35: Sea-Level Executives
00:00:00
◼
►
you can use that uh that marker arm and plus 30 minutes skip button at this point if you uh if you
00:00:05
◼
►
interested at all right but um by the way great idea huh wouldn't be great to have a plus 30
00:00:10
◼
►
minutes skip button you get to john stu acusa's second bullet point singleton boston that's all
00:00:17
◼
►
i have to say oh you are such a baby i would the chance to be going to that one are much higher
00:00:23
◼
►
oh they're still mediocre at best let's be honest no i would say they're over 50 wow
00:00:29
◼
►
If they did it like next door to your house, would it be like, you know, 60% chance of you going?
00:00:36
◼
►
I mean, I guess it really depends on the timing of OS X releases, because this year,
00:00:40
◼
►
even if it was in Boston, like I did, while you guys were there doing your thing in Singleton,
00:00:44
◼
►
I was doing review stuff. So that review stuff would not have gotten done if I was there.
00:00:50
◼
►
Since you brought it up, how's it going?
00:00:51
◼
►
So they made the announcement of the October 22nd whatever iPad, whatever Apple special event
00:00:59
◼
►
with no mention of a price or a date. At this point I am resigned to the fact that I'm not
00:01:06
◼
►
going to know a price or a date until the public knows and when will the public know? Maybe they'll
00:01:11
◼
►
know on the 22nd. Maybe the release matter is on the 22nd. So I just have to plan for that. So the
00:01:15
◼
►
current plan is act as if Apple is going to announce on stage on the 22nd, "Oh and by
00:01:21
◼
►
the way, Mavericks is available for download now at such and such a price."
00:01:25
◼
►
And that means I have to have an ebook ready to purchase on the 22nd.
00:01:31
◼
►
Which means I have to submit the ebook probably tomorrow, which means I had to get all the
00:01:36
◼
►
information finalized in the review, make sure it's somewhat coherent even though it
00:01:41
◼
►
does not contain information about pricing.
00:01:43
◼
►
it can't because I don't know. And so that's what I did before the podcast was got that
00:01:49
◼
►
ebook ready. I haven't actually submitted it yet because I'm waiting on one last pass
00:01:54
◼
►
of copy editing and then tomorrow I'm going to submit it. Got it. I don't know if you
00:01:57
◼
►
guys have ever used iTunes producer.
00:02:01
◼
►
Just like Apple too. I mean I haven't used iTunes connect but there's iTunes connect.
00:02:06
◼
►
Is that an app that you run on your Mac as well?
00:02:08
◼
►
No thank God. Although it's you know actually I don't know if that would make it better
00:02:12
◼
►
or worse. I mean, you could make a pretty terrible native app too.
00:02:16
◼
►
I was going to say that this, like, in any other system, for example, like Amazon or
00:02:20
◼
►
whatever, and their things have their own terrible problems, but you would expect this
00:02:23
◼
►
to be a web app. Hey, there's a store somewhere on the internet where you can buy digital
00:02:27
◼
►
media, and if you're a producer of digital media, you can upload things to that store
00:02:31
◼
►
and put them for sale. And you totally expect that to be a web application, but instead
00:02:35
◼
►
it's this native Mac application, not a particularly nice native Mac application, with tons and
00:02:40
◼
►
tons of fields with insufficient room to type in them and not very nicely laid out and you
00:02:46
◼
►
have to go be looking through the giant PDF documentation to figure out what all the fields
00:02:50
◼
►
mean and just you have to do all this stuff locally and save it into this big giant package
00:02:56
◼
►
file and then hit this thing that uploads the whole package to Apple.
00:02:59
◼
►
Versus being like a web application where you piecemeal add the metadata, add the data
00:03:03
◼
►
and slowly get the book ready like online where you can see what it's going to look
00:03:06
◼
►
like before you finally submit it here.
00:03:08
◼
►
do everything at once and then press a button and then it just like shoves the whole thing
00:03:11
◼
►
up to Apple.
00:03:12
◼
►
And then if you want to modify any information, I think you have to modify it locally again,
00:03:17
◼
►
but only certain fields you can modify and then shove it back up.
00:03:19
◼
►
I don't know.
00:03:20
◼
►
This experience is not confidence inspiring and it is definitely a little bit scary that
00:03:25
◼
►
you have to do all this stuff locally and then press one button and then like, you know,
00:03:29
◼
►
the thing sails off into the sunset.
00:03:32
◼
►
And then presumably it's rejected.
00:03:33
◼
►
Like, I'm assuming that's the next phase.
00:03:36
◼
►
Well that isn't actually that different from the way Xcode apps are uploaded now.
00:03:41
◼
►
Back three years ago or so, it was basically used to web form.
00:03:46
◼
►
And there was a separate uploader app that you could use to upload for submissions, but
00:03:52
◼
►
you didn't have to use it and you'd only ever use it, I think, if it was above a certain
00:03:55
◼
►
size where the web form would time out or something like that.
00:03:58
◼
►
Now though, I think you have to always use Xcode's built-in native uploader.
00:04:04
◼
►
And it's actually kind of nice because you still do all the metadata entry on the web
00:04:09
◼
►
interface, which is probably good because even though it's a pretty terrible web interface,
00:04:15
◼
►
I can't imagine the native version would be substantially better because the reason
00:04:20
◼
►
iTunes connects as a terrible web interface is not because web interfaces have to be terrible,
00:04:24
◼
►
it's because Apple doesn't really care that much about it being good.
00:04:27
◼
►
And so obviously they could have the same problem with native app.
00:04:31
◼
►
But it is nice to have, like for an app,
00:04:34
◼
►
they run a whole bunch of validation steps locally.
00:04:37
◼
►
And then they run a whole bunch more on the server side
00:04:39
◼
►
as soon as you submit.
00:04:41
◼
►
And so it can have a nice little feedback mechanism there.
00:04:44
◼
►
Also, it takes care of some of the code signing stuff way
00:04:47
◼
►
better than it did before.
00:04:49
◼
►
So it is nice having that blend of native and web
00:04:52
◼
►
for this kind of thing.
00:04:53
◼
►
I think it's more just a matter of how much Apple cares
00:04:56
◼
►
about getting it right.
00:04:58
◼
►
And with iTunes Connect, they've had a pretty bad record of that.
00:05:03
◼
►
It's not that it's always terrible, but it's never great.
00:05:07
◼
►
Yeah, a lot of my trepidation about this is because this is my first one.
00:05:10
◼
►
So obviously after I do the first one, I'll sort of know what to expect.
00:05:14
◼
►
Like I'm just pouring over the documentation to make sure, like for example, the on-sale
00:05:19
◼
►
date of the book, I have to make sure that's editable after I submit.
00:05:22
◼
►
And the documentation says it is, but like, not, I would like to say it in bold with arrows
00:05:28
◼
►
pointing to the thing and saying "Yes, totally, you can submit a book with a for-sale date
00:05:33
◼
►
in the future, and then if, for example, Mavericks is not released on the 22nd, I need to change
00:05:38
◼
►
the sale date because I can't put the thing on sale until Mavericks comes out," and so
00:05:42
◼
►
on and so forth.
00:05:43
◼
►
So that seems to be the case, I think everything is all in line for that, although I may set
00:05:47
◼
►
the date to the 23rd just in case, because if the date really is editable I can always
00:05:51
◼
►
set it back to the 22nd, right? But if the date isn't editable, at least I have the 22nd
00:05:56
◼
►
to run around like a chicken with my head cut off trying to get Apple to make sure the
00:05:59
◼
►
book doesn't go for sale on the 23rd.
00:06:00
◼
►
Yeah, I mean, if it works on anything like the App Store, the way people try to do controlled
00:06:05
◼
►
releases there, you can either do the hold for release and then you click a button and
00:06:09
◼
►
it starts going. But the other thing you could do, which helps a little bit to avoid some
00:06:14
◼
►
of the cache delays, is to release it with an availability date way in the future. And
00:06:20
◼
►
And then when you write it to your release, set the availability date way in the past.
00:06:24
◼
►
And then it updates and it gets submitted.
00:06:29
◼
►
It becomes available faster than I think any other method, but I'm not entirely sure
00:06:35
◼
►
So what system do they have for setting the price?
00:06:37
◼
►
Do you have to set the price in all the various regions that the store is in?
00:06:40
◼
►
No, you set the price tier, which basically is like the first digit of the price in the
00:06:47
◼
►
And then they have this big chart to show what that is in all the different other currencies.
00:06:50
◼
►
But you pick tier one is 99 cents in the US and so on to everyone else.
00:06:56
◼
►
So that's why all the prices are pretty much locked into that and are all the same.
00:07:00
◼
►
Yeah, it's the same thing with the tiering in the iJUNGIS Producer, but it does it in
00:07:03
◼
►
like a native Mac GUI with this sort of having all the fields.
00:07:07
◼
►
I think they're all independently editable, but then you have to select them all and then
00:07:10
◼
►
do a mass edit to edit all of them.
00:07:13
◼
►
For example, I picked the wrong type for the book.
00:07:16
◼
►
The choices were new release, digital only, and other.
00:07:20
◼
►
And being the typical person that I am,
00:07:23
◼
►
instead of stopping and going to the documentation
00:07:24
◼
►
and seeing which one it was,
00:07:25
◼
►
I was like, well, I'll just pick new release for now.
00:07:27
◼
►
And then I looked up what it was later,
00:07:28
◼
►
I said, oh, actually, I should have picked digital only.
00:07:31
◼
►
So I went to change it to digital only,
00:07:33
◼
►
and digital only was the only choice in the pop-up menu
00:07:35
◼
►
when I selected all of the items.
00:07:36
◼
►
So I had to select each individual territory
00:07:38
◼
►
and change that pop-up menu 200 and something times.
00:07:40
◼
►
So that was fun.
00:07:43
◼
►
- Yeah, it's not the experience I want.
00:07:45
◼
►
I feel better, in general, I feel better when I'm using a web form to edit information that's
00:07:53
◼
►
on a server, kind of like the server is the source of truth and then I'm just editing
00:07:57
◼
►
it versus having some local thing that I edit and then submit and then I can edit the local
00:08:03
◼
►
thing again and resubmit and what happens is the diffs get applied or maybe just totally
00:08:07
◼
►
replaces the content.
00:08:08
◼
►
I feel more comfortable picking away at something, slowly making it better when it's all uploaded
00:08:14
◼
►
piece at a time into a web interface and then finally adding a button, versus doing all of that
00:08:18
◼
►
locally, which of course I can only do on a single machine unless I put the thing in my Dropbox, and
00:08:22
◼
►
I don't know. We'll see how it goes. So have you gotten to the point that you are writing
00:08:28
◼
►
four different versions of the pricing paragraph or paragraphs or section or whatever based on $10,
00:08:33
◼
►
$20, $30, and free? Yeah, I wish it was only that section because the other parts of the review make
00:08:41
◼
►
oblique reference to the price in various places. So yeah, I have a version of three different versions
00:08:47
◼
►
and then plus all the other places in the review where I allude to those versions and I tried to
00:08:53
◼
►
make the illusions vague enough that they could fit no matter what the price ends up being. But
00:08:58
◼
►
it's all just very annoying. This is a new complication because in every past year
00:09:01
◼
►
they've always announced the date and the price well in advance and this year they're not for some
00:09:08
◼
►
reason. I think it's just to troll you, if I'm not mistaken. It is pretty annoying.
00:09:13
◼
►
I would not have—if you would say, "How could you annoy me the most? This would not
00:09:16
◼
►
have occurred to me." But it is pretty darn annoying. I have to imagine if
00:09:22
◼
►
somebody really tries to annoy you, it can't be that hard to come up with a way.
00:09:26
◼
►
Well, you know, last year was the Amazon stuff, and I'm sure—I fully predict this
00:09:31
◼
►
year when we upload the book to Amazon, it will also inexplicably not be
00:09:34
◼
►
downloadable onto the iPad because the odds of Amazon having fixed this problem seem slim
00:09:39
◼
►
to me because last year when I went through it all, I heard from lots of other people
00:09:43
◼
►
like, "Yeah, that totally happened to me. It's been happening for a long time."
00:09:46
◼
►
It's not. I wasn't the first person this happened to, and I'm sure I won't be the
00:09:50
◼
►
last. In fact, it may happen to me again. Why did it happen? What makes it happen? What
00:09:54
◼
►
fixes it? Who knows?
00:09:56
◼
►
Yeah, if Amazon's system for uploading e-books is anything at all like their system for Kindle
00:10:03
◼
►
Kindle publications and publishing a magazine on the Kindle, I feel very sorry for you because
00:10:10
◼
►
that was miserable.
00:10:12
◼
►
Well, the good thing about the Amazon system is you submit and then a reasonable amount
00:10:17
◼
►
of time later, it appears. I don't think a human ever looks at it. So it's somewhat predictable
00:10:24
◼
►
in that respect, but because a human never looks at it, you probably have a difficult
00:10:30
◼
►
time getting a human to fix something about it, which was the problem last year.
00:10:33
◼
►
And the other thing is, I don't know how long that delay is going to be.
00:10:36
◼
►
I think it's like 24 hours or something like that, but you can't pick a for sale date.
00:10:41
◼
►
So you submit and then wait, wait, wait, and then it's for sale, which really doesn't go
00:10:46
◼
►
well with not knowing the release date, because if someone gets on stage on the 22nd and says,
00:10:52
◼
►
"Maverick's is out today," then I can submit to the Amazon store and then wait 24 hours
00:10:58
◼
►
for the Amazon version to be available, which is not ideal.
00:11:01
◼
►
Yeah, this is kind of a world of hurt for you, isn't it?
