169: ‘A Murder of Eeros’ With Matthew Panzarino
00:00:00
◼
►
Alright, we got to move. There's an emergency scheduled episode of the talk show. Matthew
00:00:05
◼
►
Panzorino is kind enough to shuffle his schedule. We're recording on Wednesday night. We got
00:00:10
◼
►
a baseball game coming up. Big important wild card game with the Giants and the Mets. I've
00:00:17
◼
►
got travel plans this weekend that have been rescheduled because there's apparently a hurricane
00:00:22
◼
►
that is coming towards the United States. And so we could either record a short episode
00:00:26
◼
►
right now, short for the talk show or probably no episode until next week. So anybody who
00:00:32
◼
►
looks at the time on this and says, "Wow, that's too short." Well, it's better than
00:00:36
◼
►
nothing. And for those of you who've been begging for shorter episodes of the show,
00:00:40
◼
►
here you go. It's a gift just for you.
00:00:42
◼
►
You're welcome. Thank the wildcard race. I'm not a Giants fan, but my family is.
00:00:50
◼
►
You gotta watch.
00:00:51
◼
►
Yep. And it's a West Coast team. It's the hometown team, so you gotta watch anyway.
00:00:55
◼
►
I tell people this, I'm sure you know this, because I also know you're a uniform nerd.
00:01:01
◼
►
I tell people this and it blows people's minds, even baseball fans, that the Mets,
00:01:07
◼
►
the Brooklyn Dodgers and the New York Giants left New York within like a year of each other.
00:01:11
◼
►
I think it was like, I don't know, 1959 or 60. And it left New York, which used to
00:01:16
◼
►
have two National League teams with no National League teams, and so they created the Mets
00:01:21
◼
►
to fill the void left behind by both teams.
00:01:23
◼
►
And because it was two teams,
00:01:25
◼
►
the Mets colors are Dodger blue and Giants orange.
00:01:29
◼
►
And I tell people this, and they're like,
00:01:31
◼
►
no they're not, and then they go look at the Mets uniforms.
00:01:33
◼
►
And they're like, oh, well that's weird.
00:01:36
◼
►
And I'm like, and don't you think it's a little weird?
00:01:39
◼
►
Don't you think it's a little weird
00:01:40
◼
►
that those colors don't really go that well together?
00:01:44
◼
►
- Yeah, that one was a crime of expediency.
00:01:48
◼
►
There was no careful designer behind that one,
00:01:52
◼
►
And it's, you know, the other color for the Dodgers, or the Giants at least, is black,
00:01:57
◼
►
which doesn't really—you can't really mix with anything.
00:01:59
◼
►
So it was really the—you know, as long as you were going to go with this idea, which
00:02:02
◼
►
was a sketchy idea, I think, in the first place.
00:02:05
◼
►
But there you go.
00:02:06
◼
►
There's a little baseball.
00:02:07
◼
►
Ben: You know what it reminds me of?
00:02:08
◼
►
And this is—it's like not the same colors, but it reminds me of the mellow yellow car
00:02:12
◼
►
in Days of Thunder, because those colors are so awful.
00:02:16
◼
►
It's just like it reminds me of a color scheme that would be on a NASCAR car like, you know
00:02:22
◼
►
We're like a late late 90s NASCAR car, you know, they're like they're more sedate these days
00:02:27
◼
►
Yeah, who do you like in a game tonight?
00:02:29
◼
►
I think that you know, I think the John's will pull it out. They tend to they tend to somehow by hook or crook
00:02:35
◼
►
They tend to like react better under pressure and come through and you know, I never count bum Garner out, you know
00:02:41
◼
►
Bummy's just an amazing pitcher. He's a beast. So, can't count him out.
00:02:46
◼
►
- Syndergaard for pitching for the Mets is one of the best pitchers in baseball.
00:02:49
◼
►
You can't go wrong with him. The Mets have got to like their chances. But I think right now,
00:02:54
◼
►
given the last three, four years of baseball in a big game, I don't think anybody's better in
00:02:59
◼
►
Bumgarner. I mean, the record... - Yeah, it's crazy. I mean, the World Series,
00:03:04
◼
►
their last World Series win was just insane, you know, when he's like, "No, just put me back in.
00:03:10
◼
►
It was as close the one day one two years ago was about as close as you can get to it to a single
00:03:15
◼
►
Person a one man winning the World Series for his team
00:03:19
◼
►
It's it's really that's you know, there's no other way to put it. I
00:03:23
◼
►
Really? Hope the Giants lose at some point though
00:03:26
◼
►
Cuz I if they win the goddamn World Series again and that this every other year they've what they would have won it in
00:03:33
◼
►
Yeah, every other year twelve twelve. No, no ten ten twelve fourteen sixteen
00:03:39
◼
►
- Yeah, yeah, sorry, yeah, 10, 12, 14, 16, right.
00:03:42
◼
►
- And then you know they're gonna finish
00:03:43
◼
►
in last place next year.
00:03:44
◼
►
- Yeah, exactly.
00:03:46
◼
►
And they're gonna be insufferable too.
00:03:48
◼
►
Like all of the fans will be insufferable.
00:03:50
◼
►
I mean, look, hey, I love the Warriors,
00:03:53
◼
►
I love Steph Curry, and I wish they would've won,
00:03:56
◼
►
but I'm almost kinda glad they didn't win,
00:03:59
◼
►
'cause if they won and the Giants won in the same year,
00:04:00
◼
►
it would just be impossible.
00:04:02
◼
►
It'd just be impossible.
00:04:04
◼
►
- And they did take it to insufferable levels,
00:04:07
◼
►
because there was a story,
00:04:08
◼
►
I forget who published it, it might have been Businessweek,
00:04:11
◼
►
but I don't know, it wasn't even a sports publication,
00:04:13
◼
►
but somebody had a piece on the Warriors
00:04:16
◼
►
while they were still months away from the playoffs
00:04:19
◼
►
about how Silicon Valley geniuses have beaten the NBA
00:04:24
◼
►
at its own game and created an unbeatable team.
00:04:26
◼
►
And it's like, take it easy, guys.
00:04:29
◼
►
- Yeah, that was a pretty remarkable piece of PR placement.
00:04:36
◼
►
I was pretty staggered by that.
00:04:38
◼
►
- One thing, and you're a Yankees fan too,
00:04:42
◼
►
I think one thing all Yankees fans can agree on
00:04:44
◼
►
is that we do not like insufferable fans
00:04:46
◼
►
who gloat over championships.
00:04:49
◼
►
- Right, 'cause we're so humble and salt of the earth.
00:04:52
◼
►
- Exactly. - That's our calling card,
00:04:53
◼
►
for sure. - Exactly.
00:04:55
◼
►
Who else do you like in the baseball playoffs?
00:04:58
◼
►
I gotta say, I'm gonna go with the obvious answers,
00:05:01
◼
►
and it really, I'll pick first, if you don't mind.
00:05:03
◼
►
I'm gonna say Cubs, and I really hate to say
00:05:07
◼
►
the following two words, Red Sox.
00:05:09
◼
►
- Red Sox, hmm.
00:05:12
◼
►
- But then I hope the Cubs beat the Red Sox.
00:05:14
◼
►
That to me would be delicious.
00:05:17
◼
►
- Right, yeah.
00:05:19
◼
►
Yeah, that would be.
00:05:20
◼
►
I mean, the Cubs, you know, I don't know.
00:05:23
◼
►
I don't know.
00:05:25
◼
►
I mean, I think the Red Sox is probably my number one pick,
00:05:27
◼
►
and I would really detest it at the Dodgers one,
00:05:30
◼
►
but they've been playing so incredibly well.
00:05:33
◼
►
aside from these last three games, which the Giants just destroyed them.
00:05:36
◼
►
But yeah, I mean, I think I think we could see either one of those.
00:05:40
◼
►
I think that when I watched him because I was watching to see the Vin Scully
00:05:43
◼
►
telecasts and it just looked to me like the Dodgers.
00:05:46
◼
►
I know they were still fighting for for, you know, home field and stuff like that.
00:05:49
◼
►
There wasn't like the games didn't matter, but they had already once they'd locked up
00:05:54
◼
►
that they were going to be the, you know, the middle stay.
00:05:57
◼
►
We're going to catch the Cubs so they weren't going to get to play the wild card team.
00:06:00
◼
►
And I feel like home field wasn't enough to really fire them up.
00:06:03
◼
►
They, they played flat.
00:06:03
◼
►
Yeah, I think so.
00:06:06
◼
►
I mean, it was, it was kind of, you know, bittersweet too.
00:06:09
◼
►
I mean, you have Vince Scoli coming in, um, you know, doing, calling those games
00:06:12
◼
►
as last games in San Francisco.
00:06:14
◼
►
It was so, it was so cool to see.
00:06:16
◼
►
And it was just like, Hey man, you know, win one for win one for Vin, but I guess not.
00:06:20
◼
►
Well, and they got it on the, the last Dodger game.
00:06:24
◼
►
You know what I mean?
00:06:24
◼
►
Like, I mean, the last home game for the Dodgers.
00:06:27
◼
►
So the last home game for the Dodgers was one with a dramatic walk-off home run that Scully got to call. Yeah, that's true
00:06:32
◼
►
So I feel like it does. Yeah, it's his park. Yeah. Yeah, they got that
00:06:36
◼
►
Anyway as we speak literally whether the start of this podcast was the the last holdup was big breaking news
00:06:49
◼
►
Yeah, so Samsung acquired viv which is the company
00:06:54
◼
►
created by, or founded by, Doug Kittlaus, Adam Chayer, and Chris Brigham, who all worked on Siri,
00:07:01
◼
►
which was acquired by Apple in 2010. So they left in 2012, well, over the years,
00:07:07
◼
►
several of them left, but Doug left in 2012, founded VIV, which is a next-gen AI,
00:07:15
◼
►
and then worked on that for several years and has just sold it to Samsung.
00:07:21
◼
►
which is, I think, is sort of, they were either,
00:07:26
◼
►
I hate to say it, I'm not gonna say that they were built
00:07:29
◼
►
to be sold, but I think it is the,
00:07:32
◼
►
now we can get to Google's announcements,
00:07:33
◼
►
we will get to Google's announcements later in the show,
00:07:36
◼
►
but I feel like these sort of AI systems,
00:07:41
◼
►
assistant systems, fundamentally have to be built
00:07:45
◼
►
into the devices.
00:07:47
◼
►
You can't just be an app, right?
00:07:49
◼
►
And as a standalone company, that's
00:07:51
◼
►
what Viv would have been, is you have to launch the Viv app
00:07:55
◼
►
and then do your stuff.
00:07:56
◼
►
And there's some cool-- that's how Siri started, too.
00:07:59
◼
►
But everybody is moving in the direction
00:08:02
◼
►
of integrating these things into a system level
00:08:04
◼
►
so that you can address-- whether it's
00:08:06
◼
►
so you can say to the device, hey, dingus, go get me an Uber,
00:08:11
◼
►
whatever the need may be, or to just have access
00:08:14
◼
►
to a button like the way that the new Google Assistant works
00:08:18
◼
►
with a long press on the home button
00:08:19
◼
►
in the same way that Siri works, et cetera.
00:08:23
◼
►
Yeah, I mean, I think with Viv,
00:08:25
◼
►
I talked to Doug quite a bit.
00:08:27
◼
►
I interviewed him in May at our conference in New York,
00:08:32
◼
►
and I had talked to him a little bit previously,
00:08:34
◼
►
obviously in the run-up,
00:08:35
◼
►
and kind of get the feel for what to talk about on stage.
00:08:39
◼
►
And their philosophy, and he said some of this on stage too,
00:08:42
◼
►
it's not like private information or anything,
00:08:44
◼
►
but he said that they want to,
00:08:47
◼
►
they wanted to launch the app as a sort of proof of concept,
00:08:51
◼
►
but that their vision was the Viv button in every app,
00:08:55
◼
►
next to every search bar, et cetera, et cetera.
00:08:58
◼
►
And at the time, and I told him this,
00:09:01
◼
►
that's like incredibly optimistic, right?
00:09:03
◼
►
Because everybody is sort of introducing their own systems
00:09:07
◼
►
of this type, specifically because they don't want
00:09:10
◼
►
to be disintermediated by somebody else's system, right?
00:09:14
◼
►
Apple introduced Siri for a variety of reasons,
00:09:17
◼
►
but one of those reasons is you go to Google less with it.
00:09:21
◼
►
You go out to some competitor's product less with it.
00:09:26
◼
►
And with Apple, it's a little different equation.
00:09:29
◼
►
You're slicing the pie a little different
00:09:31
◼
►
'cause it doesn't necessarily make its money
00:09:32
◼
►
when you do a Google search and click on an ad, right?
00:09:34
◼
►
But it does compete with device makers like Samsung
00:09:39
◼
►
and other folks who are trying to carve out
00:09:43
◼
►
a piece of people's life, you know,
00:09:46
◼
►
and lock them into a system that says,
00:09:50
◼
►
look, I know so much about you.
00:09:53
◼
►
I know all of these things that I need to know
00:09:56
◼
►
to serve you well and to do the things
00:09:59
◼
►
you want me to do with efficiency.
00:10:00
◼
►
Why would you ever leave?
00:10:01
◼
►
Why would you ever go?
00:10:02
◼
►
You know, why do you wanna do that?
00:10:04
◼
►
And I think that that is like an insurmountable
00:10:07
◼
►
or will be insurmountable very, very soon
00:10:10
◼
►
as far as, you know, customer lock-in
00:10:11
◼
►
and like a third entrant into the system.
00:10:13
◼
►
So honestly, this is a good time for them.
00:10:16
◼
►
I mean, he said this is about ubiquity
00:10:18
◼
►
because Samsung has 500 million devices or whatever,
00:10:21
◼
►
which that's a fair statement.
00:10:23
◼
►
Like if you wanna be ubiquitous, what are you gonna do?
00:10:26
◼
►
Who are you gonna go to?
00:10:27
◼
►
There's only four companies
00:10:28
◼
►
and three of them have their own already.
00:10:29
◼
►
You know what I mean?
00:10:31
◼
►
And yeah, I think it was destined
00:10:35
◼
►
to be acquired by somebody,
00:10:36
◼
►
whether it would be Apple or Google or Amazon or Microsoft
00:10:40
◼
►
who would buy them to integrate
00:10:42
◼
►
with what they're already working on,
00:10:44
◼
►
or someone like Samsung,
00:10:46
◼
►
who is the biggest example I can think of,
00:10:48
◼
►
who just had this glaring hole in their own technology
00:10:52
◼
►
that they own that plays this game.
00:10:55
◼
►
So I'm kind of, I don't know, I had never met the guy.
00:10:59
◼
►
But just from my armchair quarterback position
00:11:02
◼
►
across the continent, I think this is huge news,
00:11:05
◼
►
but I'm not the least bit surprised
00:11:07
◼
►
that Samsung bought them.
00:11:10
◼
►
Yeah, no, not at all. I mean, I think it's definitely, if you were to have asked me a
00:11:14
◼
►
couple of days ago, you know, which company would buy Viv, you know, like I said, there's
00:11:19
◼
►
only a handful and I was telling this to somebody else and they were like, "Oh, I don't know,
00:11:24
◼
►
if they're so far along that they couldn't have been helped by Viv, you know, by Viv's
00:11:27
◼
►
team." And I think that it's true that Amazon or Google or Apple could definitely have utilized
00:11:33
◼
►
Viv's technology and expertise, right? Because they've got an insane team. But at the same
00:11:39
◼
►
time they've already sort of made their bed and now they have to build on top of that
00:11:43
◼
►
bed and this isn't the time to be taking that bed and throwing it out and purchasing
00:11:47
◼
►
a new bed, you know? And I think that that is, it's a simplistic analogy, but AI systems
00:11:53
◼
►
like this that need to be trained and integrated are not like plug and play. You know, you
00:11:58
◼
►
don't just kind of buy one and then insert it. AI as a concept is an additive concept,
00:12:06
◼
►
So you can sort of pour it into other buckets and it will improve them.
00:12:09
◼
►
But if you're looking for like a cross device, cross platform solution
00:12:14
◼
►
that sort of, you know, is your brain across all of this
00:12:19
◼
►
that recognizes people and their context and serves them,
00:12:22
◼
►
that's not something you just buy and go click click.
00:12:25
◼
►
I mean, Siri took a long time to integrate,
00:12:27
◼
►
and it's still like far from as sophisticated as it could be
00:12:30
◼
►
or sophisticated as it is.
00:12:33
◼
►
but Apple has not yet unlocked those capabilities.
00:12:37
◼
►
- Yeah, yeah.
00:12:38
◼
►
And I just posted, I just linked to the article,
00:12:41
◼
►
literally while we're recording.
00:12:43
◼
►
But I linked to the article at TechCrunch,
00:12:46
◼
►
and my quick comment is just,
00:12:48
◼
►
does anyone disagree that AI assistant technology
00:12:50
◼
►
is table stakes for the next decade?
00:12:53
◼
►
- Yeah, thank you. - I don't know,
00:12:54
◼
►
I think this is one of those rare things
00:12:56
◼
►
where everybody agrees.
00:12:57
◼
►
I don't know anybody who disagrees with this.
00:13:00
◼
►
You know, you-- - Yeah, you got the person
00:13:01
◼
►
who's like, no, that's stupid.
00:13:02
◼
►
nobody should have one of those.
00:13:04
◼
►
- Right, and it's just another way for Samsung
00:13:07
◼
►
to sort of assert their independence from Google.
00:13:09
◼
►
It's just not a good position to be in
00:13:16
◼
►
for them to be completely beholden to Google
00:13:18
◼
►
to provide all of that intelligence.
00:13:20
◼
►
- Not at all, not at all.
00:13:21
◼
►
It doesn't make any sense for them,
00:13:23
◼
►
and it hasn't made sense for a while,
00:13:24
◼
►
which is why they've been experimenting
00:13:26
◼
►
with Tizen and other stuff.
00:13:27
◼
►
But with Samsung, they have two options.
00:13:30
◼
►
they can sort of try to create a mobile operating system, right?
00:13:34
◼
►
Like try to do an Android, right?
00:13:36
◼
►
Pull an Android and just like turn and burn
00:13:38
◼
►
and make a mess of things and go as fast as they can
00:13:42
◼
►
and then have to clean it all up.
00:13:43
◼
►
Like honestly, Android, we joked about this Porsche analogy
00:13:47
◼
►
with the whole, you know, the iPhone, like, hey,
00:13:49
◼
►
you just refine this Porsche thing.
00:13:51
◼
►
But there's sort of another saying about Porsche,
00:13:53
◼
►
which is that they made a mistake 50 years ago
00:13:55
◼
►
and have spent 50 years fixing it.
00:13:57
◼
►
And that mistake was that they made a rear wheel drive car
00:14:02
◼
►
with an engine in the back.
00:14:04
◼
►
It's like, no, that doesn't--
00:14:07
◼
►
Did anybody check the physics?
00:14:09
◼
►
And so 9/11's are famously squirrelly and hard to drive
00:14:13
◼
►
and have gotten better because they've added traction control
00:14:16
◼
►
and new suspension and steering assistance
00:14:19
◼
►
and better differentials and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
00:14:23
◼
►
But it took them 50 years to get into a space
00:14:25
◼
►
where you can actually take a 9/11 out
00:14:27
◼
►
and drive it to the storm back and not be afraid you're
00:14:30
◼
►
going to end your life.
00:14:31
◼
►
And if it rains for like three seconds, it's like, done.
00:14:35
◼
►
You might as well pull over.
00:14:38
◼
►
But I think that that is an interesting analogy
00:14:40
◼
►
when you look at Android, because Android was created out
00:14:43
◼
►
of necessity.
00:14:44
◼
►
It was sort of created to be one thing,
00:14:46
◼
►
and then purchased, and then modified for other uses,
00:14:49
◼
►
and has been essentially fixed over the intervening years.
00:14:53
◼
►
patches have been placed on holes and things have been desoldered and taken out and new
00:15:01
◼
►
things have been bolted on.
