210: My Stupid Thumb
00:00:00
◼
►
So much easier when everything was monochrome.
00:00:02
◼
►
Those were the days, right John?
00:00:04
◼
►
Those were the days.
00:00:06
◼
►
You kids these days and your multi-bit displays.
00:00:08
◼
►
Pixels could be on or they could be off.
00:00:10
◼
►
What more did you need?
00:00:12
◼
►
(electronic beeping)
00:00:13
◼
►
So I'm sick.
00:00:15
◼
►
You know, I should actually save that
00:00:16
◼
►
for right before followup,
00:00:17
◼
►
because if you don't leave in that I'm sick,
00:00:19
◼
►
then everyone's gonna branch at you
00:00:20
◼
►
about how the sound's all wrong for me.
00:00:22
◼
►
- Marco would never edit something out of a podcast
00:00:24
◼
►
that causes a stream of feedback for an entire week,
00:00:26
◼
►
even though we discussed it on the show.
00:00:30
◼
►
- Normally I try to edit,
00:00:34
◼
►
I try to remove things that we say,
00:00:37
◼
►
kind of like, "I wonder if it's this way,"
00:00:39
◼
►
that we find out two seconds later are wrong,
00:00:42
◼
►
because that way, if I don't do that,
00:00:45
◼
►
then we will get tons of email from people
00:00:47
◼
►
who pause at that point before we realize that we are wrong
00:00:51
◼
►
and write it and tell us that we were wrong.
00:00:53
◼
►
So normally I will edit out the first half
00:00:55
◼
►
of something like that, just because it doesn't do anybody
00:00:57
◼
►
any good to hear us speculate being wrong
00:01:00
◼
►
that we're gonna learn is wrong shortly after.
00:01:03
◼
►
But sometimes I get it wrong.
00:01:05
◼
►
- So with that in mind, before anyone writes in,
00:01:08
◼
►
I am a little sick.
00:01:09
◼
►
I actually feel fine, but I don't know,
00:01:11
◼
►
maybe my sinuses are all clogged up
00:01:13
◼
►
because I sound weird as hell.
00:01:14
◼
►
- You sound like hell.
00:01:15
◼
►
- I know, but I really do feel okay.
00:01:17
◼
►
I haven't been snotting that much.
00:01:18
◼
►
I mean, everything seems okay, but I can feel it coming.
00:01:21
◼
►
- Can we hear more detail about your nasal situation?
00:01:24
◼
►
- I would love to, I would love to.
00:01:25
◼
►
Actually, it's funny because I--
00:01:27
◼
►
- How's your butt?
00:01:28
◼
►
Let's hear more, yeah.
00:01:31
◼
►
- God, I wish I remembered that Scrubs song about,
00:01:34
◼
►
I think it all comes down to poo, something like that.
00:01:36
◼
►
Anyway. - That's life.
00:01:38
◼
►
But yeah, I listened to Dubai Friday,
00:01:41
◼
►
which I resisted listening to for a while
00:01:44
◼
►
for no particular reason,
00:01:46
◼
►
I guess just because I don't feel like
00:01:47
◼
►
I have a lot of availability in my schedule
00:01:51
◼
►
for new podcasts.
00:01:53
◼
►
- Don't do that.
00:01:54
◼
►
- Well, and as it turns out, I'm glad I folded
00:01:57
◼
►
because Dubai Friday is excellent.
00:02:00
◼
►
And on Dubai Friday, they were talking about
00:02:03
◼
►
some sort of sinus cleansing device
00:02:05
◼
►
that I think came from Walgreens.
00:02:07
◼
►
- Don't do that either.
00:02:08
◼
►
- It was a neti pot, right?
00:02:09
◼
►
- Well, yeah, neti pot or something along those lines.
00:02:11
◼
►
I forget the details.
00:02:12
◼
►
- Brain amoebas.
00:02:13
◼
►
- Yeah, well, that's the thing.
00:02:13
◼
►
And so on the one side, I feel like,
00:02:15
◼
►
I think my sinuses are like clogged as hell
00:02:18
◼
►
and one of these neti pot-like things
00:02:21
◼
►
would theoretically clear it.
00:02:23
◼
►
But that being said, I really do not want a brain amoeba
00:02:27
◼
►
and so I will just pass and sound like a moron
00:02:29
◼
►
for the rest of the episode and not die from a brain amoeba
00:02:33
◼
►
and I'll be okay with that.
00:02:34
◼
►
- Now, in fairness for the "Dubai Friday"
00:02:36
◼
►
brain squirting device, that one did have a microfilter of some kind that purported
00:02:43
◼
►
to block the brain amoebas from entering your brain.
00:02:45
◼
►
And if there's anybody you want to trust with keeping microbes out of your body through
00:02:49
◼
►
use of a paper-thin filter, it's CVS.
00:02:52
◼
►
It's a $14 thing at Walgreens.
00:02:54
◼
►
Oh, Walgreens.
00:02:55
◼
►
Sorry, not CVS.
00:02:57
◼
►
That's a whole different story.
00:02:58
◼
►
Yeah, if it's Walgreens, then you're okay.
00:03:00
◼
►
Oh, my goodness.
00:03:01
◼
►
So, yeah, so don't yell at Marco.
00:03:03
◼
►
His levels aren't wrong.
00:03:04
◼
►
My levels aren't wrong.
00:03:05
◼
►
sound weird. So, um, so yeah, apologies for that. We should start with some follow up.
00:03:12
◼
►
We are aware that you can use Control Center to switch to AirPods on iOS devices. The whole
00:03:18
◼
►
of the internet wrote in to tell us this, and this was very confusing for Jon and I
00:03:22
◼
►
because we spoke about this on the show and I didn't understand why nobody spent the time
00:03:28
◼
►
to figure that out. And as it turns out, we later discovered that this was one of those
00:03:34
◼
►
instances where Marco got a little aggressive with the edits, which truth be told, happens
00:03:39
◼
►
extremely rarely. But every great once in a while, something slips through the cracks.
00:03:43
◼
►
And this was one of those instances where John and I discussed this, and it was in the
00:03:49
◼
►
midst of other things that should have been cut, and apparently the slicing and dicing
00:03:53
◼
►
was not quite surgical enough. So we are aware that you can use Control Center to switch
00:03:59
◼
►
to AirPods on iOS devices. So thank you the entirety of the internet for writing it.
00:04:03
◼
►
But more importantly for the people who listen to the show the vast vast majority of people that information was cut and they
00:04:09
◼
►
Didn't get the benefit of knowing that yes, obviously the people who wrote in to tell us
00:04:13
◼
►
That we can use a control center
00:04:16
◼
►
You know like that I was surprised by them writing in because I said oh
00:04:20
◼
►
Like Marco said sometimes people pause the show to send feedback
00:04:24
◼
►
And then they resume playing it and there's some standard amount of feedback you get of someone saying
00:04:30
◼
►
something that you know will be addressed maybe 20 or 30 seconds later in the show.
00:04:33
◼
►
And that's fine. That happens all the time. I do it myself. Everybody does it, right?
00:04:37
◼
►
>> JOSHUA YAMISCH: Yep. Me too.
00:04:37
◼
►
>> BRIAN KARDELL: I usually expect to see one or two pieces of feedback after that saying,
00:04:43
◼
►
"Oh, ha ha. I should have waited 20 seconds, then you mentioned it." But I didn't see any of those.
00:04:47
◼
►
I was like, "This is weird." Large volume of people apparently pausing the podcast to get feedback,
00:04:52
◼
►
but nobody saying, "Oh, sorry. I should have kept listening." So that was my clue that this was
00:04:59
◼
►
was going on. But anyway, the important piece of information denied to all the other listeners
00:05:03
◼
►
who didn't know, like me, that you can do this. If you have AirPods and multiple iOS
00:05:11
◼
►
devices, you don't have to go to settings and Bluetooth and switch it. You can do it
00:05:16
◼
►
in Control Center, and it is more convenient, so try it.
00:05:19
◼
►
Yeah, and to be clear, just in case it wasn't obvious, there are two panes in Control Center,
00:05:24
◼
►
And it is the right most pain.
00:05:27
◼
►
There's a kind of a dropdown list-ish thing on the bottom where you can select your output
00:05:32
◼
►
device and that's what you want.
00:05:34
◼
►
And actually speaking of Control Center, one of the reasons that it is not actually as
00:05:39
◼
►
convenient for me to use Control Center is because as of right now I have Control Center
00:05:44
◼
►
disabled on my iPad every place except for Springboard.
00:05:48
◼
►
You know there's that setting if you whether you want to be able to swipe up and get Control
00:05:51
◼
►
Center either just in Springboard or in all apps.
00:05:53
◼
►
I forget how it's phrased, but anyway, I had to disable Control Center in applications
00:05:59
◼
►
on my iPad, which is the main device I would be switching to, because of Stagehand, which
00:06:04
◼
►
is an excellent game that you should try, but it involves a lot of swiping rapidly upward
00:06:07
◼
►
from the bottom of your iPad, and I really don't want Control Center to appear.
00:06:11
◼
►
I don't even want the little tabby thing to appear, because you know what makes you do
00:06:14
◼
►
it twice to show that you really mean it?
00:06:16
◼
►
That little tabby thing appears, and I'm instantly dead, so that's a great game.
00:06:21
◼
►
Everyone should buy it and try it and you should disable Control Center first.
00:06:26
◼
►
I love the style of that game, I love the music of that game, I love the idea of that
00:06:32
◼
►
game, but my brain just can't do it.
00:06:34
◼
►
Like I know there's some kind of learning curve maybe, and I tried playing it for like
00:06:38
◼
►
a good 15 minutes, I could not get my brain to do it right.
00:06:43
◼
►
It's not a learning curve, it's a two-state machine.
00:06:46
◼
►
There is "I don't get the game" and then you will cross a humongous gap somehow magically
00:06:51
◼
►
and then all of a sudden you get the game. That was my experiences. I was in the beta
00:06:55
◼
►
for that game and I played it a lot during the beta, right? And my high score was like
00:07:01
◼
►
one or two hundred for several weeks. And then as the beta went on, I got close to four hundred.
00:07:10
◼
►
And I was asking, I was asking, "Nevin, what did normal people get for high scores? I know
00:07:15
◼
►
it's just the beta testers, but am I just terrible at this game or am I average?"
00:07:20
◼
►
And he was saying there's a lot of variability and so on and so forth
00:07:23
◼
►
It's trying to make me feel better about my thought my terrible high score
00:07:27
◼
►
But once the game got closer to release it. I think it was actually around the time of release I
00:07:32
◼
►
my brain figured it out like figure it out how to play the game and instantly went up into the thousands and
00:07:38
◼
►
You know and have him look back, so I I wouldn't you know it. It's a fun game
00:07:44
◼
►
It's a cute little trifle you can play with it, but unfortunately unlike alto's adventure unfortunately slash fortunately
00:07:50
◼
►
once you figure the game out it becomes surprisingly time consuming as you spend
00:07:57
◼
►
your days plunking away at this thing but there is there is a big leap so if
00:08:01
◼
►
you don't you know if you don't want to ever make that leap that's fine
00:08:03
◼
►
I still think it's worth the three bucks or whatever the game costs just to play
00:08:06
◼
►
with it because it is a really novel interesting idea very well executed but
00:08:10
◼
►
there is another game on the other side of it once you once you cross the hurdle
00:08:14
◼
►
once your brain gets the game and then you can like me spend most of your time
00:08:18
◼
►
being incredibly frustrated that you made some tiny minute mistake after
00:08:22
◼
►
playing for literally 20 minutes and just missed your high score. This sounds
00:08:26
◼
►
vaguely like the smarter everyday video with the backwards bike. Have you seen
00:08:31
◼
►
this? It's you know with where they they had it's like a gear or something like
00:08:35
◼
►
that such that when you turned the handlebars right the bike went left and
00:08:40
◼
►
and if you watch the video, spoiler alert, basically eventually you just flip this
00:08:45
◼
►
switch or your brain just flips the switch where it understands and then you
00:08:50
◼
►
can actually ride the bike. Also real-time follow-up this is an example
00:08:53
◼
►
of us saying something that we don't realize is wrong. People will have
00:08:57
◼
►
already paused the show and written in and now I will correct it. For the three
00:09:02
◼
►
of you that actually use HomeKit, HomeKit is the right most pain on a
00:09:06
◼
►
control center. It is not the audio stuff but there's only three of
00:09:11
◼
►
you that use HomeKit so I appreciate all three of you writing in.
00:09:14
◼
►
that out don't worry. Yeah. Do you think they're also the opera users? Ah, you know,
00:09:19
◼
►
that's an interesting point. Very well could be. Hmm, I don't know. So write in if
00:09:23
◼
►
you, no actually not really. There are long waits when you use the chat
00:09:28
◼
►
feature for most customer support tools. This is when you use the online
00:09:32
◼
►
web chat because like me you hate the telephone and don't want to spend any
00:09:36
◼
►
time on the telephone if you can avoid it. Tom W. writes in to point out, "Web chat
00:09:40
◼
►
works on the premise that one person speaks to a few people at once, many up
00:09:44
◼
►
to 10. And perhaps that's why the latency is so atrociously bad when you're having these
00:09:52
◼
►
online chat experiences.
00:09:53
◼
►
Yeah, a lot of people wrote in with that feedback and that makes perfect sense. And it should
00:09:57
◼
►
have occurred to me, but didn't. I was using it because the phone lines were closed. But
00:10:01
◼
►
I mean, it just falls out of like, "Okay, so the phone lines are closed. Why is the
00:10:05
◼
►
text chat open?" Because in text chat, you get a 10 to one multiplier on your people.
00:10:10
◼
►
And that's why I gotta wait 10 minutes for a reply, because someone is replying to 10
00:10:15
◼
►
other people.
00:10:16
◼
►
And that's actually kind of an amazing/terrible job, because who wants to – have you ever
00:10:21
◼
►
tried to conduct 10 simultaneous text conversations that are productive in any way with anybody?
00:10:28
◼
►
You can't even joke around with three friends at once.
00:10:31
◼
►
I feel like I'm frazzled doing that.
00:10:32
◼
►
It's like, all right.
00:10:33
◼
►
I mean, you can have multiple things going in a non-time-critical nature, like just,
00:10:39
◼
►
you know, whatever, like someone says something funny
00:10:41
◼
►
and then you say something funny backward,
00:10:42
◼
►
like that's fine, and multiple Slack channels,
00:10:44
◼
►
all that stuff, but 10 customer service conversations
00:10:47
◼
►
where the person on the other end is potentially angry
00:10:50
◼
►
and wants to just complete a transaction,
00:10:52
◼
►
now I feel really bad for these people.
00:10:53
◼
►
- I mean, I'm guessing that there's, you know,
00:10:56
◼
►
software assistants here, that they're probably using
00:10:58
◼
►
special tools that have like a checklist script
00:11:01
◼
►
that they're going through with each person.
00:11:02
◼
►
- Yeah, it's macros, yeah.
00:11:03
◼
►
- Well, but even just like, I'm sure there's like a script
00:11:06
◼
►
or like a checklist that each one can probably keep a state
00:11:09
◼
►
of like, here's what I've done with this customer so far.
00:11:11
◼
►
So there's probably some kind of special software design
00:11:14
◼
►
to help them out here.
00:11:16
◼
►
- Well, I mean, this is a perfect application
00:11:17
◼
►
for everyone's favorite '80s AI technology, expert systems,
00:11:21
◼
►
where you can't make a general purpose AI
00:11:23
◼
►
because it's really hard,
00:11:24
◼
►
but what you can do is make a text-only chat thing
00:11:28
◼
►
that knows how to handle customer service,
00:11:31
◼
►
the top five customer service concerns,
00:11:33
◼
►
and punts to a user if it can't figure it out.
00:11:37
◼
►
And those can work fine too,
00:11:38
◼
►
and I think I would probably be mostly okay with those.
00:11:41
◼
►
If it just, you know, I would type in something
00:11:45
◼
►
and it would repeat back to me
00:11:46
◼
►
its understanding of the thing, asking for confirmation.
00:11:50
◼
►
And that can get frustrating if you go around in circles,
00:11:52
◼
►
but if it just punts you to a person,
00:11:53
◼
►
I can imagine it would probably be good for, you know,
00:11:55
◼
►
covering at least half of the cases of,
00:11:58
◼
►
I have a product, there's a problem, I want to return,
00:12:00
◼
►
and it would ask me for the order number
00:12:02
◼
►
and give me the RMA, but like, machine could do that.
00:12:05
◼
►
Not that I'm trying to put more people out of work
00:12:06
◼
►
the AIs, but, you know, efficiencies.
00:12:10
◼
►
All right, so let's get to the John Syracuse, a portion of follow-up, as if all the follow-up
00:12:16
◼
►
isn't John's already.
00:12:17
◼
►
Why don't you tell us about APFS?
00:12:22
◼
►
Somebody on the internet named Tyler Locke, or "Loke," successfully booted macOS Sierra
00:12:28
◼
►
from an APFS file system.
00:12:30
◼
►
As we all know, APFS was introduced in Sierra as a developer preview, and presumably sometime
00:12:35
◼
►
this year will be the official supported bootable file system for what I suppose is the next
00:12:42
◼
►
major version of Mac OS, but who knows, they could do it in a point release too, whatever,
00:12:46
◼
►
it's already coming to iOS in 10.3 and that's not even the next major release.
00:12:51
◼
►
And up till now you haven't been able to boot from it, but many many parts of it are getting
00:12:55
◼
►
more and more mature and obviously if it's going to be the, it's going to convert all
00:12:59
◼
►
your iOS devices to APFS in 10.3, I bet the file system is pretty much ready for prime
00:13:04
◼
►
The only reason it's not on the Mac is because the Mac is obviously a lower priority.
00:13:08
◼
►
And he tweeted about this.
00:13:09
◼
►
We'll put some links in the show notes to these tweets just so you can get in touch
00:13:12
◼
►
with him and tell him to write a blog post about it if he hasn't already.
00:13:16
◼
►
He did it by taking a 10.12.4 drive, cloning it, running the APFS/HFS convert command line
00:13:25
◼
►
utility which exists to convert it in place just like it does in the iOS devices, right?
00:13:29
◼
►
That's why that utility exists.
00:13:31
◼
►
And then manually edited the global partition table UUID to some big hex string that apparently
00:13:37
◼
►
is the right one.
00:13:40
◼
►
And then did some other stuff that I can't understand because he tried to compress it
00:13:43
◼
►
all into a tweet.
00:13:45
◼
►
And changed some kernel flags and rebooted.
00:13:47
◼
►
And he was booted into APFS.
00:13:48
◼
►
And the other thing to note is his little screenshot showing, "Hey, look, I'm booted
00:13:52
◼
►
into APFS," showed as the volume type APFS and in parentheses case insensitive.
00:13:59
◼
►
So in case you're wondering, I don't know if this is just a choice you made or if it's
00:14:02
◼
►
going to be the official one, but APFS case insensitive is certainly a thing.
00:14:07
◼
►
So maybe if you're having problems with case sensitive HFS+, you won't have to worry about
00:14:12
◼
►
that with APFS because you won't be forced to make your Mac case sensitive if this screenshot
00:14:16
◼
►
is any indication.
00:14:17
◼
►
We are sponsored this week by Indochino.
00:14:21
◼
►
Go to Indochino.com and use promo code ATP for any premium suit for just $3.89 with free
00:14:29
◼
►
deal for a suit that will fit you better than anything
00:14:31
◼
►
off the rack ever could.
00:14:33
◼
►
Indochino is reinventing men's fashion by making
00:14:37
◼
►
made to measure suits affordable and available
00:14:40
◼
►
to the masses.
00:14:41
◼
►
Made to measure suits just fit and feel so much better
00:14:46
◼
►
than generic off the rack suits.
00:14:47
◼
►
Even if you get other suits like custom tailored
00:14:49
◼
►
off the rack, a made to order suit made just for you
00:14:53
◼
►
will still fit so much better than that.
00:14:56
◼
►
And it feels so good to have a suit that's one of a kind,
00:14:58
◼
►
uniquely yours, and when you look good, you feel good.
00:15:02
◼
►
You feel confident in yourself.
00:15:04
◼
►
So with Indochino, you can get a one of a kind,
00:15:07
◼
►
made to measure suit.
00:15:08
◼
►
You can customize the details you want,
00:15:10
◼
►
you can pick your own lining, lapel style,
00:15:13
◼
►
personal monogram, and so many more things
00:15:15
◼
►
you can customize about these suits.
00:15:17
◼
►
14 unique measurements go into making a suit
00:15:20
◼
►
that fits you perfectly.
00:15:22
◼
►
You cannot go wrong with a well-crafted,
00:15:24
◼
►
100% merino wool suit from Indochino.
00:15:27
◼
►
They also have made to measure dress shirts
00:15:29
◼
►
and men's accessories.
00:15:30
◼
►
And all this comes with a money back guarantee.
00:15:33
◼
►
Listeners can get any premium Indochino suit
00:15:36
◼
►
for just $3.89 at Indochino.com
00:15:39
◼
►
when entering ATP at checkout.
00:15:41
◼
►
This is 50% off the regular price
00:15:44
◼
►
for a made to measure premium suit plus free shipping
00:15:47
◼
►
and money back guarantee.
00:15:49
◼
►
So once again, Indochino.com, promo code ATP
00:15:52
◼
►
to get any premium suit for just $3.89 and free shipping.
00:15:56
◼
►
and it's an incredible deal for a suit
00:15:57
◼
►
that will fit you better than anything
00:15:58
◼
►
off the rack ever could.
00:16:00
◼
►
Thank you very much to Indochino
00:16:01
◼
►
for sponsoring our show once again.
00:16:03
◼
►
(upbeat music)
00:16:06
◼
►
- So, big week for Marco, as they say.
00:16:09
◼
►
You have released Overcast 3, so congratulations.
00:16:12
◼
►
- Thank you, there's only one massive bug.
00:16:14
◼
►
- What's the massive bug?
00:16:15
◼
►
- Well, there were 15 minor bugs that I fixed
00:16:17
◼
►
in a point release yesterday,
00:16:20
◼
►
but created one less minor bug
00:16:22
◼
►
where now you just can't create playlists anymore.
