   and I said, quarts.

01:16:05   And there was a little bit of a pause,

01:16:08   and HomePod said, quarts is a mineral compound

01:16:12   composed of silicon and oxygen atoms

01:16:14   in a continuous framework,

01:16:16   blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

01:16:18   It was verbatim the first paragraph of Q-U-A-R-T-Z

01:16:23   from Wikipedia.

01:16:25   And I thought it was so funny.

01:16:28   And it was weird, and I actually know this.

01:16:31   I actually, it was a weird conversation

01:16:34   when Amy was doing something and she said,

01:16:37   how many quarts are in a gallon, two?

01:16:39   And I was like, no, no, four,

01:16:40   because that's the quart and quart is a quarter,

01:16:44   and it's a quarter gallon.

01:16:46   That's how I remember it.

01:16:47   - Wait, is it really?

01:16:48   - Yeah, there's four quarts in it.

01:16:50   - I never knew that.

01:16:51   - Yeah, so there's four quarts in a gallon

01:16:52   and the way to remember it is that the Q-U-A-R-T

01:16:56   is the same whatever route as quarter.

01:16:59   So there you go, you'll never--

01:17:01   - Oh, that's awesome.

01:17:02   - Yeah, so I actually knew it.

01:17:04   I hate the dipshits on Twitter who were like,

01:17:06   "Oh, don't you know that?"

01:17:07   And it's like, you know what,

01:17:09   I'm a big fan of Fahrenheit, everybody knows it.

01:17:13   I'm okay with miles instead of kilometers.

01:17:16   But you know, like for the volume,

01:17:21   I mean, the imperial system is terrible.

01:17:24   I mean, you know.

01:17:26   And it even shows, like, you know,

01:17:28   that you can buy like a two liter of soda, you know,

01:17:30   like we do sell products and like the liter

01:17:33   is the one thing that sort of seeped into American life.

01:17:36   So I'm down with that.

01:17:37   I can't remember for the life of me

01:17:39   how many cups are in anything or anything like that.

01:17:41   But I knew the answer to this,

01:17:43   But I just thought off the top of my head, hey,

01:17:45   here's a question to ask Siri on the HomePod.

01:17:50   And the way that this interaction went bad was--

01:17:54   I swear to God, this is verbatim, word for word,

01:17:56   what she said.

01:17:57   And then I immediately, after this,

01:18:00   immediately tried it again.

01:18:02   And I said the same thing.

01:18:03   Hey, HomePod, how many quarts are in a gallon?

01:18:05   And it got the right answer.

01:18:08   I said, there's four quarts in a gallon immediately.

01:18:11   So I got it.

01:18:12   I had this comical response, immediately asked again,

01:18:16   and it gave me the right answer.

01:18:18   And so a whole bunch of people on Twitter,

01:18:21   I didn't explain it.

01:18:22   All I did was post the transcript of my interaction

01:18:24   and a whole bunch of people said,

01:18:25   "I just tried it, it works for me."

01:18:27   But I thought it was kind of enlightening

01:18:31   that the way that this blew up

01:18:34   and became a widely retweeted and liked and everything,

01:18:37   clarified for me some mushy thinking

01:18:40   on what's wrong with Siri.

01:18:43   And that sort of like, hey, I tried it, it worked for me.

01:18:48   And the fact that it worked for me, five seconds later,

01:18:51   I get it, I see that all the time.

01:18:53   And that to me is the fundamental problem with Siri today.

01:18:58   And it's not how much Siri can do

01:19:01   and how many features Siri has.

01:19:05   And even though I think that's what too many people

01:19:07   focused on compared to the Amazon Alexa on the Echo products and the Google on theirs

01:19:14   and how many home, smart home stuff they can hook up to and what syntax you have to use,

01:19:19   blah, blah, blah. To me, that's way--you're already past the fundamental problem, which

01:19:23   is that Siri is completely unreliable, even at the things that Siri can do and maybe even

01:19:30   does most of the time correctly. But if you can't count on it--I don't know what percentage

01:19:36   of my queries like how many courts are in a gallon go wrong like this. But whatever

01:19:43   that percentage is, and I'm going to guess it's, I'm going to say off the top of my head,

01:19:47   it's 10%, maybe 15%. And I could be way wrong either way because I don't keep track of it

01:19:54   and human memory is very faulty. But whatever that percentage is, it's way, way, way too

01:20:00   high and it breeds contempt. It breeds absolute contempt for the feature. And the analogy

01:20:10   I would draw is that when I click or tap, you know, on the Mac I click and on the iOS

01:20:18   I tap a button on the screen. And I know that I've hit the target correctly, that my mouse

01:20:26   is within the buttons region or my finger is with touches within the button tap region,

01:20:33   what percentage of the time does that button actually activate when I tap it? That percentage

01:20:38   is very, very close to 100% and it may well be 100%. It may well be that I, in the what,

01:20:47   five, six months I've been using an iPhone 10, that I haven't once tapped the screen

01:20:51   on a tap target and not had the tap target fire.

01:20:56   When I type a key on my keyboard, and this gets to some of the problems with the new

01:21:00   MacBook Pro keyboard, when I type a D key, how many times do I get a D on the screen?

01:21:06   A hundred percent of the time.

01:21:08   Not 99% of the time, not 99.8% of the time.

01:21:11   A hundred percent of the time.

01:21:13   And anything less than that is unacceptable.

01:21:16   And I feel like that's the problem with Siri.

01:21:18   And I get it that Siri's not, in the year 2018,

01:21:22   Siri's not going to be at 100%,

01:21:24   and it's probably not gonna be at 99%,

01:21:27   but it should be in the high 90s,

01:21:29   and it's nowhere near that.

01:21:31   - Yeah, Siri has a lot of, I think, pretty big problems

01:21:36   and pretty big challenges,

01:21:37   but the reliability is definitely, I think,

01:21:41   one of the biggest, because when this was introduced,

01:21:45   again, in 2011, that was a long time ago,

01:21:48   and Apple really was indeed way ahead of the competition then.

01:21:51   You know, it's kind of like, you know,

01:21:52   when they introduced the iPhone and Steve sat on stage

01:21:56   that they were five years ahead of the competition.

01:21:58   And that proved to be roughly correct.

01:22:00   - Right.

01:22:01   It really did.

01:22:02   - With Siri, I think they were, you know, similar,

01:22:05   you know, maybe like three to five years

01:22:06   ahead of the competition.

01:22:08   But it seemed like the competition then, of course,

01:22:11   caught up in that time, like Siri, you know,

01:22:13   like many Apple innovations do,

01:22:14   Siri kind of set the roadmap of the rest of the industry

01:22:18   for them, and so they did, the industry followed.

01:22:22   But it seemed like Siri has not gotten better

01:22:27   at anywhere near the rate

01:22:28   that everyone else is getting better.

01:22:30   It seems like Siri gets better

01:22:32   at an absolutely glacial pace compared to developments

01:22:37   at Amazon, Google, and even Microsoft.

01:22:41   - Mm-hmm.

01:22:42   So it seems like, and I don't know what it is,

01:22:46   I don't know what exactly Siri's challenges are,

01:22:49   whether there's like problems with the project or whatever.

01:22:52   I have no idea, it doesn't really matter.

01:22:53   What matters from the outside is that it is fundamentally

01:22:57   way too unreliable compared to its competitors

01:23:02   and also seems to be improving way too slowly.

01:23:06   And there's a lot of things the competitors can do

01:23:09   that Siri still can't do.

01:23:11   There's a lot of basic things that the competitors do

01:23:13   faster and more reliably than Siri does.

01:23:17   And there's a lot of things that I think

01:23:20   the competitors have figured out about

01:23:21   how to design the system, how things should respond,

01:23:25   how things should be that Apple seems to either

01:23:27   disagree with or not care about.

01:23:29   Like one of the big things there is like

01:23:31   Siri is very kind of a smart ass about certain things.

01:23:36   - Yeah, I've mentioned that before.

01:23:38   You can be a smart ass if you're really,

01:23:40   really good at your job.

01:23:42   You can occasionally be a smart ass.

01:23:44   - And you know that as a smart ass yourself.

01:23:47   You know that.

01:23:48   And I know it as somebody who's a bit of a smart ass

01:23:51   and in my youth was an intolerable smart ass.

01:23:55   But only when I knew that I was the smartest person

01:23:57   in the room. - Now you're definitely not.

01:23:59   Yeah. (laughs)

01:24:01   But if I was somebody's assistant

01:24:03   and I acted the way that I do

01:24:06   while I also messed up a third of the things

01:24:08   that I was asked to do in comically obtuse ways,

01:24:12   I would be fired in a day.

01:24:13   Like it would take less than a day I'd be fired.

01:24:17   Like Siri, I think there's always been this design

01:24:21   of Siri to be like kind of a smart ass

01:24:23   and that was kind of cute in 2011.

01:24:26   But, and it would still be kind of okay.

01:24:29   I mean, not always, honestly, I think a lot of,

01:24:31   it turns off a lot of people,

01:24:32   but it would still be kind of okay

01:24:35   if Siri was just awesome and if it did everything like awesomely.

01:24:40   But the reality is like, you know, no voice assistant

01:24:45   is as reliable as our keyboards and our other input devices.

01:24:51   And that's kind of a shame, honestly. If you think, you know, your earlier thing about, you know,

01:24:55   how often does a keyboard fail or does tapping on a screen fail?

01:25:00   I'm not sure there's any other area of consumer computing that we tolerate as high as we can.

01:25:04   rate as high of an error rate as we do with with voices. No, it's no, I mean, the only

01:25:10   other thing I can think of is is my Apple TV remote is not as accurate as my as my mouse

01:25:19   at my iMac, my trackpad on my MacBook Pro or my keyboard like or the touchscreen on

01:25:27   my iPhone and iPad. There's definitely a, I overshoot things with that remote or, or,

01:25:34   but it's still way more accurate and efficient, you know, a combination of accuracy, reliability

01:25:41   and efficiency than Siri way more. It's, it's not even close. And I've been, I was puttering

01:25:47   around with the fire TV again recently, just, I wanted to see, I want to get to it later,

01:25:54   to talk about the updated YouTube app for Apple TV.

01:25:58   And I wanted to see what was going on

01:26:00   on the Fire TV with YouTube,

01:26:02   because there's that whole pissing match

01:26:04   between Amazon and Google,

01:26:06   where Amazon booted off the official,

01:26:10   or YouTube yanked the official YouTube app

01:26:13   or started blocking it, and we could get into that.

01:26:16   But their remote is sort of Apple TV-like in its minimalism.

01:26:21   I don't know if you have one.

01:26:24   Do you have a Fire TV product?

01:26:25   - I bought the first one, I have since sold it,

01:26:29   but does it still have that same kind of black,

01:26:31   almost like triangular profile remote?

01:26:33   - Yeah, sort of.

01:26:35   It's got a circular D-pad at the top,

01:26:38   sort of a lot like the old Apple TV remote.

01:26:40   It's got a circular D-pad at the top,

01:26:43   a home button, a back button, and a menu button.

01:26:46   The menu button is the one that puts it a little bit more

01:26:49   in the more buttons than Apple has.

01:26:52   But it's, you know, it's roughly Apple TV-like

01:26:55   and it's minimalism.

01:26:56   And it's not, I like the Apple TV,

01:27:04   maybe it's 'cause I'm used to it,

01:27:06   'cause I use Apple TV almost every day.

01:27:08   I like the Apple TV, we could do a whole show

01:27:13   and we all, you and I always go along,

01:27:15   and we could do a whole show about the problems

01:27:17   with Apple TV's remote.

01:27:20   But the basic idea of a touchpad on a remote,

01:27:22   I think, is definitely a solid one.

01:27:26   There are times when it's so much-- it is nice and efficient.

01:27:29   It feels like I can go more than one row.

01:27:31   Like, the D-pad on the Fire one, it's like one click at a time sucks.

01:27:36   And if you press and hold, it goes way too fast.

01:27:38   But even so, I never feel as completely frustrated

01:27:45   as I do when a Siri interaction goes wrong.

01:27:47   And think about that.

01:27:48   I do think that this one that I tweeted, it's really interesting how it went wrong.

01:27:53   So the it's four interactions, two for me, two from Siri.

01:27:57   And my first one is how many courts are in a gallon, which should be,

01:28:02   you know, and again, I don't know, you know, to Apple's credit,

01:28:06   they at least have the right goal,

01:28:08   which is that they want to allow arbitrary syntax.

01:28:13   Like you don't have to say, maybe I would have gotten a better result if I said,

01:28:18   "Hey, convert one gallon to quarts."

01:28:22   I don't know if that's better

01:28:24   than how many quarts are in a gallon.

01:28:26   But Apple's stated goal, which I think is admirable

01:28:29   and which is correct,

01:28:30   which is that it should just process language the way we do,

01:28:33   where if I asked you, a human, thinking you knew the answer,

01:28:38   it wouldn't matter to you which way I put it, right?

01:28:41   And so I think it's admirable from Apple's perspective

01:28:44   that they're approaching it that way.

01:28:46   And her response is, "What would you like me

01:28:49   "to convert one gallon to?"

01:28:51   So she obviously knew I was converting something to gallons,

01:28:56   but must have misheard me say quarts,

01:28:58   but it's just a weird thing.

01:29:00   But then she asks me, "What would you like me

01:29:02   "to convert one gallon to?"

01:29:04   And all I said was the one word answer, quarts.

01:29:06   And so she was in the mode where she's listening

01:29:09   for me to respond.

01:29:10   I didn't have to say, "Hey, HomePod, quarts."

01:29:14   I could just, you know, there's certain multi-step things with Siri where she's expecting an

01:29:19   answer and you can just say it.

01:29:21   So what would you like me to convert one gallon to?

01:29:24   I say one word, quartz, and somehow this gets misconstrued as what is quartz, the mineral.

01:29:31   Like how…

01:29:32   It's a…

01:29:33   Yeah, that's…

01:29:34   There's no excuse for that.

01:29:35   It's a really strange interaction.

01:29:39   really bizarre to me that she asked me what would I like to convert one gallon

01:29:43   to and and if anything knowing that I was converting a gallon you would think

01:29:48   you know listen for common forms of you know volume measures of volume you know

01:29:55   whether they right yeah you didn't say like miles or airplanes or whatever it's

01:30:00   like it was something that's very that it should be a very expected and common

01:30:04   response to that question and and quartz should be on a very short list of things

01:30:09   an English speaker might want to convert one gallon to. It's a very bizarre way for that

01:30:14   to have gone off the rails. And again, immediately, within 10 seconds, I took a little bit of

01:30:21   time just to jot it down, because I really suspected I wouldn't be able to reproduce

01:30:25   it. So I wanted to get it down as best I could. And I even quick looked up the Quartz QRTZ

01:30:33   Wikipedia page to make sure that—and it was word for word, so I didn't have to memorize

01:30:37   that portion of it. I could just copy and paste it from Wikipedia. And then immediately

01:30:42   tried it again and it worked. And it did. But to me, that level of unreliability is

01:30:48   why people stop using it. And the problem is we're no longer at the point where Siri

01:30:56   is, "Well, it's okay if it sucks because it's just sort of an extra and nobody really

01:31:01   depends on it." Because now, with HomePod, they're shipping a product where the primary

01:31:05   interfaces Siri. And again, even just leave aside, just leave aside the comparisons to

01:31:13   Alexa and Google Assistant. Just judge it on its own merits. Is it good enough? And

01:31:19   I really do think the answer is no, it's it's not it's like having it would be like shipping

01:31:23   a touchscreen phone before capacitive touchscreens, right? Like back in the when you had to press

01:31:30   real hard era.

01:31:32   - Yeah, exactly.

01:31:33   Like this, Siri is very frustrating to me

01:31:37   because I want so badly to only be

01:31:40   in the Apple ecosystem for this stuff.

01:31:43   Like I want so badly to not have an Amazon cylinder

01:31:47   of commerce and creepiness in my kitchen.

01:31:49   Like I want that to be a HomePod.

01:31:51   I want to be all in on Apple stuff

01:31:53   because a lot of stuff just works better that way

01:31:55   and I like their privacy and I like their apparent

01:31:58   sound quality and niceness of their devices and everything.

01:32:00   are like, I want so badly for that to be the case,

01:32:03   but Siri, I really think is holding them back

01:32:06   in some pretty big ways.

01:32:08   It just is not good enough.

01:32:10   You know, I think you're right.

01:32:12   The rate of just errors and weirdness and unreliability

01:32:17   and honestly, fragmentation is another major concern here.

01:32:21   Of like, you know, Siri on different platforms

01:32:22   handling different things or not handling different things.

01:32:26   I think that's a pretty big problem.

01:32:28   There's lots of problems with Siri,

01:32:29   But it all comes down to the fact that like, it is now seven years old, and it's still not reliable.

01:32:38   And not to the sense that it's like 100% reliable, because as I said earlier, like, none of the voice assistants are 100% reliable.

01:32:45   But like one of the most shocking things to me when I first got the Amazon Echo, after only having used Siri before that,

01:32:52   was that the Echo, even though in some ways it is less advanced,

01:32:57   like it's less advanced in things like non-English language support,

01:33:01   in things like what order you say certain phrases in with like understanding the syntax.

01:33:06   So there's areas that like Apple and its fans are always happy to try it out and say,

01:33:11   "Well Siri is really advanced in these areas, fine."

01:33:15   But the Amazon Echo is 100% reliable for me in what it can do.

01:33:19   It almost never misunderstands me.

01:33:22   It almost never gives me, I think I've heard

01:33:25   like their version of like the, like when Siri says,

01:33:28   sorry, I can't help you right now,

01:33:29   where it's like basically like a server error happened.

01:33:32   I've heard that on the Echo, I think twice in two years.

01:33:37   And we use it multiple times a day for lots of stuff.

01:33:41   So the Echo is clearly way ahead in reliability.

01:33:46   It's also way ahead in speed.

01:33:48   Like I remember when I first got it,

01:33:50   just being amazed compared to Siri,

01:33:51   just how quickly and how consistently

01:33:54   it responded to things.

01:33:55   So we have speed, consistency, and reliability

01:33:59   with the Amazon Alexa service

01:34:01   that we just don't have with Siri.

01:34:04   And I think that, like, that shouldn't be the case.

01:34:08   This is not one of Amazon's like core competencies,

01:34:12   historically, this is not the kind of thing

01:34:13   that like their products heavily depend on it.

01:34:16   Well, now they do, but they didn't at the time.

01:34:17   Apple should be kicking Amazon's butt in this area.

01:34:21   And the fact that they're not, I think,

01:34:22   should be cause for serious concern in the company

01:34:25   because this is not just some toy accessory feature

01:34:30   that is kind of a fun thing.

01:34:32   Like you said, this is becoming a really important feature

01:34:35   and in some ways the most important feature

01:34:37   of certain products.

01:34:38   And it's just embarrassing that Apple seems to be

01:34:44   unable to compete to that let to even a basic level of reliability and quality compared to

01:34:50   What the other players in this same market were able to do in less time

01:34:55   It's in arguable to me that Siri is the primary interface to home pod

01:34:59   I don't see how else you I don't see how you could argue. Otherwise sure you can control it by airplay and

01:35:05   Yes, there are hardware volume buttons and you can tap it for play pause, but it's it's clearly

01:35:12   I mean, it doesn't ship with a remote control.

01:35:14   I mean, there's no--

01:35:15   - Oh, yeah.

01:35:16   - The fact that it doesn't ship with a remote control,

01:35:18   and it's conceived that the remote control is your voice.

01:35:22   - And one could argue that the Siri might even be

01:35:26   a pretty close second interface for the Apple Watch.

01:35:28   - Exactly, you took the words right out of my mouth.

01:35:31   And AirPods, AirPods a little bit less so,

01:35:36   but I think if Siri was better on AirPods

01:35:39   and faster to respond, it would be primary.

01:35:43   Like it's only not primary because it takes so long

01:35:46   and isn't reliable for like, you know,

01:35:50   changing what you're listening to or play pause

01:35:53   or you know, changing the volume and stuff like that.

