110: And on That Bombshell…
00:00:00
◼
►
I think it's a bad reason for a couple of reasons.
00:00:04
◼
►
Our first bit of follow up, John, it's about pronunciation so you're in charge of it.
00:00:08
◼
►
Well I don't know why that's the case, but I did put this in there.
00:00:11
◼
►
Dan from Twitter wrote us to tell us the correct pronunciation of MKBHD's name.
00:00:17
◼
►
It is apparently Marquez, not Marcus or any other thing that we tried to mumble our way
00:00:22
◼
►
through in the last show.
00:00:23
◼
►
See, I'm annoyed by this because back when we first talked about him and his video when
00:00:28
◼
►
when he got the alleged iPhone 6 screen cover
00:00:31
◼
►
with the possible sapphire.
00:00:33
◼
►
I guessed that it would have been pronounced Marquez,
00:00:36
◼
►
and so I said Marquez,
00:00:38
◼
►
and I heard from a few people saying, "That's wrong."
00:00:40
◼
►
So that's why I didn't try to pronounce it that way again.
00:00:43
◼
►
- We don't know if this is right either.
00:00:45
◼
►
Anyone can type anything into a box on the web,
00:00:47
◼
►
but I believe this person.
00:00:48
◼
►
His typing seemed authentic.
00:00:53
◼
►
- I still would like to have a video of Marquez
00:00:55
◼
►
saying his own name just so I can hear it from him.
00:00:58
◼
►
Yep, that would be good. There probably are a thousand hours of that video, but we don't know because we don't watch his channel.
00:01:03
◼
►
But he always calls himself MKBHD.
00:01:05
◼
►
Wait, that's what he calls himself like in his own videos?
00:01:07
◼
►
Yeah, he says, "Hey guys, this is MKBHD." And then he like so--
00:01:11
◼
►
Yeah, that's the first place I looked for pronunciation assistance.
00:01:14
◼
►
It's like Madonna, but way longer.
00:01:16
◼
►
Real-time follow-up from Underscore, who is my favorite person to have in the chat because he is like our entire
00:01:21
◼
►
research squad in one character, which is Underscore. Anyway,
00:01:26
◼
►
He has found a link to Marquez pronouncing his name and it's a video so I haven't listened to it
00:01:32
◼
►
But he is confirmed that it is indeed Marquez. My name is Marquez Brownlee
00:01:35
◼
►
Skylake no sooner we talked about
00:01:38
◼
►
Skylake maybe come you know
00:01:41
◼
►
Maybe maybe Apple won't even use broad well because sky like is coming so soon broadwell was delayed because they had a lot of trouble
00:01:46
◼
►
With the 14 nanometer process sky like is a new architecture, but on the same process
00:01:50
◼
►
So maybe do this Apple just get right to that and now just before the show I got a link to an article
00:01:57
◼
►
Post some rumors about skylake possibly being delayed now. It's from digitimes
00:02:02
◼
►
So take it with a grain of salt, but supposedly they're delaying it until August
00:02:06
◼
►
And the article that we linked to here from IT world
00:02:11
◼
►
I think tries to say that they're delaying it just to space out their products not for any particular reason like it would be ready
00:02:18
◼
►
But they want to space it out to give room for broadwell to sell
00:02:20
◼
►
I don't know what to think but anyway betting on Intel delaying something is always a safe bet
00:02:26
◼
►
Well, the law of Intel delays and release dates is that every Intel release will be
00:02:32
◼
►
late except for the one that comes right after whatever you buy.
00:02:36
◼
►
Anyway, as a question of marketness, but a follow-up, this is not a definitive thing.
00:02:40
◼
►
It is just a link to a rumor from Digitime, so we'll see how it goes.
00:02:44
◼
►
But I'm thinking that Apple's going to ship Broadmell machines no matter what.
00:02:49
◼
►
Even if Skylake was available for sale now, I think it's too late.
00:02:53
◼
►
already got the Broadmell machines designed, ready, manufacturing, like, they're, I think
00:02:57
◼
►
they're just gonna, you know, know what, they're gonna ship no matter what.
00:03:00
◼
►
Yeah, I think you're right. It, now that, like, you know, having Skylake come so soon
00:03:04
◼
►
after Broadmell was already, like, pretty suspicious, and, and so now, if there's, if
00:03:09
◼
►
there's any hint that it might actually be delayed, that's extremely plausible. I agree,
00:03:14
◼
►
I think we're gonna see Broadmell this summer on the 15th, and that'll be that, and we'll
00:03:18
◼
►
see Skylake next year. And we also heard some interesting information that possibly explains
00:03:24
◼
►
limitations of the new MacBook. So one thing I had complained about initially was that
00:03:30
◼
►
it only has 8 gigs of RAM that's not configurable to anything higher. We heard from a number
00:03:35
◼
►
of people and these are publicly documented on Intel's site and stuff that the Broadwell
00:03:40
◼
►
Core M chipset that is used in the new MacBook to get that low power 5 watt fanless design,
00:03:47
◼
►
the max RAM it supports is eight gigs.
00:03:50
◼
►
So that's it, like there's just,
00:03:53
◼
►
there's no more RAM that the chipset can support.
00:03:55
◼
►
So that's why eight gigs is what it is.
00:03:57
◼
►
- Yeah, I tried to look that up
00:03:58
◼
►
rather than just taking these people's word for it.
00:04:00
◼
►
If you go to Intel's site, it says the limit is 16
00:04:02
◼
►
and you can see machines with 16 gigs
00:04:04
◼
►
with the same processor.
00:04:06
◼
►
What the person who wrote to us under the name K period says
00:04:11
◼
►
is that the limit, yeah, you can put 16 on it,
00:04:13
◼
►
Intel site says 16, but if you want the RAM to be soldered
00:04:17
◼
►
the circuit board, not like a DIMM or anything like that, that the Core RAM only has two
00:04:21
◼
►
channels and it's 4 gigs per channel for RAM that's soldered onto the board and thus the
00:04:26
◼
►
And on Intel's site it did say, you know, maximum RAM, and then it said in parentheses
00:04:30
◼
►
depending on type.
00:04:31
◼
►
I could not dig my way to whatever document gives the more verbose explanation, yeah,
00:04:35
◼
►
depending on type, what does that mean?
00:04:36
◼
►
Like that leads me to believe maybe yeah, if you have DIMMs you can use 16, but if you
00:04:40
◼
►
have soldered to the board you're limited to 8.
00:04:42
◼
►
I'm inclined to believe these people, I just couldn't find the documentation to back it
00:04:45
◼
►
makes sense, you know, like this is the smallest of the small low-powered, you know, chipsets
00:04:50
◼
►
for laptops and Apple definitely is soldering their RAM to a board and we do see machines
00:04:55
◼
►
out there with 16 with the same chip, but maybe they're not soldering it to the board.
00:04:58
◼
►
So it's entirely plausible, makes sense to me.
00:05:01
◼
►
Yeah, and you know, looking at it from Intel's point of view, this is a really low-end chip.
00:05:06
◼
►
I mean, it's going in some really like, you know, sexy laptops that we all want, but the
00:05:11
◼
►
The reality is these are low end parts.
00:05:13
◼
►
These are slow, they're very, very low power.
00:05:16
◼
►
That's why they're slow.
00:05:17
◼
►
They have to be really low power.
00:05:19
◼
►
They're going into these very physically small designs
00:05:21
◼
►
with very few chips.
00:05:23
◼
►
And this leads us very well into our next follow up point
00:05:26
◼
►
on this, which is, John, you've been begging
00:05:29
◼
►
for a long time, months, years,
00:05:33
◼
►
on somebody to give you a good reason
00:05:36
◼
►
why there is only one USB port on this machine.
00:05:39
◼
►
- Let me stop you there because this is old.
00:05:41
◼
►
This is all a follow-up and I don't consider it.
00:05:43
◼
►
You can go continue to explain it,
00:05:44
◼
►
but I've seen this before.
00:05:45
◼
►
And like I said, I gotta see the technical docs.
00:05:48
◼
►
I gotta see the sourcing.
00:05:49
◼
►
Otherwise it's just, you know, anyway, go on.
00:05:52
◼
►
- Well, so we got two possible explanations here.
00:05:56
◼
►
The first one, which I think is a little bit less solid,
00:05:59
◼
►
is from Chris Jones, who says that the PCH,
00:06:04
◼
►
which is what I think that used to be called
00:06:05
◼
►
the Southbridge, the platform controller hub
00:06:08
◼
►
or whatever it's called,
00:06:09
◼
►
that's the chip on the motherboard
00:06:10
◼
►
those that don't know, that controls most of the IO stuff, especially the slower IO
00:06:15
◼
►
stuff. So not like RAM and GPUs, which is all I believe now directly controlled by the
00:06:19
◼
►
CPU and the entire lineup, but now it's like USB stuff basically. And so the PCH integrated
00:06:25
◼
►
into this chipset by Intel provides four USB 3 connections. A typical MacBook uses one
00:06:32
◼
►
USB connection internally for Bluetooth, one for the keyboard and trackpad, and one for
00:06:36
◼
►
with a FaceTime camera, leaving one connection left
00:06:39
◼
►
for the USB Type-C port.
00:06:41
◼
►
And for Apple to add more ports,
00:06:43
◼
►
if they wanted them to be USB 3,
00:06:45
◼
►
would require them to add a separate USB controller,
00:06:48
◼
►
which should be another chip on the board.
00:06:50
◼
►
And so that costs board space, that costs power,
00:06:53
◼
►
that costs money.
00:06:54
◼
►
So all these costs to that,
00:06:56
◼
►
they probably chose not to do it.
00:06:58
◼
►
Now, this might be a little bit unreliable of a reason
00:07:02
◼
►
because, and as Chris points out,
00:07:06
◼
►
the USB 2.0 ports are counted separately.
00:07:09
◼
►
And I checked on my MacBook Pro,
00:07:11
◼
►
which is granted three years old,
00:07:13
◼
►
but I checked on that and the keyboard
00:07:16
◼
►
and Bluetooth controller are plugged
00:07:18
◼
►
into the USB 2.0 bus on mine.
00:07:21
◼
►
- That's what I was gonna get at.
00:07:22
◼
►
I remember back in the day,
00:07:23
◼
►
I think some internal components on PowerBooks then
00:07:26
◼
►
were on the ADB.
00:07:29
◼
►
- They're gonna use the smallest,
00:07:30
◼
►
lowest cost connection possible for the internal component.
00:07:34
◼
►
So why does the track need USB 3 versus USB 2?
00:07:38
◼
►
You know, and same thing for a 480p camera.
00:07:41
◼
►
So that's why, this is kind of like,
00:07:44
◼
►
you have to use connections for these things.
00:07:45
◼
►
You can't, like, it just doesn't make sense to me.
00:07:47
◼
►
Like, why would you use USB 3 connection for the camera?
00:07:54
◼
►
- Yeah, and the keyboard too.
00:07:55
◼
►
I mean, like, yeah, there's not--
00:07:56
◼
►
- Yeah, especially the keyboard.
00:07:57
◼
►
Like, there's not a high bandwidth of device.
00:07:58
◼
►
- Yeah, so this is a good theory.
00:08:01
◼
►
I'm not sure that it applies here though.
00:08:04
◼
►
But the better reason-
00:08:05
◼
►
- I think this is worse, but go on.
00:08:07
◼
►
The better reason as pointed out by K period,
00:08:10
◼
►
is that due to limitations of the integrated Intel GPU
00:08:15
◼
►
in this fanless low power chipset,
00:08:17
◼
►
it is not possible to drive two external displays
00:08:21
◼
►
at very high resolutions along with the internal panel.
00:08:23
◼
►
So anything I believe past 1080p,
00:08:26
◼
►
it's considered a high resolution.
00:08:28
◼
►
It can't drive two externals.
00:08:29
◼
►
It can only do one external at those resolutions
00:08:32
◼
►
plus the built-in panel.
00:08:33
◼
►
And so if there are multiple USB-C ports,
00:08:36
◼
►
and assuming you could plug a display into a USB-C port,
00:08:40
◼
►
then only one of them could reasonably drive a display.
00:08:43
◼
►
And so there would be this weird situation
00:08:45
◼
►
where you'd have these two identical ports,
00:08:47
◼
►
only one of which can drive a high resolution display,
00:08:49
◼
►
but both of which possibly might be able
00:08:51
◼
►
to drive low resolution, it'd be weird.
00:08:53
◼
►
So that I think is a pretty good reason.
00:08:55
◼
►
- I think it's a bad reason for a couple of reasons.
00:08:58
◼
►
One, we already established when we were trying to figure
00:09:00
◼
►
out if it had mirroring, remember, like,
00:09:01
◼
►
can it do mirroring or can it do extended display and I think you looked it up and said oh it says
00:09:05
◼
►
right here on the specs page it has mirroring and also dual display dual meaning two this machine
00:09:11
◼
►
supports two displays that's what the Apple specs say that's what the machine does if you have it
00:09:15
◼
►
with two identical ports you plug a monitor into one then you get a second monitor and you plug
00:09:18
◼
►
into the second one you're like what the hell the second monitor isn't working it only supports two
00:09:21
◼
►
displays it says it right there on the spec page there's no ambiguity would you be like enraged or
00:09:26
◼
►
confused by the fact that you can't support three displays the machine only supports two for years
00:09:30
◼
►
"Laptops only support two displays."
00:09:32
◼
►
It's not like you just keep plugging displays
00:09:33
◼
►
in willy-nilly.
00:09:34
◼
►
It only supports two displays.
00:09:36
◼
►
Having another USB port puts 17 USB ports in there.
00:09:39
◼
►
People are like, "Now I can have 17 displays."
00:09:40
◼
►
No, you gotta go to the text specs page.
00:09:42
◼
►
Say, "How many displays can I drive from this thing?"
00:09:44
◼
►
So that makes no sense to me.
00:09:46
◼
►
Like the people would somehow be confused
00:09:47
◼
►
or angry or disappointed that the machine
00:09:50
◼
►
that clearly says supports dual displays
00:09:52
◼
►
can only support dual displays.
00:09:54
◼
►
- Well, okay, I disagree that that's a valid reason,
00:09:56
◼
►
but I at least, we'll have to agree to disagree on this,
00:10:00
◼
►
which is a phrase I hate.
00:10:01
◼
►
- So what do you think?
00:10:02
◼
►
Like they would say, well, we could put two USB ports
00:10:04
◼
►
in this thing, but we can only support two displays,
00:10:07
◼
►
so we better get rid of that port.
00:10:08
◼
►
Like that makes sense to you?
00:10:09
◼
►
That's the kind of reasoning you would support?
00:10:11
◼
►
- Well, what I see here are a bunch of smaller reasons
00:10:14
◼
►
that potentially if you add all these reasons up
00:10:18
◼
►
might be enough justification.
00:10:19
◼
►
And by the way, and we heard a theory from a few people
00:10:22
◼
►
that I want to address, people saying that Apple
00:10:26
◼
►
is artificially only giving one port,
00:10:28
◼
►
That way they can sell an upgraded model next year
00:10:31
◼
►
or whenever with two ports
00:10:32
◼
►
and people will buy the upgraded model.
00:10:34
◼
►
- What do you mean by upgraded?
00:10:35
◼
►
Like just the next revision of the machine?
00:10:36
◼
►
- Yeah, exactly.
00:10:37
◼
►
- That doesn't make any sense.
00:10:38
◼
►
- Right, exactly.
00:10:39
◼
►
We hear this theory a lot.
00:10:40
◼
►
Whenever there's any limitation,
00:10:41
◼
►
we usually hear from a handful of people like this
00:10:43
◼
►
who are like, well, they're just artificially
00:10:45
◼
►
keeping that down so they can release it next year
00:10:47
◼
►
and have everybody upgrade.
00:10:48
◼
►
And I don't think, I mean, I don't know how Apple works
00:10:52
◼
►
internally with regard to decisions like that, but--
00:10:54
◼
►
- That's not how any business works.
00:10:55
◼
►
So it's like going to a sandwich shop,
00:10:56
◼
►
Let's give them a little bit crappier sandwich today. So tomorrow we can sell them the better one
00:11:00
◼
►
They're not gonna come back and you sell my product doesn't satisfy them. They're not gonna say
00:11:04
◼
►
Well, I now I have to buy the new one next year
00:11:06
◼
►
Like if you get a car and it's not a great car you maybe look at a different car maker next time you're gonna say
00:11:11
◼
►
Damn it. They just did this all by the better Honda next year
00:11:14
◼
►
No, you're just gonna buy a Honda if you get a product you get a product is not satisfactory
00:11:17
◼
►
They're not an intentionally handicapping their products with the goal of we'll get them next time
00:11:23
◼
►
that'll make them buy a new computer sooner.
00:11:25
◼
►
It just doesn't make sense to me.
00:11:26
◼
►
- Exactly, I mean there's so many reasons
00:11:28
◼
►
why products have limitations in one generation,
00:11:31
◼
►
in the next generation they're lifted,
00:11:33
◼
►
or things are faster or better or whatever.
00:11:36
◼
►
And usually it's regards to reasonable,
00:11:38
◼
►
justifiable reasons like availability or costs
00:11:41
◼
►
or things like that, or just not being feasible yet,
00:11:46
◼
►
or having major trade-offs, major downsides.
00:11:49
◼
►
So that's, I don't think any, and by the way,
00:11:52
◼
►
Most people don't buy every generation of a product.
00:11:56
◼
►
And most people don't follow things so closely
00:11:59
◼
►
that they would even know.
00:12:00
◼
►
Most of Apple's customers, if they buy this machine
00:12:02
◼
►
and one comes out next year with two ports--
00:12:05
◼
►
- They're not shopping for a computer then, they don't know.
00:12:06
◼
►
- Right, they won't know until that computer dies
00:12:09
◼
►
or gets too slow to be usable or the battery
00:12:11
◼
►
starts wearing out really badly,
00:12:12
◼
►
and they go in two or three years or more
00:12:15
◼
►
and look at a new computer.
00:12:16
◼
►
That's when they're gonna see what's available then,
00:12:18
◼
►
which might be totally different.
00:12:19
◼
►
- Usually much more, it's not like phones,
00:12:21
◼
►
you're lucky they go every two years but some people feel like all of my
00:12:25
◼
►
contracts over now I have this freedom period and whatever but max people just
00:12:29
◼
►
use them it's you know I don't know what the upper it's like a lot of the max but
00:12:32
◼
►
I think it's way longer than any other thing and certainly not one year I mean
00:12:37
◼
►
even even Marco doesn't buy new max every year no I just said I'm using I'm
00:12:40
◼
►
using a three-year-old MacBook Pro as well the iMac and the Mac Pro is that's
00:12:44
◼
►
true I think that was a special case though before that I let my things last
00:12:47
◼
►
it pretty long because I kept buying Mac pros John is your is your Mac Pro hit a
00:12:51
◼
►
- Have you been in a decade yet or no?
00:12:53
◼
►
- Well, seven years, it's hanging in there.
00:12:55
◼
►
- God, that's a closer answer than I expected, if I'm honest.
00:12:58
◼
►
- The funny thing is, so I took a trip last week to England
00:13:02
◼
►
and I was using my laptop very heavily
00:13:04
◼
►
and every time I used my laptop, I realized,
00:13:07
◼
►
with the exception of the screen retention,
00:13:09
◼
►
which I could get fixed for, I think, like $400,
00:13:12
◼
►
somebody told me it would be about that, I don't know.
00:13:14
◼
►
I'm probably not gonna get it fixed, probably not worth it,
00:13:16
◼
►
but this machine I got was the base model, the 1999 model,
00:13:20
◼
►
the base model that came out three years ago,
00:13:23
◼
►
it was the first Retina 15 inch.
00:13:25
◼
►
And I was looking, just out of curiosity,
00:13:26
◼
►
I was looking like, you know,
00:13:27
◼
►
if I wanted to replace this today,
00:13:30
◼
►
you know, if it broke or if I wanted to replace it
00:13:32
◼
►
this summer with Broadwell, what would I replace it with?
00:13:34
◼
►
What configuration?
00:13:35
◼
►
And looked at the configurations that are available today,
00:13:38
◼
►
and I would get the base model again.
00:13:39
◼
►
It's like, the specs are so good.
00:13:41
◼
►
Now it's 16 gigs of RAM, mine is eight.
00:13:43
◼
►
It's a faster CPU, same disk space,
00:13:46
◼
►
but I don't need a lot of space
00:13:47
◼
►
'cause it's not my primary computer.
00:13:48
◼
►
And so it's no big deal.
00:13:50
◼
►
So like, I think I would, you know,
00:13:53
◼
►
I think if, if Broadwalk comes out this summer,
00:13:56
◼
►
like I said, you know, I have a family member who,
00:13:58
◼
►
who I kind of need to hand this down to pretty soon.
00:14:00
◼
►
So if Broadwalk comes out this summer
00:14:02
◼
►
and it's a reasonable update,
00:14:03
◼
►
I'm gonna buy the base model again, probably.
00:14:05
◼
►
If I didn't have a good reason to upgrade,
00:14:08
◼
►
I would keep using this one for another year or two,
00:14:11
◼
►
at least, I mean, I would guess the,
00:14:13
◼
►
the average duration of a Mac owner, you know,
00:14:17
◼
►
between, between upgrading the computers
00:14:18
◼
►
probably three years or more.
00:14:21
◼
►
- I mean, I've had my work computer for three years.
00:14:24
◼
►
I've had my personal computer for three-ish years.
00:14:27
◼
►
I probably will be getting a new machine,
00:14:31
◼
►
a new machine for myself sometime soon.
00:14:33
◼
►
And I know work is on a three-year cycle.
00:14:35
◼
►
So I might be rocking two different new Macs this year.
00:14:39
◼
►
I don't know, we'll see what happens.
00:14:40
◼
►
But yeah, I mean, a three-year cycle is not unreasonable.
