PodSearch

ATP

592: I Think He Won the Game

 

00:00:00   I have found a great use for the Vision Pro.

00:00:04   - This is gonna be good.

00:00:06   I don't think I even knew you had yours back,

00:00:07   or do you not?

00:00:09   - I have, I've had it back.

00:00:10   It has been in its little marshmallow pod for, you know,

00:00:13   a month or two at least, since the last time I used it.

00:00:17   - I thought you had loaned it to somebody, that's why.

00:00:18   - I did, yeah, I loaned it to a friend for like,

00:00:20   two or three weeks earlier in the spring.

00:00:22   - I gotcha.

00:00:23   - But, you know, I've had it back now for a while.

00:00:25   It took me a while to like, you know,

00:00:26   actually motivate myself to, you know,

00:00:28   actually reset it back up as me, and you know,

00:00:31   charge it, update, and all that stuff.

00:00:33   Because like, you know, every time that you put it on,

00:00:36   and it's either discharged, or it needs a software update,

00:00:39   that's an excuse for you, or that's kind of a requirement

00:00:41   for you to like, all right, let me take it off,

00:00:42   I'll let it do its thing, and I'll come back to it.

00:00:45   And I never come back to it.

00:00:47   This last few days, I have been strictly constrained

00:00:52   to lying on the couch, because I got a vasectomy.

00:00:57   It doesn't really matter for everyone to know this,

00:00:59   but it's minor surgery, and more men in this country

00:01:01   should do our part for birth control,

00:01:04   since especially women's options are being needlessly

00:01:08   and horribly limited.

00:01:09   So anyway, it's no big deal.

00:01:11   I've been laid up on the couch for a few days,

00:01:13   and I was told, you know, don't do anything.

00:01:15   Like, don't sit at a desk, don't walk around,

00:01:17   like, don't lift heavy things, don't do anything.

00:01:20   And honestly, really, men out there,

00:01:22   it really isn't that bad.

00:01:23   If you're on the fence, just do it.

00:01:25   I was scared, and it was fine, and it's totally fine.

00:01:28   Anyway, I had to lay on the couch for a couple days,

00:01:31   and I am really bad at doing nothing.

00:01:34   Like, I just wanna get up and do, I wanna work,

00:01:36   I wanna do stuff around the house, I wanna walk the dog,

00:01:38   like, there's a million things I wanna be doing.

00:01:40   But I had to lay on the couch.

00:01:41   And when you're lying on the couch,

00:01:43   it's really not that comfortable to use a laptop,

00:01:46   you know, when you're really lying down.

00:01:47   It's also, you know, in a situation like this,

00:01:49   you might not necessarily want to be putting things

00:01:52   in your lap.

00:01:54   - Like some frozen peas.

00:01:55   - Right, yes, and by the way, those work great.

00:01:58   - Noted.

00:02:00   - Way better than the special Amazon underwear

00:02:02   with the ice packs.

00:02:03   I can say a bag of frozen peas works better than that.

00:02:06   - Noted.

00:02:07   - It'll just save you 40 bucks.

00:02:08   Anyway.

00:02:10   - That is true, because I'm supposed to say

00:02:11   I will be following in your footsteps

00:02:13   at the end of the summer.

00:02:14   So this is good advice.

00:02:16   - All right, well, after the apocalypse,

00:02:17   I guess it'll be up to me to repopulate the planet.

00:02:19   - Yep.

00:02:21   It'll be all little Syracuse's, it'll be great.

00:02:23   - Oh my gosh.

00:02:25   - Anyway, this was the perfect use case for the Vision Pro.

00:02:29   I got to lie down on the couch,

00:02:31   and I didn't want to,

00:02:32   if you're lying down on the couch,

00:02:34   in most living room arrangements, including mine,

00:02:36   you can't look directly at the TV.

00:02:38   The TV is off to your side.

00:02:40   - Oh, contraire.

00:02:42   - Yeah, I think I have that moved down,

00:02:43   but anyway, go on.

00:02:44   - Oh, yeah, 'cause you're more diagonal.

00:02:46   Anyway, we have a more standard linear couch to TV layout.

00:02:52   - Easy places to put your speakers.

00:02:53   Yeah, I know how it is.

00:02:54   - Yeah.

00:02:55   (laughing)

00:02:56   Anyway, so I've been watching stuff in the Vision Pro

00:03:01   and kind of messing around with it

00:03:04   as basically lying on the couch,

00:03:05   being able to look straight up

00:03:07   and have a virtual screen projected

00:03:09   straight up above my head.

00:03:11   I've been watching WBC session videos mostly

00:03:13   and stuff like that.

00:03:14   But a long time ago, when Federico Vatici

00:03:18   had to spend a lot of time in hospital beds for a while.

00:03:21   That's when he fell in love with the iPad

00:03:23   because the iPad was easy to use in a hospital bed.

00:03:26   And that was a huge computing win for him.

00:03:30   I can say with confidence that the Vision Pro

00:03:34   is not necessarily as big of a win

00:03:37   for general purpose computing as the iPad is

00:03:41   in that context.

00:03:42   But it does serve an interesting role

00:03:44   in that you can compute while you are lying down

00:03:47   and you can do so while holding nothing in your hands

00:03:51   and barely even moving your hands.

00:03:53   And so there are decent numbers of cases

00:03:55   where that can be very useful to people.

00:03:57   It is a lot harder to get a lot of things done

00:04:00   in the Vision Pro, to be honest.

00:04:01   And there's a lot less software

00:04:02   and a lot of totally missing apps

00:04:04   that you just have no way to run in there.

00:04:05   - Like the iPad.

00:04:07   - But man, it actually was like,

00:04:09   I actually really came to appreciate it

00:04:12   during these two days for that purpose.

00:04:14   - I thought you were gonna say that the person

00:04:16   who did the procedure used the Vision Pro to do it.

00:04:18   - Oh wow. - No.

00:04:19   - I sure would not have appreciated that, no.

00:04:21   - Maybe they did, you don't know.

00:04:23   - That's true, I have no idea.

00:04:24   (laughing)

00:04:26   - Well I'm glad that it took a little minor surgery

00:04:29   to get you on the Vision Pro bandwagon.

00:04:31   Welcome, we're happy to have you.

00:04:33   So all kidding aside, you said you were watching

00:04:38   some developer videos.

00:04:39   Is there anything else that,

00:04:40   or any moments that you've had that you're like,

00:04:42   hey, this is actually pretty great.

00:04:45   - I also did watch the talk show live in there.

00:04:47   It was actually really cool to see it that way.

00:04:50   It worked very well, in fact, Casey,

00:04:52   you can even hear you talking at the very, very end,

00:04:55   like when the lights come, everything's up,

00:04:57   and the lights come up, 'cause you were apparently

00:04:58   sitting right next to the camera rig.

00:04:59   Right at the end, you hear Casey say something

00:05:01   right before the audio cuts out.

00:05:03   - I was sitting right by the camera rig,

00:05:05   'cause it blocked my view of the stage.

00:05:07   - Yeah, well. - It's very upsetting,

00:05:07   but I survived.

00:05:08   - Yeah. - I was like,

00:05:09   if you wanted to see the show from the perspective

00:05:11   of where I sit, that's the 3D thing that they put up.

00:05:15   - Yeah, and I'll tell you what,

00:05:16   so the talk show live, so our friend Adam Lisagor

00:05:19   at Sandwich, and this other company,

00:05:21   I forget the name of it, Spatial something.

00:05:23   - Something Gen maybe?

00:05:25   - Yeah, I think that's it.

00:05:26   They did a live, so Sandwich has a new app called Theater.

00:05:30   It's kind of like the big screen equivalent

00:05:32   of their television app, where you can watch

00:05:34   arbitrary videos inside cool settings,

00:05:38   or in the case of television, inside retro TV sets

00:05:40   in the Vision Pro.

00:05:41   So they made this theater app,

00:05:42   and they did a live broadcast of John Gruber's

00:05:45   the talk show live at WWDC event in stereo video,

00:05:49   so in 3D video.

00:05:51   It's really cool, and first of all,

00:05:54   it's an interesting and remarkable technical achievement

00:05:57   that they were able to do this live event this way

00:05:59   with what appear to be two very small companies,

00:06:02   relatively speaking, while Apple has currently broadcast

00:06:05   zero live events to the Vision Pro.

00:06:08   So as far as I can tell, there have been no other

00:06:11   live events broadcast to the Vision Pro,

00:06:14   and it was really compelling.

00:06:15   And I don't wanna speak for them,

00:06:18   but from what I heard, it sounded like the engagement

00:06:21   numbers were pretty good to my ears.

00:06:23   There really is a cool potential for the Vision Pro

00:06:28   for spatial video broadcast of live, cool events,

00:06:33   and I just hope someone else ever does it,

00:06:36   because that really is a really cool idea.

00:06:41   It worked very, very well.

00:06:44   It turned out great, and I would love to watch

00:06:47   other concerts or productions or other live events this way.

00:06:52   I obviously support people, I know,

00:06:53   we're dying to watch sports this way too.

00:06:55   There is so much potential there,

00:06:57   and so I hope that potential is realized,

00:07:00   because obviously if this one, or these two small companies

00:07:05   who get together and do this, obviously there's nothing

00:07:07   stopping Apple or major sports leagues

00:07:10   or major content providers from doing this themselves,

00:07:13   there's still a long way to go in a lot of the technical

00:07:15   angles of it, but this was literally just like,

00:07:17   this was a fixed camera at a fixed location,

00:07:20   it was like you were sitting in the front row,

00:07:21   and you just saw a fixed viewport, and it was 3D,

00:07:25   and it was, yeah, a little bit low resolution

00:07:27   and a little bit low frame rate, but it looked great,

00:07:29   it looked like you were there.

00:07:30   It was a really cool thing to see,

00:07:31   and so I really hope we see more of this

00:07:33   coming to the Vision Pro.

00:07:34   - Well that's really awesome.

00:07:35   I do plan to at least take a quick watch of it.

00:07:39   John and a few of our friends and I

00:07:42   were all sitting front row because Gruber was kind enough

00:07:44   to leave some reserved seats and whatnot,

00:07:46   and so the view of the camera is basically

00:07:49   what Syracuse and I had seen, we were on either side of it,

00:07:52   but basically what we had seen for the show,

00:07:55   and it was a good show.

00:07:56   It ran long, I was surprised that the Apple execs

00:08:00   were willing to give Gruber two hours.

00:08:02   Not that he's undeserving, just that I feel like typically

00:08:05   they're getting antsy at like 90 minutes,

00:08:07   but it was a full two hours, and it was good.

00:08:09   So yeah, you should definitely check it out.

00:08:10   And they have a rendered or mastered in 4K YouTube version,

00:08:14   like a standard 2D YouTube version,

00:08:16   which I also have not watched yet,

00:08:18   or I mean since I was there, but nevertheless,

00:08:21   if you don't have a Vision Pro,

00:08:22   don't feel like you're entirely missing out,

00:08:23   you can just watch it on YouTube.

00:08:25   - It's also a podcast, there was a podcast version today

00:08:27   as well, and content-wise, I gotta say,

00:08:29   that I really enjoyed this live talk show.

00:08:32   You know, they were interviewing John Giannandrea,

00:08:34   Jaws, and Federighi, and I think it went great

00:08:37   for all three of them, and I think John Gruber

00:08:40   had a really good balance of like questions

00:08:43   to kind of let them flex and show off

00:08:45   and tell us a few more cool details,

00:08:47   but also some hard questions that kind of, you know,

00:08:49   had them have to answer for certain things,

00:08:51   or have to explain certain things.

00:08:52   It was a really good balance of that,

00:08:54   and so I really enjoyed it, highly recommended

00:08:56   for anybody listening to this show.

00:08:58   - You know what else was highly recommended?

00:09:00   Our interview, which we were lucky enough to do,

00:09:03   this is, we're recording this on Friday.

00:09:05   It was Tuesday that we sat down with Holly Borla

00:09:08   and Ben Cohen, both Swift compiler engineers

00:09:12   are in that vicinity. - Core team.

00:09:14   - Yes, with core team, thank you.

00:09:16   It was, I wasn't nervous going into it,

00:09:21   but you know, you don't know how it's gonna go,

00:09:22   and having five people on one show can be challenging,

00:09:26   and I thought that Holly and Ben did a phenomenal job.

00:09:30   I thought it was really great.

00:09:32   They are very willing to get in the weeds,

00:09:35   but they don't jump immediately there.

00:09:37   You know, they're extraordinarily good communicators,

00:09:39   both of them.

00:09:40   It was really, really great, and I had an absolute blast.

00:09:42   I don't wanna speak for you two,

00:09:43   well, maybe I do a little bit,

00:09:44   but I could've gone easily another hour,

00:09:47   probably another two if we had the space and the time,

00:09:49   and I don't know if Holly and Ben would've liked that,

00:09:52   but I would've, it was a lot of fun,

00:09:54   and it was really, really great,

00:09:55   and that is not behind any sort of paywall

00:09:58   or anything like that.

00:09:59   It's just a little bonus episode

00:10:00   that we released a couple of days ago now.

00:10:03   - Yeah, and it's primarily for programmers.

00:10:04   If you're a programmer, we do go heavy into programery stuff.

00:10:08   It helps if you know about Swift, Apple's ecosystem.

00:10:10   We went very deep because we,

00:10:12   to take advantage of the people we got to speak to,

00:10:15   that was the best use of our time,

00:10:16   because if you're talking to experts,

00:10:17   you don't ask them just the basic stuff,

00:10:20   but we have heard from some people who are like,

00:10:21   "Look, I don't develop for Apple's platforms,

00:10:24   "or maybe I'm not even a programmer,"

00:10:25   and they still found it interesting

00:10:26   to get a feel for things,

00:10:27   'cause we did cover stuff at a higher level

00:10:29   as well as getting way down to the nitty-gritty,

00:10:32   so please check it out.

00:10:33   - Yep, yep, it was really, really fun,

00:10:34   and I think you would enjoy it.

00:10:37   All right, this is the customary WWDC, or post-WWDC,

00:10:42   all follow-up, all the time episode,

00:10:44   so unless we somehow absolutely fly through this,

00:10:48   I'm just setting the stage now, this is all follow-up,

00:10:49   but that's okay, we gotta clear the decks

00:10:51   so we can get back to regularly scheduled programming

00:10:54   in the next episode.

00:10:55   So Microsoft has had a bit of a rollercoaster

00:10:58   over the last few days, or last couple of weeks, really,

00:11:01   so on June 7th, there's a Verge article,

00:11:04   "Microsoft Changes Recall," which is their thing

00:11:07   which records your screen and lets you ask questions

00:11:10   of what you saw where.

00:11:12   Anyways, Microsoft changes recall to be opt-in

00:11:15   and improves the security from The Verge.

00:11:17   - As we predicted, by the way, in the pre-WWDC episode,

00:11:21   that they would have to change it to opt-in,

00:11:23   and we weren't just kidding, it was obvious next move,

00:11:25   and they did it almost immediately

00:11:26   after we released the show.

00:11:27   - Yeah, and that's the right move.

00:11:29   Microsoft says it's making its new recall an opt-in feature

00:11:33   and addressing various security concerns.

00:11:35   Windows and Devices VP, Pavin Davulri,

00:11:38   Davulri, hopefully that's somewhere close,

00:11:42   said, "If you don't proactively choose to turn it on,

00:11:44   "it will be off by default."

00:11:46   They also said, "We are adding additional layers

00:11:48   "of data protection, including just-in-time decryption

00:11:50   "protected by Windows Hello enhanced sign-in security,

00:11:53   "so recall snapshots will only be decrypted and accessible

00:11:56   "when the user authenticates.

00:11:57   "In addition, we encrypted the search index database."

00:11:59   That was June 7.

00:12:01   Fast forward just barely under a week, it's now June 13.

00:12:05   Microsoft delays recall again, won't debut it

00:12:07   with the new co-pilot plus PCs after all.

00:12:10   Reading this time from Ars Technica,

00:12:12   Microsoft will be delaying its controversial recall feature

00:12:15   again, according to an updated blog post

00:12:16   by Windows and Devices VP, Pavin Davulri.

00:12:20   And when the feature does return,

00:12:21   quote in the coming weeks, quote, Pavin writes,

00:12:24   "It will be as a preview available to PCs

00:12:26   "in the Windows Insider program,

00:12:28   "the same public testing and validation pipeline

00:12:29   "that all the other Windows features usually go through

00:12:32   "before being released to the general public."

00:12:34   That was the 13th, so.

00:12:35   - So it went from a flagship feature to a big controversy

00:12:39   to not being opt-in to not shipping at all,

00:12:42   except as a Windows Insider sort of beta preview.

00:12:45   Really, this has soured the whole co-pilot plus PC launch

00:12:49   for like the Snapdragon ARM processor and everything.

00:12:53   It's just, what should have been such a clean win

00:12:56   for them, hey, we have good laptops now,

00:12:59   a software feature.

00:13:00   And I think actually a software feature

00:13:01   with the potential to be a good software feature

00:13:04   is just done so poorly with, you know,

00:13:07   this is what, it's so important to like,

00:13:09   pick the right defaults, to know your audience,

00:13:11   to know how to frame things.

00:13:12   Like the same basic feature could have been released

00:13:16   without all of this, if it had been implemented better,

00:13:19   if it had been off by default,

00:13:20   if it had been like not present

00:13:22   on the enterprise version of Windows.

00:13:24   Like you have to really know who is able, who wants this,

00:13:27   who's willing to give it a chance

00:13:29   and who absolutely does not want this on their computers.

00:13:32   And Microsoft really blew this one.

00:13:35   - Sure seems like it.

00:13:37   All right, so Intel and AMD's co-pilot plus PCs

00:13:41   won't have the co-pilot AI features at launch.

00:13:44   Whoopsie doopsies.

00:13:45   It's reading from the Verge.

00:13:46   "Microsoft's new Windows AI features

00:13:48   "like AutoSuper Resolution for smoother gaming

00:13:50   "aren't exclusive to Qualcomm.

00:13:51   "Intel's Lunar Lake and AMD's StrixPoint chips

00:13:54   "will have enough AI co-processing performance too.

00:13:57   "But when Intel and AMD's new co-pilot plus PCs

00:13:59   "arrived this fall, no one is promising

00:14:01   "they'll ship with all or even any of the new AI features.

00:14:05   "Each of those laptops will require free software updates

00:14:07   "before they get Microsoft's co-pilot plus AI features

00:14:09   "and those updates won't necessarily even arrive

00:14:11   "before the end of 2024."

00:14:12   Microsoft said, "Intel, Lunar Lake and AMD Strix PCs

00:14:16   "are Windows 11 AI PCs that meet our co-pilot

00:14:19   "plus PC hardware requirements.

00:14:21   "We are partnering closely with Intel and AMD

00:14:22   "to deliver co-pilot plus PC experiences

00:14:24   "through free updates when available."

00:14:27   - I mean, this is like also Qualcomm's having problems.

00:14:30   The ARM, the big coming out party for Windows on ARM

00:14:33   with good laptops is not going well.

00:14:35   And Intel and AMD, as we noted on the pre-WWC episode,

00:14:37   they have their own processors that also qualify for this.

00:14:40   And they're not here to rescue anybody

00:14:42   because Microsoft doesn't have the software features

00:14:43   ready for them yet.

00:14:44   It seems like Microsoft was like, this is gonna be,

00:14:47   I mean, I don't know, this is our chance

00:14:49   to make ARM a thing.

