214: ‘Only Wireless. Less Smart Than an Echo. Lame.’ With Paul Kafasis
00:00:03
◼
►
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:06
◼
►
Oh, yeah, I love it.
00:00:07
◼
►
I love that beat.
00:00:11
◼
►
God, this is going to be a nightmare to edit.
00:00:16
◼
►
Sorry, Caleb.
00:00:18
◼
►
Good thing neither of us are editing the show.
00:00:22
◼
►
Paul Kefasis is back on the show,
00:00:24
◼
►
co-founder of Rokomiba Software.
00:00:27
◼
►
Paul, you've been on the show many times.
00:00:28
◼
►
I don't think you've been on in quite some time.
00:00:31
◼
►
- I think I was on some kind of a list.
00:00:33
◼
►
I'm not sure what I did.
00:00:35
◼
►
I didn't rip up a picture of the Pope or anything,
00:00:37
◼
►
but I don't know what I did, but I'm back.
00:00:40
◼
►
- All right, let me see here.
00:00:40
◼
►
I've got a list of former guests.
00:00:44
◼
►
This is episode 214.
00:00:46
◼
►
You were just on, you were on episode 112.
00:00:50
◼
►
- Well, we should have waited 10 more episodes.
00:00:52
◼
►
We could have doubled the number.
00:00:54
◼
►
- Or we should have done it two episodes ago
00:00:55
◼
►
and made it a centennial.
00:00:57
◼
►
Oh, there you go.
00:00:58
◼
►
- Yeah, I don't know.
00:01:00
◼
►
Well, I don't know what took so long.
00:01:01
◼
►
I will have to speak to the scheduler,
00:01:03
◼
►
but it is good to have you back.
00:01:05
◼
►
And it's not a complete coincidence.
00:01:07
◼
►
We're celebrating the release of a new rogue Amoeba app,
00:01:10
◼
►
Farago, am I pronouncing that correctly?
00:01:14
◼
►
- F-A-R-R-A-G-O.
00:01:17
◼
►
- That's right.
00:01:19
◼
►
- And where does the name come from?
00:01:20
◼
►
- Well, it's actually a word that means,
00:01:23
◼
►
it's a word that nobody knows.
00:01:24
◼
►
It's an English word that means basically
00:01:26
◼
►
sort of a melange or a jumble or, you know, just an assortment of things.
00:01:31
◼
►
We were, you know, toying around with a whole bunch of different names as I'm
00:01:36
◼
►
sure anyone who's named anything has experience with you, you try everything.
00:01:39
◼
►
The Mac OS X dictionary says it's a confused mixture.
00:01:44
◼
►
Yeah, it's got slightly negative connotations, so it's not quite like, you
00:01:49
◼
►
know, a medley, but most people don't know the word, so we're hoping to get away with it.
00:01:54
◼
►
any app, it's a Mac app that is a soundboard app.
00:01:58
◼
►
And if you don't know what a soundboard app is,
00:02:00
◼
►
a soundboard app is, that's my handing it off to you.
00:02:03
◼
►
- Oh, I mean, it's the perfect thing for, you know, just,
00:02:07
◼
►
(dramatic music)
00:02:09
◼
►
basically if you want any sort of audio effects
00:02:12
◼
►
in your audio, you're recording a podcast
00:02:15
◼
►
and you just wanna have some great sound effects like,
00:02:17
◼
►
(imitates sound effects)
00:02:20
◼
►
- I really think this is just what my show needs, I do.
00:02:23
◼
►
I think you need to get 10 times as many sound effects as you have now,
00:02:28
◼
►
and that's really going to draw the listeners in.
00:02:31
◼
►
>> I think it'll greatly reduce the complaints about the speed at which I speak and the number
00:02:38
◼
►
of times I pause before speaking. Marco --
00:02:42
◼
►
>> If you can just toss in sound effects any time you need a break, yeah.
00:02:45
◼
►
>> I've long suspected that Marco added that smart speed thing just for my show.
00:02:49
◼
►
>> For you? Solely for you.
00:02:53
◼
►
It should be like the talk show, the Gruber filter.
00:02:55
◼
►
Just take out the long pauses.
00:02:58
◼
►
And now we can fill them with farts.
00:03:00
◼
►
Well, so we were talking about this before the show, and I pulled up, you know, half
00:03:06
◼
►
a dozen, couple dozen different audio effects to fiddle around with.
00:03:10
◼
►
So I got to figure out how to sprinkle them in lightly.
00:03:13
◼
►
I don't want to go too nuts with it.
00:03:15
◼
►
But the idea here is not just that you can play sounds at any point, but you've obviously,
00:03:21
◼
►
everybody listening can hear. You've piped it into the audio pipeline that you're recording.
00:03:26
◼
►
You know, it's, you know, and that's, we could talk about it, just for people who aren't familiar,
00:03:33
◼
►
some of the other apps, or what Amoeba has, that's right up your alley. But then, you know,
00:03:38
◼
►
so at a technical level, you got to understand the way sound works on a Mac. But I think more
00:03:44
◼
►
importantly is that it has gorgeous user interface. Effectively, I you know, correct me if you
00:03:51
◼
►
if you think, you know, you've obviously put tons of thought in this and I've put about
00:03:54
◼
►
five minutes into like looking at it and saying cool. But in effect, it is sort of like a
00:04:02
◼
►
user interface design app for people who need to play sounds at a moment's notice. So you
00:04:08
◼
►
You can arrange, pick the sounds you need,
00:04:11
◼
►
arrange them in the way you want them to be
00:04:14
◼
►
or that makes logical sense to you,
00:04:17
◼
►
maybe not to anybody else,
00:04:18
◼
►
but you can pick this logical order
00:04:19
◼
►
and you have a big visual interface
00:04:21
◼
►
and you can color code the sounds by category or whatever
00:04:25
◼
►
and you've got these big click targets.
00:04:28
◼
►
So it's not like a little tiny thing you have to do.
00:04:30
◼
►
So if you really wanna play a sound right away,
00:04:32
◼
►
it's got a big Fitz's Law target as they would say.
00:04:37
◼
►
Yeah, and also the way we sort of anticipate people to be using it is via the keyboard.
00:04:42
◼
►
So everything's mapped right to your keyboard. So it sort of turns your keyboard into basically
00:04:47
◼
►
like a sample machine.
00:04:49
◼
►
So if you're looking at the visual on screen and you say, "Okay, I know what I need,"
00:04:53
◼
►
and you can see what key you need to hit right away. So that's, it's certainly playable
00:04:57
◼
►
via the mouse, but the keyboard is really the sort of the primary way to use it, I think.
00:05:01
◼
►
And by default, like when you first run the app, does F map to FART?
00:05:05
◼
►
>> Our sample set actually does not have a fart sound in it. I had to download that separately.
00:05:12
◼
►
You know, we've got the -- you know, we've got all sorts of -- we came up with -- I'm trying to
00:05:22
◼
►
look at our sample set. I think it's 25 sounds. And we were scouring the internet to find good
00:05:28
◼
►
sounds and to find things that we wanted. And some of the feedback I got after the app was
00:05:32
◼
►
was released, probably about a dozen different people said, "Oh, this is great. It just needs
00:05:37
◼
►
X sound, and it's like fart noise it needs. It needs a toilet flush." So really, we need
00:05:42
◼
►
another sample pack of the really goofy or juvenile noises that we did not include in
00:05:47
◼
►
the first go-round.
00:05:48
◼
►
I had a brainstorm, and as usual, it came way too late. We started recording roughly
00:05:56
◼
►
an hour and 20 minutes after I told you we would be starting to record. I had an eye
00:06:02
◼
►
doctor appointment that ran late, and various other shenanigans going on here in the city
00:06:07
◼
►
of Philadelphia, which we will get to in a bit.
00:06:10
◼
►
And of course, so an hour and 20 minutes after we were set to record as I come down to the
00:06:14
◼
►
podcast cave, shuffling my various beverages and trying not to trip and fall, I suddenly
00:06:21
◼
►
realized what we should have loaded the soundboard up with.
00:06:23
◼
►
And it's clips of my wife laughing on just the tip.
00:06:28
◼
►
and we could make it sound as though she was here with us and just loving what we're saying.
00:06:38
◼
►
Just dying of laughter every step of the way.
00:06:40
◼
►
Which probably would have driven her nuts.
00:06:46
◼
►
Because I mean, when she listens to the show, all she hears is [sad trombone sound]
00:06:51
◼
►
Yeah, pretty much.
00:06:54
◼
►
If you could make her look a fool, that'd be pretty good.
00:06:57
◼
►
Yeah, that would have been pretty good. Anyway, as usual, a dollar a day late and a dollar short.
00:07:02
◼
►
Forago, Forago? Forago? Forago came out two weeks ago, right?
00:07:09
◼
►
John "Slick" Baum: Two weeks ago today, actually.
00:07:11
◼
►
Pete: How's it doing?
00:07:12
◼
►
John "Slick" Baum I haven't bought a boat yet. So,
00:07:16
◼
►
if the listeners are intrigued, get your 1000 copies and then I can each and then I can get my
00:07:24
◼
►
boat. Pete I know the answer to this question, but I'm going to ask it as
00:07:27
◼
►
though I don't. Direct download, direct purchase, Mac App Store, or both?
00:07:33
◼
►
>> Direct download for free trial, as with all of our software. Direct purchase from our store.
00:07:40
◼
►
And this app actually could potentially be in the Mac App Store, but it is not in the Mac App Store.
00:07:44
◼
►
I mean, I don't know how deep you want to get into this, but we've had two applications in the Mac
00:07:49
◼
►
App Store, and we pulled one of them out because the changes that they made in terms of the rules
00:07:55
◼
►
in the Mac App Store made it not viable to stay there.
00:07:58
◼
►
And so we have one remaining app.
00:08:00
◼
►
- That app was Piezo, right?
00:08:02
◼
►
- Yep, so that's our simple audio recorder,
00:08:04
◼
►
which is actually the recorder that I'm using right now,
00:08:06
◼
►
because my version of Audio Hijack was all,
00:08:09
◼
►
eh, let's just call it messed up.
00:08:11
◼
►
So that was in the Mac App Store,
00:08:14
◼
►
specifically to make it possible to have a recorder
00:08:17
◼
►
that was, that skirted the, sorry,
00:08:20
◼
►
that followed the rules of the Mac App Store.
00:08:23
◼
►
And then those rules changed,
00:08:25
◼
►
and so we eventually had to pull it out because the app was not able to be updated. So we said,
00:08:31
◼
►
all right, we'd rather have a functioning app, a properly functioning app that is available directly
00:08:37
◼
►
than a crippled app that is also in the Mac App Store.
00:08:51
◼
►
connection, file serving connection stuff, effectively had to be pulled at one point
00:08:57
◼
►
from Mac App Store, even though it's an acclaimed app.
00:09:01
◼
►
It's an FTP and a web editor. I mean, like, you wouldn't think this sort of thing would
00:09:05
◼
►
run afoul of App Store rules, but here we are.
00:09:09
◼
►
But you've written publicly, I believe, about Piezo's success after being just going direct
00:09:15
◼
►
download, direct sale only, right?
00:09:17
◼
►
>> Yeah, absolutely. So, I actually just this afternoon, we posted a review of last year, 2017,
00:09:23
◼
►
and I was rereading the post that you're referring to. It was a post from February of last year, just
00:09:27
◼
►
about a year ago. And two years ago is when we pulled Piazzo out of the Mac App Store. And so,
00:09:32
◼
►
after a year, I compared our revenue from the year, the last year when it was in the Mac App
00:09:38
◼
►
Store and the first year when it was no longer in the Mac App Store. And the result was that we
00:09:42
◼
►
actually earned more revenue because our sales were -- our raw unit sales were slightly down,
00:09:49
◼
►
but the difference was not so great that we didn't earn more revenue because Apple takes 30 percent
00:09:54
◼
►
of every sale that you get in the Mac App Store. And when we sell it directly, we're getting
00:10:00
◼
►
somewhere around 95 percent of the revenue. So, it's not terribly difficult to make more money,
00:10:06
◼
►
even if you have slightly lower sales. You're probably going to earn more money on those sales.
00:10:11
◼
►
So and as you're where we are, as usual, many caveats apply that the rules for games might
00:10:19
◼
►
be entirely different than for utilities like piezo.
00:10:26
◼
►
But the bottom line is that the Mac App Store, wherever it is on the scale of zero to 100
00:10:33
◼
►
as a success for the Mac development community, it is absolute I think I can't I think it's
00:10:40
◼
►
undeniably not at the point where it is eating the non Mac App Store market. If anything,
00:10:49
◼
►
the non Mac App Store market is as strong as ever. Like, well, and I think has has started to eat
00:10:57
◼
►
some of the App Store. Because you mentioned you mentioned panic and we pulled an app out and you
00:11:02
◼
►
know, I'd have to look back but there's you can probably find a good dozen fairly major apps.
00:11:06
◼
►
the app store that then left, exactly, just like that.
00:11:11
◼
►
- Right, right.
00:11:12
◼
►
I should try to find it.
00:11:15
◼
►
Rich Segal, founder of BB, co-founder of BB Edit,
00:11:19
◼
►
Bearbound Software, had a great talk at Singleton,
00:11:22
◼
►
but got-- - At Singleton,
00:11:23
◼
►
his Max Q talk, yeah.
00:11:24
◼
►
- Yeah, but Singleton, how many years ago was that?
00:11:27
◼
►
- I think it's probably about three or four.
00:11:30
◼
►
- At least, so it's not even that recent.
00:11:32
◼
►
And it was a great talk because effectively,
00:11:35
◼
►
It was like a half hour talk about why he took BB Edit out of the Mac App Store and
00:11:40
◼
►
went back to Direct Downloads.
00:11:42
◼
►
And I don't even want to try to summarize it because what made it such a great talk
00:11:46
◼
►
was it really did take half an hour for him to make his point.
00:11:50
◼
►
And, you know, and that's there.
00:11:52
◼
►
I won't summarize it either, but it's right.
00:11:54
◼
►
I'm sure you can find a link and it's definitely worth a watch if you're at all interested
00:11:57
◼
►
in the Mac App Store or leaving the Mac App Store.
00:12:01
◼
►
peak Mac App Store was early on in the days of App Store.
00:12:05
◼
►
And one of the fears a lot of us had was that,
00:12:08
◼
►
man, if the Mac App Store really takes off,
00:12:11
◼
►
and Mac users just abandon direct downloads
00:12:14
◼
►
and outside the Mac App Store payments
00:12:18
◼
►
and only buy stuff from the App Store,
00:12:21
◼
►
it really, it's not about the 30%,
00:12:24
◼
►
or certainly not only about the 30%,
00:12:27
◼
►
but it's just about, boy, would that make people
00:12:30
◼
►
whose livelihood depends on selling independent Mac App Store
00:12:32
◼
►
feel uncomfortable about having their entire livelihood
00:12:37
◼
►
in a store that is clearly never going to be better
00:12:41
◼
►
than the second favorite at Apple.
00:12:43
◼
►
- Right, absolutely.
00:12:45
◼
►
Yeah, the iOS App Store is clearly what they're focused on
00:12:48
◼
►
and the Mac App Store sort of seemed like,
00:12:50
◼
►
hey, we did this on the phone,
00:12:52
◼
►
so we might as well try it on the Mac.
00:12:54
◼
►
And I think you made a great point that, let's see,
00:12:57
◼
►
I think it's been, was it 2010 or 2011
00:12:59
◼
►
that the Mac App Store came out.
00:13:01
◼
►
I don't want to screw it up.
00:13:03
◼
►
It was one of those two, I'm fairly certain.
00:13:06
◼
►
But it was quite a while ago at this point.
00:13:07
◼
►
And when it came out, everyone said,
00:13:09
◼
►
"Okay, let's get in there."
00:13:10
◼
►
The iOS App Store has been such a success.
00:13:13
◼
►
Let's get in there and this will get our app
00:13:15
◼
►
in front of everyone.
00:13:16
◼
►
And I think a lot of apps did get in there
00:13:19
◼
►
and then over time realized, you know what?
00:13:21
◼
►
This isn't doing a whole lot for us
00:13:23
◼
►
and it's taking a decent chunk of both our money
00:13:26
◼
►
and our energy.
00:13:27
◼
►
And that's when you've seen apps sort of peel back.
00:13:30
◼
►
And like you said, the peak was early on.
00:13:33
◼
►
And I think since then it's been fairly slow.
00:13:37
◼
►
And there certainly hasn't been any major app that I've seen
00:13:40
◼
►
that has only been in the Mac App Store.
00:13:42
◼
►
- Is Pixelmator Mac App Store only?
00:13:47
◼
►
- Ooh, that's a good question.
00:13:49
◼
►
It's certainly possible,
00:13:50
◼
►
but I would bet that they focus on the Mac App Store,
00:13:54
◼
►
but still have a direct download.
00:13:55
◼
►
- Anyway, your memory is excellent.
00:13:57
◼
►
the Mac App Store was announced at Apple's
00:13:59
◼
►
Back to the Mac event October 2010.
00:14:03
◼
►
That was the episode, that was the event
00:14:06
◼
►
where I believe Craig Federighi first appeared on stage
00:14:09
◼
►
and he had a sort of a shaky demo.
00:14:14
◼
►
- He's gotten much better at the on-stage performances.
00:14:20
◼
►
- Yeah, the backstory behind that wasn't really so much
00:14:24
◼
►
that he was nervous, but that there was like a last minute
00:14:28
◼
►
software change and he realized that it didn't work
00:14:31
◼
►
the way they thought it would.
00:14:32
◼
►
It was sort of like, you know, like the rule,
00:14:33
◼
►
like don't change anything in between rehearsals and demo.
00:14:37
◼
►
And it was like, they thought, well, we can change that.
00:14:39
◼
►
And then he realized on stage that
00:14:41
◼
►
we shouldn't have changed that.
00:14:42
◼
►
Anyway, he has gotten a little,
00:14:45
◼
►
he went from being like, wow,
00:14:46
◼
►
why did they put him on stage to,
00:14:48
◼
►
wow, he should be on TV, right?
00:14:50
◼
►
Anyway, October 20th, 2010 was when it was announced,
00:14:54
◼
►
They began taking submissions in November 2010,
00:14:57
◼
►
and then it launched in January 2011.
00:15:01
◼
►
So your 2010, 2011 confusion was actually more accurate
00:15:04
◼
►
than picking one or the other.
00:15:06
◼
►
- Yeah, and you're right.
00:15:07
◼
►
I was just looking at Pixelmator Pro is,
00:15:10
◼
►
it looks like only in the Mac App Store.
00:15:11
◼
►
So that is certainly one that is sort of,
00:15:15
◼
►
the exception that proves the rule maybe.
00:15:17
◼
►
- Well, it's a complicated story.
00:15:20
◼
►
I think Sketch is in there.
00:15:21
◼
►
I don't think Sketch is only Mac App Store,
00:15:23
◼
►
but it is-- - No, it's definitely not.
00:15:25
◼
►
Sketch definitely isn't.
00:15:26
◼
►
- Yeah, well, it's worked out in a weird way.
00:15:30
◼
►
I don't wanna spend too much time on the Mac App Store here,
00:15:32
◼
►
but it just seems like, gosh, now we're seven years in,
00:15:37
◼
►
and seven years in, it's sort of like a nowhere.
00:15:42
◼
►
You know, like it's not a failure,
00:15:45
◼
►
but it is absolutely not put a dent
00:15:47
◼
►
in the independent marketplace. - Not a success,
00:15:48
◼
►
or not a big success.
00:15:50
◼
►
- Right, it's just sort of weird.
00:15:52
◼
►
I don't think that was expected.
00:15:54
◼
►
- I don't wanna, you know, I'm not,
00:15:57
◼
►
I just looked at that one too.
00:15:58
◼
►
Sketch actually is one of the ones that left the store.
00:16:00
◼
►
- Oh, that's right, that's right.
00:16:01
◼
►
- That's what I remember.
00:16:02
◼
►
They're one of the fairly large ones that left.
00:16:04
◼
►
- That's right, because they wanted to switch
00:16:06
◼
►
to a subscription model that the app store
00:16:09
◼
►
doesn't really support or something like that.
00:16:11
◼
►
- Exactly. - Right.
00:16:13
◼
►
Yeah, that's right, that's right.
00:16:14
◼
►
That's why I knew that Sketch was on the--
00:16:17
◼
►
- There was something about it, exactly.
00:16:18
◼
►
- Yeah, something about it.
00:16:19
◼
►
- Well, so all of this is sort of tangential
00:16:23
◼
►
to what you originally asked.
00:16:25
◼
►
And, you know, Forago is something that fits
00:16:28
◼
►
within the confines of the App Store, at least currently.
00:16:30
◼
►
But for us as a developer, as developers,
00:16:34
◼
►
it has not been a priority to get it there.
00:16:37
◼
►
And I was looking back at a post from several years ago
00:16:41
◼
►
and somebody was saying, oh, you know,
00:16:42
◼
►
this isn't in the Mac App Store.
00:16:43
◼
►
You know, no one's gonna buy it, or I'm not gonna buy it.
00:16:45
◼
►
And you're crazy.
00:16:46
◼
►
This is where the puck is going, et cetera.
00:16:49
◼
►
and it was pretty amusing to read
00:16:51
◼
►
because that's not the way that it's worked out.
00:16:54
◼
►
And fortunately for us, we've been able to continue
00:16:56
◼
►
selling this stuff directly.