00:11:05
◼
►
Yeah, I don't know why it has to be so difficult, but really, nobody cares about the one guy
00:11:10
◼
►
writing the review.
00:11:12
◼
►
If it's good for customers and good for developers, you have the hierarchy of what's good for
00:11:16
◼
►
Apple, then what's good for its users, and then maybe some other stuff, and then what's
00:11:21
◼
►
good for developers, and then everything else in the universe, and then what's good for
00:11:24
◼
►
the one guy writing a review about one of our products.
00:11:30
◼
►
- Well, let's change yours for a second
00:11:32
◼
►
to a company that does care about its customers
00:11:34
◼
►
and John Syracuse.
00:11:36
◼
►
It is Transporter by Connected Data.
00:11:39
◼
►
So Transporter, here's the thing about Transporter.
00:11:42
◼
►
It's a little hard to describe for a second,
00:11:45
◼
►
so give me a second here.
00:11:46
◼
►
If you like Dropbox, then you'll love Transporter.
00:11:51
◼
►
So Transporter is basically a hard drive enclosure
00:11:55
◼
►
with network connectivity and software
00:11:58
◼
►
that goes on your Mac and your iOS and Android,
00:12:00
◼
►
I think, Android?
00:12:01
◼
►
I should check on that.
00:12:02
◼
►
At least your iOS devices.
00:12:06
◼
►
Would you guys check on that, please?
00:12:08
◼
►
Software that goes on your Mac and various mobile devices.
00:12:12
◼
►
And it behaves like Dropbox in the nice Finder integration
00:12:18
◼
►
and being able to share a link with people
00:12:20
◼
►
automatic syncing to other transporter devices, but you own this enclosure and you own the
00:12:27
◼
►
hard drive within it and all the data is stored on that hard drive. It's not stored in their
00:12:33
◼
►
servers somewhere. It's not stored somewhere the NSA can get a secret request and get it
00:12:39
◼
►
in without you knowing. And all transportation of the data between transporters and over
00:12:44
◼
►
the internet and everything is all encrypted, end-to-end encryption. Oh, and thanks, Casey.
00:12:50
◼
►
Yes, apparently the apps are also available on Android.
00:12:53
◼
►
You can tell how many Android devices
00:12:54
◼
►
that we use in this podcast.
00:12:57
◼
►
But so Transporter, they used to do this major 2.0 software
00:13:01
◼
►
update about a month ago.
00:13:03
◼
►
And they really made it much more nicely integrated
00:13:06
◼
►
with the Finder.
00:13:07
◼
►
And you can share a folder with other Transporter users.
00:13:10
◼
►
You can share files with anybody.
00:13:13
◼
►
You can just get a link to share.
00:13:15
◼
►
It's really-- everything you can think
00:13:18
◼
►
that's cool about Dropbox, the public links, the sharing, the collaboration,
00:13:22
◼
►
you can do with Transporter, but with so many better features
00:13:26
◼
►
and you can get way more space on the Transporter for
00:13:30
◼
►
way less money. Dropbox charges, let's say you wanted like a terabyte
00:13:34
◼
►
of data, a one terabyte Transporter costs about
00:13:38
◼
►
300 bucks, Dropbox charges about 500 dollars per year for that,
00:13:42
◼
►
excuse me, Dropbox charges 500 dollars a year for half as much storage.
00:13:46
◼
►
So if you want to store more than a few gigs on Dropbox,
00:13:50
◼
►
you're probably going to have a substantial savings
00:13:52
◼
►
if you want to move that to Transporter.
00:13:54
◼
►
So you can buy as many of these things as you want.
00:13:57
◼
►
You can buy one for your home.
00:13:58
◼
►
You can buy one for your work and it'll automatically sync.
00:14:01
◼
►
You can buy one for your work, one for your parents' house,
00:14:04
◼
►
have it sync there to have an offsite backup,
00:14:06
◼
►
multiple people on a team like our team, the three of us.
00:14:09
◼
►
We all live in different places.
00:14:10
◼
►
We can all collaborate by putting files on our Transporters
00:14:13
◼
►
and they will all-- we can have a folder that's
00:14:16
◼
►
like the ATP folder that syncs between all of our devices.
00:14:19
◼
►
So we have all these capabilities.
00:14:22
◼
►
Even if you just have one, you can still
00:14:24
◼
►
have your own computer accessing it,
00:14:27
◼
►
you accessing it from your mobile device
00:14:29
◼
►
from anywhere you are as long as your home internet connection
00:14:31
◼
►
works, and being able to email the share links and all
00:14:34
◼
►
these other features.
00:14:35
◼
►
So really, it is quite good.
00:14:38
◼
►
They even have a thing where they can--
00:14:40
◼
►
similar to the Dropbox app, where
00:14:42
◼
►
you can launch it on your iPhone and there's
00:14:44
◼
►
There's a feature where it can upload all your photos to the
00:14:48
◼
►
Well, Transporter has a similar feature.
00:14:50
◼
►
But unlike the Dropbox one, they upload their photos in
00:14:53
◼
►
full resolution because they have a lot more space to play
00:14:56
◼
►
around with because you have these terabyte drives in
00:14:58
◼
►
So if you want to get your own Transporter, which I highly
00:15:03
◼
►
suggest, they sell it--
00:15:05
◼
►
it's an enclosure, so they sell it empty.
00:15:07
◼
►
And you can supply your own 2 and 1/2 inch drive, any
00:15:12
◼
►
They sell empty for a special price right now because through November 11th they're
00:15:17
◼
►
having a sale for us if you use coupon code ATP50.
00:15:22
◼
►
Special sale $50 off from their store.
00:15:25
◼
►
This is pretty good.
00:15:26
◼
►
This is the biggest sale I've seen them do.
00:15:28
◼
►
They've been sponsoring great podcasts for a while so that's saying a lot.
00:15:32
◼
►
Anyway, they sell empty.
00:15:34
◼
►
You supply your own hard drive for just $149 with this sale.
00:15:38
◼
►
Regular price is $199.
00:15:39
◼
►
This is $50 off.
00:15:41
◼
►
Or you can get it one terabyte for just $249 on sale and two terabytes for just $349 on
00:15:48
◼
►
And again, that sale is valid through November 11, 2013 using coupon code ATP50 at checkout
00:15:54
◼
►
from filetransporter.com/ATP.
00:15:57
◼
►
So once again, it's Transporter.
00:15:59
◼
►
It's awesome.
00:16:00
◼
►
You want it, go get it.
00:16:02
◼
►
It is filetransporter.com/ATP, coupon code ATP50, all uppercase.
00:16:07
◼
►
Thank you very much to Transporter for sponsoring the show.
00:16:10
◼
►
I'm gonna ask in the chatroom why it's a 2.5 inch drive instead of a 3.5 because you know
00:16:15
◼
►
you can get more space for less money in a 3.5.
00:16:17
◼
►
I don't think people realize how small these things are.
00:16:20
◼
►
It is not a big gigantic thing the size of a bowling pin, the kind of shape it is.
00:16:26
◼
►
It is very small.
00:16:27
◼
►
Not only is it small, it is silent, which I like.
00:16:31
◼
►
So unlike Apple's, you know, what do you call it, the new wireless hub thing that's like
00:16:36
◼
►
a giant shoebox turned on its end and has a fan in it. This does not, or if it does
00:16:41
◼
►
have a fan I can't hear it, we're just saying something. And these things are tiny.
00:16:45
◼
►
Like, you could, you know, I was talking about it on a past show, having a whole bunch of
00:16:48
◼
►
these things like all over your house and all over your office, you could do that, because
00:16:52
◼
►
they connect to power and Ethernet, and they are very small and they're silent. So that's
00:16:56
◼
►
why they're 2.5.
00:16:58
◼
►
They do glow, though, I will warn you. I wouldn't recommend putting it like right next to your
00:17:01
◼
►
face in a bedroom.
00:17:02
◼
►
But it's a pleasant glow.
00:17:03
◼
►
It's not like one of those, like this has a light that changes color around the circle,
00:17:07
◼
►
but it's not like one of those blue LEDs that like, you know what those are like on electronics
00:17:11
◼
►
that shine right in your eye.
00:17:13
◼
►
I'm so glad that era of electronics design is over.
00:17:16
◼
►
Oh, it's not.
00:17:17
◼
►
I just got a new dishwasher and it lights up the room in the dark with its blue LEDs
00:17:23
◼
►
in the front of it.
00:17:24
◼
►
Not that I care because, you know, it's running at night when nobody's in there, but it is
00:17:29
◼
►
That's a feature.
00:17:30
◼
►
It's when you go downstairs, you see where you're going.
00:17:31
◼
►
I kind of have been using it.
00:17:32
◼
►
It's like a night light now.
00:17:33
◼
►
If the fishwasher's running, you can see, but it's an eerie blue glow.
00:17:37
◼
►
Anyway, thanks for transporting our sponsor right in the channel.
00:17:43
◼
►
Okay, what else we got to talk about?
00:17:46
◼
►
So there's a new Apple employee joining an executive who finally is a woman, which
00:17:54
◼
►
is excellent.
00:17:55
◼
►
Although, still has an unpronounceable name.
00:17:58
◼
►
Yep, you'll notice I didn't try.
00:18:00
◼
►
Yeah, no one looked that up. I figured at least one of you would have looked. I figured you would. It's Angela.
00:18:06
◼
►
Very well done.
00:18:08
◼
►
Arentz? That seems reasonable. Yeah, it sounds right to me. Here's the interesting thing about her.
00:18:14
◼
►
They hired the CEO of another company to be the not CEO of their company.
00:18:20
◼
►
I thought that too. Which does not happen that often in the corporate world where someone leaves a CEO position of like a
00:18:26
◼
►
significant company, like your CEO of your five person company, right? A CEO of a big company
00:18:31
◼
►
basically is taking a step down. She used to be the one in charge, now she's not. And granted,
00:18:38
◼
►
they seem to be throwing lots of money at her, but that's a little bit of the magic of Apple or any high-profile
00:18:44
◼
►
company where you can pull a CEO away from another company. That is very difficult to do. So it really must have been
00:18:49
◼
►
a heck of a pitch and they must have really wanted her and, you know, she must have bought it. That, yeah,
00:18:56
◼
►
she's going to go there and stop selling sugar water and change the world, right?
00:19:01
◼
►
Except in this case, it's what? Plaid scarves?
00:19:03
◼
►
Yeah. I didn't know what this store was. I had to Google Burberry because I had never
00:19:08
◼
►
heard of it before. Well, I had heard the name, but if someone had told me that Burberry
00:19:12
◼
►
sold electronics or housewares, I would have believed them because I had no idea what that
00:19:18
◼
►
store was about. Did either of you know what the store sold?
00:19:21
◼
►
I still don't. I honestly did.
00:19:24
◼
►
I think it's closed, right?
00:19:26
◼
►
It's closed.
00:19:27
◼
►
Oh, I thought you said closed as in not open anymore.
00:19:30
◼
►
I was very confused.
00:19:31
◼
►
No, it's all closed.
00:19:32
◼
►
The CEO left.
00:19:33
◼
►
They're just shutting down.
00:19:34
◼
►
Yeah, seriously.
00:19:38
◼
►
No, my understanding, and I didn't think to look this up or ask about it, so I'm sure
00:19:39
◼
►
I'll get a thousand emails.
00:19:41
◼
►
Email Marco.
00:19:42
◼
►
I thought it was a clothing store, sure, but it's kind of focused around a particular pattern,
00:19:47
◼
►
and it's like a plaid-ish pattern.
00:19:50
◼
►
And yeah, that's kind of their thing.
00:19:53
◼
►
It's like their, what is the purse with the Louis Vuitton where you always see like the
00:19:58
◼
►
L and the Vs.
00:20:00
◼
►
That's like their only pattern or so it appears.
00:20:02
◼
►
Well this is, they have that one plaid that's their only pattern.
00:20:05
◼
►
We're going to get it so much trouble.
00:20:07
◼
►
Email markup.
00:20:08
◼
►
Unlike the L and the V, my understanding is that this pattern is actually, you know, is
00:20:12
◼
►
an old thing.
00:20:13
◼
►
The L and the V I believe is new and I think they did that because you can't copyright
00:20:17
◼
►
a, like, you know, a fashion design but you can copyright a logo.
00:20:22
◼
►
So that's why everyone puts a logo all over their stuff, because that's the one thing
00:20:24
◼
►
you have some legal recourse to protect from.
00:20:27
◼
►
By the way, the chat room is trying to correct our pronunciation of this song, saying it's
00:20:30
◼
►
Burberry, not Burberry, or whatever.
00:20:33
◼
►
But they're gonna have us saying Aluminium soon, so I don't know if we can take any pronunciation
00:20:38
◼
►
advice from the people over there.
00:20:40
◼
►
Well, no, Aluminium is patently wrong.
00:20:43
◼
►
But a friend of mine, Eric Wielander, put in the chat a picture to the plaid I'm referring
00:20:48
◼
►
And so if we remember, we'll put that in the show notes.
00:20:50
◼
►
I can make up the episode artwork for this week.
00:20:53
◼
►
Actually, I'm not even kidding.
00:20:54
◼
►
That would be really funny.
00:20:56
◼
►
I don't know.
00:20:58
◼
►
What's interesting is she's being brought into this job of retail chief, which is basically
00:21:03
◼
►
like the job of doom at Apple.
00:21:06
◼
►
How many people have had this job in the last decade?
00:21:09
◼
►
Ron Johnson was the guy, right?
00:21:11
◼
►
He's the one who made that job an important job because previously Apple didn't have a
00:21:15
◼
►
retail store.