00:15:03
◼
►
And it's in a shape where you could conceivably say, "Oh, you know, I could pick up an Android
00:15:06
◼
►
phone and use it for pretty much nine-tenths of my tasks or an iPhone."
00:15:10
◼
►
And those differentiating factors are really like the personalization and the customization
00:15:14
◼
►
and artificial intelligence is a part of that.
00:15:17
◼
►
Like does my phone recognize me and everything I have to know, I need to know.
00:15:21
◼
►
So if you look at Samsung and you go,
00:15:23
◼
►
should Samsung pull an Android and build an OS from scratch,
00:15:27
◼
►
or should it start with the core differentiating factor,
00:15:30
◼
►
which is the AI, and then sort of work outwards from there?
00:15:33
◼
►
'Cause it has Android, it doesn't really need
00:15:35
◼
►
to build something new.
00:15:37
◼
►
Google's like, open, you can have almost all the stuff,
00:15:40
◼
►
except for the Google stuff, right?
00:15:42
◼
►
And that's Samsung going, well, why don't we just build
00:15:46
◼
►
our own quote, unquote, Google stuff, right?
00:15:48
◼
►
the stuff that allows people to go,
00:15:51
◼
►
oh, I can pick up my Samsung and just ask it something,
00:15:53
◼
►
or I can talk to my fridge and ask it something.
00:15:57
◼
►
Which is going to be, this actually works out,
00:16:02
◼
►
it almost seems like we've planned this,
00:16:03
◼
►
but it actually is a pretty good segue
00:16:05
◼
►
into Google's event, which was yesterday,
00:16:09
◼
►
as we recorded earlier this week,
00:16:10
◼
►
the Made by Google event.
00:16:12
◼
►
But first, since we're moving right along,
00:16:16
◼
►
I'm gonna thank our first sponsor,
00:16:18
◼
►
is our good friends at Fracture.
00:16:20
◼
►
Fracture is the company, you know them.
00:16:23
◼
►
They print your photos directly on glass.
00:16:26
◼
►
I think there's probably a lot of people
00:16:28
◼
►
that probably think, well, glass is heavy,
00:16:31
◼
►
so this is like a heavy thing to put on a wall.
00:16:33
◼
►
One of the things, I don't mention it,
00:16:35
◼
►
I'm stealing this from Marco, by the way.
00:16:36
◼
►
Marco mentioned this point on ATP, but I'm stealing it.
00:16:40
◼
►
One of the things that makes these Fracture prints
00:16:43
◼
►
so remarkable is how lightweight they are.
00:16:46
◼
►
They come, they self-hanging, they call it.
00:16:48
◼
►
But everything you need to hang it on the wall
00:16:50
◼
►
is on the back of this piece of glass.
00:16:52
◼
►
So you send them your photos.
00:16:54
◼
►
They print them directly on the glass.
00:16:55
◼
►
It looks like it's right on the surface of the glass.
00:16:58
◼
►
Edge to edge, corner to corner, no frame necessary.
00:17:02
◼
►
It's just the glass, and then there's just the thing
00:17:05
◼
►
you need to hang it on the wall.
00:17:08
◼
►
They don't come to your house and put the nail in the wall,
00:17:09
◼
►
but other than that, it hangs itself.
00:17:12
◼
►
Super lightweight, almost like lighter
00:17:15
◼
►
than you'd think it could be,
00:17:16
◼
►
which makes you feel really good hanging it on the wall
00:17:20
◼
►
because you don't feel like,
00:17:21
◼
►
hey, this is like a big heavy piece of glass
00:17:23
◼
►
that's gonna break and put broken glass
00:17:25
◼
►
all over the floor or whatever.
00:17:27
◼
►
Quality is excellent.
00:17:29
◼
►
I mean, this is how I print photos.
00:17:31
◼
►
I don't, you know, I can't imagine
00:17:33
◼
►
why I would print them some other way.
00:17:35
◼
►
Great quality, all sorts of great sizes, great price.
00:17:38
◼
►
They are made in a carbon neutral factory
00:17:41
◼
►
right in beautiful Gainesville, Florida.
00:17:44
◼
►
And here's the thing, they're upping their sponsorships
00:17:49
◼
►
recently, September, now we're in October,
00:17:52
◼
►
because these are fantastic gifts, they really are.
00:17:56
◼
►
It's both, they make the people,
00:17:58
◼
►
like you're giving to grandparents,
00:18:00
◼
►
giving to other family members, stuff like that.
00:18:03
◼
►
If you've got kids, get some pictures printed of them,
00:18:07
◼
►
give them to everybody for Christmas and the other holidays.
00:18:11
◼
►
Great gift for a couple reasons.
00:18:12
◼
►
It makes the people you give them to really happy.
00:18:14
◼
►
Trust me, they love them.
00:18:16
◼
►
And it's so easy.
00:18:17
◼
►
It is so easy for you in terms of,
00:18:19
◼
►
hey, let's knock off all the parents and grandparents
00:18:22
◼
►
and stuff like that, knock off the holiday gift items.
00:18:27
◼
►
Here's the reason.
00:18:27
◼
►
I want you to think about doing that now or soon
00:18:30
◼
►
because these things are all made by hand
00:18:32
◼
►
right here in Florida.
00:18:34
◼
►
Well, I'm not in Florida, but right here in the US.
00:18:37
◼
►
They get backed up for the holidays
00:18:38
◼
►
is what I'm going to get at.
00:18:39
◼
►
So you can't wait till like the beginning of December
00:18:42
◼
►
and then still get it by the end of December for the holidays.
00:18:45
◼
►
So think about it now.
00:18:46
◼
►
You'll knock off something on your shopping list way early.
00:18:49
◼
►
You'll be ahead of the game.
00:18:51
◼
►
Where do you go?
00:18:52
◼
►
You go to fractorme.com.
00:18:54
◼
►
That's our website.
00:18:54
◼
►
Slash podcast.
00:18:57
◼
►
That's the thing to remember, that they're
00:18:58
◼
►
using the same URL for all their podcast ads.
00:19:01
◼
►
And then they'll just ask you a one-question survey of where
00:19:04
◼
►
did you hear about it from.
00:19:05
◼
►
And that's where you tell them you hear from the talk show.
00:19:08
◼
►
And anyway, you go to that URL.
00:19:10
◼
►
You'll get 10% off your first order.
00:19:12
◼
►
So the more pictures you buy on that first order,
00:19:14
◼
►
the more you'll save.
00:19:15
◼
►
So go to fractureme.com/podcast.
00:19:17
◼
►
My thanks to them.
00:19:20
◼
►
So I said, segue, going to the Made by Google event.
00:19:24
◼
►
So why should Samsung be concerned
00:19:26
◼
►
about owning their own technology
00:19:27
◼
►
for stuff like this?
00:19:28
◼
►
Because to me, this week's Made by Google event,
00:19:32
◼
►
which overall I have to say I was pretty impressed by.
00:19:34
◼
►
But the truth is very obvious that Google is now
00:19:38
◼
►
going to favor their own hardware over those of partners.
00:19:43
◼
►
That the full experience that they're planning,
00:19:46
◼
►
that they feel like they can drive through AI technology,
00:19:52
◼
►
they clearly-- they said so.
00:19:54
◼
►
It's not even implicit, explicit in interviews this week
00:19:57
◼
►
that they see that the integrated hardware and software
00:19:59
◼
►
is the way to go.
00:20:02
◼
►
Imagine that.
00:20:04
◼
►
Surprised no other company had ever come up with this before.
00:20:07
◼
►
You know, it's remarkable that Google was first to this realization. You know, I'm
00:20:18
◼
►
not going to rag on them too hard, right? Because it does—they made a bed, right?
00:20:22
◼
►
And they had to lie in it. And that bed was that they had to be partner-friendly and,
00:20:31
◼
►
you know, this open strategy, whatever you want to call it. It really laid out a track
00:20:36
◼
►
for them, that they had to follow, and they followed it for as long as it made sense.
00:20:40
◼
►
And now it doesn't make sense anymore.
00:20:42
◼
►
Google is not a fool.
00:20:43
◼
►
The people that are not fools, but the people that should have known or should have realized
00:20:48
◼
►
are the partners.
00:20:49
◼
►
You know, the companies that are like, "Oh, Google will never betray us," and they will
00:20:53
◼
►
always have our interests at heart, et cetera.
00:20:55
◼
►
I do think Google meant it, and I don't think it's any coincidence at all.
00:20:59
◼
►
I mentioned this briefly in a short DF piece the other day, pointing out that, you know,
00:21:05
◼
►
Like the 2010 in particular was the year
00:21:08
◼
►
where it was where Vic and Dottra was given a keynote at IO
00:21:12
◼
►
and really dug into the anti-iPhone, anti-Apple,
00:21:17
◼
►
anti-Steve Jobs sort of sentiment.
00:21:21
◼
►
You know, it literally said something to the effect
00:21:24
◼
►
of one man, one phone, one company, one carrier.
00:21:29
◼
►
We're here to stop that from dominating mobile
00:21:32
◼
►
for the coming decades.
00:21:33
◼
►
And really meant it.
00:21:35
◼
►
I truly think, I think, Vint Gendotter meant it.
00:21:38
◼
►
I think Andy Rubin was very much along on that,
00:21:42
◼
►
that it was a strength of Android
00:21:45
◼
►
to be Microsoft to the PC industry,
00:21:48
◼
►
to not only do like reference hardware
00:21:53
◼
►
and just do the software.
00:21:54
◼
►
And I really think that they thought
00:21:56
◼
►
that Android would lead to a Windows-like monopoly over
00:22:05
◼
►
And they still thought that in 2012, right?
00:22:08
◼
►
- I think so, yeah.
00:22:09
◼
►
- So they had the Galaxy Nexus, the Nexus 7 tablet,
00:22:13
◼
►
that streaming device, that Nexus 6 orb,
00:22:18
◼
►
I forget what they called it exactly,
00:22:21
◼
►
but it was like the ball thing.
00:22:23
◼
►
I don't know, that was that particular Google I/O
00:22:26
◼
►
when they introduced all those things.
00:22:28
◼
►
And there was some additional Glass stuff,
00:22:31
◼
►
the Explorer edition of Glass
00:22:33
◼
►
when that was launched and everything.
00:22:35
◼
►
And that particular one, they also made a lot of really kind of, whatever you want to
00:22:43
◼
►
call it, predictive or hypothetical, but not really hypothetical statements about software
00:22:51
◼
►
and hardware integration and how they could only do certain things if they took control
00:22:54
◼
►
of both and they would show their partners how good it could be and then they would follow
00:23:00
◼
►
were dealing, they were kind of trying to roll out several small software updates to
00:23:05
◼
►
limit fragmentation and all that stuff.
00:23:08
◼
►
In 2012, I remember tweeting this because I remember the first reply was, "Do you
00:23:13
◼
►
realize the stupidity of that tweet?"
00:23:16
◼
►
It was really funny because nobody had replied to it at the time.
00:23:21
◼
►
Everybody like favorited it, but nobody replied and then it took a year.
00:23:25
◼
►
I posted it June 27th, 2012.
00:23:27
◼
►
Well, what did the tweet say?
00:23:29
◼
►
Well, the tweet was the hardware plus software epiphany.
00:23:33
◼
►
I said Apple 1979, Microsoft 2012, because it was the Surface thing, and then Google
00:23:40
◼
►
In other words, they're saying, "Oh, maybe the right way to do this is to do both,"
00:23:46
◼
►
and to say, "Maybe you could do the other."
00:23:51
◼
►
I was being a bit facetious because obviously the hardware/software join made less sense
00:23:58
◼
►
for a variety of reasons that have been gone over ad nauseam by you and other folks and
00:24:02
◼
►
all of us over the years, made less sense on desktop than it does on mobile, right?
00:24:07
◼
►
But mobile's lack of tolerance for weirdness and its intimate nature and a lot of other
00:24:12
◼
►
things, it just, Apple had the right formula for it, which is why the iPhone was such a
00:24:16
◼
►
hit right off the bat.
00:24:18
◼
►
And so Microsoft and Google in 2012 kind of shifted their gears and were like, "Oh, maybe
00:24:24
◼
►
we should take full control over these mobile experiences because people are
00:24:28
◼
►
not getting them right and letting our partners diddle around with our hardware
00:24:33
◼
►
is not going to you know or our software in Microsoft's case is not going to to
00:24:38
◼
►
make a device that's holistically like feels great and engenders love and
00:24:44
◼
►
loyalty. Do you think it took them that long though to get to the point where
00:24:48
◼
►
they have these pixels? Do you or do you think that there were further epiphanies
00:24:52
◼
►
along the line? I don't know. I mean that's the joke I was making
00:24:57
◼
►
about, you know, Google convincing people that they're launching their own phones
00:25:01
◼
►
for the third time. Yeah. For the first time because they had, you know, the
00:25:05
◼
►
Google, the Android, the One. Yeah. Yeah, and then they had the Nexus phones, of
00:25:13
◼
►
course, and then this is sort of like the third time they've done this, but it
00:25:17
◼
►
seems, for better or for worse, they seem more serious about it now, and I think
00:25:22
◼
►
they're serious about it now because they're in a place where their
00:25:26
◼
►
competitors, their real competitors, or real partners/
00:25:31
◼
►
competitors are very seriously thinking about divorcing themselves, right? And
00:25:37
◼
►
going like, "Hey, what do we do when Google's not the answer?" or "How do we
00:25:42
◼
►
fork Android in a way that's to our advantage like Amazon
00:25:47
◼
►
attempted to do. But I think that they basically look at it and say, "Well,
00:25:52
◼
►
eventually it's gonna happen and somebody's gonna be good at it, so why
00:25:55
◼
►
don't we just do it? Why don't we be the person that's good at it?" And that's why
00:25:59
◼
►
we're getting this third attempt. Yeah. As for the phones themselves, I almost...
00:26:09
◼
►
I'm one who's largely offended by rip-offs and I, you know, over the years
00:26:15
◼
►
have argued with people on Twitter.
00:26:18
◼
►
And I was certainly of the belief
00:26:22
◼
►
that Samsung ripped off the iPhone
00:26:24
◼
►
in those phones that were the subject
00:26:29
◼
►
of the big case that went to court.
00:26:32
◼
►
I largely agree with Apple on the merits
00:26:36
◼
►
of most of their arguments there.
00:26:38
◼
►
And the counterargument was always from people who either,
00:26:42
◼
►
I just think that they're mentally made up
00:26:44
◼
►
not to see or notice these things in the way that,
00:26:48
◼
►
for a best example I can think of is the way
00:26:50
◼
►
some people just don't notice the differences
00:26:52
◼
►
between fonts, and so yes, they can see the difference
00:26:55
◼
►
between a serif and a sans serif,
00:26:57
◼
►
'cause you can say, see these little feet at the bottom?
00:26:59
◼
►
That's the serifs, and they'll say, oh yeah, yeah,
00:27:01
◼
►
I see that, but they don't see the difference
00:27:03
◼
►
between Times and Garamond, and they don't see
00:27:06
◼
►
the difference even between Futura and Helvetica,
00:27:09
◼
►
let alone the subtle differences between, say,
00:27:11
◼
►
Vettica and Ariel, which is an actual ripoff font.
00:27:15
◼
►
It's a ripoff of--
00:27:17
◼
►
So I think that there's people who just
00:27:19
◼
►
don't see the differences like that in industrial design.
00:27:22
◼
►
And they give arguments like, well, there's
00:27:24
◼
►
only so many ways to make a round corner, round rectangular
00:27:28
◼
►
piece of glass.
00:27:29
◼
►
And it's like, no, that's not true.
00:27:35
◼
►
Yeah, I think it's like trying to tell somebody
00:27:37
◼
►
who's colorblind, like, this is lavender,
00:27:39
◼
►
and they're all, no, it's not.
00:27:41
◼
►
OK, never mind, because they just will never see it.
00:27:44
◼
►
These Pixel phones are so clearly following
00:27:48
◼
►
the design of the iPhone 6 that--
00:27:52
◼
►
I mean, it's to a degree that I don't think I've ever
00:27:54
◼
►
seen in any phone, any post-iPhone competing phone ever.
00:27:58
◼
►
These are the biggest rip-offs of the iPhone industrial design
00:28:04
◼
►
But it's almost so absurd that I almost salute them for--
00:28:08
◼
►
it's almost like there's a certain integrity to it
00:28:10
◼
►
where they're just explicitly saying, yes, we're making phones that make look like iPhones.
00:28:14
◼
►
They're not, I don't even think they're quite denying it. I mean, they're even talking about it
00:28:17
◼
►
in some of the articles that they've made a few choices to not make them look like iPhones.
00:28:22
◼
►
But nobody, there's so much like iPhones in terms of the, the, the shape, just the basic
00:28:29
◼
►
shape that it, I don't see how anybody could look at them and first thought not be, wow,
00:28:35
◼
►
those look exactly like the iPhone six. Right. There's almost an integrity to the fact that they
00:28:39
◼
►
or if we're going to copy Apple, we might as well copy Apple.
00:28:44
◼
►
Yeah, it's like recently Instagram copied Snapchat
00:28:47
◼
►
with their Stories thing.
00:28:48
◼
►
And they basically said, yeah, Snapchat
00:28:51
◼
►
came up with a really good idea, so this is our spin on it.
00:28:53
◼
►
Which I think is like Facebook has copied a lot of features
00:28:56
◼
►
from Snapchat over the years or tried to,
00:28:58
◼
►
and most of those standalone apps have failed.
00:29:00
◼
►
But Instagram's, even though it's under the Facebook
00:29:02
◼
►
umbrella, it's led by people who will make decisions.
00:29:05
◼
►
And in this case, they either made the decision
00:29:08
◼
►
or convince somebody above them to allow them to say,
00:29:11
◼
►
"Look, we thought it was great, so this is our spin on it."
00:29:15
◼
►
And I think that's a kind of a,
00:29:16
◼
►
there's a similar scenario going on here
00:29:18
◼
►
where they may not explicitly say it
00:29:20
◼
►
'cause Google probably has a little bit more layers
00:29:22
◼
►
of interruption between somebody just coming out
00:29:24
◼
►
and saying that and not.
00:29:26
◼
►
But I do think that there is an element of,
00:29:31
◼
►
the design is great, we're just gonna use that
00:29:34
◼
►
because the design is not really all that important to us
00:29:37
◼
►
in terms of appearance, right?
00:29:40
◼
►
And I'm using design here in the terminology
00:29:42
◼
►
of physical, industrial design, physical appearance,
00:29:46
◼
►
not the holistic design, capital D,
00:29:50
◼
►
where it's the way it works and looks.
00:29:51
◼
►
But I think that they said, hey,
00:29:53
◼
►
there's certain choices we need to make,
00:29:55
◼
►
but one of those choices is not to be wildly different,
00:29:58
◼
►
to wildly differentiate the look and feel.
00:30:00
◼
►
And the way I feel about it is,
00:30:03
◼
►
the name of the phone is perfect,
00:30:05
◼
►
it's called pixel, which obviously to anybody in the computer world, or honestly most people,
00:30:13
◼
►
probably know at least what a pixel is. Because nine times out of ten when you tell anybody
00:30:17
◼
►
about a phone or something, "Oh, how many pixels does it have?" They don't really know,
00:30:22
◼
►
or "How many pixels does that camera have?" They don't really know what it means and how
00:30:25
◼
►
that translates from a capture element to an actual pixel on a screen. Well, pixel is
00:30:29
◼
►
a really broad recognizable term. So A1, you know, number one, broad recognizable term.
00:30:36
◼
►
So that's great, right? That's a good choice. And second is, it emphasizes what's on the
00:30:42
◼
►
screen, right? The software. And to Google, the hardware is a vehicle for their AI and
00:30:49
◼
►
whatever other software they want to launch on it. And to Apple, the hardware is the thing
00:30:53
◼
►
and then people build to suit the hardware. Like that's the way that they, that's their
00:30:57
◼
►
philosophy, their entire developer ecosystem builds to the precise specifications available
00:31:02
◼
►
on the devices.
