309: Ancient Mac Archaeologist


00:00:00   [Music]

00:00:08   From Relay FM, this is Upgrade, episode 309. Today's show is brought to you by Squarespace, Pingdom, and DoorDash.

00:00:17   My name is Myke Hurley and I'm joined by Jason Snell. Hello, Jason Snell!

00:00:21   Hello, Myke Hurley, how are you?

00:00:22   I am fine and dandy, my friend. We have an action-packed Upgrade episode today.

00:00:28   But considering it's so action-packed, I'm sure that there will be many listeners who will have lots of strong opinions about this episode.

00:00:35   So our #SnellTalk question from Marlies, who submitted this in the Relay FM members Discord, ties into this perfectly.

00:00:42   Marlies wants to know, Jason, do you ever talk back to podcasts?

00:00:46   Hmm, well, I think, yes, any good podcast that engenders some connection and then you end up talking back to it from time to time.

00:00:54   Yes, I do that. I just did that the other day. I joke about how I agree with almost everything that Marco says on ATP,

00:01:03   but Marco was talking about Big Sur the other day while I was listening and I was in the shower because I listened to podcasts in the shower.

00:01:12   And if you'd been standing outside the shower door, you would have heard me say, "No, no, wrong!" So yes, I do that. I absolutely do that.

00:01:22   I tend to also just, when I speak back to podcasts, exclaim in some way, good or bad.

00:01:28   Yeah, sure.

00:01:29   Right?

00:01:29   Yeah. Well, I do a lot of laughing and all of that, but I occasionally do like, you know, "Oh, oh, Elliot," to, you know, the flophouse or something like that.

00:01:38   But occasionally there'll be something like that where I don't want to single out Marco.

00:01:42   I also said that Jon was wrong on that episode, but I'm, you know, that's fine. It's their podcast.

00:01:47   I'm not going to swoop in with some follow-out about how I disagree with some of the things they said. That's fine.

00:01:54   We'll get to it. We'll get to it. We'll talk about Big Sur at some point. But yes, I absolutely do talk back to the podcast.

00:02:00   I don't try to tell a story or something because they're not there. They can't hear me.

00:02:03   I will say also a privilege of being a Relay FM host is that I also just send messages to hosts as I'm listening to their podcast in the Relay FM Slack.

00:02:12   That happens all the time.

00:02:14   As a, I'll pull back the curtain for a little bit to our listeners. I think nobody does this to me more than Jon Siracusa.

00:02:21   Jon is an active, as you can imagine, provider of follow-up to podcasts.

00:02:27   Yes, indeed.

00:02:29   Surprise, surprise. The creator of follow-up likes to give follow-up.

00:02:32   He is both the creator of the concept of follow-up and the creator of lots of follow-up.

00:02:40   Some are fun.

00:02:42   Some are fun.

00:02:43   What could be more fun?

00:02:44   Than a new Apple device.

00:02:46   That is the tenuous link for our summer of fun topic today.

00:02:50   Let's talk about a brand new iMac, Jason Snow.

00:02:54   Okay, let's do it.

00:02:55   Shown off and goes on sale today.

00:02:58   Now there are ramifications for the rest of the iMac line, but the majority of the news is focused around a 27-inch iMac.

00:03:06   You had a story go up today, so you were clued in on the information as it was coming out from Apple's press team.

00:03:14   Nothing like getting briefing about a product you don't know anything about and then having to write a story about it in less than an hour.

00:03:20   But that's what you're so good at, Jason.

00:03:22   That's my job.

00:03:23   So nobody would even know.

00:03:24   So I'm going to run through some of the features of this 27-inch iMac and we can kind of stop and talk about them as we want to.

00:03:34   It answers the question of, well, one, I think everybody knew there was going to be some kind of iMac update, right?

00:03:41   I think with Intel chips in it.

00:03:43   Does it?

00:03:43   Has Intel chips?

00:03:44   Let's get that one out of the way.

00:03:45   This is not Apple's first iMac.

00:03:47   But I think, you know, Tim Cook said at the end of WWDC, we have Intel products coming still this year.

00:03:53   The iMac was the obvious candidate because it feels like it's been waiting on an update and it's a popular machine.

00:04:02   And so they did it, but it has the same visual designs.

00:04:07   This is an Intel chip inside of the iMac design that we know and have feelings about.

00:04:12   Well, I mean, it's just it's a classic and it's been around.

00:04:15   That means that it's like what we're used to and also means that it's been around a very long time.

00:04:19   And I think for the last couple of revisions, we've expected that we thought, you know, are they going to make that change to the iMac?

00:04:26   And it still hasn't happened.

00:04:28   So I'm just going to push that chip forward again and think maybe they are saving it for an Apple Silicon iMac.

00:04:35   And that will be a redesigned iMac because these are no different on the outside.

00:04:38   They are different on the inside.

00:04:42   It's really the 27.

00:04:44   The 24 got some changes to or 24, 21.5 got some changes to the base configurations.

00:04:53   Yeah, that's all.

00:04:53   But it's basically not any different.

00:04:56   But that's that's a that's Apple's low cost leader.

00:05:01   I mean, it's just not it's just not that exciting.

00:05:04   And they still have the non still the super cheap one, too.

00:05:08   So, you know, it's it's it's they have to keep that around.

00:05:12   But the 27 inches where they kind of made this investment and they've they've upgraded a bunch of the tech inside.

00:05:17   It's interesting.

00:05:18   It's getting closer and closer to being an iMac Pro, but it's still not an iMac Pro.

00:05:26   Yeah, well, we can talk about the iMac Pro comparison in a bit when we talk about some of the specs.

00:05:30   I would say that we're going to go through this, obviously, in more detail.

00:05:34   But this machine received more of an internal spec update than I think I would have expected at this point before visual design change.

00:05:44   Did you think the Intel iMac was ever going to get a T2 at this point?

00:05:48   Like it's the last it's swooping in here is like the last Mac to get a T2.

00:05:52   I mean, except for the 21 and a half inch iMac, which is untouched, but like almost the last Mac to get the T2.

00:05:59   But it seems so late in the process that it is kind of funny, right?

00:06:02   Like, again, late in the process because we know the transition is happening.

00:06:05   The fact is, people are going to buy these and they're going to be fine and they're going to work for years.

00:06:09   And they're going to be I mean, there is a little bit of fallacy among people who are very tech savvy that, oh, I don't want to buy an iMac.

00:06:17   Now it's the worst time to buy an iMac because the chip transition is happening.

00:06:20   It's like, well, yeah, but if you need an iMac now, it's not like this thing breaks in six months, right?

00:06:25   Like it's going to work and be fine.

00:06:26   And for a lot of people, this would actually be the best time to buy before there's uncertainty.

00:06:31   Before there's uncertainty.

00:06:32   I have a close friend who said, oh, this is the time for me to buy because my iMac is getting a little a little ratty.

00:06:40   And I think that his feeling is I'd rather go now with this stable Intel architecture and then spend the next five years watching everybody else deal with it.

00:06:50   With Apple Silicon.

00:06:51   And then, you know, when that's all settled down, it'll be time for a new iMac.

00:06:55   So that I think that's a perfectly valid.

00:06:57   It's not valid if you want to be on the cutting edge, but so many people are not interested in being on the cutting edge.

00:07:01   So, you know what they what you do get out of this is possibly the last Intel iMac.

00:07:07   And so at the height, you know, it's got the new 10th generation Intel processors.

00:07:14   It's got a new version of a Radeon Pro, AMD Radeon Pro GPU, which has more larger VRAM option.

00:07:22   There's a 10 core i9 processor, which really is last year.

00:07:27   Last year, the eight core high end iMac was basically it at iMac Pro levels with some caveats, right?

00:07:38   Like the cooling isn't as good, which means that there might be more throttling and it didn't have the T2.

00:07:43   But now it does.

00:07:44   And as far as we can tell, the cooling in these is the cooling in the old iMac, which means it's thermal.

00:07:51   Thermal capabilities are not the same as in the iMac Pro, which we designed the thermal system.

00:07:56   So there are reasons to get an iMac Pro even now.

00:08:01   But it is interesting that alongside this announcement of the up to 10 core iMac, Apple took the eight core iMac Pro, which is my iMac Pro.

00:08:10   And it's gone. It's a goner.

00:08:13   And they actually took the 10 core iMac Pro and slid it down to the entry price of the iMac Pro.

00:08:20   So I think that's Apple.

00:08:23   I think Apple is comfortable with there being a little bit of overlap between the high end iMac and the low end iMac Pro, but not that much overlap.

00:08:30   So that's a little tidbit that it did.

00:08:33   With comparing this, it's interesting.

00:08:34   I'm pleased that Apple have actually done that.

00:08:36   It's like understanding that the iMac Pro is losing some of its competitive edge here and is like reshifting a little bit,

00:08:43   because now this new iMac, the 27 inch has features the iMac Pro doesn't have, which could be considered great for people that use it.

00:08:53   I want to talk about the one that I'm the most interested in, which is the nano texture display option coming to a Mac device.

00:09:03   So it is a $500 add on, which is when I found out they were adding the nano texture, I thought would be much more than $500.

00:09:12   It's not cheap, but that is I would have expected it to be like $1,000 because that's how much more the pro display is, right?

00:09:20   It's the I think it's $1,000 more for the nano texture option.

00:09:25   This is a thing that I had hoped we would see that Apple would learn this technology and would understand it completely and would end up bringing it to other devices.

00:09:39   So I am actually really pleased to see that because I could imagine a future computer that I may want, I would want to add this onto.

00:09:49   So like for example, in my studio, I have large overhead lights like those I don't know if they're like the tube ones you get in offices.

00:09:59   The fluorescent lights.

00:10:00   The fluorescent ones, thank you. That's what I was looking for.

00:10:03   And on my Dell display that I have my Mac Mini hooked up to, it gets quite a bit of glare.

00:10:09   So I will say this makes me even more hopeful that an Apple display that may come out in the future, which I'm still hoping will happen, would include an option for nano texture on that, right?

00:10:22   So yeah, I'm just genuinely like really pleased to see that Apple has found a way to extend this new technology out to somewhere else.

00:10:30   I mean, would I love a nano texture iPad in the future?

00:10:33   Yes, Apple. I desperately would.

00:10:36   But maybe we can look at that somewhere down the line.

00:10:39   Yes. The question is what they would charge you for it because it is a $500 option for nano texture display on the iMac.

