104: ‘2014 Year in Review’ With Guest Rene Ritchie
00:00:00
◼
►
So where to start I say we let's just talk about it Renee Richie. Let's talk year in review. Yes
00:00:04
◼
►
Where better to start than January?
00:00:07
◼
►
It was a quiet beginning of the year
00:00:10
◼
►
It was so quiet that people were again pounding the doom drums that Apple wasn't doing anything anymore
00:00:14
◼
►
Yeah, and maybe even before we get into details like January
00:00:18
◼
►
Maybe just take that and and use it like to me like the year in review as a whole like with zoom out big level
00:00:26
◼
►
What are we gonna look back on this year? I?
00:00:28
◼
►
Would say that this was the year where?
00:00:33
◼
►
That sense that that Apple can't do it anymore since got rubbed away slowly, but surely over the course of the year I
00:00:40
◼
►
agree, I think it built up to I think it reached a crescendo because you know people kept making a big deal of Tim Cook saying
00:00:46
◼
►
We'd be releasing new product character categories throughout the year and then as the months ticked on they seem to get more and more
00:00:52
◼
►
personally angry with him
00:00:55
◼
►
Yeah, I think so too and I think because it the the naysayers
00:00:59
◼
►
Have been the down on cook overall. Anyway, like that's the root of their naysaying
00:01:06
◼
►
Yeah, we go over the short term at least they wanted him fired. They said he was destroying Apple
00:01:12
◼
►
They kept comparing him to Steve Jobs in a very negative way and looking back at a nine-site. It's absolutely ridiculous
00:01:18
◼
►
Yeah, I was just thinking that
00:01:21
◼
►
Before we started recording. I was thinking that I don't think anybody called for that in 2014
00:01:26
◼
►
But at least in 2013 you can find several instances of
00:01:29
◼
►
ostensibly serious
00:01:31
◼
►
Business writers calling either for Tim Cook to be outright fired or at least calling for Apple's board to like
00:01:39
◼
►
Rain him in and and have him rejigger the company
00:01:42
◼
►
We did have haunted Empire. I think earlier this year which sort of showed that Apple was completely doomed without Steve Jobs
00:01:48
◼
►
Yeah, I think it's I think that's sort of the publication of haunted Empire
00:01:53
◼
►
Her first name her last name is Kane or yeah, you could you could Tori. Yeah, you could Tori Kane
00:02:03
◼
►
Would say that the publication of her book haunted Empire was sort of the I was gonna say high watermark
00:02:08
◼
►
But I would say maybe the low low watermark of Apple nay saying yeah
00:02:13
◼
►
When did that come in that was probably February?
00:02:17
◼
►
Yeah, it must it was when I was with Jason snow, which means it had to be around Macworld time or something
00:02:22
◼
►
Yeah, which was I think February. Yeah last year
00:02:25
◼
►
Yeah, and I could not help but get the feeling when I read it that it was rushed into publication
00:02:33
◼
►
because I kind of felt like at least if she didn't know at least her the
00:02:39
◼
►
editorial team at her publisher
00:02:41
◼
►
Sort of got the sense that that the time was kicking on that sort of doom and gloom
00:02:46
◼
►
Which was interesting because you could probably make an argument for a haunted empire, but
00:02:52
◼
►
they didn't even make an attempt to make it.
00:02:53
◼
►
It was a bunch of pages strung together and nothing resembling a book.
00:02:57
◼
►
Yeah, and a couple of anecdotes to string it together.
00:03:01
◼
►
I do think, though, like if there is—I think it was a very bad book, and I think it's already
00:03:07
◼
►
showing its age, and I think it's only going to look worse as the years go on.
00:03:12
◼
►
But on the other hand, I'm kind of glad the book exists because it captures that sort
00:03:18
◼
►
of like post Steve Jobs pre-Apple Watch negative Apple perspective.
00:03:28
◼
►
Like in hindsight, you know what I mean?
00:03:30
◼
►
It's like these years, they always blur together and four or five years from now, it's like
00:03:35
◼
►
this whole, you know, period in between where the Apple Watch was announced and when we
00:03:40
◼
►
we actually have it and we have generation two and three
00:03:43
◼
►
by four or five years from now.
00:03:45
◼
►
It'll just be a blink, we'll snap our fingers
00:03:49
◼
►
and think about this interim period.
00:03:51
◼
►
But I feel like her book sort of captures
00:03:53
◼
►
that epitomizes that sort of negative viewpoint.
00:03:56
◼
►
- Yeah, I think that's absolutely true.
00:03:58
◼
►
We do tend to look back sort of the rose colored glasses,
00:04:00
◼
►
the original iPhone, the original iPad,
00:04:02
◼
►
they couldn't do anywhere nearly what they could do now,
00:04:04
◼
►
but we still look at them with fondness.
00:04:06
◼
►
We think of current software updates as being buggy,
00:04:08
◼
►
But you look back at iOS, you know, two point something
00:04:11
◼
►
when everyone was complaining it couldn't attach
00:04:13
◼
►
to a 3G network and Apple was rushing out a fix.
00:04:15
◼
►
We have this weird sort of affection, I think,
00:04:18
◼
►
for the past.
00:04:19
◼
►
So I do, I think that's 2014 in a nutshell,
00:04:24
◼
►
is that the world at large and the conventional wisdom
00:04:28
◼
►
about Apple and about Tim Cook's leadership
00:04:30
◼
►
have caught up to reality, which is that the company was,
00:04:35
◼
►
you know, Steve Jobs left the company in very good shape
00:04:38
◼
►
and in very good hands
00:04:41
◼
►
and it took about
00:04:42
◼
►
two or three years it seems for the mainstream financial media to sort of
00:04:47
◼
►
concede that point
00:04:48
◼
►
i would say that almost a full three years right because he died in twenty
00:04:53
◼
►
i would say it was a full three years
00:04:55
◼
►
and tim cook i mean the company has never been worth more the stock prices
00:04:58
◼
►
through the roof they've introduced not only the apple watch but apple pay
00:05:02
◼
►
they have an A8X processor they have a 5k iMac
00:05:05
◼
►
And you still look at Fortune contributor networks sometimes
00:05:08
◼
►
and you just wanna know how they get published.
00:05:12
◼
►
All right, you're in review, January.
00:05:14
◼
►
Definitely a slow start, I think.
00:05:18
◼
►
- Yeah, again, for some years,
00:05:20
◼
►
one year we got the Verizon iPhone in January,
00:05:22
◼
►
one year we got an education event,
00:05:24
◼
►
previous years we had the introduction of the iPad,
00:05:26
◼
►
we've had Macworld, the introduction of the iPhone.
00:05:28
◼
►
So there was sort of, for a long period of time,
00:05:30
◼
►
there were events that were, there was news in January.
00:05:33
◼
►
And I think last year there was nothing until WBC
00:05:36
◼
►
and this year I think it was almost identical to that.
00:05:39
◼
►
- Yeah, I would say so.
00:05:42
◼
►
I mean there's, you know,
00:05:45
◼
►
now that Apple doesn't make announcements in January
00:05:48
◼
►
or at least they haven't in recent years,
00:05:51
◼
►
I mean who knows this year in theory
00:05:53
◼
►
they might have a watch event,
00:05:55
◼
►
but it's pretty much left to CES,
00:05:58
◼
►
which Apple doesn't take part in,
00:06:02
◼
►
for all of the industry news.
00:06:04
◼
►
I don't recall anything from this year to 2014 CES
00:06:08
◼
►
that ended up mattering a damn bit.
00:06:12
◼
►
- No, I mean, I think this year will be different
00:06:14
◼
►
just because of home kit and health kit and carplay.
00:06:16
◼
►
But last year, CES was a graveyard.
00:06:19
◼
►
It was just almost like matrix shelf after matrix shelf
00:06:22
◼
►
of cases and nothing else.
00:06:24
◼
►
- Yeah, and I don't think they knew
00:06:25
◼
►
what they were going to, you know, going to,
00:06:28
◼
►
the industry as a whole didn't even know
00:06:29
◼
►
what they were trying to make.
00:06:31
◼
►
Yeah, they were making their fitness bands.
00:06:33
◼
►
And I remember one of the worst things I saw at CES
00:06:35
◼
►
was an Android powered car system
00:06:37
◼
►
and it was running gingerbread.
00:06:39
◼
►
And the guy told us with a straight face
00:06:41
◼
►
that you could leave it on for five days
00:06:42
◼
►
but it would drain your car battery.
00:06:44
◼
►
So you had to put it in standby mode.
00:06:46
◼
►
But if you put it, sorry, but if you turned it off,
00:06:47
◼
►
it would take like five minutes to boot again.
00:06:51
◼
►
This was something that they actually had as a press event.
00:06:54
◼
►
- Are you going to CES again this year?
00:06:57
◼
►
- Yeah, absolutely.
00:06:58
◼
►
- Yeah, what's it, Dan Fromer who was on the show last week
00:07:00
◼
►
is going for the first time this year.
00:07:02
◼
►
And like I said with him, I always talk about going,
00:07:06
◼
►
but I've never gone.
00:07:07
◼
►
- It's alternatively completely barren or incredibly busy
00:07:10
◼
►
and you never know what's gonna happen year to year.
00:07:12
◼
►
So I don't have high faith for it,
00:07:15
◼
►
but I think this year will be different
00:07:16
◼
►
'cause we will have a watch event,
00:07:18
◼
►
maybe we'll see another Apple television,
00:07:19
◼
►
maybe a bigger iPad.
00:07:20
◼
►
The spring sounds exciting this year,
00:07:22
◼
►
but last year up until June,
00:07:24
◼
►
it really was everyone just saying,
00:07:26
◼
►
where's the new stuff from Apple?
00:07:27
◼
►
Where's the new stuff?
00:07:27
◼
►
Are they capable of innovating still?
00:07:29
◼
►
- Yeah, why do we have to wait?
00:07:31
◼
►
Why do we have to wait for them to be ready for something?
00:07:33
◼
►
- Well, that's the thing that I don't understand is do,
00:07:35
◼
►
would anybody have wanted a 2006 iPhone?
00:07:37
◼
►
No, because it was not a product yet.
00:07:40
◼
►
And the Apple Watch won't be a product
00:07:42
◼
►
until early next year.
00:07:43
◼
►
You don't want them to ship what they have right now.
00:07:45
◼
►
- Yeah, and it, you know, to compare and contrast with,
00:07:50
◼
►
I think the antithesis of Apple's, you know,
00:07:53
◼
►
we'll let you know when we're ready to show you attitude,
00:07:55
◼
►
it's Google, you know, who has been,
00:07:59
◼
►
you know, Google Glass was clearly released ahead of its time.
00:08:03
◼
►
I mean, it still isn't a retail consumer product, but the fact that they sold it at all to,
00:08:08
◼
►
what did they call the people, explorers?
00:08:11
◼
►
You know, is the antithesis of Apple's strategy.
00:08:14
◼
►
That would be the equivalent of if Apple had let WWDC explorers start wearing and using
00:08:21
◼
►
an Apple Watch, you know, 18 months ago.
00:08:24
◼
►
Running like Skankwatch software or something.
00:08:27
◼
►
And you know the self-driving cars
00:08:29
◼
►
So many things that Google does they show
00:08:33
◼
►
Way early and in some sense I the the the I don't think it's productive and you know
00:08:41
◼
►
Every time I bring it up some people mention that the cars in particular
00:08:45
◼
►
It's impossible to do it without showing your hand because there's no way to road test them
00:08:50
◼
►
You know, you have to road test them in public before you can release them and you know way to keep once
00:08:55
◼
►
it's out in the road you can't keep it secret. So maybe the self-driving cars is a bit of
00:08:59
◼
►
a bad example. But the other products they do, they release and I think ultimately it's
00:09:09
◼
►
counterproductive because I think it saps away excitement from the real things you actually
00:09:15
◼
►
have available to sell to people. But on the other hand, it absolutely works to satisfy
00:09:23
◼
►
the desires of the tech press as an industry because you're giving them something to write
00:09:30
◼
►
Yeah, I think that's exactly it.
00:09:31
◼
►
I think for the tech press, perception really is reality.
00:09:34
◼
►
So if we see a demo of the Moto 240 or 360 or whatever it is, even though it's not real,
00:09:39
◼
►
even though leaving a screen like that on, like what they showed in the video is a complete
00:09:43
◼
►
science fiction fantasy, it sets expectations for that and it makes people think that Google's
00:09:47
◼
►
really busy and that product is coming and they're innovating and they're doing all these
00:09:51
◼
►
if it comes out in some cases, you know, it's a complete turd, but everyone's already seen the video the excitements already happened
00:09:57
◼
►
And then everything else from then on is it his appointment even things made by Apple or another company?
00:10:01
◼
►
Yeah, it's I think moltz has said it best where he's you know
00:10:05
◼
►
I think it's moltz but one of his lines is that you know Apple's current products continue to
00:10:12
◼
►
Fail when compared to the upcoming products in future years from its competitors
00:10:18
◼
►
It's like the iPhone 5c was a huge disappointment even though it was the third most popular phone in the world and the iPad sales
00:10:24
◼
►
Are lagging even though they're any company in the world would be happy to have that in their product line
00:10:28
◼
►
Yeah, or another example. I just noticed this week and it's funny. I haven't linked it up yet, but
00:10:33
◼
►
The same day or within 24 hours
00:10:37
◼
►
There was a New York Times story about the success of Apple pay and about a whole bunch of nude retailers who've signed up for it
00:10:47
◼
►
Some big supermarket chains like Winn-dixie, which is real big in the south here in the US. I
00:10:52
◼
►
Forget who else but some big big name retailers have signed up
00:10:59
◼
►
Companies like Whole Foods who've been on board since it started who said that it's you know
00:11:03
◼
►
It accounts for over 1% of their transactions and an enormous percent of you know
00:11:07
◼
►
The digital transactions or what would you call it cardless transactions?
00:11:12
◼
►
And at the same time there were like three or four stories that I saw all based on the same analyst report about what what?
00:11:20
◼
►
What trouble Apple pay is in because they've woken up
00:11:24
◼
►
The MCX partners and really gotten the MCX partners to really want to do a good job
00:11:30
◼
►
And so now Apple pays in trouble because MCX is is still coming
00:11:35
◼
►
It's reminds me that article. I think it was two weeks ago where someone said Apple pay
00:11:39
◼
►
probably another one of the Forbes contributor networks, that Apple Pay was
00:11:43
◼
►
a huge disappointment because it was only responsible for a very small amount of
00:11:47
◼
►
transactions worldwide. Never mind America didn't have a much of equipment
00:11:50
◼
►
for it and it was only available in America which is far behind in
00:11:54
◼
►
terms of NFC. It's amazing what perspective they can bring to it when
00:11:57
◼
►
they try hard enough to put it in a bad light. Right, that there's no other
00:12:01
◼
►
digital, you know, pay with your phone transaction retail thing that's even
00:12:06
◼
►
Close to as popular as Apple pay but somehow it's a failure because it's still only 1% of the market, you know
00:12:12
◼
►
Two months in yeah in one car not even two months, right? It didn't even launch until November. Yeah, I think right
00:12:19
◼
►
October I think came with iOS 8.1. All right. Well still that's a you know, right about two months. Yep, two months
00:12:26
◼
►
And it's crazy to me too that
00:12:35
◼
►
With the MCX that they don't mention the people who you know who want to promote it
00:12:40
◼
►
Which I think I think it's not because they actually believe it. I think it's even though they're analysts rather than press
00:12:45
◼
►
I think it's this this
00:12:47
◼
►
Idea that you want to present everything as a neck-and-neck battle, right?
00:12:52
◼
►
You know and so Apple pay is threatened by MCX because it's gonna be backed by Walmart and whoever else and they have you know
00:13:01
◼
►
huge huge footprint in retail
00:13:04
◼
►
But they just skip over the most obvious aspects of what has made Apple pay
00:13:14
◼
►
exactly what Tim Cook said on stage when he introduced it, which is
00:13:18
◼
►
You know, it's it's one of like my biggest recurring mantras about Apple is don't underestimate how often
00:13:25
◼
►
They're not giving you any spin any bullshit
00:13:28
◼
►
they're just telling you flat out in plain language exactly why they did what
00:13:33
◼
►
they did and with Apple Bay Tim Cook's explanation was we think everybody else
00:13:38
◼
►
who's tried this to date has failed because they haven't concentrated on the
00:13:41
◼
►
user experience and made that their priority that's what we've done we've
00:13:46
◼
►
made it as easy as possible to use as quick to use and as privacy protecting
00:13:52
◼
►
as we can, all in the name of the user.
00:13:57
◼
►
You know, and if that's all they did, well then who, you know, what retailer would hook up the equipment?
00:14:02
◼
►
But the other things they did secondary to the user focus is use the established
00:14:07
◼
►
infrastructure for NFC payments and make the banks
00:14:12
◼
►
happy by taking a very minimal cut and by promising
00:14:17
◼
►
significantly increase security which gets the banks on board because the
00:14:23
◼
►
banks can do the math and I really do think it works out which is that Apple's
00:14:27
◼
►
little 0.15% cut of the transactions is less than the cost of fraud per
00:14:34
◼
►
transaction that the banks have been used to I think that's absolutely true
00:14:39
◼
►
especially when you look at and the the privacy and the security too when you
00:14:42
◼
►
look at all the data breaches at the targets or the Home Depots but I think
00:14:45
◼
►
You nailed it when you said it,
00:14:46
◼
►
it's aligned with my interests.
00:14:48
◼
►
I've gone to Apple Pay terminals,
00:14:50
◼
►
even the demo ones set up at Apple when we were at the event
00:14:52
◼
►
and they read my Canadian NFC credit card.
00:14:54
◼
►
That technology is not gonna just benefit Apple,
00:14:56
◼
►
it's gonna benefit everybody
00:14:57
◼
►
who uses any sort of NFC transaction.
00:15:01
◼
►
And you compare that to current currency
00:15:02
◼
►
or whatever it's called,
00:15:03
◼
►
and that you have to give the retailer your bank account,
00:15:06
◼
►
you have to have a QR code, you have to scan the QR code.
00:15:09
◼
►
And it is such a horrible experience
00:15:11
◼
►
and it's not done to the benefit of the consumer,
00:15:13
◼
►
done to try to increase the amount of to save money on transactions they pay the credit
00:15:17
◼
►
card companies never mind how long it's gonna how much money is gonna cost them in terms
00:15:21
◼
►
of cashiers fees for the incredibly complicated error prone system that they're establishing
00:15:25
◼
►
right you can't prove yet that Tim Cook's explanation for you know why they thought
00:15:31
◼
►
Apple pay would be successful and why it seems to be successful today are true and that cut
00:15:37
◼
►
you know that a user focused approach is is the way to get it done
00:15:42
◼
►
and who knows maybe something like currency will also become popular
00:15:48
◼
►
i don't i don't know i have my doubts about currency in particular but
00:15:52
◼
►
you know it could be that something that's a lot more retailer friendly as
00:15:56
◼
►
opposed to consumer friendly could work
00:15:58
◼
►
but the evidence today suggests you know that what apple said was exactly right
00:16:04
◼
►
it's also uh...
00:16:05
◼
►
What benefits the retailer is interesting
00:16:08
◼
►
because me getting through the checkout line
00:16:10
◼
►
really quickly benefits the retailer.
00:16:12
◼
►
And I believe it's my understanding that a lot of,
00:16:15
◼
►
they signed multi-year agreements with currency
00:16:17
◼
►
and with MCX when they started,
00:16:19
◼
►
which was a silly thing to do, but they did it.
00:16:20
◼
►
But I believe a lot of those expire pretty early on
00:16:22
◼
►
this year and it'll be interesting, sorry, not this year,
00:16:24
◼
►
but in 2015, and it'll be interesting to see how many
00:16:27
◼
►
of those adopt Apple Pay as soon as they are
00:16:29
◼
►
contractually allowed to.
00:16:30
◼
►
- And the other thing that I keep thinking about
00:16:34
◼
►
as a technical limitation is the way that there's one thing that Apple Pay has that
00:16:39
◼
►
no other payment system that would work on the iPhone at least. I mean obviously like
00:16:44
◼
►
what Google could enable on Android or Microsoft with Windows Phone is different but at least
00:16:49
◼
►
if you want iPhone using customers, the one thing they have that nobody else can do is
00:16:55
◼
►
the way that it works at the system level rather than the app level. Like and I just
00:17:00
◼
►
can't emphasize enough for anybody out there who hasn't used Apple Pay yet because you
00:17:04
◼
►
don't have an iPhone 6 or because you don't shop at one of the places that supports it
00:17:09
◼
►
yet. But I just can't emphasize enough how instead of like feeling like a one step process,
00:17:18
◼
►
it almost feels like a zero step process because you don't have to unlock your phone. You just
00:17:23
◼
►
take the phone, even if it's not on, and just get it within an inch of the terminal, rest
00:17:29
◼
►
your thumb on the reader and that's it.
