00:04:16
◼►
Just for the monitors, just for a crappy 15-inch 1024x768 LCD.
00:04:21
◼►
I wish I had, eventually, a couple years later I got one from Dad, and remember that Dad worked for IBM for almost my entire life.
00:04:29
◼►
And oftentimes, there was equipment, and I don't mean that he stole it, I'm not trying to say that at all,
00:04:34
◼►
but equipment that they didn't need anymore, he would end up finding, and again, this is sounding like he's stealing it,
00:04:39
◼►
I'm not saying he's stealing it, but some way or another it ended up at home.
00:04:41
◼►
And then it ended up at college for me, this sounds way worse the more I talk, so I'm just going to plow right along.
00:04:46
◼►
But I had this ancient IBM LCD screen, and it had, again, there's surely a technical term for these connectors,
00:04:54
◼►
but it had these connectors, it was like composite, but it was on the back of the screen, and you would like,
00:05:00
◼►
it was like quasi-coaxial thing, but it was one of those things where you would, maybe that's what it was,
00:05:04
◼►
and you would stick it in and then twist.
00:05:06
◼►
Those are BNC connectors, that's probably RGB inputs, which I actually have a lot to say about later, for a totally different reason.
00:05:11
◼►
But yeah, those were probably, because I think like professional video monitors back then would use RGB HV, and yeah.
00:05:19
◼►
Our Color X terms at school had those connectors.
00:05:22
◼►
Those were distinct from the regular X terms, which of course were not color.
00:05:26
◼►
Yeah, I have a lot more to say about analog color inputs for monitors coming up later.
00:05:31
◼►
You know, not to totally jinx us, but I'm actually very excited for this entire episode, I think this is going to be a good one.
00:05:38
◼►
I have more to say about Casey's Computer Corner, but we have some related follow-up first.
00:05:44
◼►
If you recall last episode, as we were recording, the Synology had rebuilt its entire 6-Drive RAID array, or so I had thought.
00:05:54
◼►
It had marched all the way to 100%, I had taken a screenshot when it was at like 99%, thinking, "Oh, of course, this is when it's going to die."
00:06:00
◼►
And no, it didn't die at 99, it started over.
00:06:07
◼►
And several different people wrote in to talk about this and why this is,
00:06:11
◼►
and they also said that Synology's on-screen, like, GUI display of what's happening is not the best.
00:06:18
◼►
And what you really need to do is you need to enable SSH on the Synology, which I did not have enabled for security purposes.
00:06:26
◼►
And what you really need to do is to look at the file in PROC, and the file is called "mdstat," so it's, you know, you would "cat/proc/mdstat,"
00:06:35
◼►
and that will tell you with more detail exactly what is happening.
00:06:38
◼►
So I did that, and I realized, okay, it is legitimately doing something.
00:06:43
◼►
I have no idea what it is, but it's doing something.
00:06:45
◼►
It told me that it was going to take literally a week to finish, which was very disheartening.
00:06:51
◼►
And then I found from somebody else's tip, there's a place in around the same spot in the Synology where you can tell it,
00:06:58
◼►
"I don't care if this uses a lot of, like, CPU power, just crank this thing out as quickly as you possibly can."
00:07:03
◼►
And so it ended up finishing, I don't know, at some other point, we'll talk about that later, it doesn't matter.
00:07:08
◼►
But the point is, there's a blog post about how to check the progress, and why is this happening?
00:07:15
◼►
Well, and now I'm getting way out of my depth, and maybe, John, you can be my parachute and save me here,
00:07:19
◼►
but apparently, SHR, which is Synology Hybrid RAID, is basically taking several different, like, RAID 5 or RAID 6 or something like that,
00:07:29
◼►
volumes, and lumping them together using LVM, not LLVM, mind you, but just LVM, which is Logical Volume Manager,
00:07:36
◼►
and making one big, like, logical volume out of all of these smaller RAID arrays.
00:07:44
◼►
That is about as best as I can understand, so John, maybe you can help me out here?
00:07:48
◼►
Yeah, I saw the same feedback you did, I didn't check up on it, but what it sounded like,
00:07:52
◼►
I mean, the last show, Marco briefly described it as kind of like what Drobo does,
00:07:55
◼►
but it actually seems like it's much less sophisticated than that, which makes sense if you look at, from the outside,
00:08:00
◼►
what can Synology Hybrid RAID do versus what does its Drobo-type approach do.
00:08:04
◼►
Synology Hybrid RAID is basically the same as a RAID 5-type approach, the only difference is,
00:08:09
◼►
you can swap in disks that are not the same size, and if you eventually swap in enough of them, you gain some storage,
00:08:15
◼►
whereas RAID 5 really wants you to use disks that are the same size, or build a new array in the traditional way.
00:08:21
◼►
And according to this feedback, what it's doing behind the scenes is simply, when you put it in a new drive,
00:08:27
◼►
making a new RAID array with, like, the newer changed drives, and then making these multiple RAIDs that it's managing behind the scenes
00:08:35
◼►
look like one volume using logical volume management, that's what LVM is, that's what it does,
00:08:40
◼►
makes perfect sense to me, it's fine, but, you know, understandably, if they are sort of accurately reflecting
00:08:48
◼►
the rebuilding of each one of these RAIDs that they're maintaining behind the scenes,
00:08:52
◼►
it can look like what Casey just saw, where the progress bar starts and finishes and then starts over again,
00:08:57
◼►
because it's actually doing multiple RAID rebuilds behind the scenes.
