155: ‘Medium Rare MacBook’ With MG Siegler
00:00:01
◼
►
John long time no long time no here. Yeah, how are you?
00:00:05
◼
►
Very good been too long. So what what are you up to these days? What are you what the hell are you doing? So?
00:00:11
◼
►
I came back from the UK. I was over there for a year helping to set up
00:00:17
◼
►
Google Ventures European operations over there and with that off the ground I came back
00:00:22
◼
►
About I guess more than six months ago. Now is sometime last summer. It's actually
00:00:28
◼
►
We're heading back to the UK for the first time since we left, so it's almost been a year.
00:00:34
◼
►
Anyway, so back on the ground in San Francisco now.
00:00:38
◼
►
Back just to doing US Google Ventures, now called GV as a part of the
00:00:45
◼
►
Alphabet stuff, you know, so
00:00:48
◼
►
Google Ventures is one of the
00:00:52
◼
►
companies that's a sister company now to Google versus being, you know, under
00:00:56
◼
►
Google. Same basic idea, but they would prefer we use the name GV instead of Google Ventures now.
00:01:03
◼
►
Right, as part of the whole, if it's really a sibling to Google and part of Alphabet, it shouldn't be called Google.
00:01:11
◼
►
Right, exactly. So yeah, so back, but doing the same stuff, just
00:01:15
◼
►
investing in, you know, mainly early stage, early to mid stage companies here.
00:01:24
◼
►
What do you do you think that having spent a whole year in in the UK?
00:01:29
◼
►
When you came back did it?
00:01:31
◼
►
Did you look at at the valley?
00:01:34
◼
►
Culture and sort of feel like you had fresh eyes or did feel like just instantly like, you know what I'm home
00:01:41
◼
►
It's a good question because I did think about that the longer sort of I was over there
00:01:46
◼
►
And obviously we were coming back fairly regularly
00:01:50
◼
►
I think I was back at least once a quarter in the in the US and mainly in the Bay Area when I came back
00:01:55
◼
►
But still the longer I was over there you do start to get detached from it
00:02:01
◼
►
And I felt like I was able to look at it from much more of a outsider perspective
00:02:06
◼
►
After having lived in the Bay Area for almost 10 years
00:02:08
◼
►
you know concurrently
00:02:15
◼
►
interesting coming back
00:02:17
◼
►
And you do feel like you get just like sort of right back into the swing of things almost like you hadn't left
00:02:23
◼
►
but at the same time I had these lingering remembrances of what it was like being over in the UK and sort of
00:02:29
◼
►
Watching remotely both because of what we were talking about with the timezone thing was was one of the more interesting things
00:02:34
◼
►
When I would wake up in the morning
00:02:37
◼
►
It was mostly either people who were up really late or people who were out drinking or something like that were on Twitter
00:02:43
◼
►
And so I would have a much, much different usage of Twitter when I was over there than
00:02:50
◼
►
I do when I'm over here, and it's just sort of in the thick of it with everyone.
00:02:54
◼
►
When I'm over there, it's almost like you're using it to play catch-up and then talking
00:02:59
◼
►
to a few drunk people.
00:03:03
◼
►
But anyway, yeah, so when I came back, I did get right back into the swing of things, but
00:03:09
◼
►
But I still have these, hopefully, different perspectives on how the outside views Silicon
00:03:18
◼
►
Valley versus being in it for a decade.
00:03:22
◼
►
And do you think that outside the Valley startups are underrepresented or more likely to be
00:03:38
◼
►
Yeah, like I that's my outsider's perspective. My outsider's perspective is that inside the valley
00:03:43
◼
►
The the focus is so insular because there's so many
00:03:47
◼
►
things going on and so many smart people and so many interesting things that it's it it
00:03:54
◼
►
Cultivates an idea that everything worth looking at is in the valley
00:03:57
◼
►
Yeah, that's a good way to frame because most people, you know talk about well, you're too far in the forest
00:04:04
◼
►
You know you guys are just missing sort of what's outside of the valley the reality of the situation at least from my perspective is
00:04:10
◼
►
Sort of what you're suggesting which is that there are so many interesting things going on in Silicon Valley that it's it's honestly
00:04:16
◼
►
Just hard as a matter of time to be able to look outside of it
00:04:20
◼
►
Unless you happen to be in a locale that's outside of it
00:04:23
◼
►
So most of the people here who are investing here or certain companies here
00:04:28
◼
►
You know are you know very much in the in the thick of it?
00:04:32
◼
►
And so it is probably, it's definitely fair to say that, you know, sort of outside of Silicon Valley is underrepresented,
00:04:41
◼
►
underrepresented in the minds of everyone here. But I do think that that's just as much of a function of, again,
00:04:49
◼
►
there being so much here to think about and look at. And so it's just the proximity and time issue.
00:04:58
◼
►
But then when you move to somewhere else like London
00:05:01
◼
►
or any other locale, then of course
00:05:04
◼
►
you're closer to some of those things.
00:05:06
◼
►
And so you start to see outside of that.
00:05:08
◼
►
And that's not to say whether or not it's a good or bad thing.
00:05:13
◼
►
I think overall, everyone would agree,
00:05:14
◼
►
it's sort of a bad thing to have blind spots to something
00:05:17
◼
►
if you're not aware of it.
00:05:20
◼
►
But it's an easier thing that's said than done
00:05:25
◼
►
when the proximity thing is such a key factor.
00:05:29
◼
►
- I'm trying to think since the last time
00:05:36
◼
►
you've been on the show,
00:05:37
◼
►
what are some of the big high level changes
00:05:40
◼
►
to the type of stuff we talked about?
00:05:41
◼
►
- Well, Apple's still doomed.
00:05:43
◼
►
More doomed than ever.
00:05:47
◼
►
The more money they make, the farther they have to fall.
00:05:52
◼
►
It's a catastrophic fall that's happening.
00:05:55
◼
►
I think they only made whatever.
00:05:57
◼
►
What did they make?
00:05:59
◼
►
50 billion in revenue last quarter, something like that?
00:06:02
◼
►
- I thought something like that.
00:06:05
◼
►
Yeah, I think so.
00:06:06
◼
►
And 10 billion in profit.
00:06:08
◼
►
- It's more than all the major other tech companies combined.
00:06:11
◼
►
It's way more than any other company, of course,
00:06:14
◼
►
including Exxon and all the, maybe,
00:06:17
◼
►
but what's it?
00:06:19
◼
►
Aramco, I guess, is about to,
00:06:21
◼
►
or not Aramco, it's, what's the Saudi one?
00:06:25
◼
►
- Oh, I forget the name.
00:06:27
◼
►
I know what you're talking about, but I forget the name.
00:06:30
◼
►
- It sounds like they're about to go public
00:06:32
◼
►
or spun out partially, so we're about to see
00:06:34
◼
►
how much money potentially that they make,
00:06:35
◼
►
and it could be something comparable to Apple.
00:06:37
◼
►
So it might be the first time we get something like that.
00:06:41
◼
►
- Yeah, it just only compares to the gas and oil companies.
00:06:46
◼
►
And it's kind of funny, 'cause we grew up,
00:06:50
◼
►
I mean, even people who are significantly older than us,
00:06:53
◼
►
I think, grew up in a world where it's just-- well,
00:06:56
◼
►
of course the gas and oil companies
00:06:58
◼
►
are the biggest companies in the world.
00:07:00
◼
►
It's just like that's the world.
00:07:02
◼
►
Whereas it's like I'm old enough now to sort of--
00:07:05
◼
►
and with all the climate change stuff and all--
00:07:10
◼
►
the interest in renewable energy,
00:07:12
◼
►
everybody's looking at that and questioning it.
00:07:14
◼
►
And it's no longer taken as a given
00:07:19
◼
►
that this is just the way it is.
00:07:20
◼
►
But I did the math with all the skepticism
00:07:25
◼
►
with Apple's quote, unquote, bum quarter last quarter.
00:07:30
◼
►
And it really was true.
00:07:31
◼
►
I think, I forget if it was revenue or profit,
00:07:33
◼
►
I think I was looking at profit.
00:07:34
◼
►
And yeah, it was profit because that's why
00:07:36
◼
►
I took Amazon out of the equation
00:07:39
◼
►
because they don't try for profit.
00:07:40
◼
►
So it's almost like, it's like you're stacking the deck
00:07:45
◼
►
in the favor of Apple by comparing Amazon.
00:07:48
◼
►
I think it was like Google, Microsoft, and Facebook combined that they had more profit
00:07:54
◼
►
Which is just insane.
00:07:56
◼
►
Especially with Microsoft, and Google too.
00:08:00
◼
►
I think Google is often, largely, has tried for profit.
00:08:04
◼
►
But Microsoft, famously, it was the most profitable company in the industry.
00:08:12
◼
►
I remember when, thinking back to, I don't even remember how long ago, it was six, seven
00:08:17
◼
►
years ago or something sort of when I was at TechCrunch looking, trying to cover sort of the
00:08:22
◼
►
day-to-day of putting into context like just how fast Apple's growing and how big it is relative
00:08:27
◼
►
to some of the other tech companies. And I remember both putting it in the context of
00:08:32
◼
►
Microsoft at the time and Microsoft was still leaps and bounds ahead both certainly in profit
00:08:38
◼
►
and I think in still at revenue at that point. But the other one I remember is HP. Like HP was
00:08:45
◼
►
so far ahead in revenue that it seemed like Apple would never be able to surpass something like that.
00:08:50
◼
►
And then, you know, like 18 months later, it was so far in the rearview mirror that it was insane.
00:08:56
◼
►
Even the HP branded iPods couldn't change that.
00:09:01
◼
►
That's right. They somehow didn't write the ship. And now HP's been spun out,
00:09:06
◼
►
or it's got split up once, right? And I think they just sold a separate part of the enterprise
00:09:13
◼
►
version that was spun out. So it's like three separate companies now that was the one behemoth
00:09:17
◼
►
at that point that seemed seemed like you know a tech company can ever topple those those types
00:09:22
◼
►
of revenues and now it's funny. Yeah and it's like HP is one of those companies. It's not like I ever
00:09:28
◼
►
had a great interest in Hewlett-Packard you know I mean but they were at least relevant to the
00:09:34
◼
►
sphere of things that I read and now it's almost like when an article comes up with a review of
00:09:38
◼
►
like an HP laptop or something. I'm like, "Wow, HP, I haven't thought about them in
00:09:42
◼
►
like a year."
00:09:43
◼
►
Yeah, I'm the same way.
00:09:44
◼
►
I just don't even think about it.
00:09:46
◼
►
It's basically only when I see on Techmeme the earnings report of HP, and that's the
00:09:51
◼
►
only time I'll see the headline of, "Yeah, they beat," or, "They slightly missed," or
00:09:56
◼
►
whatever on their targets. It's such a mind-numbing headline to read. I just don't have time to
00:10:06
◼
►
really care that much anymore about HP.
00:10:08
◼
►
What's the name of Microsoft's tablet?
00:10:15
◼
►
So I just saw a review the other day where,
00:10:18
◼
►
where HP came out with like more or less their competitor to the surface.
00:10:26
◼
►
it's just like a surface and,
00:10:28
◼
►
and they're advertising it,
00:10:29
◼
►
but you can open it up and like,
00:10:31
◼
►
replace the Ram and you can do this and that.
00:10:34
◼
►
And you know,
00:10:34
◼
►
It's like all this stuff that was like,
00:10:37
◼
►
the things people wanted to do with their PCs
00:10:39
◼
►
like 10 years ago.
00:10:40
◼
►
But then like the bottom line is,
00:10:41
◼
►
so it's just like a surface and out of the box,
00:10:43
◼
►
it's thicker and heavier.
00:10:45
◼
►
- That's great.
00:10:48
◼
►
Good job HP.
00:10:49
◼
►
- Good luck with that.
00:10:49
◼
►
- But so it's just, it's a tablet with a keyboard thing?
00:10:55
◼
►
- Yeah, I'll try to find the review
00:10:58
◼
►
and I'll put the link in the show notes.
00:11:00
◼
►
It's just like, I don't know,
00:11:03
◼
►
some division of HP is still making these things in it.
00:11:06
◼
►
It's squeaked out the side, but it's like,
00:11:08
◼
►
it's not surprising.
00:11:10
◼
►
- Yeah, it's the office space guy
00:11:14
◼
►
with the red stapler in the basement
00:11:15
◼
►
who's just doing this and no one realizes it, yeah.
00:11:19
◼
►
- Exactly, right.
00:11:20
◼
►
He's still down there making laptops
00:11:22
◼
►
and he's like looking around the industry
00:11:23
◼
►
and he's like, well, I guess that's the new form factor.
00:11:26
◼
►
And that's what he made.
00:11:27
◼
►
That's exactly it.
00:11:32
◼
►
You are, I think, you've been bullish on Uber.
00:11:45
◼
►
I mean, you know, GV is a pretty big investor in Uber.
00:11:49
◼
►
Right, so let's disclose it every time GV
00:11:53
◼
►
is an investor in somebody.
00:11:55
◼
►
But I feel like that, again, not having
00:12:00
◼
►
had you on the show in a long time, that to me, the ride sharing, and it doesn't have
00:12:05
◼
►
to be Uber in particular, but it seems to be accelerating at an almost crazy rate. And
00:12:18
◼
►
I could be wrong. Maybe one thing, a couple years ago, I don't know, I guess about 10
00:12:23
◼
►
ago. There were a lot here in Philly, especially the Zipcars was pretty common. And you'd see them,
00:12:30
◼
►
and I always noticed it because I noticed branding and stuff that, you know, the cars all had Zipcars
00:12:35
◼
►
printed on the side. And I knew where all the parking lots were, where they were. And it was
00:12:41
◼
►
something that when we were shopping for a car 10 years ago, we considered it. We've really strongly
00:12:47
◼
►
thought, maybe we don't have to buy a car. Maybe we could just do the Zipcars thing. But it's like,
00:12:51
◼
►
we kind of pretended, you know, like, "Well, let's pretend it's a rainy day, and how far do we have to
00:12:56
◼
►
go?" And it was like, "Yeah, this is pretty far." So we didn't go for it. We bought a car. But
00:13:00
◼
►
I've noticed, and this is totally anecdotal, but I don't see anywhere near as many Zip cars in
00:13:06
◼
►
Philadelphia as I used to. It seemed like that got popular, and now it's less popular, and I can't
00:13:12
◼
►
help it think that it's the ride sharing.
00:13:19
◼
►
Actually the last time I've been in Philadelphia in a long time, certainly well before Uber
00:13:23
◼
►
and Lyft and whatnot existed, so is Uber pretty ubiquitous? Is that how people get around?
00:13:29
◼
►
Well, I can't speak for the whole city of Philadelphia, but Philadelphia, center city
00:13:33
◼
►
Philadelphia is, you know, the downtown part of Philadelphia is all centralized. It's one
00:13:37
◼
►
contiguous rectangular block. And within Center City, Philly, it's never more than a five-minute
00:13:45
◼
►
wait for a black car or an SUV. I don't really do the UberX, but I think it's even less for that.
00:13:52
◼
►
And it's really, really common.
00:13:55
◼
►
And does Philly have good public transportation or really bad public transportation?
00:13:59
◼
►
I would qualify it as mediocre. We have two subway lines, one that goes east-west and one that goes north-south.
00:14:08
◼
►
So it's just effectively just like a plus that goes right through the center of the city.
00:14:14
◼
►
So like in the sporting complex, all the Phillies, the Eagles, the Sixers, all of this stuff is all in one big area way down in South Philly.
00:14:24
◼
►
So it's easy for me, like if I'm going to a game, I just walk to the what we call the
00:14:29
◼
►
Broad Street line, the one that goes north-south, hop on that and go south, and it's great.
00:14:34
◼
►
If you want to go anywhere off that plus grid, it's not so great.
00:14:37
◼
►
I mean there's buses, but eh.
00:14:40
◼
►
I mean even in the cities now with great public transportation, New York obviously, London
00:14:45
◼
►
being another, it's still, you're still seeing Uber, Lyft, and all the rest sort of just
00:14:51
◼
►
taking over and becoming huge in all these markets just because, I mean, I think there's
00:14:56
◼
►
a number of things at play, but the convenience factor of course, like just dialing up something
00:15:01
◼
►
and it being there right at your doorstep and taking you exactly to where you need to go,
00:15:06
◼
►
you know, just makes sense for a lot of people. You talked about your wife and yourself sort of
00:15:13
◼
►
thinking about if Zipcar would make sense. You know, when Megan, my wife, and I moved over to
00:15:18
◼
►
to London, we sold our cars here in San Francisco.
00:15:22
◼
►
And so when we came back, we thought about what should we
00:15:26
◼
►
And right now, we still don't have cars.
00:15:28
◼
►
It's been almost a year.
00:15:29
◼
►
Neither one of us have a car.
00:15:31
◼
►
And we do use Uber to get everywhere, basically.
00:15:35
◼
►
A few times, we've rented a car, like if we're
00:15:37
◼
►
going for an extended trip up north or down south.
00:15:42
◼
►
But for 99% of our travel now is with Uber.
00:15:46
◼
►
And I want to preface that a little bit,
00:15:48
◼
►
because I know I sound like a Silicon Valley, perhaps,
00:15:54
◼
►
Yeah, we can get everywhere we need to go on Uber.
00:15:56
◼
►
But the reality is, in a lot of, I think, metro areas now,
00:16:01
◼
►
it can be cheaper depending on your situation
00:16:06
◼
►
and depending on what you need to do.
00:16:07
◼
►
It's obviously a little bit different
00:16:09
◼
►
if you have children and some other life situations.
00:16:11
◼
►
But for the situation that we're currently in,
00:16:15
◼
►
It's definitely cheaper for us to use something like Uber and UberX and now UberPool,
00:16:20
◼
►
like the carpooling version of it, to get around a city versus owning a car,
00:16:24
◼
►
having to pay insurance, having to pay for gas, having to pay for parking,
00:16:28
◼
►
and everything else that's included.
00:16:30
◼
►
Yeah, and it's just one of those things that it's really opened my eyes to.
00:16:36
◼
►
Just, I know it sounds so obvious, it sounds such a duh, but it's like,
00:16:42
◼
►
"Good God, look at all these cars that are parked everywhere."
00:16:45
◼
►
And I know that this is part of just the basic argument,
00:16:48
◼
►
but it's that the industry is ripe for transportation.
00:16:50
◼
►
But when you're in a city and you just see cars parked everywhere,
00:16:55
◼
►
and you see buildings that are just parking garages just stacked with cars,
00:16:59
◼
►
and you just think, "All of these cars are just sitting here for hours and hours and hours,"
00:17:03
◼
►
and you think like an Uber is always in motion.
00:17:09
◼
►
Yeah. I mean, I think that that's a good point.
00:17:11
◼
►
And it's something that gets talked about a little bit,
00:17:13
◼
►
but not enough.
00:17:14
◼
►
And I think it will be talked about more and more
00:17:17
◼
►
as this becomes more of the reality in more places.
00:17:20
◼
►
But you're exactly right.
00:17:21
◼
►
Like, imagine the future, whether it's Uber and Lyft
00:17:26
◼
►
or the eventual sort of self-driving car elements,
00:17:30
◼
►
where all of a sudden, all of these spaces and cities
00:17:33
◼
►
are unlocked that are just used, as you said,
00:17:35
◼
►
to sort of house cars that just sit there all day,
00:17:38
◼
►
which is ridiculous.
00:17:40
◼
►
so much of city life is taken up by these giant parking garages.
00:17:44
◼
►
And when you can unlock that and you no longer need those,
00:17:47
◼
►
like cities become much better as a result of having all that space sort of
00:17:51
◼
►
freed up. And you can put any number of things there, anything you want,
00:17:54
◼
►
all these, uh, I, you know, who knows how much square footage is out there.
00:17:58
◼
►
That's, that's just devoted to parking, but it is a ton.
00:18:01
◼
►
Yeah. It's, it's, you know, and when you think about it and you just don't,
00:18:06
◼
►
know, like again, it's like, you know, when I first came to Philly, you know, for college in the early
00:18:12
◼
►
90s, I just assumed that the city would be full of cars. That's just the world as I knew it. But as I,
00:18:18
◼
►
you know, question it now, it's, this seems ridiculous.
00:18:21
◼
►
Yeah, I still do wonder. So I grew up in a suburb outside of Cleveland. And, you know, it's a fairly
00:18:30
◼
►
typical Midwestern-like suburb. And there, obviously, it's not super dense and you had
00:18:39
◼
►
to drive everywhere. And so I've been home a few times in the past few years and they
00:18:48
◼
►
have Uber and I do take it, but it's not nearly, of course, as ubiquitous as it would be in
00:18:54
◼
►
the city. Like even in downtown Cleveland, it would be a lot more ubiquitous, of course.
00:18:59
◼
►
And so I do wonder for the suburbs and outside regions
00:19:03
◼
►
how long that will take to tip.
00:19:05
◼
►
But I still think it will.
00:19:08
◼
►
I think it will spill out from the cities into that.
00:19:11
◼
►
And it's just a matter of having enough cars on the roads that
00:19:17
◼
►
are performing those tasks to be able to do it in a suburban
00:19:20
◼
►
area as well.
00:19:20
◼
►
I know a lot of people still think in the suburbs,
00:19:23
◼
►
it's just not feasible.