00:17:32
◼
►
- It's gonna sound like--
00:17:34
◼
►
- Nobody else can do that.
00:17:35
◼
►
Like if a current C app on the iPhone,
00:17:38
◼
►
you would have to unlock your phone, open the app,
00:17:41
◼
►
and go from there, which is, you know,
00:17:46
◼
►
it doesn't sound like a lot,
00:17:48
◼
►
but compared to Apple Pay, it is a lot.
00:17:50
◼
►
- I get upset, most places here,
00:17:52
◼
►
I can just tap my card and go,
00:17:53
◼
►
and when it doesn't work, you feel like an animal
00:17:55
◼
►
having to put it in and put in a pin code or swipe it.
00:17:58
◼
►
I haven't had a swipe or sign something in over a year.
00:18:01
◼
►
But it reminds me of something else
00:18:03
◼
►
and it's a bit of a tangent, but I think it's the same thing.
00:18:06
◼
►
It all goes back to Apple making like the A8 chipset
00:18:09
◼
►
or the 8X chipset in that you take the cameras,
00:18:12
◼
►
for instance, I take out my iPhone,
00:18:13
◼
►
I can just take a picture and nine out of 10 times,
00:18:15
◼
►
it's gonna be a really good everyday picture.
00:18:19
◼
►
And that's because Apple makes
00:18:20
◼
►
their own image signal processor.
00:18:22
◼
►
When you look at Microsoft who buys off the shelf chips,
00:18:24
◼
►
they have to put really big glass on the front
00:18:26
◼
►
and collect as much light as they can
00:18:28
◼
►
because they're using off the shelf chips.
00:18:30
◼
►
There's no advantage to them there.
00:18:32
◼
►
Google has no idea what hardware
00:18:33
◼
►
or what software is running on their phones.
00:18:35
◼
►
They try to suck it up to the server
00:18:36
◼
►
and do all the auto awesome stuff.
00:18:37
◼
►
But Apple is just making sure that
00:18:39
◼
►
they have a good camera on it,
00:18:41
◼
►
they'll process it and almost any shot you take
00:18:43
◼
►
will be useful for a normal person.
00:18:45
◼
►
And that's the same thing.
00:18:47
◼
►
You can't get that advantage unless you own
00:18:48
◼
►
the entire stack the way that they do.
00:18:50
◼
►
And now they're moving that into payments
00:18:51
◼
►
and they're moving that into other areas with the iPhone.
00:18:54
◼
►
- Yeah, no, you can't underestimate the advantage.
00:18:57
◼
►
And I think it totally gets written off
00:19:00
◼
►
by these naysaying analysts,
00:19:03
◼
►
what an advantage Apple has by controlling
00:19:05
◼
►
that level of the stack.
00:19:07
◼
►
- I used to think they were naysaying,
00:19:09
◼
►
and I have a friend who was a sell-side analyst,
00:19:11
◼
►
and he explained it to me,
00:19:11
◼
►
and it's that the press reports analysts
00:19:13
◼
►
as though they're giving comments to readers,
00:19:15
◼
►
and their comments are not meant for their readers,
00:19:17
◼
►
they're meant to manipulate the markets.
00:19:19
◼
►
And what they say has very little to do
00:19:20
◼
►
with what they believe.
00:19:21
◼
►
It's entirely, they probably told their own clients
00:19:23
◼
►
something different two days ago, or three days ago,
00:19:26
◼
►
and now they want to produce results for them.
00:19:28
◼
►
So it's so undependable, I don't know why it gets reported.
00:19:31
◼
►
- Right, like an analyst who comes out with a report
00:19:34
◼
►
that seems to be very pessimistic
00:19:35
◼
►
about Apple Pay's long-term prospects,
00:19:38
◼
►
might in fact, honestly, privately,
00:19:40
◼
►
in terms of where he's putting money
00:19:42
◼
►
and advising his clients to put money,
00:19:43
◼
►
being very bullish on the future of Apple Pay.
00:19:46
◼
►
- It's like that video with Crane from a couple years ago
00:19:48
◼
►
where he says, "You want to make money?
00:19:49
◼
►
You spread a rumor saying the iPhone is gonna be delayed.
00:19:52
◼
►
You call up the news networks
00:19:53
◼
►
and you tell them it's gonna be delayed.
00:19:54
◼
►
Then all of a sudden Apple's down
00:19:55
◼
►
you've shorted all the shares. I think that happens a lot. Yeah. What was that
00:19:58
◼
►
guy's name? Jim Cramer. Yeah, Jim Cramer. That's it. Yeah, it's baffling, but and
00:20:04
◼
►
again this stuff keeps getting reported as though it's factual accounting on
00:20:06
◼
►
what Apple's doing. What else in the first half of the year? I think there was
00:20:14
◼
►
was Angela, I think Angela Ahrens was in early on in the year. Yeah, I do think so.
00:20:20
◼
►
When was she hired?
00:20:22
◼
►
- She was definitely, February, March.
00:20:25
◼
►
- That's a complete turnaround from John Browett
00:20:27
◼
►
from the previous year.
00:20:28
◼
►
- And I think that's super interesting
00:20:29
◼
►
because Apple is really doing well in Apple stores,
00:20:32
◼
►
but some people will say that it's a stale experience
00:20:35
◼
►
that they haven't evolved it.
00:20:36
◼
►
Even though it's working, it's hugely successful.
00:20:38
◼
►
But they gave her not only Apple retail,
00:20:40
◼
►
but Apple Online as well,
00:20:42
◼
►
which used to operate almost as separate businesses.
00:20:44
◼
►
And it's similar to giving Federiki control
00:20:46
◼
►
over both OS X and iOS,
00:20:48
◼
►
and that those sort of artificial walls are falling down
00:20:51
◼
►
and it's providing better service for everybody involved.
00:20:54
◼
►
- So Angela Arnnst, her hiring was announced a year ago
00:20:59
◼
►
in October 2013, but she did not start until,
00:21:03
◼
►
I believe February or March of 2014.
00:21:07
◼
►
I've said this before, and it seems obvious,
00:21:10
◼
►
but it's so clear to me that the reason why they hired her
00:21:13
◼
►
and why she would take the job is because of the watch.
00:21:18
◼
►
- Well, she was a CEO of Burberry.
00:21:20
◼
►
That's a huge job and people didn't understand
00:21:21
◼
►
why she'd become a senior vice president at Apple,
00:21:24
◼
►
even though the senior vice president of retail
00:21:25
◼
►
and now online as well is a huge job.
00:21:28
◼
►
It's like being a CEO of another company,
00:21:31
◼
►
but it's still, I think you're exactly right.
00:21:32
◼
►
Apple dangled something in front of her
00:21:35
◼
►
that was a challenge and people like that want a challenge.
00:21:38
◼
►
- Yeah, totally.
00:21:39
◼
►
And it does seem, it seems, you know,
00:21:42
◼
►
it's not like, we haven't really seen the ARNSTs effect
00:21:45
◼
►
on anything in retail yet,
00:21:48
◼
►
but I don't think there's anybody who doesn't think
00:21:50
◼
►
that that's coming.
00:21:52
◼
►
- You know, I think that there's half of it,
00:21:55
◼
►
I think is that changes like that take a lot of time
00:21:58
◼
►
because it, or not a lot of time,
00:22:01
◼
►
but a lot of time compared to our industry, right?
00:22:04
◼
►
Because you can't do it digitally.
00:22:05
◼
►
You can't just, you know, have a new store and, you know,
00:22:10
◼
►
like they do with the online store,
00:22:12
◼
►
put up a sticky note for 15 minutes.
00:22:14
◼
►
And then when you come back, it's an all new store,
00:22:17
◼
►
you know, this brick and mortar stuff takes physical, you know, actual time.
00:22:21
◼
►
And, you know, to take a store down and put it back up is time when you're not
00:22:26
◼
►
making sales, you know? So like in San Francisco,
00:22:29
◼
►
I don't know if the new store is open yet,
00:22:31
◼
►
but they're not putting the new store on the same spot as the old store.
00:22:34
◼
►
They're putting it like on the other corner around, uh,
00:22:37
◼
►
what's the name of that part? Union square. Yep. Um, you know,
00:22:42
◼
►
and you can't do that everywhere where Apple has a retail store. You know,
00:22:46
◼
►
most of the ones that are in shopping malls,
00:22:50
◼
►
you could, I guess, get another spot in the mall,
00:22:53
◼
►
but who knows if there's one, you know,
00:22:55
◼
►
it all depends on availability
00:22:56
◼
►
that's outside the control of Apple.
00:22:58
◼
►
- And they're not like a carrier company
00:23:00
◼
►
who's gonna just put a little kiosk out front
00:23:01
◼
►
while the store is closed behind it.
00:23:03
◼
►
- Right, exactly.
00:23:04
◼
►
- Yeah, I think you're right.
00:23:08
◼
►
I think as the watch starts to deploy into the stores
00:23:11
◼
►
and as the other products start coming online for next year,
00:23:12
◼
►
we're gonna see the stores sort of transform to,
00:23:15
◼
►
I don't know if fashion is the right word.
00:23:17
◼
►
I think Apple's doing something really interesting
00:23:19
◼
►
where technology is meeting fashion,
00:23:20
◼
►
but it's gonna be an Apple store
00:23:22
◼
►
that has to be different than it was in the past.
00:23:24
◼
►
- Yeah, let me see, anything else?
00:23:26
◼
►
I don't really see much else.
00:23:28
◼
►
- Beats, I think, was announced earlier on in the year
00:23:31
◼
►
'cause they had Dre on the stage for WVDC,
00:23:33
◼
►
so it must have been.
00:23:33
◼
►
- May 2014, Apple to acquire music,
00:23:37
◼
►
Beats Music and Beats Electronics.
00:23:39
◼
►
I don't know that that's major news,
00:23:44
◼
►
But it's because it's not a huge it's a it's a much bigger transaction than apple has made
00:23:50
◼
►
You know famously, you know, it's the biggest acquisition since they acquired next
00:23:55
◼
►
Which of course, you know
00:23:57
◼
►
Is the you know turned into like the backbone of the country of the company?
00:24:01
◼
►
But uh, you know a 500 million dollar acquisition in 1997 was like was seriously a bet the company acquisition
00:24:11
◼
►
Whereas a you know three billion or whatever it cost acquisition to get beats is pocket change
00:24:17
◼
►
Absolutely. Yeah, 300 billion three billion dollars
00:24:20
◼
►
You know, I mean you don't want to make a three billion dollar acquisition
00:24:24
◼
►
That doesn't turn out well, but it certainly isn't gonna have any meaningful if it turns out to be a complete bust
00:24:30
◼
►
It's not gonna hurt the company
00:24:31
◼
►
I think more interesting than the beats acquisition was just the reactions to it from it was almost like everyone went through the the five
00:24:37
◼
►
stages of grief with denial and anger and they just couldn't believe it and it
00:24:41
◼
►
turns out it does make some sense there are you know selling headphones at Apple
00:24:45
◼
►
stores makes a lot of sense and sort of a synergy between iTunes radio and Beats
00:24:49
◼
►
music whatever it ends up being labeled makes a lot of sense yeah and I think I
00:24:55
◼
►
don't know I still don't think overall it makes a ton of sense I'm still
00:24:59
◼
►
waiting for the other shoe to drop on it but it's in some sense it does where
00:25:04
◼
►
It's the only other iconic headphone company I can think of I mean it has nothing to do with you know, Marco Arment style
00:25:11
◼
►
Quality analysis but rather you're out on the sidewalk and you see somebody walking while they're listening to their device and you know
00:25:21
◼
►
Those white earbuds that Apple's been making ever since 2001 are truly iconic
00:25:26
◼
►
I mean they even had for years an ad campaign that was kind of based on that right with the silhouettes dancing silhouettes
00:25:33
◼
►
Who you know have white earbuds and a white why?
00:25:37
◼
►
You know connector draped around their body
00:25:40
◼
►
They own that right not that other companies had you know that they have a trademark on it and nobody can make white earbuds
00:25:46
◼
►
But white earbuds people see them
00:25:48
◼
►
They think that's somebody listening to an Apple device and beats is the only other company I can think of that has that sort of
00:25:54
◼
►
Recognition yeah, they have that the other cache that the iPod commercials used to have ten years ago
00:26:00
◼
►
But I think there's also an element to Eddie cues
00:26:02
◼
►
Organization is just so big and there's gonna be a limit at some point to what he can do
00:26:06
◼
►
I mean he's doing Apple pay now as well
00:26:08
◼
►
He does the App Store and the iTunes store and he does all the contract negotiations
00:26:12
◼
►
And if you could have Jimmy Iovine in there doing at least some of that it takes more stuff off of Eddie cues desk
00:26:18
◼
►
Yeah something I've heard and it you know, I don't think this is surprising
00:26:22
◼
►
That's probably what everybody was guessing anyway
00:26:24
◼
►
but what I have heard recently was that at least inside Apple the beats acquisition is
00:26:30
◼
►
Viewed as an Eddie thing that Eddie Eddie Eddie started it and he pushed for it Eddie drove it and not that that Tim
00:26:38
◼
►
Cook wasn't engaged and I'm sure that at the negotiation level he was in fact deeply engaged
00:26:43
◼
►
I mean, I don't think you know, Tim Cook has not like don't worry about the details sort of CEO
00:26:51
◼
►
So not to diminish what Tim Cook's role in the negotiations might have been but in terms of
00:26:56
◼
►
Advocating it and and you know
00:26:59
◼
►
Pushing for it. It was in almost entirely an ediq thing
00:27:03
◼
►
Because we didn't see anything about iTunes this year. We didn't see continuity for iTunes
00:27:08
◼
►
For example, we didn't see a new iTunes music service iTunes radio still hasn't gone past the US and Australia
00:27:14
◼
►
I think and iTunes is an aging platform. It's still based on web objects
00:27:18
◼
►
is still based on their original software they use to manage you know the music store
00:27:22
◼
►
and all of that at some point you know it's gonna be like a John Siracusa thing where
00:27:26
◼
►
a thousand years from now this is gonna have to be fixed so what's the point between now
00:27:29
◼
►
and then that it actually gets fixed and I don't know if beats has better software or
00:27:32
◼
►
better solution but it could also be a catalyst to Apple finally fixing a lot of the infrastructure
00:27:38
◼
►
things that they have to do with the iTunes store yeah I think you know above and beyond
00:27:43
◼
►
whether it's based on web objects behind the scenes and and all of that I think it's ever
00:27:48
◼
►
more clear that it's based on a model that just isn't relevant anymore. Which is, here's
00:27:56
◼
►
a song you want and you give a retailer money for it and now you own a copy of it. That's
00:28:03
◼
►
just not, that's just, that's done. I mean, I'm not done in the sense of they're not selling
00:28:09
◼
►
any songs anymore, but that I can't see any way that that ever comes back.
00:28:17
◼
►
it's in permanent decline.
00:28:19
◼
►
It's sort of like what standalone iPods are.
00:28:22
◼
►
It's still a decent business,
00:28:26
◼
►
but it's never going to increase quarter over quarter.
00:28:29
◼
►
It's just gonna go into permanent decline.
00:28:32
◼
►
- Yeah, and just like the iPod is being replaced
00:28:34
◼
►
by the iPhone, in some cases, the iPad mini,
00:28:36
◼
►
and now larger iPhones,
00:28:37
◼
►
it makes sense for whatever iTunes was,
00:28:39
◼
►
for Apple to get in early enough
00:28:41
◼
►
to have whatever iTunes will end up being.
00:28:42
◼
►
- Right, and it's, yeah, and in the same way
00:28:45
◼
►
that it, you know, iPods sales decreasing doesn't mean that people are spending less
00:28:49
◼
►
time with gadgets that play music. In the same way, music sales declining doesn't mean
00:28:55
◼
►
people are spending less time listening to music. If anything, they're probably spending
00:29:00
◼
►
more. You know, I wouldn't be surprised if you did a study and found out that people
00:29:03
◼
►
listen to more music today or at least time spent listening to music than ever before.
00:29:09
◼
►
It's just that the model is no longer buying and selling.
00:29:12
◼
►
Yeah, it's not it's not what you had to buy it
00:29:15
◼
►
It's not we had to wait in the radio people can get pretty much what they want when they want and that opens them up
00:29:18
◼
►
To just consuming it almost non-stop if they want to
00:29:24
◼
►
So, I don't know I'm still not sure what to make of that if is the beats thing an exception to the rule just
00:29:31
◼
►
because it is it it combines two things that Apple wants to continue being a leader at which is
00:29:38
◼
►
music listening hardware and
00:29:41
◼
►
and digital distribution of legal music.
00:29:46
◼
►
Is it just that Beats is like a rare,
00:29:49
◼
►
perfect storm acquisition?
00:29:52
◼
►
Or is it the sign of things to come
00:29:54
◼
►
that Apple is going to loosen up
00:29:56
◼
►
and become a company that does mid-level
00:30:01
◼
►
or to high-level acquisitions with some frequency?
00:30:04
◼
►
- I think, again, to your point about Apple
00:30:05
◼
►
just saying what they really feel,
00:30:06
◼
►
I think when Tim Cook says they're not religiously opposed
00:30:08
◼
►
to big acquisitions,
00:30:10
◼
►
I think he's absolutely sincere about that.
00:30:11
◼
►
They'll do them when they make sense,
00:30:13
◼
►
but it's gotta be something like Beats
00:30:14
◼
►
where it gives them a hardware product.
00:30:16
◼
►
They can sell the compliments and other hardware product,
00:30:18
◼
►
a service they can roll out the compliments
00:30:20
◼
►
and existing service,
00:30:21
◼
►
and has executives that might be able to,
00:30:23
◼
►
you know, a service, sorry,
00:30:24
◼
►
executives and a culture that can integrate into Apple
00:30:27
◼
►
and help them do the things that they wanna do.
00:30:29
◼
►
- Right, and it doesn't really,
00:30:30
◼
►
that's the thing that has me,
00:30:31
◼
►
I'm still curious about it,
00:30:34
◼
►
but it doesn't make me worried about it
00:30:36
◼
►
the way that there's any number of other possible
00:30:40
◼
►
three billion dollar-ish acquisitions
00:30:43
◼
►
that Apple could have made that would raise my Spidey sense,
00:30:47
◼
►
you know, in a way that Beats doesn't.
00:30:49
◼
►
Because the biggest thing is that it doesn't fundamentally
00:30:52
◼
►
change any of the areas of focus in Apple's attention.
00:30:56
◼
►
- Yeah, like you said last week with Frommer,
00:30:58
◼
►
it doesn't make them a conglomerate.
00:30:59
◼
►
- Right, which is exactly what, you know,
00:31:02
◼
►
to me is like the first canary I check in the coal mine
00:31:06
◼
►
Is is Apple losing focus and becoming more of a conglomerate which I you know, we don't know
00:31:11
◼
►
I mean, I don't say that I don't say that Apple becoming a
00:31:14
◼
►
Multifocused conglomerate would be bad. We just have no idea and there's no history for Apple as
00:31:23
◼
►
Whatever their revenue is, you know 50 or 200 billion dollar a year corporation
00:31:28
◼
►
I mean, you know, they're an uncharted territory period there's you know, they're the most valuable company not just in tech but anywhere
00:31:34
◼
►
But it would be so it wouldn't be you know them making seemingly
00:31:41
◼
►
Unfocused acquisitions wouldn't make me sure that they were on the wrong track
00:31:47
◼
►
But it would make me strongly suspect that they were on the wrong track
00:31:51
◼
►
And it's wonder how the analysts would treat it because it wouldn't be expected behavior
00:31:55
◼
►
Google can compete with everybody they can compete with Amazon with Apple with
00:31:58
◼
►
Microsoft with any tech company in the world and do it all at the same time and that's fine and interesting and wonderful
00:32:03
◼
►
wonderful but you'd probably you probably hear howls all the way across the valley if
00:32:08
◼
►
Apple started doing that yeah well and Google can compete with itself you know you know
00:32:13
◼
►
Chromebooks versus Android tablets is a perfect example and I don't even say that that's a
00:32:19
◼
►
mistake I think it kind of fits with Google's internal culture whereas if Apple had seemingly
00:32:27
◼
►
confusing overlap between low-end Mac books and iPads, I would find that worrisome.
00:32:35
◼
►
Yeah, agreed.
00:32:36
◼
►
Like if Apple had a $399 MacBook, that to me would be very worrisome.