00:21:16
◼
►
So he was the guy.
00:21:17
◼
►
And then they brought in another guy from the UK, right?
00:21:19
◼
►
guy who was the head of Dixon's or something, or I don't know if he was the head of it or
00:21:23
◼
►
whatever, but I also didn't know what that store was, even if I'm remembering the name
00:21:27
◼
►
correctly. And they brought him in, and that didn't work out, and he went away, and they
00:21:33
◼
►
were looking for somebody else for a long time, and now they found someone else.
00:21:36
◼
►
Well, that's a lot.
00:21:37
◼
►
Yeah, I mean, it's not good, but when they brought that guy in, everyone said, "Oh, boy,
00:21:41
◼
►
we predict doom for this guy," and they were like, "Oh," because the stores he ran were
00:21:44
◼
►
not Apple-type stores. They were kind of like more, you know, not as premium, high-end type
00:21:51
◼
►
of stuff. Like, "Well, who knows? He must be a great guy, Apple. You know, Apple must
00:21:54
◼
►
be good at hiring. They wouldn't just hire some random guy." And he did the things -- John
00:21:58
◼
►
Broward was his name, thanks Chat Room -- and he did the things that people expected him
00:22:02
◼
►
to do. You know, regular -- if you think of someone who runs a retail store, just the
00:22:06
◼
►
average person who runs a retail store chain or whatever, the things they do are not Apple-like
00:22:12
◼
►
things. It's just a bunch of workers. You try to pay the workers as little as possible.
00:22:19
◼
►
You try to sell the customers gold USB cables like Marco had to do, right? And you try to
00:22:24
◼
►
do all these terrible things because that's how you get ahead in retail.
00:22:28
◼
►
To be fair, I'm not sure I sold a single one.
00:22:30
◼
►
Well, the ones you refuse to sell. So that's what we think of when we think of retail.
00:22:35
◼
►
But it's not what we think of when we think of Apple retail. So it's like, well, it must
00:22:38
◼
►
be difficult for them to find someone who does retail because if you bring in the best
00:22:41
◼
►
retail guy in the world, they're going to come into Apple's thing and say, "Oh no, you're
00:22:44
◼
►
doing it all wrong here, Apple. You're paying your employees too much. You have too much
00:22:47
◼
►
staff in the store." All sorts of things. I can show you how you can cut your costs
00:22:52
◼
►
in half and it won't hurt your business at all. You'll see. And so he came in, did a
00:22:57
◼
►
bunch of stuff that made the retail store employees angry and made the experience of
00:23:02
◼
►
being in the Apple store worse, and then they canned him. So maybe this person has a better
00:23:06
◼
►
chance of not doing all of those things that regular retail stores do.
00:23:14
◼
►
You would think it'd be kind of like a dream job for somebody who is well-minded in the
00:23:20
◼
►
sense that normally, retail is just a terrible business because everything's all about just
00:23:25
◼
►
these very, very, usually very thin profit margins, very cutthroat business. You got
00:23:31
◼
►
to have as many people as possible not working full-time so you don't have to pay their benefits.
00:23:36
◼
►
and then you gotta shave off hours
00:23:37
◼
►
so you have just enough people to run the store,
00:23:40
◼
►
but no more than that so that you aren't wasting money
00:23:43
◼
►
on labor and you have all these terrible high school
00:23:47
◼
►
and college kids running everything
00:23:48
◼
►
and they have no training and no time for training
00:23:51
◼
►
and everyone steals everything.
00:23:53
◼
►
It's just a terrible business.
00:23:54
◼
►
Whereas in the Apple store,
00:23:56
◼
►
because they have some profit margin to play with
00:23:59
◼
►
and because they value things like customer experience
00:24:03
◼
►
and service wait times and quality of the stores
00:24:06
◼
►
and stuff like that, then it feels like somebody
00:24:10
◼
►
who wanted to make a really good retail store
00:24:13
◼
►
would see this as like a dream job
00:24:15
◼
►
because they have the resources to actually do things well
00:24:19
◼
►
and to do good quality things
00:24:22
◼
►
and to do the regular things well.
00:24:24
◼
►
Whereas in most other companies,
00:24:26
◼
►
you don't have that kind of power
00:24:27
◼
►
because they can't afford it.
00:24:28
◼
►
- Yeah, but wouldn't you think that she would be handcuffed
00:24:33
◼
►
by what Ron Johnson did while he was at Apple.
00:24:36
◼
►
What I mean by that is the Apple stores seem to have a pretty good thing going right now
00:24:41
◼
►
and a pretty good kind of feel to them.
00:24:44
◼
►
Of course, there's always room for improvement, but why mess with what is working?
00:24:51
◼
►
If she's brought in and has all these grand visions, which she very well may have, is
00:24:55
◼
►
she going to be allowed to do them or is it wise to do them if Apple retail is doing pretty
00:25:01
◼
►
Here's the thing about Apple retail, the curse of success.
00:25:04
◼
►
This is true of if anyone has ever been an employee
00:25:06
◼
►
of a company that finds itself being very successful.
00:25:09
◼
►
That is an extremely dangerous situation
00:25:12
◼
►
because as I believe, who was it?
00:25:14
◼
►
As Ed Catmull said in his talk
00:25:18
◼
►
that I paroded heavily on Hypercritical,
00:25:20
◼
►
but whose name I can't remember right now.
00:25:22
◼
►
I think he was talking to some business people
00:25:24
◼
►
at Stanford or something.
00:25:25
◼
►
Success hides problems.
00:25:27
◼
►
So Apple has been very successful in the past,
00:25:30
◼
►
know, seven, ten years, which means that more and more people are going into Apple
00:25:35
◼
►
retail stores and buying stuff. And you keep seeing the statistics about how the
00:25:38
◼
►
number, the amount of money made per square foot of store space is so high in
00:25:42
◼
►
Apple stores and Apple sells tons and tons of stuff. And you can do all sorts
00:25:47
◼
►
of terrible wrong things during that period. As long as your sales keep going
00:25:50
◼
►
up and up and up, everyone's like, "Hey, thumbs up, boy, you're a great retail chief.
00:25:53
◼
►
Look at our sales numbers, they're doing great." And how much is that? Is that
00:25:56
◼
►
because of you or in spite of you? Because when you're on that rocket ship,
00:26:00
◼
►
but it's hard to tell, is this because of what I'm doing?
00:26:02
◼
►
Is it because these stores are so awesome?
00:26:04
◼
►
Or is it because Apple's products are so awesome?
00:26:06
◼
►
Or is it just like the strange coincidence of events?
00:26:09
◼
►
And if you look at the trend in Apple stores,
00:26:11
◼
►
lots of things have gotten worse since the beginning.
00:26:13
◼
►
I mean, in the beginning, they were paying people
00:26:15
◼
►
obscene salaries to be geniuses.
00:26:16
◼
►
So you'd get like, you know, people who are real experts
00:26:20
◼
►
in the technology field, leaving their tech jobs
00:26:23
◼
►
for similar salaries to be a genius at the Genius Bar.
00:26:27
◼
►
You didn't see employees who were like
00:26:28
◼
►
typical retail employees like Margo said,
00:26:30
◼
►
you know the high school students or college students,
00:26:31
◼
►
not that there's anything wrong with those people,
00:26:32
◼
►
but you saw like real experienced people
00:26:35
◼
►
making good salaries doing this.
00:26:37
◼
►
And over time, the Apple Store has become
00:26:39
◼
►
more like a regular retail store.
00:26:41
◼
►
Now that I'm saying they're paying people
00:26:42
◼
►
like you get paid at Walmart or Target,
00:26:44
◼
►
but it is nothing compared to the original days
00:26:46
◼
►
of Apple retail where they were just paying tons of money
00:26:50
◼
►
to get really senior expert people in there.
00:26:53
◼
►
And this transformation has happened little by little,
00:26:57
◼
►
slowly, over many, many years, during that time,
00:27:01
◼
►
Apple stores have been doing great, right?
00:27:03
◼
►
Because they've been selling tons and tons of stuff.
00:27:04
◼
►
So it's like, well, have they been slowly kind of to see
00:27:07
◼
►
how much of the rug can we pull out
00:27:09
◼
►
from under this retail thing without breaking it?
00:27:11
◼
►
Like, is that the goal of the retail chief?
00:27:13
◼
►
Is it the goal to kinda, sorta, see how much cost
00:27:17
◼
►
you can pull out of the Apple retail stores
00:27:18
◼
►
without impacting the user experience?
00:27:20
◼
►
And then like the Broward guy just went too far?
00:27:22
◼
►
Like, I don't know what the mandate is
00:27:25
◼
►
the new retail chief. It doesn't seem like the mandate is, like, spare no expense, make
00:27:31
◼
►
our stores the best experience. We don't care if all of our stores lose money because the
00:27:34
◼
►
whole point of our stores is to be ambassadors for our products and we'll make up the money
00:27:38
◼
►
elsewhere. Like, that doesn't seem to be the mandate. I don't think that was ever the mandate,
00:27:41
◼
►
even the good old days of Apple retail. And I wonder, under Tim Cook, if the mandate isn't,
00:27:46
◼
►
let's see how much cost you can pull out of these stores without breaking them. Don't
00:27:49
◼
►
make the employees angry, don't make the experience worse, but see what you can do about, you
00:27:53
◼
►
know, pull a little cost out. And I worry about that.
00:27:56
◼
►
Yeah. Now, what do you make of the thought that Xi is well positioned to get Apple well
00:28:04
◼
►
positioned in China? So I ask because from what very little I've had a chance to read
00:28:09
◼
►
about all this, apparently Burberry, Burberry, whatever, I don't care what it's called, that
00:28:14
◼
►
thing, is doing fairly well in China and expanding pretty significantly. Do you think that this
00:28:20
◼
►
is yet another play on China, like everything Apple does is in the media these days?
00:28:25
◼
►
That can't hurt, right?
00:28:28
◼
►
I mean, it's probably – if you are in charge of any big retail, worldwide retail chain,
00:28:33
◼
►
chances are good that you have more locations in China than Apple does, simply because Apple
00:28:36
◼
►
doesn't have that many stores when compared to Walmart or whatever, some other big – or
00:28:41
◼
►
McDonald's, you know what I mean?
00:28:43
◼
►
Like how many locations does Apple have in China?
00:28:45
◼
►
Half a dozen or something?
00:28:46
◼
►
It's not a lot for a country that big.
00:28:48
◼
►
So a lot of people put up the big map saying,
00:28:51
◼
►
look at Burberry has all these locations in China.
00:28:54
◼
►
It's way more than Apple.
00:28:54
◼
►
That's true.
00:28:56
◼
►
But a lot of places have way more locations in China.
00:28:58
◼
►
But yeah, it doesn't hurt.
00:29:02
◼
►
Anybody coming to work for Apple for anything
00:29:05
◼
►
probably has to-- dealing with China, the potentially largest
00:29:10
◼
►
market in the future for all of Apple's stuff,
00:29:15
◼
►
any triangle is good.
00:29:16
◼
►
But I don't think that's why they hired her.
00:29:17
◼
►
I think they're trying to hire a person,
00:29:19
◼
►
and I guess they think this is the right person.
00:29:21
◼
►
I'm just, I'm a little, you know,
00:29:24
◼
►
gun-shy about Apple's hiring,
00:29:26
◼
►
because it's not been that great
00:29:29
◼
►
over the past several years,
00:29:29
◼
►
and not just Tim Cook, but who's the guy,
00:29:32
◼
►
Papermaster, the guy that Steve Jobs wanted, right?
00:29:34
◼
►
That didn't work out well either, so.
00:29:36
◼
►
It's kinda, I mean, maybe that's true of all hiring,
00:29:37
◼
►
like, sometimes it just doesn't work out,
00:29:39
◼
►
but when it's a high-profile position,
00:29:41
◼
►
we get to see all of the wreckage,
00:29:44
◼
►
whereas if it's just some other person
00:29:45
◼
►
no one's ever heard of, they come and go,
00:29:47
◼
►
nobody knows about it.
00:29:48
◼
►
You've got to figure this is also a tough job to sell to somebody. Obviously, with a
00:29:56
◼
►
handful of people having had it recently, if you're some CEO of a big company or some
00:30:03
◼
►
really high-ranking person at a different retailer, you're very qualified. You're
00:30:09
◼
►
very expensive. You can pick what you do at that point. Maybe this just isn't that appealing
00:30:15
◼
►
to be absorbed into Apple and hope you do well, but if you don't do well, it will be
00:30:24
◼
►
very, very public and it will probably end your career. That's not good.
00:30:28
◼
►
But these people never think they're going to fail. From Papermaster to Broude, if you
00:30:34
◼
►
were to ask them, they thought, "It's just one of those successful people never
00:30:38
◼
►
think they're going to fail." And so they're like, "Oh, don't worry about that. I
00:30:42
◼
►
the last guy, he kicked him out, boy, he wasn't he a loser, but not me. It's not going to happen
00:30:46
◼
►
to me. So no one thinks it's going to happen to them. So I don't think that examination is in
00:30:49
◼
►
there. And if you're a fan of Apple, which I bet a lot of people are, just a fan of their products
00:30:54
◼
►
and admire the company, that goes a long way. That and a $56 million signing bonus or whatever the
00:31:00
◼
►
heck she got, that goes a long way. But the money thing always confuses me in this sort of rarified
00:31:07
◼
►
air of C-level executives, because I'm assuming she already doesn't have to worry about money
00:31:14
◼
►
ever. She's multimillionaire, very rich, very powerful. Money is not a big thing. And yet,
00:31:20
◼
►
you still have to end up paying. It's like that's just what the market will bear. If
00:31:23
◼
►
you're a business person, you just say, "Well, look, this is what I'm worth, so you need
00:31:25
◼
►
to pay me what I'm worth." But something, I don't know. We'll have to try this experiment.