00:19:25
◼
►
You have to go grocery shopping and do
00:19:27
◼
►
all these things that are sort of always a drive away.
00:19:29
◼
►
But again, at scale, I'm not so sure
00:19:32
◼
►
that that's totally unreasonable.
00:19:35
◼
►
- I was listening to one of Bill Simmons' podcasts recently
00:19:40
◼
►
and I think only half ingest,
00:19:45
◼
►
he has a theory that because of Uber,
00:19:48
◼
►
there are more people having accidental third kids
00:19:52
◼
►
because Uber, the existence of Uber
00:19:55
◼
►
makes it so much easier for parents with kids
00:20:00
◼
►
to go out and have a couple drinks at dinner
00:20:03
◼
►
than they would in the past.
00:20:05
◼
►
If you had to drive, one of the two of you would have to,
00:20:08
◼
►
you know, would have to abstain.
00:20:10
◼
►
And if you just take an Uber to dinner,
00:20:12
◼
►
you can both drink.
00:20:14
◼
►
And so his theory, there's gonna be a lot more families
00:20:16
◼
►
with three kids instead of two.
00:20:18
◼
►
- That's pretty funny, I like that, the Uber boom.
00:20:23
◼
►
Uber's helping the world in families, with families.
00:20:27
◼
►
That's what it's all about.
00:20:30
◼
►
But it seems funny because it's just a funny idea
00:20:34
◼
►
that people are going to have extra babies.
00:20:37
◼
►
But there's a certain logic to it.
00:20:39
◼
►
I do think it's true.
00:20:40
◼
►
I mean, it's sort of the flip side of that, just in general.
00:20:44
◼
►
Isn't it great to know when you go out in a city or not,
00:20:49
◼
►
anywhere, really, when you want to have a few drinks,
00:20:52
◼
►
like you just do not have to worry about it.
00:20:56
◼
►
And that just was not the reality 10 years ago, of course.
00:20:59
◼
►
- Right, and there's parts of Philly,
00:21:02
◼
►
I mean, it doesn't matter,
00:21:05
◼
►
it doesn't mean anything to you if you're not here,
00:21:06
◼
►
but like an area we call Fishtown,
00:21:09
◼
►
and it's like the gentrified area,
00:21:11
◼
►
like the part that was really kind of sketchy
00:21:13
◼
►
even 10, 15 years ago,
00:21:15
◼
►
and it's sort of like that's where all the hipster stuff is.
00:21:18
◼
►
But there's lots and lots,
00:21:20
◼
►
I mean, because of that, it's all sorts of new restaurants
00:21:23
◼
►
that open up, open up in that area.
00:21:25
◼
►
And it's always, even now that it's more popular,
00:21:29
◼
►
grossly underserved by cabs.
00:21:31
◼
►
So you can get a cab to go there easily,
00:21:34
◼
►
but then when you wanna leave, you are good luck.
00:21:39
◼
►
And it's actually the type of thing where you'd actually
00:21:42
◼
►
call a cab company, which seems like such
00:21:45
◼
►
an old-timey thing to do.
00:21:49
◼
►
But then you wait.
00:21:50
◼
►
And it's like every time--
00:21:52
◼
►
I remember in the old days before Uber and stuff
00:21:55
◼
►
like that, if I did call for a cab,
00:21:58
◼
►
you could wait half an hour and they don't come.
00:22:01
◼
►
I mean, that was very much the reality of the situation
00:22:04
◼
►
when I got to San Francisco almost 10 years ago.
00:22:07
◼
►
And of course, this is--
00:22:09
◼
►
everyone knows the thing now.
00:22:10
◼
►
Like, part of the reason why Uber came into existence--
00:22:12
◼
►
I mean, the main story was they were in Paris
00:22:15
◼
►
and sort of at a tech conference and sort of talking
00:22:18
◼
►
about wouldn't it be cool to have a black car service
00:22:20
◼
►
or whatever.
00:22:21
◼
►
But the reality is that when they got back
00:22:23
◼
►
to San Francisco, everyone was living in this reality
00:22:26
◼
►
where San Francisco public transportation was awful.
00:22:28
◼
►
And it still is awful outside of Uber.
00:22:30
◼
►
Muni is the line here that's the public transportation that
00:22:34
◼
►
goes down all the time and is always running late.
00:22:37
◼
►
And it's a constant joke.
00:22:39
◼
►
If you follow Matt Honan on Twitter,
00:22:41
◼
►
it's like 50% of his tweets are complaining about Muni.
00:22:45
◼
►
And then we have the BART system,
00:22:46
◼
►
which is we have all these like sort of half baked
00:22:50
◼
►
public transportation things.
00:22:51
◼
►
But when I moved to San Francisco,
00:22:52
◼
►
I lived in an area called Russian Hill, which
00:22:55
◼
►
was not connected to any or near any of the public transportation
00:22:58
◼
►
aside from the cable cars, which I would take every once
00:23:02
◼
►
in a while, which is sort of ridiculous
00:23:03
◼
►
because it's very much like a tourist thing.
00:23:05
◼
►
And so I'm on there with 50 tourists
00:23:08
◼
►
and I'm trying to take this to commute into Soma.
00:23:12
◼
►
And it takes forever because it goes slow to appreciate
00:23:14
◼
►
the view or whatever.
00:23:16
◼
►
But that was the reality of public transportation for me
00:23:20
◼
►
when I moved to San Francisco.
00:23:21
◼
►
And yes, so you would see a cab every once in a while.
00:23:25
◼
►
But if you would have to get lucky to spot one out there,
00:23:29
◼
►
and that was even still a better situation
00:23:32
◼
►
than trying to call one.
00:23:33
◼
►
I mean, I remember I would call them
00:23:35
◼
►
from my apartment in Russian Hill,
00:23:37
◼
►
and it would be often like a 45 minute wait.
00:23:40
◼
►
And about half the time, they just wouldn't show up at all.
00:23:42
◼
►
So you couldn't trust it.
00:23:43
◼
►
And so when people are talking about,
00:23:46
◼
►
there's just simple things that led to the rise
00:23:49
◼
►
of services like Uber and just why the cab companies
00:23:53
◼
►
get all mad that this is happening to them.
00:23:57
◼
►
It's like, I mean, they really did do it to themselves.
00:24:00
◼
►
- Yeah, in Philly, it's again a long story short,
00:24:04
◼
►
but the cab situation here is,
00:24:05
◼
►
I've told this story on the show before,
00:24:06
◼
►
but it really is true.
00:24:08
◼
►
Philly's cabs are really lower, less regulated
00:24:12
◼
►
in terms of like in just the, I mean we have,
00:24:14
◼
►
it's just like New York and other big cities
00:24:16
◼
►
where you have to have a taxi medallion.
00:24:18
◼
►
And they limit the number of medallions, you know.
00:24:22
◼
►
So it's like artificial scarcity.
00:24:24
◼
►
But the actual cars themselves
00:24:26
◼
►
don't have very high inspection standards.
00:24:28
◼
►
And New York does.
00:24:31
◼
►
And so most of the cabs on the road in Philadelphia
00:24:34
◼
►
are cabs that failed regular, you know, inspection.
00:24:39
◼
►
- That's funny, I didn't know that.
00:24:40
◼
►
just ship them down the Jersey Turnpike and sell them to cab companies in Philly. Or police
00:24:45
◼
►
cruisers. The last time I couldn't remember the name of the car, Crown Victorias. And
00:24:51
◼
►
some of them, if you actually pay attention to the Crown Vic cabs in Philly, you can actually
00:24:55
◼
►
still see the ones that have the police division on the back. They just paint them. They just
00:25:00
◼
►
paint over them.
00:25:01
◼
►
That's funny.
00:25:02
◼
►
And everybody knows that police officers abuse their cars. They drive them up curbs. They're
00:25:09
◼
►
in action. And then once the police are like, "Wow, this isn't even good enough to use for
00:25:13
◼
►
a police cruiser anymore," then they just sell them to a cab company in Philly. And
00:25:16
◼
►
they're just really, again, this is a total white wine. This is absolutely coming from
00:25:22
◼
►
a position of privilege. But the cab, most of the cabs in Philly, they're just gross.
00:25:27
◼
►
They're just grossed as beer. They don't smell good. The air conditioning, a lot of them,
00:25:34
◼
►
especially the Crown Vicks, and then the Crown Vicks are there because they're not making
00:25:37
◼
►
them anymore. So slowly but surely, they're getting off the roads and they're being replaced
00:25:41
◼
►
by newer cars. But like the Crown Vics, they all have the safety-style divider between
00:25:51
◼
►
you and the cab driver with plexiglass. Most of them, there's just like this gross, I
00:25:57
◼
►
swear to God, like a two-inch diameter tube down on the floor coming from the front, which
00:26:02
◼
►
is where the heater air conditioning gets sent to the back.
00:26:05
◼
►
Oh, that's great. I guess at first I thought you were going, that's where sort of the driver
00:26:12
◼
►
discharges when they've been driving for a long time. So that's slightly better than
00:26:16
◼
►
Yeah, it's slightly better. It's definitely better than that. But yeah, imagine like an
00:26:20
◼
►
accordion style tube, like a plastic tube. You know, those ones that kids can like wave
00:26:25
◼
►
around and they make like a funny noise. It's like that type of tube and it's just there
00:26:29
◼
►
on the floor and that's where your air conditioning comes from. It's really, they did it to themselves.
00:26:34
◼
►
And so that used to be the situation, too,
00:26:36
◼
►
with cabs in San Francisco.
00:26:37
◼
►
For sure, they were disgusting.
00:26:39
◼
►
They were ridiculous cars.
00:26:41
◼
►
I've noticed-- the only time that I ever take a cab anymore
00:26:44
◼
►
in San Francisco, I've taken a few coming back
00:26:46
◼
►
from the airport, just because obviously, a lot of cities,
00:26:49
◼
►
as I'm sure you know, too, have these weird rules around where
00:26:53
◼
►
an Uber or Lyft can pick you up.
00:26:54
◼
►
And it takes sometimes longer to wait
00:26:57
◼
►
because of that as a result. So if I'm in a hurry,
00:27:00
◼
►
I'll just hop in a cab.
00:27:01
◼
►
And so I've been in a few recently,
00:27:03
◼
►
coming back from places.
00:27:04
◼
►
And the cabs are night and day better
00:27:08
◼
►
than they were those eight years ago.
00:27:10
◼
►
I mean, it's the case of just the existence of Uber, Lyft,
00:27:13
◼
►
and everything else has forced them to up their game, which
00:27:19
◼
►
means no longer accordion tubes of heat.
00:27:23
◼
►
And of course, they all now have sort of--
00:27:26
◼
►
at first, none of them would take credit card
00:27:28
◼
►
in San Francisco.
00:27:29
◼
►
It drove me insane.
00:27:30
◼
►
Now they all seem to as a result of this.
00:27:33
◼
►
But yeah, things like that.
00:27:36
◼
►
And you can summon a few from apps now, it seems like,
00:27:39
◼
►
and whatnot.
00:27:40
◼
►
So it has risen.
00:27:42
◼
►
The tide has risen for all boats.
00:27:44
◼
►
But still, yeah, took that case for it to happen.
00:27:49
◼
►
All right, let's hold that thought
00:27:51
◼
►
because I'll come back to it.
00:27:52
◼
►
I don't want to talk about Apple and where
00:27:56
◼
►
the rise of the self-driving cars
00:27:57
◼
►
might play into Apple's car ambitions.
00:27:59
◼
►
but I'm going to take a break and thank our first sponsor.
00:28:03
◼
►
It is Wealthfront.
00:28:04
◼
►
Wealthfront is an automated investment service
00:28:07
◼
►
that holds over $3 billion in client assets.
00:28:11
◼
►
In plain English, Wealthfront makes it easy for anyone
00:28:14
◼
►
to get access to a sophisticated, diversified,
00:28:18
◼
►
long-term investment portfolio without high fees,
00:28:21
◼
►
in fact, with very low fees,
00:28:23
◼
►
and with minimal account minimums.
00:28:27
◼
►
You don't have to put a lot of money in.
00:28:30
◼
►
You just give your money to Wealthfront.
00:28:32
◼
►
You invest it there.
00:28:33
◼
►
And then they take care of all the complex stuff
00:28:35
◼
►
of where to actually invest it.
00:28:39
◼
►
Investors with small accounts love Wealthfront
00:28:42
◼
►
because their low account minimum is just $500.
00:28:45
◼
►
So you don't have to put a lot of money
00:28:48
◼
►
into this if you want to get started with Wealthfront.
00:28:50
◼
►
And in fact, even their clients who
00:28:55
◼
►
have larger investments, large investments, typically start with a small amount just to
00:29:00
◼
►
see what it's like, just to double check.
00:29:02
◼
►
Don't take my word for it as a guy reading a podcast ad.
00:29:05
◼
►
Just put $500 or $1,000 in, see how it works, see how easy the website is, et cetera, and
00:29:11
◼
►
then put your "real money" in.
00:29:13
◼
►
But you can start with just $500 and up to $10,000 is managed for free, totally free.
00:29:22
◼
►
But if you follow the URL I have for you, which is wealthfront.com/thetalkshow, you
00:29:28
◼
►
get up to $15,000 managed for free.
00:29:33
◼
►
Investors with larger accounts, over $15,000, love Wealthfront because they have incredibly
00:29:40
◼
►
valuable investment services.
00:29:43
◼
►
They do things like something called tax loss harvesting.
00:29:47
◼
►
Long story short, it just minimizes the amount of taxes you have to pay strategically on
00:29:51
◼
►
on your investment, and the fees are incredibly low.
00:29:56
◼
►
Their client fee is just one quarter of 1%,
00:30:00
◼
►
and that's only on the money you put in the account
00:30:03
◼
►
over $10,000, but it's over $15,000 if you follow my URL.
00:30:08
◼
►
So if you're looking for a smarter way to invest
00:30:11
◼
►
for the long term, go check them out.
00:30:14
◼
►
They have so much information on our website
00:30:16
◼
►
and so many different account types.
00:30:18
◼
►
They have corporate accounts.
00:30:19
◼
►
They have anything you can want.
00:30:21
◼
►
way more detail than I can tell you. Go to Wealthfront.com/thetalkshow.
00:30:28
◼
►
Wealthfront.com/thetalkshow. It's a great place to invest your money.
00:30:32
◼
►
So I would say this is one of the most frequent emails I get on a weekly basis from readers of
00:30:39
◼
►
Daring Fireball or listeners of the show is just readers just saying, "Hey, hey, John. Idea.
00:30:48
◼
►
what if Apple's car project isn't about a car that they're going to sell?
00:30:52
◼
►
What if it's like a self-driving car service? And I can't tell you,
00:30:57
◼
►
I mean literally I get two or three emails like that a week. And my answer is,
00:31:02
◼
►
if I answer the email, a lot of times I don't have time to answer emails.
00:31:06
◼
►
I'm sorry about that. But my answer is maybe, I don't know.
00:31:10
◼
►
It's possible. I mean,
00:31:13
◼
►
my only thing about that though is that Apple traditionally is a company that at
00:31:17
◼
►
core makes objects that are beautiful, that are well designed, that have like a
00:31:25
◼
►
sexiness to them, and then they sell them to people who want nice things at a
00:31:31
◼
►
premium price. That's just what Apple does. So common sense would tell me that
00:31:36
◼
►
just by history that if Apple's making a car, they're making a car that they plan
00:31:40
◼
►
to sell at a high profit. Yeah, I mean so that's been a thing that that's been
00:31:47
◼
►
bandied about I guess since the whole rumors of Apple cars started. First
00:31:52
◼
►
and foremost it was was it going to be an electric car and it seems like I
00:31:57
◼
►
mean that's it that seems like a for sure thing right there's no chance that
00:32:00
◼
►
Apple makes a you know an old gas guzzler type car. I would say of yeah I
00:32:07
◼
►
would say of all the maybes and who the hell knows what they're planning with
00:32:10
◼
►
cars that's the one thing I would I would say is a hundred percent a lot
00:32:13
◼
►
Yeah, because it's it's so off their brand at this point. We're so committed with environments and everything right like right
00:32:21
◼
►
Yeah, they're so committed to the environment. I mean here in I bet it's the same everywhere, but here in Philly
00:32:26
◼
►
That front of the store right now says this store is runs on 100% renewable. I saw that exact same thing the other day
00:32:34
◼
►
Yeah, there's there's no way
00:32:38
◼
►
You could sell a device that runs on gasoline
00:32:41
◼
►
Inside a store that says the store runs on our present renewable energy. You just can't it's off their brand
00:32:48
◼
►
So I just clearly they're not I don't even think they're they're looking at maybe yeah, maybe in like ten years
00:32:52
◼
►
They'll have the campaign like, you know, we you know, we really are upset that global warming has slowed to the level
00:32:59
◼
►
You know of sustainability, so we're really amping it up
00:33:02
◼
►
We want to want to get get that back on track. The world is becoming too cold
00:33:07
◼
►
And so yeah, so that I do wonder like I and I also think I mean
00:33:13
◼
►
I would I would guess that that also rules out a hybrid, you know, they could do something like that
00:33:18
◼
►
I guess but I would imagine that they just were in this we're at the place now with with where Tesla's at or it would
00:33:23
◼
►
Make no sense. I think to even do a hybrid approach. It has to be all electric, right? I
00:33:27
◼
►
Think so. I think even and I just think they can't get they just can't get near I think I
00:33:34
◼
►
I think branding wise is why I'm certain that they just can't get near gasoline, but I think just putting on my you know
00:33:41
◼
►
Predicting the future hat. I I just think that's on the way out
00:33:46
◼
►
I think that hybrids were obviously a stop grab and you know, maybe a necessary one
00:33:51
◼
►
I'm not even saying that they weren't you know that the hybrids are on a road aren't doing a good job
00:33:55
◼
►
But it clearly doesn't seem like that's where the puck is going
00:33:59
◼
►
So the other point of would Apple just do this as sort of a service type thing is an interesting question
00:34:06
◼
►
I mean, I'm with you that I it just doesn't seem like it's it's
00:34:11
◼
►
What they do that they would they would do something like that
00:34:15
◼
►
It is interesting to think about if they're you know
00:34:17
◼
►
If they're sort of looking at the big-level picture of what everyone else is looking at like with with regards to the quote-unquote doom of
00:34:23
◼
►
Apple, you know that they can't find they can't find a business. That's that's more interesting than the iPhone
00:34:29
◼
►
Do they start to really think outside the box?
00:34:32
◼
►
And as they start to go down the path more of services,
00:34:35
◼
►
I mean, maybe there's a chance that they realize that this,
00:34:40
◼
►
beyond just selling a car themselves,
00:34:43
◼
►
maybe it's more interesting to have a service
00:34:45
◼
►
that's potentially a more stable source of ongoing revenue.
00:34:50
◼
►
Maybe, but I don't think that that's the case,
00:34:54
◼
►
but that's the only argument I could make
00:34:57
◼
►
as to why they would do something like that.
00:35:00
◼
►
I do think the self-driving question itself is interesting.
00:35:03
◼
►
It also would seem to me that that's
00:35:06
◼
►
what they would likely be going after versus having it just
00:35:11
◼
►
be full-on electric.
00:35:12
◼
►
But I don't know about that.
00:35:13
◼
►
It's possible that they're doing a two-pronged approach, one,
00:35:17
◼
►
an electric car that you can drive yourself like Tesla,
00:35:20
◼
►
two, the fully self-driving one, or some sort of hybrid,
00:35:24
◼
►
as you know, like a lot of the Teslas now
00:35:25
◼
►
rolling out these software updates to do autonomous driving in some capacity, like when it's on
00:35:30
◼
►
the freeway and whatnot. So it could end up being something like that.
00:35:36
◼
►
I just feel like the timeline doesn't add up to bank on self-driving. My best guess,
00:35:44
◼
►
and it just sounds so like I'm trying to have it every way, I'm not making a firm prediction,
00:35:49
◼
►
But my guess is that Apple is working on electric cars,
00:35:53
◼
►
that they are absolutely working on
00:35:56
◼
►
self-driving technologies.
00:35:58
◼
►
Let's say the early, I think the earliest
00:36:01
◼
►
they could possibly actually unveil
00:36:04
◼
►
an Apple branded car is like 2020.
00:36:07
◼
►
So even if there's some kind of Apple magic
00:36:12
◼
►
that throwing their resources at,
00:36:14
◼
►
that proves me wrong, 2019,
00:36:18
◼
►
I mean, that just seems crazy to go from not having a car
00:36:21
◼
►
other than as a secret project
00:36:23
◼
►
to actually having them on the road that you can buy.
00:36:25
◼
►
2019 seems like fantasy land.
00:36:28
◼
►
By 2020, will self-driving cars be there
00:36:33
◼
►
that you could do like the,
00:36:34
◼
►
not even have your hands on,
00:36:38
◼
►
not even be paying attention to the road?
00:36:39
◼
►
I just don't see that as possible.
00:36:41
◼
►
And even just legally.
00:36:43
◼
►
- Even if the technology,
00:36:44
◼
►
I think the technology is gonna get there before the laws--
00:36:47
◼
►
Yeah, I mean, that's 100% for sure.
00:36:51
◼
►
I mean, I guess they could--
00:36:56
◼
►
maybe you could look at it sort of like the way
00:36:58
◼
►
the iPhone rolled out, right?