00:09:01
◼►
Exactly. But, yeah, it seems like everything's okay, and we'll talk about that a little later.
00:09:06
◼►
Would one of you like to tell me about Dark Sky and location-specific data, please?
00:09:11
◼►
Brian Brush had this notion that what Apple might bring to the table in the case of a weather app like Dark Sky
00:09:18
◼►
is that everybody who has an iPhone is essentially a distributed barometric measuring device,
00:09:25
◼►
because our phones do have barometers in them, apparently, and assuming those are accurate enough to be useful,
00:09:31
◼►
it's not just that Apple now has a good weather app and can incorporate the prediction services and all that into its applications,
00:09:39
◼►
but potentially, depending on how Apple wants to do this, they can use iPhones as measuring devices.
00:09:43
◼►
I have no idea if that is founded in any kind of reality. I just thought the idea was interesting,
00:09:48
◼►
that actually Dark Sky would gain some benefit from being part of Apple instead of just vice versa.
00:09:56
◼►
I don't know much about weather or the barometer in iPhones, but I would guess the main value in that
00:10:03
◼►
is not necessarily measuring absolute air pressure, but in measuring change,
00:10:09
◼►
because that's probably a strong predictor of rain about to happen, isn't it?
00:10:14
◼►
Like, oh, there's a big pressure drop. And so if you have a bunch of iPhones out in the field that you can tell,
00:10:18
◼►
like, hey, the pressure just dropped noticeably in this area for almost everyone, then that would be significant data.
00:10:25
◼►
So I bet they could do something with that if they wanted to. I don't know if they will, but that's a really cool idea,
00:10:30
◼►
and it's a way that you can basically make the entire fleet of iPhones into a giant short-term weather prediction thing.
00:10:39
◼►
Now, it's not going to give them, like, radar and forecasts and anything like that, but that probably is helpful.
00:10:45
◼►
And I would guess that the barometers inside of iPhones probably are sensitive enough,
00:10:51
◼►
because the whole point of them is to do things like measure when you've gone upstairs for activity tracking,
00:10:56
◼►
like to measure flights of stairs. So I would imagine the air pressure difference between, like, one floor of a house
00:11:01
◼►
and two or three floors up is not that great of an air pressure difference.
00:11:05
◼►
So, again, I don't know anything about any of this stuff, but just going on a hunch here,
00:11:09
◼►
I bet they are sensitive enough to at least know, hey, the air pressure is changing,
00:11:13
◼►
and it's dropping for everyone in this area right now.
00:11:17
◼►
It is definitely a very interesting idea, which I had not thought of.
00:11:20
◼►
And speaking of weather data, Luke Schulman, amongst others, have pointed out that the weather data industry has consolidated,
00:11:28
◼►
leaving only two major players in the United States. In 2012, IBM purchased the assets of the Weather Channel,
00:11:35
◼►
which included software and data products, and the cable channel was later spun off.
00:11:39
◼►
They, in turn, later acquired Weather Underground, which was run, which is basically a community of personal weather stations.
00:11:45
◼►
The other major player is AccuWeather, which has its own data and media products.
00:11:49
◼►
None of these organizations operate weather stations. They simply process and repackage data from the National Weather Service,
00:11:54
◼►
which is available for free and in the public domain.
00:11:57
◼►
So, I guess if you really wanted to go to the National Weather Service, maybe you could make heads or tails of it.
00:12:01
◼►
One way or another, AccuWeather and IBM have for years been lobbying to Congress to change the law
00:12:06
◼►
so that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the NOAA, model data is no longer released to the public.
00:12:14
◼►
But basically, you can get this data if you really want to try hard enough, or you can use something, well, could have used something like Dark Skies API,
00:12:22
◼►
which I guess kind of puts a nice facade in front of all of that.
00:14:49
◼►
The second thing I did was hook that 12 terabyte external back up to the Mac Mini and immediately sign it up for Backblaze with my own money.
00:14:58
◼►
And it is currently uploading that 12 terabyte drive to Backblaze.
00:15:02
◼►
And it is, I think, two or three terabytes in.
00:15:05
◼►
And so what I wanted your guys' advice on is what to do next.
00:15:09
◼►
And I tried to do this in Slack and Marco probably rightly said save it for the show, I'm not telling you.
00:15:53
◼►
What if I destroy that first volume, drives one and two, I destroy that volume, I lose my time machine backups, whatever, I don't care.
00:16:01
◼►
I replace one of those three terabyte drives with one of these new 10 terabyte drives and make another RAID 0 no redundancy array, a 13 terabyte or thereabouts, RAID 0 zero redundancy array.
00:16:13
◼►
I duplicate everything from the big array into the little array.
00:16:18
◼►
I think I probably should do that, irrespective of the next step.
00:16:23
◼►
And then this way I would have two complete copies of my data, admittedly, on the same box.
00:16:27
◼►
Like there's plenty of problems here, this is not foolproof by any means, but it's more than one copy, which is a good thing, right?
00:16:35
◼►
And so my thought is, what if I do that and maybe I just issue time machine forever, because I can't remember the last time I've done a time machine restore, and given all the friggin' computer problems I've been having recently, my computers are effectively ephemeral anyway.
00:16:49
◼►
You know, I've gotten so darn efficient at reloading them that I can do that reasonably quickly and easily.