00:14:43
◼
►
And I think most people would actually go
00:14:46
◼
►
on an even longer cycle.
00:14:48
◼
►
And especially for those like myself who have machines that have spinning platters in them,
00:14:54
◼
►
even just an SSD can make a tremendous difference.
00:14:58
◼
►
Our first sponsor is Cards Against Humanity.
00:15:02
◼
►
Now once again they have not given me any script to read and instead they have sent
00:15:05
◼
►
Jon another toaster to review.
00:15:07
◼
►
So Jon, what toaster do you have this week and what are your thoughts on it?
00:15:13
◼
►
This week I have the Hamilton Beach 31230.
00:15:16
◼
►
They have the idea of taking letters out
00:15:19
◼
►
of their model number, which I don't know if it
00:15:20
◼
►
makes it worse or better.
00:15:21
◼
►
I guess probably better.
00:15:22
◼
►
It can't be that much worse than the other ones we've been
00:15:24
◼
►
Yeah, they all have like a name like, you know,
00:15:27
◼
►
set it and forget it, toaster oven, you know,
00:15:29
◼
►
like there's some word that's on the cover.
00:15:31
◼
►
That's not the name of the product.
00:15:32
◼
►
It's the model number.
00:15:33
◼
►
Anyway, this is a big one.
00:15:34
◼
►
This is a very big toaster.
00:15:36
◼
►
The inside is about the same size as my Breville 650XL,
00:15:40
◼
►
which is a pretty big toaster.
00:15:41
◼
►
You can easily fit four slices of bread in it.
00:15:43
◼
►
But the outside of this thing, like, first of all,
00:15:45
◼
►
left and right side and back have curves on them, so it's wider than you think it is.
00:15:49
◼
►
Like you look at it from the front and you think just the brightly colored rectangle
00:15:51
◼
►
side but it has bulges, like big metal bulges. So that adds a couple inches on either side
00:15:56
◼
►
and in the back. And the thing to the right of the toaster where all the buttons are is
00:15:59
◼
►
pretty thick. So this is, I think this is probably as big as the Breville version of
00:16:02
◼
►
mine that has convection. And I think that's probably what makes this thing larger is that
00:16:06
◼
►
this also has convection. So it's just the price you pay for convection, you get a much
00:16:10
◼
►
bigger toaster. Well it's, it's shown in the Amazon pictures as containing what appears
00:16:14
◼
►
to be either a very large chicken or a very small turkey.
00:16:17
◼
►
Yeah, that's like a smallish chicken.
00:16:19
◼
►
Like, it's the same size inside as my Breville,
00:16:22
◼
►
but the outside is bigger.
00:16:23
◼
►
So the interesting feature this has,
00:16:25
◼
►
and you can see it in the picture,
00:16:26
◼
►
is this thing comes with a probe thermometer
00:16:28
◼
►
that's attached to the toaster
00:16:29
◼
►
in a very poorly designed little door
00:16:32
◼
►
that you shove the probe into, like a slot,
00:16:36
◼
►
and then you wad up the rubber-coated wire for the probe,
00:16:39
◼
►
and then you try to close this little door.
00:16:40
◼
►
It's terrible.
00:16:41
◼
►
Anyway, it does have a probe attached
00:16:43
◼
►
which are food temperature so you can put the probe into your food and close
00:16:46
◼
►
the door yes close it on your rubber surrounded thermometer wire thing like
00:16:51
◼
►
the door will close all the way with the wire sort of shoved and pinched through
00:16:55
◼
►
there which is weird and it also means there has to be kind of a gap around the
00:16:58
◼
►
entire door to the toaster anyway you stick the probe in and you can you know
00:17:03
◼
►
pick the desired temperature of the food and you just turn the thing on and it
00:17:05
◼
►
will turn itself off when your food hits the correct temperature and it's got the
00:17:08
◼
►
government food safety temperatures for different kinds of food like printed on
00:17:12
◼
►
the door of the toaster in case you forget and I just take this time to remind everybody
00:17:16
◼
►
that the government food safety temperatures for food are often crazy. Like they say you
00:17:22
◼
►
should cook pork to 160 to 170 degrees. I invite everyone listening to this to cook
00:17:26
◼
►
a pork chop to 170 degrees and then tell me how it tastes to them. It tastes like sawdust.
00:17:31
◼
►
You cannot cook pork to 170 degrees. They do that for like, you know, prevention from
00:17:35
◼
►
trigonosis or whatever. Anyway, all I'm saying is the government food safety temperatures
00:17:38
◼
►
her food are super conservative. Yeah, it will kill every German that food, it will
00:17:43
◼
►
also kill the food and it will be tasteless and terrible.
00:17:45
◼
►
Oh god, please email Jon about this, not us.
00:17:47
◼
►
If you die of Trigonosis, don't blame me, but I'm just, you know, feel free to cook
00:17:51
◼
►
your pork to 170, but there's no way to live, just don't eat pork then.
00:17:54
◼
►
Oh my god, we're going to hear from everybody on both sides of this argument and you realize
00:18:00
◼
►
No, everyone who knows anything about cooking pork will say yes, of course you can. Have
00:18:03
◼
►
any of you ever cooked pork to 170?
00:18:05
◼
►
I've never cooked pork.
00:18:06
◼
►
Oh, you guys don't cook.
00:18:07
◼
►
Yeah, the only time I ever cooked pork is bacon and that's a whole different ballgame.
00:18:11
◼
►
Both of you don't cook.
00:18:12
◼
►
No, I cook, just not that.
00:18:15
◼
►
Just not that.
00:18:16
◼
►
Never in your whole life ever?
00:18:18
◼
►
I mean, like Casey, I've cooked bacon.
00:18:20
◼
►
But I don't really like eating pork chops, so I don't cook them.
00:18:26
◼
►
No, not even big hams.
00:18:27
◼
►
No, I'm not really a huge pork fan.
00:18:30
◼
►
Well, now you've got angry letters from the pork friends.
00:18:35
◼
►
The toaster as a toaster, I tried to do my typical toast off versus mine where you put
00:18:40
◼
►
you know, cold toaster, put a piece of bread and each one right in the middle, start toasting,
00:18:44
◼
►
see who wins.
00:18:45
◼
►
That's how you know, I've been timing them all.
00:18:48
◼
►
That the toast off was thwarted by the fact that this thing is humongous and my other
00:18:51
◼
►
toaster is not particularly small.
00:18:53
◼
►
And I tripped the circuit breaker in my kitchen halfway through the toasting process trying
00:18:56
◼
►
to toast bread and bros.
00:18:57
◼
►
This is a 1400 watt toaster oven.
00:19:01
◼
►
I flipped the breaker and tried again when the toasters were cooled one at a time.
00:19:05
◼
►
This is a slow toaster for toasting bread.
00:19:07
◼
►
It is slower than my Breville.
00:19:08
◼
►
It's the slowest one I've had.
00:19:10
◼
►
It's large, it's cavernous, and it's got the, I think it's like resistive heating elements.
00:19:15
◼
►
They're not the quartz ones that are like shiny and thick and light up quickly.
00:19:18
◼
►
These are skinnier and dark and they slowly start to glow red.
00:19:22
◼
►
It is really slow to toast.
00:19:23
◼
►
I don't know if I could tolerate trying to cook toast in this thing because it's just
00:19:27
◼
►
really slow.
00:19:28
◼
►
Now do you have like a minutes measure like what what do you consider really slow?
00:19:32
◼
►
I had I did time it in a stopwatch, but I just did the math to the subtracting from my toaster
00:19:38
◼
►
It's like 30 seconds slower. I think it's like over three minutes, maybe four minutes like
00:19:42
◼
►
Yeah, and I don't I don't know if this one is smart like my toaster because my toaster
00:19:46
◼
►
As soon as you hit toast it will tell you how long it's going to take and how long it will take depends on the ambient
00:19:52
◼
►
Temperature inside the toaster so the second piece of toast is way faster than the first one right right?
00:19:56
◼
►
That's what's make it a smart toaster. Anyway, this one has no readout like that
00:19:59
◼
►
Yeah, so speaking of the readouts
00:20:02
◼
►
Like there's not great choices for all the stuff that you touch and you see on this toaster like the dials buttons and displays
00:20:08
◼
►
There are no dials. It's all buttons the the display is like one of those multi-segment displays
00:20:13
◼
►
It's not a seven segment because it can make letters as well
00:20:16
◼
►
So it's not just the the numbers and stuff and it you know
00:20:18
◼
►
Cuz I just I think it has like the diagonal line for like the letter N and stuff
00:20:22
◼
►
I don't know. Maybe that's a seven eight nine ten eleven twelve segment display
00:20:25
◼
►
But it lights up and it tries to do this scrolling stuff. Like when you hit toast it says C N T R blank R
00:20:31
◼
►
A C K blank C N T R blank is trying to tell you center rack
00:20:36
◼
►
And this is something people our age or my age anyway might not realize that modern toasters
00:20:41
◼
►
Have a movable rack and they expect you to have the rack in the middle of the toaster like height wise now at the bottom
00:20:48
◼
►
Of the toaster now at the top of the toaster directly in the middle
00:20:51
◼
►
Which looks really weird for people like me who grew up with the black and deck toaster where the rack was always at the bottom
00:20:55
◼
►
But it makes sense from an even toasting perspective because you want to be equal distance from the heating elements
00:21:00
◼
►
If you're right against the bottom heating elements, the bottom is gonna cook way faster than the top
00:21:03
◼
►
Anyway, that little display doesn't tell you anything useful
00:21:07
◼
►
It doesn't tell you how long it's gonna take doesn't give you a countdown time or it just says it's you know toasting and
00:21:11
◼
►
The buttons in the thing are membrane buttons like the fix was brought up on a podcast listen to recently
00:21:18
◼
►
Maybe it was on back to work the Atari 400 membrane keyboard
00:21:21
◼
►
You guys don't remember that but do you know what I'm talking about when I say a membrane keyboard? Yeah
00:21:24
◼
►
It's like the little like it's like bubbles and bubbles of plastic that are that they're just like held up over the surface the entire
00:21:30
◼
►
Set of buttons that control this entire toaster are all membrane buttons and every time you press one
00:21:34
◼
►
It's not feels like you're pressing the entire membrane down like it's it is not an expensive feeling thing
00:21:40
◼
►
The the rack doesn't pull out when the door opens the the rack is flimsy the tray comes with their flimsy
00:21:46
◼
►
If you want to use it as like a this is more like a miniature oven
00:21:49
◼
►
Less like it, you know, I know they're all like that
00:21:51
◼
►
"Yo, it's a miniature oven."
00:21:52
◼
►
But this performs so poorly on toaster-related things
00:21:55
◼
►
where it's a frequently used appliance
00:21:57
◼
►
and you're going back to it again and again
00:21:58
◼
►
to cook lots of toast in the morning
00:21:59
◼
►
and to do stuff like that.
00:22:00
◼
►
This is more like what they show on the cover.
00:22:02
◼
►
If you wanna cook a chicken and put a propter monitor in it
00:22:04
◼
►
and it's like a smaller version of an oven,
00:22:05
◼
►
then you're not bothered so much by the button business.
00:22:08
◼
►
The UI isn't terrible.
00:22:09
◼
►
The buttons, you basically don't need to read the manual.
00:22:11
◼
►
You can look at the buttons and figure it out,
00:22:12
◼
►
but there's lots of waiting for everything.
00:22:14
◼
►
You press a button and it says Center Rack,
00:22:16
◼
►
and you're like, "Are you waiting for me to move the rack?
00:22:18
◼
►
"Are you gonna start toasting?"
00:22:20
◼
►
and there's no countdown to tell you when it has started.
00:22:22
◼
►
Very often I've had to open it up and stick my hand inside
00:22:24
◼
►
to see if it's starting to get hot
00:22:26
◼
►
because there's no visual indication
00:22:27
◼
►
that it is doing what I asked it to do,
00:22:29
◼
►
pushing the little membrane buttons.
00:22:30
◼
►
Yeah, not a fan.
00:22:36
◼
►
- So how do you really feel, Jon?
00:22:39
◼
►
- I mean, it's not terrible.
00:22:40
◼
►
It's a good little oven,
00:22:41
◼
►
like for cooking small things in an oven,
00:22:44
◼
►
but I would not use this as a toaster.
00:22:46
◼
►
And it's just humongous and weird.
00:22:49
◼
►
Now, it looks like in their picture,
00:22:51
◼
►
so you said they've selected a misleadingly sized chicken
00:22:56
◼
►
for the top picture there with the probe.
00:22:58
◼
►
And then I see their bread showing
00:23:00
◼
►
that it's a six-slice toaster.
00:23:02
◼
►
That is a very strange proportion
00:23:05
◼
►
that those bread slices have,
00:23:06
◼
►
where they look really small and thickly cut.
00:23:09
◼
►
- It's like Texas toast or something.
00:23:11
◼
►
- You could not fit six slices of regular sandwich bread
00:23:13
◼
►
in this thing, it's a four-slice toaster.
00:23:14
◼
►
First of all, you do have to have some space
00:23:16
◼
►
around the toast, otherwise it doesn't,
00:23:17
◼
►
you know, crisp up around the edges.
00:23:19
◼
►
And second of all, I don't think I could wedge
00:23:21
◼
►
three pieces of bread in this thing side by side.
00:23:23
◼
►
Just regular sandwich bread, you know,
00:23:25
◼
►
it's not that big.
00:23:27
◼
►
- Okay, well thank you Cards Against Humanity
00:23:30
◼
►
for giving us that toaster extravaganza one more time.
00:23:36
◼
►
All right, so back to the follow up.
00:23:38
◼
►
Do we wanna talk about what it's like to build RAM?
00:23:41
◼
►
- Oh, actually right before that,
00:23:43
◼
►
hopefully the final thing on the MacBook limitations.
00:23:47
◼
►
I think a lot of our questions will be answered
00:23:50
◼
►
when the new MacBook Pros come out,
00:23:54
◼
►
because we assume they'll all have USB Type-C connectors
00:23:58
◼
►
on them, and we also assume they're not gonna have
00:24:00
◼
►
one port, right?
00:24:02
◼
►
So all of these questions about what it takes
00:24:04
◼
►
to have more than one port and how Apple handles
00:24:07
◼
►
the possible confusion of like,
00:24:10
◼
►
oh, can you power it from both of them?
00:24:11
◼
►
Can I put four monitors in
00:24:13
◼
►
because there's four USB Type-C ports?
00:24:15
◼
►
all of those things will be answered,
00:24:17
◼
►
not by seeing whether Marques is right
00:24:20
◼
►
about the next version of this new MacBook having two ports,
00:24:23
◼
►
but by seeing what they do to the MacBook Pro.
00:24:26
◼
►
I mean, if they put one port in the MacBook Pro,
00:24:28
◼
►
it is not illuminating,
00:24:29
◼
►
but I'm assuming they're not gonna have one port
00:24:30
◼
►
in the MacBook Pro, and then we're gonna see,
00:24:32
◼
►
all these questions about possible confusion,
00:24:35
◼
►
how does Apple answer them with a product
00:24:36
◼
►
that they basically have to have
00:24:37
◼
►
more than one USB Type-C port on it?
00:24:40
◼
►
- That's a fair point, but I think a lot of these reasons
00:24:44
◼
►
really only apply with this with the chipset
00:24:46
◼
►
and stuff like that.
00:24:46
◼
►
So I'd say about half of the reasons
00:24:49
◼
►
that we've been sent in.
00:24:50
◼
►
- Yeah, I just mean like the confusion reasons,
00:24:52
◼
►
like oh, you can't charge for more than one
00:24:53
◼
►
or it's confusing, I don't know what I can plug in
00:24:55
◼
►
and if it has more ports then it supports monitors
00:24:58
◼
►
'cause maybe it supports three monitors
00:24:59
◼
►
but has four ports, you know.
00:25:00
◼
►
- Right, right, that's fair.
00:25:03
◼
►
Finally, RAM.
00:25:05
◼
►
- Yeah, last show I made an offhand comment talking about,
00:25:07
◼
►
we were talking about Skylake
00:25:08
◼
►
and the process sizes and everything
00:25:10
◼
►
And I said that when they do a new process size,
00:25:14
◼
►
they fab RAM first because it's very regular
00:25:16
◼
►
and it's easier to fab than the complicated logic in a CPU.
00:25:18
◼
►
And Joel wrote in to say that either that information
00:25:22
◼
►
was always wrong or at the very least it's not true anymore
00:25:24
◼
►
because apparently fabbing RAM is actually harder
00:25:26
◼
►
than pure logic chips these days
00:25:28
◼
►
because the RAM has more capacitors in it
00:25:33
◼
►
and yield and reliability problems in DRAM
00:25:35
◼
►
are almost always due to the manufacturing problems
00:25:37
◼
►
with the capacitors, which are very tightly packed
00:25:38
◼
►
and have high aspect ratios, whatever that means.
00:25:42
◼
►
He wrote in a very detailed explanation
00:25:43
◼
►
that I found very convincing
00:25:44
◼
►
that that is not the case anymore.
00:25:46
◼
►
In fact, the RAM is often fabbed
00:25:47
◼
►
at one to two generations behind
00:25:49
◼
►
what logic is fabbed at these days.
00:25:51
◼
►
I tried to do some googling to see
00:25:52
◼
►
where did I get this idea that they used to fab RAM first
00:25:55
◼
►
on a new process size to get the kinks worked out of it.
00:25:57
◼
►
And I just did not know what the hell to Google for.
00:25:59
◼
►
I'm pretty sure it's true,
00:26:00
◼
►
but it could be knowledge from like the '80s for all I know.
00:26:02
◼
►
So, so much has changed in silicon chip making these days
00:26:06
◼
►
that it's probably just outdated info.
00:26:08
◼
►
If anyone does know what the hell I'm remembering,
00:26:11
◼
►
if I am remembering something,
00:26:12
◼
►
please do send in the link so I can see if I'm crazy.
00:26:15
◼
►
- See, I don't even have to say,
00:26:16
◼
►
please only one person send that to us,
00:26:17
◼
►
'cause I know that the number of people
00:26:18
◼
►
who are gonna send that is gonna be between zero and one.
00:26:21
◼
►
- Anybody who read "Bite Magazine" in the '80s
00:26:23
◼
►
probably knows it.
00:26:25
◼
►
Okay, so a little bit about the new trackpad.
00:26:30
◼
►
Apple apparently has updated some apps to use it,
00:26:33
◼
►
including iMovie.
00:26:35
◼
►
I don't know which one of you entered this in the document,
00:26:39
◼
►
but I know almost nothing about this.
00:26:41
◼
►
- I entered in that.
00:26:42
◼
►
You didn't read these stories?
00:26:43
◼
►
Like they updated like a bunch of their apps to, you know,
00:26:46
◼
►
to support the new Force Touch track pad.
00:26:49
◼
►
But the most interesting one I thought was iMovie,
00:26:52
◼
►
where they updated it so like when you're dragging
00:26:54
◼
►
along the clips, you can like feel when you hit the end
00:26:56
◼
►
of the clip, like dragging the little slider along the,
00:26:59
◼
►
you know, in iMovie they show the-
00:27:00
◼
►
- Yeah, I've heard that phrase, but like how?
00:27:03
◼
►
What are you feeling?
00:27:04
◼
►
So here's the thing about this using force touch for the UI.
00:27:07
◼
►
This is a very,
00:27:08
◼
►
it's almost a one dimensional output device.
00:27:11
◼
►
All it does is vibrate.
00:27:12
◼
►
Maybe you can vibrate different amounts
00:27:13
◼
►
or different, you know, different amplitude
00:27:16
◼
►
and possibly different frequency, but this is not,
00:27:19
◼
►
you're not actually feeling anything.
00:27:21
◼
►
It is very, very limited.
00:27:23
◼
►
It's kind of like, you know,
00:27:23
◼
►
when they added the rumble pack in Star Fox 64,
00:27:25
◼
►
where it was like, well, all it does is rumble.
00:27:28
◼
►
Yeah, you can kind of make it rumble different amounts,
00:27:30
◼
►
rumble very, you know, in bursts or whatever,
00:27:33
◼
►
but it is a very limited feedback device.
00:27:34
◼
►
So all of it has to kind of be
00:27:36
◼
►
in simulating some kind of bump, right?
00:27:38
◼
►
So if you wanna feel
00:27:39
◼
►
when you're scrubbing a little cursor along a clip,
00:27:42
◼
►
when you've hit the end, it goes bzzt,
00:27:43
◼
►
and vibrate slightly, I'm assuming.
00:27:46
◼
►
I haven't tried this in person,
00:27:47
◼
►
I've just read the articles,
00:27:48
◼
►
but this is a new, I don't know what you'd call it,
00:27:51
◼
►
a new, not dimension, a new vector
00:27:54
◼
►
for output from the device.
00:27:56
◼
►
You've got visual, you've got sound,
00:27:57
◼
►
and now you've got,
00:27:58
◼
►
it can make you feel something under your finger.
00:28:01
◼
►
Not very complicated things,
00:28:03
◼
►
basically just some kind of vibration
00:28:05
◼
►
of different strength and timing,
00:28:09
◼
►
but that's not nothing.
00:28:10
◼
►
And it's the type of thing where,
00:28:12
◼
►
we all just assume Force Touch will come
00:28:14
◼
►
to all the iOS devices and everything.
00:28:16
◼
►
And Force Touch, by the way, on the watch,
00:28:17
◼
►
it's only one way, right?
00:28:19
◼
►
- What do you mean?
00:28:20
◼
►
- You press on the watch of varying amounts
00:28:21
◼
►
and it senses how much you're pressing.
00:28:23
◼
►
It does not press back on your finger, right?
