30: Cortexaversary
00:00:00
◼
►
Myke? Myke, listen, it's going at the end. Cut it now, put it at the end, we'll deal with it later.
00:00:07
◼
►
Do you do that a lot? Do you talk to yourself a lot like that in the show?
00:00:10
◼
►
Not always, but just in case I'm coloring.
00:00:12
◼
►
Yeah, but see that can be the bumper now, where you were just talking to yourself,
00:00:15
◼
►
giving yourself instructions.
00:00:16
◼
►
That's not gonna happen.
00:00:18
◼
►
That can be the beginning of the show, why not? Why won't you put it there?
00:00:20
◼
►
Myke, future Myke, you need to put this at the start of the show.
00:00:25
◼
►
Did you ever think this day would come?
00:00:29
◼
►
What day is this?
00:00:31
◼
►
It's our Cortex-iversary.
00:00:33
◼
►
Oh! Happy Cortex-iversary, Myke.
00:00:35
◼
►
Happy Cortex-iversary to you too, Gray.
00:00:37
◼
►
Have we been doing this for a year?
00:00:39
◼
►
A year, a whole year.
00:00:41
◼
►
Do you remember your very strong commitment for 10?
00:00:43
◼
►
Uh, yeah. Yeah, sort of.
00:00:45
◼
►
Yeah, those days are long gone now, my friend.
00:00:49
◼
►
So what is this? This is episode 30? 30.
00:00:53
◼
►
Yeah. This is where our very peculiar schedule is always going to ruin the numbering.
00:00:58
◼
►
in the numbering. What do you mean? Right, because we did the first 10 on a weekly basis.
00:01:02
◼
►
Right, yeah, yeah. No, I won't forget that. I won't forget that anytime soon. Yeah, that
00:01:07
◼
►
was horrific. Whose idea was that? It was my idea. Yeah, it was your idea. I had to
00:01:12
◼
►
be put through the fire to understand, right, like I went through a horrible scenario, I
00:01:17
◼
►
now know the way to do this show. It's not every week. It's not every week, no. But yeah,
00:01:22
◼
►
we made it. We made it, and I look forward to our next Cortex adversary. Oh, that's optimistic.
00:01:27
◼
►
Well, I like to live that way.
00:01:31
◼
►
Like, in all seriousness, it's great.
00:01:32
◼
►
I wasn't sure if we would get this far.
00:01:35
◼
►
As always with podcasts, I just assume that the end of all things to discuss is right around the corner.
00:01:43
◼
►
Every episode feels like, "Oh, this is probably going to be the last episode of any podcast I ever do."
00:01:47
◼
►
Like, what else can there possibly be to talk about? But there's always more stuff to talk about.
00:01:51
◼
►
And yeah, I think this has gone pretty well.
00:01:54
◼
►
It's gone pretty well.
00:01:55
◼
►
Happy Cortex-iversary.
00:01:57
◼
►
to everyone. I did not get you flowers.
00:01:59
◼
►
Oh no. Don't open that parcel just yet.
00:02:06
◼
►
So we had a much larger response to our touch typing survey than I expected we would.
00:02:12
◼
►
I haven't looked at any of this because I wanted to wait for the show because I was
00:02:16
◼
►
kind of curious to see what you would put together. You did give me a little preview
00:02:21
◼
►
of some of the data. And whenever that was, 24 hours after the show went up, there were
00:02:28
◼
►
already what seemed like a huge number of replies. So lots of people, it seemed like,
00:02:33
◼
►
wanted to share their information about when they learned or did not learn to touch-type.
00:02:39
◼
►
What is the final number of people who filled out the survey, Myke?
00:02:43
◼
►
3944 people have given their submissions for the Cortex Touch typing questionnaire.
00:02:51
◼
►
That is a lot of answers.
00:02:53
◼
►
It's a lot. And the Reddit thread was a blaze, which ended up not being very useful, like
00:03:00
◼
►
statistically because you cannot do anything with all of that, right? All you do is you
00:03:04
◼
►
just see the comments. So I was really pleased that we had the questionnaire because we could
00:03:09
◼
►
could actually get data which could kind of try and give us some answers. So what I did
00:03:14
◼
►
was I took 2,000 responses and put them into a second sheet that I made public to the world
00:03:22
◼
►
so people could take that data and try and help us understand it a little bit better
00:03:28
◼
►
because the form on its own didn't give me some of the answers that I wanted. So once
00:03:32
◼
►
we started getting all this data I was like, "Hmm, it would be interesting if we could
00:03:36
◼
►
break some of it down by age, right? Because we had the age question in there, but I was
00:03:40
◼
►
wondering like, would it be different for older and younger people as to how they answered
00:03:45
◼
►
as to whether they were taught to touch type, that kind of thing. We got some fantastic
00:03:50
◼
►
responses and people doing really interesting things with that data, which I'm going to
00:03:54
◼
►
put in the show notes. So you can continue to play around with it if you want to and
00:03:57
◼
►
take a look for yourself. But I think the overall points that I took away from this
00:04:03
◼
►
is that it seems to indicate from our data, our completely scientific data, that the older
00:04:10
◼
►
you are, the more likely you are to know how to touch type. And also you're more likely
00:04:16
◼
►
to have been taught at school. And it also appears that the younger you are, the more
00:04:22
◼
►
likely you are able to touch type on the touch screen. That was, I guess, everyone's hypothesis,
00:04:28
◼
►
Yeah, but you never know until you collect data.
00:04:31
◼
►
And there is a much higher amount of people in the younger age brackets that could touch
00:04:37
◼
►
type, or at least self-identified as touch typing.
00:04:40
◼
►
Because I think that's one part that, you know, I learned a few things in this.
00:04:44
◼
►
Like, if I would have thought we would have had the size of responses that we did, maybe
00:04:49
◼
►
I would have asked some questions differently, added in some other questions.
00:04:53
◼
►
Like you know, what is touch typing to you?
00:04:55
◼
►
Because some people don't look at the keyboard, but that isn't what I think of as touch typing.
00:05:00
◼
►
I think of that whole method that you learn
00:05:02
◼
►
in typing classes.
00:05:03
◼
►
- I disagree with you there.
00:05:04
◼
►
I totally disagree with you.
00:05:05
◼
►
If you can type on the keyboard without looking,
00:05:10
◼
►
that is touch typing as far as I'm concerned.
00:05:11
◼
►
- Yeah, okay, I get what you mean.
00:05:13
◼
►
Okay, I'm just thinking as a way to understand
00:05:16
◼
►
if someone was taught it or if they were self-taught.
00:05:20
◼
►
I think 'cause when I think of touch typing capitalized,
00:05:24
◼
►
I think of how you are taught in a typing class
00:05:28
◼
►
as opposed to like I cannot look at a keyboard and type.
00:05:31
◼
►
I think they're both completely valid,
00:05:33
◼
►
but I think they come from different areas
00:05:35
◼
►
and now I'm interested in learning
00:05:37
◼
►
of the people that know, did they teach themselves,
00:05:40
◼
►
you know, that kind of thing.
00:05:42
◼
►
So we have some of that, like are you learning
00:05:45
◼
►
and did you learn touch type in school.
00:05:46
◼
►
So there's still more data that I can dig into,
00:05:49
◼
►
but overall, this is a very useful exercise
00:05:53
◼
►
and we all have learned something.
00:05:54
◼
►
Yeah, like I'm looking at some of the charts that friend of the show _DavidSmith made.
00:06:02
◼
►
And so for example on the question "Did does your school offer touch typing lessons?"
00:06:09
◼
►
That peaks for people in the age range of 51 to 60 at almost 80%.
00:06:15
◼
►
Right there they're saying like yes, touch typing was a thing that their school offers.
00:06:20
◼
►
And then you get down to essentially 0 to 21, that age bracket is about, looks like
00:06:27
◼
►
about 45% on the chart.
00:06:29
◼
►
The slope follows upward in that direction.
00:06:31
◼
►
So the older you are, the more likely it is that you learn to touch type at school.
00:06:35
◼
►
But the one that I really like is the question about can you touch type on the glass without
00:06:44
◼
►
And that peaks for the 17-21 year old demographic is essentially 60% can type on a glass screen
00:06:52
◼
►
without looking.
00:06:53
◼
►
Which is a higher percentage than I would have expected.
00:06:55
◼
►
Is way higher than I would have guessed.
00:06:58
◼
►
Slightly younger is slightly less, which is a little bit surprising, but I can kind of
00:07:03
◼
►
see maybe why in retrospect.
00:07:05
◼
►
My thinking would be that people in the 0-16 bracket have had less experience.
00:07:12
◼
►
Yeah, that was my thought afterward as well.
00:07:15
◼
►
It's a combination of less experience and probably less need to do a lot of typing.
00:07:20
◼
►
But it's still shockingly high at 55%.
00:07:23
◼
►
But what I love is when you get to the 60+%, the number who can touch type on a glass screen without looking drops to exactly 0%.
00:07:37
◼
►
It's not zero rounded off, it's exactly 0% of people 60 or older said that they could
00:07:44
◼
►
type on Glass without looking.
00:07:46
◼
►
And the 51 to 60 demographic is at just barely 6%.
00:07:55
◼
►
Something that I also picked up from looking in the Reddit is it seems like typing classes
00:08:01
◼
►
do still exist but mainly in America.
