100: MacBook Shuffle
00:00:00
◼
►
100 episodes gentlemen, I'm proud of us. Yeah, if I had remembered we should have planned something better, but oh well
00:00:05
◼
►
We just had an episode
00:00:07
◼
►
That's but that that's the us thing to do. Yep, that totally is and that's exactly what we did because we're us
00:00:12
◼
►
But sometimes I like to think that we can be better than us but nope
00:00:18
◼
►
Actually, that should be the pre show right there feel free sets expectations exactly what you're gonna get
00:00:28
◼
►
It was a fine show. It was a reasonable show. It was a regular show.
00:00:37
◼
►
100 oh my god. I forgot about that mm-hmm now. I'm excited
00:00:40
◼
►
I thought about that like a week ago that we were coming up on a hundred, but I didn't remember it tonight well
00:00:45
◼
►
so this shows were just a
00:00:47
◼
►
Bunch of dudes who don't remember important dates, so we all forgot we all forgot our own birthday
00:00:51
◼
►
No case you remember just me and you John we we forgot yeah
00:00:55
◼
►
I guess so hypercritical made it to a hut to a hundred asterisk
00:00:59
◼
►
What did build an analyze go to 108 like lost?
00:01:05
◼
►
If we make it to 101 then we have unequivocally done better than hypercritical is that fair to say?
00:01:13
◼
►
That's not how that works
00:01:15
◼
►
Well, I should have said better
00:01:17
◼
►
That was a poor choice of words of I part thank you for keeping me honest we have perhaps completed more
00:01:25
◼
►
Can I get that from you John believe more episodes? Yes, that's what it means when one number is bigger than another
00:01:31
◼
►
I mean we technically have already completed more episodes because there was that one that was just like the promo
00:01:37
◼
►
That was for the movie thing and there was the one that me and Merlin did when John couldn't do it
00:01:41
◼
►
Which isn't really a real episode of hypercritical. It's a real episode of it's got a number and it's got a title
00:01:46
◼
►
It's in the RSS feed. That's as real as real can be
00:01:48
◼
►
Well, but it didn't have you on it doesn't matter was called hypercritical had a number had title
00:01:54
◼
►
It had a page had show notes that had everything that an episode has I
00:01:59
◼
►
I did think that was I mean, I haven't listened back but at the time I was actually very happy with how that turned out
00:02:03
◼
►
It didn't feel like hypercritical at all, but I was very happy with it. I I wish Merlin like had a tech show
00:02:09
◼
►
and and maybe maybe we're maybe it's better for everyone including him that that he doesn't that he instead just like
00:02:16
◼
►
Makes parts of his other shows tech when he has something funny to say about it
00:02:20
◼
►
but I like he is so good with the tech stuff so incredibly good and and provides a voice for it and and
00:02:27
◼
►
opinion is for it that we really don't hear from other people and
00:02:30
◼
►
And I always feel like like we're missing that you know if by good you mean makes me want to yell into the podcast
00:02:37
◼
►
The best is when they do it on Roderick on the line here the two of them together talking tech just makes me want to
00:02:46
◼
►
Throttle them both. Oh, I love it
00:02:48
◼
►
I think it's the best that one they did like three or four episodes ago where like the whole first half was about tech was
00:02:54
◼
►
All right, so the show bot is semi broken just like old times just like old times jerk
00:03:01
◼
►
Do you want to is this a clip show?
00:03:04
◼
►
Well play our hundredth episode spectacular
00:03:10
◼
►
Would you like to wager a guest what happened?
00:03:13
◼
►
Did you not properly non retain the closure to set timeout so the memory leak all over the place?
00:03:21
◼
►
No, that's a good guess but now and I should say that I have not knowingly changed any of the code with relation to
00:03:29
◼
►
The show bot specifically are you now gonna rewrite it and go no, but it is slightly tempting
00:03:34
◼
►
Honestly, you probably should it's a fun exercise if you're right sitting go his site will pay him money for hosting
00:03:42
◼
►
Go negative instead of being free. That's quite possible
00:03:46
◼
►
No, that is not the case
00:03:51
◼
►
Here it was I was thinking about making this big grandiose speech about how it really isn't so terrible
00:03:57
◼
►
Relying on third-party code because it allows you to do things that are kind of cool more specifically
00:04:04
◼
►
Earlier today. I decided that I was really tired of not being able to use markdown
00:04:10
◼
►
Footnotes in my in my site because all the cool kids use markdown footnotes. I want to be a cool kid the particular
00:04:19
◼
►
module or whatever that I was using was called marked and it's it's an NPM module or package
00:04:26
◼
►
I get think is the word I'm looking for anyway, and so I
00:04:29
◼
►
Swapped marked for markdown it which is a different package that also parses markdown
00:04:36
◼
►
And I was all excited with myself because now I had markdown footnotes
00:04:41
◼
►
the problem then that I ran into then was
00:04:45
◼
►
Now on my main page, which is the only page that I can think of that has more than one complete post on a single page,
00:04:53
◼
►
what happens when I have two posts that both have footnotes? Because they're both generated in isolation, and so they'll reuse the same anchors.
00:05:04
◼
►
And so then I had to go through a humongous song and dance, which ended up being simple at the very end,
00:05:10
◼
►
I tried like 34 different iterations to get to the simple answer of what to do and how
00:05:17
◼
►
to make unique each of these Markdown footnote anchors.
00:05:21
◼
►
So I got that accomplished.
00:05:22
◼
►
Well, what I didn't think to do was check the Showbot, specifically the page that's
00:05:29
◼
►
hosted on my regular site that handles the Showbot and see what the ramifications of
00:05:38
◼
►
this markdown parser switch would be.
00:05:41
◼
►
And it appears, for those of you who are not listening live, if this actually makes it
00:05:45
◼
►
in the show, it appears that somehow it is emitting escaped HTML only for the links section
00:05:55
◼
►
of the Showbot page.
00:05:57
◼
►
So I'm seeing all the titles just fine, but the links are just the HTML header for the
00:06:04
◼
►
table and nothing else.
00:06:06
◼
►
So oops, sorry everyone.
00:06:07
◼
►
All right, good talk.
00:06:09
◼
►
All right, that was our 100th episode spectacular.
00:06:11
◼
►
Hope everyone was happy.
00:06:13
◼
►
- Yep, I guess the show's over now
00:06:14
◼
►
'cause we can't go past 100.
00:06:15
◼
►
- Something like that.
00:06:16
◼
►
- We are joking, the show is still going on.
00:06:18
◼
►
- Everybody relax.
00:06:20
◼
►
- We've sold ads past 100.
00:06:21
◼
►
So in fact, well past 100, so we have to keep doing it.
00:06:25
◼
►
- That's actually a really good point.
00:06:27
◼
►
All right, so let's do some follow up.
00:06:29
◼
►
And I'd like to start with some very quick
00:06:33
◼
►
anecdotal thoughts about using USB ports.
00:06:37
◼
►
So we talked last episode about why is that so funny?
00:06:42
◼
►
- And then we're gonna watch paint dry.
00:06:43
◼
►
- Oh, come on, give me a chance here.
00:06:45
◼
►
So last episode, we talked about how
00:06:49
◼
►
on the potential iPad Pro/Macbook Air,
00:06:54
◼
►
that there's theoretically only going to be one USB port,
00:06:58
◼
►
it's USB type C port, and whether or not that's a big deal.
00:07:02
◼
►
And particularly John and I were going back and forth as to whether or not that's a big deal.
00:07:06
◼
►
And so I thought to myself, well, let me ask my family because they're normal computer users and see, okay, does anyone actually use USB ports?
00:07:13
◼
►
Because one of the things I was, I was thinking during the show and hopefully explained during the show was, Hey, we have a lot of technologies now like airdrop, for example, that may, uh, obviate.
00:07:24
◼
►
I think that's what I'm looking for.
00:07:25
◼
►
That may obviate the use of USB keys.
00:07:27
◼
►
And there's a bunch of other examples, Bluetooth for mice and keyboards.
00:07:32
◼
►
So I asked my family, what do you use your USB ports for?
00:07:36
◼
►
And Aaron and my mom both said,
00:07:38
◼
►
well, I charge my Fitbit that way.
00:07:40
◼
►
Well, you know, that's something,
00:07:42
◼
►
you could find other means for doing that,
00:07:44
◼
►
but that's a reasonable answer.
00:07:45
◼
►
And Aaron also has an iPod shuffle.
00:07:47
◼
►
And so she said, well, I also, you know,
00:07:49
◼
►
load things onto my iPod shuffle that way.
00:07:51
◼
►
And obviously that's not a big deal for a phone,
00:07:53
◼
►
but for an iPod shuffle, you're really out of luck otherwise.
00:07:56
◼
►
My immediate younger brother, I have two younger brothers,
00:07:58
◼
►
my immediate younger brother who is a real adult
00:08:01
◼
►
and works in the video game industry actually, said that he typically uses his USB ports
00:08:08
◼
►
for keyboard, mouse, iPhone and USB key, oftentimes but not always simultaneously.
00:08:13
◼
►
And my youngest brother who is studying out in California, he's doing a master's, he said
00:08:20
◼
►
and I'm quoting, "I don't have enough and I have three."
00:08:24
◼
►
So he was saying that he uses his for a mouse of his phone and oftentimes more than one
00:08:31
◼
►
USB key and additionally at least one external hard drive. So it appears that my theory that
00:08:39
◼
►
really you don't need USB ports, maybe not so solid after all.
00:08:43
◼
►
Well, I think, you know, I think you're seeing, I bet there's like a big bifurcation of the
00:08:48
◼
►
market here where if I had to guess, I would guess that what you have here is a pretty
00:08:54
◼
►
good representative sample actually, just by luck. I mean, I don't think your family
00:08:58
◼
►
is like the most average family ever made.
00:09:00
◼
►
But you know, I think like if I had to guess how it was,
00:09:04
◼
►
I would guess this is how it is,
00:09:05
◼
►
which is that most people use very few of them,
00:09:09
◼
►
and the primary reason they use them
00:09:10
◼
►
is to charge things that charge over USB.
00:09:13
◼
►
Phones, Fitbits, some cameras, stuff like that.
00:09:16
◼
►
Like charging things over USB I think is a big thing,
00:09:20
◼
►
especially in recent years when so many devices
00:09:22
◼
►
have become chargeable over USB.
00:09:25
◼
►
And for that, you don't necessarily need
00:09:29
◼
►
to be using a port on your computer for that,
00:09:31
◼
►
although it is convenient,
00:09:32
◼
►
because your computer is right there on your desk,
00:09:34
◼
►
and it has these ports,
00:09:35
◼
►
and you don't have to take up more outlets,
00:09:37
◼
►
and you don't have to bring so many adapters on trips.
00:09:40
◼
►
So it is definitely convenient,
00:09:41
◼
►
although it isn't strictly necessary.
00:09:43
◼
►
And then you have the people like Brady, your brother,
00:09:46
◼
►
where three ports is not enough,
00:09:49
◼
►
because he has lots of devices.
00:09:50
◼
►
This will apply to a lot of people
00:09:51
◼
►
who have a bunch of peripherals,
00:09:53
◼
►
who have a bunch of disks,
00:09:54
◼
►
who have a big desk setup with an external keyboard,
00:09:58
◼
►
mouse, disk maybe, other stuff.
00:10:00
◼
►
If you have a big setup where you're parking
00:10:02
◼
►
a laptop all the time, you're gonna need more than that,
00:10:04
◼
►
in which case, no number of ports on a laptop
00:10:07
◼
►
is going to be enough and you're gonna be using a hub.
00:10:10
◼
►
Now, things that are attached via adapters or hubs
00:10:13
◼
►
are inherently less reliable than built-in ports
00:10:16
◼
►
most of the time in my experience.
00:10:18
◼
►
And as we move towards computers that have fewer
00:10:22
◼
►
and fewer internal devices and ports,
00:10:25
◼
►
I think this is gonna keep being a problem.
00:10:28
◼
►
Fortunately, the need for many of these things
00:10:29
◼
►
is also going away as this transition happens,
00:10:31
◼
►
but you might not need an ethernet port anymore
00:10:35
◼
►
because you just use wireless,
00:10:36
◼
►
and especially on a laptop
00:10:37
◼
►
where that's probably very frequently the case.
00:10:40
◼
►
Whereas on a desktop, you need some of these things.
00:10:43
◼
►
Now, what I don't want, what I'm not looking forward to
00:10:47
◼
►
is a world in which you have this one port on the computer
00:10:51
◼
►
and then you just have to plug in some random hub
00:10:54
◼
►
from Amazon from God knows what manufacturer
00:10:56
◼
►
with God knows who's chip inside of it
00:10:58
◼
►
that has some weird cheapo power supply
00:11:02
◼
►
that's gonna flake out and get all weird
00:11:04
◼
►
and start causing weird hard to diagnose errors
00:11:07
◼
►
for the things that are plugged into it
00:11:08
◼
►
or intermittent failures for things that are plugged into it.
00:11:11
◼
►
Like I don't wanna get to the point
00:11:13
◼
►
where I'm dependent on some cheap USB hub from Amazon
00:11:17
◼
►
and trying to find like the best one
00:11:18
◼
►
that actually will work because like I have
00:11:21
◼
►
that now and like there's a certain subset of devices that I will only plug
00:11:24
◼
►
in directly to the computer ports because the hubs just are never that
00:11:28
◼
►
reliable and please don't email me as saying I bought this hub but it's
00:11:31
◼
►
perfect if you look at every hub I looked at all of them and and all of
00:11:35
◼
►
them have mostly reviews that say this is perfect and a bunch of you saying
00:11:39
◼
►
this flaked out on me and it's like it seems like they're all basically the
00:11:42
◼
►
same I bet the number of actual manufacturers of these things is
00:11:46
◼
►
probably pretty small the number of chipsets they use is probably even
00:11:49
◼
►
smaller. So like it's just the kind of thing like being dependent on like the
00:11:54
◼
►
random PC peripheral hardware market for your stuff to work properly is not a
00:11:59
◼
►
good place to be. Yeah. So if Apple was gonna do this thing where it's like oh
00:12:04
◼
►
one port and if you need more you can always have a hub or break I think like
00:12:07
◼
►
at the very least you would think that Apple would have to sign itself up to
00:12:11
◼
►
make a high quality one of these that works because I have problems with hubs
00:12:16
◼
►
all the time too. And in addition to like the things you just mentioned, some things
00:12:22
◼
►
just plain not working, some things being flaky. The worst of course is if you have
00:12:26
◼
►
a drive attached to a hub, because the last thing you want to be flaky is your connection
00:12:30
◼
►
to a drive, especially if it's your backup drive and who knows what it's doing over there.
00:12:34
◼
►
But then also like sleep/wake issues where it won't go to sleep with the hub attached
00:12:40
◼
►
or won't wake with the hub attached or the hub will wake it up because something will
00:12:44
◼
►
tickle it or it'll fire off a little thing and it'll make the computer think you've plugged
00:12:47
◼
►
in a USB device when you haven't actually. So many problems. And the only way Apple can
00:12:52
◼
►
sort of defend against them is that we sell, I mean, I can't believe I'm saying this because
00:12:57
◼
►
like the Thunderbolt display had all the problems I had or associated with the ports that were
00:13:01
◼
►
in it. It was effectively a big giant Apple made hub where you plug a Thunderbolt cable
00:13:05
◼
►
into your computer and the power thing because it's actually powering your computer too.
00:13:09
◼
►
And out of it you get Ethernet, USB, Firewire, like all these ports. And that was the problematic
00:13:13
◼
►
part of the display, not the display part, but yeah, if that's going to be their solution,
00:13:19
◼
►
they should make one and they should test that one and make sure it works and make sure
00:13:22
◼
►
computers sleep and wake with it. And when I say that, I'm thinking they can't even make
00:13:25
◼
►
sure their computers sleep and wake with nothing attached to them reliably. So sleep wake problems
00:13:30
◼
►
are evergreen when it comes to all laptops and Apple laptops, I think are the same as
00:13:36
◼
►
any other in that area. So yeah, but aside from all the reliability concerns, I still
00:13:42
◼
►
come back to the convenience angle, which is like, why, you know, why the whole point
00:13:48
◼
►
of the thing is supposed to be convenience and in the absence of some other reason, why
00:13:52
◼
►
not put another one on if it can fit?
00:13:55
◼
►
All right. So let's talk about re-clarification of context for the 12 inch air, Jon.
00:14:01
◼
►
Yeah, the discussion we had, there's a lot of feedback about it, a lot of tweets, and
00:14:05
◼
►
these aren't all tweets that were happening while people live tweeting while they listened
00:14:08
◼
►
the show. To clarify again, how we were discussing the 12-inch air, we weren't making any judgment
00:14:15
◼
►
about the validity of the rumors. We didn't spend any time, and I don't think we should
00:14:19
◼
►
spend any time, discussing like, how likely is it that these rumors are true, that Apple
00:14:24
◼
►
make this device, or whatever. We were just considering the rumored device as if it was
00:14:28
◼
►
real, and saying, if Apple made this, would it be something that we would want? The only
00:14:33
◼
►
thing we did about validity, and I think it's the main thing you should do about any rumors,
00:14:37
◼
►
is like, is it technically possible?
00:14:40
◼
►
And we covered that straight away in the last show.
00:14:43
◼
►
And that's important because it's the easiest way
00:14:46
◼
►
you can deal with rumors.
00:14:47
◼
►
Like obviously there's, you don't know everything,
00:14:49
◼
►
but if someone says that Apple is going to come out
00:14:52
◼
►
with like a Mac Pro the size of a penny,
00:14:55
◼
►
that'll be 10 times faster than the current model,
00:14:58
◼
►
and it's coming out this year, you can dismiss it
00:15:00
◼
►
because you know it's not technically feasible.
00:15:01
◼
►
Like, and there's a range there.
00:15:03
◼
►
If a rumor has a date or a technology or both,
00:15:06
◼
►
You can, you know, like Apple is going to drive all of its ports over the headphone jack.
00:15:11
◼
►
Well, we know that's not possible.
00:15:12
◼
►
And, you know, barring some crazy thing that we've never heard of.
00:15:16
◼
►
And if there's a crazy thing we've never heard of, it's probably bad
00:15:19
◼
►
because it would be proprietary and Apple only and whatever.
00:15:21
◼
►
But yeah, everything else about it, we weren't making guesses about it.
00:15:25
◼
►
And then I was getting a couple of bits of angry feedback from people, mostly tweets.
00:15:30
◼
►
And when I listened back to the show, I realized what they were all yelling at me about.
00:15:33
◼
►
I wasn't responding to their tweets because I didn't understand what they were angry about or like worked up about and it was it was
00:15:39
◼
►
the part of the episode where I think Margot or
00:15:43
◼
►
Casey maybe was like what if the rumors are for like, you know an iPad Pro and 12-inch Mac
00:15:51
◼
►
We get and I said these are not two separate devices
00:15:53
◼
►
That was a reference to the iPhone keynote, but I said it like emphatically like Steve Jobs says it in the keynote. These are not
00:16:00
◼
►
three separate devices
00:16:03
◼
►
This is one device.
00:16:05
◼
►
(audience cheering)
00:16:07
◼
►
- For people who haven't memorized every second
00:16:09
◼
►
of that keynote, it's a thing that Steve Jobs said
00:16:12
◼
►
when the iPhone was introduced.