00:14:51   You know, we won't even support the Intel and AMD things,

00:14:53   or maybe it was just poor planning,

00:14:54   but this whole launch, I guess it's just a 2025 thing.

00:14:59   And they're hoping we'll just ignore it until then.

00:15:03   I'm very disappointed.

00:15:04   Obviously, I want Windows to go entirely to ARM.

00:15:06   That seems like it's not happening,

00:15:07   but they can't even get the Intel and AMD

00:15:09   versions of these features out.

00:15:11   - You just want it for the games.

00:15:12   - I do, 100%, I do.

00:15:13   - I mean, I think this shows, though,

00:15:15   like a massive architectural change

00:15:18   in all new processors and all new hardware,

00:15:21   it's a big ordeal.

00:15:22   It shows, yeah, Apple was able to do it,

00:15:24   but it took a ton of work, and that's just one company

00:15:29   who could get aligned behind it.

00:15:32   The PC ecosystem does not work that way at all.

00:15:35   You have, I mean, think about the uphill battle

00:15:37   they have here.

00:15:38   They have an architecture transition

00:15:40   that most of their customers don't want,

00:15:43   that totally screws some of their biggest partners

00:15:46   in Intel and AMD.

00:15:47   Dealing with a company, Qualcomm,

00:15:49   that is certainly not super easy and friendly

00:15:52   to deal with by most metrics that we hear about,

00:15:57   but mainly selling into companies

00:15:59   that kind of don't want this,

00:16:02   selling to users that kind of don't want this

00:16:05   with a bunch of software that's not ready for it.

00:16:08   So yeah, they kind of have a tough environment

00:16:12   to get this through.

00:16:14   They've tried this before.

00:16:15   It didn't work.

00:16:16   Obviously, things are a little bit different now.

00:16:17   Technology's better.

00:16:18   The translation/emulation story is better.

00:16:22   So I think they have a better chance now,

00:16:24   but it's still far from an easy thing.

00:16:26   And what they're doing is trying to convince

00:16:28   a whole bunch of companies and a whole bunch of customers

00:16:31   to take a move that many of them don't want to take.

00:16:34   - Yeah, so the recall thing doesn't help with that,

00:16:35   because that's like just an additional thing to deter you.

00:16:38   You didn't even know this was on the table.

00:16:40   It's a thing that can make you not want it,

00:16:41   but guess what?

00:16:42   We added a thing that's scary and you don't want

00:16:43   to just on top of that.

00:16:44   And the thing is, I don't think they're framing it

00:16:46   as an architecture transition.

00:16:47   It's more like, here's another way that you can run Windows,

00:16:51   and it's complicated by the fact that they keep bringing up

00:16:53   AMD and Intel, and AMD and Intel do have hardware

00:16:55   that competes, which is why it's not a transition.

00:16:58   It says, look, these are new software features in Windows,

00:17:01   and by the way, they're also supported

00:17:02   on a new architecture, and you shouldn't have to know

00:17:04   which is which, but the reason for you to buy an ARM PC

00:17:08   is undercut by Intel and AMD having competitive SOCs,

00:17:12   which they will soon-ish.

00:17:14   And then those SOCs won't have all the features

00:17:16   that you're rolling out in software.

00:17:18   Again, it seems like their role is to, in 2027,

00:17:22   if Microsoft paint a picture of what the PC market

00:17:25   would look like, I guess it's like,

00:17:26   you can buy a Windows PC with AI features,

00:17:29   and it will either have an x86 processor

00:17:31   or an ARM processor, and what is their ideal percentage

00:17:36   of the market?

00:17:36   Is it 50/50, is it 60/40, is it 90/10?

00:17:39   Like, it doesn't seem like they're even trying

00:17:41   to make a transition, because as you noted,

00:17:43   a transition would totally screw over into an AMD,

00:17:46   and they don't wanna do that, but I don't honestly know

00:17:50   what they're trying to do here, but whatever it is,

00:17:52   they're doing it poorly.

00:17:54   - UTM, which is a general purpose emulator,

00:17:56   won't be in the App Store, excuse me.

00:17:59   So this is a post from one of the authors, I guess.

00:18:03   Thomas, after an almost two-month-long review process,

00:18:06   Apple has rejected UTMSE from the iOS App Store,

00:18:09   as well as from notarization for third-party app stores.

00:18:13   Yikes.

00:18:14   Their reasoning is that rule 4.7,

00:18:16   which Apple recently introduced that allows for Delta,

00:18:18   PP, SSPP, and other emulators to be allowed,

00:18:21   does not apply to UTMSE.

00:18:23   The App Store review board determined that, quote,

00:18:25   "PC is not a console," quote, regardless of the fact

00:18:28   that there are retro Windows and DOS games for the PC

00:18:30   that UTMSE can be useful in running.

00:18:33   Additionally, Apple stances that UTMSE is not allowed

00:18:35   on third-party marketplaces either,

00:18:37   because rule 4.7 also applies

00:18:39   to the notarization review guidelines.

00:18:43   So rule 4.7 covers mini apps, minigames, streaming games,

00:18:47   chatbot plugins, and game emulators.

00:18:50   Then there was an update later on from UTM.

00:18:52   Apple's reached out and clarified

00:18:53   that the notarization was rejected under rule 2.5.2,

00:18:56   and that 4.7 is an exception

00:18:58   that only applies to App Store apps,

00:19:00   but which UTMSE does not qualify for.

00:19:02   And then you can see more on Michael Tsai's blog.

00:19:04   Finally, UTM writes,

00:19:06   "We will adhere by Apple's content and policy decision,

00:19:08   because we believe UTMSE,

00:19:10   which does not have just-in-time compilation,

00:19:12   is a sub-parse experience and isn't worth fighting for."

00:19:15   See a blog post that I think,

00:19:18   I'm pretty sure we talked about this in the past,

00:19:19   but about why Dolphin, the, what is that,

00:19:21   a Wii emulator, is that right?

00:19:23   - Yep, GameCube.

00:19:24   - Why it isn't coming to the App Store.

00:19:25   And so UTM continues,

00:19:27   "We do not wish to invest any additional time or effort

00:19:29   trying to get UTMSE in the App Store or third-party stores

00:19:31   unless Apple changes their stance."

00:19:33   I'm not loving this, not loving this at all.

00:19:34   - So this is something, because, like, so what,

00:19:38   Apple rejecting stuff in the App Store, whatever,

00:19:39   like even just, it's weird that they're rejecting

00:19:41   because they allowed Delta,

00:19:42   and this is an emulator that doesn't have a JIT,

00:19:44   so it should fall within the rules,

00:19:45   but it's a PC emulator and PCs aren't consoles.

00:19:48   Remember we talked about the definition

00:19:49   of like retro console games, what do all those words mean?

00:19:52   Apple has now said after two months,

00:19:53   PC is not a console, fine, whatever.

00:19:55   But they also rejected it from the notarization process,

00:19:59   which is an overloaded term in the Apple world,

00:20:01   that they do for things going to third-party App Stores.

00:20:04   So they can't even get this into a third-party App Store.

00:20:08   And Apple's only supposed to reject things

00:20:10   from third-party App Stores for using private APIs

00:20:13   and for security reasons.

00:20:15   They could maybe make an argument

00:20:17   that there's some sort of security issue with this thing

00:20:19   of like, well, it's an emulator,

00:20:20   and like it can download arbitrary,

00:20:23   but like, I don't understand how they're going to defend

00:20:25   this to say, "Oh, remember when we said we're just gonna

00:20:28   "check for private APIs and security?

00:20:29   "Also, we're just gonna make decisions

00:20:31   "like we don't want this emulator in any store,

00:20:32   "it's not even ours."

00:20:34   I don't know why they would do this.

00:20:35   Like, why do they care if a thing that emulates Windows

00:20:38   and DOS games is on a third-party App Store?

00:20:41   - This doesn't make any sense to me,

00:20:42   and maybe there is a completely fair and logical reason,

00:20:45   but I can't put my finger on it if so.

00:20:47   - If there is, I feel like they would have communicated it

00:20:49   to the UTM authors, you know what I mean?

00:20:51   They would have said, "Here's why,"

00:20:52   'cause like, you know, the virtualization framework

00:20:54   you're using has a security flaw

00:20:56   and it would allow people to root phones or something.

00:20:57   Like, just say that if it's the case, but they haven't.

00:21:00   - Not a great look, not a great look at all.

00:21:02   All right, Apple and Meta could face charges

00:21:04   for violating EU tech rules.

00:21:06   Apple and Meta could soon face charges, I'm sorry,

00:21:08   this is from The Verge, could soon face charges

00:21:10   from the European Commission for Violating

00:21:11   Digital Markets Act, or DMA, rules.

00:21:14   The commission is reported to be targeting Apple

00:21:15   over its steering rules that charge developers

00:21:18   for appointing to third-party purchase options.

00:21:21   Meta's charges will reportedly revolve

00:21:23   around its ad-free subscription for Facebook

00:21:25   and Instagram in the EU.

00:21:26   The commission will be using preliminary findings,

00:21:28   according to Reuters, meaning that the companies

00:21:30   can make changes to try to correct things

00:21:33   before the commission makes a final decision.

00:21:34   Apple is set to be charged first.

00:21:36   Reuters reports, and the Financial Times

00:21:38   says we could see the charges in the coming weeks.

00:21:40   They can charge something like 5% of annual revenue

00:21:43   or something like that, so this is like pretty serious money

00:21:47   if they choose to go that deep in it.

00:21:50   - Yeah, this is a leak, I mean, we talked about this

00:21:52   right after Apple rolled out its DMA compliance,

00:21:55   and we said the EU is investigating to see

00:21:58   if what Apple did is actually compliant.

00:22:01   And we're coming to the part where we're gonna get

00:22:04   that answer, and it seems like this is a leak

00:22:05   from the EU to say our answer is going to be no,

00:22:08   what Apple did is not compliant.

00:22:10   This doesn't even mention things like rejecting UTM

00:22:12   from third-party app stores, this is just talking about

00:22:15   the steering rules and taking money from developers

00:22:19   for going to third-party purchase pages and stuff like that.

00:22:21   We'll see what the ruling says, they're always kind of

00:22:24   slow to move and a little bit back in time,

00:22:26   like they can't keep up with all the violations

00:22:28   that Apple is doing, but yeah.

00:22:30   That's always the risk with these things is

00:22:33   they make a rule, Apple says they comply,

00:22:35   and then the EU takes its time to say,

00:22:37   but have you really complied, and their ruling is coming,

00:22:40   and it doesn't look good for Apple.

00:22:41   - Say it again like you mean it.

00:22:43   - Yeah.

00:22:44   - It's not looking good for Apple, and I mean, I don't know,

00:22:48   I have such mixed feelings about this,

00:22:50   and depending on when you catch me,

00:22:52   sometimes I think the EU is being a bit heavy-handed,

00:22:55   and then I'll tell you 10 minutes later

00:22:57   that Apple deserves everything it's getting,

00:22:58   and right now I'm leaning more towards,

00:23:00   well, you kind of deserve it, but ask me again

00:23:03   10 minutes, like I said.

00:23:04   - Well, but that right there, that is the risk

00:23:07   of failing to self-regulate and creating--

00:23:11   - Yes, yes.

00:23:12   - Creating a need for governments to step in,

00:23:14   because when governments do step in,

00:23:16   they're not gonna get everything right.

00:23:17   They're gonna do things, 'cause these are largely

00:23:19   not technology people, certainly whatever technology people

00:23:23   who talk to the government and influence them

00:23:25   are gonna be only from a certain side of it,

00:23:27   so when governments are forced to regulate tech,

00:23:31   they don't always do what's good for everybody

00:23:33   or what's good for us in the industry

00:23:34   or what's good for our customers, and that's the risk.

00:23:38   But for Apple failing to self-regulate

00:23:39   to an acceptable degree for all these years,

00:23:42   and I think getting worse over time in a lot of these areas,

00:23:45   they have invited the government regulation risk

00:23:50   by their own failure to self-regulate,

00:23:52   and that's the risk of doing that.

00:23:55   Yes, they've made some extra money here and there

00:23:58   on their various App Store cuts

00:24:00   and anti-competitive behavior they've done there,

00:24:02   but they also provoked governments to regulate them.

00:24:07   Now they have to accept the consequences of that.

00:24:09   I think it would have been a better long-term strategy

00:24:11   to hold back a little on the anti-competitive behavior

00:24:14   and maybe avoid some of this regulation,

00:24:16   but I mean, hey, I'm not the CEO of Apple,

00:24:19   so they didn't take my advice, obviously,

00:24:21   and we'll see how it turns out, but that's,

00:24:23   they rolled the dice themselves, and this is what they got.

00:24:26   - And they're still kind of betting that their compliance,

00:24:29   the people call it malicious compliance.

00:24:30   It's not quite that bad, but it's like,

00:24:32   can we plausibly comply with this in a way

00:24:35   that makes all the alternatives

00:24:36   they're trying to introduce unattractive?

00:24:39   And as we discussed in the episode about the DMA compliance,

00:24:42   even if they were complying with the letter of the law here,

00:24:45   they are not complying with the spirit.

00:24:47   They have worked very hard to arrange things

00:24:49   to make the alternatives basically impossible

00:24:52   for them to be more attractive than what Apple offers

00:24:55   because of the rules that Apple itself makes.

00:24:57   They made rules to make all the other options

00:25:00   at best on equal footing with Apple's,

00:25:02   but most of the time, you know, worse,

00:25:04   and that is not the spirit of the law.

00:25:06   The spirit of the law is supposed to allow competition.

00:25:08   It's not supposed to allow Apple to make a set of rules

00:25:11   that doesn't allow anything better to ever exist,

00:25:14   and rejecting apps like UTM from third-party app stores

00:25:18   is just icing on the cake.

00:25:20   So, so far, they've been betting they can get away with this.

00:25:22   The penalties are supposedly huge,

00:25:24   but like all government things, everything happens slowly.

00:25:27   We've waited how many months for the EU to say

00:25:30   whether they're compliant?

00:25:31   They're probably gonna say that they're not,

00:25:33   and who knows how much longer we'll have to wait after that

00:25:35   for Apple to say, okay, well, what about now?

00:25:37   Now are we compliant?

00:25:38   And this could just go on for ages,

00:25:39   so, you know, the wheels of government move slowly.

00:25:42   - We are brought to you this episode by Squarespace,

00:25:46   the all-in-one website platform for entrepreneurs

00:25:49   to stand out and succeed online.

00:25:51   Whether you're just starting out

00:25:52   or managing a growing brand,

00:25:53   Squarespace makes it easy to create a beautiful website,

00:25:56   engage with your audience, and sell anything,

00:25:58   from your products to your content to your time,

00:26:01   all in one place and all on your terms.

00:26:04   Squarespace makes it super easy to make websites,

00:26:06   and they are especially good at making storefronts

00:26:09   and business websites.

00:26:10   So they had this brand new guided design system,

00:26:12   Squarespace Blueprint.

00:26:14   You start with a professionally curated layout

00:26:16   and styling options, and you build a unique online presence

00:26:19   from the ground up, tailored to your brand or business,

00:26:22   and optimized for every device.

00:26:23   You can easily launch your website

00:26:25   and get discovered quickly with integrated,

00:26:26   optimized SEO tools, so you show up more often

00:26:30   to more people and grow the way you want.

00:26:32   When your customers are ready to buy from you,

00:26:34   you also have amazing checkout

00:26:35   and flexible payments options,

00:26:37   simple and powerful tools that you accept credit cards,

00:26:40   PayPal, Apple Pay, and even in some countries,

00:26:42   offer the customers the option to buy now

00:26:44   and pay later with Afterpay and Clearpay.

00:26:46   There is so much more to look at at Squarespace.

00:26:49   It's all powered by their new, next generation Fluid engine.

00:26:53   It's never been easier with the Fluid engine

00:26:55   to unlock your unbreakable creativity.

00:26:57   You choose your website starting point

00:26:59   and you customize every design detail.

00:27:01   It's reimagined drag and drop

00:27:02   that works for desktop and mobile,

00:27:04   so you can really stretch your imagination online

00:27:06   with the Fluid engine.

00:27:08   Go to squarespace.com to try all this out with a free trial.

00:27:12   I am so strongly recommending Squarespace.

00:27:15   It is great.

00:27:16   It will almost certainly fit all of your needs, plus more,

00:27:18   and it's so easy, anyone can use it.

00:27:21   Go there, start a free trial.

00:27:22   You can build the whole site in trial mode.

00:27:23   You can see for yourself how great it is.

00:27:25   When you're ready to launch, go to squarespace.com/ATP

00:27:28   to get 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain.

00:27:31   So once again, squarespace.com for that free trial.

00:27:34   When you're ready to launch, squarespace.com/ATP

00:27:37   to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain.

00:27:40   Thank you so much to Squarespace for sponsoring our show.

00:27:43   - So achievement unlocked.

00:27:49   I was a little, little itty bitty speck in the keynote,

00:27:52   in the actual WWDC keynote.

00:27:55   We were seated fairly far away from the screen,

00:27:57   which is fine, I'm not complaining,

00:27:59   but my eyes are not good enough to have been able

00:28:01   to discern in the wall of icons of Vision Pro apps,

00:28:06   does mine exist there?

00:28:08   And I mean, given that there's not too many,

00:28:10   you would think so, and some eagle--

00:28:11   - Yeah, that was all of them on screen.

00:28:14   - And eagle-eyed viewers have pointed out to me,

00:28:17   and I think John, I think you made this a very helpful image

00:28:19   Noah Sarcasm.

00:28:20   - I did make it for you.

00:28:21   - Thank you.

00:28:22   But there at the top of the screen is Call Sheet.

00:28:25   So I was actually with my friend, Stee, that did that icon.

00:28:29   Jelly did the kind of default one for iOS,

00:28:31   Stee did the default one for VisionOS,

00:28:34   and I was with him just an hour ago,

00:28:36   and we were both sharing a happy moment

00:28:38   about how we had made it into the keynote.

00:28:40   So that's very, very exciting,

00:28:41   and I was very pleased to see that.

00:28:42   - That's awesome, congrats.

00:28:44   - Thanks.

00:28:44   - That was the good news.

00:28:45   That was the good news to you, Casey.

00:28:47   Now, it's a not so good news.

00:28:48   - Now, some not so great news.

00:28:49   So Apple TV's Insight feature,

00:28:51   which is like the Amazon X-ray thing,

00:28:53   which for a brief window of time,

00:28:55   I thought completely Sherlocked me,

00:28:56   and then the more I've learned,

00:28:57   the more I think that's not true, I say,

00:29:00   as I knock on wood.

00:29:02   Anyways, that feature apparently will also use your iPhone,

00:29:05   which admittedly, like taking off my selfish hat

00:29:08   for a second, that sounds really slick.

00:29:10   So reading from 9to5Mac,

00:29:12   when using the existing remote app on iOS,

00:29:15   Apple will populate your iPhone's display

00:29:17   with the info provided by Insight.

00:29:19   This means you won't need to obstruct your view on the TV

00:29:21   with Insight panel, but instead,

00:29:22   you can view and interact with Insight

00:29:23   entirely on your iPhone.

00:29:25   Again, taking off my selfish hat,

00:29:27   that is very freaking cool.

00:29:29   - Yeah, I thought you were totally safe,

00:29:31   because no one wants to junk up their screen

00:29:33   with stuff that blocks the view

00:29:34   when someone wants to ask something,

00:29:36   they should just look it up on their phone.