00:28:25
◼
►
Is that-- - Well, no, but it,
00:28:28
◼
►
see, this is why the nomenclature's so peculiar
00:28:31
◼
►
because the Taptic Engine does,
00:28:35
◼
►
God, I just had it on the tip of my tongue and I lost it,
00:28:37
◼
►
but it'll tap you like--
00:28:39
◼
►
- Yeah, it vibrates on your wrist,
00:28:40
◼
►
but not in response to you pressing it, right?
00:28:43
◼
►
It's not like you're scrolling through with your finger
00:28:46
◼
►
on the phone, like swiping through screens,
00:28:48
◼
►
and the phone vibrates to make you feel like
00:28:51
◼
►
you feel something under your finger?
00:28:53
◼
►
- I think that's correct, but I don't know.
00:28:56
◼
►
- Whatever the case, on the MacBooks,
00:28:59
◼
►
they are trying to make it as a way
00:29:00
◼
►
so that you can sort of feel stuff on the screen
00:29:02
◼
►
in a very limited way.
00:29:04
◼
►
But even just in a very limited way,
00:29:05
◼
►
it's like, well, if you're gonna put a four-step trackpad
00:29:07
◼
►
in everything, and this is so easy to do,
00:29:10
◼
►
and they have a very simple API for it,
00:29:12
◼
►
and it adds just a little bit of,
00:29:14
◼
►
it's the type of thing where
00:29:15
◼
►
if you have any kind of tactile feedback,
00:29:18
◼
►
it is another, what the hell's the word I'm looking for?
00:29:21
◼
►
Another input channel.
00:29:22
◼
►
- Dimension?
00:29:23
◼
►
- No, it's not dimension.
00:29:24
◼
►
Another input channel for your experience
00:29:26
◼
►
that once you get used to it being there,
00:29:29
◼
►
as long as it's not annoying,
00:29:30
◼
►
the lack of it will feel wrong to you
00:29:32
◼
►
in the same way that suddenly if you had to use a Mac
00:29:34
◼
►
with closing your eyes or closing your ears.
00:29:35
◼
►
And the same way they did things with sound,
00:29:37
◼
►
like user interface sound,
00:29:39
◼
►
it has to be done in a limited way.
00:29:40
◼
►
If every time you scrolled a scroll bar or a scrolling view,
00:29:44
◼
►
it made some whistle noise, you'd be like,
00:29:45
◼
►
all right, turn that off immediately.
00:29:46
◼
►
And I think most Mac users turn off the thing
00:29:51
◼
►
that makes a sound when you're done.
00:29:53
◼
►
Most sort of like people listening to this podcast,
00:29:55
◼
►
I think turn off the finder sounds
00:29:56
◼
►
that like crumple up paper when you empty the trash
00:29:58
◼
►
or make a ding when you copy a file from one place
00:30:00
◼
►
to the other, I don't know, maybe I'm crazy.
00:30:01
◼
►
- Nope. - I don't.
00:30:02
◼
►
- Neither do I. - You leave those on?
00:30:04
◼
►
- Yes. - Oh my God,
00:30:05
◼
►
I don't know what you guys are doing.
00:30:06
◼
►
- How many files are you deleting
00:30:08
◼
►
when it's such a big problem?
00:30:09
◼
►
- It doesn't matter, just like that,
00:30:10
◼
►
I don't want that to happen on my computer ever.
00:30:14
◼
►
Just empty the trash, don't make a noise.
00:30:16
◼
►
I mean, let's saw through the garage coming out
00:30:18
◼
►
and singing me a song, I don't wanna see it.
00:30:21
◼
►
- No, I mean, it's useful for me because usually,
00:30:23
◼
►
'cause I don't know, does it do it,
00:30:24
◼
►
I know the trash does, but does it do it
00:30:26
◼
►
when you're moving files, if it's just like
00:30:27
◼
►
a really quick immediate thing.
00:30:29
◼
►
'Cause I know it does it after long operations.
00:30:31
◼
►
- If you just copy it, it doesn't go bing,
00:30:32
◼
►
I don't even know what the sounds are,
00:30:34
◼
►
but I immediately turn them off.
00:30:36
◼
►
But anyway, like--
00:30:37
◼
►
- Well, it's useful feedback because when you have,
00:30:39
◼
►
like first of all, somebody like me,
00:30:40
◼
►
I very rarely empty the trash, I just forget to do it.
00:30:43
◼
►
So when I do empty the trash,
00:30:44
◼
►
it's a pretty big set of trash in there.
00:30:46
◼
►
And you know, if I'm doing a big file move,
00:30:48
◼
►
it might take a while.
00:30:49
◼
►
So the sounds provide feedback to tell you when it's done.
00:30:51
◼
►
- Yeah, anyway, what I'm getting at is it has to be done
00:30:54
◼
►
in a subtle manner.
00:30:56
◼
►
Like there's a right amount of sound feedback,
00:30:57
◼
►
beeping for things or something like that makes sense,
00:31:00
◼
►
but maybe not have a sound every time you move the cursor.
00:31:03
◼
►
(imitates beeping)
00:31:04
◼
►
You know, all that type of movie sounds.
00:31:06
◼
►
It has to be.
00:31:07
◼
►
And so the same thing with the Taptic feedback.
00:31:08
◼
►
If you just get it when you hit the bump stops
00:31:10
◼
►
in the clip and eye movie, that's fine.
00:31:11
◼
►
But if you got it every time you scrolled it,
00:31:12
◼
►
like vibrated under your finger in any app,
00:31:14
◼
►
that would be too much.
00:31:15
◼
►
So people will have to find the right balance here.
00:31:17
◼
►
But I think once they do find that balance
00:31:19
◼
►
and once it comes to every Apple device,
00:31:21
◼
►
it's just a gimme that it's like,
00:31:23
◼
►
this makes the experience richer,
00:31:25
◼
►
even if it's so incredibly primitive at all,
00:31:27
◼
►
this is like a vibrate a little bit.
00:31:28
◼
►
Just think of like if your phone
00:31:29
◼
►
didn't have a vibration motor in it,
00:31:32
◼
►
how much worse a device would be,
00:31:33
◼
►
just for that one little wiggly piece of metal inside it.
00:31:36
◼
►
And how much they can do with that.
00:31:38
◼
►
- I'm a little worried about developers
00:31:40
◼
►
overusing this for a while,
00:31:41
◼
►
and Apple also overusing this for a while.
00:31:44
◼
►
I did finally get a chance to try one of these
00:31:48
◼
►
in a store this week, so I was very happy about that.
00:31:51
◼
►
I also initially didn't believe that it was that trackpad.
00:31:55
◼
►
I thought, oh, this must be the old model.
00:31:57
◼
►
'Cause it clicked.
00:31:57
◼
►
It does feel different, but it's like a softer click.
00:32:02
◼
►
And I know it's a setting, and I tried all the different,
00:32:05
◼
►
I tried the whole range of settings they have there.
00:32:07
◼
►
It is still a softer click.
00:32:10
◼
►
It's less clicky, less feedback
00:32:12
◼
►
than you got from the old one.
00:32:13
◼
►
But it still feels like a click to me, and so it's great.
00:32:18
◼
►
My worry, and when you do the double,
00:32:20
◼
►
the deeper forced click, whatever they're calling that one,
00:32:24
◼
►
that one is interesting, it feels fine.
00:32:27
◼
►
My worry with that is that now we have
00:32:30
◼
►
three different kinds of clicks.
00:32:32
◼
►
It's kind of like Swift, where it looks simple,
00:32:35
◼
►
and it seems simple, but it's actually
00:32:37
◼
►
just hiding complexity.
00:32:39
◼
►
- It's not hiding complexity.
00:32:40
◼
►
Oh, God, we'll talk about Swift another time.
00:32:42
◼
►
- Right, yeah, we sure will.
00:32:44
◼
►
So it appears, by the trackpad,
00:32:47
◼
►
appears as though you have one button, right? Like the main click. But we all know in reality
00:32:52
◼
►
you have a secondary click, a right click, a control click, whatever you want to call
00:32:56
◼
►
it. The right click menu is often a very, often does important things. So you often
00:33:02
◼
►
need to know about it. So in reality you pretty much need to know two different clicks. The
00:33:07
◼
►
fourth click is now a third one. It's not just a right click. I think it would be better
00:33:11
◼
►
if it was just a right click. But it's not. It's now this third thing that like sometimes
00:33:16
◼
►
it does a dictionary pop-up, sometimes it does quick look, sometimes it does other things.
00:33:20
◼
►
And so now it's this third level of stuff that we have to either accidentally trigger
00:33:24
◼
►
and be surprised by, which is annoying, or that we have to learn, which is, you know,
00:33:29
◼
►
possibly tricky because now it's this third thing, or, and by the way, it's completely
00:33:33
◼
►
inconsistent as to what it does on different things, or we have to ignore it in which case
00:33:37
◼
►
it's a waste. So like, I wish they would have just kind of made it a right-click and just
00:33:42
◼
►
kept it simpler.
00:33:43
◼
►
I don't want to be right click just because I'm I'm concerned about how much force is going to take to do a force click
00:33:48
◼
►
I wouldn't want to do it as a routine
00:33:50
◼
►
It's not much you know and that's the other concern if it's not much
00:33:53
◼
►
I hope it's adjustable somewhere if it's not much
00:33:55
◼
►
Then I don't want people who are slow in doing a click who are very deliberate in doing a click to accidentally trigger a force
00:34:01
◼
►
click because then you have to end up turning it off for them because they're like
00:34:03
◼
►
I'm they're just kind of they're like I tried to click on something, but a dictionary definition came up
00:34:07
◼
►
It's like well you just held it a little bit too long right and so that then you just have to disable it for them
00:34:11
◼
►
I'm hoping it if you're able to disable it it would be better if there was like a delay
00:34:14
◼
►
And you could just crank the delay up so that the one time a month
00:34:17
◼
►
I have to do a force click though to sit there and hold their finger down
00:34:19
◼
►
Pressing for like three seconds, then the dictionary definition come up
00:34:22
◼
►
Maybe happy with that like I can see someone getting used to that and using that because if you try to teach them
00:34:26
◼
►
Command option shift D. Nobody remembers it or whatever the hell that that thing is what it reminded me a lot of was on automatic
00:34:33
◼
►
BMWs and I think most German cars are like this, but certainly BMWs you could you can floor it and then
00:34:40
◼
►
and the pedal stops and then you can kind of push through what appears to be the floorboard
00:34:47
◼
►
and then there's a little bit more depth of the pedal which is I think they call it a
00:34:51
◼
►
kick down mode or something like that which is you telling the car no really freaking
00:34:57
◼
►
go and that's a lot what this force click whatever it's called felt like.
00:35:01
◼
►
You would click and then push a little bit harder and then you'd get a second click out
00:35:07
◼
►
Does it tell the car to just downshift?
00:35:09
◼
►
Is that what it's trying to do?
00:35:10
◼
►
automatic yeah it'll tell it to downshift as much as possible so what does it do in a manual
00:35:14
◼
►
i don't have one in my car nothing right it's just it's just a placebo yeah what i brought i
00:35:20
◼
►
still have not tried the force click track but i never really wanted to but what it brings to
00:35:23
◼
►
mind to me of course is the uh and uh if john roder could ever listen to this podcast he can correct
00:35:28
◼
►
me but he doesn't so he won't haha uh the uh the flight stick in the f-16 uh doesn't move i believe
00:35:35
◼
►
as in it's like force touch type thing it does not move around you just apply forces to it
00:35:39
◼
►
And that may seem like how can you like how can you fly a plane with a with a stick that doesn't move at all?
00:35:45
◼
►
It's if this is f16 or the fd-18 perhaps. It's both someone will send us the the correction
00:35:49
◼
►
But it's I imagine it's like the force touch trackpad where you just get used to the fact that the thing doesn't move
00:35:55
◼
►
I don't even think it has any haptic feedback
00:35:57
◼
►
It's just like that's the way you you do this thing by applying force to different directions to a thing that doesn't move so sitting
00:36:02
◼
►
There are applying varying amounts of force to a glass surface that never moves and probably doesn't even flex that much
00:36:07
◼
►
seems weird but
00:36:09
◼
►
As long as there's some kind of visual or tactile feedback
00:36:13
◼
►
that you are accomplishing what you meant to do,
00:36:15
◼
►
people will just get used to it.
00:36:16
◼
►
- Our second sponsor this week is Automattic,
00:36:20
◼
►
your smart driving assistant on your smartphone.
00:36:22
◼
►
Go to automatic.com/atp.
00:36:26
◼
►
Automattic is basically this little thing
00:36:28
◼
►
that plugs into your OBD2 port.
00:36:30
◼
►
This is the little diagnostic port that's usually in the,
00:36:32
◼
►
is it the driver's side footwell or the passenger?
00:36:36
◼
►
- Yeah, driver's side footwell.
00:36:37
◼
►
It's a little Bluetooth thing that plugs into that port
00:36:38
◼
►
and it connects your iPhone or Android phone
00:36:41
◼
►
to your car, basically.
00:36:43
◼
►
So they have apps that run on iPhone and Android,
00:36:45
◼
►
and it talks to your car, and it can tell you
00:36:48
◼
►
where you've driven, how efficiently,
00:36:50
◼
►
even as you're driving, it can monitor real-time stats,
00:36:53
◼
►
it can monitor your fuel usage.
00:36:55
◼
►
If you want to, say, make a little ding
00:36:57
◼
►
if you're accelerating too hard,
00:36:59
◼
►
to kind of train yourself to save gas,
00:37:01
◼
►
it can do that for you.
00:37:03
◼
►
It can also, of course, it can track your overall economy
00:37:06
◼
►
as you're taking trips and everything,
00:37:08
◼
►
and you can see pretty graphs and everything,
00:37:10
◼
►
and you can see, oh well, my average this week
00:37:12
◼
►
is pretty bad, or my average this week is doing great,
00:37:14
◼
►
give you all this great feedback.
00:37:16
◼
►
It could also call emergency services for you
00:37:19
◼
►
in a serious crash.
00:37:21
◼
►
That is pretty cool, and that could really,
00:37:23
◼
►
you know, that could be a serious benefit there.
00:37:25
◼
►
Also, because it's plugged into the diagnostic port,
00:37:27
◼
►
it can diagnose your engine light.
00:37:29
◼
►
If you have a check engine light,
00:37:30
◼
►
any kind of error code in your car,
00:37:32
◼
►
it can tell you what the code means in more detail
00:37:34
◼
►
usually than what your car is telling you.
00:37:36
◼
►
It can also help clear the code.
00:37:38
◼
►
If it's some like one time thing,
00:37:40
◼
►
some cars the code won't clear itself.
00:37:42
◼
►
If like, you know, one time you left the gas cap
00:37:44
◼
►
a little loose, sometimes it won't clear itself
00:37:46
◼
►
after you fix it, automatic can clear it for you.
00:37:48
◼
►
It also helps you remember where you are parked
00:37:50
◼
►
because again, it has the smarts of your car plus your phone
00:37:53
◼
►
so it knows where you are
00:37:54
◼
►
and whether your car is turned off
00:37:56
◼
►
so it can tell you where you parked.
00:37:58
◼
►
It also has hooks with the Nest Learning Thermostat.
00:38:01
◼
►
It has a whole API now.
00:38:03
◼
►
It has integration with IFTTT,
00:38:06
◼
►
and so one of the many things it can control
00:38:08
◼
►
is an S thermostat.
00:38:09
◼
►
And this lets you do things like turn on your heating
00:38:11
◼
►
or AC as you're heading home from work automatically,
00:38:15
◼
►
so that by the time you get home, it's the right temperature
00:38:17
◼
►
and all the rest of the day it was saving energy.
00:38:20
◼
►
So this is really great stuff.
00:38:21
◼
►
The whole API, you can do quite a lot with this thing.
00:38:24
◼
►
Go to automatic.com/ATP.
00:38:27
◼
►
Now normally, this sells for $100.
00:38:29
◼
►
And this is great because there's no monthly fee.
00:38:32
◼
►
It's just you buy the thing for 100 bucks up front
00:38:35
◼
►
and that's it.
00:38:36
◼
►
You get all the services that it offers
00:38:38
◼
►
for the life of the device.
00:38:39
◼
►
And so again, no monthly fees.
00:38:42
◼
►
Just 100 bucks up front.
00:38:43
◼
►
We have a special offer now.
00:38:45
◼
►
It's 20% off.
00:38:46
◼
►
So if you buy it through automatic.com/ATP,
00:38:49
◼
►
our special link, it is just 80 bucks.
00:38:52
◼
►
That includes free shipping, free two-day shipping
00:38:56
◼
►
and you have a 45-day return policy.
00:38:58
◼
►
So if you end up not liking it for whatever reason,
00:39:01
◼
►
You have 45 days to figure that out and return it.
00:39:03
◼
►
So really it's no risk.
00:39:04
◼
►
So go to automatic.com/ATP, 80 bucks, free shipping,
00:39:09
◼
►
no monthly fees, 45 day return policy.
00:39:11
◼
►
Thanks a lot to Automattic.
00:39:12
◼
►
- All right.
00:39:15
◼
►
So speaking of the Force Touch trackpad,
00:39:19
◼
►
apparently there may be or may not be
00:39:22
◼
►
a missing three finger drag.
00:39:23
◼
►
And not that I was planning on buying a MacBook,
00:39:25
◼
►
but I am thinking, like I said,
00:39:27
◼
►
of buying one of the other machines
00:39:29
◼
►
that may have this trackpad.
00:39:30
◼
►
And I rely on three finger swipes to do spaces, which I love.
00:39:37
◼
►
And I'm assuming, Jon, you hate because you hate anything moving anywhere on your computer.
00:39:41
◼
►
Jon Sorrentino That's not why I hate spaces, but I do hate them.
00:39:43
◼
►
Cote, why do you hate spaces?
00:39:45
◼
►
Because if I don't ask, I'm going to, I'm going to wonder the rest of the episode.
00:39:48
◼
►
Jon Sorrentino I just couldn't, well, the animation is an annoyance, but I also could never get a workflow set up where I didn't wonder on which screen a window.
00:39:58
◼
►
Well, I could never figure out like this is gonna be the screen for X
00:40:00
◼
►
This is gonna be the screen for Y or if I tried to make a decision like that through using the system. I would
00:40:06
◼
►
Inadvertently violate that by like accidentally opening a web browser in this in the session in the space
00:40:11
◼
►
That is not for that web browser like it just never I just don't have a system for it
00:40:15
◼
►
So it just ends up making it making me have to look for stuff in two places
00:40:18
◼
►
It and maybe it's just me. Maybe it's the way spaces work
00:40:21
◼
►
Of course spaces have changed how they work over the years, but it's a simplification. I really just same reason I don't have two monitors
00:40:26
◼
►
I just want one big monitor and that's it
00:40:28
◼
►
I must say though, I am surprised,
00:40:31
◼
►
because you are such a window person
00:40:34
◼
►
and you're so into spatial organization of your windows,
00:40:37
◼
►
it does surprise me that both you don't want
00:40:39
◼
►
a second monitor and that also you don't want
00:40:41
◼
►
more space with spaces.
00:40:42
◼
►
- Yeah, the idea is I want everything to be within reach
00:40:45
◼
►
and if I have to do a gesture,
00:40:48
◼
►
and it's also I don't use track pads,
00:40:49
◼
►
like what Casey was saying,
00:40:50
◼
►
I think having to be able to just,
00:40:52
◼
►
when I use a very small laptop,
00:40:55
◼
►
I'm more likely to both go full screen in apps
00:40:57
◼
►
and use spaces because if you have that sort of swipe over
00:41:00
◼
►
to find something, that is more natural,
00:41:02
◼
►
but I don't use a trackpad on my desktop,
00:41:03
◼
►
and so then it's like control left or right arrow
00:41:05
◼
►
or whatever.
00:41:06
◼
►
- Yeah, it's a pretty easy shortcut.
00:41:08
◼
►
- I know, but it just makes it feel like things
00:41:11
◼
►
are farther away from my reach.
00:41:12
◼
►
It's like putting things in a folder
00:41:14
◼
►
in the iOS home screen.
00:41:17
◼
►
It just makes things feel farther away from me, not closer.
00:41:19
◼
►
I'd rather have them all on the same screen
00:41:21
◼
►
in a big jumbled pile than spread out
00:41:22
◼
►
on two different monitors.
00:41:24
◼
►
- And this is the same reason why I can never use any mouse
00:41:27
◼
►
but the magic mouse because on the magic mouse it's a two finger swipe to do the same action
00:41:32
◼
►
and um and so from what i'm being told and from what i've seen in the chat just a moment
00:41:37
◼
►
ago apparently it's still possible but it's moved into accessibility preferences which
00:41:43
◼
►
is weird you saw it in the chat did you as well as the notes yes yes the notes didn't
00:41:49
◼
►
i just say that i know but like you were like it may or may not be i the notes say unequivocally
00:41:54
◼
►
with a link to a screenshot showing you where this option is in the accessibility prefs.
00:41:59
◼
►
Well, I'm sorry I didn't do enough homework, John.
00:42:01
◼
►
There's no, no, you gotta look for the question mark. Question mark was there.
00:42:05
◼
►
Breaking news, breaking news, this is absolutely factual that this is in the accessibility
00:42:10
◼
►
preference pane. My sources are telling me that that is absolutely true.
00:42:14
◼
►
Your sources, you have anonymous tips are telling you, look at this,
00:42:18
◼
►
look at the screenshot in the show notes.
00:42:22
◼
►
Wow. Oh goodness. All right, last piece of follow-up. Port motivation sent in by Mila.
00:42:28
◼
►
Yeah, this is another philosophical thing, and it ties into Skylake, which we kept
00:42:32
◼
►
pushing off when we talked about its delay, but we'll talk about it a little bit later.
00:42:34
◼
►
This is from Apple's website, I believe. "The most efficient way to charge a notebook is by
00:42:41
◼
►
connecting to a charge report. As long as we are going to include a port for charging the new
00:42:44
◼
►
MacBook, we wanted to make sure it was the most advanced and versatile one available."