00:16:25
◼
►
Oh, that's no big deal.
00:16:26
◼
►
- I've heard from surprisingly few people about it
00:16:29
◼
►
because creating playlists is not a very common action.
00:16:32
◼
►
You get the all episodes list for free
00:16:34
◼
►
and if you queue things, that's created automatically,
00:16:37
◼
►
so that's fine.
00:16:38
◼
►
I have the fix ready.
00:16:39
◼
►
iTunes Connect has been undergoing maintenance stuff
00:16:42
◼
►
all day, so I haven't actually been able to submit it.
00:16:45
◼
►
But that should be fixed in a couple days,
00:16:47
◼
►
probably by the time this podcast goes live.
00:16:49
◼
►
- You found this bug, the playlist bug,
00:16:51
◼
►
after you released, laughed you uploaded 301?
00:16:54
◼
►
- 301 caused the bug.
00:16:56
◼
►
- Oh, there you go.
00:16:57
◼
►
There you go.
00:16:59
◼
►
Now that's a point release.
00:17:00
◼
►
'Cause it was a rapid turnaround.
00:17:02
◼
►
You had 3.0.1 which had a bunch of little minor fixes
00:17:05
◼
►
and it got approved really quickly
00:17:06
◼
►
and it went up on the store.
00:17:07
◼
►
It's like, wow, everything's working as is on.
00:17:09
◼
►
But then you added a bug.
00:17:10
◼
►
- Yeah, well 'cause 3.0 had a pretty serious bug
00:17:13
◼
►
where the gesture for dismissing the now playing sheet,
00:17:18
◼
►
it would interfere with the speed slider's little thumb
00:17:21
◼
►
if you would set the speed to the very bottom setting,
00:17:24
◼
►
the minus which is like .7x or .8x, something like that.
00:17:27
◼
►
So basically if you set the speed all the way down,
00:17:30
◼
►
you could never change it.
00:17:31
◼
►
Unless you had like an iPad or something
00:17:32
◼
►
that you could like sync it back from.
00:17:34
◼
►
And so that was a pretty serious bug.
00:17:36
◼
►
So I had to get 301 out quickly
00:17:40
◼
►
and there were a couple of other like minor things.
00:17:41
◼
►
I'm like, you know, let me throw in, you know,
00:17:43
◼
►
whatever I could do quickly that's not gonna require
00:17:45
◼
►
lots of testing to validate and everything.
00:17:47
◼
►
Let me just do that quickly.
00:17:48
◼
►
And I slipped up when fixing a playlist reordering bug.
00:17:52
◼
►
basically I pulled the playlist editor out of the card
00:17:55
◼
►
environment because for various implementation details
00:17:59
◼
►
that are too boring to get into here,
00:18:01
◼
►
UI table view reorder controls break if they're in a card
00:18:06
◼
►
that isn't my now playing card.
00:18:08
◼
►
So I had to revert the playlist editor back to the regular
00:18:13
◼
►
environment which is not in a card
00:18:14
◼
►
because it's a regular full screen sheet
00:18:16
◼
►
and in doing that I mistakenly forgot to re-add
00:18:20
◼
►
the done button back to it,
00:18:23
◼
►
so now you can cancel your creation of the playlist,
00:18:25
◼
►
but you cannot finish it.
00:18:26
◼
►
- I was surprised to hear your comprehensive suite
00:18:28
◼
►
of automated tests didn't catch this.
00:18:30
◼
►
- I was waiting for it, thank you John Syracuse,
00:18:32
◼
►
I love you so much. - No problem,
00:18:32
◼
►
I wanted to save your voice.
00:18:34
◼
►
- Thank you.
00:18:34
◼
►
All right, so you've gone on a justifiable media blitz.
00:18:39
◼
►
I listened to Under the Radar already,
00:18:41
◼
►
moments before we started recording,
00:18:43
◼
►
it turns out as per tradition, you are on the talk show.
00:18:45
◼
►
What do you want to talk about here,
00:18:49
◼
►
either that you've touched on previously
00:18:51
◼
►
or that you'd like to elaborate upon.
00:18:54
◼
►
I mean, this is your show, so now's the time to really,
00:18:56
◼
►
well, not that Under the Radar isn't, you know what I mean.
00:18:59
◼
►
Now's the time to really go deep on any of this stuff
00:19:01
◼
►
or do what I expect you to do and say, hey, whatever.
00:19:04
◼
►
- Well, I don't, I mean, what do you guys wanna know?
00:19:07
◼
►
Like, I mean, what do you think would be interesting?
00:19:09
◼
►
'Cause like, you know, so I'll tell you, you know,
00:19:11
◼
►
on Under the Radar, I talked about kind of the idea of,
00:19:15
◼
►
basically 3.0 was a big release in terms of
00:19:20
◼
►
how much stuff changed, but it was actually
00:19:23
◼
►
not a big release in terms of here's a list
00:19:25
◼
►
of features that are new.
00:19:27
◼
►
Like there are very few new features.
00:19:29
◼
►
And it's kind of an interesting thing to do
00:19:33
◼
►
of like here's a new version of this app.
00:19:36
◼
►
There's been tons of work to it, it's a lot better,
00:19:39
◼
►
but I can't tell you everything new in it
00:19:41
◼
►
because it's not that kind of better.
00:19:43
◼
►
Like I basically, most of the work was in revamping the UI
00:19:48
◼
►
and it doesn't even look incredibly different
00:19:52
◼
►
than how it did before.
00:19:53
◼
►
It just works differently in certain places.
00:19:56
◼
►
So like you have the whole card UI
00:19:57
◼
►
with the now playing screen,
00:19:59
◼
►
the two stage episode selection now
00:20:01
◼
►
with the action row on the bottom of it.
00:20:03
◼
►
Those are the big things and then the queuing system
00:20:06
◼
►
that goes around that whole thing
00:20:07
◼
►
and kind of like moving all the actions into visible places.
00:20:11
◼
►
but in a similar way that it's hard for me
00:20:14
◼
►
to come up with a feature change list
00:20:17
◼
►
of here's the big new headlining features,
00:20:19
◼
►
it's also hard for me to come up with
00:20:21
◼
►
what should I talk about?
00:20:22
◼
►
Like what do you wanna know?
00:20:23
◼
►
I don't know, Chatroom, what do you want?
00:20:25
◼
►
I mean, what do you think I should be covering here?
00:20:28
◼
►
- Chatroom wants to know why swipe to delete has gone on,
00:20:30
◼
►
and having been on the Overcast 3 Beta for how many months,
00:20:33
◼
►
I thought I'll eventually get used to it
00:20:34
◼
►
and it will go away, I'm still swiping them to delete.
00:20:36
◼
►
So just FYI.
00:20:38
◼
►
I mean, not that I don't mind it,
00:20:39
◼
►
'cause I don't delete them that often,
00:20:40
◼
►
like they go away when I still have the setting
00:20:42
◼
►
that deletes them when you finish listening.
00:20:44
◼
►
So it's not a thing that comes up often,
00:20:46
◼
►
but I've done it in the past week.
00:20:48
◼
►
- The short version of why this is the way it is,
00:20:51
◼
►
and then you can yell at me for an hour, is the old way of,
00:20:56
◼
►
you have your list of episodes,
00:20:58
◼
►
you could swipe one of the cells
00:20:59
◼
►
and it would reveal the iOS standard table view,
00:21:02
◼
►
delete button along with a couple other actions.
00:21:04
◼
►
Like there was a star for recommending
00:21:06
◼
►
and there was a download button there
00:21:07
◼
►
if it wasn't downloaded.
00:21:09
◼
►
this has always been the way to delete episodes in Overcast.
00:21:12
◼
►
You could also just listen to them all the way through,
00:21:14
◼
►
and the default setting was to delete after listening.
00:21:18
◼
►
I got so many emails and tweets
00:21:21
◼
►
over the last two and a half years since 1.0,
00:21:23
◼
►
with people asking, "How can I delete episodes?"
00:21:26
◼
►
Or, "How do I delete episodes
00:21:28
◼
►
"without listening to them all the way through?"
00:21:30
◼
►
Which is kind of funny, if you think about it,
00:21:31
◼
►
like that means people were actually
00:21:32
◼
►
trying to play episodes all the way through
00:21:34
◼
►
just to delete them.
00:21:35
◼
►
And the reason why is because I thought,
00:21:37
◼
►
when I was designing this app,
00:21:38
◼
►
that of course everyone using an iPhone knows
00:21:42
◼
►
that you swipe table views to delete.
00:21:44
◼
►
You know, that's obvious, everyone knows that, right?
00:21:46
◼
►
Or you tap the edit button in the corner
00:21:47
◼
►
and it shows the delete controls
00:21:49
◼
►
and then you delete from there.
00:21:50
◼
►
People don't know this.
00:21:52
◼
►
A lot of people don't know this.
00:21:54
◼
►
And you can kind of understand why
00:21:55
◼
►
because if you just get an iPhone
00:21:57
◼
►
and you just start using it,
00:21:59
◼
►
at no point do you really need that.
00:22:02
◼
►
Like in the rest of the iPhone interface,
00:22:04
◼
►
that doesn't really, like there's always also
00:22:07
◼
►
delete button somewhere or something else,
00:22:09
◼
►
or it's in some context like messages
00:22:11
◼
►
where it doesn't really matter,
00:22:13
◼
►
where you don't often delete entire conversations.
00:22:15
◼
►
So a lot of people who use iPhones don't know
00:22:19
◼
►
the quote standards for some of the standard controls
00:22:22
◼
►
for things like swiping table cells
00:22:24
◼
►
to show a delete control or hitting the edit button
00:22:26
◼
►
to show other controls, whatever else.
00:22:27
◼
►
- Does Apple Mail have a way to delete?
00:22:29
◼
►
- Yeah, there's delete buttons right on the toolbar.
00:22:32
◼
►
A huge design goal of Overcast 3,
00:22:34
◼
►
and I wrote this in my post,
00:22:35
◼
►
but a huge design goal of Overcast 3
00:22:36
◼
►
was basically to, 'cause you know, every feature that I had
00:22:40
◼
►
that was hidden behind some kind of gesture,
00:22:41
◼
►
people wouldn't find.
00:22:42
◼
►
And they would write in confused or mad
00:22:45
◼
►
that I didn't have this feature or disappointed.
00:22:47
◼
►
And so my main goal with Overcast 3 was to take
00:22:51
◼
►
all the things I've learned with two and a half years
00:22:54
◼
►
of basically feedback and user testing
00:22:56
◼
►
and try to address as many design flaws as possible.
00:23:01
◼
►
I mean, there's so many features, so much functionality,
00:23:05
◼
►
that I've had since 1.0 that a good portion of my users
00:23:08
◼
►
either can't find or just assume I don't have
00:23:11
◼
►
or they misunderstand.
00:23:12
◼
►
So it was very much like a clarifying release,
00:23:16
◼
►
like to clarify how things work and et cetera.
00:23:20
◼
►
And I knew going into it, I knew that the now playing
00:23:25
◼
►
being this card that's coming from the bottom
00:23:26
◼
►
instead of a navigation pane that slides from the right,
00:23:28
◼
►
I knew that would be like a minor thing
00:23:30
◼
►
people get used to quickly.
00:23:31
◼
►
But I also knew, and I even said on the post,
00:23:33
◼
►
that the new two stage where now you tap the cell
00:23:38
◼
►
and rather than immediately playing the episode,
00:23:41
◼
►
it shows a little action menu kind of like
00:23:44
◼
►
when you select a tweet in Tweetbot
00:23:46
◼
►
and there's buttons and the middle button there is play
00:23:49
◼
►
and the one to the far right is delete.
00:23:52
◼
►
I'm a little curious from people like you guys
00:23:55
◼
►
and the entire chat room and many people on Twitter.
00:23:58
◼
►
By the way, I should say before I make jokes like that,
00:24:01
◼
►
The response to this update has been massively positive.
00:24:05
◼
►
I am very, very happy with the response.
00:24:08
◼
►
It has been very, very positive.
00:24:11
◼
►
And for something that changes so many things,
00:24:13
◼
►
that's a more positive reaction than I would have guessed.
00:24:18
◼
►
So anyway, that aside, for the people who are not
00:24:20
◼
►
so positive about it because of this new,
00:24:22
◼
►
like, now it takes two taps to delete something thing,
00:24:26
◼
►
it always took two taps to delete something.
00:24:27
◼
►
But before it was swipe, tap, now it's tap, tap.
00:24:31
◼
►
So I'm kind of curious like why, I mean it's different,
00:24:35
◼
►
but is it actually worse?
00:24:37
◼
►
- You know why, Casey and I shouldn't,
00:24:39
◼
►
don't give him the answer, chat room don't tell him,
00:24:41
◼
►
Marco will now explain to us why there is feedback
00:24:45
◼
►
about the swipe.
00:24:46
◼
►
- I understand the people who don't like
00:24:49
◼
►
that there's two taps to play something,
00:24:51
◼
►
I understand that because it was one tap before
00:24:54
◼
►
and now it's two, even though it's much less error prone now
00:24:56
◼
►
and the interface is way clearer for everybody,
00:24:58
◼
►
But why is it worse to have delete be two taps
00:25:02
◼
►
instead of a swipe and then a tap?
00:25:04
◼
►
- And now the other part of Marco's brain,
00:25:06
◼
►
well answer that question, go ahead.
00:25:09
◼
►
- I know, I honestly like, I--
00:25:10
◼
►
- Oh, I know you can do it Casey, and I know you can do it.
00:25:13
◼
►
- It's just different, but is it worse?
00:25:17
◼
►
- It's actually easier to do, it's more precise.
00:25:19
◼
►
Because that's, one of the reasons I did this
00:25:21
◼
►
was that the swipe to delete, I would often
00:25:24
◼
►
accidentally start playing the episode.
00:25:26
◼
►
- So, well let me give you my answer,
00:25:28
◼
►
which I think is the same as John's, but who knows?
00:25:30
◼
►
My answer is you should never, ever, ever deviate
00:25:34
◼
►
from what is the norm on the platform.
00:25:36
◼
►
And so the norm on the platform is if you wanna do
00:25:39
◼
►
some sort of destructive change like that
00:25:40
◼
►
in a quick gestural way, you swipe from right to left
00:25:45
◼
►
and there will be some sort of destructive action
00:25:47
◼
►
that you can take right then and there.
00:25:48
◼
►
And like you've said previously, Marco,
00:25:50
◼
►
that's on pretty much every table view in the system
00:25:53
◼
►
that allows you to remove a table view row.
00:25:56
◼
►
And so, and I don't think this is exclusively
00:26:00
◼
►
a power user thing, although it certainly, in my mind,
00:26:03
◼
►
skews towards power users.
00:26:05
◼
►
But you should never fight the frameworks,
00:26:08
◼
►
which you've done with this table view,
00:26:10
◼
►
actually, in many ways.
00:26:12
◼
►
- And you should never fight the HIG,
00:26:14
◼
►
the Human Interface Guidelines.
00:26:15
◼
►
And I feel like you're fighting the HIG.
00:26:17
◼
►
Now, I haven't beaten you up about this too bad previously
00:26:20
◼
►
because I understand where your head's at.
00:26:21
◼
►
And it makes sense to me that,
00:26:23
◼
►
for the overwhelming majority of users,
00:26:25
◼
►
I bet you anything this was a positive change.
00:26:27
◼
►
But for someone like me and thinking completely myopically,
00:26:30
◼
►
you're behaving differently than the rest of the platform
00:26:33
◼
►
and that feels gross in the same way
00:26:35
◼
►
that you get that grossed out feeling
00:26:36
◼
►
when you look at a material design Google app on an iPhone.
00:26:40
◼
►
- I don't use any Google apps on my phone.
00:26:42
◼
►
- Well, you know what I mean though.
00:26:44
◼
►
And that's a bit of an unfair comparison
00:26:46
◼
►
and a bit slanderous to be fair
00:26:48
◼
►
because you are nowhere near that out of left field.
00:26:51
◼
►
But it's a similar scenario, right?
00:26:53
◼
►
you have something that doesn't quite feel right, but it doesn't quite feel right to a power user
00:27:00
◼
►
or even a moderate power user. I think to most people, I think you made the right change,
00:27:07
◼
►
even though it drives me batty. Well, let me just boil that down to a simpler, more visceral answer.
00:27:14
◼
►
Everything you said is right, but the result of that is that bottom line, I keep swiping things.
00:27:22
◼
►
That's that's the bottom line after many many weeks. I keep swiping and it's not a big deal and the
00:27:25
◼
►
Discoverability is a hundred percent like I'm even though it is non-standard in the same way that tweetbot is non-standard
00:27:31
◼
►
I like it like it is good because you have a complicated application and I think this is better and discoverability
00:27:36
◼
►
There's no arguing against that you were getting tons of feedback about discoverability
00:27:39
◼
►
People will find the trash can I come when they couldn't 100% on that but why why do people complain?
00:27:44
◼
►
It's not about speed. It's not about efficiency. Why do I keep swiping? It's like Casey said because I swipe everywhere else
00:27:50
◼
►
I can't convince my stupid thumbs not to swipe
00:27:54
◼
►
And everything you said about why you why you you know added the bar and the discoverability all that's 100% true
00:28:00
◼
►
but exactly in the same way that that uh
00:28:03
◼
►
Underscore convinced you to make a sideways swipe and explicably do a thing that should totally not do this because that's the way the old
00:28:09
◼
►
One worked you keep the same controls exactly where they are
00:28:12
◼
►
But if my finger stupidly swipes for the umpteenth time just let it delete
00:28:18
◼
►
But that's all I'm asking for like keep exactly the same stuff that's in there now make a discoverable so and so forth
00:28:23
◼
►
But for the admittedly very small handful of people and that's why this is not a big deal
00:28:28
◼
►
That's why 3.0 is in that win no matter what even if you never had this feature back
00:28:31
◼
►
But for the small handful of people who are either on this podcast with you or in the chat room
00:28:35
◼
►
Whose stupid thumbs keep swiping this is another case to do one of those features
00:28:42
◼
►
Just like the the one was referring to the underscore talked you into which was the old gesture was to get rid of now
00:28:47
◼
►
playing you could swipe to the side even though the new one comes up from the bottom, you
00:28:50
◼
►
still made swipe to the side work because it's no skin off anyone else's back, no one
00:28:54
◼
►
else is going to discover it except for people who have muscle memory from the old overcast,
00:28:58
◼
►
I can make that work for you too.
00:28:59
◼
►
Now it may be a pain in the butt to make swipe to delete work in the context of whatever
00:29:03
◼
►
unholy things that you've done to this table view to make it so super custom, and by the
00:29:07
◼
►
way I love the fact that you can reorder now with the little grippy tabs everywhere, so
00:29:10
◼
►
you know again it's totally a net win, but for this tiny little minor feature, you know,
00:29:16
◼
►
would be neat if the old muscle memory still worked. And I guess I'll probably eventually
00:29:20
◼
►
get used to it, but I thought I would have gotten used to it by now. And I think it's
00:29:23
◼
►
exactly what Casey said. If the whole rest of the system is training me again and again
00:29:28
◼
►
to swipe to delete, it's very difficult to sort of contextually untrain myself from that
00:29:32
◼
►
gesture on something that looks for all the world like a table view.
00:29:36
◼
►
As a general rule, use standard gestures. People are familiar with the standard gestures
00:29:39
◼
►
and don't appreciate being forced to learn different ways to do the same thing. In games
00:29:43
◼
►
and other immersive apps, custom gestures can be a fun part of the experience. In other
00:29:46
◼
►
apps it's best to use the standard gestures so extra effort isn't needed to discover or
00:29:49
◼
►
remember them. Straight out of the Hague.
00:29:52
◼
►
All right, so you guys make good points. I don't disagree with a lot of what you're saying.
00:29:57
◼
►
I actually, the idea of doing both, of adding the swipes back, actually never occurred to
00:30:04
◼
►
me until this moment. There is probably something I'm doing to that table view that would make
00:30:10
◼
►
that probably not work well.
00:30:13
◼
►
You don't like drawing glitches?
00:30:14
◼
►
Come on, that's all part of the fun.
00:30:17
◼
►
- I will try it, 'cause I admit,
00:30:19
◼
►
if I can do that with no horrible side effects,
00:30:22
◼
►
then it is kind of a no-brainer
00:30:24
◼
►
to offer that affordance to have both.
00:30:26
◼
►
- I like to see the little orange bar appear
00:30:27
◼
►
as the thing above it swipes sideways,
00:30:29
◼
►
and the orange bar starts to get clipped and filled,
00:30:31
◼
►
it will be so awesome.
00:30:32
◼
►
- Oh, you have no idea what I've done
00:30:34
◼
►
to poor UITableView.
00:30:35
◼
►
- I know, I mean, whatever Tweetbot did,
00:30:37
◼
►
same type of thing.
00:30:38
◼
►
Like this, and to be fair,
00:30:40
◼
►
I don't know if Tweetbot was the originator of this thing,
00:30:42
◼
►
But a lot of applications do this, where they want to have more stuff for you to do in a
00:30:49
◼
►
They can't all fit under a magic edit button where you go into a mode, right?
00:30:53
◼
►
And so they do this thing where it reveals more controls when you tap the thing.
00:30:57
◼
►
I think that itself, even though it's not in the HIG or whatever, is kind of standard
00:31:00
◼
►
and tried and true.
00:31:01
◼
►
But since you can't delete a tweet, the tweet bot never had to deal with – well, I guess
00:31:05
◼
►
Speaking of what, you can delete a tweet.
00:31:06
◼
►
What the hell does tweet bot do when you swipe?
00:31:08
◼
►
I guess I don't delete tweets as often as I –
00:31:10
◼
►
- Swipe I think is view conversation.
00:31:12
◼
►
- There's two different directions.
00:31:13
◼
►
One of them is view conversation,
00:31:14
◼
►
the other one I think is favorite.
00:31:15
◼
►
- Oh that's right, they used both directions for the, yeah.
00:31:19
◼
►
No I mean, so, okay, so there's a number of things
00:31:22
◼
►
to respond to here.