00:31:31
◼
►
Make me that rich and see if I demand that much money for the next job that I get. It
00:31:37
◼
►
It seems like it would just be like,
00:31:39
◼
►
I guess you have to do it,
00:31:40
◼
►
so it doesn't seem like you're not getting what you're worth
00:31:44
◼
►
because this is a supply and demand situation,
00:31:45
◼
►
but really, how much is that $56 million?
00:31:48
◼
►
It seems like so much to us, it seems so obscene,
00:31:50
◼
►
but how much is it going to change her lifestyle?
00:31:52
◼
►
Probably not at all, right?
00:31:54
◼
►
- I would assume not.
00:31:57
◼
►
And I agree, I guess once you make some salary,
00:32:00
◼
►
even if that salary is stupidly large,
00:32:02
◼
►
you're not often going to want to go backwards.
00:32:07
◼
►
So I don't know if she's paid 11 gajillion dollars now,
00:32:11
◼
►
she's probably gonna want 12 gajillion next.
00:32:14
◼
►
- Well it's also part of like career branding
00:32:16
◼
►
where you don't want, like if there's any chance
00:32:19
◼
►
of anybody else learning your salary,
00:32:21
◼
►
which for a CEO it's usually public,
00:32:24
◼
►
for a high ranking executive or director at Apple,
00:32:26
◼
►
that's usually public too.
00:32:27
◼
►
So since your salary is either public
00:32:31
◼
►
or at least somewhat easy to find out, you don't want it to look like you're on your
00:32:37
◼
►
way out career-wise. You don't want it to look like you're on your way down. That
00:32:41
◼
►
just looks bad on you. So you want to keep getting those upgrades.
00:32:44
◼
►
Yeah, and most of this, I'm assuming, is in stock. And that does make sense, where
00:32:50
◼
►
you give compensation to top-level executives in stock because that presumably motivates
00:32:54
◼
►
them to, at the very least, make the stock price go up, which hopefully is in some way
00:32:58
◼
►
related to their performance and their job. And so it's not options. I think they're giving
00:33:04
◼
►
RSU's which have an immediate value as opposed to a potential value in the future. But yeah,
00:33:11
◼
►
that's usually the way that these people get compensated. Tons and tons of stock.
00:33:14
◼
►
Bringing in someone at this point where Apple's kind of like, it's not at its stock peak,
00:33:21
◼
►
but it's kind of on its way down from its peak. It's not like it was five or 10 years ago where
00:33:26
◼
►
where there was a huge potential upside because Apple's already the biggest company in the
00:33:30
◼
►
world or close to it. So how much bigger could they possibly get? So yeah, you get RSU's
00:33:35
◼
►
and then those are worth money now, that's real money now. Don't have to worry about
00:33:39
◼
►
the stock price doubling. You're already filthy rich just from what we're giving you.
00:33:44
◼
►
Yeah, I definitely wouldn't enjoy being in a position where my financial well-being
00:33:50
◼
►
depended on Apple stock going up dramatically. I have a real-time follow-up from my wife
00:33:54
◼
►
a few minutes ago, she says that she used Googling to try to prove me wrong, and she
00:33:59
◼
►
found the Louis Vuitton logo, they've been using that on their thing since the 1800s.
00:34:03
◼
►
So she thinks it's not because you can copyright a logo, but not a pattern.
00:34:08
◼
►
It has to line up, right? Is that that one or is that the other one? The C's.
00:34:14
◼
►
I don't know. I do not know. The amount that all the—our collective knowledge of fashion
00:34:19
◼
►
is close to zero.
00:34:21
◼
►
But I love that we're devoting half of the show to it.
00:34:24
◼
►
Well, Apple needs to start hiring people from things that we know about.
00:34:27
◼
►
They just start hiring people like us to manage their fashion lines.
00:34:30
◼
►
Yeah, exactly.
00:34:31
◼
►
Well, that's the other thing about this.
00:34:34
◼
►
So they hired the guy from the French company whose name we're not going to pronounce,
00:34:37
◼
►
a fashion type thing.
00:34:38
◼
►
And they're hiring this person from a clothing company.
00:34:40
◼
►
It's just the smoke surrounding wearable items from Apple is just everywhere.
00:34:47
◼
►
No, I don't think that's it.
00:34:49
◼
►
I think it's just that Apple is trying to hire somebody to manage their very high-end
00:34:54
◼
►
retail stores, and it just so happens that most other very high-end retail stores are
00:34:58
◼
►
in the fashion business.
00:34:59
◼
►
I don't know.
00:35:01
◼
►
Where there's smoke, there's fire, Marco.
00:35:05
◼
►
Something that you can wear.
00:35:06
◼
►
I mean, they already have.
00:35:07
◼
►
We can't even pronounce this smoke.
00:35:09
◼
►
It doesn't have to be pronounceable.
00:35:11
◼
►
Something that you wear.
00:35:12
◼
►
I mean, they already do make things that you wear.
00:35:14
◼
►
They make iPods with little clips on them.
00:35:16
◼
►
You wear them, sort of.
00:35:18
◼
►
It's one short step from there to something that you slap around your wrist or...
00:35:23
◼
►
Like a slap bracelet?
00:35:25
◼
►
Put through your belly button piercing or whatever they're going to do.
00:35:28
◼
►
Whatever the kids these days do.
00:35:30
◼
►
This is going nowhere good quickly.
00:35:31
◼
►
All I have to say is I'm very much looking forward to WWDC shirts this year because they're
00:35:35
◼
►
clearly going to be phenomenal given all these fashion people that are being hired.
00:35:42
◼
►
This episode is once again brought to you by our good friends at Squarespace.
00:35:47
◼
►
is the all-in-one platform that makes it fast and easy to create your own professional website
00:35:51
◼
►
or online portfolio. For a free trial and 10% off your first purchase, go to Squarespace.com
00:35:57
◼
►
and use our show's offer code ATP10 for the month of 10. Squarespace is constantly improving
00:36:03
◼
►
their platform. They have new features, new designs, and even better support all the time.
00:36:09
◼
►
Their designs are beautiful to start with. You can look at our site as one of the examples,
00:36:13
◼
►
because we're hosted on Squarespace, of course.
00:36:15
◼
►
And all these styles come with responsive designs.
00:36:19
◼
►
So it looks great on every mobile device.
00:36:21
◼
►
You can shrink the width down.
00:36:23
◼
►
You can see this for yourself.
00:36:24
◼
►
And it looks like your site doesn't just
00:36:26
◼
►
look like one generic template.
00:36:27
◼
►
And all these styles you can customize like crazy.
00:36:31
◼
►
We've customized ours a little bit.
00:36:33
◼
►
You can inject CSS for JavaScript.
00:36:34
◼
►
You can use their online editing interface.
00:36:38
◼
►
You don't have to do code if you don't want to.
00:36:41
◼
►
You have all the access you want to do,
00:36:42
◼
►
whatever you need with these templates.
00:36:43
◼
►
It's really great.
00:36:45
◼
►
They've won design awards.
00:36:46
◼
►
It's incredibly easy to use.
00:36:49
◼
►
And on the off chance you want some customer support
00:36:51
◼
►
because you can't figure something out or whatever else,
00:36:53
◼
►
which is unlikely, I know,
00:36:54
◼
►
but in case you need customer support,
00:36:56
◼
►
they have at least 70 people working on this
00:36:58
◼
►
full-time right here in New York City
00:37:00
◼
►
that's growing every single day.
00:37:01
◼
►
Actually, I don't know that for sure.
00:37:02
◼
►
They might not be hiring somebody every single day,
00:37:04
◼
►
but you know what I mean, it's growing constantly.
00:37:06
◼
►
Even the customer support team has won numerous awards.
00:37:10
◼
►
So if that's all not enough for you,
00:37:12
◼
►
you can even sell things on your Squarespace site.
00:37:16
◼
►
They have this great platform called Squarespace Commerce.
00:37:18
◼
►
That's a whole e-commerce engine using Stripe
00:37:22
◼
►
as the payment processor, and Stripe is awesome.
00:37:24
◼
►
So there's no additional fee to use all this.
00:37:27
◼
►
All you do is pay the Stripe charges of 2.9% plus $0.30
00:37:30
◼
►
per transaction, and Squarespace doesn't charge anything
00:37:33
◼
►
on their end.
00:37:34
◼
►
It's going to be hard for you to find a better deal than that
00:37:36
◼
►
for taking credit cards online.
00:37:38
◼
►
and you can sell physical goods, you can sell digital goods,
00:37:43
◼
►
they have a shopping cart, they have coupon management,
00:37:45
◼
►
it's a very full-featured e-commerce platform.
00:37:49
◼
►
And that's all built into all Squarespace plans
00:37:52
◼
►
at no additional charge if you wanna use it.
00:37:54
◼
►
So, you can start a free trial today
00:37:57
◼
►
with no credit card required.
00:37:59
◼
►
You can start building your Squarespace website.
00:38:01
◼
►
And then if you decide to sign up,
00:38:03
◼
►
then you can give them a credit card.
00:38:04
◼
►
And then make sure you use our offer code ATP10.
00:38:07
◼
►
That's ATP 10 to get 10% off during the month of 10.
00:38:11
◼
►
It's very easy to remember this month.
00:38:12
◼
►
ATP 10, 10% off your first purchase
00:38:15
◼
►
and to show your support for ATP.
00:38:17
◼
►
So thanks a lot to Squarespace for supporting the show.
00:38:20
◼
►
They are everything you need
00:38:21
◼
►
to create an exceptional website.
00:38:23
◼
►
- Yep, thanks guys.
00:38:25
◼
►
They will always have a special place in my heart
00:38:27
◼
►
for sponsoring Neutral.
00:38:28
◼
►
- Yeah, they sponsored all of Neutral.
00:38:30
◼
►
- All right.
00:38:32
◼
►
- They're just awesome.
00:38:33
◼
►
- They are that awesome.
00:38:35
◼
►
And if I can disclose this, I think they're sponsoring more of our episodes in the future.
00:38:42
◼
►
So they are that awesome.
00:38:43
◼
►
They are that cool.
00:38:44
◼
►
So thanks a lot to Squarespace.
00:38:46
◼
►
Now, in the past, and forevermore.
00:38:48
◼
►
There's something vaguely Catholic about that.
00:38:51
◼
►
Oh my goodness.
00:38:53
◼
►
So before we eliminate all of our listeners, do you want to talk about Touch ID for a minute?
00:38:58
◼
►
Yeah, I actually finally used it a lot this weekend, and I turned it off as soon as I
00:39:02
◼
►
got in the car to go home.
00:39:04
◼
►
Man, I do not see why everyone does not like it. I really like it a lot.
00:39:11
◼
►
Well, I liked it when I was using it, but if I don't have to be using it, it's not that
00:39:16
◼
►
transparent that I can just use it all the time. It's very close, but it's a little bit
00:39:21
◼
►
too slow, and it misses a little bit too often. Like, I had—mine would refuse my finger
00:39:27
◼
►
about maybe one every 20 or 30 tries. So it happens like—
00:39:32
◼
►
That's enough to get you that grumpy?
00:39:35
◼
►
Well it would happen maybe twice a day or something.
00:39:38
◼
►
And that's just enough that it reminds me, "Oh, this kind of sometimes sucks."
00:39:47
◼
►
So it was just a little bit...
00:39:50
◼
►
I don't know.
00:39:52
◼
►
It's very close to being good enough for my ridiculously picky standards, but not quite.
00:39:59
◼
►
it's a little bit too slow and just slightly too unreliable. Again, it's close. But I would
00:40:06
◼
►
say if my false positive rate stayed the same and it just got maybe half the time, if it
00:40:13
◼
►
got fast enough that it could do it in half the time, I would turn it back on all the
00:40:18
◼
►
time. So maybe the iPhone 6 or whatever will be faster at it. Who knows? But for now, I
00:40:24
◼
►
think I'm just going to turn it on when I know I'm going to be out in public a lot like
00:40:27
◼
►
conference, but for my day-to-day use where I'm around nobody except my family and my
00:40:32
◼
►
dog, I don't think I'll leave it on.
00:40:36
◼
►
That's the letter you should have read that guy scolding you about keeping your phone
00:40:38
◼
►
unlocked because someone's going to steal it from you and get access to all your information.
00:40:43
◼
►
I did read that.
00:40:44
◼
►
First of all, he was under the impression that I live in New York City, which I don't.
00:40:49
◼
►
So basically—I don't want to pull it up now—but the gist of his response, which
00:40:56
◼
►
which was on point for the most part, I think,
00:40:58
◼
►
and most of it I agree with.
00:40:59
◼
►
The gist of it is that it's kind of like your ethical duty
00:41:04
◼
►
as a responsible technology owner to lock your phone
00:41:07
◼
►
because not only do you have your own data to protect,
00:41:11
◼
►
but you also have everyone in your address book,
00:41:14
◼
►
you have their data to protect as well.
00:41:16
◼
►
And if somebody has possession of your phone,
00:41:19
◼
►
they can do quite a lot.
00:41:20
◼
►
If they can open up your email, if they can receive email,
00:41:23
◼
►
then they can do things like receive password resets
00:41:26
◼
►
pretty much any service. And then, you know, log in as you and other services. They can
00:41:31
◼
►
take your whole address book. They can take everyone's names and phone numbers. Even,
00:41:34
◼
►
like, you know, if you're friends with, like, any celebrities or internet celebrities, then,
00:41:38
◼
►
you know, then their public information or their private information could be taken to,
00:41:42
◼
►
and that could be inconvenient, at least for them. So...
