607: The Structure and Vibe of a Podcast
00:00:00
◼
►
I installed my first Windows malware in a long time.
00:00:02
◼
►
- Oh, well that's fun.
00:00:04
◼
►
- Like a real malware or a sarcastic malware?
00:00:07
◼
►
- No, well, I don't know the extent of it yet.
00:00:10
◼
►
So there was some saga with my son's gaming PC.
00:00:14
◼
►
In trying to figure out what was going on
00:00:17
◼
►
with his laptop's cooling system or thermals or whatever,
00:00:22
◼
►
I wanted to know like what do people use on Windows
00:00:26
◼
►
to show CPU and GPU temperatures to themselves?
00:00:30
◼
►
And this is one thing, honestly,
00:00:31
◼
►
I have found the web in general
00:00:34
◼
►
to be absolutely horrific at this,
00:00:36
◼
►
but ChatGPT to be pretty good
00:00:38
◼
►
at recommending stuff like this.
00:00:39
◼
►
Like what do people use for software type X?
00:00:42
◼
►
That would be something I would normally just search
00:00:45
◼
►
the app store of the device on,
00:00:47
◼
►
which I tried and there's nothing,
00:00:49
◼
►
or search the web and it's useless garbage constantly.
00:00:54
◼
►
So I actually got pretty good results.
00:00:55
◼
►
And so there's a program called CPU ID,
00:00:58
◼
►
HW monitor or something that everybody uses.
00:01:00
◼
►
And I'm like, okay, I remember that
00:01:02
◼
►
from my old hard OCP days.
00:01:03
◼
►
That still exists, okay, great, I'll download that.
00:01:06
◼
►
And it's one of those things where like the download link
00:01:09
◼
►
opens up like an overlay on the page
00:01:12
◼
►
that looks like a download link,
00:01:13
◼
►
but it's actually an ad that is made
00:01:15
◼
►
to look like a download link, but it's--
00:01:16
◼
►
- It's like trying to download Minecraft mods.
00:01:18
◼
►
- Yeah, it's constant just like,
00:01:20
◼
►
okay, here's the real download link, download now,
00:01:22
◼
►
but it's like that's not really the download link.
00:01:23
◼
►
You have to close the ad,
00:01:24
◼
►
the download's behind it or something, anyway.
00:01:26
◼
►
Through all the logistics of trying to find
00:01:28
◼
►
the real download link to this app,
00:01:30
◼
►
I had one wrong try and I installed apparently PC App Store,
00:01:35
◼
►
which messed up all of his browser search parameters
00:01:41
◼
►
and stuff, it was a whole thing.
00:01:42
◼
►
So now I gotta figure out like how do I get rid of this now?
00:01:45
◼
►
Like of course Windows Defender is like everything's fine.
00:01:47
◼
►
It's like no, trust me, everything's not fine.
00:01:49
◼
►
So now I have to like do something else.
00:01:51
◼
►
I guess like malware bytes?
00:01:53
◼
►
It's like what do people do?
00:01:55
◼
►
Do you know like what do people do on Windows now?
00:01:58
◼
►
- I've already forgotten.
00:01:59
◼
►
What was the name of the thing
00:02:00
◼
►
that caused the big downtime recently?
00:02:02
◼
►
CrowdStrike. - CrowdStrike.
00:02:04
◼
►
Yeah, so no, we're not gonna do CrowdStrike.
00:02:06
◼
►
No, that's, it seems like a bad idea.
00:02:11
◼
►
Also, isn't that like expensive enterprise-y stuff?
00:02:14
◼
►
I don't know. - I don't know.
00:02:15
◼
►
Maybe it's a free trial.
00:02:15
◼
►
- All of these secure, all these like PC security things
00:02:18
◼
►
are all like guys with guns in the desert.
00:02:20
◼
►
I'm just like I don't wanna, you know,
00:02:23
◼
►
it's very easy to make a wrong step here.
00:02:26
◼
►
Anyway, so I think I've removed some of it.
00:02:29
◼
►
I would love recommendations on what people,
00:02:30
◼
►
like what do people who are not guys with guns in deserts,
00:02:33
◼
►
what do you use to just keep malware off of Windows PCs
00:02:37
◼
►
that your kid is using for gaming?
00:02:39
◼
►
- I think people just live with it
00:02:40
◼
►
and have 800 toolbars in their browser.
00:02:42
◼
►
- Yeah, and you know, and he also like,
00:02:44
◼
►
he'll install stuff like, you know,
00:02:45
◼
►
from random, you know, discords that tell him,
00:02:48
◼
►
oh, use this auto-clicker tool to cheat in this game
00:02:50
◼
►
so like God knows what else is on this PC.
00:02:53
◼
►
So I just, but like I just,
00:02:54
◼
►
I want something that just like is a little bit decent.
00:02:57
◼
►
Like I don't know.
00:02:58
◼
►
- I'm sorry, I moved to the Mac roundabouts of 2008
00:03:03
◼
►
and I think that's right
00:03:07
◼
►
and I was still a Windows developer by trade until,
00:03:12
◼
►
oh geez, 2016 or so,
00:03:15
◼
►
but I don't think I've spent more than five minutes
00:03:17
◼
►
using Windows since I left, since I left that job,
00:03:21
◼
►
not the most recent job,
00:03:23
◼
►
since when I got my most recent job.
00:03:24
◼
►
So I haven't really used Windows since 2016.
00:03:27
◼
►
It's been almost 10 years and it's glorious.
00:03:30
◼
►
It's so great 'cause I don't have to worry about this.
00:03:33
◼
►
I just don't care, do not care.
00:03:34
◼
►
And I know this is coming for me
00:03:36
◼
►
because there's probably gonna be a gaming PC in my future,
00:03:38
◼
►
little do I know, but right now, ignorance is less.
00:03:42
◼
►
Oh, it's so great.
00:03:43
◼
►
- And the thing is like after not using Windows for so long,
00:03:46
◼
►
I too, I thought, I assumed like,
00:03:48
◼
►
surely things have gotten a lot better
00:03:50
◼
►
and like they're a little bit different.
00:03:52
◼
►
I wouldn't say they're better.
00:03:54
◼
►
They're just different.
00:03:55
◼
►
- All right, let's do some follow up
00:04:00
◼
►
and we have to start with a genuine and heartfelt thank you
00:04:03
◼
►
to our ATP listeners.
00:04:06
◼
►
It is no longer September.
00:04:08
◼
►
So it is no longer Childhood Cancer Awareness Month.
00:04:10
◼
►
However, during the month of September,
00:04:13
◼
►
Relay and ATP, but mostly Relay,
00:04:16
◼
►
raised over $1 million.
00:04:21
◼
►
As I sit here tonight, $1,061,652.04.
00:04:24
◼
►
And that is truly incredible.
00:04:30
◼
►
The last year record,
00:04:32
◼
►
last year was the previous record for Relay
00:04:34
◼
►
and that was somewhere to the order of $776,000.
00:04:38
◼
►
Here we are a year later, over a million dollars.
00:04:43
◼
►
And I want to say from the bottom of my heart,
00:04:45
◼
►
and I know I speak for you too,
00:04:47
◼
►
thank you so much to everyone who gave $1, $5, $10,
00:04:51
◼
►
doesn't matter, any amount of money.
00:04:52
◼
►
Thank you to all of you.
00:04:53
◼
►
Look at what we have accomplished together.
00:04:57
◼
►
Truly, we have accomplished this together
00:04:59
◼
►
and that's something to be extremely, extremely proud of.
00:05:01
◼
►
And I hope that anyone who donated
00:05:03
◼
►
feels some amount of ownership over this
00:05:04
◼
►
because you do have some amount of ownership over this.
00:05:07
◼
►
I will, as a final note for this year,
00:05:09
◼
►
I will remind you that corporate matching is a thing.
00:05:12
◼
►
And if you go to St. Jude.org/Relay,
00:05:16
◼
►
there's a little bit of information about employer matching
00:05:18
◼
►
and how you can get credit or how Relay can get credit
00:05:21
◼
►
for an employer match perhaps based on your own donation.
00:05:25
◼
►
So please check it out.
00:05:26
◼
►
But don't feel like you can't donate
00:05:29
◼
►
for the rest of the year or the beginning of next year.
00:05:30
◼
►
You certainly can, that's fine.
00:05:32
◼
►
Nobody's gonna complain.
00:05:33
◼
►
But genuinely, thank you so very much
00:05:35
◼
►
for the incredible amount of money that we all raised.
00:05:38
◼
►
I am incredibly proud of all of us
00:05:40
◼
►
and thankful to all of you.
00:05:41
◼
►
So thank you.
00:05:43
◼
►
We have some anonymous feedback
00:05:44
◼
►
with regard to the hardwired camera indicator light
00:05:47
◼
►
from years past.
00:05:49
◼
►
Anonymous writes, when the first built-in camera
00:05:51
◼
►
was designed for the first Intel iMac,
00:05:53
◼
►
user notification was designed into the hardware.
00:05:56
◼
►
The camera board was separate,
00:05:57
◼
►
not integrated into the computing board.
00:06:00
◼
►
At the specific direction of a key individual,
00:06:02
◼
►
the light was hardwired directly
00:06:03
◼
►
into the board's power circuit.
00:06:05
◼
►
If the board was receiving power, the light was turned on.
00:06:08
◼
►
If the board was not receiving power, the light was off.
00:06:10
◼
►
No software was involved.
00:06:12
◼
►
This design was passed on to the laptop team.
00:06:15
◼
►
And yeah, this is just anti-laptop propaganda.
00:06:17
◼
►
I don't want to read the rest of this.
00:06:19
◼
►
The design was passed on to the laptop team.
00:06:21
◼
►
Don't extrapolate that laptops are bad
00:06:22
◼
►
just from this one example.
00:06:23
◼
►
I can hear Jon-
00:06:24
◼
►
- That's not an inclusion I drew.
00:06:25
◼
►
I feel like you're getting defensive for no reason.
00:06:27
◼
►
- Because I know you.
00:06:29
◼
►
- I didn't write this.
00:06:31
◼
►
- This design was passed on to the laptop team.
00:06:33
◼
►
Much later, news of the camera light hack
00:06:35
◼
►
mentioned on the previous episode of ATP went around Apple.
00:06:38
◼
►
Alarms went off, circuit designs were laid out on tables,
00:06:40
◼
►
and a lot of shouting happened.
00:06:41
◼
►
Turns out the laptop team had later quote unquote
00:06:44
◼
►
improved the design,
00:06:47
◼
►
accidentally making this hack possible.
00:06:49
◼
►
It's amusing to think that this quote unquote
00:06:51
◼
►
secure exclave is a return to the spirit
00:06:53
◼
►
of the original design requirement.
00:06:55
◼
►
- This is big companies, you know.
00:06:57
◼
►
It's hard to make sure that things are communicated
00:07:01
◼
►
across groups, you know, across years,
00:07:04
◼
►
across different hardware platforms.
00:07:05
◼
►
So it is interesting to know that the design initially,
00:07:09
◼
►
at least according to this person, was sound.
00:07:11
◼
►
It just sort of got,
00:07:12
◼
►
the soundness kind of got lost in translation,
00:07:14
◼
►
and eventually they shipped a thing
00:07:16
◼
►
that was supposed to be hack proof,
00:07:17
◼
►
but was in fact hackable.
00:07:20
◼
►
Yeah, it's a bummer, but like you said,
00:07:22
◼
►
that's big business for you.
00:07:24
◼
►
Wayne Dixon writes with regard to AirPods 4,
00:07:27
◼
►
the base on the AirPods 4 with ANC
00:07:29
◼
►
is definitely heavier than the AirPods 3, according to Wayne.
00:07:32
◼
►
I have no personal experience.
00:07:33
◼
►
I'll take Wayne's word on this.
00:07:35
◼
►
Wayne continues, also the new MagSafe Puck
00:07:37
◼
►
does not align itself with the AirPods 4 case either,
00:07:40
◼
►
despite being slightly smaller than the old Puck.
00:07:42
◼
►
- Oh yeah, and Marco was asking
00:07:43
◼
►
how to tell the difference between the two of them.
00:07:44
◼
►
Someone wrote in to say that the new ones
00:07:46
◼
►
have braided cables and the old ones don't.
00:07:47
◼
►
I'm not sure if that's true,
00:07:48
◼
►
but that was a suggestion from a listener.
00:07:51
◼
►
- A friend of the show, Quinn Nelson,
00:07:52
◼
►
with regard to the ear sensors in AirPods 4.
00:07:57
◼
►
This is quoting from a YouTube video,
00:07:59
◼
►
which we will link in the show notes.
00:08:00
◼
►
These buds use Apple's old optical detection sensor.
00:08:04
◼
►
So anything opaque that modifies light to this spot
00:08:07
◼
►
will pause and resume music.
00:08:09
◼
►
Apple does appear to be using the onboard accelerometers
00:08:11
◼
►
to prevent music from being resumed
00:08:13
◼
►
when the buds are at opposing angles.
00:08:16
◼
►
So you would think that it might be okay in your pocket,
00:08:18
◼
►
but it's not bulletproof.
00:08:20
◼
►
Placing one or both earbuds in my pocket
00:08:21
◼
►
will often resume music unexpectedly.
00:08:24
◼
►
This was a solved problem.
00:08:25
◼
►
The outgoing AirPods 3 had a sensor
00:08:26
◼
►
that only responded to capacitive skin.
00:08:29
◼
►
It's a real bummer of a downgrade
00:08:31
◼
►
and a compromise that I hope was only made
00:08:33
◼
►
for that thinner fitment comfort
00:08:34
◼
►
rather than to save a buck
00:08:35
◼
►
or to artificially segment the lineup.
00:08:38
◼
►
- For whatever it's worth,
00:08:38
◼
►
I have this problem on the AirPods Pros.
00:08:42
◼
►
I think the AirPods Pro don't have skin sensing.
00:08:45
◼
►
I could be wrong, but I will often have,
00:08:49
◼
►
I'll put 'em in my pants pocket
00:08:50
◼
►
for a minute as I'm going in a building or something,
00:08:52
◼
►
and I will sometimes find out
00:08:54
◼
►
that it has been playing in my pocket.
00:08:56
◼
►
So I don't know if this is just a rumor or not.
00:08:58
◼
►
- You can do an experiment and use your finger
00:08:59
◼
►
versus covering it with a piece of cardboard or something.
00:09:01
◼
►
- Yeah, that's too much work.
00:09:05
◼
►
- John, do you wanna tell us about discoveries
00:09:06
◼
►
with regard to the A18 and A18 Pro, please?
00:09:09
◼
►
- So the real hardware folks are finally getting
00:09:12
◼
►
to give us the hardware answers that we crave
00:09:14
◼
►
in these next two items.
00:09:15
◼
►
The first one is something that we talked about
00:09:17
◼
►
when these phones were announced.
00:09:18
◼
►
Based on the specs that Apple gave,
00:09:20
◼
►
it was like, boy, the A18 and the A18 Pro
00:09:22
◼
►
seem very similar.
00:09:24
◼
►
And some people were speculating that the A18 Pro,
00:09:27
◼
►
A18 might be just a binned version of the A18 Pro
00:09:29
◼
►
based on like, oh, you know,
00:09:30
◼
►
the A18 Pro has six GPU cores and the A18 has five.
00:09:33
◼
►
Maybe they're just binned.
00:09:34
◼
►
And I went through all the differences
00:09:36
◼
►
on the announcement show and the differences were many
00:09:39
◼
►
besides just the GPU cores.
00:09:41
◼
►
And I was like, technically,
00:09:42
◼
►
it could technically be a binned one,
00:09:44
◼
►
but there's so much that is different about the A18 Pro
00:09:47
◼
►
that it seems it would be totally unprecedented
00:09:50
◼
►
for them to be intentionally disabling so much of the chip.
00:09:54
◼
►
So now we have actual die shots of someone
00:09:56
◼
►
who cut the A18 and the A18 Pro open
00:09:58
◼
►
and lo and behold, they are different chips.
00:10:00
◼
►
They look pretty similar, but they're not the same chip.
00:10:03
◼
►
So no, the A18 is not a binned A18 Pro.
00:10:05
◼
►
They're just two similar chips.
00:10:07
◼
►
And you can look, this is from chipwise.tech.
00:10:10
◼
►
You can look at their die shots.
00:10:12
◼
►
And then Fabian Haussler also put in
00:10:14
◼
►
like a sort of a markup interpretation,
00:10:16
◼
►
labeling the parts of the chips to see what they are,
00:10:19
◼
►
and then put in an M4 for reference as well.
00:10:22
◼
►
So A18 and A18 Pro, two separate chips.
00:10:25
◼
►
- Well, and this actually,
00:10:27
◼
►
I didn't mention this when we first were talking about these
00:10:28
◼
►
but I kind of regretted afterwards not mentioning it,
00:10:31
◼
►
that like if you look at why they might be doing this,
00:10:34
◼
►
like the A18 being its own special chip,
00:10:37
◼
►
it's now the smallest and most likely therefore cheapest
00:10:41
◼
►
chip in Apple's lineup that can run Apple intelligence.
00:10:45
◼
►
So this is not just going to be in the iPhone 16.
00:10:48
◼
►
Like it is most likely going to also be
00:10:52
◼
►
in all upcoming Apple products
00:10:54
◼
►
that don't have a need for massive CPU power otherwise,
00:10:58
◼
►
but want to run Apple intelligence.
00:11:00
◼
►
So think about things like future home pods,
00:11:03
◼
►
like the rumored home pod with the screen
00:11:04
◼
►
or the robot arm thing, whatever that's going to be,
00:11:06
◼
►
like you know, that kind of thing.
00:11:08
◼
►
Low-end iPads, maybe possibly the next Apple TV, who knows?
00:11:12
◼
►
Like there's lots of products across Apple's lineup
00:11:15
◼
►
that they're going to want to put Apple intelligence in,
00:11:19
◼
►
you know, maybe because they are Siri-based,
00:11:20
◼
►
like a home pod or things like that.
00:11:22
◼
►
Like they're going to want that
00:11:23
◼
►
across as much of their product line as possible
00:11:26
◼
►
as quickly as possible.
00:11:27
◼
►
So I'm guessing the base A18 is most likely
00:11:31
◼
►
going to be the next chip in lots of different things,
00:11:34
◼
►
probably all releasing over the following year or two.
00:11:36
◼
►
And we'll probably find out first
00:11:38
◼
►
when we get an update to the low-end iPad,
00:11:40
◼
►
'cause I bet it'll be powering that.
00:11:42
◼
►
- I hope that's true, and I know Apple probably says
00:11:44
◼
►
that the A18 is the minimum chip
00:11:45
◼
►
that can run Apple intelligence,
00:11:46
◼
►
but I don't think the neural engine in the A18
00:11:48
◼
►
is actually any faster than the 17 or maybe even the 16
00:11:52
◼
►
when we're looking at the TFLOPS or whatever.
00:11:54
◼
►
I forget if there was a big difference.
00:11:57
◼
►
Obviously the GPU is slower,
00:11:58
◼
►
the CPUs are slower, whatever.
00:11:59
◼
►
It just seems to me that RAM is the real limiting factor,
00:12:02
◼
►
'cause it's not like you can't run Apple intelligence
00:12:04
◼
►
on older chips, it will just obviously be slower.
00:12:05
◼
►
The limiting factor that would make it
00:12:07
◼
►
so you literally can't is RAM.
00:12:09
◼
►
But you know, practically speaking,
00:12:10
◼
►
they might just say A18 is the minimum spec going forward,
00:12:13
◼
►
and yeah, these chips tend to live on for a long time.
00:12:15
◼
►
And the ones that live on are not the pro chips.
00:12:17
◼
►
So yeah, A18 hopefully is in our future.
00:12:20
◼
►
I mean, I'm saying hopefully,
00:12:21
◼
►
but I don't want them to like,
00:12:23
◼
►
like historically the home pod line has not received
00:12:26
◼
►
the cream of the crop of chips.
00:12:29
◼
►
And even though A18 is the, you know,
00:12:31
◼
►
maybe is Apple's current minimum spec for Apple intelligence
00:12:34
◼
►
due to the RAM associated with it
00:12:36
◼
►
and whatever stuff they claim about the minimum speed
00:12:38
◼
►
required for the GPU and neural engine and CPU,
00:12:42
◼
►
I can see them shipping like, for example,
00:12:43
◼
►
that robot arm thing with a chip older than the A18.
00:12:46
◼
►
I hope I'm wrong, I hope they don't do that, but we'll see.
00:12:49
◼
►
- And in the same spirit,
00:12:50
◼
►
it turns out there is a tiny hardware difference
00:12:54
◼
►
between the two of these AirPods.
00:12:56
◼
►
So John, what's going on here?
00:12:58
◼
►
- iFixit took apart the AirPods 4 painfully
00:13:01
◼
►
'cause they do not come apart easily.
00:13:03
◼
►
And here's what they had to say in a video
00:13:04
◼
►
we will link in the show notes.
00:13:06
◼
►
Both versions, talking about both versions of the AirPods 4
00:13:08
◼
►
are the ones with and without ANC.
00:13:10
◼
►
Both versions have the exact same system and package
00:13:12
◼
►
or SIP housing the brains.
00:13:13
◼
►
In fact, they said we won't be tearing down the AirPods 4
00:13:16
◼
►
with ANC because the only difference between the two AirBuds
00:13:18
◼
►
appears to be a single outward facing microphone,
00:13:21
◼
►
the ANC version having a bigger beefier mic.
00:13:24
◼
►
So we'll link to the video and you can look.
00:13:27
◼
►
These products, as far as iFixit can tell,
00:13:30
◼
►
are identical right down to the number of microphones.
00:13:33
◼
►
The only difference is the AirPods 4 with ANC,
00:13:35
◼
►
one of the microphones is bigger
00:13:37
◼
►
than it is in the AirPods 4.
00:13:39
◼
►
Which if this is true, I mean,
00:13:40
◼
►
obviously they can't tell every single minute component,
00:13:42
◼
►
but they can tell the SIP, they can tell,
00:13:45
◼
►
they can count the things that are in it.
00:13:46
◼
►
They have whatever this weird scanning microscope thing
00:13:49
◼
►
that shows them all the guts or whatever.
00:13:51
◼
►
Like now I'm looking at it and I'm thinking,
00:13:52
◼
►
why didn't Apple make the hardware the same?
00:13:55
◼
►
Like they estimated,
00:13:56
◼
►
I don't know if it's a sarcastic thing,
00:13:57
◼
►
estimated as a $2 part, that's the difference between them.
00:14:00
◼
►
And I guess maybe that adds up like,
00:14:02
◼
►
and they said it's a $2 part.
00:14:03
◼
►
So maybe the other one in the AirPods 4 is a $1 part.
00:14:05
◼
►
So it's a $1 difference.
00:14:06
◼
►
I suppose when you're making millions and millions of things
00:14:08
◼
►
that $1 really does add up.
00:14:09
◼
►
So they should make them separate, but wow.
00:14:12
◼
►
Like these really are, you know, for the $50 difference,
00:14:15
◼
►
you get a different case, which we'll get to in a second.
00:14:18
◼
►
And you get a slightly bigger microphone
00:14:20
◼
►
in one of the places, pretty amazing.
00:14:22
◼
►
I mean, maybe they did it this way
00:14:24
◼
►
so that it wouldn't be some big scandal
00:14:26
◼
►
that it's just like a software lockout kind of thing.
00:14:28
◼
►
- Yeah, yeah.
00:14:29
◼
►
- Oh, that's an interesting point.
00:14:30
◼
►
- I mean, again, it could just be that $1 difference
00:14:32
◼
►
that, you know, I don't know, iFixit's off end comment.
00:14:35
◼
►
One or $2 difference times millions of AirPods
00:14:39
◼
►
is millions of dollars.
00:14:40
◼
►
So there's that.
00:14:41
◼
►
- And then additionally from iFixit,
00:14:43
◼
►
if we take a look at the X-rays
00:14:45
◼
►
of the ANC version of the case,
00:14:47
◼
►
we can again see the exact same PCB,
00:14:50
◼
►
but with a speaker inside the housing.
00:14:53
◼
►
This is another component that contributes
00:14:54
◼
►
to the extra $50 you'd pay for the ANC version.
00:14:57
◼
►
As far as I can tell, those are the only two differences.
00:15:00
◼
►
- So they kept the guts of the case the same too,
00:15:02
◼
►
except for obviously, I mean, the case itself,
00:15:05
◼
►
I think is different 'cause it's got holes for the speaker.
00:15:07
◼
►
So there's one hardware difference.
00:15:08
◼
►
And the second one is, hey,
00:15:09
◼
►
there's a speaker behind those holes.
00:15:10
◼
►
And so, you know, for the $50 for the AirPods for the ANC,
00:15:14
◼
►
you get, one of the microphones is bigger in each earbud
00:15:18
◼
►
and you get a single speaker component
00:15:20
◼
►
that is not, and the three holes
00:15:21
◼
►
that it talks through in the case.
00:15:23
◼
►
And that's it.
00:15:24
◼
►
Everything else about them is the same.
00:15:26
◼
►
Good profit margins on the high-end product.
00:15:28
◼
►
What else is new from Apple?
00:15:31
◼
►
- All right, and then Tom's Hardware or Tom's Guide,
00:15:33
◼
►
whatever they're calling themselves these days,
00:15:34
◼
►
did a large test of the iPhone's 16 battery life.
00:15:39
◼
►
And they have a summary table that Jon has been kind enough
00:15:43
◼
►
to put in the show notes for me.
00:15:44
◼
►
- They didn't have a summary table.
00:15:45
◼
►
I made a summary table.
00:15:46
◼
►
They just had a bunch of numbers.
00:15:48
◼
►
- And that's the thing.
00:15:50
◼
►
When these people do reviews, it always boggles my mind
00:15:52
◼
►
that they spend all the time to do these tests.
00:15:54
◼
►
They do all this hard work
00:15:55
◼
►
and they have all these measurements
00:15:56
◼
►
and they put them in a bunch of tables.