00:42:48
◼
►
This ties into also Schiller during the keynote saying,
00:42:52
◼
►
you know, when's the most convenient time
00:42:53
◼
►
to plug into a cable?
00:42:55
◼
►
And this is a quote he says,
00:42:56
◼
►
"That's when you want to charge quickly."
00:42:58
◼
►
What do you mean charge quickly?
00:42:59
◼
►
What do you mean the most efficient way
00:43:02
◼
►
to charge a notebook?
00:43:03
◼
►
Isn't it the only way to charge a notebook?
00:43:04
◼
►
Charge quickly versus what?
00:43:05
◼
►
Is there a slower way to charge a notebook?
00:43:07
◼
►
Like that's it, you plug it in, right?
00:43:09
◼
►
- So people are saying this is like an indication
00:43:11
◼
►
of possible future inductive charging.
00:43:14
◼
►
Let me offer an alternative interpretation of those lines.
00:43:17
◼
►
I think the most efficient way to charge a notebook
00:43:21
◼
►
is possibly related to power efficiency.
00:43:24
◼
►
They made a point, Phil said,
00:43:25
◼
►
it's the most energy efficient laptop
00:43:28
◼
►
I think in the world right now,
00:43:29
◼
►
at least that's what they said.
00:43:31
◼
►
So it could just be,
00:43:32
◼
►
'cause induction charging I believe is,
00:43:35
◼
►
we know it's slower,
00:43:35
◼
►
I believe it's also less efficient energy waste wise.
00:43:39
◼
►
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
00:43:40
◼
►
But so it could be related to that.
00:43:44
◼
►
- So you think it's like the opposite,
00:43:45
◼
►
like where they're saying
00:43:46
◼
►
Other people may have wireless charging,
00:43:48
◼
►
but the most efficient way to charge a notebook
00:43:50
◼
►
is by plugging it in.
00:43:51
◼
►
Is that what you're saying?
00:43:52
◼
►
- It's very possible that was what he meant.
00:43:53
◼
►
And also, when you wanna plug it in and charge quickly,
00:43:57
◼
►
might have just meant like, you know,
00:43:59
◼
►
it to kind of reinforce the idea that A,
00:44:02
◼
►
the battery life is so great
00:44:03
◼
►
that you're not gonna need to spend a lot of time
00:44:05
◼
►
charging this.
00:44:06
◼
►
B, you're gonna not be plugged in most of the time
00:44:09
◼
►
so that, you know, you're gonna be unplugged
00:44:11
◼
►
and wireless and free like using iPads.
00:44:13
◼
►
And C, when you do plug in,
00:44:15
◼
►
like he didn't want to make it sound like a burden.
00:44:18
◼
►
So I think that's where those quotes were coming from.
00:44:21
◼
►
I don't think they were like foreshadowing a future
00:44:24
◼
►
of wireless charging notebooks,
00:44:26
◼
►
which I still think for the most part are not a good idea
00:44:29
◼
►
because you have to set like,
00:44:32
◼
►
my electric toothbrush charges inductively
00:44:35
◼
►
and it can do that because it is sitting on the charger
00:44:37
◼
►
the vast majority of its existence.
00:44:40
◼
►
You know, the vast majority of every day it's on the charger
00:44:43
◼
►
and it's a really low power device.
00:44:45
◼
►
A laptop does not fit that profile.
00:44:48
◼
►
So for a laptop to be able to be inductively charged,
00:44:51
◼
►
you have to be able to get a ton of current in there,
00:44:55
◼
►
you know, relative to most inductive charging systems.
00:44:58
◼
►
You just have to get a ton of current in there
00:44:59
◼
►
from what, some giant pad you stick it on?
00:45:02
◼
►
I mean, then you have to carry around a giant pad.
00:45:04
◼
►
Like there's, it's one of those things
00:45:07
◼
►
that sounds cool in theory, but in reality,
00:45:09
◼
►
I don't think it ever will hit that for laptops,
00:45:12
◼
►
at least not for a very long time.
00:45:14
◼
►
- Well, this wireless charging business is,
00:45:16
◼
►
and wireless stuff in general,
00:45:17
◼
►
is part of Intel Skylake initiative.
00:45:20
◼
►
They always have some technologies they're pushing along
00:45:22
◼
►
with their new chips or whatever
00:45:24
◼
►
that aren't really related technically.
00:45:25
◼
►
Sometimes there's some support in the CPU
00:45:27
◼
►
for something or other or the chip set.
00:45:28
◼
►
But anyway, because this is part of their push,
00:45:31
◼
►
it probably means that PC makers are going to
00:45:35
◼
►
roll this out to some degree.
00:45:38
◼
►
And maybe they'll be the ones to figure out,
00:45:40
◼
►
like, are we at a point where this is something
00:45:43
◼
►
people want to actually use yes or no.
00:45:45
◼
►
I don't know what to make a read on Apple's choice
00:45:48
◼
►
of words here.
00:45:49
◼
►
All of your interpretations that you said Marco
00:45:51
◼
►
could be true.
00:45:52
◼
►
I think the one that probably seems the truest
00:45:56
◼
►
is the idea that they are not planning
00:45:58
◼
►
on doing wireless charger
00:45:59
◼
►
and they are preemptively poo-pooing the idea
00:46:01
◼
►
by saying, you know, plugging in is way more efficient.
00:46:03
◼
►
You don't want that crappy wireless stuff.
00:46:05
◼
►
We're all about plugging in.
00:46:06
◼
►
You're gonna want to plug in.
00:46:08
◼
►
And that's why, it's like when you want to charge quickly,
00:46:12
◼
►
Like that's when you want to plug in a cable.
00:46:14
◼
►
I don't know.
00:46:14
◼
►
That interpretation rings the most true to me
00:46:17
◼
►
that they are,
00:46:18
◼
►
because they know they don't have wireless charging
00:46:20
◼
►
available for sale now and PC makers will.
00:46:22
◼
►
And they probably, if they don't,
00:46:24
◼
►
if Skylight comes out and every PC maker says,
00:46:26
◼
►
"Oh, and also charges wireless here or whatever,"
00:46:28
◼
►
and Apple doesn't have it,
00:46:29
◼
►
Apple will want to emphasize the fact
00:46:31
◼
►
that they don't have it because it sucks.
00:46:32
◼
►
Like we could have made it,
00:46:34
◼
►
but it was not good enough for us.
00:46:35
◼
►
That's why we don't have it.
00:46:36
◼
►
Plugging in is way better.
00:46:37
◼
►
- Right. Nobody wants to watch a video
00:46:38
◼
►
on an iPod size screen.
00:46:40
◼
►
But if it is, if they can get it to work better.
00:46:43
◼
►
And these are the other things.
00:46:44
◼
►
This is what I have.
00:46:45
◼
►
We're skipping out of the follow-up
00:46:46
◼
►
and jumping right into the topics here.
00:46:48
◼
►
Skylake's tech that they're promoting
00:46:51
◼
►
is not just wireless charging,
00:46:53
◼
►
but also this WiDi, which is not new,
00:46:56
◼
►
wireless display and WiGig for faster,
00:46:59
◼
►
shorter range display and WiGig hubs for USB and ethernet.
00:47:03
◼
►
So like the idea is that you would just put your computer
00:47:05
◼
►
down on your desk and there'll be a box on your desk
00:47:08
◼
►
with an ethernet cable connected to it
00:47:09
◼
►
and a bunch of USB things going into it.
00:47:11
◼
►
And you don't have to plug anything in,
00:47:12
◼
►
it's the ultimate docking station.
00:47:13
◼
►
You just put your laptop down next to it
00:47:15
◼
►
and your monitor lights up
00:47:17
◼
►
with the picture from your laptop
00:47:18
◼
►
and all your USB devices that are there mount on the thing
00:47:21
◼
►
and you switch from Wi-Fi to ethernet.
00:47:24
◼
►
That is something that Apple would love
00:47:25
◼
►
that I think everyone would love.
00:47:27
◼
►
And unlike wireless charging,
00:47:29
◼
►
I don't see anything stopping these things
00:47:31
◼
►
from being any worse or particularly worse
00:47:33
◼
►
than having to plug in a USB or a Thunderbolt cable.
00:47:37
◼
►
As long as the bandwidth is there
00:47:38
◼
►
and if the technology works, you know,
00:47:40
◼
►
that is an experience that office workers, I think,
00:47:43
◼
►
would love and would not want to go back
00:47:45
◼
►
to clipping their stupid PC into a docking station
00:47:47
◼
►
or even plugging in a single USB cable.
00:47:49
◼
►
It's a nicer experience just to sit down at your desk,
00:47:52
◼
►
put your thing down, as long as it's within five feet
00:47:55
◼
►
of that little box, you're good to go.
00:47:56
◼
►
Like that seems like the future to me.
00:47:58
◼
►
- Oh, I agree.
00:47:59
◼
►
Every time I think about a Thunderbolt display,
00:48:02
◼
►
I get jealous because I still have regular old Samsung
00:48:08
◼
►
display at home, we have a litany of random displays
00:48:12
◼
►
at work, and it would be amazing to just have one thing
00:48:16
◼
►
that I plug everything into, and then that plugs
00:48:19
◼
►
into my computer, or like you're saying, John,
00:48:21
◼
►
maybe no plugs at all.
00:48:23
◼
►
It would be phenomenal.
00:48:24
◼
►
And I gotta be honest, every time I see somebody
00:48:27
◼
►
just slam their Dell into one of these docking stations
00:48:29
◼
►
and suddenly they have ethernet and displays
00:48:31
◼
►
and power and everything else, I get a little jealous,
00:48:33
◼
►
I really do.
00:48:35
◼
►
- See, I would say like the no wires thing
00:48:39
◼
►
is so much more difficult
00:48:40
◼
►
and has so many potential issues and shortcomings.
00:48:44
◼
►
I would say the ideal scenario here is the one wire method,
00:48:47
◼
►
which we are now getting with USB-C.
00:48:50
◼
►
So I mean, I think we're pretty much, we're there.
00:48:54
◼
►
- Why do you think the no wire solution has problems?
00:48:56
◼
►
It's like super short range.
00:48:57
◼
►
It's like even shorter range than Bluetooth.
00:48:59
◼
►
- Well, because then you have the issue of powering it.
00:49:01
◼
►
Like, so you can have everything else except power,
00:49:03
◼
►
so then how are you powering?
00:49:03
◼
►
powering with some kind of induction.
00:49:05
◼
►
- Oh no, yeah, not the power I'm talking about.
00:49:06
◼
►
I'm talking about everything but the power.
00:49:08
◼
►
I'm talking about just--
00:49:09
◼
►
- But that's a big thing.
00:49:10
◼
►
- I don't think it's that big a deal
00:49:11
◼
►
because I think the signals,
00:49:13
◼
►
sending wireless signals to these devices
00:49:15
◼
►
is not going to be any,
00:49:17
◼
►
it's gonna be less power than Wi-Fi
00:49:18
◼
►
because it's shorter range, right?
00:49:19
◼
►
So the power is not a concern for the transmission
00:49:22
◼
►
and receiving end on the computer side.
00:49:24
◼
►
And if you're just worried about the fact that,
00:49:26
◼
►
well, now when I'm sitting at my desk,
00:49:27
◼
►
I'm not charging my Mac,
00:49:29
◼
►
that is the whole idea of like all day battery power,
00:49:31
◼
►
you just charge it at the end of the day.
00:49:33
◼
►
and I think that will cure it.
00:49:34
◼
►
It already has cured itself for the bigger laptops
00:49:36
◼
►
that even if you just wanna talk about
00:49:38
◼
►
that 13-inch MacBook Air,
00:49:40
◼
►
that gets, you know, you can work on it for an entire day,
00:49:42
◼
►
you do not have to plug it in.
00:49:44
◼
►
And if they can get the new MacBook up to that level,
00:49:47
◼
►
which now it's probably borderline, but it's close,
00:49:50
◼
►
then that's not an issue anymore.
00:49:52
◼
►
Like your entire working,
00:49:53
◼
►
the only time you would plug it in
00:49:54
◼
►
is when you leave for the night, you know what I mean?
00:49:57
◼
►
- Yeah, yeah, I get that that's the dream.
00:50:00
◼
►
I think reality is gonna be different for a long time.
00:50:03
◼
►
- I think the modern laptops can make it through a day.
00:50:06
◼
►
Like I see people going to meetings,
00:50:08
◼
►
bringing the laptop, and I mean a lot of people I know
00:50:10
◼
►
don't plug it in during the day.
00:50:11
◼
►
If you have it at your house and you're not going anywhere,
00:50:13
◼
►
then why not just plug it in, so maybe this isn't attractive.
00:50:16
◼
►
But for business, all I see all day are people
00:50:18
◼
►
with stupid docking stations who are constantly
00:50:20
◼
►
plugging in or unplugging their thing to their big,
00:50:21
◼
►
to the display is the big one.
00:50:22
◼
►
'Cause when they sit at their desk,
00:50:23
◼
►
they don't wanna use the little laptop display,
00:50:25
◼
►
they wanna use the big one, right?
00:50:26
◼
►
Or the multiple displays.
00:50:27
◼
►
And the constant plug-unplug, to be able to just plop it down
00:50:30
◼
►
and use it, their battery will last an eight hour workday easy.
00:50:32
◼
►
Well, unless they have to run Photoshop or Xcode or Flash.
00:50:36
◼
►
And there's a list that keeps growing of the apps that make your CPU suck.
00:50:41
◼
►
Yeah, Photoshop, I don't know if people are running back and forth in meetings with Photoshop
00:50:45
◼
►
all the time, but I'm mostly just seeing people who are typing all day, so maybe that's just
00:50:48
◼
►
the bias of being around a bunch of developers, right?
00:50:51
◼
►
That they're web browsing and typing all day, and they're not even compiling code because
00:50:55
◼
►
it's like the code is on the server, right?
00:50:56
◼
►
So it's just a bunch of SSH windows or whatever.
00:50:59
◼
►
I think the wireless display and wireless hubs like that
00:51:04
◼
►
are very attractive to me, even for at-home use.
00:51:07
◼
►
Hell, I would use it with my gigantic 50 pound Mac Pro,
00:51:11
◼
►
just so I wouldn't have to have
00:51:12
◼
►
all these stupid wires going all over the place.
00:51:14
◼
►
Like that is a luxury that I'd be willing to pay for.
00:51:16
◼
►
Just not to have to, for my USB hub,
00:51:18
◼
►
if that could be connected with YGIG
00:51:20
◼
►
and I don't have to figure out
00:51:20
◼
►
how to fish all these wires all over the place,
00:51:22
◼
►
I would buy that for a computer that never moves.
00:51:25
◼
►
- Yeah, but then you'd have to upgrade your Mac Pro,
00:51:27
◼
►
which would never happen, so.
00:51:29
◼
►
- I know, I just attached some crazy ass,
00:51:31
◼
►
hey, I've got PCI slots free, I can just put it in there.
00:51:34
◼
►
- Yeah, I'm sure that this technology will come
00:51:37
◼
►
in PCI Express desktop slot format.
00:51:40
◼
►
- Yeah, there's plenty of room in there.
00:51:42
◼
►
Who knows, I could have a whole daughter card.
00:51:43
◼
►
Hey, I could put a Mac Mini inside my Mac Pro's case
00:51:46
◼
►
and just use that.
00:51:47
◼
►
- You could fit many Mac Mini's inside your Mac Pro case.
00:51:49
◼
►
- That's right, it's gonna get rid
00:51:50
◼
►
of these two optical drives.
00:51:51
◼
►
There's plenty of room in there.
00:51:53
◼
►
- Oh my God.
00:51:54
◼
►
Our final sponsor is Backblaze.
00:51:56
◼
►
Go to backblaze.com/ATP.
00:52:03
◼
►
those things that you don't want to think about. The pain in the butt when you try to
00:52:09
◼
►
work it out. But you know that it's dangerous to go without. Most online backup gets crazy
00:52:18
◼
►
expensive when you start trying to back up everything. They put limits on your storage
00:52:25
◼
►
and limits on the file size that you're allowed to upload. It's throttled so slow but there's
00:52:33
◼
►
Just 5 bucks a month, will it just 5 bucks a month?
00:52:38
◼
►
All your data safe secure for just 5 bucks a month.
00:52:41
◼
►
Think of all those photos, those vacations and pictures from holidays.
00:52:47
◼
►
In a blink of an eye, you'll find a new one.
00:52:52
◼
►
Safe, secure for just about $1 a month
00:52:55
◼
►
Think of all those photos
00:52:57
◼
►
Those vacations and pictures from holidays
00:53:00
◼
►
In a blink of an eye they could all just go away
00:53:04
◼
►
For the price of a cup of coffee they could all be safe
00:53:08
◼
►
It's so easy to use, it just works in the background
00:53:13
◼
►
Set it up once and never think about it again
00:53:17
◼
►
Get your files one at a time
00:53:19
◼
►
Or if your hard drive dies
00:53:21
◼
►
I'll send you a new one before you know With all your files ready to go
00:53:25
◼
►
There's a better way, it's called backdays Unlimited storage for five bucks a month
00:53:33
◼
►
Unlimited file size, unlimited upload speed All of your data for five bucks a month
00:53:41
◼
►
Just five bucks a month, will it Just five bucks a month, say what
00:53:45
◼
►
All your data safe secure for just five bucks a month
00:53:49
◼
►
♫ It's just five bucks a month
00:53:51
◼
►
♫ Well it's just five bucks a month
00:53:53
◼
►
♫ Just five bucks a month
00:53:55
◼
►
♫ Well it's just five bucks a month ♫
00:53:57
◼
►
- So go to backblaze.com/ATP.
00:53:59
◼
►
Thanks a lot once again to Backblaze.
00:54:01
◼
►
Backblaze.com/ATP.
00:54:03
◼
►
- Alright, is there anything else on Skylake
00:54:05
◼
►
or do we wanna jump backwards in the notes
00:54:08
◼
►
to model lineup?
00:54:09
◼
►
- Yeah, that's a quickie left over from last week.
00:54:12
◼
►
I think we can jump backwards to that briefly.
00:54:14
◼
►
I put that in there to remind me,
00:54:17
◼
►
This is kind of like a... on the eve of the Apple Watch release to the general public,
00:54:24
◼
►
Tim Cook's first big new product category that, you know, that everyone cares about.
00:54:30
◼
►
His first big test sort of getting out from under the shadow of Steve Jobs.
00:54:33
◼
►
He's no longer the steward of the company taking control over it.
00:54:37
◼
►
I started thinking back on like, what does Tim Cook's Apple look like and how does it
00:54:42
◼
►
differ than Steve Jobs' Apple?
00:54:44
◼
►
one particular way that I've seen a lot of people bringing up lately and thinking about
00:54:49
◼
►
as well is what is Tim Cook's philosophy about the model lineup versus Steve Jobs?
00:54:55
◼
►
And a lot of people talked about, oh, the model lineup is getting more complicated and
00:54:59
◼
►
Steve Jobs loved to have a simplified product line and Tim Cook, even though he goes on
00:55:05
◼
►
shows and says, all of Apple's products can fit on this table, when people post pictures
00:55:10
◼
►
of the Apple website and say, just look at all these freaking options.
00:55:12
◼
►
It's not like Dell.com yet, but there's a lot more products and a lot more options.
00:55:15
◼
►
Granted, a lot of that has to do with the fashion and the watch bands and selling laptops
00:55:19
◼
►
in different colors.
00:55:20
◼
►
It's not really that big.
00:55:22
◼
►
But what made me think about it the most was when they introduced the new MacBook, they
00:55:28
◼
►
didn't get rid of the Airs.
00:55:29
◼
►
In fact, they revised them.
00:55:32
◼
►
And the history of Tim Cook's Apple of introducing new models but keeping the old ones around,
00:55:37
◼
►
both as part of the overall iOS strategy but also for the Macs and stuff.
00:55:41
◼
►
Steve Jobs style move would be to introduce the new MacBook and get rid of the errors. Why would he do that?
00:55:48
◼
►
Because the the errors are crap, even if they were upgraded they wouldn't be as good. This new one is the future of laptops
00:55:55
◼
►
This is what you should be using. This is the replacement for the errors
00:55:57
◼
►
You know, we'll sell out the inventory we have but this is the future and people would complain because they would say but but but it
00:56:03
◼
►
Doesn't do what the errors do here and that and there's no 11-inch model in this 11-inch model had Thunderbolt and all these things
00:56:09
◼
►
And the Steve Jobs philosophy was always when they come out with the new thing
00:56:12
◼
►
Everyone get on board. The new thing is the new thing
00:56:15
◼
►
I'm the all I can't even look at the old thing and I can't even look at that old computer
00:56:18
◼
►
it was so disgusting to me that we just need to get it out of line and
00:56:21
◼
►
Tim Cook's philosophy is not like that Tim Cook's philosophy as far as I can tell is
00:56:26
◼
►
Much more pragmatic to say although we think this is the best one and people should buy this
00:56:30
◼
►
There's no harm in keeping the other ones around until we have and replacements
00:56:34
◼
►
Well, in fact, we can revise them and make them a little bit better
00:56:36
◼
►
Yeah, they're probably gonna be phased out
00:56:37
◼
►
"but in the meantime, let's just keep selling them."
00:56:40
◼
►
Basically, if people are buying them, keep selling them.
00:56:42
◼
►
Why are we taking away models that people wanna buy
00:56:44
◼
►
and trying to force them to buy the model
00:56:46
◼
►
that we think they should buy, right?