00:36:59
◼
►
Like there were faster 3G services at the time, right?
00:37:06
◼
►
But they rolled out without 3G.
00:37:07
◼
►
And so maybe it is still the case,
00:37:10
◼
►
even if there was self-driving cars out on the road,
00:37:13
◼
►
or say 75% self-driving.
00:37:15
◼
►
It's like it could be self-driving beyond a few areas
00:37:20
◼
►
where it's not.
00:37:21
◼
►
It's possible that Apple would just roll out it as not
00:37:25
◼
►
advertised or whatever as self-driving,
00:37:28
◼
►
because they don't feel like it's
00:37:29
◼
►
a good enough experience yet.
00:37:30
◼
►
And I could see that world where it's like maybe Google
00:37:36
◼
►
is something out there, maybe Uber, maybe Tesla.
00:37:39
◼
►
And they're billing them more as self-driving,
00:37:42
◼
►
but Apple is a bit more cautious on that front.
00:37:45
◼
►
and really waiting for it to be like a fully self-driving
00:37:49
◼
►
thing before they go down that road.
00:37:51
◼
►
- Yeah, that's exactly what I think,
00:37:53
◼
►
is that they're planning for that full steam ahead,
00:37:56
◼
►
but that they are also planning,
00:37:59
◼
►
I'm guessing to ship a car before that's ready.
00:38:02
◼
►
- And that exactly, you know, the analogy to 3G and LTE,
00:38:05
◼
►
but 3G is the perfect example,
00:38:07
◼
►
'cause 3G was actually, there were 3G phones.
00:38:10
◼
►
It's actually one of the, you know,
00:38:11
◼
►
if you go back and look at the claim chowder of the people
00:38:13
◼
►
who panned the original iPhone, they'd be like,
00:38:16
◼
►
it's not even 3G.
00:38:17
◼
►
You know, it's, I think it's that sort of thing,
00:38:20
◼
►
where they're like, look, for practical purposes,
00:38:22
◼
►
we're gonna go with Edge for this one,
00:38:24
◼
►
and you know, we'll pick up 3G in a year or two.
00:38:27
◼
►
- But do you think that they would do,
00:38:29
◼
►
sort of like what Tesla's done,
00:38:31
◼
►
so they roll out one high-end, you know,
00:38:34
◼
►
Tesla started with the Roadster,
00:38:35
◼
►
which is like a super high-end, super fancy sports car,
00:38:38
◼
►
right, and then, and Elon Musk,
00:38:40
◼
►
in that great blog post many years ago,
00:38:42
◼
►
laid out exactly what they were gonna do
00:38:44
◼
►
and what they're now pulling off, right?
00:38:46
◼
►
That they would then roll out a cheaper version
00:38:49
◼
►
and then sort of a SUV type version.
00:38:52
◼
►
And then like the cheapest version,
00:38:55
◼
►
sort of the mass market version.
00:38:56
◼
►
Do you think Apple would take that approach,
00:38:58
◼
►
something akin to that, where they do sort of one at a time
00:39:01
◼
►
versus rolling out like say two models,
00:39:04
◼
►
like a high-end version and then more like the sedan
00:39:08
◼
►
for regular folks or something?
00:39:11
◼
►
Prior to Apple Watch, I would have said one for sure,
00:39:13
◼
►
because that's how Apple always did things, right?
00:39:16
◼
►
There's one iPhone, there's one iPad, here it is.
00:39:19
◼
►
This is the iPad.
00:39:20
◼
►
And only years down the road are there things like
00:39:24
◼
►
iPad Pros and iPad Minis and, you know,
00:39:27
◼
►
low-end models with two-year-old systems on a chip
00:39:30
◼
►
and high-end models with the latest and greatest.
00:39:32
◼
►
Only years down the road.
00:39:34
◼
►
But without, after Apple Watch, I think, I don't know.
00:39:38
◼
►
I don't know that, you know, maybe Apple Watch,
00:39:41
◼
►
I keep thinking that maybe Apple Watch is not that it was,
00:39:44
◼
►
not that the only reason they did it
00:39:45
◼
►
was as a test for the car,
00:39:46
◼
►
but that it lays out the formula for the car
00:39:50
◼
►
where they might do three, right?
00:39:53
◼
►
Apple Car Sport, $25,000 or something like that, $30,000.
00:39:58
◼
►
Apple Car, $50,000.
00:40:02
◼
►
And the Apple Car Edition for $100,000.
00:40:08
◼
►
And I'm laughing, but part of the reason I say that is that I know that there's an
00:40:14
◼
►
off, you know, executives at Apple.
00:40:16
◼
►
I've been to the Apple parking lot.
00:40:18
◼
►
There are a lot of really nice cars in the infinite loop parking lot.
00:40:22
◼
►
People who work at Apple have nice cars.
00:40:24
◼
►
It's almost like I've...
00:40:25
◼
►
And we know, like, Johnny Ive and Phil Schiller and who else?
00:40:33
◼
►
Eddie Q, right?
00:40:34
◼
►
He's on the board of Lamborghini, I think.
00:40:38
◼
►
- So they're obviously car guys.
00:40:40
◼
►
They like their fancy cars.
00:40:41
◼
►
- Right. - Yeah.
00:40:42
◼
►
- So, you know, how do you, you know,
00:40:48
◼
►
if there are already car guys who like exotic cars,
00:40:50
◼
►
how does Apple get into it without making an exotic car?
00:40:53
◼
►
- Well, and to tie it back
00:40:54
◼
►
to what we were talking about earlier,
00:40:56
◼
►
you know, we were talking about it in the context of Uber,
00:40:58
◼
►
like not needing to own a car anymore.
00:41:00
◼
►
Like if we're talking about, let's say it's 2020.
00:41:03
◼
►
So it's, you know, a little less than four years.
00:41:07
◼
►
say it's four years from now, four or five years from now.
00:41:10
◼
►
And more people are in the space of what you and your wife
00:41:16
◼
►
were debating, and me and my wife now live in,
00:41:19
◼
►
let's just say in urban areas at least, in city areas,
00:41:24
◼
►
that they feel like they don't need to own a car.
00:41:26
◼
►
Is it weird for Apple to be making a car that they would
00:41:29
◼
►
potentially be selling for whatever, $50,000 in a world
00:41:35
◼
►
where a decreasing number of people are buying cars?
00:41:38
◼
►
- That's a great question.
00:41:42
◼
►
That's part of why I find this whole topic fascinating
00:41:45
◼
►
'cause there's so many trends that are moving, right?
00:41:50
◼
►
There's the, we've talked about them,
00:41:52
◼
►
but there's the gas to electric.
00:41:55
◼
►
There's the self-driving is coming.
00:41:58
◼
►
There's, and then there's this whole shared,
00:42:02
◼
►
ride-sharing thing where people just don't own cars period. I think my guess
00:42:07
◼
►
is that okay fewer and fewer people are buying cars but Apple can enter and if
00:42:12
◼
►
you're gonna buy a car they're gonna they're gonna have a compelling car.
00:42:16
◼
►
You know that it's easy to say sure fewer people are buying cars but it's
00:42:21
◼
►
you know people also said fewer people are buying watches fewer people wear a
00:42:25
◼
►
watch than ever before. That's true that's a good point because I was gonna
00:42:28
◼
►
I was going to say like PCs, fewer people are buying PCs, right?
00:42:32
◼
►
But then Mac is still doing well, relatively speaking, but would they enter that world
00:42:36
◼
►
now knowing it's an overall shrinking world?
00:42:40
◼
►
And that's not to say they wouldn't, but it's a calculation you have to make.
00:42:45
◼
►
Yeah, I totally think so.
00:42:48
◼
►
But I just think that the market for cars is so big, that so many, you know, there are
00:42:53
◼
►
so many car companies and so many, you know, it's just so much money in the industry overall,
00:42:58
◼
►
even if it shrinks significantly,
00:43:01
◼
►
that Apple can take a sizable chunk
00:43:04
◼
►
of the profitable end of that market.
00:43:06
◼
►
And it still is huge.
00:43:07
◼
►
- Right, and it's a potential,
00:43:09
◼
►
talking, going back to the, what is the next iPhone,
00:43:12
◼
►
it's one of the potential things
00:43:14
◼
►
that could actually match the iPhone.
00:43:16
◼
►
Like I think we're all, I think everyone,
00:43:18
◼
►
I would assume you're in agreement now,
00:43:20
◼
►
and always have been, but like,
00:43:22
◼
►
that even at the best case scenario for Apple Watch,
00:43:27
◼
►
it cannot match what the iPhone did just because of the whole subsidy model,
00:43:32
◼
►
you know, and, and the way that,
00:43:35
◼
►
that the world just worked back then and the watch has nothing like that.
00:43:39
◼
►
Even if Apple sells more of them overall,
00:43:42
◼
►
they're not going to make as much money off of it because it's just a different
00:43:45
◼
►
business. Right. There's no way,
00:43:48
◼
►
even no matter how popular Apple watch becomes,
00:43:50
◼
►
it's not going to sell in the quantity that iPhone does.
00:43:53
◼
►
And each one they do sell is gonna sell
00:43:57
◼
►
for at least half the price,
00:43:59
◼
►
if not even less than half the price of the iPhone today.
00:44:03
◼
►
Because almost everybody gets the sport model.
00:44:05
◼
►
- Right, which is a mistake I made.
00:44:07
◼
►
- So it's a lower price product.
00:44:09
◼
►
It's a lower price, what, you did buy a sport?
00:44:11
◼
►
- No, I should have bought a sport.
00:44:13
◼
►
I bought the regular Apple Watch, not the edition.
00:44:15
◼
►
I bought the regular one and I'm just like,
00:44:17
◼
►
I don't know why I did that.
00:44:18
◼
►
I did that because I thought it would be slightly different
00:44:20
◼
►
or whatever, but it definitely should have gotten the sport.
00:44:22
◼
►
Anyway, that's an aside.
00:44:23
◼
►
- Yeah, well, I've mentioned,
00:44:26
◼
►
I'm actually wearing it today.
00:44:30
◼
►
I have the regular one with the space black,
00:44:33
◼
►
and I do like a link style bracelet,
00:44:35
◼
►
and it is a wonderful bracelet, and it's very comfortable.
00:44:38
◼
►
But I really think that the sport models are superior
00:44:41
◼
►
just because the Taptic engine works better.
00:44:44
◼
►
- Yeah, and wasn't it supposed to have
00:44:45
◼
►
a slightly better screen?
00:44:46
◼
►
I remember something slightly better, maybe?
00:44:51
◼
►
The display isn't any better, but the surface of the display on the regular Apple Watch
00:44:58
◼
►
is sapphire.
00:44:59
◼
►
The other one is whatever, ion-coated glass.
00:45:03
◼
►
So it does pick up fine scratches.
00:45:05
◼
►
But I've looked at my sons.
00:45:06
◼
►
My son has had an Apple Watch from, I guess, around a year and wears it a lot.
00:45:13
◼
►
And he's a 12-year-old kid and it's not like he's taking good care of it.
00:45:17
◼
►
I've looked at the screen and it does have fine scratches, but it's no different than
00:45:21
◼
►
than any other non-sapphire coated watch that I've worn.
00:45:25
◼
►
And when you're actually looking at the display head
00:45:27
◼
►
on the scratches, you can't see them.
00:45:29
◼
►
You have to do the thing where you turn the display off
00:45:31
◼
►
and kinda find a glaring light source
00:45:35
◼
►
to sort of spot the scratches.
00:45:36
◼
►
- Yeah, so anyway, so yeah,
00:45:41
◼
►
most people are buying the cheaper version.
00:45:44
◼
►
So the car, high-end cars are one of the few things
00:45:51
◼
►
that could produce the types of revenues that would match iPhone, potentially, at a massive scale.
00:45:57
◼
►
Right, or at least be like the same class of plan.
00:46:02
◼
►
You know what I mean? So maybe the iPhone is still Jupiter, but the car potentially is another gas giant.
00:46:10
◼
►
Could be like Neptune or something like that.
00:46:12
◼
►
As opposed to the Apple Watch, which is really just like another Venus or Earth or Mars or something.
00:46:18
◼
►
Like it's a planet, it's not Pluto. It's a real planet.
00:46:24
◼
►
But it's, come on, you can't compare it to Jupiter.
00:46:26
◼
►
But the car could be, just because the car would sell, just, you know, it could easily sell for $30,000.
00:46:34
◼
►
Quite frank, you know, it's Apple, so it's probably more.
00:46:38
◼
►
So, I know you want to talk about the Peter Thiel thing too as well, and we can get to that.
00:46:43
◼
►
But while we're still on the topic of Apple,
00:46:45
◼
►
the one thing that I've been thinking about a lot recently
00:46:48
◼
►
is the whole Alexa and the rumors now.
00:46:53
◼
►
I think the information had the report the other day
00:46:55
◼
►
that Apple would be working on a potential Echo competitor.
00:47:00
◼
►
And of course, Google announced their home thing
00:47:03
◼
►
at I/O, which is the Echo competitor.
00:47:05
◼
►
And I'm interested in your take on that.
00:47:08
◼
►
I think at a high level, we went back and forth on Twitter
00:47:12
◼
►
a little bit one night.
00:47:13
◼
►
I think you know my perspective on it, which is that the--
00:47:18
◼
►
- Well, hold your thought, hold your thought.
00:47:19
◼
►
'Cause that was already in my list of topics
00:47:21
◼
►
I wanna talk to you about.
00:47:23
◼
►
And we could do a whole segment on it.
00:47:24
◼
►
So let me take a break and thank another sponsor,
00:47:26
◼
►
thank our good friends at Audible.
00:47:28
◼
►
Audible.com has more than 250,000 audio books
00:47:35
◼
►
and spoken word audio products.
00:47:38
◼
►
You can get a 30 day free trial at audible.com/talk show.
00:47:43
◼
►
Just go to audible.com/talk show.
00:47:45
◼
►
30 days, you don't pay anything.
00:47:47
◼
►
You can listen to all this stuff.
00:47:49
◼
►
It's absolutely amazing the size of the library that they have.
00:47:54
◼
►
You can listen to these audio books from virtually any genre.
00:47:57
◼
►
And you could do it anytime, anywhere.
00:47:59
◼
►
And you can play them on your phone,
00:48:00
◼
►
play them on your tablet, play it on your computer.
00:48:03
◼
►
If you have Kindle Fire or one of the modern Kindles,
00:48:07
◼
►
you know, like that, you can play it on that.
00:48:09
◼
►
You can even play it on your good old fashioned iPod,
00:48:12
◼
►
which is really where Audible got started sponsoring
00:48:14
◼
►
podcasts was you download the stuff and just stick them
00:48:18
◼
►
on your iPod and listen to them.
00:48:19
◼
►
Audio books are great for flights, road trips,
00:48:23
◼
►
your daily commute.
00:48:25
◼
►
Really, I think the reason Audible keeps coming back
00:48:27
◼
►
to sponsor this show and other podcasts is that
00:48:30
◼
►
if you're listening to me read this sponsored blurb,
00:48:34
◼
►
that means you like listening to spoken audio content.
00:48:37
◼
►
And if you find yourself craving more, audible.com,
00:48:42
◼
►
you're not gonna, you know,
00:48:43
◼
►
nobody has a commute long enough to listen
00:48:46
◼
►
to all the stuff that Audible has.
00:48:48
◼
►
So go there and check it out.
00:48:51
◼
►
30 day free trial, audible.com/talkshow.
00:48:56
◼
►
My thanks to Audible for their continued sponsorship
00:48:58
◼
►
of this show.
00:49:00
◼
►
- You quickly, before we go into Alexa and whatnot,
00:49:03
◼
►
you brought up Bill Simmons podcast earlier.
00:49:05
◼
►
I was always curious if you ever thought about doing what he does when he does his sponsor
00:49:10
◼
►
reads and plays like, I think he plays like a Tupac song or whatever in the background.
00:49:14
◼
►
But do you think about, you know, like a way to sort of, I don't know, perdition it differently
00:49:20
◼
►
than the rest of the show?
00:49:23
◼
►
I have, it's funny, it's very funny that you would bring that up because two reasons that
00:49:29
◼
►
I have thought about that is A) Bill Simmons podcast, which now with this whole ringer
00:49:34
◼
►
there's more of them and I've been listening to them and I've noticed that and I like it.
00:49:39
◼
►
I like I really like his reads too. I think he does a great job at it.
00:49:43
◼
►
It makes me want to up my game on making sure that the the reads are engaging.
00:49:49
◼
►
Like that's really one of the things I feel like I feel like when I do this show
00:49:53
◼
►
I'm just having fun talking to people who I like talking to and my job is
00:49:57
◼
►
doing the sponsor reads in a way that makes people not want to skip them. And how can I do that?
00:50:02
◼
►
What would I what would I what would it take for me if I were listening to the talk show?
00:50:05
◼
►
To not want to skip this ad and I never skip Bill Simmons's so I really and it inspires me
00:50:12
◼
►
But I've noticed that he plays that the music. Yeah, and then the the gang on
00:50:16
◼
►
Accidental tech podcast has started they've been it's almost like an in-joke where they haven't been playing music behind the reeds
00:50:23
◼
►
But they've been they've added little
00:50:27
◼
►
sounds to start it and close them. Okay, so people to give people an indication of like this is this is now, you know
00:50:34
◼
►
the sponsored break
00:50:37
◼
►
Ding ding ding and and you know and then it's the sponsoring and then and then when it's over
00:50:41
◼
►
It's like dun dun dun and then it's like you're back and and I have to mention because they did
00:50:44
◼
►
Marco Arment on ATP said that his inspiration for starting to do that when he edits the show is
00:50:50
◼
►
the absolutely great podcast which I've mentioned before hello internet with
00:50:56
◼
►
CGP Grey and the other guy.
00:51:02
◼
►
So I've listened to Simmons' podcast for a long time, dating back well to the earlier,
00:51:11
◼
►
probably near when he started it at ESPN.
00:51:14
◼
►
And I think, because originally they would play, I think they would play canned ads,
00:51:20
◼
►
and they still do this on many ESPN podcasts, and so he slowly evolved into more of the
00:51:26
◼
►
reads that you hear now and certainly what you do.
00:51:29
◼
►
And one of the reasons why I think you like him
00:51:32
◼
►
and I like him too is because he was so bad at it at first.
00:51:36
◼
►
It's almost like when someone told him that, well, you
00:51:41
◼
►
got to actually talk about it.
00:51:43
◼
►
That's what resonates with podcast listeners.
00:51:45
◼
►
And so if you're just having a conversation,
00:51:48
◼
►
then all of a sudden dive into a spiel about whatever
00:51:52
◼
►
the advertiser is doing, it comes across much better
00:51:55
◼
►
than sort of a canned recording of whatever
00:51:58
◼
►
the advertiser is saying.
00:52:00
◼
►
And so at first he was so bad at it.
00:52:03
◼
►
And I think he's evolved over time
00:52:05
◼
►
and almost like plays on like being bad at it
00:52:09
◼
►
because it's not so bad anymore,
00:52:10
◼
►
but it's like, it's just natural, right?
00:52:12
◼
►
It's like the way that he would talk about it.
00:52:15
◼
►
And I think you, honestly,
00:52:16
◼
►
I think you do a good job of it as well.
00:52:18
◼
►
But the only thing is his just feels like more raw.
00:52:22
◼
►
That's what it is.
00:52:25
◼
►
I have to add, Brady Harron is the other co-host of Hello
00:52:31
◼
►
But they do the same thing with the bumper sounds.
00:52:33
◼
►
I don't know.
00:52:34
◼
►
I have to think about it.
00:52:35
◼
►
I'm not setting my ways on this.
00:52:37
◼
►
OK, so Siri-- so the information had a scoop the other day
00:52:43
◼
►
that Apple is planning both a Siri API for developers
00:52:48
◼
►
to extend Siri and an Echo-like standalone device, which
00:52:53
◼
►
which is also competitive with the upcoming Google Home.
00:53:00
◼
►
So, I have had an Amazon Echo.
00:53:06
◼
►
I always get confused whether I should call it Alexa or Echo.
00:53:09
◼
►
I know, yeah.
00:53:10
◼
►
It is the Echo.
00:53:11
◼
►
Alexa is the persona, obviously.
00:53:15
◼
►
But it's also how you address it.
00:53:16
◼
►
You say Alexa.
00:53:18
◼
►
It's a weird branding issue.
00:53:22
◼
►
I think they should just call it Alexa, honestly.
00:53:24
◼
►
But anyway, so I've had one for several months now,
00:53:26
◼
►
about a quarter.
00:53:27
◼
►
And I definitely use it daily when I'm home,
00:53:32
◼
►
unless I'm on the road, of course.
00:53:34
◼
►
And I'm slowly but surely finding new use cases for it.
00:53:40
◼
►
It started as sort of novelty, of course,
00:53:42
◼
►
just what's the weather and whatever.
00:53:45
◼
►
Now I use it almost daily to read me the latest news, which
00:53:50
◼
►
is sort of another obvious one.
00:53:51
◼
►
But it's sort of a nice way just to--
00:53:54
◼
►
when you get up in the morning, just like, Alexa,
00:53:57
◼
►
what's the latest news?
00:53:58
◼
►
And it'll just start doing it.
00:53:59
◼
►
There's no phone to unlock.
