207: Selling Hot Dogs on a Stick
00:00:00
◼
►
I just for the first time in a while picked up my iPhone 5s.
00:00:03
◼
►
I had it out for overcast testing.
00:00:07
◼
►
- It's waffle time.
00:00:10
◼
►
- It's so good.
00:00:13
◼
►
- See, but try accomplishing anything on it.
00:00:16
◼
►
- You are like someone who we're trying not to mention
00:00:18
◼
►
and whatever the last thing that you've done
00:00:21
◼
►
is like that has the most impression on you.
00:00:24
◼
►
Oh God, oh God.
00:00:26
◼
►
No, I mean, it's the kind of thing,
00:00:28
◼
►
Like I saw, I was doing some testing a few days ago
00:00:30
◼
►
and that's why I just picked it up,
00:00:32
◼
►
now I'm moving it out of the way so we can do the show.
00:00:34
◼
►
It just feels so good when I pick it up
00:00:36
◼
►
and I'm like, man, it looks so good.
00:00:38
◼
►
I wish phones could still look that good
00:00:39
◼
►
and would still feel good in my hand.
00:00:42
◼
►
But then when I actually use it to do my tests,
00:00:44
◼
►
I'm just like, man, this is such a toy.
00:00:47
◼
►
This is so small.
00:00:49
◼
►
This is so, I've actually, I've honestly been thinking like,
00:00:52
◼
►
okay, so my phone is continuing to not be able
00:00:56
◼
►
to make phone calls reliably.
00:00:57
◼
►
Since day one, both mine and TIFF's iPhone 7s
00:01:02
◼
►
have been very frequently exhibiting the exact same problem
00:01:06
◼
►
of the microphone cuts out during phone calls
00:01:09
◼
►
so that the other person can't hear us
00:01:10
◼
►
for like 10 seconds or 15 seconds at a time,
00:01:13
◼
►
often resulting in them saying hello, hello, hello
00:01:15
◼
►
until they hang up, and we're screaming,
00:01:16
◼
►
we're here, we're here, we're here,
00:01:18
◼
►
and they just hang up after a while
00:01:19
◼
►
'cause usually it doesn't recover.
00:01:22
◼
►
And it's, you know, you say you might think
00:01:25
◼
►
you're never on the phone.
00:01:27
◼
►
"Oh, I never take phone calls.
00:01:29
◼
►
"I use apps on my phone all the time."
00:01:31
◼
►
You'd be surprised how many times
00:01:33
◼
►
a phone call becomes something important,
00:01:36
◼
►
even in a lifestyle like this.
00:01:40
◼
►
Simple things like when your credit card gets flagged
00:01:42
◼
►
for fraud and you have to call them and explain it,
00:01:45
◼
►
and they hang up on you in the middle
00:01:46
◼
►
'cause they say, "I'm sorry, it seems like
00:01:48
◼
►
"no one's here anymore, we have to hang up."
00:01:50
◼
►
Anyway, so I've been thinking about maybe
00:01:54
◼
►
trying a plus while I get this phone fixed.
00:02:00
◼
►
- But I don't know.
00:02:01
◼
►
I just keep waffling 'cause the camera on it is so good,
00:02:04
◼
►
even though it's not that great in low light,
00:02:06
◼
►
but I don't know.
00:02:08
◼
►
'Cause I use my phone so much,
00:02:10
◼
►
and so often I wish the screen was bigger,
00:02:13
◼
►
but when I do have the plus for a week here or there,
00:02:16
◼
►
I'm just like, oh, this is so unwieldy in my hand.
00:02:19
◼
►
I hate holding it.
00:02:19
◼
►
I hate it so it's-- - Yep.
00:02:22
◼
►
- I don't know.
00:02:22
◼
►
Anyway, that's the current waffle,
00:02:24
◼
►
but it's not a very serious waffle yet.
00:02:25
◼
►
Maybe Mike will work on it for another couple of weeks
00:02:27
◼
►
and we'll see, but probably not.
00:02:28
◼
►
I'll probably just wait till the next one.
00:02:30
◼
►
- Can we not put this in the show?
00:02:31
◼
►
'Cause I don't wanna hear Mike's lip
00:02:32
◼
►
after it's inevitably released
00:02:34
◼
►
and then he starts celebrating on you waffling again.
00:02:37
◼
►
Also, I take issue with something you said a minute ago.
00:02:40
◼
►
The 5S unquestionably feels amazing in the hand.
00:02:45
◼
►
Oh my God, it feels so good in the hand.
00:02:47
◼
►
But I actually stand by my earlier assessment
00:02:51
◼
►
that this iPhone 7 matte black that I have in my hands,
00:02:56
◼
►
while unquestionably slippier than the most slippy soap
00:03:01
◼
►
that you've ever held,
00:03:02
◼
►
it is aesthetically my favorite iPhone I've ever used,
00:03:05
◼
►
which is unfortunate because it is like holding a bar of soap
00:03:08
◼
►
but God, I think this thing is beautiful.
00:03:10
◼
►
And that doesn't mean you have to agree,
00:03:11
◼
►
but this is my favorite phone
00:03:13
◼
►
of all the iPhones I've owned purely visually.
00:03:16
◼
►
- On the phone size thing,
00:03:19
◼
►
the AirPods are giving me a little bit of relief from the excessive size of the 6, which
00:03:27
◼
►
is the only size of iPhone I've had, but it's obviously bigger than the Plus, or not the
00:03:31
◼
►
Plus, the iPod Touches I used to use. Remember I said when I first got the AirPods that the
00:03:36
◼
►
clicker thing on my wired headphones was beating them in the kitchen? Well, the AirPods have
00:03:41
◼
►
made a comeback because they allow me to put my phone down someplace else and not have
00:03:47
◼
►
it in my pocket, which you wouldn't think would make a difference when I'm going around
00:03:49
◼
►
the kitchen and cooking.
00:03:51
◼
►
But when you're cooking in the kitchen, occasionally you have to bend down to get like a pot out
00:03:54
◼
►
of a low thing or whatever.
00:03:56
◼
►
And no matter which pocket I put my phone in, it's just big enough to be uncomfortable
00:04:01
◼
►
when I bend down that I feel like I'm either bending my phone or it's just, you know, I
00:04:04
◼
►
don't know, it's just nice not to have it there.
00:04:07
◼
►
It's just, anyway, I feel better when I put my phone down, you know, on a side table in
00:04:14
◼
►
the other room and then just walk around the kitchen with my AirPods.
00:04:16
◼
►
The AirPods are back in the house now.
00:04:18
◼
►
And it just goes to show that I would never trade down this for the smaller size, no matter
00:04:23
◼
►
how good it feels in the hand because, like Marco said, you don't just hold the thing.
00:04:28
◼
►
It's not a worry stone that you just rub in your hand.
00:04:30
◼
►
You actually look at it and touch the screen.
00:04:32
◼
►
And for looking and touching the screen, I want a bigger screen, so I have one.
00:04:35
◼
►
But I do like that the AirPods are letting me keep my phone away from myself while listening
00:04:41
◼
►
I'm just, I'm so torn because whenever I am using it,
00:04:45
◼
►
I want a bigger screen, but whenever I'm holding it,
00:04:47
◼
►
I want a smaller phone.
00:04:49
◼
►
- You're talking about the 5S?
00:04:50
◼
►
- No, I'm talking about the middle one,
00:04:51
◼
►
the 4.7 inch size.
00:04:53
◼
►
- Oh, oh, oh, oh.
00:04:54
◼
►
- I'm never happy with this size,
00:04:57
◼
►
but I'm also not happy with any of the other ones.
00:05:00
◼
►
So I picked the one in the middle
00:05:01
◼
►
that's kind of mediocre at everything,
00:05:03
◼
►
and I'm, I guess, least unhappy with it,
00:05:07
◼
►
but I don't know, this is why I'm hoping so much
00:05:10
◼
►
that the next industrial design of the phone
00:05:12
◼
►
puts a larger screen in smaller bodies.
00:05:14
◼
►
I would love so much to have the size screen
00:05:19
◼
►
the Plus has, but in something that isn't quite
00:05:21
◼
►
as much bigger than the Plus.
00:05:23
◼
►
Any reduction in size would probably be enough
00:05:27
◼
►
to push me over the edge, even if it's a small reduction,
00:05:30
◼
►
just like fine.
00:05:31
◼
►
And I'm not talking about thickness.
00:05:33
◼
►
As you know from ever listening to me complain
00:05:36
◼
►
about anything ever, I don't care that much about thickness.
00:05:39
◼
►
In the iPhone's case, it's more about the footprint,
00:05:42
◼
►
the dimensions, 'cause that's what makes it awkward
00:05:44
◼
►
in the hand and awkward in my pocket.
00:05:47
◼
►
The thickness itself is not that important to me.
00:05:50
◼
►
So I'm really, really hoping the next one
00:05:53
◼
►
does something like that, but I don't know.
00:05:55
◼
►
They keep selling so many of these,
00:05:56
◼
►
I don't know if they're ever gonna change it.
00:05:58
◼
►
Speaking of topical things.
00:06:00
◼
►
- So I have a question.
00:06:02
◼
►
If the next iPhone, let's just assume
00:06:06
◼
►
it's called an iPhone 8.
00:06:07
◼
►
I'm not saying that's what I expect.
00:06:08
◼
►
Let's just assume for this conversation that the next iPhone is the iPhone 8.
00:06:12
◼
►
And let's assume for the sake of conversation that it is approximately the same size as
00:06:17
◼
►
an iPhone 7, physically speaking, but the screen, because of smaller bezels or John
00:06:22
◼
►
Bezels, however, is now roughly the size of a 7 Plus.
00:06:28
◼
►
I don't even care if that's like possible physically, just for the sake of discussion.
00:06:33
◼
►
Is Mike right if we all get these iPhone 8s that are physically the size that we've always
00:06:40
◼
►
used, but the screen size is the size of a Plus?
00:06:44
◼
►
Is Mike right?
00:06:46
◼
►
Is it like the TARDIS where it's bigger on the inside?
00:06:48
◼
►
The math doesn't work out on that.
00:06:50
◼
►
Just go with it.
00:06:51
◼
►
No, I mean, just go with it.
00:06:52
◼
►
It's like, what if you could have a bus, but it was the size of a Matchbox car, but it
00:06:56
◼
►
fit your whole family.
00:06:58
◼
►
You get it, John.
00:07:00
◼
►
For reference, so I have all three phones that we're talking about right here on my
00:07:02
◼
►
I've been doing this testing,
00:07:03
◼
►
and if you place the iPhone 7 on top of a Plus phone,
00:07:08
◼
►
you can still see the size of the Plus phone screen
00:07:12
◼
►
sticking out of the left and right.
00:07:15
◼
►
- I don't think Casey knows how big a Plus is.
00:07:17
◼
►
It's way bigger.
00:07:17
◼
►
- Yeah, it's a lot bigger.
00:07:20
◼
►
So yeah, it's not possible to shove the massive screen
00:07:23
◼
►
into the mid-sized body.
00:07:24
◼
►
It is possible to put the massive screen
00:07:27
◼
►
into a phone that is less massive.
00:07:29
◼
►
It would still be a very large phone,
00:07:32
◼
►
but it would be possible.
00:07:34
◼
►
It would be more pleasant in the hand.
00:07:36
◼
►
It would be a little bit smaller.
00:07:38
◼
►
And honestly, I mean, none of the three of us
00:07:41
◼
►
have ever, to the best of my knowledge,
00:07:42
◼
►
correct me if I'm wrong, spent any time
00:07:44
◼
►
with one of these Android curved screen edge phones.
00:07:47
◼
►
But you can look at other phones on the market
00:07:51
◼
►
and they have creative ways to shove large screens
00:07:56
◼
►
into at least narrower phones and maybe also shorter,
00:07:59
◼
►
but narrower is usually the more important one.
00:08:02
◼
►
And I think I would agree with that in the hand,
00:08:04
◼
►
narrower is kind of more important
00:08:05
◼
►
for whether you can reach things with your hand
00:08:07
◼
►
and how it fits, how you hold it.
00:08:09
◼
►
But man, I just, again, any, like,
00:08:12
◼
►
the very slightest improvement in size of the big one,
00:08:17
◼
►
I'm getting it.
00:08:18
◼
►
- You won't be swayed by what they're probably gonna do,
00:08:21
◼
►
which is keep the seven form factor
00:08:24
◼
►
but pulling the margins on that.
00:08:26
◼
►
Like, so same size screen as the seven,
00:08:28
◼
►
but smaller surround.
00:08:29
◼
►
So basically it's making it in your hand feel closer
00:08:32
◼
►
to the five size.
00:08:34
◼
►
You'd still go for the big giant phone
00:08:36
◼
►
with its margins pulled in as opposed to the middle phone
00:08:39
◼
►
with the margins pulled in.
00:08:40
◼
►
- So you're probably right that that is probably
00:08:43
◼
►
the kind of thing they would do.
00:08:44
◼
►
Like if they do one, they would probably do both
00:08:46
◼
►
with the same kind of treatment.
00:08:48
◼
►
So the phone you just described,
00:08:51
◼
►
which is basically like the iPhone 8 minus,
00:08:54
◼
►
it would be really, really great feeling in my hand.
00:08:57
◼
►
However, I would have the same problems I have
00:09:00
◼
►
with the current six, which is, or seven, this design,
00:09:03
◼
►
which is that I just keep wanting more screen space
00:09:06
◼
►
and all the biggest battery and the biggest camera.
00:09:10
◼
►
Although honestly, truth be told,
00:09:12
◼
►
I have been totally fine with the battery on the seven.
00:09:15
◼
►
- Yeah, agreed.
00:09:16
◼
►
- And part of that's 'cause I'm doing
00:09:17
◼
►
a lot of iOS development,
00:09:18
◼
►
so it's plugged in a lot during the day.
00:09:22
◼
►
But overall, the battery life on the seven
00:09:24
◼
►
is noticeably better than it was in the 6S for me
00:09:28
◼
►
in my real world use.
00:09:29
◼
►
It is a substantial difference.
00:09:31
◼
►
And it's to the point now where,
00:09:33
◼
►
like Tiff and I, a few years ago,
00:09:36
◼
►
I ran a lightning cable between two segments of our couch
00:09:40
◼
►
so that we would just always be able to pull,
00:09:42
◼
►
between two of the cushions,
00:09:43
◼
►
we would just be able to pull up a cable
00:09:45
◼
►
and plug our phone in.
00:09:46
◼
►
Called a charger couch, it's a great idea.
00:09:48
◼
►
And we recently had to replace the couch
00:09:50
◼
►
and I haven't even set up the new one yet
00:09:52
◼
►
with the charger cable,
00:09:53
◼
►
'cause I realized we never really use it anymore.
00:09:56
◼
►
'Cause Tiff's phone always has
00:09:57
◼
►
the giant battery backpack on it,
00:09:58
◼
►
and mine is always plugged into my computer all day,
00:10:01
◼
►
and when I'm actually using it throughout their outside world
00:10:04
◼
►
the battery is actually better enough in the 7,
00:10:07
◼
►
the regular size 7.
00:10:08
◼
►
So that is good for them.
00:10:10
◼
►
I'm really happy about that in practice.
00:10:13
◼
►
And that's one of the reasons why overall
00:10:16
◼
►
I am happier than I thought I would be with the 7.
00:10:19
◼
►
That being said, I still want the bigger screen
00:10:21
◼
►
and whatever the best camera is.
00:10:23
◼
►
Hopefully in the next one they can fit
00:10:24
◼
►
two image stabilized cameras,
00:10:26
◼
►
and hopefully the zoomed in one is both stabilized
00:10:29
◼
►
and not a meaningfully smaller aperture.
00:10:32
◼
►
So that would be nice, but I still do want
00:10:35
◼
►
the best, best, best of all that stuff,
00:10:37
◼
►
because I use my phone so heavily
00:10:39
◼
►
for so many things throughout the day.
00:10:41
◼
►
- Sorry, Apple doesn't make best, best, best
00:10:43
◼
►
of anything anymore.
00:10:44
◼
►
- I know, that's kind of the problem, right?
00:10:46
◼
►
Yeah, you gotta decide what asterisks
00:10:49
◼
►
you're willing to tolerate.
00:10:51
◼
►
But anyway, so to answer your question, Jon,
00:10:53
◼
►
I should probably just go ahead and get the big one
00:10:56
◼
►
next time, assuming it is a little bit smaller.
00:10:58
◼
►
But the whole time I would have it,
00:11:00
◼
►
I would be waffling in the other direction.
00:11:02
◼
►
So you'll hear about it, just wait about,
00:11:04
◼
►
what, about nine months, and you'll start hearing me--
00:11:06
◼
►
- I'm gonna say this is like, you will buy the bigger one,
00:11:09
◼
►
you will receive it, you will use it for a week,
00:11:11
◼
►
and then you will keep it for testing purposes
00:11:13
◼
►
but buy a smaller one and use it as your phone.
00:11:17
◼
►
No, I just want my wonderful seven
00:11:19
◼
►
that I'm unreasonably happy with in other ways,
00:11:22
◼
►
I just want it to be able to make phone calls.
00:11:25
◼
►
It's kind of important.
00:11:26
◼
►
- Do you think that's related to the Intel,
00:11:28
◼
►
do you have the Intel chip instead of the Qualcomm one,
00:11:31
◼
►
- I do, that's another thing.
00:11:33
◼
►
So I do have, every, I think AT&T sold phone.
00:11:38
◼
►
I think all of them except, in the US,
00:11:41
◼
►
I think all of them except the Verizon one
00:11:43
◼
►
have the Intel one. - Except my phone, yeah.
00:11:44
◼
►
That I never make phone calls from.
00:11:46
◼
►
- Right, exactly.
00:11:47
◼
►
So that was also one of my theories is,
00:11:50
◼
►
if I send this in to get fixed
00:11:51
◼
►
and I buy a new phone in the meantime,
00:11:53
◼
►
I would buy a Verizon unlocked one.
00:11:54
◼
►
And then just maybe, you know,
00:11:56
◼
►
if I get the old one back, then sell it or something,
00:12:00
◼
►
I don't know, I just don't wanna deal with it.
00:12:02
◼
►
This is why I haven't gotten it fixed yet.
00:12:03
◼
►
It hasn't been able to make phone calls reliably
00:12:04
◼
►
since day one.
00:12:05
◼
►
But I just, like, I need my phone all the time.
00:12:08
◼
►
And so there hasn't been a time where I've wanted to like,
00:12:12
◼
►
you know, ship it back and be without it
00:12:13
◼
►
for probably at least a few days
00:12:15
◼
►
while Apple does whatever to it.
00:12:17
◼
►
and then it comes back and maybe isn't fixed.
00:12:19
◼
►
- Mine has been completely fine,
00:12:21
◼
►
and Aaron's to the best of my knowledge
00:12:23
◼
►
have both been completely fine since we've gotten them.
00:12:24
◼
►
We're both on AT&T, both on iPhone 7s,
00:12:27
◼
►
and they've both been no problem at all.
00:12:30
◼
►
Which, I'm not to say that you're wrong or anything,
00:12:33
◼
►
obviously your experience is your experience,
00:12:35
◼
►
but it's not a systemic issue
00:12:38
◼
►
with all the Intel chips it would seem.
00:12:40
◼
►
- Yeah, that's what I was wondering
00:12:41
◼
►
if it was like an OS bug or something.
00:12:43
◼
►
By the way, speaking of like how often we use our phones,
00:12:45
◼
►
I have my phone right here and I can pull up
00:12:47
◼
►
How often I...
00:12:49
◼
►
Does all calls do sent and received or just sent? I'm going on the recent call section in the all tab.
00:12:55
◼
►
That's everything right? I would think so. So this is 2017 phone calls for me.
00:12:59
◼
►
One on the fifth
00:13:02
◼
►
from my house
00:13:04
◼
►
Spam call on the 12th, spam call on the 18th,
00:13:07
◼
►
one on Thursday, spam call on Thursday, and then one today.