00:08:04
◼
►
Just from looking at people's comments, it seems that not a lot of people in the UK,
00:08:09
◼
►
if any, or in Europe are taught TouchType, but it seems like there are still parts of
00:08:13
◼
►
America where it's part of the curriculum, because it wasn't like resounding for everyone.
00:08:18
◼
►
I had a lot of people saying to me like, "What, your schools don't teach it?" So I will infer
00:08:21
◼
►
from that, no, they do not, and that yours must do and you are in America, so maybe there's
00:08:26
◼
►
still some of that going on.
00:08:28
◼
►
But yeah, I think this was interesting. I'm really glad that you took the time to put
00:08:33
◼
►
the survey together because yes as you said a large large number of
00:08:37
◼
►
anecdotal answers in Reddit is interesting to read through but it's hard to pull out
00:08:41
◼
►
more specific trends. So this was great to
00:08:45
◼
►
have the data and the links will be in the show notes for
00:08:49
◼
►
people who want to play around with it and visualise it further
00:08:53
◼
►
than we have done so far today. I think the only downside from doing this
00:08:57
◼
►
is that now I am survey hungry.
00:09:01
◼
►
What do you mean?
00:09:03
◼
►
Now I want to do surveys for everything.
00:09:05
◼
►
So I'm gonna have to just try and resist myself from doing that.
00:09:10
◼
►
Like now I want to know everything about how people manage email, but I won't do it.
00:09:16
◼
►
Every episode of QuaTeX comes with an appropriate survey now.
00:09:19
◼
►
I won't do it great, but I want to.
00:09:21
◼
►
But I won't.
00:09:22
◼
►
I think if you want to put in the time to construct a well done survey, then I think
00:09:29
◼
►
you can go survey crazy.
00:09:30
◼
►
There's nothing wrong with that. I feel it should be tactically deployed. Okay, otherwise we'll have survey fatigue
00:09:36
◼
►
Okay, all right I can get I can get behind that
00:09:40
◼
►
Today's episode of cortex is brought to you by smile and the brand new text expander simply indispensable
00:09:48
◼
►
I want you to imagine that you never have to type the same email address chunk of code slogan marketing copy
00:09:55
◼
►
directions or data more than once. With TextExpander you can store any piece of information as
00:10:01
◼
►
a snippet and then just activate it with a shortcut that you create. For example, I type
00:10:06
◼
►
the names of the shows on Relay FM very frequently so I have snippets set up for all of them.
00:10:11
◼
►
For example if I want to say Cortex I type CCO and it pops up. Cortex is right there.
00:10:18
◼
►
TextExpander helps you save one of your most precious resources. Time. You're able to
00:10:24
◼
►
to harness the power of fill in the blank snippets as well to customize common responses.
00:10:29
◼
►
Something else I do very frequently when I email to our sponsors and let them know about
00:10:32
◼
►
their ads being placed on the episode, I have a fill in snippet that I can activate. It
00:10:37
◼
►
lets me put in the name, the show, the information, and also allows me to personalize it a little
00:10:41
◼
►
bit as well, but it keeps the same kind of form and format that I'm used to so I'm able
00:10:46
◼
►
to standardize my responses. This stuff is so easy with TextExpander and now you can
00:10:53
◼
►
also share groups of snippets with others. This will allow people on your team to all
00:10:58
◼
►
have access to the same knowledge. If something changes, it just needs to be updated once.
00:11:03
◼
►
TextExpander is like a shared bank of information for all of the people that work in your team.
00:11:09
◼
►
TextExpander includes apps for the Mac, iPhone, iPad and now Windows which is currently in
00:11:14
◼
►
beta. No matter where you are, you'll have all of the snippets you need on all of your
00:11:18
◼
►
devices and now your team can too.
00:11:21
◼
►
hacker subscriptions cost $40 per year and include all of the apps and the text expander
00:11:27
◼
►
sharing service. Discounts are available for registered text expander users and now with
00:11:31
◼
►
team subscriptions you can also have access to organised focus snippet management, detailed
00:11:36
◼
►
access control, consolidated billing and so much more. Boost your productivity and learn
00:11:41
◼
►
more at smile software.com/cortex. Thank you so much to smile for their support of this
00:11:47
◼
►
So it's time to check in on the hiring project.
00:11:51
◼
►
Yes. How's it going? I assume that now
00:11:55
◼
►
based on our last conversation, you have taken a look
00:11:59
◼
►
at the submissions. Yes, yes.
00:12:03
◼
►
I feel like between
00:12:07
◼
►
last time we spoke and today when we were recording
00:12:11
◼
►
has been an unusually ridiculously
00:12:15
◼
►
busy time for me. So I have less progress to report than I might otherwise want. But
00:12:24
◼
►
I have definitely moved forward on this. I have looked at all of the applications and
00:12:29
◼
►
I've gone through a little bit of a process trying to whittle them down and select people
00:12:36
◼
►
to work with in the future. How many submissions did you get?
00:12:40
◼
►
Alright, what would you guess for submissions?
00:12:44
◼
►
This is a more fun game.
00:12:45
◼
►
Take a guess, what do you think?
00:12:49
◼
►
Wow, look at you, very precise guess there.
00:12:54
◼
►
Because look, if I'm right, it's the best thing ever.
00:12:57
◼
►
Right, exactly.
00:12:59
◼
►
Return on this roll of the dice here, you look like a psychic if you are correct.
00:13:05
◼
►
And you're almost certainly wrong anyway, so there's no downside to guessing.
00:13:09
◼
►
So here are the numbers. At the time that we are recording, the video has about 40,000 views.
00:13:18
◼
►
So we can assume that 40,000 people in some way were exposed to the existence of this application.
00:13:26
◼
►
And when I took a look to see what was in my Dropbox folder, which was about a week after the supposed deadline where I was going to look,
00:13:37
◼
►
there were 75 applications waiting for me to take a look at.
00:13:42
◼
►
- That's a really good number,
00:13:46
◼
►
because if it would have been a lot higher than that,
00:13:50
◼
►
one, it would have been super hard to go through,
00:13:53
◼
►
and the quality would have probably been overall worse.
00:13:57
◼
►
I would expect that you were able to really whittle it down
00:14:01
◼
►
to a more manageable number.
00:14:03
◼
►
- Yeah, and this is a bit of an estimate on my part,
00:14:05
◼
►
But I think that the number of total submissions that I may have gotten might actually be quite close to your guess, around 150.
00:14:17
◼
►
Because after the point at which I looked at it, I just had a message to my assistants to anybody who submitted from that point on.
00:14:26
◼
►
She was only to pass it along if it really struck her as something worth taking a look at.
00:14:32
◼
►
And I did see, I did just look and see briefly that there were a bunch more submissions after
00:14:36
◼
►
that, but none of them made it through her barrier.
00:14:40
◼
►
I wouldn't be surprised if the total number was 150, but the number that I actually looked
00:14:48
◼
►
And this was, like, like so many moments in life, it is really easy to overestimate how
00:15:00
◼
►
easy a task is until you try to do it yourself.
00:15:04
◼
►
And so I just had a lot, a lot of sympathy for hiring managers and HR people in this
00:15:13
◼
►
moment because I was thinking, "Oh, this is going to be super easy just to go through
00:15:16
◼
►
a bunch of applications.
00:15:18
◼
►
How hard can it possibly be?"
00:15:20
◼
►
And it turns out the answer is it's a lot harder than you think it is going through
00:15:26
◼
►
So I ended up having to break it into two parts.
00:15:29
◼
►
I did a first pass where all I was doing was I literally created a folder called "Tolerable"
00:15:39
◼
►
and so my estimation there was all I want to do on round one is put anything that is
00:15:48
◼
►
tolerable or better into this folder.
00:15:51
◼
►
Because simply trying to watch all of the videos, since some of them were very different
00:15:57
◼
►
in quality, it's like it was surprisingly hard to make comparisons after watching three or four videos.
00:16:02
◼
►
Like your brain just gets really muddled up with all the details, so I thought, okay,
00:16:07
◼
►
I just need to do a quick first pass of which ones are definitely out and which ones are definitely in.
00:16:13
◼
►
So I sorted it that way and then I thought, okay, once I have done that, then I can try again to make
00:16:19
◼
►
finer distinctions between some of the applications.
00:16:23
◼
►
But so that was the round one and then I did a round two, which was trying to limit it down a bit further.
00:16:28
◼
►
But that's how I ended up doing this on my own so far.
00:16:32
◼
►
Yeah, that makes sense to me because I think if you watch so many things in a row,
00:16:36
◼
►
you kind of lose track of what's better than another.
00:16:41
◼
►
Right? So like whittling it down by like, "Can I watch this and it doesn't hurt my eyes?" is a good way of doing things.
00:16:49
◼
►
Right. Round one was basically identify the instant no's.
00:16:54
◼
►
Right? That was all I was trying to do. Because I realized very quickly that as you're watching through stuff,
00:16:59
◼
►
you end up comparing the thing that you're currently watching mentally to the thing that you have just watched.
00:17:04
◼
►
You're like, "Wait a minute, that's not what this comparison should be at all!"
00:17:07
◼
►
I can't do this just all in one go in the way I was originally intending.
00:17:13
◼
►
So it was interesting, just again, since I think the whole purpose of this show is to talk a like about the details of being self-employed
00:17:24
◼
►
and of course there are some things here that I won't be able to discuss because we're talking about actual people
00:17:28
◼
►
but of the 75 applications that I had, 50 of them were sorted as instant nos and 25 of them were sorted as tolerable or better.
