32: Denied Permission for an Emergency Landing at Clavius
00:00:00
◼
►
Well, as it happens, I'm on my way up to the moon.
00:00:03
◼
►
Are you by any chance going up to your base at Clavius?
00:00:06
◼
►
Yes, as a matter of fact I am.
00:00:09
◼
►
Is there any particular reason why you ask?
00:00:12
◼
►
Well, Dr. Floyd, I hope you don't think I'm too inquisitive,
00:00:16
◼
►
but perhaps you can clear up the mystery about what's been going on up there.
00:00:19
◼
►
I'm sorry, but I'm not sure I know what you mean.
00:00:23
◼
►
Well, it's just for the past two weeks there have been some extremely odd things happening at Clavius.
00:00:30
◼
►
Yes, well, for one thing, whenever you phone the base, all you get is a recording which
00:00:34
◼
►
repeats that the phone lines are temporarily out of order.
00:00:37
◼
►
Well, I suppose they've been having a bit of trouble with some of the equipment.
00:00:41
◼
►
Yes, well, at first we thought that was the explanation, but it's been going on for the
00:00:45
◼
►
past ten days.
00:00:47
◼
►
You mean you haven't been able to get anyone at the base for ten days?
00:00:49
◼
►
That's right.
00:00:51
◼
►
Another thing.
00:00:52
◼
►
Two days ago, one of our rocket buses was denied permission for an emergency landing
00:00:59
◼
►
How did they manage to do that without any communication?
00:01:01
◼
►
Well, Clavius' control came on the air just long enough to transmit their refusal.
00:01:06
◼
►
Well, that does sound very odd.
00:01:08
◼
►
Yes, I'm afraid there's going to be a bit of a row about it.
00:01:11
◼
►
Denying the men permission to land was a direct violation of the IAS convention.
00:01:17
◼
►
Well, I hope the crew got back safely.
00:01:19
◼
►
Fortunately they did.
00:01:20
◼
►
Well, I'm glad about that.
00:01:22
◼
►
Dr. Floyd, at the risk of pressing you on a point you seem reticent to discuss, may
00:01:27
◼
►
May I ask you a straightforward question?
00:01:30
◼
►
Quite frankly, we have some very reliable intelligence reports that a quite serious
00:01:35
◼
►
epidemic has broken out at Clavius.
00:01:37
◼
►
Something apparently of an unknown origin.
00:01:41
◼
►
Is this in fact what has happened?
00:01:44
◼
►
I'm sorry, Dr. Smeislov, but I'm really not at liberty to discuss this.
00:01:49
◼
►
This epidemic could easily spread to our base, Dr. Floyd.
00:01:52
◼
►
We should be given all the facts.
00:01:54
◼
►
Dr. Smyslov, I'm not permitted to discuss this.
00:01:58
◼
►
So I'm here in Chicago,
00:02:02
◼
►
Kudol Partners World Headquarters,
00:02:04
◼
►
with my good friend Jim Kudol.
00:02:07
◼
►
Jim, welcome.
00:02:10
◼
►
Last night we went to see a screening of 2001,
00:02:15
◼
►
a space odyssey at the...
00:02:17
◼
►
Music Box Theater.
00:02:18
◼
►
Music Box Theater, 70mm print.
00:02:23
◼
►
A couple years ago there was a new print of this movie that came out and we thought we
00:02:27
◼
►
were going to go see it and it was a different older sort of scratched up 70mm print.
00:02:33
◼
►
Yeah, we were going to go, we went to the Wexler Art Center at Ohio State University
00:02:38
◼
►
because we had heard that they had the new print and as soon as it was sold out, it was
00:02:43
◼
►
great to see it projected large, but as soon as it started rolling there's a ticking artifact
00:02:48
◼
►
on the left side channel of the audio in the first section of the film and as soon as we
00:02:53
◼
►
heard that ticking, we knew that we were watching that same old print. So if you
00:02:57
◼
►
go to see 2001 in a 70 millimeter print you'll know you've got the right print
00:03:02
◼
►
when the picture is absolutely gorgeous and there's no crazy audio thing on the
00:03:05
◼
►
left side. Right, and in addition to the fact that we didn't have any audio errors
00:03:09
◼
►
last night, it was a digital audio thing. It was not the analog audio on
00:03:16
◼
►
the side of the film. Optical, yeah. Well we were lucky enough to meet to chat
00:03:20
◼
►
with the projectionist last night during intermission. How's that? Intermission in a film. So cool.
00:03:25
◼
►
And he said that originally the 70 millimeter prints were released with an optical audio
00:03:31
◼
►
track that ran alongside the picture. And that after that, they used a strip of mag,
00:03:40
◼
►
like magnetic tape that ran along the picture. But that now all that's alongside the picture
00:03:46
◼
►
his time code and it slaves basically a CD player which has all the digital audio on it.
00:03:52
◼
►
But even though the audio was perfectly clear it is an old track and I believe that it's mono
00:04:01
◼
►
and we also noticed that there's very little bottom end. There's very little base in the track
00:04:07
◼
►
and I think that's probably true of most of the films of that era. We're sort of spoiled now by
00:04:13
◼
►
Transformers and everything else. These chest-thumping subwoofer
00:04:17
◼
►
theatre sound experience. Exactly, although it did sound great and it did sound great.
00:04:21
◼
►
It did sound great. Again, no bottom end, it was no heavy bass, but it
00:04:27
◼
►
would, in addition to a truly, truly magnificent picture quality, it sounded
00:04:31
◼
►
great. Yeah, yeah. It was, you know, my father took me to see 2001, I can't
00:04:38
◼
►
figure out exactly when it was, but it was soon after it came out. That would
00:04:42
◼
►
to put me about eight years old so I chose how old I am.
00:04:44
◼
►
But, and I remember being enthralled
00:04:47
◼
►
and confused by the film.
00:04:50
◼
►
But this was certainly the best representation
00:04:54
◼
►
of the film I've ever seen.
00:04:55
◼
►
And we were sitting right in the second row
00:04:57
◼
►
and that was the right place to be, I think.
00:05:00
◼
►
So it's a full house, Stanley can still sell them out.
00:05:02
◼
►
- Absolutely. - I think the film,
00:05:04
◼
►
the film has been part of a 70 millimeter festival
00:05:06
◼
►
that they're running and I think every seat
00:05:08
◼
►
for every show sold out right away.
00:05:10
◼
►
- Wow, that's pretty cool.
00:05:16
◼
►
I think anybody who ever goes to see this movie,
00:05:20
◼
►
you come out of it and you do exactly what I always think
00:05:23
◼
►
I'm not gonna do, which is start talking about what it means.
00:05:26
◼
►
- Well, we were with my 12-year-old son yesterday,
00:05:28
◼
►
so we couldn't help you.
00:05:29
◼
►
His first question is, "What was that?"
00:05:32
◼
►
- I actually liked, I really thought that Spencer
00:05:36
◼
►
had a truly fabulous interpretation
00:05:39
◼
►
of the last shot of the movie, which is that it's Superman
00:05:43
◼
►
floating over the Earth.
00:05:44
◼
►
And I know he was kind of half joking,
00:05:46
◼
►
but I actually think that's, you know,
00:05:49
◼
►
that to me is the basic gist of the story as I see it,
00:05:52
◼
►
is that four million years ago, whoever this is
00:05:56
◼
►
behind the monoliths, used a monolith to turn
00:06:00
◼
►
our ape-like ancestors into men.
00:06:04
◼
►
How did we turn from apes to men?
00:06:06
◼
►
It was with their help and that monolith.
00:06:08
◼
►
And that now, four million years later,
00:06:11
◼
►
through the same people's help,
00:06:14
◼
►
Dave Bowman has become the first whatever's next after us.
00:06:18
◼
►
Like going from humans to whatever is greater than humans,
00:06:23
◼
►
Dave Bowman's the first one who's done it.
00:06:26
◼
►
- Yeah, and I don't think Spencer was the first one
00:06:28
◼
►
with that theory, but that's the best I can make of it.
00:06:31
◼
►
You know, the more I learn about the film
00:06:34
◼
►
and the more I see it, the less I care, sort of,
00:06:37
◼
►
about what the actual specific meaning of that last reel of the film is.
00:06:42
◼
►
You know, it's so interesting.
00:06:45
◼
►
All the details in the middle section and the Jupiter discovery section,
00:06:50
◼
►
all the details are like, everything takes forever,
00:06:52
◼
►
and you see every little bit of everything.
00:06:54
◼
►
And then we make these huge jumps.
00:06:59
◼
►
Obviously the most famous cut in cinema history between the bone and the spaceship
00:07:03
◼
►
and the spaceship is a jump and then, you know, we jump down that slit scan, acid-induced
00:07:09
◼
►
sort of color section. Well, and it really is, right, there's these two fantastic leaps
00:07:15
◼
►
in the movie. There's the one where you, the jump cut from four million years ago to
00:07:21
◼
►
forty years in the future. I mean, I still think of it as the future, because even though
00:07:25
◼
►
it's 11 years after, right?
00:07:28
◼
►
But, I guess 12 years now, it's 2013.
00:07:31
◼
►
But then that last reel is another jump like that.
00:07:36
◼
►
Where, I mean, who knows when or where you are.
00:07:38
◼
►
But the other thing that really struck me last night,
00:07:42
◼
►
I mean, again, this is super obvious,
00:07:44
◼
►
but up until that last reel, up until the slit scan,
00:07:49
◼
►
I think of it like, I always thought
00:07:51
◼
►
he was going through hyperspace or something.
00:07:53
◼
►
That's where he's going to wherever the people who made the monolith are.
00:07:58
◼
►
But at that moment, the movie shifts from two hours or so of being extremely, almost
00:08:06
◼
►
pedantically scientific, like both from the caveman stuff through the space stuff, you
00:08:12
◼
►
know, this sort of almost extraordinary precision and an attempt to do everything as
00:08:20
◼
►
realistically as possible to a final reel, which every single second of it, who knows
00:08:29
◼
►
if any of it is even real.
00:08:33
◼
►
It's completely poetic.
00:08:35
◼
►
Is it in Bowman's head?
00:08:38
◼
►
Is it a wormhole through space?
00:08:44
◼
►
Spencer's other theory was when the very old man wakes up at the end, he said, "Well, it
00:08:48
◼
►
was all a dream, which is sort of a conventional Hollywood way to approach it.
00:08:52
◼
►
If you have a chance to see this print, and we understand that this will be the
00:08:56
◼
►
print that's circulating, so I would certainly encourage you
00:09:00
◼
►
if you have a chance to see it, to see it, a little
00:09:04
◼
►
bit about the technical thing of it. It's the first time I ever
00:09:08
◼
►
saw the film where things started to feel fake.
00:09:12
◼
►
And I don't mean that as an insult to the film, obviously it's
00:09:16
◼
►
special effects and it's from 1968. But the, you mentioned last night and I think
00:09:23
◼
►
the same thing, the 3D model stuff like of the Discovery still holds up really
00:09:27
◼
►
well. But some of the scenes are actually 2D photo realistic paintings or
00:09:37
◼
►
photographs that are moved across another 2D surface and the fidelity of
00:09:42
◼
►
of the picture last night, put the lie to that a little bit.
00:09:47
◼
►
- It looked flat.
00:09:48
◼
►
- Yeah, right, right.
00:09:50
◼
►
It didn't look bad, it just looked flat.
00:09:55
◼
►
It's sort of interesting to see it projected.
00:09:59
◼
►
It's such a different thing than to see even the DVD
00:10:01
◼
►
on your big screen, flat screen at home or whatever.
00:10:04
◼
►
- And some of this stuff, honestly, I don't think
00:10:07
◼
►
that it's just me being an enormous fan of the movie.