01:35:58   And their future products are going to be,

01:36:03   I mean, what is Apple great at?

01:36:05   They're great at making personal computers

01:36:08   smaller and smaller and more personal and more personal.

01:36:11   And once you get beneath the size of a phone,

01:36:15   a screen is really not that great as a primary interface.

01:36:19   I mean, that's a big deal.

01:36:21   That's why I wanted to bring up Apple Watch and Siri

01:36:24   and you saw it coming.

01:36:26   It's good for, it's okay for literally displaying things

01:36:31   like taking a glance at your watch to see what that tap was.

01:36:35   But for responding, Siri would be,

01:36:37   I would be better if Siri were reliable and fast enough.

01:36:41   - Yeah, and I think we're seeing,

01:36:44   like this is the direction

01:36:46   that some pretty big markets are heading.

01:36:48   Like obviously, I don't think Siri has a ton of,

01:36:53   I don't think it's massively holding back

01:36:56   the Mac or the iPad, and maybe not the phone,

01:37:00   but that's kind of a maybe.

01:37:02   But a lot of these markets where things are getting smaller

01:37:05   and especially anything wearable, as you said,

01:37:07   like anything where you have either no screen

01:37:09   or a very small screen,

01:37:10   that's only gonna get more important.

01:37:12   And the other voice assistants are not standing still.

01:37:15   They are really advancing quickly.

01:37:18   And Amazon I don't think is gonna ever

01:37:21   have great multi-language support

01:37:23   because Amazon, the company,

01:37:25   doesn't really have a lot of great support

01:37:26   outside of the US for pretty much anything.

01:37:29   Google does, and Google I think is doing pretty well

01:37:31   in that area so far.

01:37:33   Microsoft, probably also with Cortana,

01:37:35   I don't know much about that, but from what I hear,

01:37:37   it's pretty decent.

01:37:38   This is an area where, again, Apple should be

01:37:42   leading the way, this is user interface.

01:37:45   And Apple, in their DNA and in their history,

01:37:49   they have cared so deeply about making really great

01:37:53   user interfaces and user experiences.

01:37:55   And this is one area where, when it came out in 2011,

01:37:58   it was like, well, it's kinda crappy and kind of unreliable,

01:38:02   but it's pretty cool, let's see where this goes.

01:38:05   And hopefully Apple will have the best one of these

01:38:08   like forever, the same way they usually

01:38:09   have the best interface.

01:38:10   And that just hasn't happened,

01:38:12   and it's been quite the opposite,

01:38:14   where now like Siri seems like Windows

01:38:17   by comparison to even the most basic Alexa interactions,

01:38:21   because the Alexa interactions are just so damn fast

01:38:24   and reliable and pretty smart, honestly.

01:38:28   Like when I ask like general knowledge questions

01:38:31   or like local questions.

01:38:32   I will often try Siri first if I have my phone with me.

01:38:38   And so often it just gives me bad results

01:38:41   or no good results or a web search.

01:38:42   And I ask the exact same question

01:38:44   and the exact same phrasing to my Amazon Echo

01:38:47   and it gives me the answer.

01:38:48   And this doesn't happen every time that way

01:38:50   but it happens a lot that way

01:38:51   and it doesn't usually happen the other direction.

01:38:53   So it's concerning to me like just quite

01:38:56   how far behind Siri appears to be

01:38:59   and how slowly it seems to ever change.

01:39:02   It just seems like what I hope is coming

01:39:06   is a massive reset or like a big Siri 2.0.

01:39:10   I hope there's massive changes underfoot

01:39:13   that we just aren't seeing yet

01:39:14   because whatever they've been doing to date with Siri,

01:39:18   it's just not good enough.

01:39:19   And it doesn't seem to be getting good enough,

01:39:21   quickly enough to ever catch up

01:39:24   or ever even reach a minimum level of good.

01:39:27   There was a funny thing, and it is funny because we were talking about how we don't like

01:39:34   it when Siri tries to be funny, but there was a—Amy was the one who found it. But

01:39:44   before the Super Bowl, if you asked the Echo who's going to win the Super Bowl, like,

01:39:49   Siri has been—one of the things Siri has been ahead of is Siri's been hooked up to

01:39:52   like sports betting lines for a while. So you can ask like who's the favorite in an

01:39:57   upcoming major sports event, and Siri almost always can tell you exactly what the point

01:40:02   spread is or if it's a different type of sport where it's just odds, what the odds

01:40:06   are.

01:40:10   But when you asked—did you hear about this?

01:40:11   When you asked the Alexa before the Super Bowl who was going to win the Super Bowl,

01:40:14   they programmed her with a total jab at the Patriots.

01:40:18   Did you see this?

01:40:19   She said, "The team favored to win is the—excuse me.

01:40:24   Excuse me. It's the Patriots. That was tough to get out. But I'm flying with the Eagles

01:40:32   on this one because of their relentless defense and the momentum they've been riding off

01:40:36   their underdog status. E-A-G-L-E-S. Eagles. For whatever reason, Eagles fans, their chant

01:40:46   is to just spell out the word Eagles, but they're very into it. I thought it was amazing.

01:40:53   are speculating that it comes from the fact that Bob Kraft, the owner of the Patriots,

01:41:02   is best friends with Trump, and that Bezos has his issues with Trump. Perhaps that was the reason.

01:41:10   But for whatever reason, Echo was totally down with the Eagles in the Super Bowl. And I thought

01:41:15   that was actually pretty charming. I thought that was actually one of these assistants trying to be

01:41:19   be funny where it came off as pretty funny.

01:41:22   - Meanwhile, I asked Siri the morning of the Super Bowl,

01:41:27   who is playing the Super Bowl?

01:41:30   And it told me Justin Timberlake.

01:41:32   - Well, that's true.

01:41:34   That is true.

01:41:35   - Right, exactly, yeah, it's like, okay.

01:41:37   And if you said who is playing in the Super Bowl,

01:41:39   it would tell you the right answer,

01:41:41   but if you said who is playing the Super Bowl,

01:41:43   it treated that as a musical venue.

01:41:45   Because as everyone knows,

01:41:48   Super Bowl is primarily a musical venue. It's like you knew that the Eagles had a backup

01:41:53   quarterback in but you didn't realize they were so desperate that they were going with

01:41:56   Justin Timberlake. Yeah like it and it's like it's again it's like one of those it's just

01:42:03   a great example of like okay I can see why a smart ass computer that isn't very advanced

01:42:10   gave me that answer because like it interpreted who is playing place name as a musical venue

01:42:17   question. Even though the Super Bowl halftime show is a very large event, sure,

01:42:24   and it is a musical event, but if you say who is playing the Super Bowl that could

01:42:31   have multiple meanings and I think the far more common interpretation of that

01:42:38   is who is playing the sports game. Because I didn't say who was playing the

01:42:42   Super Bowl halftime show. Like the Super Bowl halftime show is the name of the

01:42:45   musical venue, the Super Bowl is a sporting event.

01:42:48   And so there's like, it should have gotten that right.

01:42:52   And again, it just, like your court saying,

01:42:54   it just said something totally, to me, bonkers,

01:42:57   even though it's not quite as bad as yours,

01:42:59   'cause it at least like, you can at least see

01:43:01   why it got there.

01:43:02   - I feel like the next level of this needs to be

01:43:07   a sort of, just, you know, I often say this

01:43:11   as like a life lesson, like, honestly,

01:43:14   I feel like where I sort of crossed from adolescence

01:43:18   into adulthood was when I realized that there's no shame

01:43:22   in saying I don't know when you don't know.

01:43:25   And so, you know, it was just like a breakthrough in my life

01:43:27   where I always was so, you know,

01:43:31   worried about how smart I was,

01:43:32   or if I didn't know something that it was shameful,

01:43:34   I, you know, I should know the answer to everything.

01:43:37   And it's like, if you just suddenly relax

01:43:38   and realize that if you don't know something,

01:43:40   don't waste people's time to say, you know what?

01:43:42   I don't, I don't understand either.

01:43:43   I don't understand this, can you stop and explain this to me

01:43:46   in a way that I understand or if somebody asks you

01:43:49   a question and you don't know, just say I don't know.

01:43:51   I don't know.

01:43:52   I want Siri to gain I don't know.

01:43:56   So if you ask that question and she doesn't know,

01:43:59   she's pretty sure you're either asking who's playing

01:44:01   the halftime show or who's playing the game, just ask.

01:44:04   Do you mean the game or the halftime show?

01:44:06   Like what a human being would do.

01:44:08   - Right, that would have been, yeah.

01:44:11   Well a human being would have said the team names

01:44:12   playing in the sporting event. But yeah, but even if a human was unsure and thought, you

01:44:17   know, like, you know, it, there's an uncertainty to these virtual assistants that I will that

01:44:24   that, you know, like a human should a normal human should pick that up. But you know, I

01:44:30   could see how some an assistant, especially an AI one that isn't a human could think,

01:44:35   Well, I don't think Marco is really all that into sports. So I'm not sure what he's asking

01:44:41   about here. Just ask, and you could just say it quickly. Just say, "Do you mean the game

01:44:45   or the halftime show?" And you could say, "The game," and then she would tell you who's playing

01:44:50   in the game. That would be fine. You would walk away from that interaction without even

01:44:54   thinking about that question in the middle, if it happened fast enough, roughly at the

01:44:59   speed that it would happen if it was a human being. And computers are so much faster than

01:45:04   human beings that there's no reason it shouldn't, even if it has to round trip to the cloud

01:45:09   briefly, right? It could still happen at roughly the same speed as human interaction.

01:45:14   You know, just think about the little questions you get asked. I've been thinking about this a

01:45:20   lot lately, and it's like, we have a little, great little grocery store here in Center City,

01:45:26   Philadelphia. It's called the Bruno Brothers, and they, you know, all sorts of great, like, Italian

01:45:33   lunch meats and stuff and fresh break bread. So I stopped in and all I did is just get

01:45:38   a big long loaf of Italian bread. And it comes in its own little paper sleeve. And I rang

01:45:46   out. That's all I needed. And I rang out and the guy was gonna, you know, he was like,

01:45:50   do you want to know you want a bag? And I was like, nah, because it's in a bag. But

01:45:53   like him asking me, do I want a bag for my bread that's already in a bag? And that's

01:45:58   all I've got to carry. Like, I didn't feel interrupted by that. You know, it because

01:46:02   it happened at a speed and a pace and there's no reason that our virtual assistant shouldn't

01:46:08   be able to interact with us like that. Like I don't expect it all to come out in one fluent

01:46:12   query from a human that gives the answer, you know, but just have some back and forth.

01:46:16   I love like if you were Siri, you would have asked a bag for what? And he would have said

01:46:24   your bread and you would have been like bread is a big food product made from wheat. Right?

01:46:29   The fact that she forgot we were talking about units of measure, it almost is like she's got a head injury.

01:46:36   Right, yeah.

01:46:38   You've hired an assistant, like a human, and it's great.

01:46:43   And then, oh my God, terrible news.

01:46:46   She's in a car accident, and she's injured her head, and then she comes back.

01:46:50   And you ask a question like that, and all of a sudden she starts telling you about Quartz the mineral.

01:46:56   know two seconds ago she just asked you a question about what do you want to

01:47:00   convert gallons to you would feel terrible but you would think like well

01:47:03   I've got a fire right yeah it's like this clearly this person like this is a

01:47:09   tragedy but this also means this person probably can't write job you know and

01:47:13   and it's like yeah here you don't have the human connection it's just this

01:47:16   person can't do this this AI really is not very good at this job all right let

01:47:21   me take a break here and thank our next sponsor that's our good friends at ero

01:47:25   E-E-R-O. Eero makes Wi-Fi systems for your house and they use what's called a mesh network

01:47:35   where you just plug a bunch of them in and you don't have, there's no special magic one

01:47:40   that's the base system. You just plug the same little puck size thing which is very

01:47:47   nicely designed. You plug them in all around your house depending on how big your house

01:47:51   is or what their shape is and there's all sorts of information at their website that

01:47:55   they can help you choose how many of them to buy. Well, they've got their second generation

01:47:59   product is out. And the second generation product is better as more speed, more range

01:48:07   and in same high quality elegant design as the original. And they've got these new ones

01:48:15   that are like a little, they call them a beacon. And the beacon, you just plug in like a night

01:48:20   light goes right in the socket. There's no cable or anything. You just plug it in a socket

01:48:25   somewhere like maybe at the top of some steps, stairway or something like that. And it even

01:48:31   has a light because it could be a nightlight. So it has a nightlight. But if you don't want

01:48:36   the nightlight, they're wonderful, excellent Euro app that you install on your phone, which

01:48:41   is where you control the whole system from. You could just turn off the light or turn

01:48:46   it on or put it on schedule or whatever. But anyway, the whole second generation system

01:48:51   from Eero adds a third 5 GHz radio and that makes it that's now tri-band and it's now

01:49:00   twice as fast as its predecessor. And the first generation Eero is the fastest Wi-Fi

01:49:05   system I ever had in my house in my life and it was great, still great. And you can just

01:49:10   if you already have first generation, you can add second generation hardware and it

01:49:14   just works together. And the app is great. And the app lets you do all sorts of terrific

01:49:19   things like do speed tests to make sure see what kind of upstream downstream connection

01:49:23   you're getting. It's really it's just a great product. The beacon is half the size of the

01:49:30   little of the normal stations that they have. And it really is it's very discreet. It is

01:49:35   the sort of thing that doesn't junk up your house or anything like that no one will even

01:49:38   notice that you've got it. But what you wind up with is a solid Wi Fi network, a single

01:49:44   network mashed together with these multiple hardware units. So it's not like when you're

01:49:49   moving from one area to another, your devices are going from one network to another. They

01:49:54   just see one network and it really can thoroughly cover a large house or a difficult house with

01:50:01   walls or something like that. It's really great. I use it here. You're hearing me right

01:50:06   now speak to you over in the Eero network. I really do like this product. And to me,

01:50:12   thing that I like is that it's just it could not have been easier to set up. I just plugged

01:50:17   them in and told the Eero app what room each one was in and that was it. I've never done

01:50:22   any more work than that to configure it. For someone as lazy as me that just wants good

01:50:29   Wi-Fi throughout the house, that's really pretty great. What more am I supposed to tell

01:50:37   I think I'm supposed to give you a URL and that's a euro.com. But what you got to remember,

01:50:45   you got to remember is the code and it's a code that will get you free overnight shipping

01:50:56   to the US and Canada. And that code is the talk show, T H E T A L K S H O W. So use that

01:51:06   code the talk show talk show with the the which I always pleases me a little bit and

01:51:12   you get free overnight shipping in the US or Canada to great product and a good deal

01:51:18   get free overnight shipping you're listening to me right now you can have this thing in

01:51:21   your house by tomorrow so there you go my thanks to euro.com for sponsoring the show

01:51:26   what do you do on the underscore show do you do the ads due to the sponsors or does underscore

01:51:34   - I do 'em, it's basically like a smaller version of ATP.

01:51:39   - So do you like, is it relaxing

01:51:41   to not have to do the sponsors?

01:51:43   - Oh, it's glorious.

01:51:46   Like what I love about doing this show

01:51:48   is I can just walk over to my desk

01:51:50   five seconds before we were gonna record

01:51:52   and just sit down and just start.

01:51:54   And I don't have to have any windows open,

01:51:56   I don't have to be like watching like the script

01:51:59   or the program or you know, having the list of sponsors out.

01:52:02   Like with ATP, at first I started,

01:52:05   for years I would do the ads live as we recorded,

01:52:07   and that was terrible,

01:52:10   because not only would I screw them up a lot

01:52:12   and require lots of editing,

01:52:13   but the whole show, I was like,

01:52:16   I was always like a little bit distracted that,

01:52:20   oh, I had this ad I have to fit in sometime,

01:52:22   like I have to like wait for a time and then jump on it

01:52:24   and just start doing it,

01:52:26   and it was always distracting me

01:52:27   from listening to the conversation

01:52:29   or really being more in-depth about my own conversations.

01:52:34   And so I started about, I don't know, six months ago

01:52:37   or a year ago, I started basically pre-recording them,

01:52:40   but I want it to sound like I'm doing them live.

01:52:43   So I record them like a half hour before I record the show.

01:52:47   So it's like my same setup,

01:52:48   like it's the same night I'm recording,

01:52:50   my voice sounds the same, the room is the same.

01:52:52   So it's still kind of like a mad rush

01:52:56   to get everything done before each show,

01:52:59   But now I at least like during the show,

01:53:00   I don't have to worry about it so much.

01:53:02   So during the show, like I can be more present

01:53:04   in the conversation and not be constantly looking

01:53:07   at the sponsor list and trying to figure out

01:53:09   like when I can do each one.

01:53:10   The downside is that it allows me to be

01:53:13   a little bit more of a perfectionist.

01:53:15   So a lot of times I have to do an ad read

01:53:17   like five times before I actually get it right.

01:53:19   - That's the same with me.

01:53:20   90% of the ad reads I do on the talk show,

01:53:23   I just do live during recording

01:53:25   like I did right there with Eero.

01:53:28   probably more than 90%, but then every once in a while,

01:53:30   something happens, either I botch it

01:53:32   or something happens in between recording

01:53:35   and doing the show, or I go to record

01:53:38   and there's a sponsor who's set to go,

01:53:40   but they still haven't given us the thing

01:53:43   and I have to do that the next day.

01:53:45   And when I do that, I almost never ever redo a read

01:53:50   when I do it live during the recording like this.

01:53:52   And every single time I do it independently by myself,

01:53:56   I botch it.

01:53:58   I can't, there is something,

01:54:00   I've developed some kind of mental muscle

01:54:03   where I no longer feel weird or awkward

01:54:11   talking to somebody like you doing the show.

01:54:14   Like I'm very comfortable right now

01:54:17   having this conversation with you,

01:54:18   even knowing that we're recording it

01:54:20   and tens of thousands of people

01:54:22   will soon be listening to it,

01:54:25   which originally I always felt very self-conscious about,

01:54:28   but I've developed a comfort.

01:54:30   But when I'm here just talking into the microphone

01:54:34   and nobody's listening to me, I feel incredibly awkward.

01:54:37   I don't know if you took notice that one of the reads

01:54:43   last week I had to redo, Paul Kaphasis was the guest,

01:54:48   and I had to do one of the reads the next day.

01:54:53   I don't know if you noticed. I forgot. Honestly, I usually skip ads. I thought it was a good

01:55:01   one. What was it? It was the Casper one because Casper had, you know this too because I think

01:55:11   they were on ATP. Yeah, the President's Day sale. And it was sort of like, they were like,

01:55:20   If your show airs on these dates in February, we want you to do the President's Day sale.

01:55:25   And the show is going to come out the day before, but at night.

01:55:29   And so we had the same issue.

01:55:31   And we actually went ahead, Jesse, like, go check with them.

01:55:34   Like, can we do it?

01:55:35   Like, what should we do the day before this day was going to come out at like, like 1030

01:55:39   at night the day before.

01:55:43   And they were like, we'd rather have the President's Day sale.

01:55:45   So I was like, I can do that.

01:55:47   I can do it the next day.

01:55:48   But I also had, I don't know if it sounded weird to people, if any, you know, backstory,

01:55:52   if you thought that the Casper's President's Day sale sounded weird last week, it was because

01:55:58   when I recorded with Paul, my voice was still really hoarse from having been out in Las

01:56:03   Vegas for the Super Bowl.

01:56:05   And I always come back from Vegas with a hoarse voice because it's dry and people smoke cigarettes.

01:56:10   And I'm not used to either, I'm not used to desert air and I'm not used to breathing cigarette

01:56:14   combined with the fact that in while watching the Super Bowl it's a really

01:56:19   noisy big cavernous room and to say anything you have to yell so when I

01:56:24   recorded I think on Wednesday with Paul my voice was still a mess and by

01:56:27   Thursday it was already sounding better but I was as I'm recording the ad I'm

01:56:31   like I should I should like scream a little or something to horse it up my

01:56:35   voice to get it back to where it was anyway yeah this is why like whenever

01:56:41   you record I do it the same night like right right before the show because

01:56:44   because otherwise it sounds different.