00:16:14
◼
►
And watch the video and it will make more sense.
00:16:17
◼
►
But it sounded like, if you just listen back to it,
00:16:18
◼
►
it sounded like I was super emphatic
00:16:20
◼
►
that these are not just, I don't know if they're just,
00:16:22
◼
►
it was just a stupid rumor.
00:16:22
◼
►
I was making a joke.
00:16:24
◼
►
- Even we got that and we don't get anything.
00:16:26
◼
►
- Yeah, well, if I'm gonna make a reference
00:16:27
◼
►
that you're gonna get,
00:16:28
◼
►
it's gonna be on the iPhone keynote, right?
00:16:31
◼
►
It's not gonna, yeah, pop culture.
00:16:33
◼
►
So we didn't even talk about iPad,
00:16:35
◼
►
we've talked about iPad Pro in the past,
00:16:36
◼
►
but because that story had renderings of a,
00:16:40
◼
►
mock-ups of this rumored product,
00:16:41
◼
►
and that's what we talked about.
00:16:42
◼
►
Those renderings, those mock-ups, those rumors.
00:16:44
◼
►
- Right, and the only reason I said that I was suspicious
00:16:46
◼
►
whether this was two separate devices
00:16:47
◼
►
is because the rumors over the last few months
00:16:51
◼
►
have been all pointing towards two 12-inch Retina
00:16:55
◼
►
ultra-portable devices from Apple
00:16:57
◼
►
coming at about the same time.
00:16:59
◼
►
And I thought, you know, the same size display,
00:17:02
◼
►
the same, like, all this stuff, like all these rumors,
00:17:05
◼
►
all this smoke around this, you know,
00:17:07
◼
►
there's probably fire behind it.
00:17:08
◼
►
It's like, is this really gonna be two different devices
00:17:11
◼
►
that are like the exact same size
00:17:13
◼
►
that are radically different from each other?
00:17:14
◼
►
Like, I was skeptical of that.
00:17:17
◼
►
I remain a little skeptical of that,
00:17:19
◼
►
except that I've heard from so many people
00:17:21
◼
►
who claim to have knowledge of this,
00:17:24
◼
►
and it's all, you know, secondhand here,
00:17:25
◼
►
say all this stuff, but so many people
00:17:26
◼
►
who claim to have heard authoritatively
00:17:29
◼
►
that no, this is really two separate devices.
00:17:30
◼
►
- Yeah, well, we just gotta wait for the 9to5Mac store
00:17:33
◼
►
with mockups of the iPad Pro,
00:17:35
◼
►
and then we could talk about that too.
00:17:36
◼
►
'Cause like, I mean, there are rumors everywhere.
00:17:39
◼
►
And like the reason we discussed the 9to5Mac one
00:17:41
◼
►
is because it was an interesting rumor at least.
00:17:44
◼
►
And 9to5Mac's track record is reasonable enough
00:17:48
◼
►
that we're not just like picking some random thing
00:17:50
◼
►
from some website and saying,
00:17:51
◼
►
"Somebody said this, let's talk about it."
00:17:52
◼
►
Because, you know, and again,
00:17:54
◼
►
because it was technically feasible
00:17:55
◼
►
because it's a great rumor that takes advantage
00:17:58
◼
►
of known technologies that we have.
00:18:00
◼
►
Like the USB 3, the connector and what the bus can carry
00:18:03
◼
►
makes new hardware designs possible.
00:18:05
◼
►
So it's inevitable that Apple will use that connector
00:18:08
◼
►
in interesting ways on its future Macs
00:18:10
◼
►
and this rumor is one possible way that they could do it.
00:18:13
◼
►
- Our first sponsor this week is our friends at Squarespace.
00:18:17
◼
►
Squarespace is the best website builder out there.
00:18:20
◼
►
I've used many of them
00:18:22
◼
►
and I've built my own websites plenty of times.
00:18:25
◼
►
And in this day and age, building your own website,
00:18:28
◼
►
most of the listeners to this show
00:18:29
◼
►
have probably built a website before somewhere else,
00:18:32
◼
►
like either through some kind of CMS
00:18:34
◼
►
or building it from scratch, building your own CMS,
00:18:36
◼
►
whatever the case, building it statically
00:18:38
◼
►
using Microsoft Frontpage 15 years ago,
00:18:40
◼
►
whatever the case, you probably made a website before.
00:18:43
◼
►
And you know, yeah, there's a time and a place
00:18:46
◼
►
for making it yourself, but the percentage of times
00:18:49
◼
►
and places where that's the best answer for you
00:18:51
◼
►
keeps getting smaller and smaller
00:18:53
◼
►
because things like Squarespace exist and are very good.
00:18:55
◼
►
So we use Squarespace for this podcast site.
00:18:58
◼
►
I could make a podcast site CMS.
00:19:01
◼
►
It would be terrible.
00:19:02
◼
►
It would offer none of the features that Squarespace does,
00:19:05
◼
►
and it would not be the best use of my time.
00:19:08
◼
►
And I've wanted to make a podcast CMS for a while,
00:19:11
◼
►
but I know, I keep thinking like,
00:19:12
◼
►
you know, as much as I wanna do that, why should I do that?
00:19:16
◼
►
Because Squarespace works just fine,
00:19:18
◼
►
and it has so many other features
00:19:19
◼
►
that I'm never gonna be able to match.
00:19:21
◼
►
And I think that is overall, like for geeks like us,
00:19:25
◼
►
I think that's the core Squarespace message is like,
00:19:27
◼
►
yes, they know you can build your own site.
00:19:29
◼
►
They know you have the ability to build your own CMS
00:19:32
◼
►
or host something somewhere else.
00:19:34
◼
►
But they also are confident that once you see
00:19:36
◼
►
the features they offer, once you see how easy it is,
00:19:39
◼
►
if you're building it for somebody else,
00:19:40
◼
►
once you see how easy it is for that other person
00:19:43
◼
►
to get help and to keep it running without you,
00:19:45
◼
►
without having to bug you constantly for support,
00:19:48
◼
►
it's a no brainer.
00:19:50
◼
►
They have all these beautiful designs you can start with.
00:19:53
◼
►
They're all responsive mobile designs.
00:19:56
◼
►
They keep up with the times.
00:19:57
◼
►
They're fashionable.
00:19:58
◼
►
They use JavaScript and dynamic stuff,
00:20:00
◼
►
wherever it makes sense to.
00:20:01
◼
►
Everything about their site, it's clean.
00:20:05
◼
►
Again, it's responsive.
00:20:06
◼
►
All this great stuff.
00:20:07
◼
►
Your site looks like your site, and it's customizable.
00:20:09
◼
►
You can customize everything, the colors down to the fonts,
00:20:13
◼
►
the sizing, the blocks, where the blocks go,
00:20:14
◼
►
how big things are.
00:20:16
◼
►
You can even inject your own code if you're that geeky
00:20:18
◼
►
and you have a little nitpick.
00:20:20
◼
►
"You know, I don't like the way this happens
00:20:22
◼
►
"when I resize it," or "I don't like this one little element."
00:20:24
◼
►
Well, you can inject your own CSS or JavaScript
00:20:26
◼
►
and actually modify the page right there.
00:20:29
◼
►
They also have all this new stuff with Squarespace 7,
00:20:32
◼
►
integration with Google Apps,
00:20:33
◼
►
they have a partnership with Getty Images
00:20:34
◼
►
where you can just buy a stock photo
00:20:36
◼
►
right there in the app for 10 bucks
00:20:38
◼
►
and insert it as background, header, post image,
00:20:41
◼
►
whatever you need.
00:20:42
◼
►
This huge partnership with Getty,
00:20:43
◼
►
all these fantastic quality images.
00:20:45
◼
►
They have cover pages, which is now back in fashion
00:20:48
◼
►
and you can do a really nice job very, very easily
00:20:50
◼
►
the Squarespace where you have like a big splash page
00:20:52
◼
►
when you start up if you wanna have an intro
00:20:54
◼
►
or if you wanna promote some special event going on
00:20:56
◼
►
or something you just launched,
00:20:57
◼
►
you can do that really easily.
00:20:59
◼
►
All this in a beautiful design,
00:21:00
◼
►
very easy to use but yet very powerful.
00:21:03
◼
►
They have 24/7 support via live chat and email.
00:21:06
◼
►
All this starts at just $8 a month
00:21:08
◼
►
and you get a free domain name if you buy a year upfront.
00:21:12
◼
►
They also have commerce built in store functionality.
00:21:14
◼
►
Oh, it's so great and all that's no additional charge also.
00:21:17
◼
►
Anyway, start a free trial today
00:21:19
◼
►
with no credit card required.
00:21:21
◼
►
This is a real genuine free trial.
00:21:22
◼
►
They don't ask you for the credit card upfront
00:21:24
◼
►
and then bill you if you forget to cancel it, not like that.
00:21:26
◼
►
A real, no strings attached, free trial.
00:21:29
◼
►
No credit card required.
00:21:30
◼
►
Start building a website today.
00:21:32
◼
►
If you are curious about it,
00:21:33
◼
►
if you don't believe me when I say
00:21:36
◼
►
that this is better than building it yourself
00:21:37
◼
►
most of the time, try it.
00:21:39
◼
►
They let you try it for free.
00:21:40
◼
►
You can just start something.
00:21:42
◼
►
You poke around, make a fake website, make a real website,
00:21:44
◼
►
whatever the case is, just try it.
00:21:48
◼
►
When you decide to sign up for Squarespace,
00:21:49
◼
►
please use offer code ATP.
00:21:52
◼
►
That will tell them you came from here
00:21:53
◼
►
and you'll get 10% off.
00:21:55
◼
►
So once again, go to squarespace.com,
00:21:57
◼
►
use coupon code ATP for 10% off.
00:22:00
◼
►
Thanks a lot to Squarespace for supporting our show.
00:22:02
◼
►
Squarespace, start here, go anywhere.
00:22:05
◼
►
- Okay, so John, would you like to tell us
00:22:07
◼
►
a little bit about Hypercritical back in the day?
00:22:10
◼
►
- Yeah, that's another person reminding me
00:22:12
◼
►
of shows I did that I've forgotten.
00:22:13
◼
►
This is Jason Becker.
00:22:14
◼
►
Wait, is Hypercritical follow-up carrying you over to this show?
00:22:17
◼
►
Yeah, more or less, because people keep reminding me that, like, "Hey, you talked about something
00:22:22
◼
►
on Hypercritical that's relevant to what you're talking about on ATP," and hypercritical I
00:22:26
◼
►
was talking about is probably one of my blog posts, so Hypercritical will go about things
00:22:29
◼
►
getting thinner.
00:22:30
◼
►
I think at the time it was about the iMac, because people were upset that the iMac was
00:22:33
◼
►
super thin or whatever.
00:22:35
◼
►
But it's relevant to the rumored 12-inch error, because the whole deal with the 12-inch error
00:22:39
◼
►
is, like, they just keep making it thinner, and Marco was talking about, like, "Why do
00:22:42
◼
►
you got to taper it?"
00:22:43
◼
►
We've talked about this before, like if you don't taper it, you can fit way more battery.
00:22:46
◼
►
And what does the taper give you?
00:22:48
◼
►
That's another example of like, you know, give me the reason for this.
00:22:53
◼
►
The reason I would imagine for the taper is perception of thinness and possibly weight.
00:23:00
◼
►
Those are the two, like because the taper does make it feel like, wow, look at this
00:23:03
◼
►
razor edge type thing.
00:23:05
◼
►
It feels thinner than every uniform and making it actually be thinner reduces the weight.
00:23:11
◼
►
Maybe there's room for a non tapered version to get more battery
00:23:14
◼
►
But we don't know what the battery life is of this fictional project anyway, so we have to wait to see what it's like
00:23:17
◼
►
But it always comes back to that question that we talked about with the phones
00:23:21
◼
►
And I've always said that I even though it's frustrating that they don't expand the line to give a model that is a little bit thicker
00:23:28
◼
►
And a little bit heavier in exchange for battery life
00:23:30
◼
►
But just rely entirely on third-party you know battery cases and stuff or you know third-party
00:23:34
◼
►
Recharge extra battery packs and other stuff they sell for laptops that you you know plug into it
00:23:39
◼
►
On a long plane flight or whatever
00:23:41
◼
►
Why do they keep making a thinner? Why and and why do I support that idea?
00:23:45
◼
►
And one of the reasons that I supported it is I think I'll find I have to find this this post on my website
00:23:50
◼
►
I didn't put in the show. It's
00:23:52
◼
►
That you don't if you just keep making them the same thickness and keep making the battery bigger and just keep finding things to do
00:23:57
◼
►
With the space available to you like oh we can use an even hotter GPU and now that the power of everything has gone down
00:24:03
◼
►
We can you know, we have so much extra power budget
00:24:05
◼
►
we can make the battery life even longer.
00:24:07
◼
►
And you could do a lot if you stayed within a similar size.
00:24:10
◼
►
But if you do that, you're never going to learn
00:24:12
◼
►
how to make things really thin.
00:24:13
◼
►
And it's not like five years from now,
00:24:17
◼
►
someone's gonna be ready with some new technology,
00:24:20
◼
►
like, wow, with that technology,
00:24:22
◼
►
we can make a laptop even thinner.
00:24:25
◼
►
And you won't have the expertise
00:24:27
◼
►
to jump from your half-inch thick laptop
00:24:30
◼
►
to the one that's the thickness of a credit card or whatever.
00:24:32
◼
►
It works better with that analogy
00:24:33
◼
►
when you talk about phones.
00:24:34
◼
►
but I think that was the analogy I was using is like,
00:24:37
◼
►
phones keep getting thinner and it's like stupid,
00:24:39
◼
►
soon they're gonna be able to bend them,
00:24:41
◼
►
like we've got the bending issues
00:24:43
◼
►
with the iPhone 6 and everything
00:24:44
◼
►
and they just, they start becoming thin enough,
00:24:46
◼
►
you're like, geez, we're going in the wrong direction here,
00:24:48
◼
►
we just need to stop.
00:24:50
◼
►
You don't need to stop,
00:24:51
◼
►
actually you need to just keep going and go through
00:24:53
◼
►
and until your phone ends up the thickness
00:24:55
◼
►
and weight of a credit card
00:24:57
◼
►
and then when you drop it on the ground, who cares?
00:24:59
◼
►
'Cause if you drop a credit card on the ground,
00:25:00
◼
►
nothing happens to it, right?
00:25:01
◼
►
It's flexible, it's thin, it's lighter,
00:25:03
◼
►
it's more durable, but you're not gonna get to your phone
00:25:07
◼
►
that is so light and thin and durable
00:25:08
◼
►
that you don't even care about it.
00:25:09
◼
►
You're never gonna get there
00:25:10
◼
►
if you keep making your phone the thickness
00:25:12
◼
►
of the original iPhone and you just keep adding more CPU
00:25:14
◼
►
and RAM and battery to that thickness.
00:25:16
◼
►
So this I think is part of the march of progress.
00:25:19
◼
►
And as it relates to the MacBook Air, rumored 12 inch,
00:25:22
◼
►
or even just any of the MacBook Airs that are out now,
00:25:25
◼
►
why do they keep making that thinner?
00:25:27
◼
►
What are they aiming for now?
00:25:29
◼
►
I think part of it is weight,
00:25:31
◼
►
because as Marco found out with the iPad Air,
00:25:33
◼
►
Even though weight is like, oh, who cares,
00:25:35
◼
►
a couple grams here, a couple grams there.
00:25:37
◼
►
For things that you either hold all the time,
00:25:39
◼
►
like the iOS devices, or carry around a lot,
00:25:41
◼
►
from room to room, or put in your backpack,
00:25:44
◼
►
there are little thresholds of weight.
00:25:47
◼
►
I think, speaking of Merlin talking about tech,
00:25:48
◼
►
Merlin has discussed this on his podcast a few times,
00:25:52
◼
►
how once you pass a certain threshold of weight,
00:25:54
◼
►
he doesn't notice when that Apple hardware
00:25:56
◼
►
is in his backpack.
00:25:57
◼
►
Like he says he notices more
00:25:58
◼
►
if he brings his Leatherman with him,
00:26:00
◼
►
like a metal tool.
00:26:02
◼
►
He notices when that's in his backpack,
00:26:03
◼
►
but he can't even tell, is my iPad mini in there
00:26:05
◼
►
or is it not?
00:26:06
◼
►
And the MacBook Air could be getting to that thing
00:26:08
◼
►
where it's not a factor of like,
00:26:10
◼
►
whoever used to be like,
00:26:11
◼
►
"Oh, I'm gonna have a laptop in my backpack.
00:26:12
◼
►
I don't wanna lug that big thing around."
00:26:14
◼
►
MacBook Air has already kind of crossed the threshold
00:26:17
◼
►
of like, it's not a big thing to lug around,
00:26:18
◼
►
but you kinda know when it's in there.
00:26:20
◼
►
And if they keep going along this path
00:26:21
◼
►
and making it thinner and keeping with the taper,
00:26:23
◼
►
making it lighter, they are,
00:26:25
◼
►
they will eventually run up into a durability issue
00:26:27
◼
►
because you can't make aluminum that thin
00:26:29
◼
►
because it doesn't spring back like say,
00:26:30
◼
►
carbon fiber would.
00:26:31
◼
►
and then they got the screen problem there,
00:26:33
◼
►
especially if you use glass anywhere in it for flexibility.
00:26:35
◼
►
But they're approaching a place
00:26:37
◼
►
where they'll have to do some materials redesign.
00:26:39
◼
►
So within the current materials they're using,
00:26:41
◼
►
they're just trying to keep it going thinner
00:26:43
◼
►
to get the expertise of like, how thin can we make this?
00:26:45
◼
►
How much can we remove?
00:26:46
◼
►
What is actually essential?
00:26:47
◼
►
Now you gotta get Johnny Iovine
00:26:48
◼
►
in his white world talking about this stuff.
00:26:49
◼
►
What is essential for a laptop?
00:26:52
◼
►
Do you need a keyboard and a screen?
00:26:54
◼
►
How about just a keyboard?
00:26:56
◼
►
The MacBook shuffle.
00:26:59
◼
►
That's what I'm still thinking about these things,
00:27:01
◼
►
which is why I'm not digging them so much for why you gotta make it something.
00:27:04
◼
►
The port thing, I complain to them because if you think you need any ports, why would
00:27:11
◼
►
you have one of them and not two?
00:27:12
◼
►
So there's another follow up item about that.
00:27:15
◼
►
I just wanted to follow that up because hey, I talked about an Africa critical and I actually
00:27:20
◼
►
blogged about it and it is relevant to the rumors of this fictional product.
00:27:24
◼
►
There was a really good post on Six Colors, Jason Snell's new website, with research help
00:27:29
◼
►
from our friend Steven Hackett about Apple solving for X with battery life.
00:27:37
◼
►
The gist of the post is, if you look, Apple has clearly decided what the right level of
00:27:43
◼
►
battery life is for iPhones and iPads, and they've kept it fairly consistent, or at least
00:27:49
◼
►
within a very small range.
00:27:51
◼
►
iPads are exactly the same, and iPhones vary a little bit more, but it's clear that Apple
00:27:58
◼
►
has decided through whatever, through research or experimentation or just thinking whatever
00:28:03
◼
►
they think is best, they've decided clearly like, we don't need more battery life than
00:28:08
◼
►
this in this device type.