00:10:46   But you know, there are people who will want that level of glare reduction, right?

00:10:54   Like they're absolutely, and it may come down to your workplace, right?

00:10:57   Like in fact, it may open up new options for you in your workplace.

00:11:03   Like I literally can't move my monitor from this or my iMac from this place because there's too much glare in every other direction.

00:11:10   And maybe that is a thing that, you know, with a nano texture display iMac, you could be like, oh, now I can put it over here.

00:11:16   I can move it here.

00:11:18   So that would be great.

00:11:19   So yeah, it's fascinating to see that rolled out here and who knows where else it might go.

00:11:24   New 1080p webcam in the honor.

00:11:30   Yeah.

00:11:31   Yeah. So this is, I think basically the iMac Pro webcam.

00:11:34   And what it gets is not just the webcam hardware, but because there's a T2 now, the T2 does all of the image signal processing,

00:11:43   like on the iMac Pro, which means that it's going to be a better webcam experience.

00:11:48   It's not a 4K webcam or anything, but it's going to be a better webcam experience, not just because the hardware is better,

00:11:53   but because the T2 is doing all the controlling in terms of face detection and adjusting the camera settings.

00:11:59   That's all happening on the T2.

00:12:02   And so that'll be a big upgrade versus the previous iMac.

00:12:06   Oh, also up to 128 gigabytes of RAM you can put in one of these machines.

00:12:14   It's quite significant.

00:12:18   You can really get a lot into this.

00:12:20   And did we mention the 16-inch MacBook Pro professional microphone system is in here too?

00:12:26   Ah, yes. The podcast and microphones that nobody should use.

00:12:31   Studio quality, studio quality, whatever.

00:12:34   It may actually, I was thinking about it.

00:12:35   It may actually be better on the iMac.

00:12:37   You wouldn't be typing on it.

00:12:38   Well, that's true.

00:12:38   And the 16-inch MacBook Pro, it's a laptop, so it's moving around.

00:12:42   And what we found is that it can sound good, but it also can sound not great depending on where it is.

00:12:47   My guess is that the iMac, because it just sits in one place,

00:12:50   it's probably not going to be pressed up against a comforter or in weird places that you might put a laptop.

00:13:00   Just sitting out on a desk and it may be optimized for that and may actually sound better.

00:13:04   But it's two microphones in the front, in the chin, and then one in the back.

00:13:08   And so it can do noise cancellation and echo cancellation and all those things.

00:13:12   And it's basically the mic system that is in the 16-inch MacBook Pro as well.

00:13:18   And I'd imagine that over time that will go on all Macs, but this is the second Mac to really get that.

00:13:24   So SSDs are now standard on every single iMac.

00:13:28   All of the starting options for every iMac now includes an SSD.

00:13:33   They do start at 256 gigabytes, though.

00:13:36   But I know you've been very upset, rightly so,

00:13:39   about spinning disks being a standard option in any machine now.

00:13:44   You can choose to add one, which I think is fine.

00:13:47   You can choose to make your 256 gig, you can bump in a fusion drive into that,

00:13:52   which I think is a great option to offer for people.

00:13:55   Yeah, I should say that the two high-end configurations of the iMac are 512, not 256.

00:14:00   It's the base model 27 and all the 21.5s that are 256 SSD.

00:14:05   And on the 21.5, you can, for the same price, order a one terabyte fusion drive instead.

00:14:12   And the idea there is if you're somebody who doesn't care about speed as much,

00:14:17   but you really have a big photo library and you want that size,

00:14:20   and you don't want to spend more money on a larger SSD,

00:14:23   they're still going to give you the option.

00:14:25   So we can't say the spinning disk is totally dead.

00:14:27   It's available as an option, but that's it.

00:14:33   It's out of all the base models now.

00:14:36   These default iMac 21.5 and 27 now, both are just SSD.

00:14:43   And then on the highest-end iMac, you can actually go all the way up to eight terabytes.

00:14:48   So you can do one, two, four, eight terabytes.

00:14:50   And that's, again, Apple's got all their little slots,

00:14:56   and you can order different things in little slots.

00:14:58   So you can upgrade the two retina 21.5s to up to a terabyte SSD.

00:15:06   But again, that 1099 non-retina, sad little 21.5-inch iMac,

00:15:14   it's going to have either a 256 SSD or a one terabyte fusion drive.

00:15:20   Those are your only options.

00:15:21   MATT PORTER, Ph.D. That is a sad little computer.

00:15:23   JEAN-MICHEL LAMBERT, Ph.D. It is. It needs to go. There are rumors that Apple is working on kind of

00:15:28   a 24-inch iMac redesign. That rumor has been floating out there.

00:15:34   And that would actually, I wonder if the first new iMac we see on Apple Silicon

00:15:39   is replacing the 21-inch Intel iMac.

00:15:42   That's 21.5, the sad, un-updated iMac.

00:15:46   MATT PORTER, Ph.D. I think they've only shown today that that is more likely

00:15:50   because they added a lot of things into the 27-inch.

00:15:54   JEAN-MICHEL LAMBERT, Ph.D. Yeah, you could keep that one alive for a while.

00:15:55   MATT PORTER, Ph.D. Arguably, some of them could have come to the 21,

00:15:58   but they have not done that, right?

00:16:00   JEAN-MICHEL LAMBERT, Ph.D. And the argument is also that Apple,

00:16:03   even though I'm very optimistic about Apple Silicon,

00:16:07   and I've done the made-up charts to prove it, to quote-unquote "prove it,"

00:16:12   I think it's worth saying that it's probably going to be harder for them

00:16:18   to hit performance at the high, high end than it is at the low end,

00:16:23   where they're already there.

00:16:24   And this might be the case where Apple is taking the 27-inch iMac and saying,

00:16:30   "Keep that plate spinning. Update it to the latest Intel processors. Look, it's really fast."

00:16:35   And then that means they can leave it there.

00:16:38   And it can be part of the later part of the Apple Silicon transition.

00:16:42   They can just sort of let it sit there.

00:16:44   And then they take the 21.5-inch iMac and they're like,

00:16:47   "All right, tap it on the shoulder. You got to go. You're cut."

00:16:51   And bring in on the low end, because if they do a redesign and it's of the 24,

00:16:57   let's say, so they bring in the bezels and it's not much bigger than the 21.5,

00:17:02   but it's a bigger screen and all of that, and it's Apple Silicon,

00:17:05   and whatever processor they put in there, I think there's no doubt they've got a processor ready to

00:17:10   go for that, even if they wait on the bigger iMac for a little while.

00:17:15   Totally a reasonable scenario that seems more likely today because the 21.5-inch iMac

00:17:22   is more or less untouched for a couple of years and is kind of sad and bad.

00:17:30   And that's why. I mean, it's there because it's cheap. That's it. It's there because it's cheap.

00:17:34   It's not great, but it's cheap. And that seems ripe for an Apple Silicon replacement.

00:17:40   -Do you think that this will be the last Intel Mac of any kind that gets a significant update?

00:17:50   -I... Okay. So, without getting into details, because Apple gives us these briefings on

00:17:59   background, and that means not for attribution and no direct quotes and all that, what I'll say is,

00:18:06   I get the distinct impression that Tim Cook's statement, they're letting it ride, right?

00:18:13   Like, there was no statement that this is the end, and what Tim Cook said is,

00:18:17   "We still have Intel machines in the pipeline." So, I'm gonna say there probably are more Intel

00:18:25   updates in the pipeline. I don't know if there will be any substantial Intel updates in the pipeline.

00:18:34   I'm skeptical of that. It wouldn't surprise me if, I mean, what I just said about keeping some

00:18:41   of the high-end plates spinning while dealing with the ones you want to target as your first Apple

00:18:49   Silicon Macs means that, like, what if they announce a 13-inch MacBook Pro or a 14-inch

00:18:55   MacBook Pro with Apple Silicon, which is a rumor for this fall. Maybe when they do that, they say,

00:19:02   "Oh, and the 16-inch got new Intel processors." And, like, that's it. Like, they literally,

00:19:08   like, "We're not doing that today. Those got a little bit, those got a refresh or a configuration

00:19:14   change, but we're not doing that yet. We're doing this now." That, I think, may happen.

00:19:21   And who knows, there might be a Mac Mini, Intel Mac Mini bump, where they're like, "Look, we're not

00:19:25   gonna do this now. We're just gonna rev the Mac Mini." Like, I think it's a priority thing. Like,

00:19:32   you can see Apple's prioritization because they can't ship everything at once. So if the Mac Mini

00:19:37   gets an Intel bump now, that's Apple saying, "It's not getting Apple Silicon for a while."

00:19:42   If it doesn't, then perhaps it's toward the front of the Apple Silicon train. So we'll see. But

00:19:48   my gut feeling, based on the fact that they seem to be letting Tim Cook's statement just

00:19:55   be there and letting it ride, is a suggestion to me that there are probably some more Intel Macs.

00:20:02   This is probably not the last Intel Mac, but it sure feels like it's probably the last notable

00:20:09   Intel Mac update. Could, might not be, but I think there's probably not a lot left in the pipeline

00:20:16   for them. - I would agree with you that I, if I was gonna assume, if I was gonna put my money

00:20:24   on it, I would say that this is probably the last update for an Intel machine that is notable,

00:20:32   is significant. It has more than just, "We're keeping this one alive for a while." Right?

00:20:39   Because that's kind of what they've done with the 21 in a way. Like, they've made some changes that

00:20:43   make it make a little bit more sense in the product line, but that's not notable in any way. I would

00:20:48   say that this, the last time that they did the iMac update, this one is much bigger than that.

00:20:55   The last iMac update was mostly, "We'll put a new chip in it," that kind of thing. I can imagine

00:21:00   doing that for a while, but this adds some actual new features that didn't exist in the iMac line

00:21:07   before, so it really feels like this is a big one. Yeah, 'cause I could imagine, right? Especially

00:21:12   the Mac Pro, I don't know about the iMac Pro, but especially the Mac Pro, I can imagine that one is

00:21:17   going to be one of the very last to move to Apple Silicon. I'm probably not alone in my thinking

00:21:22   there. So they'll have some new stuff that they'll be putting into the Mac Pro line over time,

00:21:27   but we're not going to see a brand new Mac Pro, I would imagine, for quite a while, but they'll

00:21:32   keep bumping some things. You can now put this processor in, this graphics card in, that kind of

00:21:36   thing. I think that's exactly the idea, is for stuff like that that's at the high end,

00:21:41   saying, "We're not ready yet, but we'll give this a new... Oh, are there some new Xeons or whatever?