00:31:23
◼
►
One of them is when you're thinking about
00:31:27
◼
►
how this app should be or how this thing should be,
00:31:30
◼
►
actually work through the entire thing in your head
00:31:33
◼
►
to see, maybe think maybe there's a reason
00:31:37
◼
►
why it isn't that way, right?
00:31:38
◼
►
or maybe that would present more challenges.
00:31:40
◼
►
And we often do this with trying to,
00:31:43
◼
►
as our armchair people, trying to tell Apple what to do.
00:31:46
◼
►
Like, well what if they did that?
00:31:48
◼
►
What are the other ramifications of that?
00:31:49
◼
►
So, if I didn't do the button bar thing,
00:31:53
◼
►
if I kept the delete in there,
00:31:55
◼
►
what other way, how else could I make it
00:31:57
◼
►
actually discoverable to people?
00:31:59
◼
►
And so, the way that the Apple apps do it,
00:32:01
◼
►
that you're reading from The Hic as if this is a gospel,
00:32:04
◼
►
well I'll get to that next,
00:32:05
◼
►
but the way they do it is on the resulting screen,
00:32:09
◼
►
so like look at Mail, Mail is always a good example
00:32:11
◼
►
of like standard UI kit stuff,
00:32:14
◼
►
it's always a good inspiration or reference point for that.
00:32:16
◼
►
So look at Mail, with Mail, you open the message,
00:32:20
◼
►
if you assume that you don't know how to swipe
00:32:22
◼
►
on table cells to delete things, which most people don't,
00:32:26
◼
►
if you open the message, in the message window,
00:32:28
◼
►
there's a delete button.
00:32:29
◼
►
So if you don't know how to swipe on the table view,
00:32:31
◼
►
you're still seeing delete buttons all the time.
00:32:34
◼
►
So if I were to go down this path with Overcast
00:32:38
◼
►
to have single tap to open the message
00:32:43
◼
►
and to have a swipe offer the delete,
00:32:46
◼
►
or single tap to begin play the way I had it before,
00:32:49
◼
►
how else could I make delete more discoverable?
00:32:53
◼
►
So one way to do it would be if I put delete
00:32:56
◼
►
in the info pane, which I could do,
00:32:58
◼
►
I forget whether I did it or not, but I could do that,
00:33:00
◼
►
have delete be one of the buttons in the info pane.
00:33:03
◼
►
But in typical playback, you're not using the info pane.
00:33:06
◼
►
In typical playback, you're hitting the episode
00:33:09
◼
►
and then it begins playing in the screen, if it's this way.
00:33:11
◼
►
And so it would have to be in the now playing screen.
00:33:15
◼
►
So now look at the now playing screen
00:33:16
◼
►
and where would I put it?
00:33:17
◼
►
- No one's arguing that you should get rid of the bar.
00:33:22
◼
►
Well at least I certainly wasn't.
00:33:23
◼
►
I totally, you have to keep the bar.
00:33:24
◼
►
- Oh, people are. - You have to.
00:33:25
◼
►
It's an improvement.
00:33:26
◼
►
I'm saying like adding swipe to delete
00:33:28
◼
►
as a shortcut for the people who happen to know it.
00:33:30
◼
►
which is definitely a tiny detail, nice to have thing
00:33:33
◼
►
that is not essential for 3.0.
00:33:35
◼
►
That's why I said the bar is obviously an improvement,
00:33:37
◼
►
like just, you know, 100%.
00:33:39
◼
►
And in fact, I think you can--
00:33:41
◼
►
- It's not obvious to a lot of people on Twitter.
00:33:43
◼
►
- Well, I think the other thing the bar gives you
00:33:48
◼
►
looking at it is, I don't know how much metrics
00:33:52
◼
►
you're collecting in terms of usage,
00:33:53
◼
►
but you have a lot of room.
00:33:54
◼
►
- Not a lot.
00:33:55
◼
►
- And I don't know what, how common the, you know,
00:34:00
◼
►
you know, add to playlist, you know, the plus hamburger thing and the star thing are or
00:34:06
◼
►
even the share, like you have enough room to actually use that bar as a place to highlight
00:34:11
◼
►
new features in 4.0 or whatever as they come. And I think it's important to have an element
00:34:17
◼
►
like that and burying it under info or putting it on the now playing screen are all much
00:34:20
◼
►
worse. This was merely a question of, and I don't understand how this is spun out into
00:34:24
◼
►
this giant big thing because this is such a minor thing. Like this is not a problem
00:34:28
◼
►
with the application at all, it's just like it's a problem with my thumb still doing a
00:34:32
◼
►
thing, and I'm just exploring why it might do that, is to continue to provide affordances
00:34:37
◼
►
for the tiny amount of people who are used to, or their thumbs are used to doing a certain
00:34:43
◼
►
thing in a way that doesn't detract at all from the increased discoverability provided
00:34:48
◼
►
by the little bar.
00:34:49
◼
►
If people are arguing against the bar entirely to go back to the old way, I think they probably
00:34:53
◼
►
just haven't been using the app long enough.
00:34:54
◼
►
Because when I first started using it with the little bar too, it feels weird.
00:34:57
◼
►
You're used to using overcast for, at this point, like, years, right?
00:35:00
◼
►
Used to tapping to play a thing, and you tap to play a thing and the podcast doesn't start
00:35:06
◼
►
That's something I got used to, and it's not as if the first tap doesn't do anything.
00:35:11
◼
►
The first tap reveals the bar.
00:35:12
◼
►
So it's not like with swiping, where the swiping just literally does nothing, does not give
00:35:15
◼
►
you any progress towards your delete action that you were trying to perform.
00:35:19
◼
►
Tapping reveals the bar.
00:35:20
◼
►
You have a visual cue that there's something else that you have to do, and usually I'm
00:35:24
◼
►
I'm doing playlists anyway,
00:35:25
◼
►
so it's just playing one after the other,
00:35:26
◼
►
so it's not a big deal.
00:35:27
◼
►
- Yeah, again, until this podcast,
00:35:30
◼
►
did not even consider the idea
00:35:31
◼
►
of leaving the swipe buttons in
00:35:33
◼
►
and also leaving the bar in.
00:35:35
◼
►
So I actually am gonna see if I can do that easily
00:35:38
◼
►
without massive horrible side effects
00:35:40
◼
►
because of my table view abuse.
00:35:42
◼
►
- Did you have it in the old one?
00:35:43
◼
►
I don't even know if you had this.
00:35:44
◼
►
Did you have the male style super duper swipe?
00:35:47
◼
►
- Yeah, where there's like three buttons over there?
00:35:48
◼
►
Yeah, I had that.
00:35:49
◼
►
- But like where you go all the way to the end
00:35:50
◼
►
and it just deletes it?
00:35:51
◼
►
- Oh, no, that was never made available.
00:35:53
◼
►
Mail always, whatever TableView Mail uses,
00:35:57
◼
►
always gets cool features like that
00:35:59
◼
►
before they're available in the public API.
00:36:01
◼
►
So they had the first action buttons there
00:36:04
◼
►
for I think an entire iOS version
00:36:05
◼
►
before it was easy to do that with other ways.
00:36:08
◼
►
And then they later, once they gave us the API
00:36:12
◼
►
to make those action buttons,
00:36:13
◼
►
then Mail got the ability to have the full drag
00:36:15
◼
►
all the way across for delete,
00:36:16
◼
►
and I don't think they ever made that available to anybody.
00:36:19
◼
►
- That's a cool feature.
00:36:20
◼
►
I hope that does come to TableViews,
00:36:21
◼
►
because it's definitely like,
00:36:23
◼
►
we're getting into the realm of like,
00:36:25
◼
►
not expert features, but features that hopefully
00:36:28
◼
►
never bother anybody if you don't know they exist,
00:36:31
◼
►
but once you know they exist, it becomes addictive
00:36:33
◼
►
to be able to go (whooshing)
00:36:35
◼
►
and just knock out things.
00:36:36
◼
►
- The only thing I don't like about that feature
00:36:37
◼
►
is that if you swipe mail messages left,
00:36:41
◼
►
there's an unread option on the side,
00:36:43
◼
►
which doesn't say anything, like you swipe hard enough
00:36:45
◼
►
and it just marks it unread and that's cool.
00:36:47
◼
►
If you swipe it right, you have that super mode
00:36:50
◼
►
where if you swipe it far enough, it just deletes it,
00:36:52
◼
►
and the far most button is trash,
00:36:54
◼
►
but the other two buttons it offers are more and flag.
00:36:58
◼
►
And so if you're opening that menu
00:37:01
◼
►
in order to flag the message,
00:37:02
◼
►
that's kind of the opposite of putting it in the trash,
00:37:05
◼
►
but if you drag just very slightly too far
00:37:07
◼
►
when you open that message up, it deletes it.
00:37:09
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, it's a fine line with the swiping.
00:37:12
◼
►
- Well, it's a bad decision.
00:37:13
◼
►
Like to me, I think that everything that's not trash
00:37:17
◼
►
should be on the other direction swipe menu
00:37:19
◼
►
if they're gonna do that,
00:37:20
◼
►
if you're gonna have this all the way swipe gesture,
00:37:23
◼
►
because it's too easy to do this destructive action
00:37:26
◼
►
when you're trying to do flag or more.
00:37:29
◼
►
- I have the opposite problem where I guess
00:37:31
◼
►
I'm too lazy with the swipe and I wanted to delete it,
00:37:34
◼
►
but I didn't quite go far enough
00:37:36
◼
►
and I have to give a second attempt on it,
00:37:37
◼
►
but I can see the opposite being true to it.
00:37:38
◼
►
Definitely with anything gestural, that's the problem.
00:37:41
◼
►
That's the good thing about the bad thing about gestures.
00:37:43
◼
►
They feel so good when they're right,
00:37:44
◼
►
but you get it, it's like controlling a video game.
00:37:46
◼
►
You get it a little bit wrong,
00:37:48
◼
►
and because it's not a precise thing,
00:37:49
◼
►
because it is inherently a fuzzy thing, it's really difficult to get sort of the control
00:37:54
◼
►
scheme just right for everybody, and everybody is a little bit different.
00:37:57
◼
►
As opposed to the much more analytical world of pointers and mouse control and how big
00:38:03
◼
►
targets have to be, it's easier to measure that and it's generally a more precise thing.
00:38:09
◼
►
Although you did the basics here for the little bar.
00:38:11
◼
►
Trash is far away from the play button.
00:38:14
◼
►
Play is not all the way on the left and trash is not all the way on the right because the
00:38:17
◼
►
the middle is easier to hit than the edges of the screen.
00:38:19
◼
►
Like it's, you know, everything you've just described
00:38:21
◼
►
about the ergonomics of where items are
00:38:24
◼
►
in relation to each other
00:38:25
◼
►
and how easy it is to accidentally is revealed in the bar.
00:38:27
◼
►
The only thing you can maybe argue about is
00:38:30
◼
►
whether the center is appropriate for play,
00:38:32
◼
►
but I think it is.
00:38:33
◼
►
- Yeah, oh yeah, I don't think I would hear
00:38:37
◼
►
any other arguments about that.
00:38:39
◼
►
Again, it's like, if you think about
00:38:40
◼
►
where else would you put these things?
00:38:42
◼
►
Like you come to pretty similar conclusions,
00:38:45
◼
►
I think with a lot of this stuff.
00:38:46
◼
►
Anyway, so yeah, I'll look into the double gesture thing
00:38:49
◼
►
'cause that does make some sense.
00:38:50
◼
►
I do want to address though the whole like, you know,
00:38:54
◼
►
HIG, adherence to standards, everything else as gospel.
00:38:58
◼
►
Apple, and for those of you who don't know,
00:39:01
◼
►
HIG is the Human Interface Guidelines.
00:39:03
◼
►
It's been a document Apple has published forever
00:39:06
◼
►
and they revised it over time with new OSs
00:39:09
◼
►
and new, you know, new knowledge,
00:39:11
◼
►
but basically it's like how, it's like the standards
00:39:13
◼
►
for how your interface should look and work
00:39:15
◼
►
and be laid out for Apple's platforms.
00:39:19
◼
►
Over the years, there's always been tons of debate
00:39:21
◼
►
over the HIG and whether it's okay to violate it,
00:39:23
◼
►
when it's okay to violate it.
00:39:25
◼
►
And I think it's similar to rules of grammar for poetry.
00:39:30
◼
►
You know, I think it's like you're allowed to violate
00:39:33
◼
►
the HIG if you know what you're doing
00:39:35
◼
►
and you have good reason, basically.
00:39:37
◼
►
Or, you know, it's not like this set in stone thing.
00:39:40
◼
►
And Apple violates the HIG all the time with their own apps.
00:39:44
◼
►
they blatantly violate it and they don't care
00:39:48
◼
►
because they think they know better
00:39:50
◼
►
and in many cases that's true.
00:39:52
◼
►
I am a developer.
00:39:54
◼
►
For years I said I am not a designer
00:39:58
◼
►
and when it became clear to me
00:40:01
◼
►
that I was doing the vast majority of the design in my apps,
00:40:04
◼
►
I stopped saying that.
00:40:06
◼
►
I think now, no matter what anyone else says,
00:40:09
◼
►
I think of myself as an app developer and app designer,
00:40:13
◼
►
combo in one, even though I'm not as good at the design part
00:40:16
◼
►
as I am at the development part,
00:40:17
◼
►
I now do both of those rules.
00:40:19
◼
►
I think that I now have a good enough design sense
00:40:23
◼
►
that I can judge or I can kind of have some leeway
00:40:28
◼
►
in deciding when to break a standard rule.
00:40:32
◼
►
And it doesn't always work, sometimes I have to roll it back
00:40:34
◼
►
I have lots of crazy ideas and many of them are awful.
00:40:37
◼
►
But I think I now have earned myself the right to break
00:40:42
◼
►
sometimes because the fact is, in order to do good design
00:40:47
◼
►
and especially in order to move things forward,
00:40:49
◼
►
you have to break the rules.
00:40:51
◼
►
The rules were never written to be gospel,
00:40:53
◼
►
they were never written to be here to 100%.
00:40:56
◼
►
As soon as any version of the HIG is published,
00:40:59
◼
►
Apple already has apps out there that violate it
00:41:01
◼
►
all over the place because the HIG is,
00:41:04
◼
►
it's kind of like using stock UI kit controls
00:41:07
◼
►
with stock themes on them.
00:41:09
◼
►
It's like, you can do that.
00:41:11
◼
►
For most people, that's a reasonable default,
00:41:13
◼
►
that's a good starting place.
00:41:15
◼
►
If you aren't confident whether you can break the rules,
00:41:17
◼
►
you should just do that.
00:41:18
◼
►
Like that's fine.
00:41:20
◼
►
But it's also nice to have apps
00:41:23
◼
►
that don't follow all the rules,
00:41:24
◼
►
they push things forward or they do things differently.
00:41:27
◼
►
And that is how progress gets made
00:41:29
◼
►
and that is often, that often is necessary
00:41:32
◼
►
to result in an overall better designed
00:41:34
◼
►
or more usable app.
00:41:36
◼
►
- Yeah, you know, the thing of it is is that
00:41:40
◼
►
To me, the best user interface is one you don't have to think about, right?
00:41:44
◼
►
And it just feels frictionless that things are where you expect them to be.
00:41:49
◼
►
As an example, as an unrelated example, in my car, I feel like everything is where I expect it to be.
00:41:58
◼
►
Even within iDrive, which a lot of people hate, it makes sense to my brain.
00:42:03
◼
►
Maybe it doesn't to yours or to whomever's, but it makes sense to me.
00:42:07
◼
►
And so the best, like I said, the best user interface is one you don't have to think about.
00:42:11
◼
►
And the moment I have to think about that user interface, about how I accomplish a task,
00:42:17
◼
►
then I'm experiencing friction and I'm taken out of the moment of what I'm trying to do.
00:42:23
◼
►
And we were beating up a lot about this swipe to delete thing because I think I speak for
00:42:29
◼
►
Jon in saying my natural gut reaction is to just immediately swipe and then I have to
00:42:34
◼
►
think, "Wait, no. No, this is that place that doesn't work. Oh, what do I do? Oh, yeah, I tap,
00:42:40
◼
►
and then I tap again. Well, that's fine. It's just, ugh, why can't it work the way I expect it to?"
00:42:46
◼
►
And that doesn't really negate anything you said about how the HIG isn't...
00:42:51
◼
►
it's not laws, it's guidelines. What was that stupid movie? Pirates of the Caribbean style.
00:43:00
◼
►
But I don't know, it takes someone who is very confident
00:43:04
◼
►
and with a lot of skill, like you had said,
00:43:06
◼
►
to violate it in ways that make sense.
00:43:08
◼
►
Like somebody in the chat room, I already lost who it was,
00:43:10
◼
►
noted that pull to refresh wasn't in the HIG.
00:43:14
◼
►
And that's a perfect example of something
00:43:17
◼
►
that wasn't in the Human Interface Guidelines
00:43:18
◼
►
but just made freaking sense.
00:43:20
◼
►
And that was a great choice.
00:43:23
◼
►
But other times, I think you have to be very confident
00:43:27
◼
►
and very, very sure you're right
00:43:29
◼
►
in order to get away with violating it.
00:43:32
◼
►
I think that the HIG has changed over the years.
00:43:34
◼
►
It's time for me to do a more old man stuff here.
00:43:37
◼
►
When you guys talk about the HIG, you're talking about like the umpteenth iteration in the
00:43:43
◼
►
I know you guys started with Apple before iOS, but not much before like three years
00:43:46
◼
►
before or something, right?
00:43:48
◼
►
The human interface guidelines used to be very, very different than they are now.
00:43:53
◼
►
One thing that they shared is the thing that you were talking about, Casey.
00:43:56
◼
►
In the beginning, part of what was revolutionary about both the Mac and the human interface
00:44:01
◼
►
guidelines that came along with it is the selling point of the Mac and the selling point
00:44:06
◼
►
of the graphical user interface was there would be a standard set of controls and a
00:44:10
◼
►
standard guideline for how to use them so that if you learned how to use one program
00:44:15
◼
►
on a Mac, you could go to another program and reuse a lot of those skills because it
00:44:19
◼
►
would also have a menu bar with pull-down menus.
00:44:21
◼
►
It would also use the same command keys for things.
00:44:24
◼
►
So it also have windows with the button the confirmation button on the right and the cancel button on the left and all you know
00:44:29
◼
►
the whole nine yards interface consistency, which was a
00:44:32
◼
►
revolutionary and novel thing in an age when on DOS you use word star and it had
00:44:37
◼
►
Absolutely nothing in its interface in common with word perfect or whatever some other contemporary even though they were both word processors
00:44:44
◼
►
They didn't copy and paste text the same way. They didn't format the same way
00:44:47
◼
►
They didn't have the same menu structure didn't use the same keys. It was like oh, I know word star
00:44:50
◼
►
Can I transfer those skills over to it?
00:44:53
◼
►
You could transfer your basic skills of knowing where the keys are in the keyboard.
00:44:56
◼
►
And maybe if you're lucky, they shared something about how their interface worked, but they
00:45:01
◼
►
rapidly diverged.
00:45:02
◼
►
Whereas if you use Microsoft Word or MacWrite, you know, some of the menus were the same.
00:45:08
◼
►
There was a font menu, there was font sizing, the fact that there was a menu bar at all,
00:45:14
◼
►
And just in general, using anything on the Mac, you were able to take the skills that
00:45:19
◼
►
you learned and build on them to more rapidly get up to speed in another application. That's
00:45:23
◼
►
the whole point of the interface guidelines. And the way the document was different is
00:45:27
◼
►
that especially in the beginning, it did way, way less of explaining to you how things should
00:45:34
◼
►
look or what you should do and way, way more of explaining the reasoning behind it. Do
00:45:40
◼
►
this with your whatevers because and then explain the philosophy behind it. And very
00:45:45
◼
►
often that philosophy had more of a foundation on, you know, user testing and stuff. If I
00:45:51
◼
►
look at the HIG today, even just the first like Aqua HIG for Mac OS X, so much of it
00:45:58
◼
►
is about how big the borders should be between items. Like, I mean, this isn't even talking
00:46:02
◼
►
about like size of minimum, size of touch targets, we're just like, this is how you
00:46:05
◼
►
should lay out your dialogues, this is how far away buttons, labels should be from their
00:46:08
◼
►
fields and buttons should be from their whatever, and this is how tall this should be, and this
00:46:11
◼
►
is how much padding there should be on all the things, it's like, that's all great, and
00:46:14
◼
►
should totally have that, and interface builder should do it for you automatically, which
00:46:17
◼
►
they added, you know, like, that's all fine. But that does not tell me why. And that is
00:46:23
◼
►
how things should look, which is related to how they work very often in terms of the size
00:46:28
◼
►
of touch targets and readability and why labels that are aligned this way are easier to scan
00:46:32
◼
►
and all that other stuff. But there's less of the, less of the philosophy, less of like,
00:46:38
◼
►
look, let me just explain to you the concepts. And here are some guidelines. But now you
00:46:43
◼
►
you see these guidelines, you see here's the concepts that they flow out of. And when you're
00:46:46
◼
►
provided with the concepts, and actually I feel like I've given more free reign in the
00:46:50
◼
►
old days to say, follow these concepts in your custom interfaces and yours will feel
00:46:56
◼
►
like ours rather than saying, "Just use our controls because that's the only way you could
00:47:00
◼
►
possibly do this." The new ones feel more like, "Make your applications look like ours
00:47:05
◼
►
down to the pixel, use our standard controls, and we won't really explain to you the reasons.