00:10:10
◼
►
Some of the special effects scenes still look as good
00:10:13
◼
►
as anything you're ever gonna see
00:10:16
◼
►
because it looks absolutely real.
00:10:18
◼
►
Like there's some shots where the camera
00:10:20
◼
►
is sort of stationary in space, outer space,
00:10:23
◼
►
and the discovery is passing over it.
00:10:26
◼
►
And it looks, I don't think it can ever be surpassed
00:10:30
◼
►
because it really looks like what it would look like
00:10:32
◼
►
if you put a 70 millimeter camera in outer space
00:10:35
◼
►
and built a real discovery and flew it over the camera.
00:10:38
◼
►
- Right, right, right.
00:10:39
◼
►
And every flyby of the camera of every spaceship since 1968
00:10:44
◼
►
owes its existence to that particular opening scene.
00:10:49
◼
►
- And a lot of the interiors--
00:10:51
◼
►
- Opening scene of the discovery of the Jupiter section.
00:10:55
◼
►
- The interiors really hold up just remarkably well.
00:10:59
◼
►
Just in terms of does that feel like this could be
00:11:02
◼
►
a real pod-based station in a starship.
00:11:06
◼
►
And it just feels absolutely real.
00:11:08
◼
►
And actually, the scientist's wardrobe is sort of right back in style right now.
00:11:12
◼
►
The cut of the suits and everything is very contemporary.
00:11:18
◼
►
I guess we've got to get on them to do Barry Lyndon next, right?
00:11:22
◼
►
Oh, that would be a great pick.
00:11:23
◼
►
Because that's another one where I would just love to see it on a big screen.
00:11:27
◼
►
Yeah, me too.
00:11:28
◼
►
Of all of the other films, I think that would be the one.
00:11:31
◼
►
Just talking about "Seen You Projected," that would be the next one I'd want to see
00:11:35
◼
►
projected, I think.
00:11:36
◼
►
I was at the Kubrick exhibit in Amsterdam, and that was sort of interesting.
00:11:41
◼
►
It's now in LA.
00:11:42
◼
►
I don't know how long it is.
00:11:43
◼
►
It's the same exhibit.
00:11:44
◼
►
It's the same exhibit.
00:11:45
◼
►
They had this big space at the new film museum right on the water there, a really great building.
00:11:51
◼
►
The space was divided up by the movie.
00:11:53
◼
►
So there was one section that was Dr. Strangelove, and there was another section that was 2001,
00:11:58
◼
►
and there was another section that was Paths of Glory.
00:12:01
◼
►
The really cool thing was they were showing a projection of long sequences from the film
00:12:08
◼
►
on large screens in each of the sections, but the sections of the exhibit were not separated
00:12:13
◼
►
from each other.
00:12:14
◼
►
So while you were watching Alex in Clockwork, you could hear Hal at the other side of the
00:12:21
◼
►
room and you could hear Merkin Muffley talking to the Russian premier from Strangelove.
00:12:28
◼
►
It was like your head, the net effect of it was maybe what it might have been to be like
00:12:34
◼
►
Kubrick, because you had all these ideas floating around in your head at one time.
00:12:37
◼
►
There's a great app for that exhibit, too.
00:12:40
◼
►
Have you seen that?
00:12:42
◼
►
And it's got photos I've never seen anywhere before in that app.
00:12:45
◼
►
In fact, photos are in that app that aren't even in the exhibit.
00:12:47
◼
►
Interesting.
00:12:48
◼
►
Yeah, so anybody out there is vaguely interested in Kubrick, and if you're not, you've probably
00:12:52
◼
►
already stopped the podcast.
00:12:54
◼
►
But you've got to go to the app store.
00:12:56
◼
►
- Go to the app store and just search for Kubrick,
00:12:58
◼
►
and I think that's actually just the name of the app,
00:13:00
◼
►
it's just Kubrick, but yeah, it's like a great ebook,
00:13:04
◼
►
really, like a coffee table book type thing.
00:13:06
◼
►
- It's really cool.
00:13:08
◼
►
- There was another thing, just like a random thing
00:13:10
◼
►
that stuck out to me last night,
00:13:11
◼
►
I mentioned this to you last night after the film,
00:13:13
◼
►
but I'd never thought about it before,
00:13:15
◼
►
but it really stuck out to me,
00:13:17
◼
►
was in the caveman sequence, in the prehistoric sequence,
00:13:21
◼
►
there's a scene where a cheetah is up a bunnet,
00:13:26
◼
►
on like a little small cliff above the tribe
00:13:31
◼
►
and pounces and attacks one of the tribe's people.
00:13:36
◼
►
And I don't know how they shot that
00:13:37
◼
►
because I realized like it's,
00:13:39
◼
►
and it wasn't all diced up with cuts, it was like--
00:13:42
◼
►
- It was one cut, one shot I believe.
00:13:45
◼
►
- I think it cut when it jumped,
00:13:46
◼
►
it cut when the cheetah jumped
00:13:48
◼
►
and then the rest of it is just,
00:13:50
◼
►
it holds on a shot, like kind of a long shot
00:13:52
◼
►
of a guy, not really a guy, but one of these,
00:13:57
◼
►
what do you want to call them, cavemen,
00:14:01
◼
►
I call them cavemen, whatever.
00:14:02
◼
►
- Monkeys, whatever you call them.
00:14:03
◼
►
- Right, fighting a cheetah, and everybody knows
00:14:07
◼
►
that it was people in suits doing this.
00:14:10
◼
►
So they had a guy in a suit fighting an actual cheetah.
00:14:14
◼
►
- Against a front projection glass screen
00:14:17
◼
►
showing the Sahara Desert.
00:14:19
◼
►
I noticed that scene too, but not for that,
00:14:22
◼
►
It didn't occur to me, I guess I'm so immune to Hollywood special effects.
00:14:28
◼
►
One of the Oscar nominated films is a boy and a tiger in a boat for God's sake.
00:14:33
◼
►
Maybe it didn't occur to me that, God that cat's actually attacking that guy.
00:14:37
◼
►
The thing that occurred to me in that scene is that the color correction was off in that
00:14:41
◼
►
scene relative to the scenes before and after it.
00:14:44
◼
►
It made me think, I've seen this movie too many times, but it made me think I bet they
00:14:49
◼
►
only got that once.
00:14:51
◼
►
They only got the action they wanted once and maybe the lighting wasn't correct, but
00:14:55
◼
►
the fact was that they needed the action so they had to do what they could with the color
00:15:00
◼
►
correction to make it sort of fit with the scene that came before and after it.
00:15:04
◼
►
I agree with that.
00:15:05
◼
►
There is something off about the lighting.
00:15:07
◼
►
I love the scene where the leopard turns into the camera and the front projection light
00:15:12
◼
►
is reflected in his eyes.
00:15:14
◼
►
For me that's like a really awesome scene, which probably wouldn't happen in nature,
00:15:18
◼
►
but in a way.
00:15:20
◼
►
Let's talk about one other thing.
00:15:21
◼
►
It's a lot of scenes.
00:15:22
◼
►
It got a good big laugh in the movie.
00:15:23
◼
►
It always gets a big laugh when you see the movie.
00:15:25
◼
►
It's the zero gravity toilet instruction scene.
00:15:29
◼
►
- Right, on the Pan Am shuttle.
00:15:32
◼
►
- Yeah, to Clavius. - That Heywood Floyd is on.
00:15:34
◼
►
- Yeah, that he's going, to Clavius?
00:15:35
◼
►
- No, I think it's on his way to the space station.
00:15:37
◼
►
- It's on the way to the space station.
00:15:38
◼
►
And it's like paragraphs and paragraphs of text.
00:15:43
◼
►
And I believe it's all real text.
00:15:44
◼
►
It's not like Lorem Ipsum Dolar.
00:15:46
◼
►
And that comes up and Heywood Floyd's looking at it
00:15:49
◼
►
and he's like puzzled by it.
00:15:50
◼
►
And I sort of think that that scene is like maybe the only scene of the film that actually doesn't fit.
00:15:56
◼
►
That's actually there just as a gag.
00:15:58
◼
►
Because, as you said, he's been flying around the galaxy for a long time.
00:16:06
◼
►
He's been on these ships before.
00:16:07
◼
►
I find it hard to believe he hadn't had to go to the bathroom before.
00:16:10
◼
►
And secondly, if everyone who ever flew on these ships used the zero gravity toilet,
00:16:17
◼
►
would they have to have like all of these instructions?
00:16:20
◼
►
I mean it's clearly a joke for the contemporary audience watching the film.
00:16:26
◼
►
Which there's really very little of that. The other thing is that the stewardesses,
00:16:30
◼
►
I think we can call them a stewardess because they're not really a flight attack.
00:16:33
◼
►
The stewardesses shoes which have some velcro on the bottom to keep her from,
00:16:38
◼
►
to allow her to walk in zero gravity, it said grip shoes on the side.
00:16:43
◼
►
And for me that, and it looked cool, it was almost like an Adidas looking thing,
00:16:47
◼
►
But for me that was another thing like a thing for the audience because if everybody wore those shoes
00:16:52
◼
►
You wouldn't put grip to it doesn't say tennis shoes on the side of my shoes, you know
00:16:57
◼
►
It doesn't you know, like so it was sort of a way to give out some scientific information
00:17:03
◼
►
Yeah, it was almost as though they they did like
00:17:05
◼
►
It was almost the equivalent of putting a graphic on screen with an arrow
00:17:09
◼
►
You know like a pop-up graphic right that like labels it or explains it or like you do and you know
00:17:15
◼
►
Like some comic books will explain, you know, like like the old Dick Tracy comics, right?
00:17:20
◼
►
Would draw like a little arrow to his watch and say two-way wrist radio, right?
00:17:24
◼
►
It's almost proof of how smart we are about the future, right?
00:17:27
◼
►
You know and I do kind of miss Pan Am now now after seeing it again, you know
00:17:32
◼
►
Is there any more Pan Am airline? No, no, and they were gonna be the ones that made it to the future
00:17:36
◼
►
But they didn't I guess yeah, it's weird. We don't really do that. It was still good, right?
00:17:43
◼
►
- Right, Hilton's still there. - Hilton's still there.
00:17:44
◼
►
It was Ma Bell, AT&T, I guess.
00:17:47
◼
►
I don't know what it was exactly,
00:17:48
◼
►
but anyhow, interesting on that.
00:17:52
◼
►
- I do, and I, there's so many scenes that I love,
00:17:55
◼
►
but the scene in Hilton, to me, is one of my favorites.
00:17:59
◼
►
It's-- - The one we did.
00:18:00
◼
►
- Right. - Yeah, right.
00:18:01
◼
►
- The one we did a read-through here for the opening.
00:18:04
◼
►
And there's something about the way
00:18:07
◼
►
that the guy who plays Haywood Floyd,
00:18:09
◼
►
I don't know, I don't remember his name as an actor.
00:18:12
◼
►
as far as I know he's never been in anything
00:18:13
◼
►
I've seen since, but he's so deadpan
00:18:16
◼
►
in terms of, he obviously knows,
00:18:19
◼
►
but he's not underplaying it, he's not overplaying it,
00:18:22
◼
►
he's just stone-faced about it.
00:18:24
◼
►
And he's not tight-lipped about it.
00:18:28
◼
►
He seems like exactly the sort of guy
00:18:30
◼
►
who you'd want in the government to trust
00:18:33
◼
►
with the single greatest secret the government's ever had.
00:18:36
◼
►
He really does seem like the perfect guy.
00:18:38
◼
►
- Yeah, and then he does the presentation later
00:18:41
◼
►
where he doesn't really say anything to anyone.
00:18:44
◼
►
- He's like perfect government scientific bureaucrat.
00:18:48
◼
►
He's still really the only guy who knows
00:18:50
◼
►
what the hell's going on, even in the presentation, yeah.