00:17:41
◼
►
So that was the round one of the applications.
00:17:46
◼
►
What happens next was that I had to give my brain a couple of days to
00:17:51
◼
►
filter that out, to kind of like, "Okay, forget what you've seen,
00:17:57
◼
►
and I need to come back to this at a later point."
00:18:00
◼
►
So I gave it a little while.
00:18:03
◼
►
This is where we may return to it later, but a whole other thing happened which distracted my attention for a little bit,
00:18:08
◼
►
for a little bit, so this has gone on a bit longer than I would have wanted to otherwise.
00:18:12
◼
►
But when I came back, then I was trying to make a decision about...
00:18:19
◼
►
through these 25 applications, I want to narrow this down as much as I can, again, based solely on the animation.
00:18:30
◼
►
So I'm still looking at all of these things as files with just single numbers.
00:18:35
◼
►
I don't know anything about the people, I don't know where they are, I don't know their experience, I'm just looking at the animations.
00:18:40
◼
►
And the second round of cutting was a much harder thing to do, but I did a round two that took it from 25 down to 10.
00:18:53
◼
►
So that was the second round of trying to figure out what's happening.
00:18:57
◼
►
And there I was looking at many more finer details about the animations, like, "Oh, what choices did you make to animate this or that?"
00:19:07
◼
►
Some of the things that are very hard to articulate is, for example, watching a video is seeing...
00:19:12
◼
►
Did the person get me to laugh when I'm watching the video? Like, did this person do something that matches up with my sense of humor?
00:19:24
◼
►
Again, that's not to say that the people that I didn't select weren't funny, but the question is
00:19:29
◼
►
do they match up with the kind of joke that I might make in a video, right?
00:19:36
◼
►
Like that's what I'm looking for there.
00:19:38
◼
►
And so yeah, it was, again, surprisingly hard to do.
00:19:43
◼
►
But it was down to
00:19:46
◼
►
10 then. So what's happening now is that my assistant is
00:19:52
◼
►
reaching out to those 10 and collecting some information that I want to have about the applications at this point
00:20:00
◼
►
to be able to make some decisions about where to go in the future.
00:20:04
◼
►
Is it seeming like that this was the worthwhile experiment you were hoping it would be?
00:20:09
◼
►
I'm feeling pretty good about how
00:20:11
◼
►
this has been going.
00:20:14
◼
►
It's especially interesting to me because I am, as we are recording, I am currently in the middle of
00:20:21
◼
►
animating my next video, which should be out in a few days.
00:20:26
◼
►
And of course while I am in the process of animating this video
00:20:30
◼
►
I can't help but have my mind constantly turn to thinking about how will this be different when I'm working with somebody else.
00:20:37
◼
►
And before the application went out, I was just really nervous and really concerned about the kind of quality of
00:20:45
◼
►
applications that I was going to get. And now being future me,
00:20:51
◼
►
who has seen the applications, I have to say that the average quality of application was much higher
00:20:58
◼
►
than I was expecting, which to me was a big, big relief. Like, okay, I am glad to see that there are
00:21:05
◼
►
lots of skilled people in here. And even, I just, I do have to say that for lots of the applications
00:21:12
◼
►
that I rejected, those people could be motion animators. Like, without a doubt. I rejected
00:21:19
◼
►
people who could do this for a living.
00:21:21
◼
►
But just the average quality was quite high
00:21:24
◼
►
and then that's where it starts to come down to
00:21:26
◼
►
again, just some of the particulars about how would I do something
00:21:29
◼
►
or what are the particular choices that they made about how to animate.
00:21:32
◼
►
It's not necessarily about that person's skill
00:21:35
◼
►
but it's their understanding of your style, which is the point I guess.
00:21:39
◼
►
Yeah, exactly. But that
00:21:42
◼
►
that is what made it so hard is because there were definitely some applications where I felt like
00:21:47
◼
►
I want to reject this, but this person is undoubtedly good.
00:21:51
◼
►
Like, they're very good, they just made decisions that I don't agree with for my own style.
00:21:57
◼
►
And it's just a strange position to be in.
00:21:59
◼
►
But overall, I was very happy to see the quality of the submissions.
00:22:04
◼
►
And in my experience of animating the video that I'm currently working on,
00:22:10
◼
►
It's a huge relief to know that in the future I will almost certainly be working with someone to help make this process easier
00:22:19
◼
►
because I can tell that I am still not fully recovered from some of the RSI problems I had the last video or the video prior to that
00:22:29
◼
►
Like I am having to work in much shorter bursts and with larger breaks between bursts, like I can just still feel that I am not fully recovered from that before
00:22:39
◼
►
And so it's just, I think everything has happened at the right time.
00:22:45
◼
►
Like I was already thinking about bringing people on board.
00:22:48
◼
►
I had a thing that accelerated this whole process, which I think ultimately is good.
00:22:53
◼
►
And I'm looking at these applications and I have to say, of the ten people that I'm going to get some more information about,
00:23:01
◼
►
I think any of them I could imagine working with to produce animations in the future.
00:23:07
◼
►
I think that there are definitely people here that I can work with and I want to work with in the future.
00:23:15
◼
►
Presuming that everything works out between us and that it's all okay.
00:23:20
◼
►
Were you planning on giving feedback to the applicants?
00:23:25
◼
►
It was a thing that crossed my mind because I remember when I was applying for a job as a teacher
00:23:33
◼
►
that the schools did give feedback to people if they didn't select you.
00:23:38
◼
►
One of the very first schools I ever applied to, I didn't realize they were offering me a job
00:23:43
◼
►
and I sort of talked myself out of the job and then I got some feedback about how like,
00:23:47
◼
►
"You seemed really uncommitted to the school."
00:23:48
◼
►
And then I realized like, "Oh, I realized what was happening here."
00:23:55
◼
►
I had this... okay, I'll have to tell you now, but I applied to this school
00:23:59
◼
►
which was very high on the list. Like I had a short list of three schools that I really wanted to work at.
00:24:03
◼
►
and I applied to one of them.
00:24:05
◼
►
And you do a whole test lesson, and then you talk to the head of department,
00:24:10
◼
►
and then you talk to the head of the school,
00:24:12
◼
►
and then presumably they have a little meeting about you,
00:24:14
◼
►
and then they walk you out to the front and someone's talking to you.
00:24:16
◼
►
And as the head of department was walking me out of the building,
00:24:19
◼
►
he was going, "What would you say if we offered you the job right now?"
00:24:25
◼
►
I said, "Oh, I'd have to think about it,
00:24:29
◼
►
because I don't like to make decisions on the spot."
00:24:33
◼
►
He's like, "But what if we were going to offer it to you right now?"
00:24:39
◼
►
And I was like, "Well, I would just have to think about it."
00:24:42
◼
►
And like, I was just a total idiot.
00:24:46
◼
►
Like, I just didn't realize what was occurring there.
00:24:51
◼
►
And I remember he was like really insistent on this point all the way out to the front door about,
00:24:56
◼
►
But if we were to tell you at this very moment that you could start work immediately, what would you think about that?
00:25:03
◼
►
And I was like, I would just have to think about it.
00:25:05
◼
►
And then it was a couple days later when I got a phone call from the headmistress and she was telling me how it seemed like I was uncommitted to the school.
00:25:12
◼
►
And then it was like the other penny dropped, I was like, oh, that's what was happening.
00:25:17
◼
►
That's my experience with feedback for applying to jobs.
00:25:24
◼
►
No desire to have an impulse.
00:25:26
◼
►
But I don't know, like when I watch Shark Tank,
00:25:28
◼
►
I always think when the VCs offer a deal
00:25:30
◼
►
and they're like, "Oh, here's a deal,
00:25:31
◼
►
"but you have to say yes or no right now."
00:25:32
◼
►
It's like, "Oh, I'm sorry, my blanket policy is no.
00:25:34
◼
►
"If you need me to decide right now, the answer is no."
00:25:36
◼
►
Right, but this is why you would never go on that show.
00:25:39
◼
►
No, no, I would never go on that show.
00:25:41
◼
►
'Cause it's pointless.
00:25:41
◼
►
But I think that's a reasonable policy.
00:25:43
◼
►
You spend hours and hours preparing for it.
00:25:46
◼
►
You go on the show, give your pitch,
00:25:47
◼
►
they offer you the $100,000 you want
00:25:49
◼
►
and you tell them you need to go away and think about it.
00:25:52
◼
►
Yeah, it's not unreasonable.
00:25:55
◼
►
Going back to the feedback question.
00:25:58
◼
►
I did think about it simply because of the large number of applications and also because
00:26:03
◼
►
of how surprisingly busy my past two weeks were.
00:26:06
◼
►
I realized if I was going to do this I would want to do it right and this was, this would
00:26:11
◼
►
quite easily be two full days of work to just write back with feedback on the applications.
00:26:19
◼
►
What about to the final ten?
00:26:20
◼
►
It's a much smaller number.
00:26:22
◼
►
people all know that you're kind of interested now. Maybe they would be at least a more manageable
00:26:29
◼
►
task to give feedback to those 10.
00:26:32
◼
►
Yeah, it's a possibility. It's a possibility. But I'm not sure how much more specific the
00:26:37
◼
►
feedback would be at this stage than just some peculiar reasoning on my part.
00:26:43
◼
►
Sometimes that's all it takes, though. Just to know, so you don't question it.