00:54:01
◼
►
There's no button to push.
00:54:04
◼
►
You just speak out loud.
00:54:06
◼
►
That's what you want.
00:54:07
◼
►
My wife uses it all the time when she's cooking to say--
00:54:10
◼
►
and it's like a constant thing.
00:54:12
◼
►
It's almost like an orchestrated event of her cooking
00:54:17
◼
►
and with the Alexa in the kitchen saying,
00:54:19
◼
►
Alexa, set a timer for two minutes.
00:54:21
◼
►
Then two minutes goes by, it goes off.
00:54:23
◼
►
Alexa, set a timer for five minutes.
00:54:25
◼
►
And it's like this whole thing that just goes on every night
00:54:28
◼
►
that she's cooking.
00:54:31
◼
►
It's really a good device.
00:54:33
◼
►
And I was skeptical of it when I first heard about it
00:54:36
◼
►
because it seemed ridiculous.
00:54:37
◼
►
It's a standalone, expensive thing
00:54:40
◼
►
that does a lot of what you can already
00:54:43
◼
►
do with Siri and Cortana and Google Now
00:54:48
◼
►
and some of the other things.
00:54:50
◼
►
But in using it, it's useful.
00:54:55
◼
►
Yeah, and there's a certain--
00:54:56
◼
►
like, the cooking in the kitchen scenario
00:55:00
◼
►
is almost ideal for it.
00:55:02
◼
►
I have one too.
00:55:03
◼
►
I just got it like three weeks ago,
00:55:05
◼
►
and I'm not using it that much.
00:55:10
◼
►
But I think one of the reasons-- do
00:55:11
◼
►
you have any of the smart home stuff, like light bulbs
00:55:14
◼
►
and stuff like that?
00:55:15
◼
►
I don't have anything like that.
00:55:16
◼
►
Yeah, not that I think we do have like one light bulb thing,
00:55:20
◼
►
but not that we use, and we don't have a Nest or anything like that currently installed.
00:55:24
◼
►
Right. But for the cooking stuff, so I know people definitely use their phones for stuff
00:55:29
◼
►
like that, and I know definitely people use a smartwatch, like your Apple Watch or whatever
00:55:35
◼
►
are the smartwatch to do that stuff too. But the thing with Echo is it's completely hands-free,
00:55:42
◼
►
so you don't have to push a button on a watch or fish your phone out of the pocket. I know
00:55:49
◼
►
your phone I guess if you know if you have a new iPhone you could if you have
00:55:52
◼
►
it plugged in you can try the hey you know the name of I try to avoid it's
00:55:57
◼
►
we don't have to beep it but Siri but you know it works even if not plugged in
00:56:04
◼
►
like this is a big thing that people oh yeah it does now that's that's the thing
00:56:07
◼
►
that you have to have a new one for now that's right that's a new feature right
00:56:10
◼
►
if you have like the iPhone success it just seems though that echo is more
00:56:17
◼
►
reliable. You can really count on it to make sure that it's given you the timer that you
00:56:26
◼
►
just told her to say. I really struggle with the pronoun for these things. I tend to use
00:56:36
◼
►
her with Siri, and it's even weirder because I know that in some countries it defaults
00:56:40
◼
►
to a male voice.
00:56:41
◼
►
That's right. Yeah. Yeah. So, should you use it? And the whole -- it's a very strange dynamic
00:56:48
◼
►
that I think will never be fully sorted out. But, yeah. So, you bring up like the -- I
00:56:55
◼
►
even hesitate to call it accuracy. Because I'm not 100% sure that Alexa is more accurate
00:57:03
◼
►
than, say, Siri. It seems that way. But it's just more reliable, right? And I think it's
00:57:09
◼
►
because it's a combination of things. But one of the things is that, you know, when
00:57:14
◼
►
you set up Siri, you have to set it up by saying, hey, I also don't want to set up all
00:57:20
◼
►
my devices. You know the word. Hey, she who shall not be named. And so, you have to do
00:57:27
◼
►
that a few times, right? And so, it's like Apple obviously thought that that's a good
00:57:31
◼
►
way to make it sort of personalized to you. And so, someone else can't necessarily set
00:57:36
◼
►
it off. But that is also a limiting factor, it seems like, and makes it less reliable.
00:57:43
◼
►
And so Amazon just deciding not to do it that way and just leaving it open so anyone can
00:57:48
◼
►
trigger it, ends up being, I think, a smarter implementation, at least for now, of how to
00:57:55
◼
►
Yeah, and anecdotally, I've read this and I've had, since I've started talking about
00:58:00
◼
►
this and heard from people on Twitter and email sending me, that a lot of... I've heard
00:58:05
◼
►
it numerous times that people with young kids, their kids can use the echo really
00:58:12
◼
►
reliably and they have no luck at all with Siri. Siri really doesn't...
00:58:17
◼
►
Siri's speech recognition really isn't good with kids. And it's funny
00:58:21
◼
►
because it's like you know it. You know that kids don't speak as... I don't even
00:58:29
◼
►
know what the word is. They're not as articulate. They don't
00:58:31
◼
►
enunciate as crisply as adults. But you tend to think of it as, "Well, that's just how kids talk."
00:58:38
◼
►
But it's seemingly, from a speech recognition standpoint, they're just harder to understand.
00:58:43
◼
►
Whereas humans are so good that we don't really think of kids as being harder to understand,
00:58:47
◼
►
we just think of them as sounding as kids, because our natural linguistic abilities are so good that
00:58:54
◼
►
we just blow right through the way that they mispronounce words. Yeah, and so the kids thing
00:59:01
◼
►
is interesting also because before I got a echo everyone one of the main themes that kept coming
00:59:08
◼
►
up is like kids love it and I don't have kids you have a son like does your son use it like
00:59:13
◼
►
no not really he's he's but he I he kind of thinks it's pointless because but there's nothing he
00:59:20
◼
►
really wants to know from it that we have hooked up yeah we had fun we did have fun as the family
00:59:25
◼
►
the one one or two nights playing music and calling out you know and then it's it's funny
00:59:30
◼
►
because it's like if there's a song on and any one of the three of us doesn't like it, you can
00:59:34
◼
►
tell Alexa to stop and play something else. Yeah, and I think that that's been stated. I don't know
00:59:40
◼
►
if it's by Amazon or not, that that's one of the main use cases, of course, is playing the music.
00:59:46
◼
►
It's a seamless way to do, "Hey, Alexa," and I said, "Hey," you don't have to say, "Hey, of course,"
00:59:56
◼
►
Alexa play, you know, this station on Pandora or whatever. I think you can hook up,
01:00:02
◼
►
obviously Amazon Music, you can hook up Pandora. You can't hook up Apple Music right now, right? So
01:00:10
◼
►
so there's... I don't expect Apple to get on that quickly.
01:00:15
◼
►
Yeah, no, I don't either. But so that's one big use case. So the other thing is,
01:00:22
◼
►
It obviously has a decent speaker, but it's not great.
01:00:26
◼
►
It's not like a Sonos or something like that.
01:00:28
◼
►
And you can hook up--
01:00:29
◼
►
because we also got the dot thing.
01:00:31
◼
►
The dot is a smaller one.
01:00:33
◼
►
As an aside, the one thing I loved about that rollout
01:00:36
◼
►
was the fact that in order to first order a dot,
01:00:39
◼
►
you actually had to order it through the Echo.
01:00:40
◼
►
You had to say, like, Alexa, order me a dot.
01:00:44
◼
►
And it knew what it was.
01:00:46
◼
►
I mean, my wife actually did it.
01:00:47
◼
►
And within three minutes or whatever, it confirms.
01:00:50
◼
►
And so we had a dot ordered and come in shipping to our house.
01:00:54
◼
►
And we got it.
01:00:54
◼
►
And it worked beautifully.
01:00:55
◼
►
And you couldn't order it on the website, at least at the time,
01:00:58
◼
►
when they first rolled that out.
01:01:00
◼
►
So that was fascinating.
01:01:02
◼
►
I don't think you can now.
01:01:03
◼
►
I mean, I just searched Amazon for Echo.
01:01:05
◼
►
I don't see it.
01:01:08
◼
►
So did you know it's--
01:01:10
◼
►
They do have it.
01:01:10
◼
►
You can get it.
01:01:11
◼
►
You can get Echo dot for $89 on Amazon.
01:01:17
◼
►
Do you know it's hilarious right now?
01:01:18
◼
►
So I just was giving that whole spiel,
01:01:23
◼
►
and I swear to God, I just triggered Alexa,
01:01:25
◼
►
and she's now playing music in my bedroom.
01:01:28
◼
►
So I'm in my office right now, one room down from the bedroom.
01:01:33
◼
►
I all of a sudden heard this music, and I'm like,
01:01:35
◼
►
is my wife home?
01:01:36
◼
►
Did she just start playing music?
01:01:37
◼
►
Because I thought I heard a voice.
01:01:39
◼
►
It was Alexa, and it was Alexa saying, now playing whatever.
01:01:42
◼
►
And so there's just music playing in the bedroom right now.
01:01:44
◼
►
I stand corrected.
01:01:45
◼
►
So there is a web page on Amazon for the Echo Dot,
01:01:48
◼
►
But it says, "Available exclusively from Alexa.
01:01:51
◼
►
Echo Dot is available in limited quantities
01:01:53
◼
►
and exclusively for Prime members
01:01:55
◼
►
through Alexa Voice Shopping."
01:01:57
◼
►
So I think that that's ingenious,
01:01:59
◼
►
because it obviously makes it so that, first and foremost,
01:02:03
◼
►
only sort of, quote unquote, "hardcore"
01:02:05
◼
►
users are going to be able to get it and get it that way.
01:02:08
◼
►
And people who already understand, right,
01:02:10
◼
►
they have to have Alexa--
01:02:12
◼
►
an Echo, sorry, to be able to do it.
01:02:14
◼
►
So it doesn't need some sort of new learning curve all of a sudden,
01:02:18
◼
►
because you should already know how to use it based on that.
01:02:23
◼
►
I think the music playing is clearly--
01:02:26
◼
►
and when this rumor from the information
01:02:29
◼
►
came out that Apple has a device like this in the works,
01:02:33
◼
►
and that they've been working on it for quite a while, a bunch of people
01:02:36
◼
►
said, well, why?
01:02:37
◼
►
I have my iPhone with me everywhere I go.
01:02:40
◼
►
If I'm going to use Siri, why would the world
01:02:43
◼
►
I want another device. I don't know what else they have planned for it. I don't know what other home
01:02:47
◼
►
integration, you know, home kit type features they might have in mind for what kind of a hub it might
01:02:53
◼
►
be for your entire home. But the speaker alone makes sense for Apple to do just because music
01:03:00
◼
►
is still such a big part of what they want to be known for. Yeah, and I'm sort of surprised that,
01:03:05
◼
►
you know, they weren't... I know that, you know, they're almost never the first mover in these
01:03:10
◼
►
these types of things.
01:03:11
◼
►
But I'm sort of surprised that some sort of combination
01:03:16
◼
►
of things didn't lead them down this path earlier,
01:03:19
◼
►
whether it be the Airport Express or Apple TV
01:03:25
◼
►
as basically the way to do this.
01:03:28
◼
►
There were all those rumors, remember,
01:03:29
◼
►
that Apple TV was going to be the hub of their whole home
01:03:34
◼
►
And maybe that still ends up being the case.
01:03:36
◼
►
But that was the whole thing about, why is it running iOS?
01:03:38
◼
►
and of course apps, but also maybe the HomeKit stuff.
01:03:43
◼
►
And yeah, I'm just a little surprised
01:03:47
◼
►
that they didn't make a all-in-one type device.
01:03:50
◼
►
And especially knowing the popularity of things like Sonos.
01:03:57
◼
►
And obviously, they had to work with Sonos
01:03:59
◼
►
to get Apple Music as one of the first things on there.
01:04:02
◼
►
But maybe it was--
01:04:03
◼
►
I think you made the joke the other day.
01:04:05
◼
►
Maybe it was the iPod Hi-Fi thing
01:04:08
◼
►
that sort of dissuaded them from doing that,
01:04:10
◼
►
because that was obviously a disaster.
01:04:13
◼
►
That's what I want them to call it.
01:04:14
◼
►
I want them to call it the Siri Hi-Fi.
01:04:16
◼
►
They have the trademark, yeah.
01:04:18
◼
►
So-- but yeah, it seems like--
01:04:24
◼
►
I think the way--
01:04:25
◼
►
someone was saying this the other day on Twitter,
01:04:28
◼
►
that it's great that we have Alexa,
01:04:31
◼
►
and it's cool that you can sort of hook it up to Sonos.
01:04:34
◼
►
It's a pain, honestly, because you have to do it through the back of the device and through
01:04:40
◼
►
It's not seamless at all.
01:04:41
◼
►
And now we have things like Eero and the newfangled routers that are out.
01:04:46
◼
►
It seems like someone should combine all of that into one thing, right?
01:04:50
◼
►
Yes, I think so.
01:04:53
◼
►
But you run into...
01:04:56
◼
►
I've thought about this, right?
01:04:58
◼
►
It seems like a big butt.
01:05:03
◼
►
thinking about my house now. The cable comes in in the living room and it's sort of like
01:05:10
◼
►
that's where the router needs to be. I mean I guess I could, I'd have to wire the house
01:05:18
◼
►
with internet or ethernet or something or get the cable company to come out and put
01:05:25
◼
►
another cable connector somewhere else if I wanted it to be in the kitchen.
01:05:32
◼
►
because that's where I want the music to play. You know what I mean? It's like, I don't know.
01:05:35
◼
►
I'm not quite sure. Yeah, I understand. Yeah, so that's like, that's one issue.
01:05:41
◼
►
But sort of, I don't know if you've had a chance to play around with like things like the Eero,
01:05:45
◼
►
and there's some other ones coming out that are, you know, these these newfangled routers that
01:05:49
◼
►
that allow you to better spread internet over your entire house. I have a box downstairs that's
01:05:56
◼
►
full of Eero kit, and it's still in the box. I just came the other day and I haven't had a
01:06:01
◼
►
chance to look at it. So it's on my radar and I'm going to set it up.
01:06:04
◼
►
Yeah, you should. I mean, we have one set up now and it's great. It's
01:06:11
◼
►
surprisingly great how well it works compared to what I previously just had a
01:06:16
◼
►
an airport. I had both at Extreme and then I had like an Express and I had
01:06:22
◼
►
like things like doing bridging and you know trying to get good service in the
01:06:26
◼
►
bedroom and then in the office and nothing has worked as well as this Eero
01:06:30
◼
►
thing works. And so I wonder if sort of this this device things that we're talking about,
01:06:37
◼
►
if they don't do, yeah, you have the main hub in the living room that's that's sort of connected to
01:06:42
◼
►
the still necessary for whatever reason cable modem. And then everything else is like a
01:06:47
◼
►
satellite version, sort of like the Echo Dot, right? It's like a smaller version of it. So no
01:06:52
◼
►
matter what room you're in, you're covered by it. It's sort of like what you have with Sonos now for
01:06:57
◼
►
for people who have Sonos in multiple rooms,
01:07:00
◼
►
they wirelessly connect to it.
01:07:03
◼
►
You can do wired, of course, but most people, I think,
01:07:06
◼
►
do the wireless version.
01:07:07
◼
►
And so some device, it's like a combination
01:07:10
◼
►
of all these things.
01:07:11
◼
►
So you have the speaker, you have the voice assistant
01:07:15
◼
►
type thing, and you have your Wi-Fi all in one thing.
01:07:20
◼
►
I mean, that seems like where all this should go,
01:07:23
◼
►
but I would imagine it'll take a while for someone
01:07:25
◼
►
to actually connect that all together
01:07:27
◼
►
to be able to work well.
01:07:28
◼
►
- Yeah, and it's just, you know, Apple has a very,
01:07:31
◼
►
you know, right at the forefront of WiFi,
01:07:33
◼
►
you know, I've been making base stations
01:07:36
◼
►
or whatever you wanna call them, you know,
01:07:38
◼
►
the thing that gives you WiFi in your house.
01:07:39
◼
►
I mean, Apple's been doing it.
01:07:41
◼
►
I mean, they were one of the first companies
01:07:44
◼
►
to really go public with it.
01:07:45
◼
►
Remember the Phil Schiller demo
01:07:47
◼
►
when he jumped onto like a mattress?
01:07:52
◼
►
- Yeah. (laughs)
01:07:54
◼
►
- It was like to prove that the iBook
01:07:56
◼
►
was getting the internet over the air.
01:07:58
◼
►
That's right.
01:07:58
◼
►
It was like heretofore unknown.
01:08:00
◼
►
Phil Schiller actually performed a stunt on stage.
01:08:03
◼
►
Like he jumped off a 10-foot high thing
01:08:06
◼
►
onto a padded landing thing and then showed that the iBook was
01:08:11
◼
►
still getting internet.
01:08:13
◼
►
So Apple's been doing that for a long time.
01:08:14
◼
►
I think that at this point, it just
01:08:17
◼
►
seems like it's too fiddly, especially for a house
01:08:21
◼
►
an apartment, it's easy to fill it with your Wi-Fi.
01:08:25
◼
►
But even here, I have it set up pretty good.
01:08:27
◼
►
Right now, we just have the airport extreme.
01:08:30
◼
►
I don't have any of the satellite devices
01:08:32
◼
►
like I used to have.
01:08:33
◼
►
And it goes up one floor to my office, and it's pretty good.
01:08:39
◼
►
And it goes up two floors to our bedroom.
01:08:42
◼
►
And it's good enough, good enough
01:08:45
◼
►
that it doesn't make me want to get another thing.
01:08:48
◼
►
But even one floor down in our garage, it's gone.
01:08:51
◼
►
So it's like when you get in the car,
01:08:54
◼
►
it's like one floor down from where the router is,
01:08:56
◼
►
and you wanna update something on your phone quick.
01:08:59
◼
►
It's like sometimes you have to like do the fiddly thing
01:09:01
◼
►
where you turn off Wi-Fi because it's so bad.
01:09:05
◼
►
Yeah, you should try the zero thing.
01:09:08
◼
►
I think you'll like--
01:09:09
◼
►
- Oh, I'm gonna try it.
01:09:10
◼
►
I told you it's down, it's in the house.
01:09:12
◼
►
So it's a sure thing that I will try it.
01:09:16
◼
►
- So I don't know, maybe that's what Apple's going with.
01:09:18
◼
►
And I can't help but think that
01:09:19
◼
►
if the information's report is correct
01:09:21
◼
►
that they've been working on this device for quite a while,
01:09:24
◼
►
I mean, like, according to the information, years.
01:09:27
◼
►
It can't just be a speaker that listens for Siri,
01:09:31
◼
►
because if it's taken Apple years to do a speaker
01:09:36
◼
►
that listens for Siri, that's a problem.
01:09:40
◼
►
It has to be a little bit more ambitious than that
01:09:41
◼
►
in terms of serving as some kind of, you know,
01:09:45
◼
►
hey, you don't have to buy these six different things.
01:09:46
◼
►
You can just buy this, plug this thing in,
01:09:49
◼
►
and then you're set.
01:09:50
◼
►
- Well, and you brought it up.
01:09:51
◼
►
I mean, the importance of music, certainly to Apple,
01:09:54
◼
►
And they obviously know the popularity
01:09:56
◼
►
of something like Sonos.
01:09:58
◼
►
And do you think then it would be just as predicated
01:10:02
◼
►
around being a great speaker, sort of a Sonos competitor
01:10:05
◼
►
with Siri built in?
01:10:06
◼
►
Is that maybe what they would do?
01:10:10
◼
►
And would they launch it as a family of devices
01:10:14
◼
►
at the beginning so that you can put them
01:10:17
◼
►
throughout your house?
01:10:19
◼
►
I mean, that seems to be one area that--
01:10:21
◼
►
And obviously Amazon is working on it, or adds a solution,
01:10:25
◼
►
because they have these dot devices that are
01:10:28
◼
►
meant to be satellite devices.
01:10:29
◼
►
And I know with Google Home, people
01:10:31
◼
►
asked when they announced it at I/O last week,
01:10:34
◼
►
well, what if you have two of these things, and they're like,
01:10:36
◼
►
well, we're working on that.
01:10:37
◼
►
We'll get back to you.
01:10:38
◼
►
It's a hard problem.
01:10:41
◼
►
And the Amazon-- so the dot--
01:10:43
◼
►
so in general, I think the consensus
01:10:45
◼
►
is the Echo speaker is OK.
01:10:47
◼
►
it's good enough for casual listening or whatever.
01:10:51
◼
►
And the Dot1 is considered to be much more subpar.
01:10:54
◼
►
It's obviously much smaller.
01:10:56
◼
►
It's just a tiny little thing.
01:10:57
◼
►
And that's why it has sort of the output
01:10:59
◼
►
to be able to hook it into a speaker.
01:11:00
◼
►
And that's what they suggest you do actually.
01:11:03
◼
►
So I wouldn't, like if I were Apple,
01:11:06
◼
►
I would imagine that the way to do it
01:11:07
◼
►
is just what we were talking about,
01:11:08
◼
►
to do like a really great speaker,
01:11:11
◼
►
like a Sonos-like speaker with the Siri capability built in.
01:11:15
◼
►
And I think that would be a great device
01:11:18
◼
►
for a lot of people.