00:15:58
◼
►
And it's like, you gotta do the final step,
00:16:01
◼
►
which is like, sum it up, tell me what this means.
00:16:05
◼
►
Don't make me do the math, which I had to do for all of this
00:16:07
◼
►
to find out the actual important information.
00:16:10
◼
►
- Here it was, I was trying to credit you
00:16:11
◼
►
and apparently I did not give you sufficient credit.
00:16:13
◼
►
So I apologize.
00:16:14
◼
►
- You didn't yell at Tom's Guide enough.
00:16:17
◼
►
- Okay, I see.
00:16:18
◼
►
Follow-up copyright 2011, Jon Sarcusa.
00:16:20
◼
►
So anyway, battery size for the iPhone 16, it's up 6.3%.
00:16:25
◼
►
Battery life up almost 15%.
00:16:29
◼
►
Battery size for the 16 Plus up almost 7%.
00:16:33
◼
►
Battery life up almost 16%.
00:16:36
◼
►
16 Pro gets about 9% and 30% increased battery life.
00:16:41
◼
►
16 Pro Max, 6% battery size increase.
00:16:45
◼
►
And again, about 30% battery life increase.
00:16:48
◼
►
That is quite impressive.
00:16:49
◼
►
- Yeah, and so the reason why this,
00:16:50
◼
►
these are the things you should put in,
00:16:52
◼
►
like this is sort of the bottom line,
00:16:53
◼
►
sum it up for me, is how much bigger did the battery get?
00:16:56
◼
►
And yeah, I did the math on like how many milliamp hours
00:16:58
◼
►
or whatever, but you really wanna know percentage-wise.
00:17:01
◼
►
Yeah, and this is all versus its predecessors.
00:17:02
◼
►
So it's 16 versus 15, 16 Plus versus 15 Plus,
00:17:05
◼
►
16 Pro versus, you know,
00:17:06
◼
►
it's directly versus their predecessors
00:17:09
◼
►
'cause there are direct predecessors for all these phones.
00:17:11
◼
►
It's like, what percentage bigger did the battery get?
00:17:14
◼
►
And then for that increase in battery size,
00:17:17
◼
►
what percentage better is the battery life?
00:17:19
◼
►
And Tom's Hardware is in a position to do that.
00:17:20
◼
►
They put the numbers in for these different phones
00:17:22
◼
►
because presumably they ran the same test on all the 15s
00:17:25
◼
►
that they did on the 16s.
00:17:26
◼
►
And they come up with the number that's, you know,
00:17:28
◼
►
representative of whatever their test is.
00:17:31
◼
►
So in all these cases, the battery got some percent bigger,
00:17:34
◼
►
but the battery life increased much more
00:17:37
◼
►
than the battery size increase.
00:17:39
◼
►
So, you know, again, the 16 Pro got a 10% bigger battery,
00:17:43
◼
►
but 30% bigger battery life.
00:17:45
◼
►
That is huge.
00:17:46
◼
►
And then I put the absolute values here.
00:17:47
◼
►
It's like, what does that even mean?
00:17:48
◼
►
So the increased battery life in terms of wall clock time,
00:17:51
◼
►
for the iPhone 16 is an hour 38.
00:17:53
◼
►
For the 16 Plus, it's two hours and 15 minutes.
00:17:56
◼
►
16 Pro is three hours and 14 minutes.
00:17:58
◼
►
And 16 Pro Max is four hours and four minutes.
00:18:00
◼
►
These are not small battery increases.
00:18:02
◼
►
Like, oh, you get extra 10 minutes to 30 minutes.
00:18:04
◼
►
Again, how representative is this Tom's Guide test?
00:18:07
◼
►
Like, is it light web browsing?
00:18:09
◼
►
Is it representative of how you use your phones?
00:18:11
◼
►
But they made all the batteries bigger
00:18:13
◼
►
by a significant percentage,
00:18:15
◼
►
and the battery life got way bigger
00:18:17
◼
►
than the percentage increase.
00:18:19
◼
►
And you will feel those for most of these things,
00:18:22
◼
►
'cause they're measured in,
00:18:23
◼
►
only one of them is a single hour,
00:18:24
◼
►
and all the other ones are in multiple hours.
00:18:26
◼
►
And this brings me to the next topic.
00:18:28
◼
►
I have a 16 Pro, which apparently gets 30% better
00:18:32
◼
►
battery life than the 15 Pro did,
00:18:34
◼
►
which equates to an extra three hours and 14 minutes
00:18:37
◼
►
of battery life in the Tom's test.
00:18:40
◼
►
What I did, after having my phone for a day or two,
00:18:42
◼
►
was I put on the 80% battery limit.
00:18:45
◼
►
I said, I don't think I need to charge this thing to 100%.
00:18:49
◼
►
So in the battery, this is the first time
00:18:50
◼
►
I've had a phone that supports this setting,
00:18:51
◼
►
'cause my 14 Pro didn't support it.
00:18:53
◼
►
So I went into battery or whatever and I said,
00:18:55
◼
►
never charge yourself more than 80%.
00:18:57
◼
►
And then for the next several days,
00:18:58
◼
►
I intentionally did not charge my phone during the day,
00:19:01
◼
►
even though I could have, like I could plug it in
00:19:03
◼
►
when I'm doing dishes or whatever.
00:19:04
◼
►
I intentionally didn't do that just to see,
00:19:06
◼
►
is 80% enough to get me through a regular day?
00:19:09
◼
►
And right now on a brand new 16 Pro,
00:19:11
◼
►
80% is more than enough, intentionally not charging,
00:19:14
◼
►
like I would normally would during the day.
00:19:17
◼
►
And so I'm currently on the 80% plan.
00:19:20
◼
►
And there's been lots of debate about this.
00:19:22
◼
►
People saying, oh, that's a waste.
00:19:24
◼
►
You're never getting the full capacity of your phone.
00:19:25
◼
►
You should charge it to 100%.
00:19:27
◼
►
Don't worry about it or whatever.
00:19:29
◼
►
But if I don't need to charge it to 100%,
00:19:31
◼
►
I am making my battery last longer,
00:19:34
◼
►
especially since I keep my phone for two years
00:19:36
◼
►
than if I did otherwise.
00:19:37
◼
►
So that's my plan.
00:19:39
◼
►
And we'll put a link in the show notes
00:19:40
◼
►
to some sort of anecdotal from Nick here
00:19:43
◼
►
who had like a survey of like 100 people and said,
00:19:45
◼
►
hey, are you charging to 80%?
00:19:47
◼
►
And if so, you know, how's it going for you or whatever?
00:19:50
◼
►
I think this is something people should at least consider
00:19:55
◼
►
might be a possibility for them.
00:19:56
◼
►
And you know, everyone knows your own life.
00:19:57
◼
►
If you're on a commute and you have no place to charge
00:19:59
◼
►
during the day and you barely make it through 100%,
00:20:01
◼
►
charge to 100%, like by all means.
00:20:03
◼
►
But I thought I could make it with 80% and so far I can.
00:20:07
◼
►
And so I'm gonna keep it there.
00:20:07
◼
►
And if it turns out I can't make it with 80%,
00:20:10
◼
►
I'll probably crank it to 90 and then go up to 100.
00:20:13
◼
►
And we'll see at the end of my two years
00:20:14
◼
►
how my battery life is doing.
00:20:15
◼
►
- Can you crank it to 90 or 100?
00:20:17
◼
►
I thought it was either 80 or nothing.
00:20:18
◼
►
- Yeah, it's like a slider.
00:20:19
◼
►
Like maybe you can even go by fives, I don't remember.
00:20:22
◼
►
But yeah, there's like a little slider bar in the settings.
00:20:25
◼
►
- Well, for some reason, I thought it was the same.
00:20:27
◼
►
I think the laptops are 80 or 100
00:20:29
◼
►
and I thought it was the same on the phone.
00:20:30
◼
►
So I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm wrong.
00:20:32
◼
►
I just, I didn't realize.
00:20:33
◼
►
- Yeah, and on laptops, people always recommend this
00:20:35
◼
►
and I forget to write it down.
00:20:35
◼
►
But there are programs for the Mac
00:20:37
◼
►
that give you even more control over this,
00:20:39
◼
►
that like not just the OS things.
00:20:41
◼
►
What does that one call this?
00:20:42
◼
►
Maybe it's coconut battery, maybe it's something else.
00:20:43
◼
►
There's a bunch of Mac OS programs
00:20:45
◼
►
that let you do the same thing for your laptop battery
00:20:48
◼
►
and choose what you wanna limit to
00:20:49
◼
►
and do all these fancy stuff.
00:20:51
◼
►
- Al dente is the one that I think most people recommend.
00:20:54
◼
►
A-L-D-E-N-T-E, I will put it in the show notes.
00:20:58
◼
►
David Schaub has some input or correction really.
00:21:03
◼
►
We were talking last episode or the episode before
00:21:06
◼
►
about the glue that becomes not so sticky
00:21:10
◼
►
when you apply a voltage to it.
00:21:12
◼
►
And remind me what exactly we said would happen
00:21:15
◼
►
if you reverse polarity.
00:21:16
◼
►
- Yeah, I was trying to remember what happened
00:21:18
◼
►
if you reverse the polarity and I misinterpreted the,
00:21:20
◼
►
or misremembered the iFixit video that was explaining this.
00:21:24
◼
►
So David wrote in with the correction.
00:21:25
◼
►
- So David writes, "When making the positive
00:21:27
◼
►
and negative electrical connections
00:21:28
◼
►
to release an iPhone 16 battery,
00:21:29
◼
►
the polarity determines which side the glue residue
00:21:32
◼
►
is left on when it unsticks.
00:21:33
◼
►
If you mistakenly reverse the positive
00:21:36
◼
►
and negative connections, the residue is left on the chassis
00:21:39
◼
►
which is hard to clean instead of the battery
00:21:41
◼
►
which is where you want it."
00:21:42
◼
►
- Yeah, so it's like the sticky gunk.
00:21:44
◼
►
Apparently there is sticky gunk
00:21:45
◼
►
and you get to choose where it's left
00:21:46
◼
►
and you don't want it to be in the phone.
00:21:47
◼
►
So that's why you have to be careful about the polarity
00:21:49
◼
►
but it will not like re-stick.
00:21:52
◼
►
And then Eric Westland writes in to corroborate your story
00:21:55
◼
►
with regard to Verizon activation problems.
00:21:58
◼
►
Eric writes, "I bought my iPhone unlocked from Apple."
00:22:01
◼
►
"I had the exact same experience as John.
00:22:03
◼
►
My last phone was three years ago
00:22:04
◼
►
and I had the same problem then too.
00:22:05
◼
►
Verizon just stinks at this."
00:22:07
◼
►
I will interject as me now.
00:22:08
◼
►
Hi, this is Casey.
00:22:09
◼
►
- Wow, keep cut.
00:22:12
◼
►
- I'll say that for me, I think we talked last week
00:22:16
◼
►
about how it did not, my phone did not activate initially.
00:22:21
◼
►
And then if memory serves, it was like once I got
00:22:23
◼
►
to the standard Springboard iOS screen,
00:22:26
◼
►
I think it was at that point, it was like,
00:22:27
◼
►
"Hey, you're not activated.
00:22:28
◼
►
You want to do it again?"
00:22:29
◼
►
I said, "Yeah."
00:22:31
◼
►
And then it worked no problem the second time.
00:22:33
◼
►
For Aaron's phone, I did the exact same stuff
00:22:36
◼
►
that I did on my phone and it worked no sweat.
00:22:38
◼
►
Now hers was Tuesday or Wednesday after release,
00:22:42
◼
►
I think it was, whereas I was doing it the Sunday,
00:22:44
◼
►
the weekend of release.
00:22:46
◼
►
So I would imagine things were still a bit busy
00:22:48
◼
►
on both the carrier and Apple sides of things.
00:22:50
◼
►
So maybe it was just that it was,
00:22:52
◼
►
things were overwhelmed when John was trying to do it
00:22:54
◼
►
and Eric apparently, but who knows?
00:22:55
◼
►
- Yeah, I'm sure that's what it was.
00:22:56
◼
►
Like I always, I'm doing it like the phones are arriving
00:22:58
◼
►
at people's doorsteps that day, right?
00:23:00
◼
►
And so it's the worst possible time to do it.
00:23:01
◼
►
But yeah, Verizon is apparently very bad at this.
00:23:03
◼
►
And by the way, I think Eric said
00:23:05
◼
►
he did it in two different states.
00:23:06
◼
►
I think one, like Massachusetts and Iowa
00:23:08
◼
►
had the same problem.
00:23:09
◼
►
So yeah, the moral of the story is,
00:23:11
◼
►
even if you get an unlock phone from Verizon,
00:23:13
◼
►
if you get it on day one and you try to do activation,
00:23:16
◼
►
- We are brought to you this episode by QA Wolf.
00:23:20
◼
►
If slow QA processes bottleneck you
00:23:23
◼
►
or your software engineering team
00:23:24
◼
►
and you're releasing slower because of it,
00:23:26
◼
►
you need to check out QA Wolf at qawolf.com/atp.
00:23:31
◼
►
QA Wolf gets engineering teams to 80%
00:23:34
◼
►
automated end-to-end test coverage
00:23:36
◼
►
and helps them ship five times faster
00:23:38
◼
►
by reducing QA cycles from hours to minutes.
00:23:42
◼
►
With over 100 five-star reviews on G2
00:23:44
◼
►
and customer testimonials from Salesloft,
00:23:46
◼
►
Drada, Autotrader and many more,
00:23:49
◼
►
you're in good hands with QA Wolf.
00:23:50
◼
►
Check it out today at qawolf.com/atp
00:23:55
◼
►
to see if QA Wolf can help you squash your QA bottleneck.
00:23:59
◼
►
Thank you so much to QA Wolf for sponsoring our show.
00:24:02
◼
►
- John, I believe this is your case review
00:24:08
◼
►
that we would like to talk about next.
00:24:09
◼
►
- And Marco's got the same case.
00:24:10
◼
►
We can both talk about it.
00:24:11
◼
►
But yeah, I got the leather bull strap case
00:24:13
◼
►
with the open bottom on it.
00:24:15
◼
►
We'll put a link in the show notes.
00:24:16
◼
►
This is the one that has a hole for the camera control
00:24:19
◼
►
as do nearly all, but not all third-party cases.
00:24:23
◼
►
Previously, I was using the Beats case,
00:24:24
◼
►
which I talked about on the earlier show.
00:24:26
◼
►
And so here's my review of the bull strap case.
00:24:29
◼
►
Leather is nicer than the material
00:24:32
◼
►
for as far as I'm concerned than the Beats case.
00:24:36
◼
►
I do think this one, the corners had some wrinkles on them.
00:24:38
◼
►
That's a little bit unpleasing,
00:24:40
◼
►
but you know, it's a artisanal product.
00:24:42
◼
►
Everyone is a little bit different.
00:24:44
◼
►
Everything about it is the same as my iPhone 14 Pro case,
00:24:46
◼
►
obviously, except for the camera control cutout.
00:24:49
◼
►
Marco talked about the peak design camera control cutout,
00:24:52
◼
►
which had sort of like a sloping on all sides
00:24:54
◼
►
to get down to the camera control,
00:24:55
◼
►
and that was not pleasing to him.
00:24:57
◼
►
Bull strap has decided to try to avoid that problem,
00:25:00
◼
►
which I think is smart of them,
00:25:02
◼
►
by not making it so there's like sloping things on all sides
00:25:05
◼
►
so you have to kind of shove your fleshy finger
00:25:07
◼
►
into this little valley to get to the thing.
00:25:09
◼
►
They decided one of the sides is not going to exist.
00:25:13
◼
►
So if you look at the phone from the front,
00:25:14
◼
►
it's just a regular, you know,
00:25:16
◼
►
you see the case going all the way around.
00:25:17
◼
►
But if you look at the phone from the back,
00:25:18
◼
►
you see part of the sidewall of the case
00:25:20
◼
►
has been notched out, right?
00:25:22
◼
►
So it's not symmetrical.
00:25:23
◼
►
It is not a symmetrical hole in the side of your case.
00:25:26
◼
►
There is a wall on the screen side,
00:25:28
◼
►
then there's the hole for the camera button,
00:25:29
◼
►
and there's no wall on the other side.
00:25:31
◼
►
Like basically the bottom of the case
00:25:32
◼
►
just comes to an end and that's it.
00:25:34
◼
►
And it's not really,
00:25:36
◼
►
it doesn't really center the camera control either.
00:25:39
◼
►
So it's interesting.
00:25:40
◼
►
There is, it feels flimsier on that side.
00:25:43
◼
►
It feels like there's a gigantic notch
00:25:45
◼
►
taken out of the side of the phone,
00:25:46
◼
►
because there is a gigantic notch
00:25:47
◼
►
taken out of the side of the phone.
00:25:48
◼
►
The sort of little stick or pole or whatever
00:25:52
◼
►
that is the front of the sidewall over the camera control
00:25:57
◼
►
seems delicate and fidgety and creaky.
00:26:01
◼
►
And I just generally hate this.
00:26:03
◼
►
I don't like the hole in the side of the case at all.
00:26:07
◼
►
I can get to the camera control, I can press it,
00:26:10
◼
►
but it is annoying to do so.
00:26:12
◼
►
And now, well, so I'm going to leave this on the phone,
00:26:16
◼
►
because I'm like, I don't know if I can handle this.
00:26:17
◼
►
Maybe I'm gonna go back to the Beats case.
00:26:18
◼
►
But after having it for like a week or so,
00:26:20
◼
►
I've decided the advantages of the leather,
00:26:23
◼
►
the grippiness of the leather,
00:26:25
◼
►
outweigh the terribleness of this hole
00:26:28
◼
►
in the side of the thing.
00:26:29
◼
►
So I'm going to keep this on until or unless it breaks.
00:26:32
◼
►
But as of right now, what I am looking for
00:26:35
◼
►
is basically this case, a leather case with an open bottom,
00:26:39
◼
►
but with the pass-through camera control.
00:26:42
◼
►
And third parties, I think there's like two or three
00:26:45
◼
►
or maybe four third-party case manufacturers
00:26:48
◼
►
that do have pass-through.
00:26:49
◼
►
One of them I saw doesn't even use the quartz thing.
00:26:52
◼
►
It uses a piece of plastic
00:26:53
◼
►
with a bunch of little copper wires going through it
00:26:55
◼
►
to do the conductance thing.
00:26:58
◼
►
Look, whatever you gotta do with third-party cases.
00:27:01
◼
►
But I'm out here saying, "Bullstrap, Ryan London,"
00:27:04
◼
►
and then the five other manufacturers
00:27:05
◼
►
who apparently sell this exact same case
00:27:07
◼
►
for differing prices.
00:27:09
◼
►
I know you had to do the thing with the hole on day one.
00:27:11
◼
►
You couldn't, maybe you couldn't figure it,
00:27:12
◼
►
like everyone else had to do too.
00:27:14
◼
►
I bought your case at great expense.
00:27:15
◼
►
I'm using it on my phone.
00:27:16
◼
►
But please, somebody, somebody out there,
00:27:19
◼
►
make a leather open bottom case
00:27:23
◼
►
with a quartz pass-through for the camera control.
00:27:25
◼
►
That's what I want.
00:27:26
◼
►
And until then, I'm just gonna have a gigantic wound
00:27:28
◼
►
in the side of my phone that I feel every day
00:27:31
◼
►
and it makes it slightly less satisfying.
00:27:33
◼
►
Marco, what do you think of the Bullstrap case?
00:27:35
◼
►
- After however many weeks it's been,
00:27:38
◼
►
one, two, of using the Apple silicone case,
00:27:41
◼
►
I actually also switched to my Bullstrap case
00:27:44
◼
►
a couple of days ago
00:27:46
◼
►
because the silicone case,
00:27:47
◼
►
it's just too hard getting in and out of jeans pockets.
00:27:51
◼
►
It pulls the whole pocket liner out with it, you know?
00:27:54
◼
►
So I wanted to try this.
00:27:56
◼
►
And yeah, the leather does feel a lot better.
00:27:58
◼
►
Bullstrap's leather is very, very good.
00:28:01
◼
►
But yeah, I too hate the camera cutout.
00:28:05
◼
►
It doesn't feel good, it doesn't work well.
00:28:08
◼
►
It certainly doesn't look good.
00:28:10
◼
►
And I too worry about the longevity
00:28:12
◼
►
of that little thin piece of leather
00:28:14
◼
►
that comes down across the front edge of it.
00:28:17
◼
►
This, look, this is all,
00:28:20
◼
►
no one's gonna have this design next year.
00:28:22
◼
►
By the time everyone makes their cases
00:28:24
◼
►
for next year's phones,
00:28:26
◼
►
no one will be using this design on a good case.
00:28:28
◼
►
And there's a reason for that.
00:28:28
◼
►
It's not a good design.
00:28:30
◼
►
They did what they had to do with day one unknowns.
00:28:32
◼
►
But yeah, like Jon, I'm hoping for a better version
00:28:37
◼
►
of this case in the future that has a button cover
00:28:39
◼
►
for the camera control that works.
00:28:41
◼
►
- Do you agree that their decision
00:28:43
◼
►
to omit one of the side walls surrounding the camera control
00:28:47
◼
►
makes it more comfortable to you
00:28:48
◼
►
than the Peak Design version of the hole?
00:28:50
◼
►
- I think it's only more comfortable
00:28:52
◼
►
because leather is softer than hard plastic.
00:28:55
◼
►
'Cause here, I'll pull, I got the Peak Design one right here.
00:28:58
◼
►
Like the Peak Design one,
00:28:59
◼
►
it actually has about the same indentation shape.
00:29:03
◼
►
Like it is just as thin on that little skinny piece
00:29:07
◼
►
in front of the camera control button.
00:29:08
◼
►
- But look at the other side of the camera control.
00:29:10
◼
►
There's no wall there.
00:29:11
◼
►
- You mean like the back of the phone?
00:29:12
◼
►
- Yeah, yeah, there's not equal size walls
00:29:15
◼
►
on the front and the back of the phone
00:29:18
◼
►
in terms of surrounding the camera control.
00:29:19
◼
►
Do you see what I mean?
00:29:20
◼
►
- I see what you mean.
00:29:21
◼
►
It's pretty subtle.
00:29:22
◼
►
The Peak Design one is symmetric.
00:29:23
◼
►
But that's a pretty subtle difference.
00:29:25
◼
►
I don't think that matters.
00:29:27
◼
►
I think what I didn't like about the Peak Design
00:29:29
◼
►
is merely that their plastic is harder than leather.
00:29:33
◼
►
And neither one of these feels good.
00:29:35
◼
►
But I'm tolerating the bull strap case
00:29:38
◼
►
because it is the smallest number of bad trade-offs
00:29:43
◼
►
that I have found yet.
00:29:43
◼
►
I also have the Apple Clear case.
00:29:46
◼
►
I thought that would solve my problems.
00:29:48
◼
►
And it does not.
00:29:50
◼
►
The Apple Clear case, I found to have very bad buttons.
00:29:54
◼
►
Like the ones, especially the sleep/wake button,
00:29:56
◼
►
it's much harder to push than the other cases I have.
00:29:59
◼
►
And it doesn't have good feedback.
00:30:02
◼
►
So I think it's just like a lower quality
00:30:04
◼
►
or maybe it's a materials thing.
00:30:06
◼
►
So far, the Apple silicone case works the best
00:30:09
◼
►
and feels the best in use.
00:30:12
◼
►
It just sucks at going in and out of pockets.
00:30:14
◼
►
Which is the problem they've always had.
00:30:15
◼
►
Whereas the bare bottom bull strap case
00:30:20
◼
►
is the nicest leather case that I have found so far.
00:30:23
◼
►
But with the exception of that giant thing
00:30:25
◼
►
that Jon completed about the giant camera cut out.
00:30:27
◼
►
- By the way, if Apple made an open bottom silicone case,
00:30:29
◼
►
I would probably be using it instead of the leather one.
00:30:31
◼
►
Because I don't have so many problems
00:30:32
◼
►
with getting in and out of pockets.
00:30:34
◼
►
And I'm desperate to not have this giant hole
00:30:37
◼
►
in the side of my phone.
00:30:38
◼
►
It feels like a chicken pox scar.
00:30:40
◼
►
- Yeah, I hope in a few months,
00:30:42
◼
►
people have remade these cases with better designs.
00:30:46
◼
►
- I'm so afraid they're gonna be like,
00:30:47
◼
►
ah, we'll do that for the next phone.
00:30:49
◼
►
This phone, tough luck, right?
00:30:50
◼
►
I really hope that they come out with version two.
00:30:52
◼
►
It's like, well, we couldn't have them in day one.
00:30:54
◼
►
But now everyone knows how to do the quartz pads through.
00:30:56
◼
►
So here's, I'll buy a second case bull strap.
00:30:58
◼
►
Just put it out.
00:31:00
◼
►
I don't want them to be like,
00:31:01
◼
►
well, we can never figure it out for the 16 line.
00:31:03
◼
►
But for the 17, we'll have the quartz pads through.
00:31:05
◼
►
That doesn't help me 'cause I'm not cutting a 17.
00:31:07
◼
►
- Yeah, I hope they do.
00:31:08
◼
►
I hope they do.
00:31:09
◼
►
- You say that, and I agree with you in principle.
00:31:11
◼
►
But last year when I was casting about for a case
00:31:14
◼
►
for my 15 Pro Max,
00:31:17
◼
►
I had gotten a peel case, which I loved.
00:31:20
◼
►
But it had a cutout for the action button,
00:31:23
◼
►
which at the time most cases were doing.
00:31:25
◼
►
And I hated that.
00:31:27
◼
►
And I'm currently going caseless, caseless
00:31:30
◼
►
on the iPhone 16 that I have.
00:31:32
◼
►
And I'll probably continue to do that.
00:31:34
◼
►
But I was looking and I was wondering,
00:31:35
◼
►
hey, I wonder if since last year did Peak end up doing,
00:31:40
◼
►
I think it's, no, Peel.
00:31:41
◼
►
I'm sorry, Peel.