00:26:47
◼
►
Yeah, I guess. Again, I think all of the ten, the people who, by the time this goes up, will almost
00:26:54
◼
►
certainly have replied if they got the email in their inbox. Any of them I could imagine
00:27:00
◼
►
working with. So it feels like that's... isn't that feedback enough? I don't know.
00:27:06
◼
►
But yeah, to just reiterate my earlier answer is I am feeling pretty good about this.
00:27:16
◼
►
It's going slower than I would have otherwise wanted, but I'm feeling pretty good about this.
00:27:21
◼
►
And at this stage, it's just going to come down to the peculiarities of working with the individuals,
00:27:28
◼
►
or like when are people available. At this stage, it's just going to be, I think, very
00:27:34
◼
►
particular and maybe not a whole lot to be gained from talking about those details.
00:27:41
◼
►
Like, it's just the specifics.
00:27:45
◼
►
We have a new sponsor on cortex and that is blue apron blue aprons mission is to make incredible home cooking
00:27:52
◼
►
Accessible to everyone and yes
00:27:54
◼
►
That means you as well for less than just ten dollars per meal blue apron delivers seasonal recipes along with fresh
00:28:01
◼
►
High quality ingredients to help you make delicious home cooked meals
00:28:05
◼
►
every blue apron meal comes with a step-by-step easy to follow recipe card and
00:28:11
◼
►
portioned ingredients that can be prepared in 40 minutes or less. You are able to customise
00:28:16
◼
►
your recipes each week based on your own dietary preferences and choose the delivery option
00:28:20
◼
►
that fits your own needs. There's no weekly commitment so you can get deliveries when
00:28:24
◼
►
you want them and Blue Apron delivers to 99% of the continental US. New recipes are created
00:28:31
◼
►
each week by Blue Apron's culinary team and are not repeated within a year so you're not
00:28:35
◼
►
going to get the same stuff over and over again, you're going to get new and exciting
00:28:39
◼
►
food every single time. You can cook meals like crispy cod and cabbage slaw tacos with
00:28:45
◼
►
pepita, pineapple and avocado salsa or pan seared pork chops with two cheese mashed potatoes
00:28:51
◼
►
and sautéed spinach. That was so difficult to say because the food is so great as I'm
00:28:56
◼
►
saying it. My mouth is filling with saliva. All of these meals are awesome. And let me
00:29:02
◼
►
tell you, once you have Blue Apron delivering to your home, you're going to get better at
00:29:05
◼
►
cooking, learn new skills, try new things and you'll be able to keep all those recipes
00:29:10
◼
►
and just remake them later if you like. Your mind will be opened to a new world of culinary
00:29:16
◼
►
Blue Apron knows that when you cook with fresh ingredients that support a more sustainable
00:29:20
◼
►
food system, you can make incredible meals. Blue Apron sets the highest quality standards
00:29:24
◼
►
for their community of artisanal suppliers, family run farms, fisheries and ranches. Whether
00:29:29
◼
►
it's Japanese ramen noodles, wild caught Alaskan salmon or heirloom tomatoes, Blue
00:29:34
◼
►
brings you the best. Check out this week's menu and get your two meals free with free
00:29:40
◼
►
shipping by going to blueapron.com/cortex. This is free food guys, just go check it out,
00:29:45
◼
►
you will love how good it feels and tastes to create incredible home cooked meals with
00:29:49
◼
►
Blue Apron. So don't wait, visit blueapron.com/cortex and we thank Blue Apron for their support of
00:29:55
◼
►
Cortex. Blue Apron, a better way to cook.
00:29:58
◼
►
Of the people that are in the last final ten, this sounds like a reality show now. You give
00:30:03
◼
►
roses out to the ones that you like and maybe you give them like Wacom styluses or something
00:30:11
◼
►
That's how they know.
00:30:12
◼
►
Yeah that'll work.
00:30:13
◼
►
Of the ones that are through to the final round, are there any in there or are they
00:30:19
◼
►
all kind of in a scenario where you could have an all-in-one person?
00:30:22
◼
►
I know we spoke about that before about like someone who would be animator and illustrator.
00:30:29
◼
►
Is this something that you think might exist in these people?
00:30:33
◼
►
Yeah, I would say that all of these people would be totally fine as animator/illustrators.
00:30:40
◼
►
And what I was kind of thinking from the beginning but didn't quite want to say is work collaboratively on storyboards.
00:30:47
◼
►
Like, I... If a person is good, my thought is I want their feedback on a storyboard.
00:30:54
◼
►
If I can give them a script, I think...
00:30:56
◼
►
I think a good workflow... Again, this is me just speculating, just thinking about it in the future.
00:31:01
◼
►
But all of these people seem really good.
00:31:03
◼
►
And so my thought is that if I have scripts, one of the things I might be able to do is say,
00:31:07
◼
►
look, here is the script.
00:31:09
◼
►
I'm going to do a rough storyboard.
00:31:11
◼
►
You separately do a rough storyboard and together, let's see what is the best thing to do.
00:31:18
◼
►
Right, because those people have already done that.
00:31:20
◼
►
Right, exactly.
00:31:20
◼
►
That was the first challenge, right, was take just the audio, not even the script, right,
00:31:28
◼
►
making it even harder than it would be and make something entertaining out of this and
00:31:33
◼
►
to get into that position that they're in now, they have done that.
00:31:37
◼
►
Yeah. So it's again, it's a strong group of people and all of them could be animator,
00:31:44
◼
►
illustrators, storyboarder people. So I think, I can't remember what I said in the last episode
00:31:49
◼
►
that I was expecting like a 25% chance that I might be able to find someone who fills
00:31:54
◼
►
that all-in-one role, and here I am with 10 possibilities of people who could fill that
00:31:59
◼
►
all-in-one role.
00:32:01
◼
►
So I think I dramatically, dramatically underestimated last time.
00:32:07
◼
►
That was my bet, by the way, that you would find lots of people that could do both, because
00:32:10
◼
►
how else could they have gotten to the point where they made the submission?
00:32:14
◼
►
Yeah, you are totally right.
00:32:17
◼
►
You were right on this one.
00:32:18
◼
►
#mikewasright, I guess, because you like to hear that.
00:32:21
◼
►
I love to hear that.
00:32:22
◼
►
I know it's a sweet, sweet sound to your ears, so I'll give it to you.
00:32:26
◼
►
It is core to my emotional wellness.
00:32:28
◼
►
So you found these 10 people, is there going to be a fleet of CGP Grey animator illustrators?
00:32:37
◼
►
Like you have 10 now. It's an abundance.
00:32:41
◼
►
This is where I have found things a little bit tricky is I'm not 100% sure how to proceed
00:32:50
◼
►
from this point.
00:32:53
◼
►
Again, this is where I...
00:32:56
◼
►
For the purposes of hiring,
00:33:00
◼
►
I again wish that I was a bigger entity.
00:33:03
◼
►
I would love to be able to
00:33:06
◼
►
do something like bring on three animators
00:33:10
◼
►
and have them work on stuff.
00:33:12
◼
►
But the question is, I just don't produce enough
00:33:15
◼
►
writing at this point to support something like that.
00:33:19
◼
►
Right? It's just--it is--it is just not practical.
00:33:22
◼
►
So I don't really know how this is--this is going to proceed.
00:33:26
◼
►
And this is partly why I am doing this information gathering stage on the people who have applied.
00:33:32
◼
►
I could easily see...
00:33:35
◼
►
you know, one of two...
00:33:37
◼
►
outcomes for this. I could--I could see either...
00:33:41
◼
►
having one person who does a large amount of work for me...
00:33:47
◼
►
or I could see rotating between a few people.
00:33:51
◼
►
And one of the interesting things about this submission process,
00:33:57
◼
►
which I did expect but didn't explicitly want to say,
00:34:01
◼
►
is that a couple of people ignored what was seemingly the most important piece of advice,
00:34:10
◼
►
which was, "You are to animate this video in my style."
00:34:14
◼
►
And I anticipated that some people would just totally ignore that,
00:34:19
◼
►
but still produce very interesting work.
00:34:24
◼
►
And so I have a couple of submissions which fall into that category of
00:34:29
◼
►
"This is obviously not a video that I could have ever produced."
00:34:34
◼
►
No one would watch this and think,
00:34:36
◼
►
"Boy, CGP Grey got a little bit better at animating!"
00:34:39
◼
►
It's like, no, no, no, CGP Grey did not get this good at animating.
00:34:42
◼
►
Like somebody else did this. This does not look like his style at all.
00:34:45
◼
►
And so those submissions are interesting in a different way.
00:34:50
◼
►
Maybe there's a way that the future of the CGBGray channel that it has rotating styles.
00:34:56
◼
►
That, just like in the past I have had Knut do animation for a few of my videos,
00:35:02
◼
►
Lord of the Rings videos, the Star Trek videos.
00:35:04
◼
►
Like maybe going forward in the future there might be a couple of different animation styles.
00:35:09
◼
►
You already do have different styles though.
00:35:11
◼
►
else though. Like you have the like the slideshow-y type ones, like the Royal Family tree and
00:35:19
◼
►
the political ones like the voting ones. Then you also have like Great Explains where it's
00:35:24
◼
►
little stick figure guy talking. Or you go like full on stock footage 15 minute mini
00:35:31
◼
►
documentary.
00:35:32
◼
►
Right. So what you are saying right now is the thing that everybody I have spoken to
00:35:38
◼
►
says right back to me, like, "You know you already do this, right? Like, you don't actually have a single style that every single video looks like. You already do this."