00:56:48
◼
►
And that, I think, if I'm even close in this,
00:56:51
◼
►
and I don't have like huge dreams of supporting it,
00:56:54
◼
►
and it's just a general feeling
00:56:55
◼
►
from seeing the different model lines,
00:56:56
◼
►
is one of the first things I've seen
00:56:59
◼
►
that is a difference between Tim Cook's Apple
00:57:01
◼
►
and Steve Jobs' Apple,
00:57:02
◼
►
but besides things like, obviously, their demeanor
00:57:04
◼
►
and the charitable contributions
00:57:08
◼
►
and all that other stuff that's kind of extracurricular.
00:57:10
◼
►
Talk about the products and the product lines themselves.
00:57:13
◼
►
Tim Cook's Apple seems much more like a regular business
00:57:17
◼
►
in that they're not gonna leave money on the table
00:57:19
◼
►
but pulling products that people still wanna buy.
00:57:21
◼
►
Whereas Steve Jobs' Apple would pull products
00:57:23
◼
►
that people still wanna buy,
00:57:24
◼
►
basically for philosophical reasons,
00:57:26
◼
►
'cause he can't stand to look at the old ones
00:57:27
◼
►
'cause the new one is better
00:57:29
◼
►
and that's just what he wants to do.
00:57:30
◼
►
And that is the strongest thing I've felt about
00:57:34
◼
►
Tim Cook's Apple differs from Steve Jobs' Apple
00:57:37
◼
►
I think in history of all the little things that we've ever talked about and I don't want to know if you guys like
00:57:41
◼
►
Do you feel that as well or am I crazy and Steve Jobs did exactly the same thing as Tim Cook is doing it?
00:57:46
◼
►
I'm just misremembering
00:57:47
◼
►
No, I think this seems different during my
00:57:51
◼
►
tenure as an Apple fan that I
00:57:55
◼
►
wonder if this has to do with Tim being a
00:58:01
◼
►
Supply chain guy and not fearing that not to say that that's what motivated Steve because I think you're right
00:58:06
◼
►
I think Steve is motivated by this is the new hotness
00:58:09
◼
►
You will like it or you will screw off and I think with Tim it's it's a little like you had said John
00:58:17
◼
►
Well, what's it gonna hurt and and I think?
00:58:19
◼
►
It's a lot of well
00:58:21
◼
►
I know it's not gonna hurt anything because I used to do this and and I know how the supply chain works and I know
00:58:27
◼
►
That this we can handle this. I mean does that sound reasonable?
00:58:30
◼
►
It's not like that's applied to me. It's like bean counting, but that's that's a pejorative like it's not
00:58:35
◼
►
we can make a few extra cents here because like Apple did keep all models around when they had to and people in the chat room
00:58:40
◼
►
Point out like they would they would often say this model will still be available but only for education purposes like Steve Jobs wasn't
00:58:45
◼
►
Totally out of touch with the needs of the customers if there's some big important customer base
00:58:50
◼
►
Which used to be education back in the day was saying like well education really needs this so we're gonna keep selling it
00:58:55
◼
►
but we're only going to sell it to education rather than selling it to everybody and that
00:59:00
◼
►
You know, I'm sure there have been cases where Steve Jobs did not immediately wipe out the new model with the old models with the new
00:59:06
◼
►
But when he could you could tell that
00:59:08
◼
►
I mean just you felt from him that
00:59:11
◼
►
He wanted you to like this new one as much as he does and part of helping you along that path would be to take
00:59:17
◼
►
Away the old one. So your only choice is the new one, right?
00:59:19
◼
►
I mean, I think this is kind of a combination of factors, you know part of it is
00:59:24
◼
►
Probably the Tim Cook, you know method or Tim Cook's principles
00:59:29
◼
►
coming up, you know, where this is the way he chooses to run things. I think though this
00:59:33
◼
►
did start under Steve. And it might have just corresponded with the rise of Tim Cook's authority
00:59:41
◼
►
and power in the company. And as Steve started having more severe medical issues in his last
00:59:46
◼
►
few years, as Tim, you know, ran more of the company, you know, so it might have been that
00:59:52
◼
►
overlap. I think it's also a sign of Apple just maturing as a company. They now have
00:59:57
◼
►
way more customers than they did before.
00:59:59
◼
►
They have products that span much larger price ranges.
01:00:02
◼
►
The old small product lines were all expensive.
01:00:06
◼
►
Now they have products that start at moderate prices
01:00:10
◼
►
and go into expensive.
01:00:12
◼
►
So they have more product lines,
01:00:15
◼
►
and also a lot of the technology really has slowed down.
01:00:19
◼
►
I mean, the phones keep advancing pretty aggressively,
01:00:23
◼
►
although even that's starting to slow down a little bit.
01:00:26
◼
►
But if you look at the Mac books, or the Mac in general,
01:00:30
◼
►
advancement in PCs has been,
01:00:33
◼
►
and I'm including Macs in that,
01:00:35
◼
►
advancement in PCs has been pretty slow
01:00:38
◼
►
in the last five or 10 years.
01:00:40
◼
►
The SSD transition was the big thing that happened.
01:00:43
◼
►
And retina's happening mostly,
01:00:45
◼
►
but it's happening more slowly.
01:00:47
◼
►
Well, both of those are happening slowly.
01:00:48
◼
►
But once you go retina and SSD, those are two big jumps,
01:00:52
◼
►
and then CPUs have kind of gone nowhere
01:00:54
◼
►
in the last few years.
01:00:55
◼
►
they've made very small improvements at best.
01:00:57
◼
►
Everything's kinda like, not at a standstill,
01:01:02
◼
►
but certainly slowing down.
01:01:05
◼
►
And so, hardware that was perfectly fine a few years ago
01:01:09
◼
►
is still perfectly fine today.
01:01:11
◼
►
The difference between the performance of the MacBook Air
01:01:16
◼
►
versus the performance of the 15-inch matters a lot less
01:01:20
◼
►
today from what most people do.
01:01:22
◼
►
So there's all these,
01:01:24
◼
►
it just seemed like the hardware has gotten so good
01:01:26
◼
►
that you don't need to be in as big of a rush
01:01:29
◼
►
to get rid of the old stuff.
01:01:30
◼
►
And the new stuff isn't so dramatically much better
01:01:33
◼
►
that everyone is forced or everyone is strongly encouraged
01:01:36
◼
►
to buy it instead.
01:01:38
◼
►
There's still room in the lineup.
01:01:39
◼
►
And so by keeping old lines around
01:01:41
◼
►
or by keeping more lines around
01:01:43
◼
►
than the original Steve four boxes thing,
01:01:45
◼
►
I think it allows them to serve way more customers
01:01:50
◼
►
in a way that doesn't necessarily hurt anybody.
01:01:53
◼
►
It's not really that confusing for the most part.
01:01:55
◼
►
Occasionally there's some weird overlap,
01:01:57
◼
►
but usually that's resolved within a couple years.
01:02:00
◼
►
I just think for the most part,
01:02:01
◼
►
this is just a sign of both the PC industry
01:02:05
◼
►
and Apple maturing.
01:02:07
◼
►
- I don't know if it's a maturing thing,
01:02:09
◼
►
but because I can't decide which is particularly better,
01:02:14
◼
►
which shows more maturity,
01:02:16
◼
►
because the type of thing of keeping products around
01:02:19
◼
►
is just like, well, that's what business always does.
01:02:21
◼
►
It's not a new phenomenon.
01:02:22
◼
►
It's not a sign of a young or an old company all companies do it because it's basically smart from a business perspective
01:02:26
◼
►
Like if you want to give you money for a product keeps selling it to them until it doesn't make sense for you to sell
01:02:31
◼
►
It to him for you guys not enough people buy it like the 17-inch MacBook or whatever whatever was called when it went away
01:02:36
◼
►
Didn't go away. I'm assuming for philosophical reason when I guess not enough people buy them, right?
01:02:41
◼
►
That's you know, that's why the Mac Pro didn't get updated for a long time, you know, like
01:02:44
◼
►
Volumes can make you discontinue a product line. But when you have something like this where the new MacBook comes out
01:02:52
◼
►
It basically obsoletes all the other, the Airs.
01:02:57
◼
►
It should have just been called,
01:02:58
◼
►
people expected it to be called an Air
01:02:59
◼
►
and wipe out all the Airs, but it was like,
01:03:00
◼
►
this is a discontinuity,
01:03:02
◼
►
in the same way that the first Air was a discontinuity
01:03:04
◼
►
and the first Unibody was a discontinuity
01:03:06
◼
►
in their laptop design.
01:03:07
◼
►
It's clearly, this is the spearhead
01:03:10
◼
►
of the new design philosophy for laptops.
01:03:13
◼
►
There's been generations where they just get revved,
01:03:14
◼
►
revved, revved, and then retina,
01:03:16
◼
►
and then this is like, I would say it's like,
01:03:21
◼
►
Aluminum aluminum unibody first air, you know aluminum and then I guess first air was the first unit body
01:03:27
◼
►
So that's two and one and then and then this and this is like totally removing ports
01:03:31
◼
►
Slim at all cost retina like has has the screen of the pros
01:03:37
◼
►
But the the power and size of the air is and like it's such an overlaps
01:03:43
◼
►
like why keep you understand keeping like maybe an old thing around or a cheaper thing around or the non retina one around because it's
01:03:48
◼
►
But like the overlap with the air is insane with this thing like it's like what what are you it?
01:03:54
◼
►
It doesn't send a clear message
01:03:55
◼
►
Are you saying this is the future of things, but you can still buy these other ones
01:03:58
◼
►
Why would I buy these other ones when you go to an Apple store?
01:04:01
◼
►
How will they explain to you to choose between?
01:04:03
◼
►
The I guess it's like the the crappy screen versus non crappy screen
01:04:07
◼
►
But why keep around the one with the crappy screen like I totally believe not that again
01:04:11
◼
►
Not this makes it good or bad
01:04:12
◼
►
But I totally believe the Steve Jobs would have
01:04:14
◼
►
Gotten rid of the air's like he would have sold out the inventory and the new MacBook would have come out and that would have taken
01:04:19
◼
►
The spot in the line and for a while their line would not be correctly proportioned
01:04:23
◼
►
But eventually they would all convert and everything would be fine instead the Tim Cook model line philosophy is of course
01:04:29
◼
►
You keep selling the areas eventually. We won't eventually they'll go away. Obviously, we're not gonna keep revving that line probably or if we do
01:04:34
◼
►
They're going to they're going to transform to be things that have one or zero USB C ports on them
01:04:38
◼
►
Right, like no one expects the heiress the next revision of the air still have Thunderbolt ports on them
01:04:43
◼
►
Right, like they're going to all look like the new MacBook and so will the pros eventually in terms of the port layouts and everything
01:04:49
◼
►
I am that is the new design philosophy and it's just weird to see them coexisting. I think the the jobs philosophy is
01:04:55
◼
►
bolder and sort of
01:04:57
◼
►
Expresses the intent of Apple like their vision of technology out into the world
01:05:01
◼
►
In a way in a stronger way in the same way that annoys people because you take away their products
01:05:07
◼
►
It sends the message to everyone else that like this is our vision of the future and we are leading
01:05:12
◼
►
Right and then Tim Cook way is more sort of
01:05:14
◼
►
This is our vision of the future, but we understand if you're not ready for it yet. We'd also have another product
01:05:19
◼
►
It's actually pretty darn good, and you can still buy it eventually they'll go away
01:05:22
◼
►
It seems more chill and it's less exciting to me as an observer
01:05:28
◼
►
It's probably better for the business business wise short term
01:05:32
◼
►
I don't know if it's better long term if taken to its logical conclusion
01:05:35
◼
►
well you just
01:05:37
◼
►
sell models forever until people stop buying them because I think people will continue to buy models that they
01:05:42
◼
►
quote-unquote shouldn't
01:05:43
◼
►
For a really long time and sometimes you have to sort of herd them along to the new model by taking away the old model
01:05:48
◼
►
The same time you bring in the new ones. Yeah, that's fair
01:05:50
◼
►
I think maybe a lot of it might have to do with how much of a compromise in certain ways the new one is
01:05:55
◼
►
First the old one like the greatest example
01:05:57
◼
►
I think of Steve killing off an old product when the new one came out was the iPad or the iPod
01:06:02
◼
►
Mini going to the iPod nano
01:06:05
◼
►
That was like the canonical example of like and he even said on stage is like the iPod mini was like our best-selling iPod ever
01:06:11
◼
►
And we're discontinuing it today and people would have kept buying the mini if they kept selling it
01:06:15
◼
►
It came in more colors people loved it the form factor and everything even though you'd look at it like who the hell would buy
01:06:20
◼
►
This thing when the nano is out even though the nano scratches like hell, right?
01:06:23
◼
►
But yeah, who the hell would buy this thing when the nano is available people would keep buying them because they came in
01:06:28
◼
►
You know yellow and pink or whatever. They came in gold right the first gold thing, right and
01:06:34
◼
►
By making that decision, it wasn't just bold
01:06:36
◼
►
and showing their vision of the future,
01:06:37
◼
►
it was forcing the world to move on faster
01:06:41
◼
►
than they would have otherwise,
01:06:42
◼
►
which is upsetting to some people,
01:06:44
◼
►
but it's the advantage that Apple has,
01:06:48
◼
►
that they can sort of herd their customer base along
01:06:51
◼
►
at a faster clip than everybody else
01:06:52
◼
►
because they're not afraid to take away
01:06:54
◼
►
products the customers still like.
01:06:56
◼
►
- Well, but in that example of the iPod Mini to Nano,
01:07:00
◼
►
like the way the Nano was worse than the Mini
01:07:03
◼
►
or more limiting were very small.
01:07:05
◼
►
It had less capacity, but not by a whole lot.
01:07:07
◼
►
I think it was like six gigs versus four,
01:07:09
◼
►
something like that.
01:07:10
◼
►
So it was a relatively small drop in capacity.
01:07:14
◼
►
- It was a first gen product
01:07:15
◼
►
that got scratches all over it.
01:07:17
◼
►
That's the whole thing.
01:07:17
◼
►
If you're saying this is the bold new vision
01:07:19
◼
►
and if your first gen project has some sort of problems,
01:07:21
◼
►
you're like, oh, well, I'll just buy the old one.
01:07:23
◼
►
Oh, wait, I can't, they took that one away.
01:07:25
◼
►
- Well, but for the most part,
01:07:26
◼
►
I don't think people are doing that kind of calculus
01:07:27
◼
►
of like, oh, well, let me just wait till the problem surface
01:07:30
◼
►
and buy the old one.
01:07:31
◼
►
I don't think anybody except you
01:07:32
◼
►
puts that much thought into that.
01:07:33
◼
►
But that was an easy transition to force
01:07:36
◼
►
because the new one was a lot better
01:07:39
◼
►
in some really critical ways.
01:07:41
◼
►
And the ways in which it was worse than the old one
01:07:45
◼
►
or more limiting were fairly minor.
01:07:47
◼
►
Whereas when you look at something like now,
01:07:50
◼
►
the new MacBook versus the MacBook Air,
01:07:53
◼
►
the ways in which it is worse or more limiting
01:07:56
◼
►
than the old one are pretty big still.
01:07:58
◼
►
Like it's pretty substantial.
01:08:00
◼
►
like the port differences are massive,
01:08:03
◼
►
the keyboard might be significantly worse,
01:08:06
◼
►
we don't know yet, we'll see.
01:08:08
◼
►
And then in these new ways it is way better,
01:08:10
◼
►
it is thinner, lighter,
01:08:12
◼
►
somewhat longer battery life
01:08:14
◼
►
at least compared to the 11 inch probably.
01:08:17
◼
►
It's also, although unfortunately,
01:08:19
◼
►
it's also probably a lot slower CPU wise.
01:08:22
◼
►
So, you know, there's this one,
01:08:25
◼
►
I think it's, you can look at the easy transition,
01:08:30
◼
►
of the iPod Mini to Nano, that's a no brainer.
01:08:35
◼
►
The MacBook Air to new MacBook,
01:08:37
◼
►
I think forcing that on people,
01:08:39
◼
►
not leaving that old option behind
01:08:40
◼
►
until some of the stuff shakes out and matures,
01:08:43
◼
►
that would be I think a lot more damaging,
01:08:44
◼
►
especially because the MacBook Air line,
01:08:49
◼
►
maybe not the 11, I don't know, but probably the 13,
01:08:52
◼
►
that's probably their best selling computer.
01:08:54
◼
►
- Well that's the Tim Cook reason not to get rid of it,
01:08:57
◼
►
'cause people are still buying a ton of them,
01:08:58
◼
►
and like the Steve Jobs would be like,
01:08:59
◼
►
I don't care again the the iPod mini people are buying a ton of them
01:09:03
◼
►
I'm thinking of even a more boring one like when the the I forget what you want to call
01:09:07
◼
►
But the the iMac with the big metal arm with the first flat panel iMac or that one yeah, right?
01:09:12
◼
►
So the previous iMacs with the CRT is with all the pretty colors people would have kept buying them too
01:09:16
◼
►
Especially if they were slightly cheaper or got slightly cheaper when the thing came out
01:09:19
◼
►
Or well apparently we're not gonna get to again this week, but the Apple TV is another example
01:09:25
◼
►
Do you think they'll keep selling the $69 one when the new one comes out? Maybe it's I think they've already told us
01:09:31
◼
►
They will it's a Tim Cook kind of thing to do right but a Steve Jobs thing is this is the new Apple TV and the
01:09:35
◼
►
Old one is gone. This is the new iMac and the old iMac is gone, right?
01:09:38
◼
►
Well, I believe the whole thing everyone's jumping on about how they said the Apple TV starting at 69
01:09:44
◼
►
I think that tells you right there that that I don't think you need to see that to know that a new Apple TV is
01:09:48
◼
►
Come look if they're gonna do the Apple TV as a product
01:09:50
◼
►
They have to revise it sometime and when they drop them and they drop the price on the old one, of course
01:09:54
◼
►
they're gonna, yeah.
01:09:55
◼
►
- No, but I'm saying like that I think indicates that
01:09:57
◼
►
you know, it's not gonna, this isn't gonna,
01:09:59
◼
►
this isn't gonna be for sale at this price
01:10:01
◼
►
and then for you know, six months or whatever
01:10:03
◼
►
and then be discontinued.
01:10:05
◼
►
I think they're gonna, it's just gonna be
01:10:06
◼
►
the bottom of the line.
01:10:07
◼
►
It's gonna keep being sold forever.
01:10:08
◼
►
We're gonna have A5, look they're still selling
01:10:10
◼
►
the freaking iPod touch.
01:10:11
◼
►
That's less updated than what, 2012?
01:10:14
◼
►
- I know, I know.
01:10:15
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean like.
01:10:16
◼
►
- Well that's just saying, this type of philosophy,
01:10:20
◼
►
the Tim Cook's Apple philosophy
01:10:22
◼
►
And maybe the tail end of Steve Jobs' Apple philosophy was,
01:10:25
◼
►
you keep selling products as long as people keep wanting
01:10:29
◼
►
to buy them within reason.
01:10:31
◼
►
Like, you know, eventually not enough people wanna buy them
01:10:35
◼
►
or there's no place in your product line for it.
01:10:37
◼
►
But if there's still a place in your product line,
01:10:39
◼
►
we'll just, you know, like the iPod touch,
01:10:40
◼
►
why the iPod touch still even exist?
01:10:42
◼
►
Well, I mean, they don't sell a lot of them.
01:10:44
◼
►
We see their sales number.
01:10:44
◼
►
It's not as if tons of people are selling them,
01:10:46
◼
►
but enough people are buying them that it's like,
01:10:49
◼
►
well, why not?
01:10:51
◼
►
Whereas at this point, I think Steve Jobs
01:10:53
◼
►
would have lost faith in the iPod Touch as a product
01:10:55
◼
►
and just canned it.
01:10:57
◼
►
- I mean, they're still selling the non-Retina MacBook Pro
01:11:00
◼
►
with the DVD-ROM drive.
01:11:02
◼
►
- I know, I know, with the optical drive.
01:11:03
◼
►
Again, because optical drives,
01:11:05
◼
►
we're taking the optical drives away.
01:11:06
◼
►
Soon they'll be gone from all our products,
01:11:07
◼
►
except this one thing will linger on forever,
01:11:09
◼
►
because we know there's somehow enough people
01:11:11
◼
►
who wanna buy it with an optical drive.
01:11:12
◼
►
And it's not just, education's another thing.
01:11:14
◼
►
Like corporate sales or education,
01:11:16
◼
►
where it's like we demand this and we're a big customer,
01:11:19
◼
►
they've always been able to,
01:11:20
◼
►
as we've said in the past shows,
01:11:21
◼
►
Apple used to make specific products just for education.
01:11:25
◼
►
Like that's how important education was as a customer.
01:11:27
◼
►
Now they'll just keep all the ones around,
01:11:28
◼
►
but they're just, you know,
01:11:29
◼
►
having the one with the CD drive in it
01:11:31
◼
►
or having non-retina MacBooks still for sale
01:11:35
◼
►
or having the Air still for sale,
01:11:36
◼
►
it's not so much that it confuses the line,
01:11:40
◼
►
but it is definitely not like Apple clearly speaking out
01:11:44
◼
►
and saying, "This is the future, these are our products."
01:11:46
◼
►
And I think Tim Cook's table where he keeps all the products
01:11:49
◼
►
is gonna have to be a pretty darn big table pretty soon.
01:11:52
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean that big glass watch box
01:11:55
◼
►
takes up probably half the table now.
01:11:56
◼
►
- Yeah, the watches you can put in a jumble in a pile,
01:11:58
◼
►
but you gotta have all those different varieties
01:12:01
◼
►
of MacBooks and the big iMacs,
01:12:04
◼
►
and I guess you can put the two Mac Pros, anyway.
01:12:06
◼
►
- Does each color of like the iPads and everything,
01:12:08
◼
►
does each color count?
01:12:09
◼
►
Although if you line iPads up like a bookshelf,
01:12:12
◼
►
like on their ends and like just stick them between.