00:21:47   We'll put those in there if there are." I think they're keeping their options open there too,

00:21:52   but who knows? I think it would be really weird for them to say, "Oh, we've completely redesigned

00:21:59   the MacBook Pro 13-inch, and it's running on Intel processors." I don't know. So yeah, it feels like

00:22:10   if we're not at the end, I think we're pretty close to the end now. I think I would be surprised

00:22:17   if there was a new Mac running Intel processors that was a more substantial update than what we

00:22:25   just saw. I cannot stay in one place about my thinking as to whether the iMac Pro will continue.

00:22:33   So the future of the iMac Pro is a really good question. So for those who don't remember,

00:22:40   the iMac Pro, based on all reports from the time, was Apple's replacement for the

00:22:46   Trashcan Mac Pro. They were literally going to say, "No more Mac Pro. We're just going to do

00:22:50   an iMac Pro. That's going to suffice, and that is going to be our new Pro Mac going forward."

00:22:56   And then they changed their strategy, and they had that meeting, and they said, "We are going

00:23:00   to do a Mac Pro." But the iMac Pro was already kind of designed, and they put it out, and it

00:23:04   was out way before the Mac Pro was. And I bought one, and I love it. I think it feels like the time

00:23:13   for them to have updated it has passed now, given that they're going to Apple Silicon. So now what

00:23:19   it feels like to me is they have a plan for the iMac on Apple Silicon. And my guess is that the

00:23:27   iMac Pro won't exist anymore, or if it does exist, it's going to exist but really just be a powerful

00:23:35   iMac. That's my guess. - It's just the top of the line configuration of whatever the iMac will become.

00:23:42   - Imagine, yeah, using the same base design as whatever the 27-inch iMac becomes, which again,

00:23:47   may be a little while, right? Depending on how they handle the smaller one. If that one is their

00:23:52   target for a redesign for Apple Silicon, maybe these iMacs hang around. But when they do bring

00:23:57   the 27-inch iMac over to Apple Silicon, you know, offering a high-end processor configuration is

00:24:06   something they could do. If they want to keep the idea of an iMac Pro around, they could offer that,

00:24:12   and they could even have that be the different colored case, like, "Oh, darker aluminum space

00:24:19   gray for the high-end," right? And that's sort of a, how do they, do they value that? Do they

00:24:24   think there's value in having that? But yeah, the truth is, it's like the Spinal Tap thing of,

00:24:30   you know, why do you make it 11? Why don't you just make 10 louder? It's a little bit like that.

00:24:34   It's like, why make an iMac Pro? Why not just make the iMac faster at the high-end? If it's a brand

00:24:39   new architecture, is there anything in here that needs to be different architecturally for the iMac

00:24:44   Pro? And my guess is that they're going to build the new iMac for Apple Silicon whenever it comes.

00:24:49   With the idea of having a good thermal envelope to grow the processors over time without completely

00:24:57   redesigning the cooling system, right? At which point, you know, they would do that once. Why do

00:25:03   that twice? They would do that once. There's got to be only one iMac design. So I think,

00:25:06   I think it means that essentially the iMac Pro is probably dead. Even if they keep it around,

00:25:12   I think it's much more likely to just be a high-end iMac with some special features,

00:25:16   rather than like a completely new design. I'm a little disappointed that the iMac Pro design

00:25:22   doesn't seem to have ever gone in any iMac and seems like it maybe never will, but maybe they'll

00:25:28   take lessons. Well, I mean, it's SSD only and it's got the whole giant cooling system that is

00:25:35   way more capable than what's in the iMac. But I don't know. Maybe the next iMac actually benefits

00:25:41   from that technology. Maybe it'll benefit. And again, I would come back to the fact that the

00:25:46   iMac Pro was a conception from the before time in terms of how Apple thinks of the Mac. So it's

00:25:53   possible the iMac Pro was designed thinking that not only would there not be a Mac Pro,

00:25:57   but that there would not be Apple Silicon, right? From a period where they were just going to get

00:26:01   along to go along, put the Mac in maintenance mode, essentially legacy mode, where it was there,

00:26:06   but it never really changed that much. And whatever there was a new set of Xeons,

00:26:10   they'd stick it in the iMac Pro and call it a day, but really that was not the future. And then they

00:26:15   changed their path. And so it's designed under all sorts of assumptions that Apple has probably cast

00:26:21   off like four or five years ago, and it's still kicking around. Yeah, for all we know, they're

00:26:25   going to take a wash on the R&D of the iMac Pro because that future didn't pan out. The future of

00:26:32   our professional Macintosh is this one. Yeah. And so we may never see if it's possible,

00:26:40   like all that work that we're talking about, that incredible cooling that the iMac Pro has,

00:26:44   that literally may never make it to another computer, right? Like you might just live in

00:26:48   this one because Apple Silicon chips will take a different type of system. Yeah, I think, I mean,

00:26:53   SSD only is the future, right? And so what they did in pulling all of the space out of the iMac,

00:27:01   you know, that's great, but they're going to design a new iMac and they may decide, well,

00:27:05   I want it to be smaller and lighter. And so I'm not going to use that hard drive space for cooling.

00:27:10   I'm going to remove it from the computer, right? So it may be a very different kind of computer,

00:27:15   but that's, it's okay. I think, I think Apple knows how many people who have high-end Pro tasks

00:27:22   use iMacs and not just the iMac Pro, but other high-end iMacs. I think they're aware of that.

00:27:28   And I think that they're aware of their needs and will continue to have a computer available

00:27:34   that serves those needs, whether they brand it as an iMac Pro and load it up with options that are

00:27:42   awesome and a space gray enclosure and all of that, or whether it's just not worth it,

00:27:47   I think is an open question. It's sort of like, it's their choice about if they think that there's

00:27:52   value in branding one of their iMacs as the Pro iMac in order to get people to buy it and spend

00:27:57   more money. That's a marketing decision more than a technical decision, I think, honestly.

00:28:03   This episode is brought to you by Pingdom from SolarWinds. Do you have a website? Does your

00:28:08   website have a shopping cart or a registration form? Maybe even a contact us page? These are

00:28:12   pages that you want to be available. You have content, you want that to be available. If you

00:28:16   answered that, yes, you do have a website that has this stuff on it, you need Pingdom. Do you know

00:28:20   what that means? It means every website, because nobody wants their critical website transactions

00:28:25   to fail. This means a bad experience for you, your users, could mean lost business for you as well,

00:28:32   which you definitely don't want. The good news is you can set up transaction monitoring from

00:28:36   our friends at Pingdom from SolarWinds. Transaction monitoring alerts you when your cart checkout,

00:28:42   your forms, your login pages fail before they affect your customers or your business. Pingdom

00:28:48   will let you know the moment that any of these fail in whatever way is best for you. You can

00:28:52   customize how you're alerted and who is alerted depending on the outage severity. And Pingdom cares

00:28:59   about your users having the smoothest site experience possible. So if disaster does strike,

00:29:06   you're going to be the very first to know. It is super easy to get started. Just go to

00:29:12   Pingdom.com/RelayFM right now for a 14 day free trial with no credit card required.

00:29:19   I love Pingdom. We use it all the time here at Relay FM. It makes sure that we're

00:29:25   online when we want to be. And if there's any issues, they let us know and we can get it fixed.

00:29:30   Go right now to Pingdom.com/RelayFM and you'll get a 14 day free trial with no credit card required.

00:29:36   When you sign up, use the code UPGRADE at checkout and you'll get a massive 30% of your first

00:29:42   invoice. That's Pingdom.com/RelayFM and the code UPGRADE. Our thanks to Pingdom from SolarWinds

00:29:47   for their support of this show and Relay FM. >> Breaking news, Myke. Breaking news. We have

00:29:54   more breaking news to report. This is the summer of breaking news episode, apparently. Huge,

00:30:01   huge Apple executive story. Phil Schiller, Apple's longtime senior vice president of worldwide

00:30:09   marketing is getting a new title and a familiar face is becoming the senior vice president

00:30:19   of worldwide product marketing. So Phil Schiller has been given the white robe

00:30:25   which I don't know, being an Apple fellow. >> Are there any other Apple fellows?

00:30:33   >> There have been. I don't know. It's almost like, did they just let him choose his job title?

00:30:39   Anyway, Apple fellow, he's still going to be in charge of the app store, which is very interesting.

00:30:44   If you remember, he had that reassigned to him from Eddy Cue and has made a lot of positive

00:30:50   changes in the app store since then. >> I have a list of Apple fellows. Would

00:30:53   you like to know them? >> Let me finish this. He's also in charge of events. He's also in charge of

00:30:57   Apple's events. These two things which are probably near and dear to his heart, he's still in charge

00:31:01   of now. Before we tell you the rest of the story, Myke Hurley has got a list of other Apple fellows.

00:31:05   >> I have. I've just found it. Believe it or not, I'm not kidding, this news was announced as we

00:31:10   were recording like half an hour ago. It's already been updated to include Phil Schiller. This is on

00:31:15   an apple.fandom.com Wiki. The list of fellows include Al Alcorn, Alan Kay, Bill Atkinson,

00:31:24   Don Norman, Gary Starkweather, Gershiran Sidhu, Guy Kawasaki, Phil Schiller, Rod Holt, Rich Page,

00:31:32   Steve Capps, and Steve Wozniak. >> That's the Wozniak slot. That's what it is.

00:31:36   >> I only know like half of those names. >> It's like for distinguished people for

00:31:41   service to the computer industry or to Apple. It's an interesting choice to put him in that slot.

00:31:46   There's a statement about it where he says he will keep working at Apple as long as they will have me.

00:31:52   I bleed six colors, he says, but I want to make some time in the years ahead for my family,

00:31:56   friends, and a few personal projects I care deeply about. He turned 60 this year.

00:31:59   So there's definitely a suggestion here. He cites that, that he turned 60.

00:32:05   Look, my gut feeling in reading this, and again, it's only been a half an hour and who knows what

00:32:10   will come out about it, is that Phil Schiller's been at Apple a long time. He's made a lot of

00:32:14   money. He's got a lot of Apple stock. He doesn't need to work for a living anymore.