00:32:43
◼
►
I still have in the back of my head this idea that Google bought Android because they were
00:32:46
◼
►
panicked about mobile and then saw WebOS and smacked their head and thought that was a
00:32:50
◼
►
way more Google product than buying Android, but then they were all in on Android and now
00:32:54
◼
►
They're slowly gonna it's fun to get away to get chroma West to a point where that can be their version of web OS
00:32:59
◼
►
That's an interesting. That's an interesting argument too because they ended up hiring
00:33:03
◼
►
Matta Mattias Duarte. Yep
00:33:06
◼
►
Take his name, right? Yeah, absolutely
00:33:09
◼
►
Who was the you know lead designer behind web OS? Yeah
00:33:15
◼
►
And they're slowly giving send our Patai control over the stack and he was you know
00:33:20
◼
►
He's the web guy
00:33:21
◼
►
He's Android always seemed like an odd product from Google because it's a web company and that was very native software
00:33:25
◼
►
Yeah, and I really do think that that it took a long time for Google or for Android. I should say to
00:33:32
◼
►
Not to not at the low end but at the sort of mid to high end to get any sort of foothold is that they
00:33:40
◼
►
Were in such a deep hole design wise, you know
00:33:43
◼
►
compared to the iPhone that any you know
00:33:46
◼
►
even people who were inclined not to buy Apple stuff people who haven't ever bought Apple stuff and sort of want to you know,
00:33:54
◼
►
It's a natural thing, you know people who've been sticking with the PC for years
00:33:57
◼
►
and sort of having
00:34:00
◼
►
Apple is for other people sort of mindset about the company
00:34:03
◼
►
You know in 2011 even through 2012 you go into a store and compare the Android phones to
00:34:11
◼
►
iPhone and it's you know, you don't even have to be a design critic
00:34:15
◼
►
you just see that there's a serious difference in fit and finish in the software.
00:34:20
◼
►
It was a very different priority.
00:34:22
◼
►
Apple famously wanted to get the animation just absolutely nailed even in the first generation
00:34:27
◼
►
iPhone, but they didn't need to have every single feature crammed in there where Android
00:34:32
◼
►
It wasn't designed to be a phone for everybody.
00:34:34
◼
►
It was designed to be a phone that would protect Google's share of the web because they rightly
00:34:38
◼
►
believe web was moving mobile.
00:34:40
◼
►
Their priority wasn't that sort of interactivity.
00:34:42
◼
►
They bought Android and they made it work.
00:34:46
◼
►
But I remember even last year at CES, I was sitting there with the Nexus 4 or 5 trying
00:34:51
◼
►
to use Gmail and just cursing out loud.
00:34:53
◼
►
And Brian Klug from formerly of Anantech came over and quickly put it in developer mode
00:34:58
◼
►
and the screen went bright red.
00:34:59
◼
►
And he said that's because they're redrawing every cell four or five times trying to hope
00:35:02
◼
►
that it would stick.
00:35:04
◼
►
And their own graphics engineers couldn't get their own Gmail engineers to properly
00:35:09
◼
►
code all of it.
00:35:10
◼
►
That's why they've really locked things down now with material design and all the new things.
00:35:15
◼
►
But it took them four or five years to fix the massive architectural problems that were
00:35:19
◼
►
causing poor interaction.
00:35:22
◼
►
And the difference with WebOS is that WebOS, right from the get-go, it had performance
00:35:25
◼
►
problems because of the whole architecture of building it on top of like a WebKit rendering
00:35:32
◼
►
combined with the state of mobile hardware in what was it 2009 when when
00:35:40
◼
►
when the pre came out yeah but I you know in terms of an an elegant software
00:35:48
◼
►
interface I mean I mean you could still it to this day I think you could argue
00:35:53
◼
►
that the way that web OS handled notifications is the best design
00:35:56
◼
►
anybody's come up with absolutely there synergies I mean it was almost the
00:36:01
◼
►
fringe universe version of the iPhone if if John Rubenstein had won the keyboard
00:36:05
◼
►
argument or if what's his name it won the the Linux argument or if the people
00:36:10
◼
►
who wanted to use WebKit as the interface instead of creating UI kit had
00:36:13
◼
►
won that argument that could have been an Apple product right Tony said Tony
00:36:17
◼
►
Fidel yeah but instead they all ended up at palm making except for Fidel Rubenstein
00:36:21
◼
►
and and the web the WebKit engineers ended up at palm making their version of
00:36:25
◼
►
the iPhone yeah absolutely I I if you would have shown if you would have taken
00:36:30
◼
►
of a palm pre back in time to you know 1998 1997 and shown it to my then self
00:36:38
◼
►
and said what come you know this is a product from 2009 what company made it
00:36:42
◼
►
you know scrub the logos off I would have guessed Apple yeah without question
00:36:46
◼
►
especially if you just showed me the software and not the hardware the
00:36:50
◼
►
hardware was a lot less appley but the software was extremely appley in my
00:36:56
◼
►
opinion everything from the font choice to you know the roundness you know the
00:37:01
◼
►
rounded corners of the screen the rounded corners of the cards on the
00:37:06
◼
►
screen I think it was a very Apple DNA product software wise I've never seen
00:37:12
◼
►
the p1 phone this fidel's group was working on but in I've always suspected
00:37:16
◼
►
that if that had been the phone that had got the gone ahead of some reason p2
00:37:19
◼
►
hadn't worked out and forest all's group hadn't been able to make the iPhone that
00:37:23
◼
►
could have ended up being very similar to what the Pom Pre was. Yeah, and so it's interesting to think
00:37:27
◼
►
hypothetically what would have happened if Google had purchased, had somehow obtained, webOS instead of Android and pushed for it because in
00:37:35
◼
►
some sense the problems that webOS had were, I think,
00:37:39
◼
►
not solvable by throwing money at them, but more easily solved by throwing money at it than Android.
00:37:46
◼
►
Because with Android it was to me,
00:37:49
◼
►
Fundamentally the fact that it was designed at the outset as a sort of blackberry
00:37:53
◼
►
Style you know that it was going to you know a blackberry style mobile interface keyboard up down left right select
00:38:03
◼
►
therefore had no
00:38:05
◼
►
No, no at a foundation level aspect of a rich graphical interface with playful animations and high frame
00:38:13
◼
►
Rates and stuff like that. I've told the story before but when I reviewed the g1 the very first Android phone that came out
00:38:18
◼
►
I turned on the snake game and it said press up to start and I tried you know swiping up on the screen
00:38:23
◼
►
Then I tried pressing the up arrow key
00:38:24
◼
►
Then I tried pressing the up joypad and then I tried pressing up on whatever the other thing was on the other side
00:38:29
◼
►
I tried eight different ways of signaling up and I couldn't get it to work
00:38:32
◼
►
But there were eight different ways of signaling up right and that to me to find the very early years of Android
00:38:37
◼
►
Might I remember too that it was the only way to select text was to use the up down left, right?
00:38:42
◼
►
There was no way to touch on the screen to select text you had to
00:38:46
◼
►
You know more or less use like arrow keys
00:38:48
◼
►
And the original one you'd close the keyboard and there'd be the juke the Google search box just blinking at you wanting you to put
00:38:54
◼
►
Text but there was no virtual keyboard so you couldn't input text
00:38:57
◼
►
remember that
00:39:00
◼
►
And that's one of the problems they were facing and and palm was a tiny team and they they coded circles around Google when it
00:39:06
◼
►
came to phones in 2009
00:39:08
◼
►
So anyway, that's an interesting what-if it's and to me it's of the last
00:39:15
◼
►
of the post PC era, you know, from mid 2007 on,
00:39:20
◼
►
the great tragedy of the whole thing is that
00:39:24
◼
►
WebOS never, you know, didn't get a long enough time
00:39:27
◼
►
to try to gain a foothold.
00:39:30
◼
►
- You know, I mean, I think it was a more elegant design
00:39:34
◼
►
than Windows Phone.
00:39:36
◼
►
And so just imagine if they had had somebody
00:39:39
◼
►
with the wherewithal that Microsoft has shown
00:39:42
◼
►
with Windows Phone to stick behind WebOS, you know?
00:39:46
◼
►
And, you know, push the software forward,
00:39:49
◼
►
break some of the performance bottlenecks,
00:39:52
◼
►
but also just let Moore's Law help you out year after year.
00:39:56
◼
►
You know, two, three years later,
00:39:58
◼
►
WebOS I think would have been a lot more,
00:40:01
◼
►
without even any software optimizations,
00:40:04
◼
►
would have been a lot more tenable performance-wise.
00:40:08
◼
►
- Absolutely, I mean, they had no secondary source of income.
00:40:10
◼
►
Apple had Mac money originally,
00:40:11
◼
►
Google had search money, even Samsung had appliance money.
00:40:14
◼
►
Palm and now Blackberry, they have no additional sources
00:40:16
◼
►
of income and so everything becomes,
00:40:18
◼
►
everything becomes Bet the Company.
00:40:20
◼
►
Every phone you put out becomes Bet the Company.
00:40:23
◼
►
All right, let me take a break and thank our first sponsor
00:40:25
◼
►
this week and it is our very good friends at Backblaze.
00:40:30
◼
►
You guys know Backblaze, unlimited,
00:40:32
◼
►
un-throttled backup for Mac.
00:40:35
◼
►
They have over 100 petabytes of total data backed up.
00:40:40
◼
►
They just crossed the six billion files restored mark.
00:40:43
◼
►
That means users of Backblaze have used them to restore
00:40:47
◼
►
or download or get on another device over six billion files.
00:40:52
◼
►
They have an iPhone app that lets you access
00:40:55
◼
►
and share any of your files.
00:40:57
◼
►
So when your Mac's backed up to Backblaze,
00:40:59
◼
►
you're out and about, all you have with you is your phone
00:41:02
◼
►
and you wanna get a file from your Mac.
00:41:04
◼
►
Just log into, just open the Backblaze app
00:41:06
◼
►
and there's all your files, get it.
00:41:08
◼
►
You can email it to someone right from there.
00:41:10
◼
►
No need to do anything more complicated than that.
00:41:12
◼
►
Couldn't be easier.
00:41:14
◼
►
You can restore one file or all your files easily with their web restore.
00:41:21
◼
►
25% of all Backblaze restores are for just one file.
00:41:26
◼
►
So it's not just for computer disasters.
00:41:28
◼
►
But if you do have a computer disaster, somebody steals your Mac, somebody breaks in your house,
00:41:35
◼
►
takes your Mac, takes your backup drive, your roof leaks, water leaks all over your computer,
00:41:40
◼
►
ruins your hard drive, ruins your time machine. You need to, you know, true total disaster.
00:41:47
◼
►
You can just, you don't have to wait and download all of your stuff from Backblaze over the
00:41:51
◼
►
internet. You can just go there, say put it all on a USB hard drive and boom, they'll
00:41:56
◼
►
FedEx it to you and you know, like a day or two later, there's a USB hard drive with all
00:42:01
◼
►
of your files on it ready for you to restore to a new computer.
00:42:06
◼
►
Software's written by the company's founded by Apple X engineers.
00:42:12
◼
►
The software runs totally native on your Mac, runs great on Yosemite, runs great on Mavericks,
00:42:19
◼
►
couldn't be installed more easily, couldn't be more invisible in the background while
00:42:23
◼
►
it's running.
00:42:26
◼
►
Just great, great service for an amazing price.
00:42:29
◼
►
Five bucks a month per Mac, unlimited, no limits on how much data you can upload.
00:42:36
◼
►
Five bucks a month.
00:42:37
◼
►
So you can get a risk-free, no credit card required trial by going here, backblaze.com/daringfireball.
00:42:47
◼
►
You're nuts if you haven't done it.
00:42:48
◼
►
And if you're listening to this over the holidays, sign your parents up for it.
00:42:53
◼
►
Just go when you're at your parents' house for Christmas or whatever, just sign them
00:42:57
◼
►
up for backblaze and give it to them. It's a great little gift. They won't thank you
00:43:02
◼
►
for it until they need it, but then when they need it, they'll think you're a superhero.
00:43:05
◼
►
So put all your relatives on backblaze. My thanks to them.
00:43:10
◼
►
So the first big Apple news of the year, 2014, really didn't come until WWDC.
00:43:14
◼
►
>> Yeah. But what an event. >> Yeah. I think it was certainly -- it still
00:43:20
◼
►
seems like -- it doesn't seem like as long ago as it is. It doesn't feel like six months
00:43:25
◼
►
ago. No, it was amazing because I was sitting with you and Jason Snell and
00:43:30
◼
►
John Siracusa and different people were just lighting up at different parts of
00:43:35
◼
►
that event. It was just such a palpable reaction for them. Siracusa and Swift, right?
00:43:41
◼
►
Well, he turned to Snell and he goes, "Am I dreaming? Because if I'm... you should tell me
00:43:44
◼
►
because I might be in a fugue state. I don't know if this is real or not. Please
00:43:47
◼
►
tell me that I'm actually listening to what I'm listening to." That was certainly
00:43:51
◼
►
big news. You know, iOS 8 and Yosemite. It was the first time we got a look at Yosemite.
00:44:01
◼
►
And I think, you know, certain, how should we say it? Not like a specific, you know,
00:44:11
◼
►
like here's three lines of code, copy these exactly, this is how you do X, the recommended
00:44:17
◼
►
But more in terms of like broad strokes philosophy
00:44:20
◼
►
I think Apple started pushing a couple of new things not necessarily for the first time
00:44:25
◼
►
But two examples I can think of was the heavy focus on
00:44:29
◼
►
Dynamic user interface layout. Yeah
00:44:35
◼
►
Preshadowing, you know pre, you know in in the run-up to the iPhone 6 and 6 plus
00:44:43
◼
►
But I think in the long run more
00:44:45
◼
►
Envisioning a world of iOS devices where there's a continuum of screen sizes, you know
00:44:53
◼
►
And who knows maybe eventually something smaller than four inches
00:44:59
◼
►
You know by all accounts maybe one of the things you know
00:45:02
◼
►
That we'll be hearing about in 20 for early parts of 2015 would be a bigger screen some kind of iPad
00:45:08
◼
►
that's bigger than 9.7 inches and
00:45:11
◼
►
and not having to code a custom user interface for each size in that continuum.
00:45:19
◼
►
It's a definite, it's a huge change from the way iOS development was until recently.
00:45:23
◼
►
And it wasn't just about supporting the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus.
00:45:28
◼
►
>> The way I look at it, there was the integration theme, which we'll probably get to.
00:45:34
◼
►
But the other big theme was this transition from pull to push,
00:45:37
◼
►
where previously the interface was locked to the device.
00:45:40
◼
►
and then slowly but surely with things like AirPlay and CarPlay and now WatchKit, the
00:45:46
◼
►
interface is actually decoupled so you have the logic on one device and the interface
00:45:49
◼
►
going somewhere else.
00:45:51
◼
►
Or you have the logic for the app of the interface being able to be flexible between the 4-inch
00:45:55
◼
►
screen size, 4.7, 6-inch.
00:45:57
◼
►
Now that you have split view controllers on the iPhone 6 Plus, it's sort of like a mini
00:46:02
◼
►
So like you said, it can scale across those things, but it's all sort of one central part
00:46:08
◼
►
And then you add extensibility to it where previously you had to hunt around your iPhone
00:46:12
◼
►
for anything.
00:46:13
◼
►
You had to go between six different photo apps just to get the effects you wanted.
00:46:17
◼
►
You had to leave to reply to a message.
00:46:19
◼
►
You had to leave if you wanted to share to Tumblr.
00:46:21
◼
►
You couldn't do that from where you were.
00:46:22
◼
►
You had to go to the Tumblr app and do it.
00:46:24
◼
►
And now all of that functionality has come to one place.
00:46:27
◼
►
All of that is now independent.
00:46:28
◼
►
You have these remote views.
00:46:30
◼
►
And to me that's made, that sort of severing of that one unit into these more modular parts
00:46:34
◼
►
has really made a huge difference not just in my workflow but where I think Apple could
00:46:38
◼
►
take all these. I think it's the first big hint of much larger plans they have moving
00:46:42
◼
►
forward with these devices.
00:46:44
◼
►
Right and you mentioned both CarPlay which is that's how CarPlay works where CarPlay
00:46:48
◼
►
is a dumb terminal effectively and you know take your iPhone out of Bluetooth range and
00:46:56
◼
►
the only thing the screen is going to show you in your car is the stuff from the manufacturer.
00:47:01
◼
►
You're not going to get any of the Apple play stuff or car play stuff.
00:47:05
◼
►
No iOS at all.
00:47:09
◼
►
It's only a it's really just effectively a projector.
00:47:12
◼
►
Your iPhone is doing all of the computation.
00:47:14
◼
►
Your iPhone is all of the storage.
00:47:16
◼
►
Your iPhone is doing the networking for anything that's coming over cellular.
00:47:21
◼
►
And the only thing that the screen in your car does is show you what the iPhone is showing
00:47:27
◼
►
and report back to the phone where you're stabbing your fingers at it.
00:47:34
◼
►
And the watch, you know, as we now know and as, you know, countless people have, you know,
00:47:40
◼
►
the initial watch kit SDK shows, the first round of third party apps pretty much works
00:47:47
◼
►
the same way.
00:47:48
◼
►
You don't get to run any code.
00:47:49
◼
►
There's no part of watch, this initial watch kit where your app runs code on the watch.
00:47:56
◼
►
just a projected display of what your phone app, your iPhone app is showing it
00:48:02
◼
►
and then the watch just reports back what you tapped on. I would like that
00:48:07
◼
►
everywhere I mean I like the idea of CarPlay I bought the Toyota car before
00:48:11
◼
►
they had any integration at all and my only option is to buy a new car if I
00:48:15
◼
►
want anything but with CarPlay every time I upgrade iOS or upgrade my phone I
00:48:19
◼
►
get a better experience I'd like that on my camera I'd like CameraPlay so that my
00:48:23
◼
►
the Canon interface is replaced with iOS.
00:48:25
◼
►
I don't wanna have Android appliances at home,
00:48:27
◼
►
I wanna have them running iOS.
00:48:28
◼
►
Just anytime there's a screen,
00:48:29
◼
►
I would eventually like to be able to just put,
00:48:31
◼
►
like project iOS right onto it.
00:48:34
◼
►
- Ooh, doing that with a camera, like a Canon,
00:48:37
◼
►
or like a serious, serious camera would be fascinating.
00:48:41
◼
►
I mean, there is a move afoot in the camera world
00:48:44
◼
►
to build in Wi-Fi, but it's,
00:48:47
◼
►
and I don't have a camera that does it yet.
00:48:49
◼
►
my Fuji X100S is a year off.
00:48:54
◼
►
Like the brand new X100T,
00:48:56
◼
►
which just came out a few weeks ago
00:48:58
◼
►
and I linked to a review of it a couple of days ago,
00:49:01
◼
►
now has WiFi, but it's clunky.
00:49:03
◼
►
Like the only way to get it to work,
00:49:05
◼
►
I haven't seen it,
00:49:05
◼
►
but it's like you have to get a Fuji app from the app store
00:49:08
◼
►
and then open the Fuji app on your phone
00:49:11
◼
►
and then you can do something between your phone
00:49:14
◼
►
and the camera.
00:49:17
◼
►
Whereas having it be like CarPlay,
00:49:19
◼
►
man, that would be fantastic.
00:49:21
◼
►
- And it's great for Apple
00:49:21
◼
►
because they're never gonna get into,
00:49:23
◼
►
never is a long time,
00:49:24
◼
►
but they're not gonna get into making appliances.
00:49:25
◼
►
They're not gonna become a giant manufacturing conglomerate
00:49:27
◼
►
like Samsung.
00:49:28
◼
►
And they're not gonna license iOS
00:49:30
◼
►
the way that Android is easily able to be put on any device.
00:49:33
◼
►
But just projecting the interface,
00:49:34
◼
►
it means they can still control it.
00:49:36
◼
►
They in essence just take it over.
00:49:37
◼
►
And the customer will have a great experience
00:49:39
◼
►
and they don't have to relinquish any of the control
00:49:41
◼
►
that they need for products.
00:49:42
◼
►
- Yeah, it almost to me takes cameras
00:49:44
◼
►
back to where they were pre-digital, right?
00:49:46
◼
►
where when you load it, we had a 35 millimeter film camera.
00:49:50
◼
►
The only things the camera did was let you take pictures.
00:49:54
◼
►
You would look through a viewfinder and see,
00:49:57
◼
►
and the camera would have things like a light set.
00:49:59
◼
►
In the latter years, obviously in the early years,
00:50:01
◼
►
you had to set all that stuff manually.
00:50:03
◼
►
But by the latter years of the tail end of the film world,
00:50:08
◼
►
it would do the exposure.
00:50:10
◼
►
If you set things to auto, it would set the aperture,
00:50:13
◼
►
set the exposure time.