00:28:10
◼
►
And so any savings we get from advancements in technology or manufacturing, we can apply
00:28:15
◼
►
to other areas like making it thinner and lighter.
00:28:19
◼
►
And I think this, it's so obvious when you look at this that, okay, of course that's
00:28:24
◼
►
what they're doing, that's what they have been doing.
00:28:27
◼
►
And so looking at this I think it's pretty obvious that the "Macbook stealth" or
00:28:32
◼
►
whatever this thing ends up being called, that's probably not its name, but whatever
00:28:36
◼
►
this thing ends up being called if it's real, I think it's pretty obvious that it's
00:28:40
◼
►
not going to be a quantum leap forward in battery life.
00:28:42
◼
►
It is most likely going to, they're going to apply those savings towards the innocent
00:28:47
◼
►
And I agree, John, with what you said about we do need to make progress in those areas
00:28:52
◼
►
I do think though, like, I don't know anybody who has an iPhone who is extremely satisfied
00:28:58
◼
►
with his battery life most of the time.
00:29:02
◼
►
I have an iPhone.
00:29:03
◼
►
I am extremely satisfied with his battery life.
00:29:05
◼
►
You've had an iPhone for like a day.
00:29:06
◼
►
I know, but this is how I...
00:29:09
◼
►
Part of the reason I didn't have an iPhone is because I don't really, you know, need
00:29:13
◼
►
one, but now that I have one, I am completely satisfied with his battery life.
00:29:17
◼
►
Like, I can forget to charge it for a day and I'm fine.
00:29:20
◼
►
I go two days with it.
00:29:22
◼
►
Who you know who uses an iPhone who goes two days with it?
00:29:25
◼
►
It doesn't mean that it's not appropriate,
00:29:27
◼
►
as I said before, for Apple to have a model of phone
00:29:30
◼
►
that does a different trade-off for people,
00:29:32
◼
►
for people who do use it heavily,
00:29:33
◼
►
who do barely get through the day on a charge,
00:29:36
◼
►
there should be a product for them,
00:29:37
◼
►
but the current battery life is fine.
00:29:39
◼
►
And I think in their little graphs,
00:29:40
◼
►
they showed like an uptick for the,
00:29:42
◼
►
I can think of it as the 6 Plus that had the big uptick,
00:29:44
◼
►
but I think--
00:29:45
◼
►
- Yeah, the 6 Plus is the only big jump on it.
00:29:47
◼
►
- But the 6 is up a little bit too.
00:29:48
◼
►
I mean we've talked over the past year many many times about the same exact thing of like
00:29:54
◼
►
Of how of how they there hold the hold the battery life
00:29:59
◼
►
Constant and then make it thinner if you can and I
00:30:03
◼
►
Margot you were saying that like they've decided decided that's the best for that. I don't think they've decided anything like that
00:30:10
◼
►
I think that's just that's the battery life they have and when they made a follow-up device there was a mandate no regression on battery life
00:30:16
◼
►
Make it thinner if you can
00:30:18
◼
►
and that mandate wavered on the iPad 3.
00:30:21
◼
►
Again, we've discussed this many times.
00:30:23
◼
►
And so that has been their mandate,
00:30:25
◼
►
but I wouldn't wager too much on them deciding,
00:30:30
◼
►
the same way that they decided like,
00:30:31
◼
►
"Oh, this size for the iPhone is exactly the right size."
00:30:33
◼
►
No, that's just the size they made it.
00:30:35
◼
►
Seemed like a good size at the time.
00:30:36
◼
►
Later they tried taller.
00:30:37
◼
►
That was all right too, and then they made it bigger.
00:30:39
◼
►
That's all right too.
00:30:41
◼
►
It's up for grabs, right?
00:30:42
◼
►
And I think the battery life on all the products
00:30:45
◼
►
being held more or less constant
00:30:46
◼
►
is simply a matter of the follow-up product
00:30:48
◼
►
can't be worse than the one that came before.
00:30:50
◼
►
But if you try to make it better,
00:30:52
◼
►
all the areas that you can make it better,
00:30:54
◼
►
battery life seems like the last on the list.
00:30:57
◼
►
Like you're not gonna regress,
00:30:58
◼
►
you gotta make it at least the same
00:30:59
◼
►
'cause the new phone's gotta be better
00:31:00
◼
►
than the one that replaces it.
00:31:01
◼
►
But we can make it better in CPU, in GPU, in screen,
00:31:05
◼
►
in the interface, in cheapness in the manufacturer,
00:31:10
◼
►
durability, like all these different categories.
00:31:11
◼
►
And battery life is like, just don't regress.
00:31:13
◼
►
Like it seems to be pretty darn low on the list
00:31:15
◼
►
of things they're prioritizing.
00:31:17
◼
►
And I think those are reasonable priorities,
00:31:18
◼
►
again, for the reason I talked about with the thinness,
00:31:20
◼
►
and also because faster CPUs and GPUs,
00:31:23
◼
►
cell phones more than battery life.
00:31:26
◼
►
You just need to make one model
00:31:27
◼
►
that has decent battery, yeah,
00:31:28
◼
►
but I guess maybe the 6 Plus is that model.
00:31:29
◼
►
- Yeah, I think that's pretty clear
00:31:31
◼
►
that that's their answer.
00:31:32
◼
►
No, but I think similar to your arguing about thinness,
00:31:35
◼
►
where we have to make progress gradually over time
00:31:39
◼
►
to eventually have a major step forward in total,
00:31:44
◼
►
you can apply the same thing to battery life,
00:31:45
◼
►
And they have made incremental progress over time,
00:31:47
◼
►
but it really has been fairly incremental.
00:31:50
◼
►
And part of this is just because battery technology
00:31:53
◼
►
changes so incredibly slowly.
00:31:54
◼
►
And we're not gonna have--
00:31:56
◼
►
- Compared to the silicon technology, basically.
00:31:58
◼
►
Not that it changes that, I mean, it changes,
00:32:00
◼
►
the speed is fine, it's just it compared
00:32:01
◼
►
to almost every other component.
00:32:03
◼
►
What you can do with those phones,
00:32:06
◼
►
the screens are just twice as good,
00:32:08
◼
►
twice, three times the resolution
00:32:09
◼
►
in the lifetime of the phone.
00:32:10
◼
►
The batteries have not gotten three times as good
00:32:12
◼
►
in the lifetime of the phone.
00:32:13
◼
►
is just the different rates of technology change.
00:32:15
◼
►
- Right, and if you look at the laptops,
00:32:18
◼
►
their battery lives have gone up substantially
00:32:21
◼
►
over the last few years, where it wasn't that long ago
00:32:23
◼
►
that a five hour battery life was top of the line
00:32:27
◼
►
under the most ideal conditions only.
00:32:29
◼
►
And now we're up to seven, eight, fairly regularly.
00:32:33
◼
►
Although I've never gotten that,
00:32:34
◼
►
but that could just be because I buy
00:32:35
◼
►
the big four core models, I don't know.
00:32:36
◼
►
Anyway, with battery life, where things get interesting,
00:32:41
◼
►
where you get really interesting shifts
00:32:45
◼
►
in what this enables you to do
00:32:47
◼
►
is when you have a really big change in battery life.
00:32:49
◼
►
When all of a sudden, if your laptop,
00:32:53
◼
►
if you don't need to be plugging it in all day,
00:32:55
◼
►
if you can actually work on battery all day
00:32:58
◼
►
and not worry, not have range anxiety,
00:33:01
◼
►
not worry about bottoming out and having to go plug in,
00:33:04
◼
►
if you can treat it, if your laptop genuinely has 24 hour
00:33:08
◼
►
in use with WiFi battery life,
00:33:11
◼
►
then that enables uses, that enables freedoms
00:33:14
◼
►
that you might not have before
00:33:16
◼
►
or that you couldn't really count on reliably before.
00:33:19
◼
►
That's where things get interesting
00:33:20
◼
►
is when you can make jumps like that.
00:33:22
◼
►
And over time, eventually maybe we'll get there,
00:33:24
◼
►
I hope, maybe.
00:33:26
◼
►
But if you look at the way Apple does these jumps,
00:33:28
◼
►
it doesn't look like getting there is a very high priority.
00:33:33
◼
►
Eventually they might get there accidentally,
00:33:37
◼
►
but it doesn't seem like they're pushing for that.
00:33:40
◼
►
And I think that's a lost opportunity.
00:33:42
◼
►
- I think the rumored 12-inch MacBook is an indication
00:33:46
◼
►
of how they might make the next step on that.
00:33:49
◼
►
Because as we said, when they have this extra capacity,
00:33:54
◼
►
the batteries aren't getting better that much faster.
00:33:56
◼
►
But what is happening is that every other component
00:33:58
◼
►
that's in the laptop gets lower power,
00:33:59
◼
►
and that's how we get the current good MacBook Airs
00:34:02
◼
►
that have better battery life than the old ones did.
00:34:05
◼
►
But for this rumored thing, this could be a way
00:34:08
◼
►
they make sort of a larger step forward.
00:34:11
◼
►
Like, well, the batteries aren't really getting
00:34:12
◼
►
that much better, but, you know,
00:34:15
◼
►
some in the back of some designers mind,
00:34:17
◼
►
hardware designer or Johnny Iver both,
00:34:18
◼
►
they have the idea of, well, our components keep getting,
00:34:21
◼
►
but you know, our screens,
00:34:22
◼
►
even though we went to the retina 5K iMac screen,
00:34:24
◼
►
it's actually lower power than the previous screen.
00:34:26
◼
►
Eventually they're gonna get decent OLEDs in these things
00:34:29
◼
►
and you'll have an even bigger drop,
00:34:30
◼
►
especially if they make the entire interface black.
00:34:34
◼
►
Lots of the components are going down in power usage,
00:34:37
◼
►
but somebody has in the back of their mind,
00:34:39
◼
►
can I just rip everything out of this freaking notebook
00:34:41
◼
►
and just have like a tiny little two centimeter square
00:34:46
◼
►
that's the whole laptop
00:34:47
◼
►
and then just fill the rest of it with battery?
00:34:49
◼
►
Like what can I pull out of this laptop?
00:34:51
◼
►
Well, you gotta have a keyboard
00:34:52
◼
►
and you gotta have a screen.
00:34:53
◼
►
All right, what else can I remove?
00:34:54
◼
►
Can I remove everything except, can I remove all the ports?
00:34:56
◼
►
No, you can't remove all the ports.
00:34:58
◼
►
We need some place for power to go in.
00:34:59
◼
►
I mean, something like,
00:35:00
◼
►
how about I remove every single interface
00:35:02
◼
►
except for one low power USB three thing.
00:35:05
◼
►
I can get rid of, you know,
00:35:07
◼
►
If they could have rid of, I think they got rid of audio in.
00:35:09
◼
►
I know they have like the hybrid cable
00:35:11
◼
►
that like the headphone jack is the input thing,
00:35:13
◼
►
but I'm still like--
00:35:14
◼
►
- Well, those don't offer audio in anymore.
00:35:16
◼
►
Sorry, I should clarify on most hardware.
00:35:20
◼
►
The iMac does have audio in,
00:35:21
◼
►
the Mac mini has audio in, but the laptops,
00:35:23
◼
►
as far as I know, the laptops don't have audio in anymore.
00:35:26
◼
►
- I mean, that's not really probably a power saving,
00:35:28
◼
►
so maybe like with a chip set or whatever,
00:35:30
◼
►
like they just, they want them to be like the phone,
00:35:32
◼
►
where it's mostly just a giant battery
00:35:34
◼
►
in a case with a screen, and then off to the side,
00:35:36
◼
►
there's this tiny little thing
00:35:37
◼
►
that is the entire computer.
00:35:38
◼
►
And if you look inside the MacBook Air,
00:35:39
◼
►
as you watch the battery slowly eat the rest of the computer
00:35:41
◼
►
over the past few years.
00:35:44
◼
►
It used to be like a board inside there,
00:35:45
◼
►
and then the board became like two little skinny things.
00:35:47
◼
►
And it's just like, it's running away
00:35:49
◼
►
from this giant battery that's eating it.
00:35:50
◼
►
And one of the ways you get power savings back
00:35:52
◼
►
is just to be merciless about what you remove.
00:35:55
◼
►
I guess we should probably skip to that follow-up item
00:35:58
◼
►
because it's related to this.
00:35:59
◼
►
Troy Gall wrote in with some reasons of like,
00:36:01
◼
►
I kept asking for why, what do I get with one port
00:36:04
◼
►
that I don't have with two?
00:36:05
◼
►
Why would they do this?
00:36:06
◼
►
is there a reason that we can think of?
00:36:08
◼
►
And he's got two guesses for reasons.
00:36:10
◼
►
One is related to power,
00:36:12
◼
►
but in a slightly different way that I was talking about.
00:36:13
◼
►
I'm like, well, maybe two means you can't have,
00:36:16
◼
►
like maybe ripping out the port
00:36:17
◼
►
means ripping out the supporting chip set
00:36:19
◼
►
because the one port is like, I don't know.
00:36:20
◼
►
If there's some large gain
00:36:22
◼
►
that's not just like incremental,
00:36:24
◼
►
like it's, you don't need supporting machinery
00:36:26
◼
►
behind it to have two ports.
00:36:27
◼
►
The one port wires directly into the thing
00:36:29
◼
►
without a control.
00:36:30
◼
►
Who knows? I don't know what the details might be, but.
00:36:31
◼
►
- No, it isn't about,
00:36:32
◼
►
it is almost certainly not about controller logic inside.
00:36:35
◼
►
it's about the amount of power that port could draw
00:36:38
◼
►
by its own spec.
00:36:39
◼
►
So if you have like FireWire devices,
00:36:41
◼
►
I think could draw like 10 Watts or something like that.
00:36:43
◼
►
So a new USB is, I think, I don't know, sometimes.
00:36:47
◼
►
So anyway, it's like, if you have multiple ports,
00:36:49
◼
►
you have to, the laptop has to be able to supply
00:36:52
◼
►
the maximum power draw to each of those ports.
00:36:54
◼
►
So it has to have a power supply big enough and so on.
00:36:56
◼
►
- That just shortens the battery life
00:36:57
◼
►
if you have something plugged in.
00:36:58
◼
►
Like I don't think they're optimizing
00:36:59
◼
►
for the everything plugged in battery life.
00:37:01
◼
►
I think they're optimizing for the battery life
00:37:03
◼
►
with nothing plugged in.
00:37:04
◼
►
Like that's the life they're gonna, you know,
00:37:05
◼
►
whenever they show battery life,
00:37:07
◼
►
they're not saying with a bunch of drive-sucking,
00:37:09
◼
►
self-powered hard drives,
00:37:12
◼
►
spinning hard drives sucking power from all your ports.
00:37:13
◼
►
Like it's always with nothing.
00:37:15
◼
►
So I'm thinking is there some passive power,
00:37:17
◼
►
you know, that you need other components?
00:37:19
◼
►
- No, I think it's more like, you know,
00:37:21
◼
►
'cause if you have the port that can potentially
00:37:23
◼
►
draw 10 watts or whatever,
00:37:25
◼
►
then every, like the power supply circuitry
00:37:27
◼
►
has to be bigger, the power brick has to be bigger,
00:37:29
◼
►
the total power draw and thermal output of the laptop
00:37:32
◼
►
has to be best to be higher.
00:37:34
◼
►
- Well, the peak power, but yeah,
00:37:35
◼
►
there could be some passive loss
00:37:37
◼
►
to the larger supply or whatever.
00:37:39
◼
►
But his angle on it is that if you had two ports,
00:37:41
◼
►
he thinks that they would both have to support charging.
00:37:43
◼
►
Like if you're gonna charge through it,
00:37:44
◼
►
and then maybe that would be more complicated electrically,
00:37:47
◼
►
and that would be the complication.
00:37:48
◼
►
I would imagine that if they have two ports,
00:37:50
◼
►
they would be perfectly fine,
00:37:51
◼
►
so you can only charge through one of them.
00:37:52
◼
►
It would be the one with the little like chargey symbol,
00:37:55
◼
►
silk-screened on it and laser etched stuff
00:37:57
◼
►
that no human being could see
00:37:58
◼
►
without being two inches away.
00:38:01
◼
►
And his second thought was there's no room for more ports
00:38:04
◼
►
because the keyboard goes edge to edge
00:38:06
◼
►
and you need space for the key travel
00:38:07
◼
►
and they're putting the port in the one place
00:38:09
◼
►
where it can be, where it doesn't interfere
00:38:11
◼
►
with the keys going up and down
00:38:11
◼
►
but the thing's so damn thin.
00:38:14
◼
►
That doesn't explain why you can't have one on one side
00:38:16
◼
►
and one on the other.
00:38:17
◼
►
And the headphone port, I feel like you could shove that.
00:38:21
◼
►
From looking from these fake mockups of a product
00:38:23
◼
►
that doesn't actually exist,
00:38:24
◼
►
it seemed to me that there was room on both sides
00:38:27
◼
►
to have one USB on both sides
00:38:29
◼
►
and still find a place to wedge in the thing.
00:38:31
◼
►
But like, you're not constrained by a predefined case
00:38:36
◼
►
or a mock-up rendering.
00:38:37
◼
►
You get to design the product.
00:38:38
◼
►
If you're gonna go keyboard edge to edge, fine,
00:38:40
◼
►
like move it down an extra three millimeters
00:38:42
◼
►
to make room for the, you know.
00:38:44
◼
►
Anyway, I don't find any of these reasons
00:38:46
◼
►
particularly convincing, but they're at least new theories.
00:38:49
◼
►
- Our second sponsor this week is Igloo,
00:38:52
◼
►
an intranet you will actually like.
00:38:54
◼
►
Igloo is built with easy to use apps like shared calendars,
00:38:57
◼
►
Twitter like micro blogs, file sharing, task management,
00:39:00
◼
►
It is everything you need to work better together
00:39:03
◼
►
in one very configurable cloud platform.
00:39:05
◼
►
Go to igloosoftware.com/atp to sign up.
00:39:09
◼
►
Igloo is an internet you will actually like
00:39:11
◼
►
that is free for up to 10 people
00:39:13
◼
►
and very reasonably priced once you go past that.
00:39:16
◼
►
They have responsive design.
00:39:17
◼
►
It works perfectly on all your devices.
00:39:20
◼
►
iOS, Android, and Blackberry all supported fully as well.
00:39:23
◼
►
They built their document renderer
00:39:26
◼
►
and their annotation engine, all with HTML5
00:39:29
◼
►
so that even that will work.
00:39:30
◼
►
All these dynamic features, the commenting features,
00:39:32
◼
►
the annotation features, that all works
00:39:34
◼
►
even on smartphones and Blackberries.
00:39:36
◼
►
You know, it'll work with,
00:39:38
◼
►
whenever Apple releases new devices, new size devices,
00:39:41
◼
►
it works great on those because it's fully responsive.
00:39:44
◼
►
You can review documents, you can post project updates,
00:39:47
◼
►
you can even change admin settings or all the,
00:39:50
◼
►
you can do pretty much anything you can do on Igloo,
00:39:52
◼
►
you can do from a mobile device as well.