00:16:55
◼►
So that's step one is, are you guys on board with that idea, and then there's a second step that I'd like to talk about first.
00:17:03
◼►
Or am I being silly by throwing away the time machine volume and having a duplication of all of that data.
00:17:22
◼►
Don't touch it. Back away slowly. Just don't touch it.
00:17:26
◼►
Let the backblaze backup finish. And don't do anything else until it does.
00:17:32
◼►
Well, and to be clear, the backblaze backup is being sourced by that 12 terabyte external. I do not disagree with you. I do not disagree with you. I think you're right.
00:17:40
◼►
But let's assume for the sake of discussion, it is not done. But let's assume for the sake of discussion it is done.
00:17:44
◼►
And I super pinky promise I will not touch anything until that backblaze stuff is squared away. What would you do then?
00:17:50
◼►
Right now, you are recovering from a near disaster. You are lucky that you got out of this.
00:17:59
◼►
So, step one is like, get your insurance policy in place. Get these backups done.
00:18:07
◼►
Step two might be, start fixing things that aren't broken again, like John said last week.
00:18:13
◼►
But, here's the thing. We're still in COVID-19 quarantine everything. It's slow and difficult to get new parts delivered to your house quickly right now.
00:18:24
◼►
So, if things go wrong, or if you change your mind, or if your needs change, you lucked out with your Best Buy parking lot hard drive.
00:18:32
◼►
But it might not be easy to get more stuff. So, if you do something and then three drives die in the process, I don't know. It could happen, right?
00:18:41
◼►
How hard is it going to be right now to get new hard drives? It might be hard. It might be tricky. It might take longer than you think.
00:18:48
◼►
This is not a good time to be making changes. So, I suggest that because it's hard to get supplies right now, this is not a great time to mess with it.
00:19:02
◼►
Let the backup finish. Let this just continue the way it is going. And then, consider other options once you can get hard drives delivered same day or tomorrow from Amazon.
00:19:14
◼►
Alright, so let's assume then that now we're in 2025 when all this is blown over. Then what would you do? Would you nuke the time machine? Would you issue time machine entirely to have a second copy of all this data?
00:19:27
◼►
I actually like time machine. Now, it is incredibly slow and incredibly old and comically terrible in the UI.
00:19:39
◼►
Like, things like missing progress bars. By the way, talk about missing progress bars. The new Catalina Finder integration for plugged in iOS devices to access their files. So, you know how iTunes forever had that section where you could actually drag files in and out of certain apps using iTunes?
00:19:59
◼►
You can do that now in the Finder in Catalina, but it's so incredibly half-assed. So, we were trying to transfer our Minecraft game from Adam's iPad to Tiff's gaming PC.
00:20:11
◼►
And this is the method that this was able to be done. You could plug in the iPad and Minecraft exposes it to Data Directory through that old iTunes file transfer interface.
00:20:23
◼►
And you can drag the files out and put them on a different device. That's what I did. The directory I was dragging out was something like, I don't know, a couple of gigs.
00:20:32
◼►
It's showing folders, but you can't actually, like, open those folders. You have to just, like, drag the entire folder out. So, you can't take, like, just a subfolder. You can't actually browse beyond the top level. That's limitation number one.
00:20:46
◼►
Limitation number two is when you drag that folder that you have to copy the whole folder of out from the fake iTunes interface in Catalina Finder onto, you know, your own computer, onto, you know, some other folder.
00:20:57
◼►
You drag it, you drop it, and there is no feedback whatsoever. Nothing. You have no clue what's going on.
00:21:06
◼►
Now, if you're transferring a two gig folder, that actually takes a minute or two. Like, it's not an immediate thing. There is no feedback. There is no progress bar. There is no spinner. There is nothing indicating that anything is happening, except if you try to do it again, something weird happens. I forgot what it was.
00:21:24
◼►
So, eventually, it pops in. Like, it shows up. It's just, like, I just love how, like, they didn't even code a progress bar. Nothing. Like, it's so gloriously half-assed. But, anyway, it's just one more way in which the breakup of iTunes actually made everything worse.
00:21:40
◼►
Anyway, so going back to your thing. Yeah, what I would suggest, I actually like Time Machine because I hardly ever need to fetch anything off of it. I think I use it maybe once a year. And usually it's like, you know what? I had something working in a code file that I was working on.
00:21:59
◼►
I've been there. I had it working last night. I didn't commit it. And I messed it up today. And I can't get it back to the way it was. Let me just revert to how it was at 10 p.m. last night. And I pulled that one file out. And that saves my butt about once a year. And I'm glad I have it.
00:22:17
◼►
And it's slow as hell, but I'm really glad I have it during that time.
00:22:22
◼►
That's a feature that Xcode should add that I sorely miss and it made me actually consider switching my editing from editing in Xcode to editing in BB Edit. BB Edit has this amazing feature that I wish Xcode had, which is that you can configure it so that every time you save a file, it saves a backup copy of the previous version of that file in a folder of your choice.
00:22:44
◼►
Text files are small. It is a no-brainer. I have had this feature enabled for many, many years, maybe decades at this point. I have a giant folder on my computer with the old version of tons and tons of text files all organized by date.
00:22:58
◼►
It has saved my butt so many times. Because, yeah, sometimes you forget to commit. Sometimes you don't commit. Bringing up the commit interface, even using a keyboard accelerator in Xcode takes time.