01:56:46   And I think most people really don't care, but I care.

01:56:50   Like when I'm doing it, I care that I want this to sound

01:56:54   totally seamless.

01:56:55   - Speaking of ad skipping, one of the recent things

01:56:59   that have come out in the world of podcasting

01:57:00   is Apple's long-awaited analytics have come out.

01:57:04   And so if you have a podcast in the iTunes store

01:57:08   and you've signed up for their,

01:57:10   I guess I don't think you can get listed

01:57:12   which are not in Podcast Connect, right?

01:57:14   Like they don't just list podcasts.

01:57:17   - Yeah, you have to sign up.

01:57:18   I think the only question is like,

01:57:20   you know, if you signed up a while ago

01:57:22   and you forgot what email you used,

01:57:24   like you might have to like basically like claim it

01:57:26   from them or register in a certain way with them.

01:57:28   I forget how, I did it a while ago,

01:57:29   so I forgot how to do this,

01:57:30   but like I was already registered in some way.

01:57:33   - Well, I have a cheat move 'cause I know,

01:57:35   I know some people on the podcast team there.

01:57:37   - Yeah, that's totally BS.

01:57:38   - But I do think though that,

01:57:40   Everybody, I think that's why they have the one special iTunes tag for the RSS feed

01:57:46   with an email address. That if you can email from the address that's in your RSS feed,

01:57:51   they trust it. And that makes a certain amount of sense that, you know, if somebody has right

01:57:58   access to your RSS feed for your podcast, you're screwed already.

01:58:02   You know.

01:58:03   Yeah, yeah. The game's over at that point.

01:58:07   But anyway, they came out with these analytics and what the advertising industry wants is,

01:58:14   of course, their JavaScript to be running all the time, turning on your camera to look

01:58:22   at you while you listen to podcasts.

01:58:24   The most intrusive thing you can possibly imagine, like all of standard web advertising

01:58:29   technology has fallen into where your fucking battery goes dead because of ads on web pages

01:58:35   now.

01:58:36   Of course that's what they want and of course Apple wasn't willing to give them anything

01:58:41   close to that, but they do have some basic listening stats.

01:58:46   And I was super happy but totally not surprised that the graph of every episode of my show

01:58:53   looks pretty much the same, which is that most people listen to the end, there's some

01:59:02   drop off, but that, you know, and I think some of that could correspond to people who

01:59:05   started listening to it and then listen somewhere else and it's not connected there. And you

01:59:11   can see in each episode, three dips where the sponsor reads go, and those dips are surprisingly

01:59:19   shallow. So yes, there are people who skip ads, but it is a definite minority of listeners.

01:59:28   And I, you know, I've said before, I often say it when you're on because we get into

01:59:31   shop talk about running a podcast. But I just see my job doing these ads as trying to make

01:59:37   them as interesting as possible, both for everybody's benefit, for the sponsor's benefit.

01:59:43   Even if you've heard me talk about ERO before or Squarespace, what can I say that maybe

01:59:47   would throw a monkey wrench in there and make you want to listen for another minute? And

01:59:54   if you want to skip, skip. I'm not going to try to fight you. It's my job to make it interesting.

02:00:01   We found pretty similar patterns when we looked at ATP stats in the same thing, which probably

02:00:08   makes sense because we probably have a lot of the same audience, where it turns out most

02:00:12   people listen to most shows all the way through and there's a small dip at the ad breaks that

02:00:18   you can see, but it's on the order of maybe 15% fewer people listen to the ad breaks.

02:00:24   It's not a huge jump down.

02:00:26   You can also see where they're using a 30-second skip.

02:00:29   it starts to come back in the second half of the ad read.

02:00:32   It does.

02:00:33   - Right, exactly, yeah.

02:00:34   - So I appreciate that.

02:00:37   I've always wanted to know, but I'm not surprised.

02:00:41   I often get emails from people when I mention it,

02:00:42   and people are so nice,

02:00:44   and I think it's because they realize that me,

02:00:48   and I'm sure it's true for you guys too,

02:00:52   I'm sure it's true for everybody at Relay,

02:00:55   all the people who have shows there,

02:00:59   But people realize that we're all very low to the ground here.

02:01:04   There's no employees at Daring Fireball.

02:01:06   There's no-- Six Colors doesn't have a sales department.

02:01:09   There's not much-- there's really

02:01:14   nothing between us and our readers and listeners.

02:01:19   And I often get email that takes that into consideration.

02:01:23   And they want us to succeed.

02:01:25   And the gist of these emails often are, hey,

02:01:28   I'm a long time listener of your show.

02:01:30   I love it, I love every episode that comes out.

02:01:33   I feel guilty though 'cause here's my personal,

02:01:37   and it's so funny how many people repeat the same thing.

02:01:39   They're like, I will listen to every sponsor

02:01:41   for the first time and sometimes a second time,

02:01:43   but then after that, I'll skip.

02:01:45   And I'm like, that's great.

02:01:47   And they're like, I write back,

02:01:48   you don't need to apologize, that's fantastic.

02:01:51   - Yeah, I'm happy with that.

02:01:54   I mean, when I started doing chapters in ATP,

02:01:58   question obviously becomes like you know how do you chapter ads like you know

02:02:01   some people don't put chapters in the ads so you so it's harder to skip them

02:02:05   if you want to. I decided I basically worked through a bunch of things and

02:02:10   decided what I do is I put a chapter at the start of the ad when the ad is

02:02:17   playing it shows it says sponsor colon name of sponsor and it links to the

02:02:20   sponsor URL so it's actually kind of better if you're you know if you're

02:02:24   interested in the product you get a link right there in the chapter title so like

02:02:27   it's showing right on screen.

02:02:28   You don't have to like go over to the show notes,

02:02:30   scroll down to the bottom and find it like it's right there.

02:02:32   So it's super easy.

02:02:34   If you want to look at the sponsor, the link is right there.

02:02:36   So I think sponsors are getting some additional value there.

02:02:39   And then you can skip that chapter,

02:02:42   but where that chapter ends is not at the end

02:02:46   of the sponsor read, but like 10 seconds

02:02:48   before the end of the sponsor read.

02:02:50   And so if you skip the sponsor read,

02:02:53   what you hear is the very end summary

02:02:56   where it says, "For a great mattress, go to this URL

02:02:58   "and use this promo code."

02:03:00   That's what you hear.

02:03:02   And so you're basically hearing a 10 second version

02:03:05   of the ad or so.

02:03:07   And that is what I found to be a very good compromise,

02:03:11   where if you've heard the ad a million times,

02:03:13   you already know what this company does.

02:03:15   You hit skip, you get reminded of the URL

02:03:18   and the promo code, and you move on.

02:03:22   I've heard from both listeners and from advertisers

02:03:26   that that seems to be a very good balance.

02:03:29   - I wrote to Caleb Sexton who,

02:03:32   after you posted that you did that,

02:03:34   and he edits this show, and I said,

02:03:36   "Hey, that's pretty clever, maybe we could do that."

02:03:38   And he was like, "I've been trying to do that all along."

02:03:40   And I was like, "Oh, I'll try to do a better job

02:03:42   "of doing a good summary at the end of this spot, thanks."

02:03:46   Or by all along he means ever since he's been using forecast

02:03:50   or whatever the--

02:03:51   - Yeah, right, yeah, yeah, forecast, yeah.

02:03:54   Yeah, 'cause it, and you do have to like kind of,

02:03:56   you know, structure your reads, like to,

02:03:58   what I basically say is like,

02:04:00   we're brought to you this week by so and so,

02:04:01   here's the URL and the promo code,

02:04:03   and then big long explanation for two minutes,

02:04:05   and then here's, once again, go to this URL, promo code,

02:04:09   thanks again, thanks to sponsor, you know,

02:04:10   like so you have to structure it in a way where

02:04:12   if you cut out the whole middle of it,

02:04:14   it still makes some sense.

02:04:16   - So when you guys record ATP, you guys,

02:04:18   you sit there and you've got a soundboard thing,

02:04:21   And so when like when Syracuse had mentioned file systems

02:04:25   and you play the ding, that's live when you're recording.

02:04:27   Like you don't do that in post.

02:04:29   - No, it's a bell.

02:04:30   I got, it's an actual bell.

02:04:32   - So it's not even a soundboard app.

02:04:34   You actually-- - I have a bell on my desk.

02:04:35   - Keep a bell and you do that.

02:04:37   What about--

02:04:39   - Yeah, the only time I've ever used a soundboard app

02:04:41   is when we did our live show last year.

02:04:43   I had a soundboard app running

02:04:44   so I could play like our ad transition music

02:04:47   and the outro music and the theme song.

02:04:50   That's the only reason I've ever used one.

02:04:52   But when we record live, I have a bell on my desk

02:04:54   and I bring it out and the first time

02:04:56   he mentions file systems, I hit that bell

02:04:58   and I put a bell away.

02:04:59   - What about the car door for car talk?

02:05:01   - I put that in during editing.

02:05:03   - Ah, so that is in post.

02:05:04   I thought that might have been live, I wasn't sure.

02:05:07   - Although, that is actually my car door

02:05:09   from the BMW I had like five years ago.

02:05:13   I actually went out one night and recorded those sounds.

02:05:15   So that was actually my car.

02:05:17   - Speaking of cars, I wanna say,

02:05:19   and while we're talking about ATP,

02:05:20   before we get back to the max stuff,

02:05:21   I wanna thank you guys for turning me on to the Grand Tour.

02:05:26   I never watched Top Gear, and I'm not really a car person,

02:05:31   but I've heard what--

02:05:32   - Did we turn you on?

02:05:32   I think we've hated the Grand Tour.

02:05:33   - I know, but I know.

02:05:34   - Did we actually turn you on?

02:05:35   - Well, in a way, but you guys seemed to like

02:05:38   Top Gear enough, and this Grand Tour thing

02:05:40   was intriguing to me enough.

02:05:42   And Jonas and I started watching it together,

02:05:46   and we both love it.

02:05:47   absolutely we watch season 2 first and just tore through it and

02:05:52   We don't have Jonas and I don't have a lot of shows that we both like

02:05:57   And and a lot of the ones we do are ones like Saturday night live that we watch with Amy -

02:06:04   And I mean, it's not like I'm looking for shows that only Jonas and I watch but it's you know

02:06:09   It's like a nice thing and like when he was growing up

02:06:11   We loved the Star Wars the Clone Wars animated series and and the rebels thing

02:06:17   But he's not into sports at all and a lot of what I watched during the day or like when he's still awake is sports

02:06:24   And we both love the grand tour

02:06:27   And and the thing I don't get though is you guys all seem to like when you watch it you like skip around like what?

02:06:33   What are the parts that you skip past you just watch the parts when they're like actually reviewing cars

02:06:38   Usually I will skip past any parts that have them in the studio. I love I love the parts. Oh yeah

02:06:46   - Yeah.

02:06:47   - A lot of them get pretty cringe word.

02:06:50   Like not all of them, but yeah, a lot of them do.

02:06:52   - It is.

02:06:53   - And like back when it was Top Gear,

02:06:55   I used to skip through a lot of that stuff

02:06:57   because I would skip through the celebrity part

02:07:00   because it would bring on usually like a British celebrity

02:07:03   who I didn't know.

02:07:04   And so I would skip it,

02:07:05   I was like, well, I don't even know this person.

02:07:06   I have no interest in this.

02:07:07   And I skipped that section and just jump in

02:07:09   to whatever they did next.

02:07:11   The problem with the grand tour of the US,

02:07:14   new US show is that they just I think need a lot more editing than what they

02:07:18   are guys see I and a lot of the jokes and stuff that they do in the indoor

02:07:23   segments I think are pretty I really disagree and Jonas likes it too we

02:07:28   watch the whole thing straight through and it's I'm not gonna say every bit

02:07:32   works but I think that they actually do a pretty good job of not letting any

02:07:37   segment run too long and like when they do the thing that's most like a podcast

02:07:42   the conversation street, it's always too short. It's like I would listen to those guys talk

02:07:47   about cars for three times as long per episode. So I feel like they do a really good job of

02:07:52   sort of leaving you wanting more. We love the show, we really do. And now we're like

02:07:57   halfway through season one. And I give credit to you guys.

02:08:02   I'm glad you enjoy it. Somebody has to.

02:08:04   I think you should give it another shot when new episodes come out. I think you should

02:08:08   just try just you know crack open an IPA or something just to take the edge off

02:08:12   and then just just watch the whole show straight through I'm telling you it

02:08:15   there's there there's something going on I don't know I I'm I really can't

02:08:20   believe I never watched these guys before I really like it and I'm not even

02:08:23   all that into cars well I'm glad you all right there was a thing last week and

02:08:33   And actually the original scoop, it wasn't "Gurman,"

02:08:36   it was actually, you know,

02:08:40   Fried at Axios actually had the first story.

02:08:43   I'm really digging Axios, by the way.

02:08:47   I don't know if you read news on Axios,

02:08:48   but Axios is this newish site that launched like last year.

02:08:53   And they just, like the whole style of Axios,

02:08:57   whether it's tech or politics or anything else they cover,

02:09:00   is sort of breaking everything down

02:09:02   into just like bullet points,

02:09:04   which isn't how I'd wanna read everything,

02:09:07   but it's really kind of efficient.

02:09:10   And it's like, I either wanna read something

02:09:13   that's truly a well-written article by a good writer,

02:09:16   and you could really dig into it like a piece of steak,

02:09:20   or I just want like the snack size tidbits.

02:09:23   And I feel like so much of the news industry

02:09:26   has sort of grown up around this idea

02:09:29   You know if you've got three sentences to say you've still got to dress it up in 750 words

02:09:34   History and whatever just to make it article length

02:09:38   But anyway, you know had this story first before german that there was some kind of meeting

02:09:45   Craig Federighi held

02:09:48   To give a revised plan to employees

02:09:50   and

02:09:52   And mentioned some features that were originally going to be set for iOS this year that got that are being pushed a year back

02:09:59   including a refresh of the home screen and the CarPlay interface and some other things,

02:10:08   but that there are new features, but that they're somehow doing something to focus on quality and

02:10:14   performance a little bit more than before and giving certain projects more time to go.

02:10:20   And then Germin, I think, had the story the same later in the same day, and I don't know

02:10:25   if it was pressured because Ina had it first or if it was going to run anyway. But his

02:10:32   story took more of an angle indicating that this is sort of a radical departure and that

02:10:38   people who heard it were surprised by this, that this is a big change. And my take on

02:10:46   it is that it's not a big change. It's like a course correction. And then there was a

02:10:51   a good thread on Twitter by Steven Sinofsky who was you know used to head up

02:10:55   the Windows division at Apple or Microsoft not Apple who sort of was

02:10:59   making the same case that this sort of three-way three-headed thing of schedule

02:11:05   quality and new features is always you know a balancing act I'm curious what

02:11:13   you what do you think about this it's hard for me to really have a

02:11:20   reasonable or useful opinion on the internal mechanics

02:11:25   of how big companies balance this stuff,

02:11:27   because I've never worked in a big company.

02:11:29   So I really am not familiar with that kind of thing at all.

02:11:33   All I can do is comment on what I see from the outside

02:11:36   and what I experience with the products.

02:11:38   Any way that I develop my stuff

02:11:42   or that I prioritize quality and time and everything else

02:11:45   is not at all the same way that a company like Apple

02:11:47   would do pretty much anything.

02:11:48   So what I can see is, I think it's clear that in recent years, Apple has struggled with quality,

02:11:57   and they have been seemingly torn between a lot of competing desires of, you know, moving fast versus

02:12:05   getting good quality stuff out there versus bug fixes versus expansion.

02:12:09   And these aren't easy problems to solve, and they've been doing overall a pretty decent job of most of it.

02:12:17   most of it. Like it's, the reason we're able to complain about minor problems here and

02:12:23   there is because almost everything is great and almost everything has been working well

02:12:29   for a long time and so you know the small stuff sticks out more. All I can see is that

02:12:40   platforms and products that I like a lot, that I depend on a lot or that I feel like

02:12:45   need attention, oftentimes don't get the attention.

02:12:50   It seems like Apple has always been pretty bad at multitasking.

02:12:54   And this isn't a Tim thing, this goes back

02:12:59   to the Steve era too.

02:13:01   Apple has been pretty bad at really well maintaining

02:13:03   multiple platforms and many products.

02:13:09   They do seem to have tunnel vision at times,

02:13:11   where certain things will get the focus

02:13:11   and everything else gets neglected pretty badly for a while.

02:13:15   And then eventually it'll come around

02:13:18   and the things that got neglected for a while

02:13:19   will get a big burst of investment

02:13:21   and then nothing for a few years or more.

02:13:23   And again, they had this problem under Steve.

02:13:26   - And it almost seems like that's happening again

02:13:28   with the iPad, where last year iPad,

02:13:30   for years people have been clamoring,

02:13:31   well look, this thing is supposed to be

02:13:32   a laptop replacement and it still has

02:13:34   all the same multitasking features of a phone.

02:13:41   of a 13 inch screen on my iPad Pro,

02:13:43   why can't I put two apps up side by side, et cetera.

02:13:46   And they finally addressed it, but now it seems like,

02:13:48   according to these rumors, that big new, you know,

02:13:52   major features like that for iPad

02:13:54   are punted for next year again already.

02:13:56   - Yeah, and it's hard to draw comparisons

02:14:01   for like the way things used to be.

02:14:02   Like, you know, people always say, well, you know,

02:14:04   when the iPhone came out, like then,

02:14:06   whatever version of Mac OS was that year,

02:14:08   I forget, like it was delayed.

02:14:10   And they famously said it took them too much effort

02:14:13   on the iOS, anyway.

02:14:15   It's really not that useful to make comparisons

02:14:18   to how it was back then because Apple today

02:14:21   is just vastly bigger and the competitive landscape

02:14:24   is vastly different.

02:14:26   It's such a different beast and such a different problem

02:14:29   today that you can't just apply blanket wisdom

02:14:33   or examples from the past.

02:14:35   But it does seem like they still don't multitask very well.

02:14:40   very well, like if they're all there growth

02:14:42   and all the new product lines they've launched

02:14:44   and everything, they still have that fundamental problem.

02:14:47   And I don't know, some analysts like to talk about

02:14:50   the corporate structure of Apple being

02:14:54   functional rather than divisional or something like that.

02:14:56   That's it, right?

02:14:56   - Yeah.

02:14:57   - Whatever that is.

02:14:59   And I don't know, maybe that's holding them back

02:15:01   in this area, I don't know.

02:15:03   But whatever the cause and whatever possible solutions exist

02:15:07   The problem to me is the same problem they've had

02:15:12   for a very long time, which is they just don't multitask

02:15:15   very well.

02:15:18   But today they have more platforms and products than ever

02:15:20   that they're trying to maintain.

02:15:24   And so even if, you know, back 10 years ago,

02:15:27   maybe they could only really maintain like one or two things.

02:15:30   Well now, maybe they can maintain 10 things,

02:15:33   but they have 12.

02:15:32   You know, like it's something like that.

02:15:34   Like even if they've gotten better at it,

02:15:37   they're still not able to do it well enough

02:15:40   at the scale they're at today.

02:15:42   And so you have things like, you know,

02:15:43   things being neglected for a long time.

02:15:45   You have like, I think one of the biggest,

02:15:48   you know, for a while you were right,

02:15:49   for a while the iPad was one of these things

02:15:51   where it just seemed like iPad,

02:15:54   the iPad OS was getting very little attention

02:15:56   to Frankel for years.

02:15:58   Fortunately, that seems to have turned around.

02:16:01   Today I would say one of the big dangers of that is the Mac.

02:16:06   I don't think I'm gonna make a lot of argument about that.

02:16:07   The Mac has had not seemingly a ton of software investment

02:16:12   in recent years, and it's really starting to have

02:16:17   some pretty big problems.