00:13:13
◼
►
So that's everything in 20 one two three spam calls and three legit calls in 2017 so far
00:13:19
◼
►
It's February don't use my phone a lot. I have 52 calls in 2017
00:13:25
◼
►
Yeah, so you're you're feeling the pain of a weird microphone a lot more than I am yes
00:13:32
◼
►
8 for screens
00:13:34
◼
►
Yeah, it's it's somewhere between 40 and 50 and and I'm using that no more robo thing to like I don't it's I mean it
00:13:41
◼
►
I'm using it and I like the fact that it has caught some but I don't like that if you still get through
00:13:47
◼
►
Yeah, so iPhone 7 overall thumbs up, but for God's sake I want to make phone calls reliably and Noma Robo also thumbs up
00:13:55
◼
►
Big big supporter of that now. I tried a lot of the call blocking things Noma Robo was the best
00:14:01
◼
►
I think it's like two bucks a month some kind of subscription price, but it's worth it
00:14:05
◼
►
Do it. Oh, yeah. Well, I would I would pay more if it worked better
00:14:09
◼
►
Although I still have Haya on here,
00:14:11
◼
►
which was the one I was using before,
00:14:12
◼
►
which as you pointed out Marco doesn't work
00:14:13
◼
►
and is annoying and is slightly evil.
00:14:15
◼
►
Because Haya lets you look up numbers,
00:14:17
◼
►
so when one of them gets through and I don't answer it,
00:14:21
◼
►
'cause why would I, I wanna know is this a spam caller?
00:14:24
◼
►
And I can just go to Haya and paste in the number
00:14:26
◼
►
and it says oh, nine out of 10 people
00:14:28
◼
►
reported this as spam and I know.
00:14:30
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean I've had Nomorobo miss spam calls
00:14:35
◼
►
a couple of times in the last few days,
00:14:37
◼
►
but overall it's been very solid.
00:14:39
◼
►
'Cause when I'm not running a blocker of some sort,
00:14:42
◼
►
I get roughly one a day maybe.
00:14:46
◼
►
- Yeah, for the last couple years I've gotten
00:14:48
◼
►
almost one a day.
00:14:49
◼
►
Maybe it's more like four or five a week,
00:14:51
◼
►
so it's not quite one a day, but in that ballpark.
00:14:54
◼
►
And I had a high block zero of them ever.
00:14:57
◼
►
I ran it for two months.
00:14:58
◼
►
And then I've had no more robo now for a couple of weeks
00:15:01
◼
►
and I have gotten I think one or two in two weeks or so.
00:15:06
◼
►
weeks or so.
00:15:07
◼
►
We'll put a link to Marco's article about this in the show notes because it's hard
00:15:11
◼
►
to understand the name of these things.
00:15:13
◼
►
We're saying "Hiya" as in the word "Hi" and then "Yuh" is short for "You".
00:15:19
◼
►
And then "No-Mo-Robo" is "No more robo calls" but it's N-O-M-O-R-O-B-O all one
00:15:26
◼
►
Anyway, we'll link to the blog post.
00:15:27
◼
►
All this stuff is linked.
00:15:28
◼
►
It just sounds like we're saying made up words but these are real apps.
00:15:31
◼
►
Welcome to the app naming.
00:15:33
◼
►
It's like, you know, Web 2.0 site naming where you had to like spell everything because it's
00:15:37
◼
►
like, "Oh, well, it's like Flickr without the 'e'."
00:15:41
◼
►
I don't know who else would name sites like that.
00:15:44
◼
►
Yeah, who would that be?
00:15:47
◼
►
We are sponsored this week by Away.
00:15:48
◼
►
For $20 off your order, visit awaytravel.com/ATP and use promo code ATP during checkout.
00:15:55
◼
►
They make incredibly smartly designed luggage for the modern age.
00:16:00
◼
►
So they have three sizes, the carry-on, the medium, or the large.
00:16:03
◼
►
They use high quality materials, but at a much slower price than most other brands by
00:16:07
◼
►
cutting out the middlemen and selling directly to you.
00:16:10
◼
►
These are all made with premium German polycarbonate, which is unrivaled in strength and impact
00:16:14
◼
►
resistance and very, very lightweight.
00:16:16
◼
►
The interior is very smart with design, so it has a patent-pending compression system
00:16:20
◼
►
so you can fit a lot in there.
00:16:21
◼
►
It also has helpful conveniences like 360 degree spinning wheels so you can maneuver
00:16:26
◼
►
And also they have a built-in laundry bag for your dirty laundry so as you're out somewhere,
00:16:30
◼
►
you travel, you wear your clothes,
00:16:33
◼
►
you stuff them in this dirty laundry bag when you're done.
00:16:34
◼
►
So you don't have to make the pile of dirty clothes
00:16:36
◼
►
in the hotel or whatever, that's gross.
00:16:39
◼
►
Use the built-in bag, it's so convenient.
00:16:40
◼
►
And you might have heard about another cool feature they have
00:16:43
◼
►
they have a built-in battery in the carry-on model.
00:16:46
◼
►
So you can charge your cell phone, your tablet,
00:16:49
◼
►
e-readers, anything powered by USB.
00:16:51
◼
►
A single charge of the Away carry-on
00:16:53
◼
►
will charge your phone five times.
00:16:55
◼
►
It's just so smart, why doesn't everyone do this?
00:16:58
◼
►
They are truly designed for the modern age.
00:17:01
◼
►
They also, of course, back it up.
00:17:02
◼
►
They have a lifetime warranty.
00:17:03
◼
►
If anything breaks, they fix or replace it for life.
00:17:06
◼
►
And you can see for yourself, with a 100 day trial,
00:17:10
◼
►
live with it, you can even travel with it.
00:17:12
◼
►
This is how you test a suitcase.
00:17:14
◼
►
You can buy it, travel with it for 100 days.
00:17:17
◼
►
And if you decide at any point it's not for you,
00:17:19
◼
►
you can return it for a full refund
00:17:20
◼
►
with no questions asked.
00:17:22
◼
►
And of course, free shipping,
00:17:24
◼
►
because they're just that great.
00:17:26
◼
►
So check it out today.
00:17:27
◼
►
This is so smartly designed,
00:17:29
◼
►
you should really see for yourself.
00:17:30
◼
►
And because there's free shipping,
00:17:32
◼
►
and a free 100 day trial, and free returns,
00:17:35
◼
►
there's no risk.
00:17:36
◼
►
Check it out today at awaytravel.com/atp,
00:17:39
◼
►
and use promo code ATP during checkout
00:17:41
◼
►
to see really modern, intelligently designed luggage.
00:17:44
◼
►
Once again, awaytravel.com/atp,
00:17:47
◼
►
promo code ATP for 20 bucks off.
00:17:49
◼
►
Thank you very much to Away for sponsoring our show.
00:17:52
◼
►
(upbeat music)
00:17:56
◼
►
All right, so let's start with some follow-up,
00:17:58
◼
►
if you can claim starting this late.
00:18:00
◼
►
Most important piece of follow-up that I think we have,
00:18:04
◼
►
which is not in the list, which makes Jon oh so happy
00:18:07
◼
►
when I go off schedule like this,
00:18:09
◼
►
I have heard a lot of feedback about my shower habits,
00:18:12
◼
►
and I have heard one or two pieces of feedback
00:18:16
◼
►
that has disagreed with me and said,
00:18:19
◼
►
I am a barbarian for showering at night.
00:18:21
◼
►
And overwhelming amounts of feedback,
00:18:24
◼
►
probably because we've been hiding in the shadows for all these years, ashamed at our
00:18:29
◼
►
peculiar ways.
00:18:30
◼
►
David Eagleman Dozens of us.
00:18:32
◼
►
Steven McLaughlin Dozens of us, I tell you.
00:18:34
◼
►
An overwhelming amount of feedback, including many people making that same reference, have
00:18:38
◼
►
said it is absolutely the only way to go.
00:18:41
◼
►
You must shower at night.
00:18:42
◼
►
It is disgusting to shower during the morning time.
00:18:47
◼
►
And many people wrote in to say, I want to—I should have kept notes, but I believe it was
00:18:53
◼
►
culturally the way they do it is to shower at night. Forgive me. It was like every country
00:18:58
◼
►
outside of the United States. Like, Howard characterized the feedback was, well, first of all,
00:19:03
◼
►
still the vast majority of the entire United States is against Casey, and they didn't write
00:19:06
◼
►
in because they have a silent majority. That's probably true. But basically every other person
00:19:10
◼
►
wrote in and said, "In insert country that's not the United States, everybody either showers at
00:19:16
◼
►
night or showers twice a day." Nobody wrote in from other countries and said, "Oh, we all shower in
00:19:19
◼
►
in the morning because maybe there's some majority too but lots of people from many
00:19:23
◼
►
different countries in Europe, South America, Asia, everywhere they're all like oh we totally
00:19:27
◼
►
shower at night but United States nothing from them because we all know Casey's crazy
00:19:31
◼
►
and so they just let him be.
00:19:33
◼
►
Michael Scott There also were clear trends where hotter countries
00:19:37
◼
►
would more often do it and also it seemed more prevalent in Asia than other places.
00:19:41
◼
►
Michael Scott Yeah and some people point out the farther
00:19:43
◼
►
you get from Europe the more showers people take.
00:19:48
◼
►
who lived in South America, but yeah. Although I didn't pick this up because I didn't
00:19:53
◼
►
think there was anything to follow up on. I thought we covered all the bases. But since
00:19:56
◼
►
Casey insists on bringing it back up, one point that nobody brought up the last time
00:20:01
◼
►
is like what I think is the obvious reason, which again wasn't stated because we all
00:20:05
◼
►
know Casey's the outlier here, that people shower in the morning gets back to the Dilbert
00:20:10
◼
►
comic strip with after you shower you're the cleanest object in your house, right?
00:20:13
◼
►
So after you shower, that's the cleanest you're going to get and you're just going
00:20:15
◼
►
to get sweatier during the day. If you shower in the morning, your interactions with other
00:20:20
◼
►
people for your day, for your nine to five day, present you at the cleanest because you
00:20:24
◼
►
go from maximal cleanness slowly degrading until five o'clock, right? Those are the best
00:20:28
◼
►
hours you give or the hours you're with, you know, you're at work and with other people.
00:20:32
◼
►
If you shower at night, you've got a good solid eight hours of sweating in your bed
00:20:36
◼
►
before you meet the first person the next day for work. So that's the obvious morning
00:20:39
◼
►
shower thing. And I'm assuming that's why everybody in America showers in the morning.
00:20:42
◼
►
I know, Jon, there's these magical devices. They're called air conditioners.
00:20:47
◼
►
And you can turn them on, and it conditions the air.
00:20:51
◼
►
Because no one sweats at night if the room is the right temperature.
00:20:54
◼
►
Something like that.
00:20:55
◼
►
I have some bad news for you, slash your wife, as you age about night sweats.
00:21:04
◼
►
Oh, Jon, I love having the old man on the show to keep us in check.
00:21:08
◼
►
I love how like this week like everyone else is talking about Apple earnings and we're talking about showers again
00:21:14
◼
►
We'll get there. This is just follow up and Casey added this. I didn't have it in the notes
00:21:19
◼
►
Casey wanted to bring it up. He's digging his own grave. John loves it when I just throw something in at the last second
00:21:24
◼
►
It's his favorite
00:21:26
◼
►
Also, I'm gonna rearrange the show notes aspartame is the artificial sweetener and diet coke not sucralose. I don't personally care
00:21:33
◼
►
Whatever it is. It's freaking delicious. It was it was Marco who got it wrong. I got complaining about our first sweeteners
00:21:38
◼
►
I knew that already, but it doesn't really matter. It's like the concept of an artificial
00:21:44
◼
►
sweetener, I made some reference to it causing cancer, and of course we heard from everybody
00:21:49
◼
►
about how it does or doesn't cause cancer, which chemical does or doesn't.
00:21:53
◼
►
It doesn't, but you were making a joke. I took it as a joke, but other people took it
00:21:56
◼
►
seriously which is worth pointing out.
00:21:57
◼
►
I was making a joke, yes.
00:21:59
◼
►
That's not a real thing, don't be afraid. You should be afraid perhaps of weight gain
00:22:05
◼
►
and some relation to diabetes from drinking diet soda.
00:22:08
◼
►
But there's lots of studies in that of like,
00:22:09
◼
►
how could diet soda cause you to gain weight?
00:22:11
◼
►
It's zero calories and how does it have anything
00:22:13
◼
►
to do with diabetes?
00:22:14
◼
►
But there's lots of studies around that
00:22:15
◼
►
that do indicate there might be something
00:22:17
◼
►
to be concerned about, but cancer not so much.
00:22:19
◼
►
- I mean, in general, training yourself and your palate
00:22:23
◼
►
to not need all of your drinks to be sweetened
00:22:26
◼
►
is always a good thing.
00:22:28
◼
►
Because like, basically, for purposes of like calorie
00:22:32
◼
►
and sugar control, the stupidest thing you could possibly do
00:22:35
◼
►
is drink a lot of calories.
00:22:37
◼
►
Like, it's just, it works so much against you.
00:22:39
◼
►
It is so incredibly bad for you.
00:22:40
◼
►
So like, anything that conditions you
00:22:42
◼
►
to still want all your drinks to be sweet
00:22:44
◼
►
probably works against you in that way,
00:22:47
◼
►
even if one of the things you drink
00:22:49
◼
►
has a zero calorie sweetener.
00:22:51
◼
►
- Yeah, I don't know.
00:22:52
◼
►
It still tastes delicious and I'm good with that.
00:22:54
◼
►
Remco Vandenbosch writes in to say,
00:22:57
◼
►
"Once iOS 10.3 comes out,
00:23:00
◼
►
"do you think it will be worth restoring my iPhone
00:23:02
◼
►
from scratch to get more APFS benefits.
00:23:06
◼
►
And then he or she, they, talk for a little while about the HFS to APFS conversion.
00:23:14
◼
►
Is that good?
00:23:15
◼
►
Is that bad?
00:23:16
◼
►
John, as our resident file system expert, what do you think?
00:23:20
◼
►
So what he's asking about, I think, is if you leave all the data where it is and just
00:23:24
◼
►
write all the metadata to new places, maybe you have files that are fragmented and other
00:23:28
◼
►
stuff like that.
00:23:29
◼
►
if by the way, HFS+ on iOS does the auto-defragmenting stuff that they added to HFS+ years ago, like
00:23:36
◼
►
where it will find files below a certain size that are overly fragmented in its spare time,
00:23:40
◼
►
defragment them and stuff.
00:23:43
◼
►
But so, basically it's asking like, would it be better, ideally speaking, to wipe your
00:23:48
◼
►
whole phone, reformat it as APFS and refill it with your data so that you'd have fewer
00:23:54
◼
►
fragmented files?
00:23:56
◼
►
And in theory, I think you could potentially get a nicer, less fragmented layout, but I
00:24:08
◼
►
don't think it would be anything that you would notice and I think it would actually
00:24:11
◼
►
even be hard to measure.
00:24:13
◼
►
Because Flash is not a spinning disk and Random Access is faster on Flash than it is on spinning
00:24:19
◼
►
disks and fragmentation, even if they don't have the auto-defragment stuff that's part
00:24:25
◼
►
of HFS Plus. It's probably not that big of a concern. So I don't, I think you would get
00:24:32
◼
►
some benefit that maybe if you took great pains to measure it and had a really thrashed
00:24:36
◼
►
phone and compared it with a fresh one you would see, but it's definitely not worth people
00:24:40
◼
►
doing. So just let it convert in place and it'll be fine. So that's my advice.
00:24:47
◼
►
Oh, and there's also a question about whether APFS will be open source, like HFS Plus is
00:24:52
◼
►
is kinda, sorta.
00:24:53
◼
►
And what Apple has said about that is they're going to document the, what did they say,
00:25:02
◼
►
the volume format?
00:25:03
◼
►
Yeah, the volume specification.
00:25:05
◼
►
So they're gonna put a document out for that.
00:25:07
◼
►
But that's not the source code, but that's just like telling you, "Hey, here's how the
00:25:09
◼
►
bits are on disk."
00:25:10
◼
►
And all they say is, "An open source implementation is not available at this time."
00:25:15
◼
►
Doesn't say anything about the future, but who knows?
00:25:17
◼
►
So basically somebody else could theoretically make a third-party tool or driver to at least
00:25:24
◼
►
read APFS volumes and probably also write them, but you probably wouldn't want to rely
00:25:30
◼
►
Kind of like the whole Mac on Windows and NTFS on Mac kind of things, right?
00:25:33
◼
►
Yeah, and you can see the HFS Plus code, which was very helpful for all my OS X reviews.
00:25:39
◼
►
It's all in the Darwin source repository.
00:25:42
◼
►
But APFS, I'm not sure there's a big benefit to them open sourcing it because it's not
00:25:46
◼
►
like, unlike Swift, I don't think they want APFS to take over the world. Instead, I think
00:25:49
◼
►
they want it to be a custom tailored operating system just for their devices that they're
00:25:53
◼
►
free to change in any way they want, and I bet they will. And I don't know if anybody
00:25:58
◼
►
else has the exact needs that Apple has. Like, if you look at the features of APFS, they
00:26:02
◼
►
are excluding the ones that are, you know, fancy new features. All the other features,
00:26:08
◼
►
like having like per file encryption keys and foregoing a lot of these ZFS data integrity
00:26:13
◼
►
features and stuff are so tailored to Apple's specific needs because it needs that encryption
00:26:17
◼
►
stuff for what it already does on iOS outside the file system now and it can't have the
00:26:21
◼
►
heavyweight stuff because it has to run on a watch and like I don't know if anyone else
00:26:25
◼
►
has those exact needs so it's not really a general purpose PC or server file system.
00:26:30
◼
►
It is a specific purpose Apple file system as its name awkwardly implies.
00:26:37
◼
►
We're sponsored this week by Audible with an unmatched selection of audio books, original
00:26:41
◼
►
audio shows, news, comedy, and more.
00:26:43
◼
►
Get a free 30 day trial at audible.com/atp.
00:26:48
◼
►
If you wanna listen to it, Audible has it.
00:26:50
◼
►
You can listen to audiobooks from virtually every genre,
00:26:52
◼
►
anytime, anywhere, on phones, tablets, computers,
00:26:57
◼
►
even most Kindles and iPods.
00:26:59
◼
►
Audiobooks are great for flights, long road trips,
00:27:02
◼
►
or even your daily commute, 'cause you might think,
00:27:04
◼
►
"I don't have time to read books.
00:27:05
◼
►
"Audiobooks seem really long, how am I gonna do that?"
00:27:07
◼
►
But you'd be surprised how many audiobooks
00:27:10
◼
►
you can read each year, even if you only listen to and from work every day.
00:27:15
◼
►
And audiobooks bring books to life, many of them are read by the authors themselves, which
00:27:19
◼
►
adds an extra dimension to the text.
00:27:21
◼
►
And you can take risks and try new authors and genres without regret because Audible
00:27:25
◼
►
offers their great listen guarantee.
00:27:27
◼
►
If you start an audiobook and you end up not liking it, you can trade it for another one
00:27:32
◼
►
See and listen to all this for yourself.
00:27:34
◼
►
When you begin your free 30 day trial, you get your first audiobook for free and there's
00:27:38
◼
►
no stress or obligation because you can cancel your membership at any time.
00:27:43
◼
►
So with audiobooks and spoken word audio products you will find what you're looking for with
00:27:48
◼
►
Get a free 30 day trial today by signing up at audible.com/ATP.
00:27:53
◼
►
That's audible.com/ATP for a free 30 day trial.
00:27:58
◼
►
Thanks to Audible for sponsoring our show.
00:28:03
◼
►
So just, was it yesterday as we record?
00:28:06
◼
►
Apple announced their first quarter earnings, if I get this right.
00:28:11
◼
►
I believe that's right.
00:28:13
◼
►
So things are going well, as it turns out.
00:28:17
◼
►
We'll link to a summary by Jason Snell at Six Colors.
00:28:22
◼
►
And as long as you don't like the iPad, things are mostly okay.
00:28:29
◼
►
I don't know.
00:28:30
◼
►
I don't really have a lot to add on this.
00:28:31
◼
►
I've been really busy so I haven't dug into this deeply.
00:28:34
◼
►
Marco, any thoughts on this?
00:28:36
◼
►
- I mean, I think it's probably best
00:28:38
◼
►
that we leave most of the discussion of this
00:28:40
◼
►
to other podcasts with people who do this kind of like
00:28:43
◼
►
businessy type of reporting more often.
00:28:45
◼
►
But for the most part, it is useful to just see
00:28:50
◼
►
general trends of how things are going for Apple,
00:28:53
◼
►
even if we aren't directly investing in it ourselves
00:28:56
◼
►
or care about the stock price.