00:35:48
◼
►
And so, part of me feels like that is quite naturally the solution going forward.
00:35:54
◼
►
That the people that I am working with might end up just having their own style, so I have a couple of different looking things on the channel.
00:36:04
◼
►
But now the only thing that's different is that it is other people who have made them, it is not me.
00:36:08
◼
►
Because from my perspective, since I have made all the videos,
00:36:13
◼
►
I think I over assume their visual similarity to the viewer.
00:36:19
◼
►
Because I have made them, if you see what I mean.
00:36:23
◼
►
And so I was saying like, "Oh, if I have other people doing different things, it'll look just crazy different every single video."
00:36:27
◼
►
But I imagine that that is largely the experience of the viewer already.
00:36:32
◼
►
It's like, "Oh, this video looks nothing like the other CGP Grey videos."
00:36:36
◼
►
And, you know, if you go back earlier in the channel, like, there's tons of videos that
00:36:39
◼
►
don't even have the notion of stick figure CGP Grey. Like, there's a bunch of videos that don't
00:36:44
◼
►
even have that what now feels like a constant element, right? But it was totally missing from
00:36:49
◼
►
probably half of my videos. I've got to say, I tip my hat to those people.
00:36:53
◼
►
Yeah, what do you mean? It's a ballsy move.
00:36:57
◼
►
It is a total ballsy move.
00:36:59
◼
►
And I think that that shows a level of creativity,
00:37:02
◼
►
which and confidence, which could be beneficial.
00:37:06
◼
►
Those people were confident enough in their own style and their own ability
00:37:11
◼
►
that they could create something that was different,
00:37:13
◼
►
even though you explicitly asked for the same.
00:37:16
◼
►
Yeah, and this is this is kind of what I was I was getting at last time.
00:37:21
◼
►
We were talking about talent, but I still want to be a little bit indirect about it
00:37:25
◼
►
that the people who are going to do that, they're just going to do that anyway.
00:37:29
◼
►
Yeah. Because they believe in their own ability, which they should.
00:37:33
◼
►
Right. You know?
00:37:34
◼
►
Sometimes that goes terribly wrong. Like I did reject very quickly some videos that made that
00:37:41
◼
►
move, but in a way like, no, this is not going to work. But yeah, it is the daring move and it's an
00:37:48
◼
►
interesting move and like I said I was anticipating that this would happen but I wasn't going
00:37:56
◼
►
to bank on it as a 100% certainty.
00:37:59
◼
►
Hey, so a couple of times you have mentioned that something kept you busy. Like you said
00:38:07
◼
►
that you had to take some days off because you were busy etc. What's going on over there?
00:38:12
◼
►
What are you doing?
00:38:14
◼
►
You know, it's just grey industries.
00:38:16
◼
►
It's such a massive global venture.
00:38:19
◼
►
There's always something going on.
00:38:22
◼
►
- Those wheels just keep on turning, huh?
00:38:24
◼
►
- Yeah, they do.
00:38:25
◼
►
I just, I had an experience which was, again,
00:38:28
◼
►
where having started this process
00:38:33
◼
►
of trying to get someone as an animator
00:38:37
◼
►
for the YouTube channel,
00:38:39
◼
►
and also the thing that happened before with us,
00:38:42
◼
►
where you helped me get an editor for Hello Internet.
00:38:47
◼
►
Like having those two experiences
00:38:50
◼
►
have turned out to be extremely useful
00:38:53
◼
►
in the past two weeks,
00:38:55
◼
►
because related to hiring,
00:38:57
◼
►
I was able to do a thing that I know eight weeks ago
00:39:00
◼
►
would have seemed like an incredible, difficult task,
00:39:04
◼
►
but now became a thing that I just did in between shows
00:39:08
◼
►
without really mentioning it to you,
00:39:10
◼
►
which was I had a thing that I needed to do for the company.
00:39:15
◼
►
I'm not gonna specify what that thing is.
00:39:18
◼
►
I will let people in the Reddit speculate
00:39:19
◼
►
because people love to speculate on stuff.
00:39:21
◼
►
But basically I had a project that needed to get done
00:39:24
◼
►
and sort of unexpectedly needed to get done.
00:39:28
◼
►
And I thought, okay, this is,
00:39:31
◼
►
I'm like a person who tries to find freelancers
00:39:33
◼
►
to work with now.
00:39:34
◼
►
I can do this.
00:39:35
◼
►
Let me see if I can just quickly get some people
00:39:38
◼
►
to do this thing for me.
00:39:39
◼
►
And so I was really pleased that I had this thing that needed to be done.
00:39:43
◼
►
I wrote up a basic job description of what needed to occur.
00:39:48
◼
►
I passed off the relevant information about here are the key characteristics of
00:39:53
◼
►
what I'm looking for to my personal assistant.
00:39:55
◼
►
I had her go look out for a list of candidates who matched these various
00:40:01
◼
►
criteria. She gave me a short list of five people.
00:40:05
◼
►
I selected it down to a list of three people.
00:40:08
◼
►
I then had three people work on a thing simultaneously as a test for each of them.
00:40:15
◼
►
And then two of those three people worked out with doing this thing precisely the way
00:40:20
◼
►
that I needed to be done.
00:40:21
◼
►
And so now I have two freelancers to be able to call on for a particular task when I need
00:40:25
◼
►
to get done.
00:40:27
◼
►
And I feel like this thing just happened.
00:40:28
◼
►
It was like boom boom boom boom boom.
00:40:30
◼
►
Here's another time where I feel like I'm being a CEO.
00:40:33
◼
►
There's a thing I need done.
00:40:34
◼
►
Oh, I have people to help me with hiring.
00:40:36
◼
►
I'm going to make some decisions about the individuals.
00:40:39
◼
►
I'm going to pay people to do this work.
00:40:41
◼
►
And then I'm going to be able to see right away
00:40:43
◼
►
if it was done properly.
00:40:45
◼
►
And it was just done.
00:40:46
◼
►
And it was just a thing that was like done, sorted, solved.
00:40:50
◼
►
And I feel like without Cortex,
00:40:53
◼
►
that would never have happened.
00:40:54
◼
►
That would have been a huge disaster and huge time sink,
00:40:59
◼
►
much more than it was just for a couple of days.
00:41:01
◼
►
So yeah, it was good.
00:41:03
◼
►
It was a good experience, Myke.
00:41:04
◼
►
- Wow, look at you.
00:41:06
◼
►
- How long did this process take?
00:41:07
◼
►
- From start to finish, it was probably three days,
00:41:12
◼
►
but it was also a relatively small amount
00:41:15
◼
►
of my time and attention.
00:41:17
◼
►
It was a bit of a panicky thing
00:41:18
◼
►
'cause it needed to be done straight away,
00:41:20
◼
►
which is why it diverted my mental attention.
00:41:22
◼
►
But in terms of the actual amount of time that I spent,
00:41:25
◼
►
it was relatively small.
00:41:29
◼
►
And I just think this was just an interesting thing to occur
00:41:33
◼
►
and was one of the ways in which,
00:41:35
◼
►
I don't know, people change over time.
00:41:38
◼
►
Like again, this would have just been
00:41:39
◼
►
a much more difficult task a long time ago.
00:41:41
◼
►
- This would have been horrible for you
00:41:43
◼
►
a couple of months ago.
00:41:44
◼
►
You would have done everything you could
00:41:46
◼
►
to avoid this process.
00:41:49
◼
►
- Right, of like, admitting that you needed help.
00:41:53
◼
►
- And then trying to go out to the open world to find it.
00:41:59
◼
►
- Then judging the work and dealing with people.
00:42:00
◼
►
Like, it's like everything you hate.
00:42:03
◼
►
Yeah, it was absolutely terrible.
00:42:05
◼
►
But it was...
00:42:07
◼
►
It also just to me falls into this category of
00:42:12
◼
►
the theme of the year of less, as with so many of these things, of me trying to do less.
00:42:18
◼
►
And when I was thinking about this, of like, "Okay, I need someone to help with this task."
00:42:25
◼
►
I was originally thinking, like, "Okay, let me try to find one person, and I'll test one person, and I'll do this."
00:42:31
◼
►
And like, but no, wait, this needs to be done quickly.
00:42:33
◼
►
And so this also goes back to the spreadsheet that I still need to help you
00:42:36
◼
►
make at some point, Myke.
00:42:37
◼
►
I was able to kind of think about this as this is a thing that I need solved
00:42:43
◼
►
What is like, what is the cost calculation of having three people just do it
00:42:49
◼
►
if I just pay them to do it and using that essentially as also the job
00:42:53
◼
►
application?
00:42:54
◼
►
And I was like, OK, well, the return on investment for this from a business
00:42:57
◼
►
perspective says just do it like you need this thing done quickly.
00:43:01
◼
►
and the cost to trying to do it sequentially doesn't make sense.
00:43:05
◼
►
It was an interesting way to realize of how to try to solve a problem
00:43:09
◼
►
relatively quickly in a very "I am thinking about this
00:43:14
◼
►
as a CEO, I am not thinking about this as
00:43:17
◼
►
me, a person, trying to solve a problem." So yeah,
00:43:22
◼
►
Cortex. Changing lives, even mine.
00:43:26
◼
►
Today's episode of Cortex is also brought to you by one of my favorite
00:43:29
◼
►
companies and that is FreshBooks. I love FreshBooks because they help me save time and stress
00:43:35
◼
►
when it comes to running my business and they can help you too. And it all starts with the
00:43:40
◼
►
pain free invoicing that they have honed over time to make absolutely perfect and simple.