00:18:53
◼
►
- Yeah, right.
00:18:54
◼
►
Yeah, he's just trying to keep them in line, so to speak.
00:18:58
◼
►
- Sort of like, it's almost like just a formality,
00:19:03
◼
►
like just good manners that I'm not gonna not address you,
00:19:07
◼
►
but I'm not going to tell you anything
00:19:09
◼
►
when I do address you.
00:19:10
◼
►
- Right, and you have to keep up the charade of the epidemic.
00:19:13
◼
►
- Right, but that's a beautiful Kubrickian thing too,
00:19:15
◼
►
is that he sets up the scene with Smyslov in the Hilton.
00:19:18
◼
►
And the end of that scene that we just kind of went through
00:19:23
◼
►
is where he accuses Floyd of hiding the fact
00:19:27
◼
►
that there's an epidemic on the clavian base.
00:19:29
◼
►
And then later he makes the presentation
00:19:32
◼
►
and he talks about what's going on in the base
00:19:34
◼
►
and at the end of the presentation he says,
00:19:35
◼
►
"And that's why it's so important
00:19:36
◼
►
that we keep up the appearance of an epidemic at the base.
00:19:40
◼
►
So at the moment when we first saw Floyd,
00:19:44
◼
►
we didn't know what he thought about this idea
00:19:47
◼
►
of an epidemic and later we find out what a cool cat he is
00:19:50
◼
►
because he's orchestrated this entire cover story.
00:19:53
◼
►
It's a good exposition by Kubrick
00:19:55
◼
►
because we know as little as the people in the scene know.
00:19:59
◼
►
We are like the Russians in the first scene
00:20:01
◼
►
and in the second scene of the presentation,
00:20:04
◼
►
we are like the ignorant other officials
00:20:06
◼
►
from the other area, so it's nice.
00:20:08
◼
►
It's like the film we learn as characters
00:20:13
◼
►
in the film learn, sort of.
00:20:15
◼
►
Like Heywood's got one over on us, too.
00:20:19
◼
►
And then there's the, you pointed it out,
00:20:22
◼
►
that on the next shuttle, the smaller one
00:20:24
◼
►
that goes from the space station to Clavius,
00:20:27
◼
►
where they're wearing actual astronaut suits.
00:20:30
◼
►
- When they're having sandwiches.
00:20:31
◼
►
- And they're eating sandwiches.
00:20:32
◼
►
And the one guy is like, great presentation.
00:20:34
◼
►
- Yeah, you really bucked up the truth.
00:20:36
◼
►
You didn't do anything.
00:20:37
◼
►
You did nothing of this sort.
00:20:39
◼
►
- Right, really.
00:20:40
◼
►
- I mean, unless there were some other speech he gave
00:20:42
◼
►
that we didn't see.
00:20:44
◼
►
- I don't, well, maybe, but I don't think so.
00:20:46
◼
►
I think it was in reference to that presentation,
00:20:48
◼
►
and I think he was just trying to be complimentary
00:20:50
◼
►
to clearly, you know--
00:20:51
◼
►
- Kissing up to him.
00:20:52
◼
►
- To the highest ranking guy
00:20:53
◼
►
that he's probably ever gonna encounter in his career.
00:20:56
◼
►
- But that guy knew what was going on at Clavius.
00:20:59
◼
►
- So he was one of the guys at the meeting, you know, so.
00:21:02
◼
►
I don't know, "Clevius," good place for a mystery.
00:21:05
◼
►
- So that, you know, and clearly,
00:21:07
◼
►
for people who aren't a fan of the movie, the--
00:21:09
◼
►
- Well, they certainly would have hit pause by now.
00:21:13
◼
►
- On this podcast.
00:21:14
◼
►
- Well, the complaint, and it has merit, really,
00:21:18
◼
►
is that the film is tedious.
00:21:20
◼
►
It's tedious deliberately, though, right?
00:21:23
◼
►
- It's glacial.
00:21:24
◼
►
- Right. - Yeah, yeah.
00:21:25
◼
►
- There's, yeah, there's extended sequences
00:21:28
◼
►
of people doing truly mundane things,
00:21:31
◼
►
And the point of it, it's almost like a deliberation
00:21:34
◼
►
on what the mundane aspects of the future are going to be.
00:21:39
◼
►
It's like almost like a painstakingly detailed,
00:21:44
◼
►
we've thought of every single thing
00:21:46
◼
►
and we're gonna show it to you.
00:21:47
◼
►
And the pacing of it, it does,
00:21:50
◼
►
it always puts me in a certain mindset
00:21:52
◼
►
where it does, it zones me out.
00:21:54
◼
►
- Yeah, and that, and Dave's, and Bob's breathing too,
00:21:59
◼
►
like the whole thing has sort of a zen sort of a quantity,
00:22:03
◼
►
quality to it. Like when he opens,
00:22:06
◼
►
when he's going to use the explosive bolts to get back into the discovery,
00:22:10
◼
►
when he opens that hand crank door,
00:22:13
◼
►
it takes forever. Like he just turns it and turns it and turns it and turns it.
00:22:19
◼
►
And we're waiting and we're waiting and we're waiting and the tension is
00:22:21
◼
►
building and building and building. I mean, it's just beautiful.
00:22:24
◼
►
And the whole film is, I mean,
00:22:25
◼
►
The whole middle section of that film is the most anti-science fiction, science fiction
00:22:30
◼
►
film ever made.
00:22:32
◼
►
In the time it took him to open that door, in most science fiction films, civilizations
00:22:37
◼
►
will have born, lived, and died in the same time it took Dave to open the door.
00:22:42
◼
►
New generations of weapons will be developed to counter the weapons that would have been
00:22:46
◼
►
shown 15 minutes ago.
00:22:51
◼
►
It is a science fiction movie, but it's...
00:22:53
◼
►
Our idea of what a science fiction movie is now is a lot different than it was in 1968,
00:22:58
◼
►
I think there's...
00:22:59
◼
►
And most of them owe everything to it, I would say.
00:23:03
◼
►
One of the little oddities about it is that it's a G-rated movie, and surely the only
00:23:09
◼
►
G-rated movie Stanley Kubrick ever made.
00:23:13
◼
►
Which I think, A, is a little weird because it just seems to me like a murderous robot
00:23:22
◼
►
is maybe PG already.
00:23:25
◼
►
Four people get murdered, including Frank Poole, who I think kind of gets murdered in
00:23:32
◼
►
one of the most terrifying ways imaginable.
00:23:35
◼
►
It's maybe even worse than drowning, right?
00:23:38
◼
►
Just to be in a suit knowing that you've been cut.
00:23:41
◼
►
know he had a couple seconds there before he died where he knew well I'm
00:23:44
◼
►
gonna die right I'm gonna float away into truly oblivion yeah and of course
00:23:49
◼
►
the actual act takes place off-screen right which is so interesting since we
00:23:53
◼
►
they've spent their time to be spent his time showing us every little detail of
00:23:57
◼
►
every little thing except for the most crucial moment in that reel of the film
00:24:00
◼
►
that happens off-frame on a frame and the murder of the three crew members who
00:24:07
◼
►
who are hibernating is something too, yeah.
00:24:10
◼
►
If it was a murderous robot, it would have been PG-13,
00:24:15
◼
►
but it's a murderous mainframe.
00:24:17
◼
►
That's a little different.
00:24:18
◼
►
- Right, and I do think that that might be why
00:24:20
◼
►
that they didn't see it that way,
00:24:22
◼
►
because HAL's physical instantiation isn't a robot,
00:24:26
◼
►
isn't a humanoid type C-3PO thing.
00:24:29
◼
►
- Right. - It's really just
00:24:30
◼
►
a presence on the ship.
00:24:31
◼
►
He's a camera, you know, he's a series of red cameras
00:24:34
◼
►
and a voice, and that's it.
00:24:36
◼
►
Like if you want to think about it, it's almost like he's the ship.
00:24:41
◼
►
Yeah, it's like when we think of being killed by machines, generally we imagine them marching
00:24:45
◼
►
at us with lasers, you know what I mean?
00:24:50
◼
►
Not turning off the power to our hibernation cocoons.
00:24:54
◼
►
And that whole sequence after Hal kills Frank Poole and his body is going out into oblivion.
00:25:04
◼
►
And what Dave Bowman does then is never explain.
00:25:09
◼
►
He doesn't say anything,
00:25:10
◼
►
'cause the only person he would talk to would be Hal.
00:25:13
◼
►
And he clearly knows, I guess, it seems realistic to me,
00:25:15
◼
►
it seems, you know, but it also seems like
00:25:18
◼
►
unlike most Hollywood movies where he never, you know,
00:25:22
◼
►
does like a shakes his fist at Hal and swears revenge
00:25:25
◼
►
and screams at him and says,
00:25:27
◼
►
"Well, I'm gonna go get his body or something like that.
00:25:30
◼
►
"I'm not gonna let him,
00:25:33
◼
►
I'm not gonna let him go like that.
00:25:35
◼
►
I mean, clearly he knew he was dead.
00:25:37
◼
►
I think the only reason he went to get him
00:25:39
◼
►
is out of respect for his friend and clearly,
00:25:41
◼
►
it wasn't like he thought
00:25:42
◼
►
he had any hope of saving his life.
00:25:44
◼
►
He just, he went out to retrieve his body
00:25:49
◼
►
and it's minutes long.
00:25:51
◼
►
I mean, I wonder how long that scene is.
00:25:54
◼
►
That's one of those things where I wouldn't be surprised
00:25:55
◼
►
if somebody told me it was actually 20 minutes long.
00:25:58
◼
►
I don't even know, it might be 20 minutes
00:26:00
◼
►
before he gets down the steps,
00:26:02
◼
►
gets into a... From the time he leaves until the time he blows through the
00:26:07
◼
►
explosive bolts to get back in that is a long and again glacial
00:26:12
◼
►
and quiet sort of a sequence. You know like even when he blows the bolts
00:26:17
◼
►
you don't even hear the explosion. It's sort of like the Ridley Scott line right?
00:26:20
◼
►
In space no one can hear you scream. Like there's no sound of the explosion.
00:26:24
◼
►
The only sound comes as as he closes the door and air starts to rush back into the
00:26:28
◼
►
airlock. Sort of interesting choice there. And that is one of the
00:26:32
◼
►
when I say it's like super scientific, one of the ways that the film is is when the camera is
00:26:37
◼
►
exterior in space, there is no sound. Spaceships don't make any whooshing sound. It's just pure
00:26:43
◼
►
silence. And the sound, some of the sounds in the movie, it was so loud in the theater.
00:26:47
◼
►
The silence really pops. The silence, it's like, you know, in great visual, in graphic design,
00:26:53
◼
►
where if you make truly great use of white space, it's striking. But then the only time he ever
00:27:00
◼
►
interrupts that would be to use the breathing of an astronaut and sort of it
00:27:05
◼
►
almost like audio audio wise puts you in a first-person perspective yes yes as the
00:27:11
◼
►
same way of a point-of-view camera that's exact I mean that's exactly it
00:27:14
◼
►
every time you're the breathing you are Dave like in a way you know what I mean
00:27:17
◼
►
you are booming so it almost makes my face feel hot like I can feel my own hot
00:27:23
◼
►
breath in a glass you know and closed helmet right
00:27:28
◼
►
- So did we waste enough time talking about 2001 yet?
00:27:32
◼
►
- Well, I could never waste enough time.
00:27:33
◼
►
- Here's my question for you is if Hal killed me
00:27:37
◼
►
and my body was floating out into the middle of nowhere
00:27:41
◼
►
between Jupiter and Mars, would you get in a pod
00:27:44
◼
►
and come out and rescue my body?