00:31:42
◼
►
Did Peel end up doing an action button
00:31:45
◼
►
and how have they handled the camera control?
00:31:48
◼
►
And the answer is they did not do an action button
00:31:50
◼
►
and they just have a hole for the camera control
00:31:52
◼
►
as they do for all of the buttons.
00:31:54
◼
►
And it's too bad because like the way I remember it,
00:31:57
◼
►
this was a year ago now,
00:31:58
◼
►
but the way I remember it, the case felt great.
00:32:00
◼
►
It was thin because I don't want,
00:32:02
◼
►
I'm not an OtterBox kind of person.
00:32:04
◼
►
Like I want something thin, but more than zero
00:32:06
◼
►
if I'm gonna do a case at all.
00:32:08
◼
►
And the key to the Peel,
00:32:10
◼
►
and they say it as a piece of marketing as they should,
00:32:14
◼
►
say it with me, gentlemen, no branding, no branding.
00:32:17
◼
►
And I loved that.
00:32:19
◼
►
And what I ended up doing was returning that case
00:32:21
◼
►
because I hated the lack of like a fake button,
00:32:24
◼
►
if you will, for the action button.
00:32:26
◼
►
And I got a Toras, T-O-R-R-A-S,
00:32:28
◼
►
which also doesn't have any outward facing branding,
00:32:32
◼
►
but the case was fine.
00:32:35
◼
►
Like I didn't like it near as much as I liked the Peel,
00:32:38
◼
►
but I could not abide by the gaps for the buttons.
00:32:43
◼
►
And I was hoping so much that by the 16,
00:32:46
◼
►
they would at least have an action button,
00:32:47
◼
►
even if they punted on the camera control.
00:32:49
◼
►
And from everything that I can tell,
00:32:50
◼
►
nope, it's just a bunch of holes.
00:32:53
◼
►
Just like your Mac Pro.
00:32:54
◼
►
- I really hope they update these cases.
00:32:57
◼
►
If not, I don't know what I'm gonna do.
00:32:58
◼
►
It was like, if that little delicate thing does break,
00:33:00
◼
►
what am I gonna go back to the Beats case,
00:33:02
◼
►
buy a second one of these at great expense?
00:33:04
◼
►
Although honestly, because all I get on Instagram now
00:33:06
◼
►
are ads for phone cases, as you can imagine,
00:33:09
◼
►
I'm really seeing how many different people
00:33:13
◼
►
resell this exact same Ryan London bull strap,
00:33:16
◼
►
like I forgot what the other brand I started recently.
00:33:18
◼
►
It's like at least three or four,
00:33:20
◼
►
maybe even five different brands
00:33:21
◼
►
that are clearly selling the same case
00:33:23
◼
►
that some manufacturer makes in China somewhere, right?
00:33:25
◼
►
And so we say, oh, bull straps, leather is good.
00:33:27
◼
►
It's not bull straps, leather.
00:33:28
◼
►
What they do is stamp the little bull thing on it
00:33:30
◼
►
and put it in a pretty box and sell it to us
00:33:32
◼
►
for way more money than everyone else does,
00:33:33
◼
►
which is fine, like, whatever, I'll take it.
00:33:36
◼
►
They were the first ones that shipped,
00:33:37
◼
►
so that's why they got my money.
00:33:38
◼
►
But please, somebody out there,
00:33:41
◼
►
open bottom, I'm asking for a lot.
00:33:42
◼
►
Nobody cares about open bottom but me, right?
00:33:45
◼
►
Open bottom, leather, quartz, camera control.
00:33:48
◼
►
Otherwise, I'm gonna be using this weird
00:33:50
◼
►
scarred case for two years.
00:33:54
◼
►
- It's sad times.
00:33:55
◼
►
Part of me wonders if we should try to design a case
00:33:59
◼
►
that makes all of us happy,
00:34:00
◼
►
and then I immediately decide
00:34:02
◼
►
that that's a terrible, terrible, terrible decision.
00:34:04
◼
►
- Can you imagine trying to design a case
00:34:06
◼
►
that would please John?
00:34:08
◼
►
- It wouldn't actually be that hard,
00:34:09
◼
►
but the problem is most we'd ever be able to sell,
00:34:14
◼
►
assuming we sold this as a product to our listeners,
00:34:16
◼
►
is like a few hundred cases at best, right?
00:34:19
◼
►
And no one's gonna manufacture you anything
00:34:21
◼
►
with those kind of small numbers.
00:34:22
◼
►
That's probably why these companies
00:34:23
◼
►
are not gonna make a new case
00:34:25
◼
►
'cause they have to pre-order like millions,
00:34:27
◼
►
not millions, but like thousands and thousands of them
00:34:29
◼
►
to get whatever good price they get on them,
00:34:31
◼
►
and they can't afford to say, you know,
00:34:34
◼
►
let's design a whole new case
00:34:36
◼
►
and buy a few thousand of those.
00:34:37
◼
►
They have to sell through all these ones
00:34:38
◼
►
that they made and paid for,
00:34:39
◼
►
and then by then, it's time for a new phone.
00:34:41
◼
►
- I mean, hey, we did it for the chicken hat.
00:34:43
◼
►
Can be done.
00:34:44
◼
►
- Yeah, I think the chicken hat
00:34:45
◼
►
is a little bit easier to manufacture
00:34:46
◼
►
than something that has to be precisely
00:34:48
◼
►
fit around an iPhone.
00:34:49
◼
►
- Yeah, and first of all,
00:34:50
◼
►
imagine if we had to make the chicken hat,
00:34:52
◼
►
but we didn't know where people's ears would be
00:34:54
◼
►
or how big their heads would be
00:34:56
◼
►
until after they were all made.
00:34:58
◼
►
And by the way, we did know where people's ears are,
00:35:00
◼
►
we did know how big people's heads are,
00:35:02
◼
►
and we still had a lot of fit complaints
00:35:05
◼
►
about the chicken hat, let's be honest.
00:35:07
◼
►
- Well, the chicken hat was,
00:35:08
◼
►
well, the good thing about the chicken hat was,
00:35:10
◼
►
first of all, the manufacturer that was making it for us
00:35:11
◼
►
was in the US and had a short turnaround time.
00:35:14
◼
►
And second of all, we had a prototype,
00:35:16
◼
►
which is my actual chicken hat,
00:35:18
◼
►
and the chicken hats we sold,
00:35:19
◼
►
if you lay them down on top of my actual chicken hat,
00:35:22
◼
►
they pretty much nailed it.
00:35:23
◼
►
I've bought several of these hats that we sold,
00:35:25
◼
►
and I have the original,
00:35:27
◼
►
and I can just lay them on top of each other.
00:35:28
◼
►
They're constructed the same way,
00:35:30
◼
►
they're the same size,
00:35:31
◼
►
like pretty much down to the millimeter.
00:35:33
◼
►
Now, again, they ended up being too small
00:35:35
◼
►
for a lot of people's heads,
00:35:36
◼
►
because my chicken hat is too small
00:35:37
◼
►
for a lot of people's heads,
00:35:38
◼
►
but what you got with the chicken hat
00:35:41
◼
►
was exactly what we were selling,
00:35:42
◼
►
which is as close a clone as possible
00:35:44
◼
►
as we could get to my chicken hat.
00:35:45
◼
►
And so, I think we did a pretty good job with that,
00:35:48
◼
►
but yeah, trying to do something like that
00:35:51
◼
►
with a complicated product like this manufactured,
00:35:53
◼
►
not in the U.S., with six months turnaround time,
00:35:56
◼
►
not gonna happen.
00:35:57
◼
►
But somebody out there, somebody, somebody, please,
00:36:00
◼
►
find this manufacturer in China
00:36:02
◼
►
that's making these cases for all these,
00:36:03
◼
►
and if they sell one with a quartz pass-through on it,
00:36:07
◼
►
somebody buy 10,000 of those and start selling them,
00:36:09
◼
►
I will buy one, and then step three, profit?
00:36:12
◼
►
I don't know.
00:36:13
◼
►
- Only 9,999 left.
00:36:15
◼
►
This is the complaint about the Apple Store corner.
00:36:19
◼
►
Eli Liebman writes, I was planning to upgrade
00:36:22
◼
►
to the Series 10 watch, but wasn't sure which size to get
00:36:24
◼
►
and wanted to see them in person before purchasing.
00:36:27
◼
►
After confirming online that both sizes were available
00:36:29
◼
►
for pickup at my local store,
00:36:30
◼
►
I made my way there to choose and purchase my new watch.
00:36:33
◼
►
I found an employee and asked to purchase the watch.
00:36:35
◼
►
The conversation went like this.
00:36:37
◼
►
Marco, actually, would you mind playing the role of Apple
00:36:39
◼
►
in this little skit for me, please?
00:36:42
◼
►
- Sure, hold on, let me, wait, should I play it cool?
00:36:45
◼
►
- Here we go, I'd like to buy this watch, please.
00:36:48
◼
►
- Do you have an appointment?
00:36:49
◼
►
- No, I didn't know which one I wanted,
00:36:52
◼
►
and I wanted to see them before I purchased it.
00:36:55
◼
►
- All of our new products require an online order
00:36:58
◼
►
and an appointment to pick it up.
00:37:00
◼
►
- Huh, I didn't know that, is the watch in stock?
00:37:05
◼
►
- Jesus, so can I buy it?
00:37:08
◼
►
- No, first you need to make an appointment.
00:37:11
◼
►
- Okay, when's the next appointment?
00:37:13
◼
►
- In two and a half hours.
00:37:15
◼
►
- So even though the item's in stock,
00:37:18
◼
►
and I'm standing right here,
00:37:20
◼
►
I need to come back in two and a half hours
00:37:22
◼
►
in order to purchase it.
00:37:24
◼
►
- Thank you, Marco, very well done.
00:37:26
◼
►
Yeah, so Eli writes, so I left and ordered the watch
00:37:28
◼
►
on Amazon where it was delivered to me later that same day.
00:37:32
◼
►
It's just terrible.
00:37:34
◼
►
Anyway, Eli continues, I can't think of another store
00:37:36
◼
►
where this would be acceptable.
00:37:37
◼
►
If they were busy, sure, I wouldn't expect to be helped
00:37:39
◼
►
before folks who made an appointment,
00:37:41
◼
►
but the store was empty.
00:37:42
◼
►
Why is it acceptable to tell a customer
00:37:44
◼
►
to come back in a few hours to purchase an item
00:37:45
◼
►
that is in stock?
00:37:47
◼
►
It seems like they don't value their customer's time.
00:37:49
◼
►
I have things to do.
00:37:50
◼
►
I already took time away from work to come to the store.
00:37:52
◼
►
I've been buying Apple products for almost 20 years,
00:37:54
◼
►
and this is the first time I've had a negative
00:37:55
◼
►
in-store experience when trying to purchase something.
00:37:58
◼
►
What used to be magical, watching the employee
00:38:00
◼
►
pull out a receipt from under the table was delightful,
00:38:03
◼
►
is now simply inconvenient.
00:38:04
◼
►
I truly believed Apple solved the retail experience,
00:38:07
◼
►
but not anymore.
00:38:08
◼
►
- Yeah, this is the danger when saying like,
00:38:09
◼
►
we're re-imagining the experience of retail.
00:38:11
◼
►
You always picture in your head
00:38:13
◼
►
that what you're gonna be doing is not accepting
00:38:16
◼
►
sort of the status quo for all the bad things,
00:38:18
◼
►
and saying people just accept X, Y, and Z
00:38:20
◼
►
are just the way stores have to be.
00:38:22
◼
►
Well, we don't think that way.
00:38:23
◼
►
Everything's on the table.
00:38:24
◼
►
We're re-imagining the whole experience,
00:38:26
◼
►
but if you're not careful,
00:38:27
◼
►
and you just stick to that philosophy,
00:38:29
◼
►
and you're like, we're re-imagining the experience,
00:38:31
◼
►
what you can end up doing
00:38:32
◼
►
is removing some of the good things,
00:38:34
◼
►
and re-imagining them to be way, way worse,
00:38:36
◼
►
and one of the good things is if you walk into a store,
00:38:40
◼
►
and they have a product in stock,
00:38:41
◼
►
you can give someone money for it,
00:38:43
◼
►
and then walk out of the store.
00:38:45
◼
►
Like, you can buy it.
00:38:46
◼
►
Like, do you have this product?
00:38:47
◼
►
Is it in stock?
00:38:48
◼
►
I'm here, and you're here, and the product is here.
00:38:51
◼
►
My money is here.
00:38:52
◼
►
Let's make this happen in an empty store,
00:38:55
◼
►
and when they say to you,
00:38:56
◼
►
no, please make an appointment on the app,
00:38:59
◼
►
and the first appointment is two hours from now,
00:39:01
◼
►
that is re-imagining the retail experience,
00:39:03
◼
►
so you are following your philosophy
00:39:04
◼
►
of re-imagining the retail experience,
00:39:06
◼
►
but for the worse,
00:39:07
◼
►
that you get into just ridiculous territory.
00:39:10
◼
►
Like, I would, you know, we've complained that even
00:39:11
◼
►
the whole, like, oh, there are no lines
00:39:13
◼
►
is an example of re-imagining that maybe isn't positive,
00:39:15
◼
►
but this is definitely not positive.
00:39:17
◼
►
Like, you should be able to go in there and buy something.
00:39:19
◼
►
It's like, I have money.
00:39:20
◼
►
You have product.
00:39:21
◼
►
Let's make this happen, but they're like,
00:39:23
◼
►
no, make an appointment.
00:39:24
◼
►
Come back in two hours.
00:39:25
◼
►
That's no good.
00:39:26
◼
►
- It's so bad, and I know that some of this
00:39:29
◼
►
is just the east coaster in me coming out.
00:39:30
◼
►
I want a line.
00:39:31
◼
►
I want a queue.
00:39:32
◼
►
I want a order.
00:39:33
◼
►
I want everything to be ordered.
00:39:35
◼
►
I want to get in, get out as quickly as possible,
00:39:37
◼
►
but that being said, ugh, it's just,
00:39:40
◼
►
it's unnecessarily complicated,
00:39:41
◼
►
and this is the sort of thing that we would just eviscerate
00:39:44
◼
►
a Microsoft store for, and here it is, Apple doing it.
00:39:47
◼
►
- I mean, if there was ever too many people
00:39:49
◼
►
in a Microsoft store that would require
00:39:50
◼
►
such a system like this.
00:39:51
◼
►
- Well, that's true.
00:39:52
◼
►
- Yeah, like, it's just, as I pointed out,
00:39:54
◼
►
it doesn't value the customer's time.
00:39:56
◼
►
They drove to the store, came to the place,
00:39:58
◼
►
brought their money and their wallet,
00:39:59
◼
►
and they want to, like, look at it and buy a thing,
00:40:01
◼
►
and you're like, no, make an appointment
00:40:04
◼
►
for two hours from now?
00:40:05
◼
►
That doesn't value the time of the person
00:40:07
◼
►
who made the trip to it, especially if the Apple store
00:40:09
◼
►
is, like, far away from them.
00:40:10
◼
►
It's just not acceptable.
00:40:11
◼
►
- We are sponsored this episode by Squarespace,
00:40:15
◼
►
the all-in-one website platform for entrepreneurs
00:40:18
◼
►
to stand out and succeed online.
00:40:20
◼
►
Whether you're just starting out or managing
00:40:21
◼
►
a growing brand, Squarespace makes it easy
00:40:23
◼
►
to create a beautiful website, engage with your audience,
00:40:26
◼
►
and sell anything from products to content to your time,
00:40:29
◼
►
all in one place and all on your terms.
00:40:32
◼
►
Squarespace is the best place to build websites,
00:40:35
◼
►
and they have so many great features
00:40:37
◼
►
they're adding all the time.
00:40:38
◼
►
They actually recently introduced
00:40:40
◼
►
Design Intelligence from Squarespace.
00:40:42
◼
►
This combines two decades of industry-leading
00:40:44
◼
►
design expertise with cutting-edge AI tech
00:40:46
◼
►
to unlock your strongest creative potential.
00:40:49
◼
►
Design Intelligence empowers anyone
00:40:51
◼
►
to build a beautiful, more personalized website
00:40:53
◼
►
tailored to their unique needs,
00:40:55
◼
►
and craft a bespoke digital identity
00:40:58
◼
►
to use across one's entire online presence.
00:41:01
◼
►
And of course, Squarespace really specializes recently
00:41:03
◼
►
in all these amazing commerce features,
00:41:05
◼
►
and Squarespace Payments is the easiest way
00:41:08
◼
►
to manage your payments in one place.
00:41:10
◼
►
Onboarding is fast and simple.
00:41:12
◼
►
You get started in just a few clicks,
00:41:13
◼
►
and you can start receiving payments right away.
00:41:16
◼
►
And this gives your customers more ways to pay than ever,
00:41:18
◼
►
with popular methods like Klarna, ACH Direct Debit,
00:41:21
◼
►
Apple Pay, Afterpay, Clearpay,
00:41:24
◼
►
and so many more they're adding all the time.
00:41:26
◼
►
And you don't have to be a nerd to use Squarespace.
00:41:28
◼
►
You don't even have to ask nerds.
00:41:30
◼
►
If you are a nerd, you can set people up with this,
00:41:32
◼
►
and they don't have to ask you.
00:41:33
◼
►
It's wonderful.
00:41:34
◼
►
It really empowers people to build their own site
00:41:36
◼
►
for their own business their way,
00:41:38
◼
►
without having some computer gatekeeper in their way.
00:41:40
◼
►
So go to squarespace.com to try it out for a free trial.
00:41:45
◼
►
When you're ready to launch, squarespace.com/atp,
00:41:48
◼
►
and you'll save 10% off your first purchase
00:41:50
◼
►
of a website or domain.
00:41:51
◼
►
So once again, squarespace.com, start that free trial.
00:41:54
◼
►
When you're ready to launch, squarespace.com/atp
00:41:57
◼
►
for 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain.
00:42:00
◼
►
I strongly recommend Squarespace
00:42:02
◼
►
for all your website needs.
00:42:03
◼
►
Check it out today.
00:42:03
◼
►
Once again, squarespace.com.
00:42:05
◼
►
Thank you so much to Squarespace for sponsoring our show.
00:42:08
◼
►
(jazzy music)
00:42:11
◼
►
I have a small request for two apps that I can't find.
00:42:17
◼
►
- So build 'em, man.
00:42:20
◼
►
- It's tempting, honestly.
00:42:22
◼
►
But I have a bit on my plate right now
00:42:23
◼
►
with the app I do have.
00:42:25
◼
►
So I don't have time to make these right now.
00:42:28
◼
►
I assume someone has made them, but I cannot find them.
00:42:31
◼
►
So number one, I recently started sleep tracking.
00:42:34
◼
►
I'm just wearing the Apple Watch to bed.
00:42:36
◼
►
I even discovered the sleep focus mode,
00:42:38
◼
►
which I'm finally using,
00:42:39
◼
►
because it makes the screen turn off at night.
00:42:41
◼
►
I tried, the funny thing is,
00:42:42
◼
►
before, like I hadn't been using the sleep focus mode
00:42:45
◼
►
for whatever reason.
00:42:46
◼
►
I just use auto do not disturb at night.
00:42:48
◼
►
And I was trying to figure out
00:42:50
◼
►
how do I make the watch screen turn off while I'm sleeping,
00:42:53
◼
►
'cause it was bothering my wife, and so I'm like all right.
00:42:56
◼
►
- Theater mode.
00:42:57
◼
►
- That's what I tried, theater mode.
00:42:59
◼
►
Guess what theater mode turns off?
00:43:03
◼
►
- Yep, sure does.
00:43:04
◼
►
- Remember when the alarm went off
00:43:06
◼
►
when the person was in the theater?
00:43:06
◼
►
Do you remember that whole controversy?
00:43:08
◼
►
- Oh, yes I do, yes, yes, yes.
00:43:10
◼
►
- So one night of that, I'm like okay,
00:43:11
◼
►
well that's not the answer.
00:43:13
◼
►
- This is like the equivalent of the shoe bomber.
00:43:16
◼
►
25 years later, theater mode still
00:43:18
◼
►
doesn't let the alarms go off.
00:43:19
◼
►
- Yeah, anyways, yeah, theater mode's not it.
00:43:21
◼
►
But this turns out the sleep focus does that.
00:43:24
◼
►
So all I want to do is I want an app
00:43:27
◼
►
that every morning I can tag the sleep
00:43:31
◼
►
I had the night before with arbitrary tags that I input.
00:43:35
◼
►
Things like whether I stayed up too late
00:43:37
◼
►
or maybe I had a late meal, or maybe I was sleeping alone
00:43:42
◼
►
'cause I was at the beach by myself or something.
00:43:45
◼
►
I want to have tags that I can tag my sleep.
00:43:48
◼
►
Late coffee, alcohol consumption, things like that.
00:43:52
◼
►
And then I want to be able to see in the future,
00:43:55
◼
►
like I want to be able to pick a tag
00:43:56
◼
►
and see like okay, with this tag,
00:43:59
◼
►
your sleeps with this one are 12% better on average
00:44:02
◼
►
than sleeps that don't have this tag, or 12% worse.
00:44:05
◼
►
- Remember that app that Merlin always talks about
00:44:07
◼
►
and makes fun of?
00:44:08
◼
►
- Yeah, yeah.
00:44:09
◼
►
- It's like when you were in Washington,
00:44:10
◼
►
you sleep worse, like you weigh more, but sleep worse.
00:44:14
◼
►
- So I have been looking for apps to do this.
00:44:18
◼
►
And I have, so thanks to some Chad GPT research,
00:44:23
◼
►
I installed the top couple of sleep apps.
00:44:26
◼
►
They have been like super disasters of just gross,
00:44:31
◼
►
like massive privacy invasion, huge suites of functionality
00:44:35
◼
►
doing all sorts of stuff I don't need.
00:44:37
◼
►
There was one app, this is one of the top rated sleep apps
00:44:41
◼
►
in the App Store that first of all puts you through
00:44:45
◼
►
a in-app purchase flow immediately
00:44:48
◼
►
and with no way to get around it.
00:44:50
◼
►
So I'm pretty sure that actually violates the App Store rule
00:44:53
◼
►
against minimum functionality.
00:44:55
◼
►
But the App Store rules are not being enforced here
00:44:57
◼
►
in lots of ways.
00:44:58
◼
►
And this is like one, there's like a handful of top
00:45:01
◼
►
sleep apps in the App Store and this is one of them.
00:45:04
◼
►
One of them offered me to pay $40 a year
00:45:08
◼
►
for premium features including I can listen to recordings
00:45:12
◼
►
of my own farts from my sleep the next morning.
00:45:15
◼
►
- Nice. - Oh cool.
00:45:16
◼
►
- And I learned when I saw that for $40 a year,
00:45:19
◼
►
not only have we really hit App Store bottom here,
00:45:23
◼
►
but that's when I decided I think I should probably
00:45:24
◼
►
raise the overcast subscription price,
00:45:27
◼
►
which is currently a quarter of that.
00:45:29
◼
►
- How many farts does overcast let you hear?
00:45:31
◼
►
- None, well it depends, I mean what do people generate?
00:45:33
◼
►
- Say you know you gotta up your fart game
00:45:35
◼
►
if you're gonna compete in those leagues.
00:45:37
◼
►
- Obviously, yeah, maybe I'm just tackling
00:45:39
◼
►
the wrong feature set apparently.
00:45:40
◼
►
- We started out with fart apps on the App Store
00:45:42
◼
►
and we've come full circle, now you have to supply the farts.
00:45:44
◼
►
- Exactly, real time follow up by the way,
00:45:47
◼
►
apparently exist.io is the app that Merlin always
00:45:49
◼
►
talks about, yes I remember that now, so thank you
00:45:51
◼
►
to people in chat who said that.
00:45:52
◼
►
But yeah, so anyways, I just want a simple app to do it,
00:45:54
◼
►
and these apps, they wanna give you a meditation routine
00:45:59
◼
►
and be custom alarms and tie into,
00:46:02
◼
►
lay your phone on the pillow and subscribe to our service
00:46:06
◼
►
so we can life coach your partner, and it's like
00:46:08
◼
►
oh my god, let me just tag my sleep and see data,
00:46:11
◼
►
that's it, that's all I want.
00:46:12
◼
►
So far I have not found anything to do with it.
00:46:14
◼
►
- Doesn't Underscore have a sleep app?
00:46:16
◼
►
- Yeah, sleep plus plus.
00:46:17
◼
►
- Yes, I don't believe it has that feature though.
00:46:19
◼
►
- Well I think you have a direct line
00:46:20
◼
►
to getting that feature added.
00:46:21
◼
►
- Yeah, that's probably easier than making it myself.
00:46:24
◼
►
Anyway, so that's one thing I want.
00:46:26
◼
►
The second thing I want, I finally set up
00:46:28
◼
►
the rest of my Sonos system, I finally moved
00:46:30
◼
►
my Sonos speakers out of my office, downstairs
00:46:33
◼
►
to where they were originally purchased for,
00:46:35
◼
►
the living room TV, so I have the ARC sound bar,
00:46:37
◼
►
two ERA 300s as the surrounds, and a sub.
00:46:42
◼
►
- It is a very nice system, however, the one challenge
00:46:47
◼
►
with setting up a Sonos sound bar stuff is audio delay.
00:46:52
◼
►
There, you know, any Sonos input introduces latency,
00:46:56
◼
►
because of the way their system, you know,
00:46:58
◼
►
buffers and processes things and has network Wi-Fi stuff,
00:47:00
◼
►
there's always latency on the input, on the audio.
00:47:03
◼
►
And TVs have ways to adjust the audio sync.
00:47:06
◼
►
The Apple TV also has a built-in way,
00:47:09
◼
►
something like calibrate wireless audio sync,
00:47:11
◼
►
where if you're using home pods or anything else,
00:47:13
◼
►
it'll, it's like, alright, place your phone
00:47:15
◼
►
in front of the Apple TV and we'll figure out
00:47:16
◼
►
your audio sync for you, which seems to change things,
00:47:21
◼
►
but not correctly.