01:11:19
◼
►
I don't know how much that would cost, you know,
01:11:21
◼
►
and like, do they run the risk of it being
01:11:24
◼
►
another Hi-Fi like device?
01:11:27
◼
►
That's just sort of like a niche product
01:11:29
◼
►
that's interesting to a few people.
01:11:30
◼
►
I think not, I think it's a lot more interesting
01:11:32
◼
►
to do it now, especially with everything
01:11:34
◼
►
we just talked about with Alexa, but I don't know.
01:11:38
◼
►
- With a Hi-Fi, they really, it was,
01:11:42
◼
►
I mean, I know for a fact that Steve Jobs
01:11:45
◼
►
was a huge fan of the Hi-Fi.
01:11:46
◼
►
He really was.
01:11:47
◼
►
And I mean, obviously, he's willing to--
01:11:51
◼
►
if it wasn't selling, it wasn't selling, even if he liked it.
01:11:54
◼
►
So it wasn't like he kept it around just because he liked it.
01:11:56
◼
►
But I know he liked it.
01:11:57
◼
►
And they really put-- it was before I was regularly
01:12:01
◼
►
attending their press events.
01:12:02
◼
►
And I was not at the intro event for it.
01:12:04
◼
►
But I remember reading about it.
01:12:05
◼
►
And they really went all out.
01:12:07
◼
►
And they set up--
01:12:09
◼
►
Jason Snell was there.
01:12:10
◼
►
And he was talking about it a few weeks ago
01:12:12
◼
►
when he was on the show.
01:12:13
◼
►
right there in the upstairs area
01:12:17
◼
►
where they do the press briefings at the press events
01:12:19
◼
►
above town hall, they brought in,
01:12:22
◼
►
like an Ikea almost, where they made a whole bunch
01:12:26
◼
►
of living rooms.
01:12:28
◼
►
And of course, like Apple, they were really nice.
01:12:31
◼
►
They made all these, they furnished the whole place
01:12:33
◼
►
as an apartment complex, and then had individual people
01:12:37
◼
►
you could come in, and it wasn't just like,
01:12:38
◼
►
hey, hit play and listen to it for a few seconds.
01:12:40
◼
►
They wanted you to relax, sit on the couch,
01:12:42
◼
►
pretend you live here and listen to this.
01:12:44
◼
►
- Have a drink.
01:12:46
◼
►
- Right, and they really pushed like,
01:12:47
◼
►
hey, doesn't this sound amazing?
01:12:49
◼
►
Like they really, really wanted to make that like,
01:12:53
◼
►
I mean, I didn't buy one, so I don't know.
01:12:56
◼
►
I don't know how good it sounded,
01:12:57
◼
►
but Apple at least really went all out,
01:12:59
◼
►
at least in terms of marketing,
01:13:00
◼
►
is pitching it as being high quality audio.
01:13:03
◼
►
So I think that's one area
01:13:04
◼
►
where they could definitely get a leg up on Echo,
01:13:06
◼
►
'cause Echo, it's good, it's not bad.
01:13:08
◼
►
It's good enough for like a speaker in your kitchen
01:13:11
◼
►
to play music, but it's not great.
01:13:14
◼
►
And so that plus--
01:13:16
◼
►
so a great speaker plus what you mentioned from the information
01:13:21
◼
►
report with the Siri APIs, which obviously everyone's
01:13:23
◼
►
been clamoring for since Siri came out.
01:13:26
◼
►
So that plus the ability to do much more
01:13:29
◼
►
than what the Echo can do.
01:13:32
◼
►
Because the Echo has an API, obviously,
01:13:34
◼
►
and a lot of people are playing around with it
01:13:36
◼
►
and doing some interesting things with it.
01:13:37
◼
►
Like we mentioned Uber.
01:13:38
◼
►
You can call an Uber from it right now.
01:13:40
◼
►
But it does feel like it's a little bit wonky.
01:13:47
◼
►
It's a little bit--
01:13:48
◼
►
not wonky, necessarily.
01:13:50
◼
►
It's just-- I'm sure you've used the app.
01:13:53
◼
►
The app is awful for the Echo.
01:13:56
◼
►
And it's hard to--
01:13:58
◼
►
it would be hard for anyone.
01:14:01
◼
►
It's even hard for me to figure out how exactly to find things
01:14:04
◼
►
to install and what to install.
01:14:06
◼
►
And it looks god awful.
01:14:07
◼
►
So Apple will obviously do a better job of that.
01:14:10
◼
►
And so it's then a question of like,
01:14:13
◼
►
is it leaps and bounds better than what Amazon can do right
01:14:17
◼
►
now if those APIs are good enough?
01:14:21
◼
►
And I'm really curious what form these APIs come in
01:14:28
◼
►
in terms of like--
01:14:29
◼
►
I can only presume that it'll be apps somehow, I guess.
01:14:37
◼
►
apps on your iPhone or your iOS device.
01:14:42
◼
►
Yes, so do you need to have that app installed in order
01:14:46
◼
►
to have it be Siri ready?
01:14:53
◼
►
And if it's on multiple devices, how
01:14:56
◼
►
does your Siri-- if it's taking advantage
01:14:59
◼
►
of a third party extension, whatever you want to call it.
01:15:04
◼
►
Let's just say-- we've been talking about them.
01:15:07
◼
►
Let's just say Uber, right?
01:15:08
◼
►
Let's say that through an extension,
01:15:10
◼
►
you're going to allow Siri to hail you an Uber.
01:15:17
◼
►
Do you have to install it on all of your devices?
01:15:20
◼
►
I guess you would if it's through an app.
01:15:22
◼
►
But then how would it get to the standalone device?
01:15:27
◼
►
Yeah, that's weird.
01:15:30
◼
►
It's a good question, because it seems
01:15:32
◼
►
like it's an either/or thing, right?
01:15:33
◼
►
Either you would need it installed on all your devices
01:15:36
◼
►
that have hooked up to your Hey Siri stuff,
01:15:41
◼
►
or you would only do it on one so it doesn't get confused.
01:15:45
◼
►
Because say you have Uber installed on--
01:15:47
◼
►
they don't have an iPad version, but you can still obviously
01:15:49
◼
►
install it on an iPad.
01:15:50
◼
►
So say you had it on an iPad and your iPhone,
01:15:53
◼
►
and then you summoned the Uber via Siri, which one--
01:15:59
◼
►
I guess it opens both versions.
01:16:02
◼
►
Well, I mean, it doesn't matter, because on the back end,
01:16:06
◼
►
presuming you were tied into the same account,
01:16:08
◼
►
the same Uber account, when you open the app,
01:16:10
◼
►
it should know, they should be synced, right,
01:16:12
◼
►
in the backend.
01:16:13
◼
►
So I guess it doesn't really matter,
01:16:15
◼
►
but there's like a lot of more complicated issues,
01:16:20
◼
►
like the further you go down with that,
01:16:22
◼
►
like which version of the app that's running
01:16:26
◼
►
on which device are you summoning?
01:16:28
◼
►
- Right, it's, so I'm, I don't know.
01:16:33
◼
►
So my best guess is to compare it to Apple Watch.
01:16:37
◼
►
And so let's say they open up this Siri SDK.
01:16:40
◼
►
Then the Uber app on your iOS device
01:16:44
◼
►
could have the Siri extension.
01:16:47
◼
►
And then only on the iOS devices that
01:16:50
◼
►
have the latest version of the Uber app
01:16:53
◼
►
would the Siri integration work.
01:16:56
◼
►
But then also, maybe developers would
01:17:00
◼
►
be able to create like a Hi-Fi app.
01:17:04
◼
►
And just like the way that it'll say like,
01:17:07
◼
►
oh, there's an Apple Watch app that you can install,
01:17:13
◼
►
that there would be-- like if you have the Siri Hi-Fi,
01:17:17
◼
►
you would have a Siri Hi-Fi app on your phone.
01:17:20
◼
►
And then you'd go-- just like you go to the Apple Watch app
01:17:22
◼
►
to install an app on your watch, you'd
01:17:24
◼
►
go to the Hi-Fi app to install the extension on your Hi-Fi.
01:17:27
◼
►
That we're getting pretty complicated. Right. I see. And it's it makes sense to me like that's
01:17:35
◼
►
exactly what I think is it this makes sense to me technically because I can draw little arrows for
01:17:41
◼
►
all the devices and I see okay, so you download it to your phone and then from your phone, you can
01:17:45
◼
►
install it on your watch. And you can install it on the thing. But then it seems to me like you're
01:17:49
◼
►
doing an awful lot of fiddly system administrator type stuff with prices. Yeah. And so is there a
01:17:56
◼
►
better like is it just via the app and now apps require like I don't know some
01:18:01
◼
►
sort of new iCloud instance that it's that's like handling it right and that's
01:18:06
◼
►
exactly the other that it you know just erase everything that I just speculate
01:18:10
◼
►
about is there gonna be some kind of way that a developer would be able to have
01:18:14
◼
►
like an iCloud instance of this API and and and that's a total new territory for
01:18:21
◼
►
That's unlike anything I can think of that Apple's ever
01:18:29
◼
►
Yeah, I don't know.
01:18:30
◼
►
But it's good that they're--
01:18:32
◼
►
I think it's smart, of course, that they're playing
01:18:34
◼
►
in this space.
01:18:35
◼
►
Smart that Google is as well.
01:18:37
◼
►
All these guys are pouring so many resources
01:18:40
◼
►
into these assistants and the whole AI aspect.
01:18:46
◼
►
obviously, Marco's post about DAPL and AI and stuff,
01:18:50
◼
►
that they need to be able to get enough data
01:18:56
◼
►
to constantly improve these things.
01:18:58
◼
►
And it's almost like table stakes.
01:19:01
◼
►
It seems like it's going to be now that you need to have
01:19:03
◼
►
the home version of whatever the assistant thing is
01:19:06
◼
►
to be able to keep up and remain on par
01:19:10
◼
►
with all the other competitors.
01:19:11
◼
►
- Yeah, one of the things I was thinking about
01:19:14
◼
►
in light of Marco's post the other day about it,
01:19:18
◼
►
is I was trying to think,
01:19:21
◼
►
'cause I didn't agree with him fully.
01:19:23
◼
►
It was a great post, and the ways that I disagree,
01:19:27
◼
►
it's just all, it's not like Marco's dumb,
01:19:30
◼
►
it's like, no, Marco's smart,
01:19:32
◼
►
and I actually see the logic of what he's saying,
01:19:33
◼
►
but something doesn't sit right with me.
01:19:35
◼
►
And then I thought about social networking,
01:19:38
◼
►
and social networking is obviously a huge part
01:19:41
◼
►
of the whole industry that we talk about.
01:19:43
◼
►
I mean, Facebook is a giant company now,
01:19:46
◼
►
and super influential.
01:19:48
◼
►
I mean, literally a scandal in the last few weeks,
01:19:53
◼
►
or a controversy, I should say, about whether or not
01:19:57
◼
►
Facebook is single-handedly skewing political news in the US.
01:20:03
◼
►
Hugely influential.
01:20:04
◼
►
Instagram is a huge success.
01:20:10
◼
►
Twitter is Twitter.
01:20:11
◼
►
I love it, but it is what it is.
01:20:15
◼
►
But it certainly is--
01:20:18
◼
►
I don't want to go down the route
01:20:19
◼
►
of talking about Twitter as a business.
01:20:21
◼
►
But culturally, though, its influence is undeniable.
01:20:24
◼
►
I always say, the one thing about Twitter
01:20:26
◼
►
that it's just stunning how every time I watch TV news
01:20:30
◼
►
and somebody comes on, they tell you
01:20:32
◼
►
what their Twitter handle is.
01:20:34
◼
►
Well, and if you watch ESPN at all,
01:20:36
◼
►
it's a significant percentage of ESPN via reporting,
01:20:40
◼
►
via talking about tweets.
01:20:42
◼
►
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
01:20:44
◼
►
Twitter's influence in the sports world alone is astounding.
01:20:49
◼
►
Especially as we go down the path of the NBA playoffs
01:20:51
◼
►
and stuff, it's--
01:20:52
◼
►
I don't know.
01:20:52
◼
►
I think-- well, and now, Major League Baseball
01:20:55
◼
►
has a ton of Twitter, too.
01:20:56
◼
►
So no, it's just everywhere in sports.
01:20:59
◼
►
Apple has no real social networking.
01:21:03
◼
►
And they've even tried twice.
01:21:04
◼
►
They had Ping.
01:21:05
◼
►
And then last year, the--
01:21:08
◼
►
I don't even remember what it's called--
01:21:10
◼
►
the middle tab of Apple Music.
01:21:12
◼
►
- Right, the thing that's going away apparently.
01:21:14
◼
►
- Right, and hasn't taken off, hasn't really,
01:21:18
◼
►
never gained a foothold, but so what?
01:21:19
◼
►
Apple has, in a second level way,
01:21:22
◼
►
sort of thrived on social networking
01:21:26
◼
►
because people use their iPhones to Facebook
01:21:30
◼
►
and to Instagram and to tweet.
01:21:33
◼
►
And it's only made, the rise of social networking
01:21:38
◼
►
largely coincides with the rise of the iPhone,
01:21:41
◼
►
and it's a big part of why.
01:21:43
◼
►
I think that there's a real difference
01:21:45
◼
►
that I was thinking about it,
01:21:46
◼
►
and the voice assistants aren't like that,
01:21:48
◼
►
because the voice assistants, to be useful,
01:21:51
◼
►
have to be built into the system.
01:21:53
◼
►
There is a Cortana app.
01:21:54
◼
►
There is, the Google app has all of the Google
01:21:58
◼
►
assistant type stuff.
01:22:01
◼
►
The startups that are in this space have apps.
01:22:07
◼
►
I can't remember some of their names, but you know, like--
01:22:09
◼
►
- Yeah, there's like operator,
01:22:12
◼
►
oh, well Viv is, yeah,
01:22:14
◼
►
they were-- - Viv will be an app.
01:22:15
◼
►
- By the Siri people, yeah.
01:22:19
◼
►
- So you can do that, but that doesn't make it,
01:22:22
◼
►
it doesn't work like that.
01:22:23
◼
►
You can't say go launch an app and then do it.
01:22:26
◼
►
It doesn't work like that.
01:22:27
◼
►
It has to be built into the system.
01:22:28
◼
►
- So the one outside the bounds though,
01:22:31
◼
►
which I'd be interested in your thoughts on then,
01:22:32
◼
►
is the Facebook Messenger one, Facebook M it's called, right?
01:22:36
◼
►
So that Facebook, obviously, famously does not have a phone.
01:22:40
◼
►
They run on other people's devices.
01:22:44
◼
►
But they do, by most accounts, have some of the foremost
01:22:48
◼
►
experts in AI working at Facebook.
01:22:51
◼
►
So how do you square that?
01:22:53
◼
►
Where do you think that they--
01:22:55
◼
►
where does that come into play?
01:22:57
◼
►
Because you think they're going after AI.
01:22:59
◼
►
They think they're going to be a leader in whatever
01:23:02
◼
►
comes of AI.
01:23:02
◼
►
And certainly, these assistant things are a big part of that,
01:23:05
◼
►
at least right now, and FacebookM is sort of one of the front runners right now for
01:23:11
◼
►
that, but they don't have the system level integration.
01:23:14
◼
►
It's a good question. It could just be to do the AI while you're in their apps. Facebook's
01:23:26
◼
►
advantage is, and I say this as someone who doesn't use Facebook, but part of what makes
01:23:33
◼
►
them so valuable is that, you know, people spend an awful lot of people spend an awful
01:23:38
◼
►
lot of time in Facebook. So they already have them there. So they almost are like their
01:23:46
◼
►
Yeah, that's true.
01:23:47
◼
►
If you're already there, you're in Facebook on your phone or, you know, well, I think
01:23:52
◼
►
the phone's probably number one now. So you're in Facebook, you're on your phone, any kind
01:23:56
◼
►
of AI features that they can offer you, you're already there. So they have the need for that.
01:24:03
◼
►
or the opportunity.
01:24:05
◼
►
- Good way to frame it, I think.
01:24:06
◼
►
It's almost like, so the browser on a PC or Mac
01:24:11
◼
►
is not, you know, sort of,
01:24:14
◼
►
well, while they are baked into the system,
01:24:18
◼
►
it is a separate application
01:24:19
◼
►
that you're running all the time.
01:24:21
◼
►
Everyone's always running a browser, right?
01:24:22
◼
►
And that's like Facebook on the phone.
01:24:25
◼
►
- Is sort of the, I mean, that's been said before, of course,
01:24:27
◼
►
but it is in that context, like basically the same thing.
01:24:30
◼
►
They even helpfully cheat and use the audio APIs
01:24:33
◼
►
to make sure they're literally running on your phone
01:24:35
◼
►
all the time.
01:24:38
◼
►
I keyed, I keyed slightly.
01:24:41
◼
►
That brings to mind another one of the topics in this space
01:24:44
◼
►
that I want to talk about.
01:24:45
◼
►
And I've seen an awful lot of people bring this up.
01:24:47
◼
►
So one of the other rumors, it's separate from the information
01:24:50
◼
►
report, but there's also a rumor that has come out.
01:24:53
◼
►
I know MacRumors had it.
01:24:54
◼
►
I don't know if it was their original.
01:24:56
◼
►
I think it was.
01:24:56
◼
►
I think it was their original scoop.
01:24:58
◼
►
the next version of Mac OS is going to have Siri built in.
01:25:04
◼
►
- And a lot of people read that and the question I got is,
01:25:07
◼
►
well, why do I have to talk to Siri?
01:25:09
◼
►
Why can't I just type like Spotlight?
01:25:12
◼
►
And then therefore, well, maybe that's the answer.
01:25:14
◼
►
Maybe the Spotlight feature goes away
01:25:17
◼
►
and it's replaced by Siri
01:25:18
◼
►
and you can either talk to it or type.
01:25:20
◼
►
- Yeah, that's a good question.
01:25:27
◼
►
I think that that, thinking about it for a few seconds
01:25:30
◼
►
just now, I think that that's probably
01:25:32
◼
►
the way they should do it.
01:25:33
◼
►
I think it's a little weird, like,
01:25:36
◼
►
Microsoft has done this too with Cortana.
01:25:38
◼
►
I think it's a little weird to have those things
01:25:40
◼
►
on the desktop in the same, trying to fit them
01:25:44
◼
►
into the same context as they exist right now
01:25:46
◼
►
on mobile devices, because you just use a desktop,
01:25:50
◼
►
laptop, whatever, traditional computer, differently.
01:25:55
◼
►
And you're right, a lot of it is text-based input.
01:25:58
◼
►
It's not vocal, which ties back to the whole thing of why
01:26:03
◼
►
I also think Alexa is important, because there is no way
01:26:06
◼
►
to interface with it besides the voice, but that's--
01:26:09
◼
►
that's a different route to go down.
01:26:12
◼
►
But yeah, so I think that Siri as a text-based thing
01:26:15
◼
►
is interesting.
01:26:16
◼
►
And that's also like going to Facebook M. Right now,
01:26:19
◼
►
it is mainly text, but it's all chat-based, right?
01:26:23
◼
►
So they're doing it the opposite way of what Siri and Alexa
01:26:27
◼
►
and Cortana and--
01:26:30
◼
►
the Google thing, I guess, is a hybrid, right?
01:26:32
◼
►
Because you can talk to it or it can just be--
01:26:37
◼
►
I mean, the main interface is to say, OK, Google.
01:26:39
◼
►
And then it loads, basically.
01:26:42
◼
►
It's doing a search query.
01:26:45
◼
►
So that's, I guess, the closest thing to that.
01:26:47
◼
►
And that would be Apple, if they did do Siri for Mac OS,
01:26:53
◼
►
doing it with the text thing would be, I guess, most comparable to that.
01:26:57
◼
►
Maybe. You know, there's a trick that I just learned recently. I didn't
01:27:01
◼
►
know this, but if you do invoke Siri on
01:27:05
◼
►
your iPhone and she
01:27:09
◼
►
hears you wrong, you can, on that results screen,
01:27:13
◼
►
you pull down on it and it shows you what Siri
01:27:17
◼
►
thought you said. And if you tap on that, you can edit that text.
01:27:21
◼
►
Oh really? I didn't know that.
01:27:23
◼
►
I didn't know it either. I just learned it in the last week or two from someone on Twitter in the midst of talking about all of this.
01:27:29
◼
►
I think it was in the context of that discussion of why can't you just enter text.
01:27:34
◼
►
And in other words, why can't you invoke Siri and then pull down or something to bring up a text field and just type your query to Siri.
01:27:41
◼
►
Because there are certain contexts where you can't write.
01:27:44
◼
►
Right. What if you're in a quiet area? Yeah, yeah, right.
01:27:47
◼
►
Huh. Yeah, I had no idea about that.
01:27:50
◼
►
So you can edit text after you've made your vocal query to Siri.
01:27:55
◼
►
You can edit it as text, but you can't just type it as text.
01:27:59
◼
►
So if you want to use that feature, you should just speak gibberish to Siri.
01:28:03
◼
►
Just whisper some quick gibberish.
01:28:05
◼
►
Right. To invoke the text mode.
01:28:09
◼
►
Anyway, interesting trick, I thought.
01:28:12
◼
►
Yeah, and then there was the report, I think it was Gherman, right?