00:23:08
◼►
And you have to think of a commit message because it makes you write one. I don't want to have to think about it. And I also don't want to have to restore code files from Time Machine. Never had to do that when I was using BB Edit.
00:23:18
◼►
I was already using Xcode for a short amount of time. Occasionally I said I'd done it in the same situation. I forgot to commit. I'll just get it from the backup folder. Oh, no, it doesn't exist.
00:23:27
◼►
So if you're listening to Apple and you work on Xcode, add this feature. It's so easy to add. You just make a bunch of folders by date and you put the file in there and you stick a timestamp on the file name.
00:23:38
◼►
And maybe there's a little bit tricky logic about truncating for someone who has a 255 character file name, but honestly they should be punished anyway. So please add this feature. People will use it. It's great.
00:23:53
◼►
Yeah, right. Is there really much of a team there? Has Time Machine been touched?
00:23:59
◼►
Yeah, but it's updated to use the APFS snapshots. Every time we've talked about this, even though progress is extremely slow and should be faster, it is still changing, which gives me hope that it hasn't been entirely abandoned.
00:24:13
◼►
That someday, somehow we might get a version of Time Machine that takes full advantage of the modern technology stack in macOS. We're not there yet, but every version gets a little tiny bit better.
00:24:22
◼►
Speaking of which, by the way, we didn't prepare to do this news at all, but there's a new version of Arc, the backup app, ARQ. It looks really cool. It uses APFS snapshotting to make the backups really fast.
00:24:33
◼►
I'm going to upgrade to that. I'm going to check that out because it looks really cool. And Casey, it actually might be an option for you at some point in the future, maybe, because it supports fully now, or better supports Amazon's super cheap Glacier version and Google archive, because it's basically Google's Glacier.
00:24:53
◼►
And I believe they each charge about a dollar per terabyte per month. So if you can make that work for you, that could back up your stuff actually legally for like 12 bucks a month.
00:25:04
◼►
Yeah, I had heard a little bit about that and I haven't had a chance to look into it, but that does sound very, very appealing.
00:25:10
◼►
You should look at what the restore prices are, though, because unlike Backblaze, they will not ship you a drive for free.
00:25:15
◼►
Yeah, and I will say, the process of using Glacier with ARQ a couple years ago when I tried it was miserable, but apparently it is better now. But I don't know how much better.
00:25:26
◼►
I just peeked in my BBA backup folder, by the way. Apparently, I must have started fresh in this machine because the oldest folder is from November 16, 2008.
00:25:36
◼►
There's no reason why Apple can't do this with that, because we have that weird local time machine thing. I've never had a good concept of how and when and why this works, but there is that concept of local time machine snapshots when you don't have a remote disk or when you're not near it.
00:25:51
◼►
Even if you do, it still does it. Even if you have a remote disk, it's always doing local snapshot backups now.
00:25:56
◼►
Right, so in theory, it should be really fast and easy to, you know, some files that you modified last night to be able to go back, assuming you have any free disk space at all, to be able to go back and say, and just the OS should be able to do all that locally, just say, "Alright, give me this file from last night." I don't know if it's that easy in practice.
00:26:12
◼►
Yeah, it is fast to do it if you do it from the command line and know how to do all the magic, but the UI, like you said, it seems silly, but when they got rid of the space vortex UI, it's like things went downhill after that. That was like the most frivolous, you know, fanciful, what was the word we're always using when we're talking about it?
00:26:32
◼►
Yeah, interface, right, and it's like, well, maybe it's kind of too whimsical. Maybe they should just improve it only. What they did was they got rid of the whimsy and did not improve it in any other way, and now every time I go into the interface, I'm frustrated at how slow it is, especially with the, you know, Synology time machine backup over the network.
00:26:50
◼►
Navigating that interface and getting to the point where you can initiate a restore can take forever, and it's bad, but anyway, you can do it from the command line. You can access those things. It's inexcusable that they don't have a very fast lookup of local snapshot stuff like Margo said. You should be able to right-click a file in the Finder and say, "Show me all the local snapshot versions of this file," and then just pick one and restart.
00:27:09
◼►
Isn't there that revision system? I've never used that either.
00:27:15
◼►
Because that was for saving file versions. It wasn't the same as like time machine local snapshots of your whole disk. They might both use ABFS snapshot at this point, but I actually honestly don't think they do.
00:27:29
◼►
The file version thing started out using this weird SQLite database with diffs in it, and it was this terrifying thing that I'm glad more applications didn't adopt because honestly, it's just, meh.
00:27:39
◼►
I agree with you that in a perfect world, I would prefer to have time machine, no doubt, but I cannot remember the last time I've restored anything from time machine, in part because it's so slow, in part because it's on the Synology.
00:27:50
◼►
A lot of this is my own choices, but I am willing to sacrifice time machine in order to get a redundant copy of my data, again, understanding that it's on the same physical device, etc.
00:28:02
◼►
Marco, you sound like you're not too keen on this idea, even in the future state where I can get a hard drive easily and all the backups have been done, etc.
00:28:13
◼►
First of all, I don't think it's worth losing the functionality of time machine for a RAID 0 copy of this data.
00:28:23
◼►
Even though I do use a RAID 0 array for time machine, but again, that's because when I set this up, that was actually a large amount of disk space.
00:28:34
◼►
If I was setting it up again today, I wouldn't be doing this, but you are setting it up again today, and that's why I'm suggesting that you go with simpler solutions because drives are so big and so cheap, and your data usage has not grown with the size of drives.