00:16:58
◼
►
- I mean, there's a part of it.
00:17:00
◼
►
I've been in the racket, as they say,
00:17:02
◼
►
and I understand the...
00:17:04
◼
►
When you're on the side where Apple's taking 30%
00:17:10
◼
►
from the price you set for the app you made,
00:17:12
◼
►
it feels a little high.
00:17:17
◼
►
But I totally understand from the user's point of view,
00:17:20
◼
►
'cause I personally still enjoy buying apps
00:17:22
◼
►
from the Mac App Store,
00:17:23
◼
►
because I love the simplicity of knowing,
00:17:26
◼
►
if I bought it from the Mac App Store,
00:17:27
◼
►
there's one place to go to redownload it
00:17:29
◼
►
on a different machine, or, you know what I mean?
00:17:33
◼
►
There's just one central place to check for that.
00:17:36
◼
►
And that is very convenient, and I do trust it,
00:17:39
◼
►
and I know I'm not gonna get spam
00:17:40
◼
►
from the developer afterwards.
00:17:43
◼
►
Not that I buy a lot of apps that I suspect
00:17:44
◼
►
I'm gonna get spam from the developer for,
00:17:46
◼
►
but I understand the convenience of it, but.
00:17:49
◼
►
- No, absolutely.
00:17:50
◼
►
And it's certainly something where,
00:17:52
◼
►
it's not something we shied away from.
00:17:54
◼
►
And we've mentioned that 30% a bunch.
00:17:56
◼
►
That was never a sole reason to avoid it
00:17:59
◼
►
or anything like that.
00:17:59
◼
►
It's a high number, but it's not so high that you'd say,
00:18:02
◼
►
well, the heck with that.
00:18:03
◼
►
But that coupled with a half dozen other issues
00:18:07
◼
►
that you face as a developer
00:18:08
◼
►
makes it a whole lot less appealing right now.
00:18:10
◼
►
And it's not something where like iOS,
00:18:12
◼
►
you have to be there to get to users.
00:18:14
◼
►
So, fortunately we can avoid it.
00:18:17
◼
►
- All right, let me take a break here
00:18:18
◼
►
and thank our first sponsor.
00:18:19
◼
►
You are never gonna believe who it is,
00:18:21
◼
►
it is our good friend.
00:18:22
◼
►
- It's the Mac App Store.
00:18:23
◼
►
- It's the Mac App Store.
00:18:25
◼
►
Squarespace.
00:18:26
◼
►
Look, it's the new year.
00:18:28
◼
►
It still counts as new year in early February.
00:18:31
◼
►
And if you, people, you know, I think it's cliche
00:18:33
◼
►
that people make resolutions
00:18:35
◼
►
and they're setting out to do new things.
00:18:37
◼
►
But I think it's true.
00:18:38
◼
►
I think it's absolutely true that it's, you know,
00:18:40
◼
►
the winter time is the time you reflect.
00:18:42
◼
►
You think, hey, I wanna set out,
00:18:43
◼
►
I've got this project I've always been wanting to make.
00:18:46
◼
►
Something like that.
00:18:47
◼
►
Or you wanna redo like a website you already have.
00:18:50
◼
►
Squarespace is a fantastic platform to go try it out on.
00:18:57
◼
►
First, it's terrific.
00:18:58
◼
►
Second, it has unbelievable design features.
00:19:03
◼
►
And third, they do it all.
00:19:06
◼
►
They do the hosting.
00:19:08
◼
►
They do the,
00:19:12
◼
►
You could do domain registration there.
00:19:15
◼
►
They have their own stats and analytics package.
00:19:20
◼
►
And I've seen it.
00:19:22
◼
►
And the presentation is so good.
00:19:23
◼
►
Because it's not just about-- like with analytics,
00:19:27
◼
►
it's not just like, do you have all this XYZ information?
00:19:30
◼
►
It's how is it presented to you?
00:19:32
◼
►
Does it make any sense?
00:19:33
◼
►
I'll tell you the truth.
00:19:34
◼
►
I still use Google Analytics during Fireball.
00:19:37
◼
►
I honestly don't understand how to use it.
00:19:39
◼
►
I've been using it for like seven years.
00:19:41
◼
►
And I go in there.
00:19:42
◼
►
and I honest to God feel like I'm reading Greek
00:19:44
◼
►
or something like that.
00:19:45
◼
►
It's terrible.
00:19:46
◼
►
Everything at Squarespace is so easy.
00:19:48
◼
►
It is so clearly made from a company
00:19:52
◼
►
that values good design every step of the way.
00:19:55
◼
►
Not just in terms of you having a good website
00:19:58
◼
►
that looks well designed,
00:19:59
◼
►
but that everything,
00:20:01
◼
►
when your billing interface is well designed,
00:20:03
◼
►
your backend stats interface is well designed.
00:20:07
◼
►
It's just so clear sometimes
00:20:10
◼
►
when a company only values design
00:20:12
◼
►
at the very, very front end,
00:20:15
◼
►
customer facing part of their business,
00:20:17
◼
►
and they don't care about it
00:20:19
◼
►
at the rest of the way down the line.
00:20:20
◼
►
Squarespace is a company that is all about design,
00:20:25
◼
►
When you get started at Squarespace,
00:20:28
◼
►
you can start with a free trial,
00:20:29
◼
►
and you can build the site,
00:20:31
◼
►
there's no limits to it,
00:20:32
◼
►
you can build everything.
00:20:33
◼
►
There's no catch on the free trial
00:20:37
◼
►
other than that it eventually ends.
00:20:39
◼
►
And you can just go to squarespace.com to get started.
00:20:43
◼
►
And when you do sign up to pay,
00:20:45
◼
►
that's the point when you wanna remember this code,
00:20:47
◼
►
talk show at checkout, and you can get 10% off.
00:20:52
◼
►
Start your free trial today at squarespace.com
00:20:55
◼
►
and when you decide to sign up,
00:20:56
◼
►
just remember that code, talk show,
00:20:58
◼
►
and you get 10% off your first purchase,
00:21:00
◼
►
including a purchase for up to a year of service,
00:21:02
◼
►
so you can get like 10% of a year off, big bucks.
00:21:07
◼
►
So my thanks to Squarespace.
00:21:11
◼
►
I've got some follow up.
00:21:15
◼
►
I've got some important follow up from last week's episode,
00:21:18
◼
►
episode 213 with John Moltz,
00:21:21
◼
►
who hadn't been on for a long time either.
00:21:23
◼
►
I mentioned, there was a podcast a few years back.
00:21:29
◼
►
Do you remember the show, Paul,
00:21:30
◼
►
it was called You Look Nice Today?
00:21:32
◼
►
- I am familiar.
00:21:33
◼
►
- It's a show, I figured you would be.
00:21:35
◼
►
It's a show that was the,
00:21:37
◼
►
was actually, this is actually, people don't know this, it was actually the first podcast.
00:21:43
◼
►
These three lads invented podcasting a little over 10 years ago, featuring Scott Simpson,
00:21:53
◼
►
Merlin Mann and Adam "Lonely Sandwich" Lisagor, all three of whom have been on this
00:21:58
◼
►
show I think a few times, including Scott, who happens to have been on a very special
00:22:05
◼
►
episode of this show that was recorded with you. It was me, you, and Scott Simpson.
00:22:12
◼
►
That's right. The Velocity Hotels episode.
00:22:15
◼
►
That was the Velocity Hotels episode. We came up with the idea. It was a fantastic idea that
00:22:19
◼
►
we never really followed up on. But we were going to—
00:22:21
◼
►
Well, now has been stolen.
00:22:23
◼
►
Now it's been stolen.
00:22:24
◼
►
I have lawyers working on this, but I don't know if we're going to see any money out of it.
00:22:29
◼
►
The idea, if you don't remember this in the Velocity Hotels episode,
00:22:34
◼
►
that we came up with the idea that, you know, why are hotels only fixed in fixed locations?
00:22:40
◼
►
And what if, you know, you're on a trip and you need to get from point A to point B,
00:22:44
◼
►
we stay in a hotel at point A, you get into good night's sleep, you wake up, and then you've still
00:22:50
◼
►
got to get to point B. Well, what if your hotel could be a bus, a large motorcoach, perhaps,
00:22:56
◼
►
but not like you're sleeping on like a Greyhound and just reclining in a chair, you'd get a nice
00:23:02
◼
►
little luxury seats sort of like those first class cabins on Emirates.
00:23:06
◼
►
Oh yeah, like a light flat bed.
00:23:07
◼
►
Yeah, and maybe there's a lobby bar in the back of the bus so before you tuck in you could have
00:23:13
◼
►
a nightcap. It was a fantastic idea. And the truth is, as you've pointed out, that there's
00:23:21
◼
►
some competitors. While we've been sitting on the idea, some competitors have come out.
00:23:24
◼
►
Do we have lawyers on this?
00:23:29
◼
►
I do. They I don't know exactly what they're doing.
00:23:33
◼
►
I got laughed at kind of a lot.
00:23:35
◼
►
So I'm not it's not clear if that was laughter as you know, they're going to take these people to the cleaners or I hope that's what it was.
00:23:43
◼
►
Well, anyway, while John Moltz was telling a story on the show last week about how he does not enjoy cherries,
00:23:50
◼
►
but he does enjoy cherries when they are soaked in bourbon and put into a cocktail, which does sound good.
00:23:57
◼
►
And I asked him, just for specificity, even though I knew, I kind of knew the answer.
00:24:02
◼
►
I suspected that he was talking about regular cherries.
00:24:04
◼
►
I wanted to make sure he didn't mean maraschino cherries, which are often used as a garnish
00:24:08
◼
►
in cocktails.
00:24:09
◼
►
And he said, "No, regular."
00:24:10
◼
►
And that reminded me of an episode of You Look Nice Today, and I brought it up, where
00:24:16
◼
►
the lads on You Look Nice Today were talking about a cocktail they invented just for the
00:24:21
◼
►
listeners of the show.
00:24:23
◼
►
And I conflated two cocktails, unfortunately, and that's what I need to follow up.
00:24:27
◼
►
I said it was called the Aunt Nancy,
00:24:29
◼
►
like your dad's sister Nancy, the Aunt Nancy,
00:24:33
◼
►
and that involved a fistful of maraschino cherries,
00:24:38
◼
►
ice, and top it off with Maker's Mark.
00:24:42
◼
►
Turns out that's not the Aunt Nancy.
00:24:46
◼
►
That was from a later episode of You Look Nice Today.
00:24:49
◼
►
That drink was called,
00:24:50
◼
►
they called the Shirley Temple of Doom.
00:24:53
◼
►
- I think there's some ginger ale in that, is there not?
00:24:55
◼
►
- Nope, that's the Aunt Nancy.
00:24:56
◼
►
The Aunt Nancy.
00:24:58
◼
►
- Oh, is that, okay, this is why you conflated it, I see.
00:25:00
◼
►
- Right, this is why I conflated it.
00:25:02
◼
►
The Aunt Nancy, in fact,
00:25:04
◼
►
and I will put this link in the show notes,
00:25:05
◼
►
there's a gentleman who runs a You Look Nice Today index,
00:25:10
◼
►
where he went back and re-listened to their episodes
00:25:12
◼
►
and indexed topics.
00:25:13
◼
►
Unfortunately, the Aunt Nancy,
00:25:16
◼
►
I happened to re-listen to the episode
00:25:19
◼
►
on the HomePod I've got upstairs, as a matter of fact.
00:25:22
◼
►
It was-- - I also gave it a listen
00:25:25
◼
►
because it was better than anything else that was going on.
00:25:28
◼
►
- It was ambiguously defined in the episode.
00:25:31
◼
►
But as best as anybody can determine,
00:25:35
◼
►
the Aunt Nancy is ginger ale and maker's mark,
00:25:38
◼
►
served with lots of cherries.
00:25:41
◼
►
- A plastic drink sword.
00:25:43
◼
►
You know those little swords they use to spear a garnish?
00:25:47
◼
►
So on one of those, you put a buffalo chicken wing,
00:25:53
◼
►
- Predipped in ranch dressing.
00:25:55
◼
►
And then a second sword kebab
00:25:57
◼
►
with eight, spearing eight mentos.
00:26:02
◼
►
And then you put that together and there you got it.
00:26:05
◼
►
That's the best definition anybody has of an aunt Nancy.
00:26:07
◼
►
The only required elements,
00:26:09
◼
►
this is sort of like when you're talking about
00:26:10
◼
►
like an old fashioned and you know,
00:26:13
◼
►
there's bourbon or rye.
00:26:15
◼
►
- 20 different variations on it.
00:26:16
◼
►
- Sugar and bitters.
00:26:19
◼
►
But then other variations on the old fashioned,
00:26:21
◼
►
Some will include a muddled up orange or cherry
00:26:23
◼
►
or something like that.
00:26:24
◼
►
The required parts are not the ginger ale or the maker's mark
00:26:29
◼
►
it's just the speared buffalo chicken wing
00:26:33
◼
►
pre-dipped in ranch dressing
00:26:34
◼
►
and the second sword of eight Mentos.
00:26:37
◼
►
And you could pretty much mix that with any alcohol
00:26:39
◼
►
that you wanted to
00:26:40
◼
►
and I think you could still call it an Aunt Nancy.
00:26:43
◼
►
And I also believe there's some ambiguity
00:26:46
◼
►
about whether you can also substitute a chicken tender
00:26:50
◼
►
Right, there was definitely a beauty about chicken finger versus chicken wing.
00:26:54
◼
►
And I, while I was listening to this, I had to raise a couple objections because my parents are
00:27:00
◼
►
from Buffalo and they would roundly chastise me for not pointing out that it's a chicken wing,
00:27:04
◼
►
it's not a Buffalo wing. So, it's the Philly cheesesteak kind of thing. But, you know,
00:27:10
◼
►
my mom always makes sure to point out that Buffalo's do not have wings in case anyone is
00:27:15
◼
►
confused. And ranch dressing is all wrong. It's blue cheese or it's nothing. And then the third
00:27:23
◼
►
issue is I don't think you can spear Mentos. Mentos have a hard shell. So, this is a 10-year-old
00:27:32
◼
►
episode of a mildly popular podcast. But we are doing some deep cut criticism and critiquing of
00:27:41
◼
►
of it. Staring up some significant controversy. Absolutely. But I do I do want to praise them
00:27:47
◼
►
because in the episode, there was a reference to a domain, buttholevideo.com, which a decade
00:27:56
◼
►
later, almost one full decade later still leads to this episode. Buttholevideo.com.
00:28:05
◼
►
Buttholevideo.com. You know, click that and it will take you directly to this episode.
00:28:09
◼
►
I'll bet you 10 bucks Merlin registered the domain.
00:28:14
◼
►
- He's a domain hoarder.
00:28:15
◼
►
- And he's also very good at it.
00:28:17
◼
►
If by good you mean actually keeps them
00:28:20
◼
►
and keeps paying for them, perhaps--
00:28:22
◼
►
- For forever.
00:28:24
◼
►
- By some people's definitions,
00:28:26
◼
►
the people who are good at domains
00:28:27
◼
►
are the ones who forget the ones they've never used
00:28:30
◼
►
and stop paying for them, but--
00:28:32
◼
►
- I was gonna say I bought velocityhotels.com
00:28:35
◼
►
for that episode that we did.
00:28:37
◼
►
and I checked it and I have not been paying for it.
00:28:41
◼
►
So I guess it's a question of whether or not I'm good at it,
00:28:44
◼
►
but I have kept the 30 or $40 that I would have been paying.
00:28:49
◼
►
So my wallet thanks me at least.
00:28:51
◼
►
- So in the show notes for this episode,
00:28:54
◼
►
do I just leave buttholevideo.com as an item
00:28:57
◼
►
in the list of links without any explanation?
00:28:59
◼
►
I think I must.
00:29:00
◼
►
- No context, no context.
00:29:06
◼
►
- I also, and a minor correction on the Shirley Temple
00:29:08
◼
►
of Doom is that I believe the official definition
00:29:13
◼
►
is not a fistful of maraschino cherries,
00:29:17
◼
►
but instead a shitload of maraschino cherries.
00:29:20
◼
►
It's sort of like mixing up teaspoons and tablespoons.
00:29:25
◼
►
So you don't wanna get the wrong proportion.
00:29:26
◼
►
You want a shitload of maraschino cherries
00:29:29
◼
►
and Maker's Mark and I guess some ice and that's it.
00:29:32
◼
►
And that is the drink I have in fact seen Scott Simpson
00:29:35
◼
►
order several times.
00:29:37
◼
►
- Oh, frequently.
00:29:39
◼
►
But I'm looking at Merlin's picture
00:29:40
◼
►
of a Shirley Temple of Doom and there is ginger ale.
00:29:43
◼
►
So I think the Shirley Temple of Doom
00:29:44
◼
►
and the Aunt Nancy are remarkably similar,
00:29:47
◼
►
save for the speared meats and candies.
00:29:51
◼
►
- Yeah, and then I actually was trying to Google this
00:29:53
◼
►
and it's actually impossible to Google.
00:29:57
◼
►
You can get to the Aunt Nancy,
00:30:00
◼
►
even though usually most of the Google,
00:30:02
◼
►
like Aunt Nancy recipe,
00:30:03
◼
►
and it's seriously like somebody's Aunt Nancy's recipe
00:30:06
◼
►
for pumpkin pie.
00:30:08
◼
►
And there's absolutely no.
00:30:12
◼
►
There are no Mentos involved.
00:30:14
◼
►
Oh, and I should also mention,
00:30:16
◼
►
for those of you who are curious
00:30:17
◼
►
about the chicken wing garnish,
00:30:21
◼
►
that their idea for that is not necessarily
00:30:25
◼
►
that it's a flavor enhancer for the cocktail.
00:30:27
◼
►
It's something that while,
00:30:29
◼
►
like a mixed crowd of adults and children.
00:30:32
◼
►
- Right, it's a distraction.
00:30:33
◼
►
- Right, that you could, if mommy needs a moment,
00:30:36
◼
►
mommy needs a drink, she can order an Aunt Nancy
00:30:39
◼
►
and then take the chicken wing out
00:30:40
◼
►
and hand it to little Joey and he'll have something
00:30:43
◼
►
to keep him quiet.
00:30:44
◼
►
Anyway, which I think is a genius idea, quite frankly.
00:30:49
◼
►
Here's my point, if you Google Shirley Temple of Doom,
00:30:52
◼
►
there's a ton of people who've come up with,
00:30:54
◼
►
it's too obvious a name, the pun,
00:30:59
◼
►
I don't know what you call that
00:31:00
◼
►
when you connect Temple of Doom with Shirley Temple.
00:31:02
◼
►
And you Google it and there's actually an entire slew
00:31:05
◼
►
of people who've used this name to define a cocktail.
00:31:08
◼
►
And the cocktail, they bear no similarity whatsoever.
00:31:10
◼
►
They're just people who thought of the name.
00:31:13
◼
►
Whereas the Aunt Nancy to me is a genius name
00:31:15
◼
►
for a cocktail.
00:31:16
◼
►
And I kind of feel like,
00:31:18
◼
►
I kind of feel like it's up to me and you, Paul,
00:31:20
◼
►
I kind of feel like this definition in the guy's index
00:31:25
◼
►
of you look nice today ought to become
00:31:26
◼
►
the official Aunt Nancy.
00:31:27
◼
►
Let's combine them together.
00:31:30
◼
►
We'll have ginger ale, Maker's Mark.
00:31:32
◼
►
I would just go with a splash of ginger ale, frankly.
00:31:35
◼
►
You don't wanna put a lot of ginger ale on a drink.
00:31:38
◼
►
- Mostly Maker's Mark is what we want.
00:31:40
◼
►
- Yeah, a splash of ginger ale, Maker's Mark,
00:31:45
◼
►
a shitload of cherries,
00:31:47
◼
►
a kebab with a buffalo chicken wing or small chicken finger.
00:31:52
◼
►
Now, do you think that we should say
00:31:55
◼
►
ranch dressing or blue cheese?
00:31:58
◼
►
- I wanna nix the ranch.
00:31:59
◼
►
- I say blue cheese or nothing.
00:32:01
◼
►
- All right, blue cheese or nothing.
00:32:02
◼
►
But remember this is for children.
00:32:04
◼
►
And blue cheese is a pretty strong flavor for children.
00:32:10
◼
►
- You make a good point.
00:32:12
◼
►
- I'm gonna say that--
00:32:15
◼
►
- Well, if we're making the cocktail for children,
00:32:17
◼
►
we can go with ranch.
00:32:18
◼
►
- Let's just nix the dressing.
00:32:21
◼
►
Let's just nix it as a, you know,
00:32:23
◼
►
and then it can be--
00:32:24
◼
►
- As a required element.
00:32:25
◼
►
Dressing of your choice.
00:32:26
◼
►
- You know what I mean?
00:32:27
◼
►
Like you can get a martini with a blue cheese stuffed olive
00:32:29
◼
►
and that's not necessarily canonical,
00:32:30
◼
►
but nobody would question that it's still
00:32:32
◼
►
a legitimate martini, it's just up to the choice.
00:32:34
◼
►
- Right, absolutely.
00:32:36
◼
►
- And what do we do about the Mentos?
00:32:38
◼
►
- I really don't think you can spear Mentos
00:32:41
◼
►
with a plastic sword, and I don't wanna make that
00:32:44
◼
►
a requirement and then suddenly no one can make this drink.
00:32:46
◼
►
- Is there a spearable candy?