02:16:18   But again, I say this on a Mac, it's working.

02:16:21   Everything's relative, I guess, but it seems like

02:16:27   almost every week there's some kind of embarrassing

02:16:30   quality or security flaw in Mac OS.

02:16:33   And so like, obviously this is not getting

02:16:36   the type of attention it deserves,

02:16:37   or the time for bug fixing or quality assurance

02:16:41   that it needs.

02:16:43   So I think this is a problem that Apple can fix.

02:16:47   Like, they have a massive amount of resources

02:16:51   at their disposal.

02:16:52   I think, you know, you can't just throw money

02:16:55   at something and make it go away, it isn't that easy.

02:16:57   but it's also really hard to argue

02:17:00   that Apple can't do something

02:17:02   because they don't have enough of something.

02:17:04   That is really a tough argument

02:17:06   because they have all the resources in the world.

02:17:10   For example, if they can't hire enough engineers,

02:17:15   well, fix that problem.

02:17:17   Find ways to hire more engineers.

02:17:19   More engineers exist, they work at lots of other places,

02:17:22   why not Apple?

02:17:23   And so maybe there's changes to policies or cultures

02:17:28   or geographies that they need to make.

02:17:31   I don't know, I don't know what the problem is,

02:17:32   but these are problems that are within

02:17:35   their control to solve.

02:17:36   And so that ultimately what we need is a company

02:17:38   that is able to maintain the many products

02:17:43   and platforms and services that they keep launching,

02:17:48   they keep expanding into.

02:17:50   To me, it's not good if they just keep launching

02:17:54   new platforms and new services and stuff

02:17:56   and then just leave them to die

02:17:58   while they work on the next big thing.

02:17:59   That's not long-term gonna be healthy.

02:18:01   - Yeah, it's a hard argument to,

02:18:06   it's inherently mushy to say that it comes down

02:18:11   to three things, schedule, features, quality.

02:18:13   That's arbitrary to say those are the three things,

02:18:18   But it's not a bad way to break it up.

02:18:22   It's like the old analogy that you can have,

02:18:24   what, good, soon, or cheap, pick two.

02:18:30   The real thing is you can pick one,

02:18:32   that they're all at odds with each other.

02:18:34   But I do think that they've gone off the rails

02:18:39   in recent years a little bit.

02:18:42   And again, it's a course correction more than turning,

02:18:46   Apple, especially the iPhone, you know, it's just this massive, massive ship analogy-wise.

02:18:52   Just, you know, the biggest cruise ship you could imagine. And it's not like they need

02:18:57   to turn this thing 90 degrees and go in a totally different direction and break all

02:19:01   of this massive momentum they have. They need like a minor course correction, in my opinion.

02:19:05   But in the long term, just a handful of years, if you're off by just a few degrees, you can

02:19:13   wind up, you know, hundreds of miles away from where you should be. You know, it's

02:19:17   important to make course corrections because even a minor course correction

02:19:21   over time can get you way off track. And I feel like where Apple has gone wrong

02:19:27   in recent years is emphasizing new features over improving

02:19:35   existing features. It is the single biggest thing, and I think that's true

02:19:39   across all their platforms. And I really, I just think that there's like, the Mac to

02:19:45   me is the one that means the most to me personally. It's the one I love the most. If I could only

02:19:49   use one Apple platform, I swear to God, I would give up my iPhone before I gave up using

02:19:53   a Mac. That's how much I wouldn't even hesitate. If I had gone to my head, I wouldn't even

02:19:58   really be a tough decision. And I might bitch about it every day for the rest of my life

02:20:03   as I use a Google Pixel, but it's just too important to my work. If anything, maybe having

02:20:10   a phone I like less would be better for my attention or something like that.

02:20:14   And I worry the most about the Mac because I see weird things happening with the Mac

02:20:22   that to me are worrisome because to me, as somebody who to me gets the Mac and what makes

02:20:29   the Mac the Mac in a way that I even as a writer have trouble expressing

02:20:33   sometimes because it's it's like trying to explain why I love my wife you know

02:20:38   it's like I can give you reasons but there's also something ineffable about

02:20:43   it that I can't explain and I see weird things happen on the Mac that to me are

02:20:48   like this is weird and I'll just give you one minor example it's like I forget

02:20:52   like two or three years ago when they added tab documents to to cocoa yeah

02:20:58   Yeah, like I get it. I use tabs in Safari. I do I use tabs and terminal too

02:21:03   and then they added it to like NS document and like any NS document based app could have tabs and

02:21:10   It was all just so it it

02:21:14   weird because it wasn't designed the system the UI wasn't designed from the get-go to have tab windows and

02:21:22   Browsers kind of pulled it off because browsers have always sort of been a weird little world within a world where you can run apps

02:21:29   within a browser, you know and

02:21:31   Terminal is terminal and terminal is not really a normal app, but then to do it document wide and

02:21:38   It's like well what keyboard shortcut are you gonna use because all these other apps that have tabs have command T

02:21:43   For making a new tab, but all NS document apps have used command T since like 1988 with next step for opening the font panel

02:21:52   And I thought well, there's a lot of things that they're gonna

02:21:55   I can't wait to see how they clarify all these things and they they didn't really do anything

02:21:59   And to me I know there's people who love spaces, but I really cannot get into spaces and to me

02:22:07   It's just confusing and I often feel like where the hell am I and I get the idea of having multiple

02:22:12   Doc, you know multiple desktops that you can go between and maybe divide your work up between them

02:22:19   I get the idea but to me the fact that the system wasn't designed originally with spaces in mind and to me

02:22:26   They never really they never really clarified it and unified it into a hole and there's just a whole bunch of little things like that

02:22:33   so to me wanting Apple to add new features to Mac OS is

02:22:37   The wrong way to look at it

02:22:41   I almost feel like I feel like the desktop the idea of desktop computing in a window, you know mouse pointer and a

02:22:48   Windowing system and the max style of having the menu bar at the top. They've got that down that doesn't really need to be rethought

02:22:55   It's this is what it is and it'll have the future that it has and it's good for what it's good at and better

02:23:00   Than anything else for what it's better at

02:23:03   I feel just make those features work better. I feel like adding, you know, here's the thing that's all new it just

02:23:10   messes it up

02:23:13   Yeah, and to me like I I

02:23:17   I disagree somewhat with the concept that,

02:23:19   I know this is not what you just said,

02:23:20   but a lot of people think of this in a similar way,

02:23:23   where people think like desktop OSes

02:23:26   are kind of just a solved problem,

02:23:27   that they're just done,

02:23:29   and there's really nowhere to go with them,

02:23:30   and I fundamentally disagree with that.

02:23:32   Like, there's so much improvement that Mac OS could have,

02:23:36   and there's lots of different areas.

02:23:37   You know, just as a quick example, like app installation,

02:23:41   like the whole thing with like,

02:23:42   well you download a DMG,

02:23:44   and then you open up this virtual disk image

02:23:48   and you drag this, like that's crazy

02:23:50   and incredibly confusing to anybody

02:23:52   and that's no wonder that's a problem.

02:23:54   Also the fact that apps can just write all over the system

02:23:57   with temp files and other garbage that goes all over

02:23:59   like library and everything, that's kind of weird.

02:24:03   And that when you delete an app,

02:24:04   all of its crap isn't deleted.

02:24:06   There's a lot of things that we learned from iOS

02:24:07   that I think would be nice to be brought to the Mac

02:24:10   for things like the ease of software installation

02:24:13   deleting things and everything. The Mac App Store kind of went halfway with that,

02:24:17   but it has been done so poorly and so half-assedly for its entire lifetime

02:24:24   that it really doesn't do a great service to these concepts at all and

02:24:29   might even be doing more harm than good to some of these concepts and to the

02:24:32   advancement of the platform. But so to me like there's a lot of ways that

02:24:36   the Mac can move forward and needs to move forward. From simple things like

02:24:42   features like for instance I still very firmly believe that we need cellular

02:24:47   Macs. We need cellular Mac laptops and the system has the concept of

02:24:53   distinguishing a network connection request between cellular between like it

02:24:58   should run over cellular and this shouldn't run over cellular. It's been

02:25:01   there since iOS got it like three four years ago at least. So like there is a

02:25:05   framework there for apps to like control their data usage. There's also third-party

02:25:09   like trip mode that allow the user to control this.

02:25:13   So like the software support is either there or easy to add,

02:25:18   so they need to add cellular Macs.

02:25:20   I don't know why they still don't have them.

02:25:21   The PC industry's had them for 10 years.

02:25:23   - That's the sort of problem

02:25:24   that I always look to Apple to solve, right?

02:25:26   It is a problem that if you have a cellular Mac,

02:25:29   you wouldn't want it to behave the same way it would

02:25:32   when it's on unfettered WiFi.

02:25:34   And I can vouch for this,

02:25:37   having been on a cruise ship where you pay for the Wi-Fi

02:25:42   by very expensive one gigabyte doses,

02:25:46   where I quickly learned that even with trying my best to,

02:25:51   the last time I did this,

02:25:52   I knew that Jason Snell had recommended an app

02:25:55   and it ends up it was the trip mode,

02:25:58   but I didn't have it yet.

02:25:59   So even just getting it was hard

02:26:01   because it was on this terrible cruise ship Wi-Fi.

02:26:04   But literally just opening my Mac

02:26:06   and like having a Safari that didn't have any tabs open

02:26:09   in the background and don't open mail,

02:26:12   and it's like, it didn't matter what I did,

02:26:13   I'd mow through a gigabyte in like 10 minutes,

02:26:16   and it'd be like, what the hell just happened?

02:26:17   I don't even understand what the hell just happened there.

02:26:20   I've looked at Apple to solve that,

02:26:22   like, and I hate to say it to the Trip Mode people,

02:26:24   but what I would look for Apple to do

02:26:27   if they came out with cellular Macs

02:26:28   is coincide with an OS feature that puts,

02:26:32   you know, that puts Trip Mode out of business

02:26:34   by making, just giving you explicit control

02:26:38   over what can do what over cellular

02:26:41   and treating it very differently.

02:26:42   It's totally a solvable problem.

02:26:43   - Just like we have on iOS.

02:26:45   Like iOS solved this problem years ago with settings.

02:26:48   - Well, iOS solves it in a different way though,

02:26:51   where iOS has a very different concept

02:26:53   of what an app can do in the background,

02:26:55   meaning it's not the front most has input focus.

02:26:58   Like the Mac would have to solve it in a different way.

02:27:00   But it's totally solvable.

02:27:02   But iOS has a settings panel called cellular,

02:27:05   and you can go in there and you can see

02:27:06   how much data each app is using, you can turn them off.

02:27:08   And you can say, well this app is okay over Wi-Fi,

02:27:11   but don't use cellular for this app.

02:27:12   - Well I would imagine that in my mind,

02:27:14   and I could be wrong, you always have to try it

02:27:16   and see if it's good, but my mind,

02:27:18   if they came out with cellular Macs,

02:27:20   my mind, in my mind it would be something

02:27:22   more active, interactive, where like,

02:27:25   you turn on cellular and as soon as an app

02:27:27   tries to hit the network the first time,

02:27:29   you'd get some kind of alert like, "Hey, Tweetbot is trying to use the internet over

02:27:36   cellular. Do you want to allow this?" And have an option where it's only allowed to

02:27:41   do it when it's front most. I don't know.

02:27:44   That's interesting. Almost like Little Snitch telling you, "Hey, this app is trying to do

02:27:48   this."

02:27:49   Yeah, exactly. Little Snitch is actually what I have in mind, where some kind of thing like

02:27:53   that. And then once I say for the first time, "Oh yeah, Tweetbot, I always have that running,

02:27:58   But yeah, you know what, that would actually be fine on cellular if it only could use the

02:28:02   internet while it's the front most application.

02:28:04   That's fine.

02:28:07   And mail.

02:28:08   And just say, "Hey, when you're on cellular, do you want to turn off everything except

02:28:11   just downloading the text of mail?"

02:28:13   You don't want to...

02:28:14   And the iOS is very smart about this, where it won't download images in email and stuff

02:28:19   like that.

02:28:20   It's solely solvable.

02:28:21   What do you call it?

02:28:22   It's a Microsoft.

02:28:23   You guys talked about an ATP.

02:28:24   Microsoft has cellular Surface laptops and they're--

02:28:29   - Oh yeah, there's been cellular PC laptops

02:28:32   literally for over a decade.

02:28:33   Like this is not a rare thing.

02:28:35   I'm not asking for something that we don't know

02:28:37   whether it's possible or not.

02:28:38   No, we know it's possible.

02:28:39   The rest of the industry does it.

02:28:40   People buy it and it's fine.

02:28:42   So yeah.

02:28:43   And what worries me ultimately with the Mac is like,

02:28:47   it's hard to see a lot of those big features like that

02:28:50   getting done and/or getting done well.

02:28:55   Because what seems to be Mac involvement,

02:28:57   or Mac investment in recent years,

02:29:00   is a lot of stuff just never comes to the Mac.

02:29:03   Stuff that is introduced on iOS

02:29:05   that becomes fairly standard

02:29:08   that you kind of want everywhere.

02:29:09   Things like iMessage effects.

02:29:11   - And stickers.

02:29:12   - Where you can do them, yeah, you can do it on iOS,

02:29:15   you can't do it on the Mac,

02:29:16   and there's kind of no clear path

02:29:17   of how they would even do that on the Mac

02:29:18   in the current environment.

02:29:20   - I'll tell you which one gets me.

02:29:22   I love the tap back feature on iOS messages

02:29:26   where like somebody sends you an iMessage

02:29:29   and you can just press on the thing and give it a thumbs up.

02:29:32   I love it.

02:29:33   It's such a great way to communicate.

02:29:35   Instead of sending them an entire message

02:29:37   to just say, okay, good or whatever,

02:29:39   just put a thumbs up on their last message.

02:29:41   And on the Mac, you can do it,

02:29:44   but you've gotta like first bring up the contextual menu

02:29:47   and then tap back and then you get the tap back options.

02:29:51   Why aren't those thumbs and hearts,

02:29:54   why aren't they right there in the contextual menu?

02:29:56   There should just be a row of them.

02:29:57   - That's a good question.

02:29:58   You can also long click on it,

02:30:01   like as if you were doing a long press on iOS,

02:30:03   and that brings up tap back immediately,

02:30:05   but it's still almost funky.

02:30:06   - Yeah, but who the hell wants to do a long press?

02:30:08   That sucks.

02:30:10   - Yeah, and long click on Mac isn't a thing.

02:30:13   That's not a thing anybody wants to try,

02:30:14   'cause that's not a gesture in the system.

02:30:16   Anyways, so my point is for features like cellular Macs

02:30:21   or other major platform changes,

02:30:25   it's hard to see that happening

02:30:27   because it seems like the Mac

02:30:29   doesn't get a lot of those anymore.

02:30:31   You can look at recent things and you say,

02:30:33   oh, well the Mac got APFS, the new file system,

02:30:35   that's a big job.

02:30:36   But the main reason APFS existed

02:30:38   is probably for iOS devices.

02:30:40   That was something that wasn't just investing in the Mac,

02:30:42   that was investing in all of their software platforms,

02:30:45   including the big ones that get off the headlines

02:30:47   and make most of the money.

02:30:48   So it's hard to say that was like a Mac thing.

02:30:51   - In the hypothetical world where,

02:30:53   just bear with me for a second,

02:30:57   but if Intel-based computers had to use different SSDs

02:31:02   at a technical level than ARM devices,

02:31:07   like let's just say that in this hypothetical world,

02:31:10   SSDs are built into the CPU.

02:31:13   And there's a fundamental difference in the way

02:31:15   Intel does it from the way ARM ones do it. Would APFS have been written to

02:31:18   support both? I think that's a really... Right, it's like I want to say

02:31:24   yes that they would have abstracted away because HFS+ really was long in the

02:31:29   tooth. You know, you could play your little ding there, you only do once a

02:31:33   show. But my heart is telling me, yeah, I don't think that... I think

02:31:40   - Max would have been on HFS Plus forever.

02:31:44   Like it's a fact that they use fundamentally the same SSDs

02:31:49   that allowed that work to be justified.

02:31:52   - Yeah, and like when the Mac does get significant effort

02:31:59   put into it, it seems to be, like I often use the phrase,

02:32:03   it's kind of like a drive-by update,

02:32:05   where like some subsystem will be rewritten.

02:32:08   we had Discovery D a few years ago.

02:32:10   I think in Sierra we had the USB subsystem,

02:32:13   and that's why Sierra had so many USB audio bugs.

02:32:16   In High Sierra, I think the window manager was rewritten

02:32:20   to be metal-based, and so everything is,

02:32:23   that's one of the reasons why it's so much faster

02:32:25   in certain ways.

02:32:26   And then there's the PDF subsystem that was rewritten,

02:32:29   I think one or two versions ago.

02:32:30   - Yeah, I remember Michael Sauer writing about that.

02:32:32   And it was f-ed up in a bunch of ways.

02:32:33   - Right, and the problem is when, right,

02:32:36   like when these subsystems and things get rewritten

02:32:38   Mac OS they get brought up to like what basically seems like a beta. Disc utility.

02:32:44   Instability and features. Yeah the new disc utility that had like you know

02:32:47   grammatical errors and the dialog box and stuff like and the crazy password

02:32:51   authentication. It seems like these things get rewritten to like you know

02:32:57   it's almost done it works for me and then they ship it and then they never

02:33:01   fix it. So it's like it not only is the Mac not getting like really major

02:33:08   platform changing work put into it it seems but also what work is going into

02:33:14   it seems to be done in a more rushed fashion and it introduces bugs that seem

02:33:21   to never really get fixed and that is that to me that's what's most concerning

02:33:26   is not only that the platform is not moving forward in ways that I think it

02:33:31   could and should, but also that what we have,

02:33:34   in some ways, is getting worse every year

02:33:36   as more bugs are added for kinda three-quarters-assed

02:33:41   rewrites of system--

02:33:42   - Well, and it ties in with a couple of other recent rumors.

02:33:45   There's the other one that Germin had

02:33:46   where there's Project Marzipan,

02:33:49   which is supposedly some kind of way

02:33:52   to have universal iPad, iOS, Mac apps.

02:33:57   It's, you know, we can't get into details on it.

02:34:00   I talked about it on this show too.

02:34:03   I don't think, I think in typical German fashion,

02:34:06   there's probably something to it,

02:34:08   and it's, what it actually is,

02:34:12   is not really interesting or understandable by him,

02:34:16   and so it's misrepresented.

02:34:18   But it very likely could be some kind of either UI kit

02:34:24   on Mac or UI kit-like version of app kit on Mac.

02:34:30   And and to make a very long story very short UI kit is the fundamental framework for making iOS apps and app kit is

02:34:38   the Mac framework for making apps that dates back to next in 1988 and UI kit is

02:34:44   unsurprisingly

02:34:47   almost universally held as

02:34:49   What would you know a company?

02:34:52   18 years into app kit in 2006. What would they change if they had it to do all over again?

02:34:58   again. And therefore is easier, more convenient in certain ways for developers. AppKit developers

02:35:08   find it much easier to move to UIKit and, "Ooh, this is suddenly a lot easier." And UIKit

02:35:14   developers such as yourself often find it very frustrating to move to AppKit because

02:35:17   all of a sudden there's more grunt work to be handled by the developer. And so something

02:35:26   that would enable people with UI kit skills

02:35:29   to more easily make native Mac apps would be great,

02:35:31   if done well, in theory.

02:35:36   - Yeah, I am very excited about that possibility.

02:35:40   That, because as an iOS developer

02:35:43   who kind of reluctantly makes some Mac apps,

02:35:45   like I would love to make more Mac apps,

02:35:48   but it feels like my iOS skills

02:35:51   are almost completely useless.

02:35:53   Like it feels like it's a whole new platform,

02:35:55   Because in many ways, it's kind of a--

02:35:56   Forecast probably would have been a perfect app for that,

02:35:59   or maybe it would be.