01:12:15
◼
►
- Exactly, you just stack them, yeah, they're stackable.
01:12:17
◼
►
But yeah, I guess you could stack the laptops too.
01:12:20
◼
►
I think that's the strategy.
01:12:21
◼
►
It's the 3D strategy, just stacking.
01:12:23
◼
►
All of our products fold flat except for, I guess,
01:12:25
◼
►
the iMac and the tubes we can kind of stack like cord would.
01:12:28
◼
►
So you can get them all on the table.
01:12:30
◼
►
Someone should do that.
01:12:31
◼
►
Someone who had too much money should say,
01:12:33
◼
►
"How big a table do you need to put all the products
01:12:35
◼
►
"Apple sells in it?"
01:12:36
◼
►
And I mean all of them.
01:12:36
◼
►
I want all the colors, all the bands for all the watches,
01:12:39
◼
►
all the different models of iPads with different Wi-Fi
01:12:42
◼
►
and the colors for the iPads too.
01:12:44
◼
►
Anyway, yeah.
01:12:46
◼
►
That was my thought on the model line philosophy.
01:12:49
◼
►
- All right, we good?
01:12:51
◼
►
- Before we forget, since it's been an entire show
01:12:55
◼
►
plus an entire hour since the Nintendo thing was announced
01:12:58
◼
►
and we still haven't talked about it,
01:12:59
◼
►
let's talk about the Nintendo thing now.
01:13:01
◼
►
- All right, so John, who did Nintendo sell to?
01:13:05
◼
►
- Nobody in South, anyway, they did a partnership deal
01:13:08
◼
►
with DNA, which is spelled capital D lowercase E,
01:13:11
◼
►
capital N, capital A, instead of Dana,
01:13:13
◼
►
which would be better.
01:13:14
◼
►
- I've been saying Dina in my head.
01:13:15
◼
►
I guess that you're what makes a lot more sense.
01:13:19
◼
►
And as a partnership with them,
01:13:20
◼
►
they're a company that makes mobile games.
01:13:22
◼
►
And this is basically Nintendo saying,
01:13:24
◼
►
"We don't know how to make mobile games.
01:13:27
◼
►
We need mobile games quickly.
01:13:29
◼
►
We don't have time to learn how to make mobile games.
01:13:32
◼
►
Therefore, this company that we're going to partner with
01:13:35
◼
►
will make mobile games for us
01:13:37
◼
►
using our intellectual property."
01:13:39
◼
►
I would imagine that Nintendo is still in a position
01:13:42
◼
►
strong enough to make this partnership
01:13:44
◼
►
the way they usually do, which is,
01:13:46
◼
►
you will make a game for us,
01:13:49
◼
►
but we will tell you that your game is crappy
01:13:51
◼
►
and tell you how to change it.
01:13:52
◼
►
So like when Retro Studios made Metroid Prime,
01:13:55
◼
►
oh, Retro Studios, they're making Metroid Prime, right?
01:13:57
◼
►
Yeah, they're making Metroid Prime,
01:13:58
◼
►
and then Miyamoto comes and tells them
01:13:59
◼
►
how their game sucks and how they have to change it.
01:14:02
◼
►
And they repeat that process over and over again
01:14:04
◼
►
until Miyamoto is satisfied,
01:14:05
◼
►
and then you get to release what you call Metroid Prime.
01:14:07
◼
►
And it's like, we want you to do the part
01:14:09
◼
►
that you're good at, which is we have no idea
01:14:11
◼
►
how to do this mobile development stuff.
01:14:12
◼
►
But I would imagine that Nintendo is still in the same kind of position Apple is in with
01:14:18
◼
►
its suppliers.
01:14:19
◼
►
We are Nintendo.
01:14:20
◼
►
We'll tell you when you've done a good enough job.
01:14:22
◼
►
This partnership deal heavily favors us.
01:14:24
◼
►
But it is a partnership deal.
01:14:26
◼
►
This is not a strength move.
01:14:27
◼
►
This is a sign of weakness, a sign that we need money.
01:14:33
◼
►
Our products aren't selling because we made bad choices when we designed them.
01:14:37
◼
►
We need games.
01:14:38
◼
►
We need revenue.
01:14:39
◼
►
We can't ignore mobile.
01:14:40
◼
►
also can't make mobile games on our own. I think partnering is probably a good idea because
01:14:45
◼
►
Nintendo has shown they are fairly incompetent at all the parts of making games except for
01:14:50
◼
►
the part where you play the game. Like networking, friend systems, the equivalent of Xbox Live
01:14:55
◼
►
type stuff, app stores. Trying to buy, digitally buy games from Nintendo is like pulling teeth.
01:15:00
◼
►
It's like have they never, you know, the joke is always like that all Nintendo's employees
01:15:05
◼
►
are never allowed to use any other game system nor are they allowed to have smartphones.
01:15:09
◼
►
they're probably not also allowed to use the internet.
01:15:11
◼
►
And that's why they have no idea
01:15:12
◼
►
how the rest of the world works.
01:15:14
◼
►
So, you know, if you find yourself entering friend codes
01:15:16
◼
►
or trying to buy something from the eShop
01:15:18
◼
►
and going through 8,000 steps
01:15:19
◼
►
or trying to transfer your stuff
01:15:20
◼
►
from one of Nintendo's platforms to another
01:15:22
◼
►
and taking a million steps for that
01:15:24
◼
►
involving swapping SD cards
01:15:26
◼
►
or realizing that your games are tied to your hardware,
01:15:28
◼
►
not to use your account,
01:15:29
◼
►
which is just mind boggling in its wrongness and craziness
01:15:32
◼
►
and being out of step with the rest of the industry.
01:15:35
◼
►
All that leads me to believe
01:15:36
◼
►
they made the right move by partnering, but it's not a strength move. It's kind of a sad
01:15:41
◼
►
situation and I'm not quite sure what's going to come of it. A partnership deal doesn't
01:15:45
◼
►
mean anything. They haven't announced any games. All they said is all of Nintendo's
01:15:49
◼
►
intellectual property is up for grabs and hopefully some fruit will come from this in
01:15:54
◼
►
the future. They've also said by the way they're not porting their games, which means this
01:15:58
◼
►
company is going to be making new games, so don't expect "insert your favorite Nintendo
01:16:02
◼
►
game here" is going to appear on your mobile phone because it's not. They are absolutely
01:16:05
◼
►
not porting any of their games, which means they have to make new games, and those new
01:16:08
◼
►
games I think are not going to be what Nintendo fans want.
01:16:12
◼
►
It's not like, "Oh, I would love it, a 2D side-scrolling Metroid on my phone."
01:16:16
◼
►
I'm thinking that's not what you're going to get.
01:16:18
◼
►
I'm thinking you're going to get something more like the Pokemon Shuffle game they made
01:16:22
◼
►
for the 3DS that's like, it's a simpler mobile-style focused game using Nintendo intellectual property,
01:16:30
◼
►
but it is not, "Let me just take what I think of as a typical Nintendo console or handheld
01:16:34
◼
►
game and shove it onto a mobile phone because A) that wouldn't work and B) that's just
01:16:38
◼
►
not what this partnership seems like it's about to me.
01:16:41
◼
►
Well I think, I don't think that's as big of a problem as some people are going to say
01:16:45
◼
►
because Nintendo's fans are already buying their stuff. This is not to attract Nintendo's
01:16:52
◼
►
fans to suddenly start playing Nintendo games on their smartphones. Because if you're
01:16:56
◼
►
a Nintendo fan you already have one of their systems or at least one of their systems and
01:17:00
◼
►
you know you're already buying all their little plastic accessories and everything
01:17:03
◼
►
and you're fine. This is trying, I would assume, this is trying to attract new customers who
01:17:10
◼
►
don't, who aren't yet Nintendo fans. And this I think is going to be a real uphill battle
01:17:15
◼
►
for them. I really don't see this succeeding. I mean, I could be wrong, I'm wrong about
01:17:19
◼
►
a lot of things, but I think this is going to be tough because, you know, the risk of
01:17:25
◼
►
the games being crappy, or at least nothing special, is very high. You know, as you said,
01:17:31
◼
►
It sounds like Nintendo's basically, you know, I mean they bought a chunk of DNA so, you
01:17:37
◼
►
know, they're serious about it but I think these are basically just gonna be DNA games
01:17:43
◼
►
that happen to include Nintendo characters in them.
01:17:46
◼
►
Well that's where I was getting into Miyamoto coming and scolding them because their game's
01:17:49
◼
►
not good enough because I imagine like this partnership, whatever the deal is, like they
01:17:53
◼
►
buy 10% of the company and it's like the partnership, Nintendo is the senior partner here by a lot
01:17:58
◼
►
And so they have a lot of control over how...
01:18:01
◼
►
Like, because they're saying you can use any of our IP,
01:18:04
◼
►
I think Nintendo is still going to be very protective of its IP
01:18:07
◼
►
and not inclined to release a game that's terrible.
01:18:09
◼
►
And I think you're right about like, this is aimed at...
01:18:11
◼
►
It's money that's been left on the table.
01:18:13
◼
►
It's saying, look, these people are never going to buy a Nintendo console,
01:18:16
◼
►
but they would totally willingly buy a $1 iOS game featuring Mario.
01:18:21
◼
►
Why are we not taking their money?
01:18:23
◼
►
It's not even like we expect them to go out and buy a 3DS or Wii U.
01:18:26
◼
►
It's just like they will buy this iOS game. It won't cost us that much to make it. Why are we not making it for them?
01:18:32
◼
►
It's not like we're saying. Oh, we're gonna make this game instead of instead of a new real Mario game
01:18:36
◼
►
We're gonna make this game instead of a new console Metroid
01:18:38
◼
►
No, they're gonna still make all those games. But why are we not taking these people's money or looking at the nicer way?
01:18:44
◼
►
Why are we not giving them some cute little you know?
01:18:47
◼
►
Mobile game featuring our characters to play why not?
01:18:50
◼
►
What what is you know?
01:18:51
◼
►
And the reason was because we have no idea how to do that and we're really bad at making that those parts of the games
01:18:56
◼
►
But we don't need to build those expertise in-house. We don't need to be distract our engineers from there. You know working on our next generation
01:19:04
◼
►
handheld console project
01:19:07
◼
►
We can just partner with this and then we can drive this partner who is the the junior partner to make sure that they are
01:19:13
◼
►
respectable or intellectual property and release a game that is at the very least a
01:19:17
◼
►
Good game and is competent is gonna set the world on fire is it gonna be great
01:19:21
◼
►
It maybe won't even sell as much as cross your road, but it will I think they'll be profitable right because
01:19:26
◼
►
Because DNA, like you said, already has the ability to make these games.
01:19:30
◼
►
The intellectual property is the real valuable thing, and that's what's going to make someone
01:19:33
◼
►
buy this game versus any other random game with less recognizable characters.
01:19:39
◼
►
And the secondary effect is, possibly, it could have the effect of scrubbing at least
01:19:43
◼
►
the iOS store clean of the million games that have pictures of Mario and Zelda in them.
01:19:48
◼
►
Well, so the idea that people will value these games higher because they have Nintendo IP
01:19:54
◼
►
in them, I'm not sure that's a given.
01:19:57
◼
►
- Oh, it's a given.
01:19:58
◼
►
They will buy them more.
01:20:00
◼
►
I don't know if they'll value them higher,
01:20:01
◼
►
but they'll be more likely to buy them.
01:20:02
◼
►
- Well, some people will be more likely to buy them,
01:20:04
◼
►
but I would bet the vast majority of people
01:20:07
◼
►
who buy games on iOS have never heard of Mario.
01:20:10
◼
►
They don't, they don't--
01:20:11
◼
►
- Everybody's heard of Mario.
01:20:12
◼
►
More people have heard of him than Mickey Mouse.
01:20:16
◼
►
- I would bet that the average age of iOS game buyers
01:20:20
◼
►
is low, first of all, lower than 35.
01:20:24
◼
►
so, you know, lower than us basically,
01:20:27
◼
►
by a significant amount.
01:20:29
◼
►
And if the people they're trying to attract
01:20:32
◼
►
are new fans who don't already have Nintendo allegiance,
01:20:37
◼
►
they've probably never owned a Nintendo system.
01:20:40
◼
►
- It's not that they're new fans,
01:20:42
◼
►
it's that they are people who,
01:20:43
◼
►
it's like the same way that you're aware of Mickey Mouse,
01:20:45
◼
►
maybe you never go to Disney World.
01:20:47
◼
►
It's like, I'm never gonna buy a Nintendo console
01:20:50
◼
►
'cause I'm an Xbox guy.
01:20:51
◼
►
But I heard of all those Nintendo characters,
01:20:52
◼
►
And I will buy a $1 game, and I'm more likely to buy the $1 game that has Mario in it.
01:20:57
◼
►
In fact, the Mario $1 game is more likely to be advertised, to be featured, for my friends to have bought it.
01:21:02
◼
►
It's just, it's...
01:21:04
◼
►
The intellectual property drives this, and as you said before, it could drive it in a way that it makes people buy crappy games.
01:21:10
◼
►
I'm hoping the games at least be reasonable, but it's not like you're trying to convert them,
01:21:14
◼
►
and it's not like you're going to find people who've never heard of Mario.
01:21:16
◼
►
You're finding people who, "Yeah, I've heard of Mario, but I'm still never going to buy a Nintendo console."
01:21:20
◼
►
But you will tap the button for 99 cents.
01:21:22
◼
►
Also, you forget Marco that consoles at least the way I define them aren't necessarily tied to a TV
01:21:29
◼
►
I mean there are gazillion
01:21:31
◼
►
handheld Nintendo devices out there and as far as I knew even
01:21:36
◼
►
Reasonably little kids today are still using like 3ds and things like that. I don't know John
01:21:42
◼
►
You could probably tell me better than the 3ds has been more successful than the Wii U
01:21:46
◼
►
Which is not saying much because the Wii U has been very honest and the rumors of the next generation project there
01:21:51
◼
►
These are old rumors so who knows what the hell's to your now is the idea that they would be unifying their platform so that they
01:21:56
◼
►
Are not so different to develop for whether that means they're gonna release something that works as a handheld system
01:22:00
◼
►
But can also hook up to your TV or whether it just means that they're gonna use the same underlying technology
01:22:05
◼
►
So there's not this Gulf so they have to develop a game twice because the you know in the same way that desktop and laptop
01:22:11
◼
►
Performance has been becoming closer now handheld performance and at least in the use case you you can imagine Nintendo making a single
01:22:20
◼
►
Writing a game that runs both on their TV connected console and on their handheld one whether those are two separate devices or not
01:22:26
◼
►
Basically because handheld consoles have good a good enough graphics now that you wouldn't be embarrassed to see them on the TV
01:22:31
◼
►
And that was that has you know many years ago. That was not the case. They've been
01:22:35
◼
►
converging towards each other so
01:22:37
◼
►
Yeah, that has little to do with this. I think this has entirely to do with
01:22:41
◼
►
What about the people who are never going to buy or play any of those type of games?
01:22:46
◼
►
They they only will they will only ever buy games in their phone. Why are we not selling them something?
01:22:50
◼
►
All right. No, I'm responding to Marco saying nobody knows who Mario is in so many words.
01:22:56
◼
►
And I think that a lot more people know who Mario is, even today, even young people than
01:23:01
◼
►
you would suspect. Another thing that I don't think we're considering is I've got to imagine
01:23:07
◼
►
that if Nintendo released a game in the App Store, that Apple will fall all over them
01:23:14
◼
►
and there'll be featured and there'll be all sorts of App Store marketing. And I suspect
01:23:19
◼
►
that you will definitely see that all over the App Store.
01:23:23
◼
►
- I just saw a screenshot today on Twitter
01:23:25
◼
►
of a game called Apple Watch It,
01:23:27
◼
►
which is a great name,
01:23:28
◼
►
Apple space watch space it exclamation point.
01:23:31
◼
►
And the icon is link as in Nintendo's intellectual property.
01:23:34
◼
►
That's the icon for the app, by the way,
01:23:36
◼
►
shooting an arrow in the game,
01:23:37
◼
►
I think is like you're using using link in the game
01:23:40
◼
►
to shoot an arrow off the head of somebody.
01:23:41
◼
►
So it's got the Apple Watch, like, you know,
01:23:44
◼
►
keyword trolling, and it's getting Nintendo intellectual
01:23:46
◼
►
property in the fricking icon and in the game.
01:23:49
◼
►
and that is like on the App Store right now.
01:23:51
◼
►
- Yeah, Underscore tweeted that earlier.
01:23:52
◼
►
- Yeah, yeah, I was like.
01:23:54
◼
►
- It's fantastic.
01:23:55
◼
►
- I mean, I know it's not Apple's responsibility
01:23:56
◼
►
to police these things, but.
01:23:57
◼
►
- No, it is.
01:23:58
◼
►
- You would think that Nintendo would wake up,
01:24:00
◼
►
like Nintendo could hire one person all day
01:24:03
◼
►
just to go through the iOS store
01:24:05
◼
►
and just send cease and desist letters,
01:24:07
◼
►
and like, 'cause you know,
01:24:08
◼
►
Apple will take them off the store in a second.
01:24:10
◼
►
- Well, they used to.
01:24:12
◼
►
- Oh, they will, they will take them.
01:24:13
◼
►
I mean, all they need, it's bureaucracy.
01:24:16
◼
►
All you need is your own bureaucrat
01:24:17
◼
►
to communicate with their bureaucrats
01:24:19
◼
►
bureaucrat ease and everything. It would be great if Nintendo could get the sweet deal
01:24:25
◼
►
that music and video copyright owners have with YouTube, where YouTube does the policing
01:24:32
◼
►
for them and just takes down anything that looks like it might be copyrighted in any
01:24:36
◼
►
way, like preemptively takes it down.
01:24:38
◼
►
Well, that's partly because I mean, YouTube was a platform that was created and thrived
01:24:43
◼
►
on completely ripping off everything from everybody. I mean, I know it's different now,
01:24:47
◼
►
but that's like, that's its origin.
01:24:49
◼
►
- But the fact that they'll do it preemptively
01:24:52
◼
►
and on behalf, like Apple system is one actually
01:24:54
◼
►
that makes sense.
01:24:55
◼
►
It's like, look, it's not our job
01:24:56
◼
►
to police your intellectual property.
01:24:57
◼
►
If you see someone violating your intellectual property,
01:24:59
◼
►
tell us and even then Apple will favor,
01:25:01
◼
►
will assume that you are right and take it down, I think.
01:25:04
◼
►
But like YouTube, like the big thing is like,
01:25:06
◼
►
who is it who does the Every Frame a Painting channel
01:25:10
◼
►
on YouTube, which is great by the way.
01:25:13
◼
►
He puts up videos that, you know,
01:25:14
◼
►
that talk about scenes from films.
01:25:16
◼
►
And of course, you know, all the videos have scenes
01:25:17
◼
►
from different movies, but it's fair use
01:25:19
◼
►
because it's like he's using it to talk about film, right?
01:25:21
◼
►
He's not putting the entire movie up,
01:25:22
◼
►
but there is a scene from the movie in the video
01:25:24
◼
►
and his videos always get taken down.
01:25:26
◼
►
They just automatically get taken down
01:25:27
◼
►
for copyright violations.
01:25:28
◼
►
And then he has to go through this bureaucratic process
01:25:31
◼
►
where they tell him he has to take it down
01:25:33
◼
►
and he has to fill out a form and say it's fair use
01:25:35
◼
►
and then they deny him and then you go back and forth
01:25:36
◼
►
and back and forth.
01:25:37
◼
►
Eventually they go back up after like three days,
01:25:39
◼
►
a week, a month.
01:25:40
◼
►
It's terrible that like you are presumed guilty
01:25:44
◼
►
and have to prove your innocence.
01:25:45
◼
►
And it's not even proving
01:25:46
◼
►
It's just a big machine sending out like we noticed that you're using copyright stuff
01:25:50
◼
►
We take you down immediately if you think this is an error
01:25:53
◼
►
Please fill out these 18 forms and fight with this record company
01:25:55
◼
►
Moo-boo studio or whatever until they give up like and the movie story really cared they can just say
01:26:01
◼
►
We're taking this all the way to court
01:26:02
◼
►
And then you then they win because you can't afford to hire a lawyer
01:26:04
◼
►
But for the most part it's just a matter of filling out forms repeatedly to get YouTube to bring it back up
01:26:08
◼
►
But anyway what I'm getting as the Nintendo should at least have somebody looking at the friggin star and filling out the forms right instead of
01:26:14
◼
►
just letting them linger there because this shows
01:26:17
◼
►
that this was Nintendo's blind spot.
01:26:20
◼
►
Why are you pretending mobile games don't exist on phones?
01:26:23
◼
►
Why can't you put something there?
01:26:25
◼
►
Which is very different than the idea Nintendo,
01:26:27
◼
►
you should stop making consoles,
01:26:29
◼
►
you should stop making handhelds,
01:26:30
◼
►
you should stop making games that work on consoles
01:26:32
◼
►
and handhelds and concentrate entirely on making games
01:26:34
◼
►
that work on mobile devices,
01:26:36
◼
►
which is not what they're doing.
01:26:38
◼
►
But the fact that they have to go do this,
01:26:40
◼
►
it's basically for the survival of the company,
01:26:42
◼
►
it's to say there is money available out there
01:26:44
◼
►
that we're not taking and we need to take it
01:26:46
◼
►
'cause we're not doing that hot
01:26:47
◼
►
because nobody's buying Wii U's
01:26:49
◼
►
and not many people are buying 3DS's.
01:26:51
◼
►
That's kind of sad.
01:26:53
◼
►
- Yeah, but I don't, I mean, we'll see.
01:26:55
◼
►
Again, I'm wrong a lot, but I don't think
01:26:58
◼
►
this is gonna solve that problem.