00:29:37   Obviously, Call Shoot is still way more full featured

00:29:39   than the Insight feature,

00:29:40   and has tons and tons of information, anyway.

00:29:43   But still, Apple did apparently provide a way

00:29:46   for you to look up this information

00:29:47   without junking up your screen.

00:29:49   - This next one, I did not see

00:29:51   when I was going through the show notes

00:29:52   literally three hours ago,

00:29:53   so this must be another late-breaking news,

00:29:55   and it makes me miserable.

00:29:56   So apparently, Insight isn't using metadata

00:30:00   on Apple TV, or Apple, yeah, Apple TV Plus provided media.

00:30:04   It's using ML to identify actors in songs.

00:30:07   Please tell me it ain't so.

00:30:09   - This is very late-breaking news

00:30:11   from Digital Friends, a YouTube channel

00:30:13   that I watch for TV reviews,

00:30:15   and they're doing a news segment,

00:30:16   and they're always talking about Apple TV.

00:30:17   I think this is info straight from Apple, apparently,

00:30:20   that instead of doing what Amazon does,

00:30:22   which is, of course, hire armies of people

00:30:24   to watch every single show on their streaming service,

00:30:26   and manually annotate when every single actor

00:30:29   is on the screen, so that the little pop,

00:30:31   that's what they do, it's like,

00:30:32   "Who's visible on the screen now?

00:30:33   "Who's in this scene?"

00:30:35   X-Ray shows that in the Amazon video thing.

00:30:38   I thought that's what Apple was doing.

00:30:40   They'll just do it for their own shows,

00:30:41   'cause I believe this is limited to Apple TV Plus,

00:30:43   but according to this video

00:30:44   that we will link in the show notes,

00:30:46   apparently, no, they're using machine learning

00:30:48   to identify both the actors' faces

00:30:50   and the Shazam thing to identify the songs,

00:30:52   'cause that's all they show,

00:30:53   and this is a very limited feature.

00:30:54   They show the actors who are on screen,

00:30:56   and if there's music, they show the song that's playing.

00:30:59   And I mean, what they said in the video

00:31:02   that we'll link is that that means

00:31:04   Insight could potentially be sort of an OS-wide thing

00:31:08   on TV OS and not just in Apple TV Plus,

00:31:11   because if they're just looking at the video

00:31:13   and identifying faces, and it also means,

00:31:16   well, okay, is it gonna be able to identify faces of people

00:31:20   when they have makeup on or they're dressed

00:31:23   as a fantasy creature or something,

00:31:26   or their backs to the camera, or they're in shadow?

00:31:31   I'm really curious to see, A, if this is actually true,

00:31:34   and B, how well this feature works,

00:31:36   as compared to the let's just brute force it method

00:31:39   of Amazon of having people enter all that information.

00:31:42   - Yeah, this makes me very sad.

00:31:44   I mean, well, again, as a user, that sounds incredible

00:31:48   and really, really useful, but as a developer

00:31:51   of a competing product, that's making me hear

00:31:53   a very, very sad trombone.

00:31:54   - And it makes Apple happy,

00:31:55   because they don't wanna spend money.

00:31:57   And hey, we don't have to pay hundreds of people

00:31:59   to watch thousands of hours of content

00:32:01   and manually annotate it.

00:32:02   Why don't we just let computers do it for us?

00:32:04   - Indeed, that is, well, we'll see what happens.

00:32:07   But selfishly, I hope not, unselfishly, yeah, let's go.

00:32:11   All right, so you had cast about John,

00:32:13   I think it was you, John, maybe it was Marco,

00:32:14   but I presume it was John.

00:32:15   - It was all of us. - It was all of us.

00:32:16   There you go.

00:32:17   How do we disable sports?

00:32:18   Well, it wasn't me, 'cause I actually kinda like this.

00:32:20   Anyway, how to disable--

00:32:21   - Do you like the sports?

00:32:22   You didn't chime in.

00:32:23   Do you like them?

00:32:23   You're like, ooh, I didn't know

00:32:25   that my favorite college football team,

00:32:27   something happened to them.

00:32:28   Do you, does that happen?

00:32:30   - I like it.

00:32:31   On the occasion, it's a team that I care about.

00:32:34   Now, it will, if memory serves,

00:32:35   I don't, other than F1,

00:32:37   I'm not really paying attention to sports at the moment.

00:32:40   So anyways, if it's a team that I don't care about,

00:32:43   or especially a sport I don't care about,

00:32:45   then I find it frustrating and annoying,

00:32:46   like I think you guys do.

00:32:48   But if it's at least a sport that I care about,

00:32:51   like let's say it's a close game between two teams

00:32:53   that I don't really care that much about,

00:32:56   then I don't mind that so much at all.

00:32:57   But so like if it's two college football teams, for example,

00:33:00   that are having a close game,

00:33:01   yeah, maybe I'll be interested in that.

00:33:02   But if it's two, I don't know, baseball teams

00:33:06   that are having a close game, could not care less.

00:33:08   - See, here's why.

00:33:09   This thing has irritated me so much.

00:33:12   You know, people wrote in to say,

00:33:13   "Oh, just unfollow all the sports teams.

00:33:15   "You must have launched Apple Sports

00:33:16   "and followed sports teams."

00:33:18   And so I went in there and, nope, sure didn't.

00:33:21   Then some other people said,

00:33:22   "Oh, you have to go unfollow your local teams

00:33:25   "in the Apple News app under their sports section."

00:33:27   So I went there and, nope,

00:33:30   I didn't have anything there either.

00:33:31   This is literally just an opted in feature

00:33:34   that they added to tvOS for, I think, everyone.

00:33:38   Because nothing about any of my Apple activity

00:33:41   would suggest that I ever want to watch

00:33:43   or ever have watched sports using an Apple device.

00:33:46   So I guess this is just opted in for everyone.

00:33:50   And what dressed me nuts is like,

00:33:52   Apple is, or at least used to be,

00:33:54   so careful about respecting the user experience

00:33:59   when doing something really immersive,

00:34:01   like watching a drama on TV.

00:34:03   Like, I've been sitting there watching these

00:34:05   really serious TV shows, often, by the way,

00:34:08   not even using the Apple's TV app,

00:34:10   often in other apps like the Max app.

00:34:12   And then this sports pop-up pops up in the corner.

00:34:15   Like, I never would have enabled that.

00:34:17   I never did enable that.

00:34:18   I've never watched sports on an Apple device.

00:34:20   I don't follow any sports teams on any device,

00:34:21   let alone an Apple device,

00:34:23   'cause I don't follow any sports.

00:34:24   They are just intruding upon the sanctity

00:34:28   of a full-screen TV episode, a drama,

00:34:31   that I'm watching on my TV with their premium experience,

00:34:35   allegedly premium experience Apple TV platform and box.

00:34:38   That is so against their ethos.

00:34:40   That is so gross.

00:34:42   Apple used to never do stuff like that,

00:34:44   and there are so many paper cuts like this

00:34:47   creeping into their products in the effort

00:34:49   of ever-increasing services engagement and revenue.

00:34:51   It is really irritating me.

00:34:53   And it just seems like the standards of the company

00:34:56   around things like this are just going down

00:34:59   and down and down over time, and it makes me sad.

00:35:01   - Yeah, you can see why they would want to throw this

00:35:05   in people's face, because no one's ever gonna find it,

00:35:08   like, to turn it on manually.

00:35:10   But the normal way to do that, which is still irritating,

00:35:13   but is way better than what they did,

00:35:14   is on first startup after the OS update,

00:35:19   or on the first time you go back to the home screen

00:35:20   after the OS update, pop up a one-time thing,

00:35:23   you hope it's one time,

00:35:24   pop up a one-time thing that says, "Hey, by the way,

00:35:26   it looks like you just upgraded to tvOS 123.

00:35:29   There's a new feature that will show you sports scores

00:35:32   when something exciting happens.

00:35:33   Do you want to enable that? Yes, no."

00:35:34   Right? But they didn't do that.

00:35:36   They just literally, apparently, turned it on.

00:35:38   And, you know, as Marco mentioned,

00:35:40   those places that it mentioned to look,

00:35:42   you should look there,

00:35:43   because I did add favorite teams to the sports app,

00:35:47   and I'm like, "That must be it," so I deleted them.

00:35:49   And I looked in Apple News,

00:35:50   and I didn't have anything there.

00:35:51   But the actual location of this feature,

00:35:53   thanks to Jason Snell, is in tvOS,

00:35:56   go to Settings, Apps, TV,

00:36:00   and then find the item that says Exciting Games

00:36:03   in the notification section and turn that off.

00:36:05   That is the thing that they turned on for you.

00:36:07   No one would ever find that on their own

00:36:08   to turn it on manually,

00:36:10   which is why you'd have to prompt them

00:36:11   on first boot after the new OS or whatever,

00:36:13   but they just turned it on from everybody.

00:36:15   And as Marco mentioned,

00:36:16   like of all the things to intrude on,

00:36:18   a full-screen, watching television experience

00:36:22   that they need to come up with

00:36:24   like sort of company-wide guidelines that like,

00:36:26   "Look, unless someone has manually opted into it,

00:36:28   you cannot ever pop up anything on the screen,

00:36:30   unless it's like their house is on fire.

00:36:32   Like the HomeKit can pop up things

00:36:33   if there's a smoke alarm going off.

00:36:34   I'll allow that, or like a security camera."

00:36:36   But other than that,

00:36:37   sports scores are not the same as your house on fire.

00:36:40   - Yeah, I mean, I can totally understand

00:36:43   why this would be very frustrating,

00:36:44   and I do not like how buried it is.

00:36:46   Let me just repeat what you said.

00:36:48   Settings, Apps, TV, Exciting Games.

00:36:51   That's not where I would look to find this at all,

00:36:54   but what are you gonna do?

00:36:56   All right, we got a phenomenal flex from Matthew Willoughby,

00:37:01   who is extremely excited

00:37:03   about finally being able to get a rest day.

00:37:04   And they sent us a picture of an Apple Watch Ultra

00:37:08   where it says, "You've received this award,"

00:37:11   this is your longest move streak,

00:37:12   "You've received this award for your longest move streak,

00:37:14   which lasted 3,338 days.

00:37:18   This was sent on such a day that," I guess,

00:37:20   John, you computed,

00:37:22   "that 3,338 days before when this was sent

00:37:25   was April 23rd of 2015."

00:37:28   Does that have any significance?

00:37:29   - That was the day the original Apple Watch first launched.

00:37:33   On the previous episode, I said,

00:37:34   "Hey, this move streak thing

00:37:36   where you are allowed to have rest days,

00:37:37   I bet there's someone out there who got a Series Zero watch

00:37:40   and has had a move streak going since that day,

00:37:42   and somehow didn't lose their streak

00:37:44   every time they upgraded watches,

00:37:46   and is just thankful that finally they can get a rest day.

00:37:49   This person truly does exist."

00:37:50   - It's Matthew Willoughby.

00:37:52   - Yep.

00:37:53   - This is wearing an Apple Watch Ultra.

00:37:54   So he has upgraded from the Series Zero

00:37:56   through a series of Apple Watches to the Ultra.

00:37:59   His move streak has lasted the longest

00:38:01   that any Apple Watch move streak could possibly last

00:38:04   for someone who bought this watch at retail,

00:38:05   because that was literally day one

00:38:07   of the release of the Apple Watch.

00:38:09   - It's impressive, it's very impressive.

00:38:11   - He says, and I quote, "All caps,

00:38:13   I can finally have a rest day."

00:38:14   Yes, Matthew, you can.

00:38:16   You've earned it.

00:38:17   - I'm not sure that's what he said.

00:38:19   I think what he said is, "I can finally have a rest day!"

00:38:23   Something more along those lines.

00:38:25   - Apple should fly someone to his house.

00:38:27   Like, the gamification of fitness,

00:38:31   I think he won the game.

00:38:33   - Yeah.

00:38:33   - Well done.

00:38:37   All right, Apple ID has been renamed to Apple Account,

00:38:40   as was foretold.

00:38:41   - As the prophecy foretold.

00:38:43   - So Apple, in one of their newsroom posts,

00:38:45   says, "With the releases of iOS 18, iPadOS 18,

00:38:49   Mac OS Sequoia, and Watch OS 11,

00:38:51   Apple ID is renamed to Apple Account

00:38:52   for a consistent sign-in experience

00:38:54   across Apple services and devices,

00:38:56   and relies on a user's existing credentials."

00:38:59   - They did it!

00:39:01   So they did this, and now, make a marker, listener here,

00:39:05   how many years will it take us

00:39:06   to not say Apple ID on this program?

00:39:09   - Infinite, infinite years.

00:39:10   - It's gonna be a while.

00:39:11   - All right, let's start doing some OS-based follow-up,

00:39:15   and let's start, because Jon wrote

00:39:17   pretty much all these show notes.

00:39:19   Where do you think we're gonna start?

00:39:20   We're gonna start with macOS.

00:39:21   So, tell me about macOS 15 Sequoia

00:39:24   with the Apple Pencil and iPad in sidecar mode.

00:39:27   So what's the ask here, what are we talking about?

00:39:30   - Technically, we started with tvOS,

00:39:31   because we wanted to get your glory/sadness in.

00:39:34   But anyway, yes, macOS is the next one up.

00:39:36   So, we were talking before, like,

00:39:38   we were talking about Math Notes.

00:39:39   Like, do you think you could use Math Notes

00:39:41   with handwriting in Sequoia

00:39:43   if you used an iPad in sidecar mode?

00:39:45   Like, they should do that, that would be really cool.

00:39:48   And apparently that already works.

00:39:50   Not in Sequoia, but if you take your iPad

00:39:55   and use it in sidecar mode as a second monitor,

00:39:57   which I did with my iPad, and have an Apple Pencil,

00:40:00   you can go into, for example, the Notes app,

00:40:02   and scribble yourself a little sketch on your iPad,

00:40:05   even though you're using the macOS version of Notes.

00:40:07   Because then you're just using your iPad

00:40:09   as a secondary screen, but it's basically

00:40:11   a touch screen on your Mac.

00:40:13   It even does the hover effect with the cursor

00:40:15   and everything, that already works.

00:40:16   Now, I didn't try it with Math Notes on Sequoia,

00:40:19   mostly because Math Notes in Sequoia

00:40:21   in the very first developer beta is super duper buggy.

00:40:25   But I'm hoping this will mean that if you really want

00:40:27   to handwrite Math Notes on your Mac,

00:40:29   and you have an iPad, you can do it.

00:40:32   - That is very cool, that's super neat.

00:40:34   Chris Kjellberg writes with regard

00:40:36   to iPhone mirroring in Sequoia,

00:40:38   "Is iPhone mirroring a way to rearrange

00:40:40   your iOS home screen more easily?"

00:40:41   I don't know, possibly, right?

00:40:43   - Yes, I hadn't thought of it,

00:40:44   but I would much rather use a mouse pointer

00:40:47   than my finger, because A, it doesn't obstruct everything,

00:40:50   and B, I have pixel perfect precision as I try to drag,

00:40:53   because it will still be that weird game

00:40:54   of bumping around icons and stuff.

00:40:56   But this actually is a big upgrade

00:40:59   in my ability to rearrange my home screen

00:41:02   without pulling my hair out.

00:41:03   We'll see how it goes.

00:41:04   But, and also the thing with being able to leave space,

00:41:07   I hope it doesn't make the icons as squirmy,

00:41:09   and as collapsible as they were before.

00:41:13   So I am actually looking forward to trying this.

00:41:15   - Jon, I'm not trying to be funny.

00:41:16   Remind me why people like,

00:41:19   what is this network locations thing?

00:41:21   I've heard of this, and I remember talking about

00:41:23   it having left and everyone was upset,

00:41:25   but I don't think I've ever used it,

00:41:26   so can you give me a two second tour

00:41:27   of what network locations is, please?

00:41:30   - Yeah, I don't use it either,

00:41:31   but I believe the idea is that

00:41:33   when you are in different locations,

00:41:35   you might have different network setups.

00:41:37   When I'm at work, I use work's DNS servers,

00:41:39   I have a VPN, Wi-Fi is ahead of ethernet

00:41:43   in my network order, all sorts of stuff like that.

00:41:46   And you don't wanna have to manually

00:41:48   switch all this networking stuff, network locations.

00:41:51   I don't know if it's actually location aware,

00:41:52   but it does let you have a pop-up menu that says,

00:41:54   I'm on this network now, I'm on my home network,

00:41:56   I'm on my work network, I'm on my traveling network

00:41:58   where I use a VPN or whatever.

00:42:01   I believe that's what the feature is for.

00:42:03   The reason it's a story is because it disappeared

00:42:05   when they redid the settings app,

00:42:06   and when the system preferences became system settings,

00:42:08   network locations disappeared.

00:42:10   The functionality was still in the OS,

00:42:11   but the GUI for it was gone, and the story is now,

00:42:14   thanks to Raycat, let us know,

00:42:16   network locations are back in the GUI in Sequoia.

00:42:18   So if you missed them, they are there.

00:42:20   They're still kind of buried in the network pane,

00:42:22   but it's better than trying to do it from the command line.

00:42:25   - We do have some sad news though, from Rob.

00:42:28   Bad news, Syracuse, it looks like the password field

00:42:31   is still right aligned in the passwords app,

00:42:32   at least on iOS.

00:42:34   - And it's the same on Mac OS.

00:42:35   I launched, I installed Sequoia, I was using the beta,

00:42:37   I launched the password app.

00:42:38   Yeah, it's just so weird.

00:42:41   Like if you stick the insertion point at like,

00:42:44   the, I can't even say it, the beginning of the word?

00:42:47   Yeah, it is the beginning.

00:42:48   It's the first letter of the word,

00:42:49   and you type a character, the character appears

00:42:52   to the left of your insertion point.

00:42:54   - That's very weird.

00:42:55   - Which makes sense if you think about it,

00:42:56   but like when you're typing, it's like,

00:42:57   this is not how typing should be.

00:43:00   Like again, I think this is possible on the web

00:43:03   using modern web technology,

00:43:04   but no one would ever do this.

00:43:07   Like why?

00:43:08   Just, it's literally a form.

00:43:11   There are labels and there are text fields.

00:43:13   Username colon field, password colon field.

00:43:17   It doesn't have to be this hard apple.

00:43:19   Just use regular text fields, you're breaking my brain.

00:43:21   I should file a bug on it now.

00:43:24   I guess like, you know, you gotta get those bugs in early.

00:43:26   Hell, I mean, I don't know why I didn't file it

00:43:27   for the year and a half since this,

00:43:29   or two years, whatever it's been since then.

00:43:31   File it now, like you made a whole new app, it's all new.

00:43:34   Can we fix the text fields please?

00:43:36   - Our friend MB Bischoff writes

00:43:38   with regard to Sequoia window tiling.

00:43:40   Window tiling in Sequoia can be disabled

00:43:42   or set to happen only when option is held down.

00:43:44   Also it can optionally leave margins between windows.

00:43:47   That's pretty cool, I didn't know any of that.

00:43:48   - Yeah, I'm shocked if there are any settings

00:43:50   related to this.

00:43:51   I was afraid I would just have to like find

00:43:52   some hidden P list key to turn it off.

00:43:54   But if you can find it in system settings,

00:43:57   it's a little bit hidden.

00:43:58   There are three whole options to do it.

00:44:00   And I was playing with the tiling.

00:44:03   I don't know if I know all the options,

00:44:05   but it seems kind of limited.