00:27:45
◼
►
- Yes, because I, at that moment,
00:27:48
◼
►
I did not know that Hal knew.
00:27:52
◼
►
Remember, Hal doesn't reveal that he had read his lips
00:27:55
◼
►
until after.
00:27:56
◼
►
So I, you get the feeling though
00:28:01
◼
►
that Bowman is suspicious beyond the fact
00:28:04
◼
►
of just, just from the look on his face.
00:28:07
◼
►
But yeah, of course I'd come and get you, Jon.
00:28:10
◼
►
- All right, good to know, Jim.
00:28:11
◼
►
- But then when I got back and I couldn't get in,
00:28:13
◼
►
I'd have to let you float away.
00:28:15
◼
►
- I think Bowman at that point is angry,
00:28:18
◼
►
'cause I think he knows it's Hal's fault,
00:28:20
◼
►
but that he's only unsure whether it's Hal is malfunctioning
00:28:26
◼
►
- Or malevolent. - Or malevolent.
00:28:28
◼
►
- Yeah, right, right. - Right.
00:28:29
◼
►
And so I think, though, and I think he's so
00:28:32
◼
►
in a state of shock, because, you know,
00:28:34
◼
►
I mean, obviously he was good, he was his friend,
00:28:36
◼
►
the only guy he's talked to in the last year or something.
00:28:38
◼
►
I don't know how long he'd been up there, but--
00:28:40
◼
►
- A long time. - It's an 18-month mission,
00:28:41
◼
►
and it seems like they're pretty far along in it.
00:28:43
◼
►
- Well, it's mostly almost there,
00:28:45
◼
►
because he sees the video transmission from Floyd
00:28:50
◼
►
when he's disconnecting Hal, and that means--
00:28:53
◼
►
- That's when he's up there. - And he says,
00:28:55
◼
►
"We're only going to give you this message now that you're in reach of Jupiter."
00:28:59
◼
►
- Jupiter, right.
00:29:00
◼
►
Yeah, so it must be like 18 months.
00:29:01
◼
►
So in like 18 months, he's the only guy he's known.
00:29:05
◼
►
He's in a state of shock.
00:29:06
◼
►
He forgets his helmet.
00:29:09
◼
►
But whether he completely forgot the helmet or just made the assumption that I don't really
00:29:13
◼
►
need it because I'm not going out of the pod, I'm just going to use the arms to get Frank
00:29:17
◼
►
and then Hal will let me back in here, just never even occurred to him that Hal wouldn't
00:29:22
◼
►
let him back in.
00:29:23
◼
►
- Yeah, that's the answer, I think.
00:29:25
◼
►
And then there's, you know, you go into that whole sequence of the slitscreen camera and
00:29:33
◼
►
everything that goes into there.
00:29:34
◼
►
Now there's two ways this movie can go, really.
00:29:37
◼
►
One way is if you stay on the same path, you wind up in the room with the white floors
00:29:42
◼
►
and Dave Bowman and the changing of time and the space baby.
00:29:47
◼
►
But if you make a little left-hand turn right there, you run right into Terrence Malick's
00:29:51
◼
►
Tree of Life.
00:29:52
◼
►
And then that movie takes over from there.
00:29:54
◼
►
So that's the primordial ooze from which interesting movies come or something.
00:30:02
◼
►
Although you can't make Tree of Life into a science fiction movie.
00:30:05
◼
►
That would be a hell of a double feature.
00:30:07
◼
►
Yeah, you better drink some coffee.
00:30:11
◼
►
That would be like six hours.
00:30:14
◼
►
I could stand it.
00:30:15
◼
►
I don't know if anybody else could.
00:30:16
◼
►
I don't think Spencer could.
00:30:17
◼
►
I don't think my son could.
00:30:19
◼
►
I don't know what kind of state of mind you'd be in by the end of that, too.
00:30:24
◼
►
All right, well, that was good.
00:30:25
◼
►
Let me do the first sponsor read.
00:30:27
◼
►
I want to thank Squarespace.
00:30:30
◼
►
Squarespace is back on board this week to sponsor the show.
00:30:34
◼
►
You guys know who Squarespace is.
00:30:35
◼
►
It's a beautiful, intuitive website platform that allows anyone to easily create professional
00:30:41
◼
►
webpages, blogs, online stores, galleries.
00:30:46
◼
►
It's all on a single platform.
00:30:48
◼
►
You log in and you get to choose which parts of those things you want for your site.
00:30:54
◼
►
You simply start with one of their designs.
00:30:56
◼
►
You can start with one of their designs.
00:30:58
◼
►
You add your own images and content, anything you want to sell.
00:31:02
◼
►
You connect your social accounts, your Twitter account, your Facebook account, that sort
00:31:06
◼
►
And you'll have a website that looks great on every device because one of the things
00:31:09
◼
►
Squarespace has in all of their templates is that responsive design where the same thing,
00:31:15
◼
►
The same URL is optimized for the iPad, it's optimized for your iPhone or your smartphone,
00:31:20
◼
►
and it looks great on a big desktop monitor.
00:31:24
◼
►
All Squarespace accounts come with their award-winning 24/7 technical support, their cloud hosting,
00:31:31
◼
►
they take care of all the hosting needs, they do domain name registration, they have real-time
00:31:35
◼
►
analytics, so you log in, you get to see who's coming to your site where live.
00:31:41
◼
►
And if you sign up for a year, they even give you a free domain name.
00:31:46
◼
►
The new thing they have, this is the new thing, is this integrated store.
00:31:51
◼
►
They call it Squarespace Commerce.
00:31:53
◼
►
And you can add a fully integrated store to your website and start accepting payments
00:31:57
◼
►
and like everything else in Squarespace, literally in just minutes.
00:32:01
◼
►
You can sell anything.
00:32:02
◼
►
You can add a store and you get to set up what type of objects you're selling.
00:32:08
◼
►
easy store management and great options for payment.
00:32:12
◼
►
I think that they – I think it's Stripe.
00:32:14
◼
►
Yeah, I think that's their primary.
00:32:15
◼
►
That's their primary.
00:32:16
◼
►
Yeah, and everybody knows Stripe is just – it's the best way to do online commerce.
00:32:20
◼
►
So I mean it really took something that's a huge pain in the ass.
00:32:24
◼
►
I mean and Jim and I both know that setting up an online store and have made it really,
00:32:29
◼
►
really easy.
00:32:30
◼
►
So check them out.
00:32:32
◼
►
The URL is squarespace.com/thetalkshow.
00:32:37
◼
►
dot com slash the talk show that way they'll know you're coming here from the show but
00:32:42
◼
►
check them out especially if you've got something you've been thinking about setting up an online
00:32:46
◼
►
store that's new so check out what they have to offer before you make a mistake and go
00:32:50
◼
►
with someone else. Yeah I mean just brand new I think it's brand new and it's a whole
00:32:54
◼
►
suite of e-commerce features that are loaded into your account so it looks cool I've been
00:33:00
◼
►
playing around with it a little bit so it looks cool. They're a sponsor on the deck
00:33:03
◼
►
They are. They're a long time sponsor of the deck. Like other smart companies. Very smart
00:33:10
◼
►
companies. Let's talk about the deck. So when, how long have we been doing this?
00:33:15
◼
►
The deck's been going since about 2007, 2008, was kind of in its infancy and then really
00:33:24
◼
►
started getting going in 2009. So it kind of, it ran as a small text ad service as a
00:33:32
◼
►
sort of a proof of concept and originally just ran on Kudol.com and then after that
00:33:36
◼
►
it got we sort of got serious about it so I think it was 2009 was when we we might have run a little
00:33:42
◼
►
at the end of 2008 but 2009 would have been the first year of the deck I guess and here we are in
00:33:47
◼
►
13 so are you sure you don't have the years wrong on that I thought it was sooner I mean or older
00:33:52
◼
►
I thought it was no I don't think it's much older than that we happen to be sitting in my office so
00:33:57
◼
►
so I can just look on my computer and see.
00:33:59
◼
►
- What I remember is that it first launched
00:34:01
◼
►
with you and 37signals and Zeldin.
00:34:05
◼
►
- That is correct.
00:34:06
◼
►
You are correct.
00:34:09
◼
►
- And you guys, the Jewelboxing, I think.
00:34:13
◼
►
- Yes, 2006 and 2007, 2008 and 2009.
00:34:18
◼
►
- That makes sense 'cause it really sort of coincides
00:34:20
◼
►
with when I took Darren Fireball full time.
00:34:22
◼
►
And prior to that--
00:34:24
◼
►
- Man, it's a long time ago now.
00:34:26
◼
►
- Feels like it.
00:34:27
◼
►
But prior to that, I'd been selling my own totally text ads.
00:34:31
◼
►
Same spot where the deck ads are on Daring Fireball.
00:34:34
◼
►
- Right, I remember that, yeah.
00:34:35
◼
►
- It was just text.
00:34:36
◼
►
And similar model where it was sort of like
00:34:38
◼
►
my RSS sponsorship still are,
00:34:39
◼
►
where it's one spot a week.
00:34:41
◼
►
One sponsor a week.
00:34:43
◼
►
And you were buying those spots occasionally
00:34:47
◼
►
for Jewel Boxing.
00:34:50
◼
►
- And I don't think Field Notes existed then.
00:34:51
◼
►
- No, it was just starting 2007.
00:34:53
◼
►
- I think it was Jewel Boxing.
00:34:55
◼
►
'cause back then people actually needed
00:34:56
◼
►
jewel boxes for discs.
00:34:58
◼
►
I mean, that's how old we are now.
00:34:59
◼
►
- Despite everything, some people still do.
00:35:03
◼
►
Business, jewel boxes still selling.
00:35:04
◼
►
Not very many compared to the old days.
00:35:06
◼
►
- And I was gonna go,
00:35:10
◼
►
when I wanted to take Daring Farboul full-time,
00:35:12
◼
►
I needed somebody else to sell the ads.
00:35:14
◼
►
I needed bigger and better ads.
00:35:16
◼
►
I needed some more money from it.
00:35:18
◼
►
And so I just emailed you to say,
00:35:19
◼
►
"Hey, thanks for all of the jewel boxing things
00:35:22
◼
►
"you've sponsored here,
00:35:23
◼
►
"but I'm going to start looking for something else for ads."
00:35:28
◼
►
And you were like, "Hold that thought, John.
00:35:30
◼
►
"Give me a week."
00:35:32
◼
►
And then the next week you were like,
00:35:34
◼
►
"All right, you want to be in the deck."
00:35:35
◼
►
- Right, well we had done,
00:35:37
◼
►
I was always convinced it would work,
00:35:39
◼
►
and I believe it was at South By in 2006
00:35:43
◼
►
where it was easy to talk Jason Fried into it
00:35:45
◼
►
because we shared an office.
00:35:47
◼
►
So I'm like, "Jason, I'm going to do this ad thing.
00:35:48
◼
►
"Come and do it with me."
00:35:49
◼
►
And then I talked Jeffrey Zeldman into it
00:35:53
◼
►
a list apart. And then it ran with us three as the only place where the ads appeared for
00:35:57
◼
►
a little bit, for a while. I believe you were next or maybe Andy. You were Andy. I don't
00:36:03
◼
►
know who was next.
00:36:04
◼
►
It was really close between me and Andy Baio's waxy.org.
00:36:07
◼
►
And then it started. Then it grew fairly quickly. Now it's growing slowly. But that's how we
00:36:12
◼
►
want it to be. At that point, it was relatively easy to... There were different concerns about
00:36:21
◼
►
getting new affiliates at that point.
00:36:23
◼
►
Now we're looking for exactly the right affiliate and one that the ads work well for the audience
00:36:28
◼
►
and that is designed properly, whatever.
00:36:30
◼
►
But back then, nobody was carrying ads.