01:27:00
◼
►
- Well, they still have, I mean,
01:27:01
◼
►
their root problem is still the same.
01:27:02
◼
►
You need to, you know, again, as I've said
01:27:05
◼
►
many times in the past, if there exists
01:27:07
◼
►
a market for devices that mostly pay games,
01:27:09
◼
►
it is possible for Apple, or Apple,
01:27:11
◼
►
for Nintendo to do well in that market.
01:27:15
◼
►
It's not guaranteed, but it is possible,
01:27:17
◼
►
because they have all the skills necessary
01:27:18
◼
►
to do well in that market, minus a few
01:27:21
◼
►
that they can kind of learn
01:27:22
◼
►
if they get their act together, right?
01:27:24
◼
►
But if we ever get to the point
01:27:26
◼
►
where there is no way to do that,
01:27:27
◼
►
where you cannot be a company that sells things
01:27:31
◼
►
that mostly play games, they're screwed,
01:27:33
◼
►
because they can't field a phone platformer.
01:27:35
◼
►
They'd have to go Sega and say,
01:27:37
◼
►
"All we do now is make software
01:27:38
◼
►
"for other people's platforms,
01:27:39
◼
►
iOS Android whatever else are out there, and they worked out great for Sega
01:27:43
◼
►
Exactly right and so it's you know, but it's right now
01:27:47
◼
►
There's definitely a market for home consoles the Xbox one playstation 4 doing well
01:27:51
◼
►
Nintendo is not doing well because they made a bad product that people don't want so oh well
01:27:55
◼
►
Do they have a second chance next is there going to be a next generation of consoles will there be a PlayStation 5 and next box?
01:28:01
◼
►
Don't know what the hell they're gonna name the next one. That's their problem
01:28:05
◼
►
Whatever if there is a next generation of products box 10. Yeah, why not? Why not just skip the time like Windows?
01:28:10
◼
►
Nintendo may have a second shot at this right and that's the with the annex thing
01:28:16
◼
►
Are they gonna make the same stupid mistakes with their with their next shot? Hopefully not hopefully they will learn from their past mistakes
01:28:22
◼
►
That's that's their root problem
01:28:25
◼
►
It's like this is kind of keeping the boat afloat and maybe getting some money
01:28:29
◼
►
And maybe you know trying I mean you can imagine like if they do this
01:28:33
◼
►
Like there can be interactions where there's an iOS game that interacts with the game that is available on the Wii U for like companion
01:28:38
◼
►
Apps type of things they do that for like Mac apps where there's a companion
01:28:40
◼
►
iOS app or websites for there's a companion iOS app like that's a potential market as well
01:28:46
◼
►
But this is all just kind of like let's keep the lights on and fund our next thing
01:28:50
◼
►
but the real the real proof of whether Nintendo is gonna
01:28:53
◼
►
Go the route of Sega or be resurgent is is there an X generation of consoles and if there is
01:29:00
◼
►
Does Nintendo do a good job and the rumors are the Nintendo is is because the Wii U is doing so terribly is gonna be like
01:29:07
◼
►
Yeah, yeah, we you will make the games
01:29:09
◼
►
We said we were gonna make for it
01:29:10
◼
►
But we're kind of in a hurry to sort of shuffle the Wii U off the stage and show you our next thing like that
01:29:14
◼
►
They will be the first ones out of the gate that the ps4 and Xbox one
01:29:17
◼
►
Will go link go on many many years after Nintendo has already revved to do the next generation console
01:29:23
◼
►
But we'll see they still have to make a good console
01:29:25
◼
►
They still have to make good games that people want to play they have to make the right choices
01:29:28
◼
►
That's that's what the future of the company is staked on not so much this deal
01:29:33
◼
►
So before we go of curiosity if you had to pick one
01:29:39
◼
►
Existing piece of IP to be made into an iOS game
01:29:43
◼
►
What would that be and I must the obvious answer is Zelda because I know you love it so much but
01:29:47
◼
►
What I'm not sure if perhaps you think something else would translate better
01:29:51
◼
►
I don't think Zelda would translate particularly well either the problem is all the intellectual property that I really care about from Nintendo
01:29:58
◼
►
I like because of the games they were featured in and most of those games are console games and console games
01:30:03
◼
►
Tend not to translate well to a touchscreen or to like iOS type gaming
01:30:10
◼
►
There's a reason that the genres that do well on iOS are what they are
01:30:14
◼
►
like they're not the same genres that do well on consoles or on PCs because it's just a different play environment like
01:30:20
◼
►
infinite runners tower defense board games all those genres
01:30:26
◼
►
work on a tiny little touch screen
01:30:28
◼
►
none of those genres are the genres that you know Metroid or Zelda or even Mario like platforming doesn't work that well on
01:30:36
◼
►
handhelds either like it's the the genres that become popular on each platform become popular for a reason so I think
01:30:42
◼
►
There's no particular intellectual property that I think would translate really well
01:30:47
◼
►
Maybe Star Fox because there are some sort of flying around games
01:30:51
◼
►
But honestly, I think it's it's more like what Marco was saying only not quite the cynical version where it's like they're going to make
01:30:57
◼
►
A game I'm not gonna say this is a silly example like make a match three game
01:31:01
◼
►
But put Nintendo characters in the little things right that's that's the silly cynical example like not that bad, but similar
01:31:07
◼
►
Some kind of infinite runner some kind of tower defense game some kind of board game with a bunch of Nintendo faces on things
01:31:14
◼
►
But actually done well because all those genres can be done when to put well in probably look at alto's adventure
01:31:18
◼
►
It is kind of like an infinite runner, but if you do a really really good job with it
01:31:22
◼
►
It can stand head and shoulder above the other games that do similar things, right?
01:31:26
◼
►
Same thing with all the other the genres that are popular and mobile. So I'm
01:31:30
◼
►
My ties to Nintendo intellectual property have almost nothing to do with the characters and everything to do with the games
01:31:36
◼
►
They appear in because those games have been exemplary. That is what that's why Sonic is not valued anymore
01:31:41
◼
►
No one cares about Sonic if he repeatedly appears in crap games
01:31:44
◼
►
Then you're like, you know what Sonic sucks science doesn't suck the games featuring him suck
01:31:48
◼
►
Why do people care about Mario? Who cares? He's a freaking plumber. He's not a you know, but because they make awesome games
01:31:53
◼
►
They respect that that IP so much. They do not allow Mario to be
01:31:56
◼
►
Okay, and he's in a real Mario platform game. They polished the hell out of that game
01:32:01
◼
►
That's why you know
01:32:03
◼
►
Super Mario 3d world and Mario Galaxy and everything
01:32:06
◼
►
That's why people still love Mario because they know when I see him in a game and he and it's a real Mario game and
01:32:10
◼
►
It's a platformer. It is going to be an amazingly good game
01:32:13
◼
►
Whereas when you see Sonic in a game you're like why even bother it's gonna be crap and it is
01:32:17
◼
►
- My worry for Nintendo is you keep saying,
01:32:22
◼
►
which I think is a good argument,
01:32:23
◼
►
that as long as they can do well,
01:32:26
◼
►
they can still survive as long as there is a market
01:32:29
◼
►
for dedicated console things, basically.
01:32:31
◼
►
My worry is that the things that they are not good at,
01:32:36
◼
►
what you were saying earlier,
01:32:37
◼
►
like all the social and online and app store kind of thing,
01:32:40
◼
►
if you look at what the people who still buy consoles today,
01:32:46
◼
►
what do they value, what's important, what succeeds among the kind of consoles that sell
01:32:51
◼
►
well today? I think that, like Nintendo has really suffered in so many of those areas
01:33:01
◼
►
that matter a lot today. And so much of what Nintendo used to have a total monopoly on,
01:33:07
◼
►
which was like, like kind of nerd high quality and casual gaming, so much of that has moved
01:33:13
◼
►
to mobile. And so what you're left with on the console side is people who like first
01:33:19
◼
►
person shooters a lot and people who really want online play and online app stores and
01:33:23
◼
►
stuff like that. So like the console market still exists but it has taken itself in a
01:33:29
◼
►
direction where Nintendo really sucks at and the parts of gaming that Nintendo has always
01:33:35
◼
►
been very good at, I think a disproportionate amount of those have moved to mobile for casual
01:33:42
◼
►
That's part of the DNA deal, actually.
01:33:43
◼
►
That's the part I highlighted in this final thing.
01:33:46
◼
►
Nintendo has tried at various times
01:33:48
◼
►
to implement what I think is everyone--
01:33:50
◼
►
like they suggest to their children,
01:33:52
◼
►
how do online accounts work?
01:33:53
◼
►
How does that work when you buy things under an account?
01:33:56
◼
►
It's like, listen, Dad.
01:33:57
◼
►
You have an account.
01:33:58
◼
►
When you buy things, it's attached to the account.
01:34:01
◼
►
No matter what device you buy, you sign in with your username,
01:34:03
◼
►
all the stuff you bought is there.
01:34:04
◼
►
That's how it works everywhere else in the world.
01:34:07
◼
►
So having-- they got rid of this Club Nintendo membership
01:34:10
◼
►
and this Nintendo Network thing and they're replacing it with a
01:34:13
◼
►
Sane online account system like iTunes like everything else you can possibly name like Netflix like whatever like all your stuff is attached to your
01:34:20
◼
►
Account that's how it works
01:34:22
◼
►
DNA is going to give that to them because of course DNA like every other
01:34:25
◼
►
Company that's on the internet has such a system and can make one for them probably to their specifications probably the blah blah blah
01:34:30
◼
►
But they've proven that they can't make that thing a part of this partnership deal is
01:34:34
◼
►
You know how to make one of those things right make one of those for us, and you know okay?
01:34:39
◼
►
They will do it so there there are at least
01:34:41
◼
►
Recognizing the parts where they're weak and trying to dig themselves out of it
01:34:44
◼
►
I think Nintendo can live on in the same way that sort of indie game studios live on like you don't have to make call
01:34:51
◼
►
Duty to be successful there is a market for sort of I call them artsy-fartsy games on the overall
01:34:57
◼
►
But like games that connoisseurs appreciate people who appreciate the fact
01:35:01
◼
►
That a really good Zelda game is not the same as just any random adventure game
01:35:06
◼
►
that a really good Mario game is not the same as just any random platformer that Nintendo is still the best in the world at
01:35:11
◼
►
These few things that it does they're just bad at the surrounding stuff and when you're playing games like even though you know
01:35:18
◼
►
Mario Kart you're driving the cart most of the time
01:35:21
◼
►
I reckon it is an amazing game when you're driving every time you're not driving
01:35:24
◼
►
It is not an amazing game because they can't even handle doing the menu systems that well
01:35:29
◼
►
Same thing with Super Smash Brothers same thing with the new Mario games
01:35:34
◼
►
They are amazing when you are playing them and it was still the best in the world of doing that type of game
01:35:39
◼
►
Can they survive?
01:35:41
◼
►
With just that skill that you need ancillary supporting skills
01:35:45
◼
►
But I think they can survive
01:35:46
◼
►
Like you know people like make kind of like a lifestyle business where like you're just making enough money to support yourself and your whatever
01:35:52
◼
►
I think Nintendo could be like a lifestyle console business as long as anyone's buying any any kind of consoles
01:35:56
◼
►
If the only games available on them is practically the case with the Wii U
01:36:00
◼
►
It's like first party in Nintendo games and like five other games that you could possibly care about
01:36:04
◼
►
That's basically what it is in the Wii U and the Wii U was not successful
01:36:08
◼
►
but it didn't put the company out of business like
01:36:10
◼
►
Nintendo could could live on past sort of the they could probably live on past the extension of dedicated consoles
01:36:16
◼
►
Just just continuing to sell to the people who appreciate how much better the best in those games can be
01:36:22
◼
►
and there's you're right that there's not as many of those because most people either want casual games or they want Call of Duty or
01:36:27
◼
►
Grand Theft Auto and
01:36:29
◼
►
You know Nintendo is not gonna make Grand Theft Auto and they're not gonna make Call of Duty and you know
01:36:34
◼
►
For the iOS games, they're gonna take a little bit of the money, but they're their expertise is in those type of things
01:36:40
◼
►
you know and I think
01:36:41
◼
►
We talked about this before I think too like Miyamoto is not gonna live forever
01:36:45
◼
►
What happens to the company and his the people he taught will not live forever like when the generational turnover happens?
01:36:51
◼
►
Do they have enough shared culture Nintendo could to continue to?
01:36:57
◼
►
Did you continue to make games like the ones they have made in the past several decades at the same level?
01:37:03
◼
►
They've been making them when all the people who originally sort of brought them to that higher gone
01:37:07
◼
►
All right. Thanks a lot to our three sponsors this week cards against humanity automatic and backblaze and we will see you next week
01:37:15
◼
►
Now the show is over they didn't even mean to begin because it was accidental
01:37:26
◼
►
Oh it was accidental.
01:37:29
◼
►
John didn't do any research.
01:37:31
◼
►
Margo and Casey wouldn't let him.
01:37:34
◼
►
Cause it was accidental.
01:37:36
◼
►
Oh it was accidental.
01:37:39
◼
►
And you can find the show notes at ATP.fm.
01:37:44
◼
►
And if you're into Twitter, you can follow them @C-A-S-E-Y-L-I-S-S.
01:37:53
◼
►
♪ So that's Casey List, M-A-R-C-O-A-R-M ♪
01:37:58
◼
►
♪ Anti-Marco Arman, S-I-R-A-C ♪
01:38:03
◼
►
♪ USA, Syracuse, it's accidental ♪
01:38:07
◼
►
♪ It's accidental ♪
01:38:09
◼
►
♪ They didn't mean to ♪
01:38:11
◼
►
♪ Accidental ♪
01:38:12
◼
►
♪ Accidental ♪
01:38:13
◼
►
♪ Tech podcast ♪
01:38:15
◼
►
♪ So long ♪
01:38:17
◼
►
- So do we wanna talk about this top gear?
01:38:21
◼
►
Fracas, kerfuffle?
01:38:23
◼
►
disaster i do i do i'm sad guys i'm sad yeah i uh mourned the passing of top gear last night by
01:38:32
◼
►
simultaneously with underscore watching um the race to verbiage i forget the episode number off
01:38:39
◼
►
hand i think it's series five episode eight and the race across japan i totally forget the episode
01:38:46
◼
►
number there but um we watched it simultaneously and we're i'm messaging back and forth like a
01:38:51
◼
►
couple of children watching. I don't know, some stupid children's show. Anyway—
01:38:59
◼
►
[Joey] You can make a Win Harry/Miss Sally reference,
01:39:01
◼
►
but I think Margot hasn't seen that either.
01:39:02
◼
►
[Marty] I haven't either.
01:39:03
◼
►
[Joey] Oh, God.
01:39:04
◼
►
[Marty] Hi. But it's sad. And, you know, it's frustrating because a lot of people,
01:39:10
◼
►
like CMF in the chat, seem to think that any time you bring up Top Gear, their purpose in life
01:39:21
◼
►
is to explain that Clarkson is a jerk and he should rot in, you know, whatever the opposite
01:39:27
◼
►
of heaven is in your particular belief system. So inclusive.
01:39:30
◼
►
So I don't understand that perspective. In that, I don't understand why this is binary.
01:39:39
◼
►
Why can't I think that Clarkson is a jerk and yet enjoy the TV show that he is a part of?
01:39:49
◼
►
Like, why does it have to be all or none?
01:39:52
◼
►
And regardless of the answer there, the fact of the matter is, I liked Top Gear.
01:39:58
◼
►
You can think I'm a jerk if you'd like.
01:40:01
◼
►
You can think that I'm supporting things that Clarkson stands for,
01:40:06
◼
►
which I'm not really sure how you make that leap, but fine, go ahead.
01:40:09
◼
►
But in the end of the day, I loved the show.
01:40:13
◼
►
I still love the show.
01:40:14
◼
►
I'm sad that it's ended.
01:40:17
◼
►
Maybe something will come from the ashes and maybe there will be something even better, but I'm sad that it ended. I'm
01:40:22
◼
►
pissed off that Clarkson decided that a
01:40:26
◼
►
lunch or dinner or whatever it was was enough to punch somebody over and ruined it for all of us, but
01:40:31
◼
►
It is what it is and I'm sad
01:40:34
◼
►
I think I gotta explain why people
01:40:39
◼
►
Can't square the idea of you liking the show but agreeing that the guy's a big jerk
01:40:43
◼
►
Because like everyone has their limit of what you're willing to support it like Mel Gibson is another example like you know anti-semitic remarks
01:40:50
◼
►
Sexist remarks like I think that's a pretty different level, but yeah, right
01:40:54
◼
►
But I'm just like simple what I'm trying to get it is that there's a continuum like at a certain point
01:40:58
◼
►
the person you're a fan of
01:41:00
◼
►
Supports an idea or does something that puts them over the line
01:41:05
◼
►
It's like an actor is actually it's a even bigger line because it's like well
01:41:09
◼
►
I can still enjoy the movie they're in because they're not them they're being an actor right whereas Clark's
01:41:13
◼
►
Clarkson is like essentially himself. He's not playing a role in you know in a formal sense, right?
01:41:18
◼
►
So there's more of a close connection
01:41:19
◼
►
So like just just put it this way
01:41:22
◼
►
What would Clarkson have to do for you to not be able to enjoy him enjoy him on top gear anymore?
01:41:27
◼
►
Like obviously there's there's a line that you know
01:41:29
◼
►
What is your personal line and the reason why people can't square it is that he crossed their personal line possibly crossed it already
01:41:34
◼
►
With like, you know racist remarks when they were in Thailand or whatever, right? And and this just confirms their previous beliefs
01:41:41
◼
►
And I find that uncomfortable as well. We talked about this on an episode of The Incomfortable with like, authors like Orson Scott Card
01:41:49
◼
►
who, you know, everyone loved Ender's Games, but think his, you know,
01:41:52
◼
►
terrible bigotry about homosexuals is just, you just can't stand it.
01:41:56
◼
►
It's like, can you like the book Ender's Game while also hating the guy who wrote it? And again,
01:42:00
◼
►
I think authors it's easier to do that too, because they've made this work of fiction, you love the work of fiction,
01:42:04
◼
►
but you hate the guy. Clarkson is the guy on the show.
01:42:07
◼
►
So it's probably pretty the line for him to cross for people not to be able to enjoy the show anymore
01:42:12
◼
►
It's just much closer for than it is for authors and actors and stuff
01:42:15
◼
►
And I just feel like he's crossed the line for a lot of people and not even with this one event now
01:42:19
◼
►
They're just you know gleefully saying he crossed the line and I didn't like him already and he now he got what he deserved
01:42:23
◼
►
so that's why I think and
01:42:25
◼
►
You know, he obviously hasn't crossed your own line and not saying that your line is wrong other people's lines are right
01:42:29
◼
►
but that's why so many people are
01:42:31
◼
►
Surprised by the fact that you can still separate the two because I think it is much harder for
01:42:36
◼
►
People to separate the two when the guy is the guy on the show, you know, yeah that makes sense
01:42:40
◼
►
I don't know. It was just very frustrating because when when the BBC finally made their statement and
01:42:46
◼
►
They said, you know, we're not gonna renew Clarkson's contract and I had tweeted about oh, you know, that sucks. I'm sad. I
01:42:54
◼
►
Don't recall my initial tweet having been
01:42:58
◼
►
You know, this is wrong. I didn't say that that he didn't deserve it
01:43:03
◼
►
I just thought this sucks and this is sad and oh my god
01:43:06
◼
►
I mean welcome to the internet Casey, but everyone came out of the woodwork was like eyes a jerk
01:43:10
◼
►
I friggin deserves it. Oh, how could you support this dill hole and blah blah blah. It's like dude
01:43:16
◼
►
Can I just be say I did they say dill hole? No, but you know
01:43:20
◼
►
Can I just be sad for like 30 seconds that my favorite TV show is ending?
01:43:24
◼
►
Is that really that egregious to the entire internet?
01:43:27
◼
►
What's egregious is not that you're sad that the show is ending but that it was still your favorite show despite this guy being out
01:43:32
◼
►
Like that's because it was over the line for them and they're saying how could you even still watch the show in good conscience?
01:43:36
◼
►
And so it's not so much that you're sad the show is ending
01:43:39
◼
►
It's like the whole other rest of the time when you were enjoying the show
01:43:41
◼
►
that's the time they thought you were a bad person because you're still enjoying and watching the show and still supporting the show because you know,
01:43:46
◼
►
Like that's that's what it was
01:43:48
◼
►
And then it's just this is just making them come out and remind you that the whole time you were enjoying the show
01:43:52
◼
►
They thought you were a bad person because they hate him so much. Well, you know what then I'm a bad person
01:43:55
◼
►
I mean, whatever. I I really don't care if people want to judge me because I like a television show about cars
01:44:01
◼
►
Whatever. No, and you know what and I've been I've also been tweeting about this because I feel similarly to you that you know
01:44:07
◼
►
I was always enjoying the show. I'm very sad the show is ending
01:44:11
◼
►
I do recognize that Clarkson ended the show like this was his fault
01:44:16
◼
►
I like I'm not denying that at all like his actions here were way over any line
01:44:21
◼
►
And and like the last in a series of things not like this is a one-time incident
01:44:25
◼
►
You know what? I mean? Like I'm not that familiar with all the behind-the-scenes drama that has happened in the past of the show
01:44:30
◼
►
I'm really not I've watched the show, but I have not followed the controversies that I wasn't even aware
01:44:37
◼
►
There were so many controversies until this started coming up
01:44:39
◼
►
but you know looking at
01:44:42
◼
►
His general attitude on this show that the style with which he says things the style with which he does things
01:44:48
◼
►
He is like a lovable ass on the show. Like that's his character on the show
01:44:54
◼
►
I don't know what he's like in real life
01:44:56
◼
►
Is his character also a conservative racist bigot on the show or is that just a side effect of the actual person?