00:50:15
◼
►
And then, but it was all just about letting you take the next photo.
00:50:22
◼
►
Then you'd push the button and the photo would be taken.
00:50:24
◼
►
It would be stored on the film and that was it, right?
00:50:28
◼
►
I would like a digital camera that worked like that.
00:50:30
◼
►
Do whatever you can to help me get a perfect exposure and focus.
00:50:35
◼
►
You know, set the focus distance, give me a recommended aperture, give me a recommended
00:50:39
◼
►
exposure time or let me set any of those variables manually if I choose to.
00:50:44
◼
►
And then when I hit click, it should just store the photo and then let me do everything
00:50:49
◼
►
else over a wireless connection to my iPhone.
00:50:53
◼
►
I would love that for a couple reasons.
00:50:55
◼
►
One, if you don't have an iPhone, you would just get whatever the QNX CarPlay system is,
00:50:59
◼
►
you know, whatever the standard software is on the phone.
00:51:02
◼
►
But if you do have it, you get a better experience and that becomes the same reason you want
00:51:05
◼
►
to get CarPlay.
00:51:06
◼
►
You know, this stuff all works better if you happen to have an iPhone.
00:51:09
◼
►
Yeah, boy, that would be great.
00:51:12
◼
►
But I do totally think that the WWDC 2014 heralded that sort of future.
00:51:19
◼
►
I think so too.
00:51:20
◼
►
And I think we also see, for example, continuity is going to work on the watch because there's
00:51:24
◼
►
going to be things on the watch.
00:51:25
◼
►
The watch to me is a total convenience play.
00:51:27
◼
►
It's for all those thousands of tiny interactions that you have with your phone every day that
00:51:32
◼
►
don't take a lot of time but are super important, yet you still have to go to your bag or go
00:51:35
◼
►
to your purse or go to your pocket.
00:51:38
◼
►
And I can sort of shift those to my watch.
00:51:40
◼
►
But if something ends up being more important than I thought it was, being able to just
00:51:43
◼
►
send that right back to my phone and continue it on my phone, Sync is great.
00:51:47
◼
►
But with Sync, I still have to unlock the phone, go find the app, go to the same place
00:51:51
◼
►
where I was, scroll through it, try to find it.
00:51:53
◼
►
But with continuity, I can be looking at something, press a button, and that exact same thing
00:51:57
◼
►
is just there waiting for me again.
00:51:59
◼
►
I think that's going to be much more interesting when the watch is in play.
00:52:03
◼
►
And I think a lot of these things are sort of breaking -- it goes back to what I said
00:52:08
◼
►
earlier about Apple Pay where it's at a from a user's perspective it's outside
00:52:14
◼
►
the app centric world of using the phone itself it's it's much more about the
00:52:21
◼
►
real physical world where your phone is just within the Bluetooth and/or Wi-Fi
00:52:28
◼
►
you know wireless range of whatever terminal you're dealing with whether the
00:52:33
◼
►
terminal is your watch whether it's your dashboard in your car and you just tap
00:52:38
◼
►
on the watch and things get started you don't have to wake up your phone you
00:52:41
◼
►
don't and you definitely don't have to find any particular app like a Fuji app
00:52:47
◼
►
to get you know to get this to work you're just on your camera and hit a
00:52:51
◼
►
button on your camera and you know the phone interface just wakes up and starts
00:52:55
◼
►
you know can read those photos that are right on your phone now the phone
00:52:58
◼
►
becomes like the Star Destroyer and the watch becomes the shuttlecraft that
00:53:01
◼
►
moves you in between this big objects
00:53:04
◼
►
that's pretty good I like that what else from WWDC I guess Yosemite we could yeah
00:53:14
◼
►
you know and in the summer there wasn't really any news per se it was just you
00:53:19
◼
►
know betas of iOS and Yosemite not a bad way to just roll into if we're gonna
00:53:25
◼
►
talk 2014 in hindsight you I mean have to talk Yosemite yeah I mean Dave
00:53:30
◼
►
Wiska stood an article on macworld right before hand where you're sort of speculating of what Yosemite would end up looking like and I
00:53:36
◼
►
Think he was really really close. It's like Apple didn't just clone iOS 7 which was a long-running joke
00:53:41
◼
►
They they sort of took the cues from it the translucency and and the other effects and they made something that was very Mac
00:53:48
◼
►
And you know, they kept the shadows for example. Yeah our example when Dave and I were
00:53:52
◼
►
Noodling ideas for Vesper Mac before we saw Yosemite and we thought well
00:53:59
◼
►
what if they do totally just go all in iOS 7 look and feel and
00:54:03
◼
►
We the only thing we could come up with was the the iCloud web apps. Yeah, which are
00:54:08
◼
►
You know you use them with a mouse pointer, and you know I think typically I don't even think they run on an iPad
00:54:16
◼
►
So I mean you're using it on a Mac
00:54:18
◼
►
And they have some things like dialog boxes that you know you know it's like
00:54:23
◼
►
You know how would you do an iOS 7 dialog box with a mouse pointer?
00:54:28
◼
►
But overall, boy, we looked at that and we were like, "Boy, I hope that's not it."
00:54:34
◼
►
And it wasn't.
00:54:37
◼
►
It had to be enough because they did that back to the Mac event and they changed the names of the apps
00:54:41
◼
►
and they brought over the same look and feel and they really made an effort to get all the people who had iOS devices,
00:54:47
◼
►
not to make the Mac the same, but to make them comfortable, to make an easy sort of a halo effect transition.
00:54:52
◼
►
And when you look at Yosemite and you look at continuity, it's just about adding value.
00:54:56
◼
►
Again, if you have an iPhone or iPad,
00:54:58
◼
►
you'll have a much better experience with a Mac.
00:55:01
◼
►
- Yeah, absolutely.
00:55:02
◼
►
I do think too, and it shows,
00:55:04
◼
►
and part of it is our perspective
00:55:07
◼
►
where we get to go to these press events
00:55:09
◼
►
and talk to some of the people at Apple,
00:55:11
◼
►
like in the product marketing group.
00:55:13
◼
►
And there's a palpable sense.
00:55:16
◼
►
I mean, there's some things that they just never come up.
00:55:19
◼
►
I mean, nobody really spends a long time talking about the,
00:55:23
◼
►
we don't even call them that anymore,
00:55:24
◼
►
but like the iWorks apps, right?
00:55:26
◼
►
Like pages and numbers and keynote.
00:55:29
◼
►
They, you know, there hasn't been a lot of enthusiasm
00:55:32
◼
►
about those apps in recent years.
00:55:35
◼
►
I'm not saying there's none.
00:55:36
◼
►
I'm just saying that it's, you know,
00:55:39
◼
►
I think it shows in the real world
00:55:41
◼
►
and, you know, in this current state of those apps.
00:55:44
◼
►
And I think it shows in the enthusiasm
00:55:46
◼
►
when you talk to people at Apple privately.
00:55:48
◼
►
But whereas like the Mac overall and Yosemite overall,
00:55:51
◼
►
like there were people, there's people at Apple
00:55:52
◼
►
who just still love the Mac.
00:55:54
◼
►
Like as a whole, it is not like the, you know,
00:55:58
◼
►
forgotten first child, you know,
00:56:02
◼
►
brushed aside in favor of the beloved, you know, iOS,
00:56:08
◼
►
- I wonder if that has anything to do with the Mac,
00:56:11
◼
►
like Yosemite being very firmly in Federighi's org,
00:56:13
◼
►
but things like iWork and iTunes all being projects
00:56:16
◼
►
that are run by, in Q's org, you know,
00:56:18
◼
►
almost like a totally secondary
00:56:19
◼
►
software development system.
00:56:21
◼
►
- I do wonder about that.
00:56:23
◼
►
And I don't know if it's because it's any way to
00:56:28
◼
►
to slag at EQ, but almost that he's got so much on his plate
00:56:32
◼
►
that how could it get any more of his attention,
00:56:35
◼
►
you know, with how much that he's got on his plate.
00:56:38
◼
►
- And you don't have the Federica,
00:56:40
◼
►
like the one guy who's in charge of software engineering
00:56:42
◼
►
isn't in charge of those bits of software engineering.
00:56:44
◼
►
- But as a whole, I, you know, this year,
00:56:47
◼
►
I think that the people I've spoken to at Apple
00:56:51
◼
►
were more excited about Yosemite and what's new on the Mac than iOS 8. And you
00:56:55
◼
►
know and a lot of it is hard to separate because so much of what's new about both
00:56:59
◼
►
iOS 8 and Yosemite is the continuity stuff which ties them together and there
00:57:03
◼
►
is no one without the other. That was one of the most impressive things to me
00:57:07
◼
►
because the famously iOS and OS X used to be run separately and there was a big
00:57:12
◼
►
rework but not only that it's it's it filtered down so instead of having
00:57:16
◼
►
someone in charge of Yosemite and someone in charge of iOS the person who
00:57:19
◼
►
was in charge of extensibility,
00:57:21
◼
►
or at least the engineering program manager
00:57:24
◼
►
was in charge of extensibility for iOS and OS X,
00:57:27
◼
►
was in charge of continuity for iOS and iOS X.
00:57:30
◼
►
And even when it would have been easier
00:57:31
◼
►
to do them separately or do them in different ways,
00:57:33
◼
►
they made sure that they were done in the same way,
00:57:35
◼
►
so developers had just one way
00:57:36
◼
►
to target them on both systems.
00:57:38
◼
►
And that might be a subtle change,
00:57:39
◼
►
but I think that's a really profound change
00:57:41
◼
►
based on how Apple used to be run.
00:57:43
◼
►
- Yeah, and it's a recurring theme
00:57:47
◼
►
since he left the company, but you know with forestall and again, I overall I'm a big fan of forestall and I think
00:57:54
◼
►
You know for Scott forestall is a huge reason that the iPhone was a hit product
00:58:01
◼
►
I was as good as it was I think he is a huge reason that the App Store
00:58:05
◼
►
Exists and that it's as popular as it is problems aside and we can get into that because there's been a lot of recent
00:58:12
◼
►
you know problems with the App Store, but on the whole, you know, it's
00:58:17
◼
►
you know a success and you know at a time when in
00:58:21
◼
►
2007 when the first iPhone came out and there wasn't any
00:58:24
◼
►
Third-party software at all and there were questions about whether there ever would be and then even when it was announced
00:58:31
◼
►
Well house how strict are they gonna keep this?
00:58:33
◼
►
How much is it gonna be a handful of apps that Apple vets and how much is it gonna be?
00:58:38
◼
►
You know, are they gonna allow tens of thousands hundreds thousands of apps?
00:58:42
◼
►
I think all of that is thanks to forest all or at least by these partly thanks to forest all absolutely
00:58:48
◼
►
But on the other hand, I don't think continuity happens
00:58:51
◼
►
All in one fell swoop in 2014 if forest all is still running iOS as his own fiefdom because the way he ran it was
00:59:02
◼
►
Even when it wasn't new, you know even you know, you know 20
00:59:06
◼
►
2012 I guess when he
00:59:09
◼
►
Got pushed out. Mm-hmm
00:59:12
◼
►
Yeah, I think he was a phenomenal partner for Steve Jobs.
00:59:15
◼
►
I mean you hear stories about when he was at Apple, he knew which of the three studded
00:59:21
◼
►
leather textures Steve would pick.
00:59:23
◼
►
And when he wasn't there, the designers just kept hearing no and no and no over and over
00:59:28
◼
►
And he was just so good at working with Steve Jobs.
00:59:30
◼
►
But then, you know, he faced an Apple without Steve Jobs.
00:59:32
◼
►
And it's possible that he was the best person in the world to birth the iPhone but not the
00:59:36
◼
►
best person to get it through the awkward teenage years.
00:59:39
◼
►
We'll see that with the watch now because Kevin Lynch runs watch software at Apple.
00:59:42
◼
►
It's not in Craig Federighi's org.
00:59:44
◼
►
But that's sort of what you have to do when you're creating something new.
00:59:46
◼
►
You have to give it that sort of independent space to come alive and then you integrate
00:59:50
◼
►
it back again over time.
00:59:52
◼
►
But even with Lynch and that's a good open question as to in terms of what to look for
00:59:59
◼
►
How good is their initial watch software going to be?
01:00:05
◼
►
it's fair or not, you know, how good the initial like when we get our first Apple watch 1.0
01:00:11
◼
►
in quote early 2015. We're gonna we're all going to form pretty firm opinions of Kevin
01:00:20
◼
►
Lynch as an Apple product manager, right off the bat. But Lynch was hired into an Apple
01:00:27
◼
►
where, you know, he could be told point blank and I'm sure was this is how we work now we
01:00:33
◼
►
collaborate you know and I think that's why you see you know that you know
01:00:36
◼
►
Schiller's already wearing an Apple watch, Eddy Q's wearing an Apple watch,
01:00:40
◼
►
Federighi is wearing an Apple watch, you know that they're not locked out of that
01:00:44
◼
►
in the way that I think a lot of people were with the iPhone before it came out.
01:00:49
◼
►
And the other thing that I mean I've heard really good things about Kevin
01:00:53
◼
►
Lynch's work at Apple like he sounds like he's doing a great job but also
01:00:56
◼
►
while the watch stuff is separate for example like I don't know this for a
01:01:01
◼
►
Fact but it sounds to me like messages is not being like if you're working on watch messages
01:01:05
◼
►
You're not allowed to talk to the guy working on iOS or Mac messages
01:01:08
◼
►
It sounds like that's not the case that the messages group, you know spans across from that which is what you want
01:01:12
◼
►
Because otherwise it's gonna create a broken experience
01:01:14
◼
►
Yeah, I do. I think that's absolutely the case where where he you know, it might be separate from
01:01:20
◼
►
Federighi's stuff but in a sense it's not because it's Federighi isn't trusted with it or he's not part of it
01:01:26
◼
►
But that he's already got enough on this plate and they need this is such a big undertaking that it needs
01:01:31
◼
►
Its own point person and team but they're not I think the difference is maybe maybe the word is fiefdom
01:01:37
◼
►
You know that iOS was run by Scott for stall as his own fiefdom within the company and that's not the case with the watch
01:01:44
◼
►
And I was talking to Brad Ellis about this last week
01:01:47
◼
►
But you look at the design cues of the watch and you start to imagine
01:01:50
◼
►
It's not just a copy of iOS 7 or a copy of Yosemite
01:01:53
◼
►
It is it is being given the room to be its own thing sort of establish its own identity as well
01:01:57
◼
►
Yeah, I almost get the sense that it if there's anything that holds up as an analogy
01:02:01
◼
►
It's almost like the watch OS is to iOS what iOS?
01:02:06
◼
►
Was to Mac OS yeah, you know that yes, we're not throwing everything out the kernel
01:02:13
◼
►
It might be the exact same kernel. There's there it might be a UI kit
01:02:17
◼
►
That's doing drawing it runs from port like the iPhone runs from port right
01:02:24
◼
►
but that it's it's just about based, you know using the technology that makes sense to reuse but but
01:02:31
◼
►
Stripping it down to a level that's appropriate for this new dramatically
01:02:37
◼
►
Lesser form factor. Yeah, but the strategic
01:02:40
◼
►
aspects of how the software runs
01:02:44
◼
►
Couldn't be more different from the original iPhone where the original iPhone
01:02:51
◼
►
only had this tangential relationship with your Mac, which was
01:02:55
◼
►
connect a 30 pin connector and a USB cord to the two and
01:03:00
◼
►
Hit them, you know sync and wait and
01:03:05
◼
►
Have you know, I still think it's almost seems prehistoric. I can't believe it's only seven years ago
01:03:11
◼
►
But that's the only way you've got calendar events on your phone or back to your Mac if you created the event on your phone
01:03:18
◼
►
It's the only way you could sync calendar events, the only way you could sync contacts.
01:03:24
◼
►
It's crazy that you only had to do all that tethered.
01:03:26
◼
►
But then once you untethered, your phone was a completely, iPhone was a completely independent
01:03:32
◼
►
device that had to do everything.
01:03:35
◼
►
Any kind of computation was done on the CPU on the phone.
01:03:38
◼
►
All of the drawing was done on the GPU on the phone.
01:03:41
◼
►
And the watch, at least for third party software, is largely just a projected screen where it's
01:03:47
◼
►
doing the least work possible. It's almost like the web app solution for the
01:03:53
◼
►
original iPhone where when you no longer connected to the internet nothing can
01:03:56
◼
►
update when you're not when your phone is no longer in vicinity nothing can
01:03:58
◼
►
update. Right yeah absolutely. Let's take a break and we'll come back and talk
01:04:05
◼
►
more Yosemite but I want to thank our second sponsor and it's another long
01:04:10
◼
►
friend of the show our good friends at lynda.com. L-Y-N-D-A dot com. lynda.com is
01:04:18
◼
►
an easy and affordable way to help you learn. Learn what? Well just about
01:04:25
◼
►
anything from programming to photography to design to audio editing even even
01:04:33
◼
►
stuff like negotiation skills they have classes on that. It's amazing the breadth
01:04:37
◼
►
of their library. You instantly stream thousands of courses created by experts
01:04:42
◼
►
on software, web development, graphic design, any of those things and watch
01:04:46
◼
►
them right on your computer. Fresh content, there's new courses added daily.
01:04:52
◼
►
They work directly with industry experts and software companies to provide timely
01:04:56
◼
►
training often the same day that new versions or releases of apps or products
01:05:00
◼
►
or services hit the market. So if you want to learn something new, new version
01:05:04
◼
►
of Lightroom comes out, guess what? You can learn everything that's new from
01:05:07
◼
►
from Linda.com right away.
01:05:10
◼
►
Easy to learn, high quality, easy to follow.
01:05:14
◼
►
Their video tutorials are produced at the highest quality.
01:05:18
◼
►
Courses are broken down into bite size pieces so you can learn at your own pace and learn
01:05:23
◼
►
from start to finish or just find a quick answer.
01:05:27
◼
►
They have beginning level stuff, mid level stuff and expert level courses.
01:05:32
◼
►
They have great, great tools including searchable transcripts.
01:05:37
◼
►
Super super important if you're looking back to find something that you knew you saw a
01:05:40
◼
►
couple weeks ago in a course and you can't find it and you know what it is, you want
01:05:44
◼
►
to search for it, well they've got it because all of their stuff has transcripts.
01:05:47
◼
►
You can make playlists and they even have stuff like certificates.
01:05:51
◼
►
So like when you finish a course you can publish in your LinkedIn profile a certificate of
01:05:56
◼
►
which lynda.com courses you've completed.