00:31:03
◼
►
And that's what leads to theoretically great experiences.
00:31:06
◼
►
But Google is basically like, "Hey, we can provide all the experiences people need or
00:31:11
◼
►
that we really care about."
00:31:14
◼
►
And so the Pixel, calling it Pixel, telegraphs that.
00:31:17
◼
►
It says, "It's about what's on the screen.
00:31:18
◼
►
It's not about what's around the screen.
00:31:22
◼
►
Don't worry too much about that.
00:31:23
◼
►
We're gonna give you a design that feels familiar,
00:31:26
◼
►
that you feel like, oh, that's a phone,
00:31:28
◼
►
I can use that thing, you know?
00:31:30
◼
►
And that's it, they're good, they're golden.
00:31:31
◼
►
The rest of it is on the screen.
00:31:33
◼
►
- Here's my biggest question.
00:31:36
◼
►
It's a win for them, honestly.
00:31:40
◼
►
It doesn't have a camera bump,
00:31:42
◼
►
and that was one of the first things I noticed.
00:31:44
◼
►
One of the things that they copied, though,
00:31:46
◼
►
is they put the camera in the same corner
00:31:48
◼
►
that the iPhone has always put the camera.
00:31:50
◼
►
And that's been one of the weird things
00:31:52
◼
►
that I've always wondered about, that here we are,
00:31:54
◼
►
nine years with 10 generations of the iPhone,
00:31:57
◼
►
and every single one has had the camera in the top left
00:32:01
◼
►
as you look at the back face of the camera.
00:32:04
◼
►
And almost all competing phones put the camera in the center,
00:32:09
◼
►
more or less where the Apple logo goes on an iPhone,
00:32:12
◼
►
and where the pixels put their fingerprint sensor.
00:32:16
◼
►
Most other phones, though, put the cameras there,
00:32:18
◼
►
whether there's a bump, whether there's no bump.
00:32:21
◼
►
I've never quite understood why since,
00:32:24
◼
►
just not even making the argument
00:32:25
◼
►
of why the iPhone's placement is better,
00:32:27
◼
►
but given that the iPhone--
00:32:28
◼
►
- Oh, it is, for sure.
00:32:29
◼
►
- I think so too, 'cause I think it's more likely
00:32:32
◼
►
to keep your finger out of the position.
00:32:34
◼
►
- Yeah, most people are right-handed,
00:32:35
◼
►
and you bring up the phone,
00:32:36
◼
►
and most people are gonna take it in horizontal,
00:32:38
◼
►
and so you bring up the phone and turn it horizontal,
00:32:40
◼
►
and you tap it with your right thumb,
00:32:42
◼
►
and your other finger is in front of it, holding it stable,
00:32:45
◼
►
and then that way you don't have a finger
00:32:46
◼
►
in front of the lens.
00:32:47
◼
►
It makes total damn sense.
00:32:48
◼
►
It's like the right place to put the camera.
00:32:50
◼
►
And Android phones, I always have my damn finger
00:32:52
◼
►
in front of the camera and I have to remove it.
00:32:53
◼
►
- I do too, and I don't know if it's because I have
00:32:57
◼
►
finger, you know, handheld habits that coincide with it
00:33:01
◼
►
I'm looking at my Moto X right here,
00:33:05
◼
►
and I just remember I've often, I'd hold it up
00:33:08
◼
►
and my finger's right over the camera.
00:33:10
◼
►
Well, the Nexus 5 is in the center,
00:33:12
◼
►
so they sort of like, hey, we'll be agnostic,
00:33:14
◼
►
you know, left hand, right hand.
00:33:15
◼
►
- Here was my first question though.
00:33:17
◼
►
As soon as I saw the design, and this is before,
00:33:19
◼
►
you know, before the event, because it leaked,
00:33:21
◼
►
and I was like, well, there's no camera bump,
00:33:22
◼
►
so how are they not having a camera bump?
00:33:24
◼
►
Is it because they made the phone thicker?
00:33:27
◼
►
Or is it that they've got,
00:33:29
◼
►
somehow they've got superior optics?
00:33:31
◼
►
So the iPhone 7 is,
00:33:36
◼
►
have it right here in front of me,
00:33:39
◼
►
7.1 millimeters thick,
00:33:42
◼
►
and the 7 Plus is 7.3 millimeters thick,
00:33:45
◼
►
so 2/10 of one millimeter thicker for the Plus
00:33:48
◼
►
than the regular 7.
00:33:50
◼
►
And then there's a big bump.
00:33:52
◼
►
The pixels dimensions on Google's tech specs page
00:33:56
◼
►
are for thickness--
00:33:59
◼
►
I don't understand what this means-- 7.3 and then a tilde
00:34:04
◼
►
8.5 millimeters.
00:34:06
◼
►
And that's for both phones, the Pixel and the Pixel XL.
00:34:08
◼
►
It's 8.5 at the top, because there's a plate of glass
00:34:11
◼
►
or whatever that is over the top.
00:34:15
◼
►
I haven't seen anybody answer this, though.
00:34:16
◼
►
that they're slightly wedge-shaped, sort of like,
00:34:20
◼
►
you know, not quite to the narrow,
00:34:23
◼
►
to like a blade, like a MacBook Air,
00:34:25
◼
►
but that they're not, when you look at it in profile
00:34:29
◼
►
from the side, it doesn't look like the bottom
00:34:32
◼
►
is as thick as the top.
00:34:33
◼
►
It's thinner at the bottom than it is at the top.
00:34:35
◼
►
So it's sort of like they slope the whole phone
00:34:38
◼
►
up to where it would be a bump.
00:34:40
◼
►
- Right, yes, I totally agree.
00:34:43
◼
►
I think that's what happened there.
00:34:44
◼
►
I actually didn't go to the event,
00:34:46
◼
►
so I didn't handle them myself, but I did ask somebody,
00:34:49
◼
►
and I believe that's what they told me.
00:34:51
◼
►
There was that sort of like piece of material at the top.
00:34:55
◼
►
I hesitate to just say glass
00:34:57
◼
►
'cause I don't wanna be wrong.
00:34:58
◼
►
- I don't think that it's just,
00:34:59
◼
►
but it doesn't like jump in thickness.
00:35:01
◼
►
I think it is, it's like a gentle wedge shape.
00:35:04
◼
►
But, and their product photography--
00:35:06
◼
►
- There's a bevel though.
00:35:07
◼
►
- Their product photography
00:35:08
◼
►
seems to purposefully obscure that.
00:35:11
◼
►
I looked at product photography for a while
00:35:16
◼
►
before I even thought to suspect that.
00:35:18
◼
►
- Yeah, I actually went in our back end here
00:35:23
◼
►
'cause our guys were at the event.
00:35:25
◼
►
We generally, when we shoot pictures,
00:35:27
◼
►
we dump 'em all into the back end
00:35:28
◼
►
so people that are utilizing them
00:35:31
◼
►
or writing articles about them can pull 'em up.
00:35:34
◼
►
And so let me, I'm pulling one up here.
00:35:37
◼
►
Yeah, and he's holding it at an angle
00:35:39
◼
►
and you can clearly see that that part at the top is raised.
00:35:42
◼
►
Now whether it's like a wedge from two thirds up the phone,
00:35:46
◼
►
it starts out at like eight millimeters
00:35:49
◼
►
and then it goes up to 8.3 at the very top, I don't know.
00:35:51
◼
►
But it's definitely like raised at the top.
00:35:55
◼
►
The top third of the phone is raised
00:35:56
◼
►
off of the rest of the phone.
00:35:58
◼
►
So I think they're hiding a lot of the bump in there.
00:36:00
◼
►
And if you look at the camera, it's interesting
00:36:02
◼
►
because there's actually a sort of slight indention.
00:36:06
◼
►
It slopes inwards at the camera.
00:36:10
◼
►
- So I don't know, I think it's a combination of things.
00:36:12
◼
►
I think they found out, they figured out a way
00:36:14
◼
►
to make it as thin as possible,
00:36:15
◼
►
and then they also sloped it up a little bit.
00:36:18
◼
►
But yeah, it's a clever way to get rid of the bump, for sure.
00:36:21
◼
►
- Yeah, and it will, it certainly would allow it
00:36:23
◼
►
to still sit flat on the table with no wobble.
00:36:27
◼
►
So I have to say, I mean, I'm not willing to say
00:36:29
◼
►
that it's a complete win without seeing it myself.
00:36:32
◼
►
I mean, I think I'm gonna buy one,
00:36:33
◼
►
'cause I haven't bought an Android phone in a while,
00:36:36
◼
►
and it seems like this would be the one to buy.
00:36:38
◼
►
- Yeah, I think I'm gonna upgrade for my 5X too, yeah.
00:36:41
◼
►
So I don't know, but it's, you know,
00:36:43
◼
►
I still hate the bumps.
00:36:44
◼
►
I like the seven bump better, I've said this before,
00:36:46
◼
►
I like the seven bump better than the six and six S bump
00:36:49
◼
►
because to me it's more of an honest bump.
00:36:51
◼
►
It's like, yeah, man, we've got it,
00:36:53
◼
►
yeah, we definitely have a bump.
00:36:54
◼
►
And you see it in a product photography.
00:36:56
◼
►
- We put this badass camera in here and yeah.
00:36:58
◼
►
- There were entire articles two years ago
00:37:00
◼
►
about how Apple's product photography hid the bump
00:37:04
◼
►
and they had profile pictures where in theory
00:37:07
◼
►
you think you would have been able to see the bump
00:37:09
◼
►
and you didn't, and then there were defenses
00:37:12
◼
►
where people were making their own photos,
00:37:14
◼
►
and they're like, "If you hold it just right,
00:37:15
◼
►
"you can take a real photo and not show the bump
00:37:18
◼
►
"by just the exact, shooting it from the opposite side
00:37:22
◼
►
"and putting it at the exact right angle."
00:37:25
◼
►
And I can just hold up my phone to my eye
00:37:27
◼
►
and hold it sideways, and if I hold it just right,
00:37:29
◼
►
it looks like it's in perfect profile
00:37:31
◼
►
and I don't see the bump.
00:37:32
◼
►
But doing it was dishonest,
00:37:33
◼
►
whereas now Apple's product photography highlights the bump.
00:37:37
◼
►
they've got like a beautiful reflection
00:37:39
◼
►
off the jet black aluminum.
00:37:42
◼
►
- Right, and the reflection's not an accident.
00:37:46
◼
►
So I'm not willing, but overall,
00:37:49
◼
►
I think not having a bump, you've gotta say,
00:37:52
◼
►
otherwise it doesn't feel too thick in your hand, et cetera.
00:37:56
◼
►
This could be a win for the Pixel over the iPhone.
00:37:59
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, hey, who wants, nobody wants a bump.
00:38:02
◼
►
That bump probably just drives Johnny insane, right?
00:38:06
◼
►
But it's, you know, you gotta do what you gotta do.
00:38:09
◼
►
- I think having an asymmetrical, overall,
00:38:11
◼
►
the whole phone being asymmetric
00:38:13
◼
►
would drive him nuts too, though.
00:38:15
◼
►
- Yeah, yeah, that's true.
00:38:17
◼
►
That's true. - Like, I can still see why,
00:38:18
◼
►
I could, I wouldn't be, you know,
00:38:21
◼
►
I'd almost be surprised if Apple didn't consider
00:38:23
◼
►
a wedge-shaped design to accommodate the,
00:38:26
◼
►
you know, the necessary thickness of the camera unit.
00:38:31
◼
►
And I could see why Apple rejected it.
00:38:33
◼
►
- God, remember that wedge-shaped design that,
00:38:36
◼
►
Who said that was gonna have a,
00:38:37
◼
►
was it Josh Polsky or somebody?
00:38:39
◼
►
- Yeah, I think so.
00:38:40
◼
►
- Maybe This Is My Next or something
00:38:41
◼
►
that they said was gonna be like a wedge.
00:38:43
◼
►
So maybe they were considering a wedge at some point.
00:38:45
◼
►
- Right, but maybe that wasn't totally
00:38:47
◼
►
pulled out of thin air.
00:38:50
◼
►
- Maybe that was an, I wouldn't be surprised at all.
00:38:51
◼
►
But I can also see why they got rid of,
00:38:53
◼
►
didn't go that way.
00:38:56
◼
►
- What else about these phones?
00:38:59
◼
►
They did move, they moved the volume to the other side.
00:39:05
◼
►
- Which is where a lot of Android phones
00:39:06
◼
►
had the volume. Right, right. Yeah, I mean, I like them. I mean, I think that they're
00:39:12
◼
►
a little bit awkward. The mix of materials is not really my bag, you know, like the two-tone
00:39:17
◼
►
thing. It just seems a little bit contrived to me, and I don't know why they have antenna
00:39:25
◼
►
lines and a huge window that could theoretically be transparent to signal, but that's, you
00:39:34
◼
►
I'm not a phone designer so there's probably like very logical reasons and all of that stuff.
00:39:38
◼
►
Right and it's like the iPhone 4 and 4s had breaks, you know, the antenna was the frame
00:39:46
◼
►
around the sides and then there famously there were breaks in there for different antennas to
00:39:51
◼
►
not be touching each other but then the back was made out of glass and therefore signals get
00:39:56
◼
►
get through. I don't quite get why they've got a one-third glass back and
00:40:00
◼
►
two-thirds aluminum and antenna lines. I could see why they have glass if they
00:40:06
◼
►
wanted to have the antenna signals get through and I could see having antenna
00:40:09
◼
►
lines for the reasons that the iPhone 6 and 7 have antenna lines but I don't see
00:40:13
◼
►
both. Yeah. It'll be curious. It's a very technical design, right? Yeah. Like it
00:40:20
◼
►
screams like this is very technical, we have lots of things going on and I think
00:40:24
◼
►
I think that's an interesting play,
00:40:27
◼
►
and they probably did it intentionally, right?
00:40:30
◼
►
'Cause this is the high, high end of the Android market,
00:40:33
◼
►
which is something we haven't talked about yet,
00:40:34
◼
►
but pricing-wise, this is an expensive phone, right?
00:40:38
◼
►
This is not like the Nexus 5X,
00:40:40
◼
►
"Hey, get one for 250 bucks, flat out,"
00:40:42
◼
►
you know, or whatever, on sale or with a coupon.
00:40:45
◼
►
You know, these are expensive $650 to $800,
00:40:49
◼
►
$950 phones or whatever.
00:40:51
◼
►
- Yeah, they're very comparably priced
00:40:53
◼
►
to the iPhone 7.
00:40:54
◼
►
It's 120 more for the bigger display
00:41:01
◼
►
instead of 100 more, and they have two storage tiers,
00:41:04
◼
►
32 and 128, and the 128 I think is,
00:41:08
◼
►
I think for both might be exactly the same price
00:41:11
◼
►
as the same iPhones.
00:41:14
◼
►
So I guess whatever math Apple was doing
00:41:18
◼
►
wasn't just about gouging.
00:41:20
◼
►
- No, I don't think so.
00:41:22
◼
►
The colors are called Very Silver, Quite Black, and Limited Edition Really Blue, which is already out of stock.
00:41:31
◼
►
I almost bought the blue. I literally pulled it up and I was pre-ordering it.
00:41:36
◼
►
And then I decided to just kind of wait and see what the first impressions were.
00:41:40
◼
►
Did you order one already?
00:41:42
◼
►
No, I haven't ordered. I'm going to, but I don't have it.
00:41:45
◼
►
I am too, but I'd probably just buy black. I don't want to wait.
00:41:48
◼
►
Although I'm curious why blue is limited edition.
00:41:52
◼
►
Is it just artificial scarcity or is it because--
00:41:54
◼
►
- It's probably harder to make.
00:41:55
◼
►
I mean those finishes are tougher.
00:41:57
◼
►
You know, I mean like even the, look at the jet black.
00:41:59
◼
►
Right, it's like, you know, some just nine step process
00:42:02
◼
►
that they have to anodize it and then they have to clear
00:42:04
◼
►
coat it and polish it and clear coat it and polish it
00:42:06
◼
►
and clear coat it and polish it.
00:42:07
◼
►
It just takes longer.
00:42:08
◼
►
I would guess they just produced a lot less of them
00:42:09
◼
►
because of that.
00:42:11
◼
►
- It looks like most of their product photography
00:42:14
◼
►
is the very silver.
00:42:16
◼
►
They skipped gold, so there's no gold.
00:42:18
◼
►
They can't accuse them of ripping off
00:42:20
◼
►
or following Apple in that regard.
00:42:22
◼
►
I'm kind of impressed if the black looks as good as it does
00:42:26
◼
►
on the aluminum, that I'm kind of impressed
00:42:28
◼
►
that they've already caught up.
00:42:30
◼
►
Who knows how much of that expertise Google brought,
00:42:32
◼
►
and who knows how much they're leaning on HTC.
00:42:35
◼
►
But famously, the reason that we've had space gray
00:42:38
◼
►
for a couple of years is because black proved so hard,
00:42:42
◼
►
even for Apple, whose unparalleled expertise in materials
00:42:47
◼
►
couldn't even get right.
00:42:49
◼
►
And here they're coming out of the box
00:42:51
◼
►
with a black anodized aluminum.
00:42:53
◼
►
- Yeah, yeah, like I said, I haven't seen it in person,
00:42:56
◼
►
so I don't know how black the black is,
00:42:59
◼
►
but it looks pretty black.
00:43:00
◼
►
I mean, you look at the black top section,
00:43:03
◼
►
and it is lighter than that, but it's not like gray.
00:43:06
◼
►
Like the previous iPhones were.
00:43:09
◼
►
- Yeah, it's, I don't know.
00:43:11
◼
►
There's some things that look weird about it to me,
00:43:13
◼
►
but it certainly is the best looking
00:43:15
◼
►
or Android phone I've seen in a while, to my eyes.
00:43:19
◼
►
- Yeah, a lot of them have too many notes
00:43:21
◼
►
'cause they gotta differentiate, right?
00:43:23
◼
►
- Right. - You're in this
00:43:24
◼
►
crowded market with a bunch of competitors
00:43:25
◼
►
and you're sitting on this Verizon shelf,
00:43:28
◼
►
like people walk into the Verizon store
00:43:29
◼
►
and they're like, "Oh, that one looks cool."
00:43:32
◼
►
That's what they're playing to, that audience.
00:43:35
◼
►
And Google's not.
00:43:36
◼
►
- This shot, I'll send it to you.
00:43:39
◼
►
This shot seems to me to really emphasize--
00:43:42
◼
►
I think this is where you can kind of see the wedge shape.
00:43:47
◼
►
I don't know.
00:43:49
◼
►
AMOLED display instead of LCD, but just about everybody
00:43:52
◼
►
other than Apple has gone to AMOLED.
00:43:55
◼
►
And there's rumors that Apple is going to go to AMOLED eventually
00:43:59
◼
►
sooner than later.
00:43:59
◼
►
I don't know.
00:44:01
◼
►
It seems to me like--
00:44:02
◼
►
I mean, AMOLED still has advantages on blacks.
00:44:04
◼
►
And I think they're inherent to the technology,
00:44:06
◼
►
that black on AMOLED is going to be a darker black,
00:44:10
◼
►
a deeper black, whatever you want to describe it,
00:44:12
◼
►
than LCD can ever do.
00:44:14
◼
►
But it seems to me like both technologies
00:44:17
◼
►
are sort of approaching each other.
00:44:19
◼
►
It take, you know, both are catching up
00:44:21
◼
►
to the strengths and weakness, or strengths of the others,
00:44:23
◼
►
and getting rid of their weaknesses.
00:44:25
◼
►
Like the days when AMOLED couldn't reproduce color
00:44:28
◼
►
faithfully, I think are probably over.
00:44:31
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, that was always the,
00:44:35
◼
►
I mean, AMOLED was a new technology for a long time
00:44:37
◼
►
and it was harder to make and everything else,
00:44:39
◼
►
but it's starting to become much more widely adopted.
00:44:42
◼
►
- I remember there was, in particular,
00:44:45
◼
►
the Flickr logo, which had the magenta.