00:44:09   It didn't seem like a lot of flexibility for the tiling

00:44:11   where I can do eighths and thirds and grids

00:44:14   and stuff like that.

00:44:14   It's more like just left half of the screen,

00:44:15   right half of the screen, top bottom,

00:44:18   limited top bottom stuff because when you do the top,

00:44:20   you end up going to the spaces thing.

00:44:22   But anyway, margins between windows,

00:44:23   I am a big fan of, but I know some people don't like it,

00:44:26   so hey, make it a toggle.

00:44:27   If you don't like margins, no margins.

00:44:28   If you do like them, there they are.

00:44:30   It doesn't let you adjust the margins, which they should.

00:44:33   And my dream of having full Windows Server access

00:44:35   to make a real window manager continues to be a dream.

00:44:38   But for now, all those people who like Windows style,

00:44:41   Windows tiling, they will get thrown a bone in Sequoia.

00:44:45   - We have a miracle.

00:44:47   A miracle has happened in Sequoia.

00:44:49   Steve Trout and Smith noticed that there's an update

00:44:53   to the chess app.

00:44:54   Yes, in macOS, there's been a chess app,

00:44:56   what, forever, I think, or at least in--

00:44:59   - I believe it was there in Next as well,

00:45:00   but don't quote me.

00:45:01   In Next app, it's a very old app.

00:45:03   - Right, so apparently the renderer has been updated,

00:45:07   and according to Steve Trout and Smith,

00:45:09   it's the first time since macOS 10.3 Panther,

00:45:13   which is 21 years ago.

00:45:17   My goodness.

00:45:18   - Wow.

00:45:19   - We'll link to a post from my cable sash that shows

00:45:22   the old renderer and the new one.

00:45:23   The new one, I'm assuming, is using a reality kit,

00:45:25   and it looks nice, and the old one looks super dated.

00:45:27   And remember, the old one was new in macOS 10.3,

00:45:32   21 years ago.

00:45:34   So the chess app, not only will the chess app not die,

00:45:36   it seems like it's getting more updated

00:45:38   than a lot of other apps in macOS these days.

00:45:42   - Indeed.

00:45:43   With regard to iCloud Keychain and browser integration

00:45:47   in Sequoia, Jonathan Freese noticed that a clean install

00:45:50   of macOS Sequoia has what appears to be pre-installed

00:45:54   extensions for passwords, and Jon, you've put in a bunch

00:45:57   of JSON in our show documents,

00:45:58   so can you talk about this, please?

00:46:00   - Yeah, he just sent the path to a JSON file,

00:46:05   and it was like /library/google/chrome/native-message-host/com.apple

00:46:11   .password-manager.json.

00:46:13   Like, okay, does that say that the extension

00:46:17   is pre-installed, or is that just information

00:46:19   about where they might get it?

00:46:20   And I looked at it, and if you look at the JSON,

00:46:23   it's got a name and a description, and it's got a path,

00:46:26   and the path is to the Cryptex thing,

00:46:28   I think we talked about on the past shows,

00:46:29   the system has these Cryptexes, which are like sub-images

00:46:32   that they're allowed to be overlaid

00:46:33   on top of the cryptographically secure OS image,

00:46:36   so that the combination of them

00:46:37   is also cryptographically secure,

00:46:39   and the Cryptexes are so that Apple can update those

00:46:41   separately from the whole OS, so they don't have to do

00:46:44   a full OS update when one little thing changes.

00:46:47   And it looks like, well, it's called password-manager-browser-extension-helper.

00:46:52   Is that the full extension?

00:46:54   It looks like it, I mean, it's a .app,

00:46:57   it's .app, contents, Mac OS, I think that Apple

00:47:00   is literally bundling the iCloud, like Jonathan says,

00:47:04   the iCloud keychain extensions for Chrome and for Firefox.

00:47:09   I guess I should, I mean, I had limited time

00:47:12   with the developer beta, it seems pretty solid,

00:47:14   but a lot of the new features are buggy

00:47:16   or entirely missing, like the AI stuff,

00:47:18   so I'll have to, I think you'd look into this,

00:47:20   but that would be a bold move.

00:47:23   Pre-shipping, like really just saying,

00:47:25   hey, third parties have to make you install

00:47:28   their browser extensions to use it

00:47:30   for their password manager, but we can just ship them.

00:47:32   Everyone who gets this, and honestly,

00:47:34   I think, well, in one respect, I think it's a good idea,

00:47:37   because you get explaining to anybody that,

00:47:40   you know, you can use iCloud keychain,

00:47:43   it does two-factor, it does this, it does that.

00:47:45   A, they don't know what iCloud keychain is,

00:47:47   and they say, oh, but I use Chrome.

00:47:50   No problem, just install the iCloud keychain

00:47:55   Chrome extension, I would never trust someone,

00:47:58   you know, someone who's not a tech nerd,

00:48:00   to be able to find the correct, non-scammy,

00:48:02   real live Apple iCloud keychain.

00:48:05   I don't even know what it's called.

00:48:06   I have to check 100 times before I install it

00:48:08   to make sure, this is actually from Apple,

00:48:10   or is this just gonna steal all my passwords?

00:48:12   Pre-installing in the OS is the right way to go.

00:48:15   Must be nice to be the platform owner.

00:48:17   - Indeed, you can just make these things so much easier.

00:48:21   There is incredibly great news for a lot of developers,

00:48:25   particularly macOS developers.

00:48:27   For the longest time, if you wanted to have

00:48:30   a virtual machine on your computer,

00:48:32   maybe of an old version of macOS or something like that,

00:48:35   you couldn't sign into iCloud, so that means on this VM,

00:48:39   you couldn't do anything that relates to iCloud,

00:48:40   you know, because it wouldn't let you sign in.

00:48:42   And that's still true of all the existing,

00:48:47   or the already released versions of macOS,

00:48:49   but Sequoia virtual machines will allow logging into iCloud,

00:48:53   which is super duper exciting for those that have that need.

00:48:56   That's not me personally, but that is really great, no joke.

00:49:00   So reading from Ars Technica,

00:49:01   as long as your host operating system is macOS 15 or newer,

00:49:04   and your guest operating system is macOS 15 or newer,

00:49:06   VMs will now be able to sign into and use iCloud

00:49:09   and other Apple ID-related services,

00:49:11   just as they would when running directly on the hardware.

00:49:14   That's very cool.

00:49:15   - I think they mean Apple account-related services.

00:49:16   - Ah, that's true, they say we already did it.

00:49:19   - It begins.

00:49:20   - It begins.

00:49:21   Then there's a doc on Apple's developer site

00:49:24   using iCloud with macOS virtual machines,

00:49:27   and reading from that doc,

00:49:28   when you create a VM in macOS 15

00:49:29   from a macOS 15 software image, blah, blah, blah,

00:49:32   virtualization configures an identity for the VM

00:49:35   that it derives from the security information

00:49:36   in the host's secure enclave.

00:49:38   Just as individual physical devices have distinct identities

00:49:41   based on their secure enclaves,

00:49:42   this identity is distinct from other VMs.

00:49:45   - Yeah, so this is a thing that pretty much

00:49:46   only Apple could do because they are the ones

00:49:48   who are the keeper of all the software

00:49:50   that interacts with the secure enclave.

00:49:51   The reason it didn't work before

00:49:53   is because the VMs didn't have access to that,

00:49:55   and you need that to sign into iCloud,

00:49:56   and you may be thinking,

00:49:57   who cares if you can sign into iCloud?

00:49:59   So many things and so many apps require an iCloud,

00:50:01   not just in-app purchase or stuff like that,

00:50:04   but anything that uses CloudKit

00:50:06   or any of Apple's cloud services.

00:50:08   It was very difficult to do what iOS users take for granted

00:50:12   of being able to have a simulator or a VM

00:50:14   where you can test your software,

00:50:16   especially for Mac OS

00:50:18   if you wanna support two versions back.

00:50:19   You had to keep running old Macs, running old versions,

00:50:21   and that's a little bit more cumbersome

00:50:23   than keeping around old phones

00:50:25   because the Macs are just bigger,

00:50:26   and you gotta have a keyboard and mouse attached to them

00:50:28   and everything, right?

00:50:29   We're like, it would be great

00:50:30   if we could just do this all in virtualization.

00:50:31   Oh, but we can't because even though you can

00:50:34   and have been able to virtualize Mac OS for years,

00:50:36   the inability to sign into iCloud put a big damper on that.

00:50:39   Now, it's not great that this requires,

00:50:41   you have to be running Sequoia to run the VM,

00:50:43   and the only OS you can run in the VM is Sequoia or later.

00:50:47   So it doesn't help people now, but two years from now,

00:50:51   you'll be able to run the two-year-old version of Mac OS

00:50:54   in a VM.

00:50:54   So I mean, you could quibble with how they did it

00:50:56   or whatever, but obviously it kind of requires support

00:50:59   in both the OS and the VM thing,

00:51:00   so I can see why it requires 15 on both,

00:51:03   and in a few years, this will fix itself.

00:51:05   I'm just glad this finally came.

00:51:06   They heard the cries of their developers.

00:51:08   Next stop, Mac OS simulators in Xcode, dare to dream.

00:51:13   - That would be cool, and I mean,

00:51:15   there's no reason not to, right?

00:51:16   I mean, the reason is it takes work,

00:51:18   but hypothetically, there's no reason

00:51:20   we couldn't, that Apple couldn't do it.

00:51:22   All right, let's move on to Apple intelligence.

00:51:25   Rick Knoller writes with regard to Apple intelligence

00:51:28   and third-party mail apps.

00:51:29   Could you add your Gmail account to the Apple mail app

00:51:32   and then hide it?

00:51:33   That might allow Apple intelligence to access that info,

00:51:36   but you wouldn't have to use it or see it in mail.app.

00:51:40   - Yeah, I do this on my Mac.

00:51:41   I think I mentioned this before.

00:51:42   I have a weird arrangement, Apple mail on my Mac,

00:51:45   which is an app that I do not use.

00:51:47   I occasionally launch it, and I have my Gmail account

00:51:50   configured with this ancient Google thing

00:51:53   that has been in there forever,

00:51:54   where you can pop from your Gmail account.

00:51:58   It's very strange, and they still support it.

00:52:00   I keep waiting for it to break,

00:52:01   but the old pop protocol where you just say,

00:52:03   what's new since the last time I checked,

00:52:05   and it downloads the messages individually, right?

00:52:07   That exists for Gmail, and I use it

00:52:10   to basically make a network backup of my Gmail, right?

00:52:13   An incremental network backup.

00:52:15   So I launch Apple mail every once in a while.

00:52:17   It downloads all the messages into a pop local mailbox,

00:52:20   and I just stick them into a folder called Gmail archive.

00:52:22   It's the tertiary backup of my Gmail.

00:52:27   And what that means is Apple intelligence on, not my Mac,

00:52:31   but on my future Mac will be able to have access to my mail

00:52:35   to use that to give it the context

00:52:37   that it needs to do smart things.

00:52:38   But on my phone, I don't do that.

00:52:40   And so the suggestion from Rick is something I'm gonna try.

00:52:43   I configured my Gmail account, not with pop,

00:52:46   but just the default way you can configure it on your phone.

00:52:49   I haven't figured out how to hide the account.

00:52:51   I just ignore it, and I'm into my other inbox.

00:52:53   I'm not in the all inboxes view or whatever.

00:52:56   And I hope what that means is that my phone

00:52:58   will also see my mail.

00:53:00   Now, unfortunately, I don't ever wanna use Apple mail,

00:53:03   and my default email client is set to the Gmail app,

00:53:06   but I hope this means that Apple intelligence,

00:53:09   again, not on my current phone 'cause it's only a 14 Pro,

00:53:12   will be able to be smart about my email

00:53:15   even though I don't use Apple mail.

00:53:17   - All right, Xcode AI code completions.

00:53:20   In the documentation for Xcode 16,

00:53:23   it reads Xcode 16 includes predictive code completion

00:53:26   powered by a machine learning model

00:53:27   specifically trained for Swift and Apple SDKs.

00:53:30   See you, Objective-C.

00:53:31   Predictive code completion requires a Mac with Apple Silicon

00:53:33   and 16 gigs of unified memory running Mac OS 15.

00:53:37   - So another double whammy.

00:53:38   So A, Xcode 16, if you want the cool code completion,

00:53:42   you have to also be running Mac OS 15,

00:53:44   which has not always been the case.

00:53:45   Sometimes, usually when there's new versions of Xcode,

00:53:47   you can run them on the current stable OS,

00:53:50   and they work and have all the features, but not this year.

00:53:54   And the second thing is, hey, you want code completion?

00:53:56   Hope you didn't buy a base model MacBook

00:53:57   or MacBook Pro with eight gigs of RAM

00:54:00   because the cool, smart code completion requires 16 gigs

00:54:03   of memory.

00:54:05   In other words, it requires a Co-pilot Plus PC.

00:54:07   - Ooh.

00:54:08   - All right, yeah, that's tough, but I mean, here we are.

00:54:12   More with regards to the hardware requirements,

00:54:17   David Steer writes, "I'm curious as to why Apple Intelligence

00:54:20   works on M1 chips, but you need an A18 Pro

00:54:22   to use it on iPhone.

00:54:23   If I recall correctly, the M1 is roughly equivalent

00:54:25   to the A15 Bionic, which means anything after iPhone 13,

00:54:28   including iPhone SE third generation,

00:54:30   could possibly have the necessary power,

00:54:32   but crucially, not the required amount of RAM.

00:54:35   Do you think it's possible that Apple's

00:54:36   notoriously stingy RAM provision could be coming back

00:54:38   to bite them in the era of AI?

00:54:40   It's true that lack of backwards compatibility

00:54:42   could help them manage server capacity

00:54:43   or drive customers to upgrade their devices,

00:54:45   but they'll need to balance that with the difficult

00:54:47   messaging that their new flagship features are not available

00:54:49   to the vast majority of their user base."

00:54:51   - Yep, 100%, it's the RAM.

00:54:53   I mean, Grubber asked that on the talk show,

00:54:55   and they were typically cagey about it,

00:54:57   but they did confirm.

00:54:58   It's lots of factors, including the RAM.

00:55:00   It's 100% the RAM.

00:55:01   Like, that's why the 15 Pro can do it,

00:55:03   and the other ones don't.

00:55:04   Yes, the 15 Pro does have a better neural engine

00:55:06   than the 14 Pro, but not that much better.

00:55:09   But what the 15 Pro has is more RAM,

00:55:11   and it seems to me that getting any of this stuff

00:55:15   to work on a phone with the limited amount of RAM

00:55:17   that's on a phone, because I believe,

00:55:19   what, the 15 Pro has what, eight gigs?

00:55:20   - I believe that's right.

00:55:21   - So we just got done saying that on the Mac,

00:55:24   to get a somewhat pedestrian feature, AI feature,

00:55:28   like code completion of like where I write some code for you

00:55:31   or whatever, you need 16 gigs of RAM.

00:55:34   And they're trying to get this to work on a phone with eight.

00:55:37   They cannot get it to work on a phone with six, apparently.

00:55:40   Like RAM is the thing here.

00:55:41   If you bought a base model MacBook Air

00:55:44   after hearing people rave that you can do everything

00:55:45   on this, you can buy an eight gig MacBook Air,

00:55:47   you can do Xcode, you can do all your development,

00:55:49   well, you don't get the AI features that you want

00:55:51   from the new version of Xcode, 'cause you need 16.

00:55:54   And we discussed on a past show how the rumor was

00:55:56   that all of the phones for this year in September

00:55:59   are going to have eight gigs of RAM, this is why, right?

00:56:01   And even eight gigs is probably pushing it,

00:56:03   because it's the same amount as the 15 Pro.

00:56:05   Why didn't they go to nine or 10 or 11 or 12 or 16, whatever?

00:56:08   AI eats RAM, it needs a lot of it.

00:56:12   RAM takes battery, RAM takes space, RAM produces heat.

00:56:16   Like Apple is stingy because they're cheap,

00:56:19   but also stingy because, especially in a portable device,

00:56:22   RAM has a cost to it.

00:56:23   Well, now they're rolling out tons of AI features,

00:56:26   and I don't think Apple wants the only phone

00:56:31   that can run this stuff to be the very tippy top flagship,

00:56:34   'cause even the iPhone 15 can't run it.

00:56:36   Only the 15 Pro can run it, that is not ideal.

00:56:39   It's nice on the Mac that it can run all,

00:56:41   you know, all the AI features can run all the way back down

00:56:43   to the M1, so kudos to those teams,

00:56:45   but like the Macs have more stuff, they have more battery,

00:56:48   they have more memory, they have more CPU.

00:56:50   And even though the Xcode code completion requires 16 gigs,

00:56:53   Apple Intelligence, broadly speaking, as far as I know,

00:56:56   does not require 16 gigs,

00:56:57   so a lot of the Apple Intelligence features

00:56:58   will work with eight gigs, just not the Xcode thing,

00:57:01   it seems, but yeah, this is definitely

00:57:04   chickens coming home to roost.

00:57:05   Apple being stingy with RAM seems like it's fine.

00:57:07   Every time someone probably made an internal argument,

00:57:09   we should put more RAM, they say, "It's fine, I'll show you."

00:57:11   Like we even got some inside information ages ago

00:57:14   that they said we did tests with, it was just about SSDs.

00:57:17   And it turns out one SSD chip isn't actually that bad,

00:57:20   it's not noticeably worse than having the two SSD chips,

00:57:23   so we didn't do it.

00:57:24   They reversed that decision because of, you know,

00:57:26   presumably public outcry, or they just didn't want to hear

00:57:28   people whine about it anymore.

00:57:30   But all the previous cases where they said

00:57:32   actually eight gigs of RAM is fine,

00:57:33   they need to keep up with the pace of the industry,

00:57:37   even if it doesn't seem like it's strictly necessary,

00:57:40   they can lag behind a little bit,

00:57:41   but you can't just ignore it forever in saying

00:57:43   there will never be another thing that we need to do

00:57:44   that requires more RAM than we have now.

00:57:47   Here's AI saying, "Guess what, we found a use

00:57:49   for all that RAM."

00:57:51   That always happens.

00:57:52   There's always something over the horizon

00:57:53   that requires more resources.

00:57:54   Usually it's just games.

00:57:56   Honestly, games will always eat everything you give them,

00:57:59   right?

00:58:00   But sometimes there's applications that everybody uses,

00:58:02   although at this point everybody games to some degree

00:58:04   or another, something is going to want those resources.

00:58:07   Computers are never fast enough and never have enough RAM,

00:58:10   so you have to keep up with the industry.

00:58:13   You can't say we finally plateaued.

00:58:14   Computers will never need more than eight gigs of RAM.

00:58:17   It's AI now, who knows what it'll be in 20 years.

00:58:20   Apple, please give us RAM.

00:58:22   - I think this also should inform your purchasing decisions

00:58:27   of Macs over time.

00:58:29   If you buy a Mac today and you want it to still have

00:58:32   cutting edge features for as long as possible,

00:58:35   this is a pretty big reason to not just leave it

00:58:37   at the eight gig default.

00:58:38   Even 16, because LLMs as we know them are giant RAM hogs

00:58:43   and because we don't really know what the future will hold

00:58:48   with features, there might be some really killer feature

00:58:51   that comes out in two or three years that requires

00:58:54   16 gigs of RAM or more on the Mac to actually be usable.

00:58:58   And even if Apple doesn't do it, someone else might.