01:06:01
◼
►
have mobile apps so you can learn on the go with your iPhone, iPad, even Android. And
01:06:07
◼
►
if you get a premium account, you can download the courses to your mobile device like your
01:06:14
◼
►
iPad, your iPhone, and watch them offline. Premium plan members can also download project
01:06:21
◼
►
files and practice along with the instructor. So how do you get all this? Do you pay for
01:06:25
◼
►
by the video nope one low monthly price you pay 25 bucks per month and that
01:06:32
◼
►
gives you unlimited access to over 100,000 video tutorials the whole
01:06:37
◼
►
library you pay 25 bucks a month you get everything now you might be thinking
01:06:44
◼
►
well 25 bucks a month that's actually not cheap that's that's that's a lot of
01:06:48
◼
►
money here's how confident Linda comm is in their service they have a special
01:06:54
◼
►
deal just for listeners of the show. Go to Linda calm l y n da.com slash the talk show
01:07:02
◼
►
with the and for the next seven days, you can access everything for free no credit card
01:07:09
◼
►
upfront. Just go there linda.com slash the talk show they'll know you're coming from
01:07:14
◼
►
the show. And for seven days, you can watch everything they have unlimited. That's and
01:07:20
◼
►
see for yourself how good this stuff is and that's how confident they are that
01:07:24
◼
►
at the end of that period you're gonna jump at the chance to sign up for an
01:07:27
◼
►
account and stick with them really really good stuff I've I've used it for
01:07:32
◼
►
several things it's really really can't say good enough just how high quality
01:07:37
◼
►
Linda comms material is so my thanks to them and check them out at Linda comm
01:07:40
◼
►
slash the talk show do you still have any machines that are running Mavericks
01:07:47
◼
►
Renee I don't I waited a year to upgrade from
01:07:50
◼
►
Mountain Lion to Mavericks on my podcast machine and I think I lasted a month before putting a somebody on it. I
01:07:56
◼
►
Still have the the air that I used to record these shows
01:08:02
◼
►
Like I'm recording right now using my my old MacBook Air still runs the latest version of Mavericks and it's funny
01:08:13
◼
►
It feels to me like it's years old. Yeah, like I can't I was just thinking before we started recording and thinking about the you know
01:08:19
◼
►
You're all I was like, I wonder how long I how long how how to date am I and then I realized I'm really only like
01:08:23
◼
►
Still only like two months how to date
01:08:26
◼
►
But it looks ancient to my eyes just the wallpaper when you see the Mavericks wallpaper. It feels like a bygone era
01:08:32
◼
►
Yeah, I think so. But it's there to me. It's the fonts, you know and the the heaviness of the buttons
01:08:40
◼
►
It's yeah, it's it's a much heavier more dour experience and that's probably why I upgraded
01:08:45
◼
►
I just I would look at it when I podcast and it would just look wrong to me
01:08:48
◼
►
And it was a visuals. I think more than anything else that encouraged me to upgrade. Yeah, I think I over the holiday break
01:08:54
◼
►
I'm gonna upgrade this machine to it. I can't think of a good reason to keep one around anymore either. There's nothing you know
01:09:01
◼
►
It's really just out of laziness and the fact that I don't use this machine for much anymore
01:09:06
◼
►
I just happens to be all set up with the you know
01:09:10
◼
►
Software I used to record the shows and so it's sort of like and if it ain't broke don't
01:09:16
◼
►
Situation but it just staring at it just looks ugly and I got the retina 5k iMac after the event
01:09:23
◼
►
I just couldn't on unsee it and you know that shipped with
01:09:29
◼
►
Yo, somebody yeah, and I was just all in yeah
01:09:33
◼
►
I've also grown to be completely I don't I wouldn't quite say in love, but I'm completely accustomed to the
01:09:41
◼
►
system version of Helvetica Noya as the system font
01:09:45
◼
►
It's it looks so good on a retina
01:09:49
◼
►
We were arguing the other day whether it you would prefer to have something like San Francisco or the mythical Apple songs
01:09:53
◼
►
If they ever shipped it, but they they did a really great job of putting Helvetica Noya on on the Mac
01:09:59
◼
►
Do you have any idea whether San Francisco is Apple sand? I've heard that it isn't
01:10:03
◼
►
I don't know if that's true or not because I haven't heard it from a lot of people but I heard an offhand comment that it
01:10:07
◼
►
Wasn't I wouldn't be surprised if it's not but I have no no idea
01:10:11
◼
►
Like the little birdies that told me about Apple Sands and the little birdies that told me about San Francisco
01:10:15
◼
►
Or they really tell me about it
01:10:18
◼
►
They didn't know about it in advance, but uh, but that told me that internally they were calling it din vetica
01:10:22
◼
►
But nobody's told me whether they're one in the same and I can't help but think that they're not the same
01:10:29
◼
►
It's hard to interpret it because it's almost like reading smoke signals and it could just mean that this an optimized version
01:10:33
◼
►
version of Apple songs for the watch and that's why they're considered different
01:10:35
◼
►
but it struck me that they were different yeah the thing I've found
01:10:39
◼
►
playing with the San Francisco is that it really only looks good very very
01:10:43
◼
►
small yeah I mean and from my hands-on time you know months ago at the Apple
01:10:49
◼
►
watch event I thought it looked fantastic up close like just really
01:10:53
◼
►
really look good playing with it on my Mac now that we have the SDK it doesn't
01:10:59
◼
►
really look good to me at the sizes that I use fonts on the Mac.
01:11:03
◼
►
Yeah, it's not optimized.
01:11:05
◼
►
And I tried the, I think I mentioned this a few shows ago, but I tried, there's like
01:11:09
◼
►
a GitHub thing with hacked versions of San Francisco that have metadata set that make
01:11:15
◼
►
it look like they tell the system it's the system font.
01:11:18
◼
►
And if you put them, and I don't recommend anybody try this because it's hacking with
01:11:23
◼
►
your system, you're on your own.
01:11:24
◼
►
But more or less what you do is you put these hacked versions, and also it's like a copyright
01:11:28
◼
►
violation and a direct violation of the terms of the SDK download that you're not allowed
01:11:35
◼
►
to diddle with the San Francisco font and you're expressly not allowed to use it for
01:11:38
◼
►
anything other than developing watch kit apps.
01:11:42
◼
►
But what you could do is go to find this project on GitHub, download these versions of the
01:11:47
◼
►
fonts, which are different from Apple's versions.
01:11:49
◼
►
There's some kind of metadata that's set that tells the system, "Hey, this is the system
01:11:53
◼
►
them in at slash library or yeah slash library fonts slash library slash fonts
01:12:02
◼
►
and you can't put them in your user font file not you you know users your name
01:12:09
◼
►
library fonts because the system won't look there for system fonts the system
01:12:14
◼
►
looks first in slash system library fonts and that's your Helvetica system
01:12:19
◼
►
font is still there you're not replacing it you're not deleting it you're not
01:12:22
◼
►
renaming it or not moving it. But then the system will look in slash library fonts and
01:12:27
◼
►
if it finds another system font there, it will use that one instead. So you just put
01:12:30
◼
►
these font files there, log out, log back in and Yosemite will draw as with the system
01:12:37
◼
►
font it will use San Francisco. So I tried it just to see what it was like and it just
01:12:45
◼
►
doesn't work. It's not that it doesn't work like it's broken and it's a technical failure.
01:12:52
◼
►
Aesthetically, it's just kind of not right
01:12:55
◼
►
Which is interesting because I didn't think I'd like Helvetica on the Mac as much as I did but then
01:12:59
◼
►
After the Apple TV update which came much after you know much after WBC and now I'm seeing Helvetica on my Apple TV
01:13:06
◼
►
That is much more every time I see it. I get a little reaction to it. Yeah
01:13:10
◼
►
And it feels it's somehow crazy to me how Apple has made it a font that is available to everyone anywhere
01:13:17
◼
►
Feel like they own it
01:13:20
◼
►
Yeah, and it just when they use it. It's it's such an established font
01:13:24
◼
►
It's such a classic and yet it feels so modern in the way that they're using it. Yeah
01:13:27
◼
►
But I don't think at San Francisco to me. It's it's completely designed
01:13:32
◼
►
I think for the watch and it's meant to be used at watch like sizes which are physically very very small
01:13:39
◼
►
Yeah, like the biggest you're ever gonna see text on your Apple watch is a pretty small size
01:13:43
◼
►
It's it's sort of in context
01:13:46
◼
►
I know you've spoken with us on previous shows with the vibrancy and you know some people turn it off
01:13:50
◼
►
But I've even gotten used to that
01:13:52
◼
►
I've gotten used to seeing areas of red or black or or things and it it just I
01:13:56
◼
►
Don't buy the argument that it brings a desktop through but it does sort of make the whole system seem more alive
01:14:02
◼
►
Yeah, but I was no doubt that like Syracuse has mentioned several times
01:14:06
◼
►
There's no doubt that that's gonna get toned down. Yeah next year and a year after you know that they start out with
01:14:11
◼
►
taking an idea to the
01:14:14
◼
►
Maximal level and then over the years dial it back to where it should be but there they you know
01:14:19
◼
►
Apple is it as a company tends to err on the side of taking an idea too far than taking not taking it far enough
01:14:26
◼
►
And it's also they're very for a giant company
01:14:29
◼
►
They've they have a lot of respect for the singular designer vision like the person who designed
01:14:33
◼
►
Somebody had a lot of ideas and those ideas not all of them made it through but a lot of them did in a lot
01:14:37
◼
►
Of companies it would have fallen to design by committee very quickly. Yeah
01:14:41
◼
►
So I think overall Yosemite has been a pretty pretty strong success
01:14:49
◼
►
Yeah, I agree completely and for all the bugs that iOS 8 had and you know hit so many people
01:14:55
◼
►
I think I think Yosemite has been pretty stable and and you know deserves applause right from the get-go for
01:15:02
◼
►
for being pretty
01:15:04
◼
►
Trouble-free if you were an early adopter
01:15:06
◼
►
They had a couple Wi-Fi patch and Wi-Fi and Bluetooth seemed to be something that just affects some percentage of people every time
01:15:12
◼
►
They had some security things even today. They patched it was yesterday. They're patching security now faster than they've ever done before
01:15:19
◼
►
Yeah, it's it's really a new age in at least a delivery of Mac software
01:15:23
◼
►
Yeah today as we record we're recording on December 23rd, and it might have rolled out
01:15:29
◼
►
I think I rolled out last night at least on us time
01:15:32
◼
►
But within the 24 hours that we're recording as we speak
01:15:35
◼
►
There was a bug fix that Apple rolled out that for the first time ever they pushed to
01:15:41
◼
►
At least me of 70, I don't know if Mavericks got the push
01:15:45
◼
►
But if you're running Yosemite, I got the notification like when I logged in this morning
01:15:50
◼
►
It just said a security update was applied. Yeah, and that's it. It's like, you know
01:15:55
◼
►
And I you know, it's a lot of pressure for them because if they ever pushed one of those that did break things
01:16:01
◼
►
it's there it's gonna be you know quite a scandal yeah I mean they're paying
01:16:08
◼
►
close attention to that stuff now but it's sort of we complained that they
01:16:10
◼
►
weren't being fast enough for security updates and a certain point they just
01:16:13
◼
►
you know pick up the pace yeah and I'd you know the the thanks for that the
01:16:18
◼
►
applause for that is never as loud as the criticism beforehand no no no it
01:16:24
◼
►
does seem like they're getting faster I can't help but think that with the
01:16:27
◼
►
Bluetooth and Wi-Fi that it must it must just be that the matrix of how many
01:16:34
◼
►
different Wi-Fi chipsets there are in all the supported Macs that run Yosemite
01:16:39
◼
►
multiplied by all the various chipsets in the Wi-Fi routers out in the real
01:16:45
◼
►
world is just it it's just a testing nightmare like you know you know it's
01:16:53
◼
►
almost we're almost lucky that it works at all because it just happens over
01:16:56
◼
►
and over and over again. I just run all Apple stuff and I've never had a Wi-Fi
01:17:00
◼
►
or Bluetooth problem but I imagine when you like you say if you have every
01:17:02
◼
►
single vendor in there and every single variant you're gonna you're gonna hit
01:17:05
◼
►
whatever bugs are in both those stacks fairly often. Yeah I have an Apple router
01:17:10
◼
►
downstairs I think it's the latest whatever extreme I don't know what they
01:17:14
◼
►
call it anymore but the one that's tall and have for years and I've never been
01:17:20
◼
►
hit with those problems either because I'm surely you know every single
01:17:23
◼
►
Standard Apple Wi-Fi chipset in a Mac does get tested against Apple's own routers
01:17:29
◼
►
Yeah, I think they're first in line, right
01:17:32
◼
►
And I think that max or I mean you see bugs with with iOS and Wi-Fi, too
01:17:39
◼
►
But I do think it seems to hit the Mac more and I can't help
01:17:41
◼
►
But think it's because the Mac hardware is not as unified as iOS hardware
01:17:45
◼
►
I think iPad air 2 is the first iPad where we didn't see a bunch of people complaining about Wi-Fi
01:17:49
◼
►
As soon as it launched
01:17:52
◼
►
Yeah, I get the feeling that like supporting Wi-Fi at the driver level is you know sort of like supporting
01:17:58
◼
►
I'm app when you're writing a mail client
01:18:00
◼
►
Which it meaning that every single I map server has like a different interpretation of the I map spec at some level. Yeah
01:18:08
◼
►
Like there's no way to just write a generic I map client every I map client that it gains any popularity because it hasn't you know
01:18:17
◼
►
It's actually useful
01:18:19
◼
►
Effectively as you know
01:18:21
◼
►
you know, I'm
01:18:22
◼
►
Server by server list of exceptions and and stuff like that which was the big complaint about mail and Mavericks especially with Gmail's
01:18:29
◼
►
Eccentric to use the polite word. I'm app implementation and now with Yosemite. You don't hear that very much anymore either
01:18:35
◼
►
No, you don't I think it's I think they've cleaned that up pretty well. Yeah
01:18:39
◼
►
Where are we at in a calendar year? I think we're heading towards the iPhone 6 and 6 plus event. Yeah
01:18:47
◼
►
Which was also the debut of the watch. Yeah
01:18:50
◼
►
Big and bigger and then small right and Apple pay
01:18:55
◼
►
Yeah, and in the demo area, I mean they had the iPhones laid out. They had the iPads
01:19:00
◼
►
They had the Apple watch laid out and then they had a whole area where you could go and see
01:19:04
◼
►
Apple pay both in the app and at a simulated
01:19:07
◼
►
checkout station
01:19:10
◼
►
Yeah, and I do think that's a good example of how
01:19:14
◼
►
How difficult this you know and broads broke strokes how difficult Apple and you know anybody else who's in the industry?
01:19:22
◼
►
But how it's not a month to month year to year game. It's a decade-long game because even with Apple pay
01:19:30
◼
►
You know it's intertwined with the iPhone 6 because it's the iPhone 6 and 6 plus
01:19:36
◼
►
They're the only phones that work with Apple pay at least at retail terminals
01:19:43
◼
►
You know you had to have touch ID first so that was a year that goes back a year ago to the iPhone 5s
01:19:49
◼
►
You had to have it and it had to work really well, so that starts a year ago now this year
01:19:56
◼
►
you've got the two new phones that have NFC built in and
01:19:59
◼
►
The rollout in the retail stores of the terminals you know that accept it
01:20:08
◼
►
But you're still talking about a service that only works two months in for people who've bought a brand new
01:20:14
◼
►
Top of the line iPhone within the last two months right like the real the real Apple play is
01:20:20
◼
►
Two three years ago when 85% of active iPhone users are using something iPhone 6 or newer
01:20:27
◼
►
It's it shows the patience that Apple has for some things and it shows how for example
01:20:32
◼
►
NFC to a lot of their competitors was just a chipset like they would just throw it in there
01:20:36
◼
►
They didn't really care what you did with it.
01:20:37
◼
►
Different manufacturers would do different things.
01:20:40
◼
►
Where Apple, there's no such thing as a chip set.
01:20:41
◼
►
It's a feature set.
01:20:42
◼
►
And they experimented with NFC.
01:20:44
◼
►
There were prototypes with NFC for years
01:20:46
◼
►
and they just never shipped it
01:20:46
◼
►
'cause they didn't have a feature set that needed it.
01:20:48
◼
►
Not that it was a curiosity and might be a benefit,
01:20:51
◼
►
but actually needed it as a core technology in the phone.
01:20:54
◼
►
And when they did, they put NFC in and they shipped it.
01:20:56
◼
►
And it took until iPhone 6 for that to happen.
01:20:59
◼
►
But like you said, they had to have Passbook,
01:21:01
◼
►
they had to have Touch ID,
01:21:02
◼
►
they'd have all these things in place.
01:21:04
◼
►
And then when it made sense as a product, it gets shipped.
01:21:06
◼
►
- Yeah, I've heard about NFC for iPhone,
01:21:09
◼
►
I think as far back as 2009,
01:21:12
◼
►
which was the year that the 3GS came out.
01:21:15
◼
►
And that, I'm trying to think when that was
01:21:17
◼
►
that I heard that.
01:21:18
◼
►
I mean, it wouldn't have been right before,
01:21:21
◼
►
it would have been like seven or eight months before
01:21:24
◼
►
that it was a maybe for the next iPhone.
01:21:27
◼
►
And clearly, obviously it did not happen.
01:21:30
◼
►
And I think ultimately, why not?
01:21:33
◼
►
And then again, it was a recurring thing.
01:21:35
◼
►
Like 2009, maybe 2010, definitely maybe
01:21:38
◼
►
Apple is very, very interested in NFC.
01:21:40
◼
►
So that would have been the iPhone 4, wasn't there.
01:21:45
◼
►
And I think it was always,
01:21:46
◼
►
is that there was no story behind it, right?
01:21:49
◼
►
There's no, how is this actually gonna be useful
01:21:52
◼
►
to people in the real world?
01:21:55
◼
►
- Absolutely, I mean, they would prototype it.
01:21:57
◼
►
Apple prototypes almost anything
01:21:59
◼
►
that you can find a blog post about
01:22:00
◼
►
that makes even the slightest logical sense.
01:22:02
◼
►
Apple will have prototyped it.
01:22:04
◼
►
Like when they say Macs make no sense for multi-touch,
01:22:06
◼
►
it's not because they're just daydreaming
01:22:08
◼
►
or saying it for the sake of saying it.
01:22:09
◼
►
It's because they built it,
01:22:10
◼
►
they spent a lot of time trying it
01:22:12
◼
►
and they decided it wasn't an experience they wanna ship.
01:22:14
◼
►
And in one day, maybe it will be.
01:22:16
◼
►
And with NFC, it was in later stage prototypes
01:22:18
◼
►
for different phones and they're trying things
01:22:20
◼
►
and they're, like you said, no story, so it didn't ship.
01:22:22
◼
►
And then as soon as they had a really compelling story,
01:22:24
◼
►
which was Apple Pay, that's in every phone we have now.
01:22:27
◼
►
- Yeah, so tying it in, the iPhone 6 announcement
01:22:31
◼
►
with this week's news.
01:22:33
◼
►
There's another rumor that came out of Asia,
01:22:36
◼
►
some analyst that Apple is considering
01:22:39
◼
►
a new four-inch iPhone for next year.
01:22:44
◼
►
Do you see that?
01:22:47
◼
►
- I think MacRumors had it.
01:22:47
◼
►
I think the name the guy came up with it was totally stupid.
01:22:51
◼
►
He called it the iPhone 6S Mini.
01:22:56
◼
►
They just call it the 6S minus.
01:22:58
◼
►
- I think the name would be,
01:22:59
◼
►
- Clearly it would be the iPhone 6C, right?
01:23:02
◼
►
- I think it almost certainly would be the iPhone 6C
01:23:05
◼
►
and if not C, then Air maybe.
01:23:08
◼
►
- It's gotta be 6S minus 6S and 6S Plus.
01:23:12
◼
►
Use them, just ride that math analogy into the ground.
01:23:18
◼
►
And they'd actually spell it out like M-I-N-U-S.
01:23:21
◼
►
- I think, again, I'm almost, you know,
01:23:23
◼
►
I can't say I'm positive,
01:23:24
◼
►
but I think it's very likely
01:23:25
◼
►
that Apple's prototyping four inch iPhones
01:23:26
◼
►
'cause they prototype tons of different sizes.
01:23:29
◼
►
What was interesting to me is I heard you say that
01:23:30
◼
►
on a previous show, it might've been two episodes ago
01:23:32
◼
►
or three episodes ago.
01:23:33
◼
►
And I was curious what Android people thought of that
01:23:36
◼
►
'cause their phones, I mean, their version of the HTC One Mini
01:23:39
◼
►
was I think five inches or something.
01:23:42
◼
►
And so I asked them, is there a demand
01:23:44
◼
►
for four-inch Android phones?
01:23:45
◼
►
I heard crickets.
01:23:46
◼
►
People said, "No, 4.7 is the smallest we'd ever want."
01:23:50
◼
►
And to me, that doesn't mean Apple should make one.
01:23:52
◼
►
That means there's probably a segment of the market
01:23:54
◼
►
is totally underserved by the volume vendors and that there is opportunity
01:23:58
◼
►
for people who are distinguished or have very specific tastes and would enjoy
01:24:02
◼
►
iOS at that size. Yeah, the thing that makes and this isn't based on this guy's
01:24:07
◼
►
reporting this is just my I close my eyes and think about the way Apple
01:24:10
◼
►
thinks and the way Apple has acted over the last seven years and I think it's
01:24:15
◼
►
probably true but I also think that calling it the 6c whether they call it
01:24:20
◼
►
that or not tells you exactly what it's going to be is I think it's going to be
01:24:23
◼
►
an A8, you know, this year's A8 and a camera like this year's camera, it's, you know, going
01:24:35
◼
►
to be effectively an iPhone 6 shrunk to 4 inches. Whereas the iPhone 6s and 6s plus,
01:24:42
◼
►
if they call them that, will get the A9 and they'll get a better camera and other, you
01:24:48
◼
►
whatever the 2015 technical improvements are.
01:24:52
◼
►
So that you'll be able to buy a four-inch iPhone next year, and you'll have Touch ID,
01:24:58
◼
►
and you'll have Apple Pay, and you'll have an A8, and you'll have a camera like the one
01:25:03
◼
►
we have today.
01:25:04
◼
►
But if you want the top of the line, if you want the newest, the latest, and greatest
01:25:07
◼
►
camera, if you want the latest and greatest system on a chip, you're still going to have
01:25:12
◼
►
to go 4.7 or 5.5.
01:25:16
◼
►
It makes a lot of sense for the same reasons, because the iPhone 5C was always called the
01:25:21
◼
►
cheap iPhone and Apple never makes cheap products, but they wanted to make a popular iPhone.