00:44:48
◼
►
You could damage your retina,
00:44:50
◼
►
but just by looking at the Flickr logo.
00:44:52
◼
►
- That's right.
00:44:53
◼
►
Yeah, and when you vanish to AMOLED overall
00:44:55
◼
►
is that the colors are more neutral, right?
00:44:57
◼
►
And LCDs always have a sort of,
00:45:00
◼
►
they fight against the blue cast, you know?
00:45:03
◼
►
And that moving to AMOLED sort of fixes that
00:45:07
◼
►
without having to do software trickery on top of it
00:45:12
◼
►
to filter that.
00:45:12
◼
►
But I don't know.
00:45:14
◼
►
I think LCD and plane switching stuff,
00:45:16
◼
►
it just was so good because it didn't burn in,
00:45:20
◼
►
and it was really easy to make in pretty decent quality.
00:45:25
◼
►
But yeah, I think everything's gonna be AMOLED pretty soon
00:45:28
◼
►
because of the better color rendition.
00:45:30
◼
►
- I think it just comes down to the scale.
00:45:33
◼
►
And you have to remember that for Apple to switch,
00:45:36
◼
►
they're switching like 70 million displays
00:45:38
◼
►
in the first quarter.
00:45:40
◼
►
So it's not surprising to me at all
00:45:43
◼
►
that they might be late to that game just because.
00:45:48
◼
►
There's no way they were going to shift in the early years
00:45:51
◼
►
when the color of reproduction was so bad.
00:45:53
◼
►
And even now, if they might want to,
00:45:55
◼
►
they have to wait not just until you
00:45:57
◼
►
can make one that's up to their qualities for--
00:45:59
◼
►
just how good does it look, really,
00:46:01
◼
►
which is ultimately what Apple cares about.
00:46:03
◼
►
It's not really what you can measure in any kind of test.
00:46:06
◼
►
It's just look, just look at it with your eyes.
00:46:08
◼
►
Does it look good?
00:46:09
◼
►
But they've gotta be able to do it
00:46:11
◼
►
where they can make it in iPhone quantities.
00:46:13
◼
►
Let me take a break.
00:46:14
◼
►
I wanna talk camera on the Pixel.
00:46:21
◼
►
- But let me take a break and thank our second sponsor
00:46:24
◼
►
and just because it seems like a natural point
00:46:26
◼
►
in the show to do so.
00:46:27
◼
►
It's our good friends at Igloo.
00:46:28
◼
►
You guys know Igloo.
00:46:29
◼
►
They make the intranet that doesn't suck.
00:46:33
◼
►
Anyone who's worked in a corporate environment
00:46:35
◼
►
knows how painful intranets can be.
00:46:37
◼
►
The content's stale.
00:46:38
◼
►
The interface is ugly.
00:46:39
◼
►
You can't access it on your phone,
00:46:40
◼
►
or you have to do it with a lot of pinching and zooming.
00:46:43
◼
►
And nobody uses it because they don't like it.
00:46:45
◼
►
Igloo is an internet intranet you will actually like,
00:46:49
◼
►
because it's designed for the user.
00:46:51
◼
►
It's designed to be nice.
00:46:54
◼
►
And therefore, people use it because it's nice.
00:46:56
◼
►
And because people use it, it stays up to date.
00:47:00
◼
►
It gives you the flexibility to get your team's work done,
00:47:03
◼
►
how you want to do it, where you want,
00:47:05
◼
►
and on whatever device you want.
00:47:08
◼
►
Igloo is truly building a modern product meant for 2015,
00:47:12
◼
►
not for 1997.
00:47:14
◼
►
You can share news, organize files, coordinate calendars,
00:47:17
◼
►
manage projects, to-dos, all in one place.
00:47:21
◼
►
They've got annotation on documents.
00:47:23
◼
►
They've done a lot of work in the last year or two
00:47:25
◼
►
on the document sharing stuff.
00:47:27
◼
►
And everything can be social.
00:47:29
◼
►
You can have comments if you want.
00:47:30
◼
►
It's all configurable, too.
00:47:32
◼
►
comments and like buttons so everybody within your team
00:47:34
◼
►
can do all the sort of stuff that you're
00:47:36
◼
►
used to doing on social networks right there
00:47:38
◼
►
within your own private internet.
00:47:42
◼
►
And everything is responsive web design wise.
00:47:44
◼
►
So it looks fantastic on everything from your phone
00:47:48
◼
►
to your tablet to your big giant 5K iMac.
00:47:52
◼
►
So go to igloosoftware.com/tts, TTS for the talk show.
00:47:59
◼
►
igloosoftware.com/tts.
00:48:01
◼
►
And you can get a free trial for your team
00:48:04
◼
►
and see for yourself just how good it is.
00:48:06
◼
►
My thanks to them.
00:48:06
◼
►
I wanted to talk about this.
00:48:11
◼
►
So Google's bragging on the camera.
00:48:15
◼
►
It might be a great camera.
00:48:16
◼
►
But they're banking it all on the scores from DxOMark.
00:48:22
◼
►
And I didn't have time before the show to look this up.
00:48:25
◼
►
But there was something else recently,
00:48:26
◼
►
like within the last year or so, where DxOMark came out
00:48:29
◼
►
with something about Apple's image quality.
00:48:31
◼
►
And they have this test that comes out.
00:48:35
◼
►
I don't know.
00:48:36
◼
►
They run these tests, and then they get a number from one
00:48:40
◼
►
And that's it.
00:48:41
◼
►
So the Pixel phone--
00:48:43
◼
►
How good's the picture of your kids?
00:48:45
◼
►
Oh, it's 86.
00:48:46
◼
►
It's an 86 picture.
00:48:48
◼
►
How good is this camera?
00:48:49
◼
►
It's pretty good, but not so good.
00:48:51
◼
►
And this, to me, sounds like bullshit.
00:48:56
◼
►
And I know some people will say, well,
00:48:58
◼
►
that's because you're a fan of the iPhone,
00:49:00
◼
►
and you've got an iPhone.
00:49:01
◼
►
And so if Apple had the higher score,
00:49:04
◼
►
you'd be bragging about that.
00:49:07
◼
►
I don't, because I don't understand how you do this.
00:49:10
◼
►
And it's not like the iPhone is that far behind.
00:49:12
◼
►
The iPhone 7 is at 86 on their scale.
00:49:15
◼
►
I don't know if that's for both the iPhone 7 Plus and the 7,
00:49:20
◼
►
or just the iPhone 7.
00:49:23
◼
►
There's a couple of Android phones that are at 87 and 88,
00:49:27
◼
►
including the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge, which
00:49:29
◼
►
I've heard is is a and I've seen examples from is probably the one camera that if anything's better than the iPhone
00:49:36
◼
►
It's the galaxy s7
00:49:38
◼
►
Yeah, I think so. I mean, I think the s7 is probably the best camera out there other than the iPhone
00:49:43
◼
►
You know of shipping phones or whatever whatever you want to call
00:49:46
◼
►
I saw I mean I find this scale to be a little bit weird because there's like the moto z force droid is rated higher than
00:49:54
◼
►
the iPhone 7 as is the Xperia z5
00:49:58
◼
►
The galaxy galaxy s6 edge, which is a generation old
00:50:02
◼
►
The HTC 10, I mean that's the problem with numerical scales right is that they they don't make any sense across generations
00:50:10
◼
►
They don't make any sense, you know out of model year and frankly they just don't making any really damn sense at all
00:50:17
◼
►
I'm not a fan of numeric scales. I never assign them to reviews not each fan. I think it's enormously reductive
00:50:23
◼
►
And I think you know you could give somebody even if you want to give them the cheat sheet, you know
00:50:27
◼
►
You give them a simple one-line kind of explanation
00:50:30
◼
►
of why something is good or bad or kind of where it rates
00:50:33
◼
►
in the grand scheme of things.
00:50:34
◼
►
And you're doing people a much better favor
00:50:36
◼
►
than a number, which is marketing.
00:50:38
◼
►
It's not actually anything.
00:50:41
◼
►
It even goes so far.
00:50:44
◼
►
I think everybody has-- even at a consumer level,
00:50:46
◼
►
people have gotten away from counting megapixels.
00:50:50
◼
►
And for years, people who knew would say megapixels,
00:50:55
◼
►
they are important.
00:50:56
◼
►
And they certainly were pretty important in the early days
00:50:58
◼
►
of digital photography, where if you only
00:51:01
◼
►
had like a two megapixel phone, you really couldn't--
00:51:04
◼
►
there's a limit to how far you could--
00:51:06
◼
►
even if it was perfectly exposed,
00:51:07
◼
►
there's a limit to how far you could blow it up,
00:51:09
◼
►
because the pixels just weren't there to make a poster-sized
00:51:15
◼
►
We long ago got past that.
00:51:16
◼
►
And things like, well, how big are the pixels on the sensor?
00:51:19
◼
►
Not just how many there are, but how big they are,
00:51:21
◼
►
and that you could--
00:51:22
◼
►
just simply that a camera with fewer but bigger pixels
00:51:25
◼
►
could get much better image quality than a camera
00:51:27
◼
►
with more but smaller pixels to fit it in the same space.
00:51:32
◼
►
And there's so many other factors.
00:51:33
◼
►
Photography is so multivariate that the idea
00:51:37
◼
►
that you could reduce it-- at least with the megapixel
00:51:39
◼
►
comparison, you really are counting something.
00:51:41
◼
►
And you can argue whether it makes for a better camera
00:51:43
◼
►
or not, but you could say, well, 15 megapixels
00:51:46
◼
►
is more than 12 megapixels.
00:51:48
◼
►
You can't deny that.
00:51:49
◼
►
You could argue about whether it actually
00:51:51
◼
►
makes for a better camera or not,
00:51:52
◼
►
but at least when you're comparing those numbers,
00:51:54
◼
►
you're comparing the same thing.
00:51:55
◼
►
Whereas saying this one gets an 89, I don't know.
00:52:00
◼
►
It seems like bullshit to me.
00:52:02
◼
►
And I didn't think Google's heart was in it.
00:52:04
◼
►
Maybe I'm reading into it.
00:52:05
◼
►
But when they talked about it on stage in the event,
00:52:08
◼
►
to me, when they said that--
00:52:09
◼
►
I forget the guy's name who was talking about the camera.
00:52:12
◼
►
It just seemed to me like his heart wasn't in it.
00:52:14
◼
►
Because Google naturally draws people
00:52:17
◼
►
who want to measure things that are real.
00:52:20
◼
►
And this, to me, seems like a bullshit censor.
00:52:22
◼
►
the example photos they showed taken with the pixels
00:52:25
◼
►
did look very nice to me.
00:52:27
◼
►
I have no doubt--
00:52:28
◼
►
well, I don't deny that it might have a very nice camera.
00:52:32
◼
►
It might be a better camera than the iPhone 7.
00:52:34
◼
►
I don't know.
00:52:35
◼
►
But using DXO Mark to prove it, to me, raises some red alerts.
00:52:41
◼
►
Well, if you go to--
00:52:42
◼
►
I mean, the megapixels discussion, I think, is apt.
00:52:45
◼
►
Because you got like--
00:52:47
◼
►
in the first really affordable, quote, unquote,
00:52:50
◼
►
commercial digital SLR was the 30D, right?
00:52:54
◼
►
And around that time was the time, the age of the Mavica.
00:52:57
◼
►
Most people don't remember it, but it was the digital camera
00:53:00
◼
►
that you threw a floppy disk into, that Sony made.
00:53:04
◼
►
And then took pictures onto a floppy disk.
00:53:05
◼
►
And then they came out with the CD Mavica,
00:53:07
◼
►
and so on and so forth.
00:53:08
◼
►
But from those days, all the way on through to like,
00:53:11
◼
►
Canon came out with this, I think it was a G6,
00:53:15
◼
►
and the previous model, the G5, don't quote me,
00:53:17
◼
►
don't at me, 'cause I'm sure I'm getting
00:53:19
◼
►
these model numbers wrong.
00:53:20
◼
►
It was something like 2008 or 2009,
00:53:24
◼
►
somewhere around there, or a little bit earlier.
00:53:26
◼
►
And they came out with this compact G-series camera,
00:53:29
◼
►
which is compact point and shoot.
00:53:30
◼
►
And the previous year's model year had been 12 megapixel.
00:53:34
◼
►
And this model year was a 10 megapixel.
00:53:37
◼
►
And everybody was going ape, customer-wise.
00:53:40
◼
►
People would go like, "Why are you, why are you?"
00:53:42
◼
►
I used to sell, I was selling cameras at the time.
00:53:44
◼
►
And they were like, "Oh, why do you, why does it go down?"
00:53:48
◼
►
And you have to sort of explain to them about pixel pitch,
00:53:51
◼
►
right, and the size of the capture element,
00:53:53
◼
►
and how a smaller megapixel rating,
00:53:56
◼
►
you know, anything over eight megapixels
00:53:58
◼
►
is already gonna give you a great eight by 10
00:54:00
◼
►
and larger even.
00:54:02
◼
►
So at that point, it's all a wash,
00:54:04
◼
►
and for them to get better image quality,
00:54:06
◼
►
they had to concentrate on the size of the elements,
00:54:09
◼
►
to reduce the noise,
00:54:10
◼
►
and to give you a better picture quality, all of that.
00:54:12
◼
►
And so the numbers race is like a,
00:54:14
◼
►
it's a, just long done.
00:54:17
◼
►
I mean, it's done almost 10 years ago now, you know?
00:54:20
◼
►
And that's the thing that you get into when you
00:54:23
◼
►
start reading things numerically.
00:54:25
◼
►
So like this DxOMark has these really wacky phones
00:54:28
◼
►
rated above the iPhone 7 because the chart crosses model years.
00:54:32
◼
►
And those cameras have lower pixel pitch and worse quality,
00:54:36
◼
►
but in fact are rated, quote unquote, "better"
00:54:38
◼
►
because they were rated on that scale of the older phones.
00:54:42
◼
►
But then you have, in addition, the thing that bothers me
00:54:46
◼
►
about DxO. DxO has been around for a lot of years, but in the last couple of years, they've
00:54:51
◼
►
started marketing an attachment for the iPhone camera that is supposed to make it like DSLR
00:54:58
◼
►
quality or whatever. It's basically a huge sensor, much bigger sensor that can fit in
00:55:02
◼
►
your iPhone in an external unit that you plug into the lightning port, right? And it sits
00:55:08
◼
►
on the side like a tumor and takes better pictures. And I'm sure it takes better. I
00:55:12
◼
►
I've never tried one.
00:55:14
◼
►
Our camera guys have tried one and they think it's fine.
00:55:16
◼
►
But the thing is, is like you go to DxOMark,
00:55:19
◼
►
you go to this review of the Pixel,
00:55:20
◼
►
and it's literally the logo of the site,
00:55:23
◼
►
the charts on the side, on the right hand side of the page,
00:55:26
◼
►
and the Pixel overview is right there,
00:55:30
◼
►
and framing the Pixel review of the camera
00:55:35
◼
►
is an enormous banner for the DxO1 iPhone attachment,
00:55:40
◼
►
And then down at the bottom, a pop-up banner is,
00:55:42
◼
►
discover the DX01 Crow-Quality camera, miniaturized,
00:55:47
◼
►
connected with a picture of an iPhone
00:55:49
◼
►
and this thing plugged into it, right?
00:55:51
◼
►
So look, I'm sure these folks are very nice.
00:55:54
◼
►
I'm sure this David Cardinale is doing
00:55:57
◼
►
the best work he can do writing this article.
00:56:00
◼
►
But it does raise questions about how much you can rely
00:56:03
◼
►
on the rating of a camera company
00:56:07
◼
►
on another person's camera
00:56:09
◼
►
when they're actually made for the same device.
00:56:12
◼
►
Like, oh, what's better, the iPhone's camera
00:56:13
◼
►
or the one we made for the iPhone?
00:56:16
◼
►
And I would look, it's probably fine,
00:56:18
◼
►
and it's probably like this three point difference
00:56:20
◼
►
between that and the Pixel probably doesn't have anything
00:56:23
◼
►
to do with it, it's just I always take stuff coming
00:56:25
◼
►
from DxO about smartphones with a grain of salt,
00:56:27
◼
►
as long as they're in the camera business, I always will.
00:56:30
◼
►
It's just my gut, you know?
00:56:31
◼
►
- Right, that they've got a motivation
00:56:34
◼
►
to make iPhone users think maybe the iPhone camera
00:56:36
◼
►
isn't that great because they're selling
00:56:39
◼
►
a separate camera that you can add to your iPhone.
00:56:41
◼
►
Like don't worry, you don't need to replace your iPhone,
00:56:42
◼
►
you can just buy our camera
00:56:44
◼
►
that you stick on the lighting port.
00:56:45
◼
►
- Yeah, oh your camera is only an 84?
00:56:47
◼
►
Oh, it's too bad, but we can make it 100.
00:56:49
◼
►
- Do they give a rating to their DxO mark?
00:56:52
◼
►
- No, I don't know, I don't know.
00:56:55
◼
►
That would be good though, I would love to look at that.
00:56:57
◼
►
Maybe they rate it like a 70 or something,
00:56:59
◼
►
that would be funny.
00:57:00
◼
►
But anyhow, the Pixel, like I really,
00:57:04
◼
►
it's hard to kind of make any value judgments on the camera
00:57:07
◼
►
until I take a look at it, right?
00:57:08
◼
►
I don't want to go off the handle and say,
00:57:10
◼
►
"Oh, it's probably crap," when it maybe is amazing,
00:57:12
◼
►
and I just haven't seen it yet.
00:57:14
◼
►
That would be the worst thing.
00:57:15
◼
►
There are some specifications that do tell some stories about the camera.
00:57:19
◼
►
It has a larger pixel pitch than the iPhone.
00:57:21
◼
►
So however they arrange their sensor and size of the sensor,
00:57:25
◼
►
they manage to map out larger capture elements per pixel,
00:57:29
◼
►
which does help. It helps with color rendition.
00:57:31
◼
►
The way that capture elements work is that there's a small,
00:57:34
◼
►
flat capture element that sits on the back of the sensor,
00:57:38
◼
►
and then above it there's a sort of well, right? And that well
00:57:41
◼
►
divides it from the the capture elements next to it,
00:57:46
◼
►
and the way light shines in, especially from the edges,
00:57:49
◼
►
can affect how much color information that
00:57:52
◼
►
that capture element picks up and how it reads as like a red pixel or green or
00:57:56
◼
►
whatever the case may be. And all of that is predicated on how
00:58:01
◼
►
large each of those wells are. And so the bigger the pixel pitch, the
00:58:04
◼
►
The wider those wells are, the better color rendition, the more accurate color, the less
00:58:11
◼
►
weirdness around the edges of the borders of two colors where they blend into one another
00:58:15
◼
►
or divide from one another.
00:58:17
◼
►
All of that is going to be affected by the pixel pitch.
00:58:19
◼
►
So seeing a larger pixel pitch is already a great sign.
00:58:23
◼
►
So that's good.
00:58:25
◼
►
Then on top of that though, you do have, I believe it's a smaller aperture than the
00:58:29
◼
►
widest aperture on the iPhones.
00:58:31
◼
►
I think it's a 2.0, whereas the iPhone's a,
00:58:34
◼
►
think, what's 1.8, is that a half stop or a full stop?
00:58:37
◼
►
I don't know.
00:58:38
◼
►
- I think it's a half stop. - Yeah, yeah.
00:58:39
◼
►
But anyhow, it's brighter, right?
00:58:41
◼
►
So people are saying, oh, it's brighter,
00:58:43
◼
►
you know, the iPhone's brighter,
00:58:44
◼
►
but at the same time, the larger pixel pitch
00:58:46
◼
►
could offset it and then some,
00:58:48
◼
►
because it is significantly larger.
00:58:50
◼
►
So, you know, I'm interested to see what it can do.
00:58:53
◼
►
I'm curious.
00:58:54
◼
►
- Right, there's so many variables that go into photography
00:58:57
◼
►
and that it really is, and it's always been,
00:59:01
◼
►
It's not just new to digital photography.