00:28:49
◼►
They've grown a lot faster, so I suggest still leaning towards simpler solutions.
00:28:56
◼►
If you still want time machine, either put in one or two disks not in RAID and use that for time machine.
00:29:04
◼►
They don't have to be very big because your built-in SSD isn't that big, so they can be pretty modestly sized drives, and you can put them in RAID 1 or just have a single disk and have that do time machine with no redundancy at all because it doesn't matter that much.
00:29:18
◼►
But yeah, for your actual other copy of this data that you have, I still suggest getting another Best Buy parking lot drive if you can and just having it be on a drive that is basically put in cold storage that you unplug, that is not being run until this backup is done, and then you repurpose it for whatever you need.
00:29:38
◼►
All right, Jon, at this point, what is your thought?
00:29:43
◼►
Margo already hit the main point I wanted to, which is I didn't hear you say that you had gotten a second 12 terabyte drive.
00:29:51
◼►
So that should be step zero in your thing. You didn't mention it. Margo, just do that for crying out loud.
00:29:56
◼►
As for the time machine thing, two points on that. One, even after all the dust settles and the backplace thing is done, yada, yada, yada, it still never feels good to me to even momentarily, quote unquote, "momentarily" reduce the number of copies of files that you have.
00:30:15
◼►
So saying, "Oh, well, it's a time machine anyway, and I'm going to rebuild it in a second so I can just get rid of these backups and then I'll remake a new backup somewhere, whether you use Arc or Time Machine or whatever."
00:30:26
◼►
During the time between when you tear that down, you're like, "Ah, it's not a big deal, I'm just going to make it again," you've lost one copy of all the data that's on that.
00:30:33
◼►
And so it's better to make an additional copy before you lose that one so then the number of copies of your data doesn't go down. You bring it up briefly, then bring it back down to what it was. That's that point.
00:30:41
◼►
Second point is, I like the idea of you continuing to use Time Machine because for diversity of backup software, rather than having five super-duper backups, I'd rather have one super-duper, one Arc, one backplace, and one Time Machine.
00:30:58
◼►
Because all these pieces of software have their own bugs and their own upgrade cycles and their own potential for mistakes and so on and so forth.
00:31:07
◼►
Having more of them gives you more biodiversity in terms of if some plague comes and it only affects AWS or it only affects Backblaze or it only affects Time Machine, you always have something else.
00:31:19
◼►
And in particular, the upgrades cycle. The Time Machine one changes when a major new OS comes out and it totally changes the way Time Machine works and I could totally bork your Time Machine backup, which is why it's good that you back up with something other than Time Machine.
00:31:29
◼►
Same is true of Backblaze, same is true of Arc. If you have a bug in one of those things or super-duper gets hosed by some version, upgrade version of the operating system, but Time Machine still works because Apple makes that one.
00:31:41
◼►
I'm very heavily in favor of keeping a Time Machine backup just because it's one more backup program. And also, by the way, it's the backup program that the SPAR is ostensibly supported by the platform vendor, so pretty much guaranteed to work.
00:31:55
◼►
Yeah, I agree with all that, but again, I think the difference between the two of you guys and me is that I genuinely, and maybe I'm lying to myself, but I genuinely consider the data that is on my computers less valuable to me than the data that is on that Synology.
00:32:10
◼►
I would much rather lose all the data on my iMac Pro than lose all the data on my Synology.
00:32:16
◼►
So on that point, by the way, the recent versions of Time Machine have a checkbox hidden in the little options thing that says "Don't back up system files or applications."
00:32:25
◼►
So if you check that box, it won't waste its time backing up your operating system, which is on a read-only volume anyway and you can't customize it all, and it won't bother backing up your applications, which it assumes you can redownload or get from the App Store or whatever.
00:32:36
◼►
It will only back up whatever data you happen to have on the thing, and I know you think it's ephemeral, but you actually do produce data that hangs out there, and if you accidentally delete something that you had in your desktop yesterday, you're going to be happy to be able to get it back from Time Machine or wherever.
00:32:49
◼►
Yeah, I agree with everything you said. I think it's just, from my perspective, if I have to choose one, even for just a little while while I'm doing some dancing around with data in the Synology, I would choose a duplicate of the Synology data.
00:33:00
◼►
So, okay, so it sounds like you guys aren't going to like what step two was hypothetically going to be. So my hypothetical step one was nuke the Time Machine volume, like I'd said, put in a bigger drive so that I can get a over 10 terabyte array out of two disks, copy everything from the big six-disk array into this two-disk array,
00:33:23
◼►
and then I was starting to think, "Oh, this bit rot thing is starting to mess with my head. What if I do indeed nuke at this point when I have two copies of the data on the Synology, I nuke the big array and redo it all with BTRFS or ButterFS or whatever it's supposed to be called,
00:33:40
◼►
possibly even with two-drive redundancy if I can, and then I bring everything back from that RAID0 array to the new Butter file system, BTRFS file system, six-disk array, and then at that point if I want to go back to using Time Machine on that two-disk array, then so be it.
00:33:58
◼►
And I was hoping that I would win you over here, Jon, but perhaps not.
00:34:01
◼►
You can totally do that, but just follow the thing that I said before. Don't reduce the number of copies. If you want to do that, and I think you should, it's a good idea, you can't do that until you get that data to one more location.
00:34:11
◼►
So increase the number of locations that data is stored. This is above and beyond the other 12 terabyte Best Buy drive that you're going to get.