00:39:55
◼
►
It's really mobile first design, fully responsive design,
00:39:57
◼
►
perfect for all that stuff.
00:39:59
◼
►
You can customize the look and feel,
00:40:01
◼
►
and when you customize that,
00:40:02
◼
►
those customizations also carry over to every device,
00:40:05
◼
►
'cause it's fully responsive
00:40:06
◼
►
and integrated with your design.
00:40:07
◼
►
And even in the past,
00:40:10
◼
►
I don't think this has been updated in a while,
00:40:12
◼
►
but in the past, Gartner put them on their magic quadrant
00:40:15
◼
►
for social software for six consecutive years,
00:40:18
◼
►
so I'm guessing when that comes out next,
00:40:20
◼
►
I bet they're still gonna be on it,
00:40:21
◼
►
alongside tech giants, including Microsoft, IBM,
00:40:24
◼
►
Google, VMware, Salesforce, and SAP.
00:40:27
◼
►
In this report that valued the viability of the vendor,
00:40:31
◼
►
Gartner praised igloo for their responsiveness
00:40:35
◼
►
and customer experience.
00:40:37
◼
►
A quote from this report from last fall,
00:40:39
◼
►
"Feedback from igloo's reference customers
00:40:40
◼
►
"was consistently positive.
00:40:41
◼
►
"They praised the product's quick deployment,
00:40:43
◼
►
"configuration, and customization flexibility
00:40:45
◼
►
"with their self-serve options for non-technical users,
00:40:48
◼
►
"control over branding and information organization
00:40:50
◼
►
"and ease of use."
00:40:51
◼
►
They also praised the responsiveness of igloo
00:40:53
◼
►
as an organization.
00:40:54
◼
►
So anyway, if your company has a legacy internet
00:40:57
◼
►
built on SharePoint or old portal technology,
00:41:00
◼
►
you should definitely give igloo a try
00:41:01
◼
►
because I've never heard of anybody
00:41:03
◼
►
who said they loved their internet before they used igloo
00:41:05
◼
►
and once they used igloo I hear very good things.
00:41:07
◼
►
So igloo is free to use for teams of up to 10 people.
00:41:10
◼
►
So really if you're a small company,
00:41:11
◼
►
you have nothing to lose, just go try it.
00:41:13
◼
►
Even if you're a small department within a big company,
00:41:16
◼
►
go try it for your department, see if you like it.
00:41:18
◼
►
Sign up at igloosoftware.com/atp.
00:41:21
◼
►
That's igloosoftware.com/atp.
00:41:24
◼
►
Thanks a lot.
00:41:25
◼
►
So we're going a little long on the follow up,
00:41:27
◼
►
but I wanna try to trudge through all the 12 inch air stuff.
00:41:31
◼
►
- Episode 100, all follow up.
00:41:34
◼
►
- Yep, it probably will be, and that would be fitting.
00:41:37
◼
►
So do you wanna talk, I think this is mostly aimed at Jon,
00:41:42
◼
►
do you wanna talk about what Phil Compton said to us?
00:41:45
◼
►
- There's a couple people who talked about
00:41:48
◼
►
the rumored 12 inch air as he relates to Chromebooks,
00:41:52
◼
►
and you mentioned it, wasn't you Casey in the last show
00:41:54
◼
►
Talking about Chromebooks?
00:41:56
◼
►
Well, anyway, the whole idea with Chromebooks,
00:41:57
◼
►
people will know, it's like a laptop that, you know,
00:42:00
◼
►
it's like the network computer all over again.
00:42:02
◼
►
It's a laptop where,
00:42:04
◼
►
the laptop itself doesn't have anything important on it.
00:42:06
◼
►
Everything's on the cloud.
00:42:07
◼
►
The laptop is just a local cache
00:42:09
◼
►
and it's super simple and super cheap
00:42:10
◼
►
and they like them for education.
00:42:11
◼
►
And it's like, oh, if your Chromebook
00:42:13
◼
►
just falls off a cliff, whatever, get a new one,
00:42:15
◼
►
plug it in, sign in with your Google account,
00:42:16
◼
►
all your crap's there again.
00:42:18
◼
►
It's a really great idea.
00:42:19
◼
►
The videos that Google has shown
00:42:22
◼
►
when they presented it or whatever,
00:42:23
◼
►
Like it's essentially the future of computing and Apple
00:42:25
◼
►
and Google is there first and it's lonely there
00:42:29
◼
►
because it's not ready yet, right?
00:42:32
◼
►
Yeah, so, but there's two angles in the Chromebook.
00:42:35
◼
►
People like the Chromebooks for the elimination
00:42:38
◼
►
of all the headaches that come with like owning
00:42:40
◼
►
and maintaining a computer to try and move it more
00:42:42
◼
►
towards being a disposable type thing,
00:42:44
◼
►
which obviously is the opposite
00:42:45
◼
►
of the way Apple designs thing more or less.
00:42:47
◼
►
And the second aspect of it is they're so damn cheap.
00:42:49
◼
►
Like remember the netbooks from a long time ago.
00:42:51
◼
►
Oh, everyone loves netbooks.
00:42:51
◼
►
Everyone loves cheap things.
00:42:52
◼
►
Of course, everyone is like, "Apple needs to make cheap things to compete."
00:42:56
◼
►
But that's not how Apple competes.
00:42:57
◼
►
We went around in circles about that.
00:42:59
◼
►
But the network book and the Chromebook seems to be bringing the issue back again.
00:43:03
◼
►
I think the people who learned the lesson in the netbook error are fine, but now there's
00:43:06
◼
►
a new crap of people who either weren't around during the network thing or have forgotten
00:43:13
◼
►
who are saying Apple needs to come out with a $300 laptop.
00:43:17
◼
►
If they don't, the Chromebook is going to eat their lunch and they're going to take
00:43:20
◼
►
over the education market because schools are cheap and they want cheap laptops and
00:43:24
◼
►
you know the Chromebook is less expensive than iPads even.
00:43:27
◼
►
Even if you're buying iPad 2s and all this stuff.
00:43:30
◼
►
So there's a lot of angles for when you see a small thin light thing you're like oh that's
00:43:36
◼
►
gonna be Apple's competition with the Chromebook and every time someone tweeted that at me
00:43:40
◼
►
or sent feedback related to Chromebooks all I could think was Apple's gonna compete with
00:43:44
◼
►
the Chromebook with a product that's four times the price or maybe ten times the price.
00:43:49
◼
►
We didn't talk about pricing of the rumored fictional product here, but do any of us expect
00:43:53
◼
►
this laptop to be less than around $1,000?
00:43:56
◼
►
Yeah, I mean Chromebooks start at about $200, right?
00:44:00
◼
►
Right so it says like it's 5x the price.
00:44:03
◼
►
I'm guessing $1,500 start.
00:44:05
◼
►
Right, and it's the other thing, it could be even more expensive because of the thinness,
00:44:09
◼
►
that's just not how Apple works.
00:44:11
◼
►
I don't think anybody thinks this rumored 12 inch Air is going to be some super duper
00:44:15
◼
►
cheap thing.
00:44:16
◼
►
Maybe it'll be cheaper than the current Airs, somehow, possibly, because of all the crap
00:44:20
◼
►
they rip out of it.
00:44:21
◼
►
That's conceivable.
00:44:22
◼
►
But is it going to be $200?
00:44:25
◼
►
And so it seems crazy to me to talk about competing with Chromebooks with a product
00:44:29
◼
►
that's not in its price range.
00:44:32
◼
►
No matter what you think about competition, it's very...
00:44:36
◼
►
There's no sense in saying this competes...
00:44:38
◼
►
It's like saying that my Honda Accord competes with a Ferrari.
00:44:42
◼
►
There is no competition between them.
00:44:43
◼
►
You can't entertain thoughts of competition between them.
00:44:45
◼
►
They're in a different market.
00:44:46
◼
►
And no matter how much you think that, you know, Ferrari really needs to answer for the
00:44:50
◼
►
new Honda Accord because the Honda Accord is going to eat up their market for like,
00:44:54
◼
►
no, they don't.
00:44:55
◼
►
They're just, what do you mean answer with us?
00:44:57
◼
►
Actually, the new Ferrari, I think that the new Ferrari is Ferrari's answer to the new
00:45:01
◼
►
Honda Odyssey.
00:45:02
◼
►
How is it Ferrari's answer to the new Honda Odyssey?
00:45:04
◼
►
Well, I know they're not, the pricing is, you know, multiples of each other, but I really
00:45:07
◼
►
do think that's their answer.
00:45:08
◼
►
No, they're not comparable.
00:45:10
◼
►
So anytime I see the word Chromebook in relation to this thing, again, it's a rumored thing.
00:45:14
◼
►
I don't know. Maybe it will cost $200. That'd be great. I'll buy three of them, right?
00:45:18
◼
►
But I really don't really don't think it will you wouldn't even buy one you complain about the price
00:45:22
◼
►
Yeah, I don't like laptops, but
00:45:24
◼
►
See there's no there's no way until there is at least a pricing rumor about this. I don't think it's important
00:45:31
◼
►
I do think that
00:45:32
◼
►
Apple's competition is the idea behind the Chromebook and
00:45:35
◼
►
Perhaps I think I think this was Casey was it perhaps like their answer to this?
00:45:40
◼
►
Yeah, you were going the whole thing of like, oh we don't need ports anymore
00:45:43
◼
►
We need to remove complications everything can be wireless or whatever that is eventually the future
00:45:48
◼
►
It's just not quite the present and people buy computers
00:45:50
◼
►
They want to use in the present and so in the present you can remove every single port from a laptop except for USB
00:45:54
◼
►
We totally can do that. And by the way, someone just an hour ago tweeted us a picture showing us
00:45:59
◼
►
USB type-c with DisplayPort going over it. I don't know how many times we have to reiterate this. Yes
00:46:04
◼
►
It's not it's not a made-up crazy Apple thing. You can send DisplayPort over USB type-c connectors
00:46:09
◼
►
It's part of the spec it is not and it can power retina 5k
00:46:12
◼
►
It has enough bandwidth for that right like and just look up the spec
00:46:16
◼
►
I will try to put in the show notes
00:46:18
◼
►
They show you the pin outs to show you what goes over those pins. This is not a crazy proprietary Apple is and this is an
00:46:22
◼
►
Industry-wide spec it is not speculation that we're saying this is technically possible. It really is technically possible
00:46:27
◼
►
It's a thing so you'll be buying products with it anyway
00:46:29
◼
►
I was I don't know why people keep sending us these things to show us the display can go over
00:46:33
◼
►
Yeah, we know we said so
00:46:35
◼
►
It's baffling to me
00:46:39
◼
►
So, I do think Apple has to eventually have an answer to the idea behind the Chromebook,
00:46:46
◼
►
but I think it's also, for now, it is trying to field products that fulfill needs, that
00:46:52
◼
►
do the Apple thing.
00:46:53
◼
►
They're premium products, they charge a premium for them, they make a lot of money, they're
00:46:56
◼
►
fancy, they're nice.
00:46:57
◼
►
Hardware-wise, we're all talking about here.
00:47:01
◼
►
And thus far, Apple has not shown any interest in trying to compete with the various other
00:47:06
◼
►
companies that sell similar devices for massively lower prices and I don't see
00:47:12
◼
►
anything in this rumor that makes me think it's gonna be massively lower.
00:47:15
◼
►
Again I can't entertain the idea that the entry-level model could have a three
00:47:18
◼
►
digit price. I can't entertain the idea that it'll be 200 bucks. I don't think
00:47:23
◼
►
it'll be anywhere near that cheap. I think you're both right that it'll be
00:47:26
◼
►
around abouts of $1,000 if it's what we think it is which by the way obviously
00:47:31
◼
►
it may be totally different but if it's less than $1,000 I will be stunned.
00:47:36
◼
►
- I think also, I saw a few people make the comment
00:47:41
◼
►
that Apple has to respond Chromebook style
00:47:44
◼
►
because Chromebooks are apparently selling well
00:47:46
◼
►
to education.
00:47:48
◼
►
First of all, I think Apple's answer to the Chromebook
00:47:51
◼
►
is the iPad.
00:47:52
◼
►
I don't think it's a cheap laptop.
00:47:54
◼
►
- And by the way, iPads can push up into $1,000
00:47:57
◼
►
if you buy the fancy model, so it's not like iPads
00:48:00
◼
►
are 200 bucks either.
00:48:01
◼
►
- Oh yeah, and certainly the education market's buying
00:48:04
◼
►
you know, the three and $400 models,
00:48:05
◼
►
but still, you know, and that's still more than a Chromebook
00:48:09
◼
►
and in many ways harder to manage for a big, you know,
00:48:12
◼
►
school or fleet type use, but anyway.
00:48:15
◼
►
I don't think Apple holds the educational relationship
00:48:18
◼
►
as some kind of thing that they cannot ever lose.
00:48:20
◼
►
Education customers are, you know,
00:48:23
◼
►
just like big enterprise customers,
00:48:25
◼
►
there is, there's a lot of buyers out there
00:48:28
◼
►
that will buy the stuff,
00:48:29
◼
►
but they're extremely hard to get,
00:48:31
◼
►
And education, it's like enterprise but with no money.
00:48:35
◼
►
Like there is money in education,
00:48:37
◼
►
but not nearly as much as anybody wants.
00:48:41
◼
►
- You can't fleece them like IBM will do
00:48:43
◼
►
for its corporate customers by charging them insane fees
00:48:47
◼
►
because they know it may look crazy,
00:48:48
◼
►
but they have so much money, they'll pay it.
00:48:50
◼
►
- Right, and many of, you know, the biggest buyers
00:48:53
◼
►
are gonna be very high needs, high maintenance customers
00:48:57
◼
►
that like you're gonna have to come to them on their terms
00:49:00
◼
►
and make concessions to them because they have to buy
00:49:05
◼
►
a couple hundred or thousand of these things
00:49:07
◼
►
and then maintain them over time
00:49:08
◼
►
and justify that to all these different committees
00:49:10
◼
►
and funders and work within the grants and everything.
00:49:13
◼
►
There's so, so much complexity in that system
00:49:17
◼
►
and it's so hard to get and in the end,
00:49:19
◼
►
there's not a whole lot of money to be made there.
00:49:20
◼
►
And so, I don't think Apple looks at that
00:49:24
◼
►
as something that they must keep.
00:49:26
◼
►
I think education should be looked at
00:49:28
◼
►
just like any other big enterprise customer
00:49:31
◼
►
where they'll be happy to serve them,
00:49:34
◼
►
but only on Apple's terms,
00:49:36
◼
►
and they're not that scared to lose them.
00:49:39
◼
►
And you can look at it and say,
00:49:40
◼
►
well, you wanna catch kids early,
00:49:42
◼
►
but I think the era of kids having their
00:49:47
◼
►
primary computing experience at school
00:49:51
◼
►
is certainly not going away,
00:49:53
◼
►
and probably will never totally go away
00:49:54
◼
►
from many demographics and kids,
00:49:57
◼
►
But I think the relevance of that is being greatly reduced
00:50:00
◼
►
by personal devices, smartphones,
00:50:03
◼
►
iPod touches, and iPads at home.
00:50:05
◼
►
- I was gonna say, Apple doesn't necessarily
00:50:07
◼
►
have to be too concerned with keeping the education market.
00:50:11
◼
►
It just has to be concerned with keeping the kids.
00:50:14
◼
►
I think it's doing pretty well at keeping the kids
00:50:16
◼
►
because, like you said, the kids have contact
00:50:19
◼
►
with computing devices.
00:50:21
◼
►
Computing is everywhere now.
00:50:23
◼
►
It's not just in a school or work.
00:50:24
◼
►
It's a part of life, right?
00:50:25
◼
►
So as long as Apple keeps the kids, you're OK.
00:50:27
◼
►
Now there is a danger here because like,
00:50:31
◼
►
if Chromebooks ever did become pervasive,
00:50:33
◼
►
which I don't think that Chromebooks are doing well,
00:50:36
◼
►
but I don't think it's like they're wiping Apple out
00:50:38
◼
►
of education.
00:50:38
◼
►
But if they do become pervasive, Microsoft
00:50:41
◼
►
hates it because all the kids are
00:50:42
◼
►
going to be doing all their work in Google Docs instead of Word.
00:50:45
◼
►
And Apple should hate it because kids
00:50:47
◼
►
will become acclimated to the Google ecosystem, which
00:50:49
◼
►
does not involve Apple.
00:50:50
◼
►
And the Google ecosystem in terms of the cloud stuff
00:50:52
◼
►
is actually pretty damn good.
00:50:53
◼
►
Google, if you're email, Google, if you share documents,
00:50:55
◼
►
Like that's Google's thing, a bunch of web applications,
00:50:58
◼
►
lowest common denominator, works everywhere,
00:51:00
◼
►
all your crap synced.
00:51:01
◼
►
If kids get used to that, it's a short jump from there
00:51:04
◼
►
to a Google phone where all your stuff is right.
00:51:05
◼
►
So, you know, keeping the kids,
00:51:09
◼
►
part of keeping the kids is keeping a toehold in education.
00:51:11
◼
►
So far in sort of the jobs to error,
00:51:14
◼
►
it seems like Apple's approach to education has been,
00:51:17
◼
►
we in, if you are a prestige school,
00:51:19
◼
►
if there's gonna be a news story
00:51:21
◼
►
about your school getting fancy stuff,
00:51:22
◼
►
we want to have our stuff in the prestige school.
00:51:24
◼
►
And the prestige school is not necessarily
00:51:25
◼
►
the rich kids school, but it's the school that's storyworthy.
00:51:28
◼
►
Is it a school that's up and coming,
00:51:30
◼
►
where it's doing much better now?
00:51:31
◼
►
Is it a school that got a big grant?
00:51:33
◼
►
Is it a school, you know, like, you want it to be a story.
00:51:36
◼
►
You want it to be like the important ones.
00:51:38
◼
►
And then it should be significant.
00:51:40
◼
►
The kids in that school and teachers in that school
00:51:42
◼
►
should feel lucky to have Apple hardware
00:51:44
◼
►
because it's fancy and shiny, nice and expensive.
00:51:46
◼
►
And that's where Apple seems to be in education these days.
00:51:50
◼
►
It's not so much bending over backwards,
00:51:53
◼
►
with the possible exception of keeping the iPad 2 around
00:51:55
◼
►
for a long time, but they're not doing stuff like, remember, they used to do the EMAC and
00:51:59
◼
►
the various Macs that were made just for education.
00:52:01
◼
►
Those were all pretty short-lived, though.
00:52:03
◼
►
Well, but they would do that.
00:52:04
◼
►
They would say, "We're going to make a model of Mac that is only for education, and it's
00:52:07
◼
►
going to make compromises that work for education."
00:52:09
◼
►
Usually those compromises were ways to make it cheaper.
00:52:12
◼
►
Sometimes it would be an education-only version.
00:52:13
◼
►
I think they still have that on.
00:52:14
◼
►
Right, like they're super cheap iMac and stuff.
00:52:17
◼
►
Right, or a keeper on a model just for education.
00:52:19
◼
►
So they still are doing stuff for the market, but I think the days are gone where they design
00:52:22
◼
►
and like the giant tooth, the big molar,
00:52:25
◼
►
you can look up what that is and put it in the show notes,
00:52:27
◼
►
a computer that only ever sold to education.