00:47:12
◼
►
is this alignment or the spacing beneficial? Why should you phrase words in the dialogue
00:47:17
◼
►
in this manner, whether it's imperative? Why should you use verbs or buttons or why should
00:47:21
◼
►
you, you know, like the whole not why should you not use differently styled text and, you
00:47:25
◼
►
know, they used to have reasons for it. They would say, "When in our testing we found out
00:47:28
◼
►
if you put a bunch of bold words in dialogues, that's all people read, so don't make bold
00:47:31
◼
►
words, make everything in the same consistent font." I'm just making this up, this is not
00:47:34
◼
►
a real thing. But like, to explain the reasoning behind things. And that I feel like has been
00:47:39
◼
►
lacking and because that's lacking I feel like the human interface guidelines
00:47:44
◼
►
for iOS and even for the Mac are way less authoritative now in terms of how
00:47:50
◼
►
how developers should take them like just because it's in the Hague that's
00:47:55
◼
►
just one other person's or a couple other people's ideas and it's important
00:47:58
◼
►
for you to know what they expect from you from consistent for the sake of
00:48:02
◼
►
consistency with the other applications but if they're not going to explain
00:48:05
◼
►
their reasoning and you suspect that you might have a better way I think you are
00:48:08
◼
►
much more likely today to actually have a better way than you were back in the old days
00:48:13
◼
►
where A, nobody knew anything and B, Apple knew so much more than everybody else because
00:48:19
◼
►
developers were coming upon this for the first time and Apple at least had put many, many
00:48:23
◼
►
years into it and they were the world's leading experts on making consumer-facing personal
00:48:27
◼
►
computer gooeys for a very long time and they would show their work. They would say, "Here's
00:48:32
◼
►
why. Here's why we're doing all this stuff." And you'd read it and you go, "Oh, that makes
00:48:36
◼
►
And if they said they did a bunch of user testing, you don't have a user experience
00:48:39
◼
►
lab for you to test this stuff.
00:48:43
◼
►
Part of the transition from the jobs era was it seemed like he was much less of a fan of
00:48:49
◼
►
the scientific method and user testing and much more of a fan of using his gut.
00:48:53
◼
►
And his gut was pretty good, but sometimes he got like stitched leather and stuff.
00:48:58
◼
►
Yeah. Anyway, all this is to say that I put much less stake in Apple's human interface guidelines
00:49:07
◼
►
now than I did many decades ago. But the guiding principle that I think every developer uses,
00:49:15
◼
►
who's making their applications, is to try to make it fit in with what the user expects. Again,
00:49:22
◼
►
if you made a Mac application and you didn't have a menu bar or the file and edit menus were
00:49:26
◼
►
in the opposite order. Even if you think you have a really good reason for that, it's probably
00:49:31
◼
►
not a good idea. But if you want to put different items in your file menu, as long as "Quit"
00:49:35
◼
►
is at the bottom, if you're really old, that's where it used to be everybody. As long as
00:49:38
◼
►
"Quit" is at the bottom, people are okay with you shoving in a few other items. And third
00:49:42
◼
►
party applications, like Marco said, push the interface forward because the Apple can't
00:49:47
◼
►
cover all your possible scenarios. So if Photoshop starts doing something and Photoshop does
00:49:51
◼
►
it for 25 years, eventually, whether that's in the Human Interface Guidelines or not,
00:49:55
◼
►
if you're making a graphics application, it would be a good idea for you to perhaps take
00:50:00
◼
►
a few conventions from Photoshop because it's so important in its field. And I think that's
00:50:05
◼
►
the same way a lot of Twitter clients can get away with the side swipes, which I don't
00:50:08
◼
►
know who invented that, but it's all over the place in Twitter clients. Because if you
00:50:12
◼
►
use a lot of Twitter clients, eventually that's what you get used to. And in the realm of
00:50:16
◼
►
podcast apps, I feel like if you use a lot of podcast apps, I don't use a lot of them,
00:50:20
◼
►
but I imagine there's some conventions for controlling things that would have some commonality
00:50:24
◼
►
between them that you would begin to read the landscape and get used to using.
00:50:28
◼
►
Not that you want every genre of application to be different, but where you start falling
00:50:34
◼
►
back to the bedrock of expectation is for things like muscle memory and the fact that
00:50:39
◼
►
you're using a table view at all and the fact that the transitions between things are sort
00:50:42
◼
►
of mental and spatial model of how the application flows from left to right and coming up from
00:50:48
◼
►
Lots of judgment calls to make there, but in general you try to keep it consistent.
00:50:53
◼
►
And if you miss one little tiny corner where now delete works a little bit differently,
00:50:58
◼
►
it's probably not a big deal, especially since delete is probably not a common operation.
00:51:02
◼
►
But if it's a place where you can return that, where you can fulfill that expectation in
00:51:12
◼
►
a way that lets you retain all the other benefits, it's a pretty clean one.
00:51:17
◼
►
I would question even more the feature you did have there, which I mentioned before,
00:51:19
◼
►
where it's like being able to dismiss a thing
00:51:21
◼
►
that comes up from the bottom by swiping sideways.
00:51:24
◼
►
Makes not much sense, spatially speaking,
00:51:27
◼
►
and it's probably a misfeatured.
00:51:28
◼
►
The only reason it's there is to honor the muscle memory
00:51:31
◼
►
of users of your specific application,
00:51:34
◼
►
because if you did never use the previous version
00:51:36
◼
►
of Overcast, you would never expect that to work
00:51:38
◼
►
and you would never even try it, right?
00:51:40
◼
►
But you're just doing that to just give a little help
00:51:41
◼
►
to those people, and I think this is the same category
00:51:43
◼
►
of things, in fact, I would trade these in terms of
00:51:47
◼
►
what is more beneficial in the long run.
00:51:49
◼
►
I would say, if I had to sacrifice one,
00:51:51
◼
►
which you don't, you should just keep both of them,
00:51:52
◼
►
but if I had to sacrifice one, I would say,
00:51:54
◼
►
the side swipe people will get used to the card coming
00:51:56
◼
►
from the bottom pretty quick,
00:51:58
◼
►
and it's just a gesture in a different direction,
00:52:00
◼
►
whereas the swipe to deleteers are still being trained
00:52:03
◼
►
by the whole rest of their entire iOS device
00:52:05
◼
►
to keep doing that.
00:52:06
◼
►
- We're sponsored tonight by Warby Parker.
00:52:10
◼
►
To start your free home try-ons today,
00:52:12
◼
►
go to warbyparker.com/atp.
00:52:15
◼
►
Warby Parker believes that eyeglasses
00:52:17
◼
►
should not cost as much as a phone.
00:52:20
◼
►
They have prescription eyeglasses starting at just $95,
00:52:23
◼
►
including prescription lenses,
00:52:25
◼
►
and they make buying glasses online easy and risk-free,
00:52:28
◼
►
which sounds kinda crazy, but here's how they do it.
00:52:30
◼
►
They have this home try-on program.
00:52:32
◼
►
This allows you to order up to five pairs of eyeglasses,
00:52:35
◼
►
and they ship them to you for free,
00:52:37
◼
►
and you get to try them on for five days
00:52:39
◼
►
with no obligation to buy.
00:52:41
◼
►
When you're done, you ship them back
00:52:43
◼
►
in the free prepaid return label.
00:52:45
◼
►
You're out no money for this whole process,
00:52:47
◼
►
And again, no obligation to buy.
00:52:49
◼
►
If you wanna buy, of course, they make it very, very easy.
00:52:51
◼
►
They have a word parker app from the app store also.
00:52:54
◼
►
It has a home try and companion feature
00:52:56
◼
►
which allows you to quickly take photos.
00:52:57
◼
►
You can wear it wearing all the frames that you're trying on.
00:52:59
◼
►
You can stitch it into a video.
00:53:01
◼
►
You can share it with friends and family
00:53:02
◼
►
to help you pick a winner, you know,
00:53:03
◼
►
get feedback from everybody.
00:53:05
◼
►
Buying glasses through them is, in my opinion,
00:53:08
◼
►
probably easier than buying them from anybody else.
00:53:11
◼
►
And of course, they do good in the world too.
00:53:13
◼
►
For every pair of eyeglasses you buy,
00:53:15
◼
►
a pair is attributed to someone in need
00:53:17
◼
►
through various vision charities around the world.
00:53:19
◼
►
You gotta check it out.
00:53:20
◼
►
The Warby Parker glasses are great.
00:53:21
◼
►
My wife has a couple of pairs, she loves them.
00:53:24
◼
►
I don't wear glasses, but I do have sunglasses from them
00:53:26
◼
►
because they also have sunglasses,
00:53:28
◼
►
including polarized lenses,
00:53:30
◼
►
starting at just $95 for non-prescription,
00:53:32
◼
►
and with prescription starting at just $175.
00:53:35
◼
►
Just like their eyeglasses,
00:53:37
◼
►
that you can also get sunglasses
00:53:38
◼
►
through the home try-on program.
00:53:40
◼
►
These are premium polarized lenses
00:53:41
◼
►
that are scratch resistant and 100% UV protection.
00:53:44
◼
►
You gotta check out Warby Parker.
00:53:45
◼
►
Their glasses are so good, they're fashionable,
00:53:48
◼
►
and it's so easy to buy from them.
00:53:50
◼
►
Glasses start at just $95, including prescription lenses.
00:53:54
◼
►
Lenses include anti-glare and anti-scratch coatings.
00:53:56
◼
►
Check it out, warbyparker.com/atp
00:54:00
◼
►
for your home try-on kit today.
00:54:01
◼
►
Thank you very much to Warby Parker for sponsoring our show.
00:54:04
◼
►
(jazzy music)
00:54:07
◼
►
- Before we move on from Overcast,
00:54:09
◼
►
I did want to briefly ask you about this new ad model.
00:54:15
◼
►
and I'm not entirely sure I understand the nuances of it.
00:54:20
◼
►
And so I'm going to defer my chief summarizer
00:54:24
◼
►
and chief role to you, Marco,
00:54:25
◼
►
if you could summarize what this new setup is
00:54:29
◼
►
and kinda how it works in broad strokes.
00:54:32
◼
►
- Sure, so basically before,
00:54:34
◼
►
I have, as John likes to remind me,
00:54:38
◼
►
I change my business model on Overcast
00:54:39
◼
►
roughly every nine to 18 months.
00:54:43
◼
►
I've gone through many of them now.
00:54:44
◼
►
The one I've settled on since this past September,
00:54:47
◼
►
which was just kind of a tweak to the one before it,
00:54:49
◼
►
is basically ads as like the main source of income
00:54:53
◼
►
and then paid subscriptions to remove the ads
00:54:56
◼
►
if you want to.
00:54:58
◼
►
And the way this has worked out over time
00:55:00
◼
►
is actually not that way.
00:55:02
◼
►
The way it has worked out since September
00:55:03
◼
►
when I added these Google AdMob ads,
00:55:07
◼
►
and by the way, just as a quick clarification,
00:55:09
◼
►
I know there are other ad networks,
00:55:12
◼
►
but they're all worse in some major way.
00:55:14
◼
►
Like either they have creepier code
00:55:17
◼
►
or they require more SDK integration,
00:55:19
◼
►
they're kind of like meta networks
00:55:22
◼
►
where they have to add lots of SDKs to your app
00:55:24
◼
►
for all these different companies.
00:55:25
◼
►
Or they just don't sell enough inventory.
00:55:28
◼
►
You end up getting very little money from your ads
00:55:30
◼
►
and a lot of like unsold inventory
00:55:32
◼
►
that you have to just like show nothing for
00:55:34
◼
►
or show your own, you know, splash thing for, whatever else.
00:55:37
◼
►
So I think if you're gonna do third party ads,
00:55:40
◼
►
I think AdMob is the way to do it.
00:55:43
◼
►
But what I found with AdMob ultimately is that
00:55:46
◼
►
the ads were of lower quality than I wanted
00:55:48
◼
►
and they made very little money.
00:55:51
◼
►
And as I kept going through and going in their control panel
00:55:55
◼
►
and turning off various categories of crappy ads
00:55:58
◼
►
that I didn't wanna see, things like casino stuff
00:56:02
◼
►
and weird sexy dating services,
00:56:05
◼
►
I would find those and I'd turn them off
00:56:07
◼
►
and that'd make even less money
00:56:08
◼
►
it turns out all the crap ads make a lot of money,
00:56:10
◼
►
which is why they run them.
00:56:12
◼
►
So basically it was making very little money.
00:56:15
◼
►
It ended up like, I thought I was gonna make
00:56:17
◼
►
most money from the ads,
00:56:18
◼
►
and then some money from subscriptions,
00:56:21
◼
►
and it ended up that I was making 90% of the money
00:56:23
◼
►
from subscriptions.
00:56:24
◼
►
Totally flipped, and that's actually fine.
00:56:27
◼
►
I like it that way.
00:56:28
◼
►
I'd rather have people paying me
00:56:29
◼
►
than have to deal with ads.
00:56:31
◼
►
And the ads, the presence of the ads
00:56:34
◼
►
increased subscriptions dramatically
00:56:35
◼
►
from the previous system,
00:56:36
◼
►
which is basically pay if you feel like it.
00:56:38
◼
►
like patronage, you know, just pay if you like me.
00:56:40
◼
►
And that worked a little bit,
00:56:42
◼
►
but it wasn't working enough.
00:56:44
◼
►
So it succeeded as a business model,
00:56:48
◼
►
but not because of the ads.
00:56:50
◼
►
It succeeded because there were ads there,
00:56:53
◼
►
but the ads could be anything.
00:56:54
◼
►
Honestly, I'm sure I might actually see
00:56:56
◼
►
a slightly lower subscription rate
00:56:58
◼
►
because the ads are no longer crappy,
00:57:01
◼
►
but they're also now on the Now Playing screen,
00:57:04
◼
►
so you see them more.
00:57:05
◼
►
So I don't know, that'll probably balance itself out.
00:57:07
◼
►
Anyway, so I decided that I was no longer interested
00:57:09
◼
►
in running Google AdMob ads for lots of different reasons.
00:57:12
◼
►
Quality of the ads, low revenue, those are major factors,
00:57:17
◼
►
but also as I talked about in the blog post
00:57:18
◼
►
and a little bit here, I think I'm no longer
00:57:21
◼
►
very comfortable embedding closed source ad libraries
00:57:25
◼
►
into my app from ad companies.
00:57:28
◼
►
I think as a developer, you have to be conscious of that.
00:57:31
◼
►
There has to be a really good reason for you to embed
00:57:33
◼
►
someone else's closed source code in your app
00:57:35
◼
►
because that can do anything and it's on you.
00:57:38
◼
►
Like that can access all of your user data,
00:57:41
◼
►
whatever users are doing with the app,
00:57:43
◼
►
whatever they are entering into the app,
00:57:45
◼
►
that code has complete access to it.
00:57:48
◼
►
That code can get you in trouble with Apple,
00:57:50
◼
►
that code can do things that are prohibited,
00:57:51
◼
►
that code can require you to have all these
00:57:54
◼
►
advertising disclaimers that your users see
00:57:57
◼
►
or that app review sees that can get you
00:57:59
◼
►
in trouble with app review.
00:58:00
◼
►
There's all sorts of like baggage that you sign up for.
00:58:05
◼
►
when you are adding someone else's closed source code
00:58:08
◼
►
to your app.
00:58:10
◼
►
And so I thought there had to be a really, really good
00:58:11
◼
►
reason for that to be in there,
00:58:13
◼
►
and I no longer had a good reason.
00:58:15
◼
►
The only reason I did it in September was
00:58:16
◼
►
I thought it was the only option.
00:58:18
◼
►
The option between that and going out of business, basically.
00:58:21
◼
►
And so I took that option,
00:58:23
◼
►
but then the business model changed
00:58:25
◼
►
and the environment changed.
00:58:26
◼
►
You know, that all happened in September.
00:58:29
◼
►
Then November happened.
00:58:30
◼
►
Then January happened.
00:58:32
◼
►
It's a different world now.
00:58:33
◼
►
And so now I basically went to this saying like,
00:58:37
◼
►
"All right, well now let me see what can I do myself?"
00:58:41
◼
►
And because the Google Ads made so little money for me,
00:58:47
◼
►
and other people have more success with Google Ads
00:58:50
◼
►
than I have, I don't wanna say that they don't work
00:58:54
◼
►
for anybody 'cause they obviously work for lots of people.
00:58:57
◼
►
But my tap-through rate was awful.
00:59:02
◼
►
And most of, basically how much money you make
00:59:05
◼
►
depends extremely heavily on your tap through rate.
00:59:08
◼
►
And there's lots of reasons for that,
00:59:10
◼
►
none of which I was willing to fix.
00:59:11
◼
►
Like so, there's like, for example,
00:59:13
◼
►
if you want a, if you want to make more money,
00:59:16
◼
►
you should put the ad somewhere where people
00:59:19
◼
►
are more likely to accidentally tap them.
00:59:21
◼
►
I'm not gonna do that.
00:59:23
◼
►
You should have the ads on every screen of your app,
00:59:25
◼
►
or more screens of your app, but I wasn't doing that.
00:59:27
◼
►
I had them only in the list screens before
00:59:28
◼
►
'cause they were too big to fit, I'm now playing.
00:59:31
◼
►
you should enable things like animated banners.
00:59:33
◼
►
I didn't wanna do that, 'cause those pay better.
00:59:36
◼
►
There's all sorts of things that you can do
00:59:38
◼
►
to make ads work better that I was unwilling to do.
00:59:41
◼
►
So it's not entirely AdMob's fault
00:59:44
◼
►
that I had such a bad experience.
00:59:45
◼
►
It was just my app and my strict requirements for it,
00:59:49
◼
►
just what I could stomach and what I was willing to do.
00:59:51
◼
►
Anyway, I decided since AdMob ads
00:59:54
◼
►
were making so little for me,
00:59:55
◼
►
I could replace them with pretty much anything,
00:59:58
◼
►
and it probably wouldn't negatively affect my business.
01:00:02
◼
►
So, because like, the main risk with running my own ads
01:00:06
◼
►
is what if no one buys them?
01:00:08
◼
►
What if it turns out they're really hard to sell?
01:00:10
◼
►
Which they might be, you know?
01:00:11
◼
►
These aren't podcast ads, they're display ads.
01:00:13
◼
►
And display ads are hard to sell right now.
01:00:16
◼
►
I only have very, very limited data right now
01:00:19
◼
►
with these trial partners that I have now in there,
01:00:23
◼
►
but I have no idea even what kind of views
01:00:28
◼
►
or tap through rates or subscription rates
01:00:30
◼
►
that they're gonna get in like three months.
01:00:32
◼
►
You know, right now it's all, everyone's looking at them
01:00:34
◼
►
and poking them and seeing what they're like,
01:00:36
◼
►
so the data right now is nice,
01:00:37
◼
►
but it's not really representative probably.
01:00:39
◼
►
So I have no idea how they're gonna perform,
01:00:42
◼
►
but the fact is I am way happier with them.
01:00:45
◼
►
They are totally under my control.
01:00:48
◼
►
There is no weird closed source code
01:00:50
◼
►
going to the world's biggest advertising company.
01:00:52
◼
►
It is just completely my app doing my thing,
01:00:55
◼
►
the way I designed it, under my control.
01:00:58
◼
►
The privacy of them is great because I don't collect
01:01:01
◼
►
anything 'cause I don't want any of your data.
01:01:04
◼
►
I want the least data I can possibly get from you
01:01:06
◼
►
to make my app work.
01:01:07
◼
►
If you ever are curious what I call it,
01:01:10
◼
►
read the privacy policy in Overcast.
01:01:12
◼
►
It's very short, human readable, I wrote it all.
01:01:14
◼
►
It's very, very clear.
01:01:16
◼
►
And so I'm much happier with this setup now.
01:01:21
◼
►
And so what the setup is is my own ads.
01:01:25
◼
►
They show in the Now Playing screen
01:01:26
◼
►
and in the ad podcast screen,
01:01:29
◼
►
the ad unit can show either ads for websites,
01:01:33
◼
►
apps in the app store, or podcasts in Overcast.
01:01:36
◼
►
And so you can actually advertise for a podcast
01:01:40
◼
►
in the podcast app, and when you tap these ads,
01:01:42
◼
►
it brings up the sheet that is just
01:01:44
◼
►
the Overcast ad podcast screen, the standard screen.
01:01:47
◼
►
And so it has all the episodes in it,
01:01:49
◼
►
they all have all the buttons that Casey and Jon hate,
01:01:51
◼
►
with you can add to queue, you can subscribe there,
01:01:54
◼
►
you can download whatever else.
01:01:55
◼
►
And so it's all this, the standard native interface.
01:01:59
◼
►
I don't know how many podcasters are going to be willing
01:02:02
◼
►
to pay for ads long term.
01:02:04
◼
►
I can tell you I have an inbox full of emails
01:02:06
◼
►
from podcasters who are interested right now
01:02:08
◼
►
that I am having a very hard time answering all at once.
01:02:11
◼
►
However, there's tons of interest right now,
01:02:15
◼
►
but once you get into nitty gritty of getting people
01:02:18
◼
►
to actually commit and to pay, everything changes.
01:02:22
◼
►
So I have no idea what it's going to be like long term.
01:02:25
◼
►
But the fact is, I don't need to sell very many ads
01:02:29
◼
►
to make more than I was making before.
01:02:32
◼
►
And even if I make less than what I was making before,
01:02:34
◼
►
as long as people keep subscribing, I'm still fine.
01:02:37
◼
►
So I think I made the right move.
01:02:40
◼
►
Also, by the same logic and for all the same reasons,
01:02:44
◼
►
I also in this update removed the fabric analytics
01:02:47
◼
►
from the app, so there's no more third-party
01:02:49
◼
►
analytics services either.
01:02:51
◼
►
All I do now is I have a very, very basic analytics
01:02:55
◼
►
class that I wrote myself that just logs
01:02:58
◼
►
some very basic information and it can be used
01:03:00
◼
►
to do things like what you were describing earlier,
01:03:02
◼
►
John, about like, you know, measuring how many people
01:03:04
◼
►
use the delete button or whatever you were asking about.
01:03:07
◼
►
I can do stuff like that.
01:03:08
◼
►
Right now, I'm measuring almost nothing in the app.
01:03:10
◼
►
I talked a little bit about this on the radar this week.
01:03:12
◼
►
The short version there is I've done analytics
01:03:15
◼
►
for a while now with Fabric and I found some actionable
01:03:19
◼
►
things from it but most of the data I was collecting
01:03:21
◼
►
was neither useful nor actionable.
01:03:24
◼
►
I find analytics are great to,
01:03:27
◼
►
like when you have a specific question
01:03:28
◼
►
you're trying to answer.