00:32:18   And he loves Apple. So this sounds to me like Phil Schiller saying, "Look, I could retire,

00:32:25   but I don't want to do that. But I don't want to work the way I've been working." And they're like,

00:32:29   "Okay." Tim probably is like, "Okay, how about this?" Or maybe he said, "I'll keep the app store

00:32:38   and events, but let's let someone else do all the other marketing stuff. I want a smaller job."

00:32:44   Now, maybe there's a whole other story here, but that's my gut read on this at the beginning is

00:32:49   a lot of these people who've been at Apple a long time don't need to be there anymore.

00:32:53   And they can retire. And some of the reasons they're there is because they love Apple and

00:32:57   they love what they do. It's really true that when he says he bleeds six colors, Phil's been there a

00:33:02   long time. He really does care about this stuff. But at the same time, you're looking at the fact

00:33:08   that you turn 60 and you're working at a very intense company at a very intense job. It would be,

00:33:14   it seems entirely reasonable that a human being in that position would go to their boss, in this

00:33:21   case Tim Cook, and say, "Tim, I just want to cut back. This is too intense for me. I'm turning 60.

00:33:27   There are other people who can do the rest of this job. I don't want to go, but I don't want to keep

00:33:33   doing it at the level that I'm doing it." I think that's not unreasonable at all. So I'm going to,

00:33:37   that's my gut read on it is, I think it's interesting because he's not stepping away

00:33:41   from the app store. That's a huge thing that he took the reins of and has made substantive

00:33:46   changes to, and it sounds like he gets to still be in charge of that part, which either that's him

00:33:51   saying, "I don't want somebody else to mess up the work I did in this area," or it's somebody like

00:33:57   Tim Cook saying, "I can't lose you from the app store because you really got a good grip on that,

00:34:03   and I want you to keep on that." Events is his thing, and he's been behind those all along.

00:34:10   Tim Cook Yeah, this press release says that he was responsible, like ultimately, for the online

00:34:15   WWDC, so that was cool to know. Chris Smith

00:34:17   Yeah, so whether it's Phil saying, "These are my favorites," or it's Tim saying, "I can't lose you

00:34:23   on these things," or whether it's them saying, "We've got a new executive who can be in charge

00:34:28   of product marketing, but what we can't do is load all of this other stuff on him too. It's too much,

00:34:33   and let's let him succeed in the one job without taking on these other jobs."

00:34:39   Tim Cook Well, my other thought would be is like,

00:34:41   you just don't want to rip the band-aid off too fast?

00:34:45   Chris Smith Well, sure. I think there's a logical thing there, like how long does he do this job?

00:34:50   And the fact is, he says, "As long as they'll have me," maybe if this all is going well,

00:34:55   he's around another 10 years doing just this stuff, or five years, or however long he wants

00:35:01   to be before he truly, really retires. And maybe, and again, this is not one of these like, "Oh,

00:35:06   it's all a sham. He's actually out of there." I think there are a lot of scenarios where what

00:35:10   it really is as an organization is, "I'm going to take a step back, and we're going to let other

00:35:14   people take a step forward, and we're going to train people up." Maybe he feels like there's

00:35:17   nobody who can take the job of running the App Store or running events yet, but as he steps away,

00:35:23   those people fill those spots, and he trains them up. And when he truly wants to retire,

00:35:27   or become just an Apple fellow where he has no responsibilities, he just walks around the campus

00:35:31   wearing the white robe. I made that up, by the way. There's no white robe. Maybe there is, but

00:35:35   I don't know. I just, I like that idea that there's been like a ceremony and he's been inducted.

00:35:42   You know, he'll have, those people will have come along. And then, because that happens sometimes,

00:35:47   right? Where you get these people who are super high powered, and they've been there a long time,

00:35:49   and they know what they're doing. And then you say, "Well, what happens when you leave?" And the

00:35:54   answer is there's no one. Like, we'll scramble. And one of the things you do, I think if you're

00:35:59   responsible, especially if you're 60 and you want to step back, is you say, "Can we, you know,

00:36:05   move to," everything's a transition, right? It's not like a transitional job. Everybody,

00:36:10   you know, has their time and then they leave. So, even Phil Schiller. So, this is a good opportunity

00:36:17   for him to take, you know, this part off of his plate, but also presumably to develop other people

00:36:25   so that when he leaves, leaves, that those people, that there are people who can step into those jobs.

00:36:30   We haven't even talked about Greg Joswiak, who has been, who is an Apple lifer. He has been there so

00:36:34   long. I think he can't, I think he left at one point and he came back, but like Greg Joswiak,

00:36:39   he was like a PowerBook product marketing manager of the original PowerBooks, I think. Like, he's

00:36:45   been there a long time and he, and we've seen him on stage a lot more lately, although he's always

00:36:50   been kind of around and on stage occasionally. And he is the new Phil in the sense of being the

00:36:58   Senior Vice President of Worldwide Product Marketing. So, all of the marketing and PR

00:37:02   presumably all now report to Joswiak. And I have known him at least a little bit for a long time

00:37:11   because I've been covering Apple a long time and he's been at Apple a long time. And I really like

00:37:16   him. I mean, I think his personality comes across. He's very disciplined as a speaker on stage and

00:37:21   things like that, but I think he's a good guy and I'm looking forward to seeing what he does with

00:37:27   product marketing, but it's a big moment. Also, another thing I wanted to throw out there, which

00:37:33   is like Johnny Ive, I have to wonder if this is one of those announcements that is following the

00:37:41   actual disengagement. Like, if that makes sense, that maybe Jos has kind of been doing this job

00:37:47   increasingly over the last year and Phil has been- - It does feel that way. I mean-

00:37:52   - Stepping back, right. - Publicly, I feel like I see Jos way more than I see

00:37:57   Schiller these days. It's been like that for a while.

00:37:59   - Yeah, yeah, I think so. Jos is definitely, I was gonna say in the last two or three years,

00:38:04   we've seen way more of Jos than we used to. And we have seen less of Phil and it's funny too,

00:38:12   because back when we were doing in-person events before now, there would be people,

00:38:17   so I go to an event and on the live stream, I'm like, "Oh, there's no Phil. What's up with Phil?"

00:38:21   And it's like, "Phil's there. I talked to Phil afterward. Phil's there." It's just, I think that

00:38:28   maybe that was part of the conscious kind of getting other people involved and Phil doesn't

00:38:32   have to be on stage for everything. Even though he's in charge of the event and in charge of the

00:38:38   product marketing, it doesn't mean he has to be on stage. Now that goes hand in hand with a general

00:38:42   trend Apple has had since Steve Jobs died of getting away from the single or very limited set

00:38:51   of presenters and trying to show lots of people. Because Steve Jobs, especially in the early days

00:38:56   when he came back, Steve Jobs and Katie Cotton, who was the head of communications during this

00:39:01   period, it was very much like Steve is our spokesman. Steve, and he's got his sidekicks,

00:39:06   like Phil Schiller, but the message is Steve and the message is Apple, and Apple is a monolithic

00:39:11   force and you don't even know who all those people are that Steve is thanking at the end for not

00:39:16   seeing their families because they were working on this product. Like you don't know who they are.

00:39:19   And the Tim Cook Apple, for lots of good reasons, is about showing the faces of all the people who

00:39:25   work at Apple and getting to know those people and having it be this cast of people and saying,

00:39:31   "Look at all these brilliant people we have working at Apple on all these products."

00:39:34   And so it's a natural part of that process too for Phil Schiller to step back. And I'll point out,

00:39:39   he's the guy in charge of events, so he was probably driving that process. So I think it's

00:39:46   not just that Phil is seen less often because he was stepping away, but also sort of by design

00:39:52   that he wanted some different people in there. But it's still a big deal and we'll have to watch it

00:39:56   and see if things change. But the fact that Phil Schiller is still around and still in charge of

00:40:02   things, that's the big one, I think, in terms of the headline here is that he's got this title of

00:40:07   Apple Fellow, which seems super amorphous. - This is different to Johnny. Johnny just left.

00:40:11   - Johnny just left and it's different to Woz, who gets a paycheck but doesn't do anything.

00:40:15   Sorry, Woz. But he's still in charge of App Store and events. That's the part of this that I find

00:40:21   fascinating. It's like, "Well, Phil has ascended into Apple fellowhood, but he's also in charge

00:40:28   of the App Store and events still." So he's left, but he hasn't left at all. Whereas Johnny Ive was

00:40:35   already gone and now he's really gone. - But I think it's fair to say, fair to assume,

00:40:40   the things that he is in charge of, they are looking for people to fill those roles.

00:40:49   - Like I said, I feel like the things he's in charge of, presumably, one of the things he's

00:40:54   doing is identifying the people who can replace him to do those things. And it could be, "Well,

00:41:00   Jaws will take this over later." Or it could be, "It's not really a product marketing job in the

00:41:04   same way. Phil did it because it was Phil." Because that's the other truth here, is that there are

00:41:09   titles and then there are what the people do. And if you've been in an organization long enough,

00:41:14   sometimes you will accumulate roles that are not your job as it's defined, but you're the person

00:41:21   who knows. I mean, this happened to me all the time, where I was like, "It's not my job to do

00:41:25   this, but I'm the person who does that because I'm the one of all of us that was the best fit,"

00:41:30   or whatever. And it's like, "Okay, well, why is that your job?" I'm like, "I don't know, it's my job."

00:41:34   I think Phil Schiller has done that over the years. And I think this is a good example of that,

00:41:38   where some of these jobs are probably not SVP worldwide product marketing jobs,

00:41:44   but they're Phil jobs. And so ideally, yeah, he would be looking at people within the organization

00:41:51   to take over those jobs down the road. And that's the job, honestly, that's the job of any

00:41:57   responsible manager, right? You should always be cultivating your replacement. That's being a good

00:42:02   manager is you want your people to continue to grow and either replace you as you go on to do

00:42:08   your next thing, or ultimately, if they hit a brick wall, you give them the opportunity to go

00:42:13   somewhere else and do this thing. And that's part of being a manager and letting your people progress.

00:42:17   So I would hope that he's doing that. big day, wild day. We spoke a lot about Max, we spoke a lot

00:42:23   about people instrumental in Max. But I'm really trying to segue into 20 Max for 2020. Hey, Jason,

00:42:30   you're probably gonna have to save me at some point. I have a project, everybody that I've been

00:42:34   working on all year. And it's finally out, which is 20 Max for 2020. It's a multimedia extravaganza.