00:52:30
◼
►
Most of those were terrible by the way,
00:52:32
◼
►
but they existed and Apple's not doing that anymore.
00:52:34
◼
►
There's not a computer with a different name,
00:52:37
◼
►
like it's not an iMac, it's not a Mac mini or whatever,
00:52:39
◼
►
a different name that you can't buy
00:52:40
◼
►
unless you're in education.
00:52:41
◼
►
So Apple is out of that business.
00:52:44
◼
►
- It's funny you mention education in Apple
00:52:46
◼
►
because right around the time we moved to Richmond,
00:52:48
◼
►
one of the surrounding counties,
00:52:49
◼
►
they were using iBooks and issuing,
00:52:52
◼
►
I believe all middle schoolers and high schoolers iBooks.
00:52:55
◼
►
And they decided it was cheaper and better to go with Dells
00:53:00
◼
►
and they've been using Dells ever since.
00:53:03
◼
►
And you may have heard of this.
00:53:07
◼
►
This was the area in which we live.
00:53:08
◼
►
It made national news because they were selling these
00:53:11
◼
►
like two or three, no four year old iBooks for 50 bucks
00:53:14
◼
►
at the NASCAR track in downtown Richmond.
00:53:16
◼
►
And there were actually like stampedes
00:53:19
◼
►
trying to beat each other up to get to the front of the line
00:53:23
◼
►
so you could buy a $50 four-year-old iBook.
00:53:25
◼
►
And that was right around where we live.
00:53:28
◼
►
And now they've been using Dells for years
00:53:29
◼
►
and they're pieces of crap.
00:53:30
◼
►
Although to be fair, these iBooks,
00:53:31
◼
►
these iBooks were falling apart
00:53:33
◼
►
by the time they were done with them.
00:53:34
◼
►
- Yeah, it's like buying a used police car.
00:53:38
◼
►
Like, there's a reason why used police cars
00:53:41
◼
►
usually just become the crappiest taxis
00:53:44
◼
►
for the crappiest taxi services in the world.
00:53:48
◼
►
these devices are in such constant heavy use
00:53:52
◼
►
for those four years, like you do not want them afterwards.
00:53:56
◼
►
Although to be fair to those $50 iBooks,
00:53:59
◼
►
can you imagine a stampede for four year old PCs
00:54:02
◼
►
at any price?
00:54:03
◼
►
- No, definitely not.
00:54:04
◼
►
- Yeah, 'cause it's not a fashion item,
00:54:06
◼
►
it doesn't have the prestige associated,
00:54:08
◼
►
even an out of date technology thing
00:54:11
◼
►
still has the fashion cache, so people are interested
00:54:13
◼
►
and they feel like it's a steal at 50 bucks.
00:54:16
◼
►
If you want to make the foreign listeners, the non-US listeners, feel even more that
00:54:21
◼
►
we live in a third world country, we can describe the other common phenomenon for technologies
00:54:27
◼
►
Technologies or tissues and paper towels, which is there's no money in the budget for
00:54:31
◼
►
The only way your school is ever going to get any kind of technology or paper towels
00:54:36
◼
►
or tissues for the kids to use is the parents themselves, or the parent-teacher's association
00:54:42
◼
►
or some other like, you know, organization thing will raise money and the parents will
00:54:46
◼
►
all pay for the computers for their kids' school.
00:54:50
◼
►
That only works for all the parents are rich.
00:54:51
◼
►
So you can guess how many people's schools have max in them.
00:54:55
◼
►
It's only the schools that are in districts where, and even in the districts with rich
00:54:58
◼
►
people, even those districts can't pass laws to raise taxes enough to pay for anything
00:55:02
◼
►
for their schools, barely can keep the buildings up, you know, barely can pay the teachers
00:55:07
◼
►
their meager salaries, can't afford any computers, can't, if you want your classroom to have
00:55:11
◼
►
paper towels, napkins, or tissues, you also have to pay for those and do drives to put
00:55:15
◼
►
around. This is in their rich neighborhoods. That's the state of education in our country.
00:55:18
◼
►
That's absolutely true. When I went to high school, it was in Fairfield County, Connecticut,
00:55:22
◼
►
which at the time as a county was the single most affluent county in the entire country,
00:55:27
◼
►
because they had a whole bunch of like silly rich superstars that are that instead of living
00:55:33
◼
►
in New York, they'd live in Fairfield County. Now, the particular town I lived in was, I mean,
00:55:38
◼
►
I guess reasonably affluent, but not nothing remarkable.
00:55:41
◼
►
And every spring without fail come about March or so all of our Xerox paper,
00:55:46
◼
►
our copy machine paper,
00:55:50
◼
►
it was perforated about two thirds of the way down and then again in half.
00:55:55
◼
►
And at the bottom it said Danbury hospital radiology department.
00:55:59
◼
►
Because despite the fact that we lived in the most affluent County in the entire
00:56:05
◼
►
All of the people that lived in the particular town we lived in didn't want to pay enough money to the schools
00:56:10
◼
►
So that we had copy paper for the entire year and we needed to accept donations of like crappy leftover
00:56:17
◼
►
Perforated copy paper from the local hospital. Oh my god, that's so sad. Oh goodness. All right
00:56:24
◼
►
What other follow-up do we have one last note? This is from Oliver agar agar
00:56:29
◼
►
apologies Oliver
00:56:32
◼
►
He had tweeted at the three of us
00:56:34
◼
►
It's pretty clear now that both Thunderbolt and lightning are
00:56:37
◼
►
They're going to be the shortest live ports ever. I don't I don't know if I agree with that. It's certainly possible
00:56:44
◼
►
But I I don't see lightning going away anytime soon. I think Thunderbolt is more likely to go away
00:56:51
◼
►
But I'm still skeptical that that's gonna be the case
00:56:55
◼
►
What do you guys think?
00:56:56
◼
►
I think thunderbolts gonna last just as long as firewire did just because it'll be sticking out the back of that Mac Pro until Apple
00:57:01
◼
►
Stops making that computer. Oh
00:57:03
◼
►
Like it doesn't mean it's gonna like
00:57:05
◼
►
Thunderbolt sure totally go away from the MacBook Air
00:57:08
◼
►
They want because like it can go away from the MacBook Air because the innovation of Thunderbolt that was a simplification
00:57:14
◼
►
Hey display, you know USB all over one port
00:57:17
◼
►
But if USB 3 can do all that too then right
00:57:20
◼
►
Thunderbolt port gone at the very least from the small laptops probably also from the big ones because what you know
00:57:26
◼
►
It's only for basically high speed storage
00:57:28
◼
►
like it's kind of an aberration that thunderbolt ended up being on sort of the low-end laptops because it was like
00:57:33
◼
►
We're not so much into the high-speed storage part.
00:57:36
◼
►
We like the idea that there's one connector that you can carry all this sort of stuff
00:57:40
◼
►
You can carry the display over it, you can carry it, you can do an Ethernet adapter.
00:57:42
◼
►
It was kind of a shame that you could do each one of those things but you had to swap your
00:57:46
◼
►
stupid adapters and crap like that.
00:57:47
◼
►
But you could plug it into the Thunderbolt display and get a full complement of ports
00:57:51
◼
►
through one connector.
00:57:52
◼
►
I see no reason that USB 3.0 can't usurp that.
00:57:56
◼
►
And so then the only reason left to have Thunderbolt is, alright, well actually it's a super high-speed
00:57:59
◼
►
thing and of course the Mac Pro has a million Thunderbolt ports on it.
00:58:03
◼
►
continue to have them, the Thunderbolt spec will continue to get revised, I think there
00:58:08
◼
►
will still be Thunderbolt ports all over those things.
00:58:11
◼
►
So I don't think Thunderbolt is going away, and Lightning I definitely don't think is
00:58:14
◼
►
going away because Lightning is still smaller and more importantly thinner than I would
00:58:18
◼
►
imagine potentially more durable than USB 3.
00:58:21
◼
►
I don't think Apple is going to go through its entire iOS line and say "Oh, USB 3 Type
00:58:25
◼
►
C is here, we can get rid of this silly Lightning thing and change it."
00:58:28
◼
►
Nope, Lightning is going to be with us for a long time, at least as long as I think the
00:58:32
◼
►
a 30 pin connector was for this.
00:58:34
◼
►
- Yeah, I totally agree.
00:58:36
◼
►
I don't see, you know, Thunderbolt I think is
00:58:39
◼
►
just like Firewire 800, where it's gonna be
00:58:41
◼
►
on the highest end pro products and that's about it.
00:58:44
◼
►
It does have that advantage, as you said,
00:58:46
◼
►
of because it is really just PCI express over a cable,
00:58:50
◼
►
you can offer like direct full speed,
00:58:53
◼
►
like bus connected versions of the other ports
00:58:56
◼
►
without a big performance penalty or translation penalty
00:58:59
◼
►
or anything like that.
00:59:00
◼
►
but all those other ports it's offering
00:59:03
◼
►
are getting less relevant over time
00:59:05
◼
►
and less necessary over time.
00:59:07
◼
►
So I think the biggest justification
00:59:10
◼
►
for Thunderbolt in two years
00:59:13
◼
►
is not even gonna be those PCI card case boxes
00:59:17
◼
►
that you can use an old PCI video card,
00:59:19
◼
►
video processing card in or anything.
00:59:22
◼
►
I don't think that's it at all.
00:59:22
◼
►
I think Thunderbolt in two years is gonna be looked at
00:59:27
◼
►
only as the highest speed port for external SSD arrays
00:59:32
◼
►
and disk arrays, like that's what it's mainly for.
00:59:35
◼
►
And I think that's probably mostly what it's used
00:59:37
◼
►
for today even, but I think that's gonna be like
00:59:41
◼
►
its mainstay and everything else is gonna go to wireless
00:59:46
◼
►
or USB three.
00:59:47
◼
►
- And Thunderbolt will have to keep scaling up
00:59:49
◼
►
because like, you know, I always imagined the Mac pros
00:59:52
◼
►
with these Thunderbolt things having something to do
00:59:53
◼
►
with video stuff, and 4K video eventually
00:59:57
◼
►
becomes more common, like you just cranked up
00:59:59
◼
►
your bandwidth requirements again.
01:00:00
◼
►
So like these giant arrays of super fast storage,
01:00:03
◼
►
and the only way you can let that storage run
01:00:06
◼
►
at the full speed that it's capable of running at
01:00:07
◼
►
and get the data into your computer
01:00:09
◼
►
is either to have it inside your computer,
01:00:10
◼
►
which Apple doesn't make any of those anymore,
01:00:12
◼
►
or it's gotta be over the fastest possible external bus,
01:00:14
◼
►
and right now, that is, even with USB 3,
01:00:17
◼
►
Thunderbolt is still faster, and I imagine
01:00:19
◼
►
they'll just keep making it faster and faster,
01:00:20
◼
►
and it'll become more and more confined
01:00:22
◼
►
the people who have insane data rates that are necessary to do like you know
01:00:27
◼
►
uncompressed 5k video for Hollywood movies or God knows what they're doing
01:00:30
◼
►
with these Mac Pros these days. And those enclosures cost more than a
01:00:35
◼
►
MacBook Pro. Yeah, it's not the realm of regular people. I'm trying to
01:00:40
◼
►
think is there any reason for a Thunderbolt to be to remain on like the
01:00:44
◼
►
15-inch MacBook Pro or anything? Well it is the highest end laptop in the
01:00:48
◼
►
lineup and there's always going to be demand from people who try to do
01:00:52
◼
►
Pro work on laptops on the go or on site or on set or whatever.
01:00:56
◼
►
So there's always going to be demand.
01:00:58
◼
►
Whether they choose to address that demand is not a guaranteed thing.
01:01:03
◼
►
They might choose at some point, "You know what?
01:01:05
◼
►
We're done with that."
01:01:06
◼
►
Just like how many things died with the 17-inch MacBook Pro.
01:01:09
◼
►
I think the 15-inch Retina MacBook Pro I think is going to be the last Apple laptop with
01:01:20
◼
►
Thunderbolt, but I don't know how soon it's going to come.
01:01:23
◼
►
If I had to guess, I would say maybe two more years before it's relegated to only a handful
01:01:29
◼
►
of models in the lineup.
01:01:31
◼
►
I hope that they keep it around for at least a couple more years because I know we just
01:01:35
◼
►
finally got done with the transition at work where every conference room has a mini display
01:01:40
◼
►
board, a.k.a.
01:01:41
◼
►
Display port, a.k.a.
01:01:42
◼
►
Thunderbolt, to VGA connector so that every Mac that comes into the room can hook up to
01:01:48
◼
►
the cruddy projector that's in the room.
01:01:49
◼
►
It used to be that first everyone who had a Mac
01:01:52
◼
►
had one of the adapters
01:01:53
◼
►
and they'd write their names on them in a marker,
01:01:55
◼
►
but then they'd lose them
01:01:56
◼
►
and then you'd leave one in the conference room
01:01:57
◼
►
and now they're like chained to the conference room.
01:01:58
◼
►
So every conference room has one.
01:02:01
◼
►
And if Apple drops Thunderbolt from their entire line,
01:02:03
◼
►
it'll be like, well, we have,
01:02:04
◼
►
every conference room has an adapter
01:02:05
◼
►
that has no place to be plugged into any of the new Macs.
01:02:08
◼
►
And that will be sad
01:02:09
◼
►
because it seems like we haven't had enough time
01:02:11
◼
►
where anyone with a Mac can go into any conference room
01:02:14
◼
►
and plug into the projector.
01:02:15
◼
►
Then I feel like we need to have a couple more years
01:02:18
◼
►
before we have to redo all the adapters again.
01:02:21
◼
►
- Yeah, 'cause they could put it over USB 3
01:02:23
◼
►
in DisplayPort mode, the alternate mode,
01:02:26
◼
►
which we talked about a few minutes ago.
01:02:28
◼
►
And yeah, it's just another $30 adapter at the Apple Store.
01:02:32
◼
►
- Just this big, daily chain of that going
01:02:33
◼
►
into a mini Thunderbolt to the HDMI or to DVI to VGA.
01:02:38
◼
►
You'll have like this five adapter long chain.
01:02:41
◼
►
- Sometimes it's VGA, sometimes it's HDMI.
01:02:43
◼
►
That's not the problem.
01:02:44
◼
►
It's the end that connects into the Mac that's the problem.
01:02:46
◼
►
So it'd be nice to have some stability in that
01:02:49
◼
►
for a little while longer,
01:02:49
◼
►
because that's the other thing Thunderbolt does.
01:02:51
◼
►
It's like, well, Thunderbolt,
01:02:52
◼
►
I don't need high-speed stuff.
01:02:53
◼
►
I don't care that I multiplex multiple things over it.
01:02:56
◼
►
Then if you don't care about any of those things
01:02:58
◼
►
and you look at the Thunderbolt port,
01:02:59
◼
►
it's like, oh, that's just my external display port.
01:03:00
◼
►
Like I think, I imagine most of the people in my company
01:03:03
◼
►
who have Macs consider that their display port,
01:03:05
◼
►
like this is where I hook up external monitors,
01:03:07
◼
►
not knowing all the other things that that one port can do.
01:03:10
◼
►
And Apple's answer might be like,
01:03:12
◼
►
for a big part of the line, it might just be,
01:03:14
◼
►
Well, use AirPlay and have an Apple TV,
01:03:17
◼
►
which of course is comical.
01:03:18
◼
►
- There's lots of AirPlay enabled projectors.
01:03:21
◼
►
- Right, exactly.
01:03:22
◼
►
Anyway, our final sponsor this week is Fracture.
01:03:25
◼
►
They're back once again.
01:03:26
◼
►
Fracture prints photos in vivid color directly onto glass.
01:03:30
◼
►
Go to fractureme.com to see more.
01:03:34
◼
►
So I have Fracture pictures hanging all over my office.
01:03:37
◼
►
We've heard from many people who've gotten them too.
01:03:39
◼
►
They're great.
01:03:40
◼
►
My idea, which I spread whenever I have one of these
01:03:42
◼
►
that reads is I print my app icons
01:03:46
◼
►
onto the small five by five size, which is 15 bucks.
01:03:50
◼
►
I print my app icons on those whenever I make a new app.
01:03:52
◼
►
And so I have this row of like app icon trophy pictures
01:03:55
◼
►
across this part of the wall in my office.
01:03:58
◼
►
And it's really nice.
01:03:59
◼
►
People compliment them.
01:04:01
◼
►
It's very nice, you know, as a physical representation
01:04:06
◼
►
of things you've done in the software world,
01:04:09
◼
►
where you don't usually get physical representations.
01:04:12
◼
►
It's just really nice.
01:04:13
◼
►
Their print quality is really great.
01:04:15
◼
►
The way it works, so they print the photo
01:04:17
◼
►
directly onto glass, and it's technically
01:04:20
◼
►
it's onto the back of glass so that you see the front.
01:04:22
◼
►
And it's a thin layer of glass mounted to a thin piece
01:04:26
◼
►
of like a foam board kind of thing so you can hang it easily
01:04:30
◼
►
and so they're actually pretty lightweight.
01:04:32
◼
►
It's not like hanging this giant pane of glass
01:04:34
◼
►
on your wall that you're afraid is gonna like
01:04:35
◼
►
tear the wall anchor out of the wall
01:04:37
◼
►
and fall out and shatter.
01:04:38
◼
►
No, they're pretty lightweight for their size
01:04:40
◼
►
and they just look fantastic 'cause it just looks
01:04:42
◼
►
like a piece of glass, that's it.
01:04:43
◼
►
Like there's no frame around it,
01:04:45
◼
►
like it is its own frame,
01:04:46
◼
►
it doesn't need another frame around it,
01:04:48
◼
►
which is a huge cost savings and a huge hassle savings.
01:04:51
◼
►
It's just really nice, the print quality is great,
01:04:54
◼
►
the prices are very reasonable.
01:04:56
◼
►
Once again, it starts to get $15 for the five by five
01:04:59
◼
►
square print, which I use for my app icons.
01:05:01
◼
►
It's also great for Instagram prints.
01:05:03
◼
►
And then I have a couple of, I don't know, 12 by 17,
01:05:07
◼
►
something like that in that size.
01:05:08
◼
►
I have a couple of those above my monitor too.
01:05:10
◼
►
They're just, they're great quality,
01:05:12
◼
►
very reasonable prices.
01:05:14
◼
►
About half of these I've actually bought at full price
01:05:16
◼
►
without coupon codes and it was just that good
01:05:18
◼
►
and I wanted them right then and that was it.
01:05:20
◼
►
Anyway, check it out.
01:05:22
◼
►
It is the thinnest, lightest and most elegant way
01:05:24
◼
►
to display your favorite photos.
01:05:26
◼
►
A great gift idea too.
01:05:27
◼
►
If you missed any holiday gifts,
01:05:29
◼
►
you gotta send one kinda late.
01:05:30
◼
►
This is a great gift idea.
01:05:32
◼
►
I can't say enough good things about my fracture prints.
01:05:35
◼
►
Anyway, get 15% off your first order
01:05:38
◼
►
by using coupon code ATP15.
01:05:41
◼
►
Once again, does 15% off your first order
01:05:43
◼
►
with coupon code ATP15?
01:05:45
◼
►
Go to fractureme.com to see more.