00:41:44
◼
►
Right. Even MC Hammer.
00:41:46
◼
►
Exactly. Even MC Hammer. I don't even know if he still uses that phone number. But, anyway,
00:41:52
◼
►
So I agree with him that that is a risk. However, I think most people probably
00:41:58
◼
►
grossly overestimate how much I go in public and how many people are
00:42:06
◼
►
there when I get there. I really pretty much stay in my small town and the
00:42:11
◼
►
town next to us most of the time, and there's rarely any people around. I
00:42:15
◼
►
rarely even have my phone out of my pocket, and it's not even a dense enough
00:42:19
◼
►
area that would be pickpocketed. It could happen. I'm not saying it can't happen,
00:42:24
◼
►
but I think the chances of it happening are so astronomically low that it's just not
00:42:29
◼
►
worth it for me.
00:42:31
◼
►
Yeah, that's always what I thought when I saw people use their iPhones with even just
00:42:36
◼
►
the four-digit code. Because you know how often people check their phones. People are
00:42:40
◼
►
just obsessive about it. They're constantly looking at their phones, and you'd see them
00:42:43
◼
►
doing it, and you'd also see them entering their little number over and over and over
00:42:47
◼
►
again, which seems so annoying to me. And not only so annoying, but like, if you wanted
00:42:52
◼
►
to steal that person's phone, spend five minutes next to them, wait for them to check their
00:42:56
◼
►
phone 900 times, watch them type in that same four digit code over and over and over and
00:43:00
◼
►
over again and see where their fingers are. Like this is not rocket science. And then
00:43:04
◼
►
take their phone. It's like an extra five minute investment, at least with touch ID,
00:43:08
◼
►
you have to make more of an effort to fake it out.
00:43:13
◼
►
My wife got her phone and I played with the touch ID.
00:43:17
◼
►
I think I would probably enable it because I couldn't bring myself to do the four-digit
00:43:21
◼
►
code thing because that was just too much of a burden.
00:43:26
◼
►
Even when I'm out of the house, not that I have an iPhone, so it's not an issue, but
00:43:29
◼
►
if I did have an iPhone, I don't think I would enable the four-digit one unless I was going
00:43:34
◼
►
into an area where suddenly my risk of losing my phone was getting much higher.
00:43:37
◼
►
But I think I would enable the fingerprint thing every time I went outside, although
00:43:42
◼
►
That's not in control center, right?
00:43:43
◼
►
I'd have to actually go into settings
00:43:44
◼
►
and turn on the fingerprint thing.
00:43:46
◼
►
So that might be a little bit of a hassle.
00:43:47
◼
►
But I think I would give it more of a go
00:43:49
◼
►
just because it passes my threshold
00:43:52
◼
►
for like I'm going to endure this annoyance
00:43:55
◼
►
for the slight added safety.
00:43:58
◼
►
Because for some reason, I mean,
00:44:00
◼
►
once you accept that there is this step in the process
00:44:02
◼
►
of taking out your phone that is unlocking it,
00:44:05
◼
►
if you can make that step pretty easy,
00:44:06
◼
►
I'm willing to accept that as a step in the process.
00:44:09
◼
►
If you're not willing to accept that
00:44:10
◼
►
as a step in the process,
00:44:11
◼
►
then it's just like, it better be zero time
00:44:14
◼
►
or it's constantly annoying me.
00:44:16
◼
►
And I think I could get with the program with Touch ID,
00:44:18
◼
►
but I enabled it on my wife's phone.
00:44:20
◼
►
I don't know if she's already enabled it,
00:44:22
◼
►
disabled it, we'll see.
00:44:24
◼
►
I'll see how long she lasts for.
00:44:25
◼
►
She never used a lock on her previous phone.
00:44:27
◼
►
She always had it completely unlocked.
00:44:29
◼
►
- Now, to be clear, you have to use a passcode
00:44:31
◼
►
of some variety when Touch ID is on,
00:44:33
◼
►
because if you reboot, for example,
00:44:35
◼
►
it won't let you do Touch ID to unlock.
00:44:37
◼
►
You have to use the passcode.
00:44:39
◼
►
And there were some other circumstances
00:44:40
◼
►
I don't recall. Well, if you can't get in via Touch ID, you have to fall back on a passcode.
00:44:45
◼
►
I don't think it has to be four digit. I think you can use a crazy alphanumeric one.
00:44:49
◼
►
Right. I just had a password. You can either do the simple passcode, which is four digits,
00:44:53
◼
►
or you can just have it put up a text box and enter whatever you want with the regular
00:44:57
◼
►
Yeah. The regular keyboard is at least slightly more difficult to shoulder surf from somebody.
00:45:02
◼
►
All right. Actually, I should point out, I have not tried this, but earlier on, Double
00:45:07
◼
►
in the chat said, "Hey, the way I fixed all the issues with not registering my finger
00:45:14
◼
►
is to have the same finger as two entries in the Touch ID registration."
00:45:21
◼
►
You know what I mean?
00:45:22
◼
►
So, say take your right thumb, you register your right thumb as two independent fingers
00:45:28
◼
►
and that makes it a lot better and a lot less likely to mess it up, which I have not tried,
00:45:34
◼
►
but it sounds reasonable to me.
00:45:36
◼
►
That's interesting.
00:45:37
◼
►
Yeah, I thought that was interesting.
00:45:38
◼
►
I'm surprised it would even accept it.
00:45:40
◼
►
Yeah, I don't know.
00:45:42
◼
►
Sure, it'll accept it.
00:45:44
◼
►
It's just a question of when they tell you to put your thumb on it in all sorts of different
00:45:48
◼
►
You just do a different set of positions the second time, and then you have just more data.
00:45:52
◼
►
Yeah, my experience with it has been great.
00:45:55
◼
►
Certainly it fails sometimes, but I guess the difference is I look at it the same way
00:45:59
◼
►
John does, which is, you know what, there is another step in this process that at least
00:46:04
◼
►
80% of the time for me, I don't even notice it.
00:46:08
◼
►
I don't even think about it.
00:46:09
◼
►
And then the other small portion of the time, 20% of the time I do notice it, you know,
00:46:13
◼
►
maybe I have to try again, but my data in principle is that much more secure and that's
00:46:17
◼
►
a price I'm willing to pay.
00:46:19
◼
►
Much more so than the price of having even a four digit simple lock code, which I never
00:46:26
◼
►
And it frustrated me every time I turned it on, which was basically only when I was at
00:46:29
◼
►
conferences.
00:46:30
◼
►
I give two thumbs up, as terrible as that pun ends up being, I give two thumbs up to
00:46:36
◼
►
I think it's been really good.
00:46:37
◼
►
One thing I wanted to ask you guys about though is do you think this is coming to both MacBook
00:46:43
◼
►
Pros and the desktop Macs, I guess specifically perhaps the iMac, and I assume we all agree
00:46:51
◼
►
that it's going to be on iPads as soon as possible.
00:46:55
◼
►
I'm going to say no on the Macs because...
00:46:57
◼
►
Even the portables?
00:46:59
◼
►
- Yeah, because right now, I mean, first of all,
00:47:04
◼
►
they sell so many fewer Macs, the motivation
00:47:07
◼
►
to bring cutting-edge features to them is way lower.
00:47:08
◼
►
I mean, look, we still don't even have
00:47:11
◼
►
built-in cellular modems on the Macs.
00:47:13
◼
►
And that's, like, even when they launched one
00:47:15
◼
►
called the MacBook Air and they didn't build in an AirCard,
00:47:18
◼
►
I mean, that's crazy.
00:47:20
◼
►
You know, so we, like, obviously the Mac,
00:47:22
◼
►
like, putting new hardware features on the Mac
00:47:24
◼
►
is obviously a lower priority.
00:47:26
◼
►
But also, I think it's just because the design of it
00:47:29
◼
►
requires that secure enclave thing, and if you look at what this is, if you look at the
00:47:34
◼
►
NN Tech article on the A7, you can kind of see what that means. And it's this pretty
00:47:40
◼
►
deeply integrated architecture as part of the new ARM architecture, whatever it is.
00:47:47
◼
►
And so I don't think they would do it in a way that wasn't just as secure as the phone,
00:47:53
◼
►
and in regards to, not only just recognizing your fingerprint, but in regards to not letting
00:47:58
◼
►
getting anything else, access fingerprint data.
00:48:03
◼
►
No other software on the computer, not even the CPU,
00:48:05
◼
►
stuff like that, doing the hashing and then even
00:48:09
◼
►
locking the hashes down super tightly in this secure area.
00:48:11
◼
►
So this is all enabled by special hardware features
00:48:15
◼
►
of the new ARM architecture.
00:48:19
◼
►
And as far as I know, I don't think there's anything
00:48:21
◼
►
like that on Intel, but who knows?
00:48:24
◼
►
Intel's always worked in little features like this
00:48:23
◼
►
in their specs and that nobody ever uses them.
00:48:25
◼
►
They might have them, but I don't think they do right now.
00:48:27
◼
►
And so I don't think
00:48:29
◼
►
I don't think it's going to come to the
00:48:31
◼
►
portables anytime soon.
00:48:33
◼
►
Even coming to the iPads,
00:48:35
◼
►
obviously I think it's only going to come
00:48:37
◼
►
to iOS devices that have
00:48:39
◼
►
the A7 or better.
00:48:41
◼
►
And right now, the
00:48:43
◼
►
iPad Mini is on the A5.
00:48:45
◼
►
So the question is, if they're
00:48:47
◼
►
about to do a retina iPad Mini,
00:48:49
◼
►
which I think is pretty
00:48:51
◼
►
pretty likely so it's certainly possible but i think it's pretty pretty likely
00:48:55
◼
►
uh... if they're actually is that
00:48:57
◼
►
you have to ask you what's the price point i think it'd be in cannot even
00:49:00
◼
►
support you know
00:49:01
◼
►
there but the the means already
00:49:04
◼
►
so can that support
00:49:05
◼
►
an a seven and a redness green in one year i'm guessing probably not
00:49:10
◼
►
i'm guessing the retina
00:49:12
◼
►
i've had many is probably gonna have
00:49:14
◼
►
an a six x chip and not the a seven x
00:49:17
◼
►
which is just yet but the program called that
00:49:19
◼
►
and then I'm guessing the full-size iPad will have
00:49:22
◼
►
A7X and Tuxedo because, first of all, also,
00:49:25
◼
►
Apple needs some segmentation here.
00:49:27
◼
►
Apple needs some reasons for people to buy the big one.
00:49:32
◼
►
Because the big one, they make way more money on it,
00:49:34
◼
►
and there's a lot more room there for upsells as well.
00:49:38
◼
►
So I think we're gonna see that come to the iPad this fall
00:49:42
◼
►
as big iPad only, and the mini won't have it this year.
00:49:47
◼
►
That's just my guess.
00:49:48
◼
►
- Well, yeah, I kind of agree that it's not likely
00:49:51
◼
►
that we're gonna see this in Macs anytime soon.
00:49:54
◼
►
But for the Secure Enclave stuff,
00:49:56
◼
►
if Intel doesn't already have something like that,
00:49:59
◼
►
they will soon, because Intel wants into
00:50:01
◼
►
all the businesses that ARM is into.
00:50:03
◼
►
And this is even ignoring the possibility of
00:50:06
◼
►
a Mac based on an ARM system on a chip.
00:50:08
◼
►
Like, these type of features,
00:50:10
◼
►
not only can Apple get it if they want it
00:50:14
◼
►
a couple years down the line,
00:50:15
◼
►
but Intel is going to want to offer it,
00:50:17
◼
►
because they're gonna want to offer
00:50:18
◼
►
chips to people who do things like this. And because Apple has some fingerprint thing in
00:50:22
◼
►
their thing, that seems to be reasonably successful. We haven't heard all crazy backlash or no late
00:50:27
◼
►
night jokes about how fingerprints don't work. It's more or less how to launch the best that you
00:50:32
◼
►
could have hoped for. And again, this is a forward looking technology and blah, blah, blah. This is
00:50:36
◼
►
the cutting edge. But a couple of years down the line, when it's less cutting edge, if it turns out
00:50:41
◼
►
to be something that people like, laptops have the same exact problem in that you should use a screen
00:50:46
◼
►
lock whenever you're away from your laptop and stuff like that, but a lot of people don't
00:50:51
◼
►
because it's annoying to keep typing in your password over and over and over again, even
00:50:54
◼
►
though you have a real keyboard in front of you.
00:50:56
◼
►
I do it at work.
00:50:57
◼
►
My screen has a password lock on it and I'm sick of typing it all day every time I get
00:51:00
◼
►
up and leave my computer and come back down to it.
00:51:03
◼
►
If I could put my finger on some little spot, that's faster than typing in front of my password
00:51:07
◼
►
and I would do it.