00:32:48
◼
►
- Ooh, starbursts that have been sitting in your back pocket.
00:32:54
◼
►
- Yeah, I don't think the bartend,
00:32:55
◼
►
I think that's against, I think that's gonna,
00:32:58
◼
►
I think the bar's gonna lose their A rating, Paul.
00:33:02
◼
►
I think Starbursts are a legitimate,
00:33:04
◼
►
I think Starbursts are a legitimate substitute.
00:33:08
◼
►
I hate to speak for the You Look Nice Today boys,
00:33:10
◼
►
because they're all good friends
00:33:11
◼
►
and I don't wanna stomp on their intellectual property
00:33:13
◼
►
and I know that they have very good attorneys.
00:33:16
◼
►
But I think Starbursts, off the top of my head,
00:33:19
◼
►
is a good idea and I'll tell you what,
00:33:20
◼
►
it adds a little bit of chance to the drink
00:33:26
◼
►
because you don't know what flavor
00:33:28
◼
►
Starbursts are gonna get.
00:33:30
◼
►
- And it's gonna help the kids even more.
00:33:33
◼
►
They get their dinner, they get their chicken wing
00:33:36
◼
►
or chicken tender, and then they get a little dessert.
00:33:38
◼
►
- Yeah, and they're gonna be barking for those Starbursts,
00:33:40
◼
►
but you gotta tell 'em, not until you eat that chicken wing.
00:33:45
◼
►
All right, I say we redefine this, see what the boys say,
00:33:48
◼
►
see if we can get an official,
00:33:50
◼
►
and then see if we can get this into some cocktail books.
00:33:53
◼
►
- Some cocktail books, exactly.
00:33:54
◼
►
- All right.
00:33:55
◼
►
- All right, what else do we have to follow up?
00:33:59
◼
►
This one's, nowhere near as fun.
00:34:01
◼
►
- This one is so much nerdier.
00:34:02
◼
►
- There's an app called Nuzzle that Milt and I talked about,
00:34:06
◼
►
which is an app that it's, I really like.
00:34:09
◼
►
It's, you let it have your Twitter credentials,
00:34:13
◼
►
and then Nuzzle keeps track of the people you follow.
00:34:16
◼
►
And at a threshold, you can specify if four people
00:34:20
◼
►
that you follow in the last four hours
00:34:21
◼
►
have posted the same link,
00:34:23
◼
►
Nozzle will send you a notification of it.
00:34:25
◼
►
And then when you just want to see what's up,
00:34:29
◼
►
you can go and there's like a homepage
00:34:31
◼
►
where maybe they haven't reached the point
00:34:34
◼
►
where they would have sent you a notification,
00:34:36
◼
►
but you can see a list of linked articles
00:34:39
◼
►
in order of how many people you follow
00:34:42
◼
►
have recently tweeted the link.
00:34:44
◼
►
And it's truly, for me at least,
00:34:46
◼
►
the people I follow an interesting source of information,
00:34:49
◼
►
a way to find interesting breaking news.
00:34:51
◼
►
I said that they don't use the WebKit browser.
00:34:54
◼
►
Turns out they do, there's an option that you can turn on
00:35:01
◼
►
so that it does support the new SF Safari view controller,
00:35:05
◼
►
which is the in-app browser that looks like Safari
00:35:09
◼
►
and supports content blockers and stuff like that.
00:35:14
◼
►
You have to go to settings, view stories with Safari,
00:35:19
◼
►
and in most cases they'll use Safari View Controller,
00:35:21
◼
►
but even then they don't use it all the time
00:35:23
◼
►
because they also have a view
00:35:25
◼
►
that includes a little dingus at the bottom
00:35:27
◼
►
that shows you which Twitter people you follow
00:35:31
◼
►
are the people who linked this that you can,
00:35:34
◼
►
so you can see who are the people who linked this
00:35:37
◼
►
so that it's in your list,
00:35:38
◼
►
and you can tap on them to see what their commentary was
00:35:41
◼
►
on the link too.
00:35:42
◼
►
And when they show that view,
00:35:43
◼
►
they still use the old web view that's kind of janky
00:35:46
◼
►
and shows a lot of ads.
00:35:47
◼
►
But anyway, that's my follow-up on this.
00:35:51
◼
►
There's a reason I don't do follow-up most weeks.
00:35:53
◼
►
I just let the--
00:35:54
◼
►
- And yet we've got three of them today.
00:35:56
◼
►
- Let the errors fall.
00:35:57
◼
►
This next one I think is gonna be very interesting to you.
00:35:59
◼
►
This seems like something that knowing you,
00:36:00
◼
►
you're gonna have strong opinions on.
00:36:02
◼
►
This one I might have let fly,
00:36:03
◼
►
except I knew that with you on the show,
00:36:05
◼
►
we could have a good conversation about it.
00:36:06
◼
►
And this was that Molson and I were talking about
00:36:09
◼
►
me complaining about a trip to the bank to deposit a check.
00:36:13
◼
►
And I knew this, I knew this,
00:36:15
◼
►
But it kind of slipped my mind during the show
00:36:18
◼
►
because I can't help it.
00:36:19
◼
►
I try not to be too American-centric,
00:36:22
◼
►
especially these days.
00:36:23
◼
►
But I knew this and it kind of slipped my mind,
00:36:28
◼
►
which is that, and then maybe this is news
00:36:30
◼
►
to some of you who are Americans,
00:36:32
◼
►
that the rest of the world,
00:36:33
◼
►
the rest of Western civilization moved away from checks
00:36:37
◼
►
as a means of conducting banking about 20 years ago.
00:36:43
◼
►
And so the idea that we still conduct business by checks,
00:36:47
◼
►
there were numerous listeners of the show
00:36:49
◼
►
who simply expressed laughter.
00:36:53
◼
►
It's like finding out that in America
00:36:56
◼
►
they still don't have indoor plumbing.
00:37:01
◼
►
And that literally what I want to do,
00:37:03
◼
►
what I would like to be able to do,
00:37:05
◼
►
is write myself a check and then take a picture of it
00:37:09
◼
►
and submit it through an app
00:37:11
◼
►
so I don't have to go to the bank.
00:37:12
◼
►
effectively do it electronically, but even in that scenario, I still have to rip out a check,
00:37:19
◼
►
a piece of paper, and write it and sign it and then authorize it on the back just to do it. So...
00:37:27
◼
►
John "Slick" Baum: Well, that's what I was going to say is I've got -- I'd have to think about how
00:37:32
◼
►
many checks I get in a year. It's not a lot, but I can do bill pay or, you know, an online deposit
00:37:37
◼
►
of them by taking a picture with my phone. But the fact that I have to get this artifact in the
00:37:43
◼
►
first place and then I digitize it with my, you know, $1,000 pocket computer, send it to the bank.
00:37:51
◼
►
I mean, that's -- we're still dependent on this ridiculous piece of paper that has almost no
00:38:00
◼
►
security features. So, what's the follow-up on this, though? Just, yeah, we're backwards and
00:38:06
◼
►
- Yeah, and it's embarrassing, it truly is.
00:38:09
◼
►
But don't you also think, just looking back on it,
00:38:13
◼
►
the idea of checks are absurd.
00:38:15
◼
►
I mean, at a certain point, the concept of money,
00:38:18
◼
►
it's like, we can--
00:38:19
◼
►
- You don't wanna think about it too much.
00:38:20
◼
►
- You don't wanna think about it too much.
00:38:21
◼
►
It's a collective shared illusion.
00:38:24
◼
►
But checks in particular just seem,
00:38:29
◼
►
it just seems crazy that when I was a kid,
00:38:34
◼
►
half the time I'd go to the supermarket with my mom.
00:38:38
◼
►
You know, somebody in front of us
00:38:41
◼
►
was paying for the groceries with a check
00:38:43
◼
►
and it was just, they would just let the person
00:38:45
◼
►
walk out of the store with $150 worth of groceries with,
00:38:49
◼
►
here, I put my name on this piece of paper, I'm good.
00:38:52
◼
►
Yep, you're good.
00:38:53
◼
►
- But John, they usually made them write
00:38:55
◼
►
a phone number on there too.
00:38:57
◼
►
Not necessarily their phone number, but a phone number.
00:39:00
◼
►
- We're gonna call this number that you wrote on here
00:39:04
◼
►
if there's any problems with this check.
00:39:06
◼
►
It was kind of crazy.
00:39:11
◼
►
I mean, and it's just crazy now.
00:39:13
◼
►
Like imagine if like one of these new payment systems
00:39:15
◼
►
came out, like Apple Pay came out,
00:39:17
◼
►
and Eddy Cue is up there on stage.
00:39:20
◼
►
He's like, we've got, this is a great new system.
00:39:25
◼
►
You just type in how much you want in your iPhone,
00:39:30
◼
►
and then you go down to the share menu and you hit print.
00:39:35
◼
►
Go over to your printer and now you've got
00:39:38
◼
►
an Apple Pay certificate and you can take that to any store
00:39:42
◼
►
and they're gonna take it and they're gonna file it away
00:39:45
◼
►
in a register and they're gonna take it
00:39:47
◼
►
to their nearest Apple store at their nearest convenience
00:39:50
◼
►
and we'll turn it into cash.
00:39:51
◼
►
The idea that there's paper involved in this
00:39:57
◼
►
is just nonsensical, it's crazy.
00:39:59
◼
►
So anyway, we understand--
00:40:01
◼
►
What was the check you were depositing?
00:40:03
◼
►
- It was just a payment, a partner payment
00:40:05
◼
►
from my daring firewall company
00:40:07
◼
►
to me and Amy's personal account.
00:40:11
◼
►
- So it was even your own money.
00:40:13
◼
►
You're transferring money between your own accounts
00:40:15
◼
►
and you still had to do it with a check.
00:40:17
◼
►
- Well, and bottom line of this,
00:40:18
◼
►
and there were a couple other people who commented on this.
00:40:20
◼
►
One of them said, and the problem,
00:40:22
◼
►
we can't do the electronic thing
00:40:23
◼
►
because our personal checking has like a $500 limit
00:40:26
◼
►
on the checks that we can scan.
00:40:29
◼
►
So like relatives--
00:40:30
◼
►
- Yeah, you don't wanna get too much money
00:40:31
◼
►
your own account.
00:40:32
◼
►
That's a good...
00:40:34
◼
►
Like a grandparent sends Jonas a check for his birthday or whatever.
00:40:38
◼
►
We can scan that and it goes right into our account because we're not going to give the
00:40:42
◼
►
money to him.
00:40:43
◼
►
No, of course not.
00:40:46
◼
►
But any kind of serious...
00:40:48
◼
►
Anything that would count as a paycheck is over the limit.
00:40:51
◼
►
But a couple of people have said that they had the same problem, but you just go to your
00:40:54
◼
►
bank and say, "Hey, I want a higher limit on this," that they have a lot of discretion.
00:40:58
◼
►
I never tried that.
00:40:59
◼
►
It never occurs to me to try stuff like that.
00:41:01
◼
►
Like a bank tells me, I don't know, I don't think I'm, you know me, Paul, I'm not really
00:41:05
◼
►
like a strict toe-of-the-line rules follower, but I just assume that when—
00:41:11
◼
►
But a bank's rule just seems like that's it, right?
00:41:14
◼
►
That doesn't seem negotiable.
00:41:15
◼
►
When a bank tells me you can deposit up to $500, I just think, well, that's a stupid
00:41:21
◼
►
It doesn't even occur to me that you can't do it.
00:41:25
◼
►
Do you think we should be trying to negotiate like better interest rates?
00:41:30
◼
►
- Is that an option too?
00:41:31
◼
►
- Hey, can I do the same thing with my mortgage?
00:41:34
◼
►
Is that possible?
00:41:35
◼
►
Can I just go and say--
00:41:36
◼
►
- I'm just not gonna pay one month.
00:41:38
◼
►
So what are you gonna do about it?
00:41:40
◼
►
Can we make this work?
00:41:41
◼
►
- Well, what do you say I only pay in a month
00:41:43
◼
►
that I have 31 days?
00:41:44
◼
►
'Cause that seems like the full value of a month.
00:41:46
◼
►
I'll still pay the same number.
00:41:50
◼
►
- Now I got a task for after the show.
00:41:52
◼
►
This is good, I'm gonna call my bank, see what happens.
00:41:54
◼
►
- Well, that's it for follow up.
00:41:57
◼
►
Anyway, checks are ridiculous.
00:41:58
◼
►
We know it and we don't know what to do about it.
00:42:01
◼
►
I'm sure Trump will get on it.
00:42:03
◼
►
- We'll fix that right after we fix our healthcare system
00:42:05
◼
►
and our immigration system.
00:42:07
◼
►
- And our elections being hijacked by Russian propaganda.
00:42:11
◼
►
- But it's fourth on the list, right after those three.
00:42:14
◼
►
- We'll get right on the check.
00:42:16
◼
►
Well, I don't know, why don't I,
00:42:22
◼
►
I'll take another break here.
00:42:24
◼
►
Seems like as good a time as ever.
00:42:27
◼
►
I'm gonna talk to you about another sponsor of the show,
00:42:32
◼
►
And boy does Casper have a deal for you.
00:42:34
◼
►
They have a special, limited time, President's Day offer.
00:42:39
◼
►
This is the first time they've ever done this.
00:42:41
◼
►
I think it's the first time they've done anything like this,
00:42:44
◼
►
but they've got a terrific offer.
00:42:46
◼
►
Casper is a sleep company.
00:42:49
◼
►
They make three lines of mattresses now.
00:42:52
◼
►
They have the original Casper,
00:42:54
◼
►
the innovative Wave mattress and the streamlined essential.
00:42:59
◼
►
But they're not just a mattress company,
00:43:01
◼
►
they also offer sheets, pillows, and even bed frames.
00:43:06
◼
►
They are the place to shop for President's Day
00:43:09
◼
►
mattress savings this year.
00:43:12
◼
►
I don't know why, President's Day seems to be
00:43:13
◼
►
like a big mattress promotional period.
00:43:16
◼
►
Well, Casper's on board.
00:43:17
◼
►
And they make these mattresses right here
00:43:23
◼
►
in the United States, they're designed and made
00:43:26
◼
►
right here in the United States.
00:43:29
◼
►
And you can be sure of your purchase
00:43:31
◼
►
with whatever you wind up with.
00:43:33
◼
►
With their 100 night risk free sleep on it trial
00:43:38
◼
►
and returns are hassle free
00:43:40
◼
►
if you're not completely satisfied.
00:43:43
◼
►
Really is that easy, you just buy it,
00:43:45
◼
►
it shows up at your house, you unpack it
00:43:48
◼
►
from the clever little box and wait for the air
00:43:51
◼
►
to fill up the foam and boom, you've got a mattress
00:43:53
◼
►
and if you don't like it, they'll just take it right back.
00:43:56
◼
►
You got 100 nights to try it out.
00:43:58
◼
►
Really is that easy, and it really is a terrific product.
00:44:02
◼
►
Great company.
00:44:03
◼
►
We've got Casper mattresses here in the house.
00:44:07
◼
►
Everybody loves them.
00:44:09
◼
►
Guests love them.
00:44:10
◼
►
We got people in the guest bedroom right now
00:44:12
◼
►
for Super Bowl Parade.
00:44:15
◼
►
I worry that maybe we shouldn't have a Casper
00:44:19
◼
►
in the guest bedroom because maybe
00:44:20
◼
►
we have too many people coming back.
00:44:23
◼
►
Maybe we should get like--
00:44:24
◼
►
- Yeah, a real lumpy mattress in the guest bed.
00:44:26
◼
►
- I think we've--
00:44:27
◼
►
- That's where you get the piece of crap
00:44:28
◼
►
from the retail store.
00:44:29
◼
►
- I think we made a terrible decision with that.
00:44:33
◼
►
That's how good these mattresses are.
00:44:35
◼
►
So for a limited time, visit casper.com/savings.
00:44:40
◼
►
S-A-V-I-N-G-S, casper.com/savings.
00:44:44
◼
►
And when you do that, you will receive up to $200
00:44:49
◼
►
off your purchase of $2,000 or more.
00:44:52
◼
►
This special offer expires February 20, 2018.
00:44:57
◼
►
So if you're listening to this show brand new,
00:44:59
◼
►
fresh off the internets, you're fine.
00:45:03
◼
►
If you've waited a couple days,
00:45:04
◼
►
if you're getting close to the deadline,
00:45:06
◼
►
don't wait 'cause this offer expires February 20, 2018.
00:45:11
◼
►
And you gotta see casper.com/terms
00:45:14
◼
►
for more details about this special promotion.
00:45:17
◼
►
So go to casper.com/savings and remember it expires.
00:45:20
◼
►
This special promotion expires February 20.
00:45:24
◼
►
All right, HomePod is coming out on Friday,
00:45:28
◼
►
two days from now, probably a day after the show airs.
00:45:31
◼
►
I've had one for a little over a week now,
00:45:32
◼
►
a review unit from Apple after a trip to California
00:45:37
◼
►
where I also got a tour of Apple's quote unquote audio lab,
00:45:42
◼
►
which I didn't really talk about in my review too much.
00:45:43
◼
►
A couple other people did.
00:45:44
◼
►
I've got some links in here.
00:45:46
◼
►
I thought Dalrymple's review had a good look at the,
00:45:51
◼
►
good summary of the behind the scenes.
00:45:54
◼
►
That's what I was hoping.
00:45:55
◼
►
I was hoping that somebody else who was on this tour
00:45:57
◼
►
would have written that aspect of it up
00:46:00
◼
►
'cause it was pretty interesting.
00:46:02
◼
►
I don't know, what are you curious about?
00:46:07
◼
►
- Wow, I think I'm most curious to see how it does.
00:46:13
◼
►
I mean, we've seen, like you said, these reviews are out now
00:46:15
◼
►
there's probably a good half dozen to dozen of them. And certainly none of them are glowing
00:46:22
◼
►
reviews that say you have to get this device. And I think, you know, that's a pretty high bar,
00:46:27
◼
►
obviously. But you know, that's something that I guess I maybe I've got rose-colored glasses on,
00:46:32
◼
►
but like when the iPhone came out, were there, do you remember what the reviews were like for
00:46:38
◼
►
the first iPhone? Well, they were severely limited. There were only four people who got it. It was
00:46:43
◼
►
Pogue, Ed Begg, Mossberg, and Steven Levy,
00:46:48
◼
►
who was at the time at Newsweek.
00:46:51
◼
►
I don't think they quite knew what to make of it.
00:46:54
◼
►
I do remember that the four of them got together
00:46:57
◼
►
and on the 10th year anniversary,
00:46:59
◼
►
and I did reread them,
00:47:00
◼
►
and none of the reviews had any clunkers in them.
00:47:04
◼
►
And I think Apple was wise,
00:47:08
◼
►
and they knew they were getting four smart people
00:47:11
◼
►
to review it.
00:47:12
◼
►
So nobody had the knee-jerk reaction
00:47:15
◼
►
of every other phone on the market
00:47:18
◼
►
has a hardware green button for making calls
00:47:21
◼
►
and a red one for hanging up and wine,
00:47:24
◼
►
something stupid like that.
00:47:25
◼
►
Wine World doesn't just have this.
00:47:28
◼
►
- The classic iPod slash dot review of,
00:47:32
◼
►
I can't even remember exactly what it was,
00:47:33
◼
►
but like less space than a Nomad, something.
00:47:37
◼
►
- Yeah, 300 hours.
00:47:39
◼
►
- It was like 10 words that they all turned out to be
00:47:42
◼
►
just foolish sounding after the fact.
00:47:44
◼
►
- Right, and nobody wants to touch on GLAAD.
00:47:48
◼
►
The reviews were good.
00:47:49
◼
►
I think the reviews saw the potential.
00:47:51
◼
►
All four of them saw the potential and were pretty good,
00:47:53
◼
►
but none of them were like, "You should run out and buy it."
00:47:55
◼
►
Because I feel like the $699 or $599 starting price
00:48:00
◼
►
of the four gig model was still exceedingly high
00:48:06
◼
►
by cell phone standards, because it wasn't on any kind
00:48:08
◼
►
contract. And I know a lot of people today are no longer buying their phones on contract,
00:48:14
◼
►
but that's after 11 years of weaning us towards having 500 to $1,000 cell phones. Whereas
00:48:27
◼
►
10 years ago, everybody was used to buying quote unquote $29 cell phones that were $29
00:48:34
◼
►
contract from Nokia and your carrier or whoever. But everybody had this mental
00:48:40
◼
►
model that your cell phone cost you know like $29 or maybe if you got an expensive
00:48:45
◼
►
one like a razor or something like a few hundred dollars but the idea of a $700
00:48:51
◼
►
cell phone was so seemed so outlandish that I think they were hesitant to tell
00:48:56
◼
►
people you got to go out and get it just because it was too much and I think it
00:49:00
◼
►
too hard to foresee at the time how people would see value in that in terms of it really
00:49:05
◼
►
replacing your laptop for many purposes.
00:49:26
◼
►
It certainly sounds like it sounds great, but in terms of just comparing to what's already on the market, it certainly isn't blowing anything away.
00:49:36
◼
►
So, I'm curious, I've got one coming on Friday, you know, I need it for work. I don't know that I'd get it for myself.
00:49:42
◼
►
But I'm curious how it plays out over the next, say, three to nine months, more than just any individual thing on it.