01:05:48
◼
►
Thanks a lot to Fracture for sponsoring our show once again.
01:05:51
◼
►
- Yeah, I actually have a, I think four of them
01:05:55
◼
►
on their way.
01:05:55
◼
►
I copied your idea, but instead of apps,
01:05:58
◼
►
I did it with the shows that I've been on,
01:06:01
◼
►
that I've been around regularly.
01:06:03
◼
►
And then I got that picture of Aaron and Declan
01:06:07
◼
►
from the hospital that I really like printed.
01:06:09
◼
►
And so they are on their way
01:06:11
◼
►
and I'm very excited about it.
01:06:12
◼
►
So definitely check them out.
01:06:13
◼
►
- No feed icons?
01:06:15
◼
►
- No feed icons.
01:06:16
◼
►
I actually, the funny thing is as you were doing that read,
01:06:19
◼
►
it occurred to me,
01:06:20
◼
►
I don't know why I didn't put that in that order,
01:06:23
◼
►
put fast text in that order.
01:06:24
◼
►
Like that probably speaks poorly
01:06:26
◼
►
to what I think about fast text these days.
01:06:29
◼
►
- That's sad.
01:06:29
◼
►
- Yeah, I know that is sad.
01:06:30
◼
►
Actually, I'm a little upset with myself, but anyway.
01:06:33
◼
►
- Well, use code ATP15 to go order one now.
01:06:35
◼
►
- Yeah, exactly.
01:06:36
◼
►
So let's be done with follow-up,
01:06:39
◼
►
and let's try to answer the question,
01:06:42
◼
►
what can Apple do to fix the reliability,
01:06:46
◼
►
what did you call it, Marco Nosedive?
01:06:48
◼
►
- Oh God, we were still talking about this.
01:06:51
◼
►
Can we please stop talking about it?
01:06:52
◼
►
- We talked about the issue last time,
01:06:54
◼
►
but we didn't get to like, okay,
01:06:56
◼
►
so we agree that this is an issue.
01:06:58
◼
►
We may disagree about whether things are worse now
01:07:00
◼
►
than they've ever been or have been
01:07:02
◼
►
in the past X number of years,
01:07:03
◼
►
whatever value you want to pay for X's.
01:07:04
◼
►
But I think we all agreed that regardless of the history
01:07:09
◼
►
and whether the trend and what the direction the trend is,
01:07:11
◼
►
the current state of things is not satisfactory
01:07:13
◼
►
for the products and customers that Apple currently has.
01:07:16
◼
►
That the customers are dissatisfied,
01:07:18
◼
►
they have a lot of products,
01:07:19
◼
►
they all interoperate with each other.
01:07:20
◼
►
Marker is like multiplying factor of like,
01:07:22
◼
►
your problem multiplied, probability of problem here
01:07:24
◼
►
multiplied by the probability of problem there.
01:07:26
◼
►
The probability that you have a problem somewhere
01:07:27
◼
►
just goes up, it's not just additive
01:07:29
◼
►
because of the way they all interact.
01:07:30
◼
►
- By the way, I'm not clear on that math.
01:07:32
◼
►
That might, it might actually be exponential or factorial.
01:07:36
◼
►
Yeah, I'm not 100% confident on that math, go ahead.
01:07:38
◼
►
- It's not additive.
01:07:39
◼
►
- Right, yeah, it's not a linear additive progression.
01:07:42
◼
►
It is some kind of curve.
01:07:43
◼
►
- Yeah, you can do the probability thing.
01:07:45
◼
►
So just like if you have one thing
01:07:46
◼
►
and you have a certain probability,
01:07:47
◼
►
it's up 50% of the time, you have 50% reliability, right?
01:07:50
◼
►
Or you have two things, they both have 50% of the time,
01:07:52
◼
►
now you need them both to be up
01:07:53
◼
►
and you can figure it out with marbles and jars
01:07:57
◼
►
and all that other stuff and it's not, anyway, it's worse.
01:07:59
◼
►
But so we all agree that they have a reliability problem,
01:08:02
◼
►
the need to address it.
01:08:03
◼
►
I don't-- yeah, and we talked all last show
01:08:05
◼
►
about arguing about whether this is a new problem,
01:08:07
◼
►
a no problem, whatever.
01:08:08
◼
►
But so the question is, how does Apple improve its reliability?
01:08:11
◼
►
If you say, how does it fix its problem,
01:08:12
◼
►
it sounds like there's something,
01:08:13
◼
►
and then there's someday there's going to be a fix to it.
01:08:15
◼
►
I think a better way to phrase it
01:08:16
◼
►
is, how does Apple improve the reliability of its products,
01:08:19
◼
►
specifically the software reliability?
01:08:22
◼
►
Because the hardware does have issues,
01:08:23
◼
►
but whenever hardware has an issue,
01:08:25
◼
►
you always wonder if it's like a driver issue.
01:08:27
◼
►
Or sometimes it's actually a hardware issue
01:08:28
◼
►
where something is overheating, or some solder joints are bad,
01:08:31
◼
►
or something like, but then sometimes,
01:08:33
◼
►
I think the vast majority of the time,
01:08:34
◼
►
it's like a driver issue,
01:08:36
◼
►
or they just never quite get it working right over.
01:08:38
◼
►
So what can Apple do to improve
01:08:42
◼
►
the reliability of its products?
01:08:44
◼
►
- We talked a little about this last step,
01:08:46
◼
►
whatever episode it was,
01:08:48
◼
►
in that they could either space out
01:08:51
◼
►
the releases between OSs,
01:08:53
◼
►
which I think we all pretty much agree
01:08:55
◼
►
is never gonna happen, or just bite off less each time.
01:08:59
◼
►
- I don't agree that it's never gonna happen,
01:09:00
◼
►
'cause I could totally see them taking longer
01:09:03
◼
►
between iOS releases or any iOS releases.
01:09:07
◼
►
Not significantly longer, not like two years,
01:09:09
◼
►
but I could see the Mac going to 18 months
01:09:11
◼
►
and iOS going to like 14 or 15,
01:09:14
◼
►
and it's slowly drifting through the year,
01:09:16
◼
►
you know what I mean?
01:09:17
◼
►
- Yeah, but they've set such a precedent,
01:09:20
◼
►
and which they've broken precedents in the past,
01:09:22
◼
►
but they've set such a precedent
01:09:24
◼
►
of having a new version of iOS every fall.
01:09:28
◼
►
And there was a time, not long ago,
01:09:30
◼
►
when I think people, both nerds and non-nerds,
01:09:33
◼
►
got really excited about that every fall.
01:09:36
◼
►
Now, to be fair, they may not be so excited,
01:09:38
◼
►
and we may not be so excited about that anymore,
01:09:41
◼
►
and so maybe now is the time to break that precedent.
01:09:43
◼
►
But I'm very skeptical they would do it on iOS,
01:09:47
◼
►
and I'm fairly skeptical they would go less frequently
01:09:52
◼
►
than every year on OS X.
01:09:54
◼
►
But that's certainly one answer,
01:09:55
◼
►
or just biting off less each time,
01:09:59
◼
►
doing less new things and keeping yourself at a year release.
01:10:03
◼
►
I mean, that's another option.
01:10:04
◼
►
- Well, so the obvious option that's sitting in the notes
01:10:06
◼
►
is, and the one that's been suggested by many people
01:10:08
◼
►
and that I believe we talked about in the past many times,
01:10:10
◼
►
is to go to what originally Intel dubbed the TikTok cadence
01:10:14
◼
►
and which Apple has more or less de facto dubbed
01:10:18
◼
►
the blank S cadence.
01:10:21
◼
►
You get the four of the four S, the five of the five S,
01:10:23
◼
►
and then who knows what they're gonna do with the six,
01:10:24
◼
►
But the idea is you do a release that's your big release
01:10:29
◼
►
with all your fancy crap in it.
01:10:31
◼
►
And then the next one is pretty much the same
01:10:33
◼
►
as the previous one, just modified in some way.
01:10:35
◼
►
So after the four, you have the 4S.
01:10:37
◼
►
The same hardware design, you tweak it,
01:10:39
◼
►
you move the antennas around,
01:10:40
◼
►
but it's not an entire redesign.
01:10:42
◼
►
And in OS X, Apple did the same thing with Leopard.
01:10:46
◼
►
That was their big release.
01:10:47
◼
►
And then Snow Leopard is like,
01:10:49
◼
►
"Well, it's like Leopard, but we just improved crap."
01:10:51
◼
►
And then they had, what was it?
01:10:53
◼
►
Lion, which is a big release, and they had Mountain Lion,
01:10:56
◼
►
which was supposed to be the,
01:10:57
◼
►
oh, it's like Lion, but we just improved some stuff.
01:10:59
◼
►
They're off of that train in OS X
01:11:01
◼
►
because Mavericks and Yosemite
01:11:02
◼
►
are not related to each other in that way.
01:11:04
◼
►
I mean, Yosemite's radically different than Mavericks was.
01:11:07
◼
►
You could just say Mavericks was an in-between release,
01:11:09
◼
►
and after Yosemite, they'll have one
01:11:10
◼
►
that's like Yosemite but tweaked,
01:11:11
◼
►
but it's very difficult to tell because without,
01:11:15
◼
►
I mean, the names made it clear
01:11:16
◼
►
with leopard, snow leopard, lion, mountain lion.
01:11:18
◼
►
But then you could argue like,
01:11:20
◼
►
well, did the contents of those releases
01:11:22
◼
►
reflect the naming.
01:11:24
◼
►
Only with Snow Leopard did Apple come out and say,
01:11:27
◼
►
this is the no new features release,
01:11:29
◼
►
all we're doing is frying stuff,
01:11:30
◼
►
and even that was a lie because they added
01:11:31
◼
►
tons of internal crap, and so.
01:11:33
◼
►
- Right, it was a huge under the hood change,
01:11:35
◼
►
just like it didn't look different to users.
01:11:37
◼
►
- Right, and the big thing is if you don't add
01:11:40
◼
►
user-facing features, even if you make tons
01:11:43
◼
►
of under the hood changes, you can lie to people
01:11:45
◼
►
and say no new features by basically saying
01:11:47
◼
►
no new user-facing features, and if there's no new
01:11:50
◼
►
user-facing features, your expectation is
01:11:52
◼
►
that all they did was improve the functionality
01:11:55
◼
►
of the existing user interface.
01:11:57
◼
►
People weren't distracted by saying,
01:11:59
◼
►
"Nevermind about making whatever work,
01:12:01
◼
►
"make this new thing, or work better or whatever."
01:12:05
◼
►
That is mostly, I think, a perception issue,
01:12:10
◼
►
but I think trying to achieve that perception
01:12:14
◼
►
from the customer base influences
01:12:18
◼
►
the way the engineering organization operates.
01:12:21
◼
►
Like in the same way that if you're trying to impress people
01:12:23
◼
►
with gee whiz features, it influences how you assess
01:12:26
◼
►
like risk reliability or whatever.
01:12:28
◼
►
If you said straight out that like, oh,
01:12:30
◼
►
this is gonna be a no new feature release,
01:12:32
◼
►
that gives the engineering organization the freedom
01:12:34
◼
►
to make different trade-offs internally
01:12:36
◼
►
because there's no pressure to make the whizzy new feature
01:12:39
◼
►
that's gonna be impressive in a demo
01:12:40
◼
►
because you've already said like the public message
01:12:42
◼
►
was no new features, so you don't have to do that.
01:12:45
◼
►
And then you can make, when you make decisions about
01:12:47
◼
►
what are we gonna refactor, what are we gonna rip out,
01:12:50
◼
►
what giant new internal frameworks like GCD
01:12:52
◼
►
we're gonna add, you can make all those decisions
01:12:54
◼
►
without the pressure of having to serve
01:12:57
◼
►
the external need to be impressive.
01:13:00
◼
►
So it's kind of weird that the phone hardware
01:13:03
◼
►
has been on that cadence for so long,
01:13:04
◼
►
but the phone software has definitely
01:13:05
◼
►
not been on that cadence, right?
01:13:07
◼
►
- Well, and I would argue the hardware,
01:13:09
◼
►
that's kind of a red herring.
01:13:10
◼
►
Like, if you look at the 3S releases of iPhones
01:13:13
◼
►
we've had so far, the 3GS, the 4S, and the 5S,
01:13:16
◼
►
those were all major hardware releases.
01:13:18
◼
►
the S minor revision designation is really only cosmetic
01:13:23
◼
►
in all three of those cases.
01:13:26
◼
►
- But it's not cosmetic because like,
01:13:28
◼
►
it is cosmetic but it's like the cosmetics
01:13:32
◼
►
are a huge part of the hardware design
01:13:35
◼
►
because it's manufacturing lines,
01:13:37
◼
►
it's the tooling, it's the materials,
01:13:39
◼
►
it's the, you know, it's all that part of it
01:13:41
◼
►
is a huge part of the product.
01:13:43
◼
►
We think the product is like the tech specs of the CPU
01:13:46
◼
►
or whatever and you're right, they made S things
01:13:47
◼
►
is like the entire guts of this phone are different.
01:13:49
◼
►
How is this like a minor revision?
01:13:51
◼
►
There's like no shared part with the previous one.
01:13:53
◼
►
But that's just the guts, right?
01:13:55
◼
►
The big part of these phones is how do you make
01:13:57
◼
►
a million little glass aluminum rectangle thingies
01:14:00
◼
►
to the quality control that Apple wants?
01:14:02
◼
►
And they put a huge investment into making
01:14:05
◼
►
the production lines and the tools and everything,
01:14:08
◼
►
the materials and the expertise to assemble these phones.
01:14:11
◼
►
And they wanna get their bang for their buck out of that.
01:14:12
◼
►
So they said, we're gonna make two years worth of phones
01:14:15
◼
►
that use the same materials assembled
01:14:17
◼
►
more or less the same way with only possibly minor external changes to, you know, like
01:14:21
◼
►
again moving the antennas and the break points of the whatever, you know, construction techniques,
01:14:27
◼
►
like whatever they're using or whatever, they want to get two years of value out of that.
01:14:30
◼
►
CPU architecture?
01:14:31
◼
►
Yeah, but like the silicon I think is easier because that's like, look, silicon revs when
01:14:35
◼
►
it revs, right?
01:14:36
◼
►
But that is a separate thing, but I'm saying the physical part of it is such a big part
01:14:40
◼
►
of, you know, physical products that that's where they want to get the thing.
01:14:44
◼
►
And like the fabs, like they don't have to make a new fab,
01:14:46
◼
►
you know, except when they do die shrinks and stuff.
01:14:49
◼
►
But it's like, once you have the fab up and running,
01:14:50
◼
►
if you give it a different design,
01:14:52
◼
►
then it just has a different design, right?
01:14:54
◼
►
And if someone gets a new fab, like it's not part of,
01:14:56
◼
►
it's not so much part of like the, you know,
01:14:58
◼
►
the production line for a particular phone,
01:14:59
◼
►
I think is more built for that phone
01:15:02
◼
►
than a production line for a particular CPU
01:15:04
◼
►
is built for that CPU.
01:15:06
◼
►
- Yeah, but where they're having problems is not,
01:15:10
◼
►
you know, oh, my 5S, you know,
01:15:12
◼
►
the parts don't fit right together.
01:15:14
◼
►
where they're having problems is in the software
01:15:18
◼
►
and the low-level component interactions
01:15:20
◼
►
and the services and stuff that like--
01:15:22
◼
►
- But do you think that's hardware related?
01:15:24
◼
►
Even the 64-bit transition,
01:15:25
◼
►
I know there was problems with going from 33 to 64
01:15:28
◼
►
and the 64-bit versions were buggy and stuff like that,
01:15:31
◼
►
but I have to imagine,
01:15:33
◼
►
you have to pay that transition some time.
01:15:34
◼
►
They want it to be the first out of the gate.
01:15:36
◼
►
I think they've reaped benefits of being the first,
01:15:38
◼
►
but other than that,
01:15:39
◼
►
I don't think any other silicon-based transition
01:15:42
◼
►
has been particularly killer to them.
01:15:45
◼
►
- No, no, I'm just saying that the idea
01:15:47
◼
►
that the iPhone hardware is on this TikTok cadence,
01:15:51
◼
►
I would say is mostly wrong.
01:15:52
◼
►
It is on that TikTok cadence
01:15:56
◼
►
in only the physical shell way,
01:16:00
◼
►
but the parts inside seem to change
01:16:03
◼
►
just as rapidly with every version of the iPhone
01:16:05
◼
►
regardless of what letter is after its name.
01:16:07
◼
►
- Yeah, no, I agree on that,
01:16:08
◼
►
but I think the physical shell part
01:16:10
◼
►
is a huge percentage of the hardware product.
01:16:13
◼
►
And so that's why I don't think you can dismiss it
01:16:14
◼
►
as like just cosmetics or just the visual thing,
01:16:17
◼
►
because like when you think about
01:16:19
◼
►
the physical hardware product,
01:16:20
◼
►
it's almost as if the silicon part is like,
01:16:22
◼
►
might as well be a separate thing.
01:16:23
◼
►
Like you have a certain allotted amount of space
01:16:25
◼
►
that you have to fit in,
01:16:26
◼
►
but really the product designers of the iPhone
01:16:28
◼
►
are designing a physical thing.
01:16:30
◼
►
And by the way, this little silicon sliver
01:16:34
◼
►
goes in whatever's left over when we put the battery in.
01:16:37
◼
►
I mean, I don't know,
01:16:38
◼
►
obviously it's not done that way or whatever,
01:16:39
◼
►
If you look at the parts inside there, the phone is all everything else and then this little tiny thing
01:16:44
◼
►
That's the actual phone phone
01:16:45
◼
►
So I just see that I just see that as a separate cadence and that cadence has not so much been on the you know
01:16:53
◼
►
Because like I think they just change everything every year like they get from year to year
01:16:56
◼
►
They change like who's going to sell us the our radio chip this year like forget about the stuff
01:17:01
◼
►
You know who's gonna sell the display controller this year or the battery controller like from year to year
01:17:05
◼
►
It's just like whoever has the best chips with the best specs or if Apple needs to do custom designs itself
01:17:09
◼
►
It just changes all the time on the phones and that hasn't been a you know a particular source of problems
01:17:16
◼
►
I think if it is we don't have an insight to know like oh
01:17:19
◼
►
This one phone had problems because of some flaky chip, and you didn't know about it
01:17:23
◼
►
But next year Apple picked a different manufacturer and ironed out those problems
01:17:26
◼
►
Or you know OS X or iOS was working around this problem and this buggy chipset
01:17:31
◼
►
And you didn't know but it took a lot of engineering effort from Apple, but for OS X Apple you know
01:17:36
◼
►
The Mac lines change much more slowly in a much more predictable way with you know
01:17:42
◼
►
We kind of know is going into them with the Intel chipsets. We know it's available for them to go in to go into and
01:17:49
◼
►
For the OS 10 cadence like Apple is just again
01:17:52
◼
►
You know chasing itself chasing its own tail of or as someone said like I was asking who they're chasing so they're chasing iOS
01:18:00
◼
►
It's like well. That's just chasing yourself because they are iOS as well
01:18:02
◼
►
They can make the decision of how to move along with two things and cadence to each other
01:18:07
◼
►
But I think that type of cadence
01:18:09
◼
►
formalized that type of kid is formalized and the reason you had to formalize it is like perception PR like if you formalize it
01:18:14
◼
►
like Intel did Intel formalized it too because they
01:18:18
◼
►
Recognized that if you just do this internally kind of sort of secretly
01:18:21
◼
►
Then the marketing PR organization still has to come up with some reason why everything is awesome every single year
01:18:27
◼
►
Whereas if you if you announce this is this is our new strategy for the foreseeable future
01:18:31
◼
►
then only every other year do you have to impress
01:18:34
◼
►
and everyone just gets used to,
01:18:36
◼
►
oh, this is the year where they just make stuff work better.