00:42:41   It really is. I'm writing an essay. So this is how it started. I am writing an essay

00:42:46   about the 20 most notable Max ever, as defined by me arbitrarily, one a week,

00:42:53   counting down from 20 to one. So counting down from the 20th most notable to the number one

00:43:00   most notable Mac. This was my 2020 project got a little sidetracked because you know,

00:43:06   of the world. But here it is. And as I was doing this, and I wrote, I think the first 10 essays,

00:43:12   and I thought to myself, I'm gonna regret it, if there isn't a podcast component,

00:43:17   because you're a podcast guy. That's Yeah, so I and then I thought, I'm gonna regret it if there's

00:43:22   not a video component, so people can see these things. And so it's all of those now. So they're

00:43:27   in addition to writing an essay, 20 essays, I'm going to make 20 videos and 20 podcast episodes

00:43:33   about these 20 Max. So yeah, it's a lot. So I'm doing the videos in collaboration with

00:43:40   Steven Hackett on 512 pixels. And the podcast is going to be on relay FM. And the essays are on

00:43:49   six colors. And then as a bonus for six colors members and upgrade supporters at relay FM.

00:43:54   Those those people will have access to an early feed of the podcast, the get you'll get the

00:44:01   episodes on Monday instead of Friday. The public podcast feed is on Friday. So everybody gets to

00:44:06   hear it. The supporters of upgrade or of six colors. Get it sooner. That makes sense.

00:44:13   Yep. We're talking upgrade plus about how you can get it because it's like a separate feed,

00:44:17   which you can grab. We'll talk about that and upgrade plus. But what made you I know the numbers

00:44:23   are good, right? 2020, you know, but what made you want to put this together? Now? You know,

00:44:29   like you could have done 19 Max for 2019. If you wanted to, honestly, I was thinking of the 20

00:44:36   was a again. This is before everything went bad. The 20 was a an opportunity for a list of 20 of

00:44:43   something. And I've wanted to do an extended project. My friend Simon Jerry, who works at

00:44:50   IDG. He used to be the editor in chief of Macworld. UK. He was my counterpart for many, many years.

00:44:55   He wrote a column every month. His column in Macworld. UK every month was something called

00:45:00   Apple A to Zed, which was every month he would discuss like everything related to Apple that

00:45:07   starts with a certain letter, and he went through the whole alphabet. I thought was that was a

00:45:11   really clever project, and I told him he should turn it into like an e book or something, and

00:45:16   that never happened. But I thought that was cool. And then there's a sports writer I love named Joe

00:45:22   Pazdansky, who did a series that recently finished that was called the Baseball 100, where he wrote

00:45:27   an essay about the top 100 basically most notable, I would say, because people argued about it,

00:45:33   baseball players of all time. And that was a fun idea. And I thought, well, maybe that's my

00:45:39   and I wanted to give myself a project for 2020. I wanted to have, you know, we have our we have our

00:45:44   jobs that we do, but a lot of it is kind of amorphous. It's like six colors, especially.

00:45:48   It's just like I write about whatever is going on. And I thought it would be nice to have

00:45:53   something to kind of focus my time. That is also not a commitment to do it forever.

00:45:58   And I put all that together, and I thought, well, this is what I'm going to do. I'm going to play

00:46:03   on the fact that I've got I don't write a lot about like history, even though I've been covering Apple

00:46:09   a long time. I don't do that. It's not my I'm not I'm not your nostalgia blogger, right? Like,

00:46:14   that's not my goal. Steven is what you're saying. But the difference is, I guess, between Steven

00:46:20   and you is Steven researches it, but you were there for most of it. Right, right, right. Yeah,

00:46:29   yeah. So I decided to leverage the fact that I've been around a long time and have some of these

00:46:33   stories that have kind of there is an amnesia before Mac OS 10. Basically, there's a real Mac

00:46:39   amnesia. So some of these stories are predate that. And, yeah, so that was what I thought is

00:46:46   that even though I'm not going to be your nostalgia blogger all the time for this, why not tap into

00:46:51   that and do a little sort of celebratory kind of project. And that was that was the origin of it.

00:46:57   I really wasn't trying to burn Steven like but but that is what he does, right? Like he writes

00:47:03   articles about products all the time. That's what 512 is about, right? Like old computers about old

00:47:09   old old stuff. Yeah. Like the thing that makes 512 different is he is he talks a lot of Mac history

00:47:15   as well as Mac present. I guess what I'd say is, as somebody who's 16 years older than Steven,

00:47:21   I feel like the writing about old things is a bigger trap for me than it is for him. Because

00:47:30   for him, it's like I'm burrowing down into the layers and discovering what's down in the

00:47:36   archaeological dig of the Mac. And like I'm in the archaeological dig. So it's a little harder for me

00:47:44   to do that. This is going to sound like this might take a long way around to give you this compliment,

00:47:48   but please just stick with me for a moment. A conversation that I have quite frequently

00:47:54   with friends of mine about you is that you are not stuck in the past. Right? You are, as you said,

00:48:04   you are 16 years older than Jason, which means that you're... No, that's me. You're Jason and Steven.

00:48:09   I'm exactly my age. So there's a couple more years of difference between us or one. I don't

00:48:14   even know how old Steven is. I don't know how old I am most of the time. But you are very...

00:48:20   Like you're just as modern as anybody, right? Like you are not... Because I don't ever think of you

00:48:26   as being older than me in any way, and nor do I think of you as like the old-timer Mac guy.

00:48:33   So you are definitely a modern writer for computing, but that is a skill that you have

00:48:43   of you do not get stuck in the past. You do move forward and you stick with the times. You're not

00:48:49   like a "oh, back in my day" kind of thing. And this even, I think, comes through with

00:48:55   the coverage that you've had about Big Sur so far of welcoming the change of Big Sur.

00:49:01   But this is the risk about writing about old stuff is that I do try not to do that.

00:49:08   I do it occasionally, but I try not to do it. And so that's why I don't do this a lot,

00:49:14   but I thought I would do it this time. Right, but this is what I'm saying. You have,

00:49:18   I think, the ability to do this now because it doesn't "date" you because this is just a

00:49:27   special thing that you're doing. So basically what I'm saying is you are not like, I don't

00:49:33   ever think of you, I don't think anybody does, as like this ancient Mac archaeologist, as you would

00:49:40   say, or part of the fossil or whatever. So it gives you the ability to do it because this isn't

00:49:45   your thing, but you do have the knowledge so it should be shared. Yeah, there are those moments

00:49:50   where somebody like Steven especially is like, "oh, there was this video about Steve Jobs and

00:49:56   the coffin, that's a great video," and I'm like, "yeah, I was in the front row." I was like,

00:50:00   I was like 10 feet away from that. It's like, "oh, but that's ancient history!" Yes, it is

00:50:04   ancient history, it is. We watched some old keynotes for Connected or The Prompton,

00:50:08   like we were watching the iPod one and we were kind of talking about that as like a

00:50:12   historical moment and you're just sitting there, you know, baby Jason's in the fourth row or

00:50:17   whatever, you know. So you have this knowledge and it's worth sharing because as well, like,

00:50:23   what I love, obviously I've heard the first episode, I've heard some parts of

00:50:27   later episodes of 20 Macs in 2020, but it's not just you, right? The great part about it is

00:50:34   interviews with many people who were around them, people you used to work with. So the great thing

00:50:40   is like it is a, for the podcast especially, I think like a really great oral history of

00:50:48   these Macs in their time from people that use them, not just a case of like, "oh, I looked it

00:50:55   up on Wikipedia and like let me tell you about it." Like there are stats, there are things to

00:50:59   hear about which are interesting, but I always find it more interesting to hear from people who

00:51:05   have the actual context of being around them. Like, you know, like when you look at the history,

00:51:10   I'm sure like the 20 Macs of 2020 will touch on computers that were released at a time when Apple

00:51:17   nearly went bankrupt. And as of this week, Apple is the most valuable company in the world. So like

00:51:25   people that have only been around like me for 15 years caring about this stuff, I can't accurately

00:51:33   give the context of what it was like for to be a Mac user 22 years ago. And so I think that that's

00:51:40   the thing that I like about this project is it's giving more people as well as yourself who were

00:51:45   around then to share those stories because it gives additional context to these to the history

00:51:51   of these computers. So it's cool. Well, I neglected to mention that. So the podcast is a scripted

00:51:58   podcast with me talking to, I'm telling a story and I'm also weaving in the stories of a bunch

00:52:09   of people I know. And so like some old timers like Adam Angst and Andy Anadko are in there,

00:52:14   but also like Stephen Hackett's in there and John Gruber's in there. And there are a bunch of people

00:52:19   coming up who you haven't heard from yet who are in and I'm gathering more. And so it's a different,

00:52:25   it's a very different feel. The essay is just me. The podcast is the voices. It's me telling a story

00:52:30   and also the voices of other people who have other things that are their priority. And I let them

00:52:34   say that part. And then the video is actually a little more like a podcast in that it's me and

00:52:40   Stephen Hackett just talking about it and then showing you like pictures of the old Macs.

00:52:45   - Oh, I guess Stephen has a lot of them too, right?

00:52:47   - Well, this is one of the reasons that it's a collab as the kids say is 'cause he's got so

00:52:52   many of these, not all of them, by the way, he doesn't have all of them, but he has so many of

00:52:55   them that I said, if you can help me out with the pictures and the video of these things and we'll

00:53:02   talk and we'll make it like a collaboration and we'll put it on 512 pixels. And he was up to that.

00:53:07   So that's helpful because I don't have most of these, although I have a few more than I used to

00:53:13   'cause I've been buying things on eBay. - Was that because of this project?

00:53:16   Did it make you want to buy some? - Well, it's also because I realized

00:53:20   Stephen doesn't have it and I'm like, well, I need one to shoot for this project. So I have bought a

00:53:26   couple of computers specifically to take pictures of them and video of them for this project.

00:53:32   So that's a little tidbit, but anyway, so you'll get something different out of the video,

00:53:38   which is me and Stephen talking about old Max and you can see them, then out of the podcast,

00:53:43   which has lots of different voices, including mine and then the essay, which is mine. So pick

00:53:47   your poison, use them all. - Multimedia extravaganza.

00:53:51   - Well, you talk about me wanting to be current. This is an example where the old way of thinking

00:53:56   was I shall write 20 essays, one a week and that'll be it. And I thought, that's wrong.