00:47:23
◼
►
Anyway, so, you know, I'm trying to like watch TV
00:47:25
◼
►
and everyone's lips aren't matching up to their audio,
00:47:26
◼
►
which is infuriating, and so I'm trying to align it.
00:47:28
◼
►
My TV also has a built-in control, but it's, you know,
00:47:31
◼
►
like negative five through positive three or something,
00:47:34
◼
►
it's, you know, these units make no sense.
00:47:36
◼
►
And so I'm like, alright, well what is it?
00:47:38
◼
►
And I've been adjusting it, trying to figure out what it is.
00:47:41
◼
►
Eventually, I looked at my, there has to be an app
00:47:44
◼
►
to like automatically like use my phone and the TV
00:47:47
◼
►
to tell me like, alright, you're 50 milliseconds behind,
00:47:50
◼
►
you're 30 milliseconds behind, like, you know,
00:47:51
◼
►
show me an actual number, like play something on the TV,
00:47:55
◼
►
use the phone to show me an actual number.
00:47:58
◼
►
And there's even videos on YouTube that will,
00:48:00
◼
►
that show you like, it like plays beep, beep,
00:48:04
◼
►
every few seconds, beep, and it shows you like
00:48:05
◼
►
a little bar going across when it hits the middle,
00:48:07
◼
►
right when the beep happens, so you can tell
00:48:09
◼
►
if you use your own phone to shoot video of the TV screen
00:48:14
◼
►
and then slow-mo through the video to find
00:48:17
◼
►
where does the beep happen if you can see the waveform.
00:48:20
◼
►
So here's how I did this.
00:48:21
◼
►
- Oh, by the way, this all sounds familiar to you listeners
00:48:23
◼
►
because we talked about this in episode 297 of ATP
00:48:26
◼
►
when I set up my AV setup, including the,
00:48:29
◼
►
probably the exact video that Marco was looking at
00:48:31
◼
►
and me recording on my phone in slow motion
00:48:33
◼
►
and seeing the waveform in iMovie.
00:48:35
◼
►
So we'll put a link in the show notes to that episode of ATP
00:48:38
◼
►
and also to the two apps/videos that I used for that.
00:48:43
◼
►
- I did the same thing but with Final Cut,
00:48:45
◼
►
'cause I didn't have iMovie on my computer,
00:48:47
◼
►
but I had Final Cut still, so my God,
00:48:48
◼
►
and this is like such a ridiculous, like overuse of a tool.
00:48:53
◼
►
Like Final Cut is not, this is not what this is for.
00:48:56
◼
►
It fights you at every turn.
00:48:57
◼
►
It should not be doing this, and yet, you know,
00:49:00
◼
►
that's what I was able to see where the waveform
00:49:03
◼
►
of the video is while looking at the other--
00:49:05
◼
►
- And then you still have to make the choice,
00:49:06
◼
►
like I said, in episode 297.
00:49:08
◼
►
Then you still have to decide, all right,
00:49:10
◼
►
so when the little bar is in the middle in the video,
00:49:13
◼
►
should that be just as the waveform
00:49:15
◼
►
goes from silent to not silent?
00:49:17
◼
►
Should it be the peak of the waveform
00:49:19
◼
►
where the volume, the amplitude is the highest?
00:49:21
◼
►
You have to make all these judgment calls,
00:49:22
◼
►
but I can tell you from experience
00:49:24
◼
►
that no matter how you make the judgment calls,
00:49:26
◼
►
as long as you do something reasonable,
00:49:27
◼
►
you can get it so close to being perfect
00:49:29
◼
►
that you won't notice it anymore.
00:49:31
◼
►
- Yeah, but what I want,
00:49:32
◼
►
like this process would be very easy.
00:49:34
◼
►
So here's what this process should be.
00:49:37
◼
►
The phone plays a video over AirPlay to the Apple TV,
00:49:42
◼
►
or you just have a YouTube video
00:49:45
◼
►
that you can point your app to and say,
00:49:46
◼
►
play this video on the Apple TV,
00:49:49
◼
►
and then the phone uses its camera and microphone
00:49:52
◼
►
to watch for a big white flash on the video
00:49:56
◼
►
and listen to the microphone and listen to the beep,
00:49:59
◼
►
and you can see those impulses on the input video
00:50:03
◼
►
and on the input audio,
00:50:04
◼
►
and the app should be able to tell you.
00:50:06
◼
►
Every time it sees flash beep,
00:50:08
◼
►
every time it should be able to tell you,
00:50:09
◼
►
you're 35 milliseconds behind.
00:50:11
◼
►
It can tell you that, that's not hard to write.
00:50:13
◼
►
I could write it, I just shouldn't write it.
00:50:15
◼
►
- The tricky part of that is when you get down
00:50:17
◼
►
to these kind of timings,
00:50:19
◼
►
that the time between when a photon hits the camera
00:50:23
◼
►
and the time when an app registered that that took place
00:50:26
◼
►
is probably a handful of milliseconds,
00:50:28
◼
►
and you have to account for that,
00:50:29
◼
►
and it might vary from phone to phone,
00:50:31
◼
►
so that's a little bit tricky.
00:50:32
◼
►
- I'm guessing that's probably less than a frame
00:50:37
◼
►
I mean, but again, maybe it varies by device.
00:50:39
◼
►
Like, it's not something that comes up normally,
00:50:41
◼
►
like when you're recording video or something like that.
00:50:43
◼
►
Like, oh, how much lag is there?
00:50:44
◼
►
How much lag between, again,
00:50:46
◼
►
photons hitting the lens of the camera
00:50:47
◼
►
and a program that is watching for that
00:50:49
◼
►
knowing that that happened?
00:50:50
◼
►
But yeah, it would definitely be better
00:50:52
◼
►
than doing it the manual way, which is very annoying.
00:50:55
◼
►
And why Marco was using Final Cut
00:50:58
◼
►
and why I was using iMovie
00:50:59
◼
►
is because you need a visual representation of the audio.
00:51:02
◼
►
You need to be able to see a waveform,
00:51:04
◼
►
and I don't think there,
00:51:06
◼
►
or at least there was no apps that I knew of on the phone
00:51:07
◼
►
that did that that were not full-fledged video editors,
00:51:10
◼
►
and honestly, I'd rather just do it on the Mac.
00:51:11
◼
►
So I was recording videos, coming back to the Mac,
00:51:14
◼
►
opening the video in iMovie,
00:51:17
◼
►
watching the slow-motion thing, going frame by frame,
00:51:19
◼
►
seeing where the waveform is,
00:51:21
◼
►
and then adjusting the delay until I dialed it in.
00:51:26
◼
►
And I did that in 2022 and haven't touched a sync,
00:51:28
◼
►
and it's been great.
00:51:29
◼
►
So I believe in you, Mark.
00:51:30
◼
►
You can get over this hump.
00:51:32
◼
►
Like, I have it set up that it seems okay now,
00:51:36
◼
►
but it still doesn't seem quite right,
00:51:38
◼
►
but I think it's so close,
00:51:40
◼
►
and I have it between negative three
00:51:42
◼
►
and negative four on my TV,
00:51:44
◼
►
and if I put it on the next one over, it looks too wrong.
00:51:48
◼
►
So I think this is about as good as it's gonna get,
00:51:50
◼
►
but this process took me 40 minutes,
00:51:53
◼
►
and it could have taken me four minutes.
00:51:55
◼
►
- Yeah, and the tricky part for you is,
00:51:58
◼
►
I don't know, maybe it's not tricky.
00:51:59
◼
►
Maybe it'll be the same,
00:52:00
◼
►
but what you hope is you get some scenario
00:52:02
◼
►
where you're tweaking it, right?
00:52:04
◼
►
And you get it, so you get it right there.
00:52:05
◼
►
You're like, okay, it's right.
00:52:07
◼
►
Is it right for all video sources and all output types
00:52:10
◼
►
and all, for example, if you did it through AirPlay,
00:52:12
◼
►
does that apply to things you play on Apple TV?
00:52:14
◼
►
Does that apply to things you watch over regular TV?
00:52:16
◼
►
If you have any other video source connected,
00:52:18
◼
►
if you have a video game system connected,
00:52:20
◼
►
you're hoping that you'll be able to configure this
00:52:23
◼
►
in one place and it will apply to any picture
00:52:25
◼
►
that ever shows on your TV,
00:52:26
◼
►
but you have to be careful of where you're doing it.
00:52:28
◼
►
For example, if you're doing it on the Apple TV,
00:52:30
◼
►
it's not going to apply when you're playing a video game
00:52:32
◼
►
'cause the Apple TV is not involved
00:52:33
◼
►
if you're playing like Nintendo Switch or something.
00:52:35
◼
►
It's not gonna be involved in that.
00:52:36
◼
►
And so now you have a second place
00:52:37
◼
►
where you have to dial it in.
00:52:39
◼
►
And this is one of the places where it comes in handy
00:52:41
◼
►
to have something like a receiver,
00:52:42
◼
►
which is the central meeting point
00:52:44
◼
►
for all the audio and the video.
00:52:45
◼
►
And that's where I made my adjustment
00:52:47
◼
►
and everything that goes on my TV screen
00:52:48
◼
►
goes through my receiver
00:52:49
◼
►
and my receiver applies the delay
00:52:51
◼
►
and so far so good for me.
00:52:53
◼
►
- Yes, but everything else about having a receiver sucks
00:52:54
◼
►
and I will accept no other contrary arguments.
00:52:57
◼
►
Anyway, I should note that in the Sonos app,
00:52:59
◼
►
if you go to the gear in the upper right
00:53:01
◼
►
and then go to your living room or whatever,
00:53:03
◼
►
set up and then scroll, scroll, scroll, scroll, scroll,
00:53:06
◼
►
way down in the home theater section,
00:53:09
◼
►
there's TV dialog sync.
00:53:11
◼
►
And I have mine cranked to five seconds
00:53:13
◼
►
for my 2019 LG OLED.
00:53:16
◼
►
- Five seconds?
00:53:18
◼
►
- Or five units, sorry, sorry, sorry, five units.
00:53:20
◼
►
I think I said seconds, five units.
00:53:23
◼
►
It's zero to five, I believe.
00:53:25
◼
►
Anyways, and that has worked for me across Switch,
00:53:29
◼
►
across Wii, across TV.
00:53:31
◼
►
- I'll have to look at that.
00:53:32
◼
►
I assume that would,
00:53:33
◼
►
'cause it's only like a positive offset.
00:53:36
◼
►
- I assume that would change it in the wrong direction.
00:53:39
◼
►
- I mean, give it a shot.
00:53:39
◼
►
You may not have the good experience I did,
00:53:42
◼
►
but it can't hurt to try.
00:53:43
◼
►
- 'Cause what has to happen
00:53:44
◼
►
is the TV has to hold the video back.
00:53:47
◼
►
The TV has to buffer the video for a few milliseconds
00:53:50
◼
►
while the audio catches up
00:53:52
◼
►
because the audio is where Sonos is introducing latency.
00:53:54
◼
►
- But yeah, but the TVs also have latency as well,
00:53:57
◼
►
so it depends on which, adding more latency
00:53:59
◼
►
and you gotta kind of match them up.
00:54:00
◼
►
But the audio advice video,
00:54:02
◼
►
it's a YouTube video that I use to do my adjustment,
00:54:04
◼
►
has helpful labels on the plus and minus sign
00:54:07
◼
►
where it says basically like,
00:54:08
◼
►
it says audio early, increase the delay,
00:54:11
◼
►
and then audio late, decrease the delay.
00:54:13
◼
►
But bottom line is,
00:54:14
◼
►
once you have something that you can measure on,
00:54:16
◼
►
you just push the delay to the maximum and minimum value
00:54:19
◼
►
and see which side of the zero it's at,
00:54:21
◼
►
and then you know which direction you need to adjust it
00:54:23
◼
►
to get it in.
00:54:24
◼
►
Mine, I think, was on,
00:54:25
◼
►
I can't even see it in this picture, it's too blurry.
00:54:27
◼
►
Mine was like 120, is that milliseconds?
00:54:31
◼
►
Maybe it's milliseconds, maybe it's microseconds.
00:54:33
◼
►
- No, it's milliseconds.
00:54:34
◼
►
- Anyway, 120 milliseconds is what mine is set to
00:54:37
◼
►
in this image from the show notes from episode 297.
00:54:41
◼
►
- You said 297, it's actually 497, isn't it?
00:54:44
◼
►
- 297, oh yeah, 497, sorry, typo, yes.
00:54:47
◼
►
497, August 25th, 2022.
00:54:50
◼
►
- There you go.
00:54:51
◼
►
All right, we have some breaking-ish news
00:54:54
◼
►
from a few days ago.
00:54:56
◼
►
If you remember our friends at Massimo
00:54:59
◼
►
that do the blood oxygen detection thing
00:55:02
◼
►
and have a patent for it,
00:55:03
◼
►
and oh boy, we've patented it,
00:55:05
◼
►
and so they have been in a bitter fight with Apple
00:55:10
◼
►
to the point that it went to the courts.
00:55:12
◼
►
The court said that Apple cannot enable
00:55:15
◼
►
the blood oxygen detection in new Apple watches,
00:55:19
◼
►
including the one on my wrist right now,
00:55:21
◼
►
and they've been battling it out for a while now.
00:55:23
◼
►
Personally, I don't understand why Apple
00:55:25
◼
►
doesn't just pay them all the money and make them go away.
00:55:28
◼
►
Not to say that they're wrong, but just make them go away.
00:55:30
◼
►
You have all the money in the world.
00:55:31
◼
►
You have infinite money,
00:55:33
◼
►
less the 15 billion you just gave to Ireland,
00:55:35
◼
►
but you have infinite money, just make them go away.
00:55:37
◼
►
It'll be fine, but here we are.
00:55:40
◼
►
Anyways, the breaking news a few days ago,
00:55:42
◼
►
actually a couple weeks ago now, or maybe a week ago,
00:55:44
◼
►
is that the founder and CEO has resigned
00:55:47
◼
►
after he was removed from the board.
00:55:49
◼
►
So Reuters writes, "Massimo said that on September 25,
00:55:53
◼
►
"founder Joe Chiani has decided to step down
00:55:56
◼
►
"as the medical device maker CEO days after shareholders
00:55:59
◼
►
"voted to remove him from the company's board
00:56:01
◼
►
"following a bitter proxy battle
00:56:03
◼
►
"with activist hedge fund Politan Capital Management."
00:56:07
◼
►
- So the answer to your question of like,
00:56:09
◼
►
I don't understand why Apple doesn't pay this,
00:56:11
◼
►
one of the rumors is that it's because the CEO
00:56:13
◼
►
was being unreasonable and would just not accept
00:56:15
◼
►
any kind of reasonable offer.
00:56:17
◼
►
And this hedge fund thing here,
00:56:19
◼
►
like again, I don't know any truth to this,
00:56:20
◼
►
but some of the things I've heard swirling
00:56:23
◼
►
as people speculating was that like,
00:56:25
◼
►
oh, this hedge fund is actually,
00:56:27
◼
►
the hedge fund and the shareholders,
00:56:28
◼
►
and basically everybody who's not the CEO were like,
00:56:31
◼
►
Massimo, take the money.
00:56:33
◼
►
You've got you won, you've got Apple over a barrel.
00:56:36
◼
►
They have to pay you.
00:56:37
◼
►
Maybe they're even offering to pay you.
00:56:39
◼
►
We as the people who are either current shareholders
00:56:43
◼
►
and board members of the company,
00:56:44
◼
►
or speculative shareholders who want to invest
00:56:47
◼
►
these hedge fund things wherever we, you know, whatever.
00:56:49
◼
►
Like we think, if you let us be in charge of the company,
00:56:52
◼
►
we could make you more money,
00:56:53
◼
►
because we wouldn't be dummies like your CEO,
00:56:55
◼
►
and we would just take the Apple money and make us all rich.
00:56:57
◼
►
And so I don't know if any of that is,
00:57:00
◼
►
if that's just speculation or rumors or whatever,
00:57:02
◼
►
but it sure looks like from the outside
00:57:05
◼
►
that there may have been one person,
00:57:06
◼
►
and one person only, who was stopping this
00:57:09
◼
►
from being resolved with large amounts of money,
00:57:11
◼
►
and that was the founder and CEO, and he is out.
00:57:15
◼
►
And there's more from Matt Levine in Bloomberg,
00:57:17
◼
►
if you want to read about this.
00:57:19
◼
►
We'll find out in the coming weeks and months if,
00:57:23
◼
►
oh, suddenly there's a Massimo deal
00:57:24
◼
►
between Apple and Massimo, and they get a lot of money.
00:57:27
◼
►
We'll see if that happens.
00:57:28
◼
►
It seems like, again, from the outside looking in,
00:57:30
◼
►
it seems like finally the way is clear
00:57:33
◼
►
for large amounts of money to change hands.
00:57:36
◼
►
But if he gets kicked out, and still we go years and years,
00:57:39
◼
►
and Apple still can't enable this feature in the US,
00:57:41
◼
►
then I'm out of ideas.
00:57:43
◼
►
- I mean, it sure seems like Apple
00:57:45
◼
►
just didn't want to pay anything for it.
00:57:47
◼
►
So I don't know that this was the problem here,
00:57:50
◼
►
but we'll find out.
00:57:51
◼
►
- There's also some news over the last week or so,
00:57:55
◼
►
Meta, Meta, Meta, whatever you want to call them.
00:57:58
◼
►
Are you saying Meta?
00:58:00
◼
►
Does anyone pronounce it that way?
00:58:02
◼
►
- Sorry, that rhymes.
00:58:03
◼
►
- Oh my God. - Well, I do sometimes.
00:58:05
◼
►
Anyways, that company that's Facebook but not,
00:58:10
◼
►
they have released, or not released, I shouldn't say,
00:58:12
◼
►
but have demoed some AR glasses
00:58:16
◼
►
that they're calling Orion.
00:58:17
◼
►
And apparently this stuff is really freaking slick.
00:58:21
◼
►
There's a wrap up at The Verge for Meta Connect,
00:58:25
◼
►
which is their kind of equivalent of WWDC.
00:58:28
◼
►
There's also a post where one of their authors,
00:58:31
◼
►
whose name I don't have in front of me, I am so sorry,
00:58:33
◼
►
Alex Heath, actually got to demo the Orion glasses
00:58:38
◼
►
in part with Mark Zuckerberg.
00:58:40
◼
►
And there's also a post over, a couple of posts,
00:58:43
◼
►
I think over at Stratechery with our friend Ben Thompson.
00:58:47
◼
►
I will try to dig up a link for the show notes
00:58:49
◼
►
for at least one of those.
00:58:50
◼
►
But anyways, everything, I haven't read a lot on this,
00:58:53
◼
►
but everything I've read on this is,
00:58:55
◼
►
oh my, this is the future, the Vision Pro is a mistake.
00:58:58
◼
►
When can we have this?
00:59:00
◼
►
And the answer is, well, probably not soon.
00:59:02
◼
►
So let me read some stuff.
00:59:03
◼
►
So from The Verge, Meta, not Meta,
00:59:06
◼
►
has revealed its Orion augmented reality glasses.
00:59:09
◼
►
And they look almost like a trendy pair of frames
00:59:11
◼
►
you could pick up without all the tech inside.
00:59:13
◼
►
Orion uses micro LED projectors inside the frame
00:59:15
◼
►
and beams images in front of your eyes
00:59:17
◼
►
via wave guides in the lenses.
00:59:20
◼
►
The glasses pair with a wireless compute puck
00:59:23
◼
►
and a neural wristband you wear on your arm
00:59:26
◼
►
that responds to gestures like pinches.
00:59:28
◼
►
Again, this from the Orion review now.
00:59:32
◼
►
Orion, Meta's first pair of augmented reality glasses,
00:59:35
◼
►
was supposed to be a product you could buy.
00:59:37
◼
►
When the glasses graduated from a Skunk Works project
00:59:39
◼
►
in Meta's research division back in 2018,
00:59:41
◼
►
the goal was to start shipping them
00:59:42
◼
►
in the low tens of thousands by now.
00:59:44
◼
►
But in 2022, amidst a phase of broader belt tightening
00:59:47
◼
►
across the company, Zuckerberg made the call
00:59:49
◼
►
to shelve its release.
00:59:50
◼
►
As Meta's executives retell it,
00:59:52
◼
►
the decision to shelve Orion mostly came down
00:59:54
◼
►
to the device's astronomical cost to build,
00:59:56
◼
►
which allegedly is in the ballpark of $10,000 per unit.
01:00:00
◼
►
Most of that cost is due to how difficult and expensive
01:00:02
◼
►
it is to reliably manufacture the silicon carbide lenses.
01:00:05
◼
►
When it started designing Orion,
01:00:06
◼
►
Meta expected the material to become more commonly used
01:00:08
◼
►
across the industry and therefore cheaper,
01:00:10
◼
►
but that didn't happen.
01:00:11
◼
►
Quote, "You can't imagine how horrible the yields are,"
01:00:13
◼
►
says Meta's CTO, Andrew Bosworth of Lenses.
01:00:16
◼
►
Instead, the company pivoted to making about 1,000 pairs
01:00:19
◼
►
of the Orion glasses for internal development
01:00:20
◼
►
and external demos.
01:00:22
◼
►
Quote, "It's probably turned out significantly better
01:00:24
◼
►
than our 50/50 estimates of what it would be,
01:00:26
◼
►
but we didn't get there on everything we wanted to."
01:00:28
◼
►
Zuckerberg says to the device, quote,
01:00:30
◼
►
"We still want it to be a little smaller, a little brighter,
01:00:33
◼
►
a little bit higher resolution, and a lot more affordable
01:00:35
◼
►
before we put it out there as a product.
01:00:36
◼
►
And look, we have a line of sight to all those things."
01:00:40
◼
►
- This has really shaken up the tech press world
01:00:42
◼
►
over the last week because--
01:00:43
◼
►
- And I don't understand why.
01:00:45
◼
►
- Well-- - That's, I mean,
01:00:46
◼
►
I'm sure people have had that take, but I said,
01:00:48
◼
►
"I agree with you that this is like,
01:00:49
◼
►
the tech press is all over this," and people were like,
01:00:51
◼
►
"Oh my God, it's this, it's that," but like,
01:00:54
◼
►
honestly, people, like, there is no new anything here
01:00:59
◼
►
that changes anything as far as I'm concerned.
01:01:02
◼
►
- Well, I don't know.
01:01:03
◼
►
I mean, so what they've shown, this is,
01:01:05
◼
►
first of all, this is very smart by Meta, I think,
01:01:07
◼
►
because this goes along with, first of all,
01:01:10
◼
►
with their overall, you know, pretty, pretty,
01:01:14
◼
►
I would say successful rebranding efforts.
01:01:18
◼
►
We are the last people calling them Facebook.
01:01:20
◼
►
They've rebranded themselves as Meta.
01:01:21
◼
►
They've dropped their terrible baggage
01:01:23
◼
►
from the Facebook name to almost everybody.
01:01:26
◼
►
Mark Zuckerberg is out there, like, rebranding himself
01:01:28
◼
►
as this, like, cool, normal guy somehow.
01:01:31
◼
►
- Good luck with that.
01:01:32
◼
►
- It's working!
01:01:33
◼
►
- You know, I don't know, man, it's working.
01:01:35
◼
►
- No, I disagree.
01:01:36
◼
►
- Rebrands work, like, that's why people do them,
01:01:39
◼
►
because you can hold on as much as you can to the old one,
01:01:42
◼
►
but the rest of the world moves on and listens to it.
01:01:45
◼
►
Like, they work.
01:01:46
◼
►
- No, the renaming, I think it's going better
01:01:49
◼
►
than Alphabet, for sure, 'cause everyone just keeps
01:01:51
◼
►
calling them Google, but like, the whole Meta renaming
01:01:54
◼
►
was about the Metaverse, which bombed,
01:01:55
◼
►
and so now they're just a company who doesn't want
01:01:58
◼
►
to be associated with one product called Facebook,
01:02:00
◼
►
and so they're renaming themselves Meta, it's fine,
01:02:02
◼
►
but like, the Metaverse still is not a thing,
01:02:04
◼
►
and they're the leader in glasses, but they were
01:02:06
◼
►
before they renamed themselves, too,
01:02:07
◼
►
because they bought Oculus.
01:02:09
◼
►
- Well, yeah, but the thing is, well, I mean, that's true,
01:02:11
◼
►
but I would say, in the same way that, like, yes,
01:02:14
◼
►
they bought Instagram, they didn't make it from scratch,
01:02:16
◼
►
but Instagram is way more Facebook now than it's Instagram,
01:02:20
◼
►
like, you know, in that same way, like, you know,
01:02:23
◼
►
their VR products are way more Meta
01:02:25
◼
►
than they were Oculus at this point.
01:02:27
◼
►
But anyway, they show a very different approach
01:02:30
◼
►
to AR and VR than what we see from Apple.
01:02:34
◼
►
What we see, and Microsoft and everyone else who's tried it,
01:02:37
◼
►
you know, what we see from Meta has been pretty successful
01:02:42
◼
►
at the low-end gaming market for VR headsets
01:02:45
◼
►
with some basic pass-through features,
01:02:47
◼
►
and we see, you know, using that foundation
01:02:50
◼
►
to slowly build towards something like this.
01:02:54
◼
►
And what we see from Apple is really,
01:02:56
◼
►
is like the total opposite approach
01:02:58
◼
►
with Vision Pro platform and product,
01:03:00
◼
►
which is like, you know, Apple had,
01:03:02
◼
►
Apple started at the extraordinarily high-end
01:03:06
◼
►
with no gaming to speak of, no software to speak of,
01:03:11
◼
►
really not, seemingly not putting, you know,
01:03:13
◼
►
much faith in this being a consumer product at all,
01:03:16
◼
►
but for some reason putting it out there,
01:03:19
◼
►
which I continue to doubt at this point.
01:03:22
◼
►
But anyway, Meta is, you know, doing great at the low-end
01:03:26
◼
►
and the mid-range with their gaming stuff,
01:03:29
◼
►
and they're not even touching the high-end anymore.