00:49:50
◼
►
know, is there anything specific that you—I mean, you just wrote a review of it, obviously—but is
00:49:54
◼
►
there anything specific that jumped out to you that was interesting? Or I guess one thing that
00:50:00
◼
►
you mentioned was being able to give commands to it without sort of yelling over the music,
00:50:06
◼
►
if you're playing music. So that's one that was interesting to me. I'm interested to experiment
00:50:10
◼
►
with that, even if I don't know that it's something that's super useful.
00:50:12
◼
►
Pete: It is super useful, I think, if you ever plan to play music at an even reasonably loud
00:50:18
◼
►
volume. And it really is uncanny. I think that's the word I used in the review. It works uncannily
00:50:25
◼
►
well because you don't expect it, I didn't expect it to be able to work better than human ears.
00:50:32
◼
►
So, imagine if you and I are in the same room where a home pod is blaring music relatively
00:50:38
◼
►
loudly and you're standing eight feet away from me, there's a certain volume that I'm
00:50:45
◼
►
going to, if I want to say to you, "Hey, do you want another beverage?" I'm going
00:50:50
◼
►
to say it at a certain volume that I think you'll probably still hear me. And I, you
00:50:56
◼
►
know, and I think I'm, I think, you know, anybody who's lived life for a while is
00:51:00
◼
►
pretty good at getting that volume about right, you know, where you don't sound like you're
00:51:05
◼
►
screaming too loud, but you're speaking louder than you would without the music on.
00:51:08
◼
►
whereas with the HomePod, you can say, "Hey, dingus," whatever, to it at a volume that
00:51:15
◼
►
if there was another person in the room, you would never think that they would hear it.
00:51:20
◼
►
Or they might hear that you're saying something, but they would never understand it.
00:51:25
◼
►
So that's definitely interesting, and it sounds like, from what you said and from your experiments
00:51:29
◼
►
with it, that it's fairly impressive, and it's not something that I saw, at least, that
00:51:34
◼
►
Apple had touched on or that Apple had—is that something that they at least mentioned
00:51:37
◼
►
to you or is that something that you discovered?
00:51:39
◼
►
No, they mentioned it to us, well, to me at least, to my group, at least while we were
00:51:42
◼
►
in California.
00:51:44
◼
►
Yeah, and it is at an engineering level, and I think it is inextricably tied both to the
00:51:54
◼
►
hardware of the microphones and the software running.
00:52:00
◼
►
It's a version of iOS.
00:52:01
◼
►
It's like a lot of these other gadgets Apple's come out with, where it's really running a
00:52:05
◼
►
variant of iOS.
00:52:06
◼
►
The version number right now is even 11.2.5,
00:52:09
◼
►
the same version number as the version on your phone.
00:52:12
◼
►
- It's involved with that, right.
00:52:14
◼
►
- It's a combination of the mics being really good,
00:52:18
◼
►
the mics being oriented in a certain way,
00:52:20
◼
►
and the mics knowing exactly how the seven tweeters
00:52:25
◼
►
and the woofer are oriented.
00:52:29
◼
►
And it's one of those funny things
00:52:35
◼
►
Apple wanted to, I'm not surprised that they're not like making it a major advertising component,
00:52:43
◼
►
but they definitely wanted us to know about it.
00:52:46
◼
►
I definitely noticed it in the demos that Apple performed for me that they, you know,
00:52:54
◼
►
she clearly, the woman who was doing the demos clearly wasn't speaking, I thought, loud enough,
00:52:59
◼
►
but it was hearing her almost perfectly.
00:53:01
◼
►
I mean, there were a whole bunch of commands and there was like one or two she had to repeat.
00:53:05
◼
►
But it was -- and I know -- and the other thing combining that is that firsthand as a year-long
00:53:12
◼
►
owner of an Amazon Alexa, with the Alexa, it's not that you have to scream, but you have to talk at
00:53:18
◼
►
least as loud as you'd have to talk to a human being over the same volume of music.
00:53:22
◼
►
Soterios Johnson So, you've got -- I think you mentioned you've got an Echo in the kitchen.
00:53:27
◼
►
Do you have -- how many do you have throughout the house, like two or three?
00:53:29
◼
►
Dave: Yeah, we've got one in Jonas' room and another, a dot in the living room. But
00:53:36
◼
►
the living room and the kitchen are on the same floor, and it's maddening because I'll
00:53:40
◼
►
be in the kitchen—the same thing happens to Amy is we'll be in the kitchen and we'll
00:53:44
◼
►
say the Alexa name—hopefully I said that in a way that won't trigger people's things—and
00:53:53
◼
►
and whatever, at a relatively sane volume.
00:53:57
◼
►
And it's like, for whatever reason,
00:53:59
◼
►
the one in the living room at the other end of the floor
00:54:04
◼
►
And it's like, what?
00:54:05
◼
►
It's like crazy.
00:54:06
◼
►
I don't understand how that's possible.
00:54:09
◼
►
And does the kitchen one not kick in,
00:54:11
◼
►
or do they both kick in?
00:54:12
◼
►
No, it's only the other one.
00:54:14
◼
►
I don't know how that is.
00:54:15
◼
►
It's very strange.
00:54:16
◼
►
And it doesn't happen all the time.
00:54:17
◼
►
It certainly doesn't happen most of the time,
00:54:18
◼
►
or I would have thrown the things out the window.
00:54:20
◼
►
it happens enough that it's crazy. And it's like, and one way, one way it manifests itself is,
00:54:28
◼
►
like, Amy certainly sends the most timers, because in the kitchen, because she's, she cooks more
00:54:32
◼
►
things that need to be timed. And I think what happens every once in a while, she'll tell it
00:54:37
◼
►
to set a timer and thinks it didn't hear. And then she'll tell it to set the timer again, and it
00:54:44
◼
►
hears her and it goes off. But meanwhile, the dot out in the other room, I don't know, 30,
00:54:50
◼
►
40 feet away heard it too, and nobody's in there. And it set a timer. And then like, you know,
00:54:56
◼
►
15 minutes later, the dot is making the little alarm sound. And it's like, who the hell did that?
00:55:03
◼
►
>> Well, so I'm interested to hear, you know, like you said, you've had these Echo devices for
00:55:10
◼
►
about a year and you've had, did they, they just gave you one HomePod to test with?
00:55:13
◼
►
- That is correct because it's right now.
00:55:16
◼
►
And the HomePod we got for testing
00:55:18
◼
►
is running the production software
00:55:20
◼
►
that will be on the ones that come in the mail on--
00:55:23
◼
►
- In two days. - On two days.
00:55:25
◼
►
Or that you can buy in a store in two days.
00:55:27
◼
►
So because ours are running,
00:55:29
◼
►
which is the way I would prefer it.
00:55:30
◼
►
I would not, I would be,
00:55:33
◼
►
I would have been very uncomfortable.
00:55:34
◼
►
I don't know what I would have done in fact, because I--
00:55:37
◼
►
- Right, throwing in caveats of,
00:55:38
◼
►
you know, I'm testing something that's not yet available.
00:55:40
◼
►
- Right, I would have, if I was running one
00:55:43
◼
►
with a pre-release version of 11.3
00:55:47
◼
►
with the AirPlay 2 stuff on it,
00:55:50
◼
►
I would have mentioned it up front
00:55:52
◼
►
and I would have had to mention it every step of the way.
00:55:54
◼
►
I don't know, it would have made me very,
00:55:57
◼
►
I don't know, so I'm glad.
00:55:58
◼
►
And I think that the same reason that I'm glad
00:56:00
◼
►
is the reason that they gave us the production firmware,
00:56:04
◼
►
whatever you wanna call it.
00:56:06
◼
►
So anyway, they only gave us one
00:56:07
◼
►
because there's really no point to having two yet.
00:56:10
◼
►
I mean, I guess you could set it up
00:56:11
◼
►
as two independent devices,
00:56:12
◼
►
it's not really going to help you review anything.
00:56:14
◼
►
>> Sure. But so, in your actual use case in your house, if you've got three different Echo devices,
00:56:22
◼
►
I guess that's sort of the question is, do you think and does Apple think that people are going
00:56:29
◼
►
to use this in the same way that people use an Echo currently or use a Google Home currently?
00:56:35
◼
►
>> Or -- exactly. And because they've been so focused on the music aspect of it,
00:56:39
◼
►
but it really seems like, you know,
00:56:40
◼
►
maybe you only get one of these for the house
00:56:42
◼
►
and you put it wherever you have your biggest TV
00:56:45
◼
►
or your stereo system if you still have one of those.
00:56:47
◼
►
And it sort of joins in that way,
00:56:50
◼
►
as opposed to Amazon's idea that, you know,
00:56:52
◼
►
maybe you have one of these
00:56:53
◼
►
in every single room of the house.
00:56:55
◼
►
Although I think you could have them in multiple rooms.
00:56:58
◼
►
I think it, you know,
00:57:01
◼
►
I think it varies greatly by the layout of your home.
00:57:04
◼
►
Like, do you have this sort of floor plan
00:57:07
◼
►
we're putting one in the dining room and the kitchen
00:57:10
◼
►
and having them sync together to play the same song
00:57:13
◼
►
at the same time makes sense.
00:57:14
◼
►
We kind of do.
00:57:19
◼
►
That might make sense for us to have two that way
00:57:22
◼
►
because from our dining room,
00:57:25
◼
►
you can walk right through to the kitchen,
00:57:26
◼
►
but if the HomePod was in the kitchen,
00:57:29
◼
►
you wouldn't really consider it a source for music
00:57:32
◼
►
in the dining room and vice versa.
00:57:34
◼
►
- Outside of the kitchen, right?
00:57:35
◼
►
So, I think it comes down to the fact that it really is music first. It really is a thing
00:57:42
◼
►
that's meant to be playing music. And I think the other thing I think that you mentioned
00:57:47
◼
►
that the one place where I feel like the HomePod really doesn't fit is in the room with your
00:57:52
◼
►
TV, or at least not unless you want to use it completely separately from your TV.
00:57:59
◼
►
Right. Sorry, that is what I meant. Yeah. That's the same way that you might have a
00:58:04
◼
►
stereo there that is, at least in my mom's house, she has a TV here and a stereo there,
00:58:08
◼
►
and they're completely divorced from one another or completely unrelated to one another, but it's
00:58:12
◼
►
where you do your listening or your viewing. But right, yeah, that was something interesting that
00:58:18
◼
►
you wrote about was that it's not designed to hook up to your TV, and this is a super high-quality
00:58:23
◼
►
speaker that doesn't have an input and can't really take audio from your TV short of having
00:58:28
◼
►
your Apple TV send to it. Which is, I don't know, you had talked about not having a line input
00:58:35
◼
►
because Apple, you know, is thinking that everything's going to be wireless. And that's,
00:58:39
◼
►
I get that, but it's a pretty cheap part to add to this. And when everything else on this is fairly
00:58:46
◼
►
high end and you, you know, you could say, well, I just want to be able to take my device somewhere
00:58:51
◼
►
and plug in audio to it without having to wirelessly send to it. I don't know, that's one
00:58:57
◼
►
that it wouldn't make me not purchase it if I were interested to purchase it, but it seems like
00:59:02
◼
►
something that doesn't necessarily make sense to cut the same way that they made some changes on
00:59:08
◼
►
like the phone where, you know, a headphone jack supposedly at least had something to do with
00:59:12
◼
►
waterproofing. Obviously, you're not waterproofing the HomePod, so there's not an obvious reason to
00:59:18
◼
►
cut this besides the idea that, no, we just want everyone to focus on wireless audio to this thing.
00:59:22
◼
►
Well, I think there's also a simplicity angle though because if you have a line in and then you're pumping your TV to it
00:59:29
◼
►
And you're watching a movie what happens when you say hey dingus play whatever to it
00:59:35
◼
►
Does it start playing the music you just asked it to play or does it keep playing the TV?
00:59:40
◼
►
Input on line in and what happens when you tap the top of it?
00:59:43
◼
►
Which typically does play pause does it stop and how would top how would tapping the stop button on?
00:59:50
◼
►
on a speaker getting a dumb line-in signal go back to pause the TV. It couldn't.
00:59:57
◼
►
No, that's certainly a good point. Yeah, absolutely.
01:00:00
◼
►
You know, I mentioned it in my review. It does seem wasteful. If you want to put it in a room
01:00:04
◼
►
where you already have a TV and some kind of speaker system, it seems wasteful to add another
01:00:09
◼
►
wholly independent speaker system. It is…
01:00:12
◼
►
You know, what is that word? I was going to say duplicitous, but duplicitous means
01:00:17
◼
►
Oh, superfluous.
01:00:19
◼
►
Superfluous, right. It does seem superfluous. But I get it. I think it's for a simplicity where
01:00:27
◼
►
it's always just playing either what you tell it to or acting as an AirPlay speaker and acting as
01:00:33
◼
►
an AirPlay speaker never. I don't know though, because you can set Apple TV to talk to it as
01:00:39
◼
►
an AirPlay speaker. I don't know. I don't feel like I feel much stronger. I feel like getting
01:00:48
◼
►
getting rid of the headphone jack on the phones
01:00:50
◼
►
is the right way, I feel like it was the right decision
01:00:53
◼
►
last year, I really do.
01:00:55
◼
►
On the line in, I'm a little bit more ambivalent.
01:00:58
◼
►
I'm okay with this product not having it,
01:01:01
◼
►
but if it did have it, I wouldn't think that they were
01:01:05
◼
►
sticking with an older technology for no good reason,
01:01:07
◼
►
like I would've if they didn't get rid of the headphone jack
01:01:10
◼
►
I'm more ambivalent about it.
01:01:18
◼
►
What else about it?
01:01:19
◼
►
I do think if there's one thing, excuse me, Paul.
01:01:23
◼
►
There's one thing I saw in a couple of reviews,
01:01:25
◼
►
I think Matthew Panzarino's in particular,
01:01:27
◼
►
which was really interesting to me because he knows,
01:01:30
◼
►
and I knew this like a career ago,
01:01:33
◼
►
he was actually working as a salesman
01:01:35
◼
►
in a high-end stereo shop.
01:01:38
◼
►
So he really knows a lot more about
01:01:41
◼
►
why one speaker sounds better than another
01:01:47
◼
►
or where one speaker sounds better and another one doesn't
01:01:50
◼
►
and why and stuff like that than I do.
01:01:52
◼
►
I just kinda listen to one, listen to the other,
01:01:53
◼
►
and then well, I can tell I like that one better.
01:01:56
◼
►
I just, I don't know. - Right.
01:01:57
◼
►
- But he mentioned something,
01:02:01
◼
►
and I think it's absolutely true, is that,
01:02:04
◼
►
and it's just the layout of our current house
01:02:07
◼
►
just and where I could try it.
01:02:09
◼
►
I don't really have a smaller and smaller room.
01:02:15
◼
►
And in a small room, and I heard a couple of demos,
01:02:19
◼
►
'cause when Apple demoed these things for us,
01:02:22
◼
►
it was in an actual house.
01:02:25
◼
►
I don't know if they rented it or whatever,
01:02:27
◼
►
but it was in a real house of real dimensions
01:02:31
◼
►
and had real furnishings and stuff.
01:02:33
◼
►
And I think very typical.
01:02:35
◼
►
I don't think it was, there was nothing weird
01:02:39
◼
►
or set up about it, including some room.
01:02:44
◼
►
camera's on every inch of it and you're in all sorts of videos now.
01:02:47
◼
►
But they had like a downstairs with like a very modern floor plan for a living room, living floor,
01:02:56
◼
►
where the kitchen flows right into the living room without a wall, just with like a kitchen
01:03:02
◼
►
island between them, which is, you know, I've been I know so many people who have a floor plan like
01:03:07
◼
►
that, which is a bigger, bigger, much bigger space, more risk for more ways that you could
01:03:13
◼
►
you get echoes.
01:03:14
◼
►
And then a smaller room upstairs,
01:03:15
◼
►
which would be just a very, very typical,
01:03:18
◼
►
or they even had a bedroom.
01:03:19
◼
►
There was even a very typical bedroom,
01:03:21
◼
►
and then maybe like a very typical home office type room.
01:03:24
◼
►
And in those smaller rooms,
01:03:27
◼
►
it was really more startling how good it sounded.
01:03:31
◼
►
And in my personal testing at home, it sounded good.
01:03:35
◼
►
It sounded better than any other thing
01:03:36
◼
►
I've tried in these rooms,
01:03:38
◼
►
but I feel like our place is a little bit,
01:03:41
◼
►
has more space, bigger rooms and more echoey rooms.
01:03:44
◼
►
So that's one thing too, is there's a lot of,
01:03:49
◼
►
the smaller your room, I think the better
01:03:51
◼
►
this thing is gonna sound, and it really
01:03:53
◼
►
almost sounds phenomenal, and the effect
01:03:56
◼
►
of not quite coming from a single point
01:03:59
◼
►
is way more pronounced in a smaller room.
01:04:02
◼
►
That's the other thing that I remember from the demos.
01:04:05
◼
►
And it's not like it fools you into thinking
01:04:08
◼
►
that there's two speakers on two sides of the room.
01:04:10
◼
►
you could close your eyes and point to where the HomePod is,
01:04:14
◼
►
Or like if you're in a small room and there's one HomePod
01:04:19
◼
►
and somebody spins you around like pin the tail
01:04:21
◼
►
on the donkey and they're like, where's the HomePod?
01:04:23
◼
►
You'll get very close to it when you point it,
01:04:25
◼
►
but it doesn't sound like it's coming
01:04:27
◼
►
from a tiny little seven inch point.
01:04:30
◼
►
It really does have a dimensionality, a 3D-ness to it
01:04:33
◼
►
that seems like something, you know,
01:04:36
◼
►
a next level up in small speaker design.
01:04:40
◼
►
So do you think that — all these reviews have talked about, you know, this audio quality, and
01:04:45
◼
►
Apple touted this, and it sounds like that is true, that this has phenomenal audio quality and better
01:04:51
◼
►
than, you know, the other devices that are out there, certainly better than the cheaper devices
01:04:55
◼
►
that are out there, and sounds like better than even the devices that are comparably priced from,
01:05:01
◼
►
you know, the Google Home Max and Sonos. Is that enough to make this thing sell, though?
01:05:07
◼
►
I don't know. I've I thought before I started my review, just knowing what I knew, you know,
01:05:12
◼
►
what Apple had said coming up to it and up to the point where I met with their, you know, engineers
01:05:18
◼
►
and the next day got a briefing and headed home with my review unit before it and after it, I
01:05:25
◼
►
really I have I don't know what I would which way I would bet on how successful this product would
01:05:29
◼
►
be. My guess is that the best case scenario is a sort of slowly building hit, sort of like Apple
01:05:39
◼
►
Watch, you know, where, although without that initial, like, Apple Watch debuted with like a,
01:05:45
◼
►
you could, you know, all of a sudden it was backordered six weeks. Right, everybody wanted
01:05:49
◼
►
that up front. But then once that subsided, it was sort of like you didn't really see a lot of
01:05:54
◼
►
of people with Apple Watch the first year, but then it seemed like through word of mouth.
01:05:59
◼
►
It's the sort of thing that I feel like you need word of mouth for, and that people might
01:06:03
◼
►
come to your house and if you have a HomePod, they might be really impressed by it and think,
01:06:08
◼
►
"Wow, that really does sound good. I might get one of those." But I could see it all
01:06:14
◼
►
the way to being the iPod 2.0, the iPod Hi-Fi 2.0, that Apple built this thing that they
01:06:23
◼
►
seemingly spend a lot of engineering time on and seemingly are very proud of and really
01:06:27
◼
►
think people are going to like and people just don't want to spend 300 plus dollars
01:06:33
◼
►
on something that just plays music from Apple.
01:06:36
◼
►
And was that I'm trying to remember was that $4.99 the iPod Hi-Fi?
01:06:39
◼
►
I don't remember how much it was.
01:06:41
◼
►
We could think that's I, I don't want to, we should look it up.
01:06:46
◼
►
But it was it was definitely I think, even more expensive than this and obviously did
01:06:51
◼
►
It was literally just a speaker that took audio from an iPod.
01:06:54
◼
►
- Nope, it was three.
01:06:55
◼
►
- It didn't take commands or anything like that.
01:06:57
◼
►
- It was 349.
01:06:58
◼
►
- Oh, was it exactly the same price?
01:07:00
◼
►
I guess I feel like I remember people saying that
01:07:02
◼
►
now that I think about it.
01:07:04
◼
►
- That's even funnier.
01:07:06
◼
►
My God, is it bigger.
01:07:07
◼
►
It's ridiculous how much bigger the iPod I was.
01:07:10
◼
►
- Oh, it was enormous, yeah.
01:07:12
◼
►
And especially compared to the device
01:07:14
◼
►
that you were putting on it.
01:07:16
◼
►
- I never bought one of those.
01:07:18
◼
►
I had no desire to buy one.
01:07:21
◼
►
But boy, I kind of wish I had one laying around
01:07:23
◼
►
'cause that would be a fun side-by-side review.
01:07:25
◼
►
- Oh, comparison test, yeah, absolutely.
01:07:28
◼
►
- See how much better it sounds.
01:07:29
◼
►
I thought Pansarino, I think it was Pansarino,
01:07:33
◼
►
had another observation that I thought was spot on
01:07:35
◼
►
where he described the iPod Hi-Fi's sound as being,
01:07:39
◼
►
I think he said accurate.
01:07:41
◼
►
- Wait, the iPod Hi-Fi or the HomePod?