00:59:02
◼
►
It's always been an argument over how much glass
00:59:05
◼
►
do you want to carry around.
00:59:08
◼
►
- You know, and sensor versus the lens,
00:59:14
◼
►
and getting more light by doing it on the sensor side
00:59:17
◼
►
as opposed to doing it on the aperture side.
00:59:20
◼
►
Effectively, in the bottom line is what is it like
00:59:22
◼
►
to actually go out and shoot photos with the thing?
00:59:24
◼
►
And that's what matters.
00:59:25
◼
►
One difference I've seen is that it doesn't,
00:59:29
◼
►
unless they're not talking about it,
00:59:30
◼
►
It doesn't have optical image stabilization.
00:59:34
◼
►
So I think on stills, that's going
00:59:35
◼
►
to hurt them a little bit, because it certainly is going
00:59:39
◼
►
it really does help with stills.
00:59:41
◼
►
On video, I'm not sure, because it
00:59:43
◼
►
seems they have a gyroscope-driven digital
00:59:49
◼
►
stabilization for video.
00:59:51
◼
►
And they showed an example that was supposedly shot side
00:59:53
◼
►
by side, where they exaggerated the camera shake of video
00:59:57
◼
►
while you walk.
00:59:58
◼
►
and their stabilized version looked pretty good.
01:00:00
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, there's still the normal
01:00:03
◼
►
rolling shutter effects, and then you do get
01:00:05
◼
►
the little blur and low light and stuff,
01:00:07
◼
►
but it looks like they're digital.
01:00:08
◼
►
I mean, this is Google's kind of bag.
01:00:11
◼
►
The digital stabilization I would estimate
01:00:13
◼
►
would probably be pretty good, so I'm not shocked
01:00:15
◼
►
to hear that it is pretty good in the video.
01:00:17
◼
►
But yeah, no optical stabilization.
01:00:19
◼
►
- I have an app, maybe there's other apps that do it,
01:00:22
◼
►
but I have an app for the iPhone called Horizon.
01:00:24
◼
►
I don't know if you've ever heard of it.
01:00:26
◼
►
It's an app that lets you shoot horizontal video
01:00:29
◼
►
no matter how you hold your iPhone.
01:00:34
◼
►
- So what they're doing is they're just using
01:00:36
◼
►
a crop of the sensor to do it.
01:00:38
◼
►
And so that you can hold, now obviously there is a,
01:00:42
◼
►
it's not magic, it doesn't shoot the same exact video
01:00:45
◼
►
that you would get holding it horizontally
01:00:47
◼
►
when you hold it vertically, it's a crop,
01:00:50
◼
►
so it's almost like the equivalent
01:00:51
◼
►
of being zoomed in a little bit.
01:00:56
◼
►
but you get a preview while you shoot.
01:00:58
◼
►
But they must be doing the same thing,
01:01:00
◼
►
'cause it also, the other effect is even
01:01:02
◼
►
when you use Horizon to shoot,
01:01:04
◼
►
even if you hold your iPhone horizontally,
01:01:08
◼
►
you still get stabilization.
01:01:11
◼
►
- Yes, it's all the digital stabilization systems
01:01:13
◼
►
are exactly that, they're all based on crop.
01:01:16
◼
►
And so the most intelligent ones will crop dynamically.
01:01:19
◼
►
Right, the earliest ones are
01:01:23
◼
►
the earliest digital stabilization systems
01:01:27
◼
►
were all based on a fixed crop.
01:01:28
◼
►
So they would essentially crop in 20% of your resolution
01:01:32
◼
►
and then use that as a buffer, right?
01:01:34
◼
►
To try and stabilize your image.
01:01:35
◼
►
And the more dynamic ones, the newer ones,
01:01:38
◼
►
like this Google one most likely,
01:01:39
◼
►
although I haven't read deep on it,
01:01:41
◼
►
vary that crop by how fast you're moving your phone.
01:01:44
◼
►
They use the accelerometer data and gyroscope data to say,
01:01:47
◼
►
hey, you know, you're vibrating, you're, you know,
01:01:50
◼
►
jigging a lot, so let's go ahead and just crop in a ton
01:01:53
◼
►
and then, oh, you're more stable now,
01:01:55
◼
►
you've stopped walking or whatever,
01:01:56
◼
►
let's go back out and get you as much resolution as we can.
01:01:59
◼
►
So the more intelligent ones, that's what they do.
01:02:01
◼
►
And that's the way Apple's digital stabilization works
01:02:03
◼
►
on the, like the iPhone 6S where it has no optical.
01:02:07
◼
►
I think it's a win for the iPhone 7, though,
01:02:10
◼
►
and I think it'll be proven out
01:02:11
◼
►
that on all of the iPhone 7s, plus and regular size,
01:02:15
◼
►
you get true optical image stabilization,
01:02:17
◼
►
including for video.
01:02:18
◼
►
So that's-- - I'll tell you what,
01:02:19
◼
►
I missed the hell out of it in 2X.
01:02:23
◼
►
- It's the worst, yeah.
01:02:24
◼
►
It's like, yeah.
01:02:26
◼
►
- It's the one thing I keep telling myself
01:02:28
◼
►
to console myself that my personal iPhone
01:02:31
◼
►
doesn't have the 2X camera.
01:02:33
◼
►
Is that, well, it doesn't have OIS, so who cares?
01:02:37
◼
►
- So what, who cares?
01:02:38
◼
►
- It is very shaky, I'll tell you.
01:02:39
◼
►
Especially because it's 2X, right?
01:02:41
◼
►
You know, so hey, it's the price you pay.
01:02:45
◼
►
- It's a camera for well-lit situations.
01:02:48
◼
►
While we're on this subject,
01:02:51
◼
►
I don't know that there's anybody who knows more
01:02:53
◼
►
about the depth effect on the iPhone 7 Plus than you.
01:02:57
◼
►
You had pre-release access to the feature a couple days
01:03:01
◼
►
before the developer beta came out.
01:03:03
◼
►
Your explanation of it is as detailed, technically,
01:03:06
◼
►
as anything I've seen.
01:03:08
◼
►
More detailed in some regards even than what Apple has seen,
01:03:10
◼
►
because you've poked at them to get them to tell you
01:03:14
◼
►
that they wrote their own custom disk blur.
01:03:17
◼
►
Which is funny, because it came up a couple times.
01:03:19
◼
►
I keep seeing people say that it's like a Gaussian blur,
01:03:22
◼
►
which is exactly what you said
01:03:23
◼
►
in your first version of the report.
01:03:25
◼
►
- I'm so irritated.
01:03:26
◼
►
I'm so irritated that it was in my article.
01:03:30
◼
►
Because I think, 'cause I remember talking to you
01:03:32
◼
►
about it behind the scenes,
01:03:33
◼
►
and you were somewhat skeptical that it was a Gaussian blur.
01:03:35
◼
►
You're like, "But that's what they told me."
01:03:38
◼
►
Right, that's why you're frustrated.
01:03:39
◼
►
- When you get told that it's Gaussian,
01:03:40
◼
►
you just say, "Okay."
01:03:42
◼
►
- But honestly, a reader, and I'm sorry,
01:03:44
◼
►
I don't have the tweet in front of me,
01:03:46
◼
►
but he tweeted at me and was like,
01:03:48
◼
►
"Hey, this picture of a strawberry that you have in your piece,
01:03:51
◼
►
like, I'm-- the edges of it, the bloom really looks like a disc blur."
01:03:55
◼
►
And the guy's probably in visual, you know, in visual work somehow.
01:03:59
◼
►
He's a designer or in visual effects or something.
01:04:01
◼
►
'Cause the visual effects supervisors and those people
01:04:03
◼
►
are writing articles about it now, they all have it nailed.
01:04:06
◼
►
And, you know, like, they're super sharp about this 'cause they do it all day.
01:04:09
◼
►
They simulate camera effects for a living, right?
01:04:13
◼
►
Or many of them do.
01:04:14
◼
►
But he said, "Hey, this kind of looks like a disc blur. Are you sure?"
01:04:18
◼
►
And I was like, no, no.
01:04:19
◼
►
And I was really like, oh, you know.
01:04:21
◼
►
And he's like, oh, just asking.
01:04:22
◼
►
And I'm like, no, no.
01:04:23
◼
►
You know what?
01:04:24
◼
►
Hey, you know what?
01:04:25
◼
►
Actually, now that I look at it-- and so I went back.
01:04:27
◼
►
And yeah, it's a custom disk blur.
01:04:28
◼
►
So I was really irritated.
01:04:29
◼
►
I hate getting anything wrong.
01:04:31
◼
►
So it's just like, it makes me itch.
01:04:32
◼
►
Here's the thing I've noticed.
01:04:34
◼
►
And I've had a few brief conversations with people
01:04:36
◼
►
on Twitter about it.
01:04:38
◼
►
At least for me personally, while I
01:04:40
◼
►
was shooting test shots with the iPhone 7 Plus review
01:04:43
◼
►
unit with the feature on, it looks to me
01:04:46
◼
►
like they're doing something different with the noise,
01:04:49
◼
►
that to me, it gives a sort of film-like grain
01:04:54
◼
►
to the noise on those images.
01:04:58
◼
►
And I don't see the same thing on the non-portrait shots.
01:05:02
◼
►
And I don't know if I'm seeing what I wanna see
01:05:04
◼
►
because I've always been a big fan.
01:05:05
◼
►
- No, I have seen it too.
01:05:06
◼
►
I've seen it too.
01:05:07
◼
►
And honestly, I haven't seen it as much on my shots,
01:05:10
◼
►
but maybe I just haven't been looking,
01:05:11
◼
►
but I've seen it a ton on examples,
01:05:13
◼
►
like things people are showing me
01:05:15
◼
►
or things that I see on Instagram.
01:05:17
◼
►
And yes, I have seen it and I don't know.
01:05:20
◼
►
I have no information about whether they're artificially
01:05:25
◼
►
under sharpening it, right?
01:05:26
◼
►
Or sharpening it with a tighter radius.
01:05:29
◼
►
Excuse me, under noise reducing it is what I meant.
01:05:32
◼
►
Or sharpening it with a tighter radius.
01:05:33
◼
►
Because I am not a fan of how aggressively
01:05:38
◼
►
Apple noise reduces their images.
01:05:40
◼
►
So I feel that the iPhone's images,
01:05:44
◼
►
while great, would be better subjectively, right?
01:05:49
◼
►
This is me talking.
01:05:49
◼
►
This is not like some grandiose statement
01:05:52
◼
►
about better or worse for everybody.
01:05:54
◼
►
But I definitely feel that they would be better
01:05:56
◼
►
if they were sharpened a little bit less while still
01:06:00
◼
►
understanding why they do it.
01:06:02
◼
►
Because most people would just rather not see any grain.
01:06:06
◼
►
And to me, that's the trade-off.
01:06:08
◼
►
And I get it.
01:06:08
◼
►
I just don't like it.
01:06:09
◼
►
Yeah, I've never been afraid of the grain.
01:06:12
◼
►
I used to when I shot film would tend to just leave the camera loaded with 400 or even 800
01:06:18
◼
►
speed film because I always thought like if you're going to leave some film in there,
01:06:23
◼
►
be ready for any situation. And if it means that I'm an outside and I'm getting a lot
01:06:28
◼
►
of grain because I could be shooting like it with 100 speed film, so be it because the
01:06:34
◼
►
colors still look good and I can shoot indoors and get an exposure where I couldn't if I
01:06:40
◼
►
if I had 100-speed film already loaded in there.
01:06:42
◼
►
And if there was a slider I could set in iOS
01:06:45
◼
►
that adjusted noise reduction,
01:06:49
◼
►
I would probably turn it to the lowest setting
01:06:51
◼
►
that Apple would allow me to get away with,
01:06:53
◼
►
knowing that Apple isn't going to say
01:06:55
◼
►
don't noise reduce at all.
01:06:57
◼
►
'Cause that's one of the things people have been noticing
01:06:58
◼
►
now that you can shoot raw with the iPhone camera
01:07:01
◼
►
is holy shit how much noise there is on the image
01:07:04
◼
►
when you shoot raw, and it's just what the camera sees.
01:07:08
◼
►
Everybody I know who's using Lightroom to shoot RAW on the iPhone 7 is like, "Holy
01:07:14
◼
►
shit, I can't believe how noisy this is."
01:07:16
◼
►
I'm sure there's somebody at Apple or on the camera team who are like, "Do you know
01:07:20
◼
►
how small that sensor is?"
01:07:22
◼
►
You know what kind of miracles we're pulling?
01:07:25
◼
►
That's why I always say, I try to be really careful when I'm talking about this noise
01:07:29
◼
►
and say, for me, I would be okay if they dialed it back.
01:07:33
◼
►
But they really are performing miracles.
01:07:35
◼
►
I mean, honestly, the RAW image that comes off of that sensor
01:07:39
◼
►
is already better than the actual data that they get.
01:07:44
◼
►
So I mean, I think that you're getting a viewport
01:07:48
◼
►
with the RAW stuff, and just how good the ISP is.
01:07:55
◼
►
I mean, you could always tweak it.
01:07:56
◼
►
I talked about this last week.
01:07:58
◼
►
One of my almost beloved devices-- not just cameras,
01:08:02
◼
►
but devices I've ever owned was my original Ricoh GRD.
01:08:06
◼
►
The Ricoh GRs were the point and shoot cameras
01:08:08
◼
►
that they made for film for years,
01:08:09
◼
►
and when they first went digital, they called it the GRD.
01:08:12
◼
►
It was the first generation one.
01:08:13
◼
►
And it's very confusing,
01:08:14
◼
►
'cause then they had the GRD2 and the GRD3, I think,
01:08:17
◼
►
and then they went back, they went back,
01:08:19
◼
►
and they just had one, instead of numbering it four,
01:08:21
◼
►
they just went back to Ricoh GR.
01:08:23
◼
►
And so it's very confusing.
01:08:24
◼
►
But I had the original one, I think I bought it in 2006,
01:08:27
◼
►
and the whole reason I bought it,
01:08:29
◼
►
I bought it without ever knowing anybody who owned it,
01:08:31
◼
►
just based on the reviews, and it was gray market,
01:08:33
◼
►
wasn't officially sold in North America,
01:08:36
◼
►
was that everybody said that Ricoh's digital sensor
01:08:40
◼
►
is tuned, the ISP is tuned to turn the,
01:08:43
◼
►
make the noise look more like film grain.
01:08:46
◼
►
And everybody who had one on these boards would say so,
01:08:49
◼
►
and I looked at people's Flickr uploads,
01:08:51
◼
►
and looked at, Flickr would let you see the original,
01:08:53
◼
►
so I was like, damned if that doesn't look like film grain,
01:08:56
◼
►
not digital noise, or at least less, more along those lines.
01:09:00
◼
►
And the idea was, and Rico was explicit about it,
01:09:03
◼
►
as opposed to being sort of secretive like Apple
01:09:05
◼
►
and not really talking about it.
01:09:07
◼
►
Rico was very explicit and said,
01:09:09
◼
►
"There's a limit to what we can do with these,"
01:09:12
◼
►
and it was a very small sensor for a 2006 point and shoot.
01:09:16
◼
►
There's a limit to how much, there's going to be noise.
01:09:19
◼
►
And so rather than trying to hide the noise,
01:09:21
◼
►
our efforts are to make the noise aesthetically pleasing.
01:09:25
◼
►
And that's exactly what the film industry did
01:09:28
◼
►
for a hundred years.
01:09:29
◼
►
The people who are like anti-noise would say,
01:09:31
◼
►
"Ah, you guys celebrate film.
01:09:35
◼
►
"You're just, you're romantics."
01:09:38
◼
►
And you're celebrating something
01:09:42
◼
►
that was a technical limitation anyway.
01:09:45
◼
►
But I would argue, in my opinion, sort of as an amateur,
01:09:49
◼
►
but the reason film grain looked good
01:09:51
◼
►
wasn't just nostalgia.
01:09:52
◼
►
It was because Kodak and Fuji and the other film companies
01:09:56
◼
►
spent 100 years making the noise look better.
01:10:00
◼
►
I call it noise now, but that it wasn't like,
01:10:05
◼
►
it's not just because it was old
01:10:07
◼
►
that we thought film grain looked good,
01:10:08
◼
►
it was that they, decades of work
01:10:10
◼
►
went into making it look good.
01:10:12
◼
►
Anyway, I see it in the seven plus portrait shots,
01:10:15
◼
►
and I don't know if it's my imagination or not.
01:10:17
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, I do know, I do know that they,
01:10:23
◼
►
you know, the work that was done to tune the ISP
01:10:28
◼
►
was definitely done with an eye to what had come in the past,
01:10:31
◼
►
but not just photographs, you know,
01:10:32
◼
►
other works of art too.
01:10:34
◼
►
I mean, remember, they're creating this custom from scratch
01:10:37
◼
►
and Apple's never one to kind of go with the accepted wisdom
01:10:40
◼
►
around something like that.
01:10:41
◼
►
So they have an opportunity to sort of tune the ISP
01:10:45
◼
►
to however they want it.
01:10:46
◼
►
And now that the camera, honestly,
01:10:49
◼
►
what else is a defining, you know,
01:10:52
◼
►
definitive deciding factor between phones.
01:10:56
◼
►
Most of the time it's the camera these days.
01:10:59
◼
►
And you could argue that AI or the assistant features
01:11:02
◼
►
may be what they're seeking for to be next.
01:11:05
◼
►
But right now, if you're deciding between three cameras
01:11:08
◼
►
or three phones on the shelf,
01:11:10
◼
►
you kinda wanna know which one has the best camera,
01:11:12
◼
►
'cause that's your camera too.
01:11:13
◼
►
It's a huge factor when they decide on picking stuff.
01:11:17
◼
►
So now that they have an opportunity
01:11:19
◼
►
to really have an amazing camera that has optical zoom,
01:11:24
◼
►
that has all of these additional features
01:11:26
◼
►
that could be unlocked in the future by having two lenses,
01:11:30
◼
►
and they're able to tune the ISP how they want,
01:11:32
◼
►
they can pick and choose and really create a look
01:11:36
◼
►
that is new, you know?
01:11:38
◼
►
And it may have some elements of film,
01:11:41
◼
►
it may have some elements of what we consider to be
01:11:45
◼
►
like, you know, characteristic of digital images,
01:11:49
◼
►
which would be maybe a little bit crisper,
01:11:52
◼
►
maybe a little bit lower noise or whatever,
01:11:54
◼
►
but you could definitely kind of see them
01:11:56
◼
►
combining the two qualities.
01:11:58
◼
►
- I've been thinking, one thing that's occurred to me
01:12:00
◼
►
as more and more people are shooting with this,
01:12:03
◼
►
you still have to have a beta,
01:12:04
◼
►
so it's still pretty uncommon.
01:12:05
◼
►
You have to, A, have to have this iPhone 7 Plus,
01:12:07
◼
►
and B, you have to be willing to install the beta,
01:12:09
◼
►
but I've seen enough examples.
01:12:10
◼
►
It occurs to me, this thought had occurred to me,
01:12:13
◼
►
but now the more I think about it,
01:12:14
◼
►
the more I think it's gonna be a big deal,
01:12:16
◼
►
is that the number of people who see your photos
01:12:20
◼
►
on their own phones, they're seeing them
01:12:23
◼
►
on Instagram on their phone, or on Facebook,
01:12:25
◼
►
or on Twitter, or something like that,
01:12:26
◼
►
they're seeing them in such a small size
01:12:28
◼
►
that the smaller the size you view the image at,
01:12:31
◼
►
more like a real bokeh from a real large sensor camera,
01:12:36
◼
►
the effect looks like.
01:12:38
◼
►
You have to zoom in more, you have to make it really big
01:12:42
◼
►
to see the deficiencies of the trickery.
01:12:46
◼
►
So when you see somebody who has an iPhone 7 Plus
01:12:48
◼
►
using this feature just in their Instagram feed,
01:12:51
◼
►
that's more compelling than looking at it
01:12:57
◼
►
blown up to a full size on your iMac.