00:36:34
◼
►
And when you put the ads on your site or Jason Kotke did or we did, there was some concern
00:36:42
◼
►
that our readers would see that as a betrayal, which seems kind of funny now, doesn't it?
00:36:47
◼
►
Like to be so worried about that.
00:36:50
◼
►
And that is definitely true.
00:36:51
◼
►
were in those, you know, I've been doing Daring Fireball
00:36:54
◼
►
for 10 years, so we can talk about it
00:36:56
◼
►
as a little bit over 10 years now, but as a decade.
00:36:58
◼
►
And in that first half, the 2002, 2003, 2004 years,
00:37:03
◼
►
nobody had ads on their weblogs.
00:37:06
◼
►
Nobody had any kind of ads.
00:37:08
◼
►
And then Google had the AdSense thing,
00:37:13
◼
►
but that was still just text, and it was all pay-per-click.
00:37:16
◼
►
And that was, I mean, it really was controversial
00:37:19
◼
►
and people would just add like a single Google text thing.
00:37:22
◼
►
It was like a, I don't know, a complete aversion
00:37:24
◼
►
to advertising at all in this.
00:37:27
◼
►
We were more altruistic back in our young days, I guess.
00:37:30
◼
►
- But at the same time, there were,
00:37:33
◼
►
I've always been, other websites, the CNETs,
00:37:35
◼
►
the New York Times is the ones that were not personal
00:37:39
◼
►
but somehow, I don't know what you want to call them,
00:37:42
◼
►
institutionalized news sites had the worst ads.
00:37:47
◼
►
I mean, ads that are worse than the ones you even see today.
00:37:49
◼
►
I mean, I think like about 10, eight, nine years ago,
00:37:53
◼
►
advertising online was absolutely at like the bottom.
00:37:58
◼
►
- Punch the Monkey, you remember that?
00:38:00
◼
►
They would have these ads that--
00:38:02
◼
►
- There's plenty of bad shit out there now too though.
00:38:04
◼
►
- Yeah, maybe I just don't see it
00:38:05
◼
►
'cause I have flash turned off on my computer.
00:38:07
◼
►
I don't know, maybe I shouldn't say that.
00:38:09
◼
►
- Would you think, should I, I mean,
00:38:10
◼
►
the idea of the deck was, just to go over the basics
00:38:13
◼
►
if you know this, I'm sorry to repeat,
00:38:14
◼
►
but the idea of the deck was we thought
00:38:16
◼
►
there was probably a better way to do display advertising that would provide benefits for
00:38:22
◼
►
all three people in the advertising equation.
00:38:24
◼
►
By the three people in the equation, I mean the publisher, the advertiser, and the reader.
00:38:30
◼
►
If we felt like when we made the deck, if we could come up with a concept for delivering
00:38:34
◼
►
advertiser that would be beneficial to all three of those people, then it would work.
00:38:38
◼
►
Up until that point, it was for the advertiser, it was for the publisher, it was for the publisher,
00:38:45
◼
►
It was for the reader, whatever.
00:38:47
◼
►
Our concept was if we put together a confederation of like-minded sites that we displayed a single
00:38:57
◼
►
ad from an advertiser that was truly relevant to the readership that everybody could benefit.
00:39:05
◼
►
We've never said that if an ad is in the deck, we endorse its business, but it's sort of
00:39:10
◼
►
an implied endorsement since we turn down ads all the time.
00:39:14
◼
►
Since we're fairly low-fi and low-tech, and we're serving up, I mean the deck is not any
00:39:20
◼
►
whiz-bang programming thing, and we're serving up these ads, we have very low overhead on
00:39:25
◼
►
the network, and so we deliver a lot of impressions for a relatively good cost.
00:39:31
◼
►
So lots of people want to buy on the deck, but we don't want the ads from lots of people.
00:39:35
◼
►
We want ads from people who have products and services that appeal to our audience in
00:39:39
◼
►
a real way, not just in a sort of, you know.
00:39:43
◼
►
I'm unconvinced that an algorithm can ever really choose relevance for advertising to
00:39:50
◼
►
a marketplace.
00:39:51
◼
►
I mean, maybe someday I can.
00:39:52
◼
►
The other thing that's not really of direct concern to people who read sites that are
00:39:57
◼
►
on the deck, people who read Daring Fireball or who read Kaki, they don't need to understand
00:40:02
◼
►
this and it doesn't matter.
00:40:05
◼
►
But the fact is the deck has never paid by the page view ever.
00:40:08
◼
►
In fact, that was part of the concept of this.
00:40:12
◼
►
It's better for everybody if we do it this way, where advertisers just paid the deck
00:40:17
◼
►
a set fee and they run for the month.
00:40:23
◼
►
It's not that we don't give them traffic numbers and we tell them collectively we tend to do
00:40:29
◼
►
this many page views a month or whatever, but if we happen to do more, we do a little
00:40:33
◼
►
less in a month, it doesn't affect it.
00:40:38
◼
►
That's to me the biggest thing.
00:40:39
◼
►
To me, that's even bigger than the unobtrusiveness of the actual physical format of the ad on
00:40:43
◼
►
the page is that it takes away any sort of impetus to trump up your page views.
00:40:48
◼
►
There is no reason.
00:40:49
◼
►
And so you don't see, there's nobody I know of on the deck who takes long articles and
00:40:53
◼
►
breaks them into six pages, which is truly just, it's just a scam.
00:40:57
◼
►
I mean, and I don't even use that word lightly.
00:41:00
◼
►
It's a scam to get your page views up.
00:41:03
◼
►
And that works against nobody.
00:41:06
◼
►
So the pay-per-view model that most of the rest of online advertising uses is bad for
00:41:11
◼
►
everybody because it's bad for the advertiser because they're getting these numbers that
00:41:17
◼
►
don't correlate to people.
00:41:18
◼
►
They correlate to people clicking on web pages, right?
00:41:21
◼
►
So when you go through and the worst of it now, the way that that's sort of bottomed
00:41:25
◼
►
out are the slideshows, right?
00:41:28
◼
►
Here's 20 ways that Apple could screw up the iWatch.
00:41:34
◼
►
And then you've got to click 20 times and it counts as 20 pages.
00:41:37
◼
►
But that's no good for the advertiser.
00:41:40
◼
►
Because each one of those advertisers, let's say there's four advertisers in the slide
00:41:43
◼
►
view, they're all being charged the full price of a page view when it goes without saying
00:41:48
◼
►
that if I'm clicking through to 20 pictures and not seeing 20 pictures on one page, what's
00:41:51
◼
►
a more valuable impression?
00:41:55
◼
►
If I'm involved in an article, I'm reading it at Fireball or I'm reading a post from
00:42:00
◼
►
from TNet, Swiss Miss, or a long thread on MetaFilter,
00:42:04
◼
►
I'm involved in the ad is there.
00:42:06
◼
►
If I have to click through and see four ads,
00:42:09
◼
►
sure, we'll get four more impressions,
00:42:11
◼
►
but are those four impressions equal
00:42:13
◼
►
to the single impression?
00:42:14
◼
►
No, of course not.
00:42:15
◼
►
It's even worse for the reader.
00:42:17
◼
►
I mean, nobody ever in the history of the world has said,
00:42:19
◼
►
"You know what I like to do is I like to click 20 times
00:42:21
◼
►
"to see all 20 ideas you have about the--"
00:42:24
◼
►
- All the Kate Upton pictures I can handle, right?
00:42:26
◼
►
Whatever it is, yeah.
00:42:28
◼
►
And it's no good for the sites themselves,
00:42:30
◼
►
because then they're busy themselves
00:42:32
◼
►
with trumped up SEO headlines.
00:42:36
◼
►
Who feels good about taking a nice long article
00:42:39
◼
►
that's really a good read and chopping it up into bits,
00:42:42
◼
►
where you know that each one of those times
00:42:44
◼
►
where you make asking the reader to click the thing,
00:42:46
◼
►
you know that half of them are gonna just drop out.
00:42:48
◼
►
- And some are gonna drop away, yeah.
00:42:49
◼
►
- Right, it's almost heartbreaking to know
00:42:51
◼
►
that if you've written something that really is good,
00:42:53
◼
►
like a real nice 2,000 word piece,
00:42:55
◼
►
It's almost heartbreaking to think that two thirds of the readers only go to the first
00:43:00
◼
►
seven hundred words because they just closed the window.
00:43:03
◼
►
So it doesn't work for anybody.
00:43:04
◼
►
And yet it's like entrenched.
00:43:07
◼
►
And it's not just that.
00:43:08
◼
►
It's the idea of displaying five ads on a page and counting them all as an you don't
00:43:15
◼
►
count each of those as somehow for some reason you don't count each of those as a fifth of
00:43:19
◼
►
an impression.
00:43:21
◼
►
You count them all as a full impression.
00:43:22
◼
►
So I don't know, maybe we're over-delivering, but the dirty little secret of the deck is
00:43:26
◼
►
for the right advertiser, it works very well.
00:43:28
◼
►
Most of our advertisers renew.
00:43:30
◼
►
Advertisers that have the service or a product that fits with the mindset of the affiliates
00:43:34
◼
►
that are in the deck do very well.
00:43:36
◼
►
So we don't have to change all the advertising on the web.
00:43:39
◼
►
We just have to keep going.
00:43:41
◼
►
The equivalent, and it's hard to equate the ads in any one medium to another.
00:43:46
◼
►
How is a TV commercial like a magazine ad?
00:43:50
◼
►
It's hard to draw the comparison.
00:43:52
◼
►
But to me, the way that there's five ads on a page at the Washington Post or something
00:43:58
◼
►
like that, and they sell them all as separate page views, to me it's like selling a full-page
00:44:01
◼
►
ad in the newspaper or magazine, but putting five ads on the page.
00:44:07
◼
►
That's the point I was trying to make.
00:44:08
◼
►
That's a good way to put it.
00:44:09
◼
►
But you know what it is?
00:44:10
◼
►
I often think that buying a slot on the deck, which buys you one slot on the deck, buys
00:44:17
◼
►
you 3% of all the impressions across all the sites and services in the network for a calendar
00:44:25
◼
►
month and that works out to somewhere between 2 and 3 million impressions.
00:44:29
◼
►
But buying that, currently it does, but buying that is most akin to buying a full page in
00:44:35
◼
►
the New Yorker in a magazine.
00:44:36
◼
►
It's more like a magazine ad because you're buying a monthly thing.
00:44:41
◼
►
Your ad is by itself.
00:44:44
◼
►
It is adjacent to content but it is not adjacent to other ads.
00:44:48
◼
►
It's a very difficult thing to quantify the results that you get for it but if you
00:44:54
◼
►
buy the ad in the New Yorker and your sales go up, you probably renew the ad and you can
00:44:59
◼
►
track who saw it in the New Yorker.
00:45:00
◼
►
Well, it's the same thing with the deck.
00:45:02
◼
►
So I think the deck, if it's like anything in old media, it's more like a full page
00:45:08
◼
►
magazine ad in a magazine than it is like a TV commercial or like a traditional banner
00:45:13
◼
►
ad. I just wish the deck could just take over all the pages on the affiliates. The deck
00:45:19
◼
►
ad could get really big and blot out all the content. I think the readers and the advertisers
00:45:23
◼
►
would appreciate that.
00:45:24
◼
►
Yeah, or if you could use a little JavaScript to make the ad march over the page and you
00:45:29
◼
►
have to shoot it before it and it'll go back to the spot that it was in.
00:45:34
◼
►
And then it puts up a dialogue that says,
00:45:36
◼
►
do you really want to leave this ad?
00:45:38
◼
►
I love those.
00:45:39
◼
►
But it's like, yes, you're trying to leave this page.