01:07:45
◼
►
- Not the iPod Hi-Pod. (laughs)
01:07:46
◼
►
You've got me thrown off, the HomePod.
01:07:49
◼
►
And everybody agreed, if you saw it,
01:07:51
◼
►
if you read it, I'll put a link to a couple
01:07:54
◼
►
of these reviews in there, but there was a strong consensus
01:07:56
◼
►
among everybody that the Google Home Max,
01:07:59
◼
►
which is their $399 dingus, which is the,
01:08:03
◼
►
you know, $50 more than the HomePod,
01:08:06
◼
►
so clearly, you know, fair comparison,
01:08:09
◼
►
is way too base heavy, you know,
01:08:12
◼
►
which some people like, but it's like one of those things
01:08:15
◼
►
that's like the TVs in the store being oversaturated
01:08:20
◼
►
because you're in there looking at 17 different TVs
01:08:24
◼
►
and the ones with the saturated colors look like,
01:08:27
◼
►
wow, that one has, that other one looks bland.
01:08:30
◼
►
This one has pop, I want the one with pop.
01:08:32
◼
►
But you would never, it's like inaccurate.
01:08:35
◼
►
You'd never really wanna tune your TV that way.
01:08:37
◼
►
It's, you know.
01:08:38
◼
►
And I think it's also similar to the way
01:08:43
◼
►
that Apple has calibrated its screens forever,
01:08:48
◼
►
but especially like in the iPhone era,
01:08:51
◼
►
where Apple, one of the reasons that they were
01:08:53
◼
►
one of the last, if not the last major phone company
01:08:57
◼
►
to put out a phone with an OLED display
01:09:00
◼
►
was that in the early days of OLED,
01:09:02
◼
►
while there are some advantages to battery life
01:09:04
◼
►
and certainly all along batteries
01:09:06
◼
►
or advantages to the richer blacks,
01:09:08
◼
►
color accuracy was really, really hard
01:09:12
◼
►
and really has only come in the last few years.
01:09:14
◼
►
And even though once it came on other phones,
01:09:16
◼
►
it still couldn't come in the quantities Apple needed.
01:09:19
◼
►
Like Apple was never gonna ship an OLED phone
01:09:22
◼
►
until they could ship it in the quantities they needed
01:09:25
◼
►
and with the color accuracy that they wanted.
01:09:28
◼
►
And one thing, I'm picky about color.
01:09:31
◼
►
I really, I've always been very picky about color.
01:09:34
◼
►
And the one thing I've noticed with the iPhone 10
01:09:36
◼
►
now that I've had it for months,
01:09:37
◼
►
is even when I see it side by side with anybody else
01:09:40
◼
►
who has like an iPhone 8 or a 7 or any other recent iPhone,
01:09:43
◼
►
is the one thing I don't notice
01:09:44
◼
►
is I don't notice any difference in color.
01:09:46
◼
►
I really don't.
01:09:47
◼
►
And I feel like that is exactly what they've done with sound
01:09:51
◼
►
on the HomePod,
01:09:52
◼
►
where they're being very, very fair to the original.
01:09:55
◼
►
They're not pumping up the bass.
01:09:56
◼
►
They're not doing other,
01:09:58
◼
►
like the audio equivalent of sugar sweetening the audio.
01:10:02
◼
►
- Right, tweaking it to make it sound supposedly better,
01:10:05
◼
►
but bastardizing it a little bit.
01:10:08
◼
►
I would say that that's very fair.
01:10:10
◼
►
I think the other thing that I got out of this,
01:10:15
◼
►
I feel like there's three factors in the decision
01:10:18
◼
►
of does somebody want a HomePod.
01:10:20
◼
►
One is do you care enough about,
01:10:22
◼
►
do you have a place in your life where a $350 speaker
01:10:26
◼
►
that sounds really good makes sense?
01:10:29
◼
►
And for some people that might be nowhere.
01:10:33
◼
►
You might not have a room in your house or an office
01:10:36
◼
►
where you can do that.
01:10:37
◼
►
if you work in a cubicle or something like that.
01:10:39
◼
►
I don't think your cubicle mates are gonna appreciate it
01:10:42
◼
►
if you set up a home pot.
01:10:44
◼
►
- But it's gonna sound great.
01:10:47
◼
►
- Right, and there might be people out there
01:10:49
◼
►
who like hear the $89 Amazon Alexa play music
01:10:54
◼
►
and say that's good enough for me.
01:10:57
◼
►
And why in the world would I spend four times more
01:10:59
◼
►
on this other thing?
01:11:01
◼
►
So that's one factor.
01:11:02
◼
►
Do you have a spot in your life
01:11:03
◼
►
where you're willing to spend $3.50 for audio
01:11:06
◼
►
that you would appreciate.
01:11:08
◼
►
Two is the issue of where do you,
01:11:13
◼
►
where does your music come from?
01:11:15
◼
►
You know, if your music, if you're heavily into Spotify,
01:11:18
◼
►
and Spotify keeps coming up over and over and over again
01:11:20
◼
►
in all these reviews,
01:11:21
◼
►
because some of these other products support Spotify
01:11:25
◼
►
as a first class like source of talking to the device
01:11:29
◼
►
to play music from Spotify, and HomePod doesn't.
01:11:36
◼
►
there's no way you want HomePod, in my opinion.
01:11:38
◼
►
If you're heavily into Spotify and you don't wanna leave,
01:11:40
◼
►
then I really can't see why you'd want to switch to HomePod,
01:11:45
◼
►
even if the sound is a little better.
01:11:48
◼
►
- And conversely, if you are on the opposite,
01:11:50
◼
►
if you're heavily into the Apple Music ecosystem,
01:11:53
◼
►
lowercase m, 'cause I'll include in that
01:11:57
◼
►
the Apple Music, capital M, subscription service,
01:12:02
◼
►
iTunes Music Store, any purchases that you've ever made,
01:12:06
◼
►
or see any music that you own in your personal library,
01:12:11
◼
►
if you have iTunes Match or Apple Music,
01:12:14
◼
►
they'll sync to the cloud,
01:12:16
◼
►
and then you can talk to your HomePod
01:12:19
◼
►
and have it play those.
01:12:20
◼
►
And in fact, that's most of the music testing
01:12:22
◼
►
I did this week, 'cause I was so interested in that,
01:12:24
◼
►
is I had it play a bunch of Rolling Stones albums I have
01:12:28
◼
►
that are not and have never been available
01:12:30
◼
►
from the iTunes Store.
01:12:31
◼
►
And it worked great
01:12:33
◼
►
So if you're into the Apple system
01:12:36
◼
►
Yeah, and you could just say and it's funny it got smarter - I have an album
01:12:42
◼
►
I think it's a 1973 live recording called the Brussels affair recorded in Brussels
01:12:48
◼
►
One of my all-time favorite Rolling Stones albums and the first time I asked the home pod to play the Rolling Stones Brussels affair
01:12:56
◼
►
I think that's what I asked for play the Rolling Stones Brussels affair
01:13:00
◼
►
HomePod told me that it couldn't find any music
01:13:02
◼
►
Brussels affair and I thought damn that's this sinking I thought the damn sinking feature wasn't working
01:13:10
◼
►
So I thought about it and I looked in my library and the actual file name I have on the album is Brussels affair
01:13:21
◼
►
1973 so I said I asked the HomePod to play Brussels play Brussels affair live
01:13:28
◼
►
1973 and it said okay. Here's the Rolling Stones Brussels affair live
01:13:32
◼
►
1973 and it just started playing
01:13:35
◼
►
That's a little bit of a pain in ass, but that's okay. But then like the next day I said
01:13:39
◼
►
Hey play the Brussels affair and it said okay. Here's the Rolling Stones Brussels affair and then it it worked now
01:13:47
◼
►
I don't know if it learned I don't know if it just needed to sink
01:13:50
◼
►
You know if I asked it the first time before it was done sinking
01:13:54
◼
►
I don't know what happened.
01:13:55
◼
►
You know, and that's one of the things
01:13:57
◼
►
about these talking dinguses,
01:13:59
◼
►
is you never know why it works one day
01:14:01
◼
►
and doesn't work the other day.
01:14:03
◼
►
- Well, so can I pick this bone that I have with you
01:14:08
◼
►
about the HomePod? - Yeah, absolutely.
01:14:09
◼
►
Well, before we do that, let's save that.
01:14:10
◼
►
Let's save that.
01:14:11
◼
►
And I did wanna mention,
01:14:13
◼
►
I wanted to mention one review in particular
01:14:15
◼
►
that I thought was kinda crappy,
01:14:16
◼
►
was Brian Chen's review for the New York Times.
01:14:19
◼
►
Because I feel like all the other reviews,
01:14:22
◼
►
I largely agree, even if I didn't agree completely,
01:14:24
◼
►
I thought they were all pretty accurate.
01:14:26
◼
►
And I thought Chen's review for the New York Times
01:14:28
◼
►
was way out of line because it was sort of like
01:14:31
◼
►
it started with him talking about using it
01:14:33
◼
►
to listen to music.
01:14:34
◼
►
And he said, "Hey, play some music."
01:14:37
◼
►
And it played music he didn't like,
01:14:38
◼
►
and he tried to get it to stop.
01:14:40
◼
►
And instead of stopping, it said it didn't recognize
01:14:43
◼
►
whatever artist he's complaining about's album, Stop,
01:14:46
◼
►
or something like that.
01:14:49
◼
►
And then he kind of went right to like a 14 point comparison
01:14:53
◼
►
of trying to get these, you know,
01:14:55
◼
►
multiple of these devices to do assistant type things,
01:15:00
◼
►
like create calendar events and stuff like that.
01:15:04
◼
►
And creating calendar events
01:15:06
◼
►
is something HomePod doesn't do.
01:15:07
◼
►
Now, I'm not saying it's not fair to mention that,
01:15:09
◼
►
but it's like his whole review was pretty much
01:15:12
◼
►
comparing it.
01:15:15
◼
►
To me, it would be the equivalent of
01:15:19
◼
►
if he wrote a review of the new Amazon Echo
01:15:24
◼
►
and quickly brushed over a bunch of something
01:15:28
◼
►
that Alexa does that does particularly well,
01:15:32
◼
►
and then just skipped right to a 14 point comparison
01:15:35
◼
►
of how good did the speaker sound.
01:15:37
◼
►
Right, and then that's the whole review of,
01:15:40
◼
►
like it's totally fair to mention it,
01:15:44
◼
►
and I think my review and various others,
01:15:48
◼
►
I don't see how you couldn't mention that Siri does less
01:15:52
◼
►
on HomePod than Alexa does on the Echo products
01:15:56
◼
►
and that the Google Voice product, you know,
01:15:59
◼
►
which I feel like needs a name.
01:16:00
◼
►
Like, I don't know what to call it.
01:16:01
◼
►
They call it like the device is Google Home Max,
01:16:04
◼
►
but, and you address it as OK Google,
01:16:07
◼
►
but it's so much--
01:16:09
◼
►
- Right, it doesn't have a personified name behind it.
01:16:11
◼
►
- Right, it's so much easier.
01:16:13
◼
►
It's just a small aside from writing a long review
01:16:15
◼
►
about this is it's so much easier
01:16:17
◼
►
to write about the separation between HomePod and Siri
01:16:21
◼
►
and say the Echo or the Alexa equipped Sonos One hardware
01:16:26
◼
►
and Alexa as the abstract service.
01:16:33
◼
►
I feel like I wish Google would fix that,
01:16:35
◼
►
but I don't, I guess we could just call the service
01:16:39
◼
►
okay Google, I don't know.
01:16:41
◼
►
But anyway, that's an aside.
01:16:43
◼
►
Anyway, I thought Chen's review was sort of
01:16:45
◼
►
deliberately written to make it look bad.
01:16:48
◼
►
I don't see how there was any way
01:16:50
◼
►
that HomePod could come out of his review testing
01:16:52
◼
►
looking good, 'cause he was trying things
01:16:54
◼
►
that he knew in advance it couldn't do.
01:16:57
◼
►
Like, what's the point? - Well, but I mean,
01:16:58
◼
►
is that unfair if those are the things
01:17:01
◼
►
that he wants it to do?
01:17:02
◼
►
I mean, it's not like he went and said,
01:17:04
◼
►
"This car doesn't have any storage space,
01:17:07
◼
►
"so this is a two-seater convertible,
01:17:09
◼
►
"so I'm gonna try and haul two tons of potting soil in it."
01:17:14
◼
►
This is something that I think people who get a device
01:17:17
◼
►
of this type are gonna try and do.
01:17:19
◼
►
And this is, it's something where it certainly is lacking.
01:17:22
◼
►
And Apple definitely wanted to frame this device
01:17:25
◼
►
and I think successfully framed a bunch of the reviews as,
01:17:29
◼
►
you know, there's some shortcomings
01:17:31
◼
►
but the audio quality is great.
01:17:32
◼
►
Or the audio quality is great despite other shortcomings.
01:17:36
◼
►
And his review was definitely,
01:17:38
◼
►
it didn't really talk too much at all
01:17:40
◼
►
about the audio quality said, you know,
01:17:41
◼
►
I listened to some music that didn't work super well.
01:17:43
◼
►
and then Siri itself worked really poorly.
01:17:46
◼
►
Do you think that's about an accurate summary
01:17:48
◼
►
of what he wrote?
01:17:49
◼
►
- Yeah, I think so.
01:17:52
◼
►
I think that's a pretty accurate summary.
01:17:54
◼
►
- So I don't know that,
01:17:56
◼
►
I mean, you're absolutely right.
01:17:57
◼
►
It was definitely one of the harshest reviews of the device,
01:18:01
◼
►
but I don't think that he came at it in a super unfair way.
01:18:04
◼
►
- I wouldn't say super unfair.
01:18:07
◼
►
I would just say a,
01:18:09
◼
►
I just don't think it was helpful.
01:18:13
◼
►
You know what I mean?
01:18:14
◼
►
I don't know.
01:18:15
◼
►
I feel like, I almost feel like the angle he took
01:18:17
◼
►
would be better as a follow-up
01:18:19
◼
►
after reviewing it for what it is,
01:18:21
◼
►
and then having a column of what type of device
01:18:24
◼
►
do you want in your house that talks to you,
01:18:27
◼
►
which is two different things.
01:18:28
◼
►
- Well, I guess to me, it's a question of
01:18:32
◼
►
how similar is this device to the Echo and the HomePod,
01:18:37
◼
►
or sorry, and the Google Home, rather.
01:18:40
◼
►
- Are these really exactly the same type of device,
01:18:43
◼
►
or are we getting down to the nitty gritty and saying,
01:18:45
◼
►
you know what, there's actually virtual assistant devices
01:18:48
◼
►
that happen to play music, and there's music players
01:18:51
◼
►
that happen to have a virtual assistant,
01:18:52
◼
►
and those are two separate things.
01:18:54
◼
►
And I think to most, I would assume
01:18:57
◼
►
to most potential customers, those are the same thing.
01:19:01
◼
►
And it's just a question of which one of those
01:19:04
◼
►
you care about a little bit more, but.
01:19:06
◼
►
- That's a good way to put it.
01:19:07
◼
►
I think that's exactly a good way to put it.
01:19:08
◼
►
And that's how I tried to frame my review.
01:19:11
◼
►
And in fact, I even caught myself at one point
01:19:13
◼
►
where I, in my review, in an early draft of it,
01:19:16
◼
►
I had that the HomePod and Alexa
01:19:19
◼
►
clearly aren't even in the same category.
01:19:21
◼
►
And I realized that the other day,
01:19:23
◼
►
I had written that they are in the same category,
01:19:25
◼
►
but from different perspectives.
01:19:27
◼
►
And so I caught myself and realized,
01:19:31
◼
►
the way I reworded it, and which I think is more accurate,
01:19:33
◼
►
is that they're at opposite ends of the category.
01:19:36
◼
►
Right, 'cause you really, like, right now,
01:19:38
◼
►
we literally have the Alexa and the HomePod
01:19:41
◼
►
in the kitchen at the same time,
01:19:43
◼
►
both, you know, just mostly for testing reasons.
01:19:46
◼
►
Feature wise, because Amy is actually annoyed
01:19:50
◼
►
that the HomePod doesn't have the one thing she,
01:19:52
◼
►
one of the things she really likes about the Echo,
01:19:54
◼
►
which is being able to set multiple timers,
01:19:56
◼
►
which really feels like it's something that Apple could
01:20:01
◼
►
and should fix right away.
01:20:03
◼
►
Like with Alexa, you can say,
01:20:06
◼
►
set a potato timer for 20 minutes,
01:20:09
◼
►
and then like a minute later say,
01:20:11
◼
►
what else might you be cooking with potatoes?
01:20:16
◼
►
- Remind me about the boiling water in 10 minutes
01:20:18
◼
►
or whatever. - Right.
01:20:19
◼
►
And then you can say, Alexa, how much time do I have left
01:20:23
◼
►
on the potato timer?
01:20:24
◼
►
And she will tell you.
01:20:27
◼
►
And on the HomePod, if you set a timer, you can't name it,
01:20:31
◼
►
it's only one timer.
01:20:32
◼
►
And then if you set another timer, Siri will say,
01:20:36
◼
►
you already have a timer with four minutes
01:20:38
◼
►
and 33 seconds remaining, would you like to replace it?
01:20:42
◼
►
Like that's your only option.
01:20:43
◼
►
And that's, you know, pretty sure that iOS
01:20:46
◼
►
is an A8 processor could handle running two timers
01:20:50
◼
►
at the same time.
01:20:51
◼
►
- Well, now I'm trying to think,
01:20:54
◼
►
does the phone let you do multiple times?
01:20:55
◼
►
- No, the phone doesn't either.
01:20:56
◼
►
- I don't think it does, right?
01:20:59
◼
►
So, you know, and you know, it's a feature she uses.
01:21:05
◼
►
It's not a crazy feature.
01:21:06
◼
►
I don't think that's esoteric.
01:21:08
◼
►
And I feel like once you get, I hear this a lot.
01:21:11
◼
►
It's clearly putting these things in a kitchen
01:21:13
◼
►
is very popular and setting timers is hugely popular.
01:21:16
◼
►
And it's just one of those tiny little,
01:21:20
◼
►
once you get used to, just to go back to it,
01:21:25
◼
►
once you get used to indoor plumbing,
01:21:26
◼
►
there's no going back to outdoor plumbing.
01:21:28
◼
►
People have been cooking for thousands of years
01:21:32
◼
►
and they've used various ways of determining
01:21:35
◼
►
how long to cook a thing.
01:21:36
◼
►
But the idea of having to touch a device to set a timer
01:21:43
◼
►
is, once you go to just doing it by voice,
01:21:46
◼
►
it's so, it just seems barbaric.
01:21:49
◼
►
Because a lot of times, if you're in the kitchen cooking,
01:21:52
◼
►
your hands might be covered with stuff,
01:21:54
◼
►
or you might not be near the device,
01:21:56
◼
►
or various reasons.
01:21:59
◼
►
It's just so nice, and it just, you know.
01:22:02
◼
►
So anyway, that's something Apple's got to get on.
01:22:06
◼
►
>> All right, now can I issue with this thing?
01:22:08
◼
►
>> Absolutely.
01:22:10
◼
►
I feel like this is a fantastic discussion.
01:22:12
◼
►
>> All right, so six, no, I guess about eight months ago,
01:22:15
◼
►
the HomePod was announced.
01:22:17
◼
►
And you had a post that I assume you will link to about
01:22:22
◼
►
the HomePod having a touchscreen.
01:22:24
◼
►
And prior to the announcement, there were all the rumors floating around and
01:22:29
◼
►
multiple rumors sites reported that it did not have a touchscreen, unlike the, what is
01:22:36
◼
►
it, the Amazon Echo Show, I think is the one that has a screen.
01:22:39
◼
►
Which you don't hear about much anymore, by the way.
01:22:41
◼
►
In this whole—
01:22:42
◼
►
Yeah, that came out, and I don't know if it's—I don't know anything about that one except that
01:22:46
◼
►
it has a screen and I guess it exists. But so, after this was announced, you said,
01:22:53
◼
►
"Claim Chowder, it does have a touchscreen." And you and I had a discussion about this,
01:22:58
◼
►
and I said, "I don't think that that constitutes a touchscreen." And you stuck to your guns,
01:23:04
◼
►
and you said, "No, you touch it, and I don't know, you can summarize your own position."
01:23:08
◼
►
JS: Well, I don't think it was multiple rumor sites, though. I think it was a Bloomberg report
01:23:13
◼
►
by Mark Gurman and Alex Webb for Bloomberg, and it was, I think, about a week before WWDC,
01:23:19
◼
►
and their exact words are, "Ahead of Apple's launch, the competition has upgraded their
01:23:24
◼
►
speakers with support for making voice calls while Amazon's gained a touch screen.
01:23:31
◼
►
Apple's speaker won't include such a screen according to people who have seen the product.
01:23:37
◼
►
And then Ming-Chi Kuo, two weeks before that, said, "We also believe this new product
01:23:41
◼
►
will come with a touch panel."
01:23:44
◼
►
And then you wrote, "HomePod has a touch screen on top."
01:23:48
◼
►
After seeing it at WWDC.
01:23:51
◼
►
This was, I've posted it Tuesday, so it was like within a day of the keynote.
01:23:57
◼
►
And I was under the impression, now this was, I forget if I'd had my hands on, I don't think
01:24:01
◼
►
I had, I don't think they'd had the briefing yet.