01:18:38
◼
►
And that becomes a story in itself and people like that.
01:18:41
◼
►
Like customers like it and you don't get the bad stories
01:18:43
◼
►
about, well, it was WWC,
01:18:45
◼
►
but Apple didn't have any new features.
01:18:46
◼
►
You just know this is a talk year or whatever.
01:18:48
◼
►
I forget which one is the frigging ticker that talk.
01:18:49
◼
►
- Yeah, I never, I always forget that every time.
01:18:52
◼
►
- You know what I mean.
01:18:53
◼
►
- It's like, it's always, it's the opposite of what you think
01:18:54
◼
►
like the tick, I think the tick is the minor one.
01:18:57
◼
►
- Yeah, and the talk is like the loud one
01:18:59
◼
►
'cause it's, I don't know.
01:19:02
◼
►
It doesn't make sense.
01:19:03
◼
►
But anyway, a TikTok cadence,
01:19:05
◼
►
Apple has considered and sort of played around with
01:19:10
◼
►
in the past and continues to play around with arguably
01:19:13
◼
►
on the non-silicon part of the hardware side.
01:19:16
◼
►
I think that has the best sort of, you know,
01:19:21
◼
►
the best features of any solution I can think of
01:19:23
◼
►
other than the silly solution.
01:19:24
◼
►
People will say, "Just be more careful and do stuff better."
01:19:27
◼
►
Like that's not a solution, right?
01:19:29
◼
►
because of the external effects of this,
01:19:32
◼
►
because it is a thing that you announced to the world
01:19:35
◼
►
and that announcement frees up things
01:19:39
◼
►
inside your organization to act in a way
01:19:40
◼
►
that they wouldn't be able to
01:19:42
◼
►
if you tried to do it only as an internal change.
01:19:45
◼
►
- You know, I read something earlier today
01:19:48
◼
►
that I thought was really fascinating
01:19:50
◼
►
for a bunch of reasons, but it's relevant here.
01:19:52
◼
►
On Objective-CIO, they had an interview
01:19:54
◼
►
with Andy Matuszak, I hope I pronounced that right,
01:19:58
◼
►
I'm so sorry if I didn't.
01:19:59
◼
►
Anyway, he used to work on UIKit of memory serves,
01:20:03
◼
►
and they had an interview with him.
01:20:06
◼
►
And the question that they asked was,
01:20:08
◼
►
what effect do you think Swift will have
01:20:09
◼
►
on Apple's framework APIs?
01:20:11
◼
►
Do you expect something here in the short term?
01:20:13
◼
►
And his answer was very interesting and relevant.
01:20:16
◼
►
I don't actually have insider knowledge here,
01:20:18
◼
►
so this is just speculation,
01:20:19
◼
►
but I think it will be a long process.
01:20:21
◼
►
At least when I was there,
01:20:23
◼
►
the team spent the majority of their time
01:20:25
◼
►
not maintaining and improving frameworks,
01:20:28
◼
►
but really supporting market features
01:20:30
◼
►
like new screen sizes or support for new hardware.
01:20:34
◼
►
That's what takes most of the time.
01:20:36
◼
►
So it will take a conscious decision
01:20:38
◼
►
to do anything non-trivial,
01:20:39
◼
►
and I don't see that forthcoming.
01:20:41
◼
►
- Yeah, that actually mirrors what we heard
01:20:44
◼
►
when somebody who works on iWork
01:20:46
◼
►
wrote into us a couple of, maybe a month or two ago now,
01:20:49
◼
►
who wrote in, 'cause we were talking about how,
01:20:52
◼
►
we were complaining about iWork
01:20:54
◼
►
and how there seems to be nobody working on it for years
01:20:56
◼
►
and all of a sudden it gets rushed together.
01:20:57
◼
►
And this person who wrote in basically said,
01:21:01
◼
►
that's not the case, that instead,
01:21:03
◼
►
the team is constantly working on it,
01:21:05
◼
►
but that iWork always has to show off
01:21:07
◼
►
the latest and greatest OS features
01:21:09
◼
►
and directions of the company's sharing
01:21:12
◼
►
and cloud platforms and everything.
01:21:13
◼
►
And so they're constantly having to keep up
01:21:16
◼
►
with the new marketing features
01:21:18
◼
►
and the new directions of things like iCloud
01:21:21
◼
►
instead of working on the core product functionality.
01:21:24
◼
►
So it's actually very,
01:21:26
◼
►
it sounds like this is possibly
01:21:29
◼
►
infecting many parts of Apple.
01:21:30
◼
►
And this is like, their market features
01:21:33
◼
►
are moving so quickly and are so aggressive
01:21:36
◼
►
that the rest of the engineering department
01:21:39
◼
►
is maybe not able to keep up with things like quality
01:21:43
◼
►
and long-term feature maintenance.
01:21:45
◼
►
Is that, you think that's fair
01:21:46
◼
►
based on what we've heard so far?
01:21:48
◼
►
- Certainly sounds right to me.
01:21:49
◼
►
- One thing that gives me hope here,
01:21:50
◼
►
I mentioned this on the talk shows, I'll be quick,
01:21:52
◼
►
but the watch is gonna be where Apple focuses
01:21:55
◼
►
most of their PR for the next little while.
01:21:57
◼
►
And we'll see how it goes, how long that lasts.
01:22:01
◼
►
Maybe the watch is gonna be the primary focus
01:22:04
◼
►
of Apple's marketing for the next year or two or three,
01:22:07
◼
►
I don't know.
01:22:08
◼
►
But I think that might help take some of the marketing burden
01:22:12
◼
►
off of the other products.
01:22:14
◼
►
And so maybe by focusing so much on the watch
01:22:17
◼
►
and first watch kit stuff, and then later
01:22:20
◼
►
on the native SDK and then the second generation
01:22:22
◼
►
of the watch hardware, maybe that will be such the focus
01:22:25
◼
►
of the marketing that just like the Mac was kind of
01:22:29
◼
►
playing second fiddle when the iPhone came out,
01:22:31
◼
►
maybe the watch will then make the iPhone and iPad
01:22:35
◼
►
and the Mac now, it'll give them like a break
01:22:37
◼
►
for a little while from being in the spotlight
01:22:39
◼
►
and give them a chance to stabilize.
01:22:41
◼
►
- Yeah, the whole idea of like having to support
01:22:44
◼
►
new hardware factors or new APIs.
01:22:47
◼
►
New APIs you have a little more control over
01:22:49
◼
►
because you can just lay off on that.
01:22:51
◼
►
But new hardware features, that kind of
01:22:53
◼
►
gets back to what kind of company Apple is.
01:22:55
◼
►
They're trying to make entire products that
01:23:00
◼
►
have hardware and software integrated
01:23:02
◼
►
and trying to improve both aspects of that.
01:23:04
◼
►
And it seems like hardware is like, oh, I
01:23:07
◼
►
want to make a nicer phone, a cooler laptop,
01:23:09
◼
►
like I want to make a better product or whatever.
01:23:11
◼
►
And that thing I was just talking about,
01:23:14
◼
►
changing the chipsets you use for your radios
01:23:18
◼
►
or the manufacturers for your power controller,
01:23:20
◼
►
your display controller inside the phone.
01:23:22
◼
►
You're just changing that all the time
01:23:23
◼
►
because you wanna get the one that has the best features,
01:23:25
◼
►
the lowest power, the best contract deal for parts,
01:23:28
◼
►
and all these other things that change year over year.
01:23:31
◼
►
I can imagine lots of time being spent supporting that.
01:23:35
◼
►
It's like, can't you guys just pick one manufacturer
01:23:37
◼
►
for like the, you know, whatever IO controller
01:23:39
◼
►
for iOS devices and keep it for one or two years in a row
01:23:43
◼
►
so that we can do something else or display controller.
01:23:46
◼
►
you know, like that would make their lives easier,
01:23:49
◼
►
but it would mean, well,
01:23:51
◼
►
but the new one is slightly lower power
01:23:53
◼
►
and it has this extra little feature
01:23:55
◼
►
and we can combine these two things into one chip.
01:23:57
◼
►
And it's like, if we don't do that,
01:23:59
◼
►
if we try to make it easier for the software guys
01:24:01
◼
►
by trying to make a stable, like a more stable platform,
01:24:03
◼
►
kind of like the Intel, you know, motherboard,
01:24:07
◼
►
Intel based motherboards and chip sets are whatever,
01:24:09
◼
►
like a little bit more stable,
01:24:10
◼
►
then the other guys will have a better phone than us.
01:24:12
◼
►
And we will, every year we have to be,
01:24:14
◼
►
we have to be better, better battery life,
01:24:15
◼
►
better everything like I think the screen size changes.
01:24:19
◼
►
That is a big hassle for them to do.
01:24:21
◼
►
But part of that is like they're paying the price
01:24:23
◼
►
for their expedience and doing the original version of iOS.
01:24:26
◼
►
It's like, let's just get it working on this one phone.
01:24:28
◼
►
Like they didn't do what Android did,
01:24:30
◼
►
which was, was forced to do, which is,
01:24:33
◼
►
let's make a generic, let's try at least
01:24:34
◼
►
to make a generic framework for doing UI
01:24:36
◼
►
on variable screen sizes.
01:24:38
◼
►
And the Apple was like,
01:24:39
◼
►
we're at the edge of what is even possible.
01:24:42
◼
►
Just make it work on the original iPhone.
01:24:44
◼
►
that is the mandate no matter what you have to do.
01:24:46
◼
►
And so they've paid the price and like, you know,
01:24:48
◼
►
they reap the benefits being the first person out
01:24:50
◼
►
with the iPhone that no one else could even think
01:24:52
◼
►
was possible.
01:24:53
◼
►
And then the price is the engineering compromises
01:24:55
◼
►
you had to do to get there,
01:24:56
◼
►
meaning you have a long road ahead of you
01:24:57
◼
►
to be able to support arbitrary resolutions,
01:25:00
◼
►
arbitrary screen sizes, like,
01:25:01
◼
►
and so that how many years has it taken
01:25:03
◼
►
to get to where we are now with like multiple screen sizes
01:25:05
◼
►
and auto layout and all the scaling and the high res screens?
01:25:08
◼
►
Like it was very much unlike OS X
01:25:12
◼
►
where in the beginning of OS X,
01:25:14
◼
►
they had this model of what the future
01:25:15
◼
►
of the display system is gonna be like,
01:25:17
◼
►
and the hardware wasn't there to support it,
01:25:19
◼
►
and it was terrible, and they're just like,
01:25:20
◼
►
"We just gotta hold on for like six more years,
01:25:23
◼
►
and this crap will work right."
01:25:26
◼
►
And even then, they had to do
01:25:28
◼
►
some fairly large architectural changes
01:25:30
◼
►
to get stuff off the CPU and onto the GPU.
01:25:32
◼
►
So everything in engineering, software, hardware,
01:25:36
◼
►
engineering is a trade-off, and I just think
01:25:38
◼
►
what we see now, and this whole idea of the UI
01:25:40
◼
►
kept people spending their time treading water
01:25:42
◼
►
and doing marketing features,
01:25:43
◼
►
is the result of engineering trade-offs made
01:25:46
◼
►
many, many years earlier,
01:25:47
◼
►
just kind of coming home to roost now.
01:25:50
◼
►
- Yeah, that makes sense.
01:25:51
◼
►
All right, thanks a lot to our three sponsors this week,
01:25:55
◼
►
Squarespace, Igloo, and Fracture,
01:25:57
◼
►
and we will see you next week.
01:25:59
◼
►
(upbeat music)
01:26:02
◼
►
♪ Now the show is over ♪
01:26:04
◼
►
♪ They didn't even mean to begin ♪
01:26:07
◼
►
♪ 'Cause it was accidental ♪
01:26:09
◼
►
♪ Accidental ♪
01:26:10
◼
►
♪ Oh, it was accidental ♪
01:26:11
◼
►
John didn't do any research, Marco and Casey wouldn't let him
01:26:17
◼
►
'Cause it was accidental, or it was accidental
01:26:22
◼
►
And you can find the show notes at ATP.FM
01:26:27
◼
►
And if you're into Twitter, you can follow them
01:26:37
◼
►
So that's Kasey Liszt
01:26:38
◼
►
M-A-R-C-O-A-R-M
01:26:41
◼
►
Auntie Marco Arment
01:26:46
◼
►
USA Syracuse
01:26:49
◼
►
It's accidental
01:26:52
◼
►
They didn't mean to
01:26:57
◼
►
Tech podcast
01:27:02
◼
►
A hundred episodes in the bag.
01:27:05
◼
►
God, we're getting old.
01:27:08
◼
►
So how about the Detroit Auto Show?
01:27:10
◼
►
Did anything happen to the Detroit Auto Show other than the Ford GT?
01:27:15
◼
►
Oh, yeah, but everyone knew about that.
01:27:17
◼
►
Everyone saw pictures.
01:27:19
◼
►
What was new that we learned about the NSX?
01:27:20
◼
►
I haven't looked at any of the news, so I'm asking you.
01:27:22
◼
►
What was new that we learned about the NSX at the Detroit Auto Show?
01:27:25
◼
►
We learned it's a twin turbo V6.
01:27:27
◼
►
We learned it- You didn't know that already?
01:27:29
◼
►
I don't keep up with Honda because I don't drive a Honda, but I didn't know that.
01:27:35
◼
►
I didn't know for sure it would be mid-engined, although it's a safe assumption, and it is
01:27:39
◼
►
mid-engined.
01:27:40
◼
►
What do you mean you didn't know it would be mid-engined?
01:27:41
◼
►
We've seen final pictures of the NSX for what seems like a year now.
01:27:45
◼
►
You can just look at the car.
01:27:46
◼
►
Where do you think they're putting the engine?
01:27:48
◼
►
Have we seen it?
01:27:51
◼
►
More or less, the complete NSX, maybe with camouflage or whatever, we've known what this
01:27:57
◼
►
car is going to look like for a long time.
01:27:59
◼
►
No, fair enough.
01:28:00
◼
►
Well, I guess I just don't follow Honda as closely as you do, John.
01:28:03
◼
►
I don't follow it at all, but I've, you know, when it was like, it was like a year ago and
01:28:06
◼
►
they said, this is the new SX and they were selling like drawings and then you get to
01:28:09
◼
►
see the one with the camouflage paint all over it.
01:28:11
◼
►
And I guess now this is the first time we're seeing the one like, you know, painted and
01:28:14
◼
►
presented the way Honda wants to do that.
01:28:17
◼
►
But anyway, I think it's kind of ugly.
01:28:19
◼
►
You know what I did like is on their intro video, which to my eye looked 100% CGI.
01:28:27
◼
►
I mean, it was good CGI, but it looked like to me anyway, it looked like it was completely
01:28:33
◼
►
On the bottom of this CGI video of the NSX driving around, it said "Professional Driver
01:28:41
◼
►
Close Course."
01:28:43
◼
►
And it was a completely fabricated video.
01:28:46
◼
►
Alright, if it wasn't it was very poorly recorded because it looked it's gonna watch the video. It didn't look CG
01:28:51
◼
►
Is that one with the little kid playing with the toy old? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, look like it could be real to me
01:28:57
◼
►
I mean maybe modified after the fact, but I just thought that was funny. It's new Ford GT looks good
01:29:02
◼
►
Yeah, I'm not that excited about the NSX the GT
01:29:05
◼
►
GT makes me uncomfortable because I don't I don't like the idea of
01:29:14
◼
►
styling driven nostalgia or
01:29:16
◼
►
nostalgia driven styling to the degree that has been practiced by US automakers over the past like say decade or two where they make like
01:29:23
◼
►
oh make the new Mustang and make it look like a
01:29:27
◼
►
Modernized version of a particular model of all the Mustang which usually makes it look worse. Oh see I think they all look good
01:29:34
◼
►
Yeah, you live in the south
01:29:36
◼
►
But I agree with you that this whole idea is getting pretty played now
01:29:40
◼
►
Because like it's okay to be inspired by cars of the past
01:29:44
◼
►
But you have to know what the difference between inspired is and like a style parody
01:29:48
◼
►
Where like you're not even like a style pair like you're taking me like the Ford GT
01:29:52
◼
►
Is a great example like the the previous Ford GT the GT 40 thing right that
01:29:57
◼
►
Like it's like the same freaking cars the old one
01:30:00
◼
►
It's just like you know puffed up into modern like they're taking the same design
01:30:04
◼
►
It's not inspired by it's the same design and this new one is more different, but still I mean
01:30:10
◼
►
I don't know if we have enough carlisses. I know someone right now is writing an angry email that mentions the word 9/11 in it
01:30:17
◼
►
Right, we understand 9/11. Yeah, it's like
01:30:20
◼
►
Are the Volkswagen Beetle for that matter but like I feel like the 911 has come by that honestly
01:30:27
◼
►
By never moving away from that the 911 is a Volkswagen Beetle. Oh
01:30:30
◼
►
But you know to me like it it is it has not
01:30:34
◼
►
Every year they just change it a little bit a little bit a little bit
01:30:38
◼
►
And yeah, they all look the same and it's all kind of the same family resemblance
01:30:40
◼
►
But it's not like like the difference in the 9/11 the beetle is great because the beetle was the beetle and then there was a large
01:30:46
◼
►
Gap of time then they made the new beetle which was exactly the same
01:30:49
◼
►
You know, it's like let's make a modern version of the old beetle, right?
01:30:53
◼
►
And then they have the new revision of that or whatever, right?
01:30:55
◼
►
The 9/11 every single revision was just like a little change a little change a little change
01:30:59
◼
►
It just never drifted too far, right?
01:31:01
◼
►
I feel like that is more honest than waiting for a huge gap of time and then making a new car that looks like an old
01:31:06
◼
►
I don't like new cars that that are modern versions of old cars all the way down to it
01:31:10
◼
►
Is that aren't even a mix of like well this this grill is reminiscent of the grill on the blah blah blah and this tail
01:31:15
◼
►
Is reminiscent of this and this isn't new like that is more appropriate
01:31:18
◼
►
Don't just make me a new version of the old one, but I have to say the new GT
01:31:21
◼
►
Moves farther away from the old ones
01:31:25
◼
►
You can still kind of see the GT 40 and all the predecessors under there
01:31:30
◼
►
But I think I think what is what's the pillar right behind the door the B pillar is that right?
01:31:37
◼
►
From the B pillar to the front. It looks almost identical but from the B pillar to the back. It looks totally different
01:31:43
◼
►
and let's see the thing is it's a nice looking car all versions that the original one the the
01:31:47
◼
►
GT40 from like a decade ago or whatever and the new crazy looking one. These are all no, you've got that backwards
01:31:54
◼
►
It's the GT from a decade ago and the GT 40 from the 60s or 70s or whatever it was
01:31:59
◼
►
So you think these are good-looking cars? Well, I thought when they did the revision one, it was to call the G
01:32:04
◼
►
I don't remember the name.