01:03:31
◼
►
They had a brief time trying to make the Quest Pro happen,
01:03:34
◼
►
it didn't happen, they backed off of it.
01:03:36
◼
►
They had a high-end one planned that they canceled
01:03:38
◼
►
because they saw a Vision Pro and they're like,
01:03:40
◼
►
"Eh, nah, no thanks."
01:03:42
◼
►
They're doing fine at the low-end with VR stuff,
01:03:44
◼
►
with gaming and with kids and everything,
01:03:46
◼
►
and now they're demoing kind of where they think
01:03:49
◼
►
the high-end can go, and all of the tech demo,
01:03:52
◼
►
or all the demos from the people who had them,
01:03:55
◼
►
the people come away being blown away by them.
01:03:57
◼
►
Like everyone's like, "Oh my God, this is the future."
01:03:59
◼
►
Now granted, it's a tech demo, it's not a shipping product.
01:04:02
◼
►
That is a massive difference, obviously.
01:04:06
◼
►
But this kind of shows where there is huge value to this
01:04:11
◼
►
is in the AR glasses format,
01:04:15
◼
►
in that kind of physical product format.
01:04:17
◼
►
AR glasses are a thing that people think is very cool
01:04:20
◼
►
and has a lot of promise.
01:04:21
◼
►
VR headsets are a different thing
01:04:24
◼
►
that people also think is cool and has promise,
01:04:27
◼
►
but for very different reasons
01:04:29
◼
►
and in very different use cases.
01:04:31
◼
►
You can kind of see the two companies
01:04:33
◼
►
trying to solve this from two different ways,
01:04:35
◼
►
but I think Meta's approach is more likely to succeed,
01:04:39
◼
►
to be honest.
01:04:40
◼
►
There are so many physical challenges around these products,
01:04:43
◼
►
so many technical challenges,
01:04:46
◼
►
so many fashion and just coolness challenges,
01:04:50
◼
►
and so many practicality challenges to these products.
01:04:53
◼
►
Apple took a really big swing
01:04:55
◼
►
and I think has almost completely missed.
01:04:57
◼
►
I think they went down almost every wrong path possible
01:05:01
◼
►
and shipped it out there.
01:05:03
◼
►
And I think part of the reason
01:05:05
◼
►
why we're hearing all these rumors
01:05:08
◼
►
around the Vision Pro launch
01:05:09
◼
►
that maybe some people in the company
01:05:10
◼
►
weren't really supportive of it
01:05:12
◼
►
or they weren't sure if they should release it
01:05:14
◼
►
or it was divisive within the company,
01:05:15
◼
►
we've heard that for a long time.
01:05:18
◼
►
I think we see why.
01:05:19
◼
►
It's a really hard area to get right.
01:05:22
◼
►
And the Vision Pro didn't get it right.
01:05:25
◼
►
And what Meta's showing here doesn't exist yet.
01:05:29
◼
►
But they're going towards that
01:05:32
◼
►
and I think what everyone is kind of seeing is,
01:05:34
◼
►
oh, they have a pretty good chance
01:05:38
◼
►
of doing something good here.
01:05:40
◼
►
Whereas what we're seeing from Apple
01:05:42
◼
►
has not really led us in that direction yet.
01:05:46
◼
►
At this point, I would be surprised
01:05:50
◼
►
if we ever saw another Vision hardware release from Apple.
01:05:54
◼
►
Like, that's how I think the platform
01:05:58
◼
►
has gotten off on such a wrong foot.
01:06:00
◼
►
I honestly would be surprised if we ever see a sequel to it.
01:06:03
◼
►
If they do anything in this space,
01:06:05
◼
►
I think it will be radically different.
01:06:06
◼
►
Not the same thing but a little bit better
01:06:09
◼
►
and a little bit cheaper.
01:06:09
◼
►
I think it'll be radically different if at all.
01:06:12
◼
►
And not soon.
01:06:14
◼
►
But what we see from Meta is like,
01:06:15
◼
►
they're already succeeding in the VR market
01:06:20
◼
►
better than anybody else ever has.
01:06:21
◼
►
They're doing great in that market.
01:06:23
◼
►
It's still a small market but they're doing great in it.
01:06:25
◼
►
And they might be doing this thing at the high end.
01:06:28
◼
►
That's why everyone's excited
01:06:29
◼
►
'cause everyone sees it and they're like,
01:06:30
◼
►
huh, it has some trade-offs, some pretty big trade-offs.
01:06:34
◼
►
And with the largest asterisk being
01:06:36
◼
►
it literally is not shipping and is not buyable
01:06:38
◼
►
and will never ship in this form.
01:06:40
◼
►
So this is literally just a tech demo.
01:06:42
◼
►
However, people like it and they're excited by it.
01:06:46
◼
►
Now that being said, I don't think AR and VR,
01:06:50
◼
►
even in a great form like this,
01:06:53
◼
►
I don't think that's going to replace the smartphone.
01:06:56
◼
►
I don't think it's going to be nearly as big
01:06:59
◼
►
or as important as a lot of people think
01:07:00
◼
►
or hope that it will.
01:07:02
◼
►
What we're seeing with the actual products
01:07:04
◼
►
that exist in this category is they're fun,
01:07:08
◼
►
they're useful to certain people,
01:07:10
◼
►
they're not replacing phones,
01:07:11
◼
►
they're not replacing game consoles,
01:07:13
◼
►
they're not replacing TVs in any kind of meaningful numbers.
01:07:16
◼
►
I think the whole investment in this area is interesting
01:07:21
◼
►
and in certain ways it's exciting,
01:07:23
◼
►
but I don't think it's the future of computing.
01:07:25
◼
►
I think it's the future of more wearables
01:07:28
◼
►
to add to our lives.
01:07:29
◼
►
In the same way that the Apple Watch and wearables like it
01:07:31
◼
►
didn't replace smartphones, they just added to them.
01:07:35
◼
►
I think AR glasses will add to our computing lives as well.
01:07:38
◼
►
I don't think they will be replacing nearly anything.
01:07:41
◼
►
However, if they are to succeed,
01:07:43
◼
►
the approach Meta is taking,
01:07:45
◼
►
and they already have the Ray-Ban glasses
01:07:47
◼
►
that are pretty successful.
01:07:49
◼
►
I think that approach, like what Meta's doing,
01:07:52
◼
►
slowly adding things that people will add
01:07:54
◼
►
to their computing lives, not replace things with,
01:07:57
◼
►
that's working.
01:07:58
◼
►
And this is the latest demo of where that's going.
01:08:00
◼
►
That's working.
01:08:02
◼
►
And I think what Apple's doing is not working.
01:08:05
◼
►
- Here's why I think this is a non-story
01:08:10
◼
►
and I'm very disappointed in the press
01:08:11
◼
►
for how they've handled this.
01:08:13
◼
►
Ever since we've been talking about this topic at all
01:08:17
◼
►
on the show or in the Apple world
01:08:18
◼
►
or in the entire tech world,
01:08:21
◼
►
everyone has known that some kind of glasses thing
01:08:25
◼
►
would be amazing, but it's too bad we can't build that.
01:08:28
◼
►
And years ago when the rumors were
01:08:30
◼
►
about Apple's headset thing, it was like,
01:08:32
◼
►
Apple's not gonna do a headset, they're gonna do glasses
01:08:34
◼
►
because they know headsets are big and clunky and crappy.
01:08:37
◼
►
And Tim Cook would just constantly,
01:08:40
◼
►
anytime he's asked about this for years,
01:08:41
◼
►
he'd be like, we're interested in AR, not VR.
01:08:44
◼
►
We're all about augmenting reality.
01:08:46
◼
►
Have you seen all the AR features we've added
01:08:48
◼
►
to our phones and iPads over the years?
01:08:50
◼
►
We don't want to be closed off inside a VR headset.
01:08:53
◼
►
We're all about augmented reality, right?
01:08:55
◼
►
The reason Apple was into that,
01:08:58
◼
►
it's not just like, oh, Apple thought AR would be good.
01:09:00
◼
►
Everybody thinks AR is good.
01:09:01
◼
►
Everyone thinks glasses,
01:09:02
◼
►
where they could let you magically see the world,
01:09:03
◼
►
but also stuff laid on top of it is a great idea.
01:09:06
◼
►
It's in science fiction books.
01:09:07
◼
►
It's in our culture.
01:09:08
◼
►
It's baked into everything,
01:09:09
◼
►
and that is an Apple strategy from day one.
01:09:11
◼
►
When we eventually heard,
01:09:13
◼
►
actually Apple's gonna ship a VR headset.
01:09:15
◼
►
You're like, well, what about all that stuff
01:09:16
◼
►
that Tim Cook's been saying about the glasses?
01:09:17
◼
►
And the basically consensus was,
01:09:19
◼
►
well, nobody can make the glasses.
01:09:22
◼
►
So Apple's gonna ship something.
01:09:24
◼
►
And what they did ship was their attempt to say,
01:09:26
◼
►
you know, in typical Apple fashion,
01:09:28
◼
►
super expensive VR headset, but look, we do,
01:09:32
◼
►
one of the reasons it's so expensive
01:09:34
◼
►
is we're trying to give you that AR glasses experience
01:09:37
◼
►
of like, look, the pass-through is magical.
01:09:38
◼
►
It's like, you don't even know you're looking
01:09:39
◼
►
through cameras or whatever,
01:09:40
◼
►
but of course it's not an AR thing.
01:09:42
◼
►
You're not actually looking at the room.
01:09:44
◼
►
We're just applying technology and money
01:09:46
◼
►
to try to get something out there
01:09:48
◼
►
that has some desirable attributes
01:09:50
◼
►
that are better than the competitors
01:09:51
◼
►
that we try to spin as a computing device and blah, blah,
01:09:53
◼
►
you get into the whole thing.
01:09:54
◼
►
But the bottom line is Apple didn't wait
01:09:57
◼
►
until they could ship glasses.
01:09:59
◼
►
They shipped a headset that they kind of sort of tried
01:10:03
◼
►
to push in the AR direction, but wasn't really that.
01:10:05
◼
►
And setting the Vision Pro aside and all its failures
01:10:07
◼
►
or whatever, that's what they did.
01:10:09
◼
►
But at no point during this, did anyone say,
01:10:12
◼
►
Apple doesn't think AR is the future,
01:10:14
◼
►
or they shouldn't have said that.
01:10:15
◼
►
That it was just simply the fact that no one has technology
01:10:19
◼
►
to ship something that looks like
01:10:21
◼
►
what the Vision Pro looks like,
01:10:23
◼
►
but as a pair of glasses that you could see the room through.
01:10:25
◼
►
That doesn't exist, right?
01:10:28
◼
►
So here's Facebook and they're like,
01:10:30
◼
►
they come out with this thing.
01:10:31
◼
►
Now, first of all, AR glasses have existed for a while.
01:10:33
◼
►
There was Magic Leap, there was the HoloLens,
01:10:35
◼
►
one and two, it's very difficult to do this.
01:10:37
◼
►
Obviously the screen technology is not great.
01:10:40
◼
►
They come out with their thing and they're like,
01:10:42
◼
►
look, it's glasses that you can see through.
01:10:45
◼
►
But it doesn't really change anything
01:10:47
◼
►
about everything I just laid out.
01:10:48
◼
►
Everyone knows glasses are gonna be awesome someday.
01:10:50
◼
►
Everyone also knows we can't actually currently do them.
01:10:53
◼
►
And I would say a $10,000 device
01:10:55
◼
►
that doesn't look as good as the Vision Pro
01:10:57
◼
►
is an example of not being able to do them.
01:10:59
◼
►
I mean, it's not, you can't ship this to people.
01:11:01
◼
►
It's not a product and it's not even as good,
01:11:04
◼
►
it doesn't even look as good as Vision Pro
01:11:06
◼
►
in terms of the graphics, setting aside the room
01:11:08
◼
►
that you're actually looking at or whatever, right?
01:11:11
◼
►
So this is the type of thing I would imagine
01:11:14
◼
►
that Apple would have and say, well, we can't ship this.
01:11:16
◼
►
It's not a shippable product.
01:11:17
◼
►
The only difference is Facebook says, well, okay,
01:11:20
◼
►
we have something that's not a shippable product.
01:11:21
◼
►
Let's show it to the world to try to basically
01:11:23
◼
►
get our investors off our back
01:11:24
◼
►
because we're spending all this money
01:11:26
◼
►
and they think we're just burning it
01:11:27
◼
►
because the metaverse didn't happen
01:11:28
◼
►
and we're just selling a bunch of Quest headsets
01:11:30
◼
►
and why do we keep burning these billions of dollars?
01:11:31
◼
►
And Facebook's gotta come out there and say,
01:11:33
◼
►
this is why we're burning billions of dollars
01:11:34
◼
►
'cause we think someday we'll be able
01:11:36
◼
►
to make something like this only good and shippable.
01:11:39
◼
►
And as Zuckerberg says, we have a line of sight on that.
01:11:43
◼
►
If they had come up with a product that you could buy
01:11:45
◼
►
that did this stuff, maybe we could say
01:11:47
◼
►
they're ahead of everybody else.
01:11:48
◼
►
Apple couldn't find anything that they could ship
01:11:49
◼
►
but Facebook could.
01:11:51
◼
►
But they can't ship this.
01:11:52
◼
►
It's not a shippable thing and even if it was shippable,
01:11:54
◼
►
certain attributes aren't even as good
01:11:56
◼
►
as Vision Pro fidelity-wise.
01:11:58
◼
►
So I don't think this is anything other than Facebook
01:12:02
◼
►
trying to get some good press out of a thing
01:12:05
◼
►
that is essentially on par with what everyone else has
01:12:07
◼
►
in the industry but everyone knows that it's not shippable
01:12:10
◼
►
and when Apple has something that's not shippable,
01:12:12
◼
►
they don't talk about it, right?
01:12:14
◼
►
Now, since we know nothing about what's going on
01:12:16
◼
►
inside Apple, it is possible that Apple at some point
01:12:19
◼
►
three years ago diverted all of their resources
01:12:22
◼
►
into Vision Pro and left their glasses efforts
01:12:26
◼
►
dying on the vine and Facebook really is ahead of them.
01:12:28
◼
►
But we don't know that, just like we don't know anything
01:12:31
◼
►
about what goes on inside Apple.
01:12:32
◼
►
So we can't say by Facebook showing us this prototype,
01:12:35
◼
►
they're ahead of Apple, Apple's never gonna catch up.
01:12:37
◼
►
Apple doesn't have glasses like this.
01:12:39
◼
►
We just don't know the answer to that question.
01:12:41
◼
►
I would imagine that if Apple, if you went into an Apple lab
01:12:44
◼
►
and wanted to get the same experience,
01:12:46
◼
►
although they might not look as nice as these
01:12:48
◼
►
with the little frame around them or whatever,
01:12:49
◼
►
you could probably get something similar
01:12:51
◼
►
if Apple had continued their AR thing
01:12:53
◼
►
but we don't know if they continued it.
01:12:55
◼
►
If you look at this product though, one of the things
01:12:57
◼
►
that it does seem to take from Vision Pro
01:12:59
◼
►
is the idea of eye tracking and pinching as your interface.
01:13:02
◼
►
But interestingly, it doesn't use cameras
01:13:04
◼
►
to track your hands, it uses the little wristband.
01:13:06
◼
►
This is something that Apple could maybe see
01:13:09
◼
►
how that works out, try the prototype,
01:13:11
◼
►
see how it goes if they haven't already been trying this.
01:13:13
◼
►
Choosing how you are going to do eye tracking and pinching
01:13:17
◼
►
is kind of like an implementation detail
01:13:19
◼
►
versus deciding eye tracking and pinching
01:13:21
◼
►
is how you should interact with things.
01:13:23
◼
►
Like in other words, they're not saying,
01:13:24
◼
►
Orion, it comes with Quest hand controllers.
01:13:26
◼
►
Quest hand control is great for games,
01:13:28
◼
►
maybe not so great for what you would imagine
01:13:31
◼
►
you would do something that's more like a pair of glasses.
01:13:33
◼
►
These things seem to have like,
01:13:34
◼
►
the wristband has like a little electrical conductor
01:13:37
◼
►
sensor thingies that catch your nerve signals or whatever.
01:13:40
◼
►
It's a nice way to do it that doesn't require you
01:13:43
◼
►
to have line of sight on your fingers
01:13:45
◼
►
and doesn't require like these glasses frames
01:13:47
◼
►
to be bristling with even more cameras
01:13:50
◼
►
that are tracking where your fingers are
01:13:51
◼
►
as opposed to the ones that are just tracking your eyeballs.
01:13:54
◼
►
But anyway, like I don't, like people saying this
01:13:58
◼
►
and say, were there people out there who were like,
01:14:00
◼
►
previously, I didn't think augmented reality glasses
01:14:03
◼
►
would be a good idea,
01:14:04
◼
►
but now that I've been able to try a prototype,
01:14:06
◼
►
I do think they're a good idea?
01:14:07
◼
►
I suppose there are people like this,
01:14:08
◼
►
but like read a sci-fi book.
01:14:10
◼
►
We all want magic glasses that you put them on
01:14:12
◼
►
and they cover the world with information
01:14:14
◼
►
and you can see all the things
01:14:15
◼
►
and your walking directions go like that
01:14:17
◼
►
and as we said, there's a name tag over people's heads
01:14:19
◼
►
and there's that whole story about like the Ray-Ban glasses
01:14:22
◼
►
that do like image lookups for people
01:14:23
◼
►
and like docks them as you walk around.
01:14:24
◼
►
Yeah, that's the sci-fi future, dystopian and utopian,
01:14:27
◼
►
that we're all talking about here, right?
01:14:28
◼
►
And there's gonna be a lot of problems with it,
01:14:30
◼
►
but like first things first,
01:14:31
◼
►
we gotta figure out how to get the screens
01:14:34
◼
►
and by the way, the way these things work
01:14:35
◼
►
is like they have like a little tiny screen
01:14:37
◼
►
that projects a little image into the lenses
01:14:40
◼
►
and the lenses try to bounce the image from the screen
01:14:45
◼
►
off of the lenses and into your eyes
01:14:46
◼
►
so they focus on the back of your eye
01:14:48
◼
►
and yes, that is as annoyingly hard as you can imagine it is
01:14:51
◼
►
because it's not like you can put a big mirror in there
01:14:53
◼
►
'cause that would block your view of the outside world.
01:14:55
◼
►
So these wave guides are essentially taking the image
01:14:57
◼
►
of a tiny little screen that's projecting
01:14:59
◼
►
like from the side on an angle into the lens
01:15:03
◼
►
and internally bouncing it inside the last lens
01:15:05
◼
►
until it exits the lens at just the right angle
01:15:07
◼
►
so it focuses on your eye.
01:15:08
◼
►
It is as complicated and apparently very expensive
01:15:12
◼
►
to manufacture as you would think
01:15:13
◼
►
and in the end, still doesn't have the fidelity
01:15:16
◼
►
of a very expensive closed-in VR headset
01:15:19
◼
►
where you don't have to worry about all that business.
01:15:21
◼
►
You can just literally project the screen
01:15:22
◼
►
right into their eyeballs
01:15:23
◼
►
because you're not worried about them
01:15:24
◼
►
seeing through it to the outside world.
01:15:27
◼
►
Final thing I'll say about this
01:15:28
◼
►
is the way the hardware is implemented,
01:15:30
◼
►
having the little, I don't know, puck stick thing
01:15:34
◼
►
where the compute is is, you know,
01:15:37
◼
►
if you want something that's like glasses,
01:15:39
◼
►
don't put all the computer stuff inside the glasses, right?
01:15:41
◼
►
So they didn't, they put the computer stuff inside a puck
01:15:43
◼
►
and I've seen a lot of people look at that puck and say,
01:15:46
◼
►
well, the future is gonna be,
01:15:47
◼
►
that puck will just be your phone.
01:15:49
◼
►
Maybe the distant future but the near future, no,
01:15:53
◼
►
because in the near future,
01:15:56
◼
►
A, you're not going to want to literally
01:15:58
◼
►
destroy your phone's battery
01:16:00
◼
►
by getting two hours of AR glasses out of this thing
01:16:02
◼
►
and B, the hardware that you would wanna put in that puck
01:16:06
◼
►
is gonna have to be,
01:16:08
◼
►
it's on the ragged edge of what's possible.
01:16:10
◼
►
It's gonna have to be so purpose-built
01:16:12
◼
►
and so like high-end for a portable thing.
01:16:15
◼
►
Phones have to do so much different stuff.
01:16:18
◼
►
They have to have their cameras
01:16:19
◼
►
and the battery life for that
01:16:21
◼
►
and it's for web browsing, all the Wi-Fi radios,
01:16:23
◼
►
whatever and this is a purpose-built device
01:16:25
◼
►
that the first one of these that actually ships somewhere
01:16:27
◼
►
needs to just be a thing that feeds these glasses.
01:16:31
◼
►
Eventually, yes, why have a separate thing, right?
01:16:33
◼
►
But that's gonna be when we have
01:16:34
◼
►
so much excess computing capacity
01:16:36
◼
►
that it's no problem for our phones to do
01:16:37
◼
►
and I would say today, it is not no problem
01:16:40
◼
►
for our phones to do what that little puck is doing.
01:16:42
◼
►
So I suspect whoever gets to be the first one
01:16:45
◼
►
to ship something like this and again,
01:16:46
◼
►
arguably Magic Leap and HoloLens
01:16:48
◼
►
already did ship something like this,
01:16:49
◼
►
albeit a much lower fidelity
01:16:50
◼
►
without the same Apple Vision Pro-inspired UI.
01:16:54
◼
►
It's gonna be a separate puck
01:16:55
◼
►
and I think it'll be a separate puck for many years,
01:16:57
◼
►
which is fine and is the right move
01:16:59
◼
►
and it is much better than hanging off a giant computer
01:17:01
◼
►
with a metal case off your face
01:17:02
◼
►
like the Apple Vision Pro does
01:17:04
◼
►
but for now, I would expect there to be a puck.
01:17:07
◼
►
Now, we'll find out in a few years or many years
01:17:11
◼
►
when the tell-all things come out
01:17:12
◼
►
and it's like, oh, Apple abandoned AR
01:17:14
◼
►
because someone was convinced that there was no way
01:17:16
◼
►
they were gonna do it within the next 50 years
01:17:17
◼
►
so we should stop and they didn't see
01:17:19
◼
►
these silicon carbide lenses coming or whatever
01:17:22
◼
►
but I would hope that inside Apple,
01:17:25
◼
►
all the technology you just saw Facebook demonstrate
01:17:28
◼
►
was also known to them
01:17:29
◼
►
and had been experimented with them
01:17:31
◼
►
and they realized that for the next X number of years,
01:17:36
◼
►
it's not a viable product
01:17:37
◼
►
so they're gonna try this Vision Pro thing
01:17:39
◼
►
and it's not going great for them
01:17:40
◼
►
but I don't think philosophically anything,
01:17:44
◼
►
I don't actually think there's a philosophical difference
01:17:46
◼
►
when it comes to the long-term view of AR
01:17:49
◼
►
between Meta and Apple.
01:17:52
◼
►
I think they both believe glasses are the future
01:17:54
◼
►
and they wanna get there as fast as they possibly can.
01:17:56
◼
►
The only difference is, how does that manifest?
01:17:58
◼
►
For Facebook, it manifests with tech demos
01:18:00
◼
►
of $10,000 headsets.
01:18:01
◼
►
For Apple, it manifests for saying nothing
01:18:03
◼
►
and shipping an entirely different product
01:18:05
◼
►
that they can actually manufacture
01:18:07
◼
►
and hoping that works out.
01:18:08
◼
►
- I don't, I both agree and disagree
01:18:12
◼
►
with basically everything that you guys just said.
01:18:14
◼
►
I'm not so disappointed in the tech press as Jon is.
01:18:18
◼
►
I concur that it's been obvious to anyone
01:18:21
◼
►
who's paid even the tiniest bit of attention
01:18:23
◼
►
that this is what Apple is angling for,
01:18:26
◼
►
that they want something that looks,
01:18:28
◼
►
maybe not aesthetically but in principle,
01:18:31
◼
►
functionally looks, if you will, like Orion,
01:18:33
◼
►
that you don't have pass-through
01:18:36
◼
►
because you're already looking at the real world
01:18:38
◼
►
and you're just augmenting that,
01:18:40
◼
►
hence Tim saying over and over again,
01:18:42
◼
►
AR is very interesting to us.
01:18:43
◼
►
It's clear that's what Apple wants
01:18:45
◼
►
and I think a reasonable way to get there,
01:18:48
◼
►
maybe not the best way to get there,
01:18:50
◼
►
but a reasonable way to get there is to say,
01:18:52
◼
►
well, let's make some hyper, hyper great-looking
01:18:57
◼
►
internal pass-through inside these goggles
01:19:00
◼
►
that lock you away from the world
01:19:01
◼
►
to get us used to what it'll be like
01:19:03
◼
►
when we don't have to have pass-through,
01:19:05
◼
►
when the pass-through is the real world.
01:19:07
◼
►
Hopefully I'm making sense here.
01:19:08
◼
►
And to get ahead of that
01:19:10
◼
►
and to hopefully build a developer story around that,
01:19:13
◼
►
you just fake it until you make it.
01:19:15
◼
►
And that's what Apple's done.
01:19:16
◼
►
Now the problem is they haven't really made it, right,
01:19:18
◼
►
in the sense that developers are mostly ignoring it
01:19:20
◼
►
and I think that Apple is largely,
01:19:23
◼
►
mostly ignoring the Vision Pro.
01:19:26
◼
►
But I don't think it's unreasonable for Ben
01:19:30
◼
►
and others in the tech press to say,
01:19:32
◼
►
oh my God, this was amazing.
01:19:33
◼
►
Oh my God, this is the future today.
01:19:35
◼
►
I don't think that's unreasonable.
01:19:36
◼
►
Now it should be couched and there should be asterisks
01:19:40
◼
►
and daggers and double daggers saying,
01:19:41
◼
►
well, yes, this is the future today,
01:19:43
◼
►
but you can't buy it because it is what?