02:36:00   Maybe it's so perfect for it that if it comes out

02:36:03   that you'd rewrite it using it, if that's basically what it is.

02:36:06   Because I think where AppKit really shines over UIKit

02:36:09   is on truly complex code bases.

02:36:13   Think about apps like the big Omni apps,

02:36:17   or some of Panic's apps, and stuff like that.

02:36:21   Apps that truly are way more complex than anything

02:36:23   could reasonably get by with on iOS.

02:36:26   AppKit is great at making that manageable.

02:36:29   And UIKit is better for sort of,

02:36:32   hey, all I need is this one screen, really,

02:36:34   and it'll have a list here of things

02:36:37   and a couple of buttons and a text field.

02:36:39   - Yeah, and like, I mean,

02:36:42   forecast is kind of an okay example.

02:36:45   A better example is overcast.

02:36:47   - Yeah, yeah.

02:36:48   - Overcast, like, it's,

02:36:49   most people listen to overcast on their phones.

02:36:52   And by far, I think it's something like 92% phone,

02:36:57   and then the rest is iPad, something like that,

02:37:01   like in that neighborhood.

02:37:03   And so it is primarily a phone platform,

02:37:05   but because I've written Overcast using a lot of stock

02:37:08   UI kit components, it is not that much effort

02:37:11   to also maintain an iPad version of it.

02:37:14   And even though the iPad version is only 7 or 8%

02:37:17   of the usage, first of all, I use the iPad version,

02:37:18   so that's kind of enough of motivation right there.

02:37:21   But also, it is only about seven or eight percent

02:37:25   more effort to maintain the iPad version to the degree I do.

02:37:28   Now I could make an incredibly awesome,

02:37:31   more customized iPad version that would take

02:37:33   way more effort, but it probably isn't worth that,

02:37:36   but it's fine, it only takes five percent more effort

02:37:39   to reach five percent more people.

02:37:41   If the Mac became a similar type of extension,

02:37:45   where I already have this entire iOS code base

02:37:49   with iOS UI in a lot of places.

02:37:53   I know it wouldn't be the most amazing Mac app in the world

02:37:56   in the same way that it isn't the most amazing iPad app

02:37:58   in the world, but if I could get a Mac app out of Overcast

02:38:02   for 10% more effort, I would totally do that.

02:38:07   Whereas right now, it would be nearly 100% more effort,

02:38:11   and the market is not able to justify that.

02:38:13   it's not a big enough market for that,

02:38:15   and it's not worth, I don't have that much bandwidth

02:38:18   to spare on something like that.

02:38:19   Whereas anything that would make it easier,

02:38:22   if it's gonna make developing for Mac from an iOS code base

02:38:27   about as much work, or even if it's more work,

02:38:30   but it's not that much more work,

02:38:31   than it is to port an iPhone app to the iPad,

02:38:34   that is going to enable a ton more Mac apps.

02:38:38   And yeah, they won't be the best Mac apps in the world.

02:38:41   There will be a lot of crappy ports,

02:38:43   just like there are on iPad, there will be a lot of

02:38:47   behaviors that are really a little too iOS-y

02:38:51   that feel a little bit weird on the Mac,

02:38:53   but it is better for the Mac on a whole if that exists,

02:38:57   and it's better for the iPad, because what you basically do

02:39:01   is, assuming that developing an iPad,

02:39:04   or assuming if you have an iPhone app,

02:39:07   that expanding it onto the iPad and the Mac

02:39:11   are probably kind of similar in a lot of ways,

02:39:13   then what you've basically done is you've almost doubled

02:39:17   the value of what a developer would get

02:39:20   out of making the app from their iPhone app

02:39:23   into this larger type of app.

02:39:25   And so you increase the odds that more developers will,

02:39:28   and you increase the amount of resources

02:39:30   that they're able to justify devoting to it.

02:39:33   And so what that does is have way more and better apps

02:39:37   for both the iPad and the Mac,

02:39:40   which both of those platforms could honestly use.

02:39:43   - Yeah, the Mac has such a great library

02:39:46   of long-standing apps, you know,

02:39:49   and I was looking at it the other day,

02:39:51   and most of the apps that I use have been around

02:39:53   for quite a long time.

02:39:55   BB Edit, Transmit, they both date back to classic Mac OS,

02:40:00   Omni Outliner, even Mars Edit is a long-standing app

02:40:05   at this point, I think Brent first shipped it in 2004,

02:40:09   I don't know but

02:40:11   You know it. I don't need a lot of new apps and these are the apps that I use on

02:40:16   You know acorn is a relative to me in my mind is still a relatively new app

02:40:20   It's up to like version 6.0. So it's not it's not that new

02:40:23   Yeah, like apps that succeed on the Mac tend to last for a long time

02:40:28   And those apps are great and are all in active development. There's new versions

02:40:34   I think of just about every one of those apps that I just mentioned brand new versions that have great new features in

02:40:39   Just like the last year BB edit transmit Mars edit

02:40:42   Tweet bot hasn't had a new version in a while on a Mac

02:40:48   But I'm just looking at the Mac apps that I rely on the most things

02:40:51   Has a new version out

02:40:54   But I still I do feel like so I'm not worried about those apps and app kits not going anywhere and they can keep using

02:41:01   It but I do worry about when's the last time like somebody shipped a new Mac app that you're like, wow

02:41:06   I love this is a new Mac app and I really do worry that that that's sort of a canary in the coal mine

02:41:12   for the platform, you know that

02:41:15   And it has so much momentum and so much, you know and sales of Mac hardware still as like all-time highs

02:41:23   It's all good

02:41:24   but as a platform I worry about the fact that

02:41:27   all the apps that I consider my most used and beloved and best examples of good apps on the platform are like

02:41:36   you know, even the new quote-unquote new ones are ten years old.

02:41:40   Yeah, and you know if you listen to you know, people like Mike Hurley and and other like Federico Vatici

02:41:48   people who are really into getting their primary work done on iOS

02:41:54   one of the most common reasons cited for that is

02:41:58   that there's honestly just more action on iOS with like what new apps are coming out, new

02:42:05   concepts and apps, new developers becoming prominent,

02:42:09   new design languages and new workflow strategies

02:42:13   and everything, there's so much more happening on iOS.

02:42:17   The Mac, there's not a lot of software innovation

02:42:22   and just software health that's really growing on the Mac.

02:42:28   Like the old apps that have been here forever

02:42:31   seem to be doing fine.

02:42:32   all of them, honestly. But many of them seem to be fine.

02:42:35   I just checked Acorn's about box. It's copyright 2007 to 2018, so it's 11 years

02:42:41   old and I just acted like it was brand new. I knew it wasn't, but still, compared to

02:42:46   BB Edit and Transmit, it's…

02:42:47   Yeah, right. Time flies.

02:42:48   Compared to BB Edit and Transmit, it's…

02:42:49   Time flies when your platform is being neglected.

02:42:51   Where's Transmit? Transmit is copyright 1997 to 2017.

02:42:55   BB Edit.

02:42:56   I was in middle school.

02:42:58   I know I first started using BB edit in

02:43:01   1992 and so

02:43:05   It's pretty old

02:43:09   Yeah, yeah, so like

02:43:12   My concern with the Mac is that if they don't do something like this if they leave the status quo

02:43:18   Where you have the Mac with its own?

02:43:21   You know API's for everything that are older and clunkier, you know

02:43:26   though richer in a lot of ways, but still older and clunkier

02:43:30   and basically turning off a lot of modern developers.

02:43:33   If you leave this the way it is,

02:43:35   I think we're just gonna keep seeing a continuation

02:43:38   of what we see now, which is not a lot of new developers

02:43:41   coming to the Mac, not a lot of new apps,

02:43:43   not a lot of new concepts, all the action continuing

02:43:47   to happen in the US. - I honestly--

02:43:47   - And that's not good for the Mac.

02:43:50   - If I could chew the ear of Apple's executive team

02:43:52   on what to do with the Mac going forward,

02:43:54   Honestly, I really think and and that's why I'm happy

02:43:57   I'm optimistic about this marzipan rumor is that I would rather see them focus almost entirely on

02:44:04   Stuff for Mac developers or would be Mac developers then actual

02:44:11   You know, here's a thing that you the user get from Apple right when you install the OS features

02:44:17   Like you the features are all there. There's windows. There's menus. There's buttons

02:44:23   But I feel like enabling people to making it

02:44:26   Doing for you know like when Coco was first came out, and it was just like man

02:44:31   You can make an app that is rich and has all you know complete rich text editor and all of these features for free

02:44:39   And just focus on the features you want to add for your app

02:44:45   And and you really could like a smaller team of developers or one person could make an app that

02:44:52   one person could never make on Windows because you just didn't you didn't get that much with the framework and I feel like

02:44:58   At this point they need to level that up again and make it like that again

02:45:02   I just wrote this week about how like to me the biggest threat to the Mac is this proliferation of

02:45:07   Non-native apps that people just accept as being well, that's what an app is these electron apps and shit

02:45:13   Like that's the way slack works

02:45:15   I think it's a threat to the platform that if the longer it goes on where that's accepted where

02:45:21   a 300 megabyte download app that consumes 500 megabytes of RAM just for opening one

02:45:28   window and is slow and doesn't use native controls and breaks a bunch of native conventions

02:45:34   and uses weird Moonman keyboard shortcuts. If that's just accepted as the way that it

02:45:39   is, then the Mac loses its reason for existence because any system, a Chromebook is as good

02:45:47   as that because the same app will run with the same keyboard shortcuts. All you need

02:45:51   is something that runs a web view. And if that's what desktop computers devolve to,

02:45:59   where it's really not about the OS but just about the form factor of having a clamshell

02:46:03   laptop that opens up and a keyboard that's connected and a trackpad, the Mac OS loses

02:46:09   its reason for existence. The whole reason that the Mac thrived or survived in the rough

02:46:14   years and thrived in later years is that it was better. And the reason it was better was

02:46:20   is that it had better apps.

02:46:21   And if new apps aren't coming out

02:46:25   that follow in the same mold as their predecessors,

02:46:28   it's a long-term problem for the platform,

02:46:31   like a serious problem.

02:46:32   - Yeah, and because, you know,

02:46:35   and when you have something, you know,

02:46:38   like you have apps that are just like web views

02:46:40   shoved into standalone apps for the Mac,

02:46:44   that's only a continuation of what we had a few years ago

02:46:47   before this became so common,

02:46:48   which is basically like the solution was on your phone,

02:46:51   you can use a cool native app,

02:46:53   and when you're on your computer,

02:46:54   you just have to use our webpage.

02:46:56   Like that just sucks, and I know why it's done that way,

02:47:00   but it sucks.

02:47:01   - It depends what the app or service is though.

02:47:03   Like OpenTable, I'm fine with OpenTable being nothing more

02:47:06   than a web thing on the Mac.

02:47:07   I don't wanna, I wouldn't install an OpenTable app

02:47:09   on my Mac, why would I?

02:47:11   - Sure, but what about things like Netflix?

02:47:13   - Right.

02:47:13   - Right, like Netflix should be a native app,

02:47:15   but instead it's a web view.

02:47:16   And you know, Slack is kind of a special case

02:47:19   'cause it's like, it's kind of a web view

02:47:21   on all the platforms, I think, but it's like,

02:47:25   there are a lot of apps where, you know,

02:47:27   they're willing to invest the effort into an iOS app

02:47:31   because the market supports that and the platform

02:47:34   really makes it hard to do anything else in a good way.

02:47:38   So like, you know, they're willing to do that,

02:47:39   but when it comes to the Mac, they're just like,

02:47:42   ah, well, you know, just web view is fine

02:47:44   because it isn't worth them making a whole separate

02:47:49   app kit code base just for this portion of the user base

02:47:52   when they can just throw the webpage at them.

02:47:54   So anything that Apple can do to help companies

02:47:58   leverage their iOS code base that they're writing anyway

02:48:02   to also make a Mac app fairly easily will pay off big time

02:48:06   because lots of companies are doing that calculus.

02:48:09   They're saying, well, it's not worth making a whole Mac app

02:48:11   from nothing, from scratch,

02:48:13   and not being able to reuse anything really.

02:48:16   But they would have a very different calculus

02:48:18   if the barrier was lower,

02:48:21   if you could share more of that iOS code.

02:48:23   And I wouldn't expect it to be like a new checkbox

02:48:27   in Xcode, just make Mac app and that's it, you're done.

02:48:30   You know, it's not gonna be that easy,

02:48:31   but I hope it can be more like what it is

02:48:36   to have an app go from iPhone to iPad,

02:48:39   where it does take some work to get it to be usable

02:48:41   and to get it to be nice,

02:48:43   but it's at least possible to do

02:48:46   without rewriting your entire UI from scratch.

02:48:49   - All right, let me take a break here

02:48:51   and thank our third and final sponsor of the evening,

02:48:55   two good friends at Squarespace.

02:48:56   Squarespace, look, when you wanna make a website,

02:49:01   what are you gonna do?

02:49:02   You're gonna start coding,

02:49:03   you're gonna start opening up a web hosting account,

02:49:06   you're gonna start writing PHP, HTML, all that stuff,

02:49:11   the way websites were made back in the stone ages. You could,

02:49:15   you could do that. You know what?

02:49:17   To be a lot easier way to do it is start at Squarespace,

02:49:20   go to Squarespace and spend half an hour making a new website.

02:49:25   Sign up, you get a free account, you get a free trial. Just to start going.

02:49:28   Squarespace handles everything. They are the host.

02:49:31   They provide the templates you can start with. They provide the,

02:49:35   the widgets that you can add to your page to add something like a store or to

02:49:40   add like image portfolio and then you can just upload the images and it'll go right

02:49:46   in. It is so much easier and takes so much work out of the process, especially if you

02:49:54   are like a technically minded person who listens to the show and people come to you and they're

02:49:59   like, Hey, I need a website. What am I supposed to do? You can build them a website at Squarespace,

02:50:04   get them started and then just hand it off to them and they can take care of everything

02:50:08   after that and do the updates. Back in the day when I was doing consulting and making

02:50:14   websites for people, I'd make the website and I thought it was all the work and then

02:50:18   I would just get all this continuing consulting work from them just to do content updates.

02:50:24   It was like, "Well, thanks for the work, but it's like you're paying me to just be a typist."

02:50:29   With Squarespace, a normal person, you can hand it over to them. It's a WYSIWYG interface

02:50:34   and they can take care of updating content, adding new posts if you give them a blog or

02:50:40   something like that on their Squarespace site. It really is so much easier and Squarespace

02:50:46   has amazing technical support that they can just, normal person can just call them up

02:50:52   and get help and instead of calling you, they'll call Squarespace. It's such a great product.

02:50:58   Let me tell you, I like to do this because they sponsor the show a lot. I keep telling

02:51:02   you more websites that you use on a regular basis are Squarespace sites than you would

02:51:07   believe and I don't know what is wrong with me that I do it I guess it's because Squarespace

02:51:11   sponsors the show so often but I every so I just view source and look for some of the

02:51:16   things in the HTML that indicate that it's a Squarespace site and I'm like damn I this

02:51:22   looks nothing like any other site I've seen it's totally branded to the company it doesn't

02:51:26   look like it came from a cookie cutter template. So I had relatives in town from both sides

02:51:33   of the family recently. They wanted to come to Philly, stay here at Daring Fireball headquarters

02:51:39   for the Eagles Victory Parade last week here in Philadelphia because you couldn't get a

02:51:43   hotel. The city was nuts. There were 3 million people at this damn parade. What do they want

02:51:49   to eat the next night? Of course, everybody wanted to get cheesesteaks because that's

02:51:52   you get in Philadelphia. Well, there's a great new cheese steak place pretty close to us

02:51:57   here in Philadelphia. Cleaver's C L E A V E R S. Um, and their website is cleavers,

02:52:06   philly.com. You can go there. It's a beautiful website. They have a beautiful restaurant

02:52:10   and they make delicious sandwiches and they have great sides. Uh, I love that you're doing

02:52:16   an ad for, well, guess what? Guess what? View source. It's Squarespace site. It is so

02:52:22   so great. It's a great website. What do you want? You want a menu? You want to see pictures

02:52:28   of their food? It's great. Go there, check it out. Check out to see what you can make

02:52:32   with Squarespace. Go to cleversphilly.com. When you want to make your own website, though,

02:52:39   where do you go? Well, you go to squarespace.com and you enter offer code. Now, this is what

02:52:45   you do when you're ready to pay. You can just go there, go to Squarespace. That's all they

02:52:48   care that you do to get started. Take their free trial and build what you want to build.

02:52:55   And then when you go to pay, that's when you've got to remember this code. This is the thing

02:52:59   you got to have long term memory for this. All you need to do to get started is go to

02:53:02   squarespace.com. There's no special URL. But then when you go to pay, when you sign up,

02:53:07   just remember the offer code talk show. No, the just talk show and you'll get 10% off

02:53:12   your first purchase. So that's Squarespace is where you go to build a new website. I'm

02:53:15   I'm telling you, the reason these people can make

02:53:18   these great cheesesteaks is they didn't waste time

02:53:20   building a website, other than going to Squarespace

02:53:25   and putting their design out.

02:53:26   They're not sitting there writing PHP,

02:53:27   they're sitting there cooking up steaks.

02:53:30   So go to squarespace.com and remember that offer code,

02:53:32   talk show, know the.

02:53:34   My thanks to Squarespace.

02:53:35   That's not your favorite cheesesteak place.

02:53:38   What's your favorite?

02:53:39   You don't like Campos either.

02:53:40   You go to the one that's a couple doors down

02:53:42   from Campos when you're here.

02:53:45   I forget what it's called, but it's it's the yeah, but campus is good too campus is really good

02:53:50   You got to go to next time you're here that will take you to cleavers cleavers is I'm telling you. It's really good

02:53:54   Now which is the one that I'm like the famous one that I don't go to that I'm supposed to be going to

02:54:01   Every time I take a picture, okay

02:54:03   The one I like a sunny is good sunny's is my favorite, but you've never been to campus

02:54:07   so it says every time people will probably tell you to go to

02:54:12   Well, there's Pat's and Gina's here and there's the one on South Street. What the hell's it called? Yeah, I hear Jim

02:54:17   And Dallas, I don't want to

02:54:20   Jim's Jim's if you google it Jim's has a lot of problems where every year or so they get busted for selling drugs

02:54:28   It's and in my opinion that it's not a great steak it's really not

02:54:34   It's a see when I have Sonny's I think why I'm not in Philly that much

02:54:41   much. Why, when I come here, would I not get this?

02:54:45   Well, like it's so good when I have it. I'm just like, I don't, I wouldn't want to

02:54:49   like waste a meal. But you're a couple of miles away. You could save, you could, you

02:54:54   could save a lot of driving or whatever by going to Cleaver's. You should, but see, and

02:54:57   you should try more than one. I'm telling you, Cleaver's is the way to go. If you wanted

02:55:01   to bust out and try one on the other side of Broad Street just because they, you know,

02:55:06   It's similar sort of small shop atmosphere

02:55:09   Jim's on South Street is designed to get like the most people through in the shortest amount of time like when they're busy

02:55:16   They I don't know I wouldn't be surprised if they serve

02:55:19   50 60 people an hour whereas you know like when you go to Sonny's it's like just going into a busy lunch place

02:55:24   There's not like a crazy line out the door

02:55:26   Yeah, that's fair but anyway I

02:55:34   Had a thing what's what's the shortest show no no you and I often go

02:55:38   All time record is me and Ben Thompson. Todd Visserie just updated his

02:55:43   Talk-show episode length chart, although I don't think he posted it publicly. He sent it to me privately

02:55:48   It's actually been going. Yeah, but we did one that was so long you split it into two

02:55:53   Oh, so, I don't know. I don't think would that actually got credit for that one? No, it is. He's going by episodes

02:56:00   Let me see here

02:56:04   I'll send this to you. Where'd you go? There you are. I had a thing that kind of ties into

02:56:14   what we were just talking about. Let me see if we have this in the notes. Oh, well, you

02:56:21   were talking about two Do apps on ATP recently, and I wouldn't mind talking to you about this

02:56:25   recently.