01:24:04
◼
►
Maybe I did though, maybe they did that on Monday.
01:24:06
◼
►
I don't remember when, in addition to the one that they had out there for everybody
01:24:10
◼
►
to walk by, but not touch, we also got invited in like little groups of four to hear it,
01:24:17
◼
►
not touch it and we weren't allowed to speak to it or anything. But I saw the plus and
01:24:25
◼
►
minus buttons that you could touch for volume and I saw the Siri, I'll call it a waveform,
01:24:30
◼
►
but the primary colored circular swirly cloud animation and assumed incorrectly that that
01:24:39
◼
►
that was some sort of, like the equivalent
01:24:44
◼
►
of an iPhone screen showing these things.
01:24:48
◼
►
And that it could, in theory, show other things
01:24:52
◼
►
under other circumstances.
01:24:55
◼
►
And I had no idea how it worked,
01:24:56
◼
►
other than that they said you could touch it
01:24:58
◼
►
to do the plus/minus, but they wouldn't let us touch it,
01:25:00
◼
►
so we couldn't see how it worked.
01:25:04
◼
►
So you think I was wrong?
01:25:08
◼
►
You think I was wrong?
01:25:09
◼
►
- I'm not saying you're wrong on this.
01:25:10
◼
►
- It does not, I would say I am wrong.
01:25:13
◼
►
'Cause I would not call the thing on top of HomePod
01:25:15
◼
►
a touchscreen.
01:25:16
◼
►
What Ming-Chi Kuo called it a touch panel
01:25:19
◼
►
is probably better.
01:25:20
◼
►
It's weird what to call it because it is,
01:25:23
◼
►
it doesn't show arbitrary pixels.
01:25:27
◼
►
I'm kind of curious for iFixit to get,
01:25:29
◼
►
more curious than for most products,
01:25:31
◼
►
just to have iFixit take this apart
01:25:33
◼
►
because I'm curious what the hell is under there
01:25:36
◼
►
to make the waveform.
01:25:38
◼
►
But what we've since heard from various birdies,
01:25:42
◼
►
not me directly, I think ATP might've had a birdie
01:25:44
◼
►
who said it, is that there's some kind of color LCDs
01:25:48
◼
►
under there, but it's more like, I don't know,
01:25:52
◼
►
like light bright type things, you know,
01:25:54
◼
►
like not pixels that could display anything that,
01:25:56
◼
►
you know, like text.
01:25:57
◼
►
Anything arbitrary, right.
01:25:58
◼
►
Or arbitrary information, but it's really only meant
01:26:00
◼
►
to create that Siri multicolored animation
01:26:04
◼
►
and then some kind of diffuser that makes it look blurry.
01:26:10
◼
►
- And like the plus and minus buttons are, I believe,
01:26:13
◼
►
just completely hard, you know,
01:26:14
◼
►
they're just old fashioned buttons that are, you know,
01:26:18
◼
►
there's nothing else that--
01:26:19
◼
►
- Pressed in plastic or whatever.
01:26:20
◼
►
- Right, they're not arbitrary pixels,
01:26:22
◼
►
they're just, you know, plus and minus.
01:26:24
◼
►
- So I looked this up, and Apple refers to it,
01:26:29
◼
►
you can go to their tech specs,
01:26:30
◼
►
and they call it the touch surface,
01:26:33
◼
►
which I guess would apply to pretty much anything you can touch.
01:26:37
◼
►
But it's definitely not -- they don't refer to it as a touch screen,
01:26:42
◼
►
because like you said, I think that to me, I guess, is the definition,
01:26:45
◼
►
is that it can't display an arbitrary image.
01:26:50
◼
►
And that to me is what a touch screen can do.
01:26:53
◼
►
A touch screen ATM can display whatever you put on it.
01:26:56
◼
►
Your phone obviously can display whatever you draw to it.
01:26:59
◼
►
>> Touch surface. I guess that's fair.
01:27:02
◼
►
So, touch panel sounds pretty much right to me as well.
01:27:04
◼
►
That seems like a pretty good name for it.
01:27:06
◼
►
Touch surface just sounds sort of meaningless, but that is the term that they're using.
01:27:12
◼
►
Yeah, I think I was wrong.
01:27:14
◼
►
I don't think German and Webb were right, though.
01:27:16
◼
►
I don't think saying it doesn't include such a screen is right either,
01:27:18
◼
►
because you can't -- there is a touch thing that they didn't mention.
01:27:23
◼
►
Well, so the only thing that -- there, I think there --
01:27:27
◼
►
I think it was poor writing, if anything.
01:27:28
◼
►
They're saying the Amazon device has a true screen that displays the weather and whatever,
01:27:34
◼
►
and the HomePod obviously does not have that. And if you just showed them side by side and said,
01:27:40
◼
►
"This one has a screen and this one doesn't," you'd say, "Yeah, that's right." But because
01:27:44
◼
►
they're writing about things that they didn't have images of and, I think, like I said, didn't
01:27:49
◼
►
necessarily express it properly, then yeah, I think you're right that it was not necessarily
01:27:54
◼
►
written the way that it should have been. - Right, you read it again, and it sounds to me
01:27:57
◼
►
like they weren't told by someone what the HomePod does present to you, a Siri waveform
01:28:04
◼
►
and plus and minus volume buttons, but they were told that it doesn't present to you a
01:28:10
◼
►
what the Amazon device does.
01:28:12
◼
►
Well, I just kicked Syrian somehow. Sorry about that. Sorry, Siri. Here's a weird thing
01:28:21
◼
►
with the HomePod that I forgot to mention in my review. Could it happen to me today?
01:28:27
◼
►
which is really why I forgot to write.
01:28:29
◼
►
I'd noticed it before, but if you don't touch your HomePod
01:28:32
◼
►
or use it in like a day, like let's say,
01:28:35
◼
►
I was using it yesterday and I went to bed
01:28:38
◼
►
and then I woke up today and did some work
01:28:41
◼
►
and then I went out and then I record a podcast
01:28:44
◼
►
and it's been like 18 hours since I've used the thing
01:28:46
◼
►
and I go in there and if I just touch the top,
01:28:49
◼
►
it'll just start playing whatever I left off on
01:28:52
◼
►
like a day ago.
01:28:53
◼
►
- 18 hours later.
01:28:54
◼
►
- Right, and it, you know, and like, I've run into it,
01:28:58
◼
►
and I mentioned in my review that the,
01:28:59
◼
►
at least on the Space Gray run,
01:29:01
◼
►
the touch surface is a fingerprint magnet,
01:29:04
◼
►
and I kind of wish it was either matte finished
01:29:06
◼
►
or had a better oleophobic coating.
01:29:08
◼
►
It's, I've run into it where I look at it
01:29:10
◼
►
and it looks like smudgy, and I wanna just,
01:29:12
◼
►
I kinda wipe it off, and I just go to wipe it off,
01:29:15
◼
►
and it just starts playing music real loud.
01:29:17
◼
►
It doesn't seem,
01:29:19
◼
►
I don't know, it doesn't seem to me like it should,
01:29:22
◼
►
It seems like that's, I could see where it would like wake up
01:29:25
◼
►
and maybe, maybe, you know, Siri should say hello to you
01:29:29
◼
►
or something, if it hasn't been playing for,
01:29:33
◼
►
I don't know what the threshold is,
01:29:34
◼
►
but there's some threshold in ours
01:29:36
◼
►
where if it hasn't been playing music,
01:29:39
◼
►
I feel like just touching it should just sort of wake it up.
01:29:42
◼
►
I'm not quite sure what wake it up means,
01:29:44
◼
►
but I, you know, more or less the prompt you get
01:29:47
◼
►
when you just hold the side button on the phone.
01:29:50
◼
►
- Right, yeah.
01:29:51
◼
►
think it should just start playing. When it is playing, of course, tapping it to pause it is
01:29:56
◼
►
fantastic. It makes all the sense in the world. But just randomly starting to play when you touch it
01:30:02
◼
►
is surprising.
01:30:04
◼
►
>> Well, I'm interested to get it. I'm interested to fiddle with it. I don't know if it's gonna be
01:30:11
◼
►
something that I wind up using or if it's something that I test with, and then that's sort of the end
01:30:15
◼
►
of it. But like I said, I'm definitely interested to see longer term whether this is something that
01:30:20
◼
►
you know, do you think, how about that?
01:30:22
◼
►
Do you think they have a HomePod 2 in development already
01:30:26
◼
►
with, I don't even know what features we think it would have
01:30:29
◼
►
but you know, do they, do you think they have a
01:30:31
◼
►
chain of these or is it something like the iPod HiFi
01:30:34
◼
►
where they made one and that was it?
01:30:36
◼
►
- I think it's more like Apple TV.
01:30:38
◼
►
And Apple TV had, at least in its current incarnation
01:30:43
◼
►
since it went to like a, you know, a TV OS
01:30:45
◼
►
with an app store, it had a very obvious
01:30:48
◼
►
next generation model with support for 4K.
01:30:51
◼
►
I know there are other changes too,
01:30:54
◼
►
but just specifically going, supporting 4K
01:30:57
◼
►
was an obvious need and there's no such thing in audio.
01:31:01
◼
►
Right, like, so I wouldn't be,
01:31:03
◼
►
I think this is sort of like Apple TV
01:31:06
◼
►
without even the obvious 4K upgrade
01:31:08
◼
►
and anything that's improved on this
01:31:11
◼
►
is all going to come on the software side
01:31:14
◼
►
in terms of either some kind of SDK
01:31:17
◼
►
so that other services like Spotify can be addressed directly by talking to the device,
01:31:25
◼
►
and so that apps, like things like podcast players, like Overcast and Castro, can be
01:31:33
◼
►
addressed by talking to the device without having your phone nearby, you know?
01:31:39
◼
►
Or even if it's only with your phone nearby, but some way where you can just talk to it.
01:31:44
◼
►
>> Well, so I guess the only -- so thinking about the hardware,
01:31:47
◼
►
the only obvious thing that you could do to change it would be what we were just talking about is
01:31:51
◼
►
having some sort of display screen on it, which given what you said about the Echo Show not --
01:31:58
◼
►
well, I guess we don't really know. We have no idea how well that's sold or anything,
01:32:00
◼
►
but it certainly has not been in the forefront when you're talking about the Echo. It doesn't
01:32:05
◼
►
necessarily seem like that would be the obvious thing to do with this. So, yeah, it definitely
01:32:09
◼
►
does seem like software is where this will get upgraded. So, that's, yeah, I don't know.
01:32:14
◼
►
The whole thing is interesting to me because they've been talking, they've said that they've
01:32:18
◼
►
been working on this for half a decade. And so, it's very much not, oh, we got to play catch up
01:32:24
◼
►
with a virtual assistant. It seems more like, oh, we have this thing and we can, you know, add a
01:32:29
◼
►
virtual assistant to it. So, we'll do that. That makes sense. But they didn't necessarily want to
01:32:35
◼
►
enter that virtual assistant market as much as they wanted to have a high quality speaker.
01:32:39
◼
►
Yeah. You know, and it's, you know, a lot of people, people who are already invested in
01:32:44
◼
►
Spotify are very, very down on the thing. And I don't blame them if you really are.
01:32:48
◼
►
And talking to a couple of, I'm not, I have like a free Spotify account that I only use for poking
01:32:53
◼
►
around on it. But talking to various friends over the last week or two, some of them are really into
01:32:59
◼
►
Spotify. It sounds like Spotify has some fantastic features, some really interesting features in
01:33:05
◼
►
terms of not telling Spotify to play, you know, having something specific to play in mind, but
01:33:11
◼
►
being able to tell Spotify what you're in the mood for and based on your previous preferences,
01:33:17
◼
►
it's like getting a radio station that is just perfect for you and it plays things that you-
01:33:22
◼
►
Well, it's what Pandora, you know, claimed to do a decade ago and is still around and still trying
01:33:27
◼
►
to do. But yeah, it seems like Spotify has gotten the intelligence of music recommendations pretty
01:33:33
◼
►
well done at this point. Right. I guess the two main things are playing things that you do like
01:33:38
◼
►
but weren't in your mind to ask for and like, "Oh, I love this song," and be exposing you to
01:33:44
◼
►
new music that you might like. Whereas if you only ever ask for what you like or what you already know
01:33:51
◼
►
that you want to listen to right now, it's very different. And I'm not saying that that's how
01:33:55
◼
►
HomePod works, I mean, although that's how mostly how I tested it.
01:34:00
◼
►
You know, and a big factor in that, though, is the limit the current limitation of HomePod
01:34:06
◼
►
only being tied to one iCloud account, which, you know, I spent a fair amount of time on
01:34:11
◼
►
And it's I understand it, especially for a 1.0.
01:34:13
◼
►
But it's, it certainly is obvious to me that the way this product should work is that,
01:34:22
◼
►
at least in the size of a typical household
01:34:24
◼
►
with two, three, five people,
01:34:29
◼
►
it should be able to have five people's iCloud music accounts
01:34:34
◼
►
and identify them by voice.
01:34:38
◼
►
And the competing products, and you say,
01:34:40
◼
►
well, this isn't science fiction,
01:34:43
◼
►
but the other products already do this.
01:34:45
◼
►
The Google products can identify people by voice
01:34:48
◼
►
and the Amazon, and tie them to different Google accounts.
01:34:52
◼
►
So like with the Google products,
01:34:55
◼
►
you can tell it to add an event to your calendar,
01:34:58
◼
►
and it adds it to your Google calendar,
01:35:00
◼
►
'cause it both recognizes your voice
01:35:02
◼
►
and knows which Google account is yours,
01:35:05
◼
►
and then I can ask it to add event to my calendar,
01:35:07
◼
►
and it knows my voice and can add it to my calendar.
01:35:10
◼
►
So it's not like me saying that the HomePod should do this
01:35:15
◼
►
is asking for something outlandish,
01:35:16
◼
►
it's something that competing products do.
01:35:19
◼
►
And for building up--
01:35:19
◼
►
- Are there any Apple devices besides the Mac
01:35:23
◼
►
that do profiles?
01:35:25
◼
►
- No, I don't think so.
01:35:26
◼
►
- Like your phone obviously doesn't,
01:35:28
◼
►
your phone that makes a decent amount of sense,
01:35:30
◼
►
that's your device,
01:35:31
◼
►
even if you have kids or something like that.
01:35:32
◼
►
iPads are one that people have been,
01:35:35
◼
►
I think clamoring for for years to have profiles on.
01:35:37
◼
►
- Right from the beginning.
01:35:38
◼
►
I remember people saying,
01:35:39
◼
►
this would be fantastic in school,
01:35:40
◼
►
but why can't I have profiles?
01:35:43
◼
►
Apple TV is one where individual apps
01:35:47
◼
►
definitely have profiles.
01:35:48
◼
►
You know, if you load up Netflix,
01:35:49
◼
►
it'll ask you who's watching,
01:35:51
◼
►
but there's not an overarching profile
01:35:54
◼
►
where you can just say, okay, now Paul's watching,
01:35:56
◼
►
now John's watching, and just show me my apps
01:35:58
◼
►
or show me my recommendations or whatever.
01:36:02
◼
►
It seems like something that they don't do currently,
01:36:05
◼
►
besides on the Mac, obviously.
01:36:06
◼
►
- Yeah, it seems like a blind spot for the company.
01:36:08
◼
►
I thought about that as an angle for the review,
01:36:10
◼
►
that they're so, you know, their roots as a quote unquote
01:36:15
◼
►
personal computer company really still show through
01:36:20
◼
►
to today, right?
01:36:21
◼
►
And like with a watch, it makes all the sense in the world.
01:36:24
◼
►
You know? - Right.
01:36:25
◼
►
- But with the TV, it makes no sense.
01:36:28
◼
►
And even with the way that they've changed their TV app
01:36:32
◼
►
in the last year to make it, try to make it like your hub
01:36:35
◼
►
for watching stuff. - Right, exactly.
01:36:37
◼
►
- From multiple sources, like pick up on this show
01:36:40
◼
►
you were watching on Hulu or pick up on this other show
01:36:45
◼
►
that you're watching on Amazon Prime
01:36:47
◼
►
or watch this new movie release from iTunes.
01:36:52
◼
►
It's like it's based on the aggregate viewing
01:36:55
◼
►
of everybody in your house, not on you,
01:36:57
◼
►
which really doesn't make a lot of sense.
01:36:59
◼
►
- Doesn't make any sense, yeah.
01:37:01
◼
►
And now I'm trying to remember, OS 9 and earlier,
01:37:04
◼
►
did that not have users?
01:37:06
◼
►
- No, definitely did not.
01:37:08
◼
►
- There might have been some kind of weird,
01:37:11
◼
►
cheaty move towards the end that was like in a,
01:37:16
◼
►
I wish Syracuse were here, but it was,
01:37:18
◼
►
there might have been-- - That's what I'm trying to,
01:37:19
◼
►
I'm trying to go back in time 20 years at this point,
01:37:22
◼
►
but LS-10 is clearly where,
01:37:24
◼
►
that's definitely built around individual users
01:37:27
◼
►
and you have a home folder
01:37:28
◼
►
and you can have 10 home folders on your computer
01:37:31
◼
►
if you have 10 people in your house
01:37:32
◼
►
and everybody can use the same computer.
01:37:33
◼
►
- And everybody can be equal.
01:37:35
◼
►
You can even make everybody an admin.
01:37:37
◼
►
It's not-- - An admin on it, exactly.
01:37:39
◼
►
- You can't, you're not even limited to,
01:37:41
◼
►
well, one person can be the admin
01:37:43
◼
►
and everybody else can be a non-admin user.
01:37:45
◼
►
You can even grant admin privileges to everybody in the house
01:37:48
◼
►
if you want and trust them with the computer.
01:37:50
◼
►
And the non-admin users aren't really limited
01:37:55
◼
►
from what they can do other than modifying
01:37:57
◼
►
the system software and installing apps and stuff like that.
01:38:01
◼
►
- Right, whereas the TV-- - It truly is--
01:38:02
◼
►
- Like you said, that's the big one to me,
01:38:04
◼
►
that the TV and the iPad,
01:38:06
◼
►
where these sorts of things make perfect sense,
01:38:08
◼
►
but I think you're right, it's not in their DNA
01:38:11
◼
►
as a personal computing company,
01:38:12
◼
►
and I think in OS X it sort of happened almost incidentally
01:38:15
◼
►
because they built it on Unix.
01:38:17
◼
►
- Yeah, and Netflix has a great interface for it.
01:38:20
◼
►
Netflix, I'm not even quite sure what their algorithm is,
01:38:23
◼
►
but their algorithm seems to be,
01:38:25
◼
►
if you haven't fired up Netflix,
01:38:28
◼
►
if you've, you know, we've got three family members
01:38:29
◼
►
on one Netflix account, and you know,
01:38:32
◼
►
you fire up the Apple TV
01:38:33
◼
►
and you haven't watched Netflix in a while,
01:38:35
◼
►
it'll say who's watching, and there's the three of us,
01:38:38
◼
►
and you pick who it is, and then it shows stuff
01:38:40
◼
►
based on what you've watched before.
01:38:42
◼
►
And it seems like if you have watched recently,
01:38:46
◼
►
it just assumes that you're the person
01:38:48
◼
►
who was watching recently, but if you want to,
01:38:50
◼
►
you can go back and manually change it to the other person.
01:38:55
◼
►
- Right, if you dip out of it to go back to the home screen,
01:38:57
◼
►
it doesn't immediately ask you who it is again.
01:39:00
◼
►
- But after, yeah, you're right, I don't know
01:39:02
◼
►
what the time is, because I've never thought about it,
01:39:04
◼
►
because it's always just worked the way I expected it to.
01:39:07
◼
►
- Oh my God, it was like a year ago,
01:39:09
◼
►
I had to sit Jonas down and say,
01:39:11
◼
►
you know what, don't be lazy,
01:39:13
◼
►
you've gotta switch this goddamn thing.
01:39:14
◼
►
'Cause my Netflix thing is--
01:39:16
◼
►
- Oh, you're getting the worst recommendations
01:39:17
◼
►
in the world, right?
01:39:18
◼
►
- It was filled up with 30 seasons of Friends.
01:39:24
◼
►
- I think Amy told me this, like Friends got big
01:39:27
◼
►
with the middle school crowd last year.
01:39:29
◼
►
- Yeah, like last year--
01:39:30
◼
►
- I don't understand.
01:39:31
◼
►
- It was like a nationwide craze.
01:39:33
◼
►
Jonas watched the entire series of Friends
01:39:36
◼
►
from first episode to last twice.
01:39:38
◼
►
But he did like the first season of it,
01:39:42
◼
►
or first year of it, or first run through the whole thing
01:39:44
◼
►
on my Netflix account, which I honestly have no interest
01:39:48
◼
►
in rewatching Friends, and it really,
01:39:52
◼
►
he watched a couple other stupid things too,
01:39:54
◼
►
and it was all, he understood it, that's the worst part,
01:39:56
◼
►
he totally understood it.
01:39:57
◼
►
He just didn't feel like going back, you know, one level.
01:40:00
◼
►
- Two clicks to get back to his profile.
01:40:02
◼
►
- Son of a bitch.
01:40:03
◼
►
Kids are angry.
01:40:06
◼
►
Hey, let me take a break here
01:40:07
◼
►
and thank our third and final sponsor of the show.
01:40:09
◼
►
It's our good friends at Fracture.
01:40:11
◼
►
Fracture is a company that you send them your photos,
01:40:15
◼
►
they print them directly on glass.