00:59:01   So this should inform your purchases even today.

00:59:05   Sometimes you can kind of peer into the future and be like,

00:59:08   well, I think we're on the cusp of something

00:59:10   that's about to need a lot of Resource X.

00:59:13   In this case, we are there right now for RAM.

00:59:17   We are in the early days of something that needs a lot

00:59:20   of RAM and so maybe for your next Mac purchase,

00:59:23   get a little more than you otherwise would have.

00:59:26   - Apple's AI training data at machinelearning.apple.com

00:59:29   and we'll put the full URL in the show notes of course.

00:59:32   It reads, we train our foundation models on licensed data,

00:59:35   including data selected to enhance specific features,

00:59:38   as well as publicly available data collected

00:59:39   by our web crawler, Applebot.

00:59:42   Web publishers have the option to opt out of the use

00:59:44   of their web content for Apple Intelligence Training

00:59:46   with the data usage control.

00:59:48   We never use our users' private personal data

00:59:50   or user interactions when training our foundation models.

00:59:53   And we apply filters to remove personally

00:59:55   identical information like social security

00:59:57   and credit card numbers that are publicly available

01:00:00   on the internet.

01:00:00   We also filter profanity and other low quality content

01:00:03   to prevent its inclusion in the training corpus.

01:00:05   In addition to filtering, we perform data extraction,

01:00:07   deduplication and the application of a model-based classifier

01:00:10   to identify high quality documents.

01:00:12   - Yeah, so this is kind of the same answer

01:00:14   that they gave on stage.

01:00:15   We saw them twice talk about this,

01:00:17   I think once in the iJustine interview

01:00:19   and then again on the talk show.

01:00:20   And as I said before, and I'll say again,

01:00:23   their answer to how do you train your AI models is not great.

01:00:27   It could be worse.

01:00:28   I like the idea of they're saying,

01:00:29   we are not using your private or personal data,

01:00:31   we're not training in anything that you do.

01:00:33   And they do use licensed data and so on and so forth,

01:00:35   but they also always have this item,

01:00:37   they say we use publicly available data.

01:00:41   You know, oh, you can opt out.

01:00:42   Well, it's kind of hard for us to opt out

01:00:44   when this is the first we're hearing

01:00:45   of the fact that you're training AIs on our data.

01:00:47   So you already got it, you already did it,

01:00:49   you already trained.

01:00:50   Now, I think Applebot is a pre-existing thing

01:00:53   and we could have been blocking things

01:00:54   with robots.txt or whatever.

01:00:55   But if you care about this,

01:00:56   if you didn't know that Apple was training its AI,

01:01:00   you wouldn't have maybe been blocking Applebot

01:01:02   because you're like, oh, Apple's not doing anything like that

01:01:03   and I don't have to worry about it.

01:01:04   Now, setting aside the legality and ethics

01:01:07   of training on this type of data,

01:01:11   I'm still kind of surprised that Apple didn't use

01:01:15   one of its greatest resources, money,

01:01:17   to pull an Adobe and say,

01:01:19   we do not train on publicly available information.

01:01:21   We train only on information that we licensed.

01:01:24   Cut deals with the people that have the information.

01:01:26   Make a licensing deal with the New York Times,

01:01:29   if you have to do with Wikipedia,

01:01:31   with Encyclopedia Britannica,

01:01:33   just having sort of consensual data sharing relationships,

01:01:38   but apparently that is insufficient

01:01:39   to train something as complicated

01:01:41   as what they're attempting to do.

01:01:42   So they've been training on publicly available

01:01:44   information, meaning they're crawling the web,

01:01:46   looking for stuff and throwing it through this engine

01:01:49   and how that's going to shake out in the US anyway

01:01:54   has yet to be determined because those cases

01:01:56   are winding in their way through the court system.

01:01:57   I don't think Apple's really painting itself

01:01:59   into a corner here because there are other companies

01:02:02   that are much worse off.

01:02:03   If it turns out that training on publicly available

01:02:07   information requires some kind of legal arrangement

01:02:10   or whatever, Apple will just make those legal arrangements.

01:02:12   Like they're not doomed or anything like that.

01:02:14   It just kind of surprises me that they didn't take

01:02:17   an even more conservative approach than they have.

01:02:19   And so it forces Apple executives to be on stage

01:02:22   and they have to say, we use this, we use that,

01:02:24   and we also use publicly available information.

01:02:26   If you press them and say, what is publicly available

01:02:28   information, I mean, they will say web pages,

01:02:30   web pages that are on the web, your web pages.

01:02:32   Do you have a blog?

01:02:33   Is it on the web?

01:02:34   Does it have stuff in it?

01:02:35   We probably trained our AI on it,

01:02:36   unless it contains profanity or credit card numbers

01:02:38   or whatever, right?

01:02:39   That is not an easy thing for a company like Apple

01:02:42   to talk about or say.

01:02:44   And in this case, they can't say, oh, but OpenAI,

01:02:47   we push all the problems off onto them

01:02:48   because this is Apple training its models,

01:02:51   its foundation models, and presumably its future

01:02:54   ChatGPT competitor on publicly available information.

01:02:58   - All right, so what if you don't want your website

01:03:00   to be included in Apple's AI models?

01:03:03   Well, there's a knowledge base document

01:03:05   that we will link in the show notes that describes

01:03:06   how you can modify your robots.txt

01:03:08   in order to tell it to kindly bugger off.

01:03:11   - Yeah, just go back in time and do that like two years ago.

01:03:14   - Yeah, exactly.

01:03:16   But we'll put a link in the show notes if you're interested.

01:03:18   All right, Tim Cook did a interview on the Washington Post

01:03:21   and the Washington Post asked a lot of questions.

01:03:24   John, you've extracted a few.

01:03:26   Do you want me to play the role of Tim

01:03:28   and you'll play the role of the Washington Post?

01:03:30   - Oh, you can't do both of them?

01:03:32   - I can, I thought we would play it.

01:03:33   - You can do a funny voice. - Play the space.

01:03:34   - Can you do Tim Cook's accent?

01:03:35   I can't do it.

01:03:36   Good morning.

01:03:38   - Yeah, exactly.

01:03:39   All right, the Washington Post asked,

01:03:40   did you take any special delight

01:03:41   in calling it Apple Intelligence

01:03:42   as opposed to artificial intelligence?

01:03:44   To which Tim replied,

01:03:45   it seems sort of a logical conclusion

01:03:47   after looking at so many names.

01:03:48   At least for me, I can tell you it wasn't a riff off

01:03:50   of artificial intelligence.

01:03:52   Wow, I'm struggling.

01:03:53   - It wasn't?

01:03:54   - Yeah, right.

01:03:55   It was sort of calling it what it is.

01:03:57   I'm sure a lot will be said about it,

01:03:59   but it's probably not as it appears.

01:04:01   - As far as Tim's concerned, it's just like,

01:04:02   oh, it's an Apple feature that's intelligent

01:04:04   and has nothing to do with AI.

01:04:06   Okay.

01:04:07   - It's a feature, Tim, okay.

01:04:08   I mean, at least for him.

01:04:10   He's saying his perspective.

01:04:11   - Washington Post asked,

01:04:15   what's your confidence that Apple Intelligence

01:04:16   will not hallucinate?

01:04:18   To which Tim replied, it's not 100%,

01:04:20   but I think we've done everything that we know to do,

01:04:22   including thinking very deeply about the readiness

01:04:24   of the technology in the areas that we're using it in.

01:04:26   So I'm confident that it will be very high quality,

01:04:28   but I'd say in all honesty, that's short of 100%.

01:04:31   I would never claim it's 100%.

01:04:33   - So this is interesting because,

01:04:35   as people have noted, when you opt into OpenAI,

01:04:39   you have to explicitly say you're sending your data to them,

01:04:41   and when it comes back,

01:04:43   there's a little disclaimer underneath it,

01:04:44   like there isn't all these things that says,

01:04:46   check important information,

01:04:48   or this information might not be correct,

01:04:49   or so on and so forth.

01:04:50   But this question was not about OpenAI.

01:04:52   It was not about the OpenAI integration.

01:04:53   It wasn't about that screen

01:04:55   that has the disclaimer at the bottom.

01:04:56   It was about Apple Intelligence,

01:04:58   because Apple does have models.

01:05:00   The chances of Apple's own stuff, not OpenAI,

01:05:03   the stuff that stays on device

01:05:04   or goes to Apple's super duper private servers,

01:05:06   what about that?

01:05:07   What does that have a chance of hallucinating?

01:05:08   As I continue to futilely point out,

01:05:10   hallucinating is a terrible term,

01:05:12   because there is no distinction between a quote hallucination

01:05:15   and a quote correct answer.

01:05:17   The AI model is functioning the same way in both cases.

01:05:21   It's not like, oh, it made a mistake,

01:05:23   or it got, like we know from the outside,

01:05:24   we can judge whether we think this is a good or bad thing,

01:05:27   but the internal machinery is operating

01:05:30   as expected in both cases.

01:05:32   Everything from an LLM is either not a hallucination

01:05:35   or a hallucination.

01:05:37   There's no special, like, oh, it did a bad, it did a good.

01:05:39   Like, it's just a big stew of words and probabilities,

01:05:43   and it's a machine that is deterministic,

01:05:46   that is it fed various inputs and various parameters

01:05:49   that tweak it, and you get output from it,

01:05:51   and every time it does that, it is exactly as correct

01:05:54   or exactly as incorrect as every other instance.

01:05:57   But anyway, what it is saying is,

01:05:59   can that machine produce stuff that is not useful

01:06:02   because it doesn't fulfill the purpose?

01:06:05   If you're asking a question,

01:06:06   did it give you an answer that is correct?

01:06:08   Did it actually give you something helpful?

01:06:10   Did it understand what you were asking for

01:06:12   and give it to you?

01:06:13   Like, we can judge what it does,

01:06:15   and this is Tim Cook saying,

01:06:17   some of the things that we ship as Apple intelligence

01:06:20   might not do the right thing.

01:06:21   Now, for Genmoji, what do you care?

01:06:25   You ask for, you know, a turtle skiing down the Alps,

01:06:30   and the turtle doesn't look like a turtle.

01:06:32   Who cares, right?

01:06:33   No harm, no foul.

01:06:34   Summarization, I guess it could get wrong

01:06:36   if you ask it to summarize something,

01:06:38   and its summary is not accurate

01:06:42   in a way that is significant.

01:06:44   Like, if it's a big article about, like, you know,

01:06:47   how much detergent you're supposed to use in the dishwasher,

01:06:49   and the article has a whole bunch of paragraphs

01:06:51   talking about all the things that you shouldn't do,

01:06:52   and then at the end tells you what you should do,

01:06:54   and the summary decides that the best summary of this article

01:06:59   is one of the bad things,

01:07:00   that the article is somehow concluding

01:07:02   that you should do one of the things

01:07:03   that it's actually saying you shouldn't do,

01:07:05   I would call that, in Tim's parlance here, hallucination,

01:07:08   because you asked it to summarize the article,

01:07:09   and it didn't summarize the article the way a human would,

01:07:13   because it didn't understand the point of the thing,

01:07:16   and if you rely on that summary,

01:07:18   you'll put the wrong amount of detergent

01:07:19   in your dishwasher or whatever, right?

01:07:22   And this is another awkward position

01:07:23   for Tim Cook to be put in.

01:07:25   This is a good question from the Washington Post.

01:07:26   You have to say, you're rolling out

01:07:28   a bunch of these features.

01:07:29   Are they going to essentially malfunction

01:07:31   and not do what they're supposed to do

01:07:34   in a way that's not like, oh, we'll file a radar

01:07:36   and we'll fix it, 'cause Apple ships software

01:07:37   that doesn't do what it's supposed to do all the time,

01:07:39   but those are bugs, and they can fix them.

01:07:41   There's nothing you can do when this happens.

01:07:43   You could send this to Apple and say,

01:07:44   hey, it summarized this thing wrong,

01:07:47   and they'll try to make it better next year,

01:07:48   but it's not as simple as this caused a crash,

01:07:51   or this thing was misaligned,

01:07:53   or a cosmetic error, or whatever.

01:07:54   This is a different realm,

01:07:55   where Apple is shipping products that might not function

01:07:59   correctly and that there's nothing Apple can do about it

01:08:02   except for try harder next year with their next model

01:08:05   that is trained on more data than they select from the web.

01:08:07   - So then the Washington Post asked,

01:08:10   what makes you think OpenAI and Sam Altman specifically

01:08:12   are trustworthy partners who share Apple's values?

01:08:14   Very well phrased and a very good question,

01:08:17   to which Tim replied, they've done some things

01:08:20   on privacy that I like.

01:08:21   They're not tracking IP addresses,

01:08:23   and some of the things like that

01:08:24   that we're very keen on not happening.

01:08:27   I think they're a pioneer in the area,

01:08:28   and today they have the best model,

01:08:30   and I think our customers want something

01:08:31   with world knowledge some of the time.

01:08:34   So we considered everything and everyone,

01:08:35   and obviously we're not stuck on one person forever

01:08:38   for something.

01:08:39   We're integrating with other people as well,

01:08:41   but they're first, and I think today

01:08:42   it's because they're best.

01:08:43   - It's another uncomfortable situation.

01:08:45   People keep asking Apple about OpenAI.

01:08:47   It's uncomfortable that feature exists.

01:08:49   It's uncomfortable that OpenAI is what it is.

01:08:51   Tim is trying to put a part of his spin on it,

01:08:52   saying they're doing some things with privacy they like.

01:08:54   You know why they're doing that?

01:08:55   Probably because Apple forced them to.

01:08:57   I don't think they were doing that on their own.

01:08:59   I think if you use a chat GPD through the web,

01:09:01   they are tracking IP addresses and other stuff like that,

01:09:04   but whatever they did with Apple,

01:09:06   there's baggage that comes with Samalpa and OpenAI,

01:09:11   and Apple, I guess they feel like,

01:09:14   this is on Tim, 'cause he's the person

01:09:17   to give a go, no go on this type of thing,

01:09:19   saying this is what everyone's talking about.

01:09:21   We need to have it.

01:09:22   We don't have any of this.

01:09:23   We don't have anything that matches this internally,

01:09:26   and in fact, we think it's a little bit dangerous,

01:09:27   but either way, we have no choice.

01:09:28   We have to partner, and the Google deal didn't go through,

01:09:32   and they're still keeping the door open,

01:09:33   saying it's not just OpenAI.

01:09:34   We'll partner with whoever, but yeah,

01:09:36   they have to partner with this company

01:09:38   and put a disclaimer on their little thing.

01:09:40   It's the opt-in, and there's a disclaimer

01:09:42   that says it might be wrong,

01:09:43   but they feel like they need to have it

01:09:45   because they think that's what people want.

01:09:48   I think they're right that that's what people want.

01:09:50   I think the whole story would have been

01:09:51   that they still don't have an AI chatbot,

01:09:53   but I think the utility of AI chatbots is still maybe not,

01:09:58   it's kind of like when something is good enough

01:10:00   to work in a Disney context,

01:10:02   I know Apple and Disney aren't the same thing,

01:10:03   but when is it good enough to work in an Apple context

01:10:05   where we have more expectations about,

01:10:09   I don't know, the cultural expectations

01:10:13   of an Apple product are different than a PC-type thing

01:10:16   or an Android phone.

01:10:18   It's more cautious about using the same things

01:10:23   like the App Store is not the same as the open web,

01:10:27   let's put it that way, right?

01:10:28   Apple runs the App Store in a more cautious way

01:10:31   than the open web runs, which is bad and good in some ways,

01:10:35   but here they are, they're like,

01:10:36   we have to provide this option

01:10:38   and we have to awkwardly answer every press question

01:10:40   about it by saying, people want it, they're the best one,

01:10:43   we're not stuck with them, next question, please.

01:10:47   - The aforementioned Steve Trouton Smith asks

01:10:49   with regard to Siri unsupported devices,

01:10:52   and so Steve writes, I still have so many questions

01:10:55   about Apple intelligence, does Siri just not get better

01:10:57   on anything below an iPhone 15 Pro,

01:10:59   no improvement to the cloud-based Siri on older devices,

01:11:02   HomePods, Apple TVs?

01:11:03   It's a good point.

01:11:04   - I don't know the answer to that.

01:11:06   I don't think anyone asked Apple that and they should have.

01:11:09   Obviously, the older devices can't run Apple intelligence

01:11:13   on them, certainly a HomePod can't.

01:11:14   Talk about RAM limits, right?

01:11:17   - Which by the way, for a device that is all about Siri

01:11:21   and that is so reliant on Siri and is so bad with Siri,

01:11:26   that's the device that needs it the most.

01:11:30   It's such a shame that this is not going to get it.

01:11:33   - It makes me wonder, is a new HomePod coming

01:11:35   with eight gigs of RAM?

01:11:36   Actually, I shouldn't say that.

01:11:37   I don't actually know how much RAM a HomePod has.

01:11:39   Do you know how much RAM a HomePod has?

01:11:41   - I have no idea.

01:11:42   - 128 kilobytes, I don't know.

01:11:44   - Wow.

01:11:44   - Maybe it does have eight gigs, but anyway,

01:11:47   here's the thing though, for all the devices

01:11:49   like every iPhone except for the 15 Pro,

01:11:51   it's not like Apple can't make Siri better for them

01:11:56   because they could, the whole magic of their strategy

01:12:00   for Apple intelligence is that they run it on device

01:12:04   if they can and if they can't, they run it on basically

01:12:07   a logical extension of your device.

01:12:09   That's the whole private cloud computing thing.

01:12:11   It is like a bigger iPhone processor

01:12:14   that is not in the room with you.

01:12:16   And so that's the cloud, the transparency of like,

01:12:19   we'll run on device or we'll run there,

01:12:20   but the software doesn't care where it runs

01:12:23   because it's basically running on Apple Silicon

01:12:25   with, you know, of a different size, right?

01:12:28   Runs on big Apple Silicon in our data centers,

01:12:30   runs on smaller Apple Silicon on your phone.

01:12:32   It could be that on devices like the HomePod

01:12:36   or every phone except for the 15 Pro,

01:12:39   it could just send everything to private cloud computing,

01:12:41   which obviously would be slower and there'd be latency

01:12:43   and so on and so forth, but at this point,

01:12:45   tons of Siri stuff, most of the Siri stuff

01:12:47   goes across the network anyway.

01:12:49   That could make Siri smarter on devices

01:12:53   that can't run Apple intelligence locally.

01:12:55   I would vastly prefer that.

01:12:56   I would let, my HomePod now is currently sending things

01:12:58   over the network and taking a long time to do bad things.

01:13:01   How about updating it and having it do everything

01:13:03   through private cloud computing to the LLMs?

01:13:06   I hope that's what they do, but I find it not encouraging

01:13:10   that Apple never offered that as a thing that they're doing.

01:13:14   Everyone was so excited and jazzed about Apple intelligence,

01:13:16   no one really said, what about my HomePods?

01:13:19   Maybe they just assume we all understand

01:13:23   that's what's going on, but they didn't say it.

01:13:25   They didn't say, we'll dynamically choose

01:13:27   if we do it locally or remotely,

01:13:28   and of course, on devices that can't do it locally,

01:13:30   we'll do it all remotely.

01:13:31   They didn't say that at all.

01:13:32   So we will all find out when we start installing the betas

01:13:36   that actually have Apple intelligence features in them

01:13:38   on our unsupported devices.

01:13:40   Apple Silicon in Apple's private cloud computing servers.