01:28:17
◼
►
saying that there was a, or maybe it was a riff off of another report or something,
01:28:22
◼
►
but I know that 95 Mac wrote about it that the new MacBook Pro conceivably
01:28:29
◼
►
coming out at the end of the year would have the, this like OLED strip and you
01:28:36
◼
►
know one of the reasons why that might make sense is because then you could
01:28:40
◼
►
have a Siri button without having to have like a physical Siri button.
01:28:43
◼
►
Yeah, I saw that rumor and I don't know what to make of it. It seems kind of interesting.
01:28:52
◼
►
It seems like maybe it's also sort of like that... I don't remember if it was a Kickstarter.
01:28:58
◼
►
I think it might have been before Kickstarter. But do you remember a couple years ago there
01:29:02
◼
►
was somebody who was trying to make a keyboard?
01:29:04
◼
►
Yes, I know what this is. That LED keyboard thing?
01:29:07
◼
►
- Yeah, and it was, the idea was that each key,
01:29:11
◼
►
it was a physical keyboard,
01:29:12
◼
►
but each key would be a standalone LED.
01:29:15
◼
►
And so like, in the quote unquote normal mode,
01:29:19
◼
►
it would be, you know, QWERTY, you know,
01:29:21
◼
►
and it would be alphabetic and have numbers.
01:29:23
◼
►
But then like when you're using Photoshop,
01:29:25
◼
►
the key caps could change to all of the weird shortcuts.
01:29:29
◼
►
So you, you know, you could, you know,
01:29:32
◼
►
the H key would change to, you know,
01:29:35
◼
►
whatever H does in Photoshop.
01:29:38
◼
►
- Like a game could change all of the buttons
01:29:41
◼
►
to different weapons or something like that.
01:29:45
◼
►
- Yeah, and it's sort of, I guess, similar to on iOS
01:29:50
◼
►
when you have the virtual thing on top of the keyboard,
01:29:55
◼
►
where it suggests stuff,
01:29:57
◼
►
and so it can sort of dynamically do different things.
01:30:00
◼
►
- Right, so that LED keyboard never really,
01:30:03
◼
►
It never came to be a realistic project,
01:30:08
◼
►
but it certainly got people excited.
01:30:09
◼
►
I could see how this LED touchscreen
01:30:13
◼
►
in place of the function keys could work like that.
01:30:17
◼
►
And it gets to, it's like a little bit
01:30:21
◼
►
like the Mac keyboard getting a little taste
01:30:24
◼
►
of that spiel that Steve Jobs gave
01:30:28
◼
►
at the original iPhone introduction
01:30:30
◼
►
about what to do about the buttons on a phone
01:30:33
◼
►
because once you put them there, there's nothing else.
01:30:36
◼
►
They're set.
01:30:37
◼
►
And then if you come up with a new idea later,
01:30:40
◼
►
you'd like to have a different button.
01:30:42
◼
►
What do you do?
01:30:42
◼
►
And he goes, well, the answer is,
01:30:44
◼
►
we've solved this years ago with the graphical user interface.
01:30:46
◼
►
The answer is do it in software.
01:30:48
◼
►
So I can kind of see that.
01:30:49
◼
►
And quite frankly, the idea of F1, F2, F3 keys,
01:30:53
◼
►
even it's just fiddly.
01:30:56
◼
►
And I know Apple's started printing, hard-coded printing,
01:31:00
◼
►
like this is volume up, this is volume down,
01:31:02
◼
►
this is brightness.
01:31:04
◼
►
And that by default, that's what those keys do now.
01:31:08
◼
►
You have to actually trigger a system-wide preference
01:31:12
◼
►
to turn them into regular function keys.
01:31:14
◼
►
- Right, and I think most kids would have no, like F1,
01:31:19
◼
►
they would have no idea. - They have no idea.
01:31:20
◼
►
Yeah, my son, if I, I should do it
01:31:23
◼
►
when he gets home from school, I should actually see you.
01:31:26
◼
►
- Yeah, could you hit the F1 key?
01:31:28
◼
►
What, you mean the brightness down key?
01:31:30
◼
►
Which key? - You know, and I remember
01:31:32
◼
►
when I still have the extended keyboard in front of me,
01:31:35
◼
►
but the Apple extended keyboard,
01:31:38
◼
►
you know, the big tank keyboard that I use,
01:31:40
◼
►
it shipped with like a strip
01:31:42
◼
►
that went around the function keys.
01:31:44
◼
►
Like, it was like a, I don't know what you would call it,
01:31:48
◼
►
like a stencil almost that would surround the function keys.
01:31:53
◼
►
- Oh, yeah, okay.
01:31:54
◼
►
- Different pro apps would come,
01:31:56
◼
►
like QuarkXPress came with one.
01:31:58
◼
►
- Yeah, yeah, yeah.
01:31:59
◼
►
I actually remember that on IBM PCs,
01:32:01
◼
►
they had a similar thing with that, yeah.
01:32:03
◼
►
When the big keys, the big pushdown keys.
01:32:06
◼
►
- Right. - Yeah.
01:32:07
◼
►
- By default, F1, I think it was just like,
01:32:12
◼
►
I think it was just like ZXCV.
01:32:15
◼
►
So F1 was undo, F2 was cut, F3 was copy, and F4 was paste.
01:32:20
◼
►
But this is ancient Apple history.
01:32:23
◼
►
This is like stuff that worked in like 1991.
01:32:26
◼
►
- That's really funny though, 'cause that's like,
01:32:28
◼
►
you know, talking about this virtual OLED strip
01:32:31
◼
►
that is like the original version of that, right?
01:32:33
◼
►
Like software that would ship an actual physical printout
01:32:37
◼
►
that you would overlay around the keys
01:32:41
◼
►
to change their functions,
01:32:42
◼
►
to know what their function would be.
01:32:44
◼
►
- Yeah, so I think this idea sounds to me like,
01:32:49
◼
►
hey, this sounds like a really good idea.
01:32:51
◼
►
'Cause then instead of having these hard coded things
01:32:55
◼
►
that you could make that whole area flexible.
01:32:59
◼
►
Yeah, and then software updates, when they keep updating Mac OS
01:33:04
◼
►
and adding new things, they don't
01:33:05
◼
►
have to ship a new keyboard all of a sudden.
01:33:09
◼
►
Mac OS flows off the tongue.
01:33:12
◼
►
I really like it.
01:33:13
◼
►
This is my favorite.
01:33:14
◼
►
I'm really excited about them renaming it Mac OS.
01:33:17
◼
►
But are they still going to do--
01:33:19
◼
►
they're still committed to the California thing?
01:33:21
◼
►
Is that the latest--
01:33:22
◼
►
I don't know.
01:33:23
◼
►
I have no idea.
01:33:24
◼
►
- Is it gonna be Mac OS, you know,
01:33:26
◼
►
the Hollywood or whatever?
01:33:30
◼
►
- I think so.
01:33:30
◼
►
I think that they're committed to the California thing.
01:33:32
◼
►
'Cause they've only done it for two years, right?
01:33:35
◼
►
Or did they do three?
01:33:37
◼
►
Oh no, three, 'cause there was Mavericks.
01:33:39
◼
►
- Yeah, that's right.
01:33:40
◼
►
- Mavericks was first.
01:33:41
◼
►
Yeah, I think they're committed to the California thing.
01:33:47
◼
►
And I think that, you know,
01:33:49
◼
►
but it's just gonna be Mac OS, you know, Hollywood.
01:33:53
◼
►
Yeah, well, I'll be glad to be done with the 10 elements of it, because we're at 10.11.5 now.
01:34:01
◼
►
It always bothered me all along. I've never been a fan of the name Mac OS X, and I was less of a fan when they officially changed it to OS X without the Mac.
01:34:14
◼
►
Really, never a fan of that name. Just because... Well, number one, I don't like Roman numerals. I just wrote about this...
01:34:21
◼
►
I hate Roman. I just hate them. They're absolutely terrible. There's arguments to be made that I
01:34:28
◼
►
mean, I'm not being facetious here. I've seen arguments that their stupid numeral system made the Romans so
01:34:36
◼
►
bad at math that it led to the decline of the Roman Empire because
01:34:42
◼
►
they fell to people who used a logical decimal, you know,
01:34:46
◼
►
system of indicating numerals that made math easier.
01:34:50
◼
►
I hate it. I just don't like Roman numerals. I hate the way it's, you know, this doesn't seem to be as big a problem anymore, but I hate it in the early years, the people who said Mac OS X.
01:35:01
◼
►
Oh, it still happens all the time. But yeah.
01:35:04
◼
►
It's not their problem. It's Apple's problem because it looks like Mac OS X because guess what? Normal people today don't speak in Roman numerals. If you show them an X, they say that's an X. They don't say, "Oh, I bet that's a 10."
01:35:17
◼
►
And then as time went on, it was as though, I mean, what was it? 2016? So 15 years of updates to
01:35:25
◼
►
the operating system. In their numbering system, it's like they've all been minor little feature upgrades
01:35:31
◼
►
for 15 years.
01:35:34
◼
►
So I think I read the, I don't know if you talked about this. I've read this somewhere.
01:35:40
◼
►
So, you know, they did when they did Super Bowl 50 this past year, they did Super Bowl 50 rather than Super Bowl L or whatever.
01:35:46
◼
►
but next year they're going back to the Roman numerals so it's like "LI" I think
01:35:51
◼
►
or something like that.
01:35:52
◼
►
I know, they are.
01:35:53
◼
►
It makes me want to scream because I was so happy.
01:35:57
◼
►
I was like, you know what, I was so happy because I thought that's brilliant.
01:36:01
◼
►
Fifty is the nicest, roundest number they're going to get to until a hundred.
01:36:08
◼
►
And now this is the way they get out of the mess they've created for themselves with these
01:36:14
◼
►
Roman numerals.
01:36:16
◼
►
You know what else screws me up with the Roman numerals?
01:36:17
◼
►
The Star Wars.
01:36:18
◼
►
I'm so confused over what the hell number the movies are.
01:36:23
◼
►
I really am.
01:36:24
◼
►
Once I got to the prequels, like four, five, and six,
01:36:28
◼
►
I understood that there's three.
01:36:30
◼
►
But now I'm like, what the hell is this episode eight?
01:36:32
◼
►
How, what, how have we updated already?
01:36:34
◼
►
And then it's like, just, I really,
01:36:37
◼
►
I don't like the Roman numerals in Star Wars,
01:36:39
◼
►
but there's no, they can't get out of it.
01:36:40
◼
►
They've already, they're already into it.
01:36:42
◼
►
The NFL could get out of it with the Super Bowl.
01:36:44
◼
►
did get out of it with 50 and now they're going backwards. Now they're going back. Super
01:36:49
◼
►
Bowl LI. Super Bowl LI. That's great. I used to like it, but I used to be amused by like
01:37:01
◼
►
it like old time Hollywood movies used to often put like the copyright in in Roman numerals.
01:37:07
◼
►
Oh, don't they still do that? I'm pretty sure some movies still do. So at the very end,
01:37:12
◼
►
I'm one of those people who stays through the credits,
01:37:14
◼
►
the annoying person who sits through the entire credits,
01:37:17
◼
►
even though I'm not reading everything.
01:37:18
◼
►
I just sort of like it as a time to think about what I just
01:37:20
◼
►
watched or whatever.
01:37:22
◼
►
And so I always stay through the end,
01:37:24
◼
►
and especially now with all the Marvel stuff
01:37:25
◼
►
where you have to stay through the end.
01:37:27
◼
►
But at the end, when they do the last credit thing,
01:37:31
◼
►
it's like the--
01:37:32
◼
►
whatever it is.
01:37:33
◼
►
I don't know if it's MPAA or whoever
01:37:36
◼
►
gets the last sort of screen.
01:37:38
◼
►
And they do the number of what actual movie it is,
01:37:42
◼
►
like how many movies have actually been.
01:37:45
◼
►
And it's still in Roman numerals, I'm pretty sure,
01:37:47
◼
►
because I know that because they just passed some milestone.
01:37:53
◼
►
I should look it up, but I don't even
01:37:55
◼
►
know what I would Google for.
01:37:57
◼
►
But they just passed some major milestone.
01:37:59
◼
►
And so it's now shorter because it's
01:38:02
◼
►
passed like 5,000 or whatever, 50,000 or something like that.
01:38:06
◼
►
Maybe it used to be though, and maybe it's not now,
01:38:08
◼
►
and maybe I'm remembering it slightly wrong.
01:38:10
◼
►
I know that they used to do it.
01:38:12
◼
►
What you're suggesting is like, yeah,
01:38:15
◼
►
the year and everything would be Roman numeral, right?
01:38:18
◼
►
And now I think this movie credit system at the very end,
01:38:23
◼
►
it may have switched back over to actual numbers
01:38:26
◼
►
because it just got too unwieldy,
01:38:27
◼
►
but I'm not 100% sure.
01:38:29
◼
►
I don't remember.
01:38:30
◼
►
- All right, I'll look it up.
01:38:31
◼
►
We'll look it up after the show.
01:38:33
◼
►
- All right.
01:38:33
◼
►
- Here's one answer.
01:38:35
◼
►
I don't know if this is definitive. I googled one.
01:38:37
◼
►
This is all I have time for to do live in the show.
01:38:39
◼
►
But there's a BBC article that says,
01:38:41
◼
►
perhaps one of the most notable areas
01:38:44
◼
►
where people are likely to come across Roman numerals
01:38:46
◼
►
is in TV and film credits where the convention
01:38:48
◼
►
is not to spell out what year something was made.
01:38:51
◼
►
The practice is believed to have started
01:38:54
◼
►
in an attempt to disguise the age of films
01:38:56
◼
►
or television programs.
01:38:59
◼
►
- In other words, it's the opposite of claiming
01:39:01
◼
►
an undeserved antiquity.
01:39:02
◼
►
They're not trying to look old.
01:39:03
◼
►
they are trying to look like they're still young.
01:39:06
◼
►
Because nobody can tell.
01:39:09
◼
►
Here's an example, here's 1998 in Roman numerals.
01:39:12
◼
►
M-C-M-X-C-V-I-I-I.
01:39:15
◼
►
Crazy. - Yes.
01:39:18
◼
►
Yeah, I think I see the same thing now,
01:39:20
◼
►
this on Stack Exchange talking about, yeah.
01:39:23
◼
►
Copyright, Time Warner Studios, MC, yeah, right.
01:39:26
◼
►
That's exactly right.
01:39:26
◼
►
- I've already got it in the show notes.
01:39:28
◼
►
I'll put it there.
01:39:29
◼
►
Folks, you can listen, just check out the show notes there.
01:39:31
◼
►
- That's what it is then.
01:39:32
◼
►
I think I was conflating the two things.
01:39:34
◼
►
That is where they use the Roman numerals.
01:39:36
◼
►
The movie number is, I think, just a number.
01:39:42
◼
►
There we go.
01:39:43
◼
►
But that's where they are.
01:39:44
◼
►
What the hell are we talking about?
01:39:45
◼
►
How do we get from the keyboard with an OLED strip to Roman numerals?
01:39:48
◼
►
Because Mac OS.
01:39:49
◼
►
Oh, Mac OS X, right.
01:39:51
◼
►
They're going to get rid of the X.
01:39:52
◼
►
Yeah, there we go.
01:39:58
◼
►
I wonder, would...
01:40:00
◼
►
No, no. Although I wonder, maybe they would like, if...
01:40:04
◼
►
I don't think you would have to have the new keyboard to use Siri on the Mac, but maybe
01:40:07
◼
►
they would do the little, you know, the animation for Siri, the horizontal thing, because it's
01:40:11
◼
►
such a horizontal animation, maybe the OLED strip will turn into the waveform.
01:40:16
◼
►
Yeah, that'd be pretty.
01:40:21
◼
►
The other thing with Germin's report, though, is that, and it's a little disappointing,
01:40:24
◼
►
because I was kind of hoping maybe new MacBook Pros would come out at WWDC, but his report
01:40:30
◼
►
it later this year, like a fall thing. Right, and there was some little nugget,
01:40:37
◼
►
I think, and I think that was based on, what's the one, the one, who is it, is it KJI or whatever,
01:40:44
◼
►
they have a pretty good track record of being right about those things. I think it was riffing
01:40:48
◼
►
off of that, but also talking about the fact that there's some potential for a 13-inch MacBook,
01:40:57
◼
►
not a pro, so there would be like the two pro models, and then we already have now the 12 inch,
01:41:03
◼
►
you know, Retina MacBook, and now there might be a 13 inch? It said that in there,
01:41:08
◼
►
which I was confused by, like why would they do a 12 and a 13 inch?
01:41:12
◼
►
Yeah, that seems wrong to me. It seems to me like they made the whole reason they made the
01:41:17
◼
►
12 inch in the first place was to split the difference between 13 and 11.
01:41:21
◼
►
Right. Right. And so, yeah, I don't know. Maybe it's something got lost in translation there.
01:41:29
◼
►
Yeah. Or they're going to switch to 13. I don't know. It doesn't make sense to have 12 and 13.
01:41:34
◼
►
They don't seem different enough to justify both of them existing.
01:41:38
◼
►
I mean, you could see where they would make a bigger one in order to put a second port.
01:41:44
◼
►
everyone complains of course about the one USB-C port. But then with a 14 or 15?
01:41:52
◼
►
I just think that they have to be different enough that just at a glance on the table in the Apple
01:42:00
◼
►
Store you can say, "Oh, that one's big, this one's small." If you're gonna have three, it has to be
01:42:08
◼
►
Rare, medium, and well done.
01:42:11
◼
►
You can't have a medium rare in there.
01:42:14
◼
►
It's too hard to tell apart.
01:42:17
◼
►
And that report also mentioned that they're likely
01:42:20
◼
►
keeping the MacBook Air around.
01:42:22
◼
►
And it will just be the cheaper--
01:42:24
◼
►
the low, the rare version, in your analogy--
01:42:30
◼
►
the cheaper, low-end version of what you get from Mac.
01:42:33
◼
►
So presumably still no Retina screen, I guess.
01:42:36
◼
►
Yeah, I think that the writing is on the wall.
01:42:38
◼
►
I know that this is to me, I get it all the time.
01:42:42
◼
►
And I know there's so many people,
01:42:44
◼
►
and I'm gonna make you angry
01:42:45
◼
►
if you're one of these people listening.
01:42:46
◼
►
I'm telling you right now, stop holding your breath
01:42:48
◼
►
for a retina MacBook Air, and it's just not gonna happen.
01:42:51
◼
►
And I know, I get emails all the time,
01:42:54
◼
►
this is what a lot of people want.
01:42:56
◼
►
They want exactly what the MacBook Air is right now
01:42:59
◼
►
with a retina screen.
01:43:00
◼
►
- And when they're asking for that,
01:43:02
◼
►
is it specifically that they want,
01:43:06
◼
►
like the certain type of power adapter
01:43:10
◼
►
and the older school USB ports rather than--
01:43:16
◼
►
because the new MacBook is very similar to what a MacBook Air
01:43:21
◼
►
is except for the ports, right?
01:43:25
◼
►
And the power, this performance, because it's slower.
01:43:28
◼
►
It's still slower than MacBook Air.
01:43:31
◼
►
And a refreshed MacBook Air, if it were to come, but it's not,
01:43:36
◼
►
I don't think, would be faster still.
01:43:38
◼
►
But the MacBook Air you can go by today
01:43:41
◼
►
is faster than the MacBook.
01:43:43
◼
►
And so if you push your machine a little bit,
01:43:45
◼
►
if you're like me, 50 browser tabs,
01:43:49
◼
►
or if you're using Xcode or something like that,
01:43:52
◼
►
photo editing, you want it.
01:43:55
◼
►
But no, I think it's very clear looking at the products
01:43:57
◼
►
that Apple's come out with recently, what they're doing.
01:44:00
◼
►
The MacBook, the new one, the MacBook One,
01:44:04
◼
►
will get faster over time. Right. And it will eventually, like in two years, that won't be an
01:44:09
◼
►
issue. Right. So is it worth it for Apple to spend money to make a retina MacBook Air when these
01:44:17
◼
►
things are just going to collide in two years? Right. And on the other end, the MacBook Pros
01:44:22
◼
►
are getting thinner. Like that's another part of this rumor with the OLED screen is that the
01:44:27
◼
►
MacBook, even though they got so much thinner a couple years ago when they went to the,
01:44:32
◼
►
you can't get a spinning hard drive anymore, everything's SSD, but it's going to get thinner
01:44:37
◼
►
still because that's what Apple does. They take products and make them thinner. So the MacBook
01:44:41
◼
►
Pros, at the more expensive side, and if performance is important to you, are going to get ever more
01:44:47
◼
►
air-like in their form factor, and the MacBook is going to get faster. And Apple's bet is that
01:44:54
◼
►
your need for ports is going to decrease over time. And so the MacBook Air, even though if they were
01:45:02
◼
►
to come out with a retina MacBook Air today, it would sell, might sell very well. It's
01:45:06
◼
►
a dead end, I think, in Apple's mind in terms of differentiation of the product line. That
01:45:12
◼
►
it's not, it would be too, it's too conflated with the other products or too easily mixed
01:45:17
◼
►
up. Right. And so right now the only reason the MacBook Airs exist is to hit the $899
01:45:24
◼
►
and $999 price points. Right. And I assume that's a lot of what they're selling to like
01:45:28
◼
►
right? That's their... is that also their school sort of selling? Oh, I think so. I would be...