00:34:17
◼►
You're going to get one more of them now, and you're going to copy it to a third location, then you are free to nuke your thing, make a new BTRFS thing, blah, blah, blah, and put it back.
00:34:26
◼►
This is the discipline, this is the system. Do not reduce the number of redundant copies, and as long as you follow that rule, you can feel free to experiment.
00:34:35
◼►
Well, in my hypothetical, I am increasing the number, well, briefly increasing the number of redundant copies.
00:34:40
◼►
But at the cost of killing your Time Machine backups, which you think you don't need.
00:34:43
◼►
Yeah, but who cares? I don't care about my Time Machine.
00:34:45
◼►
Don't you backup more than just your computer on Time Machine? Isn't the laptop backed up on there?
00:34:50
◼►
Don't you backup everything in the house to that one big volume?
00:34:52
◼►
There's three machines going to that one big volume. It's Aaron's MacBook Air that's been underwater seven times, which probably needs a backup more than any.
00:35:01
◼►
It's not just your computer, it's three. I'm in the same situation. The whole house's computers are backed up to my Time Machine thing.
00:35:08
◼►
I'm a Synology, and I wouldn't wipe that thing unless I had redundant copies of all of those computers.
00:35:13
◼►
Because if you wipe that thing, you're like, "Ah, I don't need it, it's fine," and then someone needs some file on that computer, or it finally succumbs to another glass of water, or whatever.
00:35:21
◼►
It's like a slide puzzle, right? You're trying to find a free space. You've got to get more spaces. You've got to get more drives and put the stuff on it.
00:35:31
◼►
And it won't be wasted money, because those drives, what was the email we got referred to as shucking the drives, like an ear of corn?
00:35:39
◼►
I loved hearing that. That was so great.
00:35:42
◼►
You peel off the outer layer, and you get— interestingly, someone also had feedback that occasionally you'll shuck a drive and the mechanism inside there will have some weirdness about its SATA connector,
00:35:53
◼►
where it won't actually work out of the box if you take the mechanism and put it inside your thing, unless you customize the cable to— I forget what the details were, but there's some difference on the cables and voltages expected that won't make it work until you hack with it a little bit, which is super annoying, but still technically possible to overcome.
00:36:09
◼►
All right. Fine, then. I thought you were going to be all on board with this BTRFS idea.
00:36:14
◼►
We're on board with it, we're just not on board with you reducing your redundancy. Wait for your things to finish, get your second 12 terabyte backup, get in it, anything other move you want to make, you need to get a new square on the tile puzzle.
00:36:25
◼►
Put the stuff there, and now you have a free spot that you can mess with.
00:36:30
◼►
We are sponsored this week by Eero, the Wi-Fi your home deserves.
00:36:35
◼►
Eero is a great Wi-Fi system. I've used it myself, I've set it up for multiple relatives.
00:36:41
◼►
Eero systems that I've bought with my own money, not freebies they've sent me. I've actually bought this multiple times, either for myself or for relatives and friends.
00:36:49
◼►
It is a wonderful system that blankets your entire home with fast, reliable Wi-Fi. You get no more dead spots, no more rooms where it's slow or it not quite reaching near the backyard or anything like that.
00:37:02
◼►
Consistently strong Wi-Fi wherever you need it, and it's super easy to set up an Eero system. It sets up in just minutes.
00:37:08
◼►
You plug it right into your modem or your router, and you manage it from their incredibly simple and quite beautiful app.
00:37:15
◼►
So you can do all sorts of great features from setup to more advanced stuff, like you can set up conditions to do things like pause Wi-Fi during dinner if you don't want your family all distracted on their devices.
00:37:25
◼►
You can be notified whenever a new device tries to join your network. It's just a wonderful system.
00:37:30
◼►
And Eero now starts for a limited time at just $79. There's never been a better time to try Eero, I'm telling you. It's a wonderful Wi-Fi system.
00:37:39
◼►
Great coverage, super easy setup. The units even look nice. They're nice little white tastefully designed little things. It's just wonderful.
00:37:46
◼►
So you can get your home Wi-Fi fixed as soon as tomorrow by going to Eero.com/ATP. That's Eero.com/ATP.
00:37:56
◼►
You can code ATP at checkout to get free overnight shipping with your order. That's Eero.com/ATP.
00:38:02
◼►
Code ATP at checkout to get your Eero delivered with free overnight shipping.
00:38:06
◼►
You must use this URL to receive this offer, Eero.com/ATP.
00:38:11
◼►
Thank you so much to Eero for fixing our Wi-Fi and sponsoring our show.
00:38:15
◼►
I actually am interested in talking about video game stuff, but we're going to do most of that later.
00:38:25
◼►
However, you, Jon, need to complete or further along perhaps an arc that started many, many years ago.
00:38:34
◼►
There is a new controller out, and I know you have not handled it in your hands,
00:38:40
◼►
but continuing the classic episode number 49 of Hypercritical from January 6, 2012, eight years ago now,
00:38:48
◼►
would you please, Jon, critique the new PlayStation controller to the best of your ability?
00:38:52
◼►
There's a weird slow rollout of the PlayStation hardware reveal.
00:38:56
◼►
Microsoft has revealed basically everything about their hardware, their controller, the box.
00:39:00
◼►
We talked about it in past shows or whatever. Sony has been trying to challenge them with press release or press release,
00:39:06
◼►
but not revealing as much. So they had a separate press release and blog post just about the PS5 controller.