01:13:44   There's a blog post about this,

01:13:45   which I did not have a chance to read,

01:13:47   but I presume, Jon, you at least glanced at it.

01:13:49   You know, I need some AI to summarize this for me.

01:13:53   - Yeah, well, so this was a question on the talk show live,

01:13:55   which we talked about before.

01:13:56   You can, we'll link to the YouTube video

01:13:58   so you can check it out, or the Vision Pro video,

01:14:01   if that's your, if you have one,

01:14:02   get it out of its little marshmallow.

01:14:05   Gruber asked them-- - It's a pretty big

01:14:06   marshmallow. - Yeah.

01:14:08   Gruber asked them, what is the Apple Silicon

01:14:11   that is running on Apple's private cloud compute servers?

01:14:14   Like, what is it?

01:14:15   And predictably, they did not answer that question, right?

01:14:18   It's Apple Silicon.

01:14:19   - Yeah, there was no way they were gonna answer that.

01:14:21   - Yeah, we talked about the,

01:14:22   like maybe three or four shows ago,

01:14:24   we talked about the rumor that it said

01:14:26   that Apple is going to run data centers

01:14:28   with M2 Ultras in them or whatever.

01:14:30   And we thought, that doesn't make any sense.

01:14:31   And again, the private cloud computing thing explains that.

01:14:33   We talked about it in the WWDC episode.

01:14:35   Now it does make sense,

01:14:36   and using M2 Ultras also makes sense,

01:14:39   because this is a chip they already designed.

01:14:41   The speculation has been that there hasn't been enough time

01:14:45   for Apple to make any kind of custom server chip.

01:14:48   They, like, they sort of decided to do this too late,

01:14:52   because the lead times on Silicon are so long.

01:14:55   And depending on how many, how successful this effort is,

01:14:58   and how many servers they need,

01:15:00   it takes a certain number of products to justify

01:15:02   making it a custom chip.

01:15:04   And M2 Ultra, despite being very power efficient

01:15:07   and having lots of compute and so on and so forth,

01:15:09   is not the ideal chip

01:15:12   for doing private cloud computing AI stuff.

01:15:15   It doesn't need the H.265 decoder and encoder on there.

01:15:19   It probably doesn't need Thunderbolt,

01:15:20   since it doesn't have persistent storage, right?

01:15:23   Like, this is not a purpose-built server chip.

01:15:27   Lots of other companies do have purpose-built server chips.

01:15:29   Companies that run huge amounts of servers,

01:15:31   like Google and Facebook and Amazon, right?

01:15:33   Apple, as far as we are aware on the outside,

01:15:37   even though they do run servers,

01:15:39   they don't have their own dedicated server Silicon.

01:15:43   I feel like if they did, they would have bragged about it.

01:15:45   So the rumor about them using M2 Ultra makes sense.

01:15:48   There's a bunch of things on that chip

01:15:49   that aren't being used and are just being wasted.

01:15:51   I think, you know, maybe two or three years ago,

01:15:54   they started the project to make a dedicated server chip,

01:15:57   and that'll come out in two or three more years after that.

01:16:00   But that is something to watch for,

01:16:03   because, you know, I can tie everything to the Mac Pro.

01:16:05   It's a situation where they have to make a weird custom chip

01:16:08   that has a limited application,

01:16:11   whose needs are different

01:16:12   than all the needs of their other chips,

01:16:14   because server is different

01:16:15   in the same way that the Mac Pro is different.

01:16:17   Can they bring themselves to do that?

01:16:19   Or will it just be, will their server farms

01:16:21   just be the dumping ground for the unsold,

01:16:24   cheap-to-produce inventory of the two years ago,

01:16:27   pretty good Mac Studio chip?

01:16:29   - All right, Apple and OpenAI aren't paying each other

01:16:33   yet, says Bloomberg.

01:16:35   This is reported on Bloomberg and then covered on The Verge,

01:16:38   but Germin says, "Apple isn't paying OpenAI

01:16:40   as part of the partnership.

01:16:41   Instead, Apple believes pushing OpenAI's brand and technology

01:16:44   to hundreds of millions of its devices

01:16:46   is of equal or greater value than monetary payments.

01:16:49   ChatGPT will be offered for free on Apple's products,

01:16:51   but OpenAI and Apple could still make money

01:16:53   by converting free users to paid accounts.

01:16:54   Today, if a user subscribes to OpenAI on an Apple device

01:16:57   via the ChatGPT app,

01:16:59   the process uses Apple's payment platform,

01:17:01   which traditionally gives the iPhone maker a cut."

01:17:04   Then back to The Verge, recapping,

01:17:06   "The report also says this deal isn't exclusive to OpenAI

01:17:10   and that Apple is in talks with Anthropic and Google

01:17:12   to offer their respective chatbots as an alternative option,

01:17:15   with an agreement for Google's Gemini

01:17:16   expected to be in place later this year."

01:17:19   - Yeah, Gerber also asked that on stage,

01:17:21   "Hey, which way is the money flowing in this situation?"

01:17:23   They obviously didn't answer.

01:17:25   This makes some sense.

01:17:27   Apple is in the power position here.

01:17:28   Apple essentially owns billions of customers

01:17:32   who have shown a willingness to spend money.

01:17:34   OpenAI wants access to those customers.

01:17:37   Apple's offer to them is,

01:17:39   we will literally build you into the operating system.

01:17:41   You couldn't ask for a better customer acquisition tool

01:17:43   than this.

01:17:44   It's your job to convert those people

01:17:46   by having a good enough product

01:17:47   that people wanna pay for it or whatever.

01:17:50   It makes sense that there's no money changing hands

01:17:52   either way, because on the other hand, OpenAI can say,

01:17:53   well, you don't have anything like what we have

01:17:55   and we're the market leader.

01:17:57   And in the end, those two things cancel each other out,

01:17:59   according to this rumor, and nobody pays anybody.

01:18:01   And OpenAI helps to do lots of conversions,

01:18:04   and Apple, as always, hopes to take a lot of 30 to 15%.

01:18:08   (laughing)

01:18:09   - Indeed.

01:18:11   All right, and then The Sane writes

01:18:13   on the impact of Apple Intelligence,

01:18:16   "Do you think that the arrival of Apple Intelligence

01:18:18   is pulling dev time away from the workflow features

01:18:20   and shortcuts, or might these be rolled together

01:18:22   in a future release?"

01:18:23   I'm sorry for chuckling.

01:18:24   It's just, I don't view those as at all related.

01:18:28   Like the sorts of people who work on one,

01:18:30   I mean, I guess in some cases could be the same people

01:18:34   that work on the other, but from what little I know

01:18:37   and from what I know as a developer,

01:18:38   I don't think that people that are really good

01:18:40   at doing the sorts of things that workflow does

01:18:42   are gonna be necessarily very good

01:18:44   at doing the sorts of things that Apple Intelligence does.

01:18:46   - I put this question in here

01:18:47   because a sort of company-wide fire drill effort

01:18:50   like Apple Intelligence pulls resources from everything.

01:18:54   Even if it's not the same people,

01:18:56   because so many people in so many groups

01:18:59   across the entire company have shifted their focus

01:19:02   because an edict has come down from on high

01:19:05   that 2024, our WWDC is gonna be the coming out

01:19:09   of Apple Intelligence, this really does,

01:19:13   it is a company-wide tax and it was the right thing to do.

01:19:16   They should have done this,

01:19:17   arguably they should have done it earlier,

01:19:19   but it does take away from things.

01:19:21   Even the problem is like, even if you're not a person

01:19:24   who was taken off task by doing this,

01:19:27   people you work with were taken off task.

01:19:28   People have probably moved around, right?

01:19:31   Priorities change, maybe your thing

01:19:32   that you actually did have time to work on and finish

01:19:35   doesn't even make it into the OS

01:19:36   because it's all hand on deck to debug the feature

01:19:38   that somebody else wrote

01:19:39   because that's the important one to roll out.

01:19:41   So, you know, in every release, priorities shift around

01:19:47   and the thing you might want to be developed

01:19:49   might not get the resources that it deserves,

01:19:52   but Apple Intelligence is definitely one of those times

01:19:55   every few years where there is a big movement

01:19:57   within the company that has the potential

01:19:59   to impact every aspect of the software stack

01:20:03   that is released to WWDC.

01:20:05   - All right, let's talk iOS 18.

01:20:07   There are some indentations on the bezel in iOS 18

01:20:13   when you engage Siri, I guess.

01:20:15   So this is really, really difficult

01:20:17   to verbally describe.

01:20:18   I'm gonna read a little bit from The Verge,

01:20:19   but there is a GIF link that you can and should click

01:20:24   because no matter how I describe it,

01:20:26   it's not gonna make a lot of sense.

01:20:27   So here we go.

01:20:28   When you press the side buttons while running the iOS 18 beta

01:20:31   there's a clever new animation that makes it look like

01:20:33   you're pushing the bezel into your screen a little bit.

01:20:35   At first glance, there's not much purpose here

01:20:37   other than to add a little whimsy,

01:20:39   but it might also be a practical visual indicator

01:20:40   if Apple eventually releases phones

01:20:42   with solid state side buttons

01:20:43   that don't move when you press them.

01:20:45   And again, there's a link in the show notes

01:20:46   to GIF so you can see it in action.

01:20:48   - So I kind of get, having a visual indication

01:20:54   that you successfully pressed a button is a good idea.

01:20:56   People should do that on the web,

01:20:57   they should do it in their iOS apps.

01:20:58   I am shocked when this does not happen.

01:21:00   I think during WWC I was complaining to somebody,

01:21:03   it might have been one of you,

01:21:04   that the WWC, like the developer app

01:21:06   where you can bookmark sessions

01:21:09   that you might wanna look at later,

01:21:10   when you tap the little bookmark icon,

01:21:13   it does not highlight in any way

01:21:15   to show that you've tapped it.

01:21:17   - You and I were talking about this.

01:21:18   - Over and over and over again,

01:21:20   and it's not clear whether you're toggling in on and off,

01:21:22   or whether you're just saying on, on, on,

01:21:24   or if none of those things are happening,

01:21:26   it's not a good UI.

01:21:28   That said, usually the feedback

01:21:30   that you successfully press the button

01:21:31   is that you feel it go in and out.

01:21:34   And even for like the buttons that don't move,

01:21:36   like the iPhone 7 home button,

01:21:39   that's what the vibration feedback is,

01:21:40   to let you know you have successfully pressed the button.

01:21:43   Now, there's this visual bit of feedback

01:21:46   where what it looks like is you've,

01:21:48   you're super strong and you have dented

01:21:50   the side of your phone in momentarily,

01:21:51   you've dented the screen and this little black region

01:21:54   from the side of your screen right next to the button

01:21:56   invades the pixels of the screen

01:21:58   and just goes like, like you're shoving

01:21:59   a little black rectangle into the screen region

01:22:01   and then letting it go back out again.

01:22:03   I'm not sure I find it aesthetically pleasing,

01:22:06   but I do like the idea of visual feedback,

01:22:09   but it also makes me worry that the like non-moving buttons

01:22:12   that have been rumored for ages maybe aren't that great

01:22:15   and they need to add this,

01:22:16   that's more clear that you press the button, I don't know.

01:22:19   It looks a little bit weird to me.

01:22:21   I think it looks really cool, honestly.

01:22:22   - Yeah, I agree, I actually thought it looked pretty neat.

01:22:25   I mean, obviously I haven't used it in my own hand,

01:22:27   but it looked pretty slick to me.

01:22:29   All right, Caleb Denman writes that,

01:22:31   "In iOS 18, you can now change the width

01:22:34   "of the beam of the flashlight.

01:22:36   "It works on the 15 Pro, 14 Pro,

01:22:37   "and maybe any iPhone with a dynamic island."

01:22:40   And I read this and I understood the words,

01:22:42   but I was like, I'm sorry, what?

01:22:44   How, what?

01:22:45   And so a friend of the show, Quinn Nelson,

01:22:47   has helpfully recorded a short little video,

01:22:50   which we will put in the show notes, that demonstrates this.

01:22:53   And I don't know that this is incredibly useful,

01:22:57   except on the rare occasions when you're like trying

01:23:00   to find something in the dark room and your partner

01:23:02   or whatever is asleep and you don't wanna blind them

01:23:04   with the flashlight going full blast,

01:23:07   that actually seems like it could be pretty useful.

01:23:10   - The interface to this is weird.

01:23:11   It's like you have an X and Y axis for swiping.

01:23:14   Like the Y axis is brightness and the X axis is beam width.

01:23:18   And since it's a circle,

01:23:19   it's really more like beam diameter.

01:23:20   I'm not actually sure how they're doing it.

01:23:22   Is there like a matrix of LEDs in there or something?

01:23:26   Or I don't know.

01:23:27   Apparently it's on my phone,

01:23:29   so I'll try it out when I get the beta.

01:23:31   - And then finally for iOS, Steve Trout and Smith,

01:23:34   as we've mentioned many times, writes,

01:23:35   "There are new APIs to provide

01:23:36   "a locked camera capture extension,

01:23:38   "which must be launched via a button

01:23:40   "on the lock screen control center or the action button.

01:23:43   "It cannot be launched by swiping sideways and lock screen."

01:23:46   There is a video about this from WWDC this year.

01:23:50   I spent some time with my good friend, Ben McCarthy,

01:23:53   and let me tell you, they were very excited about this

01:23:58   for their app Obscura.

01:23:59   So you should definitely,

01:24:01   I know Ben is definitely gonna be playing with this soon.

01:24:03   - Yeah, that was my question on the WWDC episode.

01:24:06   Does swiping, I know you can put the button

01:24:08   for third-party things,

01:24:08   but does it also work with swiping?

01:24:10   'Cause I thought it would be weird

01:24:12   that the button launches one camera app

01:24:13   and the swiping launches another.

01:24:14   That could also be a feature

01:24:15   if you wanna have two camera apps

01:24:17   and remember that the swipey one is the default one

01:24:19   and the button one is the third-party one.

01:24:21   But it does seem kind of strange.

01:24:22   Like they're giving access to the lock screen.

01:24:24   They have an extension to do this.

01:24:25   They could just as easily have a setting somewhere

01:24:27   that says, "Hey, do you want swipe

01:24:29   "to also activate the camera that you put in the little,

01:24:32   "you know, control center button thing or whatever?"

01:24:35   But not in the first beta anyway.

01:24:37   And I didn't watch the video,

01:24:38   so maybe they just explicitly say,

01:24:39   "No, in iOS 18, it's not gonna be that way."

01:24:42   - Let's move on to Marco's favorite platform, VisionOS.

01:24:45   - Woo! - VisionOS 2.0.

01:24:47   VisionOS 2.0 features that were not mentioned in the keynote.

01:24:51   And there's a VisionOS 2.0 preview that Apple has.

01:24:55   You can customize your home view, finally.

01:24:57   And Apple writes, "You can now personalize your home view.

01:24:59   "Simply pinch and hold to jiggle and arrange apps

01:25:02   "and bring them to your home view,

01:25:03   "including those from your compatible apps folder."

01:25:06   Very nice. - Finally.

01:25:07   - You can see your keyboard in any environment.

01:25:09   When you're immersed in an environment,

01:25:11   VisionOS 2 recognizes and reveals your Magic Keyboard

01:25:14   or MacBook keyboard so you can keep typing away.

01:25:16   Cool. - Does it only recognize

01:25:18   those keyboards or does it recognize

01:25:19   the quality keyboards? - Sure sounds like it.

01:25:20   - So, (laughs)

01:25:21   I feel like they should have a keyboard recognizer

01:25:24   and say, "Is that a keyboard?"

01:25:25   It's either probably rectangular,

01:25:27   you can probably find the edges, but okay.

01:25:30   - Guest user improvements.

01:25:31   All I've read about this so far

01:25:32   is what I'm about to read to you,

01:25:34   but oh my word, I'm here for it.

01:25:36   So it says, "VisionOS 2.0 now lets you save

01:25:38   "your most recent guests' eye and hand data

01:25:40   "so they can easily skip their next setup."

01:25:43   Which is pretty cool, I did that.

01:25:44   - How many recent guests?

01:25:45   Just one for now. - Just one.

01:25:48   Steve Trout and Smith writes,

01:25:49   "The enterprise APIs for VisionOS 2,"

01:25:51   which there was a session about enterprise APIs

01:25:55   in VisionOS 2 at WWDC.

01:25:57   Anyways, so it's enterprise APIs include things

01:25:59   like access to the main camera, pass-through capture,

01:26:02   and barcode or QR scanning,

01:26:03   but only for in-house or business-to-business apps.

01:26:06   You can't ship this stuff to the app store.

01:26:08   Very weird.

01:26:09   - It's interesting that they're making concessions

01:26:10   for what appears to be their one enthusiastic customer base

01:26:15   for the Vision Pro right now,

01:26:16   which is enterprises that don't balk at the price

01:26:19   and have apparently come up with useful applications

01:26:22   for a high-quality VR/XR headset thing.

01:26:27   They're giving them much more access.

01:26:30   If you need to get access to this hardware,

01:26:32   more direct access to this hardware,

01:26:34   to make this Vision Pro be useful

01:26:37   for use on your factory line

01:26:38   or whatever you're having people do with this stuff,

01:26:41   you can have it.

01:26:42   It's just you can't distribute those things

01:26:43   to the app store.

01:26:44   That's just your own private little one.

01:26:46   They've always had sort of the enterprise certificates

01:26:47   and enterprises can have their own little private

01:26:50   per-enterprise app store

01:26:51   with their own distribution certificate.

01:26:52   And that is one case where Apple has been a lot looser

01:26:56   because it's not like the whole world.

01:26:57   It's just a very, very narrow use case.

01:27:00   So it's interesting that they are immediately, essentially,

01:27:03   giving up on a lot of the restrictions for the Vision Pro

01:27:05   for customers that really, really want it.

01:27:09   - Finally, The Verge writes,

01:27:10   "More new features coming in Vision OS 2.0

01:27:13   that either weren't mentioned or flew right by.

01:27:17   Placing app windows.

01:27:19   You can place them further away than you could before."

01:27:21   That's, I guess, for people with much better vision

01:27:24   than I have.

01:27:25   "Volumetric windows, which are ones that let you view

01:27:27   an app's content from all sides.

01:27:29   They will tilt to face you,

01:27:30   so you can use them while lying down."

01:27:31   Ahem, Marco.

01:27:32   The developers can opt out of this if they want.

01:27:35   You'll also be able to resize them, which is cool.

01:27:37   "You can also offload virtual environments.

01:27:40   Their icons will still be there,

01:27:41   but if you're sick of Mount Hood,

01:27:42   it doesn't have to take up space anymore."

01:27:44   I am offended by this, The Verge,

01:27:45   'cause that's my favorite one.

01:27:47   - And by space, they mean SSD space, right?

01:27:50   - I guess so, yeah.

01:27:51   - How big could those be?

01:27:53   I don't know.

01:27:54   - Challenge accepted.

01:27:55   And then, "While watching full-screen videos

01:27:57   in a virtual environment,

01:27:57   you'll be able to lie down and recenter them above you."

01:28:00   Good stuff.

01:28:01   That's especially useful for you, Marco.

01:28:02   - Yeah. - So there you go.

01:28:03   - Yeah, 'cause that was one thing

01:28:04   I had to keep sitting up for the talk show live,

01:28:06   'cause regular windows,

01:28:07   you can just hold down the home button,

01:28:08   and it'll just center whatever you're looking at

01:28:10   as the center of the view.