00:51:08
◼
►
So if this convenience becomes addictive to customers, it's only a matter of time before
00:51:15
◼
►
it shows up everywhere because there are so many instances where you have to enter credentials
00:51:19
◼
►
on the Mac, purchasing stuff, authorizing event access if you're a nerd user or whatever. Hell,
00:51:28
◼
►
I would use it for my SSH key passcode stuff if I could. The opportunities for integration
00:51:35
◼
►
seem great. Now, the point about the 3G is a good one. That seems like a no-brainer. Everyone has
00:51:40
◼
►
to come up with all sorts of crazy theories about why isn't Apple putting 3G in any of its Mac
00:51:45
◼
►
products? Is it some sort of thing with the carriers or they don't want like I
00:51:48
◼
►
don't understand why either but the simplest explanation is the most
00:51:51
◼
►
compelling like Marco said it's just yeah they don't care that much you know
00:51:55
◼
►
maybe they'll do it someday maybe they won't but that's another feature that
00:51:59
◼
►
can you think of anybody who buys the MacBook Air and travels a lot who would
00:52:04
◼
►
not opt for the 3G option or 4G option if it was like it is on the iPad where
00:52:08
◼
►
you pay per month and the extra hardware is you know 100 extra bucks or whatever
00:52:14
◼
►
People will buy that in a second.
00:52:15
◼
►
That would be an amazing seller.
00:52:17
◼
►
And it would make the machine more useful.
00:52:19
◼
►
So that argument is against Touch ID,
00:52:21
◼
►
because it's a feature-- no matter how convenient it is
00:52:24
◼
►
and how much people want it, if Apple can't be bothered
00:52:26
◼
►
because the volumes are too low or it doesn't seem that
00:52:28
◼
►
important, who knows?
00:52:29
◼
►
But if Touch ID continues to be even middle of the road
00:52:35
◼
►
successful-- people don't love it,
00:52:37
◼
►
but it's still more convenient than typing in something--
00:52:39
◼
►
it's got to spread.
00:52:40
◼
►
Because the technology required to do that
00:52:43
◼
►
will become cheaper, will spread to more different vendors, will just be everywhere.
00:52:48
◼
►
So we'll report back in five years and we'll see if Touch ID has spread outside the iOS
00:52:52
◼
►
realm, but I would not be surprised.
00:52:54
◼
►
I would say also the demand for, or rather the need for Touch ID on laptops is lower.
00:53:03
◼
►
And they discussed this in the keynote when they unveiled it for the iPhone, that nobody
00:53:07
◼
►
locks their phone because it's hard.
00:53:09
◼
►
It has inconvenience, frequent inconvenience.
00:53:12
◼
►
So nobody does it.
00:53:14
◼
►
So on the laptop, even though I'm all picky
00:53:17
◼
►
about making a convenient phone,
00:53:19
◼
►
on my laptop I've always used full disk encryption,
00:53:23
◼
►
using FileVault, I use full disk encryption,
00:53:25
◼
►
and I have the passcode required on every wake up
00:53:28
◼
►
and a pretty aggressive sleep timeout.
00:53:31
◼
►
And the reason why is because I don't sleep
00:53:32
◼
►
and wake my laptop that much.
00:53:34
◼
►
Like it's not like a phone where you might sleep
00:53:36
◼
►
and wake it 30 to 50 times in a day, at least.
00:53:39
◼
►
I don't even, probably more than that.
00:53:40
◼
►
That's because you don't work in a public office.
00:53:42
◼
►
Like every time anyone walks away from their desk at work,
00:53:45
◼
►
you lock your screen.
00:53:46
◼
►
Not just because it's work policy,
00:53:47
◼
►
but because if you don't, your coworkers will send emails
00:53:50
◼
►
that say you forgot to lock your computer
00:53:51
◼
►
and do other terrible things to your computer.
00:53:52
◼
►
- Right, they'll go to your wallpaper.
00:53:54
◼
►
But still, I mean, how often do you get up
00:53:56
◼
►
from your desk at work?
00:53:57
◼
►
Like how many times per day,
00:53:59
◼
►
compared to how often you unlock a phone?
00:54:01
◼
►
- I'm thinking about all the other things too.
00:54:02
◼
►
Like how many times do we go to a web forum
00:54:04
◼
►
when we want it to autofill?
00:54:05
◼
►
I mean, I guess they kind of autofill automatically,
00:54:07
◼
►
the extra bit of security of having a fingerprint thing to autofill stuff versus like, "Oh
00:54:12
◼
►
God, if someone gets to my unlocked computer, they can log in as me at Gmail because I don't
00:54:17
◼
►
use two-factor auth or something because my browser will just autofill it."
00:54:23
◼
►
This is, again, a case where you're adding security where none existed before because
00:54:27
◼
►
now if you get to someone's unlocked Mac and they save their passwords, you can just go
00:54:31
◼
►
to the webpage, it will autofill, and you will just log right in as them and have access
00:54:35
◼
►
to all their stuff.
00:54:36
◼
►
So we all love Keychain and we love the convenience of like one password or whatever, remembering
00:54:40
◼
►
our passwords, but having it be so easy for someone to get access to all your passwords
00:54:45
◼
►
just because they have access to your unlocked Mac is not good for any kind of security sensitive
00:54:51
◼
►
If it could be as simple as putting your fingers on something and hey, when you're using a
00:54:54
◼
►
Mac, your fingers are already on the keyboard and there's lots of keys there, like it seems
00:54:58
◼
►
like a natural fit.
00:54:59
◼
►
But eventually, I mean, it's like 3G.
00:55:01
◼
►
Like it's got to happen eventually.
00:55:04
◼
►
"Some Mac laptop has to have cellular wireless in it."
00:55:09
◼
►
Maybe not this year, maybe not next year, but eventually it has to.
00:55:12
◼
►
Soon it becomes so cheap that kids toys have it in them.
00:55:16
◼
►
It just has to happen.
00:55:17
◼
►
So if this fingerprint stuff continues to be useful and nothing better replaces it,
00:55:24
◼
►
it'll be in Macs eventually and we'll use it for all the things that we currently use
00:55:27
◼
►
passwords for.
00:55:28
◼
►
And we'll like it.
00:55:31
◼
►
Somebody actually pointed out to me on Twitter a while back that perhaps if there is a touch
00:55:35
◼
►
ID in the portables, perhaps it would be under the touchpad.
00:55:41
◼
►
So the whole touchpad would be one big sensor, which I thought was interesting.
00:55:45
◼
►
That sounds like, it sounds unrealistic though because the sensor in the phone is super high
00:55:50
◼
►
resolution and to make one that large at the size of these giant touchpads that are on
00:55:56
◼
►
the modern Mac laptops, that's probably cost prohibitive.
00:56:00
◼
►
Putting it in a key cap is certainly the easier one with current tech, but it depends on how
00:56:04
◼
►
many years out in the future you go, because things just get cheaper, cheaper and cheaper,
00:56:07
◼
►
and eventually maybe putting it in the whole trackpad isn't as crazy as it is today, you
00:56:13
◼
►
Now, it occurred to me just a moment ago that this is our last show before the October 22nd
00:56:19
◼
►
event, so I feel like it would be remiss of me not to ask you to any other thoughts on
00:56:24
◼
►
what will be announced.
00:56:25
◼
►
I'll start with myself.
00:56:27
◼
►
I didn't think that there would be a Retina iPad Mini until the last week or so.
00:56:32
◼
►
I'm starting to lean toward there being one.
00:56:35
◼
►
And so I'll go on record and saying I think that there will be a Retina iPad Mini.
00:56:40
◼
►
And I also was just thinking to myself, if there isn't a Retina iPad Mini, I kind of
00:56:45
◼
►
wonder if we'll get iPad Mini in colors a la the iPhone 5C.
00:56:53
◼
►
So you know, "Hey, we didn't give you the Retina you always wanted, but we've got
00:56:57
◼
►
these sweet colors and so that would be kind of your the second the next best thing.
00:57:04
◼
►
But in terms of everything else I mean I suspect and hope I really hope we see updates to the
00:57:11
◼
►
What is it Haswell that we're waiting on is that right?
00:57:15
◼
►
I would hope that we'll see that I think we'll get in for more information about the Mac Pro
00:57:18
◼
►
I obviously will get more information about Mavericks but I'm going for yes on the Retina
00:57:24
◼
►
Marco how about you?
00:57:26
◼
►
I'm going to modify your prediction of the iPad mini slightly. First of all, I think
00:57:34
◼
►
it's pretty clear that we've seen parts leaks, not to the level that we see before a phone
00:57:38
◼
►
launch, but I think we've seen enough parts leaks that it looks pretty clear that they're
00:57:43
◼
►
not doing plastic, that the case for the mini looks pretty much the same as the old one
00:57:48
◼
►
but a little bit thicker, which pretty much suggests retina.
00:57:51
◼
►
My guess is we see a retina mini, but they keep the old one around at a cheaper price,
00:57:56
◼
►
and the retina price goes up because right now they have the iPad Mini at $329.
00:58:02
◼
►
And right now that's the current price?
00:58:04
◼
►
I believe that's right.
00:58:05
◼
►
So that is cheap enough that they sold a butt ton of them this year, but everyone's still
00:58:12
◼
►
undercutting the crap out of them.
00:58:14
◼
►
And Apple's not going to try to match the Kindle Fire crap box price, but they can at
00:58:20
◼
►
least try to reduce the gap, just like they did by releasing the Mini in the first place.
00:58:25
◼
►
So I'm guessing the old Mini sticks around for another year,
00:58:29
◼
►
the same way they used to do with phones,
00:58:31
◼
►
and still kind of do.
00:58:32
◼
►
So I'm guessing the old Mini sticks around
00:58:34
◼
►
at a little bit less.
00:58:36
◼
►
Maybe it becomes $300 instead of $330, you know?
00:58:40
◼
►
Or maybe even like $279, something like that.
00:58:43
◼
►
But not like a massive jump, not $200 bucks, but less.
00:58:48
◼
►
And then the Retina comes in at a higher price.
00:58:52
◼
►
Basically I'm agreeing with R. Jonesy in the chatroom.
00:58:55
◼
►
I'm saying non-retina goes down to 300-ish, retina goes up to about 400-ish, because I
00:59:03
◼
►
think they're going to need a little bit more margin to pull that off well.
00:59:06
◼
►
Obviously you can look and you can see the newest big Kindle Fires and the newer Nexus
00:59:13
◼
►
Yeah, the Nexus 7.
00:59:14
◼
►
You can look at some of these other cheap tablets that have very high res screens.
00:59:21
◼
►
very high-risk screens, rather.
00:59:22
◼
►
You can look at those, and they're able to cram in
00:59:26
◼
►
those high-density screens into these cheap price points.
00:59:28
◼
►
So obviously, it's possible to do that,
00:59:32
◼
►
but Apple tends to build in better cases,
00:59:34
◼
►
better screen types, better angles and color
00:59:37
◼
►
and stuff like that, and then they usually have
00:59:39
◼
►
a more powerful GPU, and so there's all these things.
00:59:43
◼
►
So I'm guessing Apple can't comfortably do
00:59:48
◼
►
good Retina Mini at $329 this year.
00:59:52
◼
►
So they're instead going to split it and go lower for the non-Retina and higher for
00:59:57
◼
►
I'm guessing the Retina will also have the A6X, as I said a few minutes ago, and not
01:00:01
◼
►
the A7, primarily for cost concerns.
01:00:05
◼
►
And then the iPad 5 is going to be a little bit smaller and really fast and probably have
01:00:09
◼
►
the A7X, but who cares because it's too big.
01:00:12
◼
►
All right, John?
01:00:14
◼
►
Yeah, I'm kind of upset about the smaller frame around the iPad, whatever number it's
01:00:20
◼
►
up to now, the big one.
01:00:21
◼
►
Because I like the big one, I like the bigger screen, I don't like the mini.
01:00:24
◼
►
And one of the things I don't like about the mini is the edges are so small, like they
01:00:27
◼
►
want you to hold it not by the frame, but rather like around the back of it.
01:00:32
◼
►
And so the shrinking, you know, if all the parts leaks are to be believed in, I do believe
01:00:35
◼
►
them, they're shrinking the frame around the iPad 5.
01:00:39
◼
►
Which is kind of a shame.
01:00:40
◼
►
It's still big, I guess I'll have to try it out, but anyway, that's the iPad that I'll
01:00:43
◼
►
want someday or something like that to replace my iPad 3. Although my iPad 3 does feel like
01:00:48
◼
►
it weighs a ton, but it's still pretty solid for me. It stutters a little on iOS 7, I finally
01:00:53
◼
►
did upgrade it. But yeah, I'm looking forward to the big iPad. The Mini has to be Retina
01:01:00
◼
►
this year, it just has to be. And if it's not, they will get slammed in the press and
01:01:03
◼
►
they will deserve it. Because fine, you've launched on Retina, you gotta do what you
01:01:07
◼
►
gotta do, you gotta protect your margins, it wasn't that big a deal. Now everybody has
01:01:11
◼
►
has a retina little tablet.
01:01:12
◼
►
And like what Marco said is true,
01:01:13
◼
►
maybe they're using cheaper displays or whatever,
01:01:15
◼
►
but some of them are not that bad.
01:01:17
◼
►
I've seen a lot of these 7-inch tablets.
01:01:19
◼
►
They do not look like crap displays.
01:01:20
◼
►
It's not like they're shipping with those crazy pen tile
01:01:22
◼
►
things that don't even have real RGB pixels.
01:01:24
◼
►
Some of these screens--
01:01:25
◼
►
I think some of them are.
01:01:27
◼
►
Some of them are, but the name brand good 7-inch Android
01:01:32
◼
►
or Kindle tablets, they're like $200 bucks and they're retina.
01:01:36
◼
►
And they're not bad products.
01:01:37
◼
►
Yes, they have wimpier GPUs and maybe slower CPUs,
01:01:40
◼
►
and they don't use the app, but absolutely positively,
01:01:43
◼
►
Apple must ship a Retina Mini.
01:01:46
◼
►
Whether they keep around the old one--
01:01:48
◼
►
Apple is running this experiment with the iPad 2,
01:01:50
◼
►
where they wanted to figure out, do people
01:01:54
◼
►
keep buying the iPad 2 because it's cheap
01:01:56
◼
►
or because it's big?