01:19:46
◼
►
- I don't fault them for being impressed
01:19:48
◼
►
by a cool tech demo.
01:19:50
◼
►
I fault the people, and it's not Ben,
01:19:51
◼
►
but it's not Ben knows what's up,
01:19:53
◼
►
but it's other people saying basically like,
01:19:54
◼
►
this shows that Apple is going in the wrong direction
01:19:57
◼
►
and Meta knows what's up.
01:19:59
◼
►
They're both going in exactly the same direction long-term.
01:20:02
◼
►
They both have VR headsets,
01:20:04
◼
►
albeit very different ones, right?
01:20:06
◼
►
And I think they both have AR headsets.
01:20:08
◼
►
It's just that Facebook is showing you there
01:20:10
◼
►
is that they can't ship and Apple is not showing you there
01:20:12
◼
►
that they can't ship, you know what I mean?
01:20:13
◼
►
And again, we don't know that's true.
01:20:15
◼
►
I'm speculating 'cause Apple doesn't say anything,
01:20:16
◼
►
but like the people who are citing this
01:20:19
◼
►
as like a condemnation of Apple has dropped the ball.
01:20:22
◼
►
They've taken the eye off the ball.
01:20:24
◼
►
They shouldn't be bothering with VR headsets.
01:20:26
◼
►
Meta is also bothering with VR headsets.
01:20:29
◼
►
There's a difference in strategy there,
01:20:30
◼
►
which we've talked about at length
01:20:31
◼
►
between how they're doing with VR headsets,
01:20:33
◼
►
but VR headsets is what we can make now.
01:20:35
◼
►
And you know, they have differing opinions
01:20:37
◼
►
about how to do that,
01:20:37
◼
►
but that's the difference in their strategy
01:20:39
◼
►
is like Apple has taken one direction of VR
01:20:42
◼
►
and Facebook is taking the other.
01:20:43
◼
►
A difference in their strategy is not
01:20:45
◼
►
that Meta thinks AR is the future and Apple does not.
01:20:48
◼
►
That's insanity and that's what I can't handle.
01:20:50
◼
►
From free entry like Apple doesn't think AR is the future,
01:20:53
◼
►
but Meta does and Meta is showing Apple how it's done.
01:20:55
◼
►
No, that is absolutely not the case
01:20:58
◼
►
based on public statements from the CEO of the company.
01:21:01
◼
►
- Yeah, I would agree with that.
01:21:02
◼
►
I don't know.
01:21:03
◼
►
And I also, I know it's fun for everyone,
01:21:06
◼
►
including sometimes me, to slag on the Vision Pro.
01:21:09
◼
►
And I'll be honest with you,
01:21:10
◼
►
I don't use my Vision Pro very often.
01:21:13
◼
►
And if it wasn't purchased for my job,
01:21:16
◼
►
like if I'd done this just because I thought it was neat
01:21:19
◼
►
and I wanted one, I would really, really regret
01:21:22
◼
►
spending all the money I did on it.
01:21:24
◼
►
That being said, I've maintained that for specific things,
01:21:29
◼
►
the Vision Pro was really incredible.
01:21:31
◼
►
It is not an all things to all people device,
01:21:33
◼
►
if you ask me, even though I think
01:21:34
◼
►
that's what Apple wanted it to be.
01:21:36
◼
►
If you were to look at keynotes
01:21:37
◼
►
when it was announced and whatnot.
01:21:39
◼
►
But I cannot say enough good things
01:21:43
◼
►
about the immersive video that Apple has put out.
01:21:47
◼
►
Now, admittedly, they've put out very little of it
01:21:50
◼
►
and it's coming in at a snail's pace,
01:21:52
◼
►
but it is unlike anything I've ever experienced.
01:21:56
◼
►
It is so much better than any other cinema-like experience
01:22:00
◼
►
I've ever had.
01:22:01
◼
►
It is truly, truly phenomenal.
01:22:03
◼
►
And they are releasing more stuff.
01:22:06
◼
►
It is way too slow, but they are doing it.
01:22:08
◼
►
And I believe there's going to be an immersive film,
01:22:10
◼
►
I don't know if it's a short film or a film film,
01:22:12
◼
►
sometime either late this year or early next year.
01:22:14
◼
►
And I'm really excited to watch it
01:22:15
◼
►
because I think it'll be super cool.
01:22:18
◼
►
Additionally, when I went to Memphis a couple of weeks ago,
01:22:21
◼
►
I did travel with the Vision Pro,
01:22:23
◼
►
but because both of my flights were so darn short,
01:22:25
◼
►
I didn't bother using it on the plane,
01:22:28
◼
►
but on occasions that I have used it on a plane,
01:22:31
◼
►
leaving aside that you are 1 trillion percent that guy
01:22:36
◼
►
if you don't mind being that guy, it's unreal
01:22:40
◼
►
because you're in an incredible movie theater.
01:22:42
◼
►
You're not in a plane.
01:22:43
◼
►
You're in an incredible movie theater by yourself.
01:22:45
◼
►
Nobody's around you and it's amazing.
01:22:48
◼
►
Additionally, when I was in Memphis,
01:22:50
◼
►
I did get the Vision Pro out
01:22:51
◼
►
because I did have a little bit of downtime to do work.
01:22:53
◼
►
And you know what the Vision Pro is?
01:22:54
◼
►
It's a giant ass screen that doesn't take up
01:22:57
◼
►
a giant ass amount of space in your bag.
01:22:59
◼
►
Well, it doesn't take up a small amount of space in your bag
01:23:01
◼
►
but you know what I mean.
01:23:02
◼
►
- I was gonna say, pretty big space in a bag actually.
01:23:04
◼
►
- No, you know what I mean.
01:23:06
◼
►
- It doesn't take up a lot of length and width.
01:23:07
◼
►
I wonder volume-wise if it would actually be the same
01:23:10
◼
►
as a very thin screen.
01:23:11
◼
►
- Yeah, maybe.
01:23:13
◼
►
But you know, I mean, we're snarking,
01:23:15
◼
►
but you know exactly what I'm saying.
01:23:16
◼
►
And it was really great for that.
01:23:17
◼
►
It really truly was.
01:23:19
◼
►
I was in this actually very small hotel room
01:23:21
◼
►
and yes, it had a mediocre TV
01:23:24
◼
►
that I think I probably could have hooked up to my laptop,
01:23:27
◼
►
but it was so much nicer to use the Vision Pro
01:23:29
◼
►
because I was suddenly in a different space
01:23:32
◼
►
and I've got this huge screen in front of me
01:23:34
◼
►
and especially with the developer strap,
01:23:36
◼
►
it is basically lag-free.
01:23:37
◼
►
I think the fidelity of it,
01:23:38
◼
►
admittedly my eyes are not perfect,
01:23:40
◼
►
but the fidelity of it is great.
01:23:41
◼
►
Like there are times the Vision Pro is incredible.
01:23:44
◼
►
I do not argue that it is,
01:23:46
◼
►
to my eyes it appears that it is a flop.
01:23:49
◼
►
Now we don't know what Apple's expectations were.
01:23:52
◼
►
Maybe they expected to sell three of them,
01:23:54
◼
►
in which case, mission accomplished.
01:23:56
◼
►
But I suspect they wanted to sell
01:23:58
◼
►
a whole heck of a lot more.
01:23:59
◼
►
Certainly the rumblings we've heard in the press
01:24:00
◼
►
is that they wanted to sell a whole heck of a lot more
01:24:03
◼
►
and they haven't.
01:24:04
◼
►
So it is a flop by most measures,
01:24:06
◼
►
but if you have an obscene amount of money
01:24:09
◼
►
to burn and light on fire
01:24:11
◼
►
and have these specific use cases,
01:24:13
◼
►
I don't wanna continue to slag on the Vision Pro
01:24:16
◼
►
because in certain circumstances,
01:24:17
◼
►
it's unlike and better than everything else I've ever tried.
01:24:20
◼
►
Admittedly, those circumstances are few and far between,
01:24:23
◼
►
but they do exist.
01:24:24
◼
►
And I do think that this is a really solid precursor
01:24:27
◼
►
to something like AR glasses.
01:24:29
◼
►
It's gonna look way different,
01:24:31
◼
►
both inside, outside, in every way,
01:24:33
◼
►
it's gonna look different than the Vision Pro does,
01:24:35
◼
►
but I think it is a reasonable precursor.
01:24:37
◼
►
And those who have embraced the Vision OS and Vision Pro,
01:24:41
◼
►
their AR experience when designing stuff for Apple glasses,
01:24:46
◼
►
they're gonna be ahead of the game
01:24:47
◼
►
'cause they've already done it.
01:24:48
◼
►
The same way that Underscore was way ahead of the game
01:24:51
◼
►
for widgets on iOS because all the APIs
01:24:53
◼
►
were basically just ripped from watchOS
01:24:56
◼
►
for complications and stuff.
01:24:57
◼
►
I think I have that right,
01:24:58
◼
►
but you get the idea either way.
01:25:00
◼
►
Underscore is way ahead of the game
01:25:01
◼
►
'cause he's basically already done that.
01:25:02
◼
►
And so that's part of the reason I think that Widget Smith
01:25:05
◼
►
was there on day one and was so good
01:25:08
◼
►
is because he had so much experience
01:25:09
◼
►
in a slightly different context,
01:25:11
◼
►
but using basically the same APIs.
01:25:13
◼
►
And I think that people who really and truly embrace
01:25:16
◼
►
the Vision Pro and Vision OS,
01:25:18
◼
►
I would say I have reluctantly shown it
01:25:21
◼
►
a small amount of attention.
01:25:22
◼
►
I would not say I've embraced it,
01:25:24
◼
►
but anyways, those who have really embraced it,
01:25:26
◼
►
I think there'll be way ahead of the game.
01:25:27
◼
►
And I think that everyone would agree
01:25:29
◼
►
that something that's like Orion
01:25:33
◼
►
is the future if we can get there.
01:25:35
◼
►
- Yeah, I think your point about the Vision Pro
01:25:37
◼
►
being like, oh, well, we can't do AR glasses,
01:25:40
◼
►
but just if you get used to this as a platform extension,
01:25:42
◼
►
like if we build this platform over many years
01:25:45
◼
►
inside these stupid goggles,
01:25:47
◼
►
this platform doesn't look that much different
01:25:50
◼
►
than the platform we would build for AR glasses.
01:25:52
◼
►
And I'm sure Meta's doing exactly the same thing.
01:25:54
◼
►
They've got the Quest headsets,
01:25:55
◼
►
which are addressing a different market in a different way,
01:25:58
◼
►
but whatever interface and APIs and compatibility
01:26:02
◼
►
they're building up there,
01:26:03
◼
►
even though they don't emphasize passthrough as much,
01:26:05
◼
►
I would imagine that as they extend into AR glasses,
01:26:08
◼
►
it will be an expansion of their existing VR platforms
01:26:12
◼
►
if they're smart, rather than just saying,
01:26:14
◼
►
oh, here's all new platform,
01:26:15
◼
►
nothing you did on the Quest headsets
01:26:16
◼
►
is applicable at all to this.
01:26:18
◼
►
I hope they don't do that.
01:26:19
◼
►
Now, Apple, I think, has a little bit of a headstart in this
01:26:22
◼
►
because their VR headset is so focused
01:26:25
◼
►
on pretending it's an AR headset and the quests are not.
01:26:28
◼
►
Even like I said, down to the choice of how to do the UI,
01:26:32
◼
►
Vision Pro does eye tracking and you use your fingers
01:26:34
◼
►
to pinch and do stuff, right?
01:26:36
◼
►
So does Orion, but Quest does not.
01:26:39
◼
►
Quest does not lean that heavily on that type of interface.
01:26:42
◼
►
On the other hand, Quest uses the wristband
01:26:44
◼
►
instead of cameras to track,
01:26:45
◼
►
but it was still like the whole idea of like,
01:26:47
◼
►
how would you want to use sci-fi type of AR glasses?
01:26:52
◼
►
You probably wouldn't wanna have hand controllers
01:26:55
◼
►
'cause that kind of defeats the purpose of like,
01:26:56
◼
►
oh, they're just like regular glasses, you put 'em on.
01:26:58
◼
►
Where do the hand controllers fit in that?
01:27:00
◼
►
So it's gonna probably have to be,
01:27:01
◼
►
oh, how do I do stuff?
01:27:03
◼
►
Well, how about if you looked at it
01:27:04
◼
►
and did gestures with your hands?
01:27:05
◼
►
And then it's just a question of how do we implement that?
01:27:08
◼
►
Looking at stuff, eye tracking, that seems to be obvious.
01:27:10
◼
►
Gestures with your hands,
01:27:12
◼
►
you could look at your hands with cameras,
01:27:13
◼
►
you could have a wristband,
01:27:14
◼
►
you could do both at the same time,
01:27:15
◼
►
you could use your Apple Watch.
01:27:17
◼
►
Like there's all sorts of like platform synergies.
01:27:19
◼
►
That's where the, I think I heard Ben and Gruber
01:27:21
◼
►
talking about like, what if your Apple Watch
01:27:24
◼
►
was like the nerve checking thing
01:27:28
◼
►
and what if your phone was like the puck for the glasses
01:27:31
◼
►
and it's like, yeah, maybe eventually
01:27:34
◼
►
let's hold your horses in that.
01:27:35
◼
►
'Cause like I said, I feel like AR glasses
01:27:38
◼
►
are going to be so close to the edge
01:27:39
◼
►
of what's even possible for so many years
01:27:42
◼
►
that there's gonna have to be dedicated hardware for it.
01:27:44
◼
►
And like I said, you wouldn't want to destroy
01:27:46
◼
►
your phone's battery on this.
01:27:47
◼
►
Like it's not okay, but it is the status quo
01:27:51
◼
►
that the Vision Pro gets like two hours of battery life.
01:27:54
◼
►
Orion gets two hours of battery life.
01:27:56
◼
►
Your phone, you do not want to have two hours of battery life
01:27:59
◼
►
so let's wait on this.
01:28:01
◼
►
It's $10,000, doesn't look as good as Vision Pro.
01:28:03
◼
►
The battery lasts two hours.
01:28:05
◼
►
We'll get there eventually.
01:28:06
◼
►
But yes, there are platform synergies
01:28:08
◼
►
that Apple is well-positioned to take advantage of.
01:28:11
◼
►
But Apple is not going to show you their AR glasses,
01:28:13
◼
►
demo things until they actually have a product they can ship.
01:28:16
◼
►
And we've been talking about Vision Pro
01:28:18
◼
►
and we haven't been like, oh boy,
01:28:19
◼
►
I can't wait until next year
01:28:20
◼
►
when Apple ships the glasses.
01:28:21
◼
►
No, we don't think that's coming next year.
01:28:23
◼
►
And guess what, it's not coming next year from META either.
01:28:25
◼
►
Despite Zuckerberg's, we have a line of sight on that.
01:28:28
◼
►
I'll believe it when I see it.
01:28:30
◼
►
Again, you should look at it, I'm surprised,
01:28:31
◼
►
I haven't seen many people talk about this,
01:28:32
◼
►
HoloLens and Magikleap, whatever the hell
01:28:35
◼
►
the other things are.
01:28:35
◼
►
There have been AR glasses that have shipped
01:28:37
◼
►
as actual shipping products over many years
01:28:39
◼
►
from both Microsoft and Magikleap startup.
01:28:43
◼
►
And they didn't look great and they weren't popular
01:28:45
◼
►
and they made slightly different choices,
01:28:47
◼
►
but they have existed.
01:28:48
◼
►
So it's not like we don't know like real shipping products
01:28:51
◼
►
that you could buy with less than $10,000 worth of money
01:28:54
◼
►
that would let you see the room
01:28:55
◼
►
and also see images projected on it.
01:28:57
◼
►
Many of them have existed.
01:28:58
◼
►
It's just like the people looked at them and said,
01:29:01
◼
►
they're not very good yet.
01:29:02
◼
►
And even Orion, I mean, it's the best,
01:29:04
◼
►
it's the most impressive that anyone has seen
01:29:06
◼
►
outside of development labs inside Apple or wherever.
01:29:10
◼
►
But still it's like, okay, but this is not,
01:29:12
◼
►
I can't buy this.
01:29:13
◼
►
And if I could, it would cost too much money.
01:29:15
◼
►
And even if I could, even if it didn't cost a lot of money
01:29:17
◼
►
and I could buy it, it still has limitations compared to,
01:29:21
◼
►
let's say the best images you can see inside Vision Pro
01:29:24
◼
►
or whatever.
01:29:25
◼
►
So we'll get there eventually.
01:29:26
◼
►
But I really think this is a perhaps very shrewd PR move
01:29:29
◼
►
from Facebook to satisfy the people who are upset
01:29:32
◼
►
that Facebook is spending billions of dollars
01:29:34
◼
►
on the metaverse.
01:29:35
◼
►
And they have to say, no, no,
01:29:37
◼
►
like we're not spending millions of dollars in that thing
01:29:40
◼
►
where people with no legs talk to each other in meetings.
01:29:42
◼
►
What we're actually trying to do is this.
01:29:44
◼
►
And we haven't actually done it yet,
01:29:46
◼
►
but let's show you like what we've got so far.
01:29:49
◼
►
So you know, we're not just like making the Quest 3S
01:29:52
◼
►
and we think that's all we're doing with these billions.
01:29:55
◼
►
- Yeah, I was listening to Upgrade
01:29:57
◼
►
and they had a really good turn of phrase for it
01:29:59
◼
►
and which I've already forgotten,
01:30:00
◼
►
but they were saying another thing
01:30:02
◼
►
that this might accomplish is kind of like
01:30:04
◼
►
reverse Osborne-ing anything that Apple's doing, right?
01:30:07
◼
►
Because now it's like, look, the Vision Pro is lame
01:30:11
◼
►
'cause you got to put this thing on
01:30:12
◼
►
that keeps you away from the world.
01:30:14
◼
►
- Do they need to do that to the Vision Pro?
01:30:15
◼
►
Is it selling so much it needs to be tamped down?
01:30:19
◼
►
- You're not wrong.
01:30:19
◼
►
- Like, look, look, if they're Osborne-ing anything,
01:30:21
◼
►
they could be Osborne-ing their own,
01:30:23
◼
►
actually, you know, well-selling the Quest heads.
01:30:26
◼
►
I don't think anyone sees a product that they can't even buy
01:30:28
◼
►
and like no one who's playing Beat Saber is like,
01:30:30
◼
►
I want those $10,000 glasses where I can't play Beat Saber.
01:30:33
◼
►
No, like it's a tech demo that shows
01:30:38
◼
►
how far, how close are we to AR glasses?
01:30:40
◼
►
The answer is closer than we were,
01:30:42
◼
►
but still not really that close.
01:30:43
◼
►
Anyway, back to your VR stuff.
01:30:45
◼
►
And like, if Vision Pro had been selling like crazy,
01:30:49
◼
►
I can see how this working is like, like you said,
01:30:51
◼
►
like, hey, stop going gaga over Vision Pro.
01:30:55
◼
►
That's not the goal.
01:30:57
◼
►
The goal is this and we're closer to it than Apple,
01:30:59
◼
►
but like, I don't think they need to stop Vision Pro
01:31:02
◼
►
from selling, I don't think there's any juggernaut
01:31:05
◼
►
that needs to be tamped down.
01:31:07
◼
►
- All right, the other bit of breaking news
01:31:08
◼
►
over the last few days is that Google will,
01:31:12
◼
►
I'm a little fuzzy on the details here,
01:31:13
◼
►
but apparently you can point Notebook LM,
01:31:17
◼
►
which is I think a preexisting product of theirs
01:31:20
◼
►
that I was not previously familiar with,
01:31:22
◼
►
and you can, I guess it's like a data management thing
01:31:26
◼
►
or like a knowledge management thing.
01:31:27
◼
►
- It's like a research tool.
01:31:29
◼
►
I haven't looked too much into Notebook LM itself,
01:31:31
◼
►
but it's like, you know, you like add your documents
01:31:34
◼
►
and stuff that you're researching on this topic
01:31:36
◼
►
to Notebook LM and it can tell you stuff
01:31:37
◼
►
using LMs about your documents.
01:31:40
◼
►
- You guys have like study guides too,
01:31:41
◼
►
is this the same product?
01:31:42
◼
►
- I think so, yeah, you can put in like PDFs
01:31:45
◼
►
or websites and things like that
01:31:46
◼
►
and it'll tell you stuff about them.
01:31:48
◼
►
- It'll be canceled in five years, don't worry about it.
01:31:49
◼
►
- Oh, less than that, but what's interesting about this
01:31:52
◼
►
is they introduced this feature called Audio Overview,
01:31:55
◼
►
which auto-generates podcasts about whatever you put in,
01:32:00
◼
►
and so of course people have been having
01:32:01
◼
►
a lot of fun with this, however, before I begin,
01:32:04
◼
►
have either of you heard one of these podcasts yet?
01:32:07
◼
►
- I sure have. - Same.
01:32:09
◼
►
- In this case, this won't be as much of a surprise to you,
01:32:11
◼
►
but I'd like to welcome to our show some guests.
01:32:15
◼
►
- So we get pitched all the time for guests for our show,
01:32:19
◼
►
it's just from PR spam.
01:32:21
◼
►
- I would be worried about what you're about to do
01:32:22
◼
►
causing that to increase, but it's so clear
01:32:24
◼
►
that those people never listen to our show, so it's fine.
01:32:27
◼
►
- Yeah, no, they definitely don't.
01:32:28
◼
►
I listened to one of the podcasts
01:32:32
◼
►
that was generated by Notebook LM
01:32:34
◼
►
and it kind of blew my mind.
01:32:38
◼
►
- It was not anything that made me scared about us
01:32:41
◼
►
and our future as a show, however,
01:32:43
◼
►
I think this is worth hearing.
01:32:45
◼
►
So now I'd like to play, what I fed Notebook LM
01:32:47
◼
►
for this guest appearance here was John's post
01:32:51
◼
►
on Hypercritical entitled I Made This.
01:32:54
◼
►
- Oh gosh, oh gosh.
01:32:56
◼
►
- So this is a podcast that Notebook LM generated,
01:32:58
◼
►
it's seven minutes long, I'll chapterize it,
01:33:00
◼
►
if you wanna skip it you can, listeners,
01:33:01
◼
►
but I suggest you listen to it.
01:33:03
◼
►
Now I have not heard this one yet.
01:33:05
◼
►
I saved this for the three of us to listen to
01:33:08
◼
►
live on the show.
01:33:09
◼
►
So here is this AI podcast discussing John's post
01:33:14
◼
►
about AI creation entitled I Made This.
01:33:16
◼
►
- Hey everyone, welcome back.
01:33:18
◼
►
We're gonna be diving into some pretty fascinating
01:33:20
◼
►
territory today.
01:33:21
◼
►
AI art, you guys sent in some really interesting questions
01:33:24
◼
►
about John Siracusa's blog post, I Made This.
01:33:27
◼
►
- I mispronounced my name, brutal.
01:33:28
◼
►
- And to be honest, it's got us thinking
01:33:30
◼
►
pretty hard over here too.
01:33:32
◼
►
- Yeah, it really gets into some thorny territory fast.
01:33:34
◼
►
- It does, it does.
01:33:35
◼
►
So, I mean, everybody's sort of played around
01:33:37
◼
►
with those early AI art generators by now, right?
01:33:41
◼
►
But Siracusa is kind of digging deeper here.
01:33:43
◼
►
He's asking like who actually creates AI art.
01:33:46
◼
►
- It's a great question, because on the one hand
01:33:48
◼
►
you've got these AI systems that are basically
01:33:50
◼
►
like giant sponges just soaking up all this data, right?
01:33:53
◼
►
- Great images, styles.
01:33:54
◼
►
- Exactly, and they can pump out these crazy
01:33:57
◼
►
realistic images in seconds.
01:33:58
◼
►
- Which is mind blowing in itself.
01:33:59
◼
►
- Totally, but Siracusa is really wrestling
01:34:02
◼
►
with something more fundamental, I think.
01:34:03
◼
►
He's trying to figure out if we can even call it creation
01:34:06
◼
►
when it comes to AI.
01:34:07
◼
►
- Right, like are we just talking about
01:34:09
◼
►
fancy algorithms here, or is there something more going on?
01:34:11
◼
►
- And that's where it gets interesting,
01:34:12
◼
►
because he uses this analogy of emailing an artist
01:34:16
◼
►
and asking them to paint a polar bear
01:34:19
◼
►
wearing a cowboy hat riding a unicycle.
01:34:22
◼
►
- Right, I'm already intrigued.
01:34:23
◼
►
- Is that accurate?
01:34:24
◼
►
I thought my demo was different.
01:34:25
◼
►
- The artist goes and paints it, beautiful masterpiece.
01:34:27
◼
►
They own the copyright, no problem.
01:34:29
◼
►
- Makes sense.
01:34:29
◼
►
- But what if you swap out the artist with an AI?
01:34:32
◼
►
- Right, you just type that same request into a text box
01:34:35
◼
►
and boom, you've got your polar bear unicyclist.
01:34:37
◼
►
- Exactly, so then who's the creator in that scenario?
01:34:40
◼
►
- No, you missed the middle part,
01:34:41
◼
►
where you asked an artist to do it.
01:34:42
◼
►
- Or is it the company that made the AI?
01:34:44
◼
►
- That was the important part.
01:34:45
◼
►
- Because it's their technology.
01:34:47
◼
►
- Finally, we get the experience of yelling at a podcast.
01:34:52
◼
►
- Before we can even begin to untangle the whole question
01:34:55
◼
►
of ownership, like who owns the copyright to AI art,
01:34:59
◼
►
we need to grapple with this more fundamental question
01:35:01
◼
►
of who or what is the creator in the first place?
01:35:04
◼
►
- Because if we don't know who the creator is,
01:35:07
◼
►
how can we say who owns it?
01:35:08
◼
►
- Precisely, and that's where things start
01:35:10
◼
►
to get really interesting and complicated.