00:28:58
◼
►
And I used to have Apple stock a couple years ago at least,
00:29:02
◼
►
if not more, but I have since stopped buying
00:29:06
◼
►
and selling any individual stocks
00:29:07
◼
►
and I sold off all the ones I had.
00:29:09
◼
►
And now I just invest through like mutual funds
00:29:11
◼
►
and things like that that might have it,
00:29:12
◼
►
but I'm not directly investing,
00:29:14
◼
►
so that's a disclosure there.
00:29:15
◼
►
And honestly I think, just friend to friend here,
00:29:18
◼
►
this is not investment advice, whatever, whatever.
00:29:20
◼
►
However, I think investing in individual stocks
00:29:22
◼
►
with a substantial portion of your money is a fool's game.
00:29:25
◼
►
Anyway, I think looking at it as general trends for Apple
00:29:30
◼
►
and as Apple watchers and Apple fans,
00:29:32
◼
►
it is useful to see these kind of numbers
00:29:35
◼
►
are what Tim Cook is graded on by the board
00:29:38
◼
►
and by investors.
00:29:39
◼
►
And so optimizing for these numbers
00:29:42
◼
►
is a large part of Cook's goals.
00:29:45
◼
►
Whether he has other goals for product quality
00:29:50
◼
►
and new initiatives and things like that,
00:29:52
◼
►
That's all vague and unknowable as to the balance there.
00:29:56
◼
►
However, we do know for sure that it is very important
00:29:59
◼
►
that Tim Cook keeps these numbers looking healthy
00:30:01
◼
►
for the board and for investors.
00:30:03
◼
►
And that does drive product decisions on some level.
00:30:06
◼
►
Again, whether it's a high priority in his mind,
00:30:09
◼
►
we can't know, that's up to him.
00:30:11
◼
►
But it is useful to pay attention to what's going on here,
00:30:15
◼
►
to see trends in what's working for Apple
00:30:19
◼
►
and what's not working for Apple
00:30:21
◼
►
and where they need growth, and that can help inform
00:30:26
◼
►
our predictions and our opinions
00:30:28
◼
►
and our interpretations of what Apple does.
00:30:31
◼
►
So in these earnings, the iPhone's doing great.
00:30:35
◼
►
It seems like it has kind of recovered
00:30:37
◼
►
from the weird boost and then slight dip
00:30:40
◼
►
that it had with the seemingly related
00:30:44
◼
►
to the massive success of the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus.
00:30:47
◼
►
It seems like it's kind of back on a regular track now
00:30:49
◼
►
of steady growth, so that's good for the iPhone.
00:30:52
◼
►
The iPhone seems like it's fine, so that's good for it.
00:30:56
◼
►
The Mac division is probably the least interesting.
00:30:59
◼
►
It's up a little bit, but it's within normal realm,
00:31:02
◼
►
so Mac seems like steady, healthy,
00:31:04
◼
►
not setting the road on fire, and that's to be expected
00:31:07
◼
►
after a year of having very few Mac releases.
00:31:09
◼
►
Then in this quarter is when the new MacBook Pros
00:31:12
◼
►
became available, so that helped boost those for sure.
00:31:14
◼
►
You can see that in the graphs,
00:31:15
◼
►
and things like average selling price and everything.
00:31:18
◼
►
You can see average selling price for the Mac
00:31:20
◼
►
took a big hike upwards.
00:31:22
◼
►
That's not a coincidence in the quarter
00:31:24
◼
►
in which they release a whole bunch
00:31:25
◼
►
of more expensive laptops that were significantly
00:31:28
◼
►
more expensive than what they replaced.
00:31:30
◼
►
That is probably one of the reasons why
00:31:32
◼
►
to make that boost up a little bit.
00:31:34
◼
►
Services are doing really well.
00:31:37
◼
►
Their services revenue is up by a good amount.
00:31:40
◼
►
That's interesting 'cause like,
00:31:41
◼
►
it seems like that is a major part of their future growth
00:31:47
◼
►
that they're gonna want to boost up.
00:31:48
◼
►
So that might include things like, you know,
00:31:51
◼
►
maybe we're not gonna see a whole bunch
00:31:53
◼
►
of cheaper iCloud storage this coming fall
00:31:56
◼
►
or summer or whatever else.
00:31:57
◼
►
Maybe we are gonna see more ways
00:31:59
◼
►
that we can give Apple money every month,
00:32:00
◼
►
more services, more premium tiers, things like that.
00:32:04
◼
►
This plays into things like what Apple Music is doing
00:32:06
◼
►
and their possible video efforts that they're hinting at
00:32:09
◼
►
or saying very little about, things like that.
00:32:12
◼
►
So expect to see Apple, because services
00:32:14
◼
►
is a line that's going up and is now a decent number,
00:32:17
◼
►
expect to see Apple putting more into services
00:32:21
◼
►
and trying to make more from us from services.
00:32:25
◼
►
So, you know, Tim Cook is really good at this.
00:32:26
◼
►
He's really good at taking an existing market
00:32:29
◼
►
that's doing pretty well and turning the screws
00:32:31
◼
►
so that they make more from each person.
00:32:33
◼
►
That's why the iPhones now have two sizes
00:32:35
◼
►
and one of them costs 100 bucks more than the other one
00:32:37
◼
►
and all the base storage has sucked for so long
00:32:40
◼
►
because Tim Cook is really good
00:32:41
◼
►
at pushing those average selling prices up, up, up
00:32:44
◼
►
to try to make more money from each new person.
00:32:46
◼
►
That's why things like iPad cases are so much more expensive
00:32:50
◼
►
than they were in the other two parts and all this stuff.
00:32:52
◼
►
You have the $100 battery backpack for the iPhone now
00:32:55
◼
►
and all these different things.
00:32:56
◼
►
This is why, this is not an accident.
00:33:00
◼
►
And this is definitely why the new MacBook Pros
00:33:02
◼
►
cost so much more than the old ones.
00:33:04
◼
►
Anyway, so expect to see tightening of the screws
00:33:07
◼
►
and boosts in the services area.
00:33:09
◼
►
So we're probably gonna see again,
00:33:11
◼
►
more ways we can spend money on Apple every month
00:33:14
◼
►
coming this fall or summer, whatever else.
00:33:16
◼
►
And then the other thing is the iPad.
00:33:19
◼
►
And the iPad is down again,
00:33:23
◼
►
and not by a small amount either.
00:33:25
◼
►
It's still going significantly down.
00:33:28
◼
►
It's kinda hard to explain.
00:33:31
◼
►
Everyone has their own theories.
00:33:33
◼
►
Everyone has, you know, some people say
00:33:35
◼
►
Apple is not telling the right story, whatever that means.
00:33:38
◼
►
I honestly don't really get that argument, to be fair.
00:33:42
◼
►
Some people say that iPads just last so long,
00:33:46
◼
►
and therefore people don't replace them very often.
00:33:50
◼
►
Some people think that the iPad is a flop in some way,
00:33:54
◼
►
and that nobody likes tablets anymore.
00:33:56
◼
►
I think the truth is probably a combination
00:33:59
◼
►
of all of these things.
00:34:00
◼
►
And I guess we're probably gonna talk more about that
00:34:03
◼
►
for the rest of the show,
00:34:04
◼
►
so I will move on from that for now.
00:34:06
◼
►
And then the watch is kind of buried somewhere in other,
00:34:10
◼
►
And we don't have any numbers about the watch,
00:34:12
◼
►
except Tim Cook says it was the best quarter ever
00:34:14
◼
►
for the watch, so good.
00:34:16
◼
►
On a Bezos chart, that is now the highest bar
00:34:20
◼
►
on an axis that has no label.
00:34:22
◼
►
So good for the Apple Watch.
00:34:24
◼
►
Their quote, other revenue that the Apple Watch
00:34:27
◼
►
is buried in didn't take a huge jump,
00:34:30
◼
►
so it doesn't seem like it's moving the needle much
00:34:32
◼
►
on revenue for the company, but oh well.
00:34:34
◼
►
We are an analyst, maybe I'm missing something there.
00:34:36
◼
►
But you know, it's probably doing fine.
00:34:38
◼
►
What do you guys think?
00:34:40
◼
►
So the services thing, I saw some doom and gloom about like,
00:34:42
◼
►
oh, look there, services are growing,
00:34:44
◼
►
therefore Apple's not gonna lower prices on iCloud storage.
00:34:46
◼
►
I don't make that connection at all.
00:34:48
◼
►
Like services is all about getting more people to pay Apple
00:34:50
◼
►
on a recurring basis for something, anything.
00:34:53
◼
►
One way to do that is to lower the price,
00:34:55
◼
►
because if you can lower the price by half
00:34:57
◼
►
but get more than double the number of people
00:34:58
◼
►
to sign up for it, then it works out.
00:35:00
◼
►
And there's a lot of things buried in services.
00:35:03
◼
►
It's not just, you know, when you say services,
00:35:04
◼
►
a lot of people think you just mean iCloud
00:35:06
◼
►
or like the app store is in there,
00:35:07
◼
►
which is one of the reasons everything is going up.
00:35:09
◼
►
And Apple Music, which has been backfilling for the iTunes Music store downloads that
00:35:17
◼
►
sort of disappeared many years ago and now Apple's finally getting to streaming.
00:35:20
◼
►
And the idea that Apple has all these customers, surely there's some way Apple can monetize
00:35:25
◼
►
them by making them pay some small amount for each one of these little things.
00:35:31
◼
►
And trying to—it's kind of like the original video content they're doing.
00:35:34
◼
►
By attaching the original video content to Apple Music, they're basically just trying
00:35:38
◼
►
to get more people to sign up for Apple Music. Why? Because I think once they get you on
00:35:41
◼
►
the Apple Music thing, you're just used to having all the music available to you, you'll
00:35:44
◼
►
just keep paying this month after month. And I think to entice more people to like, you
00:35:50
◼
►
know, how many people pay for iCloud storage, whatever the percentage is now, if it's not
00:35:54
◼
►
really, really high, like in a 90%, Apple must be thinking, we can get more people to
00:35:58
◼
►
pay for iCloud storage. Let me look at what the numbers are. Actually, we've been overcharging
00:36:02
◼
►
by a ridiculous amount, as everybody knows when compared to other cloud vendors. Why
00:36:06
◼
►
don't we just bump that or lower the price or both and then we'll get more people on
00:36:10
◼
►
board. And by the way, let's attach some original video content to iCloud storage.
00:36:14
◼
►
And you know, like that, the things they're willing to do to get to entice people to sign
00:36:19
◼
►
up for in a Roderick on the Line parlance, another eel are boundless and seemingly don't
00:36:25
◼
►
have to be that well related because the idea of offering exclusive, like essentially television
00:36:31
◼
►
video content to get people to sign up for Apple music doesn't make any sense except
00:36:36
◼
►
that, hey, if there's something you want and the only way to get it is to do this, you'll
00:36:40
◼
►
do it. Like it's the whole reason people sign up for Amazon Prime so they can watch Ben
00:36:44
◼
►
in the High Castle. What does Man in the High Castle have to do with getting free shipping
00:36:47
◼
►
from Amazon.com for rolls of toilet paper? Nothing. But you'll do what it takes to get
00:36:52
◼
►
the content, right? And this is a weird deal, but people have shown that it works. If you
00:36:57
◼
►
give them something they want, they will sign up for something they don't want just to get
00:37:00
◼
►
the thing they want. Hell, I did it. I signed up for YouTube Red just so I could, or I signed
00:37:03
◼
►
for Google Play Music just so I could get YouTube read on a family plan. I don't use
00:37:07
◼
►
Google Play Music. It's sitting on my phone, but I never actually launch it. It's just
00:37:11
◼
►
so I don't have to see ads on YouTube. It's a tried and true technique, which is not ideal
00:37:15
◼
►
from a consumer's perspective, but people love recurring revenue.
00:37:20
◼
►
Yeah, I mean, I'm slightly surprised—well, I guess I'll stick with it. I'm slightly
00:37:27
◼
►
surprised that things are going overall as well as they are. I mean, obviously on this show we've
00:37:35
◼
►
talked a lot about how we feel like things are not the way they once were, and I think the three
00:37:42
◼
►
of us have varying degrees of how dire everything may be, but I mean this was their best quarter
00:37:49
◼
►
ever. I mean, I'm looking at the very first chart on Jason Snell's post, and the most recent quarter
00:37:57
◼
►
was 78.4 billion and the nearest one was the prior holiday quarter or first quarter I guess
00:38:05
◼
►
which is over the holidays which was 75.9 billion. So I mean that's what two and a half billion
00:38:11
◼
►
dollars difference something like that I mean that's a big difference and things are
00:38:14
◼
►
clear. But percentage wise like look at the slopes on this graph like Apple's growth is still slowed
00:38:18
◼
►
especially if you look at the year over year change in revenue like the reason this is a big
00:38:21
◼
►
deal is because they're coming out of three consecutive negative year over year revenue
00:38:25
◼
►
growth quarters. It's like, "Hey, we're back in the black. We're back positive. We made
00:38:29
◼
►
more money in this quarter this year than we did last year." But you can kind of see
00:38:33
◼
►
if you look at those, if you look at like especially the big holiday quarters, 46, 54,
00:38:37
◼
►
57, the slope of that line versus 74, 75, 78, right?
00:38:40
◼
►
Yeah, that's true. Growth is still slowing at Apple, right? And
00:38:45
◼
►
that's something they have to deal with. But I mean, I think this is in line with everything
00:38:48
◼
►
that we said on the show. We've just been disproportionately focused on our dissatisfaction
00:38:52
◼
►
with the Mac, but when we all were asked to pick what is your favorite Apple product this
00:38:56
◼
►
year, didn't we all pick the iPhone 7?
00:39:01
◼
►
Although now I would say AirPods, but at the time when like...
00:39:04
◼
►
Or maybe you did say AirPods, I don't know, but I think Marco and I at the very least
00:39:07
◼
►
with the iPhone 7.
00:39:08
◼
►
iPhone 7 is a great phone and it doesn't surprise me that it sold well.
00:39:12
◼
►
You know, headphone jack, whatever, it is a good phone.
00:39:15
◼
►
It is a tried and true thing.
00:39:16
◼
►
It's their third attempt at the same form factor.
00:39:18
◼
►
It has better battery life.
00:39:20
◼
►
They worked out all these shoes they could possibly work out.
00:39:23
◼
►
The weird home button and the waterproofing and the whole--
00:39:26
◼
►
like everything comes-- it is a good phone.
00:39:28
◼
►
And I've always said that they're doing very well
00:39:31
◼
►
in the phone space.
00:39:32
◼
►
And because if you look at the giant Pac-Man chart
00:39:34
◼
►
and you see the little Pac-Man-shaped wedge that
00:39:36
◼
►
is the iPhone eating the rest of Apple's products,
00:39:39
◼
►
if the phone does well, Apple does well.
00:39:42
◼
►
And that totally dwarfs any--
00:39:43
◼
►
whatever, iPad, some sort of problems there.
00:39:46
◼
►
That's lost in the noise.
00:39:47
◼
►
Service revenue keeps going up.
00:39:49
◼
►
and the Mac continues doing what it does.
00:39:51
◼
►
And the little hike in the graph,
00:39:52
◼
►
like Mac ASP is going up
00:39:54
◼
►
because they cranked up the price of their Macs.
00:39:56
◼
►
It's like, it's the old Mac,
00:39:57
◼
►
for the past few years it's been like,
00:40:00
◼
►
produce pent up demand by not releasing any new computers,
00:40:03
◼
►
and then whatever the hell you release, people will buy,
00:40:05
◼
►
and if what you release is 500 bucks more
00:40:08
◼
►
than it used to be, your ASPs will go up.
00:40:10
◼
►
So it's not, I don't think that's a healthy situation,
00:40:12
◼
►
but that's what happened.
00:40:13
◼
►
- Yeah, yeah.
00:40:15
◼
►
I don't know, like Marco said,
00:40:16
◼
►
I don't know how much more analysis
00:40:17
◼
►
we should really be doing on this,
00:40:18
◼
►
But I'm sad about the iPad.
00:40:20
◼
►
It's funny, I don't know if we've talked about this
00:40:23
◼
►
on the show, I don't think so,
00:40:25
◼
►
but I've been flirting with the idea
00:40:28
◼
►
of getting a MacBook adorable
00:40:32
◼
►
whenever the presumably pending refresh happens,
00:40:35
◼
►
although with the way Apple is these days,
00:40:37
◼
►
I guess I should never assume a refresh is coming.
00:40:39
◼
►
But I don't know, I really love my iPad Mini,
00:40:44
◼
►
and I have the most modern one,
00:40:47
◼
►
which was brand new or nearly brand new,
00:40:50
◼
►
not this past Christmas, but the Christmas prior.
00:40:52
◼
►
I really love my iPad mini.
00:40:55
◼
►
I really like that form factor.
00:40:56
◼
►
I know a lot of people don't, that's fine.
00:40:59
◼
►
But I can't help personally,
00:41:03
◼
►
but feel like anytime I wanna do anything,
00:41:06
◼
►
but like look at Twitter,
00:41:07
◼
►
and I don't wanna get into like the consumption
00:41:09
◼
►
versus creation debate,
00:41:10
◼
►
but anytime I wanna do anything other than like glance
00:41:12
◼
►
at Twitter or RSS or something like that,
00:41:14
◼
►
I feel like I'm fighting the device.
00:41:16
◼
►
I feel like I'm fighting iOS.
00:41:18
◼
►
And so I've really been debating, you know,
00:41:21
◼
►
maybe a MacBook Adorable would be a better fix
00:41:25
◼
►
for this problem, because it would also be very portable.
00:41:29
◼
►
Not as portable, but very portable.
00:41:31
◼
►
And it would do everything a Mac could do.
00:41:36
◼
►
Maybe not as fast as other Macs,
00:41:38
◼
►
but that's why I have a 5K that I'm speaking on right now.
00:41:41
◼
►
And it would probably be a really good compromise.
00:41:45
◼
►
And somebody tweeted, I think earlier today, and I don't recall who it was, but, or somebody
00:41:49
◼
►
had said earlier today anyway, that, you know, if you think about it, the Macs are getting
00:41:54
◼
►
more and more and more portable.
00:41:57
◼
►
And the iPads aren't that different than they were a few years ago.
00:42:04
◼
►
The software's a lot better, multitasking is a lot better, even my iPad mini can do
00:42:07
◼
►
the multitasking.
00:42:10
◼
►
But I feel like the change in portability of the most portable Macs is dramatically
00:42:17
◼
►
better as compared to the change in ability of iOS on an iPad.
00:42:22
◼
►
And so that's led me to wonder, you know, maybe I should just get a MacBook Adorable
00:42:27
◼
►
as a super portable travel machine, because that might fit my needs even better.
00:42:32
◼
►
And so I use this all, and the reason I bring this up is because it's a case study of why
00:42:37
◼
►
maybe the iPad isn't doing that great. And as Marco alluded to, there's probably a billion other reasons.
00:42:42
◼
►
But any immediate thoughts on that before we get too far down the rabbit hole?
00:42:47
◼
►
I don't think a Mac could replace my iPad usage for me, and I think that's probably true of most people.
00:42:52
◼
►
Maybe you're using an iPad because no Mac was portable enough,
00:42:57
◼
►
but for people who are using iPads for iPad type purposes, like, there is no Mac.
00:43:01
◼
►
Even if there was a Mac exactly the same size and weight as my iPad,
00:43:04
◼
►
I still wouldn't use it because I don't want to use a trackpad. I want to touch a screen
00:43:09
◼
►
I don't want to deal with the keyboard like I want an iPad for what for when I do iPad stuff
00:43:13
◼
►
which is you know browsing the web or
00:43:15
◼
►
Reading Twitter or watching video. I want an iPad right so there's no substitute for
00:43:20
◼
►
the Mac for that
00:43:22
◼
►
the iPad sales stuff like
00:43:24
◼
►
You know that we shouldn't just rattle off the reasons that we've talked about all the other things
00:43:29
◼
►
things. Marco talked about them in his post about the iPad. One of the most
00:43:34
◼
►
compelling ones aside from iPads lasting forever is if people just use the iPads
00:43:39
◼
►
to watch video you don't have to spend $800 to watch video on a little square
00:43:43
◼
►
that's a screen, right? That's a loser market. Apple can't stake out the
00:43:47
◼
►
high end of square screens that play video because there is no high end of it.