02:56:26   Mm-hmm. Sure.

02:56:27   Sure, but I had this thing I've I've moved for years. I was using an app called itta ita

02:56:33   From nice mohawk software for managing I had like a list of things

02:56:39   I take with me every time I leave the house for like a trip

02:56:41   And I've recently moved that into Apple notes and put it in one of the notes and use their checklist feature

02:56:49   Just to sort of have one less one fewer app to use and it seems like it might be sort of

02:56:55   Put out the pasture those guys are working on some cool new

02:56:58   Home energy monitoring stuff. I don't think it has been updated for iPhone 10

02:57:05   Etc. So anyway doing a checklist and Apple Notes. It's not really a to-do app type thing

02:57:11   It's a little bit more simple

02:57:13   but it's a nice way to have this note and every time and the way I update it is every time I

02:57:21   Leave the house for a trip and wind up thinking. Oh, I should have brought whatever

02:57:26   Then I just add it to the end of the list and I'll never forget it again

02:57:30   But the thing is and indeed it is not updated for the iPhone 10

02:57:34   After I pack for the trip I either as I pack everything on my list

02:57:41   I check it off and if it's something that's not relevant like I'll put

02:57:44   Swimsuit, but I'm going somewhere where there I'm not going to swim

02:57:48   Well, I'll just check it off because I know I don't need it. So checking it off the list either means I've packed it

02:57:53   It's in a bag that I know I'm not gonna forget or I don't need it

02:57:56   What do you do for your next trip?

02:57:59   Well, what you want to do is uncheck all of those check marks right and start all over on

02:58:04   iOS as

02:58:06   Far as I can tell the only way to do that in Apple Notes whether you're on iPad or phone is to go through each

02:58:13   Goddamn item and uncheck everything whereas in the Mac app

02:58:17   app in Notes, you can, there's a menu command where you can uncheck everything. It's like

02:58:27   mark as checked and then if you select them all, you can do mark as unchecked, like marking

02:58:32   multiple messages as unread. It's a menu command in the format menu, which seems like something

02:58:39   a computer program should do, right? Computers are supposed to alleviate us of tedium. Isn't

02:58:45   that great, right? But there's no way to do it. So these people like Mike Hurley and all

02:58:51   these other iPad lifestyle people, I believe them. I'm not disputing that they're leading

02:58:57   a happier life for them using an iPad as their main computer. But that's the sort of thing

02:59:06   that makes the iPad a complete non-starter is my main computing platform. Because the

02:59:13   fact that I would have to do that and that on the Mac version I can just hit a

02:59:16   menu command and have it all unchecked all at once is exactly why I like using

02:59:22   a computer as opposed to you know mimeo graphing 20 copies of the same

02:59:27   checklist on paper I mean and you know in there in the iPad users defense like

02:59:33   there are apps that do this better like so like the solution for something like

02:59:38   that where it's like well you can't do this very well on the iPad where the Mac

02:59:42   can do it.

02:59:43   The solution on the iPad is probably,

02:59:44   well, if you use this other app, this can do that.

02:59:47   So it's not that it's impossible,

02:59:50   but it's often that you have to seek out

02:59:52   a more power user-y app or a more obscure app

02:59:56   to do these kinds of things better.

02:59:57   - To me, it comes down to the most mundane and overlooked

03:00:01   and it's, 'cause it's been here since,

03:00:04   right since 1984 when the first Mac shipped,

03:00:07   but the menu bar, and I'm not saying that iOS

03:00:10   should get a Mac style menu bar because it wouldn't work.

03:00:13   But the fact that Mac apps have a menu bar

03:00:16   and you can put commands in there,

03:00:18   and in recent years, in the old days,

03:00:21   Mac apps didn't have toolbars at all.

03:00:24   Like the only thing in the window chrome

03:00:26   were the controls to close the window, zoom the window,

03:00:29   or like minimize the window at some point

03:00:34   when they didn't even have that at first.

03:00:38   And anything you wanted to do was mostly done

03:00:41   by using menu commands.

03:00:43   That was like the main way of doing it.

03:00:46   And I get it, 'cause they're hidden,

03:00:48   everything in a menu bar is at least one level down, right?

03:00:52   Like if you wanna save, you can't just click one button,

03:00:55   you have to go to File and then go down to Save.

03:00:58   I get it that even one level of indirection

03:01:03   is gonna put some people off who are less likely

03:01:07   to be technically minded. And normal people don't memorize keyboard shortcuts. That's

03:01:12   all fine. I get it. And I think the overall trend to putting the main functions of an

03:01:16   application as visible buttons that are always present in the window is a good trend. But

03:01:23   the max menu bar, the fact that it's still there and still useful is organized, if well

03:01:29   done and well designed, organizes things in a way that you know where to look for them

03:01:36   is such a powerful feature for something like

03:01:39   uncheck all of these check boxes,

03:01:41   which maybe most people will never need or want to use

03:01:46   or it wouldn't even occur to them that it exists,

03:01:49   but there it is, a feature for me who wants to do it

03:01:51   and thinks I should be able to do it.

03:01:53   Oh, there it is.

03:01:54   And there's no good way,

03:01:57   and the point of my story is I can't think of a good way

03:02:00   to put that many commands,

03:02:02   even just from the simple Apple Notes app,

03:02:04   How would you put as many commands that Apple Notes on Mac has in the iPad version?

03:02:10   Where would you put those commands?

03:02:12   Yeah, I mean this has been one of the big challenges to trying to bring touch screens

03:02:21   into like the more like pro computing markets or into more like, you know, pro software

03:02:28   uses.

03:02:29   And you know, it's a problem that I don't think we've really figured out yet as an industry,

03:02:33   how to design touchscreen-based apps in a way that can support the level of complexity

03:02:41   and functionality that we can have on desktops.

03:02:43   And there's two different problems to this, I think.

03:02:46   One of them is that you have far less precision in the input than you do on a PC, whether

03:02:54   it's a laptop or a desktop, whether it's Windows or a Mac.

03:02:57   On a PC you have a very precise pointing device,

03:03:01   in either a mouse or a trackpad or whatever,

03:03:04   where you can really get down to the pixel-level

03:03:06   precision there, so you can cram a lot more

03:03:10   click targets on screen than you can by using

03:03:13   our fat fingers on a 10-inch screen with a touch screen.

03:03:16   And then the other problem that you have is,

03:03:19   and you have this massive keyboard where you have

03:03:23   100 keys and conventions that have been going on

03:03:26   for decades of things like holding down certain modifiers

03:03:30   and certain other keys to do certain common actions.

03:03:33   And iOS has some support for common keyboard shortcuts,

03:03:38   but not great support for it.

03:03:40   And there's also like, there's conventions that you can do

03:03:42   with the keyboard and mouse that have not yet been

03:03:46   really established on iOS.

03:03:47   So for instance, like, power users pretty quickly discover

03:03:50   things like, you can drag a box around a whole bunch

03:03:53   of icons and then pick them all up at once.

03:03:55   or you can, if you're on one mail message,

03:03:59   you can hold down shift and click one really far away

03:04:01   from it and it selects all of them in the meantime.

03:04:03   Like, you can do things like that

03:04:07   that allow you to very efficiently work

03:04:10   in the Mac and PC type form factors

03:04:14   that the touch devices just haven't developed

03:04:16   those standards yet and in some ways,

03:04:18   it's kind of hard to see how they can

03:04:20   because of the limitations of their input.

03:04:22   Just not being, obviously it does certain things better

03:04:25   like drawing and stuff like that,

03:04:27   but because you don't have the incredibly precise

03:04:31   pointing device of a mouse and a mouse cursor,

03:04:34   and you don't have the incredibly rich button-filled

03:04:37   like 100-key keyboard, it's just very, very different.

03:04:40   And then the other problem is a visual design problem

03:04:44   of your menu bar thing.

03:04:46   It's like how do you expose lots of complex features,

03:04:51   or just how do you expose lots of features

03:04:55   in a UI on a touch screen.

03:04:57   You don't have a lot of the discoverability conventions

03:05:02   that we've had on PCs.

03:05:03   You know, you don't have hovering the mouse pointer

03:05:06   over something to get a tool tip to explain what it is.

03:05:09   You don't have right clicking really.

03:05:11   You have like forced touching or long pressing,

03:05:14   but those are, it's very hard to, I mean honestly,

03:05:17   I guess right clicking has the problem.

03:05:18   It's very hard to know like what you can force touch

03:05:20   and what you can long press.

03:05:22   And there's not a lot of like conventions

03:05:24   of how to show users that.

03:05:26   And then the way that you accommodate things

03:05:29   like that you would typically get like in a menu bar

03:05:32   where like, you know, a menu bar has a very, very small

03:05:35   amount of screen space devoted to it,

03:05:37   but you can click on it and then you get expanded

03:05:41   these lists of commands that they themselves can have

03:05:44   their own subcommands that expand out

03:05:46   when you hover over them.

03:05:48   So you can cram a whole bunch of functionality

03:05:50   into a relatively small amount of screen space

03:05:54   that is out of the way when you don't need it, et cetera.

03:05:57   In addition, it really enables power use

03:05:59   because it shows you what the keyboard shortcuts are

03:06:02   for these things.

03:06:02   So if you keep going to the same menu commands

03:06:04   over and over again, eventually you might notice

03:06:07   those little characters after it and figure out,

03:06:09   oh, that's the symbol on the keyboard,

03:06:11   oh, I can hit Command + T and do this thing, right?

03:06:14   And so it enables both the progressive disclosure

03:06:19   and management of lots of functionality,

03:06:22   as well as it kind of shows you as a power user

03:06:25   how to get faster at these things.

03:06:27   And on touch devices, we really don't have

03:06:29   good conventions for these yet.

03:06:31   We don't have good ways to show power users

03:06:34   how to do things faster.

03:06:36   We don't really have concepts of things

03:06:38   like keyboard shortcuts being incredibly discoverable.

03:06:41   I know on an iPad you can just hold down command

03:06:43   on an external keyboard and it shows a little overlay,

03:06:45   but that only applies to the iPad

03:06:48   and only when you're having a keyboard attached

03:06:50   and a lot of people are using a lot of Tux devices

03:06:53   that don't have keyboards attached to them that way.

03:06:56   And we don't also have in our UI paradigms

03:06:59   the amount of progressive disclosure that you get

03:07:04   from a menu, we don't have that really

03:07:06   in our design vocabulary on Tux OS software yet.

03:07:10   And instead, Tux OS things tend to do that

03:07:14   with just having lots of modes,

03:07:16   where you tap this toolbar icon

03:07:18   the whole interface changes to be this mode, and then it's, and that just gets very confusing

03:07:23   very quickly. And even then, you're usually using iconography, not text, to show what

03:07:30   the actions are, which makes it, in some ways it makes it more accessible if like, you know,

03:07:36   if it's not in your language or if you don't understand some of the terminology used. But

03:07:40   it also makes it a lot harder to skim and browse and kind of learn the ins and outs

03:07:45   of for a lot of people. So we have like, you know, it took us a long time to figure this

03:07:49   stuff out on desktops, or on PCs rather. And I think tux just, it's just too early in the

03:07:57   tux OS's and in how we design software for them to know how to how to solve some of these

03:08:04   problems because you can't just take the solutions from PCs and translate them right over in

03:08:09   a lot of ways because it just doesn't fit.

03:08:11   - And it's not quite true that you could use the menu bar

03:08:14   to explore the entire functionality of an app.

03:08:16   And like a perfect example of that

03:08:18   is like in Adobe apps, like Photoshop.

03:08:21   - The paradigms of good user interface.

03:08:24   - Well, even going back to the early days of Photoshop

03:08:27   when it was truly a good Mac app.

03:08:29   But you could, you can always,

03:08:30   as long back as I can remember,

03:08:32   let's say you have an image

03:08:33   and you're zoomed in way bigger than your screen, right?

03:08:36   But you still wanna pan around the image.

03:08:38   You can just hold down the space bar wherever you are

03:08:41   and the mouse cursor will change to the Mickey Mouse hand,

03:08:45   and then you can click and drag

03:08:47   to just drag the canvas around screen.

03:08:50   Well, that's not a menu command.

03:08:51   That's something you somehow you have to learn that.

03:08:53   And for whatever reason, QuarkXPress back in the day,

03:08:57   the desktop image or layout program,

03:09:00   desktop like publishing program

03:09:01   that at one point I practically lived my life in

03:09:05   had the same feature, but they used the option key,

03:09:07   which I actually always liked better than space bar

03:09:10   'cause it always felt like it should be a modifier

03:09:12   and just plain option clicking on something

03:09:14   was completely unused, right?

03:09:16   Command clicking, open links,

03:09:17   and control clicking opens control menus.

03:09:20   Option clicking was right there, but you had to learn that.

03:09:23   But for the most part though, if you just wanna learn

03:09:25   what's everything this app can do,

03:09:27   if you just go through the menu bar, you'll find it all.

03:09:30   And I'll give you a perfect example of that.

03:09:32   I've lost that curiosity almost,

03:09:35   or the instinct to like, when I have a new app, to do that,

03:09:39   Because even me, as somebody who thinks of himself primarily

03:09:43   as a Mac user, I've gotten so accustomed to the,

03:09:47   look, if it's not an icon in the window that I can click,

03:09:50   don't think about it.

03:09:51   Like when I was looking for that uncheck all thing in Notes,

03:09:55   I found another feature that I had no idea was there.

03:09:58   This is probably new to almost everybody

03:09:59   who I'm going to tell this to,

03:10:00   because you didn't even think to look at it.

03:10:01   But in Apple Notes on like Sierra and Hi Sierra,

03:10:05   you can open a note in its own window, right,

03:10:08   double-clicking it and then if you go to the window menu there's a float on top

03:10:12   command and that window will stay floating on top of all other windows did

03:10:17   you know you could do that open any note you want float on top and now it's like

03:10:25   an always on top thing look at that you can you know you can keep a little

03:10:28   skinny window open on the side while you're doing other work gathering notes

03:10:32   and it's always there for you to like drag stuff to it's fantastic but there's

03:10:37   There's no other way to do it other than to go to the menu bar

03:10:40   Anyway, that's my I really feel like that's the biggest one of the biggest problems facing the iPad

03:10:46   especially like because I don't think you want apps with an extra, you know, the

03:10:50   Even the biggest phone possible whatever whoever in China is making a six point whatever inch phone

03:10:57   It's it's a small enough screen where the maximum complexity of an app is

03:11:03   dictated by the size of the screen.

03:11:05   But there's no reason in theory that a 11 inch

03:11:08   or 13 inch iPad shouldn't be able to support apps

03:11:12   of the same complexity as a Mac,

03:11:14   but the UI metaphors just aren't there

03:11:16   for where to put those commands

03:11:17   that can't be shown on screen at all time.

03:11:21   - Yeah, like where do you put a whole bunch of functionality

03:11:24   and also how do you show users

03:11:27   how to use the app in a more powerful way?

03:11:31   So with the equivalent of keyboard shortcuts

03:11:34   and things like that,

03:11:35   like how do you show users what is possible?

03:11:38   - Yeah.

03:11:39   I don't know.

03:11:41   (laughing)

03:11:45   What else did I have to talk about this week?

03:11:47   Oh, I wanna talk about the sad state of Apple TV apps.

03:11:50   I really wanna talk about this.

03:11:51   - So do I actually.

03:11:52   I don't know, are you gonna release a three hour episode?

03:11:55   Like how do you do this?

03:11:56   - What are we at?

03:11:57   I see we got interrupted by a Skype drop before,

03:11:59   so I don't know where we are.

03:12:00   - Yeah, we're gonna be at about three hours.

03:12:02   - We'll be close.

03:12:03   Well, there you go, you get your money's worth

03:12:06   out of this episode.

03:12:07   - I'm finally gonna get counted in your episode

03:12:12   length records. - Yeah, I'll tell Vasiri

03:12:13   to update his chart.

03:12:14   The sad state of Apple TV apps.

03:12:16   And this popped into my bubbled up,

03:12:18   I wrote recently about the long awaited Amazon Prime app.

03:12:22   And I was just telling you, in fact,

03:12:24   all of those episodes of Top Gear,

03:12:26   the reason I hadn't watched it until now,

03:12:28   not Top Gear, Grand Tour. By the way, have you realized how clever the name Grand Tour is? For

03:12:35   people who don't know the backstory, the three guys who did the Grand Tour for years did a BBC

03:12:40   show called Top Gear, and it was very popular around the world. And then one of the guys,

03:12:46   Jeremy Clarkson, was at a steakhouse and having dinner with one of the producers, and I don't

03:12:54   know what happened. Nobody really seems to know what happened, but he punched the guy out.

03:12:58   (laughing)

03:13:00   - That wasn't quite what, yeah, it's close enough.

03:13:03   - Well.

03:13:03   - Yeah, he punctured a staff member,

03:13:07   and therefore, like the BBC basically had to fire him.

03:13:10   - And the other two guys in solidarity left,

03:13:12   and they went to Amazon,

03:13:13   and they've started what's effectively the same show.

03:13:16   Do you realize how clever it is

03:13:17   if you're well known for a show called Top Gear,

03:13:20   how perfect a name Grand Tour is,

03:13:23   because you're taking the same two letters,

03:13:25   T and G, and just replacing them,

03:13:28   And there's something, at least in my mind,

03:13:31   where they get filed right next to each other

03:13:34   in the hash table, in my mind.

03:13:36   They sound the same, Grand Tour, Top Gear.

03:13:39   They have the same cadence.

03:13:42   Like for three guys who couldn't take the name Top Gear

03:13:46   with them, the name Grand Tour is,

03:13:50   it's unbelievably perfect.

03:13:53   It's really crazy.

03:13:54   And I find myself saying,

03:13:55   even though I never even watched Top Gear,

03:13:57   I find myself saying Top Gear all the time just because it's, like I said, it's like

03:14:01   in the same, it's like a hash table collision in my brain because it's so perfect. Anyway,

03:14:07   the whole reason I put off watching it, even though you guys started talking about it when

03:14:10   their Amazon show launched last year, was because I couldn't watch it on my goddamn

03:14:14   Apple TV. And it's not like I'm spiteful and only watch stuff on Apple TV. It's just that

03:14:20   switching to something else never seems convenient enough.

03:14:24   Yeah, it's nicer to watch an Apple TV.

03:14:26   So now that there's an Amazon Prime app on Apple TV, and even though it's a garbage

03:14:30   app, which I wrote about, it's just horrible. And it's just a direct port from the Prime

03:14:37   app on all these other platforms. It's terrible. It's just really, really a bad app. It disobeys

03:14:44   so many conventions of Apple TV. It doesn't work like any other normal Apple TV app. But

03:14:49   The one saving grace that it has is it does integrate with Apple's Apple TV app.

03:14:54   So you can just go to the Apple's TV app and it seems to do a good job of

03:14:59   saying, Hey, you just watched episode three of season two of this.

03:15:02   Do you want to watch season four?

03:15:04   And I don't really have to interact with the Amazon app. But anyway,

03:15:08   this week YouTube came out with a new,

03:15:10   an updated version of their Apple TV app and it's like the exact same thing as

03:15:16   story is the Amazon app where it's just a direct port of their youtube.com/tv web app

03:15:23   doesn't look or act anything like an Apple TV app doesn't work well with the whatever

03:15:28   you think of the Apple TV remote control. Certainly this app isn't meant to be used

03:15:32   with it and it doesn't even make noises you move around. You know how like on Apple TV

03:15:36   you go up down left, right? It goes beep, beep, beep, beep. It doesn't doesn't make any

03:15:40   noise and I have a stupid TV setup where I don't have one button to hit to turn everything

03:15:45   on. I've got to hit a button to turn on the TV and a button to turn on my sound system.