01:40:18
◼
►
And they do this, each one is handmade with love and care
01:40:22
◼
►
in Gainesville, Florida from US Source Materials.
01:40:24
◼
►
And let me tell you something,
01:40:26
◼
►
I've said this back in November,
01:40:27
◼
►
said it I think in early December, but certainly November,
01:40:30
◼
►
These things make incredibly thoughtful, unique gifts.
01:40:33
◼
►
It's win, win, win, because you get,
01:40:37
◼
►
you get an easy place to go to buy the gift.
01:40:44
◼
►
The person you give it to, your friend, your family,
01:40:47
◼
►
who you give it to, gets a very thoughtful gift
01:40:49
◼
►
that's much more personal than anything
01:40:52
◼
►
you could just buy out of a store,
01:40:54
◼
►
and they'll appreciate it.
01:40:55
◼
►
I'm telling you, people love getting these things.
01:40:57
◼
►
And then the best part about it is,
01:41:00
◼
►
is you can just keep going back to the well
01:41:02
◼
►
and giving them as gifts again and again and again.
01:41:04
◼
►
Like I've said before, the worst thing about when you,
01:41:06
◼
►
if you're a bad gift giver like I am,
01:41:08
◼
►
and you finally give somebody who you really care
01:41:10
◼
►
about a gift that they're like, and that they tear up,
01:41:13
◼
►
and they're like, this is fantastic, thank you so much.
01:41:15
◼
►
Well, now you've gotta top it, right?
01:41:17
◼
►
And you can't, if it's like a store bought item,
01:41:19
◼
►
you can't just go and buy 'em the same thing again.
01:41:21
◼
►
Fracture prints, when you buy 'em as gifts,
01:41:23
◼
►
you can just keep going back and giving 'em again
01:41:25
◼
►
and again and again.
01:41:26
◼
►
Like if you've got kids you can take pictures of,
01:41:28
◼
►
or dogs, or if you go on a vacation
01:41:32
◼
►
with certain family members every year,
01:41:33
◼
►
just find a couple of good photos from the annual trip
01:41:36
◼
►
and make a fracture every Mother's Day
01:41:38
◼
►
or whatever holiday is coming up.
01:41:40
◼
►
You can keep going back to the well again and again
01:41:43
◼
►
and people don't, they don't think twice about it.
01:41:45
◼
►
It really is fantastic as a gift.
01:41:47
◼
►
I can't emphasize that.
01:41:49
◼
►
It's also great for filling your own home
01:41:51
◼
►
with pictures from your life.
01:41:54
◼
►
It really is, I can't say enough.
01:41:56
◼
►
And as our cameras get on our phones,
01:41:58
◼
►
especially get better and better.
01:41:59
◼
►
It's like you've got all of these fantastic photos
01:42:02
◼
►
and all you ever do is look at 'em on a five inch screen.
01:42:06
◼
►
It's almost unbelievable how good
01:42:10
◼
►
a modern iPhone picture looks when it's blown up
01:42:13
◼
►
to 18 inches or even bigger.
01:42:15
◼
►
It really does work.
01:42:17
◼
►
It's kinda crazy that we just look at 'em
01:42:19
◼
►
and flick at 'em at these little tiny
01:42:21
◼
►
index card sized screens.
01:42:23
◼
►
It's kinda stunning how good they look big.
01:42:27
◼
►
You can fill up all the walls in your house with these things.
01:42:30
◼
►
Really a great product.
01:42:31
◼
►
It comes, it's just a piece of glass.
01:42:33
◼
►
The picture is printed right on it, edge to edge, and everything you need to hang it up
01:42:37
◼
►
or display it comes in the box.
01:42:39
◼
►
They even include the wall hanger.
01:42:42
◼
►
It's a green company operating a carbon neutral factory.
01:42:46
◼
►
Visit fracture.me.
01:42:49
◼
►
fracture.me is their website.
01:42:50
◼
►
and save 15% on your first Fracture order
01:42:53
◼
►
with the exclusive code TALK15, T-A-L-K, for the talk show,
01:42:58
◼
►
15 for the 15% off you'll save.
01:43:01
◼
►
So don't forget to mention this podcast, The Talk Show,
01:43:04
◼
►
in their one question,
01:43:05
◼
►
where did you hear about Fracture from survey.
01:43:08
◼
►
It helps support the show and it helps them know
01:43:10
◼
►
that their advertising money is being put to good use.
01:43:13
◼
►
So my thanks to Fracture for their continued support
01:43:16
◼
►
of the talk show.
01:43:20
◼
►
sent some fractures to us, I believe. Isn't that true?
01:43:23
◼
►
I was just thinking about that. Amy and I did an episode of Just the Tip that revolved around
01:43:29
◼
►
what we called the fracture swap. And I was wondering where those are. I sent, I believe,
01:43:35
◼
►
basically, Fracture sponsored the show and they gave us basically like a credit to send
01:43:42
◼
►
photos to one another. And she sent me one large photo and I sent her, I think, about five different
01:43:49
◼
►
ridiculous photos that then we spent half an hour laughing about. But I was wondering where those
01:43:53
◼
►
photos are now. There's one of Danny DeVito's naked ass that should be hung in a prized place
01:43:59
◼
►
in your house. I'm they might be packed up, Paul. I bet they didn't make it through the move. That's
01:44:07
◼
►
my guess. And I'm hurt by it. But I understand. I believe one of them was Pete Rose, right? The
01:44:12
◼
►
all time hit came. Absolutely. Yeah. I'll include that one in the show notes. That was a good one.
01:44:18
◼
►
Pete Rose underwear model.
01:44:19
◼
►
He's a handsome man.
01:44:23
◼
►
I saw Pete Rose a couple weeks ago. I was in Vegas.
01:44:25
◼
►
How's he doing?
01:44:27
◼
►
Well, he's still signing autographs.
01:44:29
◼
►
And what's that go for? About 50 bucks a pop?
01:44:34
◼
►
I think so. It might be up to 100 depending on what you want him to sign. I think it might
01:44:38
◼
►
be a sign baseball. It might be 100 bucks. Very strange. Speaking of sports, we had the
01:44:47
◼
►
Super Bowl this last weekend. Did you watch the Super Bowl?
01:44:52
◼
►
Michael Scott I did watch the Super Bowl. I'm in Boston.
01:44:56
◼
►
And so, you know, it's certainly fairly mandatory to watch the Super Bowl when
01:45:00
◼
►
the local team is in it.
01:45:02
◼
►
Trenton Larkin I was out in Vegas for the Super Bowl,
01:45:05
◼
►
which I've done for the last few years. I don't know if you can hear it, my voice. I'm a little
01:45:09
◼
►
hoarse still. Do you hear it? Do I sound a little hoarse?
01:45:13
◼
►
Michael Scott You sound like you've had a weekend in Vegas.
01:45:16
◼
►
- It's a bad combination because it's dry desert air
01:45:21
◼
►
and it's really the last place I go in the world
01:45:28
◼
►
where people are still allowed to smoke cigarettes
01:45:32
◼
►
I personally do not smoke.
01:45:34
◼
►
I've never really smoked.
01:45:35
◼
►
But there's a lot of,
01:45:39
◼
►
you effectively pick up a cigarette habit.
01:45:44
◼
►
So I don't know how much of it to blame
01:45:46
◼
►
on the Dry Desert Air, I don't know how much to blame
01:45:49
◼
►
on the ambient cigarette smoke,
01:45:51
◼
►
and I don't know how much to blame on yelling and screaming
01:45:54
◼
►
during the game, but it was pretty wild.
01:45:58
◼
►
It was really-- - It was a good game.
01:46:00
◼
►
- I would honestly, in hindsight though, as time goes on,
01:46:02
◼
►
you end an exciting game, you know, like,
01:46:06
◼
►
you know, last year's game had a very exciting finish,
01:46:08
◼
►
and it had sort of a stunning fourth quarter,
01:46:10
◼
►
and you come out of it thinking,
01:46:11
◼
►
"My God, that was an extraordinary game."
01:46:14
◼
►
And then as the time settles on you,
01:46:16
◼
►
it settles in and you're like,
01:46:18
◼
►
well it was certainly an extraordinary fourth quarter,
01:46:21
◼
►
but it wasn't really an exciting game.
01:46:23
◼
►
The first three quarters were actually rather unexciting.
01:46:27
◼
►
- You're talking about last year's Super Bowl.
01:46:29
◼
►
- Last year's Super Bowl.
01:46:30
◼
►
- Where it was a blowout for most of the game and then, yeah.
01:46:33
◼
►
- The Atlanta Falcons ran up a 28 to three lead
01:46:36
◼
►
on the New England Patriots. - That's right.
01:46:38
◼
►
- Until late in the third quarter,
01:46:41
◼
►
I believe the third quarter finished 28 to 10.
01:46:44
◼
►
And so they still had an 18-point lead going into the fourth quarter, but they had been
01:46:47
◼
►
up 25 points late in the third quarter.
01:46:51
◼
►
And then everything went to hell for the Atlanta Falcons.
01:46:54
◼
►
Whereas this year's Super Bowl was truly, in hindsight, really, in a moment it felt
01:47:00
◼
►
like it was terribly exciting throughout.
01:47:04
◼
►
It was certainly terribly exciting for me as somebody with a large, large wager on the
01:47:08
◼
►
Philadelphia Eagles.
01:47:10
◼
►
Were you one of the million dollar bets?
01:47:12
◼
►
I was not one of the million dollar bets.
01:47:14
◼
►
We were talking about that.
01:47:16
◼
►
That is crazy.
01:47:19
◼
►
They said there were about a half dozen and I think most more of them at least were for
01:47:23
◼
►
That was the consensus.
01:47:24
◼
►
So good for those people.
01:47:25
◼
►
Well word comes around.
01:47:26
◼
►
It's like when you're in Vegas for the Super Bowl weekend, it's just like who knows what's
01:47:32
◼
►
true and what's not.
01:47:33
◼
►
It's not like you go into the sports book where you place the bets and there's like
01:47:37
◼
►
a light up sign that says someone just placed a million dollar bet.
01:47:41
◼
►
But there's some kind of weird certainty that runs around where it's like somebody will
01:47:46
◼
►
say, "I heard somebody dropped a million dollars on Eagles."
01:47:49
◼
►
And then you're like, "Really?"
01:47:51
◼
►
And then somebody will say, "Oh, yeah, yeah.
01:47:52
◼
►
I heard it from my guy at the casino, his casino host," or something like that.
01:47:59
◼
►
What do you think the mechanics of dropping a million dollar bet on?
01:48:03
◼
►
We couldn't figure it out.
01:48:05
◼
►
Like you don't just want-
01:48:06
◼
►
Like how do you back that bet up?
01:48:09
◼
►
my bet, which I could call and considered and certainly felt in my heart throughout
01:48:13
◼
►
the game a quote unquote large bet. My bet was placed with cash. You certainly couldn't
01:48:20
◼
►
do that with a million dollars.
01:48:21
◼
►
John "Slick" Baum: You could. I mean, a million bucks is like that's a suitcase worth, I think.
01:48:27
◼
►
Dave "Slick" Baum" Kelsky "Slick" Baum" Kelsky "Slick" Baum" Kelsky "Slick" Baum" Kelsky
01:48:28
◼
►
"Slick" Baum" Kelsky "Slick" Baum" Kelsky "Slick" Baum" Kelsky "Slick" Baum" Kelsky "Slick"
01:48:29
◼
►
Baum" Kelsky "Slick" Baum" Kelsky "Slick" Baum" Kelsky "Slick" Baum" Kelsky "Slick"
01:48:30
◼
►
I believe that you would have to set up some kind of a line of credit with the casino and
01:48:35
◼
►
maybe do a wire transfer or something like that to an account.
01:48:39
◼
►
And then I don't think...
01:48:40
◼
►
No, you know what it probably is.
01:48:42
◼
►
I think they just write a check.
01:48:45
◼
►
Well, I mean, this is America.
01:48:48
◼
►
You can just write a million dollar check and hand it to them and they'll walk it over
01:48:52
◼
►
to the bank.
01:48:54
◼
►
Now, you've been in Vegas with me and you've placed sports wagers before and when a normal
01:48:59
◼
►
punter like us goes up and maybe you would like to bet a hundred dollars pre-season on
01:49:06
◼
►
the Red Sox to win the World Series. And it'll pay, I don't know what the current odds are,
01:49:12
◼
►
I bet a Red Sox ticket right now off the top of my head probably pays eight to one or nine
01:49:16
◼
►
to one. So you can play, you know, put a hundred dollars down and then they'll print out a
01:49:22
◼
►
little ticket and it's almost like a receipt. It's a little white piece of paper with that
01:49:28
◼
►
heat type printing on it.
01:49:30
◼
►
- Right, thermal printed, that's super high quality.
01:49:32
◼
►
- Right, and then there's like a little,
01:49:34
◼
►
the equivalent of a QR code at the bottom,
01:49:36
◼
►
and then it'll tell you you've bet $100 at nine to one.
01:49:39
◼
►
And then you can hold that until the World Series is over,
01:49:41
◼
►
and if you win, you can either fly back to Vegas
01:49:44
◼
►
and cash it in, or you can mail it in,
01:49:46
◼
►
and they'll send you a check for your $900.
01:49:48
◼
►
I'm gonna guess when you place a million dollar bet,
01:49:52
◼
►
they don't just print out a little
01:49:54
◼
►
thermal printed slip of paper.
01:49:57
◼
►
But I would love to know what they do print, right?
01:50:00
◼
►
What do they do?
01:50:03
◼
►
And just think about things, think about this.
01:50:05
◼
►
Let's say I go out and I bet $1,000 on the Eagles.
01:50:08
◼
►
And the game is over and the Eagles have won.
01:50:15
◼
►
But I've got a flight to catch.
01:50:16
◼
►
I could just hand you the ticket and I'll just say,
01:50:18
◼
►
Paul, just send me that 1,000 bucks.
01:50:20
◼
►
And I'm off in a cab to the airport
01:50:22
◼
►
and you can walk right up to the counter and hand it over.
01:50:25
◼
►
- Right, there's no verification.
01:50:27
◼
►
just having possession of the ticket is all you need.
01:50:29
◼
►
- They'll just pay you the thing.
01:50:32
◼
►
I'm gonna guess you can't do that with a million dollar.
01:50:36
◼
►
Bet on this.
01:50:36
◼
►
- I think it's like a bearer bond.
01:50:38
◼
►
You know, whoever has possession of that slip of paper,
01:50:41
◼
►
it's worth a million bucks now and that's it.
01:50:44
◼
►
And actually, I guess that's the question.
01:50:46
◼
►
Was it a million dollar, were the bets,
01:50:48
◼
►
did they put down a million dollars?
01:50:50
◼
►
And then how much did they win?
01:50:52
◼
►
- Well, there's different ways to bet.
01:50:53
◼
►
So the two ways to bet on a game,
01:50:56
◼
►
If you take the point spread, and now in this game,
01:50:59
◼
►
the Patriots are favored by four,
01:51:01
◼
►
and if you bet on the Eagles on the point spread,
01:51:04
◼
►
you could add four and a half points to the final score
01:51:07
◼
►
in terms of satisfying them.
01:51:08
◼
►
- Right, the Eagles could have lost by up to four points.
01:51:10
◼
►
- Right, so if the Patriots had won by three or even four,
01:51:14
◼
►
they would have won the Super Bowl,
01:51:15
◼
►
and they would have been very happy,
01:51:17
◼
►
but if you bet on the Patriots, you would be unhappy
01:51:21
◼
►
because you would have lost your bet.
01:51:23
◼
►
And then the other thing you do
01:51:24
◼
►
is they call it the money line,
01:51:26
◼
►
where instead of any point spread,
01:51:27
◼
►
it's you bet on the team that wins,
01:51:29
◼
►
and the way that it's adjusted for who's favored
01:51:32
◼
►
and who's the underdog is it pays different odds.
01:51:35
◼
►
If I recall correctly from Sunday,
01:51:40
◼
►
the Eagles, I know what the Eagles went off at.
01:51:41
◼
►
The Eagles were called, were at plus 165,
01:51:44
◼
►
and that means a money line bet on the Eagles for $100,
01:51:48
◼
►
if they won, would pay $165.
01:51:52
◼
►
So however much you wanna bet on it,
01:51:54
◼
►
you'd multiply it by 1.65 and that's your payout.
01:51:58
◼
►
And the Patriots were the other way.
01:51:59
◼
►
I believe that when the game started,
01:52:01
◼
►
they were at minus 190, meaning you had to bet $190
01:52:06
◼
►
to win just $100 if the Patriots won.
01:52:12
◼
►
And the thing that-- - Right, so if you bet
01:52:14
◼
►
a million dollars on the Eagles at 165,
01:52:16
◼
►
you would get back 2.65 million, is that right?
01:52:20
◼
►
- That is correct, 'cause you would give them the mill--
01:52:22
◼
►
And when you place the bet, you give them the money.
01:52:24
◼
►
So they've already got your million dollars.
01:52:27
◼
►
And it's sort of like an escrow.
01:52:29
◼
►
Whereby escrow, I mean in the casinos.
01:52:33
◼
►
- In the vault. - In the vault.
01:52:35
◼
►
And then when it wins, you go over there
01:52:37
◼
►
with your little thermal ticket and they'll pay you.
01:52:40
◼
►
And the ticket will say, you've bet a million
01:52:42
◼
►
to pay 2.65 million to win 1.65 million.
01:52:47
◼
►
You give it to them and then they'll sit there
01:52:51
◼
►
count out 2.65 million in $100 bills.
01:52:56
◼
►
I don't know why we didn't do this.
01:52:59
◼
►
It sounds like loads of fun
01:53:01
◼
►
and you wouldn't have been at all nervous
01:53:03
◼
►
when the Pats threw a Hail Mary at the end of the game.
01:53:06
◼
►
- Oh God, I was dying.
01:53:09
◼
►
'Cause it seemed like exactly the sort of play
01:53:10
◼
►
that they would make.
01:53:14
◼
►
It really did. - Make the completion,
01:53:15
◼
►
get the two point conversion, go to OT, win by six.
01:53:19
◼
►
- With another touchdown,
01:53:20
◼
►
us like last year, yeah. Well, so this is interesting, though. I mentioned we should
01:53:24
◼
►
talk about this because you live in Philly, and I live in New England, but you're a Cowboys fan.
01:53:28
◼
►
That is correct.
01:53:29
◼
►
So if anything, I mean, you said you placed a bet on the Eagles, so I guess you're rooting for the
01:53:34
◼
►
Eagles. But if anything, you should be rooting against the Eagles. I know I have plenty of
01:53:38
◼
►
friends who are Giants fans who are rooting for the Pats, which felt weird to them, but...
01:53:43
◼
►
I re- well, I remember specifically, it's funny, the last time the Eagles were in the Super Bowl,
01:53:47
◼
►
I don't remember the year. I think it was 2006 though. I could be wrong
01:53:50
◼
►
2005 and that was it was against the Pats right against the Pats and I was never been a fan of the Patriots
01:53:57
◼
►
I was ambivalent a bit ambivalent about that game
01:54:00
◼
►
I don't remember which way my gut swung
01:54:03
◼
►
but it wasn't very hard in either direction because I don't like the Eagles because they're a division rival of the Cowboys and I
01:54:09
◼
►
Right as a Cowboys fan in Philadelphia. I have numerous friends who we have
01:54:15
◼
►
friendly rivalry about that issue with
01:54:17
◼
►
And I don't like the Patriots because they cheat
01:54:25
◼
►
To be honest, I really don't like the Patriots because as a Cowboys fan what I really like about the Cowboys is that they
01:54:32
◼
►
are a historically great team and that they've won five Super Bowls and I
01:54:38
◼
►
Would like for the Cowboys to be the team that has the most Super Bowl victories
01:54:44
◼
►
But right now with the Cowboys have been stuck at five since I don't know. I was like 20 years old. It's been a long time
01:54:50
◼
►
They're in a very long extended rut stuck at five. I believe when they last one or right no 95 or 696
01:54:58
◼
►
I think is that right? One in 93 95 and 96?
01:55:02
◼
►
No, no, they want they want in to they want back-to-back years because that's where I was going with this
01:55:08
◼
►
Right was that they played the bills two years in a row, right?
01:55:11
◼
►
And they had the blowout against -- so, I mentioned my parents are from Buffalo, so I grew up a Bills fan
01:55:16
◼
►
and had the love of football just beaten right out of me because the Bills lost to the Giants,
01:55:23
◼
►
to the Washington Redskins, to the Cowboys in the biggest blowout in history. And then I was
01:55:29
◼
►
actually at Super Bowl XXVIII, which was in '94, I'm pretty sure, and watched them lose their fourth
01:55:36
◼
►
Super Bowl in a row. Right. Which is astounding. I mean, it's an incredible feat. I'd probably
01:55:43
◼
►
never be equaled. Just getting to four Super Bowls in a row is tremendous. In a league,
01:55:47
◼
►
in any league it would be impressive, but in the NFL in particular you tend to have teams
01:55:51
◼
►
come out of nowhere to get to the Super Bowl and then drop out of the Super Bowl and, you know,
01:55:56
◼
►
be nowhere the next year. So, this past weekend we had you, a Philadelphia resident who likes the
01:56:03
◼
►
the Cowboys who was sort of cheering for the Phillies, for the Eagles rather.