00:43:51
◼
►
That is doomed to a low end thing. All you need is some basic Wi-Fi
00:43:55
◼
►
a reasonable CPU with some video decoding hardware,
00:43:59
◼
►
and the ability to run the Amazon Prime and Netflix apps.
00:44:03
◼
►
They're Amazon tablets for that,
00:44:04
◼
►
they're Android tablets that you do not need an iPad
00:44:06
◼
►
to watch Netflix, I promise you, right?
00:44:09
◼
►
And so if that's what you're doing with your iPad,
00:44:11
◼
►
I think people like tablets for that purpose,
00:44:13
◼
►
but you don't need an iPad for that.
00:44:15
◼
►
And the other thrust of,
00:44:18
◼
►
what was the title of your article, Marco?
00:44:20
◼
►
- The Future of Computing.
00:44:22
◼
►
- Oh yeah, so we've gone over this on the show before,
00:44:24
◼
►
We've gone over this on the show before and I must remind Marco once again because apparently
00:44:28
◼
►
I wasn't there to remind him before he wrote this post.
00:44:31
◼
►
But every time we discuss that, I take great pains to emphasize the idea that the iPad
00:44:36
◼
►
as a specific product as made by Apple as it exists now may not necessarily be the product
00:44:42
◼
►
that sweeps across the market and becomes the most important thing.
00:44:45
◼
►
But when I specifically talk about the future of a computer with a capital F, capital C,
00:44:49
◼
►
What I'm talking about is post PC computing, which means computing without as many of the
00:44:56
◼
►
concerns that have necessarily come with PCs, which includes dealing with Windows menus,
00:45:01
◼
►
pointers, file systems, like all that stuff.
00:45:04
◼
►
And as compared to iOS, which swept all that stuff off the table and abstracted and hid
00:45:10
◼
►
so much of it.
00:45:11
◼
►
That is the future of computing because people can't handle PCs in general and dealing with
00:45:16
◼
►
file systems and their files and Windows.
00:45:19
◼
►
It's too much, the iOS or smartphone or whatever interface where they take away almost all
00:45:23
◼
►
that complexity and massively simplify it and protect you from yourself, that is the
00:45:27
◼
►
future of computing.
00:45:29
◼
►
Unquestionably, the question is, okay, how does that manifest?
00:45:32
◼
►
Does it manifest by Mac OS slowly removing all that functionality?
00:45:36
◼
►
Does it manifest by Windows becoming this mutant hybrid thing?
00:45:38
◼
►
Does it manifest by Android taking over the world?
00:45:41
◼
►
Or does it manifest by Apple introducing the iPad?
00:45:43
◼
►
It's incumbent upon each one of those products to figure out how they get there.
00:45:47
◼
►
But it's like saying, "Well, the Mac isn't successful, so let's all go back to DOS."
00:45:53
◼
►
Nope, that's not the answer at all.
00:45:56
◼
►
You can see with the future is because we've all lived our entire lives of seeing how badly
00:46:02
◼
►
humans are at dealing with PCs with all the stuff they come with.
00:46:05
◼
►
And then iOS showed us a way to get a computing platform with almost all that stuff gone.
00:46:11
◼
►
And now we're just figuring out, "Yeah, but what about the stuff you can't do?"
00:46:14
◼
►
the iPad thus far has been doing, as Marco points out,
00:46:17
◼
►
not a great job of showing you how you're gonna get
00:46:19
◼
►
that same stuff done without the complications.
00:46:21
◼
►
But it's very clear that without the complications,
00:46:23
◼
►
it is so much more accessible
00:46:24
◼
►
because everybody has smartphones
00:46:26
◼
►
and nobody deals with any of that weird PC crap
00:46:28
◼
►
on their smartphones.
00:46:29
◼
►
Like everything is just so much simpler and easier
00:46:32
◼
►
and easy to use, which is why smartphones
00:46:34
◼
►
have raced across the entire world.
00:46:35
◼
►
And a tablet is just basically a bigger smartphone
00:46:38
◼
►
in terms of how hard it is to use at this point.
00:46:40
◼
►
That has to change if you ever want
00:46:43
◼
►
the capital F, capital C, future of computing
00:46:45
◼
►
to actually marginalize the PC,
00:46:48
◼
►
to push it down to the specific realms
00:46:50
◼
►
where it will have to remain, right?
00:46:52
◼
►
But that hasn't happened yet.
00:46:54
◼
►
Microsoft's trying to do it with Surface Studio,
00:46:56
◼
►
Apple's sort of trying to do it with the iPad Pro,
00:46:58
◼
►
but halfheartedly, is Android doing anything in this space?
00:47:01
◼
►
I don't know.
00:47:02
◼
►
I mean, maybe you can count Chromebooks
00:47:03
◼
►
as an attempt to get away from some of the dangers of PCs,
00:47:08
◼
►
but I don't think they're doing a very good job.
00:47:10
◼
►
But anyway, that's the future of computing.
00:47:13
◼
►
we all believe in and what we should be grading an apple on is like you're blowing it.
00:47:19
◼
►
You are not achieving that.
00:47:20
◼
►
You want to have your cake but you don't want to eat it.
00:47:23
◼
►
That's a terrible one.
00:47:24
◼
►
Anyway, they want to say, "Look, it's the iPad and it's simple like your phone."
00:47:29
◼
►
It's like, "Yes, it is."
00:47:30
◼
►
And you use it to replace your PC.
00:47:31
◼
►
It's like, "Well, can we?"
00:47:35
◼
►
And Apple has to show us how to do that because there are things we need to do and we need
00:47:40
◼
►
to be able to do them and they need to be pleasant, just like web browsing.
00:47:44
◼
►
Previously, we were not able to do web browsing on our phones or it was incredibly unpleasant.
00:47:48
◼
►
And Apple said, "No, actually you can do web browsing on a tablet and on a phone."
00:47:52
◼
►
And I think we would all agree that browsing the web on a tablet is super pleasant.
00:47:56
◼
►
In many, many ways nicer than doing it on a PC, if only because you can be sitting on
00:48:00
◼
►
the couch and leaning back and using your finger and it's more like flipping through
00:48:04
◼
►
Web browsing, you've nailed it, iPad, but as Marco would point out, a million other
00:48:08
◼
►
things like whether it be from editing a podcast or using Photoshop or dealing with complicated
00:48:15
◼
►
projects that span lots of different applications and share data, you know, of the typical PC
00:48:19
◼
►
site stuff, it hasn't yet been demonstrated that we're able to do all those things in
00:48:25
◼
►
the same way. So everyone else is a contender. The Mac is still a contender for the future
00:48:29
◼
►
of computing, provided Apple was willing to remove all the functionality that we know
00:48:33
◼
►
and love about the Mac, which I hope they never do. But that's one way you could try
00:48:37
◼
►
to get there. You could try to get there like Microsoft by weirdly morphing your desktop
00:48:41
◼
►
OS into a hybrid OS that does both things at once. And who knows how we could get there,
00:48:47
◼
►
but iOS is such a stake in the ground to say it's obvious that in the future no one wants
00:48:52
◼
►
to deal with the crap that we deal with on Macs and PCs today. That is not the future
00:48:56
◼
►
of computing. We have to leave that behind. But so far, the iPad has not been a compelling
00:49:03
◼
►
argument for that.
00:49:04
◼
►
And there was one other graph that's not in Jason Snell's page that we're looking at here
00:49:09
◼
►
on sixcolors.com, which we'll put in the show notes that has tons and tons of pretty graphs.
00:49:13
◼
►
One page that I think maybe Horace tweeted or something.
00:49:17
◼
►
It's showing graphs of days of the week, like average days of the week usage time for, what
00:49:25
◼
►
was it, for smartphones and PCs.
00:49:27
◼
►
And the smartphone line is like this little lumpy thing that goes along, right?
00:49:30
◼
►
You don't see any particularly large trends there.
00:49:33
◼
►
And the PC thing goes Monday through Friday, huge dip Saturday and Sunday.
00:49:39
◼
►
And back up from Monday through Friday, huge dip Saturday and Sunday.
00:49:41
◼
►
We're just saying that people don't use PCs on the weekends.
00:49:44
◼
►
And what are they not on the weekends?
00:49:46
◼
►
They're not at work.
00:49:47
◼
►
So maybe they're using PCs at work, or maybe they only consider PC as a work-like thing,
00:49:50
◼
►
but the phones they use all the time.
00:49:52
◼
►
I feel like if the iPad curve was shown, it would look more like the phone curve and less
00:49:57
◼
►
like the PC curve.
00:49:58
◼
►
Because people aren't, for the most part, doing work on their iPad.
00:50:02
◼
►
The iPad curve would just be like,
00:50:03
◼
►
ah, use it the same amount pretty much every day.
00:50:05
◼
►
It wouldn't be like, oh, the weekend's here,
00:50:06
◼
►
I'm not gonna be on my iPad because he used my iPad
00:50:09
◼
►
You'll know that the iPad or any other PC replacement device
00:50:13
◼
►
or post-PC device is finally useful
00:50:15
◼
►
for all the same things PCs are
00:50:16
◼
►
when it starts to get the same curve,
00:50:18
◼
►
because everyone's gotta do some work,
00:50:19
◼
►
and a lot of people do work involving some kind of task
00:50:22
◼
►
with computing.
00:50:24
◼
►
And if they're still doing that
00:50:26
◼
►
on personal computer type devices,
00:50:27
◼
►
I mean, it could be a lagging indicator,
00:50:29
◼
►
so maybe we have to wait a few more years.
00:50:30
◼
►
But right now, think of the number of people you know
00:50:33
◼
►
who every day go to work and just use a tablet of any kind
00:50:37
◼
►
as opposed to a PC.
00:50:38
◼
►
I know way more PC users,
00:50:39
◼
►
maybe it's because all my friends are old,
00:50:41
◼
►
but we'll keep an eye on that.
00:50:44
◼
►
- I mean, I think what we're seeing,
00:50:47
◼
►
I think the right way to interpret the iPad
00:50:50
◼
►
and the future of computing and everything else
00:50:53
◼
►
is probably something between the crazy blog post I made
00:50:57
◼
►
and the argument that Jon is making
00:50:59
◼
►
and the argument that Jason Snell made
00:51:01
◼
►
on upgrade this week.
00:51:03
◼
►
You know, the future of computing is not going to be
00:51:06
◼
►
just one of these types of things.
00:51:08
◼
►
It's not gonna be just tablets,
00:51:09
◼
►
and it's not gonna be just computers.
00:51:12
◼
►
My argument is not that the iPad is failing as a thing,
00:51:15
◼
►
or that it's going away, or that it's useless to everybody.
00:51:19
◼
►
My argument is simply that when people say
00:51:21
◼
►
this is the future of computing,
00:51:23
◼
►
what they usually mean by that is going to replace
00:51:25
◼
►
the PC style computer.
00:51:27
◼
►
Again, I mean PCs and Macs in that.
00:51:30
◼
►
I basically mean, for the most part, I mean laptops
00:51:33
◼
►
and other desktops and things that run Windows or Mac OS
00:51:38
◼
►
or Linux even, like PC style OSs.
00:51:41
◼
►
And I think the most likely outcome here is that,
00:51:46
◼
►
as the tablets of all sorts are not going to replace PCs,
00:51:51
◼
►
they are going to do what they've been doing,
00:51:53
◼
►
which is add to them, augment them.
00:51:55
◼
►
There are going to be some people who only primarily like tablets, and there's going
00:51:59
◼
►
to be some people that only primarily like PCs.
00:52:02
◼
►
They're not going to actually replace each other in either direction.
00:52:05
◼
►
Well, the only way that'll happen, I don't think you can do that.
00:52:08
◼
►
I don't think you can have them not replace them unless PCs essentially adopt all the
00:52:15
◼
►
attributes that I was just discussing of iOS-style computing.
00:52:19
◼
►
Like in other words, PCs would have to abandon all the weird-ass crap that regular people
00:52:24
◼
►
don't like and can't handle about PCs.
00:52:26
◼
►
Like, because they can't stay in their current state of like,
00:52:31
◼
►
with all the legacy stuff that PCOSs have to deal with.
00:52:33
◼
►
It's an untenable situation because people can't use them and people can use phones.
00:52:38
◼
►
And so something is going to marginalize current style PCs,
00:52:43
◼
►
whether it's the PCs themselves changing, because it totally could be.
00:52:46
◼
►
Like you could take any of those PC style operating systems you listed and slowly,
00:52:51
◼
►
basically iOS-ify them while leaving enough of the functionality still there, you know,
00:52:56
◼
►
showing through so you can get more stuff done than you can on an iPad, for example.
00:52:59
◼
►
But you just can't leave it there. It's again, it's like going back to DOS, like saying, "Well,
00:53:03
◼
►
I can't do everything on this Mac that I can do on my PC with DOS, therefore it's a dead end and
00:53:08
◼
►
people just keep using DOS forever." They won't. Like, the capabilities of the GUI will eventually
00:53:12
◼
►
expand to do enough of the things, you know. So I don't think there is any situation where the PC
00:53:19
◼
►
as it exists today with all of its legacy concerns does not become marginalized in the
00:53:24
◼
►
future. It's just a question of what will marginalize it. Like not disappear, but marginalized.
00:53:28
◼
►
Like in the same way that, you know, people use in the command line. Still tons of people
00:53:32
◼
►
use in the command line today. I use it every day, but it's marginalized.
00:53:35
◼
►
I'm not entirely sure that your premises are sound here. So premise number one is that
00:53:41
◼
►
you said people can't figure out how to use PCs, but they can use their phones. Do we
00:53:45
◼
►
Do we actually know that?
00:53:46
◼
►
Is that actually a thing?
00:53:47
◼
►
Like are PCs really as hard as we think they are to use
00:53:52
◼
►
and then are phones as easy as we think they are to use?
00:53:54
◼
►
Or is that cap actually smaller than what we might think?
00:53:57
◼
►
- Oh, it's big.
00:53:59
◼
►
Go find someone who has a PC,
00:54:01
◼
►
whether at work or at home even, and just look at it.
00:54:03
◼
►
That's all I ask, just look at it.
00:54:05
◼
►
Watch them use it and see what's on it
00:54:07
◼
►
and see what state it's in
00:54:08
◼
►
and ask them to use it to do something.
00:54:10
◼
►
And yes, people have trouble with phones too.
00:54:12
◼
►
It's a relative thing,
00:54:13
◼
►
one is so much easier than the other.
00:54:15
◼
►
One is not infinitely easy and one is not infinitely hard,
00:54:18
◼
►
and yes, you can learn to use anything,
00:54:20
◼
►
but you have to get rid of those things
00:54:23
◼
►
that people don't like to be concerned about.
00:54:25
◼
►
It's the reason people love the phone so much.
00:54:27
◼
►
They took away so many things
00:54:28
◼
►
that they have to worry about.
00:54:30
◼
►
Maybe less so on Android.
00:54:32
◼
►
- I don't know about this at all, Jon.
00:54:34
◼
►
- I think the bigger reason is that it's always
00:54:35
◼
►
in your pocket and it has these awesome cameras
00:54:38
◼
►
and sensors and always data connections.
00:54:41
◼
►
There's a lot about phones to love
00:54:42
◼
►
that don't have to do with the usability paradigm of their software.
00:54:46
◼
►
But people can do things with their phones that PCs could also do, but they never did
00:54:51
◼
►
with the PCs because it was too much of a pain. Even just down to like installing software.
00:54:55
◼
►
So easy on phones, hard enough on personal computers and so fraught on personal computers
00:55:00
◼
►
because of lack of the App Store and viruses and all sorts of stuff like that, that people
00:55:03
◼
►
didn't attempt it or accidentally attempted it by accidentally clicking on things that
00:55:07
◼
►
install browser toolbars and crap like that. All the crap of the PC world makes it so people,
00:55:12
◼
►
Even if they were equally easy to use,
00:55:14
◼
►
it would say, well, this feels safer.
00:55:15
◼
►
Suddenly, I'm installing software.
00:55:17
◼
►
Oh, there's a cool new app, I'm gonna try it.
00:55:19
◼
►
No one, regular people were not discussing cool new apps
00:55:22
◼
►
for their PCs, only nerds were.
00:55:24
◼
►
That alone is such a huge--
00:55:26
◼
►
- I think you're describing Android.
00:55:28
◼
►
- Maybe less so on Android, but even Android,
00:55:31
◼
►
I feel like the disposability of phone is like,
00:55:33
◼
►
well, if my phone is hosed, I'll like,
00:55:35
◼
►
the fact that it normalized backups into thing,
00:55:37
◼
►
and the thing that nobody, essentially nobody did
00:55:39
◼
►
to their personal computers, but because of cloud backups
00:55:41
◼
►
with phone stuff built in, more people have a shot
00:55:44
◼
►
at having some kind of backup of something somewhere
00:55:48
◼
►
on their phones, whereas PCs, it was like forget it.
00:55:51
◼
►
Backups might as well not exist as far
00:55:52
◼
►
as the non-nerd world is concerned.
00:55:54
◼
►
- Well, and so I think there's this continuum here.
00:55:58
◼
►
You know, like you mentioned, like, you know,
00:55:59
◼
►
command line all the way up to like, GUI and phone.
00:56:02
◼
►
When you're in the more command line side of it,
00:56:04
◼
►
the more difficult side of it, getting like productivity
00:56:09
◼
►
and power user type tasks done is possibly easier
00:56:14
◼
►
than on the easy devices, but casual use is harder.
00:56:18
◼
►
And then on the devices like phones and iPads,
00:56:21
◼
►
getting productivity and power use type things done
00:56:24
◼
►
is actually harder to figure out,
00:56:26
◼
►
but casual use is easier.
00:56:28
◼
►
Somewhere in the middle there is the PC style OS.
00:56:31
◼
►
PC style OSs are, they kind of try to be everything.
00:56:36
◼
►
I think we are generally much better at using them
00:56:39
◼
►
for productivity type things and power user type things
00:56:41
◼
►
and that's partially because most productivity
00:56:44
◼
►
and power user people have grown up with computers
00:56:46
◼
►
to some degree or have a certain number of years using them
00:56:49
◼
►
so there's already a lot of what people are used to,
00:56:51
◼
►
people are already trained on how to use computers
00:56:53
◼
►
for the most part.
00:56:54
◼
►
But also part of that is just the design of them
00:56:56
◼
►
is with these kind of file centric paradigms
00:57:00
◼
►
of the desktops and everything and all this drag and drop,
00:57:02
◼
►
multiple windows kind of stuff,
00:57:04
◼
►
it's just a lot easier to do a lot of tasks,
00:57:07
◼
►
a lot of productivity and power user-type tasks
00:57:09
◼
►
on a PC-style OS.
00:57:11
◼
►
That's not to say that iPads and stuff
00:57:13
◼
►
can't get some of those features,
00:57:16
◼
►
but also you can't say that PCs can't get
00:57:21
◼
►
some of the better ease of use and security features
00:57:23
◼
►
that iPads and phones have.
00:57:25
◼
►
- Well, that's all I'm saying.
00:57:27
◼
►
If you do do that to the PC-style operating system,
00:57:30
◼
►
if you start hiding the file system
00:57:32
◼
►
on PC-style operating systems, it's the same argument.
00:57:35
◼
►
It's just like, it's the question of venue.
00:57:37
◼
►
Where is that going to happen?
00:57:38
◼
►
It's going to happen because people don't like the old way
00:57:40
◼
►
and they like the new way better.
00:57:43
◼
►
I'm pretty sure that sales curve
00:57:44
◼
►
is showing you something else.
00:57:45
◼
►
- Yes, they're proving it by what they wanna buy.
00:57:49
◼
►
I mean, so here's the thing, with the complexity of tasks,
00:57:53
◼
►
it's about marginalizing the users.
00:57:54
◼
►
It's about chasing them farther into the corner.
00:57:56
◼
►
So people who use the command line
00:57:59
◼
►
and who do sophisticated things for their computers
00:58:01
◼
►
will still need PCs, but all those people
00:58:03
◼
►
who just do email, word processing, calendaring,
00:58:06
◼
►
web browsing, they don't need PCs now.
00:58:09
◼
►
They have them because basically it's the only way
00:58:12
◼
►
to get Outlook and to be able to see PDFs
00:58:14
◼
►
and to do all the other stuff.
00:58:15
◼
►
But increasingly, if your company uses Google Docs
00:58:19
◼
►
and Slack and so on, there's no reason
00:58:22
◼
►
those people need a full-fledged PC.