01:12:59
◼
►
- Yeah, and comparing it, like a lot of,
01:13:00
◼
►
obviously, and this is not a dig,
01:13:02
◼
►
it's sort of what people want to see,
01:13:04
◼
►
but comparing it against, even in my piece,
01:13:07
◼
►
like I had to, I really had to compare it
01:13:10
◼
►
against the same shot, which it does shoot automatically,
01:13:13
◼
►
the same shot without the effect, you know?
01:13:15
◼
►
Because that's what we want to see, right?
01:13:18
◼
►
Oh, what did it look like before?
01:13:19
◼
►
What does it look like after?
01:13:20
◼
►
But I honestly think that does it a disservice
01:13:22
◼
►
because I think then it allows you to go through
01:13:24
◼
►
and be really picky about,
01:13:26
◼
►
oh, this particular thing is wrong,
01:13:28
◼
►
or I missed this, or whatever.
01:13:30
◼
►
But if you just look at it in isolation,
01:13:32
◼
►
they're really pretty good.
01:13:33
◼
►
I mean, there's some that are really funky
01:13:35
◼
►
and weird and dumb and silly and it screws up,
01:13:38
◼
►
but it is very early,
01:13:40
◼
►
and there are some shots out of it that are just great.
01:13:43
◼
►
And you don't have to use them.
01:13:44
◼
►
If it turns out weird, you got the other one,
01:13:46
◼
►
which would have been what it would look like normally.
01:13:49
◼
►
So there's no loss.
01:13:50
◼
►
- Back to the Pixel.
01:13:55
◼
►
And I don't think, I think a digression
01:13:59
◼
►
about the iPhone camera is fine,
01:14:01
◼
►
because one of the, and a big picture,
01:14:03
◼
►
I think it's not just what the pixels look like
01:14:07
◼
►
before you even turn them on and saying,
01:14:09
◼
►
look, this industrial design is just
01:14:13
◼
►
blatantly following Apple's lead.
01:14:15
◼
►
Everything about the pixels to me is saying,
01:14:19
◼
►
we're making an iPhone caliber,
01:14:21
◼
►
if we're going after the iPhone market.
01:14:23
◼
►
They've made a switching tool that,
01:14:26
◼
►
I don't even know how it works.
01:14:27
◼
►
It's fascinating to me.
01:14:28
◼
►
I can't wait to see this.
01:14:30
◼
►
They have a cable they ship it with
01:14:31
◼
►
that has lightning on one side,
01:14:33
◼
►
goes into the pixel on the other,
01:14:34
◼
►
and takes things like your iMessages
01:14:37
◼
►
and your text messages from your phone.
01:14:39
◼
►
I don't understand how something
01:14:41
◼
►
with a lightning cable is reading that.
01:14:42
◼
►
I guess it's pretending to be like iTunes or something?
01:14:46
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, yeah.
01:14:47
◼
►
- You'll have to give it permission on your iPhone,
01:14:49
◼
►
the way that the iPhone-- - You'll have to tell it
01:14:50
◼
►
to trust it, yeah. - Right, trust this thing,
01:14:52
◼
►
and it'll take it over, and I guess it'll put your
01:14:55
◼
►
iMessage and text message history into Allo, I guess,
01:15:01
◼
►
or maybe their Messages app.
01:15:03
◼
►
I don't know which app they're gonna put that history into.
01:15:06
◼
►
But that's a big deal.
01:15:07
◼
►
They really, I mean, whether it's gonna work or not,
01:15:10
◼
►
They seem to seriously be saying, look,
01:15:13
◼
►
we know there's a lot of people using iPhones who are also
01:15:15
◼
►
using heavily into Google services, including,
01:15:18
◼
►
I'm sure, thousands of people who work at Google.
01:15:21
◼
►
And they're doing the best effort
01:15:24
◼
►
they can to say, we want to make it possible for you to switch.
01:15:29
◼
►
And there's a couple of things.
01:15:31
◼
►
They're all on the TechSpec page, in a way, that to me,
01:15:35
◼
►
these are a couple of things where they're obviously
01:15:38
◼
►
ahead of Apple.
01:15:39
◼
►
And you have to say, Apple, I think that they really
01:15:44
◼
►
need to catch up.
01:15:45
◼
►
Here's one of them.
01:15:46
◼
►
Unlimited storage for photos and videos at full resolution.
01:15:52
◼
►
So if you buy a Pixel, your Google Photos account will--
01:15:55
◼
►
and here's what I'm curious about, though.
01:15:57
◼
►
Is it only for photos you've shot on the Pixel?
01:16:00
◼
►
Or can you shoot 4K video on another camera,
01:16:02
◼
►
and because you own a Pixel, you can upload it all
01:16:05
◼
►
to your Google account?
01:16:08
◼
►
I don't know.
01:16:09
◼
►
But even if it is only for the photos you shoot on the Pixel,
01:16:12
◼
►
that is a hell of a thing.
01:16:14
◼
►
Apple gives you five gigabytes of storage for free,
01:16:17
◼
►
and that includes everything-- your backups, your documents,
01:16:22
◼
►
and your photos.
01:16:24
◼
►
And Google is saying for photos, unlimited at full resolution.
01:16:29
◼
►
That is a huge difference, because real people run up
01:16:33
◼
►
against that five gigabyte limit if they shoot photos
01:16:35
◼
►
with any regularity, let alone if they
01:16:37
◼
►
to shoot 1080p or 4K video.
01:16:39
◼
►
- Yeah, and that thing is, that 5GB limit
01:16:43
◼
►
has been around forever, you know?
01:16:45
◼
►
I mean, I think that it's, if it,
01:16:48
◼
►
I'm not sure this will, because I don't know if people,
01:16:53
◼
►
I don't know if this is a big enough factor
01:16:55
◼
►
in people not buying an iPhone,
01:16:57
◼
►
but if it does, for lack of a better word, shame it,
01:17:04
◼
►
shame Apple into giving us unlimited storage for free,
01:17:07
◼
►
or at least some enormous amount,
01:17:10
◼
►
some finite but enormous amount for free, I would love that.
01:17:14
◼
►
That would thank Google for that.
01:17:16
◼
►
- Yeah, and even if Apple wanted to segregate
01:17:21
◼
►
photo storage from other storage,
01:17:23
◼
►
instead of just saying you've got one bucket
01:17:25
◼
►
where everything goes into,
01:17:26
◼
►
but I think they should up both.
01:17:28
◼
►
I think five gigabytes is not enough, especially,
01:17:31
◼
►
I really think the more I think about it,
01:17:32
◼
►
now that the minimum phone size
01:17:33
◼
►
32 gigabytes. How can the storage be five gigabytes?
01:17:36
◼
►
Oh, it's impossible. It's ridiculous. Like you go to backup and then like my wife and I have different we have separate iCloud accounts
01:17:42
◼
►
So we use the same iTunes account. So she gets all my purchases, but she has her own iCloud account. So all of her
01:17:49
◼
►
Photos and all that stuff synced to her phone, but I don't get them all in my photo stream, right?
01:17:54
◼
►
Not because we you know, don't we're not gonna care but it's just you know, less messy
01:17:59
◼
►
I mean, I got like 1500 screenshots in my camera roll. She didn't want to see all that junk, you know, and these pictures of events
01:18:06
◼
►
She doesn't need she didn't even know what I do for a living. So she's okay, but the that whole like
01:18:11
◼
►
All she has a five gigabytes and now I have to pay to upgrade her when I've already paid to upgrade myself
01:18:18
◼
►
because I have three phones and she's got her phone and my daughter's iPad and her iPad and you know,
01:18:26
◼
►
Etc. And the it's full instantly instantly, you know, so just to ensure that she doesn't lose
01:18:32
◼
►
Stuff she's got a backup to iCloud or up her iCloud storage because there's I mean she didn't even have a computer
01:18:40
◼
►
Like we are truly a post computer household aside from me
01:18:43
◼
►
Which has to sort of is like tied to my desktops because I choose to be right
01:18:49
◼
►
I mean, I could probably do my job from my iPhone. Don't tell my boss, but you know that the
01:18:56
◼
►
So big screens do help, especially on busy news days or when I'm managing a huge team
01:19:00
◼
►
across multiple continents. But my wife doesn't do that. And her work, they don't even let
01:19:05
◼
►
her bring computers into the OR, so she doesn't care. And so for her, her computer is her
01:19:10
◼
►
phone and is her iPad, and she doesn't have anything to plug it into to back it up. If
01:19:15
◼
►
I didn't have this desktop, there would be no option to do that. And I don't even want
01:19:20
◼
►
her to do that, right? Because I erase and install betas into all kinds of weird stuff
01:19:25
◼
►
on my machine and my machine's encrypted and all kinds of junk. So, you know, this,
01:19:30
◼
►
maybe I'm not home and she can't get on it or whatever. So for her, iCloud is her computer,
01:19:36
◼
►
right? That is her storage. That is everything. That's all of the storage in the world that she
01:19:40
◼
►
has aside from what's local on her phone. And it's just really crippling and silly for it to be so
01:19:45
◼
►
small out of the gate.
01:19:46
◼
►
Like it should guarantee that you should be able
01:19:49
◼
►
to back up a full iPhone out of the box.
01:19:54
◼
►
Anything else is just kind of silly.
01:19:55
◼
►
- Yeah, and I, you know, it's,
01:19:58
◼
►
I'm only saying that Apple has to do this
01:20:01
◼
►
for people who've purchased devices of, you know,
01:20:05
◼
►
I don't know where you cut it off, but you know,
01:20:08
◼
►
I don't think that they should necessarily give free
01:20:11
◼
►
unlimited storage to anybody who just signs up
01:20:13
◼
►
for a free iCloud account.
01:20:15
◼
►
But if you've bought a new device,
01:20:19
◼
►
especially the iPhones, which start at $649 or $700
01:20:24
◼
►
or something like that, and it's easy for me,
01:20:27
◼
►
I always say this, it's easy for me to spend
01:20:29
◼
►
Tim Cook's money from my armchair here,
01:20:31
◼
►
but here's existence proof that it's possible.
01:20:33
◼
►
Here's a phone you can buy for the exact same price
01:20:35
◼
►
as the iPhone that comes with free unlimited cloud storage
01:20:37
◼
►
for photos and video.
01:20:39
◼
►
So to me, the bar is raised and it's way above,
01:20:42
◼
►
It's not like the five gigabytes versus 10 gigabytes.
01:20:46
◼
►
It's five gigabytes, which is not enough, versus unlimited.
01:20:50
◼
►
Pure and simple that Apple needs to catch up.
01:20:52
◼
►
The other one, it's right here,
01:20:54
◼
►
is that they do fast charging.
01:20:56
◼
►
They call it seven hours.
01:20:57
◼
►
I'm sure seven hours of what,
01:20:59
◼
►
but they say you can get seven hours of battery life
01:21:02
◼
►
in just 15 minutes with the Pixel.
01:21:04
◼
►
Now, I thought, here's what my guess was.
01:21:07
◼
►
My guess was they've included
01:21:09
◼
►
a more expensive high watt adapter.
01:21:13
◼
►
And I'm looking at the tech spec, and that's exactly it.
01:21:15
◼
►
It comes with a USB-C 18 watt adapter.
01:21:18
◼
►
That's the thing that makes the iPhone so slow to charge
01:21:23
◼
►
is that it comes with a five watt adapter.
01:21:26
◼
►
It's, if you plug an iPhone,
01:21:28
◼
►
I think it's true for the regular 7,
01:21:30
◼
►
but I know it's true for the 7 Plus.
01:21:32
◼
►
If you plug it into the expensive iPad Pro 12 watt adapter,
01:21:37
◼
►
It charges way faster.
01:21:39
◼
►
And Apple sells, I forget how many watts it is,
01:21:41
◼
►
but they sell like a 50 or $60 standalone adapter
01:21:46
◼
►
that'll charge it even faster than that.
01:21:48
◼
►
So it's not like iPhones can't do fast charging.
01:21:51
◼
►
Nobody just knows about it because they ship
01:21:53
◼
►
with these measly little five watt adapters that charge it.
01:21:56
◼
►
- Well, sort of, right?
01:21:58
◼
►
Like yeah, it will charge faster, absolutely.
01:22:00
◼
►
You could charge it with an iPad adapter
01:22:01
◼
►
and it'll charge, I don't know,
01:22:03
◼
►
let's call it 2X faster or whatever, right?
01:22:06
◼
►
But the quick charging that's like 15 minutes
01:22:09
◼
►
for seven hours or whatever,
01:22:11
◼
►
I mean that's like 4X or 5X the normal charging rate
01:22:15
◼
►
And generally speaking, that has to be enabled
01:22:18
◼
►
by quick charging circuitry.
01:22:21
◼
►
So quick charging circuitry, and then a controller,
01:22:24
◼
►
which controls that obviously the rate and the voltage
01:22:27
◼
►
and all of that stuff coming into the battery.
01:22:28
◼
►
Like Qualcomm makes a quick charge system, right?
01:22:31
◼
►
So if you're using Snapdragons in your phone,
01:22:33
◼
►
You can get their quick charge plug and play in your device as a manufacturer, I'm saying.
01:22:40
◼
►
You can grab Qualcomm's chip and put it in there and it will give you faster charging
01:22:45
◼
►
and all of that.
01:22:46
◼
►
But I think it's just a… there is a real disconnect between this concept of, "Oh,
01:22:57
◼
►
"Oh, I'm gonna charge my phone real fast, and I'm also going to ensure that the battery lasts a long time,
01:23:06
◼
►
you know, and doesn't deteriorate." Because quick charging does damage batteries, right?
01:23:11
◼
►
The faster you charge the battery, the more strain you put on it, and the more aging cycles you put on that chemistry.
01:23:20
◼
►
So there are trade-offs, you know, and sometimes they get hot, and sometimes they explode.
01:23:24
◼
►
So quick charging is good and an interesting technology
01:23:29
◼
►
that could very well pave the way towards like,
01:23:32
◼
►
well, if you can charge something in five minutes,
01:23:35
◼
►
who really cares how long the battery lasts?
01:23:39
◼
►
- I tend to think that for the price that iPhones cost,
01:23:41
◼
►
they should ship with at least the 10-watt power adapter,
01:23:44
◼
►
if not the 12-watt power adapter.
01:23:46
◼
►
I know it's a bigger adapter too,
01:23:49
◼
►
but I still feel like it would get you
01:23:52
◼
►
part of the way there.
01:23:53
◼
►
I don't know if you've heard about this,
01:23:55
◼
►
but speaking of power adapters and stuff like that,
01:23:58
◼
►
Samsung has some problems with the batteries
01:24:02
◼
►
in their phones.
01:24:04
◼
►
- I hadn't heard.
01:24:07
◼
►
- Did you see the story today?
01:24:08
◼
►
I'm sure you did because you stay on top of everything.
01:24:10
◼
►
But some guy was on a Southwest flight this morning
01:24:12
◼
►
and his good Note 7, he even powered it off, he says,
01:24:20
◼
►
But whatever, it started burning a hole in his pocket,
01:24:24
◼
►
and so he got it out of a pocket,
01:24:26
◼
►
and there was smoke coming out of it,
01:24:28
◼
►
so they evacuated, this is before the plane took off,
01:24:29
◼
►
the plane's on the ground.
01:24:30
◼
►
And the flight staff on the southwest was like,
01:24:33
◼
►
well, everybody, let's get everybody off the plane.
01:24:35
◼
►
Nobody got hurt, it was calm and orderly,
01:24:37
◼
►
disembarkation, is that the word?
01:24:41
◼
►
- Yes. - And then they went in
01:24:43
◼
►
to take a look, and it burned through the floor
01:24:46
◼
►
of the plane.
01:24:47
◼
►
- I hadn't heard that bit.
01:24:49
◼
►
But the scary part, the really scary part,
01:24:51
◼
►
is that it was a updated phone
01:24:54
◼
►
that he just bought on September 21st
01:24:56
◼
►
and was supposedly had like the marking on the package
01:24:58
◼
►
that says this is one of the good ones,
01:25:00
◼
►
not one of the bad ones.
01:25:02
◼
►
- Which makes me think,
01:25:04
◼
►
I've been wondering for a while with this fiasco,
01:25:07
◼
►
and people keep writing to me,
01:25:08
◼
►
'cause I think people don't follow closely,
01:25:09
◼
►
if people get on an airplane,
01:25:10
◼
►
and apparently lately, around the world,
01:25:13
◼
►
you get on an airplane,
01:25:15
◼
►
and one of the things they say is,
01:25:16
◼
►
"If you have a Samsung Galaxy Note 7,
01:25:18
◼
►
You must power it off now and keep it powered off for the entire flight, which is terrible publicity. I mean just dreadful
01:25:24
◼
►
It's like the worst possible
01:25:27
◼
►
advertisement ever I've seen people on Twitter saying that they're telling people out in the
01:25:31
◼
►
Airport to that they're you know, like, you know when they're like, hey, we're gonna board, you know flight
01:25:35
◼
►
677 it's gonna board in about 10 minutes. Oh, and if you have a galaxy note 7 you got to power it off
01:25:41
◼
►
Please board now if you're gonna go like 7 just throw it in the trash on your way in
01:25:47
◼
►
I've been wondering for a while
01:25:49
◼
►
How are they gonna deal with this when there's good ones and bad ones and and you say oh no, no
01:25:53
◼
►
No, I've got I just got my new one. It's got the green battery icon up in a corner. It's it this one's good
01:26:00
◼
►
Are they gonna are they gonna believe that or are they gonna be like no way buddy? You're turning it off and now
01:26:05
◼
►
Gonna believe them. Are you kidding me? We couldn't for a decade
01:26:09
◼
►
We couldn't use our devices on planes just because they thought maybe
01:26:13
◼
►
Maybe something might interfere that they had no evidence of so I don't I don't think so
01:26:19
◼
►
My other thought with this news today that a quote unquote good galaxy note 7 caught fire on a plane
01:26:25
◼
►
Is that they're gonna wreck this for everybody and they're just gonna say you've got to turn all of your phones
01:26:28
◼
►
Powered not just sleeping. You've got a power them off before you step on the plane and
01:26:34
◼
►
Did you know whether they can make you do that or not?
01:26:37
◼
►
but they could certainly notice if you have it out and you're sitting in your seat and you're dicking around on your phone and
01:26:41
◼
►
and I don't know what I would do for that
01:26:44
◼
►
20 or 30 minutes.
01:26:45
◼
►
- Yeah, that is, God, that is the worst scenario.
01:26:48
◼
►
Now you're giving me nightmares.
01:26:50
◼
►
Poor Nick Bilton can undo all of his work.
01:26:52
◼
►
- Yeah, yeah, exactly.
01:26:54
◼
►
Nick Bilton got us to be able to use our flights
01:26:56
◼
►
while we're landing.
01:26:57
◼
►
Now I'm worried Samsung's gonna wreck it for everybody.
01:27:00
◼
►
Well, I know we gotta wrap it up.
01:27:01
◼
►
I know the baseball game is starting,
01:27:02
◼
►
but I gotta do a third sponsor
01:27:04
◼
►
and then we can talk about everyone else
01:27:05
◼
►
we wanna talk about for the rest of the show.
01:27:07
◼
►
- Sounds good. - But our third
01:27:08
◼
►
and final sponsor,
01:27:10
◼
►
Amazing coincidence given what we'll be talking about
01:27:12
◼
►
in the next segment of the show.
01:27:15
◼
►
It really is a coincidence, but it's interesting.
01:27:17
◼
►
Is Eero, E-E-R-O.
01:27:21
◼
►
Eero is a modern new WiFi system for your house.
01:27:26
◼
►
And the basic premise is one WiFi router is not enough.
01:27:32
◼
►
It's not strong enough signal for most people's houses.
01:27:35
◼
►
Maybe if you live in a studio apartment
01:27:37
◼
►
or something like that, sure, you're fine.
01:27:39
◼
►
But if you have a house that has more than one or two floors,
01:27:43
◼
►
or it has thick walls, or any sorts of things
01:27:46
◼
►
that can interfere with the signal,
01:27:47
◼
►
you might notice that there are parts of your house that
01:27:50
◼
►
don't get a good Wi-Fi signal.