01:03:29
◼
►
So like when I was developing,
01:03:31
◼
►
I was curious a while back, maybe a year ago now,
01:03:36
◼
►
so I added analytics for what type of output device
01:03:41
◼
►
people were listening on.
01:03:42
◼
►
And I learned from that that a lot of people
01:03:44
◼
►
use the built-in speaker, way more than I thought.
01:03:47
◼
►
And so that's why I did the voice boost
01:03:49
◼
►
optimized speaker profile for the iPhone speaker.
01:03:52
◼
►
because I realized like wow, a lot of people do this,
01:03:55
◼
►
this is worth focusing attention on.
01:03:57
◼
►
I also learned during times like that,
01:03:59
◼
►
I measured parts of the watch app,
01:04:01
◼
►
like does anybody even use the watch app?
01:04:03
◼
►
What features of the watch app do they use?
01:04:05
◼
►
Like do they actually go to the force touch menu,
01:04:07
◼
►
by the way, no.
01:04:09
◼
►
Do they actually like ever use the buttons on it
01:04:13
◼
►
or are they mostly using it to read information
01:04:15
◼
►
as like a glance, answer yes.
01:04:19
◼
►
So I learned stuff like that,
01:04:20
◼
►
But I can do that myself with very basic analytics.
01:04:23
◼
►
Like I don't need everything that a full blown
01:04:26
◼
►
analytics package offers today,
01:04:27
◼
►
like various conversion tracking different things
01:04:30
◼
►
and funnels all over the place and all these retention.
01:04:34
◼
►
That's the kind of stuff that venture funded companies need.
01:04:37
◼
►
I don't need that.
01:04:38
◼
►
I don't have anybody asking for that information.
01:04:41
◼
►
I don't care about that information,
01:04:42
◼
►
so I don't need to collect it.
01:04:43
◼
►
So basically, I'm getting away now
01:04:45
◼
►
with incredibly simple analytics of just my own
01:04:48
◼
►
hand rolled thing.
01:04:50
◼
►
oh god, I'm a hipster.
01:04:52
◼
►
My own art is anal analytics,
01:04:55
◼
►
and now it's just a lot simpler and lower tech,
01:04:58
◼
►
but now I can tell things like,
01:05:01
◼
►
how many people are using different devices?
01:05:03
◼
►
Like how many iPhone 7s versus 7+s do I have?
01:05:05
◼
►
And that helps me decide things like,
01:05:07
◼
►
what should I optimize this interface for?
01:05:10
◼
►
Should I optimize it for 5.5 inch screens,
01:05:12
◼
►
or for 4.7, or for 4.0?
01:05:15
◼
►
Stuff like that.
01:05:15
◼
►
That stuff I need to know.
01:05:17
◼
►
I don't need to know the level of detail
01:05:19
◼
►
that all these commercial analytics packages provide,
01:05:22
◼
►
and especially at the cost of having their own
01:05:24
◼
►
closed source code in my app,
01:05:26
◼
►
and exposing all my user data to them.
01:05:28
◼
►
- The thing I like best about these new ads
01:05:31
◼
►
is the fact that they are podcast ads and a podcast player,
01:05:34
◼
►
so they have built-in relevance.
01:05:35
◼
►
And if you ever run out of inventory,
01:05:37
◼
►
which you wouldn't, 'cause you could just lower the price
01:05:38
◼
►
and get any inventory you wanted,
01:05:39
◼
►
but if you ever did run out,
01:05:41
◼
►
I would be happy to see that slot spilled
01:05:43
◼
►
was just pulled from your own most recommended section,
01:05:45
◼
►
'cause you have ready-made inventory of,
01:05:48
◼
►
you know, I don't know how relevant, but like, hey, here are some popular, here are
01:05:53
◼
►
some podcasts with some episodes that are being recommended a lot in Insert
01:05:56
◼
►
Time Window, and then just throw them in the most recommended thing, you tap them
01:06:00
◼
►
and you go right to the episode. It's like a no-brainer. I also echo your
01:06:06
◼
►
fear that they will not be offensive enough to make people pay because
01:06:10
◼
►
they're not, they're pleasant, like they're podcast ads and they're not, you
01:06:14
◼
►
It's not be like, what was that, a mesothelioma
01:06:19
◼
►
or whatever.
01:06:21
◼
►
By the way, I do wanna clarify, they're not all
01:06:24
◼
►
podcast ads, there's an ad for Hover,
01:06:25
◼
►
there's an ad for Linode.
01:06:27
◼
►
There are a couple of website ads in there.
01:06:28
◼
►
- Well, now that you mention that,
01:06:30
◼
►
when I saw the Hover ad, I was like,
01:06:32
◼
►
'cause I see Hover and I think, oh, that's a podcast ad too,
01:06:35
◼
►
because obviously they advertise on a lot of podcasts
01:06:37
◼
►
that I listen to.
01:06:38
◼
►
Imagine if it was synchronized,
01:06:41
◼
►
like when the Hover ad is playing on the show,
01:06:42
◼
►
that the hover ad got, the hover banner got to display down in the thing and included
01:06:47
◼
►
the people's codes.
01:06:48
◼
►
There's all sorts of crazy business ideas that you could do here.
01:06:51
◼
►
Or competitive advertising where people could buy podcast advertising against, that would
01:06:55
◼
►
run against other podcasts in the same genre.
01:06:59
◼
►
This is all getting way too complicated and I agree that if, you know, if this is simply
01:07:03
◼
►
a way to replace that 10% of money with a more pleasant experience, then it's a win
01:07:08
◼
►
no matter what.
01:07:09
◼
►
I think that kind of like the, what was this, I think it was on Rectifs, I was talking about
01:07:15
◼
►
the fantasy Google ad that, you know, it's far fewer ads but far more valuable because
01:07:19
◼
►
they're better targeted by some magic AI thing.
01:07:22
◼
►
I think even just basic better targeting of the fact that, hey, I know you're interested
01:07:26
◼
►
in podcasts because you're listening to one.
01:07:28
◼
►
You are a great audience for me to advertise other podcasts to because you are a proven
01:07:32
◼
►
podcast listener and you're using a podcast client and guess what?
01:07:35
◼
►
here's another podcast, and that's why you can charge
01:07:38
◼
►
more money for that than you can for an ad,
01:07:40
◼
►
for even something like Hover or something,
01:07:42
◼
►
because although they advertise on lots of podcasts,
01:07:45
◼
►
Hover is not technically podcast related,
01:07:47
◼
►
but another podcast is, and then a podcast
01:07:50
◼
►
can spend money advertising to each other
01:07:51
◼
►
and it can do just like the App Store ads.
01:07:54
◼
►
- Yeah, cool, 'cause that's one of the reasons
01:07:56
◼
►
I made this for Podcast X, 'cause I was like,
01:07:58
◼
►
and I've had all sorts of crazy ideas
01:08:00
◼
►
on how to possibly sell these things and things like that,
01:08:04
◼
►
but ultimately it came down to like,
01:08:06
◼
►
of course this is the perfect place for an ad for a podcast.
01:08:10
◼
►
The only question is, the only doubt in my mind is
01:08:13
◼
►
whether enough podcasters will be willing and able to pay
01:08:18
◼
►
for an ad for their shows, 'cause most podcasters
01:08:20
◼
►
don't make a lot of money from sponsorships.
01:08:22
◼
►
Most podcasts don't even have sponsorships.
01:08:24
◼
►
Most podcasts don't have audiences
01:08:26
◼
►
big enough to get sponsors.
01:08:28
◼
►
So how many podcasts are gonna be willing to pay for ads?
01:08:32
◼
►
Like, I have no idea.
01:08:34
◼
►
It doesn't take a lot to make this work.
01:08:37
◼
►
You don't need thousands of advertisers,
01:08:41
◼
►
you need tens of advertisers to make this work really well.
01:08:45
◼
►
So I think it will probably be okay.
01:08:49
◼
►
I think one of the big challenges is gonna be,
01:08:52
◼
►
I don't think podcasters have ever had a way,
01:08:57
◼
►
have ever even thought about buying ads,
01:08:58
◼
►
because there's never really been a place
01:09:00
◼
►
where you could buy an ad for a podcast that made sense.
01:09:03
◼
►
'cause as you were just saying,
01:09:04
◼
►
you can't just buy a Google search ad
01:09:06
◼
►
or a Facebook ad for your podcast
01:09:08
◼
►
and get anybody to click through
01:09:09
◼
►
because you start targeting really fast there.
01:09:14
◼
►
The chances that they are a podcast listener
01:09:16
◼
►
and who wanna listen to your show,
01:09:18
◼
►
that combination gets multiplied
01:09:19
◼
►
and that's gonna be a pretty low number.
01:09:22
◼
►
- There's too much friction in other venues
01:09:24
◼
►
of doing it on the web.
01:09:25
◼
►
If you're not already in a podcast player,
01:09:28
◼
►
getting successfully subscribed to a podcast
01:09:30
◼
►
in your player of choice is difficult
01:09:33
◼
►
I encounter that when I'm on the web and I find a podcast that I like and I'm disappointed
01:09:37
◼
►
when I don't see either a link to the overcast URL or I can just save an overcast.
01:09:40
◼
►
If they just give me an iTunes link or something like that, that's not no good to me.
01:09:43
◼
►
I don't use that player, right?
01:09:45
◼
►
Because the website can't know what player I use.
01:09:47
◼
►
But if I'm already in the player that I use and there's a one-tab way to get an episode,
01:09:52
◼
►
that's way less friction.
01:09:53
◼
►
Yeah, exactly.
01:09:55
◼
►
So I am really curious to see how this plays out and to see who buys these ads.
01:10:01
◼
►
Once people can actually start seeing my prices publicly,
01:10:05
◼
►
like a few emails, once people have data
01:10:08
◼
►
of what a month worth of clicks
01:10:11
◼
►
and new subscriptions look like,
01:10:12
◼
►
and for how much money, that could change things.
01:10:16
◼
►
'Cause right now, none of us, me, the advertisers,
01:10:18
◼
►
none of us know whether these are gonna be a good deal
01:10:21
◼
►
or not, 'cause we don't have enough data yet.
01:10:23
◼
►
So we're gonna find out.
01:10:25
◼
►
And it might be an incredibly good deal.
01:10:26
◼
►
It might end up being by far the best way
01:10:28
◼
►
to get new listeners to a podcast.
01:10:31
◼
►
Or it might be that there's just too few people
01:10:34
◼
►
for it to make any financial sense.
01:10:36
◼
►
I don't know, we're gonna find out.
01:10:38
◼
►
And if that's the case,
01:10:39
◼
►
then I'll just fill it up with hover ads, I don't care.
01:10:42
◼
►
- So, a few quick hits regarding that.
01:10:45
◼
►
Do you want to disclose even an order of magnitude
01:10:48
◼
►
of pricing, like we talking tens of dollars
01:10:50
◼
►
or ten thousands of dollars, or can you narrow it down?
01:10:54
◼
►
Because I assume that you're gonna get a thousand emails
01:10:56
◼
►
about, you know, I don't even know how much this costs,
01:10:58
◼
►
can I afford this?
01:11:00
◼
►
So is there like a rough order of magnitude you can say for pricing as we record tonight,
01:11:04
◼
►
which obviously could change?
01:11:06
◼
►
- Okay, that's fair.
01:11:07
◼
►
- Ask me in a few weeks.
01:11:10
◼
►
That's when I will have a much better idea of what these things will actually be charged
01:11:13
◼
►
for long term.
01:11:18
◼
►
- Marco is currently trying to talk himself off the ledge of making this an auction system,
01:11:21
◼
►
so let's all root for him in this endeavor.
01:11:24
◼
►
One system that I thought was,
01:11:26
◼
►
there should be some way to
01:11:30
◼
►
kind of automatically scale with demand.
01:11:31
◼
►
And so one thing I thought was just like,
01:11:34
◼
►
just sell them for 30 days and just say,
01:11:37
◼
►
here's how many ads there are in the system right now.
01:11:40
◼
►
And keep the price fixed.
01:11:41
◼
►
And just, you know, the market kind of works that out.
01:11:44
◼
►
'Cause if the price is really low,
01:11:46
◼
►
then a bunch of people will buy it
01:11:48
◼
►
and then every ad will just get fewer impressions.
01:11:50
◼
►
So it kind of is self-regulating, I think.
01:11:54
◼
►
I don't know.
01:11:55
◼
►
I'm throwing around all these different ideas in my head
01:11:57
◼
►
of how this should be billed, how this should be sold.
01:12:00
◼
►
And there's a reason why there are so few
01:12:02
◼
►
initial partners on board,
01:12:03
◼
►
because everyone who's advertising it right now,
01:12:06
◼
►
I've worked out, I've gone to them in advance and said,
01:12:10
◼
►
like, "Hey, here's what's going on.
01:12:11
◼
►
"I don't know what this is gonna be yet.
01:12:14
◼
►
"And so we're gonna go into this kind of like trial mode,
01:12:18
◼
►
"and we're gonna share data.
01:12:20
◼
►
I'm gonna tell you what this gets you,
01:12:22
◼
►
and you're gonna tell me if you get click-throughs
01:12:24
◼
►
on your website and everything else,
01:12:25
◼
►
and we're gonna figure out how this actually works.
01:12:27
◼
►
Because right now I have no idea.
01:12:29
◼
►
So it's way too early.
01:12:30
◼
►
I mean, this has been in the store for like a day and a half,
01:12:33
◼
►
so it's just way too early for me to have useful data yet.
01:12:37
◼
►
- So what is the appropriate mechanism
01:12:40
◼
►
by which you could be contacted
01:12:42
◼
►
if somebody wants to buy an ad?
01:12:44
◼
►
- If you go to the site, go to the contact page,
01:12:46
◼
►
and it says there, it says,
01:12:48
◼
►
for ad inquiries, email here.
01:12:50
◼
►
So do that, but it might be--
01:12:52
◼
►
- What side is that, overcast.fm?
01:12:53
◼
►
- Yeah, and it might be a week or two
01:12:56
◼
►
before I can actually get back to you with something useful.
01:12:59
◼
►
- All right, and then finally,
01:13:02
◼
►
and this is more out of my own curiosity,
01:13:03
◼
►
how are you, are you providing,
01:13:06
◼
►
I mean, you just hinted at it a second ago,
01:13:08
◼
►
are you providing any sort of analytics,
01:13:10
◼
►
and is there a portal for that,
01:13:11
◼
►
or is this just you ripping off emails when the time comes?
01:13:13
◼
►
Like, what's your intention with that?
01:13:15
◼
►
- My intention is that people who buy the ads
01:13:19
◼
►
will be able to log into a portal
01:13:22
◼
►
and see the performance of the ads they bought.
01:13:24
◼
►
I haven't actually built that yet.
01:13:26
◼
►
I just have one giant dashboard
01:13:28
◼
►
that I can see in my admin panel.
01:13:30
◼
►
I can see how they're doing.
01:13:31
◼
►
And I'm only tracking,
01:13:33
◼
►
I say all this in the privacy policy,
01:13:34
◼
►
the only thing I'm tracking is three things.
01:13:36
◼
►
Clicks, views, and subscriptions if they're podcast ads.
01:13:41
◼
►
For websites, it's just clicks and views.
01:13:43
◼
►
And they can be targeted by podcast category.
01:13:45
◼
►
So you can say show this to everybody,
01:13:47
◼
►
or you can say show this to people who listen
01:13:49
◼
►
to shows that are in the iTunes technology category.
01:13:52
◼
►
I have targeting by top level podcast category
01:13:55
◼
►
in the directory optionally.
01:13:57
◼
►
And so that helps a little bit.
01:13:59
◼
►
But that's it.
01:14:00
◼
►
So it's a very, very simple system.
01:14:03
◼
►
It's very low on data because A, I find too much data
01:14:08
◼
►
in that situation kind of gross,
01:14:10
◼
►
and B, I don't believe is necessary for this.
01:14:12
◼
►
So we'll find out.
01:14:14
◼
►
We're sponsored this week by Hover.
01:14:17
◼
►
The best way to buy and manage domain names is to go to hover.com and use promo code ATP10
01:14:22
◼
►
at checkout to save 10% off your first purchase.
01:14:25
◼
►
Did you know over 100 million .com domains are already registered and a new one is registered
01:14:31
◼
►
every second?
01:14:33
◼
►
When you think of an idea you need to find a great domain name before someone else snatches
01:14:37
◼
►
it up and hover makes it incredibly easy to quickly register your own .com domain.
01:14:42
◼
►
Instead of making you opt out of page after page of add-ons that you don't want or need,
01:14:47
◼
►
Hover only offers domains and email, the two core services.
01:14:51
◼
►
You can quickly secure your domain and then get back to working on your great idea.
01:14:55
◼
►
Hover is also known for their no-wait, no-hold, no-transfer phone service.
01:14:59
◼
►
So this is kind of amazing.
01:15:00
◼
►
When you call them up, a real-life human being picks up the phone.
01:15:04
◼
►
There's no holds, there's no waits.
01:15:06
◼
►
And the person who picks up the phone can help you.
01:15:09
◼
►
There's no transfers, there's no phone tree to go through.
01:15:11
◼
►
A real-life human being picks up the phone if you call them for help.
01:15:15
◼
►
Plus if you don't want to call, they also have great online stuff, email and live chat
01:15:18
◼
►
support as well.
01:15:19
◼
►
So you can find a great .com name for your idea at Hover.
01:15:23
◼
►
Go to Hover.com and use promo code ATP10 at checkout.
01:15:28
◼
►
That's ATP10 at checkout to save 10% off your first purchase.
01:15:32
◼
►
Thank you very much to Hover for sponsoring our show.
01:15:38
◼
►
So I feel like we should spend a few minutes talking about how much of a cesspool Uber
01:15:43
◼
►
Uber is, because woof.
01:15:45
◼
►
- Ugh, what a disaster that can--
01:15:46
◼
►
- What a frickin' disaster.
01:15:48
◼
►
- And this latest horrible thing that they did,
01:15:51
◼
►
it's just the latest in a string of horrible things
01:15:53
◼
►
they have done over the relatively short time
01:15:56
◼
►
they've been in existence.
01:15:57
◼
►
Like, they're a horrible company, run by horrible people.
01:16:01
◼
►
- Yeah, so if you're not aware,
01:16:03
◼
►
a woman who goes by Susan J. Fowler has written,
01:16:06
◼
►
reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber.
01:16:09
◼
►
It is not a terribly long post,
01:16:12
◼
►
But it's long enough that you're going to want to leave yourself a few minutes to read
01:16:16
◼
►
And you absolutely should read it.
01:16:19
◼
►
And it is worth reading in its entirety.
01:16:20
◼
►
Don't skip around.
01:16:22
◼
►
It's worth it.
01:16:23
◼
►
Because it is flabbergasting how unbelievable it was, the behavior of Susan's superiors
01:16:33
◼
►
and in some cases peers, and the HR department at Uber.
01:16:37
◼
►
Suffice to say, I don't know if I should really pull a summarizer in chief on this one because
01:16:43
◼
►
there's so much to this post.
01:16:45
◼
►
But the short version, and again, please read it, please, please read it, but the short
01:16:50
◼
►
version is she was sexually harassed in various ways and in various magnitude, pretty much
01:16:57
◼
►
from the moment she got there until the moment she left.
01:16:59
◼
►
And to me, the most despicable thing that I found about this whole story was that she
01:17:06
◼
►
She was told when she bubbled up these complaints to HR at Uber that she was the only one complaining
01:17:12
◼
►
about this one particular individual.
01:17:14
◼
►
Yeah, it was a first time offense.
01:17:17
◼
►
Right, I'm sorry, that's an important distinction.
01:17:20
◼
►
That's absolutely correct.
01:17:21
◼
►
It was a first time offense.
01:17:22
◼
►
We'll call this person Bob.
01:17:23
◼
►
Bob has never done this before.
01:17:24
◼
►
It's Bob's first time being a complete turd.
01:17:28
◼
►
It's first time, "Yeah, I'm sure he didn't mean it.
01:17:30
◼
►
Don't worry about it."
01:17:31
◼
►
Which is such a terrible way to approach this kind of a situation.
01:17:35
◼
►
I don't understand why.
01:17:37
◼
►
- Yeah, like why is the first offense even considered free?
01:17:39
◼
►
Even if it was true, which it wasn't,
01:17:42
◼
►
but why is that even an okay response, even if it was true?
01:17:46
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, an ATP tips during the chat
01:17:48
◼
►
is phrasing it well, and this is all caps,
01:17:50
◼
►
but my voice is shot, so I'm not gonna scream.
01:17:52
◼
►
Is this first grade?
01:17:53
◼
►
Why the F is sexual harassment a strike-based system?
01:17:56
◼
►
Like, truth. - Right, exactly.
01:17:58
◼
►
- Why is this the way this works?
01:17:59
◼
►
- You don't get free strikes on that.
01:18:01
◼
►
No, immediately fired, maybe arrested.
01:18:06
◼
►
- Yeah, I completely agree.
01:18:07
◼
►
So anyway, so Susan ends up talking to some of her peers
01:18:11
◼
►
and her peers are like, "Oh, that's weird.
01:18:12
◼
►
"I was talking to HR about Bob and they told me
01:18:16
◼
►
"that it was a first time offense.
01:18:18
◼
►
"And we are not the same person.
01:18:20
◼
►
"We are not reporting the same incident.
01:18:22
◼
►
"Looks to us like HR is full of crap."
01:18:25
◼
►
And so, you know, there's always a chance
01:18:29
◼
►
that this is all fabricated, but man,
01:18:32
◼
►
I don't believe that for a second.
01:18:34
◼
►
Like this is not one of those rage quit kind of posts where,
01:18:38
◼
►
"Oh, you know, I didn't fit in well
01:18:40
◼
►
and I'm just gonna make up stuff about..."
01:18:42
◼
►
No, that's not how this reads at all.
01:18:44
◼
►
And this reads like a intelligent, mature person
01:18:48
◼
►
just stating the facts of what they went through
01:18:51
◼
►
and God, is it terrible.