01:28:11   But the fully immersive things seem to not have any

01:28:15   up and down rotational ability,

01:28:17   so I had to just keep sitting up taller

01:28:19   than I probably should have been that moment

01:28:21   to watch the talk show.

01:28:22   - Then, with regard to Swift,

01:28:24   "Swift has been moved out of Apple's GitHub account,

01:28:28   and it is now in its own account, Swiftlang."

01:28:31   S-W-I-F-T-L-A-N-G, Swiftlang.

01:28:33   - Yeah, Ben Cohen actually mentioned this on our interview.

01:28:36   - So Apple writes on a blog post--

01:28:38   - But we didn't dive into it.

01:28:39   - Yeah, "Swift is migrating to a dedicated GitHub org

01:28:42   at github.com/swiftlang.

01:28:44   This migration reflects the growth and maturity

01:28:46   of the Swift community and highlights Swift's versatility

01:28:48   beyond Apple's own ecosystems.

01:28:50   The migration to the Swiftlang organization

01:28:52   will be phased over the coming weeks and months.

01:28:54   Initially, the Swiftlang organization

01:28:55   will include foundational elements of the Swift projects,

01:28:58   such as compiler and core tools,

01:29:00   standard libraries and core APIs,

01:29:02   samples, the Swift.org website,

01:29:03   and official clients, drivers, and other packages."

01:29:06   - Yeah, since the dawn of Swift,

01:29:08   it has been presented with the whole world domination joke

01:29:10   I made in the interview as a language

01:29:12   that is good for a wide range of things,

01:29:15   and Apple didn't want it to just be,

01:29:19   "Oh, this is the language you need to use

01:29:20   to write for Apple's devices."

01:29:22   They wanted it to be a general-purpose programming language

01:29:25   that everybody can use.

01:29:26   Now, their number one priority

01:29:28   has been making it work for Apple's devices,

01:29:29   so it's a 10-year-old language,

01:29:31   and a lot of the effort in those 10 years

01:29:34   has been spent to make it good

01:29:36   for programming Apple's platforms, which makes sense.

01:29:38   But during that time, there's been server-side Swift.

01:29:41   There's been Swift on Linux.

01:29:42   There's been attempts to evangelize Swift

01:29:44   outside the Apple ecosystem,

01:29:46   and all of those efforts have run into

01:29:49   sort of stumbling blocks of saying,

01:29:50   "Well, but, you know, our foundation isn't the same

01:29:55   that Apple ships with its platforms,

01:29:58   so we have to have our own alternate version of it,"

01:30:00   or, "The server-side stuff is a little bit weird,

01:30:03   and it's clear that Apple's heart isn't into it,

01:30:05   and the Linux version has a bunch of gaps

01:30:08   in interoperability that, you know,

01:30:11   don't exist on Apple's platforms."

01:30:12   And if you keep chasing these things down,

01:30:15   at the very root, it's like,

01:30:16   Swift is -- it's an open-source project,

01:30:19   but it's at, you know, github.com/apple.

01:30:22   That's where it is. This is an Apple project.

01:30:24   And, yes, you allow people to use it on Linux,

01:30:27   and, you know, we could fork it

01:30:28   because it's open-source or whatever,

01:30:29   but, like, people just didn't have faith

01:30:31   that, like, Apple was serious about the idea

01:30:34   of this being a language that is as general-purpose as C.

01:30:38   C has a standards body and, you know,

01:30:41   has committees adding features to it and C++, whatever,

01:30:44   but no one company owns C, right?

01:30:48   And, again, even though Swift is open-source,

01:30:49   say, "Well, nobody owns it. It's open-source.

01:30:51   If Apple ever goes evil, just fork it," or whatever,

01:30:52   but no one has the staff or the desire

01:30:56   or the ability to keep developing Swift outside of Apple.

01:30:59   And so moving the language out of Apple's area

01:31:02   into what I assume will be a different legal entity,

01:31:06   a different governing system,

01:31:07   or at least a different github organization --

01:31:09   granted, it's still -- you know, the Swift core team

01:31:11   is still staffed by Apple employees and stuff like that,

01:31:13   so it's not as if Apple is giving Swift away to someone else

01:31:17   who's going to parent it from now on.

01:31:19   It will still be Apple driving this with their money

01:31:22   and their employees, but this is an important,

01:31:24   both symbolic and practical step

01:31:26   to show Apple's dedication 10 years in to finally saying,

01:31:30   "No, we're actually serious about Swift,"

01:31:33   you know, as they said in one of the slides,

01:31:34   "replacing C++."

01:31:36   Not replacing C++ on Apple's platforms.

01:31:38   Replacing C++, period, everywhere, someday, maybe.

01:31:42   [ Laughter ]

01:31:45   -All right, and then we got through

01:31:47   almost everything we wanted to in the interview

01:31:50   with Holly and Ben, but one of the major things,

01:31:54   and perhaps the only major thing

01:31:55   that we didn't have a chance to talk to them about,

01:31:57   but we really wanted to, was Swift testing.

01:31:59   So we were talking, I guess, a couple episodes ago

01:32:03   about how we really would love to see, you know,

01:32:06   XCTest kind of go the way of the dodo,

01:32:09   and Swift testing is the new hotness, baby,

01:32:11   and it looks pretty good, at least at glance.

01:32:13   -Yep, you can -- it's an open-source thing.

01:32:15   It's been out for a while. It was out before WWC.

01:32:18   I could not remember for the life of me

01:32:19   which one of the several testing frameworks it was.

01:32:21   I should have just guessed the most obvious name,

01:32:23   which is Swift-testing. Glad to see that happening.

01:32:26   It does use macros, and macros are still a little bit slow

01:32:29   in Xcode, but, you know, maybe next year they'll fix that.

01:32:31   -All right, HomeKit.

01:32:33   You can now pick your preferred HomeKit hub.

01:32:37   Reading from The Verge, "Apple Home users can rejoice

01:32:40   over an update discovered in the first iOS 18 beta.

01:32:43   The option to choose a 'preferred home hub.'

01:32:46   This fixes the problem of your smart home

01:32:47   deciding to run over Wi-Fi through HomePod

01:32:50   when there's a perfectly good Apple TV

01:32:51   using Ethernet sitting right there."

01:32:53   -Hallelujah. How long has this taken?

01:32:55   -Yep. -Yep.

01:32:56   -Like, HomeKit has always been like,

01:32:58   "You don't have to worry about it.

01:32:59   We'll intelligently pick the right thing."

01:33:01   But very often in your home, you know, if you're a tech nerd,

01:33:06   which one of your devices has the best network connection

01:33:08   and the best hardware.

01:33:09   And if it's Apple stuff,

01:33:11   most of the time that's the Apple TV.

01:33:12   If you have a recent Apple TV,

01:33:14   it has the highest chance of being plugged into Ethernet

01:33:16   because it has an Ethernet port if you bought the expensive one.

01:33:19   And if you keep buying a new one every year,

01:33:20   the processor does occasionally get better.

01:33:22   So, no, I don't want my original HomePod to be my home.

01:33:27   -On Wi-Fi. -Right.

01:33:30   The Apple TV is always plugged in.

01:33:32   My Apple TV is always going to sleep or whatever.

01:33:34   But I don't -- Just, yes, please.

01:33:36   I'm going to designate my Apple TV as my home GitHub,

01:33:39   and I hope this improves matters.

01:33:42   -Yep. All right. Let's talk CarPlay,

01:33:45   another one of Marco's favorite things.

01:33:48   There are new CarPlay features.

01:33:50   These are detailed on a MacRumors post,

01:33:53   which we will link in the show notes.

01:33:55   There are contact photos and messages.

01:33:57   I don't think it ever occurred to me

01:33:58   that that's not a thing until I read this,

01:34:00   and I was like, "Holy crap. That's not a thing, is it?"

01:34:02   So here we are.

01:34:05   So that's very exciting.

01:34:06   You'll get silent mode improvements.

01:34:08   You can now choose to have silent mode on your iPhone

01:34:12   immediately turn and automatically turn on or off

01:34:14   when the device is connected to CarPlay.

01:34:16   So that's cool. -And then, speaking of that,

01:34:18   again, I haven't driven my wife's car,

01:34:19   so I'm not that familiar with this,

01:34:20   but, like, yeah, I always have my phone on silent.

01:34:23   I mean, the little silent switch is in the silent mode,

01:34:26   and sometimes I forget that that means

01:34:27   that, like, most apps will not make noise.

01:34:31   Like, I watch YouTube on it,

01:34:33   and YouTube ignores the silent switch and just plays audio,

01:34:36   but sometimes I'll play something and be like,

01:34:37   "Why isn't this making any sound?"

01:34:39   And it's because it's honoring the silent thing.

01:34:40   So if you have the silent switch turned on,

01:34:42   as a lot of people do with their iPhones,

01:34:43   and you connect to CarPlay,

01:34:45   does your phone refuse to make sound through the car speakers?

01:34:48   -It doesn't do, like, you know, bloop

01:34:51   when you send a text message, for example.

01:34:53   It just sends it.

01:34:54   So that's the best I can think of.

01:34:56   -And so what this would do is say

01:34:57   you could leave that switch to silent,

01:34:59   but if you set the setting, what it would do

01:35:01   is when you connect to CarPlay,

01:35:02   it would be as if you had switched the switch

01:35:04   to not silent and you'd hear the bloops?

01:35:06   -I think that's correct.

01:35:08   It is hard for me to parse this,

01:35:10   but I believe that to be correct.

01:35:11   And, like, another example is, I think, generally speaking --

01:35:14   and this could be my own settings,

01:35:16   like my own focus modes and whatever,

01:35:18   so I might be accidentally lying to you --

01:35:20   but, like, another example is,

01:35:22   I don't think there's an incoming text message tone,

01:35:25   right, if you're in silent.

01:35:26   So you'll see the little banner

01:35:28   at the bottom of the CarPlay screen,

01:35:29   but there won't be the, you know, the standard ding

01:35:31   or whatever you happen to have your text message set to

01:35:34   if you have yourself in silent mode.

01:35:37   Moving on, color filters can help individuals

01:35:39   with color blindness to differentiate colors

01:35:41   in the CarPlay interface.

01:35:43   Voice control allows you to control CarPlay entirely

01:35:45   with Siri voice commands through a connected iPhone.

01:35:48   Sound recognition is expanded to CarPlay

01:35:50   to provide notifications for driving related sounds,

01:35:52   such as car horns and sirens.

01:35:54   And then there was a whole session about next-gen CarPlay.

01:35:56   Now, I haven't had a chance to watch this yet,

01:35:58   but a lot of people that had, that we saw at WWDC,

01:36:01   were kind of punchy about it,

01:36:03   and I'm not 100% clear as to why,

01:36:05   but I think, John, you have some notes for me to read,

01:36:07   so here we go.

01:36:09   Next-gen CarPlay will be highly customizable,

01:36:11   allowing automakers to tailor the design of the system

01:36:13   to uniquely match their vehicles.

01:36:15   So far, so good.

01:36:16   Apple revealed a variety of different design options

01:36:18   and layouts that will be available to automakers.

01:36:20   Automakers will be able to show custom notifications

01:36:23   on next-generation CarPlay.

01:36:24   Apple's website continues to say that the first vehicles

01:36:27   with next-generation CarPlay will arrive in 2024,

01:36:29   but it has yet to provide a more specific timeframe,

01:36:32   and it did not provide any time-related updates

01:36:34   in its WWDC sessions.

01:36:36   Daniel Pritchard writes,

01:36:37   "It's 20 minutes of an Apple designer in a white room

01:36:39   telling you, esteemed automaker, UI designer,

01:36:41   how Apple will generously let you, quote,

01:36:43   'customize your gauges and infotainment.'

01:36:46   Example, you can use any font as long as it's Apple's

01:36:50   1SF family, which has variable weights and metrics."

01:36:53   So that's fine, right?

01:36:55   - I don't know.

01:36:56   Apple still has not figured out

01:36:59   what would make car makers happy.

01:37:01   They only know what would make Apple happy.

01:37:03   Like, you can choose any variation of a single font.

01:37:06   Should be a nonstarter.

01:37:07   We're going to car companies and saying,

01:37:10   "You can customize it."

01:37:11   Now, I know Apple doesn't want people

01:37:13   to make their interfaces ugly, but have they seen a car?

01:37:15   Car makers demand to be allowed

01:37:17   to make their interfaces ugly,

01:37:19   or use whatever font is, like, corny-looking to Apple,

01:37:23   but fits with, like, the Jeep brand or whatever.

01:37:25   Not the GM is doing CarPlay, but you know, it's...

01:37:29   I don't know.

01:37:29   I don't know how this is going to work out for...

01:37:31   I mean, I still keep waiting for those

01:37:33   next-generation CarPlay cars to arrive.

01:37:35   Surely there'd be, like, there's always somebody,

01:37:37   like the singular of the car world, right?

01:37:39   Singular of the sea.

01:37:40   Who's like, "We are not the market leader.

01:37:43   "We can differentiate ourselves by doing what Apple wants

01:37:46   "when no one else would do it."

01:37:47   But, yeah, I'm going to watch the session.

01:37:50   I'm going to see how bad it really is.

01:37:52   But yeah, people were watching it.

01:37:53   They were, I don't know if they're people

01:37:55   in the audio industry or whatever,

01:37:56   but the vibe seemed to be that Apple

01:37:58   still wasn't quite getting

01:37:59   what the car industry wants from them.

01:38:01   - I don't see how they could.

01:38:03   It just, it seems so far from Apple

01:38:06   and what they could tolerate,

01:38:08   and the control and relationships they'd like to have

01:38:11   compared to what the automakers want to do.

01:38:13   I can't see almost any automaker

01:38:18   wanting to sign up for this.

01:38:19   Like, I think Apple is very type A with their designs

01:38:24   and the automakers tend to be very type A

01:38:26   with their designs and tend to be

01:38:27   pretty incompatible designs.

01:38:30   And moreover, I can't imagine anybody

01:38:32   willing to give up that level of control.

01:38:34   So I would expect this to have

01:38:37   no significant effect on the adoption

01:38:39   of this next-gen carplay.

01:38:41   - I knew this as I was saying,

01:38:43   but just to save myself,

01:38:44   Jeep, Chrysler, whatever, that's Stellantis, not GM, sorry.

01:38:47   - I meant to correct you and then I got sidetracked.

01:38:50   So thank you.

01:38:51   All right, anything else for follow-up?

01:38:55   - I think we did a great job.

01:38:56   I'm proud of us.

01:38:57   - Thank you to our sponsor this week, Squarespace.

01:39:01   And thank you to our members who support us directly.

01:39:03   We do an ATP Overtime segment

01:39:05   exclusive to members every week.

01:39:07   This is a bonus topic that we do

01:39:09   after all the rest of the show,

01:39:10   exclusively for members.

01:39:12   This week's Overtime is Apple's Blue Ocean Revisited.

01:39:17   This is relevant to a topic we talked about

01:39:20   with Jon's blog post called Apple's Blue Ocean

01:39:23   a few months back.

01:39:24   We're gonna revisit that with some updates.

01:39:27   So you can hear that by joining at atv.fm/join

01:39:31   and we will talk to you next week.

01:39:34   (upbeat music)

01:39:36   ♪ Now the show is over ♪

01:39:39   ♪ They didn't even mean to begin ♪

01:39:41   ♪ 'Cause it was accidental ♪

01:39:43   ♪ Accidental ♪

01:39:44   ♪ Oh, it was accidental ♪

01:39:46   ♪ Accidental ♪

01:39:47   ♪ Jon didn't do any research ♪

01:39:49   ♪ Marco and Casey wouldn't let him ♪

01:39:52   ♪ 'Cause it was accidental ♪

01:39:53   ♪ Accidental ♪

01:39:55   ♪ It was accidental ♪

01:39:56   ♪ Accidental ♪

01:39:57   ♪ And you can find the show notes at atv.fm ♪

01:40:02   ♪ And if you're into mastodon ♪

01:40:05   ♪ You can follow them at C-A-S-E-Y-L-I-S-S ♪

01:40:10   ♪ So that's Casey Liss ♪

01:40:13   ♪ M-A-R-C-O-A-R-M ♪

01:40:16   ♪ N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-N ♪

01:40:18   ♪ S-I-R-A-C ♪

01:40:21   ♪ U-S-A-C-R-A-C-U-S-A ♪

01:40:23   ♪ It's accidental ♪

01:40:25   ♪ It's accidental ♪

01:40:27   ♪ They didn't mean to accidental ♪

01:40:30   ♪ Accidental ♪

01:40:32   ♪ Tech.com ♪ ♪ So long ♪

01:40:37   - So when I used to travel for work,

01:40:41   for WWDC among many other things,

01:40:43   the most recent time that I had been at WWDC was in 2019.

01:40:47   And at that point, Michaela was like a year,

01:40:51   year and a half old.

01:40:52   It was a burden for me to be gone, right?

01:40:54   Like Aaron can handle it, but it's a burden.

01:40:56   Now, five years later with Michaela

01:40:58   just having graduated kindergarten,

01:41:00   it's supposed to be considerably easier.

01:41:03   And it's supposed to be almost not really,

01:41:08   I'm not even sure that anyone would have even noticed

01:41:09   I was gone. (laughs)

01:41:12   Michaela was doing a camp,

01:41:14   doing just a little like half day camp every day this week.

01:41:16   And so Monday, we are upstairs at Apple Park,

01:41:21   getting our breakfast, which I don't recall

01:41:23   if we talked about this the other day,

01:41:24   but it was actually very tasty.

01:41:25   And I'm getting to see all of my friends.

01:41:27   It's the first time I'd seen John in five years.

01:41:29   - You don't recall if we talked about this?

01:41:31   It was the last show.

01:41:33   - Oh, that's right.

01:41:34   We talked about this the whole segment, yeah, sorry.

01:41:35   - This is a new low in your inability to remember

01:41:38   what we talked about on the show.

01:41:39   - Yeah, this is pretty good.

01:41:41   We talked about food.

01:41:42   We talked about that when we did see food.

01:41:42   - I forgot about the breakfast part.

01:41:43   Yes, you're right.

01:41:44   Okay, anyway. - Anyway, go on.

01:41:45   - All right, so the point is,

01:41:47   I'm sitting there with John and other John

01:41:51   and Marco and underscore and a bunch of other people.

01:41:53   And it felt so good to see all of these people

01:41:56   I hadn't seen in so long.

01:41:57   And so I get a phone call from Erin,

01:41:59   which is not, it's not that it's not allowed

01:42:02   or anything like that.

01:42:03   It's just she knew that I was going to have a very busy day

01:42:05   and I was going to be doing a lot of different things.

01:42:07   And so for her to call me was very alarming and unusual.

01:42:12   She says, "Hey, I just picked up Michaela from camp.

01:42:16   "My car just died."

01:42:18   - You don't wanna hear that.

01:42:19   - Okay.

01:42:21   - And remind us what car this is and how old it is.

01:42:23   - This is a 2017 Volvo XC90,

01:42:26   which has somewhere around 40, 45,000 miles on it.

01:42:29   - That you purchased new.

01:42:30   - That we purchased new and have maintained

01:42:33   as per Volvo specifications every moment since.

01:42:37   So she says, "Yeah, you know, I heard something,

01:42:40   "that something was like stuck in the wheel or something,

01:42:42   "like there's a thump, thump, thump sound.