01:27:52
◼
►
Eero is designed to change all of this.
01:27:54
◼
►
They make a single device.
01:27:55
◼
►
It's a small, elegant box about the size of an Apple TV,
01:27:59
◼
►
sort of Apple-style round-wreck design.
01:28:01
◼
►
And you just buy more than one of them.
01:28:02
◼
►
So I think one of the basic packs
01:28:04
◼
►
that they recommend for most people based on square footage
01:28:06
◼
►
is you get a three-pack.
01:28:07
◼
►
You get three of these things.
01:28:09
◼
►
You hook one of them up to your cable.
01:28:11
◼
►
You put the other two strategically around the house.
01:28:14
◼
►
And your work is done.
01:28:17
◼
►
The different pods negotiate with each other,
01:28:22
◼
►
and they just do the work to form a mesh network
01:28:24
◼
►
that blankets your home in fast, reliable Wi-Fi.
01:28:28
◼
►
They sent me a three-pack when they started sponsoring
01:28:31
◼
►
I set it up.
01:28:32
◼
►
I set it up thinking, okay, I'll set this up,
01:28:34
◼
►
and then I'll go back to my Apple, whatever it's called.
01:28:38
◼
►
And I never went back to my airport because the Eero system was as good or better at every
01:28:48
◼
►
single spot in my house.
01:28:49
◼
►
And I didn't, it really was more work to like unbox the devices and plug them in than it
01:28:53
◼
►
was to set it up.
01:28:55
◼
►
That's like you unbox it, you plug them in and you're done.
01:28:57
◼
►
It's unbelievable.
01:28:59
◼
►
The configuration goes through a really nice iPhone app.
01:29:02
◼
►
So there's no, you know, command line typing or logging in through a stupid web browser
01:29:07
◼
►
or at a certain port or something like that.
01:29:09
◼
►
You just get on the Eero app on your phone.
01:29:12
◼
►
Could not be easier.
01:29:13
◼
►
They are protected with state of the art WPA2 encryption.
01:29:16
◼
►
Of course, Eero's update automatically.
01:29:21
◼
►
So if there's like a security update or a performance update,
01:29:24
◼
►
just updates by itself.
01:29:27
◼
►
It's so great.
01:29:27
◼
►
They have new features like parental controls,
01:29:30
◼
►
where you can create profiles for your kids
01:29:32
◼
►
and you can manage what and when they have internet access to.
01:29:37
◼
►
Just go check it out.
01:29:39
◼
►
I cannot tell you everything there is to know about this
01:29:41
◼
►
in the course of one little sponsorship read.
01:29:44
◼
►
Just know that they more or less recommend one euro
01:29:46
◼
►
for every thousand square feet of your home.
01:29:48
◼
►
They've got more information on the website
01:29:50
◼
►
where you can figure out how many you want in new.
01:29:51
◼
►
And here's the most important thing of all,
01:29:53
◼
►
30 day money back guarantee.
01:29:55
◼
►
So buy one, see if it works.
01:29:57
◼
►
You've got 30 days to just put it back in the box,
01:29:59
◼
►
send it back to them, no questions asked,
01:30:01
◼
►
and it'll be done.
01:30:04
◼
►
Here's what you do to find out more.
01:30:06
◼
►
You've got to remember this promo code.
01:30:07
◼
►
It's the talk show, the talk show.
01:30:10
◼
►
Just go to ero.com, E-E-R-O dot com, and at checkout,
01:30:15
◼
►
you select overnight shipping.
01:30:16
◼
►
And that code, the talk show, gets you overnight shipping.
01:30:19
◼
►
So depending on what time of day you're listening to me
01:30:21
◼
►
tell you this, you could have it by tomorrow for free,
01:30:25
◼
►
shipping-wise.
01:30:26
◼
►
So go check them out, ero.com.
01:30:28
◼
►
So I say coincidental, because one of the products Google
01:30:33
◼
►
announced at their event was called Google Wi-Fi, which
01:30:37
◼
►
is a thing that sounds like it works a lot like Eero,
01:30:41
◼
►
where you can buy more than one of these things.
01:30:43
◼
►
You spread them around your house, and it gives you Wi-Fi,
01:30:47
◼
►
and it does all the negotiation for you.
01:30:50
◼
►
And as I watched that part of the presentation--
01:30:55
◼
►
I've been thinking it ever since Eero sponsored the show,
01:30:58
◼
►
but watching Google say it is I began thinking,
01:31:00
◼
►
You know, it has been, I don't remember the last time
01:31:03
◼
►
Apple has said a damn word about airport,
01:31:06
◼
►
and airport seems like it's outdated.
01:31:10
◼
►
- Yeah, exactly.
01:31:12
◼
►
I mean, I did the same thing.
01:31:14
◼
►
I bought a pack of Eros, or Eero?
01:31:17
◼
►
Eero, is it singular?
01:31:18
◼
►
What's the plural?
01:31:19
◼
►
- I don't know.
01:31:19
◼
►
I'm gonna call 'em Eros.
01:31:20
◼
►
- Pack of Eero, okay.
01:31:23
◼
►
Like, a pack of wild Eero.
01:31:25
◼
►
A murder of Eros, and I installed them,
01:31:30
◼
►
I like them a lot. I mean, they generally cover well. They cover areas of my house where
01:31:34
◼
►
I did not have coverage before. Even like I configured a handful of other extenders
01:31:40
◼
►
like an Express attached to my extreme and blah, blah, blah, right? And none of those
01:31:47
◼
►
seem to work as well as the Eero. So you can just extend your Eero spot, I guess, to cover
01:31:52
◼
►
this conversation. But I like it. I like the concept a lot. And yeah, Apple hasn't done
01:31:57
◼
►
a whole lot with that. And it does seem like a very Apple-like concept. Oh, just unplug
01:32:01
◼
►
this in and use an iPhone app and you're done. Right? And like that's, like I could see an
01:32:06
◼
►
Apple version of that where you take it out of the box and you plug it in and your iPhone
01:32:11
◼
►
sees it over Bluetooth, you know, LE and says like, "Oh, hey, do you want to set up your
01:32:16
◼
►
Wi-Fi now?" And you hit yes, like the AirPod connect thing. You know, when you flip, flip
01:32:20
◼
►
over the AirPod case, it pops up with a little white card. And I could totally see, like
01:32:24
◼
►
It makes little sense to have an Apple system that works just like that.
01:32:28
◼
►
But they don't.
01:32:29
◼
►
And it's still very complex.
01:32:31
◼
►
And the airport utility is not user-friendly and doesn't work at the time.
01:32:36
◼
►
It was so much better than what it used to be before, you know, if you were using Cisco
01:32:41
◼
►
or Netgear or something like that.
01:32:45
◼
►
But by today's standards, AirPods are a perfect example.
01:32:49
◼
►
You just open the case and you're not like, it's like, you're not picking like which gigahertz
01:32:53
◼
►
Bluetooth to use, which one is the least noise.
01:32:56
◼
►
You're not picking-- like the way
01:32:57
◼
►
that with airport you're still supposed
01:32:59
◼
►
to pick between 5 gigahertz and 2.5 gigahertz
01:33:01
◼
►
and pick a channel.
01:33:05
◼
►
Why do you have to do any of this?
01:33:06
◼
►
Why can't the software just figure it out?
01:33:07
◼
►
And it seems like that's certainly where Eero went.
01:33:09
◼
►
And that seems like that's the exact description for Google
01:33:16
◼
►
The thought I had, though, is that right after Google Wi-Fi,
01:33:18
◼
►
they announced the Google--
01:33:20
◼
►
what's it called?
01:33:21
◼
►
The thing that you talked to?
01:33:23
◼
►
- Google Home?
01:33:24
◼
►
- Yeah, Google Home.
01:33:25
◼
►
I don't understand why those are separate products.
01:33:27
◼
►
Or at least why can't Google Home,
01:33:29
◼
►
I understand that you wouldn't wanna buy
01:33:30
◼
►
separate Google Homes to be the pods that extend the WiFi,
01:33:34
◼
►
but it seems to me like there were two teams
01:33:36
◼
►
that weren't talking to each other
01:33:38
◼
►
that should have been talking to each other,
01:33:39
◼
►
'cause maybe like your one base station
01:33:42
◼
►
should be the Google Home.
01:33:44
◼
►
- Yeah, I think the two teams thing is probably right,
01:33:47
◼
►
but I also think that they're aiming that as,
01:33:51
◼
►
I mean, they have to be a product that people purchase
01:33:53
◼
►
that already have Wi-Fi routers and aren't really
01:33:56
◼
►
looking to buy new ones.
01:33:57
◼
►
I think that I could conceivably see the technology being built
01:34:00
◼
►
into it in the future, where it's like, oh, hey,
01:34:02
◼
►
if you get a Google Home, guess what?
01:34:04
◼
►
It'll act as a Google Wi-Fi.
01:34:05
◼
►
You can add on two more, and you'll be golden.
01:34:07
◼
►
But I don't think that that was their MVP.
01:34:10
◼
►
The other thought that occurred to me after I thought about it--
01:34:13
◼
►
that was my first impression, is why
01:34:14
◼
►
are they showing me two white boxes that you plug in?
01:34:19
◼
►
The other thought that occurred to me is not just in my house,
01:34:23
◼
►
but I think in most people's houses,
01:34:25
◼
►
you might want to put them in very different spots.
01:34:27
◼
►
It seems like the Alexa type devices or the Echo type
01:34:31
◼
►
devices, a lot of people put them
01:34:33
◼
►
in the kitchen for obvious reasons.
01:34:35
◼
►
Or they might put them--
01:34:37
◼
►
Mine's on my bar.
01:34:39
◼
►
Sounds like a good location.
01:34:41
◼
►
And that's not necessarily where your cable connection is coming
01:34:45
◼
►
in, where you could plug it in by ethernet
01:34:48
◼
►
just to get it the basic internet signal to begin with,
01:34:52
◼
►
which is probably in your living room.
01:34:54
◼
►
- Mm-hmm, yeah.
01:34:55
◼
►
- So I could see that.
01:34:58
◼
►
- Yeah, that makes some sense.
01:35:00
◼
►
- Do you think Apple is going to have something
01:35:02
◼
►
along these lines?
01:35:03
◼
►
- Yeah, of course.
01:35:04
◼
►
- I wonder how they're gonna do it,
01:35:07
◼
►
and I wonder how imminent it is.
01:35:09
◼
►
'Cause at this point, at this point now that Google's has--
01:35:11
◼
►
- If it was later than next year, I would be shocked.
01:35:15
◼
►
I'm thinking--
01:35:16
◼
►
- I don't think it's this year, personally.
01:35:18
◼
►
I don't think it's this year either. I think it may be maybe like a March thing next year
01:35:23
◼
►
Where there's already rumors that there's gonna be new iPads in March
01:35:28
◼
►
Yeah, that makes some sense. I mean we got a you know
01:35:32
◼
►
So many of the Macs haven't been updated in so many years that you know later this year's got to be Mac time later this
01:35:38
◼
►
month maybe even but the
01:35:40
◼
►
That's all the rumors
01:35:42
◼
►
But I don't see that it's kind of packed to put it in here and I really see them setting it up in
01:35:49
◼
►
spring and then selling it into summer and then it becomes like the big Christmas item because it's like
01:35:56
◼
►
Oh, you have an iPhone this works great with that or you know, whatever the case may be
01:36:00
◼
►
Yeah, and you know, they're obviously not gonna be first echo is gonna get credit for being first
01:36:05
◼
►
apples often first, you know, it's you know, you know depending on
01:36:11
◼
►
on your perception of what a smartphone is.
01:36:14
◼
►
They were either very late smartphones
01:36:17
◼
►
or they were the first one to come out
01:36:19
◼
►
with the first real smartphone.
01:36:21
◼
►
- Right. - And maybe that's--
01:36:22
◼
►
- Well, I will tell you, yeah, I'm sorry,
01:36:25
◼
►
go ahead, I don't need to interrupt.
01:36:26
◼
►
- I just think that, you know,
01:36:27
◼
►
it looks weird though now that they're behind
01:36:31
◼
►
more than one company in this regard.
01:36:33
◼
►
- Yeah, well, I can say that I think that,
01:36:38
◼
►
and I think you can say if you had the same experience
01:36:41
◼
►
maybe a different one than me, but I'll tell you,
01:36:43
◼
►
Siri works a hell of a lot better when it can hear you,
01:36:47
◼
►
and the iPhone is not a good listening device at all,
01:36:52
◼
►
really bad, unless it's really quiet,
01:36:55
◼
►
which is why people, they just saw these jokes
01:36:57
◼
►
about Siri not understanding you and blah, blah, blah.
01:36:59
◼
►
But Apple built their own voice team
01:37:02
◼
►
because they weren't really happy
01:37:03
◼
►
with the way that the voice was being interpreted
01:37:06
◼
►
by the nuance, which is what they were using.
01:37:08
◼
►
So they built their own team, they made their own software.
01:37:11
◼
►
And when you couple that with four microphones,
01:37:15
◼
►
like with the AirPods, and you have two sets
01:37:18
◼
►
of beam forming, you know, lightly beam forming microphones,
01:37:22
◼
►
combined with a little bit of, you know, bone conduction,
01:37:25
◼
►
a little bit of accelerometer to say,
01:37:27
◼
►
oh, your jaw's moving, you know, it's vibrating,
01:37:29
◼
►
you're talking, like these signals that it's picking up
01:37:32
◼
►
and saying, hey, you're talking, let's go, right?
01:37:34
◼
►
Let me listen carefully and let me filter out
01:37:37
◼
►
the noise and cancel all that out. It is really reliable. I mean, like, the Siri commands that I
01:37:42
◼
►
give through my AirPods are incredibly rarely misinterpreted. You know, what happens after that
01:37:47
◼
►
is a whole other conversation, right? But the actual picking up of the voice is very good.
01:37:52
◼
►
And that's the Echo's secret sauce. It has seven microphones in it. It's, you know, beamforms those,
01:37:59
◼
►
the audio coming in to isolate that audio from other audio, which is why I can understand my kid,
01:38:05
◼
►
you know, and why I can understand me from over facing away from it, towards the stove,
01:38:11
◼
►
away from it, in the kitchen of 15 feet away, and it still picks it up just fine and starts my timer.
01:38:18
◼
►
You know, so I think that there's like some technological advancements there that will make
01:38:22
◼
►
Siri, you know, kind of react and be more responsive that I think people aren't, you know,
01:38:27
◼
►
picking up on quite yet, but will once it launches. But that's got to be like, if you ask Echo,
01:38:34
◼
►
if you ask Alexa or they echo something and she doesn't get it or she doesn't hear you,
01:38:40
◼
►
you feel like a dope, right? Like you feel like a real idiot, like talking to nothing when nothing
01:38:45
◼
►
responds. So, like the adoption of these things is really going to depend on them answering you.
01:38:50
◼
►
Because the moment that sort of suspension of disbelief, you know, that you've got a person
01:39:00
◼
►
on the other end of that artificial intelligence that wants to talk to you is broken, it makes
01:39:05
◼
►
you feel dumb and people don't like to feel that way. So I think that once you have hardware
01:39:11
◼
►
that can really, with a concrete surety, pick you up, listen to you, and at least give you
01:39:17
◼
►
some response, even to say, "Oh, I can't help you," you know, I think it's definitely
01:39:21
◼
►
going to be interesting. And I think that Apple has some stuff to offer there that isn't
01:39:25
◼
►
yet public. You know, I think that there are components of Siri that people have not seen
01:39:30
◼
►
because Apple has chosen not to expose them,
01:39:32
◼
►
that will be very surprising
01:39:35
◼
►
when they are actually rolled out or made available.
01:39:39
◼
►
- That sounds to me like you know something.
01:39:44
◼
►
- I don't know nothing, Jon.
01:39:47
◼
►
- I have to say, it's funny 'cause I could talk to you
01:39:50
◼
►
'cause you and I both have at least,
01:39:52
◼
►
quote unquote, pre-production AirPods so we can compare
01:39:55
◼
►
and everybody else is still left to speculate
01:39:56
◼
►
on what the experience is like.
01:39:57
◼
►
The longer I go with them, the more I love them.
01:40:00
◼
►
And I do miss having playback controls on a thing
01:40:05
◼
►
that I can triple click to fast forward 30 seconds or something
01:40:09
◼
►
like that, but not too much.
01:40:13
◼
►
And you can use Siri to say next track, and it works really well.
01:40:19
◼
►
And there is a delay.
01:40:20
◼
►
It takes a little bit longer than clicking a button,
01:40:24
◼
►
but not so much that I mind it.
01:40:25
◼
►
The one thing I miss on the AirPods compared to either
01:40:32
◼
►
any previous headphones I've had that have had some kind of controls on the
01:40:34
◼
►
wires is the volume control because you can't--
01:40:38
◼
►
you have to use your phone to do the volume
01:40:41
◼
►
or your watch. You can't even use Siri. Like I tried it, you
01:40:45
◼
►
double-tip and said, "Siri, turn it up two clicks," and she says, "I can't do that for
01:40:49
◼
►
you." If you have an-- if you're an Apple Watch
01:40:53
◼
►
where and you have your Apple watch on it's and I always do when I go running
01:40:56
◼
►
you start to get used to that and it's like that's where you go to the but even
01:41:01
◼
►
there it's like if I'm listening to overcast it's like when I first turn my
01:41:05
◼
►
watch up I've got the workout app is going and I've got a tap a couple time
01:41:10
◼
►
you know I've got to tap the side button to get to the playback controls so you
01:41:13
◼
►
can't just go to the watch and tap tap to make it louder because a you know I'm
01:41:19
◼
►
I'm in a noisy part of the city and there's more traffic.
01:41:22
◼
►
But other than the volume control,
01:41:24
◼
►
I like the AirPods better than any previous headphones
01:41:28
◼
►
that I've used with my phone in every single regard.
01:41:30
◼
►
- Yeah, it's great.
01:41:32
◼
►
I mean, obviously the number one question is always,
01:41:34
◼
►
does it fall out?
01:41:35
◼
►
And the answer is no, and people refuse to believe you
01:41:38
◼
►
because there's just nothing to pull them out, right?
01:41:40
◼
►
There's no mask, there's no cord attached.
01:41:42
◼
►
They have very little masks themselves.
01:41:45
◼
►
And even when I get sweaty,
01:41:47
◼
►
you know, run on the treadmill or whatever,
01:41:49
◼
►
it doesn't, you know, it's fine, they stay.
01:41:52
◼
►
I wouldn't recommend them as workout earbuds,
01:41:54
◼
►
that's why they have the Beats, right?
01:41:55
◼
►
But they are pretty good.
01:41:56
◼
►
And so I know some, I have a friend who's like,
01:41:58
◼
►
in love with the EarPods, right?
01:42:01
◼
►
He's like, before the EarPods, no headphones fit my ears,
01:42:05
◼
►
right, and you know, maybe he's weird,
01:42:06
◼
►
and maybe we're all not weird or whatever,
01:42:08
◼
►
but he loves them.
01:42:09
◼
►
So he's like super, super stoked to get the EarPods
01:42:14
◼
►
because he loves the shape.
01:42:16
◼
►
but I have people talk to me on the exact opposite spectrum
01:42:19
◼
►
where they just don't fit their ears at all,
01:42:23
◼
►
the ear pods, the regular ear pods.
01:42:25
◼
►
And I'm like, I tell 'em flat out,
01:42:26
◼
►
"Look, if those don't fit your ears,
01:42:29
◼
►
"these are not gonna fit either, so don't go there.
01:42:33
◼
►
"It's just not worth it,
01:42:35
◼
►
"you're not gonna know whether you're spending the money
01:42:36
◼
►
"or try 'em on or whatever, here, try these on."
01:42:39
◼
►
But other than that fit question,
01:42:42
◼
►
most people just are really excited
01:42:44
◼
►
and I honestly have not a whole lot of bad things to say.