01:45:01
◼
►
Like there's that's where you know
01:45:02
◼
►
Like it's one thing to be a curmudgeon as the other just secretly think they harbor regressive notions that they know enough not to
01:45:08
◼
►
Devoice publicly right? And so with that again, I don't know. I don't know the guy personally the way I interpreted it
01:45:14
◼
►
over time as I was watching the show and he would and he would say like off-color things I
01:45:19
◼
►
interpreted it as
01:45:22
◼
►
Pushing the line or stepping over the line for comedy purposes and so comedy is a tough thing
01:45:28
◼
►
like when you see when when you try to define the appropriate relationship between
01:45:33
◼
►
Comedy and sensitive topics or hurtful topics
01:45:37
◼
►
It's always a blurry line and and different cultures and different groups of people
01:45:42
◼
►
Define that line differently and and what is over the line and what is what is part of humor?
01:45:48
◼
►
Everyone defines that differently. And so I think by
01:45:52
◼
►
Like by by me and Casey being so surprised
01:45:54
◼
►
I think at how many people just really hate Jeremy Clarkson like I was shocked by that
01:46:00
◼
►
Because I've always interpreted the the way he talks on the show
01:46:04
◼
►
To be for the sake of good humor and even even when it is a little bit over the line a little bit uncomfortable
01:46:11
◼
►
I've always assumed that that the intention there was to to provoke a laugh to be funny and not to be actually
01:46:18
◼
►
Mean-spirited and to intend harm. I think there's a different political dynamic in the UK that we don't understand like they're their left
01:46:26
◼
►
And right range is unfamiliar to us mostly because all of them are way to the left of the crazy right wing here in America
01:46:32
◼
►
but I think we're not
01:46:34
◼
►
connected to that dynamic and
01:46:37
◼
►
Therefore I think we don't have a good read all we see is Jeremy Clarkson on the show right and we don't have a read of
01:46:42
◼
►
like because like I don't know about you but the only time I ever saw him is on
01:46:47
◼
►
the show like I didn't see interviews with him off the show I didn't see him
01:46:50
◼
►
doing press I didn't see him like whereas I get the impression that the
01:46:54
◼
►
people who watch the show in the UK know him from outside the show they see him
01:46:59
◼
►
on other programs they know about him as a person and so the things he says in
01:47:04
◼
►
the show rather than seeming like just being cheeky it's like that is the tip
01:47:09
◼
►
of an iceberg with which we are all too familiar, right?
01:47:12
◼
►
And that he represents some continuum
01:47:14
◼
►
in the political spectrum,
01:47:15
◼
►
and that I know his support of candidate X shows me,
01:47:18
◼
►
like, I don't know his background like that either,
01:47:22
◼
►
but it's so clear that when the people
01:47:24
◼
►
that don't like him see him,
01:47:25
◼
►
they see the whole person,
01:47:27
◼
►
and we just see the part that's on the show,
01:47:29
◼
►
and the part that's on the show is necessarily,
01:47:31
◼
►
you know, trimmed down and can be interpreted,
01:47:35
◼
►
especially by, I think, an American audience
01:47:36
◼
►
or an audience that's not familiar
01:47:37
◼
►
with the political climate there,
01:47:39
◼
►
Just being witty and interesting and that's one point on the chat room the turbo racist right-wing bigots in the United States are usually not
01:47:45
◼
►
as charming as Jeremy Clarkson, you know what I mean? Like I don't know if that's just a
01:47:48
◼
►
Divide like you know, so I feel like I don't know him either
01:47:56
◼
►
Think I was watching Top Gear for reasons that are different than both of you
01:47:59
◼
►
I like the part where they talk about cars and review cars
01:48:01
◼
►
You must have hated the show. Yeah, I did not like almost any other part of it
01:48:06
◼
►
But I enjoyed the show, but I knew absolutely nothing
01:48:10
◼
►
about any of those people outside of the words they said
01:48:12
◼
►
on that television program.
01:48:13
◼
►
And even just within that, with the few incidents
01:48:16
◼
►
that Clarkson has done, I find myself not hating him,
01:48:22
◼
►
but it's kind of like the Bill Cosby stuff.
01:48:25
◼
►
Like, oh, you wish you didn't know this,
01:48:27
◼
►
because now your opinion must necessarily
01:48:30
◼
►
be drastically changed for somebody
01:48:31
◼
►
that you previously just liked as an entertainer.
01:48:34
◼
►
and now it starts to cross the line for me
01:48:37
◼
►
where I can't separate this person, the entertainer,
01:48:39
◼
►
from the things he does elsewhere, you know what I mean?
01:48:43
◼
►
- Yeah. - Yeah, and that's,
01:48:45
◼
►
you know, the big disappointment for Top Gear fans
01:48:48
◼
►
is that he really did something really bad here,
01:48:52
◼
►
and now his image is tarnished for everybody,
01:48:57
◼
►
and he killed the show, he ended the show by his actions,
01:49:01
◼
►
so that sucks.
01:49:02
◼
►
- And it seems like he's a troubled person too,
01:49:04
◼
►
don't you think?
01:49:05
◼
►
Like, that's not--
01:49:06
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, anybody who would assault someone
01:49:08
◼
►
over a meal at the end of a shoot,
01:49:10
◼
►
I don't care what kind of bad day you've had,
01:49:12
◼
►
that's like, that's a problem.
01:49:14
◼
►
- But that's a deeper problem.
01:49:15
◼
►
It's not like he's just as temperate.
01:49:16
◼
►
Like, I don't know what his deeper,
01:49:18
◼
►
that's the whole thing.
01:49:18
◼
►
We don't know what his deeper problem is.
01:49:19
◼
►
What are you so upset about?
01:49:20
◼
►
You're rich, you get to drive fancy cars all the time.
01:49:22
◼
►
Like, obviously there is some deeper problem here
01:49:25
◼
►
with him personally or with the show dynamic
01:49:27
◼
►
or whatever it is, it's not about the stupid,
01:49:30
◼
►
you know, food, right?
01:49:32
◼
►
That's not what the fight is about and so that makes me sad too because it shows that you know whatever it is
01:49:36
◼
►
That's troubling him is deeply troubling him because the stakes were high here
01:49:40
◼
►
He knew he was like on you know final notice from all the other stuff
01:49:43
◼
►
That's me like he should have been on his best behavior and yet whatever the hell is bothering him
01:49:47
◼
►
Came up to the point where it caused that and that's just like
01:49:51
◼
►
Yeah, I don't it may you know you expect like oh when I'm rich and famous
01:49:56
◼
►
I will be happy and then you see all the movies that say well actually when you're rich or famous
01:49:59
◼
►
You'll be sad because you'll be lonely and isolated and it's like don't you want to think that it works out for somebody can somebody
01:50:04
◼
►
Have a dream job and be ridiculously wealthy and drive around in a Lamborghini or Ferrari and actually be happy
01:50:09
◼
►
Apparently not Jeremy Clarkson. Well, you used to hear about those people
01:50:12
◼
►
Well, I mean, I think Hammond seems like a reasonably happy guy. I think may I don't know anything about them either
01:50:17
◼
►
You're right. They do I'm
01:50:19
◼
►
Just I don't know any I don't you know, it's like I don't need to know celebrities lives or whatever
01:50:23
◼
►
You just want to you want to believe the fantasy that you want to believe that like I don't know anything about your life
01:50:28
◼
►
I don't want to know anything about your life, but I believe you are well adjusted and have a happy life because what you do for
01:50:32
◼
►
Living looks really fun, right?
01:50:34
◼
►
Yeah, and the thing is I agree with you John that that maybe my line is just further away than other people's that doesn't mean
01:50:40
◼
►
I'm right. It doesn't mean I'm wrong, but my line hasn't been crossed yet
01:50:44
◼
►
But the thing is I mean if you watch the first time they go through America where they went from Miami to New Orleans
01:50:53
◼
►
completely eviscerated all of America and they seem to go out of their way to find some of the worst
01:50:59
◼
►
Portions of America and as an American I found that really hard to watch really hard because they
01:51:06
◼
►
Antagonized Americans for the purpose of getting them to show really disgusting behavior, but you know what?
01:51:13
◼
►
that's part of America and
01:51:15
◼
►
That's unfortunate
01:51:18
◼
►
it, but that is part of our country. And there are people in our country, fellow citizens
01:51:24
◼
►
that act that way. And just because I don't like it doesn't mean it's not a representation
01:51:32
◼
►
of America. It may not be the most fair representation of America. I think there are a lot of Americans
01:51:37
◼
►
that are a lot less stupid as they portrayed us all to be. They obviously make fun of us
01:51:43
◼
►
always for us being fat. Don't forget cheese. We put cheese on everything.
01:51:50
◼
►
And cheese. Yeah, we put cheese on everything. And those jokes, they kind of sting, but good
01:51:57
◼
►
God, they're jokes on a TV show about cars. Again, maybe my line is just further away
01:52:03
◼
►
than other people's. And again, like you said, Jon, and like you said, Marco, I don't get
01:52:07
◼
►
to see the other parts of Clarkson. The only parts I see are the parts on the show. And
01:52:13
◼
►
yes, he's offensive. Yes, he's an ass. But whatever, like, that's the shtick. That's the whole idea.
01:52:20
◼
►
That's why he was there. But it's not just being an ass. I think that I'm not trying to push you
01:52:25
◼
►
closer to your line, but I think your line is probably the same as us. It's just that you are
01:52:28
◼
►
not forced to confront the realities of the things that this person really believes. Which I'm not
01:52:34
◼
►
saying you should be forced to confront and you should not seek this information out, but if you
01:52:38
◼
►
truly knew what was in the heart of hearts of many people that you admire, you would admire them less.
01:52:42
◼
►
and things that come out that reveal like that you know whatever regressive notion someone actually
01:52:49
◼
►
holds really dear about whatever people of a different race about women about anything
01:52:53
◼
►
you do not want to be confronted with that you you know making jokes being a jerk being silly
01:52:59
◼
►
being cheeky doing that you know using stereotypes for humor fine but then saying but really i
01:53:04
◼
►
believe in my heart of hearts that women can never be president because they're too emotional like
01:53:08
◼
►
if someone like no seriously i really have to have a serious conversation about you why women should
01:53:12
◼
►
never be president. Like, you can't have that conversation with someone you admire and not be like, just, just crumble and just go,
01:53:17
◼
►
"Oh god, I didn't know!" And now it's like, "Oh, now can I?" You know, that's, that's not that I think he's, you know,
01:53:23
◼
►
I'm just making this up. Like, make up a bias that you would, that if someone really truly believed it and deepened their fire,
01:53:29
◼
►
but you'd be like, you just check out and you'd be like, "Man,
01:53:32
◼
►
just, I can't, I can, where you are going, I cannot follow. I now know too much about what is in your heart
01:53:38
◼
►
and it is terrible." And
01:53:40
◼
►
Then you have to like try to reconcile like if you wrote a really good book
01:53:44
◼
►
Can I still enjoy the book if you were an actor to movie? Can I still enjoy the movie?
01:53:47
◼
►
But if you're on a TV show as yourself playing yourself boy, that's tough
01:53:51
◼
►
You know and somebody brought up in the chat. It's like Adam Baldwin
01:53:55
◼
►
I think the actions that he has taken are deplorable disgusting and terrible and him
01:54:02
◼
►
somehow energizing the whole gamer gate movement and coining the term that is
01:54:07
◼
►
Revolting to me. I find that absolutely disgusting but you bet your butt
01:54:12
◼
►
I love Firefly and I think it's a tremendous television show and I love the serenity movie like I
01:54:16
◼
►
Again, maybe my line is different from others. But I think that's different. Don't you think it's different with actors?
01:54:22
◼
►
I feel the same way he's terrible
01:54:24
◼
►
can still enjoy
01:54:25
◼
►
His role as an actor and like the only place that comes gross is like if he's like an actual criminal or murder and you don't
01:54:31
◼
►
Want to do anything that could possibly give him money, right? But that's not you know, he's just
01:54:35
◼
►
He holds terrible ideas, right?
01:54:37
◼
►
But can you still watch and enjoy Firefly?
01:54:41
◼
►
I still can, despite sharing your opinions
01:54:44
◼
►
about Adam Baldwin, I can still enjoy the show
01:54:45
◼
►
because he's an actor.
01:54:47
◼
►
Could I enjoy a talk show where he interviewed celebrities?
01:54:50
◼
►
I could not.
01:54:51
◼
►
That's the difference, I think.
01:54:52
◼
►
- See, I can't even make that distinction.
01:54:54
◼
►
To me, if I find out that an actor
01:54:56
◼
►
is really a pretty severe jerk,
01:55:00
◼
►
I can't even really enjoy their stuff
01:55:02
◼
►
they're acting in anymore.
01:55:03
◼
►
- It helps that he played a jerk in Firefly too.
01:55:07
◼
►
I gotta admit it does help that.
01:55:08
◼
►
If he was the hero of Firefly, if he was Mal,
01:55:10
◼
►
it would be a big problem, but he's not.
01:55:13
◼
►
He's Jane, and Jane is pretty terrible on the show,
01:55:15
◼
►
so it kinda like matches up, you know what I mean?
01:55:17
◼
►
Like, he wasn't really acting, he really is terrible.
01:55:19
◼
►
- Oh, goodness.
01:55:21
◼
►
- So anyway, back to Top Gear.
01:55:22
◼
►
I think, trying to close it out here,
01:55:26
◼
►
anyone who's watched the show on a regular basis
01:55:30
◼
►
knows that it was probably pretty close to the end anyway.
01:55:35
◼
►
- Every new season that came out, or series,
01:55:38
◼
►
in British parlance, every new series that came out,
01:55:43
◼
►
I was always a little bit surprised,
01:55:44
◼
►
like, oh, they made another one.
01:55:46
◼
►
Like, every time that they announced
01:55:47
◼
►
there would be another one, that was always like,
01:55:49
◼
►
pleasantly good, surprising news,
01:55:52
◼
►
because I was always just assuming
01:55:53
◼
►
that the current season was always gonna be the last season.
01:55:56
◼
►
And a lot of it was getting worse over time.
01:56:00
◼
►
of the bits were getting more and more contrived. More contrived? Is that possible? I have a,
01:56:05
◼
►
I know you don't share my hatred of the bits, but God, I hate them so much. I understand,
01:56:09
◼
►
I understand that Casey enjoyed them. I don't begrudge anyone their enjoyment. It's just not
01:56:13
◼
►
my, that's not why I was watching the show. And that's, that's the thing right there, John,
01:56:16
◼
►
is that people begrudge Marco and I enjoying the show. And that's what I find so bothersome.
01:56:22
◼
►
But only because they don't like the person. Like, I don't think anyone cares that you like their
01:56:28
◼
►
Stupid fake bits right it's just whatever whatever floats your boat, and you know sometimes I get a chuckle out of them too
01:56:34
◼
►
but like you know
01:56:36
◼
►
There the thing the thing about top gear is first of all to talk about the show itself the production quality was high
01:56:41
◼
►
We can all agree on that. Oh, you know how much the show cost to produce everything was shot well
01:56:46
◼
►
it was you know there was not a lot of flab to it the production quality was high and
01:56:51
◼
►
They did car reviews, and they did car reviews
01:56:54
◼
►
I think in a very interesting way I think even more interesting than a lot of the more YouTube things
01:56:57
◼
►
So if you wanted to see car reviews with wit and humor
01:57:01
◼
►
and not taking yourself too seriously,
01:57:02
◼
►
they're the best I've ever seen.
01:57:04
◼
►
They were like, you know, three minutes long sometimes,
01:57:07
◼
►
but, and they were not like, it's not like reading,
01:57:10
◼
►
it's not like reading an article in a car magazine
01:57:13
◼
►
about a car where you read the seven preview articles,
01:57:15
◼
►
the first drive article, the review, the comparison,
01:57:18
◼
►
like that is a different thing.
01:57:19
◼
►
They, the form they were working in,
01:57:22
◼
►
and I don't know if they defined this form or not,
01:57:23
◼
►
but they were excellent at that form
01:57:26
◼
►
for doing what they did.
01:57:27
◼
►
And they also had this stuff where they did a bunch of fake stuff that made you think
01:57:29
◼
►
they were going on a big journey through some country or whatever.
01:57:31
◼
►
But they did what they did well.
01:57:34
◼
►
And so that's what, the reason the show is so insanely popular, right, in the face of
01:57:38
◼
►
things like all the people doing, are using YouTube, in the face of Motor Week owns Mills,
01:57:43
◼
►
Maryland 2-1-1-1-7, like there have been other car things on television, but Top Gear was
01:57:48
◼
►
head and shoulders above them in the area that it decided to define.
01:57:51
◼
►
Yeah, I don't know.
01:57:53
◼
►
I'm just sad.
01:57:55
◼
►
I'm sad that it ended.
01:57:56
◼
►
I'm sad it's Clarkson's fault. I'm sad that I'm not allowed to be sad about it, apparently, according to half the internet.
01:58:03
◼
►
You know what? Screw those guys. Be sad about it.
01:58:05
◼
►
I agree, and I am sad about it.
01:58:07
◼
►
And I mean, I wouldn't have said I was sad if I was that worried about what they're saying.
01:58:10
◼
►
I'm sad that the show has forced us all to say "top gear," putting emphasis instead of saying "top gear."
01:58:20
◼
►
It's the British way to say it. Top gear.
01:58:22
◼
►
We all just say "top gear," and it drives me insane.
01:58:24
◼
►
And when people say series it also upsets me greatly
01:58:27
◼
►
Yeah, I agree with that. So that is I think that is the sad legacy of Top Gear
01:58:32
◼
►
Goodness no, but I don't know. We'll see what I mean. You never know what'll happen
01:58:39
◼
►
They they may have so I assume the show will be back
01:58:42
◼
►
Do we all assume the show will be back because the name the name is too bad. Yeah, I think it will be I
01:58:47
◼
►
I'm sure it'll be back with some people in it. I don't think you look at me
01:58:51
◼
►
- I'm just saying there will be a show called Top Gear.
01:58:54
◼
►
- Yeah, but already there's a couple shows called Top Gear
01:58:56
◼
►
and most of them suck.
01:58:57
◼
►
I mean like--
01:58:58
◼
►
- Well, American Top Gear, I agree.
01:59:01
◼
►
That manages to like remove all the parts that I like
01:59:05
◼
►
from real Top Gear.
01:59:06
◼
►
- That's the thing, like if you take it back
01:59:08
◼
►
to it just being a car show
01:59:12
◼
►
and you don't have these characters in it,
01:59:15
◼
►
it's a lot less interesting.
01:59:16
◼
►
- Well, American Top Gear isn't a car show.
01:59:18
◼
►
They try to do all the same bits.
01:59:19
◼
►
They just it just doesn't doesn't gel, you know, and I feel like the production college quality is way lower
01:59:26
◼
►
I don't know. I think it is it's possible to have in the same way the Daily Show
01:59:30
◼
►
I remember all Craig Kilborn's leaving the other show. Well, that show is over. Well, not quite like it could be reborn
01:59:34
◼
►
I'm fully willing to agree that another set of interesting charismatic people who really have passionate opinions about cars
01:59:41
◼
►
Could make that show work again and then so I assume none of these three guys are gonna be back
01:59:45
◼
►
Where do they go off and do something? I'm sure plenty of people are willing to hire them to do a car show for them
01:59:50
◼
►
Call whatever the hell they want to call it
01:59:51
◼
►
So I think you will still be able to see these people talking about cars and you'll probably still be able to see a show
01:59:56
◼
►
Whose name is top gear?
01:59:58
◼
►
sometime in the future
02:00:00
◼
►
I don't know
02:00:01
◼
►
I I think like the same things that were making it get worse over time and and get kind of played out
02:00:07
◼
►
I think those same things apply to any people you put in the show
02:00:12
◼
►
Like it isn't it isn't these people were necessarily played out
02:00:15
◼
►
It's that like I think the show did everything it could do it in the way we know it today
02:00:21
◼
►
Well, it's like the daily show with Greg Kilborn like the format changed when John Stewart came to focus the format the way the show
02:00:27
◼
►
Worked changed. It wasn't like if show where we make funny jokes making fun of celebrities
02:00:31
◼
►
It became basically like a news commentary show and that was John Stewart's doing because that came from him a new set of people can
02:00:36
◼
►
Take the show in a totally new direction
02:00:38
◼
►
That's what I'm talking about with new people like it's not gonna be just the same show with different hosts
02:00:41
◼
►
Whatever is inside those people who take over the show they can define the direction of the show goes
02:00:47
◼
►
What is it going to be like I don't think it's going to be like the top gear that we're familiar with
02:00:51
◼
►
Yeah, I don't see what happens and I suspect the three then we're gonna stick around and do something
02:00:58
◼
►
Different and you know there's been rumblings about them going to Netflix
02:01:02
◼
►
Yeah, we'll see yeah
02:01:03
◼
►
I wouldn't be surprised if they do the direct-to-video thing that Clarkson has done many times in the past
02:01:09
◼
►
But they're also they're also pretty old right I mean yeah
02:01:12
◼
►
What is Clarkson like early 50s May is early to mid 50s, and I think a certain point?
02:01:17
◼
►
I think they're more limited in the types of things they can do even if they wanted to keep doing this kind of show for
02:01:22
◼
►
someone else
02:01:23
◼
►
You know you can't have a 65 year olds going through Bolivia in a 4x4
02:01:27
◼
►
Yeah, and and also you know the the show they've been making so far had as you said a pretty sizable budget
02:01:35
◼
►
Any anywhere else they could go they might be forced to dramatically reduce
02:01:40
◼
►
The things they do and that might that might just not work for them or might not work for for anything
02:01:45
◼
►
We want from them, but we'll see
02:01:47
◼
►
[door closes]
02:01:49
◼
►
[BLANK_AUDIO]