00:58:25
◼
►
Not because they're not doing command line stuff,
00:58:27
◼
►
but they're not even doing anything complicated enough
00:58:29
◼
►
to require them to use the non-command line
00:58:33
◼
►
portions of a GUI.
00:58:34
◼
►
They don't have multiple files that they're assembling
00:58:36
◼
►
into a large project, they're not doing, development is also kind of a command line
00:58:43
◼
►
thing, but it's a matter of slowly making the people who need PCs a smaller and smaller
00:58:49
◼
►
subset of people, in the same way that people who need command lines have become a smaller
00:58:52
◼
►
and smaller subset of people.
00:58:53
◼
►
It stops at some point.
00:58:54
◼
►
It's not as if, if the command line, marginalizing the command line has really stalled out, because
00:58:59
◼
►
so many people do software development or do stuff involving servers and so on, where
00:59:05
◼
►
command line is important and is not going away anytime soon, right? So it's
00:59:08
◼
►
not like you chase command lines away until there's only three people in the
00:59:11
◼
►
world using it, but it shrinks way down from where it was the DOS thing. Like, to
00:59:15
◼
►
do your regular business stuff you don't need a command line. You can get that all
00:59:20
◼
►
done with a GUI, which was an argument at one point. It's like, well, if I want to get
00:59:23
◼
►
real work done I need DOS, but if I want to do this one silly thing like draw a
00:59:25
◼
►
silly digital painting maybe I can use a GUI. Eventually you can do everything
00:59:30
◼
►
from GUI. You can do your fancy business spreadsheets, you can write your word
00:59:32
◼
►
processing things. Email hadn't been invented, but you could do that too. You can do all
00:59:36
◼
►
that stuff from the GUI. It's just a question of marginalizing that stuff. And if that stuff
00:59:41
◼
►
gets marginalized by old-style PC operating system and new-style one that hides all that
00:59:47
◼
►
crap or modes within one, it really depends on the particular company that ends up figuring
00:59:52
◼
►
this out, whether it be Apple with its whole different OS/iPad approach or Microsoft with
00:59:56
◼
►
its hybrid approach or Android with its Phone OS Everywhere/Chrome OS whatever hybrid-esque
01:00:01
◼
►
thing or even just with the web stuff like can you get everything done with the web browser
01:00:04
◼
►
and use a Chromebook for regular people so you have nothing locally and it's just everything
01:00:08
◼
►
is on the web. Maybe you can do that. In that case you definitely don't need a PC style
01:00:12
◼
►
operating system to do that you just need something that can run all the web apps and
01:00:16
◼
►
that's not so far fetched especially if like there's a slack client and stuff like that.
01:00:20
◼
►
So you know I don't I wouldn't focus on one single product I wouldn't even focus on what
01:00:26
◼
►
we call PCs because it's possible for them to be the future of computing as well.
01:00:31
◼
►
Just have to look for where and how the people who really do continue to need a GUI end up
01:00:38
◼
►
Where do they get chased?
01:00:40
◼
►
What corner do they get chased into?
01:00:41
◼
►
And they'll be hanging out there with the command line people because the command line
01:00:43
◼
►
people are not going anywhere and very often they're the same people.
01:00:47
◼
►
And soon eventually they'll be joined by the people who need to use full PC operating systems.
01:00:51
◼
►
and then everyone else will be trying to book rooms in Outlook, futilely, on their future
01:00:59
◼
►
of computing devices. Because that's what they do all day, is send people emails and
01:01:03
◼
►
mess with calendars and waste time in Slack.
01:01:06
◼
►
So I don't disagree with much of what you said. I think we're kind of arguing two different
01:01:12
◼
►
points here. Basically my theory is that the PC style operating system and the iPad style
01:01:22
◼
►
operating system have this kind of common ground between the two that they're both kind
01:01:28
◼
►
of aiming for or should be aiming for to solve their problems. But I'm not sure that either
01:01:35
◼
►
product can get to the other one's common ground. If they actually meet in the middle
01:01:40
◼
►
successfully, I'm not sure that would be a good product
01:01:43
◼
►
for either of them.
01:01:44
◼
►
But I do think-- - They're not gonna meet
01:01:45
◼
►
in the middle from the same company,
01:01:46
◼
►
because the same company would be foolish
01:01:48
◼
►
to make their two products meet in the middle.
01:01:51
◼
►
But they could be like the iPad meets Windows 10
01:01:53
◼
►
in the middle, you know what I mean?
01:01:55
◼
►
- Windows 10 goes tablet-y, and the iPad goes PC,
01:01:59
◼
►
but the Mac would still be hanging out there
01:02:00
◼
►
in full-fledged PC area.
01:02:02
◼
►
- Right, however, I do think though that we are judging this
01:02:06
◼
►
for the most part from what Apple's doing,
01:02:09
◼
►
'cause Microsoft does crazy things,
01:02:10
◼
►
they're kind of on drugs, sometimes they work,
01:02:13
◼
►
sometimes they don't, who knows what they're doing
01:02:14
◼
►
over there, sometimes they're pretty cool.
01:02:16
◼
►
Microsoft is showing that there is still a lot
01:02:20
◼
►
that can maybe be done in PC style OS's,
01:02:23
◼
►
and also there is a possibility of making
01:02:27
◼
►
more productivity focused tablets.
01:02:29
◼
►
Like, Microsoft is doing a bunch of stuff in that area,
01:02:32
◼
►
and it's all wacky, and some of it is cool,
01:02:34
◼
►
most of it is weird, and sometimes it works,
01:02:36
◼
►
sometimes it does it okay.
01:02:37
◼
►
but they actually are moving,
01:02:38
◼
►
and they're actually seeing some progress there,
01:02:40
◼
►
and some success with their server stuff,
01:02:43
◼
►
and various Windows 10 stuff and everything.
01:02:45
◼
►
We make fun of it,
01:02:46
◼
►
but it actually is starting to actually succeed.
01:02:48
◼
►
Anyway, we are looking at Apple for this,
01:02:51
◼
►
because we know Apple, if they put their mind to it,
01:02:54
◼
►
would do a better job at both sides of this.
01:02:57
◼
►
However, I think it's very clear from recent years
01:03:02
◼
►
that Apple's not really stepping on the gas too hard
01:03:05
◼
►
on either side of this.
01:03:07
◼
►
they're devoting their resources elsewhere.
01:03:09
◼
►
They're focusing on things like the iPhone and services
01:03:12
◼
►
and the watch and maybe occasionally the TV
01:03:14
◼
►
and pouring God knows how much effort into this car thing.
01:03:18
◼
►
They're not really stepping on the gas
01:03:22
◼
►
on trying to improve Mac OS,
01:03:23
◼
►
which seems like it's almost in maintenance mode.
01:03:26
◼
►
And iPad OS/iOS seem like in these productivity style
01:03:33
◼
►
or power user style ways, it jumps forward
01:03:38
◼
►
like every two years in some interesting way.
01:03:41
◼
►
Like they have multitasking or split screen
01:03:43
◼
►
or extensions or whatever else.
01:03:44
◼
►
But then that kind of just sits there for a while.
01:03:46
◼
►
They're not really driving quickly
01:03:49
◼
►
towards either of these goals.
01:03:51
◼
►
And it's kind of unclear as to whether they even intend to.
01:03:54
◼
►
So I think it's kind of a bad example.
01:03:57
◼
►
Like we are trying to argue whether these things
01:03:59
◼
►
are possible or whether convergence is possible
01:04:01
◼
►
or which one of these is like quote the right
01:04:03
◼
►
or the inevitable or the future approach.
01:04:05
◼
►
But we're basing that on only what Apple's doing here.
01:04:08
◼
►
And I think that's kind of blinding us
01:04:10
◼
►
to what might be possible.
01:04:12
◼
►
Because if a company was,
01:04:15
◼
►
if a company had these platforms
01:04:16
◼
►
that really cared a lot about these particular things,
01:04:19
◼
►
enough to prioritize them higher than what Apple does,
01:04:22
◼
►
I think we might see more answers more quickly.
01:04:25
◼
►
And I think we might see ideas tried
01:04:27
◼
►
that we wouldn't have considered.
01:04:28
◼
►
And Microsoft is almost doing that.
01:04:30
◼
►
Like, again, they're doing a lot of crazy stuff.
01:04:33
◼
►
They're just not doing it very well most of the time
01:04:34
◼
►
because they're not that great at it.
01:04:36
◼
►
But we are seeing, it is possible if you invest heavily
01:04:41
◼
►
in these areas and you really step on the gas
01:04:43
◼
►
in these areas, it is possible to both have interesting
01:04:47
◼
►
tablets that could be easy to use and also run
01:04:50
◼
►
productivity software pretty well, and it's also possible
01:04:54
◼
►
to do interesting new things with desktops to bring them
01:04:57
◼
►
closer to the tablet world in ways that make
01:05:00
◼
►
the tablet world good.
01:05:01
◼
►
I think it's only a matter of, for Apple specifically,
01:05:05
◼
►
do they care enough about macOS to make major changes
01:05:09
◼
►
to the OS and to the way it works?
01:05:11
◼
►
And we just saw the touch bar and everything,
01:05:13
◼
►
and that's cool, that's not a major change
01:05:15
◼
►
to the interaction model or the application model of the OS.
01:05:19
◼
►
That's a hardware feature that sells new hardware
01:05:21
◼
►
and has some software integration,
01:05:23
◼
►
and it's really cool the way it integrates
01:05:24
◼
►
with the hardware and everything,
01:05:25
◼
►
but that's not fundamentally changing macOS
01:05:27
◼
►
in any meaningful way.
01:05:29
◼
►
So it doesn't-- - Yeah, today.
01:05:31
◼
►
- Well, okay, fair.
01:05:32
◼
►
- It's not, it's additive.
01:05:34
◼
►
I think Mark is right, it's purely additive.
01:05:36
◼
►
It's not taking away any complexity from the Mac,
01:05:38
◼
►
put it that way.
01:05:39
◼
►
Any of the weird stuff on the Mac,
01:05:40
◼
►
like the touch bar doesn't alter that at all.
01:05:42
◼
►
It's just an additive, cool thing, right?
01:05:44
◼
►
But it does not allow you to avoid or otherwise hide
01:05:47
◼
►
or make moot any of the complexity involved
01:05:50
◼
►
in all the things that iOS does better than the Mac.
01:05:52
◼
►
- Exactly, and then on the other side,
01:05:54
◼
►
iOS on the phone, the phone is making great strides,
01:05:58
◼
►
of course, 'cause that's where Apple focuses a lot,
01:05:59
◼
►
because that's good, they should,
01:06:00
◼
►
That's where all the action is, that makes sense.
01:06:03
◼
►
But on the iPad, what we see,
01:06:05
◼
►
we've seen the same pattern from them over and over again,
01:06:08
◼
►
which is they give the iPad a little bit of attention,
01:06:11
◼
►
and then they kinda just let it sit for a year or two,
01:06:13
◼
►
and then they give it a little bit more attention,
01:06:15
◼
►
and let it sit for a year or two.
01:06:16
◼
►
But ultimately, the iPad always is playing
01:06:19
◼
►
second fiddle to the iPhone,
01:06:21
◼
►
and that's true of both Apple's attention
01:06:23
◼
►
and also just the design of the OS.
01:06:26
◼
►
In so many ways, the iPad is just a blown up iPhone,
01:06:30
◼
►
and it seems like that's mostly okay with everybody.
01:06:33
◼
►
And that's fine, there are a lot of advantages
01:06:35
◼
►
to doing it that way, but if you keep doing it that way,
01:06:38
◼
►
I don't see how it ever replaces more PCs meaningfully
01:06:42
◼
►
than what it's replacing now.
01:06:44
◼
►
- You just go to the screen thing,
01:06:45
◼
►
which is the thing I always bring up.
01:06:46
◼
►
People don't use PCs with 12-inch screens on their desk
01:06:49
◼
►
if they can help it.
01:06:51
◼
►
Maybe in laptops, but even then,
01:06:52
◼
►
if they wanna work all day,
01:06:53
◼
►
they'd hook it up to a bigger screen.
01:06:55
◼
►
There's a reason for that.
01:06:56
◼
►
Bigger screen lets you see more stuff,
01:06:58
◼
►
it makes you more productive.
01:06:59
◼
►
Remember back in the 80s, all the studies about how worker productivity increases when
01:07:04
◼
►
you have bigger CRT on your desk and employees would use that as an excuse to demand a massive
01:07:09
◼
►
21-inch CRT, which actually they were massive.
01:07:12
◼
►
They're really huge and heavy and people don't understand exactly how big those things were.
01:07:16
◼
►
But yeah, both the iPad and on the Mac, one of the things that I always attribute to the
01:07:24
◼
►
fictional person of Apple Computer, which is not a person but a collection of people,
01:07:28
◼
►
you know, sort of turning it into a person.
01:07:30
◼
►
Like, Apple is hoping that people don't have to do
01:07:35
◼
►
such complicated things.
01:07:37
◼
►
Can't you do all of your stuff with the iPad apps
01:07:39
◼
►
that we give you?
01:07:40
◼
►
Look how simple they are.
01:07:41
◼
►
You just need these simple functions.
01:07:42
◼
►
You just need to be able to crop your images in this way.
01:07:45
◼
►
No, you don't need to be able to crop
01:07:47
◼
►
with fixed proportions, but also in landscape and portrait.
01:07:50
◼
►
You only need to do that on Mac.
01:07:51
◼
►
On the iPhone, do you really need to do that?
01:07:53
◼
►
When you edit video, do you really need that fine control
01:07:56
◼
►
of how the audio comes in?
01:07:57
◼
►
or can you just drag the slider
01:07:58
◼
►
and we'll pick the curve for you?
01:08:00
◼
►
Like, do you really need that much?
01:08:01
◼
►
All right, how about the precision editor?
01:08:04
◼
►
Is that precise enough?
01:08:05
◼
►
Couldn't you get your work done just with these simple,
01:08:07
◼
►
'cause it's so much easier with the simple,
01:08:08
◼
►
'cause we don't have dialogues
01:08:09
◼
►
with all these numbers in them,
01:08:11
◼
►
we don't have all these palettes that you have to rearrange
01:08:13
◼
►
and there's so many palettes,
01:08:14
◼
►
you can't even have them all on the screen at the same time,
01:08:16
◼
►
you have to pick which ones you want.
01:08:17
◼
►
That's just too much.
01:08:18
◼
►
Look how much simple it is.
01:08:19
◼
►
Guys, right, can't you get your work done?
01:08:20
◼
►
And people say, sometimes, but other times, no.
01:08:26
◼
►
And Apple really doesn't want to give you either.
01:08:28
◼
►
Like for the Mac, it's like,
01:08:29
◼
►
can't you get your work done with one CPU?
01:08:31
◼
►
Most of the time, yeah, but maybe I want,
01:08:34
◼
►
if I had two of them and they both had 12 cores,
01:08:36
◼
►
I could cut this portion of my work down in half
01:08:39
◼
►
and it would make me more productive.
01:08:41
◼
►
But can't you get, isn't this okay?
01:08:43
◼
►
We just buy this one.
01:08:44
◼
►
It's like wishful thinking that the massive simplification
01:08:48
◼
►
that is so good for everybody, doesn't that fit,
01:08:51
◼
►
they seem to be thinking that it'll fit more people into it
01:08:53
◼
►
than it does.
01:08:54
◼
►
And as Mark was always with,
01:08:55
◼
►
because people are just getting shaved off the top.
01:08:57
◼
►
And Apple has shown that they're essentially
01:09:00
◼
►
a captive audience.
01:09:00
◼
►
When you come up with the new laptops,
01:09:01
◼
►
and they're $500 more expensive,
01:09:03
◼
►
and they don't have all the ports and features
01:09:05
◼
►
that you may have wanted, you're gonna buy them anyway.
01:09:07
◼
►
What choice do you have?
01:09:08
◼
►
What are you gonna do?
01:09:10
◼
►
Vote for a third party candidate?
01:09:11
◼
►
Go ahead, throw your vote away.
01:09:14
◼
►
- I finally get the reference.
01:09:16
◼
►
So yeah, that I feel like is where Apple
01:09:21
◼
►
is dropping the ball.
01:09:22
◼
►
And they have been too optimistic, too hopeful
01:09:27
◼
►
that every new thing they make,
01:09:29
◼
►
whether it's like the new version of iMovie
01:09:30
◼
►
where they had to keep the old one around
01:09:32
◼
►
or that really old kerfuffle from many, many years ago,
01:09:35
◼
►
all the way up to the hopes
01:09:39
◼
►
that the iOS versions of their apps,
01:09:41
◼
►
like the iOS versions of photo editing
01:09:43
◼
►
and so on and so forth, would be enough for anybody,
01:09:46
◼
►
so much so that we can even just port them to the Mac
01:09:48
◼
►
and there'd be enough for everybody there too.
01:09:50
◼
►
Like, that is probably a good strategy
01:09:52
◼
►
for trying to simplify this for most people,
01:09:54
◼
►
but it is slowly like torturing the people
01:09:58
◼
►
who really do have demanding needs.
01:10:00
◼
►
And Apple doesn't wanna complexify the software,
01:10:04
◼
►
and Apple doesn't seem to want to make it
01:10:06
◼
►
so that other people can make similarly complicated software
01:10:09
◼
►
if only because they refuse to make an iPad
01:10:10
◼
►
with a bigger screen,
01:10:12
◼
►
'cause you can't fit all of Lightroom's palettes in there.
01:10:14
◼
►
Marco was playing with Lightroom on a 28-inch Surface Studio.
01:10:17
◼
►
That gives you enough room
01:10:18
◼
►
for all of Lightroom's crazy palettes.
01:10:19
◼
►
oh, do you really need all those controls in Lightroom?
01:10:21
◼
►
Can't you get away with just the controls
01:10:22
◼
►
that are in like an okay iOS app?
01:10:24
◼
►
No, you actually can't.
01:10:26
◼
►
For a certain section of the market, you can't.
01:10:28
◼
►
And if Apple doesn't care about them,
01:10:30
◼
►
they are seeding that entire market,
01:10:32
◼
►
both on the PC and on the Mac to other people.
01:10:34
◼
►
Now, to bring Microsoft into it,
01:10:36
◼
►
the thing about Microsoft,
01:10:37
◼
►
they're kind of in the Apple position,
01:10:38
◼
►
and I kind of feel bad for them,
01:10:39
◼
►
but kind of not because, you know, history.
01:10:41
◼
►
Where even if Microsoft has the right product,
01:10:46
◼
►
and even if their product is awesome,
01:10:48
◼
►
Sometimes you're just not in the right market position
01:10:50
◼
►
or you have the wrong reputation.
01:10:52
◼
►
Forces independent of the quality of your product
01:10:55
◼
►
can cause your thing to fail.
01:10:57
◼
►
Look at Apple in the 90s.
01:10:59
◼
►
The best operating system, the best GUI,
01:11:01
◼
►
but it was too late.
01:11:03
◼
►
Microsoft had already won.
01:11:04
◼
►
- Wait, hang on.
01:11:05
◼
►
You're saying OS, like classic OS,
01:11:07
◼
►
was the best operating system in the 90s?
01:11:11
◼
►
- I'll give you the 80s and maybe the first part
01:11:13
◼
►
of the 90s, first few years maybe, but like--
01:11:17
◼
►
- Until Windows 2000.
01:11:19
◼
►
When Windows 2000 was what, '99-ish?
01:11:20
◼
►
- Yeah, '99.
01:11:22
◼
►
- Yeah, trust me.
01:11:25
◼
►
- I mean, certainly on the GUI,
01:11:26
◼
►
and then on the tech things, it's borderline.
01:11:29
◼
►
But anyway, certainly back when it was like
01:11:32
◼
►
the Macintosh versus DOS, and Windows 1.0,
01:11:35
◼
►
but anyway, not to rehash that,
01:11:37
◼
►
sometimes you don't win with the best product, right?
01:11:39
◼
►
And so even if Microsoft gets it right,
01:11:41
◼
►
or gets it righter than Apple,
01:11:44
◼
►
We are at the whim of the companies that exist and their entrenched legacies and their customer
01:11:49
◼
►
bases and where they make them like, it's not a perfect system where once someone comes up with
01:11:54
◼
►
the right answer, it will just, you know, we are stuck with the companies that we have or the new
01:11:59
◼
►
companies that will have to grow to replace them. And that is a ugly, messy, slow process.