00:45:40
◼
►
Now you don't know what to click
00:45:41
◼
►
'cause you feel like you're in the spammer's embrace already
00:45:44
◼
►
like, and so if you click, no, I don't want to leave,
00:45:46
◼
►
you're saying, yes, I appreciate your takeover ad.
00:45:49
◼
►
But if you say, I want to leave,
00:45:50
◼
►
you think maybe that they're smart enough
00:45:52
◼
►
to make that the default that sends you
00:45:54
◼
►
to the Florida property page or whatever,
00:45:56
◼
►
whoever the advertiser is or something more nefarious.
00:45:59
◼
►
- Have you noticed that Netflix still does pop under ads?
00:46:04
◼
►
I don't see them. I don't know why. Maybe it's because Safari's good at getting rid of them. I don't know.
00:46:08
◼
►
It's like a cat and mouse game, I think, between the browsers and the rotten thieves who are trying to circumvent the anti-popup thing.
00:46:16
◼
►
But every once in a while--and I still see them from Netflix. And every time I see one--
00:46:21
◼
►
I've been a happy Netflix customer for years, and I still am. But every time I see a pop-under from Netflix,
00:46:26
◼
►
it puts the idea in my head that maybe I should unsubscribe from Netflix just because they're using some of the money to do pop-under ads.
00:46:32
◼
►
which are the worst.
00:46:33
◼
►
- Right, so it's not working.
00:46:36
◼
►
The advertisers are not working.
00:46:37
◼
►
In fact, it's counterproductive on you.
00:46:39
◼
►
I don't know who's, I don't see them.
00:46:41
◼
►
I don't know, maybe I must have some settings
00:46:42
◼
►
set up or something.
00:46:43
◼
►
- I don't see many.
00:46:44
◼
►
I do have to admit that I use Safari.
00:46:46
◼
►
I have to admit they're pretty good at blocking.
00:46:49
◼
►
- Right, so if you are like Squarespace
00:46:52
◼
►
and you have a product or service that could benefit
00:46:55
◼
►
by being in front of millions of creative, intelligent,
00:46:59
◼
►
curious, and good looking people, you should go to the deck
00:47:02
◼
►
and give us a holler.
00:47:03
◼
►
Let me ask you about another subject.
00:47:05
◼
►
- All right.
00:47:05
◼
►
- Tell me about Webstock.
00:47:07
◼
►
You and I were both in New Zealand,
00:47:08
◼
►
so tell me about that.
00:47:09
◼
►
- We were there a week ago, as we're recording today,
00:47:12
◼
►
Friday, February 22nd, a week ago we were together,
00:47:15
◼
►
except instead of being in Chicago,
00:47:16
◼
►
we were in Wellington, New Zealand.
00:47:18
◼
►
- Just about this time you were doing your presentation.
00:47:21
◼
►
- I think that's probably about right.
00:47:22
◼
►
- A week ago.
00:47:23
◼
►
- Although--
00:47:24
◼
►
- Well, the time difference was--
00:47:25
◼
►
- Right, which is mind-blowing, right?
00:47:26
◼
►
And there's this whole thing where
00:47:28
◼
►
the international date line, you cross,
00:47:30
◼
►
So they're in tomorrow already.
00:47:34
◼
►
Well, it's not good.
00:47:35
◼
►
That's sort of like the end of 2001,
00:47:39
◼
►
the end of the day.
00:47:39
◼
►
You just can't really understand it.
00:47:40
◼
►
- You know what?
00:47:41
◼
►
I should have had though that our friend,
00:47:42
◼
►
our mutual great friend, Michael Lop,
00:47:44
◼
►
had a birthday and he...
00:47:47
◼
►
- He left California on the 9th on the airplane
00:47:51
◼
►
from San Francisco.
00:47:51
◼
►
I was on the plane with him.
00:47:52
◼
►
We arrived in Wellington, New Zealand on the 11th.
00:47:56
◼
►
Michael's birthday's the 10th,
00:47:57
◼
►
so he got gypped out of a birthday.
00:47:58
◼
►
- Right, he had no birthday.
00:47:59
◼
►
Or maybe it's a positive, because maybe it doesn't have to count.
00:48:01
◼
►
- Right, now maybe, yeah, does it legally count
00:48:04
◼
►
as being a year older than when you weren't around
00:48:06
◼
►
on your birthday?
00:48:07
◼
►
- I don't know.
00:48:08
◼
►
Talk about, it's a great conference.
00:48:10
◼
►
What did you think of it?
00:48:11
◼
►
- I really, I went back, I was there two years ago,
00:48:15
◼
►
and it was such a long flight, and as soon as I came back,
00:48:17
◼
►
I thought, well, that was great, but never again,
00:48:19
◼
►
because the flight was too long.
00:48:20
◼
►
And then I think it's like the way that, I don't know,
00:48:23
◼
►
they say with, you know, like childbearing,
00:48:25
◼
►
where it hurts, and then women say,
00:48:27
◼
►
well, never gonna do it again.
00:48:28
◼
►
But then you're engineered to forget how painful it was.
00:48:31
◼
►
It's like, the flight's not that bad.
00:48:34
◼
►
But I remember it was such a great conference two years ago,
00:48:37
◼
►
and so I jumped at the chance to go back.
00:48:39
◼
►
And I thought the same thing, that it was, man,
00:48:41
◼
►
I would have loved to have been here even if I wasn't speaking,
00:48:44
◼
►
just to see these talks.
00:48:46
◼
►
It's the best conference I've ever-- I've even put on conferences,
00:48:49
◼
►
and I never did that good.
00:48:50
◼
►
I mean, it's the best conference I've ever been to.
00:48:52
◼
►
Maybe only rivaled by 2007, 2008, South By,
00:48:57
◼
►
before it turned into the monster that took over the world.
00:49:00
◼
►
The thing, it's a single track with a small exception.
00:49:04
◼
►
It's a single track concept.
00:49:05
◼
►
So there's about 850 people there,
00:49:07
◼
►
and everybody sees all the same talks.
00:49:08
◼
►
In the middle of the day, half the people who are more
00:49:11
◼
►
developers go one way, and half the people who are more
00:49:13
◼
►
designers go the other way.
00:49:14
◼
►
But by and large, it's a single track conference.
00:49:16
◼
►
And I have never been to a conference
00:49:19
◼
►
where more of the speakers sat and rooted
00:49:21
◼
►
for the other speakers.
00:49:22
◼
►
I mean, for me, that really said what
00:49:24
◼
►
interesting and well-programmed conference it was is that I wanted to
00:49:30
◼
►
see all the other speakers and not just because I knew some of them but but
00:49:33
◼
►
because and many of them I didn't know at all or only know now and that was
00:49:37
◼
►
sort of interesting and it's in a cool place Wellington's a cool place it's a
00:49:41
◼
►
very cool place and it's nice it is a really nice tree and I was every speaker
00:49:46
◼
►
from North America well or your yeah but I think we're all from the northern
00:49:52
◼
►
hemisphere. I don't think they had any, what do you call them, antipodes?
00:49:55
◼
►
Yeah, I don't know. It depends on where you count Craig Modis from being from.
00:50:00
◼
►
If he's from San Francisco, he's one thing, but he's also from Tokyo.
00:50:04
◼
►
I don't know. Yeah. But it's really nice to go from mid-February northern hemisphere to
00:50:12
◼
►
mid-February southern hemisphere. I guess, what is that? That's the equivalent of August?
00:50:17
◼
►
Yeah. It's like summer, mid-summer.
00:50:18
◼
►
- Yeah, and it's not real hot.
00:50:22
◼
►
It was, I don't know, 70 every day.
00:50:25
◼
►
It was like 70 and sunny every day.
00:50:27
◼
►
- Which apparently is not the case in Wellington
00:50:29
◼
►
most of the time.
00:50:30
◼
►
It's very windy and it rains quite a bit,
00:50:32
◼
►
but we didn't see any of that.
00:50:33
◼
►
- Yeah, we had more rain too.
00:50:34
◼
►
- It could be that sort of thing where they tell everybody
00:50:35
◼
►
it's windy and rainy all the time to keep people away.
00:50:38
◼
►
Like they don't want to share their space
00:50:39
◼
►
with everybody else.
00:50:40
◼
►
It might be that.
00:50:41
◼
►
- I think the single-track nature of Webstock,
00:50:46
◼
►
I mean, and there's certainly other single-track conferences,
00:50:48
◼
►
But a lot of the other single-track conferences
00:50:50
◼
►
that I go to or have been to are significantly smaller.
00:50:55
◼
►
- The new one, Singleton, which has gone on two years
00:50:59
◼
►
in a row in October in Montreal is about 100,
00:51:02
◼
►
I think the two years have been 100 and 125 people or so.
00:51:06
◼
►
And C4 here in Chicago before that,
00:51:10
◼
►
it was like a 2006 to '10 thing.
00:51:11
◼
►
- Are those both nerdier?
00:51:13
◼
►
- Yeah, those are more specifically focused
00:51:17
◼
►
on Apple developers.
00:51:18
◼
►
Used to be Mac developers, but now clearly Mac and iOS,
00:51:22
◼
►
Coke developers, if you will.
00:51:23
◼
►
- I mean, there was some nerdiness of WebStack,
00:51:27
◼
►
but it was more of a general developer-designer,
00:51:31
◼
►
broadened your mind a little bit.
00:51:33
◼
►
Like, for example, Craig talked about what he called,
00:51:36
◼
►
what does he call the publishing, the subcompact publishing,
00:51:40
◼
►
talking about Marco a little bit, and the magazine,
00:51:42
◼
►
but also sort of general trends.
00:51:45
◼
►
It was more like that.
00:51:47
◼
►
It was more like big idea and then let's break it down
00:51:50
◼
►
as opposed to this is how you code a shopping cart
00:51:53
◼
►
and rails or whatever.
00:51:55
◼
►
- Right, and Craig, his Craig Mod's talk
00:51:58
◼
►
is probably a perfect example of that
00:51:59
◼
►
where I feel like they, I mean,
00:52:01
◼
►
the name of the conference, Webstock, implies its roots,
00:52:04
◼
►
which was people making websites.
00:52:06
◼
►
You know, back, I think this was the seventh year
00:52:07
◼
►
that they ran the conference, seventh grade.
00:52:09
◼
►
And I think originally it was more specific
00:52:12
◼
►
about designing and building websites
00:52:14
◼
►
and now they've gotten away from that.
00:52:16
◼
►
I mean, that's certainly part of it.
00:52:18
◼
►
But I think Craig's talk exemplified
00:52:19
◼
►
why they're getting away from that,
00:52:21
◼
►
because there's not that much of a difference.
00:52:22
◼
►
And if you're gonna do an online publication,
00:52:25
◼
►
you're gonna need web stuff and app stuff.
00:52:30
◼
►
- Right. - You know, I did a show
00:52:31
◼
►
of hands in my talk, 'cause I was curious,
00:52:32
◼
►
'cause I remember two years ago I did the same thing.
00:52:35
◼
►
You know, what are the people in the audience working on?
00:52:37
◼
►
And it was overwhelmingly websites, web stuff.
00:52:39
◼
►
And I asked this year how many people were working on apps.
00:52:42
◼
►
And I'd say easily over half the hands went up.
00:52:45
◼
►
And the most hands went up were the ones when you said how many are working on both.
00:52:48
◼
►
You said you're working on websites and mobile apps and like the whole crowd.
00:52:54
◼
►
Everything went up and that's, you know, I even put my hand up and I'm not working on any of that.
00:52:57
◼
►
I just got caught up in the emotion of the whole thing.
00:53:00
◼
►
And I think that, but I think that that, I think it speaks to the strength of the programming of the conference that Dave sort of adjusted instead of trying to replay what Webstock was in 2007.
00:53:12
◼
►
it's they've really sort of got their finger on the pulse of what are these people working on today.