01:25:25
◼
►
They wanted something that would sit on the shelves, not like a blockbuster movie, but
01:25:28
◼
►
like a TV show that people could buy anytime.
01:25:31
◼
►
But it also let them shove that down to the bottom of the line much faster.
01:25:34
◼
►
They wouldn't have to leave an iPhone 5 there.
01:25:36
◼
►
And the same logic makes sense for an iPhone 6C to be able to move that down the product
01:25:41
◼
►
line faster and make Apple Pay more accessible to more people and to have it in more parts
01:25:45
◼
►
of their product line up.
01:25:46
◼
►
Yeah, and I think the other thing that they don't want is that third pricing tier that
01:25:53
◼
►
Because that's the other thing.
01:25:54
◼
►
If you do want a new four inch phone next year, if I'm right, then it's going to be
01:25:59
◼
►
the 2014 technical stuff, the A8 and the camera, etc.
01:26:03
◼
►
The upside will be that you'll save money because I think it'll start at $99 on a contract
01:26:08
◼
►
and if it's off contract, it'll be $100 less than the 6S.
01:26:12
◼
►
Success. Yeah, you have 4.7 at the 199 mark the 4-inch just based on human behavior has to be cheaper
01:26:20
◼
►
The thing that I think they wanted to get away from is having that $99 tier and I'm speaking in the subsidized terms
01:26:27
◼
►
But the $99 tier look virtually identical to the 199 tier. Yeah, right
01:26:35
◼
►
That's what the six or the five see did is they you know, it had exactly the same
01:26:43
◼
►
Almost to a T as the iPhone 5 but it looked different and some people, you know, obviously some people thought it looked better
01:26:50
◼
►
I know people who bought it because they wanted a colorful phone
01:26:53
◼
►
But it's still even if that's the case then you know good for you. You saved a hundred bucks
01:26:57
◼
►
but I don't think Apple liked it where up until the 5c was introduced the the
01:27:04
◼
►
$99 option looked I'd or nearly identical, you know
01:27:08
◼
►
There were obviously some certain tells that you could tell an iPhone 4 from 4s
01:27:13
◼
►
you know the antenna bands were it's certainly different at slightly different points and
01:27:17
◼
►
earlier that when they first started keeping the year old phone around the 3g and the 3gs you could tell them apart because the eye
01:27:25
◼
►
The word iPhone on the back was written. Yes shiny letters instead of flat letters
01:27:30
◼
►
Well people want to show they have the new one right as part of the esteem of having the new iPhone, right?
01:27:34
◼
►
No, I totally think so, you know, and it's an Apple wants to enable that so that's why I think that you know
01:27:41
◼
►
I don't know if I don't know if an iPhone
01:27:43
◼
►
6 C would be plastic like the 5c like I wouldn't be surprised if it's metal or
01:27:51
◼
►
In rounded, you know with rounded corners like the 6s and 6 plus but just the size of it would tell you that it's you
01:27:58
◼
►
Know the lesser model. Yeah, it was funny with the iPhone 5 even though Apple rebuilt it from the Adams on up
01:28:04
◼
►
It was boring, but the minute they made it in gold, you know people first made fun of it
01:28:07
◼
►
And then everyone complained they couldn't get one
01:28:09
◼
►
Did you you know, yeah, it's still hard to get and
01:28:15
◼
►
iPhones yeah, like there's there's still I didn't know that until I was listening to ATP and heard
01:28:21
◼
►
Syracuse are talking about it
01:28:24
◼
►
It's that yeah supply still hasn't caught up with demand
01:28:27
◼
►
Milton has been trying to get them for weeks and I think he had to finally call in favors to try to get them shipped
01:28:34
◼
►
That makes me laugh.
01:28:36
◼
►
Well, it's hilarious because people who leave Apple have no idea how to get a, like how
01:28:39
◼
►
normal people get their phones.
01:28:40
◼
►
Like they just, they've never had to deal with carriers or with retail stores or, and
01:28:44
◼
►
it sounds like some of them, you know, as much as I love them, they're just a little
01:28:46
◼
►
inadequate and equipped to deal with the horrors of retail shopping.
01:28:50
◼
►
Yeah, let me see here.
01:28:54
◼
►
If I get a 6 and I get it in space gray, I get it on Verizon.
01:29:01
◼
►
If I want, well it looks like I can get 128 gigs is available 3 to 5 business days.
01:29:13
◼
►
I think the 6 Plus is still harder than the 6.
01:29:17
◼
►
But they're starting to fall into more balance.
01:29:18
◼
►
Which is crazy.
01:29:19
◼
►
I mean as much as people complain about the iPhone, you still can't get them.
01:29:23
◼
►
Get them that there's their come put their supply constraint for months after launch. Yeah
01:29:30
◼
►
And I think that's you know, but I still think that's pretty interesting that they're at a point where they still don't catch up in
01:29:36
◼
►
Supply demand until after the holiday. Yeah and year after year - it's not a diminishing thing
01:29:43
◼
►
They're making more and more money off the iPhone. Yeah
01:29:46
◼
►
What's left? I guess we have the last event of the year, which would be the iPad air
01:29:52
◼
►
- yes and Yosemite L and the retina iMac. Yeah
01:29:56
◼
►
Retina iMac is only one it really sticks out to me. I still I love the iPad air - I still think I think it's an
01:30:02
◼
►
amazing device, but it's it's a refinement of the iPad air whereas the
01:30:07
◼
►
The retina 5k Mac is to me like a new a new era the two things that are similar to me about those devices
01:30:15
◼
►
Are that with the iPad air - Apple started making their own GPUs, you know, like an antech first thought it was a six core
01:30:22
◼
►
imagination chip and they later realized that it was an eight core one which was
01:30:27
◼
►
totally theoretical until Apple made it. It wasn't just a design they actually
01:30:31
◼
►
took the architecture and built their own custom GPU and they've been doing
01:30:34
◼
►
CPUs for a couple generations like they had Swift and they had Cyclone now they
01:30:37
◼
►
have Cyclone 2 but now they're doing the entire chip almost is in-house at Apple
01:30:43
◼
►
and then you look at the iMac and they made the timing controller for that
01:30:48
◼
►
They made 5k possible in that computer when Intel has not yet shipped
01:30:51
◼
►
Skylake or Thunderbolt 3 or anything so they are there again. They're making more and more of the internals of their machines
01:30:58
◼
►
Yeah, and that's interesting to me that they've done it for the iMac because they've they've they've had this economy of scale with iOS
01:31:06
◼
►
devices because even as they've expanded the lineups and they've gone out of two iPhone sizes and
01:31:12
◼
►
you know, there's two iPad sizes and
01:31:16
◼
►
There are cellular and non-cellular versions of the iPads, but for the most part it's still in terms of what's actually new this year
01:31:23
◼
►
It's a very limited number of SKUs
01:31:27
◼
►
Right and and they share a lot of stuff, you know that the iPhone 6 and 6 plus
01:31:32
◼
►
Are really very very there's a slight difference in the camera where the the 6 plus camera has optical image stabilization
01:31:40
◼
►
So that's a different part, but it's the same a8 CPU
01:31:44
◼
►
And it's you know, just the stuff that has to be different. It's different, you know different display
01:31:49
◼
►
Because it's a different size and it's different pixels
01:31:53
◼
►
But that they've you know
01:31:57
◼
►
They had this great economy of scale which lets them do these things like you're saying like build their own systems on a chip
01:32:02
◼
►
And not share it with the rest of the you know, have these things that aren't available to anybody else in the industry
01:32:07
◼
►
It's interesting to me that they've done it with the iMac too, which is clearly lower volume. I mean without question
01:32:14
◼
►
I mean, I think all IMAX together are just dropping the bucket volume wise compared to iPad or
01:32:20
◼
►
any iPhone or iPad model, but the retina one in particular existing only at the top of the
01:32:27
◼
►
Product what do you call it the product the pyramid? Yeah the pyramid, right?
01:32:34
◼
►
It's only the best option the good and better ones are still non retina because the retina display
01:32:41
◼
►
You know, it's it's this weird combination where it's you know in one sense
01:32:45
◼
►
It's remarkably inexpensive because famously like Dell has a 5k display didn't they come out with a 5k display
01:32:51
◼
►
They yeah, they came out with a month or so ago, but it requires two
01:32:54
◼
►
Displayport connections, but it costs as much it costs as much or more as the whole I'm yes, right
01:33:00
◼
►
So Dell came out with a 5k display
01:33:02
◼
►
We're just the display and forget about whether you need how you're gonna actually run it and that you need to display ports and all
01:33:07
◼
►
That how are you gonna get graphics cards? How are you gonna get how's everything gonna work?
01:33:10
◼
►
Just forget about it. Just the display itself costs as much as the whole iMac which includes a pretty killer computer. Yeah, and
01:33:18
◼
►
The crazy thing is Apple if you asked me for you know, ten years ago, you know, Apple's not a chip fab
01:33:24
◼
►
They're not an Intel. They're not a TMCH
01:33:25
◼
►
They're not any one of these companies and they got to 64-bit first and now they're they're making chips that are just
01:33:30
◼
►
Pushing the industry forward and they're not a peripheral maker
01:33:33
◼
►
But they're with the original IPS iMac and now with the 5k iMac they're making displays
01:33:38
◼
►
That's just pushing the industry forward and the the iPad air 2 is so overpowered that you could arguably say, you know guys relax
01:33:45
◼
►
Stop but instead of that apples just saying run get as far ahead as fast as you can and just keep going just push
01:33:51
◼
►
The state of this technology because it will filter down and we will figure out a way to make all this stuff super
01:33:55
◼
►
Super important and to do things that nobody else can do. Yeah, and that's it's turning the
01:34:02
◼
►
Industries model on its head where from the outset from the very beginning of personal computing
01:34:09
◼
►
Through recently the model was that it's you know this commodity market where you buy
01:34:16
◼
►
CPUs from Intel you buy graphics cards from Nvidia or you know whoever else
01:34:24
◼
►
Radion I guess it you know, but there'd be graphics companies. There'd be memory makers, you know, there'd be
01:34:32
◼
►
hard drive makers and you would just put all the you know if you wanted to make a computer you'd pick and choose you get the
01:34:38
◼
►
Salad bar, right? I guess yeah, it's totally like a salad bar
01:34:41
◼
►
But everybody else could get them too and you could make deals and depending on your volume
01:34:46
◼
►
I'm sure you know Dell and HP as higher volume vendors would have some sort of leverage in priority
01:34:52
◼
►
Versus you know a smaller
01:34:55
◼
►
by market share PC maker, you know, but
01:34:59
◼
►
It was that the what you were possible. What was possible to do though was
01:35:05
◼
►
limited by these
01:35:07
◼
►
Specialists, so if you wanted to drive a 5k display
01:35:11
◼
►
You were limited unless you could get somebody out
01:35:16
◼
►
You know that less the state-of-the-art in the graphics industry was a graphics card that could push that many
01:35:21
◼
►
pixels and a connector
01:35:24
◼
►
That could carry them
01:35:27
◼
►
Whereas Apple has started turning things like that on its head and it doesn't matter if the industry can't do it yet the state-of-the-art in
01:35:34
◼
►
the industry they just made their own and
01:35:36
◼
►
Made it work. Yeah, and it's not available to anybody else
01:35:40
◼
►
That's the in like you said like to do things that other people can't do
01:35:45
◼
►
What goes back to your only Apple piece from WVDC?
01:35:49
◼
►
Yeah, I think it's you know, probably the best piece I wrote this year
01:35:53
◼
►
I think it's the only one that or at least the one that has the most staying value
01:35:57
◼
►
Even lo these many months later. I think it's it's if anything I underplayed it
01:36:01
◼
►
Yeah, and I think it's true and I think when we like next year we already mentioned
01:36:04
◼
►
Maybe there's a bigger iPad but maybe there's software and services that go along with that and having two gigs and having
01:36:10
◼
►
An octa core GPU makes a lot more sense, you know next year than it makes this year
01:36:14
◼
►
But it allows people who buy the brand new iPad air this year to not feel left behind when the newer devices or newer software ships
01:36:21
◼
►
Mm-hmm. I and I still can't I keep thinking about 64-bit for mobile and you know
01:36:26
◼
►
Nobody else has it yet. I mean there's some chips that are possible of it out for Android
01:36:31
◼
►
But it certainly is far from mainstream
01:36:33
◼
►
the Nexus 9 I think ship with it just because they they decided they had to have they couldn't wait any longer to
01:36:38
◼
►
Get 64-bit out the door, but it's not in it's not arm. It's Intel right? It's the Nexus 9 I think is
01:36:44
◼
►
X 84 it's 86. I think no, I think it's Qualcomm, but I'd have to double-check. I don't know what either way though
01:36:52
◼
►
It certainly isn't like a mainstream thing
01:36:54
◼
►
But to me it's 64-bit came out and people complained. Oh, there's no four gigabytes of memory
01:36:58
◼
►
Apple's just wasting it but it turns out that the ARM v8
01:37:00
◼
►
Instruction set was so much better and the security that they could use enabled all the touch ID stuff
01:37:06
◼
►
There was just so many other things about building that chipset that 64-bit was almost a bonus for them the same way three cores on
01:37:12
◼
►
The iPhone 6 is almost a bonus and eight cores on the eye on the iPad air - they're doing it because they can there's no
01:37:17
◼
►
Reason not to so why shouldn't we do it?
01:37:20
◼
►
Right. It just goes hand in hand with the new instruction set which is really where the performance wins come from
01:37:25
◼
►
Not the mat not any sort of magical going from 32 to 64 on any hypothetical platform
01:37:31
◼
►
Magically makes things better. It wasn't like that. It was a very very practical, you know arm
01:37:37
◼
►
The new arm instruction set is way better. It gets rid of all sorts of legacy cruft
01:37:42
◼
►
You know that dates back to the early days of arm when it was powering things like the Newton
01:37:48
◼
►
and Palm pilots and stuff like that.
01:37:51
◼
►
- And way more registers, it's just so many benefits.
01:37:54
◼
►
- Right, and everything that the computer engineers
01:37:57
◼
►
have learned since then about how to make efficient
01:38:00
◼
►
instruction sets for computers
01:38:03
◼
►
and what is it that a modern compiler wants to see
01:38:08
◼
►
in an instruction set to generate efficient code?
01:38:11
◼
►
And it was rewritten from scratch with all this cruft gone
01:38:17
◼
►
and all sorts of new stuff to help modern compilers in there.
01:38:21
◼
►
And here we are over a year later,
01:38:23
◼
►
and Apple is still the only mainstream device that has it.
01:38:27
◼
►
And we have Swift and we have Metal.
01:38:29
◼
►
So when you put those technologies all together,
01:38:31
◼
►
eventually the performance is gonna be way beyond
01:38:33
◼
►
what just the hardware delivers.
01:38:35
◼
►
Yeah, and I think that those two things,
01:38:37
◼
►
Swift is obviously new for 2014, Metal is new for 2014.
01:38:44
◼
►
And I think they get to the heart of like,
01:38:49
◼
►
what is Apple going to be like as a big company
01:38:53
◼
►
with big weapons to swing around?
01:38:57
◼
►
And obviously, like I said,
01:39:00
◼
►
the watch that the Canary Nicole found I'm looking for
01:39:02
◼
►
is hubris, and obviously when a company gets bigger,
01:39:05
◼
►
it tries to do more on its own.
01:39:07
◼
►
I mean, Microsoft famously does everything on its own.
01:39:13
◼
►
They're the only company that use back to you know, just little details like that. They use backslashes instead of slashes between directory paths
01:39:20
◼
►
To you know having had their own
01:39:24
◼
►
You know developer toolchain and their own programming language, you know for you know, but they did more than that though
01:39:32
◼
►
I feel like when Microsoft was at its height, you know in the 90s, you know
01:39:37
◼
►
it was the fact that they expanded into things like
01:39:42
◼
►
ownership of slate.com the founding of msnbc you know that they wanted to own a cable news network
01:39:48
◼
►
right why would microsoft want to get involved in cable news you know but
01:39:53
◼
►
i feel like apple as they try to do more and more on their own it's only in the name of enabling
01:40:00
◼
►
features that would be better for the products they're already making right like for enterprise
01:40:05
◼
►
they didn't decide to create an enterprise company or buy an enterprise company they partnered with
01:40:08
◼
►
IBM to let them do what they did well.
01:40:10
◼
►
Right. Yeah, that's a great example of that they didn't create this new enterprise division
01:40:17
◼
►
within Apple, which is outside their expertise and risks losing their focus.
01:40:23
◼
►
If Tim Cook wants to make a big bet and do this, he doesn't have to spend anywhere near
01:40:29
◼
►
as much attention on it as he would in this world where they're willing to say, "You know what?
01:40:35
◼
►
We just want our devices to be used in the enterprise
01:40:38
◼
►
We'll let IBM handle how to make the sales and how to write these you know these apps that are meant for that market
01:40:44
◼
►
It's a perfect example
01:40:46
◼
►
Yeah, much better than buying SAP or something that the imaginary people always want Apple to buy right and Swift
01:40:52
◼
►
You know is an example where they're not they didn't create a new programming language to change computer science
01:40:58
◼
►
It's not you know if anything that the critiques from people who are like
01:41:03
◼
►
Programming language critics is that it's sort of a boring language. There's nothing outlandish about it. There's nothing novel about it
01:41:11
◼
►
It's just a nice simple language, you know in term not not that there aren't clever things under the hood and like the fact that
01:41:23
◼
►
Most of the language it's designed is is defined in the runtime not in the language itself
01:41:29
◼
►
The language itself is super super minimal
01:41:30
◼
►
There's something you know artistic about that, but effectively it's just what kind of programming language
01:41:36
◼
►
Would you write would you want to enable the sort of software that Apple wants to run?
01:41:42
◼
►
That's it. It's just a very very practical language
01:41:45
◼
►
You know and what would you get when you have a language that's
01:41:50
◼
►
Led by the compiler guy Chris Ladner or a company that lets the compiler guy leave the language, right?
01:41:57
◼
►
But it's sort of the opposite of the sort of hoity-toity
01:42:00
◼
►
academic languages that you know with the new programming languages that I remember when I was young and in college in the 90s where it
01:42:07
◼
►
Was all led it was you know that the the practical utility them was completely abstracted. It was all
01:42:14
◼
►
Philosophical in terms of what was driving the decisions behind them
01:42:19
◼
►
Yeah, it's a language designed to be used by Apple and and sooner rather than later
01:42:23
◼
►
Yes, very much so and very much designed, you know as
01:42:27
◼
►
Syracuse's pointed out on ATP
01:42:30
◼
►
It's we've already one thing we've got that is not going to budge is we've already got these frameworks the cocoa frameworks and
01:42:37
◼
►
In theory if they were going to start with all new frameworks, maybe they'd come up with a new language
01:42:41
◼
►
But it's we've got these frameworks that are you know have these you know that are already designed and already have these these
01:42:48
◼
►
You know design patterns what type of new language would we use that would best leverage them?
01:42:53
◼
►
And that's one of the things that I really like about the way that Apple is running now is there
01:42:57
◼
►
No, they don't have to restart everything again
01:42:59
◼
►
They can do something like add
01:43:01
◼
►
LLVM and add Swift and do these things that
01:43:04
◼
►
Take them further without having to destroy or stop or paid an artificial break between what they had before
01:43:09
◼
►
It's like they're swapping the parts behind the scenes and if you're not paying attention
01:43:12
◼
►
You might not even see it, but it gives them tremendous benefit over time. Yeah and metal likewise
01:43:18
◼
►
You know, it's it's it's the only it's the sort of thing you can only do when you have a big user base
01:43:25
◼
►
I mean Microsoft famously has done that with the DirectX, you know, we're Mike, you know
01:43:30
◼
►
And it's you know sustained to this day that their leadership in PC gaming, you know
01:43:35
◼
►
If that there's probably no area of computing where they're stronger than PC gaming
01:43:40
◼
►
And they're able to say here's you know, here's the graphics language
01:43:44
◼
►
you're going to use and that's it and they can do that because they've got the
01:43:50
◼
►
Apple couldn't do metal, you know
01:43:53
◼
►
Ten years ago with the Mac
01:43:55
◼
►
I mean, it's still not on the Mac
01:43:56
◼
►
But they couldn't and I don't think they could have I don't think it would have really taken off in 2008 or 2009
01:44:01
◼
►
They really needed that massive hundreds of millions of users base and this you know
01:44:08
◼
►
This de facto
01:44:10
◼
►
Position is like the leading handheld gaming market and now it's not like they're forcing it down developers throats there
01:44:18
◼
►
You know, you don't have to use it
01:44:20
◼
►
It's not like they're they've said like oh next year if you don't use if your game isn't using Swift
01:44:25
◼
►
It won't be in the App Store
01:44:27
◼
►
it's something developers want to use though because
01:44:29
◼
►
It's it gives them better performance and lets them hit
01:44:35
◼
►
You know a huge number of their users and it was something that they could announce at
01:44:39
◼
►
WWDC while they were announcing that I forget the four or five biggest game engines in the world were all supporting it
01:44:44
◼
►
so for most developers they
01:44:46
◼
►
Quote-unquote get it for free because the engine that they're already using is just now getting the benefits of all of that, right?