01:32:05
◼
►
- So the one that Clarkson had
01:32:06
◼
►
that was from like the early 2000s.
01:32:09
◼
►
- That was just called the GT as well?
01:32:10
◼
►
- That's just the Ford GT.
01:32:12
◼
►
The original one that started it all
01:32:14
◼
►
in the 60s and 70s whenever it was, that was the GT40.
01:32:17
◼
►
I'm pretty sure about this.
01:32:18
◼
►
- These are hideous.
01:32:20
◼
►
- I think this is hideous.
01:32:21
◼
►
I think the NSX is hideous.
01:32:22
◼
►
- The NS, oh, the new NSX or the old one?
01:32:24
◼
►
- The new one.
01:32:25
◼
►
The old one looks, I think, very nice.
01:32:27
◼
►
And I think the design of the old one
01:32:29
◼
►
actually ages fairly well for a car that's designed,
01:32:32
◼
►
that was designed as long ago as it was.
01:32:34
◼
►
I'm not excited, I mean I was never a huge NSX person,
01:32:39
◼
►
I never got that into high-end cars back then,
01:32:41
◼
►
so I don't really have any nostalgia either way,
01:32:43
◼
►
but to me, the GT is at least continuing
01:32:47
◼
►
what it has been more recently.
01:32:49
◼
►
The NSX is like, this car was gone for a long time,
01:32:52
◼
►
and now we're bringing it back.
01:32:53
◼
►
But to me, this is kind of like bringing it back
01:32:55
◼
►
to tech for a second, please get me out of this terrible
01:32:58
◼
►
car conversation, 'cause these cars are cars
01:33:00
◼
►
I don't care about.
01:33:02
◼
►
Sorry, it's kinda like the new Star Wars movie.
01:33:07
◼
►
Where like I am not excited about the new Star Wars movie
01:33:10
◼
►
because, like inherently because it is Star Wars.
01:33:13
◼
►
- Wait, wait, can I make some popcorn?
01:33:15
◼
►
- You're not excited about the old
01:33:16
◼
►
Star Wars movies either, so.
01:33:18
◼
►
- No, I like them.
01:33:19
◼
►
I mean, I was never that obsessed with them,
01:33:20
◼
►
but I like them.
01:33:21
◼
►
But to me, like calling this an NSX
01:33:24
◼
►
and calling the new Star Wars movie Star Wars
01:33:27
◼
►
is really just like, it's like licensing the name.
01:33:30
◼
►
It's a branding thing. - No, no, no, no.
01:33:33
◼
►
- 'Cause it's totally different people working on it.
01:33:34
◼
►
- What are you talking about?
01:33:35
◼
►
Yes, of course, but the people who work on the new Mustang
01:33:38
◼
►
have nothing to do with the people
01:33:39
◼
►
who work on the old Mustang.
01:33:40
◼
►
You still use the Mustang name.
01:33:42
◼
►
It's a franchise, but every Mustang
01:33:43
◼
►
doesn't have to look like a particular past model.
01:33:45
◼
►
There wasn't time. - No, no,
01:33:46
◼
►
I'm not talking about appearance.
01:33:47
◼
►
I'm talking more about spirit and continuity.
01:33:49
◼
►
So making a new Star Wars movie today
01:33:52
◼
►
versus making a new Star Wars movie in 50 years
01:33:55
◼
►
when everyone who made the first one is dead,
01:33:57
◼
►
is it any different really?
01:33:59
◼
►
You're just taking the name.
01:34:00
◼
►
- Everyone who made the NSX is not dead.
01:34:02
◼
►
- I know, but it's been gone for long enough
01:34:05
◼
►
and the market has moved on in so many ways.
01:34:07
◼
►
And I'm sure the people at Honda have changed staff
01:34:10
◼
►
a little bit since then.
01:34:11
◼
►
I think it's, we're talking about brand names
01:34:15
◼
►
the way that companies want you to talk about brand names
01:34:18
◼
►
as if they have some kind of like a major significance
01:34:21
◼
►
with what the product will actually be like.
01:34:23
◼
►
And the fact is, it's just a nameplate on this.
01:34:26
◼
►
It's just a nameplate on Star Wars.
01:34:28
◼
►
Like, it doesn't matter.
01:34:29
◼
►
That's how cars have always worked. Ignore movies for a second. That's how cars have always worked.
01:34:32
◼
►
It's not, there's no relation between the 911 today and the 9, like, yes, you just keep calling it the 911.
01:34:38
◼
►
You keep calling it the Mustang, keep calling it the Camaro, keep calling it the Corvette. That's how car labels work.
01:34:42
◼
►
It's just not an aberration.
01:34:43
◼
►
Right, the M5 is an abomination compared to the M1 that originally started the whole M moniker.
01:34:49
◼
►
Or even just M5 compared to M5s. Compare this M5 to three generations ago. What do they share? Just the M5.
01:34:55
◼
►
It's just a way that, like, that's how car naming works.
01:34:57
◼
►
So I don't begrudge it that at all what I complain about is when you make for the styling
01:35:01
◼
►
Specifically when you pick a particular old car and you say make a modern version of that where you don't even mix elements of other cars
01:35:07
◼
►
But it's just like a you know
01:35:08
◼
►
I complete facsimile and the Mustang is and I think they've done a little bit with the new Dodge Charger
01:35:13
◼
►
Like I don't like that. It's like it's like saying we can't figure out how to we made a good-looking car once in the 60s
01:35:19
◼
►
70s we can't figure out how to make a good-looking car again
01:35:21
◼
►
So just make us a modern version of that car that we made that was good-looking
01:35:25
◼
►
Yeah, I mean normally I totally agree with that is that is what it is
01:35:29
◼
►
And normally I would say in this conversation Wow, you know look at look at how ugly the American car is, but honestly I
01:35:37
◼
►
Cannot imagine what Acura has been thinking with their styling over the last decade or so either like to me. These are both hideous cars
01:35:45
◼
►
Acura has lost its way with the styling
01:35:47
◼
►
I I'm kind of disappointed that there aren't more cues from the old
01:35:52
◼
►
NSX in the new one like I don't think you need to make a modernized version
01:35:55
◼
►
But just take some cues like the same way that the kidneys are a cue like you can do so much with the kidneys and BMW
01:36:00
◼
►
You don't say because like RS kidneys. It looks exactly like you know
01:36:03
◼
►
BMW from the
01:36:05
◼
►
Two decades ago or something like just styling elements should there should be some commonality in styling elements
01:36:10
◼
►
I think for example the the modern Cadillac takes that too far where the cars don't look like each other
01:36:15
◼
►
Exactly, but the styling elements are so dominant, and they're so repeated everywhere that there's a sameness to them. That's boring
01:36:21
◼
►
Although that CTS-V, what is it, 600 and change horsepower?
01:36:26
◼
►
- Speaking of ugly cars.
01:36:28
◼
►
- Oh, they've always been ugly.
01:36:29
◼
►
- You got the ATS if you don't want the fat one,
01:36:31
◼
►
but they look too similar.
01:36:34
◼
►
- Have you guys seen the new Lexus M3?
01:36:37
◼
►
- Oh, it's rough.
01:36:38
◼
►
- Well, Lexus has been rough.
01:36:40
◼
►
- I know, but Lexus's styling was always very comfortable
01:36:43
◼
►
if you wanted to drive an upscale marshmallow
01:36:45
◼
►
for old people.
01:36:47
◼
►
And that's a perfectly valid market
01:36:50
◼
►
and they've done very well there
01:36:51
◼
►
and that's well deserved.
01:36:52
◼
►
But with their new sport F line or whatever it is,
01:36:57
◼
►
they're trying to get in on the BMW territory
01:37:00
◼
►
of the sports sedans and oh my god,
01:37:03
◼
►
they're hideous in person.
01:37:04
◼
►
I hope you get a chance to see one sometime soon.
01:37:07
◼
►
Oh my goodness, they are rough.
01:37:09
◼
►
It's so, so bad.
01:37:12
◼
►
- What model of car are you talking about?
01:37:13
◼
►
I don't even recognize it.
01:37:16
◼
►
- Well no, it's Lexus's answer to the M3.
01:37:18
◼
►
So I think it's the ISF.
01:37:20
◼
►
It's one of the, it's like the F Sport versions.
01:37:22
◼
►
- The RCF, you're talking about the RCF,
01:37:23
◼
►
that big, giant, fat car?
01:37:25
◼
►
- No, it's a sedan.
01:37:27
◼
►
It might be the ISF.
01:37:28
◼
►
- No, it's the RCF.
01:37:30
◼
►
Do a Google for it.
01:37:31
◼
►
- Yes, you're right, you're right.
01:37:32
◼
►
It's the RCF now.
01:37:33
◼
►
It used to be the ISF.
01:37:35
◼
►
- It's fat because it's heavy, you know, because, yeah.
01:37:38
◼
►
All the reviews I've read of it is just like,
01:37:41
◼
►
too much weight, can't get out of its own way.
01:37:44
◼
►
It's like a really bad iteration of the GT-R.
01:37:48
◼
►
- Yeah, this is what I'm talking about.
01:37:48
◼
►
Yep, I'm seeing it.
01:37:49
◼
►
- And also, I believe, am I wrong?
01:37:51
◼
►
I think they also have added F-Sport trim levels
01:37:55
◼
►
to a lot of the other models.
01:37:56
◼
►
- They have.
01:37:57
◼
►
- That doesn't sound like anything I'm familiar with.
01:37:59
◼
►
- Exactly, it's the same thing.
01:38:01
◼
►
I mean, it's the same BS that BMW pulls.
01:38:02
◼
►
- I think every luxury car maker should have this thing.
01:38:05
◼
►
Whether it's the AMG model, and Mercedes have two,
01:38:10
◼
►
so it had the AMG model, but also the black.
01:38:13
◼
►
Multiple layers of things.
01:38:15
◼
►
- M-Sport and M.
01:38:16
◼
►
- Yeah, and BMW had to have the M,
01:38:18
◼
►
and they said, "You know, we can apply that M
01:38:19
◼
►
We got the M Sport.
01:38:20
◼
►
And so Lexus-- and same thing with Infiniti and these other companies--
01:38:24
◼
►
have taken too long to figure out what they're going to do.
01:38:26
◼
►
And I think Lexus is finally settling on the F. Audi
01:38:28
◼
►
has the RS and the S model and then the RS model.
01:38:34
◼
►
So you do need these levels.
01:38:36
◼
►
This is the thing that luxury car makers do these days.
01:38:39
◼
►
And I'm glad Lexus has found one.
01:38:40
◼
►
I'm sad that whenever they add F to their models,
01:38:42
◼
►
it makes them uglier and crappier.
01:38:45
◼
►
Did you also see that BMW had a pretty big presence at CES,
01:38:49
◼
►
- Yeah, that was interesting.
01:38:50
◼
►
Showing off not only their version of CarPlay,
01:38:54
◼
►
all sorts of, their gesture interface,
01:38:56
◼
►
their backseat Samsung tablets,
01:38:58
◼
►
and all sorts of weird stuff.
01:39:00
◼
►
What annoyed me most about what they showed off there
01:39:03
◼
►
is that almost none of it is anything I would actually want
01:39:06
◼
►
and much of it I think was a step backwards.
01:39:08
◼
►
Like the big key fob with the screen on it,
01:39:13
◼
►
the touch screen, like,
01:39:14
◼
►
no BMW, thank God that will always be
01:39:17
◼
►
like a thousand dollar option,
01:39:19
◼
►
'cause I'm never buying that option.
01:39:21
◼
►
Because like, the last thing you want
01:39:23
◼
►
is your key fob to get bigger.
01:39:25
◼
►
And they're already so big,
01:39:27
◼
►
they're already so chunky in your pocket.
01:39:28
◼
►
- And you don't wanna have to look at it either.
01:39:30
◼
►
Like why would you wanna look at it?
01:39:31
◼
►
You wanna be able to do it in your pocket, just, you know.
01:39:33
◼
►
Like is there anything you need to do with it at all?
01:39:35
◼
►
If it's a proximity key, there shouldn't be anything,
01:39:36
◼
►
but what if you wanna open the trunk?
01:39:37
◼
►
So you should be able to reach in
01:39:38
◼
►
and press the little thing that opens the trunk.
01:39:39
◼
►
You shouldn't have to look at the screen, like.
01:39:41
◼
►
- And why would you want your key fob
01:39:42
◼
►
to have another battery draining feature on it?
01:39:45
◼
►
That's a terrible idea.
01:39:46
◼
►
Like, it's just so many bad ideas about that.
01:39:48
◼
►
- Well, you'll be able to get a new battery for,
01:39:50
◼
►
you get the battery replacement dealer for $700,
01:39:52
◼
►
so it'll be fine.
01:39:54
◼
►
- That's true.
01:39:54
◼
►
But John, what was the name of the memory stick
01:39:56
◼
►
for the Dreamcast that had a little display on it?
01:39:59
◼
►
- VMU, Visual Memory Unit.
01:40:01
◼
►
- Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's what it reminds me of.
01:40:03
◼
►
- I think it might have color screen though.
01:40:04
◼
►
- Yeah, well, that's true.
01:40:05
◼
►
The VMU had like one of those god-awful,
01:40:07
◼
►
like original Game Boy style screens, but.
01:40:10
◼
►
- And unfortunately, the BMW is probably gonna sell 'em
01:40:12
◼
►
a lot more of them.
01:40:13
◼
►
- Yep, that's also true.
01:40:14
◼
►
But yeah, I don't know.
01:40:16
◼
►
I just thought it was interesting seeing
01:40:18
◼
►
that BMW took CES so seriously.
01:40:20
◼
►
I don't, I still don't totally understand,
01:40:22
◼
►
well, I shouldn't even say totally.
01:40:23
◼
►
I still don't understand the laser headlights.
01:40:26
◼
►
I don't, I mean, I've read that they're more directional
01:40:30
◼
►
so they can leave a gap for like people
01:40:32
◼
►
in other cars on the road.
01:40:34
◼
►
- They're lasers, Casey.
01:40:35
◼
►
What more do you need to know?
01:40:38
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, LEDs aren't cool enough anymore.
01:40:40
◼
►
Like-- - Are you kidding?
01:40:41
◼
►
Marketing people, once marketing people even find out
01:40:43
◼
►
that it's possible to use lasers for lights,
01:40:45
◼
►
like do that, I don't care what it takes.
01:40:47
◼
►
I don't care if they're worse in every possible way,
01:40:49
◼
►
laser lights.
01:40:50
◼
►
- That's true.
01:40:51
◼
►
But I did see also that they have OLED tail lamps now
01:40:56
◼
►
or they're trying them, which I thought was very peculiar.
01:41:00
◼
►
Like I'm not really sure why one would want that,
01:41:04
◼
►
but I'm sure there's a good reason I'm not thinking of.
01:41:06
◼
►
- You can make them thinner for more light output maybe.
01:41:10
◼
►
And obviously they're a little bit lower power,
01:41:11
◼
►
I don't think it's a big deal for brake lights, but yep. I don't know. I'm looking at the NSX here
01:41:17
◼
►
it's not too terrible like that has the
01:41:19
◼
►
schnoz problem that
01:41:21
◼
►
Accurus have had but the cheese grater nose, and yeah, it's not it's a beak
01:41:26
◼
►
It's more of it's not a cheese grater
01:41:27
◼
►
But like from from the it's only like head-on right and I think a lot of cars have a little bit of a nose problem
01:41:32
◼
►
Lately too, but it's fairly restrained like you know the headlights aren't bad the little scoops on the side are okay
01:41:39
◼
►
The back is ugly.
01:41:40
◼
►
- You think this is restrained?
01:41:42
◼
►
- Yeah, well, compared to the new Ford GT,
01:41:46
◼
►
if it looks like it's-- - Well, yeah.
01:41:47
◼
►
- It's ridiculous, or even just to the Corvette.
01:41:50
◼
►
- But compared to good taste,
01:41:51
◼
►
none of these are good examples,
01:41:53
◼
►
including the new Corvette, by the way.
01:41:55
◼
►
- Yeah, no, the Ferrari looks like a car from "Night Rider"
01:41:57
◼
►
that's supposed to look like it.
01:41:59
◼
►
I guess I know "Night Rider" was not a Corvette.
01:42:01
◼
►
- The new Corvette is, of all the cars you've mentioned
01:42:03
◼
►
so far, I think the new Corvette
01:42:04
◼
►
is by far the best looking one.
01:42:05
◼
►
- Ugh, the back of the Corvette is worse
01:42:07
◼
►
in the back of all these cars.
01:42:09
◼
►
That's probably true.
01:42:11
◼
►
If you've seen one in the parking lot,
01:42:12
◼
►
it's just terrible.
01:42:14
◼
►
It's like the unibrow of--
01:42:16
◼
►
it's like a big, just ugly--
01:42:20
◼
►
The NSX is fine.
01:42:22
◼
►
I just feel like there's not--
01:42:24
◼
►
it's a little bit puffy, and there's not
01:42:25
◼
►
enough of the old NSX in it.
01:42:27
◼
►
And the GT is like a mutant amphibian fish
01:42:31
◼
►
version of the previous GT, which was a puffed up
01:42:33
◼
►
version of the original GT.
01:42:35
◼
►
And none of these cars look as nice as any Ferrari probably,
01:42:39
◼
►
except for the weird four-wheel drive one.
01:42:41
◼
►
- The Ferrari left Ferrari?
01:42:43
◼
►
- No, no, the one with four-wheel drive
01:42:45
◼
►
that looks like a shoe.
01:42:46
◼
►
- Isn't that the FF?
01:42:48
◼
►
- That four-wheel drive was weird though.
01:42:50
◼
►
Did you see how that worked?
01:42:51
◼
►
Did we talk about that at some point?
01:42:52
◼
►
- Yeah, it is weird.
01:42:53
◼
►
Didn't it suck?
01:42:54
◼
►
- No, I don't think it sucked.
01:42:56
◼
►
- Oh, I don't know.
01:42:56
◼
►
Do you think anyone's ever driven one in the snow yet?
01:42:59
◼
►
- That's true.
01:43:00
◼
►
No, but it basically,
01:43:01
◼
►
didn't it have like a second drive shaft
01:43:03
◼
►
coming out the front of the motor
01:43:04
◼
►
or something along those lines?
01:43:05
◼
►
- Yeah, it was a really weird layout.
01:43:07
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, like I said, that one, even that one,
01:43:10
◼
►
if you just don't look at the back of the car,
01:43:12
◼
►
even the front of the car is much nicer,
01:43:13
◼
►
but I think they're making, like I said in the past,
01:43:16
◼
►
they're making a regular shaped version
01:43:19
◼
►
of a non-hatchback or whatever you wanna call the thing.
01:43:22
◼
►
So it's basically, so you're gonna have two 12-cylinder
01:43:24
◼
►
front-engine Ferraris.
01:43:26
◼
►
Why are they different?
01:43:26
◼
►
Well, this one is four-wheel drive
01:43:29
◼
►
and it used to be really ugly.
01:43:33
◼
►
You can get an ugly version if you like ugly cars.
01:43:35
◼
►
I don't know whatever.
01:43:36
◼
►
(door slams)