03:15:51   And then, like, I always have to wake up the Apple TV, so that's the third button. So when

03:15:56   it wasn't making noise, I just assumed that when I went to turn on the sound system, I

03:16:01   didn't hit it. And now I'm like, well, shit, the green light's on. Oh, maybe I have to

03:16:04   turn the volume up. And I turn the volume way up. And if I turn the volume to, like,

03:16:08   you know, too loud. And I'm like, holy shit, they shipped an Apple TV app that doesn't

03:16:12   make noises you navigate. Yeah, this is so I pose a question in our notes here and

03:16:20   I think it might be a discussion like were in retrospect and and I'm not

03:16:26   saying Apple should have known this but it just as a question now in retrospect

03:16:31   was this model of letting everybody make their own apps for the Apple TV actually

03:16:36   the right model was it was this actually better than the previous Apple TV

03:16:41   software like before they had the fortune what was in 2015 before that one the app the

03:16:47   old Apple TVs before they were apps Apple basically wrote all of the like kind of channels

03:16:54   that that appeared there and they were all based on you know like a common code base

03:17:00   where it was basically like being fed like a list of things that can be played and they

03:17:04   were you know some structures it's a TV ML or something like that TV markup language

03:17:08   it was sort of like, well that's the new one.

03:17:11   - I thought that was the old one.

03:17:12   - Anyway, so, I don't think we ever knew the name

03:17:16   of what the old one was like.

03:17:18   It was basically, it was like a version of XML

03:17:20   that would like render.

03:17:21   - It was just an XML file, right.

03:17:23   - Right, and so all Apple TV video sources,

03:17:27   in the previous generation of Apple TVs,

03:17:29   all would work the same way.

03:17:30   Like you'd have the same kind of menu structure,

03:17:32   everything would look basically the same,

03:17:34   you'd just be accessing,

03:17:35   oh now you're running HBO's content,

03:17:37   and now you're running so-and-so's content.

03:17:39   And it all looked and worked in the standard way,

03:17:43   which is how TV stuff had always worked before.

03:17:47   Like your cable box, every provider who does things

03:17:51   on a cable service doesn't have their own app

03:17:53   that you don't have to navigate to.

03:17:55   Like if you wanna watch a show on a different channel

03:17:57   on a cable service, it works exactly the same way

03:18:00   as every other channel that you have access to

03:18:02   in your channel guide and whatever.

03:18:04   Everything works the same.

03:18:05   And so when Apple moved to the fourth gen,

03:18:09   there was a lot of questions about how they should do this

03:18:13   and people saying what they should and shouldn't do.

03:18:15   And what they did at the time,

03:18:16   which I think was probably the right move

03:18:18   with everything we knew at the time,

03:18:19   was now we just make everything apps.

03:18:22   And video providers and other people

03:18:25   can just make their own app however they want it to be,

03:18:29   and that's how they can bring their content

03:18:31   to the Apple TV, which is great in a number of ways.

03:18:34   it lowers barriers, it makes it so that, you know,

03:18:37   Apple doesn't have to hand create every one of these

03:18:40   video providers' channels on the TV, like,

03:18:42   the people can make their own apps,

03:18:44   and they can make them really awesome.

03:18:47   The problem is, when big companies make their own apps,

03:18:50   they often don't make them really awesome,

03:18:52   and they often have their own goals in mind,

03:18:54   like, you know, Amazon wants the Amazon app

03:18:57   to look the same way on all platforms,

03:18:59   Netflix, you know, same thing, YouTube,

03:19:01   probably the same thing, like,

03:19:03   So what we have now is companies that they control

03:19:08   the entire experience rather than Apple,

03:19:11   and what they've chosen to do is to make

03:19:14   kind of a crappy Apple TV experience.

03:19:17   - Not even kind of.

03:19:18   - Now there's no more recourse for that.

03:19:19   - And they both, I think Amazon at least

03:19:22   is using standard playback controls for the video stream.

03:19:24   Like once video is streaming,

03:19:26   it's a standard Apple TV video stream,

03:19:28   but YouTube uses their own video playback controls.

03:19:31   and they don't support, I mean, things that are fundamental

03:19:35   to the platform, like being able to tap, not click,

03:19:38   just tap the touch pad on the remote to bring up like,

03:19:43   "Hey, where am I?"

03:19:44   That doesn't work.

03:19:45   It doesn't do anything.

03:19:46   It's so literally tied to the idea

03:19:50   of a generic shitbox TV connected thing

03:19:52   with a D-pad and a select button

03:19:55   that anything other than that on the Apple TV remote

03:19:58   doesn't work, including just fundamental to the platform,

03:20:00   just tap on the thing to see where I am.

03:20:03   And the playback controls look all weird.

03:20:05   And they even bring up like a stupid picker,

03:20:08   the way that YouTube is so obsessed with always,

03:20:11   no matter where you are in a video,

03:20:13   you could be watching like a half hour YouTube video

03:20:15   and you're only 10 minutes into it.

03:20:16   But if you do anything, they immediately present you

03:20:18   with eight options for other things

03:20:20   you might wanna watch right now, right?

03:20:21   Like, I don't know how somebody

03:20:24   with a genuine attention deficit problem,

03:20:28   how they could ever watch anything on YouTube.

03:20:30   Like I don't have any kind of issues in that regard,

03:20:33   like in a clinical sense, but even I feel badgered.

03:20:37   Like I just wanted to pause the show.

03:20:39   Why are you telling me about eight other things to watch

03:20:42   and taking up a quarter of the screen?

03:20:45   All I wanted to do was freaking pause

03:20:46   and maybe see where I am in the video.

03:20:48   So the other thing I did, I told you earlier in the show,

03:20:53   I fired up the Fire TV 'cause I wanted to see

03:20:57   what the hell's going on with YouTube over there.

03:20:59   And so they have a youtube.com, at least on my Fire TV.

03:21:04   It was like one of the top two or three suggestions

03:21:06   for things to do.

03:21:08   And I was like, "Ooh, that's interesting."

03:21:10   And it didn't have the YouTube logo.

03:21:11   It was even a blue rectangle and not red.

03:21:14   So they weren't even trying to impersonate YouTube.

03:21:17   It's just a blue rectangle that said youtube.com.

03:21:20   And I clicked it and it said,

03:21:22   "You have two ways of watching YouTube on Fire TV.

03:21:25   "You can download Firefox,

03:21:27   or you can download Silk. That's Amazon's web browser. So I downloaded both. And when

03:21:36   you fire up either Mozilla or Silk, both of them assume that the only reason they exist

03:21:44   is to show YouTube. Like they're effectively both YouTube apps. So you download Silk on

03:21:51   the thing and it's just like, "You want to watch YouTube, right?" And they're like, "Yeah."

03:21:55   and then it just turns into the YouTube app.

03:21:57   And it looks exactly like the Apple TV app.

03:22:01   So running YouTube as a website in a web browser

03:22:06   on the Amazon Fire TV box is exactly the same interface

03:22:13   as Apple TV, with the small exception of at the very least

03:22:17   on Apple TV, the currently selected item does have the 3D

03:22:23   pops out effect and you can kind of jiggle it around

03:22:26   a little bit.

03:22:27   But every other thing is exactly the same.

03:22:29   So somehow, and my, I guess, is that the new YouTube app

03:22:33   on Apple TV somehow got an exception

03:22:36   and is running a web view, even though the web view

03:22:39   isn't really part of the Apple TV SDK.

03:22:43   And I think that they--

03:22:45   - Or it might not technically be a web view,

03:22:48   maybe it's some kind of thing where they're using

03:22:50   JavaScript under their hood to do most of their logic,

03:22:53   but they're rendering it differently.

03:22:55   But it doesn't necessarily have to be a WebView to do that.

03:22:58   But yeah, it's still some kind of cross-platform

03:23:01   gallery for people.

03:23:02   - And the other funny thing about the Prime app,

03:23:04   which is a great example, was the people who still have

03:23:08   the previous generation Apple TV,

03:23:11   the one from three generations ago,

03:23:14   the one before it was running on a version of iOS,

03:23:17   they got a Prime app too, a software update.

03:23:22   And it's exactly like you said,

03:23:23   it just looks like every other standard Apple TV app

03:23:27   just with Prime content.

03:23:29   So they get, in my opinion,

03:23:30   way better Prime experience under Apple TV

03:23:34   for sticking with the old Apple TV

03:23:37   than anybody with a new Apple TV gets

03:23:40   because they get a truly native to Apple TV experience.

03:23:43   I think that these apps are a disaster.

03:23:47   I think that the state of Apple TV

03:23:50   outside of Apple's own apps is really pretty bad. Netflix is okay, I would say, and I watch

03:23:55   it a lot on Netflix. I think it could be...

03:23:57   Yeah, it's okay.

03:23:59   At the very least with Netflix, I don't feel like the people who made the app aren't actually

03:24:04   Apple TV users themselves. I feel like they could go more standard and just keep Netflix

03:24:11   branding as logos and nobody's going to be confused about what app they're in. But it's

03:24:17   heads and shoulders, it's at least trying to be a good Apple TV app.

03:24:20   Whereas the Prime one and YouTube in particular, it's just unbelievable how little attention

03:24:27   they pay to what Apple TV is trying to do as a platform in terms of user experience.

03:24:34   Yeah.

03:24:35   And, like, you know, it's almost, you know, tying it back to the beginning of this conversation

03:24:41   five hours ago, it's almost like, you know,

03:24:45   when the watch launched and it had its whole

03:24:47   terrible app platform, like, you know, in retrospect,

03:24:50   it probably shouldn't have had that.

03:24:52   I feel like a lot of that same thing applies

03:24:54   to Apple TV apps, where like, you know,

03:24:56   it launched with this brand new app model

03:25:01   and this brand new app library and framework,

03:25:04   you know, about two and a half years ago,

03:25:06   and they presented it as though we were gonna be doing

03:25:11   like our shopping and browsing for hotels and stuff

03:25:14   on Apple TV and doing all sorts of things.

03:25:17   But I think what most people do on Apple TV is watch video

03:25:20   and a few of them play games,

03:25:22   but even that has been pretty badly neglected.

03:25:25   So like what we really have is still mostly

03:25:29   just a video device that happens to occasionally

03:25:31   have some games, but that's about it.

03:25:34   And they launched it with two different APIs

03:25:38   for how you could make your user interface.

03:25:40   One of them is called TVML, and that is basically

03:25:44   how the old one worked, but it lets you create,

03:25:48   not just something that looks like the old one,

03:25:49   it lets you create stock interfaces really easily

03:25:53   that look and work just like the built-in ones.

03:25:55   One of the biggest examples of this, I believe,

03:25:57   is the Plex app, I think is still a TVML app,

03:26:00   and that's why the Plex app looks like

03:26:03   all of Apple's built-in stuff,

03:26:05   like it just works the same way, it uses stock stuff,

03:26:08   what you can do is you can have your own native binary code running the logic libraries under it all, but the UI is being rendered by this layer that is basically XML driven and is using stock components for everything.

03:26:25   Then they also let you build entire applications using a

03:26:30   basically a slim-down version of UI kit.

03:26:33   So they have these two different ways you can build interfaces for your apps on Apple TV.

03:26:38   I think in retrospect, and again I don't expect them to have known this at the time, I'm not saying this is a big mistake that they did,

03:26:44   but I think in retrospect, the better move and the way to make a better experience for their customers

03:26:51   would have been to only launch TVML-based apps

03:26:55   and to force all third-party apps

03:26:58   to use a TVML interface layer.

03:27:00   And maybe they could have an exception,

03:27:04   like maybe the games would have to do it.

03:27:05   - Right, exactly, that's what I was gonna say,

03:27:06   is if your app's primary purpose is to play video,

03:27:09   you need to use this framework.

03:27:10   And you can style it, you know,

03:27:13   you can add your decorations to make it look branded.

03:27:16   And I don't think that was ever a problem

03:27:17   on the old Apple TV.

03:27:18   I was never confused when I was in the HBO app or whichever one it's called. I'm like

03:27:23   you. I can't. I can't remember. I need, I need the opposite one of you because we have

03:27:28   still have cable TV service. So I need the HBO app. I think, I think I'm HBO go, but

03:27:34   maybe you're HBO. I don't know. HBO. Maybe I'm now. I don't know. I can't believe that

03:27:40   you're John Syracuse is yelling at his podcast player. I always cracked me up that the two

03:27:44   of them together are go now, which is I get angry and that's

03:27:48   what I want to do. But I never got confused on the old Apple TV

03:27:51   that I was in the HBO app. It looked like HBO. It had HBO

03:27:54   branding and colors and felt HBO. But it always always also

03:28:00   felt like an Apple TV app.

03:28:02   Right, exactly. And, and I think what we've seen now with a

03:28:07   couple years experience in this world, we've seen that these big

03:28:11   content providers are not really able to make good apps.

03:28:15   Like, they keep showing us that over and over again.

03:28:17   That like, the more they deviate from the stock stuff

03:28:20   on the Apple TV, the worse their apps tend to get.

03:28:23   And I think it really is a better user experience

03:28:28   if the makers of these apps have less flexibility

03:28:32   in what they can do on this platform.

03:28:35   Because the Apple TV is not an iPhone, it's not an iPad.

03:28:39   we don't have the ability to have like rich, awesome

03:28:42   interactions with this.

03:28:43   We are controlling a six foot wide TV

03:28:48   from a little tiny remote in our hands

03:28:50   that's like five buttons.

03:28:51   Like it's a limited interaction.

03:28:53   There's only so much we can do.

03:28:54   We need the system to have really like a strong UI

03:28:59   consistency and leadership from the platform vendor

03:29:05   and just have it be perfectly optimized

03:29:09   isn't tailored for what it really is.

03:29:14   And we're not getting that now.

03:29:16   What we're getting instead is really crap,

03:29:18   you know, least common denominator platforms

03:29:21   designed by marketing people in these big video providers

03:29:24   that are all different from each other.

03:29:28   And like you said earlier about how there's not much reason

03:29:29   for the Mac to exist if all the software is just web views.

03:29:33   There's not much benefit to the Apple TV

03:29:34   if every video app on it is just a clone

03:29:37   of the way that service looks on every other TV stick

03:29:42   and the built-in crappy apps on your TV.

03:29:44   Like, there's no, why does Apple TV exist for them?

03:29:47   So I think, I don't know if Apple can put this cat

03:29:50   back in the bag, but honestly, I think a TVML-only policy

03:29:55   for video apps on the Apple TV

03:29:57   would be a huge benefit to Apple TV users.

03:30:00   - I almost feel it's a case where,

03:30:02   with the whole idea of app stores in general,

03:30:06   ever since the iPhone first shipped its app store

03:30:08   10 years ago,

03:30:09   the reasonable and in some cases,

03:30:15   many cases over the 10 years warranted concern is,

03:30:19   wow, this is dangerous idea putting all this

03:30:21   in this yes or no power in the hands of a company

03:30:25   as capricious as Apple,

03:30:27   that they're going to say no to apps that,

03:30:30   for reasons that most of us would disagree with.

03:30:32   It's gonna be too hard.

03:30:36   There should be, let the market sort it out sort of thinking

03:30:39   and there are gonna be dicks about this.

03:30:42   I would honestly say, at least on Apple TV,

03:30:44   I wish they were being more of a dick.

03:30:47   I wish they were like,

03:30:48   "What is this hot pile of garbage Amazon?

03:30:50   "Go back, get this out of her face and do this right."

03:30:54   I don't know.

03:30:59   I know that the way computers have always used to work

03:31:03   in the old days, pre-App Store,

03:31:05   was whatever you wrote, you wrote,

03:31:06   it was you're the developer, you can make it,

03:31:07   you wanna make a shitty app, make a shitty app.

03:31:09   But I thought the whole point of App Stores was,

03:31:13   from Apple's perspective,

03:31:14   was to sort of guarantee a baseline of quality.

03:31:16   And it's like the opposite has happened.

03:31:19   - I mean, and to be fair, it kinda never has done that.

03:31:23   Even on the iPhone from day one,

03:31:24   you had those crappy fart apps and stuff,

03:31:27   and you're like, oh, I guess this isn't actually

03:31:29   gonna be a quality thing more of like a kind of safety thing.

03:31:32   But also like, and you know, in Apple's defense also,

03:31:35   like I think one of the reasons maybe they aren't

03:31:37   going to clamp down on this is that I'm not sure

03:31:41   that they're in a position of power to do that

03:31:44   on the Apple TV.

03:31:45   Like if Amazon and YouTube, especially,

03:31:48   I mean Amazon, you know, they did without Amazon

03:31:50   for a while and they could keep doing that

03:31:52   if they wanted to.

03:31:52   But like if YouTube decides they don't wanna support

03:31:55   the Apple TV anymore, that's a much bigger problem

03:31:58   for the Apple TV than it is for YouTube.

03:32:00   And because the Apple TV just doesn't have enough

03:32:04   market share and power in the industry

03:32:07   to be able to really piss off one of the most important

03:32:11   video providers.

03:32:12   Like they just, they really can't do that.

03:32:14   Like I don't think it's strong enough.

03:32:16   I don't think it's in a strong enough negotiating position.

03:32:18   So maybe Apple did actually apply pressure to Amazon

03:32:23   and to YouTube to say like, hey, you gotta make your app

03:32:27   a little more native, and maybe they just said no.

03:32:30   And like, what's Apple gonna do, reject their apps?

03:32:32   Like, that's not gonna happen for these services,

03:32:34   so it's kind of a, it's a problem that maybe Apple

03:32:39   did try to solve and they just can't.

03:32:42   - How are we doing on time?

03:32:44   I think we're plenty long.

03:32:47   - I think we're probably done.

03:32:48   - I'm gonna say done.

03:32:49   - I think a little long.

03:32:50   - I'm gonna say that, I'm gonna say one thing

03:32:51   I just wanted to touch upon.

03:32:52   I just wanted to touch upon--

03:32:54   - One more thing. - The one more thing.

03:32:55   Did want to touch it was it was one of those funny things I feel like lately

03:32:59   I just feel like I don't know last few months or so more than usual as I listen to ATP

03:33:05   I've been more decidedly and consistently on Syracuse's side on a lot of points and I you know

03:33:11   You know, I should have him on the show too, but he hasn't been on in a while

03:33:16   But you had one where you started talking about that

03:33:20   You never really used a to-do app or a task tracker or whatever you want to call it

03:33:23   And to me that's part of the problem with the whole categories. I don't even know what to call them

03:33:26   But that you settled on things recently

03:33:29   What's who's the company behind that is that the soul men?

03:33:33   culture code

03:33:35   And that's the app I used to but I still don't put everything in it

03:33:41   and

03:33:43   Some of the stuff you said I was like, yes

03:33:45   Like you said like you in general even though things does have an inbox

03:33:49   You don't like apps to do apps that have like an inbox because where the hell is that where's inbox?

03:33:55   I I don't want an inbox because it's like inbox means I'm gonna have to do work later to put it where it's supposed to

03:34:02   Go and you're I was like, yes. Yeah, I think it comes out of the GTD

03:34:06   Model I think but but like it's like I don't like I don't want to practice GTD

03:34:11   And so the more a task manager can let me not do that

03:34:16   The more the better we're gonna get things has always had this and I've and it's always had like the eye for UI design

03:34:22   It's always been a pretty neat looking app on Mac and iOS

03:34:26   But it's always had this built-in thing where there's by you can't even get rid of them, but there's an inbox. There's a today box

03:34:33   Now I get that I get today today I get that makes sense

03:34:37   Right things I want to do today then there's upcoming anytime and someday

03:34:43   I'm already I use things things is what I've settled upon because after years of

03:34:48   Wandering back and forth between various apps and hating all of them even worse

03:34:54   Things is the one I hate the least but I still it just bothers me even though I never use upcoming anytime or someday

03:35:00   That they're there. I just hate that they're there

03:35:04   Well, I'll tell you what for me what made things click for me and it is and again

03:35:11   I still wish that there was some like checkbox option to just not use the inbox ever. But so the inbox is like, you know, the inbox is basically considered a project submit like semantically like in the way it stores things. And what clicked for me is that you can assign tasks to no project. And if you if you if you make everything no project and on the Mac, there's even an option for the quick entry window that when you hit command T or whatever, whatever your map is for that, like, there's a there's an

03:35:41   an option for quick entry things to default to no project

03:35:45   instead of inbox.