01:12:03
◼
►
And so it's really hard to tell if Microsoft actually has the right answer. Like for example,
01:12:07
◼
►
if Apple had done what Microsoft's doing with its OS strategy, they would probably be farther along,
01:12:12
◼
►
because Apple has been in a stronger position
01:12:14
◼
►
because of a little thing called the iPhone,
01:12:16
◼
►
and they could have made a lot of headway there,
01:12:18
◼
►
whereas Microsoft was coming away from behind,
01:12:21
◼
►
having really gotten, you know,
01:12:22
◼
►
really missed the boat on the mobile thing,
01:12:24
◼
►
and having all sorts of problems
01:12:25
◼
►
with their traditional sources of revenue,
01:12:27
◼
►
switching around and trying to change
01:12:29
◼
►
into a services company, like,
01:12:31
◼
►
so it's really hard to tell
01:12:32
◼
►
if they've got the right answer either, but.
01:12:34
◼
►
- I love that Microsoft has the luxury
01:12:36
◼
►
of having a completely failed smartphone effort
01:12:38
◼
►
so they have no legacy in smartphones to worry about.
01:12:41
◼
►
- Well, it's tough like now that iOS and Android
01:12:45
◼
►
have like sort of run the table,
01:12:46
◼
►
what room is there for like Tizen
01:12:49
◼
►
or whatever the hell that thing is called
01:12:50
◼
►
or you know, Windows Phone, right?
01:12:53
◼
►
And it's tough, like it again,
01:12:55
◼
►
even if Microsoft had the best smartphone operating system,
01:12:58
◼
►
technically, aesthetically, user-friendliness or whatever,
01:13:01
◼
►
it's so hard to go up against entrenched interests.
01:13:03
◼
►
But again, we always talk about Apple
01:13:05
◼
►
'cause we know more about it.
01:13:06
◼
►
And I feel like Apple's mistake is actually one of
01:13:10
◼
►
naive optimism or wishful thinking.
01:13:12
◼
►
And they keep plugging away at it.
01:13:14
◼
►
Like they plugged away at you don't need access
01:13:15
◼
►
to the file system for how many years
01:13:17
◼
►
before they did iCloud Drive?
01:13:18
◼
►
Like that's all just wasted time.
01:13:19
◼
►
Like if they were gonna come up with a better answer,
01:13:21
◼
►
that's fine.
01:13:22
◼
►
If you can't come up with a better answer,
01:13:23
◼
►
not really good to wait six years
01:13:25
◼
►
or whatever the hell it was before iCloud Drive comes out.
01:13:28
◼
►
Because by that point, everybody's already using Dropbox
01:13:31
◼
►
or OneDrive or whatever the heck they're using.
01:13:33
◼
►
And you know, iCloud Drive because it's entrenched
01:13:35
◼
►
and it's from the platform vendor, it's gonna do okay.
01:13:38
◼
►
Same thing with Apple Music streaming.
01:13:40
◼
►
Like there is an advantage to being the platform owner, but that's not a strong move to take
01:13:48
◼
►
away the file system and all the functionality it provides while hiding the complexity and
01:13:52
◼
►
then not come up with the suitable replacement and then just bail a couple years later and
01:13:56
◼
►
say, "Okay, here's Dropbox."
01:13:57
◼
►
- This is always the struggle of the iPad and iOS in general also, but I think more
01:14:05
◼
►
for the iPad that in order to enable these power uses,
01:14:09
◼
►
you have to give a little on the simplicity.
01:14:13
◼
►
And there's always the question of whether you're actually
01:14:15
◼
►
just slowly re-implementing the Mac poorly,
01:14:20
◼
►
like the whole Lisp joke.
01:14:22
◼
►
And I don't think that the industry has shown yet
01:14:26
◼
►
that anybody has a really good idea
01:14:28
◼
►
of how to balance those things between power usability
01:14:31
◼
►
and multitasking and file access and things like that,
01:14:35
◼
►
and simplicity of tablet use.
01:14:37
◼
►
I think almost everybody just kind of punts
01:14:39
◼
►
the answer to that question of,
01:14:40
◼
►
oh well, Apple will figure it out, they're smart,
01:14:44
◼
►
or some answer like that that's really not an answer,
01:14:46
◼
►
and it's like, usually Apple doesn't figure things out
01:14:50
◼
►
that we can't figure out a solution to ourselves.
01:14:53
◼
►
'Cause usually Apple's made up for the same kind of people
01:14:55
◼
►
as outside of Apple, and if we can't figure out
01:14:59
◼
►
whether a solution to a problem can even exist,
01:15:02
◼
►
they usually can't either.
01:15:03
◼
►
They usually just punt and say,
01:15:04
◼
►
well, yep, this is a problem, deal with it, and we do.
01:15:07
◼
►
And it's fine.
01:15:09
◼
►
Like when the iPad was first being rumored,
01:15:12
◼
►
we were all like, well, what are they gonna do
01:15:14
◼
►
for text input?
01:15:15
◼
►
Because on-screen keyboards are pretty limited,
01:15:19
◼
►
but you can't have like a physical keyboard on a tablet,
01:15:22
◼
►
that doesn't work either.
01:15:23
◼
►
What are they gonna do?
01:15:25
◼
►
And they punted.
01:15:26
◼
►
They said, all right, well, here's an on-screen keyboard,
01:15:28
◼
►
it's limited but deal with it and we'll sell you
01:15:30
◼
►
this external one that was really bizarre.
01:15:33
◼
►
Sometimes these are just kind of unsolvable design problems
01:15:40
◼
►
that you just have to pick one or the other
01:15:42
◼
►
and neither are great.
01:15:43
◼
►
And I think the balance between the file system access
01:15:47
◼
►
and windowing and multitasking and everything like that
01:15:50
◼
►
and the simplicity of what iOS offers today,
01:15:55
◼
►
I just don't think there is a good balance
01:15:57
◼
►
between those two.
01:15:58
◼
►
There might be ways to do it better
01:16:00
◼
►
than what the Mac and what Windows do,
01:16:04
◼
►
but I still think that if you add that power,
01:16:08
◼
►
you are going to ruin the simplicity,
01:16:09
◼
►
you're going to add complexity.
01:16:11
◼
►
It is just gonna be one of those design punts.
01:16:14
◼
►
And I'm not sure that this is necessarily avoidable,
01:16:19
◼
►
but I do think it might be an unsolvable problem,
01:16:23
◼
►
because tablets have been around for a while now,
01:16:26
◼
►
and we still haven't figured out a solution to this problem.
01:16:28
◼
►
- You know, I keep coming back to,
01:16:31
◼
►
as I'm listening to you guys,
01:16:32
◼
►
I think about what Chris Latner had said
01:16:35
◼
►
a couple episodes ago.
01:16:36
◼
►
God, it's cool that we can say that.
01:16:37
◼
►
Anyway, what he had said about Swift having,
01:16:41
◼
►
and I forget the term he used,
01:16:43
◼
►
maybe one of you remembers, but like--
01:16:44
◼
►
- Progressive disclosure. - Progressive disclosure.
01:16:46
◼
►
Yep, exactly, you knew where I was going with this.
01:16:48
◼
►
Where I think, by and large, Marco,
01:16:50
◼
►
I actually agree with you in that
01:16:52
◼
►
I personally don't see a way to square this circle.
01:16:55
◼
►
And in order to make an iPad more usable for more people in a professional capacity, I
01:17:04
◼
►
think it would have to take away a lot of the things that make the iPad so great today.
01:17:09
◼
►
But progressive disclosure is the thing that's already happening.
01:17:13
◼
►
Like if you don't do a swipe from the right side of the screen toward the center of the
01:17:16
◼
►
screen, would you ever really know about multitasking?
01:17:20
◼
►
If you don't hit that little...
01:17:22
◼
►
I know about it when I accidentally do it playing a game all the time.
01:17:25
◼
►
And that's fair. But you know what I'm driving at. You know what I'm driving at.
01:17:28
◼
►
Actually, I think that's actually relevant. Like, it sounds like a side thing. Like, "Oh, you accidentally do gesture, so what?"
01:17:33
◼
►
That's one of the things that is more troublesome on touch devices and less on PCs,
01:17:39
◼
►
where like progressive disclosure is easier on a desktop operating system because you're less likely to accidentally trigger something because the input is more precise, right?
01:17:48
◼
►
And there's more mechanisms, right? You have an entire keyboard and then you have all the hotkeys and you have a pointing device and two
01:17:53
◼
►
buttons on you can have like alternate clicks and modifier and they're not afraid to put
01:17:58
◼
►
Preferences in like hey if you want to disable dashboard and disable all hot corners
01:18:01
◼
►
You can iOS has you know disabled multitasking gestures and stuff
01:18:04
◼
►
But some things you just can't turn off on iOS because they're always there like actually control center
01:18:08
◼
►
I think you can there's a preference for that too. But
01:18:10
◼
►
Yeah, that type of that type of thing of like how do you do progressive disclosure disclosure?
01:18:14
◼
►
well on a device where you've already used up like every possible Morse code click combination
01:18:19
◼
►
on the home button and 50 million gestures and there's no keyboard.
01:18:23
◼
►
Like, they're kind of already painted themselves into a corner in their ability, in their eagerness
01:18:28
◼
►
to gild the lily of iOS touch interface.
01:18:32
◼
►
It's not leaving a lot of room for them to wedge in the more complicated stuff in a nice
01:18:35
◼
►
progressive disclosure way.
01:18:38
◼
►
And I agree with you.
01:18:39
◼
►
I just can't help but wonder, is there something that I'm not seeing today that would lend
01:18:46
◼
►
itself to having the iPad feel like a more—I'm going to use the word professional, but I
01:18:51
◼
►
can't think of a better word for it—but a more professional device?
01:18:54
◼
►
And I think about, if you had told me during the iOS 6 or 7 days, "Oh, there's going to
01:19:01
◼
►
come a time that you can have this floating window that plays video that you can shimmy
01:19:04
◼
►
around the screen and enlarge and shrink and swipe off to the side to kind of hide it for
01:19:09
◼
►
for a minute, I would have thought you were bonkers.
01:19:11
◼
►
And I would have wondered, how do you activate that?
01:19:13
◼
►
Well, how do you make it go away?
01:19:14
◼
►
What do you do with this thing?
01:19:16
◼
►
And as it turns out, picture-in-picture
01:19:17
◼
►
on the iPad is awesome.
01:19:19
◼
►
And similarly, multitasking is pretty awesome.
01:19:22
◼
►
It's pretty crappy switching between apps
01:19:24
◼
►
in the little multitasking app switcher,
01:19:26
◼
►
but by and large, it's pretty awesome.
01:19:28
◼
►
And I don't know that I would have seen a way to do that
01:19:31
◼
►
prior to having actually seen the way it was implemented.
01:19:34
◼
►
So I do agree with the both of you,
01:19:37
◼
►
but I can't help but wonder,
01:19:39
◼
►
what is it that we are not thinking of
01:19:41
◼
►
that would make something in the spirit
01:19:43
◼
►
of progressive disclosure possible?
01:19:46
◼
►
And I don't know, I have no specifics,
01:19:47
◼
►
but it makes me wonder what's coming.
01:19:50
◼
►
You know, what's coming in June?
01:19:51
◼
►
- You're not thinking of it,
01:19:52
◼
►
but I totally am thinking of it.
01:19:54
◼
►
Like, that's what I was getting at with Apple being wishful
01:19:57
◼
►
in hoping that the simple applications
01:19:59
◼
►
and the limited form factors and interface venues
01:20:02
◼
►
that they have provided on the iPad
01:20:03
◼
►
and increasingly on the Mac
01:20:05
◼
►
will be sufficient for everybody's needs.
01:20:08
◼
►
They are intentionally not doing a bunch of obvious things.
01:20:11
◼
►
For a long time, they intentionally didn't do
01:20:13
◼
►
the obvious thing of giving you a pencil,
01:20:16
◼
►
basically, the Apple Pencil.
01:20:17
◼
►
For a long time, they avoided that,
01:20:18
◼
►
because it's like, that's an additional complication,
01:20:21
◼
►
and most people don't need it.
01:20:23
◼
►
Maybe people can get along without it.
01:20:24
◼
►
And we had to endure many, many years
01:20:27
◼
►
of people selling hot dogs on a stick
01:20:29
◼
►
that you used to draw on your iPad,
01:20:32
◼
►
this big, stubby, artificial finger thing.
01:20:34
◼
►
and it took so long for them to get through their skulls.
01:20:36
◼
►
People wanna draw on these things.
01:20:38
◼
►
They're buying these terrible devices to do it,
01:20:40
◼
►
for God's sake, make a pencil.
01:20:41
◼
►
And they did, finally.
01:20:42
◼
►
There's so many obvious things they can do.
01:20:44
◼
►
They can make a much bigger form factor.
01:20:46
◼
►
If you wanna see, Microsoft's already gone
01:20:48
◼
►
and done a whole product that you can rip off ideas from
01:20:50
◼
►
or get inspired from.
01:20:52
◼
►
You can do more things with multitasking
01:20:54
◼
►
than simply splitting the screen.
01:20:56
◼
►
You can do more things with hotkeys
01:20:58
◼
►
and with the little floating windows.
01:21:00
◼
►
There's tons of obvious things they can do.
01:21:03
◼
►
And the thing that Marco was talking about,
01:21:05
◼
►
something I talk about in the first OS X reviews
01:21:08
◼
►
that I did just after iOS came out,
01:21:10
◼
►
I think it was maybe the very first one
01:21:11
◼
►
after it was clear there was some crossover between them.
01:21:13
◼
►
It was like, is it easier to make the Mac more like iOS
01:21:17
◼
►
or to make iOS more like the Mac?
01:21:19
◼
►
Like, is it easier to simplify Mac OS
01:21:22
◼
►
or bring those capabilities of the Mac to iOS?
01:21:25
◼
►
And I think it said then, and I think now,
01:21:27
◼
►
it is much easier to add the capabilities of the Mac to iOS
01:21:31
◼
►
without messing it up than it is due to the reverse.
01:21:33
◼
►
Because as soon as you start trying to make the Mac
01:21:36
◼
►
to be like iOS, you totally destroy its usefulness
01:21:39
◼
►
for the people who want to use it for the current use cases.
01:21:41
◼
►
And there's no replacement for that.
01:21:43
◼
►
If on the other hand, you take iOS,
01:21:44
◼
►
which is a cleaner slate,
01:21:45
◼
►
and was much cleaner back then than it is now,
01:21:47
◼
►
but a cleaner slate,
01:21:48
◼
►
and try to let people do the more complicated stuff
01:21:52
◼
►
with, like Casey said, progressive disclosures,
01:21:55
◼
►
it is a much easier thing to do.
01:21:57
◼
►
And you get a chance to do it in a different way over there.
01:21:59
◼
►
And while you're doing that,
01:22:00
◼
►
You're not screwing up professionals who presumably can still use your Macs.
01:22:03
◼
►
And if you're doing a good job on iOS, you're also not screwing up people who never use
01:22:06
◼
►
that functionality.
01:22:07
◼
►
And arguably, that's what Apple has been doing by making the iPad Pro, by making the 12-point
01:22:12
◼
►
whatever-inch iPad, by making the pencil, by adding multitasking.
01:22:15
◼
►
But boy, did it take them a long time.
01:22:17
◼
►
And they're still stubborn about, you know, about going all the way.
01:22:22
◼
►
Like I don't know what they're holding out for.
01:22:25
◼
►
I don't know what they're waiting for.
01:22:26
◼
►
I don't know.
01:22:27
◼
►
Maybe they're waiting for people to die and habits to change.
01:22:28
◼
►
I agree with Marco in that the use cases aren't going to change. People would like to do them
01:22:33
◼
►
with less complications, but if they can't do them with less complications, they just want to do them,
01:22:36
◼
►
period. They have to do them because it is part of their job. And if you don't give them a simpler
01:22:41
◼
►
way to do it, they will limp along with the more complicated way until and unless somebody,
01:22:45
◼
►
could be Microsoft, could be anybody else, gives them a way to literally do the same really
01:22:50
◼
►
complicated jobs with less concerns, with less fighting with the machine. And Apple still seems
01:22:57
◼
►
like like like marcus said like give them a little bit does this move the needle is the ipad really
01:23:02
◼
►
a pro device now because we made a slightly bigger one and gave you a pencil it helps it doesn't hurt
01:23:07
◼
►
right but microsoft service studio is like what are you even doing you know what was the uh the
01:23:12
◼
►
meme you're like a little baby in the 28-inch microsoft service studio that's how apple apple
01:23:19
◼
►
should feel but uh am i the impression i get from the personification of apple is they still really
01:23:24
◼
►
I really wish people didn't have to do such complicated things with computers.
01:23:27
◼
►
It's like they're almost put out by people's actual needs.
01:23:32
◼
►
We are sponsored this week by HelloFresh.
01:23:34
◼
►
For $35 off your first week, visit hellofresh.com and enter code ATP when you subscribe.
01:23:39
◼
►
Whether you're a busy professional couple, a large family that runs at a breakneck pace,
01:23:44
◼
►
or someone who simply wants to start cooking more, HelloFresh makes it easier, tastier,
01:23:48
◼
►
and healthier than ever to enjoy the experience of cooking new recipes and eating together
01:23:53
◼
►
From creating the recipes and planning the meals, to grocery shopping, and even delivering
01:23:56
◼
►
all the pre-measured ingredients, HelloFresh delivers right to your door so you can skip
01:24:02
◼
►
HelloFresh currently offers customers a classic box or veggie box, and will soon be launching
01:24:06
◼
►
a family box.
01:24:07
◼
►
You can order three, four, or five different meals per week, depending on how often you
01:24:11
◼
►
want to cook, designed for either two or four people.
01:24:14
◼
►
New recipes are created every week.
01:24:16
◼
►
HelloFresh is the meal kit delivery service that makes cooking fun, easy, and convenient.
01:24:21
◼
►
Every week they give you delicious recipes with step by step instructions designed to
01:24:25
◼
►
take around 30 minutes for everyone from novices to seasoned home cooks short on time.
01:24:30
◼
►
HelloFresh sources the freshest ingredients measured to exact quantities needed so there
01:24:34
◼
►
is no food waste.
01:24:36
◼
►
And they employ a full time registered dietitian on staff who reviews each recipe to ensure
01:24:40
◼
►
it is nutritionally balanced.
01:24:42
◼
►
All of this delivered to your doorstep in a special insulated box with free shipping.
01:24:46
◼
►
I've tried HelloFresh and it is exactly what they say.
01:24:49
◼
►
convenient, it's tasty, it's really fast and easy to make these recipes. Check it
01:24:53
◼
►
out today. Go to hellofresh.com and enter offer code ATP when you subscribe.
01:24:59
◼
►
Once again, hellofresh.com and use code ATP and you will get $35 off your first
01:25:05
◼
►
week of deliveries. Hellofresh.com code ATP for $35 off your first week. Thank
01:25:10
◼
►
you very much to HelloFresh for sponsoring our show. I think you are
01:25:17
◼
►
right that it is easier to advance the iPad probably than to lock down or dumb down the
01:25:26
◼
►
Mac. And that is, you know, your argument about like, you know, leaving Mac people behind,
01:25:30
◼
►
you know, how bad that would be versus bringing along iPad people, that makes a lot of sense.
01:25:34
◼
►
I still think it's going to be hard--we still don't really know if the iPad can do these
01:25:38
◼
►
things well and we still don't see massive efforts from Apple in the software department.
01:25:46
◼
►
we see interesting efforts in the hardware department.
01:25:48
◼
►
Like I mentioned in past shows,
01:25:52
◼
►
the iPad Pro 9.7 is amazing.
01:25:55
◼
►
And the 12.9 is also amazing for people
01:25:57
◼
►
who like even bigger ones.
01:25:58
◼
►
But the 9.7 being the average mainstream iPad,
01:26:02
◼
►
it is amazing hardware.
01:26:04
◼
►
The hardware is better than ever, as is usually the case.
01:26:09
◼
►
The hardware is better than ever.
01:26:11
◼
►
They're doing fine on the hardware.
01:26:13
◼
►
But the software is harder to do
01:26:15
◼
►
because it's a more significant
01:26:17
◼
►
and trickier design challenge
01:26:20
◼
►
and it takes a lot of investment
01:26:22
◼
►
to massively move software around.