00:54:01   I shouldn't, I should do more than that. And that's why I have made a vast amount of work

00:54:07   for myself. So see you in mid-December, everybody. - I think this is a great project. I love that you

00:54:14   have gone to the lengths that you have, because it feels to me like even more of an event because of

00:54:20   it. Like, you know, there are things where you, when you can see the amount of work someone has

00:54:24   put into something, it elevates what you think of it in your mind, right? So like the fact that I

00:54:30   know I can read an article, listen to a podcast and watch a YouTube video and the three of them

00:54:36   do have differences in content, like that is, that seems amazing to me. That's like a big thing. So

00:54:44   I congratulate you for doing this project. I urge people to go and consume it. I will also say,

00:54:52   I'm super happy because I'm not a big article guy and love that there's a podcast version so I can

00:54:58   consume in my preferred medium, which would be to listen, especially for me, considering it's lots

00:55:04   of different people. I like to hear them. You know, that's just my preference, but that's the

00:55:08   great thing about having so many different forms of media available is you've given this project

00:55:13   to people in whatever way they want to consume it. So you can find all this stuff at Six Colors,

00:55:18   or you've want to listen to the podcast version, it's relay.fm/20max. Or if you're an upgrade plus

00:55:24   subscriber or a Six Colors member, you get that feed available to you so you can get them in

00:55:29   advance. This is a great project. I'm very happy that you're doing it. And I will be here to cheer

00:55:35   you on over the next 20 weeks, Jason, because I have no doubt that by week like 17, it's going to

00:55:43   be tough. - Yep. I am ahead. I will say I am ahead. I have, I'm starting this project. I've

00:55:52   launched this project with stuff in the can. So I am ahead, which gives me some slack time.

00:55:58   But the moment you press the button and announce it, you think, "Oh boy." Like,

00:56:03   here we go. So here we go. - This episode is brought to you by Squarespace. Make your

00:56:10   next move with Squarespace. They will let you easily create a website for your next idea or

00:56:14   project. No matter what type of site you want to make, Squarespace has the tools. It is an

00:56:18   all-in-one platform to let you put your work online. There's nothing to install, patch,

00:56:23   upgrade, learn. It's super easy. I have been building websites on Squarespace for over 10 years

00:56:29   because when I have something I want to put online, I just want to put that thing online.

00:56:34   I don't want to have to jump through the million hoops that I would have to jump through to get

00:56:37   everything ready to try and work out how to build a website. No, I just want an all-in-one platform

00:56:42   that will do it for me beautifully with all of the functionality that I'm looking for. If I want

00:56:47   a blog, portfolio, online store, event, maybe you want to set... Our wedding website we built on

00:56:52   Squarespace. My podcast mentorship website I built on Squarespace. The Relay FM blog is on Squarespace

00:56:58   because these are things like I don't want to have to build any of that stuff. Squarespace has

00:57:02   the tools. They take care of all the difficult stuff so you don't have to. They've got you

00:57:06   covered. They have 24/7 award-winning customer support. If you need any help, they will take

00:57:13   care of it for you. You can quickly and easily grab a unique domain name and customize those

00:57:18   award-winning templates to really make your content sing. You can sign up for a free trial

00:57:23   right now by going to squarespace.com/upgrade. Their plans start at just $12 a month and you

00:57:28   can get 10% off if you use the code upgrade and you'll get 10% off your first purchase of a website

00:57:35   or domain. You'll be showing your support for this show. That is squarespace.com/upgrade and the code

00:57:42   upgrade to get 10% off your first purchase. Our thanks to Squarespace for their support of this

00:57:47   show and all of Relay FM Squarespace. Make your next move. Make your next website.

00:57:51   Okay, so there was last week, you can't have avoided this, the Senate Antitrust,

00:57:59   no the Congressional Antitrust hearing where Congress brought in a bunch of tech CEOs. So we

00:58:08   had Zuckerberg, Pichai, Bezos and Cook ask them a bunch of questions. There were also some statements

00:58:17   beforehand that were enlightening the questions themselves like, you know, pick your poison on

00:58:23   that one. We are not going to talk about the antitrust hearing itself. There's a lot of great

00:58:31   content out there that will do it way better than we will. I would recommend people listen to the

00:58:36   most recent episode of the talk show with Nilay Patel from The Verge along with Jon Gruber.

00:58:43   It's an excellent episode of the talk show because you get both sides. You get the tech angle and

00:58:49   Nilay is very well versed in the legal side too. So I really recommend that episode to people to go

00:58:55   and check out if they want to kind of get a good breakdown for what this hearing was like. The

00:59:00   thing that I wanted to talk about with Hugh Jason is there were a bunch of emails that came out

00:59:06   afterwards as kind of like the evidence that was collected as part of this investigation.

00:59:12   And there were two main parts to this that I wanted to touch on that tie up some things that

00:59:19   we've been talking about on this show for a while. And they actually include both Apple and Amazon

00:59:24   in both instances. One of them is why you can't buy Kindle books in the iOS app. So this one goes

00:59:32   back a long, long way. So this one is actually referring to emails that Steve Jobs was in the

00:59:40   thread of back in 2010 because I've forgotten this until I read this. You used to be able to do it,

00:59:48   right? You could buy Kindle books in the Kindle iOS app way back at the beginning and it would

00:59:55   just be processed through your Amazon account. And then Apple started introducing more functionality

01:00:01   to the app store, including in-app purchases, a thing. But, you know, it was still like an opt-in

01:00:07   thing. You know, the old rules of the app store are very different to where they are now. You know,

01:00:11   like, for example, when it began, there were no free apps at all, right? Like every app was paid.

01:00:15   It's like stuff changed over time. And basically what this breaks down to from looking at the email

01:00:21   chain between, uh, like Phil Schiller previously mentioned was in this chain, Jobs is in this

01:00:26   chain, EdiQ is in this chain. Basically, Amazon made an ad which showed customers switching to

01:00:33   and from their iPhone to get their books on the Kindle app. And they were switching to Kindles

01:00:38   and to Android devices. And they didn't like it because it kind of showed that,

01:00:43   you know, basically the iPhone was just another tool in that chain. And also by this point,

01:00:49   there were more users of iOS, like on iOS, the Kindle app, than Kindle devices from Amazon.

01:00:59   So the argument that they were making to each other was that basically at this point,

01:01:03   Amazon is making money from the iPhone more than they're making from their own hardware.

01:01:09   So they started looking at what we have today, which was basically they either use our in-app

01:01:16   purchase model or they don't do it at all. And there were a couple of interesting quotes that

01:01:21   I just wanted to pull out. One is from EdiQ, which is saying, this is going to be a huge decision for

01:01:26   us, which is very apt. And it goes on to describe a little more by basically saying like, if we do

01:01:34   this, we are making massive changes to the App Store for everyone. But they did it. And what,

01:01:42   and this is a quote from Steve Jobs in that email chain. iBooks is going to be the only bookstore on

01:01:47   iOS devices. We need to hold our heads high. One can read books bought elsewhere, just not buy,

01:01:53   rent or subscribe from iOS without paying us. While we acknowledge it is prohibitive for many

01:01:59   things. So there's a couple of interesting stuff here and there's funny stuff here. The funny stuff

01:02:03   to me is that like, that did not pan out. iBooks is not like the destination, right? Like I'm sure

01:02:10   a books, the books app is used by many people, but I think if people think about eBooks, they think

01:02:16   about Kindle books, right? Like that is pretty much where that's landed at this point. The books app

01:02:22   exists. You can go there if you want to, but it's definitely not as Apple imagined. And then the

01:02:28   other thing I just find it so interesting that we are still dealing with the ramifications of this

01:02:33   today, right? With people choosing whether to use the in-app purchase model or not for their

01:02:40   devices, for subscriptions, you know, this, all of this decision went out into all of that, right?

01:02:45   So talking about like, Hey, a few weeks ago or Netflix now, right? Like that, that you, you cannot

01:02:52   sign up there. All of that came from this one decision, which was that because there was an

01:02:56   ad that Amazon made, which showed it was easy to switch away from the iPhone. Yeah. Yeah. I,

01:03:03   not my favorite trait of Apple, this stuff. This is the, uh, I think that Steve Jobs email from 2011

01:03:12   is just so clear. It's, um, this is pretty simple. I books is going to be the only bookstore on iOS

01:03:18   devices. We need to hold our heads high. One can read books, bought elsewhere, just not buy,

01:03:23   rent, subscribe from iOS without paying us, which we acknowledge is prohibitive for many things.

01:03:28   This is Apple saying we want our money. And if that means you can't sell it on our platform,

01:03:33   so be it. Um, but the, for me, it's funny, um, this week's ATP, which is already out,

01:03:42   they beat us cause they recorded it last week. They had a, I thought a really good discussion,

01:03:46   um, especially what Marco said about like the advantages and disadvantages and the criticism

01:03:51   Apple gets for aspects of its, uh, platform on iOS and all the convenience that comes from, uh,

01:04:01   Apple's payment platform. Like for me, similarly, I would say my big criticism, I mean, I don't love

01:04:10   the fact that Apple is making developers jump through who have outside stores jump through

01:04:16   hoops, uh, or makes customers who use apps from companies like Amazon to jump through hoops. Like

01:04:23   what I do, if I want to buy a comic on Comisology or a book on, uh, on Amazon on the Kindle bookstore,

01:04:29   I have to open up a web browser, right? Like I can't, I have to use Safari. I can't use the

01:04:33   Amazon app. I can't use the Comixology app. I have to go to a web browser. It's stupid.

01:04:37   It's a waste of my time. It makes it much less convenient for me.

01:04:41   It is a worse user experience. Yeah. I think it's a, so I think it's a bad policy. And I think,

01:04:45   um, I think what Marco said is essentially all they have to do to fix this is let, well,

01:04:52   what he said is let the app say, or go to our website. I would go further and say

01:04:59   Apple should let apps link out to the place you need to go in a Safari window in Safari, right?

01:05:07   Like not a, not, not a secret hidden web view that is tricking the user, but Apple could define it

01:05:14   that way. And it would be a better, better customer experience. Um, I feel like you should

01:05:20   just be able to buy books and comics inside the Kindle and Comixology apps. Like, I feel like

01:05:25   it's stupid that Apple doesn't let them do that. Um, but the thing that puts it, puts it over the

01:05:31   edge into offensive to me is that this is a strategy to get people to buy books from Apple

01:05:39   and its bookstore. It is Apple building a competitive product that leverages Apple's

01:05:48   platform control. And let's be honest, would the iBook store have any traction at all?