01:45:35
◼
►
anybody... I would be surprised if schools were buying anything other than
01:45:41
◼
►
the MacBook Airs, because they don't have money, and B, they just don't...
01:45:47
◼
►
schools, you know, they're just not going to value something like retina. Right.
01:45:51
◼
►
You know, too bad kids. Even though kids have the sharpest eyes, and they're the
01:45:54
◼
►
most likely to be able to see the fuzzy pixels.
01:45:58
◼
►
- Well, just wait, give 'em time.
01:46:03
◼
►
Two years, kids, two years.
01:46:05
◼
►
- So I don't know, I wonder if we're gonna see
01:46:06
◼
►
any hardware at WWDC now, but on the other hand,
01:46:09
◼
►
we haven't had new Mac hardware in forever,
01:46:12
◼
►
except for the updated MacBook One,
01:46:15
◼
►
which was just a speed bump.
01:46:18
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, the only hardware,
01:46:19
◼
►
if those reports are true, and maybe it won't even be
01:46:22
◼
►
released then, would be the thing
01:46:23
◼
►
We were just talking about that music Siri hub thing.
01:46:27
◼
►
But yeah, they usually don't do--
01:46:29
◼
►
they haven't done Mac hardware in a while, right?
01:46:31
◼
►
Because they announce the new OS,
01:46:34
◼
►
and then they wait to ship.
01:46:36
◼
►
Well, they did the updated 5K iMac last year
01:46:39
◼
►
with the new high gamut screen.
01:46:42
◼
►
Oh, that's right.
01:46:45
◼
►
By the way, when are they going to launch
01:46:47
◼
►
a display, external display, with Retina?
01:46:51
◼
►
Like, why have they not done that yet?
01:46:53
◼
►
That's a fantastic question. I think that this is something that I, because I have the 5k iMac,
01:46:59
◼
►
yeah, I have the old, the first one though, not the high gamut one. So you know, play a little sad
01:47:06
◼
►
violin song for me. I know that the ATP guys have gone on about this in detail and I, because I
01:47:13
◼
►
don't have a Mac Pro, I don't care enough to figure it out, but there's some kind of thing where
01:47:17
◼
►
Thunderbolt. Oh, right. The throughput is not there.
01:47:22
◼
►
Sufficient. And the only way that Apple made it work internally in the 5k iMac
01:47:27
◼
►
was by creating your own thing. Um, uh,
01:47:31
◼
►
so I think that's the problem. Uh, but maybe this WWDC is where the,
01:47:36
◼
►
the, the trashcan Darth Vader Mac pro came out.
01:47:42
◼
►
It is incredibly long overdue for an update.
01:47:46
◼
►
And so I know it's not like a best seller, but at the WWDC developer crowd, it actually is.
01:47:54
◼
►
So maybe that would be a nice... I haven't seen any rumors about it, but just in terms of being overdue,
01:48:00
◼
►
boy, that would be a nice announcement that would play extremely...
01:48:03
◼
►
I think it would play extremely well in a room if they said, "We've updated the Mac Pro.
01:48:07
◼
►
It blows away the old Mac Pro in performance, and you can hook up this 5K, beautiful 5K display to it."
01:48:14
◼
►
Finally, an actual finally.
01:48:17
◼
►
And yeah, I mean, given Apple's dominance in both design
01:48:20
◼
►
and film and everything, it's crazy
01:48:23
◼
►
that all these people can't use a screen that
01:48:28
◼
►
ties into all of the rest of the Apple products
01:48:30
◼
►
that they're using for that.
01:48:31
◼
►
Right, and again, I'm spoiled, but I've gone all--
01:48:36
◼
►
I guess I'm trying to think what my last non-retina device was.
01:48:40
◼
►
It was, I guess it was when I upgraded to this 5K iMac,
01:48:45
◼
►
what, like a year and a half ago.
01:48:46
◼
►
But now, everything is retina.
01:48:49
◼
►
My son still has a non-retina iPad.
01:48:52
◼
►
So I think it's like the only non-retina device in the house.
01:48:55
◼
►
Like an animal.
01:48:57
◼
►
And when I see the screen, I'm like, oh my god,
01:48:59
◼
►
I can't believe you live in that one.
01:49:01
◼
►
Those pixels were pretty big.
01:49:03
◼
►
I still have--
01:49:04
◼
►
I'm actually sitting in front of right now the last iMac
01:49:08
◼
►
before it went retina.
01:49:10
◼
►
It's still nice, but yeah, you can definitely see the pixels.
01:49:13
◼
►
Yeah, it sticks out like a sore thumb.
01:49:15
◼
►
And it just seems crazy, like you said,
01:49:17
◼
►
it's just crazy that the customers who
01:49:19
◼
►
are willing to spend $10,000 on a Mac Pro--
01:49:24
◼
►
Have no option.
01:49:25
◼
►
They have to buy the Dell, whatever.
01:49:27
◼
►
4K, whatever.
01:49:30
◼
►
All right, let me take one last break here and thank
01:49:33
◼
►
our third and final sponsor.
01:49:34
◼
►
This is a great company.
01:49:36
◼
►
Love these guys.
01:49:37
◼
►
Casper. These are the guys who make mattresses. You don't have to go pick what type of foam or
01:49:45
◼
►
springs or whatever the hell you want. Casper figured this out. They've got the perfect
01:49:49
◼
►
mattress. It's like a blend of memory foam and springy latex. And it's just right. It's just the
01:49:59
◼
►
right sink, just the right bounce. And it's a breathable design. So it sleeps cool to help you
01:50:05
◼
►
you regulate your temperature through the night so you don't get the night sweats because
01:50:09
◼
►
your mattress is too hot. They sell direct. This is like the cornerstone of the podcast
01:50:15
◼
►
advertising world. There are these companies that sell direct. They make mattresses right
01:50:21
◼
►
here in the US and then they sell them to you directly. That is how they can get away
01:50:27
◼
►
with making totally premium quality mattresses that they sell at prices that just blow away
01:50:34
◼
►
the competition. Go to a mattress store. Well, you don't want to go to a mattress store,
01:50:38
◼
►
but if you did, you'd go in there and you'd find that the good mattresses usually cost
01:50:42
◼
►
start at around $1500 at a small size. Casper mattresses are just $500 for twin, $600 for
01:50:49
◼
►
twin XL, $750 for full, $850 for queen, and just $950 for a king size mattress. You go
01:50:56
◼
►
into a mattress store and try to buy a top quality mattress for $950 and you're going
01:51:02
◼
►
walk out empty handed. It's easy and even if you don't completely trust it and you're like,
01:51:09
◼
►
I know that mattress stores are gross, but I still like the idea of sitting on it a little
01:51:12
◼
►
bit before I try it trying before I buy. Seems weird to spend 900 bucks on a mattress that I've
01:51:17
◼
►
never even tried. 100 day free trial. You just buy it. You get 100 days. And if you don't like it,
01:51:26
◼
►
at any point at 100 days, you just let them know, go to the
01:51:30
◼
►
Casper website, and they'll come pick it up at your house and give
01:51:35
◼
►
you a full refund. They'll come pick it up. You don't have to
01:51:37
◼
►
like drag it down the steps. They'll do the whole thing.
01:51:39
◼
►
That's how sure they are that you're going to like the
01:51:42
◼
►
mattress. 100 days to try it before you are on the hook for
01:51:46
◼
►
it. So get yours today. 100 days. Go to casper.com. C-A-S-P-E-R.
01:51:52
◼
►
Casper.com/thetalkshow and when you do that, use that code "THETALKSHOW" you save 50 bucks.
01:51:59
◼
►
50 bucks off their already amazing prices. So my thanks to Casper for
01:52:03
◼
►
continuing to sponsor the talk show. Great company.
01:52:08
◼
►
This is what we want to talk about the Peter Thiel thing.
01:52:12
◼
►
Sure. It's literally what all of Twitter is right now.
01:52:21
◼
►
I'm sure. So anybody who's listening has almost certainly heard, and if you read
01:52:24
◼
►
"Daring Fireball," I've been obsessed with it for days.
01:52:26
◼
►
I'll summarize it thus. There's an ongoing lawsuit where Hulk Hogan sued Gawker because
01:52:37
◼
►
a couple years ago Gawker obtained a sex tape. The backstory on that is all crazy too.
01:52:43
◼
►
Someone named Buddy the Love Sponge.
01:52:47
◼
►
Yes, not making it up. That is not made up.
01:52:49
◼
►
Somehow convinced Hulk Hogan to have sex with the guy's wife and he's like totally into it and the
01:53:02
◼
►
guy surreptitiously taped the encounter and then anyway, Gawker ran it and a few lists later,
01:53:10
◼
►
Hulk Hogan sued and won an enormous judgment, $140 million in the state of Florida against
01:53:17
◼
►
Gawker, which apparently would, not surprisingly, would bankrupt the company. There's an expectation
01:53:27
◼
►
among experts that on appeal, that Gawker is going to get that greatly reduced, maybe
01:53:33
◼
►
even overturned, that Gawker's chances are very good that it was tried in a place that
01:53:37
◼
►
was very amenable to Hulk Hogan. But you never know, and it's never good news to lose the
01:53:42
◼
►
first one. So, you know, Gawker's under wraps.
01:53:45
◼
►
And it turns out this week it came out that, like, one day it started with speculation
01:53:50
◼
►
that Nick Denton, the founder and owner of Gawker, publicly came out speculating that
01:53:55
◼
►
Hogan's lawsuit was funded by somebody. And he thought maybe, like, some billionaire in
01:54:02
◼
►
Silicon Valley. I don't know if Denton actually had Teal in mind at the time. I suspect he
01:54:06
◼
►
might have because how many billionaires--
01:54:08
◼
►
The speculation, again, amongst people with no inside information, but that this is--
01:54:15
◼
►
it was very likely, if this was the case, and there was a big if, like it seemed outrageous
01:54:21
◼
►
that that would actually be the situation, that it would likely be Peter Thiel being
01:54:26
◼
►
the most likely candidate to be the one.
01:54:29
◼
►
there's a known grudge between the two because in 2007,
01:54:34
◼
►
Gawker's Valleywag property ran a story saying that,
01:54:42
◼
►
yes, Peter Thiel is gay, which, you know,
01:54:46
◼
►
was interpreted by many as outing.
01:54:49
◼
►
I think there's a very good case that that's what it was,
01:54:53
◼
►
but Valleywag and Gawker have always stood behind
01:54:55
◼
►
this argument that it was an open secret.
01:54:58
◼
►
everybody knew it just wasn't ever printed anywhere.
01:55:02
◼
►
And that it's, you know, I don't want to get into
01:55:04
◼
►
the politics of it, but that it's,
01:55:07
◼
►
the fact that we don't talk about it is sort of
01:55:10
◼
►
like bigotry against gays because it's positioning
01:55:16
◼
►
homosexuality as something that you would want to hide.
01:55:19
◼
►
Whereas it's not.
01:55:20
◼
►
Which I, personally I am amenable to, but anyway,
01:55:22
◼
►
that's just to get it out of the way though,
01:55:24
◼
►
that, you know, it's well known.
01:55:27
◼
►
I think it's even on the record that Peter Thiel was not happy with that story.
01:55:31
◼
►
And therefore, I think he likened, uh, the Valley wag to Al Qaeda.
01:55:36
◼
►
Yes. Yeah. No, literally. And that's really was his comparison.
01:55:40
◼
►
It's not like hyperbole, like you're exaggerating. That was,
01:55:42
◼
►
that was what he said. Right. Um, yeah.
01:55:47
◼
►
He's been known to have taken issue with numerous, even stories, not with him,
01:55:51
◼
►
but with other people who he knows that he knows other people who, you know,
01:55:54
◼
►
Gawker websites have run stories about that he found, you know, objectionable. So it turns out
01:56:01
◼
►
that it's, and now he's, Peter Thiel has gone on a record with the New York Times and admitted,
01:56:07
◼
►
"Yes, I bankrolled Hulk Hogan's lawsuit to the tune of 10 million dollars."
01:56:11
◼
►
And it's just crazy. It's like, this really is just like,
01:56:20
◼
►
like something from, you put on a TV show, right? Or a movie, you know, that it's like a crazy Game of Thrones plot twist.
01:56:28
◼
►
It's something that's like so outlandish that it seemed like,
01:56:33
◼
►
because I guess there were rumors about this going around during the trial itself, right?
01:56:36
◼
►
That someone was out there bankrolling this and, but everyone dismissed it, you know, reading about this in hindsight,
01:56:42
◼
►
everyone seemed to dismiss it because it was so outlandish.
01:56:45
◼
►
And then Denton says his thing and it still seems outlandish, but there's like this,
01:56:49
◼
►
But if it were to be anyone, and then like Forbes somehow was able to find people who would speak, you know,
01:56:56
◼
►
off the record or on background, I guess, on it, and then next thing we know we have
01:57:03
◼
►
Teal talking to Andrew Ross Sorkin of New York Times directly about it.
01:57:09
◼
►
Within like a two-day span or whatever.
01:57:11
◼
►
Right, and the move during the trial that raised people's eyebrows and started the speculation was that the Hogan legal team
01:57:19
◼
►
dropped a charge that, if they had won, would have been covered by Gawker's insurance.
01:57:28
◼
►
Gawker's insurance would have this, whatever, it doesn't really matter which one it was,
01:57:31
◼
►
you know, what the legal term was, but there was one of the charges.
01:57:34
◼
►
And it seemed really curious to people that they would do that because the insurance company
01:57:41
◼
►
is way more likely to be able to pay the full amount of a large judgment than Gawker is.
01:57:47
◼
►
So it's not about the money.
01:57:50
◼
►
That it was a move that totally seemed counter to maximizing
01:57:53
◼
►
the money that Hogan would win.
01:57:56
◼
►
And instead, it seemed specifically
01:57:58
◼
►
about trying to put Gawker out of business.
01:58:04
◼
►
And so the most compelling--
01:58:08
◼
►
compelling is a weird word to use.
01:58:10
◼
►
But the most interesting thing about this whole thing to me
01:58:13
◼
►
is the amount of time that has passed from when the situation
01:58:19
◼
►
happened that you talked about with the story on Valley
01:58:24
◼
►
Wag outing or--
01:58:27
◼
►
Revealing that he's gay.
01:58:28
◼
►
Yeah, revealing that-- yeah, right.
01:58:29
◼
►
Peter Thiel is gay to the masses, let's say.
01:58:34
◼
►
And now, it's like--
01:58:37
◼
►
I don't know exactly how long it's been,
01:58:38
◼
►
but it's like eight years, nine years, or something like that?
01:58:42
◼
►
Yeah, I think it was nine years.
01:58:43
◼
►
I think it was a 2007 story.
01:58:46
◼
►
I think, I could be wrong by a year,
01:58:47
◼
►
but the story I've heard is that at some point in 2006,
01:58:50
◼
►
supposedly, Teal had warned Valley WAG,
01:58:55
◼
►
do not write about my personal life,
01:58:56
◼
►
or you will make an enemy of me.
01:59:00
◼
►
I don't think he threatened them,
01:59:01
◼
►
but privately had said, don't do this,
01:59:05
◼
►
or I'll do what I can.
01:59:07
◼
►
And 2007, I think, is when the story ran.
01:59:10
◼
►
But it's been roughly 10 years.
01:59:12
◼
►
And obviously most threats made in those veins end up being hollow or, you know, sort of like just things get forgotten over time and everyone moves on.
01:59:21
◼
►
Time heals all wounds.
01:59:24
◼
►
But not here.
01:59:25
◼
►
And like the fact that this has been going on behind the scenes all these years later is just incredible.
01:59:32
◼
►
I mean, again, it's like a weird thing to say.
01:59:35
◼
►
It's like impressive in a weird way
01:59:38
◼
►
that someone is so determined to write
01:59:41
◼
►
what they view as this wrong
01:59:45
◼
►
that they've held onto it this long
01:59:46
◼
►
and like just figured out an avenue
01:59:49
◼
►
to actually be able to execute it.
01:59:52
◼
►
- All right.
01:59:53
◼
►
I will link to it in the show notes.
01:59:55
◼
►
I've already linked to it on "Daring Fireball,"
01:59:56
◼
►
but Felix Salmon writing at Fusion
01:59:59
◼
►
had a great analysis of just the depths
02:00:03
◼
►
of the evil geniusness of Thiel's revenge.
02:00:07
◼
►
Just going through step by step and just,
02:00:12
◼
►
A, how long he waited, and B,
02:00:13
◼
►
that the way that libel laws work,
02:00:16
◼
►
and typically, you know,
02:00:17
◼
►
Thiel's not the first super rich person
02:00:19
◼
►
to sue a publication over negative publicity.
02:00:23
◼
►
I mean, Donald Trump has done it many times.
02:00:25
◼
►
I mean, all sorts of people do it.
02:00:28
◼
►
But the way it typically works and the way everybody common sense thinks it works is
02:00:32
◼
►
if I'm a rich guy and I don't like what your publication wrote about me, I sue you about
02:00:38
◼
►
what you wrote about me.
02:00:41
◼
►
And the problem with that is that you'd have to prove that it was false or that it was
02:00:45
◼
►
slander or whatever.
02:00:46
◼
►
It's very, very hard.
02:00:48
◼
►
And as Samin has pointed out, so newspapers like the New York Times or any major publication,
02:00:56
◼
►
When they write about a rich person in a way that, "Hey, this is going to be controversial.
02:01:00
◼
►
They're not going to like this," they have a legal team that vets every sentence in the
02:01:04
◼
►
story before it goes out, specifically of, "Can we defend this in court?
02:01:09
◼
►
Can we defend?"
02:01:10
◼
►
Every single thing, "Can we defend this in court?"
02:01:12
◼
►
It's not just going through an editorial process.
02:01:13
◼
►
It goes through a legal process before it goes out.
02:01:16
◼
►
Therefore, it makes it very hard for the rich person who wants to sue a publication out
02:01:21
◼
►
of existence to win.
02:01:23
◼
►
Neil's strategy was not to sue Gawker over what they wrote about him, but was rather
02:01:29
◼
►
to put together a legal team to just go through everything Gawker has done for 10 years and
02:01:34
◼
►
look for something that they did that is legally questionable.
02:01:38
◼
►
And they struck gold with the Hogan sex tape.
02:01:42
◼
►
And there's, you know, I think it's actually, even while we've been on this call recording
02:01:48
◼
►
the show, I think there have already been sort of other things leaking out because the
02:01:52
◼
►
The rumor, of course, is also that they've been looking for other avenues to execute
02:01:56
◼
►
a lawsuit over the years, and maybe they have even, but no one realized it at the time.
02:02:00
◼
►
I think some of that stuff is starting to come out now.
02:02:04
◼
►
It's just breaking so fast.
02:02:06
◼
►
It's so crazy.
02:02:07
◼
►
There are so many buts, and this story is so widespread.
02:02:14
◼
►
What I've written about on Daring Fireball, it's hard to cover all of these avenues.
02:02:19
◼
►
But I'll even say right up front that I don't know, a couple of people said, "Well, what
02:02:24
◼
►
do you think, you know, shouldn't this be about whether Hogan had a good case or not?"
02:02:27
◼
►
And doesn't he have a, you know, wasn't he actually, you know, what they did a violation
02:02:31
◼
►
of his privacy?
02:02:32
◼
►
I'm very, very, I certainly would never run a sex tape taken surreptitiously by someone
02:02:38
◼
►
else or publish it or spread it.
02:02:39
◼
►
I mean, I think it's, honestly, I think it's a despicable move.
02:02:44
◼
►
Just personally, just as a human being.
02:02:47
◼
►
I mean, and so I'm not even opposed to Hogan having won the suit.
02:02:51
◼
►
I don't think Gawker ever should have run it.
02:02:53
◼
►
Gawker's media have done, published numerous things over the years that I object to for
02:02:59
◼
►
multiple grounds.
02:03:00
◼
►
Notably, of course, the iPhone prototype was Gizmodo under Gawker.
02:03:14
◼
►
So in a way that's part of the genius of Thiel's strategy is that he found a case where
02:03:21
◼
►
people who might otherwise object to the idea of a billionaire secretly funding a lawsuit to sue a company out of existence
02:03:29
◼
►
might be a little bit more likely to say, "Well, these are bad people. That's not right that they took a surreptitious sex tape and published it."
02:03:40
◼
►
it right I saw him sex tapes you calm sex tapes I know it wasn't probably
02:03:45
◼
►
wasn't on tape but what else would you call it well so because it's not a tape
02:03:51
◼
►
right it's not on tape but it seems like the term is sex tape yeah it's like the
02:03:57
◼
►
verbal equivalent of the floppy disk for save like we just don't have right a
02:04:02
◼
►
sex.mov. I don't know. A sex gif. So I read, you know, in leading up to this, I
02:04:14
◼
►
read a few different of the takes. So first of all, like we joked about, all of
02:04:19
◼
►
Twitter is talking about this. Like this is, in my mind we talked about Twitter
02:04:23
◼
►
earlier as like being, you know, sort of like this this fascinating zeitgeist of
02:04:27
◼
►
what's happening. In my view, when something like this happens, this makes
02:04:31
◼
►
Twitter almost unbearable, simply because everyone is talking about the same thing.