01:18:52
◼
►
And there was another, there was a report that came out,
01:18:55
◼
►
I don't have a link handy,
01:18:56
◼
►
but we'll find it for the show notes about how,
01:18:58
◼
►
and I'm butchering the details,
01:19:00
◼
►
but it was something like,
01:19:01
◼
►
If you don't make men use their real names or anything like that, about 5% of them think
01:19:09
◼
►
that they have any room to grow with regard to relations to women or other minority groups.
01:19:15
◼
►
And guess what?
01:19:16
◼
►
All of us are a problem.
01:19:17
◼
►
I like to think of myself as relatively woke in this department, and I'm a damn problem.
01:19:21
◼
►
I don't get this right all the time.
01:19:23
◼
►
And oh god, the utter overwhelming self-confidence that these Uber employees have shown, not
01:19:34
◼
►
the women, the men in HR, is just preposterous.
01:19:38
◼
►
Like oh my god, I just, I can't believe that this is a thing and that it's continued going
01:19:45
◼
►
Now since this blog post, Travis Kalanick, Kalanick, is that his name?
01:19:49
◼
►
The CEO, whoever he is.
01:19:52
◼
►
Because to his credit, I guess, taken a pretty strong stance on this in that he's taking
01:19:59
◼
►
it as true, he's taking it as evidence that there is a real problem, but I don't know,
01:20:06
◼
►
It's pretty late.
01:20:07
◼
►
Like, everyone has known that Uber is really frickin' slimy in a lot of frickin' ways,
01:20:11
◼
►
and now is when you're finally jumping on board and being like, "Oh, you know, maybe
01:20:13
◼
►
we have something to change."
01:20:14
◼
►
It's just this whole situation is just so freakin' gross.
01:20:18
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, that's like, the CEOs in these situations
01:20:21
◼
►
always act so surprised, I had no idea this was going on.
01:20:25
◼
►
Okay, like, that's either a complete BS,
01:20:28
◼
►
or you were really doing a bad job at looking
01:20:31
◼
►
at your own company for things that should be
01:20:34
◼
►
really common sense, like something is seriously wrong here.
01:20:38
◼
►
It's not like the evil HR department is the cause of this.
01:20:43
◼
►
No, like, the HR department is in service to the company.
01:20:47
◼
►
to the company.
01:20:49
◼
►
The HR department, it's not anybody's friend,
01:20:51
◼
►
it's not like a third party judge system.
01:20:55
◼
►
HR, their main role is to prevent the company
01:20:59
◼
►
from getting sued and to mitigate risks
01:21:01
◼
►
that might cause that.
01:21:02
◼
►
- This HR department isn't even doing that job well,
01:21:04
◼
►
by the way. - That's true.
01:21:05
◼
►
- Like so many parts of this company,
01:21:07
◼
►
this HR department is terrible,
01:21:09
◼
►
even at its ostensible job,
01:21:12
◼
►
not even at its theoretical job in the ideal world.
01:21:14
◼
►
- Right, but the point, the HR department's job
01:21:17
◼
►
is to protect the company from its employees.
01:21:20
◼
►
That is literally their job.
01:21:22
◼
►
If the HR department is being directed
01:21:26
◼
►
or being incentivized to do horrible things
01:21:28
◼
►
by the people who run the company,
01:21:30
◼
►
they're going to do horrible things.
01:21:32
◼
►
And it should come as no surprise,
01:21:35
◼
►
and I'm pretty sure it's BS that it did come as a surprise,
01:21:38
◼
►
I'm pretty sure this was no surprise,
01:21:40
◼
►
it should come as no surprise to the CEO of a company
01:21:43
◼
►
that horrible stuff goes on in HR
01:21:46
◼
►
when he himself seems to be a pretty horrible person
01:21:51
◼
►
from the little bit that I know,
01:21:53
◼
►
and the company does lots of horrible things
01:21:55
◼
►
and has a complete culture of being horrible and toxic
01:21:59
◼
►
and disrespectful of everyone, especially women.
01:22:03
◼
►
This is not the first time they've had problems
01:22:05
◼
►
with women in particular.
01:22:08
◼
►
This is not their first one, not by a long shot.
01:22:10
◼
►
And so, his whole thing about, I'm shocked,
01:22:14
◼
►
I'm gonna investigate this immediately, that's BS.
01:22:17
◼
►
That's complete BS.
01:22:19
◼
►
Yeah, so I don't believe that for a second.
01:22:22
◼
►
None of this should be forgiven,
01:22:23
◼
►
and none of it should be isolated to a couple bad apples
01:22:27
◼
►
in the HR department, 'cause it's not that.
01:22:28
◼
►
It's a deep-rooted cultural problem.
01:22:31
◼
►
- Oh, it's a systemic failure.
01:22:32
◼
►
It is absolutely a systemic failure.
01:22:34
◼
►
- And it comes right from the top.
01:22:36
◼
►
It comes right from the top.
01:22:37
◼
►
- That's why this is such a great example
01:22:39
◼
►
Like very often people who are not steeped in these issues don't spend all the time,
01:22:43
◼
►
you know, reading about them or whatever, hear the phrase "institutional_," "institutional
01:22:48
◼
►
sexism," "institutional bias," or whatever, and it seems like a buzzwordy thing that doesn't
01:22:52
◼
►
make any sense, but a reasonable working definition is based on examples like this where you find
01:22:59
◼
►
yourself in a situation where there is some kind of institution or authority.
01:23:04
◼
►
That structure could be the government, but it could also be the company that you work
01:23:07
◼
►
which even though it is not the government, it is an organizational structure with authority
01:23:13
◼
►
over your life that you work within for as long as you decide you want to work there.
01:23:17
◼
►
And in this case, as in so many other cases in many other companies, forever and ever,
01:23:23
◼
►
the institution has certain attitudes towards whatever you want to be, whether it be minorities
01:23:32
◼
►
or older people or women or whatever and those policies and biases and views come through
01:23:41
◼
►
in the rules that govern everybody else.
01:23:43
◼
►
So you have an HR department that if it was functioning well in its role as Marco described
01:23:49
◼
►
it to protect the company from its people, you know, part of it is HR like any other
01:23:54
◼
►
part of the company is supposed to make the company more successful.
01:23:58
◼
►
So if there is a problematic employee, HR has to deal with that.
01:24:02
◼
►
If that employee is doing things that could get the company sued, it is in the company
01:24:06
◼
►
and HR's best interest to solve that problem, and the most reasonable way to solve it is
01:24:13
◼
►
to try to make the company a place where people will want to work, and that usually means
01:24:17
◼
►
taking the toxic person and, you know, disciplining them or getting rid of them, right?
01:24:23
◼
►
It becomes much more difficult when that person is high up in the organization, or as they
01:24:26
◼
►
say on this thing was a high performer.
01:24:28
◼
►
Yeah, where that person's valuable to the company.
01:24:32
◼
►
Right, right, right.
01:24:33
◼
►
But you know, there is the larger value to the company.
01:24:35
◼
►
But anyway, these institutions have control over many of these employees' lives for
01:24:40
◼
►
as long as they work at the company.
01:24:42
◼
►
And yes, it is always obvious that they just get another job someplace else.
01:24:45
◼
►
But the thing about institutional sexism or any other sort of institutional bias is it's
01:24:50
◼
►
not always clear, and it very often is not the case, and it's very difficult to tell,
01:24:54
◼
►
if I were to leave this tech job and go to a different tech job, will that company have
01:24:59
◼
►
better attitudes towards, you know, whatever my thing is, whether it's minorities or women
01:25:04
◼
►
or maybe, maybe not, like that's, that's a selling point of a company. But if you're
01:25:08
◼
►
in this control, it's a it's not that easy to change jobs. And B, if you're within this
01:25:12
◼
►
control structure, these, these policies and attitudes, and the things that will happen
01:25:17
◼
►
to you seem like an injustice, because they are an injustice, because you view the authority
01:25:26
◼
►
of the company as the arbiter of the rules of play within the company. It's not as if
01:25:33
◼
►
people are getting murdered, right? So it's not, for the most part, it's usually not a
01:25:36
◼
►
criminal type of thing. It is, here are the rules as set out, and if there are any violation
01:25:41
◼
►
of the rules, or violation of what I think should be the norms, there is an authority
01:25:46
◼
►
that I appeal to, whether it be my manager, my manager's manager, the HR department,
01:25:50
◼
►
whatever it may be. For example, if you found an error in your payroll, like you know, you
01:25:54
◼
►
got paid the wrong amount, you go to the payroll department, and in a functioning company,
01:25:59
◼
►
the payroll department's job is to make sure that everybody gets paid the amount they're
01:26:02
◼
►
supposed to be paid. And if there's an error and you brought it to the payroll department,
01:26:06
◼
►
if the institution is functioning correctly, they would correct the error or tell you that
01:26:11
◼
►
it's not an error because they did some weird thing with taxes that they would then explain
01:26:14
◼
►
to you. That's the function of the payroll department. I don't think anybody would argue
01:26:18
◼
►
with like a, you know, like it would seem like an injustice if you found you're missing 100 bucks
01:26:22
◼
►
on your paycheck and you brought it to the payroll department of the institution that you are in
01:26:26
◼
►
and they didn't correct that error or tried to tell you that you did your math wrong or said,
01:26:30
◼
►
well, it's only the first time we made this mistake, so don't worry about it. Like that
01:26:34
◼
►
would feel like an injustice, even though, you know, it's just the payroll department of the
01:26:39
◼
►
company you work in. If you don't like it, get another job, right? That's the whole attitude
01:26:42
◼
►
showed you here, but it is an injustice because that's what the thing is supposed to do.
01:26:46
◼
►
So if the company says, "Oh, we are an inclusive employer and we love everybody and we certainly
01:26:52
◼
►
don't condone sexual harassment," which any company will say if you ask them, "Hey, company
01:26:56
◼
►
X, do you condone sexual harassment?" They'll all say they don't, right? So it's their stated
01:26:59
◼
►
policy not to. So if this happens to you in a company, in any company that in this day
01:27:04
◼
►
and age is going to say that, and you take this thing to the authority of the institution
01:27:09
◼
►
that you are working within and you say, "Hey, HR department, we're supposed to be a company
01:27:14
◼
►
in which people don't get sexually harassed. It's my first day at my job and my boss is
01:27:18
◼
►
propositioning me for sex." Here you go. It's on a silver platter. Now, HR, do your job
01:27:24
◼
►
as stated. And again, it's not as if like, "Oh, I'm expecting HR to protect me." They
01:27:30
◼
►
should be protecting the company by having someone like this in it because it's against
01:27:34
◼
►
their state of policy and it's bad for business, period. The only reason you wouldn't do that
01:27:39
◼
►
is if there is institutional bias and sexism
01:27:43
◼
►
from the highest levels to say,
01:27:45
◼
►
actually the strategy we want to take here
01:27:47
◼
►
is to sweep that under the carpet,
01:27:49
◼
►
to shuffle the victim off someplace else,
01:27:52
◼
►
to put the blame on them, to give them an option like,
01:27:54
◼
►
well, you can either stay under this manager,
01:27:56
◼
►
but he's gonna give you a bad performance review
01:27:57
◼
►
because we're gonna totally tell him
01:27:58
◼
►
that you reported him,
01:27:59
◼
►
and if he does give you a bad performance review,
01:28:01
◼
►
you really only have yourself to blame for report.
01:28:03
◼
►
I'm not making this up, read the thing.
01:28:05
◼
►
This is what's happening in the company.
01:28:07
◼
►
You really only have yourself to blame
01:28:08
◼
►
and because we did give you the option
01:28:10
◼
►
to transfer someplace else.
01:28:11
◼
►
And the employer's like,
01:28:12
◼
►
"But this is the department I wanna be in,
01:28:14
◼
►
"this is where my skillset lies,
01:28:15
◼
►
"and if I transfer, I'll have to learn a new thing."
01:28:16
◼
►
I'm like, "Well, we gave you a choice."
01:28:19
◼
►
Or you could just quit your job.
01:28:20
◼
►
They don't mention that, but it's always an option.
01:28:22
◼
►
You'd always just quit your job.
01:28:23
◼
►
But she had skills that were a perfect fit
01:28:26
◼
►
for the job that she was in.
01:28:27
◼
►
She enjoyed doing it technically.
01:28:29
◼
►
She liked some of the people she was working with.
01:28:31
◼
►
There's just this one niggling problem
01:28:33
◼
►
about being sexually harassed at work.
01:28:35
◼
►
So she ended up transferring to a different department,
01:28:36
◼
►
which was painful and did well. It's such a terrible story of, and then she had problems
01:28:42
◼
►
there as well and other issues and she would bring them to HR and they would do the same
01:28:45
◼
►
thing and fighting about all the other people. This is institutional sexism where the institution
01:28:51
◼
►
is working against her. She has a reasonable expectation according to the state of policies
01:28:54
◼
►
of the company that the people whose job it is to be the referees for this area, just
01:28:59
◼
►
like the payroll department is the referee for how much you get paid, are failing to
01:29:04
◼
►
act. And that is like the definition of injustice, and when it's an institution, it's the definition
01:29:08
◼
►
of institutional sexism. And you can expand that out to any institution you want, whether
01:29:12
◼
►
it be your family unit at the smallest institution where maybe everyone in your family thinks
01:29:17
◼
►
all the wives should stay at home with their kids, all the way up to the government with
01:29:20
◼
►
policies that are biased in one direction or another against people who are minorities
01:29:26
◼
►
or people who are women, which is the opposite of a minority. And so that's what's maddening
01:29:32
◼
►
to—that's the reason the whole social justice movement and the pejorative SJW that's
01:29:40
◼
►
used—the reason they have the word "justice" in them is because all of them derive from
01:29:44
◼
►
a recognition that every large grouping or organizational structure has a behavior as
01:29:53
◼
►
an overall organism that emerges from the attitudes of the people running it.
01:30:00
◼
►
And despite what people may say, it's pretty easy to find out if you're in a situation
01:30:05
◼
►
where the institution is working against you and where the supposed places you go to resolve
01:30:14
◼
►
whatever issue you have, whether it's a discrepancy in your paycheck or someone violating what
01:30:18
◼
►
you think is an HR policy, if those institutions fail to act or actively work against you,
01:30:25
◼
►
that feels like and is an injustice.
01:30:27
◼
►
And that's what people are fighting against.
01:30:30
◼
►
And I think that the payroll analogy is the one that probably works because most people
01:30:34
◼
►
think that's a no brainer.
01:30:36
◼
►
Like they understand the role of the payroll department.
01:30:38
◼
►
And if they don't get paid the money they were promised, that is an injustice.
01:30:41
◼
►
But you apply the exact same thing to other things like, "Well, he's a really nice guy
01:30:46
◼
►
and he's really important in the company.
01:30:49
◼
►
And can't you just change to a different place?"
01:30:50
◼
►
Because it just it boggles my mind that any modern company like these things would ever
01:30:57
◼
►
but then you'll hear the same story from tons like talk to women that you know who have worked in large companies for any part of
01:31:04
◼
►
their career
01:31:04
◼
►
You'll hear these same stories everywhere and that's another clue to you that this is an institutional thing
01:31:08
◼
►
It's not just uber that uber is a bad company over is the one bad apple. Everybody else is fine. It is everywhere
01:31:14
◼
►
It is systemic. It is societal. It is cultural. It is institutional. That's that's the definition and
01:31:20
◼
►
That's why the stories like this are depressing because no matter what uber does a is probably not gonna change uber
01:31:27
◼
►
because if they haven't changed by now they probably never will. And B, it's not
01:31:32
◼
►
going to solve the problem in all the other places. The only way you can fix it
01:31:35
◼
►
systemically is with systemic solutions and cultural change and all the other
01:31:39
◼
►
stuff and that takes a really long time and it's very difficult to do and that's
01:31:42
◼
►
why stories like this are very depressing. And since this original
01:31:47
◼
►
blog post was written and in just the last few hours as we record somebody's
01:31:51
◼
►
tweeted, we'll put a link to it, that 118 people have resigned or given their
01:31:56
◼
►
notice since yesterday, which I guess is Tuesday. It was in the last couple days is really what
01:32:01
◼
►
it amounts to. And that was only in San Francisco. This is at Uber in San Francisco. Like that's
01:32:06
◼
►
a lot of people, 120 people. And, you know, power to you, man. If you are willing to stand
01:32:15
◼
►
up for this and say, "I cannot be a part of this anymore." Like, here again, like I like
01:32:21
◼
►
to think of myself as reasonably woke. But if I mean, I don't know if I would have the
01:32:25
◼
►
gumption to just walk away from my job that's putting food on my table. That's awesome.
01:32:31
◼
►
And men or women, it doesn't matter, whoever these 118 people are, good for you. That's
01:32:36
◼
►
tremendous that you have put your money where your mouth is. And yeah, I can't emphasize
01:32:41
◼
►
enough. I see it from time to time at my work and I'm not even necessarily like, I don't
01:32:49
◼
►
have my antennae up, if you will, to search for it. I just see it from time to time and
01:32:53
◼
►
I try to do my best to correct it when it happens, but this stuff happens everywhere.
01:32:59
◼
►
It's not unique to San Francisco, it's not unique to Uber, although Uber seems to be
01:33:02
◼
►
excelling in this department.
01:33:04
◼
►
It's everywhere, and it's up to everyone, but particularly those of us who are not oppressed,
01:33:13
◼
►
like the three of us, to give credence to the stories of those who are, to pay attention
01:33:21
◼
►
into the stories of those who are,
01:33:23
◼
►
and to try to fix or speak for, or really even better,
01:33:27
◼
►
give the microphone to, which is comical
01:33:30
◼
►
since I'm talking into a mic right now and not doing this,
01:33:33
◼
►
but anyway, give the microphone to someone who is oppressed
01:33:36
◼
►
and who allow them to speak for themselves.
01:33:39
◼
►
- The other thing I like about this post is,
01:33:41
◼
►
I think it does a good job of explaining
01:33:44
◼
►
why someone might stay in a job where this happens,
01:33:47
◼
►
because it's always the reaction's like,
01:33:48
◼
►
"Well, just quit.
01:33:49
◼
►
"If you don't like it, just quit," right?
01:33:50
◼
►
there are mitigating factors, one of which may be you really like the work you're doing
01:33:56
◼
►
and it's technically interesting and you are growing your skills and maybe you even like
01:34:01
◼
►
the people you work with, right?
01:34:03
◼
►
It's very possible to be in a company whose institutions are failing you, but nevertheless
01:34:07
◼
►
you enjoy your peers and employees and maybe you enjoy your direct manager but you know
01:34:13
◼
►
that it only takes one bad person and then one non-functioning institution to fail to
01:34:21
◼
►
do its job to protect the company from toxic employees like this to, you know, like, you
01:34:26
◼
►
know, retention is part of the job of HR. When 100 people quit because of something
01:34:30
◼
►
like this, that's HR not doing its job, right? But it's like, why did she stay in this job?
01:34:34
◼
►
I think this article has a good description of why someone, why it's not just like, oh,
01:34:40
◼
►
Someone you know
01:34:41
◼
►
Said something you know lewd to me and therefore I got to quit the next day
01:34:45
◼
►
And if you don't quit the next day, it's your own fault right that's a ridiculous thing like
01:34:48
◼
►
People are more complicated than just they're not you know it's not just one thing right and so that's why this thing is like
01:34:55
◼
►
Reflecting on a very strange year like it is very even-handed
01:35:00
◼
►
And I think when you read it you can see
01:35:02
◼
►
The excitement of working for a company with a lot with a lot of VC money doing interesting technical stuff with people that you enjoy
01:35:07
◼
►
and expanding your skills and generally having a career, a thing that most people get to have.
01:35:12
◼
►
And that is the tension. Do you want to have a career or is your entire career going to be
01:35:15
◼
►
sending reports to HR every time someone does something bad to you? And it's like,
01:35:20
◼
►
I shouldn't have to choose between those two things. Can't I have a career and not be sexually
01:35:25
◼
►
harassed? Is that even an option on the table? And so it makes people have these ridiculous choices
01:35:32
◼
►
like, "Well, it's not really that bad, is it? And I guess I'll just tolerate it and
01:35:37
◼
►
I would just keep reporting it to HR, maybe it'll do something eventually." And it's
01:35:41
◼
►
just, it's not a healthy situation, but like, the expectation that everything is
01:35:49
◼
►
your fault if you don't immediately storm out and quit at the first time
01:35:53
◼
►
someone does something you don't like, otherwise, like, as the HR department
01:35:57
◼
►
told, "Well, it's really your own fault at that point. He's gonna give you a negative
01:36:00
◼
►
performance review, but you can't really blame the guy, right? And I mean, like, that might
01:36:04
◼
►
have been over a lot of people's lines. But it really depends on what state you are in
01:36:08
◼
►
your career and how much you know of the world and, you know, what capacity you have to leave
01:36:13
◼
►
you a job at that moment. And how excited you are to be able to work in this thing.
01:36:17
◼
►
It's like, well, it's just that one bad person. And if I work in a different department, I
01:36:21
◼
►
want to deal with them. Because there's always people at work you don't know how to deal
01:36:23
◼
►
with. And if you've lived your entire life as a woman in virtually any culture in the
01:36:26
◼
►
entire history of the universe, you are, sadly, very used to dealing with people crapping
01:36:32
◼
►
on you and treating you badly, and so have probably internalized some notion that this
01:36:37
◼
►
is a thing that you have to tolerate to get ahead in the world, and sadly you're also
01:36:41
◼
►
probably kind of right about it.
01:36:43
◼
►
So that's, like, I think will give people—reading this, I think will give people a better idea
01:36:50
◼
►
of what it might be like to be in this situation and why you might not do all the things that
01:36:55
◼
►
I'm assuming people down in the comments are screaming that this person was supposed to do,
01:36:58
◼
►
which is, you know, run out with your hair on fire at the first sign of anything going wrong,
01:37:03
◼
►
which honestly might have actually been the better choice in the case of Uber, but
01:37:08
◼
►
is not a realistic thing to demand of people. Otherwise they somehow lose their right to
01:37:14
◼
►
justice and somehow lose their expectation of being in a functioning institution that
01:37:18
◼
►
doesn't hate them. Yeah, it's just ridiculous. And again, I know I said it before, but truly,
01:37:24
◼
►
it is worth your time to read this entire post. It is extremely well thought out and extremely mature,
01:37:30
◼
►
and it just spells out the facts the way Susan saw them, and I believe every word of it.