01:05:57   If it weren't for the fact that it's the only place that you can sort of tap a couple of times

01:06:03   and buy a book on Apple's platforms, as opposed to Kindle, which is a decidedly worse experience

01:06:10   because you can't buy books. Um, and that that's the part that's always offended me the most about

01:06:15   it is that Apple's taking it. It's not just that it's guidelines lead to consumer hostile behavior.

01:06:21   It's also that it's got a horse in the race. It's it's it built a bookstore to, to eat Amazon's lunch

01:06:29   and crack down on Amazon so that it would win, which it didn't do. I mean, that feels like a

01:06:35   textbook definition of anti-competitive right? Yeah. Like I think so competition and decided

01:06:42   they would, they would fix that. Now, when we say that, I mean, we're not lawyers and we're not

01:06:46   talking about the law. We're not talking about what's legal or not. I'm saying what feels wrong.

01:06:50   This is, this is Apple using its power as a maker of computer operating systems to build a new

01:06:59   business that mirrors a business that someone else has. The only reason for it to exist is to scoop

01:07:06   up more money because it's got the platform power. That's what the iBook store is. And, you know,

01:07:11   apology, I know a lot of people who listen to this show, a lot of people who read my writing,

01:07:15   they use the bookstore and iBooks and, or books now. And that's fine. I don't really nice app.

01:07:22   Like it's, it's fine. It's nice, you know, but, but I feel like it's irrelevant because it's only

01:07:29   available for people who are in entirely in the Apple ecosystem. If you ever want to be somewhere

01:07:34   else, good luck to you. I'm not saying that it's bad. I'm saying that the Genesis of it

01:07:39   was this behavior, which is we're going to build our own thing and take all the money.

01:07:44   And everybody else is not going to be able to have a good experience because we own the store.

01:07:49   And I just, it's, it's bad and it's, and it's counter, you know, this is one of those classic

01:07:55   Apple things where it's like, Oh, well, we really care about is that people love our stuff.

01:07:58   But the way that they define that is so selective. And it's a little bit like,

01:08:04   if you remember what they said to Basecamp about, Hey, where they said, you know,

01:08:08   you've, you've had so many apps on our platform and all that money you keep, and we've gotten

01:08:13   nothing of it. And the implication there is you built a business on our greatness and we got,

01:08:18   we didn't see anything of it, but what they don't say is the way to flip that, which is

01:08:23   how good would the iPhone be if it didn't have any third party apps? The answer is it would have

01:08:29   been a flop and died. So the value goes both ways. Apple makes an enormous amount of money

01:08:35   on phone hardware, enormous amounts of money, and its platform is more valuable. Its product is

01:08:45   better because it's got those apps on it. It works both ways, but when it serves Apple to make it

01:08:52   seem like everybody else is just trying to make money on Apple's back and Apple should see a cut

01:08:58   of it. That's where it seems really distasteful to me. And I wrote about this on six colors briefly,

01:09:03   but let me tell you, this is absolutely from Steve Jobs. This is a cultural artifact inside Apple

01:09:10   that comes from Steve Jobs's attitude toward all third parties. And that means, that means

01:09:16   journalism. It also means developers where they are participating in Apple's greatness. And they're

01:09:23   lucky that Apple lets them participate at all, but never forget that it's Apple that creates all the

01:09:29   value and Apple should get its share. And that was very much a Steve Jobs attitude from the beginning.

01:09:34   I can tell you as somebody who worked at the company that did Macworld Magazine and that

01:09:38   did Macworld Expo, that Steve Jobs felt absolutely, he was infuriated by the idea that some company

01:09:45   built a business on a product with the word Mac in it. And that we had whole people with jobs and

01:09:52   businesses about Apple's stuff and Apple didn't get a piece of it. He hated it. He hated it.

01:10:00   Because that was his attitude was, this is my greatness and you're a parasite on my greatness.

01:10:05   And you see it today. This is, I think, one of the ugliest parts of Steve Jobs's legacy. And you see

01:10:12   it in cases like this. So, I mean, these emails just brought it all back to me. It was like,

01:10:16   yep, look, it's Steve Jobs saying all those things. And, you know, a lot of these policies

01:10:20   still exist today. And it's like, there's no, they're not defensible from a user standpoint.

01:10:26   They're not. They're just because the user experience is worse. It's worse. And the fact

01:10:32   that they've got a competitor, well, why don't you just buy your books on our bookstore?

01:10:36   Well, anyway, it's very frustrating. And of course none of this came up in the hearing,

01:10:42   but thank you to whoever subpoenaed these records. - Yeah. I mean, and this stuff is not for the

01:10:48   hearing. It's like for the investigation, which will produce the report. And the hope is that

01:10:53   the report will be better for what it's supposed to do than the hearing was for real, it was

01:10:58   supposed to do. - What is clear and has been clear for a long time, and after beating up Apple about

01:11:03   iBooks, I will say the iBooks ruling against Apple, where Apple was found to be colluding

01:11:10   with publishers, that was a very clear signaling point that the US law to protect consumers from

01:11:20   companies having too much power and engaging in anti-competitive behavior is broken. Because,

01:11:25   as we all know, the net result of Apple and the publishers being found guilty is that Amazon got

01:11:32   stronger, right? It was the opposite of what those laws are supposed to protect. So one of the

01:11:39   arguments is Apple isn't doing anything illegal. I think what I would say is some of the stuff that

01:11:43   smells bad, the result is what we think of as antitrust is not what they thought antitrust was

01:11:51   a hundred years ago. And this is why if I were Apple, I would be treading lightly, and they're

01:12:00   not, they're still not doing it. I would be treading lightly because all that needs to happen

01:12:07   is for the US government to have the will to pass some laws that redefine what anti-competitive

01:12:15   behavior is. And depending on what they do, that could really break Apple's business

01:12:18   and make their products worse. And some of it is probably avoidable by Apple behaving a little bit

01:12:25   differently. And if I have a fundamental frustration with today's Apple and their attitude toward this,

01:12:30   a lot of times their excuse is, "Well, look, we're just enforcing the rules." It's like,

01:12:35   "I don't make the rules. Oh, wait, I do make the rules. But no, no, I'm just enforcing the rules."

01:12:40   It's like, well, it's their rules. You could change them to be fairer, but you've chosen not to.

01:12:49   One other thing that is interesting for this show specifically is the Apple-Amazon deal that

01:12:58   occurred a couple of years ago that did two major things. One was to bring Amazon Prime to Apple TV

01:13:06   and for Apple to bring their products to sell on Amazon. So I've put a link in the show notes to

01:13:15   a couple of tweets from Mark Gurman. So the former is basically the terms of the deal for Prime

01:13:24   now, the Prime TV service. And it is effectively what we expected. They got a 15% flat cut on all

01:13:32   users who signed up in app. No waiting period. They don't have to wait for a year before it converts.

01:13:40   They got straight. Anyone that signs up, they get 15%. So this proves two things. It proves one,

01:13:46   that this happened, and two, that there is a clear policy for cutting that 30% where it feels

01:13:52   necessary, which I think I've said on this show many times in a number of places, which I think

01:13:57   is the policy I would have if I were Apple, but I wouldn't pretend that I didn't have it.

01:14:02   Netflix, Amazon, any of these companies, they have millions of users. They are bringing value

01:14:11   to Apple as much as Apple is bringing value to them. It is business that you would negotiate.

01:14:18   But this idea that all developers are treated the same and they all pay the same, it's not true.

01:14:22   - Just stop, yeah. - Stop trying to either saying it or giving

01:14:26   that impression, which they are. So the terms of the deal were that they would only pay 15%,

01:14:32   but Amazon had to support all of the tvOS features. Then there was a second slide which

01:14:37   showed, and this is wild. This one is bananas that this got put into this overall package, right?

01:14:45   There is a forecasting sheet for revenue of Apple products sold through Amazon for a year.

01:14:55   Now, the thing is, my expectation on this is it is multiple years old. This is probably a two-year-old

01:15:03   slide, so don't try to draw too many conclusions from it. But even then, you see some really

01:15:10   interesting stuff. So a couple of years ago, we basically found out that Apple TV revenue is

01:15:16   minuscule compared to the rest of the product line. So they had a $26 million total revenue

01:15:22   expectation for Apple TV. Apple Care is $66 million, so very small. But again, this is sold

01:15:29   through Amazon. You can't extrapolate this out to Apple as a whole, but it's still a slice.

01:15:34   The watch was worth more than the Mac in revenue at $440 million to $432 million.

01:15:42   And Beats at that time was selling more than "accessories" which you'd assume included AirPods.

01:15:49   But again, this is before the AirPods cultural explosion, I think. So there's just some

01:15:54   interesting stuff in there to see, right? They expected in a year to do a billion dollars of

01:16:00   revenue, like billion dollars of sales of the iPhone through Amazon. So it's kind of

01:16:05   interesting to see, considering we don't get these numbers anymore. We're going to talk about Apple's

01:16:08   revenue, their Q3 results in a minute. We don't get these kinds of breakdowns anymore, right,

01:16:14   Jason? They don't show us this now. No, they don't. No, it's, look, Apple sells a lot of

01:16:19   products and Amazon sells a lot of Apple products now that they have this deal. Yeah, it's fun when

01:16:27   we get little disclosures that go outside of what we usually get. But are we surprised that Apple

01:16:31   and Amazon, I mean, we know they made a deal. Like we know they made a deal and that this was part

01:16:36   of it. And I don't know. I think that there are aspects of this that Apple gets criticized for

01:16:45   and aspects that they don't get criticized for that they should. And that's just, it's just kind

01:16:49   of a funny situation. I just, you know, ultimately I want Apple's behavior to generate a better user

01:16:56   experience because Apple talks a lot about caring about its users, but some of the decisions it

01:17:00   makes, which are business friendly, are consumer hostile. And that's what bothers me is that they

01:17:07   don't get to hide behind loving the consumer experience and then throw the consumer experience

01:17:12   away when they can make a little more money. Because that's a bad path to walk down. That is

01:17:16   a path that leads Apple to a very bad place where it's not Apple anymore. This episode is brought

01:17:23   to you by DoorDash. You've got so much in your to-do list. Laundry, emails, errands, goodness

01:17:28   knows what else. Give yourself one less thing to worry about and let DoorDash take care of your

01:17:33   next meal. DoorDash is the app that brings you food that you're craving right now, right to your door.