01:26:25
◼
►
And there's also, there's two more issues
01:26:27
◼
►
I wanna mention here that are, I think,
01:26:30
◼
►
problems, big problems for the iPad.
01:26:32
◼
►
One is the application ecosystem.
01:26:36
◼
►
Apps that are used by professionals or content creation,
01:26:40
◼
►
or even just a lot of productivity apps,
01:26:42
◼
►
are just really, really mature and stable
01:26:45
◼
►
and usually much more financially healthy on the Mac.
01:26:49
◼
►
And when these applications have tried to move to iPad,
01:26:52
◼
►
they've had pretty mixed success.
01:26:53
◼
►
Some of them work, many of them don't.
01:26:56
◼
►
Many of them work like UI-wise to some degree
01:27:00
◼
►
with a lot of work, but then fail business-wise.
01:27:02
◼
►
They don't sell enough, they don't bring in enough money,
01:27:04
◼
►
and so the companies aren't interested
01:27:06
◼
►
in investing in them further or can't afford
01:27:08
◼
►
to bring over more of their apps or whatever else.
01:27:10
◼
►
That's a huge problem with the App Store
01:27:13
◼
►
and with customer expectations for pricing for these things.
01:27:17
◼
►
And that significantly hurts the iPad.
01:27:20
◼
►
And there's no end in sight to that, really.
01:27:23
◼
►
There's been a couple of things Apple has tried
01:27:26
◼
►
to maybe help move Needle on that a little bit,
01:27:28
◼
►
like, oh, now you can do subscriptions.
01:27:29
◼
►
And that's cool, but it doesn't seem
01:27:31
◼
►
like that's really helping a lot.
01:27:33
◼
►
- They could totally tie up the entire market
01:27:36
◼
►
for pro users who routinely spend their day
01:27:38
◼
►
using a 12.5 inch screen.
01:27:39
◼
►
Like those people are like, "Great, I can now switch my work to the iPad and get it
01:27:44
◼
►
Nobody does that.
01:27:45
◼
►
Nobody sits at a desk doing any complicated app on a 12.5-inch screen.
01:27:48
◼
►
Like the screen size alone, I feel like, is a disqualification.
01:27:51
◼
►
Even if you can get Lightroom, like exactly Lightroom, exactly how it is, like it's, you
01:27:55
◼
►
know, OS X on your iPad, would you choose to use it on a 12.5-inch screen when you could
01:27:59
◼
►
use it on a 5K?
01:28:00
◼
►
I'm like, "Nobody would."
01:28:01
◼
►
It doesn't...
01:28:02
◼
►
No, I disagree.
01:28:04
◼
►
Unless you had to be portable, obviously, like the whole use case is portability.
01:28:06
◼
►
Like, "Oh, I have to use it on the go," or whatever.
01:28:08
◼
►
Like yes, portability is a thing, but portability is only a concern for people who are not currently
01:28:14
◼
►
sitting in a dark room at a desk, plugging away at their computers.
01:28:18
◼
►
Working as Pixar or working on Photoshop all day or even if you're just doing big CAD drawings
01:28:24
◼
►
or just assembling a big presentation.
01:28:27
◼
►
Some people need to be on the go and portability is important, yada, yada, yada.
01:28:31
◼
►
But everything Marco's talking about, all these applications with strong financial foundations
01:28:35
◼
►
and they charge a lot of money and people routinely upgrade and stuff.
01:28:40
◼
►
I feel like the only company that is straddling that line is maybe Microsoft with its Office
01:28:43
◼
►
applications, which I have a feeling is still subsidized by the other businesses, and Omni,
01:28:47
◼
►
which is still selling expensive Mac apps and still making partner apps that also work
01:28:52
◼
►
on iOS for when you want to do the same stuff but portably.
01:28:56
◼
►
But almost everybody else is like, "How are you going to get that guy off the desk when
01:29:00
◼
►
you're only offering them a 12.5-inch screen?"
01:29:03
◼
►
There's so many remaining hardware barriers
01:29:05
◼
►
to success in this area that Apple,
01:29:07
◼
►
just like Margo said, he doesn't see an end in sight
01:29:08
◼
►
'cause he's like, I don't see Apple coming out
01:29:10
◼
►
with a 28-inch iPad, it doesn't even make any sense,
01:29:12
◼
►
it's not an iPad anymore.
01:29:13
◼
►
You're right, it's not, it's something else,
01:29:14
◼
►
but you're never gonna get those people off their desks
01:29:17
◼
►
if you force them to use a portable form factor
01:29:19
◼
►
all the time.
01:29:20
◼
►
- And there's also a lot to be said
01:29:22
◼
►
for using the same application from a 12-inch laptop
01:29:26
◼
►
all the way up to a 30-inch display on a desktop.
01:29:29
◼
►
You can use the same app, you can write one app
01:29:33
◼
►
for the PC operating system, you can have it show up for all those screen sizes, and
01:29:37
◼
►
you can have people both portably and at their desks using this one app. So it's easier to
01:29:42
◼
►
develop that app, it's easier to sell it, people who only have to buy one copy of it.
01:29:47
◼
►
Like, that's a huge advantage.
01:29:49
◼
►
Steven: That's true, but I think you guys are overemphasizing your own needs and not
01:29:56
◼
►
considering the needs of other kinds of users. And there is a distinct advantage to being
01:30:02
◼
►
a single machine person, and that machine could be a 13-inch iPad.
01:30:07
◼
►
There is a distinct advantage to never having to rearrange your windows every time you plug
01:30:12
◼
►
in an external.
01:30:14
◼
►
There's a distinct advantage to having a simpler experience.
01:30:19
◼
►
Just because CAD doesn't work on a 12-inch screen, which I bet it could, but it certainly
01:30:24
◼
►
wouldn't be as easy as a 40-inch screen, just because CAD doesn't doesn't mean everything
01:30:30
◼
►
A lot of people value having one machine that they can carry anywhere.
01:30:34
◼
►
I mean, look at me.
01:30:36
◼
►
I, generally speaking, for most of my life have had a single laptop that was my everything
01:30:44
◼
►
And yes, there were compromises for sure, but I preferred having one machine that always
01:30:50
◼
►
had all of my stuff.
01:30:54
◼
►
Because that was better to me, and that was a trade-off I was willing to make.
01:30:58
◼
►
And just because a CAD operator or designer or what have you doesn't necessarily want
01:31:03
◼
►
to make that trade, that doesn't mean that everyone doesn't want to make that trade.
01:31:08
◼
►
And I mean, look at all the people that have MacBook Airs that may or may not plug them
01:31:12
◼
►
into external monitors all the time.
01:31:14
◼
►
Like those are small displays, they aren't even a retina.
01:31:16
◼
►
They may or may not be dry.
01:31:18
◼
►
They may or may not be dry too, you never know.
01:31:21
◼
►
Keep your liquids away from your computer's kids.
01:31:23
◼
►
So I'm not trying to say that you're wrong, John or Marco, but I think that there is a spectrum here that you're not really giving credit.
01:31:34
◼
►
Marco's context was specifically about pro applications that are expensive, that have a foundation on the Mac, that sell to people who use them for work.
01:31:43
◼
►
And those are the people who you can't pry away from their desks with a 12.5 inch screen.
01:31:48
◼
►
Obviously, there's tons of people who are, again, like I said, they're just messing around
01:31:52
◼
►
with Outlook and sending emails and doing web browsing and writing stuff up and talking
01:31:56
◼
►
with other people in chat applications.
01:31:57
◼
►
By all means, it's just a question of whether you want a laptop or a hardware keyboard,
01:32:01
◼
►
all sorts of stuff like that.
01:32:02
◼
►
Even within the realm of your single machine being an iPad with a 2TB flash drive in it,
01:32:07
◼
►
you can sit down at your desk and connect it up to a massive 28-inch touchscreen and
01:32:10
◼
►
have Server Studio when you're sitting and when you pick it up on an iPad.
01:32:13
◼
►
That gets back to what Marco was saying, the ability to sell one app that scales to different
01:32:17
◼
►
screen sizes like you can if you buy Lightroom on a PC and you have a 5k iMac or a 5k external
01:32:23
◼
►
screen assuming your Wi-Fi router isn't nearby.
01:32:25
◼
►
And you connect it to your laptop, right?
01:32:30
◼
►
But again, that is an experience that the iPad does not offer at all.
01:32:34
◼
►
You've got a 12.5 inch screen and that's what you're stuck with whether you're at a desk
01:32:38
◼
►
You can't sell one version of your application that you can use on all those different screens.
01:32:42
◼
►
No matter how you want to do it, whether you want to do single machine, multiple machine
01:32:44
◼
►
or whatever, the iPad does not address that at all
01:32:47
◼
►
for hardware reasons.
01:32:48
◼
►
And that's all we're saying.
01:32:51
◼
►
Specifically talking about this high-end people,
01:32:53
◼
►
you will never dislodge them until the AR/VR realm comes
01:32:58
◼
►
and things are being projected
01:32:58
◼
►
under their retinas or something,
01:32:59
◼
►
and then we don't care how big screens are,
01:33:01
◼
►
and this is all a moot point.
01:33:02
◼
►
But for now, anyway, the hardware limitations
01:33:06
◼
►
of the iPad and the software and the application ecosystems
01:33:10
◼
►
that Apple has chosen for itself
01:33:12
◼
►
are necessarily limiting that.
01:33:13
◼
►
Microsoft has made different choices, but they have so many other challenges that are
01:33:17
◼
►
unrelated to the quality or potential of their products.
01:33:20
◼
►
So we're still just sitting here patiently waiting for Apple to make its next progression
01:33:25
◼
►
of the iPad, but it just seems like Apple needs to be dragged kicking and screaming
01:33:29
◼
►
into the future.
01:33:31
◼
►
And in the meantime, they've been chopping out the legs from underneath the Mac and hoping
01:33:34
◼
►
people can get all their work done in even simpler situations on the Mac, and if they
01:33:38
◼
►
can't, have fun dealing with a third-party monitor.
01:33:41
◼
►
- Well, and then the other problem,
01:33:43
◼
►
so I mentioned the applications issue,
01:33:46
◼
►
which is what got us on this big tangent,
01:33:48
◼
►
but the other problem, Casey,
01:33:49
◼
►
is what we were just talking about.
01:33:51
◼
►
It is really nice to have one machine for lots of reasons.
01:33:55
◼
►
Lots of people have one machine for price concerns alone.
01:33:59
◼
►
That's a huge concern,
01:34:00
◼
►
because a decent spec'd iPad is not cheap.
01:34:04
◼
►
Like, if you buy an iPad that's any good,
01:34:07
◼
►
you're lucky to be out of there for less than 600 bucks,
01:34:09
◼
►
And that's without any accessories.
01:34:10
◼
►
If you actually want like a keyboard or a cover
01:34:12
◼
►
or anything, it's so easy to spend like eight, $900
01:34:16
◼
►
and just to get what you consider like a mid-range iPad
01:34:19
◼
►
with a couple of accessories that kind of are required
01:34:23
◼
►
to make it very useful to you.
01:34:25
◼
►
A lot of people just cannot justify 500 to $1,000
01:34:30
◼
►
on this in-between device when they already have a phone
01:34:34
◼
►
which covers most of their ultra mobile
01:34:36
◼
►
and ultra simple needs and they already might have
01:34:39
◼
►
a computer, a laptop.
01:34:40
◼
►
And so people who want only one device,
01:34:45
◼
►
that one device so often,
01:34:47
◼
►
I'm not even gonna say most of the time,
01:34:51
◼
►
I'm not even gonna say sometimes,
01:34:52
◼
►
but that one device often can't be an iPad
01:34:56
◼
►
because that one, I mean, assuming the phone
01:34:58
◼
►
is always gonna be there, 'cause that doesn't even count,
01:35:00
◼
►
I'm talking one device between iPad or computer.
01:35:03
◼
►
So often that can't be an iPad because of things like,
01:35:06
◼
►
we were just complaining about hardware limitations
01:35:08
◼
►
they just don't make it in this size,
01:35:10
◼
►
you can't plug in an external screen or whatever else.
01:35:13
◼
►
There are so many limitations with iPads
01:35:15
◼
►
that if you need to do something outside of
01:35:19
◼
►
what is considered and optimized for by Apple,
01:35:23
◼
►
you hit a brick wall and you just can't.
01:35:26
◼
►
It's just like, well, the answer to that
01:35:27
◼
►
is you just can't do that.
01:35:29
◼
►
Or you hit what appears to be a brick wall
01:35:31
◼
►
and there might be some kind of power user app
01:35:34
◼
►
to work around that, but you might not know that
01:35:36
◼
►
as a typical iPad user, or you might not have that app,
01:35:39
◼
►
or you might not want to spend the money for that app,
01:35:41
◼
►
or whatever else, so there are so many hard brick walls
01:35:45
◼
►
that you hit when trying to do any kind of edge case thing,
01:35:49
◼
►
or even some pretty common things on iPads and iOS.
01:35:53
◼
►
And if your one device is a computer,
01:35:57
◼
►
it might be less fun, or harder, or more complicated to use,
01:36:02
◼
►
but there are far fewer of those brick walls.
01:36:05
◼
►
The computer is like, it's just partly from legacy,
01:36:09
◼
►
partly from architecture, partly from hardware ecosystem.
01:36:12
◼
►
The computer is the everything device.
01:36:15
◼
►
It can do so, so much, especially when combined
01:36:19
◼
►
with a phone, because then the phone covers
01:36:21
◼
►
your like, ultra mobile, your camera,
01:36:23
◼
►
and then the computer covers like everything else.
01:36:25
◼
►
For so many people, if they can only have,
01:36:28
◼
►
or if they only want, or they can only justify paying
01:36:31
◼
►
for one device besides their phone,
01:36:34
◼
►
the idea that it would be a tablet is not high on their list
01:36:39
◼
►
because they need to do something
01:36:42
◼
►
or they want to do something
01:36:43
◼
►
or they prefer the way something is done
01:36:45
◼
►
that can only be done on a computer
01:36:46
◼
►
and that trying to do it on iOS is either impossible
01:36:49
◼
►
or really it just fights you the whole time.
01:36:51
◼
►
And that's what you were saying earlier
01:36:53
◼
►
about wanting to maybe get a small laptop
01:36:55
◼
►
instead of your Retina Pad Mini.
01:36:58
◼
►
Sorry, Steven, again.
01:36:59
◼
►
There are these walls that you hit
01:37:01
◼
►
trying to do things with iOS
01:37:03
◼
►
that while many people can do great work on iOS
01:37:07
◼
►
and love doing it, I think they are a minority.
01:37:11
◼
►
Everyone can always point to power users like Vitici,
01:37:15
◼
►
who use the iPad for everything,
01:37:17
◼
►
and you can point to everyone has a relative
01:37:21
◼
►
or a friend who's a novice at using computers
01:37:24
◼
►
and the iPad is their only computer,
01:37:26
◼
►
but there's a lot of people in between.
01:37:29
◼
►
And for so many of those people in between,
01:37:32
◼
►
a PC style operating system and PC style hardware
01:37:36
◼
►
is the only way they can get their needs solved
01:37:38
◼
►
in one device.
01:37:40
◼
►
- Well, that's true.
01:37:41
◼
►
And again, this could change in the future.
01:37:44
◼
►
But I think changing that would require
01:37:46
◼
►
so many changes and expansions to both iOS and iPad hardware
01:37:51
◼
►
that just seem very unlikely that Apple would ever do.
01:37:56
◼
►
And that's why I think it's fairly unlikely
01:37:59
◼
►
that we're gonna get to that point.
01:38:00
◼
►
I think it's much more likely
01:38:01
◼
►
that we're gonna keep going where we are for a while,
01:38:04
◼
►
which is Apple's strategy is basically
01:38:06
◼
►
we're gonna keep selling you these devices
01:38:09
◼
►
that are kind of in this big Venn diagram
01:38:11
◼
►
where all the circles overlap like a third of the way
01:38:14
◼
►
with other circles, and we just want to,
01:38:17
◼
►
Apple's a hardware company.
01:38:18
◼
►
They wanna sell you more hardware.
01:38:20
◼
►
So Apple is perfectly fine to have the strategy be,
01:38:23
◼
►
oh, for you, you like parts of this device
01:38:25
◼
►
and parts of this device, you should buy both.
01:38:27
◼
►
You know? (laughs)
01:38:29
◼
►
I have a feeling that's gonna be their strategy
01:38:31
◼
►
for a long time, but as long as it is their strategy,
01:38:33
◼
►
the iPad is never going to replace the Mac,
01:38:36
◼
►
and at least it shouldn't.
01:38:38
◼
►
If there's a future for any kind of mainstream
01:38:40
◼
►
and power computing on Apple devices,
01:38:43
◼
►
the iPad better not replace the Mac
01:38:44
◼
►
unless it has significant changes.
01:38:46
◼
►
But again, I don't see, it just seems very unlikely
01:38:50
◼
►
that the Apple that we know today
01:38:53
◼
►
would do the kind of changes to both iPad OS and hardware
01:38:57
◼
►
that would enable it to fully replace the Mac.
01:39:01
◼
►
It must be tough, and imagine how stinky it is to have to worry about charging your computer
01:39:08
◼
►
And, God, imagine how crummy it would be to have to carry a brick that you need to charge
01:39:14
◼
►
it that's big and heavy.
01:39:17
◼
►
For me, I can just charge wherever I have a USB port.
01:39:20
◼
►
Imagine how crummy it would be if any time I wanted to get on the internet, I had to
01:39:25
◼
►
Okay, yes, I have a phone in my pocket, but I can just flip on my little cellular switch
01:39:30
◼
►
and suddenly I have Wi-Fi in the device I'm using.
01:39:33
◼
►
Imagine how crummy it would be to not be able to tear your keyboard off the device
01:39:37
◼
►
because you just really don't need it and you know you're not going to need it for a while.
01:39:40
◼
►
Imagine how crummy it would be to feel like you can't always bring your one device everywhere you're going
01:39:47
◼
►
because it's this big computer and yeah, okay, they're smaller than they used to be
01:39:50
◼
►
and they're certainly more portable than they used to be.
01:39:53
◼
►
But, man, it would stink if I felt like I had to have this big, like, laptop bag.
01:39:59
◼
►
How barbaric is that?
01:40:01
◼
►
What kind of pants are you putting an iPad into, out of curiosity?
01:40:04
◼
►
Actually, I can fit a Mini in several of my jackets.
01:40:07
◼
►
Not my pants, but my jackets.
01:40:08
◼
►
Underscore has got laptops in every pocket of all clothes you wear every day.
01:40:13
◼
►
But imagine how boring it would be to have to use a Mac every day
01:40:17
◼
►
when you can just touch and swipe your way through getting work done.
01:40:22
◼
►
I'm being silly.
01:40:23
◼
►
And I started the show by saying, I don't really know if there's an iPad--
01:40:27
◼
►
if there's a place in my life for an iPad anymore. But I absolutely understand how it would be
01:40:35
◼
►
possible to prefer an iPad for all the reasons I don't like it. And I think that the three of us
01:40:42
◼
►
are too preoccupied with our own needs and our own desires and our own wants. And I think there
01:40:48
◼
►
are plenty of people that would prefer an iPad Pro, be that a 10-inch or a 12-inch or a 9.7 or
01:40:55
◼
►
or what have you, that would prefer for all those things.
01:40:58
◼
►
And Vitici is an example of this, and yes, I acknowledge that he is, like, way on the
01:41:03
◼
►
other side of the spectrum.
01:41:04
◼
►
But I don't think a lot of his desires are that unusual.
01:41:08
◼
►
To have an LTE-equipped device, to have only one device to have to manage—again, like
01:41:14
◼
►
you, Marco, I agree that the phone is just a given—to have something where the software
01:41:19
◼
►
is always the software he has, it always looks the same, regardless of what—you know, it's
01:41:23
◼
►
because the device is always the same size. I feel like there's so many advantages to
01:41:30
◼
►
living an iPad-only life that are disadvantages to me. They're disadvantages to you too. But
01:41:37
◼
►
they are advantages to some people. And I think all three of us are discounting that
01:41:45
◼
►
there's plenty of real work that can be done. Maybe not CAD. Maybe not development. Maybe
01:41:51
◼
►
video editing, maybe not. Maybe podcast editing, maybe not. But there's a lot of
01:41:56
◼
►
real work that can be done on an iPad today and all the rumblings I've heard
01:42:01
◼
►
is that things are gonna get a lot more interesting in the next few months. So
01:42:04
◼
►
imagine what will be possible tomorrow. I don't think any of us are just counting
01:42:09
◼
►
that at all. I think you haven't been listening to us. We've been talking
01:42:11
◼
►
specifically about the high end. We totally concede that the vast
01:42:14
◼
►
majority, we were only talking about the high end. That's all we're talking about.