01:44:50
◼
►
all right, and it's definitely a
01:44:53
◼
►
Yeah, I guess that it's in broad strokes
01:44:57
◼
►
it's the sort of thing Apple could only do now that they're big and
01:45:00
◼
►
the market leader and that wouldn't it just wasn't possible in the old days when they were
01:45:06
◼
►
The little guy on the sides when the adobe's and Microsoft's could say no, we're not going to support your
01:45:11
◼
►
Your rap city. Yeah, that's a you know, perfect example, right?
01:45:16
◼
►
Although the rhapsody thing was a little bit more it's funny because they were a little bit more
01:45:21
◼
►
Adamant back then where their initial proposal with adamant with rap city was you're going to rewrite your apps in cocoa
01:45:28
◼
►
Or else you have to run in this little little ghetto
01:45:35
◼
►
Whereas, you know even with Swift like I said, they're not saying you have to use Swift
01:45:39
◼
►
even though they could
01:45:42
◼
►
Really? I mean, I think they could get away with it. But you know, they're not because I feel like there's a
01:45:48
◼
►
Humility to them
01:45:51
◼
►
Yeah, I mean absolutely and you get people like, you know, Brent Simmons now
01:45:54
◼
►
We get to play around with it and blog about all their experiences with it and the benefits everybody
01:45:58
◼
►
It's almost like a built-in
01:45:59
◼
►
They don't do betas the way Google does but the way they're releasing it gives a lot of people a lot of time
01:46:03
◼
►
To weigh in beyond the five and then hundred people at Apple who knew about it
01:46:06
◼
►
let me take a break here and thank our third and final sponsor of
01:46:10
◼
►
The show and it's our good friends at hover
01:46:17
◼
►
Hover is and I say this without any hesitation the world's best way to manage and buy domain names
01:46:26
◼
►
there are domain registrar and
01:46:29
◼
►
They're the best they really are they've been around for a long time. They've been around I think 15 years maybe even more
01:46:35
◼
►
They have tremendous customer service they have a no gimmick no upsell
01:46:43
◼
►
No, scammy buying process. They have great search for domain names
01:46:49
◼
►
They have great tools to help you if the one you're looking for your first guess is the domain name you want
01:46:54
◼
►
You type it in ends up. It's already taken ends up. None of the
01:46:58
◼
►
the top level domains where it's available or what you want.
01:47:01
◼
►
They have great tools to help you find one,
01:47:03
◼
►
a similar domain name that you do want.
01:47:07
◼
►
In less than five minutes with hover,
01:47:11
◼
►
you can find the domain name you want,
01:47:13
◼
►
get it up and running.
01:47:14
◼
►
All you have to do is search for
01:47:15
◼
►
keywords and they'll show you the best options.
01:47:18
◼
►
If you've ever registered a domain name anywhere else,
01:47:21
◼
►
and I'm guessing that the number of listeners of this show who
01:47:24
◼
►
own just one domain name is probably minimal.
01:47:27
◼
►
I mean, I think most of the people like me probably have a problem and have too many
01:47:31
◼
►
domain names, most of them unused.
01:47:33
◼
►
But if you've ever registered a domain name anywhere else, you know that most of the other
01:47:38
◼
►
registrars out there make it a really unpleasant experience.
01:47:43
◼
►
They make it complicated just to buy what you really need.
01:47:45
◼
►
They try to upsell you with stuff you don't need on your way to the shopping cart.
01:47:48
◼
►
You have to double check that they haven't already inserted something that you don't
01:47:52
◼
►
want in there.
01:47:53
◼
►
And they make you pay extra to upgrade for things that should be included like who is
01:47:58
◼
►
Like you don't have to pay extra to hover to get your who is record made private.
01:48:04
◼
►
It's just part of the service that they offer because who wouldn't want it made private.
01:48:10
◼
►
I remember years ago it used to be your who is registry had to have your home phone number
01:48:14
◼
►
in it or an active working phone number and then telemarketers could just go through who
01:48:20
◼
►
as records and get a you know a list of working phone numbers you don't want
01:48:24
◼
►
that you want privacy hover just gives it to you for free here's the most
01:48:29
◼
►
amazing thing though this I say this every time that they sponsor the show
01:48:32
◼
►
they have what they call part of their technical support is free valet
01:48:37
◼
►
transfer service so if you've already got domains at some other registrar if
01:48:42
◼
►
you're willing to give hover your login information to your to your registry
01:48:48
◼
►
account at the other registrar. They will just move your domains over from your old
01:48:53
◼
►
registrar to your new one at hover and take care of all the stuff that needs to be changed
01:48:59
◼
►
the DNS and all that stuff. This is all their their valet transfer people do their experts
01:49:05
◼
►
in moving domains. You like me probably are not an expert in moving domains. And when
01:49:10
◼
►
you do it, you make a mistake with DNS, you can ruin your day, you could knock your website
01:49:15
◼
►
offline for the day before when you fix it propagates to everywhere that got the bad
01:49:22
◼
►
Just amazing.
01:49:24
◼
►
No wait, no hold, no transfer technical support.
01:49:28
◼
►
You just call them up.
01:49:29
◼
►
You call them up on the phone and they answer the phone like a person answers the phone.
01:49:34
◼
►
So where do you go to find out more?
01:49:37
◼
►
Go to hover.com and use this promo code.
01:49:40
◼
►
The promo code for my show this week is scotch, like the beverage, S-C-O-T-C-H.
01:49:46
◼
►
Use scotch as your promo code at Hover and you'll get 10% off your first purchase by
01:49:53
◼
►
going to hover.com and typing in that promo code.
01:49:57
◼
►
Can't recommend them highly enough.
01:49:58
◼
►
Great thing, you got time to burn over the holidays and you got your domains tied up
01:50:02
◼
►
at some shitty registry.
01:50:04
◼
►
Go to Hover, sign up, use that code scotch and move your domains over.
01:50:09
◼
►
save money and then you'll you'll email me and you'll say I can't believe I
01:50:12
◼
►
didn't move my stuff over to hover before so my thanks to hover drink any
01:50:16
◼
►
good scotch lately Renee only when I'm out with you and guy that's the time
01:50:21
◼
►
when I get the bourbon in the scotch I don't think I've had any scotch lately
01:50:25
◼
►
or if I do I don't remember so lack of Christmas Apple events yeah so that's it
01:50:32
◼
►
though I think that what else is up for 2014 and review I think there's sort of
01:50:36
◼
►
things that we could touch on just quickly one is the
01:50:38
◼
►
Tim Cook beyond just running at Apple, but the the moves he's made towards the inclusivity and towards equal opportunity. Oh
01:50:47
◼
►
Can't believe I didn't think of that. I think that's it's absolutely been a big year for that
01:50:51
◼
►
That his essay I think was just absolutely pitch-perfect
01:50:55
◼
►
Just his own version of you know thoughts on and but it was so much more personal
01:51:02
◼
►
Yeah, I think even if he hadn't written that and come out himself as gay this year
01:51:08
◼
►
I think it would still be worth talking about the like you said inclusivity and
01:51:12
◼
►
Etc that that he's led and that Apple is pushed this year
01:51:17
◼
►
It's terrific and it reminds me of the story that I heard
01:51:20
◼
►
You know what?
01:51:21
◼
►
Scott forest all whether he really wanted to make Apple a more inclusive company and he believed that you in order to hire more
01:51:28
◼
►
With more diversity you had to have more diversity in the hiring process. So when he would get they had terrific female engineer
01:51:34
◼
►
I mean Vicki Murley famously but terrific female engineers on the Safari team, for example
01:51:38
◼
►
And they would they would not only send them on the resumes
01:51:41
◼
►
but they would send them out to you know on the job hunt to the to the colleges because they knew that they would come
01:51:46
◼
►
back with a different perspective and
01:51:48
◼
►
We we haven't seen tremendous spread of that effect
01:51:51
◼
►
We haven't seen a huge swing in the amount of women or minorities and in jobs in Silicon Valley
01:51:56
◼
►
But we have seen improvements and I think with Apple's report as disappointing as the results might be to many people
01:52:01
◼
►
The exposure that it gets and the willingness for people to want to make it better. I think we're huge this year
01:52:06
◼
►
Yeah, and I think it's again another one of those things where I think you can really just take Tim Cook at his word
01:52:14
◼
►
Yeah, and it's no euphemism. It's not just you know, trying to say what people want to hear
01:52:20
◼
►
I think he means it where a he thinks it's just right
01:52:23
◼
►
it's just the right thing to do but be that that that fierce competitor in him you can tell when he says it that
01:52:29
◼
►
It's there's there's obviously so much untapped talent
01:52:36
◼
►
The white male engineer, you know, yeah whites and Asians, you know that everybody else women people of color
01:52:43
◼
►
men and women
01:52:46
◼
►
It's the talent is out there and Apple is starved for talent and they want it
01:52:52
◼
►
you know, so there's in addition to the the
01:52:55
◼
►
Justice angle, you know that it's the way it should be that that people don't feel welcome in the industry
01:53:02
◼
►
But it there's also just a purely
01:53:04
◼
►
competitive aspect to it
01:53:07
◼
►
It's it was that beautiful moment too with Tim Cook when they were at the shareholders meeting and the guy stood up and he said why
01:53:12
◼
►
Are you waste basically said why are you wasting my money on?
01:53:15
◼
►
Environmentalism and accessibility and Tim Cook said, you know that this stuff matters and if you don't think it matters
01:53:20
◼
►
Just get the hell out of the stock, right? It was the guy brought up ROI
01:53:23
◼
►
Yeah, an investment and you know and it was fascinating
01:53:27
◼
►
You know that that cook got as angry as he did and said everything we do isn't about the bloody our ROI
01:53:34
◼
►
Yeah, and it's funny that he said bloody because she says, you know clearly he's not British
01:53:38
◼
►
She's he's the cool one right like we'd expect that from Steve Jobs
01:53:41
◼
►
Steve Jobs was bombastic
01:53:42
◼
►
But Tim Cook always looked like he would just sit there with laser beams in his eyes and that for him is hugely emotional
01:53:48
◼
►
Right, it wouldn't be surprising if Tim Cook I mean if Steve Jobs had gotten angry at a Cheryl
01:53:54
◼
►
Yeah, whereas Tim Cook is the guy you'd think no matter what any crackpot shareholder would say
01:53:58
◼
►
He's not gonna get angry
01:53:59
◼
►
But he did that clearly angered him and again like when I think was the Financial Times that named him their
01:54:05
◼
►
CEO of the year there was somebody there was a couple yes so far
01:54:09
◼
►
But the one that I linked to I remember that they led their their here's why with that anecdote and I think in hindsight
01:54:16
◼
►
said it was the most telling anecdote of the year you know in terms of Tim Cook
01:54:21
◼
►
being unscripted yes you know I think in terms of what was scripted and what it
01:54:25
◼
►
was planned his you know his coming out essay in business week was probably it
01:54:30
◼
►
but that moment at the shareholders meeting I think was the most telling
01:54:34
◼
►
impromptu moment yeah and you know it really made me think it's strange to say
01:54:39
◼
►
but it made me think a lot more of Tim Cook because you know it is hard to tell
01:54:42
◼
►
he is so controlled in public and so on message and so on point and he's such
01:54:46
◼
►
He's so gifted as a thinker and someone who controls logistics and all these things to see his remotional response sort of added
01:54:53
◼
►
A whole new dimension to him as not just a CEO, but a person
01:54:56
◼
►
yeah, I think absolutely and
01:54:59
◼
►
You know, and I think that's it. It's also a to me a sign of the long-term thinking
01:55:06
◼
►
That the Apple, you know under jobs, you know constantly, you know consistently since since the in the post next
01:55:15
◼
►
Verification era, you know that they've been a long-term company that's looking at building a company that's going to be here for 50 or 100 years
01:55:22
◼
►
You know that's going to outlive everybody who's at the company today, you know
01:55:27
◼
►
And there's I really do think that that's what they're looking at that they're trying to build an institution that's going to still be here
01:55:33
◼
►
when Tim Cook and Phil Schiller and Angela aren'ts are all long retired and you know
01:55:40
◼
►
Frankly in the grave. Yeah, and how do you do that? Well, you don't do it by sweating the ROI on every single thing you do
01:55:47
◼
►
Yeah, and it's you know, the other thing too it that and I think it's probably what burned him up is
01:55:54
◼
►
It's not like Apple, you know has dipped into low profit margins and that they're still spending money
01:56:01
◼
►
I think it was in particular with the
01:56:03
◼
►
the the clean energy for the data centers and
01:56:08
◼
►
Spending money on thing, you know worrying about things like their environmental impact on global warming or climate change, whatever you want to call it
01:56:15
◼
►
Carbon footprint. Yeah, it definitely struck a chord with him. It was a good chord to been struck
01:56:21
◼
►
And you know the whole, you know social
01:56:25
◼
►
Equality angle is has clearly I don't think Steve Jobs was against it, but it's you know
01:56:34
◼
►
Apple is clearly as a company is clearly more outspoken about it now than they were under him
01:56:39
◼
►
Well jobs seem to believe that all that stuff was deeply personal charity charitable donations and support for causes was something that he believed that
01:56:45
◼
►
Apple paying that people could let people spend their own money on but it wasn't at a corporate level where Tim Cook
01:56:50
◼
►
You know, he took Apple on the gay pride parade. He's put Apple behind equal employment legislation
01:56:55
◼
►
He's really believed that the power and and wealth of Apple can be used for more than just generating more power and wealth. Yeah
01:57:04
◼
►
Absolutely. All right, and what was your second thing? My second thing was I was gonna talk about the App Store stuff
01:57:08
◼
►
But I feel like it's a bit of a downer at the end now
01:57:10
◼
►
Maybe we did him in the wrong order
01:57:12
◼
►
Well, we should still do it. Well, we'll let whiskers fix it. Okay
01:57:16
◼
►
Right with the
01:57:22
◼
►
Well the today view widgets right this that people you know
01:57:29
◼
►
in short it was like Apple introduced these today view widgets and
01:57:33
◼
►
At WWDC and then you know, I think they might have even literally said we can't wait to see what you guys do with them
01:57:40
◼
►
Then they saw what people were doing with them and rejected a whole bunch of the most clever
01:57:46
◼
►
versions of them
01:57:51
◼
►
Was it I think it was James Thompson's p-calc. Yeah, that was simultaneously being promoted
01:57:58
◼
►
in the App Store with a banner for great new uses of TodayView widgets because he added
01:58:06
◼
►
a calculator.
01:58:07
◼
►
So without even opening the app right in TodayView, if you put the PCALC widget in, you could
01:58:11
◼
►
just do your calculation right there.
01:58:14
◼
►
It was being promoted as a great new widget at the same time that the review team had
01:58:19
◼
►
contacted him and said, "You know what?
01:58:21
◼
►
That's outside the bounds of what we intended to be enabled, so you're going to have to
01:58:24
◼
►
submit a new build that takes that out."
01:58:27
◼
►
On the outside it looks absolutely insane and I think it's worth explaining, not to
01:58:31
◼
►
excuse it, but sort of to explain it.
01:58:33
◼
►
So extensibility is this huge new feature and everyone is trying to ship iOS 8 and developers
01:58:38
◼
►
are trying to get their apps approved and app review is the worst time of the year to
01:58:41
◼
►
work in app review.
01:58:42
◼
►
And they bring in as many people as they can and they try to get as many apps as possible
01:58:46
◼
►
onto the store.
01:58:47
◼
►
And as soon as an app is approved, and this is all under Phil Schiller's org, that moves
01:58:51
◼
►
to Eddy Cue's org where they have app editorial and they need to program the entire app store
01:58:55
◼
►
or promotion for all that stuff,
01:58:57
◼
►
and all they see is approved.
01:58:58
◼
►
They have no idea what might be going on behind the scenes.
01:59:00
◼
►
It's flagged as approved, it's fine for editorial.
01:59:02
◼
►
And then when things sort of slow down again,
01:59:04
◼
►
people who are higher up in App Store review,
01:59:07
◼
►
who have a lot of ideas about what they believe,
01:59:09
◼
►
you know, and they sincerely believe
01:59:11
◼
►
certain things about experience,
01:59:12
◼
►
and whether a button will confuse an average user,
01:59:14
◼
►
or whether someone is spending time in Notification Center,
01:59:17
◼
►
and they're not supposed to,
01:59:18
◼
►
it's supposed to be a quick conduit.
01:59:20
◼
►
And they care a lot about these things,
01:59:21
◼
►
and they'll flag it, and then it'll get removed,
01:59:24
◼
►
and it won't make any sense,
01:59:25
◼
►
Developers will appeal and it'll go to a higher level and it might end up on the executive review committee's desk
01:59:30
◼
►
And they might say it's fine
01:59:31
◼
►
You know stop worrying about it
01:59:33
◼
►
And but it I think extensibility was so new that it created a disconnect between what was technically possible
01:59:38
◼
►
And what people who had been in app review, you know me at a slightly higher level for many years
01:59:43
◼
►
Thought should be the experience on the system
01:59:46
◼
►
Yeah, I think that's a very good way to put it and I think maybe the transmit
01:59:53
◼
►
It was transmitted right yeah, yeah that had the sharing to
01:59:58
◼
►
Storage services like box.net and Dropbox and I cloud drive
02:00:06
◼
►
You know that
02:00:09
◼
►
Completely within the the they didn't they didn't use any non-private or non-public
02:00:15
◼
►
Apis all public api's the sharing sheet itself the the what's it called move to?
02:00:22
◼
►
whatever you want to call it send to send to
02:00:24
◼
►
They don't have any control over it's part of that whole
02:00:29
◼
►
Inner application communication that that enables so many of these continuity features and sharing
02:00:37
◼
►
It's one sheet that can't line item veto certain services right because the system is drawing it which is
02:00:42
◼
►
Why Apple is opening up seemingly opening up and letting you do these things that you couldn't do before?
02:00:50
◼
►
Then they were told you can't you can't do this for iCloud Drive. You can't send anything you you can't send anything
02:00:57
◼
►
That wasn't created in your your own app to iCloud Drive
02:01:00
◼
►
Which meant like you said because you don't have line item veto on the services that are listed
02:01:05
◼
►
That you had to take out the whole thing and now the app couldn't send to anybody
02:01:09
◼
►
Including Dropbox or box or anybody who Apple doesn't care about
02:01:14
◼
►
Whereas it almost seemed like it was exactly why they added the send to in the first place so that you could do things like that
02:01:21
◼
►
It's again when you look at it from certain perspective and I'm not supporting this perspective
02:01:25
◼
►
But I know it's almost thing like, you know
02:01:27
◼
►
I understand is that they didn't they don't want the line item veto because they think that there can be disputes within companies that would
02:01:32
◼
►
Cause one company to sort of remove a competitor or remove a service and that's not to the benefit of the user
02:01:37
◼
►
But the original model on Mac it's the same like there was Apple made a calculator widget for OS 10
02:01:43
◼
►
and they didn't make one for iOS for a variety of reasons,
02:01:45
◼
►
but they thought it wasn't the right experience.
02:01:47
◼
►
So they deliberately didn't make one.
02:01:49
◼
►
Then, you know, James Thompson,
02:01:50
◼
►
who's a phenomenal developer did make one.
02:01:52
◼
►
For iCloud drive on the Mac,
02:01:53
◼
►
you could put any arbitrary file there,
02:01:54
◼
►
but on iOS, it was sort of understood
02:01:56
◼
►
that you could only put files that you created or edited,
02:01:59
◼
►
because that meant the user knew that they were in your app
02:02:01
◼
►
and was working on them,
02:02:03
◼
►
and they would understand it was in that space.
02:02:05
◼
►
But then something like transit comes along,
02:02:06
◼
►
which is the, you know, quote unquote,
02:02:08
◼
►
Steve Jobs unforeseen thing.
02:02:09
◼
►
And it's taken to the level where they can say,
02:02:11
◼
►
This isn't what we intended for it to do,
02:02:14
◼
►
but it's not taken to the level of thinking,
02:02:15
◼
►
well, is it a good thing anyway?
02:02:17
◼
►
Like, should we let it in anyway?
02:02:19
◼
►
So it gets rejected, then it gets appealed,
02:02:21
◼
►
then it gets overturned,
02:02:22
◼
►
and it makes Apple look horrible in the press.