01:56:06
◼
►
No, I was all in on the Eagles. I was all in in this case because the Patriots have
01:56:10
◼
►
only only extended their argument to be the greatest team of all time, so I need
01:56:15
◼
►
that to stop. You want that to stop? I want that to stop, and I just generally
01:56:19
◼
►
find them to be unlikable people. I really do. I, you know, it was noted
01:56:24
◼
►
after the game that when the game was over, Tom Brady didn't go to the
01:56:28
◼
►
midfield to shake hands with the Eagles quarterback Nick Foles. He just went
01:56:32
◼
►
right to the locker room.
01:56:34
◼
►
I, you know, I mean, I don't think that's a huge deal.
01:56:37
◼
►
I mean, you just lost a heartbreaker.
01:56:38
◼
►
Who knows, I might do that.
01:56:39
◼
►
I'm a very poor loser, to be honest.
01:56:42
◼
►
Honestly, I might do the same thing.
01:56:44
◼
►
I wouldn't wanna go shake somebody's hand.
01:56:46
◼
►
But this rubs me the wrong way.
01:56:48
◼
►
I don't know, I don't like 'em.
01:56:49
◼
►
And I happen to, even as a Cowboys fan
01:56:51
◼
►
who generally is predisposed to just like anybody,
01:56:54
◼
►
any other team from the NFC East,
01:56:56
◼
►
this particular Eagles team this year
01:56:58
◼
►
is extraordinarily likable.
01:57:01
◼
►
I said it to Moltz last week,
01:57:02
◼
►
that they've got these guys who are just likable guys.
01:57:04
◼
►
I mean, the one guy donated his whole salary
01:57:07
◼
►
to local schools.
01:57:08
◼
►
I mean, how do you not love that?
01:57:09
◼
►
I mean, it's just like-- - That's right.
01:57:11
◼
►
- Boy, that just seems like,
01:57:12
◼
►
and they're just doing great things in the city.
01:57:14
◼
►
They've been doing it since before this
01:57:16
◼
►
really reached a fever pitch,
01:57:17
◼
►
but they're just really good guys.
01:57:19
◼
►
- And they sold all those dog masks.
01:57:23
◼
►
So, I mean, that's good for somebody.
01:57:25
◼
►
- So anyway, we had to record today
01:57:27
◼
►
because tomorrow we're having a parade here in Philadelphia,
01:57:30
◼
►
and by, where by parade, it pretty much means
01:57:33
◼
►
the entire city is shut down.
01:57:35
◼
►
I mean, like literally, like they're,
01:57:37
◼
►
they're shutting the city down tonight.
01:57:39
◼
►
And I don't think they're real.
01:57:41
◼
►
- So are the schools closed?
01:57:42
◼
►
- Schools are closed, man.
01:57:43
◼
►
They're not even pretending that kids are going to school.
01:57:45
◼
►
There's no school.
01:57:47
◼
►
Schools are closed, which is really kind of awesome.
01:57:50
◼
►
I honestly, I mean, it's,
01:57:51
◼
►
Jonas has never been more interested in sports
01:57:53
◼
►
than when he found out that he gets out of a day at school.
01:57:56
◼
►
- He could get a day off of school.
01:57:59
◼
►
And you know, I just don't think people,
01:58:01
◼
►
people don't realize it's, you know,
01:58:03
◼
►
it really means a lot to this city.
01:58:06
◼
►
It's a city that hasn't had a championship team
01:58:08
◼
►
since the 2008 Phillies, and prior to the 2008 Phillies,
01:58:11
◼
►
I said this last week, I should have double checked.
01:58:14
◼
►
- Before that, it was the '83 Sixers.
01:58:16
◼
►
And that's a long, '83 to 2008 sounds like a long time.
01:58:20
◼
►
And from '83 until Sunday,
01:58:22
◼
►
only have one sneak in the middle was the Phillies.
01:58:25
◼
►
It's, you know, it's been a long time.
01:58:27
◼
►
But of all the teams in the city,
01:58:29
◼
►
the one that's the most beloved is the Eagles,
01:58:31
◼
►
without question.
01:58:32
◼
►
I don't think there's anybody,
01:58:33
◼
►
it doesn't matter how big a Sixers fan or Phillies fan
01:58:35
◼
►
or even, or certainly Flyers fan that you might be,
01:58:38
◼
►
no one would argue that this isn't an Eagles town.
01:58:41
◼
►
And there's nothing they want more than to win a Super Bowl.
01:58:43
◼
►
And they went 52 Super Bowls
01:58:46
◼
►
and only made it to two and lost both.
01:58:48
◼
►
So people went nuts.
01:58:50
◼
►
And to have them win it in quite arguably
01:58:54
◼
►
the most extraordinary Super Bowl game in history
01:58:58
◼
►
is just icing on the cake.
01:59:00
◼
►
I mean, and again, I know there's probably some people
01:59:02
◼
►
who've already stopped the show, but that's all right.
01:59:04
◼
►
But if you're into it, it's mathematically,
01:59:07
◼
►
it's extraordinary that in the,
01:59:09
◼
►
it's not in the history of the Super Bowl,
01:59:11
◼
►
which is 52 games, or the history of the playoffs
01:59:15
◼
►
in the NFL, which is, I guess, a thousand or so games.
01:59:19
◼
►
In the history of the NFL, every game
01:59:21
◼
►
that has ever been played in the National Football League,
01:59:25
◼
►
the game on Sunday had the most total yardage ever.
01:59:29
◼
►
And it was by a long shot.
01:59:30
◼
►
They broke the record in the third quarter.
01:59:33
◼
►
In the third quarter, they had already racked up
01:59:35
◼
►
more total yardage between both offenses
01:59:37
◼
►
than any game in the NFL.
01:59:40
◼
►
And when I was watching, I was watching in this big,
01:59:42
◼
►
big room in Vegas in a casino filled with,
01:59:45
◼
►
I don't know, a couple thousand people
01:59:47
◼
►
and all of these big jumbotrons and real noisy.
01:59:52
◼
►
That's so noisy that that's why I think
01:59:54
◼
►
half the reason I'm a horse.
01:59:56
◼
►
But everybody was just sort of looking at each other
01:59:59
◼
►
like in the third quarter.
02:00:00
◼
►
Like when the first half was terribly exciting.
02:00:04
◼
►
And then you got the big long halftime show
02:00:06
◼
►
and then the third quarter starts up
02:00:08
◼
►
and third quarter just takes it up a notch on both sides.
02:00:10
◼
►
And neither team, every time every team touches the ball,
02:00:14
◼
►
And everybody was just sort of looking at each other
02:00:16
◼
►
saying like, am I drunk, what's going on?
02:00:20
◼
►
This is like crazy, right?
02:00:21
◼
►
This is crazy.
02:00:22
◼
►
And when they came up with that stat
02:00:23
◼
►
that this was the most yardage in any game,
02:00:26
◼
►
not any playoff game, any game ever,
02:00:28
◼
►
and we're only in the third quarter.
02:00:29
◼
►
And it's the Super Bowl,
02:00:31
◼
►
which is often a very defensive game.
02:00:33
◼
►
We were like, okay, this is crazy.
02:00:35
◼
►
- Well, that was the thing.
02:00:37
◼
►
Nobody was playing defense.
02:00:38
◼
►
I mean, if you like defensive football,
02:00:40
◼
►
this was not a very good game at all.
02:00:43
◼
►
That's my theory.
02:00:44
◼
►
My fundamental theory is where pro football is going.
02:00:45
◼
►
- All the stats I saw were that, like, sorry, go ahead.
02:00:49
◼
►
- Well, my fundamental theory is that
02:00:50
◼
►
that's where football's going,
02:00:52
◼
►
is to be a more basketball-like game, meaning--
02:00:55
◼
►
- Just constant scoring.
02:00:56
◼
►
- Yeah, constant scoring and a faster pace.
02:01:00
◼
►
Both teams-- - I was gonna say,
02:01:04
◼
►
all the stats I saw were about,
02:01:06
◼
►
it was about the Pats and how they're,
02:01:09
◼
►
they got over 600 yards,
02:01:10
◼
►
and that's the only time anyone
02:01:11
◼
►
has ever lost a game doing that.
02:01:13
◼
►
And they got all these great records,
02:01:15
◼
►
except for the fact that they lost this game.
02:01:17
◼
►
- Right, so Brady personally had 500-plus yards passing
02:01:21
◼
►
and three touchdowns and no interceptions
02:01:24
◼
►
and no quarterback who's ever done that.
02:01:26
◼
►
Again, in every single game that league has ever played
02:01:29
◼
►
for like roughly 100 years, probably about 90 years,
02:01:33
◼
►
every game that's ever happened,
02:01:36
◼
►
any time a quarterback has done that, they've won the game.
02:01:38
◼
►
Because you would think, "Well, how could you lose?"
02:01:43
◼
►
Well, you can lose--
02:01:44
◼
►
- 'Cause your defense was just slightly worse
02:01:45
◼
►
than the other team's defense.
02:01:46
◼
►
- And the other team only had one time
02:01:49
◼
►
that they touched the ball that they didn't score.
02:01:51
◼
►
Both teams, I believe, had one time they touched the ball
02:01:53
◼
►
that didn't score.
02:01:54
◼
►
One time the Eagles punted, and then at the end of the game,
02:01:56
◼
►
towards the end of the game,
02:01:58
◼
►
one time Brady got hit and fumbled.
02:02:01
◼
►
- Yep, I know they didn't punt, so that sounds right.
02:02:04
◼
►
- Well, usually when you watch,
02:02:05
◼
►
and historically at least when you watch the Super Bowl,
02:02:08
◼
►
you think, "My God, it's hard to score in this league."
02:02:10
◼
►
You either have to do something crazy,
02:02:12
◼
►
or you gotta get a lucky break, or whatever.
02:02:15
◼
►
And there's times where it's like, "Punt, punt, punt,"
02:02:18
◼
►
and you're like, "My God, there's no way,
02:02:19
◼
►
"how does anybody score in this game?"
02:02:21
◼
►
Whereas in that game it was like,
02:02:24
◼
►
does the other team even have 11 men on the field?
02:02:29
◼
►
- Well, congratulations to the city of Philadelphia.
02:02:33
◼
►
- Oh, it's gonna be something.
02:02:34
◼
►
Hopefully the city stands up to this.
02:02:38
◼
►
You know, I guess they're greasing the polls again.
02:02:41
◼
►
I heard that they were not going to grease the polls.
02:02:43
◼
►
I think I told Moltz last week they were gonna stop
02:02:46
◼
►
because the idea was that they criscoed up the polls.
02:02:49
◼
►
We have a tradition here in town
02:02:50
◼
►
where when a Philadelphia team wins,
02:02:53
◼
►
the fans will climb up the street poles for whatever reason.
02:02:58
◼
►
So the cops-- - It's what you do.
02:03:02
◼
►
- Well, the cops to, I don't know, fight against this
02:03:07
◼
►
'cause they don't want people to--
02:03:09
◼
►
- Prevent this, yeah. - Prevent it.
02:03:10
◼
►
They greased them up with Crisco before the Vikings came,
02:03:15
◼
►
and it didn't stop them.
02:03:17
◼
►
And then you're the one who sent me the link that they,
02:03:19
◼
►
What'd you say?
02:03:20
◼
►
They're training for this.
02:03:20
◼
►
That in South Philadelphia,
02:03:22
◼
►
it's a tradition like on certain holidays.
02:03:24
◼
►
- During like an Italian festival or something.
02:03:26
◼
►
- That they grease, they themselves grease the poles
02:03:30
◼
►
and then they have a contest.
02:03:32
◼
►
- And then they put something on top of the pole,
02:03:34
◼
►
grease it, and then everybody tries to climb it.
02:03:36
◼
►
So yeah, they're training for this event.
02:03:38
◼
►
- And so that didn't work.
02:03:40
◼
►
They criss-coed up the poles and people climbed them anyway.
02:03:43
◼
►
And so the word was,
02:03:44
◼
►
they're not gonna criss-co them up again.
02:03:46
◼
►
But what they did is they replaced it
02:03:48
◼
►
some sort of industrial grease. I don't know how much better it worked.
02:03:50
◼
►
Yeah, it was like some kind of oil or something, yeah.
02:03:53
◼
►
Well, so did it work, though? I saw a bunch of street poles on the ground.
02:03:58
◼
►
I don't know if that was from climbing or just destruction in general.
02:04:01
◼
►
Yeah, maybe people getting angry that they were so well greased up, where it's like,
02:04:04
◼
►
"Well, if I can't climb it, I'm going to take it down."
02:04:07
◼
►
I might as well knock it over.
02:04:08
◼
►
I don't know how you do that. I really don't. I saw there were a couple of street poles
02:04:12
◼
►
knocked over, and I guess if you just get a couple people rocking it back and forth,
02:04:16
◼
►
you can do it, but it's certain, you know, I've walked by and just given them a knock this week,
02:04:21
◼
►
and it certainly seems like most of them are pretty sturdy. So it's pretty impressive.
02:04:25
◼
►
Hopefully the parade will go off. All right.
02:04:26
◼
►
And is it it doesn't go by your house? Does it? Did you say it goes by Jonas's school?
02:04:33
◼
►
It does. It does.
02:04:35
◼
►
Right by the school. Yeah. He might not have a school come Friday.
02:04:40
◼
►
Yes. He's the luckiest kid in the world. That's what he's not only does he get a day off,
02:04:45
◼
►
He gets the whole rest of the year off.
02:04:47
◼
►
- Yeah, he's rooting for chaos.
02:04:48
◼
►
We're nearby at Center City, Philadelphia,
02:04:49
◼
►
is very, very small, given the size of Philadelphia proper.
02:04:53
◼
►
Center City, Philadelphia is very small.
02:04:55
◼
►
So we're nearby, we could walk.
02:04:56
◼
►
We have a couple of choices of which way to go.
02:04:59
◼
►
But I think our house will be all right.
02:05:02
◼
►
I don't know.
02:05:03
◼
►
Anything else you wanted to talk about, Paul?
02:05:07
◼
►
- No, I think we covered it.
02:05:10
◼
►
I mean, I don't know how much you get into the politics,
02:05:15
◼
►
But I did have -- I did a quick interview that I thought maybe we could just real quick touch on.
02:05:20
◼
►
And, you know, feel free to cut this out, but I was able to reach my good pal, Barry Oboms,
02:05:27
◼
►
and I got his take on the current president of the United States. And it's just a five-second take.
02:05:34
◼
►
I don't know if you'd like to hear what Barry Oboms thinks of President Donald Trump.
02:05:38
◼
►
Now you know that guy ain't shit.
02:05:40
◼
►
Sorry this motherfucker got nothing on me, right?
02:05:46
◼
►
- And you know, it's from the heart he spoke, so.
02:05:51
◼
►
- Letting it fly.
02:05:52
◼
►
- Let it out there.
02:05:54
◼
►
- Telling it as it is.
02:05:55
◼
►
My thanks to Paul and his sidekick, Farrago, over there.
02:06:00
◼
►
I've got some links, I promise they'll be in the show notes.
02:06:04
◼
►
There's a great designing Farrago story
02:06:07
◼
►
on the Rogue Amoeba blog talking about the design of it.
02:06:11
◼
►
It's a terrific app, hope it does very well.
02:06:13
◼
►
And I don't know, I'm not sure what to say.
02:06:16
◼
►
It's like I almost wish that the Patriots
02:06:18
◼
►
had gotten blown out, I could stick it to you.
02:06:20
◼
►
I feel like there's something noble
02:06:22
◼
►
in a five-time championship team
02:06:24
◼
►
also having the single greatest performance,
02:06:29
◼
►
and indisputably the single greatest performance
02:06:31
◼
►
in a loss in Super Bowl history.
02:06:32
◼
►
- In a loss, yeah. - Right?
02:06:34
◼
►
Like there's some way to measure,
02:06:36
◼
►
like when you count the greatness of teams in all times,
02:06:40
◼
►
certain losses are better than others,
02:06:42
◼
►
you know what I mean?
02:06:43
◼
►
Like your Buffalo Bills, the time that they lost
02:06:44
◼
►
on a wide right kick at the last second by two points,
02:06:49
◼
►
well that counts for something different
02:06:50
◼
►
than when the Cowboys beat 'em 55 to 10
02:06:52
◼
►
or whatever the hell the score was.
02:06:54
◼
►
- That's what it was, it was 55 to 10.
02:06:56
◼
►
- So I would say scoring a touchdown
02:06:58
◼
►
every time you have the ball except once
02:07:01
◼
►
and then still scoring a minute later.
02:07:04
◼
►
Almost scoring a minute later.
02:07:05
◼
►
Certainly counts for something.
02:07:08
◼
►
There's something, certainly, it's certainly a noble loss.
02:07:11
◼
►
Oh, did you see the crazy thing before we signed off?
02:07:14
◼
►
Did you see the crazy thing with the offensive coordinator
02:07:16
◼
►
on the Pats?
02:07:19
◼
►
- Yeah, Josh McDaniels.
02:07:20
◼
►
- Josh McDaniels had agreed--
02:07:22
◼
►
- He was supposed to go to Indy and be their head coach.
02:07:25
◼
►
- And had gotten so far that they had already scheduled
02:07:28
◼
►
a charter plane to take him there today
02:07:30
◼
►
for the big introduction,
02:07:31
◼
►
and he'd already signed a bunch of assistant coaches
02:07:34
◼
►
who quit their jobs at other teams
02:07:36
◼
►
and had already been signed
02:07:38
◼
►
and are under contract for next year.
02:07:40
◼
►
And somehow Belichick and team owner Bob Kraft said,
02:07:45
◼
►
"Hey, maybe you wanna stay?"
02:07:48
◼
►
And he said, "Okay, Indianapolis, nevermind."
02:07:52
◼
►
- It's a real kick in the pants for the Colts,
02:07:55
◼
►
but they deserve whatever they get
02:07:58
◼
►
for stealing the team in the first place, so whatever.
02:08:00
◼
►
Yeah, sort of. I kind of had the same thought there where it's kind of what you get.
02:08:05
◼
►
Anybody who doesn't know the backstory on that, the Indianapolis Colts, long story short,
02:08:09
◼
►
in terms of you want to think like, "Hey, I feel that doesn't sound right that a team
02:08:12
◼
►
would lose their new coach like that." But what happened with the Indianapolis Colts
02:08:16
◼
►
was they were the Baltimore Colts, the beloved Baltimore Colts for decades. And the team
02:08:22
◼
►
owner, Art, what was his name? Modell? Art Modell, for whatever reason, decided he would
02:08:29
◼
►
and moved the team to Indianapolis
02:08:30
◼
►
and knew it wouldn't be popular.
02:08:32
◼
►
And so he had a bunch of moving trucks show up
02:08:35
◼
►
literally in the middle of the night in Baltimore
02:08:37
◼
►
and moved everything out of their stadium
02:08:39
◼
►
in the middle of the night
02:08:41
◼
►
and drove it all to Indianapolis
02:08:43
◼
►
and then announced it there
02:08:45
◼
►
that they were leaving the city of Baltimore.
02:08:48
◼
►
Needless to say, did not go well in Baltimore.
02:08:52
◼
►
I forget if it was Art Modell was the owner.
02:08:54
◼
►
Art Modell might have been the--
02:08:55
◼
►
- No, you solid the wrong man.
02:08:56
◼
►
He's the one that eventually got the Ravens.
02:08:58
◼
►
- He's the Browns, right? - He was the Browns owner.
02:09:00
◼
►
Exactly. - All right, all right.
02:09:01
◼
►
Sorry for-- - It was Bob Irsay.
02:09:03
◼
►
It was the father of the current owner.
02:09:05
◼
►
- That's right, that's right, Irsay, right.
02:09:07
◼
►
- So they got exactly what they deserved.
02:09:09
◼
►
- Modell's the guy who screwed Cleveland over,
02:09:11
◼
►
not screwed Baltimore over.
02:09:14
◼
►
- Well, but he didn't screw Cleveland
02:09:15
◼
►
over the way Baltimore got screwed over
02:09:17
◼
►
'cause when they left Cleveland,
02:09:18
◼
►
Cleveland knew they were getting a team back
02:09:21
◼
►
in like two years or something.
02:09:22
◼
►
- And that they would get to keep the name.
02:09:24
◼
►
- The Browns name, exactly.
02:09:25
◼
►
He didn't steal, that's exactly right.
02:09:27
◼
►
He didn't steal the Browns name.
02:09:29
◼
►
- He took the team, but--
02:09:30
◼
►
- And when you have a storied success,
02:09:32
◼
►
like the Cleveland Browns.
02:09:33
◼
►
- Like the Cleveland Browns.
02:09:35
◼
►
- Where the only good thing in your team's history
02:09:40
◼
►
was the great Jim Brown, who so hated the team owner
02:09:44
◼
►
that while he was indisputably the single greatest player
02:09:48
◼
►
active in the league, he quit,
02:09:50
◼
►
so he could just go make action movies.
02:09:55
◼
►
When that's the finest achievement
02:09:56
◼
►
your franchise has ever achieved,
02:09:58
◼
►
you certainly wanna keep that name and brand.
02:10:00
◼
►
- You gotta hold onto that name, yeah.
02:10:02
◼
►
And that beautiful color scheme.
02:10:04
◼
►
- Yeah. (laughs)
02:10:07
◼
►
Anyway, Paul Kefastas, "Rogamy," but thank you very much.
02:10:10
◼
►
It's always a pleasure to have you on.
02:10:11
◼
►
I'll see you in 100 episodes.