01:35:13
◼
►
- And I think that's what makes this such a big deal, right?
01:35:15
◼
►
It's not just some theoretical debate happening in a vacuum.
01:35:18
◼
►
This stuff has real world implications.
01:35:20
◼
►
- Absolutely, I mean, you think about
01:35:22
◼
►
all the different fields that could be impacted,
01:35:23
◼
►
photography, graphic design, music,
01:35:26
◼
►
even things like writing and filmmaking.
01:35:28
◼
►
I mean, the potential here is huge
01:35:30
◼
►
and it's already happening.
01:35:32
◼
►
- Right, like it's not even a question
01:35:33
◼
►
of if AI will disrupt these industries,
01:35:35
◼
►
it's already starting to end.
01:35:36
◼
►
- Exactly, and that raises a whole host of questions
01:35:39
◼
►
about jobs and livelihoods and copyright law
01:35:42
◼
►
is scrambling to catch up with all of this.
01:35:44
◼
►
- Which is a whole other can of worms.
01:35:45
◼
►
- Oh, totally, but beyond even the economic
01:35:48
◼
►
and legal questions,
01:35:49
◼
►
Syracuse makes this really interesting point
01:35:51
◼
►
about the impact of all this on human creativity.
01:35:54
◼
►
Like what happens to us, what happens to art
01:35:57
◼
►
when suddenly anyone with an internet connection
01:36:00
◼
►
can crank out something that looks like a masterpiece.
01:36:03
◼
►
- I don't think I made that point at all.
01:36:04
◼
►
- If you don't have to struggle,
01:36:05
◼
►
if you don't have to hold your craft
01:36:06
◼
►
over years and years of practice,
01:36:08
◼
►
does that diminish the drive to create in the first place?
01:36:11
◼
►
- Right, like you think about your own creative pursuits,
01:36:14
◼
►
whatever they might be.
01:36:14
◼
►
- No, I definitely didn't talk about this.
01:36:15
◼
►
- There's a certain satisfaction
01:36:16
◼
►
that comes from the process itself,
01:36:19
◼
►
from pushing through those frustrating moments,
01:36:21
◼
►
those creative blocks and coming out the other side
01:36:23
◼
►
with something you're proud of,
01:36:24
◼
►
something that's uniquely yours.
01:36:26
◼
►
- Absolutely, I mean, I was working on this song a while back
01:36:30
◼
►
and I hit this wall just totally stuck.
01:36:33
◼
►
Couldn't figure out where to go with it, almost gave up,
01:36:36
◼
►
but then I don't know, something clicked
01:36:38
◼
►
and I finally broke through it.
01:36:39
◼
►
And that feeling of having wrestled with it
01:36:42
◼
►
and finally found the solution, I mean, it's just incredible.
01:36:45
◼
►
And I can't imagine getting that same feeling
01:36:47
◼
►
from just typing a few words into a computer.
01:36:49
◼
►
- Yeah, it really makes you question
01:36:51
◼
►
what it is we value about art in the first place.
01:36:54
◼
►
Is it purely about the end result
01:36:56
◼
►
or is there something inherently valuable
01:36:58
◼
►
about the human element, the intention,
01:36:59
◼
►
the struggle, the imperfections even
01:37:03
◼
►
that go into the creative process?
01:37:05
◼
►
- Is it even possible for AI to replicate that experience?
01:37:08
◼
►
And if it is, do we want it to?
01:37:10
◼
►
I mean, it's a lot to unpack.
01:37:10
◼
►
So where do we even go from here?
01:37:12
◼
►
We've got this potential decline in human creativity,
01:37:14
◼
►
this legal minefield around ownership.
01:37:17
◼
►
What's the next step?
01:37:18
◼
►
- Well, Syracuse doesn't pretend to have all the answers,
01:37:20
◼
►
but he does offer this really intriguing what if.
01:37:23
◼
►
He suggests that maybe trying to force AI art
01:37:26
◼
►
into our existing copyright law
01:37:28
◼
►
is kind of like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.
01:37:31
◼
►
- What's the square peg?
01:37:32
◼
►
- Is that what you said?
01:37:33
◼
►
- No, absolutely not.
01:37:34
◼
►
- It's this idea that creation has to be
01:37:36
◼
►
this single definable act by a single entity, right?
01:37:40
◼
►
Which has always been the basis of copyright law.
01:37:43
◼
►
You can pinpoint the creator
01:37:44
◼
►
and therefore you can determine ownership.
01:37:46
◼
►
- It's the whole thing about hiring someone to do it,
01:37:48
◼
►
which is like the key to this whole article.
01:37:50
◼
►
- But AI throws a wrench in that whole system
01:37:51
◼
►
because it's not always so clear cut.
01:37:53
◼
►
Is the creator the programmer who wrote the AI's code
01:37:57
◼
►
or is it the user who typed in the prompt?
01:37:59
◼
►
Or is it somehow the data that the AI was trained
01:38:02
◼
►
on all those millions of images and text snippets?
01:38:04
◼
►
- It's like this weird blend of human
01:38:06
◼
►
and machine creativity where it's almost impossible
01:38:09
◼
►
to separate the two.
01:38:10
◼
►
- Right, and so Syracuse's point is that
01:38:12
◼
►
maybe instead of trying to cram AI art
01:38:15
◼
►
into this outdated framework,
01:38:16
◼
►
maybe we need to rethink the whole concept
01:38:18
◼
►
of creation and ownership for the digital age.
01:38:21
◼
►
- So instead of black and white,
01:38:22
◼
►
it's more like shades of gray.
01:38:23
◼
►
- Precisely.
01:38:24
◼
►
- He's suggesting that maybe we need to embrace the ambiguity
01:38:27
◼
►
and complexity that AI brings to the table
01:38:30
◼
►
instead of trying to erase it.
01:38:31
◼
►
- It's like AI is making us rethink like centuries
01:38:35
◼
►
of assumptions about what art is
01:38:37
◼
►
and who gets to be called an artist.
01:38:39
◼
►
- Yeah, and that can be a little unsettling for some people.
01:38:41
◼
►
Like it's challenging these deeply held beliefs
01:38:44
◼
►
about human exceptionalism.
01:38:45
◼
►
- Deeply held beliefs?
01:38:47
◼
►
- Totally, but for others, it's like this really exciting
01:38:49
◼
►
time, this explosion of possibilities.
01:38:51
◼
►
Like we're on the verge of something totally new
01:38:54
◼
►
and uncharted.
01:38:55
◼
►
- Exactly, and I think Syracuse captures
01:38:56
◼
►
that tension really well.
01:38:57
◼
►
He doesn't shy away from the hard questions.
01:38:59
◼
►
- No, he definitely doesn't.
01:39:01
◼
►
And speaking of hard questions,
01:39:02
◼
►
he leaves us with a pretty big one.
01:39:05
◼
►
- He says, instead of just asking, you know,
01:39:07
◼
►
who made this when it comes to AI art,
01:39:10
◼
►
maybe we should be asking,
01:39:12
◼
►
how do we want to define made in a world
01:39:15
◼
►
where AI is becoming this powerful creative force?
01:39:18
◼
►
- I love that question because it shifts the focus away
01:39:21
◼
►
from trying to find the one true creator
01:39:23
◼
►
and it puts the emphasis on what kind of future
01:39:26
◼
►
we're trying to create.
01:39:27
◼
►
- Exactly, like it's not about assigning blame
01:39:30
◼
►
or credit anymore, it's about taking responsibility
01:39:32
◼
►
for the tools we're building and the impact they're having.
01:39:35
◼
►
- And it's about recognizing that AI
01:39:36
◼
►
isn't just this neutral technology.
01:39:38
◼
►
It's shaped by our values, our biases,
01:39:41
◼
►
the choices we make as a society.
01:39:42
◼
►
- It makes you think about the ethical implications,
01:39:44
◼
►
all the unintended consequences
01:39:46
◼
►
that we might not even be able to foresee right now.
01:39:48
◼
►
- Absolutely, it's like opening Pandora's box in a way,
01:39:51
◼
►
but instead of just fearing what might come out,
01:39:54
◼
►
maybe we can try to steer it
01:39:56
◼
►
in a direction that benefits humanity.
01:39:58
◼
►
- So it's not just a technological challenge anymore, right?
01:40:01
◼
►
It's a philosophical one, a social one, an ethical one.
01:40:04
◼
►
- Totally, it's about figuring out what it means
01:40:06
◼
►
to be human in an age of intelligent machines
01:40:09
◼
►
and what role creativity will play in all of this.
01:40:12
◼
►
- Yeah, and I don't think there are any easy answers here,
01:40:16
◼
►
but I do think Syracuse gives us a good place to start
01:40:19
◼
►
by asking the right questions. - But this is the end.
01:40:21
◼
►
- We didn't get anywhere.
01:40:21
◼
►
- It's about having those difficult conversations,
01:40:24
◼
►
being willing to challenge our own assumptions
01:40:26
◼
►
and being open to new perspectives.
01:40:28
◼
►
- And I think that's something we've tried to do here today
01:40:30
◼
►
to really grapple with the complexities of AI art.
01:40:33
◼
►
- Are we gonna do a Squarespace ad now?
01:40:35
◼
►
- Absolutely, and I think it's a conversation
01:40:38
◼
►
that's only gonna become more important,
01:40:39
◼
►
more urgent as AI continues to evolve.
01:40:43
◼
►
- So on that note, I wanna thank you all for joining us
01:40:45
◼
►
for this deep dive into the world of AI art.
01:40:47
◼
►
It's been quite a journey.
01:40:48
◼
►
- It really has, and I think it's just the beginning.
01:40:51
◼
►
- Definitely. - Yeah.
01:40:52
◼
►
- So until next time, keep those creative sparks flying,
01:40:55
◼
►
whether they're human or artificial.
01:40:57
◼
►
- Here to that.
01:40:58
◼
►
- And we'll see y'all in the next one.
01:41:00
◼
►
- Here to that.
01:41:02
◼
►
- To quote a famous line from a nerdy show,
01:41:05
◼
►
the line being, "Maybe I use too many monkeys,
01:41:07
◼
►
"maybe they use too many cliches when they drain this LLM,"
01:41:11
◼
►
because wow, there was, like the whole thing was just,
01:41:14
◼
►
how many different cliches can we work in at the same time?
01:41:16
◼
►
It missed the main point of my article,
01:41:18
◼
►
which is not a great, I mean, you would think
01:41:21
◼
►
people are like, "Oh, LLMs are great at summarizing."
01:41:23
◼
►
Not if you missed the main, most important point.
01:41:26
◼
►
Even when they were parroting back the beginning
01:41:28
◼
►
and the part of whatever they trained it on was like,
01:41:31
◼
►
this is the part where we're gonna go over the article.
01:41:33
◼
►
They did not get the crux of it,
01:41:34
◼
►
and when they sort of did verbatim
01:41:36
◼
►
the example I had in the middle,
01:41:37
◼
►
they missed the important part of the example,
01:41:39
◼
►
which was the similarity between typing a prompt
01:41:43
◼
►
and then typing an email to an artist who makes it for you.
01:41:46
◼
►
They omitted that entirely, and the only two examples
01:41:48
◼
►
they had were typing a prompt and you making it yourself,
01:41:51
◼
►
and that's not, there's nothing interesting, oh my God.
01:41:53
◼
►
Anyway, this was a bad podcast that if I heard a person
01:41:57
◼
►
doing a podcast like this, I would be,
01:41:58
◼
►
to quote another famous line, Woody Allen, whatever,
01:42:01
◼
►
what was this, was it Andy Hall?
01:42:04
◼
►
"You know nothing of my work.
01:42:06
◼
►
"Boy, if only life were really like this."
01:42:08
◼
►
Oh, people know what I'm talking about.
01:42:09
◼
►
Anyway, yeah, they know nothing of my work.
01:42:11
◼
►
The LLMs did not get it, it's a shame,
01:42:14
◼
►
and they talked in circles a lot,
01:42:16
◼
►
and they used so many cliches,
01:42:18
◼
►
and it's obvious that they've trained on a lot of information
01:42:20
◼
►
surrounding AI and stuff, which is not surprising,
01:42:22
◼
►
so they can riff, freeform riff on it,
01:42:25
◼
►
but as an example of trying to look at an article
01:42:30
◼
►
and talk about what the article is talking about, they fail.
01:42:35
◼
►
As an example of natural sounding voices
01:42:40
◼
►
speaking text generated by an LLM,
01:42:42
◼
►
these things are actually pretty okay.
01:42:44
◼
►
You can still tell the AI if you've heard a few of them,
01:42:46
◼
►
because there's kind of a sameness to what they do,
01:42:49
◼
►
but honestly, there's kind of a sameness
01:42:50
◼
►
to what a lot of humans do in certain things anyway.
01:42:53
◼
►
I bet if you trained an LLM on our hundreds
01:42:56
◼
►
and hundreds of hours, they could do a pretty good job
01:42:59
◼
►
of simulating us, but I think they'd make us say
01:43:01
◼
►
even dumber things than we already say.
01:43:03
◼
►
- Well, what's interesting about this,
01:43:06
◼
►
so to me, when I hear the podcast generated by NotebookLM,
01:43:11
◼
►
they don't sound that ridiculous to me.
01:43:13
◼
►
They don't sound that bad. - No, absolutely not.
01:43:15
◼
►
- The words that they're saying
01:43:16
◼
►
or the voice that they're saying them in,
01:43:18
◼
►
because it's two different things.
01:43:19
◼
►
- The actual content is not nearly as bad
01:43:22
◼
►
as I expected it to be.
01:43:23
◼
►
- Well, but I think that the actual content
01:43:25
◼
►
is very similar to the actual content of text
01:43:27
◼
►
that comes out of an LLM.
01:43:29
◼
►
When you type in the chat GPT and it gives you a big answer
01:43:31
◼
►
and you read the text, it's coherent, right?
01:43:33
◼
►
That's the whole point.
01:43:34
◼
►
That's why people are always so impressed by it.
01:43:36
◼
►
That's why it fools so many people
01:43:37
◼
►
into thinking that it's actually intelligent,
01:43:38
◼
►
because the text is, like, it makes sense.
01:43:41
◼
►
Like, the sentences join to one another or whatever.
01:43:43
◼
►
Now, maybe the sentences are filled with made-up stuff
01:43:45
◼
►
or whatever, but the sentences themselves join.
01:43:47
◼
►
So I think the most impressive thing about these
01:43:49
◼
►
is taking that text that you would see in chat GPT
01:43:52
◼
►
and then reading it in the style of a podcaster
01:43:55
◼
►
with the same umms and oohs and pauses
01:43:59
◼
►
and emphasis or whatever.
01:44:01
◼
►
And that is the more impressive thing from my perspective.
01:44:04
◼
►
- And that is what they're doing.
01:44:06
◼
►
This is still based on modern LLM generation techniques
01:44:09
◼
►
and summarization and things like that.
01:44:10
◼
►
And obviously, they're then forming it into a podcast
01:44:14
◼
►
with these kind of podcast formats of people saying,
01:44:18
◼
►
hey, what about this?
01:44:19
◼
►
Hey, welcome back, guys.
01:44:21
◼
►
That's a good point.
01:44:22
◼
►
But to me, this shows, I think, the immense power
01:44:26
◼
►
of generative AI to actually replace
01:44:31
◼
►
a bunch of mediocre media.
01:44:34
◼
►
Like, what this sounds like to me
01:44:36
◼
►
is a lot of real podcasts that are out there.
01:44:39
◼
►
Nothing that I really listen to,
01:44:41
◼
►
but it sounds like a lot of podcasts out there.
01:44:43
◼
►
And in many ways, the style of speaking
01:44:46
◼
►
where they're very prepared and professional
01:44:49
◼
►
and yet there's no personality being shown whatsoever.
01:44:52
◼
►
Hey, that's a good point, Jane.
01:44:54
◼
►
It sounds a lot like news anchors talking to each other
01:44:58
◼
►
and trying to appear human.
01:45:00
◼
►
- Or like what a news anchor or a host
01:45:03
◼
►
or I don't know, a presenter you would call them in the UK,
01:45:06
◼
►
what they're asked to do, what part of their job is
01:45:09
◼
►
is to fake interest in things that they have no interest in.
01:45:12
◼
►
If you're like a news anchor,
01:45:13
◼
►
you can't have interest in every news story,
01:45:15
◼
►
but it's your job to pretend that you are interested
01:45:18
◼
►
in this bake sale or the school budget committee
01:45:22
◼
►
or whatever.
01:45:23
◼
►
Your job is to make it sound interesting and engaging,
01:45:26
◼
►
but you as an actual newscaster
01:45:29
◼
►
can't possibly be interested in all those things,
01:45:30
◼
►
which is why we read newscasters, for example,
01:45:34
◼
►
as having their interest.
01:45:35
◼
►
Or like I put them on a morning show
01:45:36
◼
►
and they're talking about,
01:45:37
◼
►
oh, so you won the pie competition, tell me about that.
01:45:39
◼
►
We know they're not actually interested
01:45:41
◼
►
in the pie competition or the fact that these people won,
01:45:43
◼
►
but it's their job to pretend they're interested,
01:45:45
◼
►
which is why they read as fake to many of us.
01:45:48
◼
►
But morning shows are popular.
01:45:50
◼
►
People like seeing that.
01:45:51
◼
►
And so that artificiality is essentially
01:45:54
◼
►
what we're paying those people for.
01:45:55
◼
►
And it is a service that people like to consume.
01:45:57
◼
►
And I think this provides the same thing
01:46:00
◼
►
in that we listen to it and we're like,
01:46:01
◼
►
okay, well, there's no actual person
01:46:03
◼
►
who's actually interested in anything here,
01:46:04
◼
►
but is it that much different
01:46:06
◼
►
than the hosts of Good Morning America
01:46:07
◼
►
feigning interest in the world's biggest ball of yarn?
01:46:10
◼
►
I don't think it is.
01:46:12
◼
►
And the thing is, what I am into podcasts for
01:46:15
◼
►
is people and the personalities
01:46:17
◼
►
and the chemistry between hosts
01:46:19
◼
►
and how people just interact with each other
01:46:22
◼
►
and have interesting conversations.
01:46:23
◼
►
And this is not that
01:46:25
◼
►
and doesn't sound like it will ever be that.
01:46:27
◼
►
However, there's also a lot of people out there
01:46:30
◼
►
who just want information digest.
01:46:33
◼
►
Here is like what happened today in X,
01:46:36
◼
►
or whatever my industry or interest is.
01:46:39
◼
►
I wanna hear the latest in that.
01:46:41
◼
►
Summarize the news headlines for me
01:46:43
◼
►
and give me a little bit of context for each of those
01:46:45
◼
►
that I can listen to every day on my jog or whatever.
01:46:49
◼
►
There is a large market for
01:46:54
◼
►
utilitarian mediocrity.
01:46:56
◼
►
And that's what this delivers.
01:46:58
◼
►
It's not gonna replace like due by Friday,
01:47:01
◼
►
but it is gonna replace a lot of mediocrity that's out there
01:47:06
◼
►
because a lot of people,
01:47:07
◼
►
and especially 'cause you can make something
01:47:09
◼
►
that is specialized to one thing.
01:47:13
◼
►
If you're the only person who wants to hear
01:47:15
◼
►
a summary podcast of Topic X, you can do that here.
01:47:19
◼
►
And I think that's very powerful.
01:47:21
◼
►
You really individualize your media.
01:47:24
◼
►
It's like this is exactly what you want
01:47:27
◼
►
even if no one else wants to hear this
01:47:29
◼
►
or is interested in this
01:47:30
◼
►
or it's about something that's like private documentation
01:47:33
◼
►
that only you have for whatever reason
01:47:35
◼
►
or like your own content.
01:47:37
◼
►
You can listen to that kind of thing.
01:47:39
◼
►
You can use it as a learning tool.
01:47:41
◼
►
It can be a summarization tool.
01:47:42
◼
►
It can be like get me up to date.
01:47:45
◼
►
Give me a quick refresher on the notes for my presentation
01:47:48
◼
►
before I give my presentation in an hour
01:47:50
◼
►
like I'm on my drive to work.
01:47:52
◼
►
- Well, now you're getting into things
01:47:53
◼
►
where accuracy might be required
01:47:54
◼
►
and I would be wary about that.
01:47:56
◼
►
- Sure, okay, yeah, but like--
01:47:58
◼
►
- 'Cause on the test,
01:47:59
◼
►
they're gonna want you to get the answer right
01:48:00
◼
►
not just well, I told you what my LLM told me.
01:48:03
◼
►
- But this blew my mind because yeah,
01:48:06
◼
►
this does not sound as good as a good podcast
01:48:10
◼
►
but it sounds better than a lot of bad podcasts
01:48:12
◼
►
that I've heard from actual people.
01:48:14
◼
►
I would rather listen to these
01:48:16
◼
►
than a lot of actual podcasts I have heard.
01:48:19
◼
►
- Did you hear that Facebook's going to
01:48:20
◼
►
one of the things they're proposing or slash implementing
01:48:23
◼
►
is in the Facebook, I don't know, the news feed,
01:48:26
◼
►
the feed that is personalized for you
01:48:28
◼
►
where they take stuff from your social network on Facebook
01:48:32
◼
►
while they also throw stuff in your face
01:48:34
◼
►
that they think you might be interested in
01:48:35
◼
►
based on what they know about you
01:48:37
◼
►
and then the third leg of that stool is going to be
01:48:40
◼
►
and also we will AI generate stuff
01:48:42
◼
►
that we think you might be interested in.
01:48:45
◼
►
- Because like the old way was like
01:48:46
◼
►
stuff from people you follow who are in your network
01:48:48
◼
►
and then it was like but also stuff that our algorithm
01:48:51
◼
►
you might think should be interested
01:48:52
◼
►
but all that stuff is stuff
01:48:53
◼
►
that presumably humans were creating
01:48:55
◼
►
and now it's like you know what,
01:48:56
◼
►
there's a third leg which is stuff that we create
01:48:59
◼
►
out of thin air based on LM stuff
01:49:02
◼
►
and we'll put that in your feed too
01:49:03
◼
►
and to Marco's point, do you think people will notice
01:49:08
◼
►
that that is not different
01:49:10
◼
►
than the stuff they're being algorithmically fed
01:49:12
◼
►
and the stuff that is from people in their network?
01:49:15
◼
►
Like depending on what the stuff is,
01:49:17
◼
►
lots of things created by humans
01:49:19
◼
►
have that same look and feel
01:49:21
◼
►
and if Facebook AI generates something
01:49:24
◼
►
that's unbeknownst to you is specifically
01:49:26
◼
►
for like you or a tiny slice of the population
01:49:29
◼
►
but it looks just like the thing they fed you
01:49:31
◼
►
from People Magazine, as far as you're concerned
01:49:33
◼
►
that you'd never be able to distinguish
01:49:36
◼
►
the AI generated like the average person
01:49:38
◼
►
never be able to distinguish the AI generated content
01:49:40
◼
►
from the real People Magazine content
01:49:41
◼
►
because they are really kind of at the same level
01:49:44
◼
►
and they both fulfill the same need.
01:49:45
◼
►
The problem of course is if the AI generated thing
01:49:47
◼
►
is just completely made up BS that is filled with lies
01:49:51
◼
►
or for example a podcast discussing an article
01:49:54
◼
►
that misses all the major points of the article,
01:49:56
◼
►
that's not great but maybe people won't notice.
01:49:59
◼
►
- But still I think a large effect
01:50:03
◼
►
that we are already having with generative AI and LLMs
01:50:08
◼
►
that will continue to get even more severe in the future
01:50:12
◼
►
is there's a lot of media out there
01:50:16
◼
►
that is formulaic and low personality
01:50:21
◼
►
and is mostly being used to just generate stuff
01:50:27
◼
►
for people to consume in mediocrity.
01:50:30
◼
►
I think there will be a lot of AI stuff
01:50:33
◼
►
that will replace that, like a lot of AI generation
01:50:36
◼
►
will replace a lot of that mediocrity
01:50:37
◼
►
and this is gonna be a large theme of the AI age in general
01:50:42
◼
►
that there's a huge amount of mediocrity out there
01:50:46
◼
►
that can be easily automated
01:50:48
◼
►
and the results will be good enough or better.
01:50:51
◼
►
And I think this blew my mind when I heard it
01:50:54
◼
►
'cause it's way better than I would have guessed.
01:50:58
◼
►
It's not great but it's way better
01:51:00
◼
►
than I thought it could be at this stage.
01:51:02
◼
►
- Yeah, I very much agree.
01:51:04
◼
►
Yeah, when I heard the one that somebody had done,
01:51:08
◼
►
I forgot, we'll put a link in the show notes,
01:51:09
◼
►
but somebody had done one of these
01:51:10
◼
►
about a subject that I knew nothing about
01:51:12
◼
►
and I only listened to the first couple minutes
01:51:14
◼
►
and I was gobsmacked by how real it sounded.
01:51:18
◼
►
And yes, if you really pay attention
01:51:21
◼
►
and if you really listen,
01:51:22
◼
►
if you do active listening or whatever,
01:51:24
◼
►
you can tell that it's probably not real.
01:51:27
◼
►
But note that I said probably
01:51:29
◼
►
because genuinely, if I didn't know
01:51:33
◼
►
that I was listening to AI,
01:51:35
◼
►
I would have thought that these were typical
01:51:37
◼
►
but not terribly skilled podcasters.
01:51:40
◼
►
And the ums and the inflections, or maybe they weren't ums,
01:51:44
◼
►
but the inflections and the--
01:51:46
◼
►
- There are ums, they insert them.
01:51:49
◼
►
- There you go, and there's not,
01:51:51
◼
►
it's not just monotone, right?
01:51:53
◼
►
And they play off each other well
01:51:55
◼
►
and it sounds real, certainly at a glance.
01:51:59
◼
►
And I would argue, unless you're really,
01:52:01
◼
►
really, really paying attention, it sounds real.
01:52:03
◼
►
I was stunned at how real it sounds.
01:52:06
◼
►
I could not, and I still can't believe it.