00:39:12
◼►
So they told us the PS5 specs, they told us the performance, they told us stuff about the 3D audio.
00:39:17
◼►
They told us all sorts of things, but we still haven't seen it. Here now is the controller.
00:39:21
◼►
I feel like these, the sort of, you know, I was going to say the big boy consoles or whatever, the non, let's say the non-portable consoles,
00:39:31
◼►
because the Switch, Nintendo is all in on the portable hybrid thing or whatever, and thus far, Sony and Microsoft are not.
00:39:40
◼►
Yeah, there you go. And among those, their controllers have not been particularly daring.
00:39:46
◼►
Microsoft got burned by the Kinect, probably rightfully so. That turned out not to be the future of how we control our video games,
00:39:54
◼►
even though it was really cool technology. But both systems have not really been interested in changing their standard controller much.
00:40:03
◼►
And so the new PS5 controller, it looks striking and new. It's got this two-tone appearance. It's kind of futuristic looking.
00:40:12
◼►
I was trying to discuss in one of the slacks, like, what does this look like? There's a sort of future look that has been used in movies and art on science fiction magazines and everything for decades.
00:40:24
◼►
I was trying to think of where it originates. The sort of white outer shell with glimpses of sort of a black interior where the machinery is.
00:40:34
◼►
So the white outer shell is very smooth and matte finish or maybe glossy, but very sort of smooth and, you know, characterized by joints and lines,
00:40:46
◼►
and then with certain regions where you can peek into the interior. In some respects, like Eve from Wall-E is a little bit like this, but she doesn't have the thing where you see the interior.
00:40:53
◼►
Anyway, that's what this controller looks like. We'll put a link in the chat.
00:40:56
◼►
Yeah, Stormtrooper is like that a little bit too, but again, it's not like you're seeing into it. They just have regions that are black.
00:41:01
◼►
This is more of an outer shell type thing. You can find lots of examples.
00:41:04
◼►
And I was wondering, is there one artist that pioneered this in the 60s or something? But it's I couldn't trace it to its origins.
00:41:10
◼►
Every time I think I found an older one, someone goes back farther, depending on how you characterize it. Someone's like, look at this. Here's 2001 in the 60s.
00:41:17
◼►
But the 2001 has the white outer stuff, but not the black inner stuff. Anyway, it's cool looking controller.
00:41:23
◼►
All this is to say, fine, it looks cool. It has a very different striking look, but it's not actually that different from the PS4 controller.
00:41:32
◼►
The PS4 controller, I don't remember if we talked about it in the show or I must have at some point.
00:41:37
◼►
But anyway, PS4 controller blessedly fixed many things that were wrong with the PS3, PS2 and original PlayStation controller.
00:41:44
◼►
But it still stuck to the basics. Two analog sticks in the lower middle part, a D-pad in the upper left, and four symmetrical equally sized buttons on the right.
00:41:57
◼►
And then some triggers, and they've messed with that a little bit.
00:42:00
◼►
This new controller is like an optical illusion. When I first saw it, I was like, oh well, at least they've gotten rid of one of my big pet peeves.
00:42:08
◼►
When you make a controller as if it's a piece of art, or like it's interior space in a house or something, where you make everything at 90 degrees and 45 degrees, right?
00:42:21
◼►
Because that's not what hands look like. Hands are not at right angles. They do not have sharp edges, and they are not all 45s and 90s.
00:42:30
◼►
It looks good when you make a thing where the buttons are exactly at the four corners of a diamond, and the buttons are all exactly the same shape.
00:42:38
◼►
But that has no bearing on how your hands or your thumb lands on a controller that you're holding in your hands. None whatsoever.
00:42:47
◼►
And I've always been angry about all the buttons being the same size, because there are very few games where you use all four buttons equally.
00:42:54
◼►
Most games have a dominant button, a second most dominant button, and a tertiary button. Anyway, all that aside, this looks like, oh, they finally made it so that the buttons and the D-pad aren't on these little perfectly circular, perfectly flat and level plateaus like they are on the PS4 controller, which is one of the few remaining parts of the PS4 controller that say, no, we can't get away with it.
00:43:19
◼►
We love perfect geometry. We love perfect circles, right angles, perfect cones, straight lines, just because they look good. The PS4 controller did away with almost all of that.
00:43:29
◼►
They said, let's make it a sort of bulbous shape that fits people's hands better, but still put two perfect circles exactly flat to host the buttons and the D-pad, and make those buttons and D-pads exactly vertical with the controller.
00:43:46
◼►
Vertical and horizontal, north, south, east, west, like they're not tilted in any way, despite that they know your hands and fingers are going to be coming in on them in an angle.
00:43:53
◼►
Which is not necessarily bad, especially since people are kind of used to that, but still, it's a jarring sort of departure from the design language.
00:44:00
◼►
This one looks like, oh, everything is organic and curvy, no longer do you have these circular plateaus, and it looks like they twisted the buttons to sort of align better with your hands.
00:44:09
◼►
Which, by the way, the Xbox controller does and has done for its entire life. Its buttons are laid out to try to be comfortable for your fingers, not to be perfectly vertical and horizontal when looked at in a plan view in a CAD file.
00:44:23
◼►
But, I took out my trusty Xscope on my Mac and pulled out some guides, and lo and behold, all of the buttons are still exactly aligned as they used to be.