01:01:56
◼
►
And so then they made a small one that was also cheap.
01:01:59
◼
►
And so it's like, OK, now you have the choice.
01:02:01
◼
►
You have the cheap big one and the cheap small one.
01:02:03
◼
►
Now, presumably, Apple has enough data to know whether
01:02:07
◼
►
or not they should include the, you know, keep around the non-retina mini. I just don't
01:02:13
◼
►
know what the answer to that question is. They know because they can look at their sales
01:02:15
◼
►
figures because now they've run the experiment, they're sort of controlling for the variables.
01:02:19
◼
►
They have, you know, two non-retina devices, one big one small, both cheaper than everything
01:02:23
◼
►
else, which one is selling more, what do people say about why they buy it or whatever. So
01:02:30
◼
►
I would not be surprised if they didn't keep around the old one because I think the result
01:02:33
◼
►
the experiment. My guess is that people want it at a cheaper price, not so much the bigger size,
01:02:38
◼
►
but only Apple knows for sure, so we'll see. For the MacBook Pros,
01:02:42
◼
►
I'm assuming they're going to be announced. I haven't paid enough attention to Intel's timelines.
01:02:48
◼
►
Again, we talked about it in previous shows. The thing I'm really looking for is,
01:02:52
◼
►
we're talking about the retina MacBook Pros, because obviously the other line has already
01:02:58
◼
►
already been updated this year. Will it have a discrete GPU at all in any of the model
01:03:03
◼
►
choices or will it be the Irish Pro graphics up and down the line? Because as we said before,
01:03:09
◼
►
Apple could say no discrete GPU in any of the MacBook Pros and spin it with some marketing
01:03:15
◼
►
mumbo jumbo and some graphs that show, "See, it's not really that bad. It's about the same
01:03:19
◼
►
as it was before and look at this extra battery life you get," or whatever. Or will there
01:03:23
◼
►
be a last gasp of the discrete GPU and on either some or all the models, it will still
01:03:27
◼
►
have a screen GPU but you'll use it less and less except for maybe when you're
01:03:31
◼
►
gaming because iris pro is just that good so that's what I'd be looking for
01:03:34
◼
►
there the Mac Pro I would like a price on that but I'm not holding my breath I
01:03:39
◼
►
have no idea what the time it looks like for the Mac Pro again I don't quite
01:03:43
◼
►
understand at this point why they wouldn't announce pricing they have
01:03:47
◼
►
been they've pre announced the product so far in advance anyway why not just
01:03:50
◼
►
tell us how much it's gonna cost surely you know by now there's no part of it
01:03:53
◼
►
that you're waiting for pricing on you have pricing for CPUs from Intel you
01:03:56
◼
►
have all the other parts, all that good stuff.
01:03:59
◼
►
Well, wait a minute.
01:04:00
◼
►
Is Intel's CPU pricing public?
01:04:01
◼
►
Well, I mean, the deals have to be signed by now.
01:04:04
◼
►
Like, barring any unforeseen fabbing difficulties, Apple has to know what their supply costs
01:04:09
◼
►
are for this machine and, you know, pick a price.
01:04:11
◼
►
Well, yeah, but maybe they aren't allowed to reveal the pricing of a thing using this
01:04:16
◼
►
new still kind of unreleased Intel chip yet.
01:04:18
◼
►
Intel doesn't stop Apple from announcing prices of its products.
01:04:21
◼
►
Apple does what it wants.
01:04:23
◼
►
We also haven't seen, as far as I know, the CPUs used in the new Mac Pro, the Xeon
01:04:30
◼
►
E5 V2, I don't think we've seen any of them in the wild anywhere else yet.
01:04:35
◼
►
No one else is selling those CPUs yet.
01:04:37
◼
►
So it's possible Apple's just waiting on Intel to deliver enough of them.
01:04:41
◼
►
Yeah, I'm not talking about shipping.
01:04:43
◼
►
I'm just saying, to have us a price and we'll be on sale later this year or whatever.
01:04:50
◼
►
- And then the displays are linked with the Mac Pro.
01:04:54
◼
►
- Please, please, please.
01:04:55
◼
►
- Yeah, we all want them, but I get a feeling
01:04:58
◼
►
that maybe not this year.
01:04:59
◼
►
- Yeah, I'd give that maybe a 50% chance
01:05:03
◼
►
of being this year.
01:05:04
◼
►
- No matter how much we want,
01:05:05
◼
►
that watching them doesn't make it so,
01:05:06
◼
►
so that's a shame there.
01:05:07
◼
►
Mavericks, I have, I mean, we all know
01:05:10
◼
►
that Apple shipped out the GM.
01:05:11
◼
►
They like to give developers some time
01:05:16
◼
►
to get their applications ready for Mavericks
01:05:18
◼
►
and put them up into the store and stuff like that.
01:05:20
◼
►
How much time?
01:05:21
◼
►
Not that much.
01:05:23
◼
►
I mean, how long do they usually give developers?
01:05:25
◼
►
What, iOS 7 went GM in like two weeks before?
01:05:28
◼
►
Usually you have one week on iOS.
01:05:31
◼
►
Yeah, so it's not outside the realm of possibility
01:05:33
◼
►
that Mavericks, the price is announced, and they say, hey,
01:05:37
◼
►
go to the store after we get off the stage,
01:05:39
◼
►
and you can get it today.
01:05:41
◼
►
I tend to think you're right about that.
01:05:43
◼
►
Something that just occurred to me,
01:05:44
◼
►
I don't think this is going to happen,
01:05:47
◼
►
But is Apple currently selling any iPhone with the dock connector anymore?
01:05:53
◼
►
Yes, the 4S is still for sale.
01:05:57
◼
►
Well, what I was going to say is what if they said, "You know what?
01:06:01
◼
►
The only iPads we're selling are the current gen mini, the next gen mini, the one that's
01:06:08
◼
►
going to be new in a week or less than a week.
01:06:11
◼
►
The iPad 4 is now the cheap big iPad, the iPad 5 obviously is the new big iPad.
01:06:21
◼
►
So if it wasn't for the 4S, which already ruins my argument, I was going to say, "Hey,
01:06:25
◼
►
look, we're all off the dock connector.
01:06:27
◼
►
The dock connector is gone."
01:06:28
◼
►
And then what if they did the same thing with, "Hey, we're doing a new iMac with the either
01:06:32
◼
►
4K or Retina display."
01:06:34
◼
►
Obviously with that comes the Thunderbolt display upgrade, which is now Retina.
01:06:38
◼
►
"Oh, and by the way, there's a Retina MacBook Air, and we've already got Retina MacBook Pros."
01:06:42
◼
►
Look, everything is Retina, and everything is on the Lightning connector, and everyone is happy.
01:06:45
◼
►
I don't think that'll happen, but it would be a neat storyline for the event.
01:06:50
◼
►
That's next year. By the end of next year is your only chance of getting...
01:06:54
◼
►
Because getting a Retina into the Air is difficult from a battery perspective,
01:06:57
◼
►
and the iMac is difficult from a cost perspective. Marco and I just want it for the Pro,
01:07:02
◼
►
I mean, crying out loud, for the bazillion dollar top-end device, can you get a Retina?
01:07:06
◼
►
because it can drive them. Apple said it can drive the displays. And if Apple doesn't offer
01:07:12
◼
►
the displays, what are we going to do? Buy a retina display elsewhere?
01:07:15
◼
►
What do you think of that rumor? Do you see that rumor about the
01:07:18
◼
►
potential 12-inch retina MacBook Air? You see that came out?
01:07:23
◼
►
I did not see that rumor. I did. I don't understand why that would be useful.
01:07:27
◼
►
Well, I think it's interesting. So, John, basically, we'll have to find a link to it.
01:07:32
◼
►
The rumor is that--it came out this week--the rumor is that they're working on a 12-inch
01:07:37
◼
►
Retina Air that would potentially replace the existing Air lineup with just the one
01:07:43
◼
►
model of the 12-inch.
01:07:44
◼
►
And it would be substantially smaller and thinner than the current Retina lineup, which
01:07:50
◼
►
is pretty impressive.
01:07:52
◼
►
And apparently it's like even redefining portability even further than the original Air did.
01:07:59
◼
►
Something like that.
01:08:00
◼
►
So here's the link in the chat.
01:08:01
◼
►
you to Dejonator.
01:08:06
◼
►
It says mid-2014.
01:08:07
◼
►
Oh yeah, I'm not saying right now, I'm just talking in general that this rumor exists.
01:08:12
◼
►
I think, first of all, this is just an analyst predicting this.
01:08:16
◼
►
Oh, did I tell you I'm an analyst now?
01:08:18
◼
►
I changed myself on Twitter.
01:08:20
◼
►
So obviously this is really more of speculation in all likelihood than an actual tip, and
01:08:30
◼
►
And certainly it's pretty far from credible or likely,
01:08:33
◼
►
given the sourcing.
01:08:34
◼
►
But I think it's an interesting thing to consider.
01:08:39
◼
►
And if they did it, I think it would be really cool.
01:08:42
◼
►
- It makes sense from a segmentation perspective,
01:08:44
◼
►
and I see this at work as people are getting newer laptops.
01:08:47
◼
►
When I see someone with like a 13-inch Retina MacBook Pro,
01:08:50
◼
►
that, if you had showed me that before the Air existed,
01:08:53
◼
►
I would be like, oh, that must be the new MacBook Air.
01:08:55
◼
►
Because like the Pros, now that the opticals are gone
01:08:58
◼
►
and the spinning discs are gone,
01:08:59
◼
►
Like they're getting thinner and smaller.
01:09:00
◼
►
So you need some way to further differentiate the Air
01:09:04
◼
►
because the 13-inch Pro is like creeping up
01:09:07
◼
►
on Air territory.
01:09:08
◼
►
Like if you had an original MacBook Air
01:09:11
◼
►
and the current Retina 13-inch Pro,
01:09:13
◼
►
13-inch Pro is bigger, it's thicker,
01:09:15
◼
►
but not that much bigger and not that much thicker.
01:09:17
◼
►
Like yeah, it doesn't taper or anything,
01:09:19
◼
►
but they're both pretty darn portable.
01:09:20
◼
►
So if you want the Air to continue to have the reputation
01:09:23
◼
►
of the super light thing, it makes perfect sense to say,
01:09:26
◼
►
okay, we're seeding the 13-inch realm to the MacBook Pro
01:09:28
◼
►
because it's not as thin as a 13-inch air would be,
01:09:32
◼
►
but it's thin.
01:09:33
◼
►
We really want to emphasize super-duper portability.
01:09:35
◼
►
11 inches is a little bit squinty,
01:09:37
◼
►
so maybe 12.5 or something.
01:09:39
◼
►
I don't want to give any credence to these remets either,
01:09:40
◼
►
but consolidating the air line downrange
01:09:44
◼
►
to further emphasize its super-duper portability
01:09:47
◼
►
is a good idea if you continue to have the 13-inch retina,
01:09:50
◼
►
because the 13-inch retina is getting thinner every year.
01:09:53
◼
►
It's a pretty nice machine.
01:09:56
◼
►
And also, this rumor, if it's completely true, which as I said is very unlikely, but if it's
01:10:01
◼
►
completely true, that they would actually replace both 11 and 13 with this one super
01:10:09
◼
►
That could be interesting, because right now, the 11 and 13 are very different sizes.
01:10:14
◼
►
You wouldn't think so if you just look at a picture head on, but in practice, there's
01:10:19
◼
►
a substantial gap between them.
01:10:22
◼
►
And the 13 is very thin, but not that small.
01:10:27
◼
►
And the 11 is really small, but you can't fit anything
01:10:30
◼
►
on that screen.
01:10:32
◼
►
It is impossible to fit or see anything on that screen.
01:10:35
◼
►
And so to have something that's a little bit bigger
01:10:38
◼
►
than the 11, but not as big as 13,
01:10:40
◼
►
I think really could be better than both of them.
01:10:43
◼
►
The other thing you can do is the traditional thing
01:10:45
◼
►
of reducing the spacing around the elements.
01:10:48
◼
►
There's a crash protection issue there as well,
01:10:50
◼
►
But that's the easy way to shrink the 13 without actually shrinking the screen size.
01:10:56
◼
►
They have a lot of options with the Airs, but in terms of retina, it's always been
01:11:00
◼
►
The thicker case on the Mini rumors, the same thing happened with the iPad, the iPad 3 got
01:11:05
◼
►
thicker too.
01:11:06
◼
►
You just need more battery for that retina display.
01:11:08
◼
►
And that's why they'd have to do this new design.
01:11:11
◼
►
I think it says in here that it's shaped more like the Retinome Epic Pro where it's
01:11:16
◼
►
not wedge-shaped anymore.
01:11:18
◼
►
It's square, it's flat.
01:11:20
◼
►
The problem with the 11-inch Air,
01:11:24
◼
►
until the most recent ones with Haswell,
01:11:25
◼
►
I think it's improved substantially,
01:11:27
◼
►
but the 11-inch Air, in addition to having
01:11:29
◼
►
a really tiny screen, also just has
01:11:31
◼
►
a substantially smaller battery than the 13,
01:11:34
◼
►
just because there's no room to put one.
01:11:36
◼
►
- Yeah, it's crappy battery life, too.
01:11:38
◼
►
- Exactly, and so if they made it not tapered,
01:11:42
◼
►
if they just made the whole thing a uniform thickness,
01:11:44
◼
►
that would give tons more space up front
01:11:47
◼
►
the under the wrist rest to put a nice big thick battery pack.