03:35:46   But if you make everything that you create

03:35:50   a no project entry, then your home screen

03:35:54   can be the any time tab.

03:35:56   And so that's, the way I use the app is

03:35:58   I'm always viewing the any time tab.

03:36:00   Unless I'm like diving into a project's details,

03:36:02   but for the most part, I'm looking at the any time tag.

03:36:05   So that way, anything that is rated for today,

03:36:08   it gets a little star next to it so it stands out

03:36:09   so I can see it easily.

03:36:11   But otherwise, I'm looking at a list of things

03:36:14   that are either set for today or sometime in the past

03:36:19   or have no due date.

03:36:22   So things that are in the future are still hidden.

03:36:24   Things that are in some day are hidden.

03:36:27   And it shows a nice overview of active items

03:36:31   in my projects right below the stuff on top,

03:36:35   which is the no project stuff.

03:36:37   It is, for things to be closer to perfect for me,

03:36:41   All I basically want is for the inbox to not exist

03:36:44   and for all new tasks created by any means

03:36:48   that don't specify a project to default to no project

03:36:52   instead of inbox.

03:36:53   - I guess I use it in a very different way.

03:36:55   I use it where I just pretend that inbox is,

03:36:59   instead of being called, I just pretend it doesn't have

03:37:02   that name, that it's just like, that's just like everything.

03:37:05   It's just like all music in iTunes.

03:37:09   Yeah, yeah, but then the problem there is then like you don't you can't really see anything

03:37:14   you've assigned to a project like like what I want is like one screen to be like my overview

03:37:19   from right now. And that's what the anytime thing gives me if you tag everything as no

03:37:24   project that isn't in one rather than using inbox as the project. The way I've gotten

03:37:29   around that is that I'm either doing a project that's a multi step thing. And it deserves

03:37:35   to be made a proper project and that's like a separate thing. Or it's just like a task.

03:37:41   Like I have one here called dentist. You know, I haven't had a dentist appointment in a while,

03:37:45   so that's, that's in there. Um, and I just keep it all. I just keep everything in the

03:37:50   inbox and it's just a place where I'm not going to forget it. And then every once in

03:37:54   a while I just go through and drag a couple of them to today and then I have a nice little

03:37:58   thing that I can make a small window out of with like four or five things that I can reasonably

03:38:02   - Yeah, I mean to me it's a hard problem to solve

03:38:07   with to-do apps because you're trying,

03:38:15   I said this on ATP too, you're trying to basically

03:38:17   codify people's mental systems, their mental models

03:38:21   for how they want things to be done,

03:38:23   and everyone wants it to be done differently.

03:38:26   That's why it's really hard for anybody to ever be

03:38:29   more than like 70% satisfied with their to-do app.

03:38:33   And that's why people like try different ones

03:38:35   and are oftentimes just kind of bounce between them.

03:38:38   And like it isn't the fault of the apps,

03:38:40   like it isn't that everyone who designs to-do apps

03:38:42   is an idiot, it's that it's not really

03:38:45   a generalizable problem.

03:38:47   Like the only way you can really get to have a to-do app

03:38:51   that is perfect for the way you want to do things

03:38:53   is usually to just write your own,

03:38:54   which is probably why there's so damn many of them.

03:38:57   - There's a couple of categories of apps like this,

03:38:59   like Notes apps and Calendar apps and contact,

03:39:04   address book apps, whatever you wanna call the category.

03:39:06   And people have strong opinions about them

03:39:09   and people have strong opinions about the system ones

03:39:12   or the Microsoft ones or whatever.

03:39:14   And our email clients probably qualifies as this too, right?

03:39:18   The sort of app that's sort of like,

03:39:20   everybody needs something like this.

03:39:22   But the, I don't know, like I said,

03:39:24   what do you think of things as?

03:39:25   as a task manager, a to-do app, a reminder app.

03:39:30   - I just call this whole thing to-do apps.

03:39:32   And I don't know if that's--

03:39:33   - I feel like it's the one that is the least,

03:39:37   it's the least naturally,

03:39:41   here's the natural way to do it.

03:39:43   And like you said, it's the one that is the most dependent

03:39:46   on everybody's unique, weird mental model

03:39:49   of how am I gonna, you know, what am I gonna do today?

03:39:53   and how do I think of tasks and to-dos and stuff?

03:39:57   Whereas the basic concept of an address book

03:40:00   is kind of well-defined,

03:40:02   and you're just sort of making an efficient way

03:40:04   to access ones that are already there,

03:40:07   do things with the ones that are already there,

03:40:09   like send an email from the contact

03:40:11   based on the email that's already there,

03:40:12   and how to create a new one.

03:40:14   Whereas the task management thing,

03:40:16   like where's the division between projects and items

03:40:20   and notes within items is all so mushy.

03:40:24   It's so dissatisfying.

03:40:26   - Yeah, and it's so hard to accommodate

03:40:30   what so many people want.

03:40:31   Like, a lot of people want something

03:40:32   that lets them practice GTD.

03:40:34   A lot of people want something that is GTD-like,

03:40:36   but not quite GTD.

03:40:38   A lot of people want some other methodology.

03:40:41   There's so many different methodologies

03:40:42   of how you're supposed to manage things that you need to do.

03:40:45   And they change.

03:40:47   Like, every few years, a new one comes out

03:40:48   people want to try or want to practice.

03:40:50   And again, it's just a really hard problem

03:40:54   to generalize into a sellable product

03:40:57   that can sell to anywhere near a decent number of people

03:41:01   to justify the pretty large amount of work

03:41:03   that these things take to actually be nice apps

03:41:05   available on all of the platforms and things like that.

03:41:09   So it's a tough problem.

03:41:11   Things is pretty good, so I'm happy with it.

03:41:13   Again, it isn't like a perfect fit,

03:41:16   but it's close enough and it's better than the other ones

03:41:18   for me, so there we go. - So, true story,

03:41:20   Vesper started out as a to-do app.

03:41:22   - Yeah, actually, this is when me and Koi Vin

03:41:27   took the train to visit you. - Yeah, yeah, yeah.

03:41:29   I forgot that you knew that.

03:41:30   I forgot about that.

03:41:31   We talked about doing that together.

03:41:33   And it even started out as a to-do app

03:41:35   with me and Brent and Dave.

03:41:36   And then because of reasons like this,

03:41:39   we were like, you know what, this would be a lot easier,

03:41:40   and it'd still be useful as a notes app.

03:41:43   And we would eliminate all of these very tricky,

03:41:47   hard to solve problems.

03:41:48   So the other thing too is that this is also the main reason

03:41:51   why I still carry around like a little pocket size notebook,

03:41:54   usually Field Notes brand in my back pocket

03:41:57   is on a daily basis for quote unquote today,

03:42:01   I just, my quote unquote system is to open up

03:42:05   a new two page spread in a notebook,

03:42:07   write the date at the top on the left side,

03:42:10   write anything truly important on that left side

03:42:13   and anything else on the right side.

03:42:16   And every day I just turn a new page

03:42:18   and I'll look back on the previous page

03:42:20   and see if I forgot anything important.

03:42:22   And if I did, write it down again on the new page.

03:42:25   - That's a little too manual for me.

03:42:30   - It is very manual.

03:42:30   And a benefit to the manual nature,

03:42:32   and the cheat, the lazy thing I do,

03:42:34   is some days if I haven't been busy,

03:42:36   I'll just use the, I won't start a new page.

03:42:38   I'll just work on yesterday's until it looks like a mess

03:42:42   'cause I've crossed stuff off.

03:42:43   But the advantage to rewriting it

03:42:45   is it's a little bit of an anti-procrastination hack

03:42:48   where it's like, maybe instead of writing this down again,

03:42:51   I should just do it.

03:42:53   You know, like call the dentist.

03:42:54   Like, rather than--

03:42:56   - The funny thing is, like, I think you actually

03:42:58   might be practicing some rudimentary form of GTD there.

03:43:00   - I might be, I don't know.

03:43:01   (laughing)

03:43:02   - If you call that a review, I don't know.

03:43:05   I haven't read the book, but I think that might be part of it.

03:43:08   - But that's why I've always done it.

03:43:10   Anyway, I thought it was interesting

03:43:11   to hear you talk about it.

03:43:12   such a weird software problem. It feels to me the reason that I it feels to me like the

03:43:18   one that software should be able to do better than any paper system compared to all these

03:43:22   other things like an address like a Rolodex or a paper calendar or whatever but I think

03:43:28   in truth it's actually the one that software is the least better than doing it on paper

03:43:32   then.

03:43:33   Yeah because you know software has a lot of flexibility in what it can allow you to do

03:43:40   Like you can, for instance, like you can move stuff around much more easily.

03:43:43   You can index where things are. You can have the concept of like tags where you can have an entry show up in multiple places automatically.

03:43:51   Where, you know, those things are hard to do with paper.

03:43:53   But the problem is with software, like as soon as you codify anything into software, you are by nature excluding other things, other ways you could be doing it or other things you could do with it.

03:44:05   Whereas the paper, it accommodates whatever system

03:44:09   you want to do, as long as what you want to do

03:44:11   can be represented in the analog world.

03:44:13   It accommodates that.

03:44:14   And you can change it and you can make little exceptions.

03:44:17   You can draw an arrow between this thing and this other thing

03:44:19   or you can draw it kind of sideways and explain this in a way.

03:44:22   And software never has that kind of flexibility.

03:44:25   It has other types of flexibility,

03:44:27   like moving and copying and syncing and tagging

03:44:29   and things like that.

03:44:30   But the way you lay out your own thoughts,

03:44:34   it's very hard to have software

03:44:36   for the kind of flexibility that actually,

03:44:39   that people actually want with that.

03:44:40   - Yeah, and I think that's the best way to put it,

03:44:41   and we can wrap up with that.

03:44:42   But that is the problem, is that this app category,

03:44:46   to-do apps, is trying to map your thoughts

03:44:50   in a way that other things aren't, right?

03:44:52   The model for things in, for me, that I wanna do

03:44:55   is mostly thoughts, thoughts I wanna complete,

03:44:58   whereas a calendar event, I know what that is.

03:45:02   that actually maps very well to a computer data structure.

03:45:05   And thoughts really don't, at least my thoughts don't.

03:45:09   Anyway, Marco Arment, thank you for your time.

03:45:11   This is, it's long, it's way too long.

03:45:14   It's always too long when you're on.

03:45:15   That's probably why I should have you on more frequently.

03:45:18   If I had you on more frequently, maybe we would be.

03:45:20   Although I have Ben Thompson on a little bit more frequency

03:45:22   and he tends to keep my attention long too.

03:45:25   - I'm just glad that I believe I have now finally passed

03:45:29   Craig Federighi and the number of appearances

03:45:32   Well, that's a good benchmark.

03:45:34   I think we were tied before.

03:45:35   He caught up quick.

03:45:36   He was on a couple times last year.

03:45:37   He did, yeah.

03:45:38   Exactly.

03:45:39   I want to thank our sponsors, new sponsor, Tres Pontas, coffee maker.

03:45:45   I'll be interested.

03:45:48   There's a little bit of time travel involved where I don't know yet, but you'll know.

03:45:53   You know by the time you hear me thanking them what I think of their coffee.

03:45:57   makers of very, very, very good, very easy to set up Wi-Fi equipment and Squarespace,

03:46:04   where you go to set up a new website.

03:46:06   People can—I can't believe there's anybody listening to this show who doesn't know that Marco Arment does a podcast called ATP with John Syracuse and Casey Liss at ATP.fm.

03:46:18   And most of you are probably listening to it.

03:46:20   In fact, I'm almost nearly 100% certain

03:46:23   that a majority of you are listening to it

03:46:24   using Marco's podcast app Overcast,

03:46:28   which is also, I believe, an FM domain, right?

03:46:31   Overcast.fm?

03:46:32   - That's right.

03:46:35   The wonderful, expensive,

03:46:37   Federated States of Micronesia domain names.

03:46:39   - And if we wanna throw in an extra shout out,

03:46:44   we could, I just saw it tonight before we started recording

03:46:47   that your wife Tiff has a new podcast of her own

03:46:51   with Mike Hurley, right?

03:46:54   A video game podcast.

03:46:55   What's it called?

03:46:56   - Yep, it's called Playing for Fun.

03:46:59   It's on the Real AFM network and it's nice.

03:47:01   It's a great take on games.

03:47:03   It's basically like only the fun stuff,

03:47:05   only the positive stuff.

03:47:06   Like just games that they just love,

03:47:08   not getting into like criticism and critiques,

03:47:11   like industry discussions.

03:47:12   Like just fun, just enjoying a fun game.

03:47:15   Like it's a great refreshing take.

03:47:17   And I listened to the first episode today,

03:47:19   but it came out and it's really great.

03:47:21   I am a little bit biased, but it's pretty great.

03:47:23   - You know that Mike Hurley,

03:47:24   you know he's a big phony, right?

03:47:26   (laughing)

03:47:28   You know he doesn't, the British accent fake.

03:47:31   He grew up in Tennessee.

03:47:33   - Yeah, that's-- - Honest to God truth.

03:47:38   I mean he comes across as a nice enough fellow,

03:47:40   but he's a big phony.

03:47:44   I also promoted these on ATP this week

03:47:47   and I want to promote them here too.

03:47:48   Two awesome podcasts.

03:47:50   One of them is called The Menu Bar.

03:47:52   It's a new podcast that has some really insightful criticism

03:47:56   and thought provoking questions about the tech business.

03:48:00   Some of it's Apple focused.

03:48:01   Honestly, most of it isn't.

03:48:02   And I was actually on it.

03:48:04   My episode's gonna come out,

03:48:05   I think about the same time as this.

03:48:07   And we talked a little bit about Apple

03:48:09   and honestly a lot of other stuff.

03:48:10   Facebook, Twitter, stuff like that.

03:48:12   And I think it's pretty good.

03:48:13   And then I also wanted to promote the season just ended

03:48:17   of Mark Bramhill's wonderful podcast, Welcome to Macintosh.

03:48:22   And the whole season is great.

03:48:25   It's the second season he's done.

03:48:26   It's like what you'd expect if like something

03:48:30   with the like budget and skill and production value

03:48:34   of 99% Invisible maybe, did a show about like

03:48:38   Mac nerd stuff.

03:48:39   Like that's how good this show is.

03:48:41   And the last episode just aired

03:48:42   and it's about, it was an interview with the founder

03:48:45   of iFixit, and talking a lot about like, you know,

03:48:48   the problems of e-waste and recycling and stuff,

03:48:50   and it's very thought-provoking, very well done,

03:48:52   very interesting, and the whole season is great,

03:48:54   so definitely check out the Menu Bar,

03:48:56   and welcome to Mackintosh.

03:48:58   In addition to my wife's awesome new podcast.

03:49:00   - I'm halfway through the Menu Bar episode

03:49:03   with Bob Burroughs, and it's episode two.

03:49:07   - That was controversial.

03:49:08   - Was it?

03:49:09   Well, I'm halfway through,

03:49:10   and I didn't get the controversy.

03:49:11   I get the impression that people inside of Apple

03:49:16   did not appreciate that very much,

03:49:19   but I thought it was interesting.

03:49:20   Again, I said on ATP too,

03:49:23   if you're tired of me complaining about Apple,

03:49:25   this is not that.

03:49:28   Their critique of Apple is very differently done,

03:49:29   and in my opinion, I think it's more interesting

03:49:32   than on me complaining about people.

03:49:35   I don't know Bob other than through Twitter.

03:49:35   Bob Burrow was an electrical engineer in manage,

03:49:38   I think he was electrical engineering, it seemed like it.

03:49:40   An engineering manager at Apple working on the iPhone

03:49:43   and I guess iPad.

03:49:44   I think he started just after the iPhone was announced,

03:49:49   so like early 2007 and I think he was there

03:49:53   seven or eight years.

03:49:54   Some pretty interesting stories.

03:49:57   Not surprised that it maybe didn't go over so well

03:50:01   inside Apple, it doesn't seem like he's setting himself up

03:50:03   to return to Apple, like a lot of people leave Apple,

03:50:07   something else for three or four years. But you know, I think he's very comfortable with

03:50:13   that as well and it does not also does not seem to me at least that he's stirring up

03:50:19   shit you know unnecessarily. It seems to me like he's just being honest and giving his

03:50:23   honest opinion and experience. You know, but it's unusual because it seems like the cone

03:50:32   of silence from Apple employees generally extends even after they've stopped working

03:50:37   for the company. And there's no, not for legal reasons or for job security reasons,

03:50:41   but it's just the culture. And, you know, so I guess I'm not surprised that didn't

03:50:46   go over. Anyway, it's a great, it is a great show. And, and, uh, welcome to Macintosh.

03:50:50   I love, I feel like I don't mention that enough. It's sort of the inverse of the talk show,

03:50:56   especially this rambling three hour show after this welcome to Macintosh is so tightly edited.

03:51:04   It is absolutely a leave you wanting more type show.

03:51:08   I'm a little behind on this season as well,

03:51:12   but episodes are often like 20 minutes.

03:51:14   They're great little small doses.

03:51:16   They're super well produced.

03:51:18   I loved the one with Panic earlier in the season.

03:51:21   It might have been the season opener.

03:51:22   Anyway.

03:51:24   - And he gets great interviews too.

03:51:25   It's usually an interview show and it's really, really good

03:51:29   and just produced and put together so well

03:51:31   Gets great guests and and I like travels to different places like so it isn't just like a Skype call with somebody like you like

03:51:38   You know the way we do our show is like it's it's like really a very very high production value show about nerdy max stuff

03:51:44   It's a couple years ago in person when I hosted

03:51:49   Rick Tetzel e and Brent

03:51:52   What's his forget his last name cheese

03:51:57   Yeah, that'd be Steve Jobs

03:51:59   right

03:52:01   at New York's Apple Store.

03:52:04   They, Brent Schlender were the two co-authors

03:52:08   of an excellent book.

03:52:09   And I was invited to host them

03:52:11   for like an hour long interview at the,

03:52:14   I think it was the Soho Apple Store,

03:52:15   I forget which one it is,

03:52:16   whichever one's in Southern Manhattan.

03:52:18   And Mark Bramhill, I think he was only like 19 at the time.

03:52:23   I don't know, he was really young,

03:52:23   but he and his dad were doing like a cross country road trip.

03:52:26   And I only announced it on Daring Fireball like that day

03:52:29   'cause I was kind of worried that,

03:52:31   and it actually happened, and it was standing room only,

03:52:34   even with minimal promotion from by me

03:52:36   'cause it's a limited space.

03:52:37   And he and his dad just happened to be driving

03:52:40   cross country, and they were in New York at the time,

03:52:42   and so made it to the show.

03:52:44   So just out of the pure coincidence

03:52:46   that it was their day on a cross country drive

03:52:48   where they were going through New York, they were there.

03:52:51   And I'd already been in contact with them over the internet,

03:52:53   and I was a terrific fan of his wonderful work.

03:52:56   And I love that somebody as young as he is

03:52:58   is enamored with old 1984 style Macintosh UI design

03:53:03   and fonts and stuff like that.

03:53:05   So that was terrific.

03:53:08   Anyway, that's my Mark Bramhall story.

03:53:10   He's a really good kid.

03:53:13   - It's a great show.

03:53:13   - And his, he reminds me of Cable Sasser in a way

03:53:16   where he's just got like an enthusiasm and an optimism

03:53:19   and it makes me feel like more of a misanthrope

03:53:22   than I usually feel like.

03:53:26   - Yeah, I have a feeling he's gonna have

03:53:29   a nice long career in this stuff.

03:53:30   - Oh my God, he's so talented.

03:53:31   And he has such a great attention to detail.

03:53:33   That's the thing.

03:53:34   He really sweats every little,

03:53:36   you can just tell when you listen to the show.

03:53:37   My God, it's really, really good.

03:53:40   Anyway, Marco Arment, why'd you keep me up so late?