01:17:39   Ordering is easy. Just open the DoorDash app, choose what you want to eat, and your food will

01:17:44   be left safely outside your door with their new contactless delivery drop-off setting.

01:17:48   With over 300,000 partners in the US, Puerto Rico, Canada, and Australia, you can support

01:17:54   your local go-tos or choose from your favorite national restaurants like Chipotle, Wendy's,

01:17:59   and the Cheesecake Factory. Jason Snow, can you tell me something about DoorDash?

01:18:03   Jason Snow, Chief Marketing Officer, DoorDash Super easy to get food delivered and you can

01:18:05   queue it up so that if you want to have dinner later and you're thinking about it and then like

01:18:08   early afternoon, you can just make your order and say, you know, bring it to me at 6pm and then it

01:18:13   just shows up. And that is a good idea actually to not be trying to order when you're hungry.

01:18:18   Mmm dangerous, dangerous.

01:18:21   Terrible.

01:18:22   But I like for when I'm doing that kind of stuff, I end up not being able to decide.

01:18:28   That's my problem. I think I'm hungry and trying to order. No, I just can't decide.

01:18:32   But yeah, this is great for like I think you said before as well, like if you've got a new

01:18:37   new place that's opening up, you can help support them. It's a great time to be able to support

01:18:40   restaurants that are doing delivery right now and DoorDash will help you do that, which is awesome.

01:18:46   Our listeners can get $5 off and zero delivery fees on their first order of $15 or more. All

01:18:52   you got to do is download the DoorDash app in the App Store and use the code upgrade. That's $5 off

01:18:58   and zero delivery fees on your first order when you download the DoorDash app in the App Store

01:19:03   and use the code upgrade. So don't forget, upgrade $5 off your first order. That's the code you need.

01:19:11   We have DoorDash code upgrade. Thanks to DoorDash for their support of this show and all of Relay FM.

01:19:17   So let's talk about Apple's quarterly results for financial Q3. Surprise! All of it's up.

01:19:26   Unexpected, right? Everything. We're not expecting that. Everything. All of it. All right,

01:19:33   so let me give you a very quick breakdown. Record third quarter for revenue at $59.7 billion. This

01:19:40   is Apple's largest Q3 of all time. They have an 11% year over year increase. Mac was up 22%

01:19:48   year over year. iPad up 31%. iPhone up 2%. Services up 15%. Wearables up 17%. You wrote a great article

01:19:58   breaking this down as you do over at Macworld and you said Apple made more money on iPads in the

01:20:03   last quarter than any non-holiday quarter in six years and in any quarter since the 2018 holiday

01:20:10   season, Mac sales were only slightly lower than during last year's holiday and back to school

01:20:16   quarters, which are generally by far the two best quarters for Mac sales. So we knew that the Mac

01:20:24   and the iPad were going to do well because Tim Cook indicated it last quarter, right?

01:20:29   Right. There was a tell there. It's the pandemic, right? Their thought was that there were a lot of

01:20:35   people who were at home, either for work or for school and needed to upgrade their equipment to

01:20:39   be better equipped to work or learn from home and that that was driving Mac and iPad sales. And you

01:20:45   can see why he said that because here it is. This is like the best Mac quarter in a while and the

01:20:51   best iPad quarter in a long while. But the big surprise though is that everything else followed.

01:20:59   You know, like iPhone sales being up 2% year over year would not have expected that. Like it's a lot

01:21:07   of really wild stuff going on here. Like, you know, you could say there are good keyboards and

01:21:15   new products in the Mac and iPad line, but I don't think it's just that that's not the reason, right?

01:21:22   Like the reason is like they had great products to sell, but they also had a vast demand for people

01:21:28   that needed those, which is why I'm sure we saw the biggest growth year over year in the Mac and

01:21:34   the iPad, you know, like it was smaller in the other lines. And there was a question during the

01:21:40   earnings call and I wonder what you think about this. Could this burst damage the remaining

01:21:47   quarters of 2020, do you think? Yeah. So they asked Tim Cook this question, like, is the idea

01:21:51   here that you're pulling sales that you would have had in back to school, back to school quarter or

01:21:55   the holiday quarter, are you pulling those forward? And that then, you know, it's great that you've

01:22:00   got them now, but should we expect the sales to go back down in the next couple of quarters below

01:22:06   where they would normally be because you, these, this is a bunch of stuff that got brought forward.

01:22:11   And Tim Cook's response was interesting because, you know, obviously back to school buying is going

01:22:17   on now. He said no for back to school. And he said, as for the holidays, we only predict one

01:22:23   quarter ahead. So we're not going to talk about it. My gut feeling is that they're going to have

01:22:27   a week holiday quarter. That's my gut feeling is that you've got all the economic conditions in the

01:22:32   world with COVID-19. And, and it's normally, it will still be a good quarter probably because it

01:22:38   is always Apple's best quarter, but given the economic headwinds, I used the analyst term there,

01:22:44   and given the fact that people have bought stuff, bought hardware early for the pandemic,

01:22:53   it's hard not to see this, especially given the way the pandemic is going in the United States,

01:22:59   which is not well. It's hard to imagine the holiday quarter being great for them. So my guess is that

01:23:08   they're going to take it on the chin a little bit in the holiday quarter and that it's not a

01:23:12   fundamental part of Apple's business, but really some combination of a depression of sales because

01:23:18   of economic issues and because of some of this stuff getting pulled forward. I don't need to buy

01:23:23   a new home computer for Christmas. I bought it for the pandemic. Did they give any guidance for the

01:23:29   next quarter? Nope, no guidance. Again, they said, we don't know. Things are weird. The world is

01:23:34   strange. We're not going to give you any guidance. We don't know what's going to happen. One thing

01:23:39   that could help the holiday quarter is it's very possible that all iPhones sold will be sold during

01:23:45   the holiday quarter. There'll be no fourth quarter, which is the actual calendar third quarter,

01:23:53   iPhone sales for new iPhones, right? Because they announced that the new iPhones would be, quote,

01:23:58   a couple of weeks late, which means October. Yeah, they were very quick to specify that they shipped

01:24:04   in late September and this time will ship a few weeks later. Why they didn't, I think, is in case

01:24:12   something really bad happens and it ships in early November, they can say, "Well, we said a few weeks."

01:24:17   But it feels very strongly like October is what they actually mean here. There's also the question

01:24:24   of if there are four new models, are they all going to ship at the same time or would that get

01:24:29   spread out? That may be where November comes in, right? Well, these will be out in early October,

01:24:34   but these are not going to ship until November and that would fall into the few weeks later kind of

01:24:39   zone. But it's definitely not happening in September, so it's in October, November, December,

01:24:43   fourth calendar quarter, holiday quarter, first fiscal 2021 quarter for Apple. But the holiday

01:24:50   quarter is going to get all the iPhone sales. Because if you think about it, those first

01:24:55   week, those first two weeks, that's when I would expect the majority of what would happen in the

01:24:59   quarter is happening, right? People will buy it, maybe not the majority, but it's a big spike.

01:25:04   That might help them in that quarter, but it's not going to change the amount sold, right? It's

01:25:10   just like when is it reported, right? And as you say, we could end up with phones coming out all

01:25:18   throughout the end of the year because they'll ship these things when they're ready, but who

01:25:23   knows when they're all going to be ready. Maybe Apple doesn't even know yet completely. And as

01:25:27   you say, we may get mid-October going out into November for these four products to start shipping.

01:25:34   You know, it's just unprecedented. The iPhone 10 shipped in October when the 8 was announced

01:25:42   in September. I think I've got my times right there. I will ask you if they're going to ship

01:25:49   iPhones in October, do you think the event will be in October?

01:25:55   No, I think the event will probably be in September because they announce and then they

01:26:00   don't ship right away. It's possible that they could move it. It's usually like a week later,

01:26:06   so it's possible that it could be late September or early October for an event. They could also

01:26:12   just do it in early September as they always do and say, "And they'll be available in October,"

01:26:18   and just walk away. So I don't think it precludes them from doing the event at the usual time, but

01:26:24   you know, we live in this strange year now where perhaps that'll all just get pushed back.

01:26:29   My gut feeling is that it won't, but they could if they wanted to. I guess we'll have to ask

01:26:36   Apple Fellow and head of events, Phil Schiller, what he thinks about it, but he's not talking

01:26:40   because he keeps secrets. The couple of other things that came out from the earnings call,

01:26:49   which is interesting to me, Apple TV+ production has not restarted yet because of restrictions in

01:26:56   LA. I'm intrigued to see what they're going to do here, but that's that. And also, Apple is not

01:27:03   going to be asking employees to return on math to the campus until early 2021 at the very soonest,

01:27:10   which again, not a big surprise there really. Yep, but it's a surprising quarter overall,

01:27:17   like wild to see them up those levels. I mean, they hit a bunch of goals and services and stuff

01:27:22   like that. They were really kind of sheepish. They're like, "We know the world is terrible,

01:27:26   but we made a lot of money." Yeah. It's like, "I don't know." Yep. So we can't avoid it,

01:27:31   but it definitely did happen. All right, so that is it, I think, for a bumper episode of Upgrade

01:27:39   Huge. It was even a bigger episode than we thought than when we started. Yeah, it kept getting bigger.

01:27:45   Apple also released Beta 4 of iOS today and denied that they were going to buy TikTok. So it's been a

01:27:51   really busy day. It's been a rollercoaster ride. Glad we waited until Tuesday, huh? Exactly,

01:27:56   which means we're going to skip Ask Upgrade for this week. But if you have questions...

01:27:59   Oh, that was the retraction of the lasers. If you have questions you would like us to answer on next

01:28:04   week's show, send out a tweet with the hashtag #AskUpgrade or use the question mark #AskUpgrade

01:28:10   command in the Relay FM members Discord which you get access to if you support this show and

01:28:16   support Upgrade Plus. You go to getupgradeplus.com and sign up. It's $5 a month or $50 a year. You get

01:28:23   extra content and now you will also get early access to 20 max for 2020. So thank you so much

01:28:30   if you do that. You also get upgrade without any ads. I would like to thank our sponsors for this

01:28:35   episode, DoorDash, Squarespace and Pingdom. If you want to find Jason online go to sixcolors.com and

01:28:41   he is @jsnew, J S N E double L. I am @imike, I M Y K E and we'll be back next time. Until then,

01:28:49   say goodbye Jason Snow. Goodbye Myke Hurley.