01:42:47
◼
►
They're loud, they're crisp, they sound good.
01:42:50
◼
►
I think personally the sound quality is a little bit better
01:42:53
◼
►
than an EarPod.
01:42:55
◼
►
And yeah, I agree with you.
01:42:58
◼
►
The volume and forward and back track controls
01:43:01
◼
►
are my biggest peeve.
01:43:02
◼
►
And if they could find a way to do that with touch,
01:43:04
◼
►
I would be set.
01:43:06
◼
►
- Yeah, like if they could keep the double click for Siri
01:43:10
◼
►
and maybe let you assign triple and quadruple.
01:43:13
◼
►
Tap, I don't know. I think like a single tap and hold maybe if they can detect a hold. I don't know, you know
01:43:19
◼
►
Like if they could detect oh you didn't release your finger from it
01:43:23
◼
►
It seems like they could but that's is of the accelerometer
01:43:25
◼
►
But it's the only loss for me or only con for me and and your mileage is gonna vary on fit
01:43:30
◼
►
I don't know what to tell you
01:43:32
◼
►
But if you know I'm with you if you if you either
01:43:35
◼
►
Can abide by the wired earbud AirPods from Apple or you even like them you're gonna love the AirPods
01:43:43
◼
►
Mm-hmm, and it's like I'm
01:43:45
◼
►
Like the idea I'm at the point already where the idea of having a wire connecting my headphones to my phone
01:43:51
◼
►
It seems preposterous. Oh my god, it feels so annoying. It's so annoying
01:43:56
◼
►
It's like so I have the Bluetooth. I have a Bluetooth set of beats the over ears that I noise cancellation
01:44:04
◼
►
I've used for airplane flights and then I have the Bose like the you know
01:44:10
◼
►
- The quiet C25s, the QC25, whatever they are, right?
01:44:13
◼
►
The quiet comforts, which are nice.
01:44:15
◼
►
And then I have a set of wireless Jaybird X2s,
01:44:19
◼
►
which technically still have a wire between them,
01:44:22
◼
►
but they're the workout ones.
01:44:23
◼
►
Kind of like the Beats configuration, you know,
01:44:25
◼
►
the workout things.
01:44:26
◼
►
But the Jaybirds are great.
01:44:26
◼
►
They're like a really great set of workout,
01:44:29
◼
►
wireless earbuds.
01:44:30
◼
►
But the way that these work, I mean,
01:44:33
◼
►
even the other ones, the other stuff that goes in your ear,
01:44:36
◼
►
I have never been, you know, hugely fond,
01:44:38
◼
►
I have a pair of those Heers.
01:44:41
◼
►
I don't know if you're familiar with this.
01:44:41
◼
►
- No, never heard of it.
01:44:42
◼
►
- There's a startup called Here.
01:44:44
◼
►
- How do you spell that?
01:44:45
◼
►
- And these aren't, I think just here, like H-E-A-R.
01:44:49
◼
►
- And the startup, it's not a headphone.
01:44:53
◼
►
It's a microphone that takes the audio coming in
01:44:58
◼
►
and filters it for you.
01:45:00
◼
►
So it's like augmented ears, like cyborg ears.
01:45:04
◼
►
So you plug 'em in, they have a little microphone
01:45:06
◼
►
the outside and they grab the sound and process it and put it into your ears. So like let's
01:45:13
◼
►
say you go to a concert and you want to turn down the volume, you put your ears in and
01:45:17
◼
►
you just grab your iPhone and go doo doo doo doo doo and it turns down the exterior volume.
01:45:22
◼
►
It's pretty wild actually.
01:45:23
◼
►
That's crazy.
01:45:24
◼
►
Oh no, I love them. I mean it's like if you're at a place where like you know I went to see
01:45:29
◼
►
Hamilton right and I got stuck up in the rafters like everybody but I just got really lucky
01:45:33
◼
►
and got an affordable ticket before it really exploded. But you put those things in and
01:45:38
◼
►
you could filter out the people around you because they're talking quieter and just pick
01:45:43
◼
►
up the louder noises which is the people speaking from the stage and it feels like they're right
01:45:48
◼
►
in front of you. It's actually a pretty crazy cool technology. But those are the ones that
01:45:52
◼
►
I've had the most experience with just sitting in the ear. And I can tell you, they feel
01:45:56
◼
►
like you feel them, right? They're there. And maybe they'll get lighter and better over
01:46:00
◼
►
This is just a startup, but the air pods are totally different bag because they're so light
01:46:05
◼
►
They're so you know
01:46:07
◼
►
They're not even there you really forget you're wearing them and it's just throwing those in
01:46:11
◼
►
Picking them out of the case and throwing them in is just the amount of freedom. There is is insane
01:46:16
◼
►
It's really nice and the battery life is for me has been amazing. I
01:46:19
◼
►
Almost never remember to charge the damn thing and the case was still at 28% and the headphones were at 100%
01:46:27
◼
►
So anyway, can't wait for everybody else to get them. But I really the longer I use them the more a big a fan I am
01:46:33
◼
►
Before we wrap up anything else you want to talk about you want to do you want to quick drop your guess as to who's gonna
01:46:42
◼
►
Disney yeah, I mean there's there's an equal so we reported that Disney was looking right so we we asked around and we heard yes
01:46:49
◼
►
Disney is looking at it has been looking at it for a while
01:46:52
◼
►
We were we were pretty close on doing it
01:46:55
◼
►
and then I think Bloomberg or somebody scooped it,
01:46:57
◼
►
but that's fine, you know, stuff happens.
01:46:59
◼
►
But, anyhow, we heard it.
01:47:01
◼
►
The Disney side of things is like,
01:47:03
◼
►
there's a lot of pluses and negatives,
01:47:05
◼
►
and it's just where like worlds collide for me, right?
01:47:07
◼
►
'Cause I'm a huge fan of the company,
01:47:10
◼
►
you know, what they've done in historical methodology.
01:47:14
◼
►
These days I can't be a fan
01:47:15
◼
►
'cause we report on various aspects of the company,
01:47:18
◼
►
so I'm more just like, you know, fascinated with it.
01:47:21
◼
►
- But I am fascinated with a lot of aspects of that company
01:47:24
◼
►
from the movies to the TV business to the parks
01:47:29
◼
►
and on so on and so forth, right?
01:47:32
◼
►
But I think that it's,
01:47:35
◼
►
there's some real easy alignments
01:47:38
◼
►
and there's some real hard cliffs to that happening.
01:47:43
◼
►
And I just don't know which one would win out.
01:47:46
◼
►
The biggest one, which I mentioned in our story about it,
01:47:49
◼
►
was that Twitter is supposed to be agnostic
01:47:54
◼
►
is when it comes to media companies, right?
01:47:56
◼
►
Aside from special deals like they cut with NFL
01:47:58
◼
►
or whatever to broadcast stuff.
01:48:00
◼
►
But they're supposed to be like,
01:48:01
◼
►
"Oh hey, we did this with the NFL,
01:48:02
◼
►
"we can do it with you too."
01:48:03
◼
►
But Disney's a huge media company.
01:48:05
◼
►
So if they buy Twitter, are they isolating it
01:48:09
◼
►
from the rest of the media landscape?
01:48:12
◼
►
And that's probably the biggest check in the no column.
01:48:16
◼
►
- I've been saying for years
01:48:18
◼
►
that one of the most amazing things about Twitter
01:48:19
◼
►
that I think people overlook is how ubiquitous
01:48:22
◼
►
the ideas are for people who are famous.
01:48:26
◼
►
Like if you watch sports or you watch news,
01:48:29
◼
►
and I watch both sports and especially in election year,
01:48:31
◼
►
I watch the news, when people come on to commentate on,
01:48:34
◼
►
you know, who won the debate or what do you think
01:48:37
◼
►
about Buck Showalter not putting Zach Britton in the game?
01:48:40
◼
►
They tell you the Twitter name of everybody who's on TV.
01:48:44
◼
►
They'll say, you know, here's Jimmy Rollins,
01:48:47
◼
►
former shortstop, here's his Twitter name.
01:48:49
◼
►
Everybody's Twitter name is up there.
01:48:51
◼
►
Does that happen?
01:48:52
◼
►
does TNT Sports put the Twitter handles up
01:48:56
◼
►
for these people when Twitter's owned by the company
01:48:58
◼
►
that also owns ESPN?
01:49:00
◼
►
- Yeah, exactly. - Right?
01:49:02
◼
►
- Exactly. - And that's a lot of the value
01:49:06
◼
►
in Twitter to me.
01:49:07
◼
►
I don't know quite how you connect that ubiquity
01:49:10
◼
►
and this sort of, this is the default.
01:49:12
◼
►
Facebook would love to have that, but they don't.
01:49:14
◼
►
The Twitter @names is a huge thing,
01:49:17
◼
►
and it's a way to say, hey, if you wanna connect
01:49:19
◼
►
to this person online, you do it on Twitter.
01:49:22
◼
►
That's a huge part of the value.
01:49:24
◼
►
I don't know how you quite connect it to making money,
01:49:26
◼
►
but it certainly is part of the value.
01:49:28
◼
►
'Cause to me, fundamentally,
01:49:30
◼
►
the thing that's valuable is attention.
01:49:32
◼
►
This is the central, John Gruber's central theory
01:49:36
◼
►
of the media, is that attention,
01:49:39
◼
►
attention more than money is the foundation currency
01:49:42
◼
►
because it's the one thing that there's a limit to.
01:49:45
◼
►
Each person multiplied by the number of hours a day
01:49:48
◼
►
that they're awake, that's the total amount
01:49:50
◼
►
attention that's possible. Twitter has a lot of it. I don't know how you connect it to
01:49:57
◼
►
monetization, but it's got to be possible. I could see Disney doing it, but I have the
01:50:03
◼
►
same fear as you where I feel like they could kill the golden goose because just by buying
01:50:09
◼
►
it, it takes away the ubiquity of the presence that people have.
01:50:14
◼
►
Yeah, the funny thing is that Twitter shot itself in the foot from almost day one by
01:50:20
◼
►
obeying the industry's metrics. By treating the MAU as the god of all product decisions
01:50:30
◼
►
and data. And if it had realized or recognized or embraced early on its nature as a place
01:50:40
◼
►
for people to have a strong identity and to contribute to a conversation but also a place
01:50:48
◼
►
that welcomes passive viewership and it's doing that now or trying to reposition itself
01:50:54
◼
►
as that now but it's hard to do that right you can't you got to sell an advertiser on
01:51:00
◼
►
the fact that okay we only have 300 or 280 million users or whatever but those 280 million
01:51:05
◼
►
users are creating a billion users' worth of content, right? And that it's hard to
01:51:12
◼
►
like, sell that as a package if that hasn't been your premise from the beginning. And
01:51:19
◼
►
it's rough, you know? You're treating these logged out users trying to now say,
01:51:25
◼
►
"Hey, these are value." Like the viewer on ESPN who's seeing the tweet, like that's
01:51:31
◼
►
value, right? It's still attention and still all that stuff. But yeah, you know, monetization
01:51:37
◼
►
is a huge problem there because it's like, how do you connect those disparate entities
01:51:41
◼
►
beyond ad tracking and that sort of thing. But I've always felt strongly that Twitter's
01:51:48
◼
►
biggest play should have been around identity, you know, because like, what do your identity
01:51:53
◼
►
online used to be, if you were an "online person," it used to be your URL, right?
01:52:00
◼
►
Like if you were early, early to the internet, you had an email address and a URL or one
01:52:07
◼
►
or the other or both.
01:52:09
◼
►
And today, almost nobody has a URL because creating websites is sort of like too much
01:52:14
◼
►
effort, right?
01:52:15
◼
►
It's too much anxiety to maintain and expensive and everything else.
01:52:20
◼
►
Instead, there's so many services that cover so many millions or billions of people that
01:52:25
◼
►
you can create an identity by simply signing up for one like Twitter and saying, "This
01:52:29
◼
►
is my identity. And there are people like that on Facebook, but it's much rarer than
01:52:35
◼
►
on Twitter. Like if you Google almost anybody's name that has any sort of basic activity on
01:52:40
◼
►
Twitter, their Twitter handle is going to give you everything you need to know about
01:52:44
◼
►
them, probably, you know, at a glance. Like where they work, what do they do, what do
01:52:50
◼
►
they tweet about all day, what do they talk about all day, what are their interests, you
01:52:53
◼
►
know, what are they interested in, what are they not interested in. You could go one level
01:52:57
◼
►
deeper and look at their faves to see kind of what their tastes are in humor or in, you
01:53:02
◼
►
know, in news or, you know, whatever, right? Or who they follow, etc. But no other network
01:53:08
◼
►
on the planet offers that. Facebook doesn't offer that because it was based, its core
01:53:13
◼
►
base was like, oh, networks of people who already know each other. And Twitter is like
01:53:18
◼
►
networks of people that, that you're strangers, you know, that don't know each other until
01:53:22
◼
►
you do, until you look at their profile and all of a sudden you get at least a basic picture
01:53:26
◼
►
who they are. And that play, I think, is very interesting, and that's something that Disney,
01:53:30
◼
►
I think, actually has a better ability to understand than a lot of the other buyers
01:53:35
◼
►
who might want to treat it more of like a marketing channel, you know, or attack that
01:53:41
◼
►
angle of it, which I don't think is as strong for Twitter's future, and I'm not as bullish about
01:53:45
◼
►
that. Yeah, I agree. I don't quite see all the dots that connect from here to there where Twitter is
01:53:53
◼
►
was a thriving Disney property, but my intuition
01:53:58
◼
►
says that there is a path.
01:54:00
◼
►
I can't describe it in detail, but my intuition
01:54:03
◼
►
says that there's a path there.
01:54:06
◼
►
And obviously, they could screw it up
01:54:07
◼
►
in 100 different ways, but that there's potential there.
01:54:12
◼
►
I'm more optimistic than just about anybody else who's--
01:54:14
◼
►
about Disney owning Twitter than just about anybody else who's
01:54:17
◼
►
And I almost feel like it would be better than Twitter
01:54:21
◼
►
remaining independent at this point because it seems like Twitter is…
01:54:24
◼
►
Well, I don't think that's an option, to be honest.
01:54:27
◼
►
I really don't at this point.
01:54:29
◼
►
And we'll see.
01:54:32
◼
►
But it smells like it's going to happen soon.
01:54:35
◼
►
It just seems like, boy, I see reports every couple days about progress being made on this
01:54:39
◼
►
and action on Twitter's board part, on a part of Twitter's board to start listening
01:54:44
◼
►
to bids and doing the math and stuff like that.
01:54:48
◼
►
- I think that what you end up with is you have,
01:54:51
◼
►
you have the monetary, you know, the math side of things,
01:54:54
◼
►
then you have the,
01:54:55
◼
►
how does it fit, like is it a distraction, right?
01:55:00
◼
►
'Cause when you're a company as big as Disney
01:55:02
◼
►
and you have a big pot of money to play with or debt,
01:55:05
◼
►
you know, that you can borrow on,
01:55:08
◼
►
to kind of buy what you want and make your own,
01:55:11
◼
►
choose your own destiny, it at some point becomes
01:55:14
◼
►
a question of is this additive or is it subtractive?
01:55:18
◼
►
Like is it a distraction?
01:55:19
◼
►
Sure, we could buy it, we can afford it.
01:55:21
◼
►
It makes some sense as a holistic business
01:55:23
◼
►
and we see how we can maybe make a little bit better
01:55:26
◼
►
business of it, but is it a distraction?
01:55:28
◼
►
And one of the things that I like to look at
01:55:31
◼
►
in historically with Disney is their purchase
01:55:34
◼
►
of the channel that would become ABC Family,
01:55:38
◼
►
which was a disaster.
01:55:40
◼
►
Like it was a boondoggle from the beginning, right?
01:55:43
◼
►
From the moment the hands were shook in Sun Valley
01:55:46
◼
►
to the six times it was reprogrammed to try and be like, "Oh, we're going to aim it
01:55:52
◼
►
at girls. We're going to aim it at tweens. We're going to aim it at 25 to 35." All
01:55:57
◼
►
of these reprogramming and stuff is just a huge boondoggle to try to get that thing successful.
01:56:01
◼
►
And they just really went wrong from the very beginning. And it was a distraction. And they
01:56:09
◼
►
could have probably created it wholesale. It's just a cable channel. And it costs
01:56:13
◼
►
so much angst and firings and attention subtracted from the rest of the business. And that I
01:56:21
◼
►
think is the equation that goes to their head when they look at something like Twitter.
01:56:24
◼
►
It's like, "Yeah, it's cool. It's interesting. It's a property that has a very extremely
01:56:29
◼
►
unique, amongst all other internet properties, value. But is it a distraction for us?"
01:56:36
◼
►
And if the answer is yes, it's better not to do it even if all other things said it's
01:56:41
◼
►
an interesting buy.
01:56:44
◼
►
It also occurs to me when Disney and their properties
01:56:47
◼
►
start getting into technology.
01:56:52
◼
►
Is it occurs to me this anecdote--
01:56:53
◼
►
I link to it--
01:56:54
◼
►
I forget when I linked to it.
01:56:55
◼
►
It was a while ago.
01:56:56
◼
►
But here's somebody who's referencing my link to it.
01:57:00
◼
►
Looks like it was back in 2011.
01:57:04
◼
►
From a book about inside ESPN, those guys
01:57:08
◼
►
have all the fun inside the world of ESPN.
01:57:10
◼
►
The story goes that ESPN president George Bodenheimer attended the first Disney board
01:57:14
◼
►
meeting in Orlando, Florida, just after the company had bought Pixar, the innovative animation
01:57:19
◼
►
factory, and he spotted Apple CEO Steve Jobs in a hallway.
01:57:22
◼
►
It seemed like a good time to introduce himself.
01:57:24
◼
►
"Hi, I'm George Bodenheimer," he said to Jobs.
01:57:27
◼
►
"I run ESPN."
01:57:28
◼
►
Jobs just looked at him and said nothing other than, "Your phone is the dumbest fucking
01:57:32
◼
►
idea I've ever heard," turned and walked away.
01:57:37
◼
►
- Yeah, that's a great one.
01:57:40
◼
►
I love that one. - I'll include a link.
01:57:41
◼
►
They've got a picture to it.
01:57:41
◼
►
It was, in fact, tying things together.
01:57:43
◼
►
It was a Samsung phone.
01:57:45
◼
►
- Of course it was.
01:57:48
◼
►
All right, we got baseball to watch.
01:57:52
◼
►
The short episode has gone an hour and 48 minutes.
01:57:55
◼
►
Anything else you wanted to mention before we drop off?
01:57:57
◼
►
- No, I'm good, I'm good.
01:57:59
◼
►
- I can just tell you, I've made last minute
01:58:02
◼
►
can you do my show request to people before,
01:58:05
◼
►
but never as last minute as literally this one was.
01:58:08
◼
►
And I can't tell you how much I appreciate your time.
01:58:11
◼
►
- My pleasure. - But it's also,
01:58:13
◼
►
I just feel like it was a perfect week to have you on.
01:58:15
◼
►
So I thank you, Matthew.
01:58:18
◼
►
People can get all the panzerino they want at TechCrunch
01:58:21
◼
►
where he's kicking ass with these scoops.
01:58:23
◼
►
And then on Twitter, how do you spell your Twitter handle?
01:58:29
◼
►
- P-A-N-Z-E-R.
01:58:30
◼
►
Even though your real surname is spelled with an A in there.
01:58:34
◼
►
but people will figure it out.
01:58:36
◼
►
- Yeah, it's extremely confusing.
01:58:37
◼
►
- People will figure it out.
01:58:38
◼
►
So my thanks to you and my thanks to the terrific sponsors
01:58:42
◼
►
we had this week.
01:58:42
◼
►
We had Fracture, go get your pictures printed on glass.
01:58:47
◼
►
Igloo, get yourself an internet for your team.
01:58:50
◼
►
And last but not least, Eero, E-E-R-O,
01:58:53
◼
►
where you can set up a much better home wifi.
01:58:58
◼
►
There we go.