02:04:38
◼
►
And there's no way to follow a common thread. There's so many different angles and so much
02:04:45
◼
►
information coming in and so many opinions that it's like a hodgepodge of everything.
02:04:50
◼
►
And I can imagine a regular user after signing up for Twitter, say they signed up for Twitter
02:04:55
◼
►
yesterday, and they got recommended, they're interested in the news or something. And so
02:05:01
◼
►
So they got recommended like 15 accounts
02:05:02
◼
►
to follow that are journalists.
02:05:04
◼
►
And so now today, just imagine what their experience
02:05:06
◼
►
would be like looking at Twitter for the first time.
02:05:09
◼
►
It's just like, I don't even know where to begin.
02:05:13
◼
►
Just shut it down.
02:05:14
◼
►
This is dreadful, all these people talking about each other
02:05:17
◼
►
and talking about, no, you're wrong and arguing.
02:05:20
◼
►
And so with that back story, I try
02:05:24
◼
►
to avoid as much as possible of it
02:05:26
◼
►
until there was actually more actual news of what
02:05:32
◼
►
occurred and whatnot.
02:05:33
◼
►
And it seems like this morning there was some of that.
02:05:35
◼
►
We talked about the Aaron Ross Sorkin post with Teal.
02:05:39
◼
►
And then there's been some more interesting of the hot takes,
02:05:42
◼
►
I would say.
02:05:42
◼
►
And so I read yours, of course, which
02:05:44
◼
►
I liked because it was concise.
02:05:47
◼
►
And a lot of the problems I have with things of this nature
02:05:52
◼
►
are like, this is obviously going after at least the way
02:05:55
◼
►
that journalists perceive it, going
02:05:57
◼
►
after the heart of what journalism is
02:05:59
◼
►
and trying to destroy the institution.
02:06:01
◼
►
And so we get these thought pieces
02:06:03
◼
►
that are going to be 5,000 words and just going on and on.
02:06:09
◼
►
And most of them saying the same things
02:06:11
◼
►
or saying them in slightly different ways.
02:06:13
◼
►
And it's just like, again, it's impenetrable.
02:06:16
◼
►
It's hard to know where to begin with this.
02:06:18
◼
►
So I appreciate the concise nature of your take on this.
02:06:21
◼
►
Right, and I wasn't trying to capture the whole thing
02:06:24
◼
►
because I think it's too hard to capture the whole thing.
02:06:26
◼
►
But it's just one particular, like to me it's,
02:06:29
◼
►
I appreciate your kind words about it,
02:06:32
◼
►
but it was just to respond to this whole argument
02:06:35
◼
►
of whether anybody is trying to take away
02:06:37
◼
►
Peter Thiel's freedom of speech.
02:06:40
◼
►
And it's like, it was like this libertarian take on it,
02:06:44
◼
►
which sort of a pro, super right,
02:06:49
◼
►
using their super richness to their own advantage.
02:06:54
◼
►
and the idea that anybody who objects to that
02:06:56
◼
►
or takes offense at it is therefore trying to suppress it,
02:06:59
◼
►
which is not the case.
02:07:01
◼
►
The article that the guy linked to by Josh Marshall,
02:07:05
◼
►
he wasn't, Josh Marshall at Talking Points Media
02:07:07
◼
►
wasn't advocating, hey, we should pass a law
02:07:09
◼
►
to make this illegal, we should prevent this.
02:07:12
◼
►
He was just saying this is bad news for journalism.
02:07:16
◼
►
- Because it's revealed a way to anybody else
02:07:20
◼
►
who has sufficient funds to bankroll such things
02:07:23
◼
►
way to do the same thing against any other publication they don't like.
02:07:25
◼
►
Right, but so part of that is like this has existed for a long time to be able to do like this
02:07:31
◼
►
this whole thing isn't new but it's new I guess in this context and people's eyes are opening
02:07:39
◼
►
to it for the first time because what you know what Teal did is not illegal. This is
02:07:45
◼
►
you know this is an avenue that that others have used just maybe not in this direct way before or
02:07:51
◼
►
Or maybe they haven't, we just don't know about it.
02:07:54
◼
►
But what I liked about what you wrote--
02:07:56
◼
►
and maybe correct me if I missed representing it in some ways,
02:08:00
◼
►
but this is sort of my stance on it
02:08:03
◼
►
after one day of thinking about it--
02:08:07
◼
►
is so what Teal did is not illegal,
02:08:12
◼
►
whether you think it's unethical or sort of not--
02:08:17
◼
►
I don't know.
02:08:18
◼
►
There's so many words you could use to describe it.
02:08:20
◼
►
Anyway, it's not illegal and it's also, of course,
02:08:24
◼
►
not illegal for then Denton to suggest that someone's doing this,
02:08:28
◼
►
and that it's not illegal for Forbes to look into it and get sources saying,
02:08:32
◼
►
"Yeah, it's the sky," and then it's not illegal for Teal then to go and talk to
02:08:35
◼
►
New York Times and reveal why he did it.
02:08:40
◼
►
Now, apparently Denton's working on a rebuttal post about this.
02:08:43
◼
►
It's like, at the end of the day,
02:08:46
◼
►
I understand why everyone's up in arms of this, of course,
02:08:49
◼
►
But the situation does sort of sort itself out. And I think if Gawker went out of business,
02:08:55
◼
►
which is a real possibility, my thought there is, but like 1000 other Gawker's will just rise
02:09:03
◼
►
in its sort of place. And you could say, well, then some billionaire might take out them too.
02:09:11
◼
►
I have a hard time believing that there's honestly enough money in the world to sort of
02:09:17
◼
►
fight all these battles.
02:09:18
◼
►
And it's not just money, by the way, it's time too.
02:09:20
◼
►
Again, going back to what the most interesting thing
02:09:22
◼
►
about this to me is that Peter Thiel took the time
02:09:25
◼
►
and the extended time period to actually execute this plan.
02:09:29
◼
►
Most people would not do that, of course.
02:09:31
◼
►
And most people just don't have the time to do it.
02:09:33
◼
►
It's not worth their time to do it.
02:09:35
◼
►
And so I sort of, as sort of lame as it sounds,
02:09:39
◼
►
I think this thing sorts itself out naturally.
02:09:43
◼
►
- Yeah, I think, and especially as it settles in
02:09:47
◼
►
as 24 hour old news now, I think that the fears
02:09:51
◼
►
that this will become a playbook for billionaires
02:09:54
◼
►
to take on other publications are,
02:09:56
◼
►
not just hopefully unfounded,
02:09:57
◼
►
I think they're probably unfounded.
02:09:59
◼
►
I think this was a unique situation,
02:10:02
◼
►
both in terms of the way that Gawker
02:10:07
◼
►
opened themselves up to these sort of suits
02:10:11
◼
►
by being so, I don't know what the word is, reckless?
02:10:16
◼
►
aggressive, aggressive, fast and loose with what, you know,
02:10:21
◼
►
what should or should not be published.
02:10:23
◼
►
I, you know, could somebody do this to me, for example?
02:10:27
◼
►
Could somebody, it's like, what have I written
02:10:29
◼
►
that you could really take me to court over?
02:10:31
◼
►
You could definitely inconvenience me
02:10:33
◼
►
by just making me go to court and have to hire a lawyer
02:10:35
◼
►
to fight a bogus lawsuit.
02:10:37
◼
►
But I don't, you know what I mean?
02:10:39
◼
►
I don't know that, why would,
02:10:40
◼
►
I don't see why someone would do that,
02:10:42
◼
►
'cause the other part is that Peter Thiel
02:10:44
◼
►
had such a grievance against them.
02:10:50
◼
►
- I mean, is there somebody who I've called
02:10:51
◼
►
jackass of the week in the past who would do this to me?
02:10:53
◼
►
I don't know.
02:10:54
◼
►
I don't think so.
02:10:56
◼
►
- Yeah, but even if they would,
02:10:57
◼
►
so like, yeah, you may have pissed off plenty of people,
02:11:00
◼
►
I'm sure you have over the years, but--
02:11:02
◼
►
- I may have pissed off Peter Thiel
02:11:03
◼
►
by calling him an asshole.
02:11:05
◼
►
I don't know.
02:11:06
◼
►
- But have you opened yourself up to, you know,
02:11:10
◼
►
so that could open you up to, you know,
02:11:12
◼
►
like someone could try to sue you directly for slander or whatever, or liable. I always
02:11:18
◼
►
forget the difference.
02:11:19
◼
►
Yeah, I do too.
02:11:20
◼
►
But then could someone do this sort of surrogate lawsuit and actually go after you for something?
02:11:28
◼
►
It seems almost impossible. Yeah.
02:11:32
◼
►
I think part of it is that it's just that nobody ever thought that anybody... It just
02:11:37
◼
►
never occurred to someone to do this and and it speaks to teals I honest I mean
02:11:44
◼
►
again I called him an asshole and I stand by it and I think that him doing
02:11:47
◼
►
it in secret was cowardly I think that it only came out now is you know it you
02:11:53
◼
►
know kind of a coward's move but it was genius right it was extremely clever and
02:12:02
◼
►
it's the sort of you know that's why he's the success that he is is is a big
02:12:06
◼
►
and it's a huge part of the whole Silicon Valley,
02:12:10
◼
►
what are we looking for is we're looking for people
02:12:12
◼
►
who see things that nobody else sees.
02:12:15
◼
►
And this is an example of that, right?
02:12:17
◼
►
He saw an opportunity here to do this in a way that,
02:12:22
◼
►
it just never occurred to anybody else.
02:12:23
◼
►
I think that's why this has so,
02:12:26
◼
►
grabbed everybody's attention.
02:12:28
◼
►
- Well, and so, just to, I don't know,
02:12:30
◼
►
almost to play devil's advocate a bit on this,
02:12:32
◼
►
But when you call him an asshole for the way
02:12:37
◼
►
that he sort of executed it, I mean,
02:12:41
◼
►
maybe he executed it this way on purpose.
02:12:43
◼
►
He wanted to be in the shadows for all this time
02:12:46
◼
►
and then to have some sort of big reveal
02:12:48
◼
►
to make it that much more of a statement
02:12:50
◼
►
and to make it that much more meaningful
02:12:52
◼
►
when it did come out this way.
02:12:54
◼
►
And the aforementioned Felix Salmon post definitely
02:12:59
◼
►
makes the case that--
02:13:01
◼
►
he makes a compelling case that revealing himself
02:13:04
◼
►
was absolutely part of it.
02:13:06
◼
►
- Part of the plan, yeah.
02:13:07
◼
►
- Because what it does is,
02:13:11
◼
►
it says this isn't, now you realize that whatever happens
02:13:15
◼
►
with the Hogan appeal, this isn't gonna stop.
02:13:19
◼
►
And he can keep this up indefinitely.
02:13:22
◼
►
And everybody knows that everybody can just go through
02:13:24
◼
►
in the back of their mind a list of things,
02:13:27
◼
►
articles that Gawker has published over the years
02:13:29
◼
►
that maybe they could get sued over.
02:13:30
◼
►
And it therefore means that anybody who is perhaps
02:13:34
◼
►
thinking of investing in Gawker is gonna think twice
02:13:37
◼
►
about it because it looks like if you're investing
02:13:39
◼
►
in Gawker, you're investing against Peter Thiel funding,
02:13:44
◼
►
trying to bankrupt the company.
02:13:46
◼
►
And they need the investment money because they need
02:13:49
◼
►
to deal with the legal fees and the potential judgment
02:13:53
◼
►
against Hogan.
02:13:54
◼
►
That revealing himself is part of it because now
02:13:59
◼
►
makes Gawker look like a way worse investment than it was, you know, Gawker, if you're,
02:14:03
◼
►
if anybody was thinking of investing in Gawker two days ago, it certainly looks like a worse
02:14:07
◼
►
investment now that you know that they've made a lifelong enemy of Peter Thiel and that
02:14:11
◼
►
he's set his sights on destroying the company. Unsurprisingly, there are already reports,
02:14:16
◼
►
of course, now that Gawker is trying to sell itself and, you know, it's being marked down
02:14:21
◼
►
way below what they, you know, were valued at just a few months ago. Yeah, and that's
02:14:28
◼
►
going to make it very hard.
02:14:30
◼
►
Yeah, I would say in terms of what I wrote,
02:14:32
◼
►
that if it turns out that it's true that Teal's plan all along
02:14:35
◼
►
was to reveal himself at a certain strategic point
02:14:38
◼
►
for the purpose of even kicking them when they're down,
02:14:44
◼
►
then it doesn't take away the asshole part of what I said.
02:14:46
◼
►
It takes away the coward part, because he didn't have a plan
02:14:49
◼
►
to remain secret forever, that it was only secret strategically
02:14:52
◼
►
for the first part of this deathless revenge scheme.
02:14:56
◼
►
Yeah, and I mean, I will say, I don't know Peter Tillettal.
02:14:59
◼
►
I'm fairly certain I've actually never met him,
02:15:02
◼
►
even though we sort of do the same thing now.
02:15:05
◼
►
But I also just--
02:15:08
◼
►
one of the things I'm trying to think about, again,
02:15:11
◼
►
a reaction to this in a 24-hour period,
02:15:13
◼
►
I don't recall the whole situation with Valley WAG
02:15:17
◼
►
when it happened those eight or nine years ago.
02:15:19
◼
►
I mean, I've heard about it after the fact.
02:15:25
◼
►
And I-- but I also have a hard time sort of discounting,
02:15:28
◼
►
like, well, I understand what Valleywag's position was,
02:15:34
◼
►
that it was sort of like publicly that he was known
02:15:38
◼
►
to be gay amongst a big enough circle
02:15:41
◼
►
that it should be sort of common knowledge.
02:15:44
◼
►
I don't know what his mindset--
02:15:45
◼
►
like, he was clearly--
02:15:47
◼
►
he's clearly very-- was very pissed off and very pissed off
02:15:50
◼
►
enough to do this whole plan.
02:15:52
◼
►
Like, I don't know that I'm one to say, like, is he wrong?
02:15:57
◼
►
You know, like a lot of people are saying that this is a major overblown thing
02:16:03
◼
►
that he's just taken it so far out of proportion and the response is not in
02:16:09
◼
►
proportion to what the original act was.
02:16:11
◼
►
But like, I don't know.
02:16:13
◼
►
I wasn't there.
02:16:14
◼
►
Like maybe he was like, his mindset was just totally destroyed by what they did.
02:16:21
◼
►
after he told them not to do it.
02:16:22
◼
►
So anyway, I just don't want to degrade that completely.
02:16:27
◼
►
I don't know what his mindset is.
02:16:29
◼
►
- Right, I hear you.
02:16:30
◼
►
As a devil's advocate, take,
02:16:32
◼
►
I shouldn't say I disagree, 'cause I don't know.
02:16:37
◼
►
I don't know Peter Thiel either, obviously.
02:16:40
◼
►
Right, so that's possible.
02:16:41
◼
►
That's possible that it really was
02:16:43
◼
►
so significantly stressful to him,
02:16:46
◼
►
emotionally harmful to him,
02:16:49
◼
►
that maybe it really isn't disproportionate.
02:16:51
◼
►
But the one goofy, I have to say that,
02:16:53
◼
►
here's a goofy part, I mean, this is goofy.
02:16:56
◼
►
Is Teal's description of this
02:17:01
◼
►
as the most philanthropic thing he's ever done in his life.
02:17:05
◼
►
- Oh yeah, the one. (laughs)
02:17:06
◼
►
- That is really, that's gonna go down
02:17:10
◼
►
as one of the things for people who are thinking
02:17:14
◼
►
that the inequality is out of control
02:17:16
◼
►
that the hyper-rich are detached from reality.
02:17:21
◼
►
I mean, there's exhibit A, it was Peter Thiel.
02:17:25
◼
►
I mean, whatever you think about this, right?
02:17:27
◼
►
I'm fully acknowledging that there's a devil's advocate
02:17:30
◼
►
take on this, that what he did is just revenge served cold,
02:17:34
◼
►
and was in some sense just.
02:17:37
◼
►
I don't agree, I think it's a vast overreaction.
02:17:40
◼
►
I go with, did you read Elizabeth Speer's take?
02:17:44
◼
►
- Yeah, yeah, I did.
02:17:45
◼
►
It's like if the United States attacked
02:17:49
◼
►
a small African country with the full weight
02:17:51
◼
►
of the armed services just for some small,
02:17:54
◼
►
disproportionate reaction.
02:17:58
◼
►
I'm on that side,
02:18:00
◼
►
but I agree with the devil's advocate take on that.
02:18:01
◼
►
But even if you agree with the devil's advocate take,
02:18:04
◼
►
this is not philanthropy.
02:18:07
◼
►
- I don't know, did you read Ben Thompson's take too
02:18:11
◼
►
in his newsletter today?
02:18:13
◼
►
It was interesting because I won't go into it then.
02:18:16
◼
►
I won't-- you can link to it.
02:18:17
◼
►
But it's-- I thought it was a fascinating way
02:18:22
◼
►
to frame it around the notion of superheroes and supervillains.
02:18:26
◼
►
And it's like, can these superheroes exist without a--
02:18:34
◼
►
I don't want to bungle this.
02:18:38
◼
►
But it's basically that in, so to say,
02:18:41
◼
►
the Marvel Cinematic Universe, what
02:18:44
◼
►
happens when the superheroes come
02:18:46
◼
►
is there's usually this super villain thing that
02:18:49
◼
►
ends up coming, it seems, coincidentally.
02:18:51
◼
►
But maybe it's not coincidental.
02:18:53
◼
►
Maybe it's the result of the superhero coming or vice versa.
02:18:56
◼
►
The superhero comes because the supervillain is there.
02:18:59
◼
►
And so they're intertwined.
02:19:01
◼
►
And he draws an interesting analogy
02:19:04
◼
►
to this whole situation of how this is going down,
02:19:08
◼
►
which I think is worth the read.
02:19:11
◼
►
There is a certain, and I know people have compared Elon Musk to a Bond villain,
02:19:16
◼
►
but Elon Musk doesn't seem, it doesn't, I can't think of anything he's done there.
02:19:22
◼
►
It makes him look like a jerk, but this, there is like a certain, you know,
02:19:27
◼
►
Bond movies and other movies are always full of, you know, evil billionaires or,
02:19:32
◼
►
you know, evil, maybe evil is too strong a word, but you know, right.
02:19:36
◼
►
Billionaires bent on scheming, scheming, scheming billionaires.
02:19:41
◼
►
And this is here it is in real life, you know like this
02:19:45
◼
►
Incredible scheme that nobody would have nobody really
02:19:49
◼
►
Perceived as possible like and when like you said before like when it came up in trial interviews like ah, yeah, come on
02:19:56
◼
►
That's this isn't a Marvel movie. Yeah
02:19:58
◼
►
But and then the other element to this like going back to where we started sort of like with the whole Twitter and it's just
02:20:06
◼
►
My god, and this is this is going to go on for a while
02:20:09
◼
►
I mean, you know, like you said, you know, 24 hours sort of things die down
02:20:13
◼
►
But then there's more and more just keeps coming and this is like the perfect storm
02:20:17
◼
►
you know coming as someone who comes from the reporter side and now sort of
02:20:22
◼
►
You know far enough removed from it to sort of hopefully be somewhat
02:20:27
◼
►
Circumspect about it
02:20:31
◼
►
this is like the perfect storm of a story that's not going to die anytime soon because
02:20:36
◼
►
This is what?
02:20:38
◼
►
Many not all but many reporters love writing about more than anything else is their own profession and like, yeah
02:20:44
◼
►
You know things coming after it and the potential
02:20:49
◼
►
The end of what they do and coming after potentially their livelihoods and stuff
02:20:54
◼
►
And so this is just the perfect storm for Twitter for media Twitter
02:20:58
◼
►
And it's gonna be non-stop stories about this for a long time to come. It seems like yeah to me. It's
02:21:05
◼
►
I can't it's almost hard to conceive of a better story for media Twitter. Yeah
02:21:14
◼
►
Anything else you wanted to talk about it
02:21:19
◼
►
No, those were pretty much wraps up my list
02:21:26
◼
►
People can find your writing. Where are you doing? Most you're writing these days. So
02:21:32
◼
►
Almost always now on medium, I set up one of the publications there.
02:21:36
◼
►
Medium is of course again one of the GV investments, but before we invested in it,
02:21:43
◼
►
I was a huge fan of the simplicity of the platform and the CMS elements of it,
02:21:49
◼
►
having used many other CMSs throughout the years, which are a hodgepodge of things.
02:21:54
◼
►
So most of the writing I do now, I bought a domain called 500-ish, which was nice and short,
02:22:00
◼
►
and I try to keep the writing short these days since I don't have a ton of time to do it as much as I used to.
02:22:05
◼
►
So, that's where I am.
02:22:10
◼
►
and on the Twitter, @mgsiegler
02:22:16
◼
►
That's right.
02:22:20
◼
►
My thanks to you for your time and your observations.
02:22:24
◼
►
I would also like to give one more thanks to our sponsors.
02:22:28
◼
►
Casper, go buy a mattress. Audible, go buy some audiobooks.
02:22:34
◼
►
Wealthfront, invest all the money you have left after you've bought a mattress and
02:22:40
◼
►
bought some audiobooks. And sued Gawker, or sued Al Kogan.
02:22:45
◼
►
Yes, and sued somebody.