01:42:17
◼
►
Yeah, but my point is that your high end, when you say high end, it implies, I'm trying
01:42:26
◼
►
to think of how to describe this, I feel like you feel like the high end is the Empire State
01:42:30
◼
►
Building and to me the high end is the Mighty Black Stomp.
01:42:33
◼
►
And that there are people that can, this analogy is falling apart already, but I think that
01:42:41
◼
►
you guys are treating this mythical high end as this unattainable thing.
01:42:44
◼
►
It's not a myth, it's a real thing.
01:42:46
◼
►
"Okay, you're treating this high-end as this thing
01:42:48
◼
►
"that could never be accomplished by a single touch device."
01:42:51
◼
►
I don't think that's the case.
01:42:52
◼
►
- No, I'm not treating that at all.
01:42:53
◼
►
I'm saying the opposite.
01:42:54
◼
►
I'm saying the iPad could totally do all this stuff.
01:42:56
◼
►
Apple has been reluctant to extend it to do so.
01:42:59
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, 'cause like the hardware power is there.
01:43:02
◼
►
The will of people to want to carry an iPad
01:43:06
◼
►
into these things on it is there.
01:43:09
◼
►
It's really just a very strong problem of the iPad OS
01:43:14
◼
►
really not being advanced enough
01:43:18
◼
►
and being too high friction
01:43:20
◼
►
for the way a lot of people want to work
01:43:23
◼
►
and the way some people need to work.
01:43:25
◼
►
- And the app store and upgrades
01:43:27
◼
►
and the hardware flexibility and again,
01:43:31
◼
►
Apple has been making steps in that direction.
01:43:32
◼
►
Remember they weren't making any steps in that direction
01:43:34
◼
►
for a long time and that was frustrating
01:43:35
◼
►
'cause it was static.
01:43:37
◼
►
But they have been making moves
01:43:39
◼
►
and as Marco characterized it, they're sporadic moves
01:43:42
◼
►
and they move a little bit each time
01:43:43
◼
►
and they hang out in between.
01:43:46
◼
►
And if they move faster, it would be more dramatic.
01:43:49
◼
►
But I don't really-- if they have
01:43:51
◼
►
to choose whether to put the resources behind the next iPhone
01:43:53
◼
►
or the next iPad, the iPhone is where you have to do it.
01:43:57
◼
►
Yeah, that's not a choice.
01:43:59
◼
►
So who knows?
01:43:59
◼
►
Maybe they will accelerate or whatever.
01:44:01
◼
►
But I am heartened by any kind of progress,
01:44:04
◼
►
because it's as if they came out with a Mac Pro that
01:44:08
◼
►
was a weird trash can, and they waited a year.
01:44:11
◼
►
And then they let you have two CPUs and one GPU.
01:44:14
◼
►
And they waited a year.
01:44:15
◼
►
And then they upgraded the GPU to be not really old.
01:44:18
◼
►
And they waited a year.
01:44:19
◼
►
That's not great.
01:44:20
◼
►
This sounds amazing.
01:44:21
◼
►
It's better than what we got.
01:44:22
◼
►
It's better than what we got.
01:44:23
◼
►
So on the iPad, where it's like, oh,
01:44:25
◼
►
finally I'll have multitasking.
01:44:27
◼
►
And then wait a year.
01:44:28
◼
►
Oh, here's a pencil too.
01:44:29
◼
►
And then wait a year.
01:44:30
◼
►
This is good.
01:44:31
◼
►
This is-- it's not as good as it could be.
01:44:32
◼
►
But it's better than the high end of the Mac where they're
01:44:35
◼
►
like, nope, that's not a thing anymore.
01:44:37
◼
►
Just buy what we sell.
01:44:40
◼
►
Thanks a lot to our sponsors this week, HelloFresh, Audible, and Away.
01:44:44
◼
►
We will see you next week.
01:44:46
◼
►
Now the show is over, they didn't even mean to begin
01:44:53
◼
►
'Cause it was accidental, oh it was accidental
01:44:58
◼
►
John didn't do any research, Marco and Casey wouldn't let him
01:45:03
◼
►
'Cause it was accidental, oh it was accidental
01:45:09
◼
►
And you can find the show notes at ATP.fm
01:45:14
◼
►
And if you're into Twitter, you can follow them @C-A-S-E-Y-L-I-S-S
01:45:23
◼
►
So that's Kasey List M-A-R-C-O-A-R-M
01:45:27
◼
►
Anti Marco Arment S-I-R-A-C
01:45:32
◼
►
U-S-A-C-R-A-Q-S-A
01:45:35
◼
►
It's accidental (it's accidental)
01:45:38
◼
►
They didn't mean to (accidental, accidental)
01:45:43
◼
►
♪ We've got no tech broadcast in so long ♪
01:45:48
◼
►
- So today, Scoop Gherman has written a post
01:45:53
◼
►
saying that Apple, well, let me just read the headline.
01:45:57
◼
►
"Apple is said to work on Mac chip
01:45:59
◼
►
that would lessen Intel role."
01:46:01
◼
►
And I think that actually has changed.
01:46:02
◼
►
I think it was a different headline earlier,
01:46:04
◼
►
but in any case-
01:46:04
◼
►
- Read the slug for the original headline.
01:46:07
◼
►
- "Apple developing new Mac chip
01:46:08
◼
►
in test of Intel independence,"
01:46:10
◼
►
which is certainly a little more aggressive.
01:46:12
◼
►
is not true and an inaccurate headline, so that's why they changed it, but they never
01:46:15
◼
►
change the slugs because people make terrible CMSs that don't let you change a slug. Or
01:46:18
◼
►
if they do let you, no one ever changes them. Like, do they think people don't see URLs?
01:46:22
◼
►
I know Safari hides them by default, but come on, people.
01:46:25
◼
►
Anyway, so there's a delightful autoplay video that's going on here, which is the most frustrating
01:46:30
◼
►
thing in the entire world. But anyway, the article in short seems to say, "Hey, there's
01:46:36
◼
►
There's this T1 chip that was done to power the touch bar, that's ARM-based.
01:46:42
◼
►
What if for like Power Nap, for example, there's this new chip that apparently has been codenamed
01:46:47
◼
►
T310, because that matters.
01:46:50
◼
►
But anyway, this mythical T310 chip could handle Power Nap and wake up and do those
01:46:56
◼
►
sorts of things and then go back to sleep.
01:46:58
◼
►
And because ARM just sips power, that would be flawless and perfect.
01:47:02
◼
►
So that's the way forward, is we can slowly encroach on Intel's territory by making an
01:47:08
◼
►
ARM chip that's used when convenient, and then use the Intel chip for all the other
01:47:14
◼
►
So it's an interesting premise.
01:47:17
◼
►
It's certainly not something that I had really considered, but I like the idea of it.
01:47:22
◼
►
I don't know if I really buy that it would be flexible enough, short of like virtualization,
01:47:26
◼
►
which would be a terrible idea and ruin most of the power savings, that it would be flexible
01:47:30
◼
►
enough to just do anything on this mythical ARM processor.
01:47:36
◼
►
But maybe like via the extension framework, and I saw somebody else talking about this
01:47:40
◼
►
earlier, the extensions maybe could have an extension that's compiled for ARM and the
01:47:45
◼
►
rest of the app is compiled for Intel.
01:47:47
◼
►
I don't know.
01:47:48
◼
►
But it's certainly a fascinating idea, and every sign that I can see, all of the tea
01:47:53
◼
►
leaves are pointing to Apple at least exploring getting rid of Intel and using their own chips,
01:48:00
◼
►
if it's not anytime soon. So John, what do you think? It's a weird story because like the chip
01:48:05
◼
►
that powers the touch bar like it's it's sense it only makes sense that there will be a successor
01:48:12
◼
►
to that chip that powers the touch bar on the next generation things and maybe it'll be a little
01:48:15
◼
►
better in a bunch of ways like sure granted and whatever that chip's code name is fine and we
01:48:19
◼
►
already know it's a little ARM CPU and running some little mini thing of iOS and you could use
01:48:25
◼
►
it to do smart things when the Intel CPU is asleep, right? Where this story gets fuzzy is like,
01:48:33
◼
►
"All right, so the power nap stuff?" First of all, I'm not sure that stuff your computer does when
01:48:41
◼
►
it's essentially asleep and you're not using it is a really big source of power draw. Like,
01:48:45
◼
►
idle power. People don't even list this anymore in laptop reviews. How long can I leave this laptop
01:48:51
◼
►
asleep before the battery drains.
01:48:53
◼
►
Like that's not a very common use case.
01:48:55
◼
►
Like, oh, I need to be able to leave it at my house
01:48:56
◼
►
for a week in sleep mode and come back
01:48:58
◼
►
and have it have 100% battery.
01:48:59
◼
►
Well, it's not gonna happen.
01:49:00
◼
►
Nobody even tests that and it's not a common use case.
01:49:03
◼
►
- No, it does happen.
01:49:04
◼
►
It's like, now it's like a month
01:49:06
◼
►
'cause what they do is after I think like eight hours
01:49:08
◼
►
or whatever of idle time and I believe you can tweak
01:49:10
◼
►
that timeout with some kind of, you know,
01:49:12
◼
►
NV RAM command, it goes into full hybridate mode.
01:49:15
◼
►
Like hybridate to disk.
01:49:16
◼
►
- So even in full hybridate, batteries drain.
01:49:18
◼
►
That's why you don't bring your Tesla to Fire Island
01:49:19
◼
►
because you're afraid of that.
01:49:20
◼
►
- But that's why I'm pretty sure that the idle time
01:49:23
◼
►
has been about a month since the 2012 Retina MacBook Pro.
01:49:27
◼
►
- Right, but that's not a use case they care about.
01:49:28
◼
►
So putting a lot of investment into making that use case
01:49:31
◼
►
even better, like now it's two months.
01:49:33
◼
►
Like who cares?
01:49:34
◼
►
That's not a selling point, it's not a big thing.
01:49:36
◼
►
And the second, the idea that this thing would be able
01:49:40
◼
►
to do the stuff that happens during Power Nap.
01:49:42
◼
►
Power Nap, the computer's basically asleep,
01:49:46
◼
►
but it wakes up the real live CPU periodically to do stuff
01:49:49
◼
►
in a lower clock, lower power type way.
01:49:52
◼
►
It doesn't turn on the screen
01:49:53
◼
►
and doesn't even turn on the fan
01:49:55
◼
►
in the cases of modern computers with fans, I think, right?
01:49:58
◼
►
But it's still running the real software
01:50:00
◼
►
in a limited capacity.
01:50:02
◼
►
And it has to be running something
01:50:04
◼
►
that has the ability to do IO to the disk,
01:50:07
◼
►
or, you know, to the SSD, essentially,
01:50:08
◼
►
because you can't receive your email
01:50:10
◼
►
or do time machine backups if you can't do IO to the disk.
01:50:13
◼
►
I have a hard time believing
01:50:16
◼
►
that there would be an ARM CPU in there
01:50:19
◼
►
that could not wake up the Intel CPU at all,
01:50:21
◼
►
which is still the main CPU to the system,
01:50:23
◼
►
but wake up and somehow run code for your mail application
01:50:26
◼
►
to fetch mail and do IO to your disk
01:50:28
◼
►
while the Intel CPU is asleep?
01:50:30
◼
►
Even if you were compiling extensions with ARM binaries
01:50:33
◼
►
and shipping them off to the little ARM CPU to run
01:50:36
◼
►
and that little CPU is gonna have access to IO
01:50:39
◼
►
and it's such a weird situation.
01:50:41
◼
►
It's like, what are you even optimizing for?
01:50:43
◼
►
So it makes me look at the story and think,
01:50:45
◼
►
there's totally a successor to this T1.
01:50:47
◼
►
It is better and more capable
01:50:48
◼
►
and we'll do more things like perhaps listening for
01:50:50
◼
►
(indistinct)
01:50:51
◼
►
on my Mac so I can finally use Siri in a sane way.
01:50:54
◼
►
But will it do everything?
01:50:55
◼
►
Will it do all that power nap stuff
01:50:57
◼
►
and let third party applications run arbitrary code
01:50:59
◼
►
in the background without waking the Intel CPU?
01:51:02
◼
►
I mean, it could,
01:51:03
◼
►
I'm not saying this is technically impossible,
01:51:04
◼
►
but it seems like that is not a use case
01:51:06
◼
►
that Apple would be investing money in.
01:51:09
◼
►
Whereas I think they would invest money in,
01:51:11
◼
►
you know, making Siri better
01:51:12
◼
►
or have it only listening, always listening for stuff
01:51:15
◼
►
or have it be able to do more sophisticated things,
01:51:18
◼
►
having to do with the management of the system,
01:51:19
◼
►
but once it starts shading into actual applications,
01:51:23
◼
►
running code, whether they be first party or third party,
01:51:25
◼
►
without waking up the Intel CPU,
01:51:28
◼
►
it just doesn't seem like it's worth the hardware, OS,
01:51:31
◼
►
and software investment to make that work,
01:51:34
◼
►
because the benefit is not something that you would sell
01:51:36
◼
►
and not things that people would notice.
01:51:38
◼
►
- Yeah, I think this is yet another case
01:51:41
◼
►
where a rumor article that has good sourcing
01:51:46
◼
►
gets probably the gist of the facts correct,
01:51:50
◼
►
but the story wrong.
01:51:52
◼
►
It seems like this is not like Apple trying to reduce
01:51:56
◼
►
their dependence on Intel as a chip supplier.
01:51:59
◼
►
It seems much more likely that it's like,
01:52:01
◼
►
well, we are putting this chip in these machines
01:52:04
◼
►
for the touch bar anyway.
01:52:06
◼
►
So we have this whole little embedded ARM computer
01:52:09
◼
►
in these machines that uses almost no power.
01:52:11
◼
►
Like, we're including this hardware anyway,
01:52:14
◼
►
So can we have it do anything else?
01:52:16
◼
►
Can we have it be more useful than what it's doing now
01:52:19
◼
►
while the computer is not needing it for anything else?
01:52:22
◼
►
Because it's convenient,
01:52:23
◼
►
we have all this great stuff in here,
01:52:25
◼
►
let's figure out if it can help us out any other way.
01:52:28
◼
►
I think it's probably gonna,
01:52:30
◼
►
the facts here are plausible,
01:52:31
◼
►
it is probably truly there to do very low power tasks.
01:52:36
◼
►
What those low power tasks include is another story.
01:52:39
◼
►
And I don't think this is at all indicative
01:52:43
◼
►
that Apple is slowly gonna cut Intel out and make ARM Macs.
01:52:48
◼
►
They might be doing that in the future, who knows?
01:52:51
◼
►
But I don't think this is related to that.
01:52:53
◼
►
It seems like a totally separate project or task here
01:52:58
◼
►
because it seems like what they're doing here
01:52:59
◼
►
is more effectively utilizing the resources
01:53:02
◼
►
they already have in these computers
01:53:04
◼
►
and are already building in any way.
01:53:07
◼
►
And it would be such a technical challenge
01:53:10
◼
►
and such a hurdle and so much complexity
01:53:13
◼
►
to have this chip meaningfully take over lots
01:53:15
◼
►
of what the Intel CPU is doing,
01:53:17
◼
►
any kind of major application level thing.
01:53:20
◼
►
I think you mentioned that it would be probably an extension
01:53:25
◼
►
and that would be an ARM extension,
01:53:27
◼
►
if it's accessible to third parties at all,
01:53:30
◼
►
or even just the way Apple's apps implement it.
01:53:32
◼
►
It is probably a little extension kind of thing
01:53:34
◼
►
that is native ARM code that can run here.
01:53:37
◼
►
John, I share your concern about,
01:53:39
◼
►
well, does this have access to the disk somehow?
01:53:41
◼
►
how does that work, how does it interact with--
01:53:46
◼
►
- All the buses and Wi-Fi and network operations,
01:53:49
◼
►
it's like a dual CPU system
01:53:50
◼
►
with two different CPU instruction sets,
01:53:52
◼
►
which again, you could do it,
01:53:53
◼
►
like this is all technically possible,
01:53:55
◼
►
but that's hell of an investment
01:53:56
◼
►
and I just don't see the benefit.
01:53:58
◼
►
- Right, exactly, so that's why I think it's more likely
01:54:01
◼
►
that this is a real story, but that the tasks it's going
01:54:04
◼
►
to do are going to be very, very limited.
01:54:07
◼
►
And it's not a big deal, it doesn't mean anything
01:54:10
◼
►
about Apple's relationship with Intel
01:54:12
◼
►
or the future of possible ARM MacBooks
01:54:15
◼
►
that is all totally separate discussions.
01:54:17
◼
►
And it seems much more likely
01:54:19
◼
►
that this is mostly a non-issue,
01:54:21
◼
►
something that they might mention in a keynote
01:54:23
◼
►
for two seconds that we would immediately forget about.
01:54:26
◼
►
- It could be a headlining feature if they use it right.
01:54:28
◼
►
So one example is you could do
01:54:30
◼
►
a Windows 10-style face recognition thing,
01:54:32
◼
►
not to let you in because that's terrible
01:54:34
◼
►
because people just print out a picture of your face
01:54:35
◼
►
and get access to your computer.
01:54:36
◼
►
But even just something as simple as,
01:54:38
◼
►
hey, it's always listening for you,
01:54:40
◼
►
and there's proximity detectors to see when you're close by,
01:54:43
◼
►
and when you sit down in front of your sleeping computer,
01:54:45
◼
►
it does face recognition with the camera
01:54:47
◼
►
to realize who you are to bring you your login prompt.
01:54:50
◼
►
Like even if it was on a different user,
01:54:52
◼
►
so you don't have to like pick the user or do the thing,
01:54:54
◼
►
like that would be a good use of a fairly capable,
01:54:59
◼
►
low power CPU that has access to some things,
01:55:02
◼
►
has access to the camera,
01:55:02
◼
►
has access to its own proximity detectors,
01:55:04
◼
►
has access to touch ID and the secure enclave,
01:55:06
◼
►
and can do stuff with the touch bar.
01:55:08
◼
►
It doesn't involve, oh hey, I'm taking over Power Nap.
01:55:10
◼
►
Not to mention, the reason it works,
01:55:13
◼
►
and it works even better now,
01:55:14
◼
►
is 'cause you can make these Intel CPUs
01:55:15
◼
►
run in a super underclocked rate,
01:55:17
◼
►
turning off most of the cores.
01:55:19
◼
►
They're pretty efficient.
01:55:20
◼
►
Like a Skylake in super duper low power mode
01:55:23
◼
►
with half of the chip disabled is actually pretty good.
01:55:26
◼
►
You can let, most of the power is gonna be
01:55:28
◼
►
from your Wi-Fi radio trying to do your time machine backup
01:55:32
◼
►
and all your SSD access.
01:55:33
◼
►
The CPU is not the problem there.
01:55:35
◼
►
So either if you're gonna let power nap happen at all, you're not worried. Oh, I can't have this Intel CPU running it
01:55:40
◼
►
It's 600 megahertz with one core enabled doing my thing
01:55:44
◼
►
It's because the SSD and the Wi-Fi are gonna overwhelm that anyway
01:55:47
◼
►
But but anyway back to the little arm chip if the feature I just described like face recognition proximity detection touch ID blah blah
01:55:54
◼
►
That's that's a keynote
01:55:56
◼
►
Keynote demo ball feature right there. And yeah, it's not a big deal technically speaking and they already had the hardware there
01:56:00
◼
►
It's an easy win. It's a cool thing
01:56:02
◼
►
It's something that Microsoft has sort of already done an app can pretend they don't know that and just pretend they invented it and we'll
01:56:07
◼
►
All ooh and ah and just like we like sitting down to use touch ID to unlock our computers
01:56:11
◼
►
We'd like sitting down in a shared environment and having it know that it's us and awake from sleep and show us our password prompt
01:56:16
◼
►
Even if someone else was logged in
01:56:18
◼
►
Is that it think so ship it?