01:11:50
◼
►
Yeah, the taper is a conceit that you can afford maybe when you're making a design statement,
01:11:56
◼
►
but as the years pass it's like, remind me again why it gets thinner on one end,
01:11:59
◼
►
because it's not actually all that thick at the other end either, and we're sacrificing
01:12:04
◼
►
a whole big wedge of lithium-ion battery space that we could have,
01:12:07
◼
►
especially when it's sitting there on a desk in front of you, you don't really care that it's
01:12:12
◼
►
thinner on the front than it is at the back. It looks cool when it's closed, but when you're
01:12:15
◼
►
carrying it.
01:12:16
◼
►
Like, yeah, it's a difficult tradeoff, especially with the 11-inch, which just feels like you
01:12:21
◼
►
would think the 11-inch is going to have, "Whoa, this is such amazing battery life because
01:12:24
◼
►
it's so small and light."
01:12:25
◼
►
But no, it's got the same class of CPU as in the 13, and it eats up just as much battery.
01:12:31
◼
►
I mean, smaller screen, but, you know.
01:12:34
◼
►
Like a layperson might think that the 11-inch would have better battery life than the 13,
01:12:38
◼
►
but it does not.
01:12:39
◼
►
And it can't with the current technology they have in there.
01:12:41
◼
►
So need more battery.
01:12:43
◼
►
Send battery.
01:12:44
◼
►
While we're on the subject, we never got a chance to talk about the rumors about the
01:12:49
◼
►
A7 potentially being brought to the Mac. That's why it's going 64-bit and the potential for
01:12:56
◼
►
ARM-based Mac laptops in the future. One of the reasons why I didn't think that really
01:13:03
◼
►
held a lot of water is because the CPU design doesn't actually have that massive of an impact
01:13:11
◼
►
on the overall battery life, that that would really,
01:13:14
◼
►
you know, you're not gonna have like,
01:13:15
◼
►
you're not gonna go to an ARM CPU
01:13:17
◼
►
and have the laptop last a month.
01:13:19
◼
►
Like it's not that, like you still have the screen,
01:13:22
◼
►
the RAM, the disks, like everything else
01:13:24
◼
►
that you have to power,
01:13:25
◼
►
and the screen being a pretty big one.
01:13:27
◼
►
And so, I don't, you know, now that we see
01:13:31
◼
►
as Intel's upping their game, and you know,
01:13:33
◼
►
with Haswell doing not only a big CPU power reduction,
01:13:37
◼
►
but also like a lot of other components on the motherboard
01:13:40
◼
►
being more smart about their power usage. I don't really think there's that much
01:13:44
◼
►
of a need to make the CPU dramatically lower powered in a laptop to the point where it
01:13:50
◼
►
would be worth an architecture switch that would be disruptive. And by the way, a switch
01:13:54
◼
►
to a slower architecture, which would make emulation difficult to do well, unlike every
01:14:00
◼
►
other architecture switch they've done. So I don't really see it happening, and
01:14:05
◼
►
I don't really see what it would gain that would be totally worth it. I mean, if you
01:14:09
◼
►
already have eight or 12 hours of battery life on a laptop using a fast CPU, how much
01:14:18
◼
►
demand really would there be for that? Well, we did talk about this before, right,
01:14:22
◼
►
Casey? I'm not crazy for misremembering this. I thought we did as well.
01:14:26
◼
►
I talked about Bay Trail and how Intel is getting in on ARM's area of super low power CPUs and how
01:14:34
◼
►
they're kind of meeting in the middle. It's just a question of, as they meet in the middle,
01:14:37
◼
►
who ends up coming out the victor.
01:14:39
◼
►
Two things on that.
01:14:41
◼
►
First, the CPU isn't always using the most power in the system,
01:14:46
◼
►
but it has the highest dynamic range of any component in the system,
01:14:49
◼
►
because when you really burn, especially with big multi-core things,
01:14:51
◼
►
when you're really burning up and using every ounce of the CPU,
01:14:54
◼
►
it uses a tremendous amount of power, way more than the screen,
01:14:57
◼
►
way more than an SSD, way more than the RAM.
01:15:00
◼
►
And so that's why it's a problem.
01:15:03
◼
►
Not that it's always going like that unless you're playing a game or something,
01:15:05
◼
►
or something, but when it does, it has the potential to really suck down your battery.
01:15:08
◼
►
I mean, what is it like that? I think the current has well in the air or whatever, its
01:15:12
◼
►
max power dissipation is like 25 watts, and like, the battery is like 54 watt hours or
01:15:19
◼
►
something. So you are not getting 12 hours of battery life out of your MacBook Air if
01:15:24
◼
►
you are running that CPU at max power all the time. And the second thing is that you're
01:15:30
◼
►
not looking for an ARM CPU so much as you're looking for an ARM system on a chip. And that's
01:15:35
◼
►
That's why the Haswell MacBook Airs and everything have such great power.
01:15:38
◼
►
It's not just because they're better power management in the CPU part, but because they
01:15:42
◼
►
move more crap onto the CPU die or package.
01:15:46
◼
►
So the GPU goes onto that, no more discrete GPU, and the, what is it, the PCH thing?
01:15:51
◼
►
Moving more components into the chip, that's why you can have the A7 system on a chip.
01:15:55
◼
►
It's not just the CPU, it's the entire system on a little chip.
01:15:58
◼
►
And yeah, there's a big gap between where Haswell is and the A7 system on a chip, but
01:16:01
◼
►
again, they're meeting in the middle.
01:16:03
◼
►
So as time goes on, more and more components are going to get shoved into whatever the
01:16:10
◼
►
chip is that is, you know, we call the CPU in the Mac, but really will eventually become
01:16:14
◼
►
a system on a chip.
01:16:15
◼
►
And the same thing with the phones and everything.
01:16:18
◼
►
Chip consolidation will happen.
01:16:19
◼
►
It's just a question of when it happens and where it happens first.
01:16:23
◼
►
So if you were to stick an A7 to a Mac laptop, you'd get a big advantage because the max
01:16:28
◼
►
power dissipation of the A7 is way lower than the max power dissipation of a Haswell, and
01:16:32
◼
►
The chip is slower and everything too.
01:16:35
◼
►
And so you say, well, 12 hours seems like it's plenty, right?
01:16:39
◼
►
Well, if it was 24 hours, does that change the equation?
01:16:41
◼
►
If it's 48 hours, does that change the equation?
01:16:43
◼
►
At a certain point, it's a discontinuity
01:16:46
◼
►
where it changes the nature of the way you work with things.
01:16:49
◼
►
We're not even at that point with phones.
01:16:51
◼
►
Everyone plugs in their phone at night
01:16:52
◼
►
now because the odds of you going two days
01:16:54
◼
►
without charging your phone-- you just feel like, well,
01:16:57
◼
►
just in case, I'd better plug it in every single night.
01:16:59
◼
►
Even if you barely use it, it's just a good idea.
01:17:01
◼
►
We're not at the point where you just use your phone
01:17:03
◼
►
and charge it every week or whatever,
01:17:05
◼
►
or every two days or every three days.
01:17:06
◼
►
Laptops are the same way.
01:17:08
◼
►
If you use it all day on battery,
01:17:10
◼
►
you're gonna have to plug it in at night.
01:17:13
◼
►
If they can cross that next hurdle,
01:17:15
◼
►
as the phones get better and as computers get better,
01:17:17
◼
►
if they can cross that next hurdle,
01:17:18
◼
►
it's worth it for them to do it.
01:17:19
◼
►
But like Marco said, you have to weigh that
01:17:21
◼
►
against the architecture change in a lot of stuff,
01:17:24
◼
►
and Intel's not standing still.
01:17:25
◼
►
So we should be watching both of these things,
01:17:28
◼
►
watching how much better phone battery life gets,
01:17:30
◼
►
how much more they can ring out of those little system on a chip things.
01:17:34
◼
►
And then also watch Intel and how much better are they getting at making low-powered chips
01:17:38
◼
►
because by the time an ARM-powered system on the chip is powerful enough to not be embarrassing
01:17:44
◼
►
inside a Mac, I suspect Intel will also be at that same price in PowerPoint and it'll,
01:17:50
◼
►
you know, be more of a fair fight between the two.
01:17:53
◼
►
Well, not that fair because Intel will say, "Hey, everything you have is already compiled
01:17:57
◼
►
And like I said in the show where we talked about Bay Trail, Intel's going to be saying
01:18:00
◼
►
to Apple, don't put ARM CPUs in your Macs, put Intel CPUs in your iOS devices, then you'll
01:18:04
◼
►
have one architecture across all your products and it will be great and we'll make tons of
01:18:07
◼
►
money come with us. So that's Intel's end game plan. We'll see how it works out.
01:18:12
◼
►
We'll also consider that of all the people that I know that use Macs, and almost every
01:18:18
◼
►
single one that isn't an indie Mac developer that isn't Marco or equivalent, every single
01:18:23
◼
►
one of them runs either Parallels or VMware on a regular basis to do either their jobs
01:18:28
◼
►
or something they absolutely have to do in their personal lives.
01:18:32
◼
►
And that's made a lot easier, and I think one of you alluded to this earlier, that job
01:18:36
◼
►
is made a lot easier because everything is Intel.
01:18:38
◼
►
The chip is Intel, Windows is Intel, OS X is Intel, everything is Intel.
01:18:43
◼
►
And if the chip suddenly became ARM, then you'd be going back to the god-awful PowerPC
01:18:49
◼
►
days when, wasn't there a time where you would put like a full PC motherboard, not physically
01:18:54
◼
►
full, but like all the bits with PC motherboard, like an expansion slot in order to make a
01:18:58
◼
►
virtualization possible. I don't want to have anything to do with that.
01:19:01
◼
►
That did exist.
01:19:03
◼
►
I don't think you have to worry about that in the days when even the Mac Pro has no internal
01:19:06
◼
►
slots anymore. That's not coming back.
01:19:08
◼
►
You have a Thunderbolt PC.
01:19:10
◼
►
Right. But you know what I mean. You know what I'm driving at. It's just that if you
01:19:14
◼
►
change the processor architecture, that could make getting a Mac a lot harder an argument
01:19:19
◼
►
for a lot of people, myself included. I mean, I work on Microsoft stuff all day. And I basically
01:19:24
◼
►
live in VMware Fusion most of my workday. So that would really shut the door on that,
01:19:29
◼
►
or maybe not shut the door on it, but make it a lot uglier.
01:19:35
◼
►
Both sides of that have big pluses and big minuses, and they're on a collision course.
01:19:40
◼
►
Just sit back and watch. Yeah. All right, we good?
01:19:44
◼
►
Let's wrap it up. Thanks a lot to our two sponsors this week, Squarespace and Transporter,
01:19:50
◼
►
we will see you next week.
01:19:57
◼
►
leaving me to begin.
01:19:59
◼
►
'Cause it was accidental.
01:20:01
◼
►
(Accidental)
01:20:02
◼
►
Oh, it was accidental.
01:20:03
◼
►
(Accidental)
01:20:04
◼
►
John didn't do any research.
01:20:06
◼
►
Marco and Casey wouldn't let him.
01:20:09
◼
►
'Cause it was accidental.
01:20:11
◼
►
(Accidental)
01:20:12
◼
►
Oh, it was accidental.
01:20:13
◼
►
(Accidental)
01:20:14
◼
►
And you can find the show notes at ATP.fm.
01:20:20
◼
►
And if you're into Twitter,
01:20:23
◼
►
You can follow them at C-A-S-E-Y-L-I-S-S
01:20:29
◼
►
So that's K-C-LIS-M-A-R-C-O-A-R-M
01:20:33
◼
►
Anti-Marco-Arment
01:20:38
◼
►
USA-Syracusa
01:20:41
◼
►
It's accidental
01:20:44
◼
►
They didn't mean to
01:20:49
◼
►
Tech, by Catholic, so long
01:20:54
◼
►
Alright, do you want to do titles? I really like, "Syracusa County Mall."
01:20:57
◼
►
That is pretty good, actually. No, "Syracusa County" titles, come on. I will allow a veto, but I do also agree that that is really good.
01:21:05
◼
►
That was my suggestion. You have to find a better one to override it.
01:21:10
◼
►
Irish pro graphics.
01:21:13
◼
►
When did you say that? "Iris." It's me mumbling the word "Iris" like it is in your eye, the colored part of your eye.
01:21:19
◼
►
Accidental Fashion Podcast. I don't think that should be the winner, but that is kind of funny.
01:21:23
◼
►
It is pretty good. No one has been trying to correct us on using false positive instead of false negative or whatever
01:21:29
◼
►
I almost corrected you and then I was like, I'm crazy and I'm missing something. I
01:21:33
◼
►
Kind of like sea level executives with the sea spelled wrong - what is it with you with the stupid?
01:21:38
◼
►
I don't know. I'm on a D. Sheehy everyone I pick it's been his suggestion. He's on a roll today. We're gonna tell you he's I
01:21:44
◼
►
Like his suggestions this week sea level executives look good. It makes me think of like the the sea lion
01:21:50
◼
►
Slide from WOTC. It's the big sea lion executive.
01:21:55
◼
►
Yeah, I might just do shoulder surfing or the pulling the rug out one.
01:21:58
◼
►
That's fine.
01:22:01
◼
►
Or sea level executives.
01:22:02
◼
►
I'm not doing that one.
01:22:04
◼
►
What is wrong with you, John?
01:22:06
◼
►
Because they're like, they're like at sea level. You get it? They're not up on a mountain.
01:22:10
◼
►
They're not in Death Valley.
01:22:11
◼
►
Sea level executives.