00:44:33
◼►
They just look like they might be twisted, but they are not. So the circular plateaus are gone, but the buttons and the joysticks seem to be in exactly the same positions as they were before.
00:44:42
◼►
The only thing that they've done to make a concession for increased ergonomics is they have tilted the triggers slightly.
00:44:49
◼►
The triggers used to be more or less, again, completely like if you drew a straight line through the triggers at a 90 degree angle to their hinges, they would just go straight up.
00:45:00
◼►
These look like they are tilted, again, like the Xbox triggers tilted slightly outwards because they know your fingers are coming from the sides on them and they want to tilt them a little bit so they are more comfortable.
00:45:11
◼►
But other than that, and of course they moved the options button, they changed the touchpad shape, and they did some other stuff like that.
00:45:18
◼►
They made the PlayStation button into a weird raised logo thing. There's a microphone built in, which I think is very smart. Although it probably sounds like garbage, but it's better than nothing.
00:45:26
◼►
It's good to be built into the controller. Anyway, I haven't held this thing, but it basically looks like a dressed up PS4 controller.
00:45:35
◼►
I hope it is as comfortable as the PS4 controller because I like the PS4 controller. It looks a little bit fatter and Sony emphasized that they had worked hard to make it feel slim even though it's bigger.
00:45:44
◼►
The reason it's bigger, I think, is because they are hiding more haptic engines like Apple's little inductor widgety shaky fans.
00:45:57
◼►
It's like a linear coil thing. It's a more sophisticated way to make things vibrate. They've put more of those and more sophisticated versions of those inside this controller, which take up room.
00:46:07
◼►
They also have them on the triggers themselves to have tension on the triggers or something. There's more crap inside there, which is why they had to make it bigger.
00:46:16
◼►
But honestly, I'm looking at it at all the different angles. It doesn't look that much bigger than the PS4 controller.
00:46:22
◼►
Right down to the edges of the thing and the cut lines, it looks like it will not be a shock to anyone who has a PS4, which is fine. I like the PS4 controller fine.
00:46:33
◼►
It could be improved. If the only improvement to this is that the triggers are a little bit more comfortable, I'll take it, I suppose.
00:46:40
◼►
But anyway, that's that PS5 controller. It is not a disaster. It looks mostly fine. Still don't know what the console looks like.
00:46:47
◼►
Now, Jon, you have or have not ever owned a PlayStation in the past. I don't recall.
00:46:51
◼►
I have a PlayStation 3 and a PlayStation 2.
00:46:53
◼►
But no, I'm getting myself confused. It's the Xbox that you're refused to buy?
00:47:34
◼►
Whether you're working on a small project for yourself or your hobbies or you're managing an enterprise's infrastructure.
00:47:40
◼►
Like, I actually manage all of Overcast there. I have about 25 servers there and I just absolutely love it.
00:47:45
◼►
All the way up from 1 to 25 to beyond that, Linode Cloud Hosting has the pricing, support and scale you need to take your project to the next level.
00:47:53
◼►
They have 11 data centers worldwide so far and they're always adding more.
00:47:57
◼►
They all have enterprise grade hardware, their next generation network.
00:48:01
◼►
So Linode Cloud Hosting delivers the server performance you expect at prices that frankly you don't.
00:48:07
◼►
One of the reasons I've been with Linode myself since long before they were a sponsor, probably about 8 or 9 years at least now.
00:48:12
◼►
Is that they are the best value I've seen in the business and they've been consistently the best value for that entire time I've been with them.
00:48:19
◼►
Not only do they start out with good value, they stay a good value.
00:48:22
◼►
Because over time whenever they can make things cheaper, they'll do things like issue free upgrades to everybody.
00:48:27
◼►
Or they'll introduce even lower cost plans.
00:48:29
◼►
It's just incredible what Linode offers and it's just all these features.
00:48:33
◼►
I can't even go into them all in one ad.
00:48:35
◼►
It's things like one click installs of popular apps, things like WordPress, a lamp stack, game servers for Minecraft or CSGO or whatever else.
00:48:42
◼►
Revamped cloud manager all built on an open source single page app.
00:48:46
◼►
Of course you have root access to your server to install whatever you need, do whatever you need.
00:48:54
◼►
They have plans starting from tiny $5 a month plans all the way up to specialties like dedicated CPU's, high memory plans, GPU compute plans.
00:49:41
◼►
If you are not familiar, we talked about this probably a year or two back because you used a Raspberry Pi for your short lived question mark stereo thing, right Marco?
00:49:51
◼►
Yeah, I did a few experiments with them back.
00:49:53
◼►
I talked on the show about making a card record player kind of thing where I had this NFC reader that I could stick a card for an album in front of and it would start playing that album into my speakers.
00:50:07
◼►
So it was kind of like simulating an old CD or record player but in a modern way.
00:50:12
◼►
It's still sitting over there. I wonder if it's still working. I haven't gotten near it in a long time.
00:50:19
◼►
So if you're not familiar with the Raspberry Pi, I might get the particular slightly wrong, but the general gist of it is it's a full, honest to goodness, Linux based computer that's at its most expensive something like 50 bucks.
00:50:31
◼►
And granted, when I say 50 bucks, you're literally getting a motherboard and that's it.
00:50:36
◼►
You don't have a power supply, you don't have a keyboard, you don't have a monitor, nothing.
00:50:39
◼►
But you can get an entire computer for 50 bones. Like that's really not bad.