00:43:47
◼
►
It takes just 30 seconds to get an invoice set up and then once you've sent it out to
00:43:50
◼
►
your client they're able to pay you super fast and easy because FreshBooks allow you
00:43:56
◼
►
to integrate a myriad of payment services like card and PayPal and their own payment
00:44:01
◼
►
service as well. This means that you're going to get paid five days faster on average. All
00:44:06
◼
►
you need to be as a Freshworks customer and you're going to get paid faster and you're
00:44:10
◼
►
able to track everything much easier as well. You'll be able to actually see it when someone's
00:44:15
◼
►
received your invoice, if they've looked at it, if they've printed it. So you don't have
00:44:19
◼
►
to chase people up. You know where it is in the system and you don't need to send any
00:44:23
◼
►
of those awkward "have you seen my email" emails. You don't need to do those anymore
00:44:27
◼
►
with FreshBooks. You're able to keep track of your receipts if you want to, you're able
00:44:30
◼
►
to keep track of your expenses if you want to as well and if you're in the US you can
00:44:34
◼
►
automatically import your bank transactions for easy reconciliation. FreshBooks can become
00:44:39
◼
►
the home of your finances for your business and I love them for that. They have tons of
00:44:44
◼
►
great third party integrations, great reports so you can easily see who owes you what and
00:44:48
◼
►
fantastic support. So the core of FreshBooks is something they really really believe in
00:44:52
◼
►
and you'll see it once you become a FreshBooks customer.
00:44:56
◼
►
They're offering a 30-day free trial
00:44:58
◼
►
to listeners of this show with no credit card required.
00:45:01
◼
►
Claim your 30 days of unrestricted use.
00:45:03
◼
►
Trust me, just go check them out.
00:45:04
◼
►
Go to freshbooks.com/cortex,
00:45:06
◼
►
and please enter cortex in the how you heard about us
00:45:09
◼
►
section so FreshBooks knows that you came to them
00:45:11
◼
►
from this show.
00:45:12
◼
►
Thank you so much to FreshBooks for sponsoring Cortex
00:45:15
◼
►
and Relay FM.
00:45:16
◼
►
Great, what is Colmak?
00:45:22
◼
►
Are you thinking about switching keyboard layouts, Myke?
00:45:24
◼
►
No, I've just come across a word I'd never heard of before.
00:45:28
◼
►
A ton of feedback.
00:45:29
◼
►
Colmac is better.
00:45:30
◼
►
You should try Colmac.
00:45:31
◼
►
That's what I've been told.
00:45:33
◼
►
Look, the internet is an endless fractal
00:45:37
◼
►
of opposing wars of things.
00:45:41
◼
►
It's like, oh, there's Apple versus IBM, right?
00:45:45
◼
►
Or like, there's Mac versus PC.
00:45:48
◼
►
I was like, OK, well, we're all on the Mac side.
00:45:50
◼
►
"Now it's iOS versus OS X."
00:45:53
◼
►
Right? And then, "Oh, okay."
00:45:54
◼
►
And then it's, like, these things go on forever and ever and ever.
00:45:58
◼
►
And there is nothing that you can mention that there is not going to be some other side for.
00:46:04
◼
►
No matter how obscure you get.
00:46:06
◼
►
So the question is, are you in the 0.00001% of the population considering switching to a Dvorak keyboard?
00:46:14
◼
►
Guess what? You have many options, right?
00:46:16
◼
►
options, right? And people are going to argue with you about which of the variations is the best one.
00:46:21
◼
►
So everything, everything devolves into these kind of little wars, but
00:46:26
◼
►
the answer to your question is that
00:46:29
◼
►
Colmac is another alternative keyboard.
00:46:33
◼
►
Just as Dvorak is designed to minimize finger movement,
00:46:37
◼
►
Colmac is also designed to minimize finger movement, but my understanding of it is that it is also
00:46:45
◼
►
optimized to be easier to switch to.
00:46:49
◼
►
So that when it was being designed, the question
00:46:53
◼
►
was not "let's minimize the amount of finger travel"
00:46:57
◼
►
the question was "let's minimize the amount of finger travel
00:47:01
◼
►
and also minimize the amount of keys
00:47:05
◼
►
that were actually going to move." Yeah, I'm looking at a layout now
00:47:09
◼
►
and it's very similar, very similar.
00:47:13
◼
►
So the standard copy-cut-paste keys that everybody in the world uses, those are not moved on purpose
00:47:21
◼
►
because everybody has that just burned into their brain about cut-copy-paste.
00:47:26
◼
►
There's a few other frequent keys that are not moved, but that is my understanding,
00:47:30
◼
►
is Colmac is designed to make switching simpler, which is why--
00:47:34
◼
►
Yeah, like if you're using OS X, it would be better.
00:47:38
◼
►
Yeah, sure, that one too.
00:47:40
◼
►
Because the Q and W are in the same place
00:47:42
◼
►
for the quit and close windows and stuff like that.
00:47:45
◼
►
I can see how, especially as a Mac user,
00:47:47
◼
►
it would maybe be easier to switch to Comac.
00:47:51
◼
►
- Yeah, my feeling is,
00:47:53
◼
►
it's been funny, I've been getting a lot of Twitter messages
00:47:58
◼
►
and messages from people telling me
00:48:01
◼
►
that they have decided to switch
00:48:02
◼
►
and that they now understand the feeling
00:48:04
◼
►
like you've had a stroke.
00:48:06
◼
►
It's like, oh God, that was not a joke.
00:48:09
◼
►
That is legitimately the feeling of trying to type
00:48:11
◼
►
on a new keyboard layout.
00:48:13
◼
►
- As a QWERTY user, looking at Dvorak,
00:48:15
◼
►
it's like a nightmare.
00:48:17
◼
►
Like everything is-- - It looks alien.
00:48:19
◼
►
- It just looks horrific.
00:48:20
◼
►
It's all over the place.
00:48:22
◼
►
- I like the people that have also,
00:48:23
◼
►
I've seen a couple of people that have sent in pictures
00:48:25
◼
►
of photos or printouts of the Dvorak layout
00:48:29
◼
►
on the top of their monitor.
00:48:32
◼
►
- You know like how you did that?
00:48:33
◼
►
I've seen a few people have taken that on.
00:48:36
◼
►
Even though I use Dvorak, I feel the need to reemphasize,
00:48:39
◼
►
although possibly too late for many,
00:48:41
◼
►
that I don't promote switching just for funsies.
00:48:49
◼
►
I think you need a really good reason to wanna switch.
00:48:52
◼
►
And switching because it's the more efficient layout,
00:48:55
◼
►
I think is not a good decision.
00:48:57
◼
►
You need to switch to Dvorak
00:49:00
◼
►
because you have a really good reason to do so.
00:49:04
◼
►
not for, oh it'll be a little faster
00:49:07
◼
►
or it's a little bit more efficient.
00:49:08
◼
►
I think that is not good enough for the transition costs.
00:49:11
◼
►
- I can't even imagine the minuscule amount
00:49:13
◼
►
of people in the world that it actually would affect
00:49:16
◼
►
to have more efficiency with typing.
00:49:19
◼
►
- What sort of difference are you looking at here?
00:49:22
◼
►
If you're gonna double your typing speed, it might be good.
00:49:26
◼
►
- Right, but you're not.
00:49:27
◼
►
- No, you're not doing that, buddy.
00:49:29
◼
►
- Yeah, and so the amount of time you lose
00:49:32
◼
►
over a couple of months getting back your regular typing speed, you're never going to
00:49:36
◼
►
recover that over the course of the whole rest of your life because Dvorak may or may
00:49:41
◼
►
not be slightly faster or more efficient.
00:49:43
◼
►
One thing that has been kind of rattling around my brain that I'm not sure that I fully understand
00:49:48
◼
►
from our discussion last week is why changing keyboard layout would have helped your hands.
00:49:54
◼
►
You're still making the same movements, right, but just in different locations.
00:49:59
◼
►
Yeah, it's an – like, this is why I'm, like, a reluctant Dvorak promoter, and barely
00:50:07
◼
►
even a Dvorak promoter, because –
00:50:10
◼
►
Or last week would have said different.
00:50:13
◼
►
Like, soliloquy.
00:50:16
◼
►
I think if you listened back last time, if you didn't cut it, I did say something like,
00:50:20
◼
►
all I know is that when I switched to Dvorak, I stopped having problems.
00:50:25
◼
►
That is a very different statement from "Dvorak will solve all of your problems and make all
00:50:30
◼
►
of your dreams come true."
00:50:31
◼
►
And I could just cut that section out and just use that part.
00:50:34
◼
►
Yeah, there you go.
00:50:37
◼
►
This is the problem with you doing the edit.
00:50:40
◼
►
I imagine it was a combination of many things at the time.
00:50:44
◼
►
I think it was certainly a combination of taking a big break from typing when I had
00:50:50
◼
►
I think it was almost certainly being forced to get back into typing very slowly, because
00:50:57
◼
►
I wasn't able to type very quickly.
00:51:00
◼
►
And then I think those two things started me down on the right path, and then now that
00:51:07
◼
►
I type with Dvorak, I think that the amount I am moving my hands is now under the threshold
00:51:17
◼
►
that would cause me RSI problems.