01:37:35
◼
►
I mean, even if, even hypothetically, if this was, you know, laced with BS, which again, I truly do
01:37:44
◼
►
not believe, this to me sounds like something that absolutely could have happened. And maybe if it
01:37:50
◼
►
If it didn't happen, it may not have been an Uber,
01:37:52
◼
►
but this is stuff that happens every day,
01:37:54
◼
►
and I don't see it.
01:37:56
◼
►
I'm trying to, in part, by talking to the three of you
01:38:00
◼
►
and anyone else that's listening, or two of you,
01:38:02
◼
►
God, I can count, it's late, wee!
01:38:04
◼
►
I'm trying to open my eyes wider to these sorts of things
01:38:10
◼
►
and be more aware of them and try to figure out
01:38:13
◼
►
how I can react appropriately in these situations.
01:38:16
◼
►
But golly, this is just bananas.
01:38:21
◼
►
- There's also an opportunity for people at their jobs to,
01:38:26
◼
►
I mean, I know at my job it has sparked this discussion
01:38:29
◼
►
that I think, you know, whatever venue you have
01:38:31
◼
►
to have this discussion.
01:38:33
◼
►
If you work for a company, like people might be talking
01:38:35
◼
►
about the story, especially if you're in the tech industry,
01:38:37
◼
►
it's time to ask around.
01:38:40
◼
►
Hey, has, I mean, good HR department should be doing this.
01:38:43
◼
►
Hey, does anyone in our company feel like they can't go
01:38:47
◼
►
to HR or has gone to HR and has felt like HR has failed them in some way.
01:38:53
◼
►
Things like this happen all the time.
01:38:54
◼
►
I mean, you know, people are people and there's always communication gaps, but it's like a
01:38:58
◼
►
teachable moment type thing where what a good company will do with a good HR department
01:39:02
◼
►
is use this to say, "If this is happening here, we don't want it to, and let us know,
01:39:10
◼
►
and employees should talk amongst themselves."
01:39:13
◼
►
Like, sometimes people don't talk about, you know, like, they'll report some of the HR,
01:39:16
◼
►
maybe you don't tell your peers that you did that,
01:39:19
◼
►
'cause you don't want to, 'cause you fear retribution,
01:39:21
◼
►
which is itself a very bad sign right off the bat.
01:39:23
◼
►
But sometimes it takes something like this,
01:39:26
◼
►
like it's the same reason they didn't,
01:39:27
◼
►
the women in this company didn't get together immediately,
01:39:30
◼
►
they had to eventually figure out,
01:39:31
◼
►
wait, but I reported that same guy,
01:39:33
◼
►
and they told me it was the first time.
01:39:34
◼
►
These conversations need to happen,
01:39:36
◼
►
and a healthy company should have happened.
01:39:37
◼
►
And as this story went around, people at my job,
01:39:42
◼
►
people started talking about it,
01:39:43
◼
►
and talking about their experiences with HR at our company
01:39:48
◼
►
and how it compares to this story.
01:39:50
◼
►
And if you don't hear about these stories
01:39:53
◼
►
and you don't think it's happening in your company,
01:39:55
◼
►
maybe it's totally not, but maybe it is
01:39:57
◼
►
and you're just not hearing about it
01:39:58
◼
►
because it hasn't happened to you
01:39:59
◼
►
and the people who has happened to you
01:40:00
◼
►
haven't felt like they could tell you for,
01:40:03
◼
►
and the worse it is probably,
01:40:05
◼
►
the more hesitant people will be to share these stories
01:40:08
◼
►
because if it really is bad
01:40:09
◼
►
and you really are punished for reporting it
01:40:11
◼
►
and HR justifies retaliation against you based on it and everything, you're not going to tell
01:40:17
◼
►
your co-workers that it's happening. You're going to keep your mouth shut and you're not going to
01:40:20
◼
►
report another one because you need this job. That's the case where everyone clams up. Whereas
01:40:25
◼
►
if there really is an expectation and a functioning HR department and someone has a bad
01:40:28
◼
►
interaction and they should feel free to tell everyone, all their co-workers and their boss
01:40:34
◼
►
about it because they'd have an expectation like this is not functioning correctly. And
01:40:37
◼
►
I was told something that does not seem to comport with the supposed policies of this
01:40:44
◼
►
And that's the only way these things get worked out, because if people are just quiet and
01:40:47
◼
►
go about their business and try not to rock the boat, that's not a good culture for anything,
01:40:51
◼
►
period, in a company.
01:40:53
◼
►
But certainly not a good culture for making sure you have a company that is able to retain
01:41:00
◼
►
employees, good employees, because this person seems like a good employee.
01:41:04
◼
►
She wrote an O'Reilly book on a topic and speaks at conferences.
01:41:07
◼
►
It's not like she's just this random cog in the machine, right?
01:41:09
◼
►
"Oh, just throw her away.
01:41:10
◼
►
We don't need to have that.
01:41:11
◼
►
It's more important to protect the high-performing sexual harasser."
01:41:15
◼
►
It's ridiculous.
01:41:16
◼
►
But anyway, a good HR department will try to make a company that is attractive to employees.
01:41:21
◼
►
People want to work there, and then once they do work there, they want to stay there.
01:41:24
◼
►
That is the – again, it is not a role that is in service of the employee, but it's
01:41:28
◼
►
a virtuous cycle if the HR department realizes that by making it a better company to work
01:41:35
◼
►
at, they will be protecting the company and they will be making the company more successful,
01:41:39
◼
►
even if their main goal is to, main loyalty is to the company and not to the employee.
01:41:45
◼
►
Was it Thursday of last week, the day after we recorded, that we got a very weird announcement
01:41:52
◼
►
out of Apple? Was it Thursday or was it, it was sometime after we recorded and not too
01:41:56
◼
►
long after we recorded.
01:41:57
◼
►
It's 10 minutes after we recorded.
01:41:58
◼
►
Yeah, right. That's what it felt like for sure. I think Apple's trolling us because
01:42:03
◼
►
clearly they care about our recording schedule. WWDC 2017 has been announced. It is a week
01:42:09
◼
►
before I thought it would be. It is the 5th through 9th of June. I had guessed and I was
01:42:16
◼
►
pretty confident it would be the following week. I am wrong. I had also guessed it would
01:42:19
◼
►
be in San Francisco and that's not right either. So it's going to San Jose, which apparently
01:42:25
◼
►
is the most boring big city in all of America from what I'm told. So that's a thing.
01:42:33
◼
►
who say that have never been to any other cities in America.
01:42:35
◼
►
- Yeah, that's true.
01:42:36
◼
►
And I mean, I've never been to San Jose.
01:42:39
◼
►
I've heard it's nice,
01:42:41
◼
►
but I don't really know anything about it.
01:42:44
◼
►
But one way or another, they have announced WWDC,
01:42:46
◼
►
they've announced the dates.
01:42:48
◼
►
This is way sooner than they've done it in many years.
01:42:51
◼
►
Usually it's like April or even May
01:42:53
◼
►
when they announce that,
01:42:54
◼
►
oh, in a couple of days you can buy tickets, so get ready.
01:42:58
◼
►
And this is convenient if you're somebody like us
01:43:01
◼
►
that's probably going to go regardless of whether or not you have a ticket. It's also
01:43:05
◼
►
convenient if you're someone that doesn't live in the United States and needs to work
01:43:10
◼
►
out the entry procedure. And I'm just going to dance around this whole topic. It's nice
01:43:17
◼
►
to know way in advance. And I think part of, if not most of the reason that it was announced
01:43:21
◼
►
this far out is because it's not in San Francisco and that changes things. And nobody really
01:43:26
◼
►
knows how it changes things, although I bet you weren't going to talk about it for a while.
01:43:31
◼
►
But it certainly changes things.
01:43:34
◼
►
And I'm curious to see how this turns out.
01:43:38
◼
►
Because it certainly gave me pause for a minute.
01:43:40
◼
►
Because everything I've understood about San Jose is that it is a really sleepy town after
01:43:45
◼
►
all the local businesses go to sleep, if you will, after business hours.
01:43:50
◼
►
And a lot of the reason that I go to WWDC each year is so I can hang out with you guys
01:43:55
◼
►
and all my other friends and mutual friends
01:43:59
◼
►
and socialize and have fun
01:44:01
◼
►
and continue to build existing relationships
01:44:05
◼
►
and build new relationships.
01:44:06
◼
►
And I don't know how conducive San Jose is to that.
01:44:11
◼
►
For all I know, it could be great.
01:44:12
◼
►
I mean, I really honestly don't know,
01:44:14
◼
►
but it's certainly different.
01:44:16
◼
►
And how are we gonna go to the house of prime rib
01:44:19
◼
►
if it's an hour away?
01:44:20
◼
►
Like, that's not gonna work.
01:44:21
◼
►
What do you do?
01:44:22
◼
►
I mean, this is terrible.
01:44:24
◼
►
So, I don't know.
01:44:26
◼
►
Jon, what do you think about all this?
01:44:28
◼
►
- Well, I don't like traveling and I don't like change,
01:44:30
◼
►
and I don't like change to travel.
01:44:33
◼
►
So Apple must have detected that I had gotten used to
01:44:37
◼
►
the flight to San Francisco and the arrangements there
01:44:41
◼
►
and was familiar with enough of the city
01:44:43
◼
►
to start to feel comfortable, you know?
01:44:46
◼
►
- Now they've ruined everything.
01:44:47
◼
►
- And so they said, "We need to change things up."
01:44:49
◼
►
As many people pointed out,
01:44:52
◼
►
the obvious reason they would change this
01:44:53
◼
►
is because it's marketing for Apple because it's closer to their headquarters.
01:44:57
◼
►
It's got to be cheaper than doing anything in San Francisco.
01:45:00
◼
►
In theory it was supposed to be cheaper for attendees.
01:45:03
◼
►
In practice I don't know if that will be the case because obviously all the traditional
01:45:10
◼
►
WWDC attendees plus the people who go without a ticket or some fraction of them anyway are
01:45:15
◼
►
going to drive up prices but I did get hotel reservations, provisional hotel reservations
01:45:22
◼
►
It's for less money than I could have gotten them in San Francisco for the same week.
01:45:26
◼
►
Not much less, but a little bit less, and certainly a nicer location.
01:45:28
◼
►
Mine's a thousand dollars less.
01:45:30
◼
►
Yeah, same here, but I have not independently confirmed this, but I had people that I saw
01:45:36
◼
►
on Twitter saying that within a couple hours of this announcement, all those prices went
01:45:40
◼
►
up to effectively equivalent to San Francisco prices.
01:45:44
◼
►
So, last couple of years, it has been, and I'm sure we've talked about this on the show,
01:45:49
◼
►
But it has been for a middle of the road hotel for the area.
01:45:53
◼
►
And admittedly, it's not the greatest area for like sightseeing.
01:45:56
◼
►
And there's a bunch of problems with the area in which WWDC used to happen in San Francisco.
01:46:00
◼
►
But the point of the matter is, for a unremarkable hotel, but not slummy, it was like $400 a
01:46:08
◼
►
I think I spent like $2,500 or $3,000 for a week, or well, five nights in San Francisco.
01:46:14
◼
►
And somebody said to me at some point, I wish I could remember who it was, but somebody
01:46:18
◼
►
somebody pointed out, last couple of years in San Francisco,
01:46:21
◼
►
you were basically buying an Apple Watch
01:46:23
◼
►
every single night you were there,
01:46:26
◼
►
and then throwing it away.
01:46:27
◼
►
That's how expensive the hotels were.
01:46:28
◼
►
Was it you, Jon?
01:46:29
◼
►
- Yeah, it was the last year, it was W
01:46:35
◼
►
- That's barbaric.
01:46:36
◼
►
San Francisco, or at least that part of San Francisco,
01:46:37
◼
►
is not a nice enough city to justify that kind of price.
01:46:40
◼
►
It's just not, I'm sorry.
01:46:41
◼
►
And so here it is for a fleeting moment,
01:46:44
◼
►
San Jose seemed like it would be a whole lot better,
01:46:47
◼
►
from what I understand, all of the excess inventory
01:46:50
◼
►
that was low priced has been snapped up.
01:46:52
◼
►
Now that very well could be because Apple has also bought
01:46:55
◼
►
a bunch of hotel rooms for attendees,
01:46:56
◼
►
which they've done in years past.
01:46:59
◼
►
- That is very, very likely.
01:47:00
◼
►
Apple almost certainly has blocked out
01:47:02
◼
►
discounted rooms for attendees,
01:47:04
◼
►
so that basically if you plan to try to get a ticket,
01:47:08
◼
►
don't book a non-refundable hotel room yet.
01:47:10
◼
►
- Right, exactly.
01:47:11
◼
►
- Yeah, the strategy, we've been doing this strategy
01:47:13
◼
►
at San Francisco for a few years.
01:47:14
◼
►
Always as soon as you find out the dates
01:47:15
◼
►
you book a refundable ticket and then what I would do is wait to see that if I do get
01:47:20
◼
►
a ticket, which I have in years past, look at the rates that Apple offers for like, "Hey,
01:47:25
◼
►
we reserved a block of room for you."
01:47:26
◼
►
Some years, the Apple reserved room rate is cheaper than the one I provisionally booked.
01:47:31
◼
►
Sometimes it's actually more expensive.
01:47:33
◼
►
So it really depends on how quick people are on the draw and how quickly the hotels figure
01:47:37
◼
►
out what's going on.
01:47:38
◼
►
But in this case, by the time you're listening to this, if you haven't already booked something,
01:47:43
◼
►
probably Apple's reserve block of room rate is going to be better than anything you get
01:47:48
◼
►
And there are, it seems like there are more hotels at formerly reasonable prices closer
01:47:54
◼
►
to whatever the convention center is in San Jose because Moscone has some super expensive
01:47:59
◼
►
hotels fairly close to it and some cheaper ones like 15 minute walk away and then it
01:48:04
◼
►
goes down from there whereas the San Jose one right around it within like the same block
01:48:08
◼
►
there's a couple of big hotels which don't seem as nice and we're going for
01:48:11
◼
►
You know a hundred and something a night if you were really quick on the draw of course now
01:48:16
◼
►
They're off to four or five hundred, but you know what yeah mine is like my guy
01:48:19
◼
►
I got mine for like 189 or something
01:48:21
◼
►
I mean I haven't paid a rate that low in San Francisco in a few years
01:48:24
◼
►
Yeah, I haven't seen anything with the one in front of it in many years
01:48:28
◼
►
My goodness so true
01:48:34
◼
►
On the one side, so I guess at first that seems like an improvement because it seems like it's more accessible financially
01:48:42
◼
►
until you have to fly there because there seem to be
01:48:45
◼
►
Considerably fewer options to get into San Jose than there are San Francisco, which makes sense
01:48:50
◼
►
San Francisco is a much bigger Airport from everything I've gathered
01:48:52
◼
►
I am more than a little bitter that no matter where I fly out of I'm going to have to change planes in the past
01:48:59
◼
►
I've driven two hours northbound to Dulles, everyone's favorite airport, and gotten a direct flight on Virgin America, which is
01:49:06
◼
►
non-sarcastically my favorite airline in the States. And I
01:49:10
◼
►
typically underscore and I have flown on the same flights out and back
01:49:14
◼
►
and it's been wonderful. And now I'm going to have to change planes like an animal,
01:49:20
◼
►
which I'm perfectly capable of doing but I don't care for doing.
01:49:24
◼
►
And that's a bummer.
01:49:26
◼
►
Alternatively, we could fly to San Francisco and take an hour long drive or Caltrain or
01:49:32
◼
►
something along those lines, which is a bummer.
01:49:35
◼
►
So getting there is a little bit tougher and probably more expensive, which stinks.
01:49:42
◼
►
But in the grand scheme of things, I think this has a lot of potential upside.
01:49:49
◼
►
It does make a lot of things different and at first glance potentially worse, but I think
01:49:54
◼
►
it could make a lot of things better.
01:49:57
◼
►
Also announced today, which we're not going to talk about very much,
01:50:01
◼
►
the Apple Campus 2 has been officially named Apple Park,
01:50:04
◼
►
and it will start to receive employees that will be moving in in April,
01:50:11
◼
►
and WWDC is in June.
01:50:13
◼
►
So it is certainly possible that there will be one or more WWDC events at Apple Park,
01:50:22
◼
►
which would be kind of neat, I guess.
01:50:26
◼
►
We'll see what happens.
01:50:27
◼
►
There's been a lot of theorizing and scheming
01:50:31
◼
►
about where things like the beer bash will happen
01:50:33
◼
►
and where will the keynote happen.
01:50:36
◼
►
And we know the name of the conference center or event
01:50:39
◼
►
center, whatever it is that WWDC is happening.
01:50:42
◼
►
I've already forgotten what it is.
01:50:43
◼
►
It doesn't really matter.
01:50:45
◼
►
But there's a lot of questions about this.
01:50:48
◼
►
And additionally, somewhere on the website--
01:50:50
◼
►
or maybe it was in the announcement--
01:50:51
◼
►
They made passing reference to how Apple's working with San Jose to kind of have stuff
01:50:57
◼
►
to do after hours.
01:50:59
◼
►
What does that mean?
01:51:00
◼
►
Does that mean that they work with people like Layers and Alt-Conf to get something
01:51:06
◼
►
going on, but that's not really after hours, that's during the show, so is it that they're
01:51:10
◼
►
working with the relay folks to get something going?
01:51:12
◼
►
Probably not, but you never know.
01:51:14
◼
►
There's a million questions here, very few answers.
01:51:17
◼
►
at least we know when it is and at least we know where it is and we'd know that
01:51:21
◼
►
before what feels like 10 seconds in advance which is good so I'm tentatively
01:51:26
◼
►
optimistic but we'll see how it will see how it works out I'm gonna miss the
01:51:30
◼
►
convention center like I don't even know what the same as a one is like but the
01:51:33
◼
►
Moscone was cool-looking right yeah I like that I like that space I mean
01:51:37
◼
►
obviously the rooms themselves are like you know boring partitions that they
01:51:40
◼
►
move around and stuff but I think Apple always did a good job of making it feel
01:51:43
◼
►
So the familiarity will be a little bit weird.
01:51:47
◼
►
The potential upsides of San Jose is that nerds will be able to more thoroughly dominate
01:51:51
◼
►
the place because in San Francisco, yeah, there's a lot of nerds and when you're around
01:51:55
◼
►
Moscone you see a lot of little black W2C jackets, but San Francisco is a big busy city
01:51:59
◼
►
full of people going about their business and as you move outward, nerds don't dominate
01:52:04
◼
►
the city like the people who live in the city and work there.
01:52:07
◼
►
I mean it's other nerds, the people going to work at Twitter and stuff, right?
01:52:09
◼
►
But it's a different set of nerds.
01:52:12
◼
►
In San Jose, because the population is lower and, you know, it's just less of a big city
01:52:19
◼
►
than San Francisco, I would imagine that we will dominate more.
01:52:24
◼
►
I'm worried a little bit about facilities, as people have pointed out, I'm not so much
01:52:28
◼
►
interested in bars, but even just as simple as like, "Hey, where do you want to go for
01:52:31
◼
►
dinner tonight?"
01:52:32
◼
►
If it's any remotely good restaurants, they may be overwhelmed by the additional volume
01:52:36
◼
►
of people, but then again, it is a convention center, so maybe they're used to it, I don't
01:52:39
◼
►
hard to gauge that but again San Francisco has a much larger capacity to absorb people's
01:52:45
◼
►
activities just because they're used to, you know, it's a big city. There's many more options,
01:52:49
◼
►
more places to go, places that are more used to large volumes of people on an ongoing basis
01:52:53
◼
►
whereas this surge for WWDC could be large as far as San Jose is concerned or it could
01:53:00
◼
►
not be because I think maybe their convention center regularly houses conventions that are
01:53:05
◼
►
or seven times the size of WWDC, in which case, you know, not a big deal.
01:53:08
◼
►
And also, maybe people who previously went to San Francisco for WWDC without a ticket
01:53:15
◼
►
to just, you know, enjoy the company will think twice of it, either because there's
01:53:19
◼
►
not a direct flight or because they think there won't be stuff to do.
01:53:22
◼
►
You know, there won't be as much stuff to do or whatever.
01:53:26
◼
►
I think the idea of people going into San Francisco from San Jose is crazy because that's
01:53:29
◼
►
a ridiculous trip and it's long distance even without traffic.
01:53:32
◼
►
and you're not gonna wanna make that trip back
01:53:34
◼
►
when your meal ends at 2 a.m. or whatever.
01:53:38
◼
►
So, I mean, well, certainly I would never do that,
01:53:40
◼
►
but I think most people wouldn't do that.
01:53:42
◼
►
- Can you imagine getting back in an Uber
01:53:45
◼
►
to go ride for an hour at two in the morning
01:53:48
◼
►
to go back to the park 55?
01:53:50
◼
►
- No, no, no. (laughing)
01:53:53
◼
►
Hard pass, no thank you.
01:53:55
◼
►
- Yeah, and maybe the weather will be nicer.
01:53:57
◼
►
Maybe it won't be freezing cold.
01:53:59
◼
►
- My understanding is that's accurate,
01:54:01
◼
►
that it will be considerably warmer.
01:54:03
◼
►
- Yeah, it seems that San Jose is actually in California.
01:54:05
◼
►
- Right. (laughs)
01:54:07
◼
►
And I, for me, because I hate flying and hate traveling,
01:54:13
◼
►
I'm gonna take a direct flight to SFO.
01:54:16
◼
►
I can't do the change.
01:54:18
◼
►
Like one six-hour flight, I can't do two four-hour flights
01:54:20
◼
►
with an hour in between or whatever the hell it would be
01:54:22
◼
►
if I went through Texas or whatever my options are.
01:54:24
◼
►
- I'm curious, how are you gonna get down
01:54:26
◼
►
to there from there?
01:54:27
◼
►
How does that work?
01:54:28
◼
►
- I'll get someone to drive me.
01:54:30
◼
►
It'll be fine.