02:02:24
◼
►
It stresses out the developers,
02:02:25
◼
►
and it affects the features that customers believe
02:02:27
◼
►
that they've paid for, and don't have paid for,
02:02:30
◼
►
and it's just not a good outcome for anybody.
02:02:32
◼
►
- Yeah, but I do, yeah.
02:02:33
◼
►
And if you, like you said though,
02:02:34
◼
►
I think if you wanna try to understand why,
02:02:36
◼
►
it's that it's so new, and there's so many moving pieces.
02:02:40
◼
►
And the thing that made-- if you understood everything that
02:02:45
◼
►
was going on, the thing that made Transmits--
02:02:47
◼
►
and again, Transmit wasn't yanked from the App Store.
02:02:49
◼
►
They got a mostly friendly notification
02:02:53
◼
►
that they were told, you need to submit a new build that
02:02:56
◼
►
takes this out.
02:02:58
◼
►
And they couldn't wait forever.
02:03:00
◼
►
I'm sure that at some point, Apple would--
02:03:02
◼
►
It's like two weeks usually, I think.
02:03:04
◼
►
And it's more or less, take out those lines of code
02:03:06
◼
►
that do this, test your new build, and submit it,
02:03:09
◼
►
and we'll do this.
02:03:10
◼
►
I don't think it's any surprise that it was the iOS version
02:03:15
◼
►
that caused the problem.
02:03:17
◼
►
Now, if you understood what was going on,
02:03:18
◼
►
it didn't make any sense though,
02:03:19
◼
►
because nothing you could do from the iOS version,
02:03:21
◼
►
no file that you could put, move from transmit
02:03:26
◼
►
to your iCloud drive.
02:03:28
◼
►
You couldn't do the exact same thing on Yosemite.
02:03:31
◼
►
You could do the exact same thing.
02:03:32
◼
►
So there was nothing that they were,
02:03:35
◼
►
whoever it was who thought they needed
02:03:38
◼
►
to not be able to do this from their iOS app,
02:03:41
◼
►
it was seemingly unaware that whatever it was
02:03:44
◼
►
that you would do, whether it was a porno file
02:03:46
◼
►
or a illegally downloaded movie or whatever it is
02:03:49
◼
►
that they were worried about, was it copyright, whatever.
02:03:52
◼
►
- Or just stealing files, you know, you load an app
02:03:54
◼
►
and it starts taking your files and putting it
02:03:55
◼
►
on someone's server somewhere.
02:03:57
◼
►
It was all stuff that you could do right in a finder
02:04:02
◼
►
in Yosemite, you can put whatever file you want
02:04:03
◼
►
in your iCloud drive, you know, in the same way
02:04:06
◼
►
that the finder doesn't keep you from moving,
02:04:07
◼
►
You know a file from any folder anywhere to any other folder
02:04:11
◼
►
But I think it's understandable because that you know it the review teams and it correct me if you're wrong
02:04:17
◼
►
I think you might know more about their internal makeup, but the Iowa it's not like a review team
02:04:21
◼
►
There's iOS reviewers and Mac. Yes, and the iOS reviewers are coming from a years-long
02:04:28
◼
►
history of you know, what's restricted on iOS and
02:04:33
◼
►
moving files that weren't created in app whatever your app is to anywhere else has always been
02:04:40
◼
►
Forbidden and so it's you know, I could see how it even got high up
02:04:44
◼
►
Not to the highest levels but pretty high up and they thought no this has to be against the rules
02:04:49
◼
►
This isn't something that iOS does I wrote a piece about this and one of the things I just wanted to
02:04:53
◼
►
To help people understand is that when you say like Apple rejected it Apple has these same discussions
02:04:59
◼
►
Like if you listen to ATP or you listen to the talk show, that's the discussion that's happening inside Apple as well
02:05:03
◼
►
and there's people advocating very strongly that these things should be allowed, and there's
02:05:07
◼
►
people advocating saying, "This button here is going to confuse somebody.
02:05:10
◼
►
They'll press it.
02:05:11
◼
►
They'll suddenly be an app.
02:05:12
◼
►
They won't know where they are."
02:05:13
◼
►
And they're not modeling it for me or you or Marco or John or somebody.
02:05:16
◼
►
They're marketing it for our parents and our non-sophisticated tech-using relatives.
02:05:22
◼
►
There are some people who are deeply, deeply concerned that they have a very sensible,
02:05:26
◼
►
understandable experience.
02:05:28
◼
►
You could argue that widgets and extensibility in general is a pretty nerdy feature, and
02:05:32
◼
►
anyone using it probably knows what they're doing.
02:05:34
◼
►
And I think that's the argument that's winning out now.
02:05:37
◼
►
But it really is these sorts of discussions.
02:05:39
◼
►
And people want more rules sometimes on the App Store,
02:05:42
◼
►
but Apple believes that the more,
02:05:43
◼
►
my understanding is that Apple believes
02:05:45
◼
►
that the more rules will actually chill innovation.
02:05:47
◼
►
And they'd much rather see James Thompson,
02:05:49
◼
►
as annoying as it is, make a calculator widget,
02:05:51
◼
►
have it rejected, then have it approved,
02:05:53
◼
►
then have him to see a rule and just never make it
02:05:55
◼
►
or have to lobby for a change in the rule.
02:05:57
◼
►
That might take years.
02:05:58
◼
►
Because right now as ugly and as frustrating
02:06:00
◼
►
as a process was we have PCalc, we have Transmit,
02:06:03
◼
►
we have all these things now officially on the store
02:06:05
◼
►
and we have these things officially clarified.
02:06:06
◼
►
And it's only been like two months.
02:06:09
◼
►
- That's a good point.
02:06:10
◼
►
- Yeah, I would like to see,
02:06:11
◼
►
and I wrote a thing about this,
02:06:12
◼
►
but I think it would be great for everybody
02:06:14
◼
►
if there was a public facing vice president of App Store.
02:06:17
◼
►
There are really good directors of App Stores,
02:06:20
◼
►
there's really good people in both Schiller and Q's org,
02:06:24
◼
►
but they're split over all these different organizations
02:06:26
◼
►
and much like software development
02:06:28
◼
►
accelerated under Federighi and stores are accelerating under Angela Ahrens.
02:06:32
◼
►
I think if there was somebody whose only job it was to make a fantastic
02:06:36
◼
►
experience on the App Store, whether it's making review better, whether it's adding
02:06:40
◼
►
sloppy search finally to the App Store, but to someone who all he had to do is
02:06:45
◼
►
wake up every day and make developers and customers super happy, I think that
02:06:48
◼
►
would improve the situation for everybody. What's the word, there's a word
02:06:53
◼
►
like newspapers sometimes have them. Ombudsman's. Ombudsman. That's yeah I was
02:06:59
◼
►
thinking the New York Times doesn't call them an ombudsman they call the the
02:07:03
◼
►
public editor. Only and my understanding of why is that for decades they rejected
02:07:09
◼
►
having an ombudsman and then when they finally added an ombudsman they didn't
02:07:13
◼
►
want to say okay now we have an ombudsman they just call their ombudsman
02:07:16
◼
►
the public editor. But the idea of the ombudsman is that at a newspaper for
02:07:21
◼
►
example the ombudsman doesn't is independent and doesn't report to the
02:07:25
◼
►
you know editor-in-chief of the newspaper and so a reader who has a
02:07:29
◼
►
problem with let's say the and it's some sort of bias in the coverage of anything
02:07:33
◼
►
can go to the ombudsman and the ombudsman can conduct like an independent review I
02:07:38
◼
►
would love to see Apple have an App Store ombudsman yeah you know and and
02:07:46
◼
►
And I think the way to do it would be to write a blog.
02:07:52
◼
►
And have a blog--
02:07:53
◼
►
so it's not like anybody could create an ombudsman issue.
02:07:59
◼
►
The ombudsman would still get to choose what they wrote about,
02:08:02
◼
►
but that they could look at something like pCalc
02:08:05
◼
►
or Transmit.
02:08:06
◼
►
And not just like when I write about it, or you write about it,
02:08:12
◼
►
and kind of make a stink and hope somebody at Apple
02:08:15
◼
►
reads our sites and does something about it.
02:08:17
◼
►
But before going public with it,
02:08:19
◼
►
the ombudsman could go inside and go to somebody
02:08:22
◼
►
and do the research and maybe get it clarified
02:08:25
◼
►
without the stink.
02:08:27
◼
►
- Yeah, sort of deescalate it
02:08:28
◼
►
before it hits the media and the executives.
02:08:31
◼
►
- Yeah, but then the ombudsman, as somebody inside Apple,
02:08:36
◼
►
could then write a post
02:08:37
◼
►
that maybe explains what Apple is thinking.
02:08:40
◼
►
And again, without making new rules
02:08:42
◼
►
and creating an ever more complicated set of guidelines
02:08:46
◼
►
for the App Store, at least sort of explain
02:08:49
◼
►
in plain English, here's the sort of things
02:08:51
◼
►
that are okay in a today view widget
02:08:53
◼
►
and here's the sort of things that aren't.
02:08:56
◼
►
- And I think that's a really good idea
02:08:57
◼
►
because we're friends with a lot of people
02:09:00
◼
►
who make productivity and creativity apps
02:09:01
◼
►
and that's where this is a problem.
02:09:03
◼
►
The people making Clash of Clans and Candy Crush
02:09:05
◼
►
and all the people who are making the billions of dollars
02:09:07
◼
►
on the App Store, there's no uncertainty for them,
02:09:09
◼
►
there's no problem with app review for them.
02:09:11
◼
►
they're all fine.
02:09:12
◼
►
- Right, I'm sure it never occurred to the developer
02:09:15
◼
►
to make a version of Crossy Road
02:09:18
◼
►
that runs as a today to view widget.
02:09:20
◼
►
- Yeah, and I mean, those are the easy problems,
02:09:22
◼
►
it's the ones that are more shades of gray
02:09:25
◼
►
that have these problems.
02:09:27
◼
►
And the other argument that it's killing innovation,
02:09:29
◼
►
I mean, I've had Android devices for four or five years,
02:09:31
◼
►
they have a much easier review process than Apple does.
02:09:34
◼
►
And I've not seen the groundbreaking platform making
02:09:38
◼
►
sort of future apps arrive on Android any faster
02:09:41
◼
►
because of that than iOS.
02:09:43
◼
►
And it's easy to say maybe Android sucks,
02:09:44
◼
►
and that's why it doesn't happen.
02:09:45
◼
►
But it's also possible that Apple does add background tasks
02:09:48
◼
►
and they do add extensibility,
02:09:50
◼
►
and they do add the features that they need to add
02:09:53
◼
►
to give developers sort of the tools
02:09:54
◼
►
that they need to make these sorts of apps.
02:09:56
◼
►
And it's possible that things like Workflow and Uber
02:09:59
◼
►
get made regardless of what App Review does,
02:10:01
◼
►
because those things, as cool as they are,
02:10:04
◼
►
they don't come across anywhere near
02:10:06
◼
►
the lines that Apple draws.
02:10:09
◼
►
Well, on the other hand though, I do think, to take a devil's advocate position, we do
02:10:14
◼
►
have far more, a far richer variety of outside the bounds of the stock factory OS productivity
02:10:24
◼
►
software on Mac than we do iOS.
02:10:27
◼
►
The difference is that iOS is starting with this foundation of we, Apple, are promising
02:10:34
◼
►
you that nothing you install from the App Store is going to do something like run away
02:10:39
◼
►
in the background or be hard to uninstall if you don't like it.
02:10:47
◼
►
Whereas the risks you take on the Mac of allowing anything and everything that you can download
02:10:53
◼
►
outside the App Store is that you have utilities that can be hard to uninstall.
02:10:58
◼
►
I tried to uninstall BlackBerry Connect and it was a nightmare.
02:11:02
◼
►
You know, it's always I think it's less of a problem than it used to be
02:11:05
◼
►
But it's always been a problem and that you might add uncertainty and if you feel like, you know
02:11:10
◼
►
Like a non technical user like we know that if the fans running on your computer and you don't think it should be you can
02:11:15
◼
►
Go to activity monitor or up there to the battery menu and it'll tell you you know in recent versions
02:11:20
◼
►
Who's you know, which app is using excessive power?
02:11:22
◼
►
You know, but it's can be it can be confusing to a typical user
02:11:28
◼
►
They don't know to do those things and what if it's some app that they've never heard of because it's you know
02:11:33
◼
►
The helper app for another app. It's a faceless background app. That doesn't doesn't even show up in their doc
02:11:39
◼
►
Well, then what do they do? You know iOS has this promise of
02:11:43
◼
►
We're you're never gonna have to worry about those things and you know part of that promise it only happens if if
02:11:50
◼
►
Everything goes through an App Store review process
02:11:53
◼
►
Which is why to install the keyboard you got to download an app and even though that app does absolutely nothing
02:11:57
◼
►
once you've downloaded it and if you delete it,
02:12:00
◼
►
the keyboard goes away, it's still the same mechanism
02:12:02
◼
►
to deliver all the new features that they're adding.
02:12:05
◼
►
It's an interesting problem to solve.
02:12:06
◼
►
And I think, you know, I use PCALC, the widget all the time.
02:12:10
◼
►
I barely, sorry, James, I barely launch PCALC anymore
02:12:12
◼
►
'cause a widget is just enough almost all the time.
02:12:15
◼
►
And I use drafts and I use transmit
02:12:17
◼
►
and I love all these features
02:12:18
◼
►
and I'm happy that Apple reversed the stuff.
02:12:20
◼
►
I just think that it's worth breaking down the process
02:12:23
◼
►
that happens because the more you understand it.
02:12:25
◼
►
- Did drafts get everything back?
02:12:27
◼
►
Well, I wasn't aware of that.
02:12:29
◼
►
I knew that they had had some, you know, the same type of issues.
02:12:33
◼
►
Well, that's good to know.
02:12:34
◼
►
The only thing that was rejected outright was the app launcher, because Apple really
02:12:37
◼
►
doesn't believe that other things should launch apps.
02:12:39
◼
►
And the guy who tried...
02:12:40
◼
►
There was a rule that says you couldn't have keyboards in widgets.
02:12:42
◼
►
So the guy basically drew his own instead of invoking the built-in one, and that was
02:12:46
◼
►
still rejected.
02:12:47
◼
►
Yeah, I think it comes down to my...
02:12:48
◼
►
I forgot I was arguing earlier where you have to err on one side or the other.
02:12:52
◼
►
And that at least with iOS, Apple is going to continue to err on the side of being a
02:12:59
◼
►
little too strict.
02:13:02
◼
►
And you know, the side effect of that, like the benefit of that is that abusive software
02:13:11
◼
►
isn't going to, is less likely to slip through.
02:13:15
◼
►
The downside to it is, like you said, sometimes it's going to take some ugly airing of dirty
02:13:21
◼
►
laundry, public airing of dirty laundry, to get it sufficiently looked at by a high enough
02:13:27
◼
►
level person.
02:13:28
◼
►
And I think, I don't want to call it a problem, but I think the sign of the change is that
02:13:32
◼
►
Craig Federicchi, he skews more towards geeky than Scott Forrestal.
02:13:35
◼
►
I mean, it was hard to get airdrop on the iPhone, and now we have extensibility and
02:13:42
◼
►
And App Store review hasn't changed the way software development has changed.
02:13:46
◼
►
They're still very much the organization they were back in the Forrestal era, and there's
02:13:50
◼
►
is gonna be some tension until that's worked out.
02:13:52
◼
►
As we get geekier features, we're gonna,
02:13:55
◼
►
the iPhone was not made for geeks.
02:13:56
◼
►
It was made for mainstream people.
02:13:58
◼
►
It was a smartphone that everybody could use,
02:14:00
◼
►
but geeks loved it as well.
02:14:01
◼
►
And now it's becoming a phone that works great for geeks
02:14:04
◼
►
because of these features.
02:14:05
◼
►
And I think app review is gonna have to evolve
02:14:07
◼
►
the way software has.
02:14:09
◼
►
- Yeah, totally agree.
02:14:10
◼
►
All right, I think that catches up.
02:14:14
◼
►
I think that's our year in review.
02:14:16
◼
►
- Good year.
02:14:17
◼
►
- Yeah, it was.
02:14:18
◼
►
Excited about next year?
02:14:20
◼
►
I can't wait everything from the Apple watch to the theoretically larger iPad to the new features. We'll see with it and an iOS 9
02:14:27
◼
►
It's I think it's gonna be a great year. I guess I think one thing is for sure
02:14:32
◼
►
I think one thing when we if we look back a year from now in 2015
02:14:36
◼
►
I think the first half of 2015 is gonna be a lot more interesting than the first half of 2014
02:14:41
◼
►
Yeah, it's gonna be harken back. I think to the first year
02:14:43
◼
►
I wouldn't be surprised if the first year
02:14:45
◼
►
the first part of 2015 is very similar to the first part of 2010 and the iWatch is similar to the launch of the
02:14:50
◼
►
original iPad yeah I do I cuz I you know just off the top of my head I expect
02:14:55
◼
►
both a bigger iPad and the watch in the first half yeah maybe whether they come
02:14:59
◼
►
at the same event or not I don't know but you know I think they're both coming
02:15:03
◼
►
sort of before I just don't know if the Apple TV will come with them where if
02:15:07
◼
►
that's still in the garage you know honestly no idea wouldn't be surprised
02:15:11
◼
►
it would be huge if they did all three in the first half that'd be almost
02:15:15
◼
►
unprecedented and it just as a not to try to you know err on the side of
02:15:22
◼
►
getting too excited but it would kind of make sense in the context of Tim Cook's
02:15:26
◼
►
previous you know maybe over promising of what they were going to deliver in
02:15:32
◼
►
2014 that some of these things you know maybe got bumped you know you know Apple
02:15:38
◼
►
Apple Pay and Apple Watch count as the plural new product categories, but it does seem like
02:15:49
◼
►
when he first started talking about that I expected a little bit more, like maybe one
02:15:53
◼
►
more thing for 2014.
02:15:54
◼
►
Yeah, well I think, I don't know if you heard the same thing I did, but the Apple TV sounded
02:15:57
◼
►
like last spring and then it sounded like this fall and then it sounds like next spring
02:16:00
◼
►
and it sounds like that's a bigger job than people thought it was originally going to
02:16:04
◼
►
Yeah, I definitely heard back in June in WWDC that it was
02:16:09
◼
►
Maybe originally thought that it would come out before the end of 2014, but even back at June it was no way
02:16:16
◼
►
Yeah, not even not even feasible for it to be a 2014 thing. I'm good
02:16:20
◼
►
I'm happy if they I mean I liked it when Apple had products spread across the year
02:16:23
◼
►
I find everything coming in fall just quite a lot to deal with
02:16:26
◼
►
Yeah, well and the other thing too that I think made it impossible and it's not even to get in any details of it
02:16:31
◼
►
But it's just the simple fact that if it doesn't ship by October it doesn't ship that yes that November and December don't count because they
02:16:38
◼
►
Can they're just it too late for the holiday season absolutely that if it can't be announced in October
02:16:43
◼
►
It doesn't get announced till 2015 and it doesn't get announced 2015
02:16:47
◼
►
It's probably like more like February than January yeah
02:16:51
◼
►
And we'd start to see signs already I mean if any of those products were like January February we'd start seeing things moving
02:16:55
◼
►
Yeah, like November December January not that Apple doesn't get work done
02:17:00
◼
►
But products don't get slated for release in those months
02:17:03
◼
►
All right, Renee more people can find out more see your great work at I'm more of course. I'm more calm
02:17:09
◼
►
What are your podcasts lists your podcast? I have debug with guy English
02:17:14
◼
►
We talked to developers about developing stuff and then I have vector with guy English Dave whiskus and Georgia Dow
02:17:19
◼
►
We talked about the intersection of technology and humanity and I do iterate with Mark Edwards and Seth Clifford, which is designer oriented stuff
02:17:25
◼
►
Who do you think is gonna record more podcast episodes in 2015?
02:17:30
◼
►
You or Jason snow. I it's it's neck and neck but I love that or maybe Mike Hurley
02:17:35
◼
►
I mean it's becoming it's becoming a bit of a joke
02:17:38
◼
►
They're all good shows you're prolific
02:17:43
◼
►
I like here's why I like having you on this show because I feel like on your regular shows you
02:17:48
◼
►
Defer to your guests and sometimes I forget that you're you're even there. I'm like word Renee go
02:17:54
◼
►
I'd like to hear Renee pipe in you are so deferential
02:17:57
◼
►
I like having you here and letting you go off because man you really know your shit. Thank you. I really appreciate that
02:18:04
◼
►
well, thanks to you and
02:18:06
◼
►
Go check out Renee's shows and go read I'm on you John. All right, I'm hitting stop