00:51:20
◼
►
whereas before with QWERTY, I think it was over the threshold.
00:51:25
◼
►
But I may not be representative of the general population.
00:51:30
◼
►
It's very possible that I am right on the edge with that kind of thing.
00:51:34
◼
►
Whereas everybody with RSI problems, they have some threshold.
00:51:39
◼
►
Some people's thresholds are naturally higher, some people's thresholds are naturally lower.
00:51:44
◼
►
And that is going to affect what helps you or what doesn't help you.
00:51:48
◼
►
And so I suspect that typing-wise, I was right on some threshold where changing to Dvorak
00:51:56
◼
►
But if your sensitivity to RSI problems is very high, switching to Dvorak might not help
00:52:02
◼
►
It might just cost you some time and not be beneficial.
00:52:06
◼
►
So that's why I always try to be really careful when I talk about it.
00:52:10
◼
►
It helped me, but I'm not sure that I can universally recommend it.
00:52:17
◼
►
So I would say if you are having RSI problems, it doesn't necessarily hurt to try.
00:52:25
◼
►
Because what else are you going to do?
00:52:28
◼
►
You can try different split keyboards, there's a bunch of stuff that you can try, and Dvorak
00:52:32
◼
►
is one of those tools.
00:52:35
◼
►
And I've used split keyboards, I've done a bunch of that other stuff, but I think switching
00:52:40
◼
►
the layout was the thing that worked well for me.
00:52:43
◼
►
But I am not a doctor, I do not play one on a podcast.
00:52:46
◼
►
All I will say is, with the Colmac people, I don't know how much easier it is to actually
00:52:52
◼
►
switch to Colmac.
00:52:54
◼
►
My suspicion is that if you're going to Dvorak or you're going to Colmac, either way you're
00:53:01
◼
►
going to feel like you've had a stroke.
00:53:02
◼
►
Like, I can't imagine it's going to be that much of a difference.
00:53:06
◼
►
So I think that the thing that really matters is just knowing that whatever device you are
00:53:12
◼
►
going to use has software-level support for the keyboard that you are going to use.
00:53:18
◼
►
That is the primary feature.
00:53:20
◼
►
Okay, Myke, last week I told you about the One True email app, which is Unibox.
00:53:30
◼
►
And I would like to know if you have tried it since then.
00:53:33
◼
►
I have set up Unibox on all of my devices.
00:53:38
◼
►
And I've played with it and I can see a utility for it,
00:53:43
◼
►
but I don't think I will use it as much as you do.
00:53:48
◼
►
I know exactly when I will use Unibox.
00:53:51
◼
►
- When is that?
00:53:52
◼
►
- When I go on trips.
00:53:53
◼
►
- Okay, so why on trips versus other times?
00:53:59
◼
►
What is your thinking here?
00:54:00
◼
►
- So when I'm on trips,
00:54:02
◼
►
this can be vacations or work trips,
00:54:04
◼
►
I have less time to devote to email.
00:54:08
◼
►
So whenever I do open my email inbox,
00:54:12
◼
►
I would like to be able to, at a glance,
00:54:15
◼
►
pick out important things, and that would be by person.
00:54:18
◼
►
So it's very likely that if I'm not looking email
00:54:22
◼
►
for a few days, I might have a few emails
00:54:24
◼
►
from a few important people,
00:54:25
◼
►
and they'll be grouped together in Unibox.
00:54:27
◼
►
And it's a better way, I think, to manage a large inbox.
00:54:32
◼
►
So I will definitely use it then,
00:54:35
◼
►
which is why I'm keeping it installed,
00:54:37
◼
►
Because I know that at times where I can only just dip into this and pick out important things
00:54:41
◼
►
And I know there's gonna be a lot more in there than usual
00:54:44
◼
►
This would be a really good way at a glance to get a view of what is happening
00:54:49
◼
►
Hmm, which is why I also think that this app is kind of made for your style
00:54:55
◼
►
Of email because that's kind of how you I mean, it sounds like I'm making a joke, but I'm being serious
00:55:02
◼
►
Like it's this is how you kind of always do your email, right?
00:55:06
◼
►
Is it all you would let it build up then you go in and you chop away at it, but mostly
00:55:11
◼
►
You need to see email from maybe one person. Yeah, and that's what makes your situation different to most other people
00:55:18
◼
►
Yeah, this was something which someone in the reddit left a comment along the lines like uni box is the perfect email app
00:55:26
◼
►
If you only check your email once a week, that is very accurate. I realized in retrospect. I think I had not quite really
00:55:34
◼
►
But that really got a laugh out of me because I realized as soon as I read that, yes, of course, that is exactly the purpose of this email app.
00:55:42
◼
►
If you are checking your email all the time, the very feature that it is built around, Sort By Sender, is almost entirely useless to you.
00:55:50
◼
►
Whereas if you are someone like me who wants to check their email inbox once a week and then for as little time as humanly possible, then this is the email client for you.
00:56:03
◼
►
- I think it's more than just sort by sender
00:56:06
◼
►
that makes it useful, it's the grouping.
00:56:10
◼
►
- You know, 'cause I think you could have other apps,
00:56:12
◼
►
I know you've tried and not many do it,
00:56:13
◼
►
but sort by sender is a new thing to do,
00:56:15
◼
►
it's just a different way to sort the inbox,
00:56:17
◼
►
but it goes an extra step to group email
00:56:20
◼
►
from the same person,
00:56:21
◼
►
even if it's a different thread together,
00:56:23
◼
►
that's a whole different scenario.
00:56:26
◼
►
- Yeah, and that's what I totally love about it.
00:56:29
◼
►
- I applaud doing it this way, right?
00:56:33
◼
►
you have a way of wanting to manage email
00:56:37
◼
►
that is different and going for it.
00:56:39
◼
►
I wish that more apps would do that in all honesty,
00:56:42
◼
►
like find a thing that works for you and go for it.
00:56:45
◼
►
Like it was one of the things
00:56:47
◼
►
that I loved about mailbox, right?
00:56:48
◼
►
Like the idea of mailbox was focused around
00:56:52
◼
►
what they referred to as inbox zero,
00:56:55
◼
►
which is like a real twist
00:56:57
◼
►
on what it actually started out as being.
00:57:00
◼
►
But their idea was, clear the email from your inbox,
00:57:03
◼
►
whether you are marking it as to do, snoozing it for later,
00:57:07
◼
►
answering it or archiving it.
00:57:09
◼
►
But like at the end of the day, have nothing in there.
00:57:12
◼
►
And I liked it 'cause the whole app was built around
00:57:15
◼
►
that ideology, whether it's right or wrong,
00:57:18
◼
►
like that was the way that they built their application.
00:57:20
◼
►
And that's what I also like about Unibox.
00:57:22
◼
►
And I wish that more email applications would come
00:57:25
◼
►
with some kind of overriding like theory to them.
00:57:29
◼
►
- Right, some design philosophy around
00:57:32
◼
►
how should you handle messages.
00:57:34
◼
►
- Yep, and that is exactly what my new email app has,
00:57:37
◼
►
which is do everything to them,
00:57:40
◼
►
I think is the overall theory of airmail.
00:57:43
◼
►
Have you played with airmail on iOS?
00:57:46
◼
►
- Yes, I have played with airmail.
00:57:48
◼
►
It is the white icon, right?
00:57:50
◼
►
It's like the white envelope, is that it?
00:57:52
◼
►
- Yeah, it has an envelope on it.
00:57:53
◼
►
Do you know what one I mean?
00:57:55
◼
►
- Yeah, I do know.
00:57:56
◼
►
- Okay, good.
00:57:56
◼
►
But the envelope is thin blue lines, is that airmail?
00:57:59
◼
►
Do you know what you've done to me? I just said envelope.
00:58:03
◼
►
Should be envelope.
00:58:05
◼
►
Ugh. Terrible.
00:58:06
◼
►
This is what happens when you talk to Americans all day, Myke.
00:58:08
◼
►
Oh, I know. Mobile. Mobile envelopes.
00:58:11
◼
►
This is just accent drift. There's no way to avoid this.
00:58:16
◼
►
You can hear this in my voice if you go back and you listen to my early videos. Like, you
00:58:22
◼
►
back and you listen to that UK Explained video, the very first one, I sound like a totally
00:58:27
◼
►
different person because that was the me who spoke to British people all day long. Right,
00:58:33
◼
►
my accent drifted in the opposite way and then since I left schools and don't talk to
00:58:40
◼
►
British people all day long, my accent has very naturally just drifted back much more
00:58:46
◼
►
towards the normal American. I wouldn't have expected that to happen. In schools, I think
00:58:51
◼
►
it's worse because you're aiming when you're talking in front of children to be non-distracting.
00:58:58
◼
►
And so I was actually very conscious, particularly when I was teaching, of having a much softened
00:59:05
◼
►
version of my American accent.
00:59:07
◼
►
Right, but that's exactly my thinking with my accent.
00:59:11
◼
►
I soften it down for the Americans.
00:59:14
◼
►
Exactly, because otherwise the Americans will go, "huh-huh-huh, lol, listen to the way you
00:59:18
◼
►
said that word!"
00:59:20
◼
►
Right? That's... so you learn you have to talk in a certain way to not distract your American co-hosts.
00:59:26
◼
►
Isn't that what happens?
00:59:28
◼
►
Yep, that's exactly my thinking. Anyway...