01:54:31
◼
►
- Yeah, I've debated doing the same thing,
01:54:34
◼
►
especially inbound where the schedule
01:54:37
◼
►
is a little less intense,
01:54:38
◼
►
and I haven't booked plane travel yet.
01:54:41
◼
►
- Yeah, neither have I.
01:54:42
◼
►
- But I think what I'll likely do
01:54:45
◼
►
is just fly into San Jose and deal with the fact
01:54:49
◼
►
that I have to put on my big boy pants
01:54:51
◼
►
and change planes at some point.
01:54:53
◼
►
- I'll say, when we're hearing from you,
01:54:55
◼
►
because your connection got canceled or I missed,
01:54:57
◼
►
how excited you are to miss registration.
01:55:00
◼
►
- No, true, I agree.
01:55:01
◼
►
No, and that's why, sure, I am being a little bit
01:55:05
◼
►
of a baby saying, "I don't wanna change planes,"
01:55:06
◼
►
but truly, that's why I drive two hours,
01:55:10
◼
►
because driving two hours to a larger airport
01:55:13
◼
►
is something I can control.
01:55:14
◼
►
When I get stranded in Dallas or Charlotte
01:55:18
◼
►
or Chicago or something like that, I'm screwed.
01:55:21
◼
►
There's nothing I can do about that at that point.
01:55:22
◼
►
So I'm with you, Jon, I completely understand.
01:55:25
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, that's one of the many reasons
01:55:27
◼
►
to try to go direct.
01:55:28
◼
►
And then, for me personally, there's a potential that I won't be able to go at all because
01:55:32
◼
►
my wife might have work travel during that time and then I wouldn't have anybody to watch
01:55:36
◼
►
the kids, so potentially I'm not going at all.
01:55:38
◼
►
And of course, always the option of me not getting a ticket enough if I don't get one.
01:55:42
◼
►
As always, I will have to reconsider.
01:55:45
◼
►
Because I'm not really going there for super-duper nightlife and drinking, I'm going to sit in
01:55:50
◼
►
boring nerd sessions and learn things.
01:55:52
◼
►
And it's my plan.
01:55:53
◼
►
But you're the life of the party.
01:55:54
◼
►
Yeah, right, I'm sure I'll be terribly missed.
01:55:57
◼
►
You would be, certainly by the two of us and nobody else.
01:55:59
◼
►
Marco would be so excited to be able to figure out a new recording rig where he's got two
01:56:02
◼
►
people live, one person remote.
01:56:04
◼
►
Oh, God, please don't make me do that.
01:56:06
◼
►
That would be awful.
01:56:07
◼
►
Anyway, I will be entering the lottery anyway, and hopefully I'll be able to either work
01:56:13
◼
►
out something with childcare or my wife's work travel will change because it's not set
01:56:18
◼
►
in stone at this point.
01:56:19
◼
►
And I totally, I love the fact that, in case you already mentioned, that we found out so
01:56:22
◼
►
much earlier.
01:56:23
◼
►
Like, even before, like, we can't even put our, you know, name into the hat for the lottery
01:56:29
◼
►
until the end of March.
01:56:31
◼
►
So they gave us so much notice, which is great.
01:56:33
◼
►
It's like so much more relaxing.
01:56:35
◼
►
Although the mad rush is still there, because as soon as everyone—I felt like I found
01:56:39
◼
►
out like an hour after everybody else did, despite the fact that through many venues
01:56:43
◼
►
if I had just opened my eyes I would have known much sooner.
01:56:46
◼
►
And then I'm scrambling to try to get a number with a one in front of it as my hotel room
01:56:50
◼
►
rate, which I think I barely did.
01:56:53
◼
►
But I mean, all in all, I'm tentatively excited, like I said.
01:56:56
◼
►
I think this could be a bunch of awesome changes.
01:57:01
◼
►
Now it certainly could be garbage,
01:57:03
◼
►
and it could work out really poorly,
01:57:04
◼
►
and there'll be nowhere to go after hours, nothing to do.
01:57:07
◼
►
But I'm excited.
01:57:09
◼
►
I think it could be a lot of fun,
01:57:10
◼
►
and I'm really looking forward to seeing
01:57:12
◼
►
how it all turns out.
01:57:13
◼
►
- So, just a little more on the venue stuff.
01:57:16
◼
►
Do we all agree that the keynote will not be
01:57:19
◼
►
in the Steve Jobs Theater in Apple Park?
01:57:22
◼
►
- It's too small. - It's not big enough.
01:57:23
◼
►
- Yeah, it's not even close.
01:57:25
◼
►
- Yeah, I always wondered about that theater,
01:57:26
◼
►
why they made it, I mean, I guess for press events,
01:57:28
◼
►
1,000 is probably plenty, but Apple's had
01:57:31
◼
►
a lot of press events in bigger venues,
01:57:32
◼
►
like even the watch event held like 5,000 or something,
01:57:35
◼
►
so I kinda wonder why they made it so small.
01:57:38
◼
►
- Well, I mean, I'm sure the rationale was basically like,
01:57:41
◼
►
you know, we can have some events on campus, which we do,
01:57:44
◼
►
and like the smaller events that aren't like 5,000 people
01:57:47
◼
►
in a room, they just have on their campus,
01:57:48
◼
►
and the rationale was probably like,
01:57:51
◼
►
To make it meaningfully bigger,
01:57:52
◼
►
it's like do we wanna put a 5,000 person theater
01:57:55
◼
►
in our campus?
01:57:56
◼
►
And that's a lot of people to shove into one room.
01:57:58
◼
►
It's a really big room.
01:57:59
◼
►
It's like, that's probably a massive undertaking
01:58:03
◼
►
for relatively little benefit.
01:58:05
◼
►
Like they can just go book a place in San Francisco for that
01:58:08
◼
►
or book the San Jose Conference Center for that
01:58:10
◼
►
and it's probably fine.
01:58:11
◼
►
- Yeah, that whole Steve Jobs theater
01:58:13
◼
►
is just a facade for the 800 levels of sub-basements
01:58:16
◼
►
where they do the car development, right?
01:58:18
◼
►
- Something like that.
01:58:19
◼
►
underground test track facility that's a complete recreation of the Nürburgring.
01:58:24
◼
►
- Yeah, that's it. - Where there's artificial sunlight over the whole thing.
01:58:27
◼
►
- I would not assume that there's gonna be any involvement between Apple's new
01:58:34
◼
►
campus and WBC. I don't think there's gonna be anything there.
01:58:37
◼
►
They don't really need to and it would be a pretty big ordeal. Like,
01:58:41
◼
►
5,000 people is a lot. To do anything with 5,000 people, that is a
01:58:47
◼
►
a large logistical challenge.
01:58:49
◼
►
And when the people can just walk to different buildings
01:58:52
◼
►
that are all within the same downtown area,
01:58:53
◼
►
that's way easier.
01:58:55
◼
►
- Yeah, we'll see what happens.
01:58:56
◼
►
Well, good luck you two getting tickets.
01:58:58
◼
►
- I'm not trying for a ticket.
01:58:59
◼
►
- Oh, you're not?
01:59:00
◼
►
- No, I decided last year, I'm always so double
01:59:04
◼
►
and triple booked for things I want to do during that week,
01:59:07
◼
►
during every time of every day.
01:59:09
◼
►
- Humblebrack.
01:59:10
◼
►
- That there is just, a ticket on me at this point,
01:59:15
◼
►
I would feel better with somebody else getting it.
01:59:18
◼
►
I feel like it's wasted on me now
01:59:20
◼
►
because there's so much else I want to do
01:59:22
◼
►
during those daytime slots,
01:59:24
◼
►
and last year I didn't go to that many sessions,
01:59:26
◼
►
and I felt really bad about that.
01:59:28
◼
►
So this year I'm just gonna be like,
01:59:29
◼
►
you know, I'm just gonna let someone else
01:59:31
◼
►
get my ticket this time,
01:59:32
◼
►
'cause I think I don't need it anymore.
01:59:35
◼
►
- Yeah, I'm giving you a hard time,
01:59:36
◼
►
but I actually felt very similarly.
01:59:38
◼
►
Now, I did have layers that I went to
01:59:41
◼
►
almost the entirety of last year.
01:59:43
◼
►
And quick aside, if you, for some reason, want to be in
01:59:47
◼
►
that area and you don't get a ticket or perhaps you want
01:59:51
◼
►
something a little less developer-centric, Layers is
01:59:55
◼
►
a great conference.
01:59:56
◼
►
And I think I could have sworn I saw that they were at least
02:00:00
◼
►
contemplating going to San Jose, but I might be lying
02:00:03
◼
►
about that, so double check me.
02:00:04
◼
►
But yeah, if Layers is a thing again, be it in San Francisco
02:00:08
◼
►
or San Jose, it is definitely worth checking out.
02:00:11
◼
►
But anyways, last year, I had a lot more availability because I didn't have a conference ticket
02:00:18
◼
►
I had one to Layers, and I still felt a bit overwhelmed and triple booked.
02:00:22
◼
►
And I'm giving you a hard time about humble bragging about how busy you were, but truth
02:00:25
◼
►
be told, I totally understand, and I am in the exact same boat.
02:00:28
◼
►
I will be trying for a ticket for sure, because I think I still have a lot to get from it
02:00:35
◼
►
in a way that I don't know that you necessarily do, Marco.
02:00:38
◼
►
I agree with what you just said.
02:00:41
◼
►
We'll see what happens. John obviously will be putting his hat in the ring and we'll see how it goes
02:00:45
◼
►
But but I'm looking forward to it one way or the other. Yeah, I forgot about layers
02:00:48
◼
►
That's an option like I would that would be an excuse for me to go
02:00:52
◼
►
It's like well, I didn't get a ticket but oh, well, I'll buy a ticket to layers instead
02:00:55
◼
►
Yeah, and you know, I I feel guilty because I feel the same way but truth be told layers really is a great conference
02:01:03
◼
►
Like I it shouldn't I shouldn't be positioning it as an also ran because it really is really really good
02:01:09
◼
►
Now full disclosure, one of the women that runs Layers,
02:01:14
◼
►
Jessie Char, she also does our ad sales,
02:01:16
◼
►
and so we're inclined to like her anyway.
02:01:19
◼
►
But the truth of the matter is she's awesome.
02:01:21
◼
►
- It went the other direction.
02:01:23
◼
►
She does our ad sales because we liked her so much.
02:01:26
◼
►
- That's true, actually, yeah.
02:01:28
◼
►
And Layers is just, it's such an unbelievably good
02:01:30
◼
►
conference, and a very diverse conference
02:01:32
◼
►
in a way that WWDC is not, which is super refreshing,
02:01:37
◼
►
and really, really awesome.
02:01:39
◼
►
- Yeah, that's actually, that is one of the biggest things
02:01:42
◼
►
that I want to do instead of going to WWDC this year.
02:01:46
◼
►
Like I really want, I hope Layers happens.
02:01:49
◼
►
If it does happen, I'm there, no question.
02:01:51
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean it shouldn't be positioned as an also ran.
02:01:54
◼
►
It is a peer to WWDC.
02:01:57
◼
►
It is truly a tremendous show.
02:01:59
◼
►
So anyway, so yeah, so we'll see what happens,
02:02:01
◼
►
but I'm looking forward to it one way or another,
02:02:03
◼
►
and I really, really hope that all three of us
02:02:06
◼
►
make it out there.
02:02:07
◼
►
So I will put in a good word with Tina
02:02:09
◼
►
to temporarily quit her job or something if needed.
02:02:12
◼
►
Small price to pay, am I right?
02:02:16
◼
►
- All right, thanks a lot to our three sponsors this week,
02:02:19
◼
►
Hover, Warby Parker, and Indochino,
02:02:21
◼
►
and we will see you next week.
02:02:23
◼
►
(upbeat music)
02:02:25
◼
►
♪ Now the show is over ♪
02:02:28
◼
►
♪ They didn't even mean to begin ♪
02:02:30
◼
►
♪ 'Cause it was accidental ♪
02:02:32
◼
►
♪ Accidental ♪
02:02:33
◼
►
♪ Oh, it was accidental ♪
02:02:35
◼
►
♪ Accidental ♪
02:02:36
◼
►
♪ John didn't do any research ♪
02:02:38
◼
►
Marco and Casey wouldn't let him, cause it was accidental
02:02:42
◼
►
It was accidental
02:02:46
◼
►
And you can find the show notes at ATP.fm
02:02:51
◼
►
And if you're into Twitter, you can follow them
02:02:56
◼
►
@C-A-S-E-Y-L-I-S-S
02:03:00
◼
►
So that's Casey List M-A-R-C-O-A-R-M
02:03:05
◼
►
♪ Anti-Marco Armin, S-I-R-A-C ♪
02:03:10
◼
►
♪ U-S-A-C-R-A-Q-S-A ♪
02:03:12
◼
►
♪ It's accidental, accidental ♪
02:03:16
◼
►
♪ They didn't mean to ♪
02:03:18
◼
►
♪ Accidental, accidental ♪
02:03:20
◼
►
♪ Tech broadcast ♪
02:03:25
◼
►
- I have had, I've been gaming again on the Apple TV
02:03:29
◼
►
with Adam, my son, and a while back,
02:03:33
◼
►
like right after I finished playing through all the emulator stuff with prominence on
02:03:38
◼
►
the Apple TV, I was playing them all with the SteelSeries, is it? The Nimbus controller.
02:03:46
◼
►
It was, you know, whatever the Nimbus is, I think it's SteelSeries. And it's, you know,
02:03:50
◼
►
one of the many like $50 Apple TV game pad controller things. And it's fine. It's not
02:03:57
◼
►
great but it's fine. And right after I finished playing all of these old platformers with
02:04:04
◼
►
that controller, somebody recommended that I check out the HoriPad Ultimate. This is
02:04:09
◼
►
a company, I was not familiar with it but apparently they're well respected, the Hori
02:04:13
◼
►
company I guess, they're well respected for making game pads. And there's a model called
02:04:19
◼
►
the HoriPad Ultimate that is, as far as I can tell, only sold at Apple stores and through
02:04:25
◼
►
Apple's online site. And I've been playing with that the last couple days and night and
02:04:33
◼
►
day better. It is so good. It is so much better than the Nimbus for the actual D-pad and playing
02:04:41
◼
►
old games with the D-pad. The analog sticks and everything I couldn't care less about
02:04:44
◼
►
because I'm not that picky about analog sticks. But the D-pad and the buttons and the responsiveness
02:04:50
◼
►
of it is just so much better than the Nimbus and it's more practical, like it's easier
02:04:56
◼
►
to turn on and off and everything and there's the actual power switch on it and stuff like
02:05:00
◼
►
that. It also charges via lightning. So it's very nice, very convenient, highly recommended
02:05:05
◼
►
the HoriPad Ultimate Apple TV game controller. Apparently it also works with like iPads and
02:05:09
◼
►
iPhones but I have not yet tried it with those.
02:05:13
◼
►
So what have you been playing that isn't emulated or is that basically it?
02:05:17
◼
►
there's kind of an asterisk on that. So I have not actually loaded up Providence yet
02:05:21
◼
►
because at some point in the last few months since I last touched it, all of my games got
02:05:26
◼
►
deleted out of it. Which is probably some kind of, you know, Apple TV storage purge
02:05:31
◼
►
thing. And so I probably have to reload them all on but I will have lost all my progress
02:05:35
◼
►
and I'm not looking forward to that. But I instead have been playing the official Sega
02:05:42
◼
►
authorized ports to the Apple TV of the Sonic the Hedgehog series, Sonic 1, 2, and CD. They
02:05:49
◼
►
were done, oh god I forgot the guy's name already, they were done by a really good person
02:05:54
◼
►
and they actually have like remastered the Sonic games, the original, these three Genesis
02:05:58
◼
►
Sonic games, to be natively widescreen, to have built in like saves, Christian Whitehead
02:06:05
◼
►
is the guy, thank you Chloe D. Guzman in the chat, Christian Whitehead is the person or
02:06:10
◼
►
company I guess, I think it's a person who ported the game. And it's a very, these are
02:06:15
◼
►
very well done ports. Actually like nice widescreen versions of these old Sonic games. And they
02:06:23
◼
►
actually don't break in widescreen, like things aren't worse or weird in some way. There's
02:06:26
◼
►
actually a couple of, they had to make a couple of tweaks to the games to make it not break
02:06:32
◼
►
like in Sonic 1 the boss of Spring Yard Zone kind of depends on the field of the game being
02:06:38
◼
►
a certain width and so in this remaster that's widescreen they just put up these two big
02:06:44
◼
►
walls on like the two sides to force it back into the right width. Stuff like that. So
02:06:51
◼
►
anyway really good ports of all three of these games of Sonic 1, Sonic 2 and Sonic CD. They're
02:06:56
◼
►
awesome we've been having a lot of fun playing them. And apparently he has been hired to
02:07:00
◼
►
do something called Sonic Mania which is like basically a new Sonic game in the style of
02:07:07
◼
►
the old ones. Because there have been a million garbage-y Sonic games since the Genesis, like
02:07:10
◼
►
all the stuff they've done afterwards, and it has largely gone nowhere, really, and has
02:07:15
◼
►
not been that memorable. But there's a new one now being made, I don't know when it's
02:07:21
◼
►
coming out, but... Ooh, it's for the Nintendo Switch. I should mention I'm getting a Nintendo
02:07:25
◼
►
Switch. What? Why? I don't know, I feel like it's gonna be fun. How are you getting a Nintendo
02:07:31
◼
►
Switch? Because I want to get one, and I missed the one hour pre-order window. So did I, because
02:07:37
◼
►
but a friend of the show who I would name,
02:07:40
◼
►
but I'm not going to in case he would get
02:07:43
◼
►
like bombarded with requests,
02:07:45
◼
►
a friend of the show ordered an extra,
02:07:47
◼
►
had basically had an extra pre-order and offered it,
02:07:49
◼
►
and I grabbed it.
02:07:52
◼
►
I'm going to have to figure out what games to get for it,
02:07:54
◼
►
but I think it's gonna be fun.
02:07:56
◼
►
- (sighs) I don't know.
02:07:58
◼
►
I can't get my fancy version of the Zelda game either.
02:08:00
◼
►
I missed the pre-order window on that.
02:08:01
◼
►
I have notifications on Amazon for all these things,
02:08:03
◼
►
like email me when they're available.
02:08:04
◼
►
- How did you miss that?
02:08:05
◼
►
I don't know, I was like working and I missed the day when you could put in the pre-orders.
02:08:09
◼
►
I missed it in like an hour.
02:08:10
◼
►
And by the time I went there, it was like, "Oh, too late.
02:08:13
◼
►
I already sold out."
02:08:14
◼
►
So I have no – I'm sure I'll get the console.
02:08:17
◼
►
I have no problem with that.
02:08:18
◼
►
I just would like the fancy version of the Zelda game because that's what I want.
02:08:21
◼
►
I want the console and I want the Zelda game and the pro controller.
02:08:24
◼
►
And that's what I'm going to do with it.
02:08:25
◼
►
And I don't really care about any other games for it for a while.
02:08:28
◼
►
I actually – I'm hoping – do we still know nothing about the virtual console for
02:08:34
◼
►
it? I'm sure we know something, I haven't been keeping up with it, but. Okay, well anyway,
02:08:38
◼
►
I'm hoping the Virtual Console becomes like, you know, what it is, what it has to be for,
02:08:43
◼
►
like a pretty good, pretty good thing, pretty good resource, because I would love to, to
02:08:49
◼
►
play like some of, basically some of like the Mario and Mario Kart games that I have
02:08:52
◼
►
missed in the last 20 years. Just get Mario Kart 8, the Mario Kart 8 Deluxe, it has so
02:08:57
◼
►
many freaking tracks from past games. Oh yeah, I ordered that. And they're adding 16 more
02:09:00
◼
►
I think on top of that, so. I'm going to order that, it's in my, it's in my Amazon cart
02:09:04
◼
►
to pre-order that. But yeah, so basically that's obvious, but like is there anything
02:09:09
◼
►
else? It seems like Mario games themselves are kind of absent for a while until the big
02:09:15
◼
►
one comes out like in a year or something, right? Something like that?
02:09:18
◼
►
-They're spacing it out, I think by like the end of this year. Like I think a lot of the
02:09:21
◼
►
games are basically done and they're just spacing it out to give like every two months
02:09:24
◼
►
there'll be a major new game. -Yeah, so far my launch list of things I
02:09:28
◼
►
I want at launch are basically like Bomberman,
02:09:31
◼
►
Puyo Tetris, and Mario Kart,
02:09:34
◼
►
which isn't actually at launch,
02:09:36
◼
►
but is close to launch, I guess.
02:09:38
◼
►
But I don't really know what else to get.
02:09:39
◼
►
I'm not really that into Zelda,
02:09:41
◼
►
so I probably won't get that unless Tiff wants to play,
02:09:43
◼
►
which she might, but I don't know what else to get.
02:09:45
◼
►
So you're gonna have to--
02:09:46
◼
►
- I don't know what this new Zelda is gonna be like.
02:09:48
◼
►
It might be within Tiff's window of tolerance,
02:09:50
◼
►
but I recall her not being a big fan of the 3D Zeldas.
02:09:53
◼
►
- Yeah, she was a fan of some of,
02:09:55
◼
►
like I think the very first one for N64,
02:09:57
◼
►
but not even the second one or whatever.
02:09:59
◼
►
- Yeah, this one's supposed to be very different
02:10:01
◼
►
and more open world-y, so that could be worse or better,
02:10:03
◼
►
but we'll see.
02:10:03
◼
►
- Which one's the one where you drive around
02:10:04
◼
►
the dragon boat and play all the flute songs?
02:10:07
◼
►
- Wind Waker.
02:10:07
◼
►
- Yeah, she played that one, I think,
02:10:09
◼
►
but I think that was it.
02:10:11
◼
►
- Play all the flute songs.
02:10:12
◼
►
Just, no flute, no flute!
02:10:16
◼
►
- What, what is it?
02:10:18
◼
►
It's a recorder?
02:10:19
◼
►
- It's a wand, it's called the Wind Waker.
02:10:21
◼
►
It wakes the wind.
02:10:24
◼
►
You don't blow into it, you wave it around.