00:53:17
◼
►
Or even if it's not what they're working on, it's what issues, what larger issues in design and
00:53:26
◼
►
development can we discuss that will benefit your work. And the other thing they do is they have the
00:53:32
◼
►
first two days of the conference are workshops. So you can go to a half-day workshop with Cragmod,
00:53:37
◼
►
for example, about subcompact publishing.
00:53:40
◼
►
And I think they actually, with their iPhones, published a book to Amazon
00:53:45
◼
►
in their half-day conference of photography.
00:53:47
◼
►
So, I mean, there was, I think the more practical sort of things like
00:53:52
◼
►
Karen McGrane's talks, and they wound up in the workshops where people could
00:53:57
◼
►
really get their hands on the stuff.
00:53:59
◼
►
And the more conceptual stuff wound up in the main presentations, I think.
00:54:05
◼
►
But I would encourage anybody who is interested in going to New Zealand to go to the next
00:54:13
◼
►
I hope they're all sold out.
00:54:16
◼
►
It's one of those things where I guess no matter how effusive our praise is of the conference,
00:54:22
◼
►
anybody who's listening from North America, even on the West Coast where you're already
00:54:26
◼
►
closer is still going to roll their eyes and think, "Well, I'm not going all the way to
00:54:30
◼
►
New Zealand for a conference."
00:54:32
◼
►
But if you've ever thought about going to New Zealand or maybe some kind of combined
00:54:36
◼
►
two-week trip where you'd go to Australia too or something like that, and you could
00:54:43
◼
►
work it out schedule-wise to do it with web stock in the middle, boy, that would be worth
00:54:48
◼
►
I mean, it really is the best.
00:54:49
◼
►
It's the best conference I know of that's going on right now.
00:54:52
◼
►
And we'll see because it's in this beautiful hall.
00:54:55
◼
►
The main presentations are what's called the Wellington Town Hall, which was from 1906
00:54:58
◼
►
or something.
00:55:00
◼
►
And it's this big, beautiful old building.
00:55:02
◼
►
The Beatles played there, the Talking Heads played there, and all this other stuff happened
00:55:07
◼
►
It's quite an imposing stage for a speaker.
00:55:09
◼
►
But with the big earthquake in Christchurch a year ago, two years ago, they have made
00:55:18
◼
►
much stronger regulations about how buildings have to be supported.
00:55:22
◼
►
So the town hall is going to be closed for two years while they reinforce it.
00:55:26
◼
►
So I don't know what's going to happen with Webstock.
00:55:29
◼
►
For me, it's hard to imagine that happening without that beautiful building, but I suppose
00:55:32
◼
►
it could happen anywhere.
00:55:33
◼
►
I'll have to see what happens.
00:55:35
◼
►
My story on the earthquake was that it happened, and again, I certainly didn't suffer for it.
00:55:41
◼
►
You caused it.
00:55:43
◼
►
But it happened two or three hours after our plane took off from Auckland, the 12-hour flight
00:55:49
◼
►
from Auckland to SFO.
00:55:51
◼
►
So we were in Auckland and there was no earthquake.
00:55:54
◼
►
we got on an airplane two or three hours later
00:55:55
◼
►
is when this truly horrifying earthquake,
00:55:58
◼
►
I mean, and again, I don't think it's hyperbole,
00:56:02
◼
►
devastated the city of Christchurch.
00:56:03
◼
►
And it was major, major world news.
00:56:07
◼
►
And so, like, mine and Amy's family saw this thing,
00:56:11
◼
►
major earthquake in New Zealand,
00:56:13
◼
►
and they didn't know what city,
00:56:14
◼
►
all they knew was we said we're going to New Zealand
00:56:16
◼
►
for a conference, and they, you know,
00:56:17
◼
►
blah, blah, blah, Wellington, Auckland, Christchurch.
00:56:19
◼
►
They didn't know.
00:56:20
◼
►
For all I knew, we were in Christchurch.
00:56:22
◼
►
And so they all tried calling us,
00:56:24
◼
►
and of course we couldn't get a call
00:56:25
◼
►
because we were only two or three,
00:56:27
◼
►
we had nine hours to go before we land in SFO.
00:56:30
◼
►
So when we landed in SFO, our phones,
00:56:32
◼
►
and we turned our phones on, it was like,
00:56:34
◼
►
voicemail, voicemail, voicemail, voicemail.
00:56:36
◼
►
Are you all right, are you all right, are you all right?
00:56:38
◼
►
And my first thought was, it's the way you always,
00:56:41
◼
►
when you get bad news and you just instantly blank
00:56:43
◼
►
and go into denial almost, and I was like,
00:56:46
◼
►
there was no earthquake in New Zealand.
00:56:48
◼
►
'Cause I was just there and there was no earthquake.
00:56:51
◼
►
It doesn't occur to you that something like that
00:56:52
◼
►
happen when you're flying over the Pacific.
00:56:54
◼
►
Right, especially when the other thing about that is remember when you fly from
00:56:58
◼
►
Auckland to San Francisco you pretty much arrive
00:57:01
◼
►
at the same time you left because of the international dateline so actually
00:57:04
◼
►
there's no time you know right if you leave there at three in the afternoon
00:57:07
◼
►
you get to San Francisco at about three in the afternoon it's almost like
00:57:10
◼
►
it's a free 24 hours. So of course it didn't happen.
00:57:14
◼
►
Yeah so if if if Lop's birthday had been a week later
00:57:17
◼
►
you would have had two birthdays, right?
00:57:20
◼
►
- You could have had two, oh yes,
00:57:23
◼
►
you could have had your birthday
00:57:24
◼
►
and then had your birthday again.
00:57:25
◼
►
- Right, except you would have spent
00:57:26
◼
►
the whole time on an airplane.
00:57:27
◼
►
- Yeah, which is not anybody's idea
00:57:29
◼
►
of a great birthday, I don't think.
00:57:30
◼
►
- All right, let me do the second sponsor.
00:57:32
◼
►
- New sponsor, and this is really,
00:57:34
◼
►
I'd say this not because of the sponsor,
00:57:37
◼
►
but because I'm really impressed by what they've built.
00:57:39
◼
►
It's Everpix, E-V-E-R-P-I-X.
00:57:43
◼
►
Everpix is a smart photo platform
00:57:46
◼
►
that helps you make sense of your growing
00:57:47
◼
►
photo collection. They have no storage limit, so you have all your photos anywhere, everywhere,
00:57:54
◼
►
organized automatically in the cloud. Really, the bottom line, long story short, is that
00:57:59
◼
►
they're aiming to replace something like iPhoto or Lightroom as your canonical file store.
00:58:07
◼
►
Four photos. Four photos. And the problem that they're trying to solve is that they
00:58:13
◼
►
They think and I believe that the modern photographer is simply casual photographer is overwhelmed
00:58:21
◼
►
by the number of photos that they take.
00:58:23
◼
►
You take hundreds a month, thousands in a year and you end up, we've all had digital
00:58:28
◼
►
cameras now for probably like 10 years.
00:58:30
◼
►
We have libraries of 10 or more thousand files and nobody organizes them and let's not pretend
00:58:38
◼
►
that you're going to when you get back from your vacation and that you're going to take
00:58:40
◼
►
those 300 photos and put tags on all of them and name them all.
00:58:44
◼
►
So they have done all this algorithmically.
00:58:47
◼
►
It's really, really smart stuff from a really smart team.
00:58:50
◼
►
And they have a great iPhone app and iPad app for navigating these libraries.
00:58:55
◼
►
On the Mac, you can still use something like iPhoto or Lightroom to suck the photos off
00:59:01
◼
►
your card and to make color corrections and delete the ones that are no good and eyes
00:59:06
◼
►
But then instead of organizing them into albums or anything like that, just go through and
00:59:10
◼
►
iPhoto you tell Everpix's Mac client, it's sort of like Dropbox, it's just a simple little
00:59:17
◼
►
faceless thing that runs in the background, you get to pick which known file locations,
00:59:22
◼
►
whether you just pick a folder or you pick your iPhoto library, it uploads them to your
00:59:26
◼
►
account in the cloud. And everything else happens after that. The app is really, really
00:59:32
◼
►
impressive. By default, it just groups everything by date into events. It's really, really smart
00:59:37
◼
►
about detecting the interesting parts of a photo.
00:59:40
◼
►
So when it puts them together in a collage on screen
00:59:42
◼
►
for you to pick from and scroll through,
00:59:45
◼
►
it shows you just great little thumbnails
00:59:47
◼
►
and it's very fast, very beautiful.
00:59:51
◼
►
You can try it for free.
00:59:54
◼
►
The apps are all free, the software's free,
00:59:56
◼
►
and you can do a 30-day free trial
00:59:58
◼
►
just to see how it works.
01:00:00
◼
►
If you like it, you pay.
01:00:02
◼
►
I think it's $40 a month, or $40 a year, I'm sorry,
01:00:06
◼
►
or $5 a month, very reasonable, unlimited storage.
01:00:11
◼
►
And again, I was doubtful at the beginning.
01:00:16
◼
►
And I wasn't quite sure what it was.
01:00:17
◼
►
What it's not, it's not a replacement for Flickr,
01:00:19
◼
►
it's not Instagram, it's not photo sharing.
01:00:22
◼
►
It's your personal library, backed in the cloud,
01:00:25
◼
►
available on all of your devices all the time.
01:00:28
◼
►
I'm using it, I really couldn't be happier with it.
01:00:31
◼
►
I'm really impressed.
01:00:32
◼
►
I just, just before we recorded the show,
01:00:34
◼
►
I was showing Jim I was getting all maudlin and showing baby pictures of Jonas when he was a
01:00:39
◼
►
Year old the pictures. I haven't seen in forever and it was it was just great
01:00:44
◼
►
So ever picks what you want to do is go to ever picks dot-com
01:00:49
◼
►
Eevee er pix calm and check it out. My thanks to them for sponsoring the show. I will check it out, too
01:00:57
◼
►
Because I had said the other day that I hope that there's actually there is reincarnation
01:01:02
◼
►
Because then I will be able to organize my digital photos
01:01:04
◼
►
Because otherwise it's never gonna happen. Yeah, I think it's a great premise
01:01:09
◼
►
I really do the premise is you're never going to organize them just give them to us and we'll organize them for you
01:01:14
◼
►
Right, right that long story short. That's the gist of the app
01:01:16
◼
►
And it's it's I think that they've got it
01:01:19
◼
►
Do people even delete you still delete photos and say that's not a good like I think I know it's just there's so much
01:01:24
◼
►
It's like I do that when I shoot with my real camera
01:01:28
◼
►
I do because I shoot so many pictures.
01:01:30
◼
►
But I used to do like a two pass thing
01:01:33
◼
►
where the first pass is go through,
01:01:35
◼
►
like with Webstock, I took, I don't know,
01:01:36
◼
►
300 pictures down there.
01:01:38
◼
►
First pass is just go through
01:01:40
◼
►
and pick out anything that's just awful,
01:01:43
◼
►
you know, out of focus or the lights way off
01:01:46
◼
►
or somebody's eyes are closed.
01:01:48
◼
►
And then if there's one where I took like,
01:01:50
◼
►
let's say four pictures of the same thing,
01:01:52
◼
►
I'll quick make a snap decision
01:01:55
◼
►
which one's the good one and go on.
01:01:56
◼
►
- And delete the other three.
01:01:57
◼
►
And then the old way, then what I used to do years ago,
01:02:00
◼
►
and I still do every once in a while,
01:02:02
◼
►
but I have to admit I just never get around to it
01:02:04
◼
►
with most events, then I would go through
01:02:07
◼
►
and really start thinking about which ones are good
01:02:09
◼
►
and giving a four star ranking to this one
01:02:11
◼
►
and five star to this one and stuff like that.