00:59:31
◼
►
So, accent drift. It happens to everybody. There's no way around it. And you are just in the funny
00:59:37
◼
►
situation that even though you live in the United Kingdom, the vast majority of words you speak at
00:59:43
◼
►
this point are to non-British people. I mean, that has to be the case, right?
00:59:47
◼
►
Oh, yeah, well, because I tend to speak to either American people or a Romanian person.
00:59:55
◼
►
Exactly, well that's what I was thinking, right? It's like you're not even normalizing back at home.
00:59:59
◼
►
You're being pulled in an entirely other way back at home. So, yeah, it should be no surprise that
01:00:07
◼
►
you were saying... I don't even know. Envelope? Envelope?
01:00:11
◼
►
Envelope, okay.
01:00:12
◼
►
Instead of envelope.
01:00:16
◼
►
So just after we recorded our last episode, Canvas,
01:00:20
◼
►
which is another show on relay FM, which is kind of iOS focused.
01:00:24
◼
►
They did a whole big episode about third party email clients and Federico was
01:00:29
◼
►
really pushing airmail and he had previously written a big review about it and I
01:00:35
◼
►
decided to check it out and I like it a lot.
01:00:40
◼
►
I like it a lot. Um,
01:00:42
◼
►
It is rough around the edges in places, like it does some weird stuff, like it has some weird bugs.
01:00:48
◼
►
And there's some UI stuff that I'm not massively keen on, but I feel like and have heard that there's gonna be some changes which would be a bit nicer for my eyes.
01:00:56
◼
►
But it also does the custom IMAP screwing around thing.
01:01:00
◼
►
I just realized that's why I know Airmail, because I've been trying to delete their custom IMAP folders from my setup for a while, and they keep coming back, because it must be installed somewhere that I don't know, or it's waking up every once in a while.
01:01:11
◼
►
'cause it will do snoozing and all that stuff,
01:01:13
◼
►
but I don't use any of it.
01:01:15
◼
►
It sets them up, but if you just don't go buy into that,
01:01:18
◼
►
it will just, they just live there as empty labels.
01:01:22
◼
►
But what I really like about this application
01:01:26
◼
►
is it has tons of third-party integrations.
01:01:28
◼
►
So I'm very easily able to take an email
01:01:33
◼
►
and send it to OmniFocus.
01:01:35
◼
►
It will open OmniFocus, attach the whole text
01:01:37
◼
►
the emails a note, which is so cool for me.
01:01:42
◼
►
So like say somebody sends me ad copy,
01:01:45
◼
►
I can add the whole copy that they've sent me
01:01:47
◼
►
to the OmniFocus note, reminding me to write it up.
01:01:51
◼
►
- Yeah, yeah, that kind of thing is really nice
01:01:54
◼
►
to be able to do.
01:01:55
◼
►
- They can send, there's just so many services
01:01:57
◼
►
that it plugs into, and it also can do really powerful
01:02:00
◼
►
things with the email messages, like turn them into PDFs.
01:02:04
◼
►
It has something that I've never seen any email app do,
01:02:08
◼
►
in that you can take an email and save it in a folder
01:02:11
◼
►
in another email account.
01:02:16
◼
►
- So say you have multiple email accounts.
01:02:19
◼
►
- And you get an email to cgpgray1@gmail.com.
01:02:23
◼
►
- But really, you would like to save it in a folder
01:02:25
◼
►
that you have in cgpgray3@gmail.com.
01:02:29
◼
►
- It will let you take that email and save it in the folder
01:02:32
◼
►
in the other email account.
01:02:33
◼
►
Like it does some crazy stuff of like sending them around.
01:02:36
◼
►
But it's just like a weird feature that I really like
01:02:40
◼
►
because this feels like an app that is made by people
01:02:44
◼
►
who deal with lots of email.
01:02:46
◼
►
So it has all these crazy little things that you can do.
01:02:49
◼
►
And they just had a new Mac app update come out
01:02:52
◼
►
and so this is an all around system
01:02:55
◼
►
which is on all of my platforms.
01:02:59
◼
►
And if I want to I can snooze emails
01:03:01
◼
►
but I'm not getting back into that now.
01:03:03
◼
►
- Right, right. - Because I've learned
01:03:04
◼
►
to live without it, and I really like it.
01:03:07
◼
►
And it has one of my very favorite things,
01:03:10
◼
►
and it does it so well on all my devices,
01:03:12
◼
►
and this is my main reason, seriously,
01:03:15
◼
►
for sticking with this.
01:03:16
◼
►
- Wait, wait, if I can remember,
01:03:17
◼
►
it was email notifications, is that right?
01:03:20
◼
►
- No. - Is that what it was?
01:03:20
◼
►
Ah. - It has notifications,
01:03:22
◼
►
which is fine, a notification.
01:03:23
◼
►
- I remember notifications driving you crazy
01:03:25
◼
►
that you used to have an email app set up
01:03:27
◼
►
solely for the notifications.
01:03:29
◼
►
- That was the one time, yeah.
01:03:30
◼
►
But the notifications are so good.
01:03:33
◼
►
You can choose to pull down
01:03:35
◼
►
and read the entire email message.
01:03:39
◼
►
- Which I really like.
01:03:40
◼
►
But no, my favorite feature is, you can choose this,
01:03:43
◼
►
it does not mark an email as read
01:03:46
◼
►
until it is opened and acted upon.
01:03:48
◼
►
- Oh, and acted upon.
01:03:51
◼
►
- That's nice.
01:03:52
◼
►
That's a nice touch.
01:03:53
◼
►
- So, 'cause I am constantly, in all of my email apps,
01:03:56
◼
►
opening a message and then marking it as unread again.
01:03:59
◼
►
and that drives me crazy,
01:04:00
◼
►
'cause I like to leave messages as unread
01:04:04
◼
►
until I do something with them.
01:04:05
◼
►
And then sometimes I'll purposely mark them as read,
01:04:09
◼
►
do something with the email, but leave it in my inbox
01:04:11
◼
►
'cause it's something I need to catch up on,
01:04:13
◼
►
but it's not an unread email anymore.
01:04:15
◼
►
And that's my own weird system,
01:04:17
◼
►
but I like that it has that feature
01:04:19
◼
►
and it has a bunch of different things that it will do,
01:04:22
◼
►
but I, yeah, I really like this application.
01:04:26
◼
►
There are tons of settings, tons.
01:04:29
◼
►
every setting so you can really go in and if you're willing to put the time in
01:04:34
◼
►
and kind of make this the email app that you want it to be. I'm really impressed with this Gray.
01:04:38
◼
►
So do you think you have found an email home?
01:04:41
◼
►
I think so. That's very nice.
01:04:44
◼
►
Plus they charge for the application.
01:04:48
◼
►
Right. Yeah. I'm with you on this one as well.
01:04:52
◼
►
I get nervous when apps don't charge. It feels like that if you're important to me
01:04:55
◼
►
I would like to give you money. I would like to give you more money than you're charging
01:04:59
◼
►
because I want you to be around.
01:05:01
◼
►
- Charging is a feature for important apps.
01:05:05
◼
►
But I think that's good.
01:05:06
◼
►
You are with Air Mail, you may have found a home there.
01:05:09
◼
►
And since we did that, the last show
01:05:11
◼
►
where I was promoting Unibox,
01:05:14
◼
►
someone pointed out to me an additional feature of Unibox
01:05:17
◼
►
which has now allowed it to become my only email app.
01:05:22
◼
►
So last time I mentioned I had this funny workflow
01:05:24
◼
►
of flipping into mail for VIPs and then flipping back.
01:05:27
◼
►
But someone sent to me that there's a feature on the message list where you can pull down
01:05:34
◼
►
and have it only show messages from people who are in your contact book.
01:05:41
◼
►
And that's not exactly the same as VIPs, but to me it's like a 70% solution.
01:05:49
◼
►
It's good enough that if I can do this, then I don't have to bother flipping back into
01:05:56
◼
►
mail.app and using a different interface. So now I can just do my entire workflow in
01:06:01
◼
►
Unibox in one interface, in one place, and I'm very happy. So I have found an email home
01:06:08
◼
►
and you have found an email home. For now, anyway, because the wheel always keeps turning.
01:06:13
◼
►
Oh yeah, it's the great wheel of email.
01:06:15
◼
►
Yeah, in a week! We'll be complaining about it again.
01:06:19
◼
►
Well, in Cortex episode 1, like I'm looking at my home screen, it's a completely different
01:06:24
◼
►
email application to what I'm using now. The email application on my home screen doesn't
01:06:27
◼
►
even exist anymore.
01:06:31
◼
►
That ugly, ugly home screen.
01:06:32
◼
►
Aw, rest in peace little buddy.
01:06:35
◼
►
Think about how much better your life is after you've met me.
01:06:40
◼
►
Do you think that was a worthy Cortex-versary episode, Myke?
01:06:47
◼
►
Well, I mean, we spoke about email.
01:06:54
◼
►
I guess it's an excellent point.
01:06:56
◼
►
Email is central to all of the work
01:07:01
◼
►
that occurs in our lives.
01:07:03
◼
►
So I think so.
01:07:04
◼
►
I think maybe right there.
01:07:05
◼
►
Well, yeah, it is kind of perfect
01:07:07
◼
►
because the gift for a first anniversary is paper
01:07:10
◼
►
and emails are just electronic paper.
01:07:14
◼
►
That's the traditional gift.
01:07:15
◼
►
Clocks are the modern gift.
01:07:16
◼
►
What do you want me to do?