01:42:43   "So I pulled over, looked around the car,

01:42:45   "didn't see anything, let it, you know, turned it off

01:42:46   "and let it sit for a couple minutes, turned it back on.

01:42:49   "And I started to go and then the car just straight up died."

01:42:52   And she sent a video of her cranking it.

01:42:55   I showed John and Marco and a handful of other people

01:42:58   and it was definitely, the motor was trying to turn over.

01:43:02   Like the internals of the motor were moving,

01:43:06   without question, but it was not actually like

01:43:10   properly turning over and operating under its own power.

01:43:13   - It was, the cylinders weren't firing.

01:43:15   Like I wanna claim partial credit for my attempted diagnosis

01:43:20   based on a phone video with bad audio

01:43:23   of saying it sounded like it was something

01:43:25   having to do with the belts

01:43:27   because the starter was turning.

01:43:28   Like the starter was rotating

01:43:30   and it was causing some parts of the engine to rotate,

01:43:33   but there was no, you know, no explosions happening

01:43:36   in the cylinders as far as we could hear,

01:43:38   but it was turning and turning.

01:43:40   And she said there was screeching noises

01:43:42   and I'm like, well, belts.

01:43:43   - That is what John theorized.

01:43:44   And certainly the electrics were all working just fine.

01:43:47   It was something mechanical.

01:43:48   And then I called Volvo from California and said,

01:43:51   "Hi, I'm sitting there standing in California right now.

01:43:53   "My wife is going to be coming in with her car

01:43:55   "in the back of a tow truck.

01:43:56   "Can you take care of her, please, and do something?"

01:43:59   You know, I call Volvo, I think on Tuesday,

01:44:02   and they're like, "Hey, you know,

01:44:03   "we just haven't had time to get to it," which I get.

01:44:05   I mean, we dropped this on them unexpectedly.

01:44:07   And then I call,

01:44:10   I hadn't heard anything from them Wednesday.

01:44:12   And I'm starting to get concerned

01:44:14   because the going theory from Volvo,

01:44:16   which I did not understand,

01:44:17   but what Volvo said to Erin and she relayed to me

01:44:19   was that it was a starter-related problem.

01:44:21   As John had already said,

01:44:23   we could hear the car trying to turn over, to a degree,

01:44:26   in the video, so it didn't seem to me to be a starter.

01:44:28   But I mean, I'm no professional mechanic,

01:44:30   so I'm like, "Okay, whatever you say."

01:44:32   But I'm seeing it's now Wednesday,

01:44:34   late afternoon, Eastern time.

01:44:36   And I haven't heard from Volvo

01:44:38   about what the heck is going on.

01:44:39   And we're supposed to be taking that car out of town

01:44:42   this coming weekend.

01:44:43   And so I'm thinking to myself,

01:44:45   if there's a part that they need,

01:44:47   we are bumping up against not being able

01:44:50   to get the part and get it repaired before we need to go.

01:44:52   - Keep that thought here,

01:44:53   if there's a part that they need.

01:44:54   There may be a part that you need.

01:44:56   - There might be just one part.

01:44:57   So I call Volvo, and again, they're very, very kind.

01:45:02   And he says, "All right, so here's what happened.

01:45:06   A pebble seems to have landed itself

01:45:09   inside one of the tensioners for the serpentine belt."

01:45:13   So the tensioners are like the pulleys, effectively.

01:45:16   And a pebble got in there,

01:45:17   which caused the serpentine belt to eventually sever

01:45:21   and fasten it, actually, we were just at Volvo yesterday,

01:45:23   and they handed me the serpentine belt to look at,

01:45:25   and it just severed right in half.

01:45:27   And I don't know how, but it did.

01:45:29   And these things are thick.

01:45:30   Like, these are really designed not to do that,

01:45:32   but nevertheless.

01:45:33   So the serpentine belt severed,

01:45:37   which in and of itself is a problem,

01:45:39   but it is a fixable problem.

01:45:41   But he said, "And then," and I'm like, uh-oh,

01:45:45   "it caused a hole in the housing of the timing belt,

01:45:51   and then shredded the timing belt."

01:45:53   - God.

01:45:54   - At this point, I know we're (beep)

01:45:57   because if you're not familiar with what a timing belt does,

01:46:00   and Jon, correct me when you're ready,

01:46:02   but a timing belt is what keeps the internal bits

01:46:05   of the motor working the way they're supposed to.

01:46:08   So if you think about it, like, if you put up a fist, right,

01:46:11   and you're moving your fist up and down,

01:46:12   that's like a piston in a car engine, right?

01:46:15   Well, above your fist are valves,

01:46:17   which are other pieces of metal.

01:46:18   And the timing belt makes sure

01:46:19   that never the two shall meet.

01:46:21   So if the piston is all the way up,

01:46:23   then the valve is also up.

01:46:24   If the piston is down,

01:46:26   then the valve can lower into the cylinder,

01:46:28   so it can let in gas or air or let out exhaust, et cetera.

01:46:32   If your timing belt, or in some cars chain, gets messed up,

01:46:36   the two can meet, and that means your engine is destroyed.

01:46:40   - Yeah, that's basically a delicate ballet of metal

01:46:43   going on inside your engines with lots of parts moving,

01:46:45   and they have to move exactly in unison with each other,

01:46:48   so no parts that are not supposed to hit each other will hit.

01:46:51   That is what your timing system does.

01:46:53   It is super duper important

01:46:54   to have your engine correctly timed.

01:46:56   If it's off by a little bit, it can run badly.

01:46:59   If the timing belt doesn't exist, it's a catastrophe.

01:47:03   Like, everything, because remember,

01:47:05   there's explosions happening in your engine,

01:47:07   shoving the metal parts up and down very forcefully.

01:47:12   And if that's not done at the right time

01:47:13   with all the other parts,

01:47:15   now you have metal parts being shot at each other

01:47:18   using explosions, which is the same thing

01:47:20   that propels bullets out of guns.

01:47:22   It's not good for your engine.

01:47:24   - Certainly not.

01:47:25   So at this point, I lean forward, hands on my forehead,

01:47:30   and Erin looks at me like a ghost, and she says, "Oh no."

01:47:33   The very nice gentleman at Volvo says,

01:47:35   "The engine is a catastrophic loss.

01:47:38   "We're gonna need to replace it."

01:47:39   - So you just need one part, Casey.

01:47:41   - The engine. - Just one part.

01:47:42   - The engine. - The engine.

01:47:43   - That's the part that you need.

01:47:45   - That is correct.

01:47:46   - That sounds important.

01:47:47   - Yeah.

01:47:48   - Yes, it is an important part of the car.

01:47:50   - I asked, "Well, that's like 10 plus thousand dollars,

01:47:55   "right?"

01:47:57   And he says, "I haven't gotten an estimate yet,

01:48:00   "but yes, it is."

01:48:02   (laughing)

01:48:03   Oh, okay.

01:48:06   So fast forward a little bit of time,

01:48:08   and suffice to say, the engine shot,

01:48:11   we will need to replace it.

01:48:13   I don't know exactly what the car is worth,

01:48:15   but the estimate for the parts alone

01:48:20   for a full engine replacement were north of $14,000.

01:48:25   Then he said the labor is between 25 and 30 hours

01:48:29   at $175 an hour, so that's roughly another $5,000.

01:48:34   So we're looking at $20,000 for this thing to be repaired.

01:48:39   And that's the best case scenario, right?

01:48:42   I guess we could opt to get a used motor,

01:48:46   and they apparently have some place up in Erie, New York

01:48:49   that does a really good job of putting together

01:48:51   like full used replacement crate motors.

01:48:54   And that would be like $15,000 all in instead of 20,000,

01:48:59   which is better, but not that different.

01:49:00   - You might as well get a new one at that point.

01:49:02   - Right, so--

01:49:03   - And what the car rebuilding YouTube channels

01:49:05   that I watch would do, because this is what they always do,

01:49:08   is they would take that engine

01:49:10   and they would throw away the parts that are dead,

01:49:12   like many of the cylinders, most of the valves,

01:49:14   the entire top end of the engine,

01:49:16   all sorts of stuff like that,

01:49:16   but they would salvage all the other parts,

01:49:19   all the other things that are bolted onto the engine.

01:49:21   Anything that wasn't broken, they would salvage,

01:49:23   and they would buy the other parts,

01:49:25   or they'd buy a used engine

01:49:27   and take the parts from the broken engine

01:49:30   and stick them on to parts from a less broken engine

01:49:32   and build a Frankenstein's monster,

01:49:36   a conglomeration of working parts

01:49:38   and used parts and new parts to build a new working engine.

01:49:42   And the reason they do that is because they literally

01:49:43   make money from their labor,

01:49:45   as opposed to having to pay hundreds of dollars per hour,

01:49:48   as Casey has to do for this,

01:49:50   because they are making entertainment from repairing engines.

01:49:53   But yeah, if it was my engine, I would want a brand new one.

01:49:55   And if I couldn't get a brand new one,

01:49:57   a used one with similar mileage probably seems fine.

01:50:00   But I think the most fascinating,

01:50:02   as someone who watches tons and tons of hours

01:50:04   of car rebuilding channels,

01:50:05   the most fascinating thing about this story,

01:50:06   and I think everyone you've told this to has said,

01:50:08   "I've never heard of that happening."

01:50:10   - Yes.

01:50:11   - It sounded like your iPad and the windshield.

01:50:13   Anyway, I saw a picture of it.

01:50:15   You sent a picture, maybe you'll put it in the show notes.

01:50:17   You may be wondering how could this happen?

01:50:18   Like the tensioner, it's like a little pulley,

01:50:21   like a little disc that rotates on an axis.

01:50:25   And it's got strakes in it, like fins,

01:50:29   around the little wheel.

01:50:31   And the perfectly sized pebble, like a pebble,

01:50:35   like a one in a million pebble,

01:50:37   got into this engine from the road,

01:50:39   because there's pebbles on the road all the time,

01:50:41   such that it wedged itself

01:50:43   between two of the metal strakes,

01:50:45   or I can't tell if they're metal or plastic,

01:50:47   of this little wheel.

01:50:48   It would have to be a pebble, you know,

01:50:51   going at just the right time, at just the right angle,

01:50:53   bouncing around off the road surface, into this engine,

01:50:55   and wedging itself exactly between these two little fins

01:51:00   on this wheel, and getting stuck in there,

01:51:03   and then essentially serving as like a diamond cutter

01:51:07   to shred your belts, as it rotated,

01:51:10   as this little hard nugget of rock,

01:51:13   because it was like a little white piece of quartz

01:51:16   or whatever, going around again and again and again,

01:51:18   until it just totally shredded your belt.

01:51:21   As they say on Seinfeld, one in a million shot, doc.

01:51:23   That is some bad luck.

01:51:25   - That is world-class bad luck.

01:51:27   It's really, it's astonishing and also depressing.

01:51:31   - I mean, I think he just put it in the chat room,

01:51:33   so I think it'll be in the show.

01:51:34   Just look at this.

01:51:35   Just think of what has to happen for this little tiny,

01:51:38   because this is not the only engine, I can tell you,

01:51:40   this is not the only engine to have pulleys like that on it.

01:51:43   Every engine, every internal combustion engine

01:51:45   has tons of these things all over it.

01:51:47   You're like, why don't they cover them

01:51:48   with plastic shielding?

01:51:49   I mean, they're not usually super accessible,

01:51:51   but for the most part, you can see them and get at them

01:51:54   in the engine, in every internal combustion car on the road,

01:51:57   I've never heard of this happening.

01:51:58   This is just, wow.

01:52:00   - Is that the pebble right there

01:52:02   that's in the little pulley hole?

01:52:03   - Oh yeah, yes.

01:52:03   - It's that little tiny, that little tiny rectangle.

01:52:08   Oh my God.

01:52:09   - 'Cause it's sticking out just a little bit

01:52:10   and the belts are under tension.

01:52:12   That is the belt tensioner and this is essentially rotating

01:52:14   with the belt, slowly shredding it, or maybe not so slowly,

01:52:17   because, you know, do the RPM calculation.

01:52:19   - Yeah, 'cause I was wondering like how a pebble would stay

01:52:22   in that, but yeah, it is like right between

01:52:25   those little fins, oh my God.

01:52:27   - Like what kind of pebble is that shape

01:52:29   to successfully wedge itself in there?

01:52:30   Like it's gotta be like have like flat sides

01:52:32   and be like, wow, it's just.

01:52:35   - If this was a plot to like how James Bond

01:52:37   was escaping somebody chasing him,

01:52:38   like we would say that's completely implausible.

01:52:41   Like nobody would ever believe.

01:52:42   - This would never happen, you can't disable a car

01:52:44   with a pebble, that's stupid.

01:52:46   - Exactly.

01:52:47   - You can't cause catastrophic engine damage

01:52:51   to a car with a pebble.

01:52:53   - Yeah, I mean the engine grenaded itself

01:52:54   because of a pebble.

01:52:55   So I told Volvo, and I was being deadly serious,

01:52:58   I want that pebble.

01:53:00   I want that old attentioner.

01:53:02   - The $20,000 pebble.

01:53:04   - I wanna put that motherfucker in a shadow box

01:53:06   and I want that thing to be the $20,000 pebble

01:53:09   somewhere in my house, because as depressing as it is,

01:53:12   you have to see the, like I have to laugh at it,

01:53:14   because it's just, it's just absurd.

01:53:17   It's just absolutely absurd.

01:53:18   And so we talked to Volvo about it and they were like,

01:53:19   yeah, we've heard of something like this happening

01:53:20   like once, maybe twice, and all of the years

01:53:23   that they've serviced thousands of cars.

01:53:26   And all Volvos basically have, I mean,

01:53:28   it's not literally the same engine,

01:53:29   but all Volvos from last like 15, or no, I'm sorry,

01:53:32   for the last like seven or eight years

01:53:33   have effectively the same engine.

01:53:34   And they're like, yeah, this has happened

01:53:36   maybe one other time, maybe.

01:53:38   And when I called it into our insurance company,

01:53:41   who happens to be Allstate, and I gotta tell you,

01:53:43   I'm not feeling like I'm in good hands right now,

01:53:44   but that's neither here nor there.

01:53:46   When I called it into Allstate, they were like,

01:53:49   wait, what?

01:53:51   - What?

01:53:52   - What?

01:53:53   - I'm sorry.

01:53:53   - It sounds like a great insurance fraud scheme.

01:53:56   - Right?

01:53:57   But I mean, I'm not the one who can, trust me,

01:53:58   I do not want to defraud Allstate of a new motor.

01:54:02   I'd rather have a functional car.

01:54:04   But anyways, so we'll see what Allstate says.

01:54:07   There's gonna be an adjuster that's gonna go look at it

01:54:09   and we'll see what happens.

01:54:10   But I just feel absolutely so incredibly terrible for Erin.

01:54:14   'Cause here it was, this was the first work trip,

01:54:16   or first WWDC trip anyway,

01:54:17   that was supposed to be fairly easy.

01:54:19   And on day one, her car catastrophically dies.

01:54:24   And then when we're, I'm on my way home from the airport

01:54:27   when we get the news,

01:54:28   oh, you thought it was just a starter, oh no.

01:54:32   It's going to be an entirely new motor.

01:54:33   And that also brings up the question,

01:54:35   it raises the question, is this going to be totaled?

01:54:40   Because depending on how much the car is worth,

01:54:42   which I think it's worth enough

01:54:44   that they aren't gonna total it,

01:54:45   but they might just total the damn thing.

01:54:47   And that's fine, I guess,

01:54:51   but certainly not what we had on our bingo card

01:54:53   for this week.

01:54:54   And we're not gonna find out about it

01:54:55   for another week or two.

01:54:56   And now we have to rent a car to get to our vacation

01:54:59   in a couple of days.

01:55:00   It's just a mess.

01:55:01   So with all that in mind, ATP.fm/draw.

01:55:04   (laughing)

01:55:06   - Oh man, I mean, Erin, does Erin,

01:55:09   is she okay not thinking this is her fault?

01:55:11   'Cause this is absolutely in no possible way her fault.

01:55:15   - She's blaming herself some,

01:55:17   but I have been extremely, figuratively loud

01:55:20   about the fact that you could not have done this.

01:55:22   It was an act of God.

01:55:23   There's nothing you could have done.

01:55:25   You did nothing wrong.

01:55:27   The only thing she did wrong

01:55:28   was that she sent me a text to ask,

01:55:30   "Can I call you?"

01:55:31   Instead of just frigging calling me immediately,

01:55:33   because that's how kind she is.

01:55:35   I was a little perturbed

01:55:36   that she didn't just immediately call me.

01:55:37   But no, other than that,

01:55:39   I mean, it was unbelievably bad luck, but here we are.

01:55:42   I mean, literally, the Volvo people,

01:55:43   I kid you not, the Volvo people said to us,

01:55:45   "You should play the lottery,

01:55:46   "because your luck is incredible."

01:55:48   It's just bad in this case, unfortunately.

01:55:50   - Your luck is incredible in the wrong direction.

01:55:52   - Yeah, exactly, exactly.

01:55:53   - Oh, man.

01:55:54   I mean, you couldn't do this if you tried.

01:55:56   It's just, wow.

01:55:59   - If you tried to search the ground

01:56:00   for just the right pebble, find the best one,

01:56:03   reach into the engine, and shove it in there,

01:56:05   the pebble would just fall out,

01:56:06   because you didn't get it down

01:56:07   to the fraction of a millimeter.

01:56:09   You couldn't manually find a pebble that would fit like this

01:56:13   and stick it in with your hand, let alone throw it.

01:56:15   Because again, this wasn't stuck in by hand.

01:56:17   This was flung from the, so find a pebble that's just right,

01:56:21   and throw it into the engine such that it gets stuck

01:56:25   well enough into the little thing to shred the belt.

01:56:28   You'd be there for the rest of your life trying to do that.

01:56:30   - Yeah, couldn't agree more.

01:56:32   But here we are.

01:56:33   I'm really sad about it.

01:56:35   Like, all kidding aside, I'm really, really sad about it,

01:56:37   'cause it is a great car, despite this story.

01:56:39   It's been mostly bulletproof.

01:56:42   It's been very good to us.

01:56:45   I have a couple of minor complaints about it,

01:56:46   but all in all, I really, really like that car.

01:56:49   And to be honest, if it was totaled,

01:56:50   we would probably get a lightly used XC90 tomorrow,

01:56:55   because we really do like the car.

01:56:56   And it occurred to me as I was thinking,

01:56:59   what are we gonna do, what are we gonna do,

01:57:00   I was thinking to myself,

01:57:01   I really am not looking at spending 60, $70,000

01:57:05   on a new XC90, but then it occurred to me,

01:57:07   well, the reason we bought this one new

01:57:09   was because CarPlay was new, or at least in this model.

01:57:13   And I insisted on CarPlay,

01:57:16   and there really wasn't a used market at the time we bought.

01:57:19   But now, now there's a robust used market,

01:57:22   and it's not absolutely bananas prices

01:57:24   like it was a year or two back.

01:57:25   So I think if we were to replace it,

01:57:27   we would get like a 2020 or 2021 XC90 and call it a day.

01:57:32   And they're actually reasonably affordable

01:57:34   if you get one with like 20,000 miles on it

01:57:36   or something like that.

01:57:37   But hopefully it won't come to that.

01:57:39   Hopefully we'll get Allstate to buy us a new motor

01:57:42   and the absurdly many thousands of dollars

01:57:45   to have labor to put it in.

01:57:46   [BLANK_AUDIO]