01:02:14
◼
►
Giving them titles or putting names and stuff.
01:02:18
◼
►
- I mean, I don't do anything.
01:02:20
◼
►
I don't delete, I don't title, I don't organize.
01:02:23
◼
►
And it's not that I don't want to,
01:02:27
◼
►
it's just that I, it's just so much.
01:02:29
◼
►
- It just never seems like there's a right time.
01:02:31
◼
►
When you really want to take two hours and go through.
01:02:33
◼
►
And it's, you know, once you've fallen behind,
01:02:35
◼
►
now you've got, you know, a year worth of photos.
01:02:38
◼
►
- Well, CJ said, who we met, who I met,
01:02:40
◼
►
you've met before CJ at Webstock,
01:02:42
◼
►
said that an eight hour layover in Singapore
01:02:45
◼
►
is a good time to organize photos.
01:02:47
◼
►
(both laughing)
01:02:48
◼
►
So that seems like a long layover to me.
01:02:50
◼
►
- Yeah, hanging out with CJ at Webstock
01:02:53
◼
►
made me feel great about my New Zealand to Philadelphia
01:02:58
◼
►
by way of Auckland and LAX.
01:03:01
◼
►
I went through LAX, but there's no difference really
01:03:05
◼
►
than going through SFO.
01:03:06
◼
►
It made me feel a lot better
01:03:07
◼
►
'cause he was going home to Sweden
01:03:09
◼
►
and he was flying, instead of flying east,
01:03:12
◼
►
he was flying west.
01:03:12
◼
►
So it was like New Zealand to Australia to Singapore
01:03:16
◼
►
to God knows where, Timbuktu.
01:03:19
◼
►
Right, it was like one of the Indiana Jones trip, you know dot the picture of the little plane on the map on the sepia tone map
01:03:26
◼
►
So what would you go back to web stock I would I think I mean I would hope to be invited again
01:03:34
◼
►
But I but you know what I would like to do and we should get we should talk to Mike Monteiro
01:03:39
◼
►
Because he did it a little bit is I would like to go for longer
01:03:41
◼
►
go to web stock and then take a car around the South Island because everybody said that's like
01:03:46
◼
►
That's the place and that's where a lot of them there are some locations around Wellington from the the Lord of the Rings movie
01:03:54
◼
►
That's sort of like their cottage industry. Yeah
01:03:56
◼
►
Tourist pitch anyhow is is go there and see the Lord of the Rings
01:04:01
◼
►
Sites and stuff like that and the studio isn't right the studio is in Wellington. The was it weta. Yeah. Yeah, WTA right? Yeah
01:04:09
◼
►
I'll take a guess and I'll assume I'm wrong that it's weta. Yeah, but it is I really
01:04:17
◼
►
See now everybody will be surprised
01:04:18
◼
►
'cause whenever I have to guess at the pronunciation
01:04:20
◼
►
of something, I always guess.
01:04:22
◼
►
- I just what the cab driver said,
01:04:23
◼
►
so maybe he was wrong, so I don't know.
01:04:25
◼
►
- There's some locations on the North Island,
01:04:28
◼
►
which is the one with Auckland and Wellington,
01:04:31
◼
►
but the South Island is the one where it's apparently
01:04:33
◼
►
a little bit more--
01:04:34
◼
►
- A lot more scenic.
01:04:35
◼
►
There's a lot more.
01:04:36
◼
►
There's a lot less population,
01:04:37
◼
►
a lot more public ground is supposed to be.
01:04:39
◼
►
So I think that would be, you know,
01:04:42
◼
►
I think I would like to go to Webstock again.
01:04:45
◼
►
I would also like to see more of New Zealand.
01:04:48
◼
►
So maybe we can work those two things together
01:04:50
◼
►
at some point.
01:04:57
◼
►
What talk did you think at Webstock
01:05:01
◼
►
was most gratifying or most illuminating?
01:05:07
◼
►
- That's a good question.
01:05:12
◼
►
There were a bunch that were really good.
01:05:14
◼
►
- I'm drawing a blank on his name.
01:05:15
◼
►
The guy who wrote the novel, Mr. Penumbra's--
01:05:17
◼
►
- Sloan, Robin Sloan. - Robin Sloan.
01:05:19
◼
►
- That was a great talk, yeah.
01:05:20
◼
►
- Gave a great talk on the way we,
01:05:25
◼
►
I don't wanna butcher it by summarizing it the wrong way,
01:05:29
◼
►
but part of it was about the way
01:05:31
◼
►
that we don't really understand any new medium
01:05:34
◼
►
until decades after it comes out.
01:05:36
◼
►
And one of the ways he proved that was
01:05:39
◼
►
by going back to the turn of the last century
01:05:42
◼
►
and how when movies first became a thing,
01:05:46
◼
►
people put like sarcastic quotes around the word movies.
01:05:49
◼
►
That it was, you know, movies with quotes around it.
01:05:53
◼
►
And that that lasted for decades,
01:05:55
◼
►
like even up through like the 20s,
01:05:57
◼
►
even until like the 1930s,
01:05:59
◼
►
when people in newspapers wrote about movies,
01:06:01
◼
►
they put the word in quotes,
01:06:03
◼
►
like it was sort of not a real thing
01:06:05
◼
►
or a valid art form.
01:06:06
◼
►
- Right, or passing fancy of some sort, right, right.
01:06:12
◼
►
His talk reminded me of one thing.
01:06:13
◼
►
I don't remember who said it, maybe,
01:06:15
◼
►
I don't know where the quote is,
01:06:16
◼
►
but when they first shown a movie for the first time,
01:06:21
◼
►
somewhere in India or somewhere,
01:06:24
◼
►
the audience didn't know whether they should look
01:06:27
◼
►
at the screen or the light moving through the air,
01:06:30
◼
►
like from the projection booth,
01:06:32
◼
►
like they didn't know what was the most interesting thing.
01:06:34
◼
►
I thought that's sort of funny.
01:06:35
◼
►
So which way do you turn your chair?
01:06:36
◼
►
- What was the best one for you?
01:06:40
◼
►
What was your favorite?
01:06:41
◼
►
I think that one was very entertaining.
01:06:45
◼
►
I sort of enjoyed Jason Kotke's talk about building Stellar,
01:06:49
◼
►
which I don't want to-- and I believe all the Web Stock
01:06:51
◼
►
videos go up online, right?
01:06:53
◼
►
So I'm not going to sort of spoil what it's about,
01:06:55
◼
►
but it was a surprising--
01:06:58
◼
►
it was a very typical talk about one guy building a web app that
01:07:02
◼
►
took an interesting and surprising turn.
01:07:06
◼
►
It was very human and emotional and also very informative.
01:07:09
◼
►
So I like that.
01:07:10
◼
►
And then I saw Kelly Anderson's talk about design
01:07:15
◼
►
in everyday life, which really was great.
01:07:19
◼
►
Some super interesting projects and a lot of really
01:07:22
◼
►
terrific work presented in a entertaining
01:07:25
◼
►
and intelligent way.
01:07:26
◼
►
If you get a chance to see her speak, I would do that.
01:07:29
◼
►
I think those two maybe were--
01:07:31
◼
►
- Unsurprisingly, I have the same taste as you.
01:07:34
◼
►
But yeah, Kottke's was great and very personal
01:07:39
◼
►
in a very Jason way.
01:07:42
◼
►
Every one of the room was surprised at one point in it.
01:07:47
◼
►
Let's put it that way.
01:07:48
◼
►
- Right, and I know he doesn't speak a lot,
01:07:49
◼
►
so there's probably a lot of people out there listening
01:07:51
◼
►
who certainly know his sight, probably daily,
01:07:54
◼
►
but maybe don't know what he's like in person.
01:07:59
◼
►
But I think he is a lot like what you think he is
01:08:01
◼
►
from his sight.
01:08:02
◼
►
You know, it's not quiet, but he's--
01:08:05
◼
►
- Thoughtful and observant.
01:08:09
◼
►
Not a shouter.
01:08:09
◼
►
- Sneaky funny.
01:08:11
◼
►
- That doesn't mean he's not funny,
01:08:12
◼
►
it just means it's quiet funny, like smart funny.
01:08:16
◼
►
- His talk and the way he gave it was really him,
01:08:19
◼
►
I thought, in a way that I can't do.
01:08:22
◼
►
I don't know, there's like a stage John Gruber that's,
01:08:26
◼
►
I don't think it's, I'm disingenuous on stage,
01:08:29
◼
►
but I don't know, I know that I'm not as
01:08:32
◼
►
broadly personal as he was.
01:08:35
◼
►
And I really enjoyed that.
01:08:36
◼
►
And Kelly's, again, was great.
01:08:37
◼
►
Kelly's one of those ones, like you said,
01:08:39
◼
►
where I had never, I wasn't familiar with her work before.
01:08:42
◼
►
I'd never met her before and now would consider her a friend
01:08:46
◼
►
and blown away by the quality of her work.
01:08:49
◼
►
- And then Mike brought the house down.
01:08:52
◼
►
Mike Montero brought the house down.
01:08:53
◼
►
He was the last speech on the last day
01:08:55
◼
►
and he talked about designers' responsibility
01:08:58
◼
►
to their work and to what's right and to their craft.
01:09:03
◼
►
And it was, I don't know what you call that.
01:09:07
◼
►
It brought the house down.
01:09:10
◼
►
Everybody was, everybody was,
01:09:11
◼
►
and it was powerful and positive,
01:09:14
◼
►
and it was also a bit of a lecture,
01:09:17
◼
►
so, but you know, but good, in a good way.
01:09:19
◼
►
- And it was, boy, was that the right audience
01:09:22
◼
►
for that talk, right?
01:09:23
◼
►
I mean, like, in terms of actually him giving,
01:09:26
◼
►
you know, hey, if you're doing it this way,
01:09:27
◼
►
you're doing it wrong, and you should do it this way,
01:09:30
◼
►
and not just for yourself, but really, literally,
01:09:32
◼
►
he meant it for the world.
01:09:34
◼
►
And the people in the audience are the people who,
01:09:36
◼
►
You know and you know what a lot of speakers swear a lot right for effect
01:09:41
◼
►
But he's the man nobody swears like fun to like in a speech like that, which is a highly structured well-rehearsed, right?
01:09:49
◼
►
intellectually rigorous presentation
01:09:51
◼
►
He is his his his profanity is powerful. I will say in a good way. So
01:09:59
◼
►
Yeah, his use of profanity is about as eloquent
01:10:04
◼
►
Well, what is the title of his most famous speech online fuck you pay me fuck you pay me, right?
01:10:11
◼
►
So he's also good at making this time. This was called how designers destroyed the world, right? He's good with titles. He is good
01:10:17
◼
►
It was a good way to end web stock
01:10:21
◼
►
It's probably a good way to end the show. It probably is. Well, thanks for having me on
01:10:25
◼
►
Yeah, thanks. I'm listening first time caller as they say
01:10:30
◼
►
And if you have a chance to see the new 70 millimeter print of 2001, travel all the way
01:10:35
◼
►
from Philadelphia to Chicago if you have to, it's worth it.
01:10:37
◼
►
You know what this means, of course.
01:10:39
◼
►
You know that they're going to schedule a 70 millimeter, a screening of this print in
01:10:42
◼
►
Philly, probably while I'm flying home.
01:10:44
◼
►
Yeah, maybe.
01:10:45
◼
►
That's right.
01:10:47
◼
►
Well, keep our eyes open for Barry Lyndon.
01:10:48
◼
►
We'll go back to Ohio State.
01:10:49
◼
►
We could tell the story about the countdown bar at some point, but we'll have to do that
01:10:52
◼
►
on a future episode.
01:10:53
◼
►
Yeah, we'll save that one.
01:10:55
◼
►
Thanks, John.