01:52:09
◼
►
- Well, that part isn't new, by the way.
01:52:10
◼
►
They've been able to do people speaking like this
01:52:13
◼
►
and obviously the texts from LLMs,
01:52:14
◼
►
that's all been around for a while now.
01:52:17
◼
►
The new thing that I think is impressive about this
01:52:19
◼
►
is understanding of the podcast format.
01:52:21
◼
►
How do I make, and I know it sounds nice,
01:52:23
◼
►
how do I make a podcast out of this?
01:52:24
◼
►
It's clear that this has been trained
01:52:26
◼
►
on how podcasts are structured,
01:52:28
◼
►
right down to, hey, we're gonna talk about this article.
01:52:30
◼
►
First, we're gonna talk about,
01:52:32
◼
►
we'll give you an overview of the article,
01:52:33
◼
►
then we're gonna get into some of the details,
01:52:34
◼
►
and then after that, we're gonna spin off
01:52:36
◼
►
into a more freeform discussion on ideas from the,
01:52:39
◼
►
that is the structure of a podcast discussion,
01:52:41
◼
►
and that's what this model knows.
01:52:43
◼
►
And if you haven't heard voices like this before,
01:52:45
◼
►
you're impressed by the intonation,
01:52:46
◼
►
or whatever, but previously,
01:52:47
◼
►
this same type of voice would be saying things,
01:52:49
◼
►
but it wouldn't sound like a podcast,
01:52:51
◼
►
because it would just be like,
01:52:52
◼
►
look, we can make this voice recite this passage
01:52:54
◼
►
from the book, and it sounds very expressive,
01:52:56
◼
►
and it does um's and ah's, and aren't you fooled by it?
01:52:58
◼
►
This is the whole origin of all the deepfake stuff
01:53:00
◼
►
that's out there, but this one is like,
01:53:02
◼
►
I mean, I guess they just fed it the transcripts
01:53:04
◼
►
or the audio of podcasts, however they did it,
01:53:06
◼
►
it definitely gets the structure and the vibe of a podcast,
01:53:10
◼
►
despite the content being terrible.
01:53:13
◼
►
- But the thing, like, you know,
01:53:14
◼
►
obviously you're gonna be, I think,
01:53:16
◼
►
a more critical evaluator than many.
01:53:19
◼
►
- But that's the thing about all these,
01:53:20
◼
►
like when Casey was saying he listened to one
01:53:21
◼
►
that was about a topic he didn't know about,
01:53:23
◼
►
that's the danger of these,
01:53:24
◼
►
this whole, the whole thing of LMs is like, you know,
01:53:27
◼
►
like pets and many other things,
01:53:29
◼
►
it's so easy to fool humans into thinking
01:53:32
◼
►
that like, there's a spirit living in the tree,
01:53:34
◼
►
or the chair, or whatever,
01:53:35
◼
►
like we will personify anything.
01:53:37
◼
►
And so it's so easy to fool us into thinking
01:53:42
◼
►
that that's a real person expressing real things
01:53:44
◼
►
and blah, blah, blah.
01:53:45
◼
►
And it's the worst when the content is in,
01:53:49
◼
►
it has no rhyme or reason other than
01:53:51
◼
►
just a bunch of statistical probabilities.
01:53:53
◼
►
And so you end up listening to a podcast
01:53:54
◼
►
about a topic you knew nothing about,
01:53:56
◼
►
and at the end of it, your head is filled
01:53:57
◼
►
with completely false information,
01:53:59
◼
►
because the accuracy of the podcast
01:54:01
◼
►
is not really important at all.
01:54:04
◼
►
And you're like, well, it was a person saying
01:54:05
◼
►
it to me, so I really totally believe it,
01:54:07
◼
►
so I guess that's the truth.
01:54:08
◼
►
And it's like, no, not even close.
01:54:10
◼
►
And that's why, that's why I feel like it's,
01:54:13
◼
►
the utility is potentially somewhat limited.
01:54:16
◼
►
It's like we talked about the summarization of notifications.
01:54:20
◼
►
Once you rely on this, or like studying for a test,
01:54:23
◼
►
once there's like a, once there is a measurement to,
01:54:27
◼
►
like that you compare against, like, okay,
01:54:29
◼
►
but the summary of my notifications has to be accurate,
01:54:31
◼
►
otherwise it's useless.
01:54:32
◼
►
Okay, but the study guide needs to tell me
01:54:34
◼
►
the correct capital of Minnesota,
01:54:36
◼
►
because when I enter it on the test,
01:54:37
◼
►
if it's wrong, I can't say, well,
01:54:39
◼
►
that's what the LLM said, because there actually
01:54:41
◼
►
is a right answer, and the purpose of the study guide
01:54:43
◼
►
is to let me know the right answer.
01:54:45
◼
►
The purpose of the study guide is not
01:54:46
◼
►
to fool me into thinking that this is a good study guide,
01:54:49
◼
►
'cause I thought that right up to the point
01:54:50
◼
►
until I took the test.
01:54:51
◼
►
And so I would say, podcasts are somewhere in the middle.
01:54:54
◼
►
Like, do you care if this podcast
01:54:56
◼
►
about avocados is full of lies?
01:54:58
◼
►
I bet there's plenty of real podcasts
01:54:59
◼
►
about avocados that are full of lies.
01:55:01
◼
►
Maybe it doesn't matter.
01:55:02
◼
►
But right until you get to the point of like,
01:55:04
◼
►
even something as simple as, oh, iPhone,
01:55:07
◼
►
summarize my notifications, and that's not accurate,
01:55:10
◼
►
the stakes are still low, but suddenly now you're mad,
01:55:13
◼
►
and now you're not impressed by the intonation
01:55:15
◼
►
and the ums of the voice that was reading the other thing.
01:55:17
◼
►
You're like, well, what the hell?
01:55:18
◼
►
If you're not gonna be accurate about the summaries
01:55:20
◼
►
of my thing, I'm just gonna turn this feature off.
01:55:22
◼
►
- Well, I'll tell you what.
01:55:23
◼
►
I've been living with the notification summaries
01:55:25
◼
►
on 18.1 for the last week or whatever.
01:55:27
◼
►
I find them very useful.
01:55:29
◼
►
Even when they are not always right,
01:55:30
◼
►
I find them very useful, and when I listen
01:55:33
◼
►
to NotebookLM-generated podcasts about things
01:55:35
◼
►
I do know about, I find their error rate
01:55:38
◼
►
to be about the same as people podcasts
01:55:40
◼
►
covering the same topics.
01:55:42
◼
►
I really do.
01:55:43
◼
►
It's not, this is closer than you think to human accuracy.
01:55:47
◼
►
- Well, like I said, podcasts are somewhere in the middle.
01:55:50
◼
►
You're not being tested on them, and in the end,
01:55:52
◼
►
you knowing false information of avocados
01:55:54
◼
►
isn't that big a deal, but notifications,
01:55:57
◼
►
that's an annoyance question of whether you're annoyed
01:55:59
◼
►
when it gets things wrong, but study guides,
01:56:01
◼
►
now we're starting to get into, it actually kinda matters
01:56:04
◼
►
if it gets it right, because I don't wanna study
01:56:05
◼
►
incorrect information, that's just gonna make me mad,
01:56:08
◼
►
and then obviously you crank that up into like,
01:56:11
◼
►
let this LOM control the surgery machine, yeah.
01:56:14
◼
►
- No, by this point, my only problem with Apple's,
01:56:17
◼
►
Apple's summarization on Apple Intelligence Beta so far,
01:56:21
◼
►
and this is a big problem, is that there is no API.
01:56:25
◼
►
- For you to, as a app developer,
01:56:28
◼
►
to try to make the summaries better?
01:56:30
◼
►
- For me to use them at all in my app, like, for example.
01:56:33
◼
►
- Yeah, it's applied to you or not, yeah.
01:56:35
◼
►
- Yeah, in mail, it can show in the table list there
01:56:38
◼
►
a summary of each message.
01:56:40
◼
►
I can't do that in my app.
01:56:41
◼
►
And the most infuriating thing, Apple sent a developer email
01:56:45
◼
►
like two weeks ago saying, bring Apple Intelligence
01:56:48
◼
►
to your apps, and every single thing the email suggests
01:56:52
◼
►
that you do is not Apple Intelligence.
01:56:54
◼
►
They're just using that to brand like,
01:56:56
◼
►
here's our ML features that we've had for years.
01:56:58
◼
►
Use this, here's Spotlight, try to use that, we guess.
01:57:02
◼
►
All of the Apple Intelligence features
01:57:04
◼
►
that they're advertising everywhere else
01:57:05
◼
►
as Apple Intelligence are not available in any APIs
01:57:08
◼
►
to any developers right now.
01:57:10
◼
►
- But by doing like the Spotlight thing,
01:57:11
◼
►
that feeds into their semantic model
01:57:14
◼
►
on the phone and everything, right?
01:57:15
◼
►
- No, not yet, it doesn't.
01:57:16
◼
►
It might someday.
01:57:17
◼
►
- I know, but you've gotta do it, it's chicken egg.
01:57:18
◼
►
They want you to do it, so when they roll that out,
01:57:21
◼
►
the data's there.
01:57:22
◼
►
- This is like the biggest Apple development on iOS,
01:57:25
◼
►
in iOS's history, that only Apple can use.
01:57:29
◼
►
They have opened up zero of it.
01:57:31
◼
►
There's no API for any of it,
01:57:33
◼
►
and that makes me very angry.
01:57:34
◼
►
Anyway, but besides that, I like them,
01:57:37
◼
►
but that's a big thing that I will keep harping on.
01:57:41
◼
►
- And by the way, we talked about this on past shows,
01:57:43
◼
►
you can disable those summaries,
01:57:45
◼
►
both on an individual app basis,
01:57:47
◼
►
and I think also globally if you don't like them.
01:57:49
◼
►
- Honestly, I live with them for a couple days
01:57:52
◼
►
before you do.
01:57:53
◼
►
I have found them to be very useful,
01:57:54
◼
►
and accurate enough to be useful.
01:57:57
◼
►
- Oh, you know I'm gonna.
01:57:58
◼
►
I'm the one who asked my three different voice assistants
01:58:00
◼
►
the same questions today.
01:58:00
◼
►
You know I'm gonna make them enabled,
01:58:02
◼
►
but I just, I'd question the utility
01:58:04
◼
►
for people who aren't doing what I'm doing.
01:58:07
◼
►
- All right, thank you to our sponsors this week,
01:58:09
◼
►
Squarespace and QA Wolf, and thanks to our members
01:58:12
◼
►
who support us directly.
01:58:13
◼
►
You can join at atp.fm/join.
01:58:15
◼
►
One of the member perks is ATP Overtime,
01:58:18
◼
►
a weekly bonus segment that is available exclusively
01:58:21
◼
►
This week's Overtime, we'll be talking about
01:58:24
◼
►
school cell phone bans, and kids and cell phones,
01:58:27
◼
►
and kind of the parenting and school decisions
01:58:29
◼
►
and legal decisions around whether your kid
01:58:32
◼
►
should have a phone in school.
01:58:33
◼
►
We'll talk about that in Overtime.
01:58:34
◼
►
You can join a list at atp.fm/join.
01:58:37
◼
►
Thanks for listening everybody,
01:58:38
◼
►
and we'll talk to you next week.
01:58:41
◼
►
(upbeat music)
01:58:44
◼
►
♪ Now the show is over ♪
01:58:46
◼
►
♪ They didn't even mean to begin ♪
01:58:48
◼
►
♪ 'Cause it was accidental ♪
01:58:50
◼
►
♪ Accidental ♪
01:58:51
◼
►
♪ Oh it was accidental ♪
01:58:53
◼
►
♪ Accidental ♪
01:58:54
◼
►
♪ John didn't do any research ♪
01:58:56
◼
►
♪ Margo and Casey wouldn't let him ♪
01:58:59
◼
►
♪ 'Cause it was accidental ♪
01:59:01
◼
►
♪ Accidental ♪
01:59:02
◼
►
♪ Oh it was accidental ♪
01:59:03
◼
►
♪ Accidental ♪
01:59:04
◼
►
♪ And you can find the show notes at atp.fm ♪
01:59:09
◼
►
♪ And if you're into Mastodon ♪
01:59:12
◼
►
♪ You can follow them at C-A-S-E-Y-L-I-S-S ♪
01:59:19
◼
►
♪ So that's Casey Liss M-A-R-C-O-A-R-M ♪
01:59:23
◼
►
♪ Auntie Margo Arman S-I-R-A-C ♪
01:59:28
◼
►
♪ U-S-A-C-R-A-Q-S-A ♪
01:59:31
◼
►
♪ It's accidental ♪
01:59:32
◼
►
♪ It's accidental ♪
01:59:34
◼
►
♪ They didn't mean to accidental ♪
01:59:37
◼
►
♪ Accidental ♪
01:59:39
◼
►
♪ Tech podcast so long ♪
01:59:42
◼
►
- Right, get ready to fire up those stoves,
01:59:46
◼
►
because today we're diving into something
01:59:48
◼
►
seemingly simple, but surprisingly nuanced,
01:59:52
◼
►
John Siracusa's legendary basic pasta sauce.
01:59:57
◼
►
You wouldn't think a simple tomato sauce
01:59:58
◼
►
would require such a deep dive,
02:00:00
◼
►
but trust me, Siracusa approaches this recipe
02:00:04
◼
►
with almost philosophical reverence.
02:00:06
◼
►
- What's fascinating is how he breaks it down
02:00:08
◼
►
into this sauce.
02:00:09
◼
►
- No, you sure don't.
02:00:10
◼
►
- Emphasizing that the ingredients, the process,
02:00:13
◼
►
and the time all hold equal weight.
02:00:15
◼
►
He argues you can't just nail one of these elements,
02:00:18
◼
►
you have to treat them all with equal importance.
02:00:20
◼
►
- Okay, so it's like three-legged stool,
02:00:22
◼
►
neglect one leg, and the whole thing collapses.
02:00:25
◼
►
So let's start with the foundation ingredients.
02:00:27
◼
►
- Don't sound like me.
02:00:28
◼
►
- And Siracusa doesn't hold back
02:00:30
◼
►
on his thoughts about tomatoes.
02:00:31
◼
►
- Oh no, he goes deep,
02:00:32
◼
►
especially on the San Marzano tomatoes.
02:00:34
◼
►
- He could have just said, "Use canned tomatoes,"
02:00:37
◼
►
but no, he practically wrote a dissertation
02:00:40
◼
►
on finding the perfect San Marzano.
02:00:42
◼
►
- For those of us who haven't quite reached
02:00:44
◼
►
that level of tomato enthusiasm, what is it
02:00:48
◼
►
about these San Marzanos?
02:00:49
◼
►
What makes them so special?
02:00:51
◼
►
- They have this unique combination
02:00:53
◼
►
of low acidity, a natural sweetness, and a meaty texture,
02:00:58
◼
►
which makes them ideal for a well-balanced flavorful sauce.
02:01:02
◼
►
However, Siracusa is also realistic.
02:01:04
◼
►
He knows finding truly authentic San Marzanos
02:01:08
◼
►
can be a challenge.
02:01:09
◼
►
He even links to this hilarious video
02:01:11
◼
►
where he's case testing different brands.
02:01:13
◼
►
- I'm sorry, what?
02:01:15
◼
►
- Oh man, I've got to see this video.
02:01:16
◼
►
It's like finding out your favorite band has been-
02:01:18
◼
►
- Yeah, me too, I know I made a video.
02:01:20
◼
►
- Can they generate that for us?
02:01:21
◼
►
- But he does say a good San Marzano style tomato
02:01:23
◼
►
you enjoy is better than an authentic one you don't.
02:01:25
◼
►
Exactly, and that actually ties into his whole philosophy.
02:01:28
◼
►
- Wait, is that two different people, same voice?
02:01:31
◼
►
- Sometimes it's the third person.
02:01:32
◼
►
- And ultimately trusting your own judgment.
02:01:34
◼
►
- There's that trust element again,
02:01:36
◼
►
just like with the sauce trinity.
02:01:37
◼
►
You have to trust your gut, which leads us perfectly-
02:01:39
◼
►
- They're really adding a lot to this,
02:01:41
◼
►
'cause this is not that much text.
02:01:43
◼
►
- And Syracuse gets real about the anxiety
02:01:45
◼
►
of burning the sauce.
02:01:47
◼
►
- He does, he even points to a clean pot
02:01:49
◼
►
as a mark of success. - People stop being polite,
02:01:50
◼
►
start getting real about burning the sauce.
02:01:52
◼
►
Reference acknowledged.
02:01:53
◼
►
- Low and slow cooking.
02:01:55
◼
►
- He says a burned sauce ruins the entire batch,
02:01:57
◼
►
which let's be honest is a fear
02:01:59
◼
►
we've all experienced in the kitchen.
02:02:01
◼
►
- I hope you have all experienced it.
02:02:01
◼
►
- But what's the science behind this low and slow approach?
02:02:04
◼
►
- Low heat allows the flavors to develop slowly-
02:02:06
◼
►
- Now they're just reading from Wikipedia again
02:02:08
◼
►
about low heat. - Without that harshness
02:02:09
◼
►
you get from high heat.
02:02:10
◼
►
And it prevents burning,
02:02:11
◼
►
which can ruin the flavor of the whole sauce.
02:02:14
◼
►
He's also a stickler for stirring,
02:02:16
◼
►
not just letting it simmer on its own.
02:02:18
◼
►
- So it's about being engaged in the process,
02:02:20
◼
►
not just letting it simmer-
02:02:21
◼
►
- This is so-
02:02:22
◼
►
- He doesn't want us to just go off and watch TV
02:02:24
◼
►
while the sauce simmer. - You don't need to go back.
02:02:26
◼
►
- Definitely not.
02:02:27
◼
►
- You want a shot- - I'm so angry.
02:02:28
◼
►
- Of keeping an eye on things.
02:02:29
◼
►
- If someone wrote like this and this is like top of mind,
02:02:31
◼
►
'cause my daughter is doing college essays.
02:02:32
◼
►
- This is not a set it and forget it kind of sauce.
02:02:33
◼
►
- Just get out the red pen for this one.
02:02:34
◼
►
- Now, speaking of being present and engaged,
02:02:36
◼
►
let's talk about Syracuse's very specific instructions
02:02:40
◼
►
on fresh herbs.
02:02:41
◼
►
- Oh yes, the fresh factor,
02:02:43
◼
►
as I like to call it.
02:02:44
◼
►
He's very clear about wanting us to use only fresh parsley
02:02:47
◼
►
and basil chopped right before they go into the pot.
02:02:50
◼
►
- He is, and I love how he emphasizes
02:02:52
◼
►
not refrigerating the basil, saying it dulls the flavor.
02:02:55
◼
►
It's like he wants to capture the essence of these herbs
02:02:58
◼
►
at the peak.
02:02:59
◼
►
- And that little tip about storing parsley
02:03:00
◼
►
in a glass of water, like a bouquet of flowers.
02:03:03
◼
►
So simple yet brilliant.
02:03:05
◼
►
- So brilliant.
02:03:06
◼
►
- I'm the first person to ever think of that.
02:03:08
◼
►
- He would argue, and I'd have to agree
02:03:10
◼
►
that it makes a world of difference.
02:03:12
◼
►
See, fresh herbs have these volatile oils.
02:03:15
◼
►
- Oh my God, they're eating from Wikipedia again.
02:03:17
◼
►
- Almost nuanced flavor,
02:03:18
◼
►
which you just don't get with dried herbs.
02:03:19
◼
►
- I love this method of torture for John.
02:03:21
◼
►
Like have somebody poorly summarize your own content
02:03:25
◼
►
back to you.
02:03:26
◼
►
- I know, right.
02:03:26
◼
►
- And expand on it in the most kind of like,
02:03:29
◼
►
what is this whole thing about low heat?
02:03:32
◼
►
I expect them to start quoting thermodynamics.
02:03:34
◼
►
- It instructs us to add a whole peeled onion to the sauce,
02:03:37
◼
►
but then we just discard it at the end.
02:03:40
◼
►
- Spoiler alert.
02:03:41
◼
►
- It's like a culinary magic trick.
02:03:45
◼
►
- It infuses the sauce
02:03:46
◼
►
with this really subtle depth of flavor.
02:03:48
◼
►
- So it's like a secret ingredient that disappears
02:03:50
◼
►
leaving behind its essence.
02:03:51
◼
►
- It's not a secret, it's an ingredient.
02:03:53
◼
►
- It's a classic technique to add-
02:03:54
◼
►
- It's all literally in the recipe.
02:03:56
◼
►
- Without overpowering the other flavors.
02:03:58
◼
►
Think of it like using a bay leaf.
02:04:00
◼
►
You don't eat it, but it subtly enhances the overall taste.
02:04:04
◼
►
- Mind blown.
02:04:10
◼
►
- Even when it comes to something as basic as an onion.
02:04:13
◼
►
Now his actual cooking process seems pretty straightforward.
02:04:16
◼
►
Wouldn't you say?
02:04:17
◼
►
- It is, but straightforward doesn't mean foolproof.
02:04:19
◼
►
- This is longer than the recipe.
02:04:21
◼
►
- And it brings us to the final piece
02:04:22
◼
►
of the sauce training puzzle. - Way longer.
02:04:23
◼
►
- Yeah, it is.
02:04:24
◼
►
- Ah, yes, the simmer.
02:04:25
◼
►
He does have some specific guidelines about that, right?
02:04:28
◼
►
He recommends simmering for one to two hours,
02:04:30
◼
►
which seems pretty standard for a good tomato sauce.
02:04:33
◼
►
But then he throws in this interesting curve ball.
02:04:35
◼
►
He says he often finds less is more.
02:04:37
◼
►
- Wait, hold on.
02:04:38
◼
►
- Interesting curve ball.
02:04:39
◼
►
- It's not like baking where you absolutely
02:04:40
◼
►
need to follow the recipe to the letter.
02:04:42
◼
►
You're telling me he's cool with me eyeballing it.
02:04:44
◼
►
- That's classic Syracuse. - Not you, AI voice.
02:04:46
◼
►
- The man could explain the nuances of drying herbs
02:04:49
◼
►
and make it sound like a suspense thriller.
02:04:53
◼
►
- He emphasizes the sauce as it simmers
02:04:54
◼
►
because over cooking can make it bland.
02:05:01
◼
►
- The more you cook it, the more flavorful it gets.
02:05:02
◼
►
- That's what's so great about Syracuse's approach.
02:05:04
◼
►
He encourages you to trust your instincts,
02:05:06
◼
►
not just the clock. - You're instincts.
02:05:08
◼
►
- No, I definitely do not encourage that.
02:05:09
◼
►
- And start adding those optional meat additions.
02:05:12
◼
►
- Right, we briefly touched on the meatballs
02:05:14
◼
►
and sausage before.
02:05:16
◼
►
- How does simmering time come into play
02:05:17
◼
►
when you're adding those to the mix?
02:05:18
◼
►
- Well, now you're not just simmering for flavor,
02:05:20
◼
►
you're also making sure those meats are cooked through.
02:05:23
◼
►
And of course, your acusa has some very specific thoughts
02:05:25
◼
►
on this as well.
02:05:26
◼
►
- I bet he does.
02:05:27
◼
►
Does he have a size guideline for the meatballs?
02:05:30
◼
►
He actually compares them to sports equipment.
02:05:32
◼
►
He says they should be bigger than a golf ball but smaller
02:05:34
◼
►
than a tennis ball. - I think I have a weight.
02:05:35
◼
►
Use the weight. - Ball with the failure ball
02:05:36
◼
►
being the absolute maximum size.
02:05:38
◼
►
- Only Syracuse could use sports equipment
02:05:41
◼
►
as a meatball size guide.
02:05:43
◼
►
- What's the reasoning behind this?
02:05:44
◼
►
- It all comes back to that final element
02:05:47
◼
►
of the sauce trinity time.
02:05:49
◼
►
The larger the meatball,
02:05:50
◼
►
the longer it will take to cook through.
02:05:52
◼
►
- 3.5 ounce balls.
02:05:53
◼
►
- You don't wanna end up with undercooked meat in your sauce.
02:05:55
◼
►
- Safety first.
02:05:56
◼
►
So it's all about finding that balance between simmering
02:06:00
◼
►
long enough to develop those deep, rich flavors
02:06:02
◼
►
but not so long that you end up with a bland or even worse
02:06:06
◼
►
undercooked sauce.
02:06:07
◼
►
It's a delicate dance but clearly--
02:06:08
◼
►
- Undercooked?
02:06:09
◼
►
Why would cooking it so long make it undercooked?
02:06:10
◼
►
- It really highlights how even a seemingly simple sauce
02:06:12
◼
►
requires a certain level of attention and care.
02:06:17
◼
►
And that's what makes Syracuse's approach so fascinating.
02:06:19
◼
►
He doesn't just throw a recipe at you.
02:06:21
◼
►
He guides you through the process
02:06:23
◼
►
and encourages you to understand--
02:06:24
◼
►
- Someone needs to feed this model more podcasts
02:06:26
◼
►
where they trash something?
02:06:27
◼
►
'Cause they're always so positive.
02:06:30
◼
►
- Absolutely.
02:06:30
◼
►
It's about trusting your sense of your instincts.
02:06:31
◼
►
- You can tell they're not friends in our show.
02:06:34
◼
►
- Yeah, exactly.
02:06:35
◼
►
- And on that note, what final thoughts
02:06:36
◼
►
would you leave our listeners with
02:06:38
◼
►
as they embark on their own pasta making adventures?
02:06:41
◼
►
- I'd say use this recipe as a starting point,
02:06:44
◼
►
a foundation upon which to build
02:06:45
◼
►
your own culinary masterpiece.
02:06:47
◼
►
Don't be afraid to experiment with tomatoes,
02:06:50
◼
►
maybe try and mix up herbs
02:06:52
◼
►
or even adjust the simmering time to suit your taste.
02:06:54
◼
►
- So just like he trusts us to find the perfect San Marzano,
02:06:57
◼
►
he's also giving us permission to make this recipe our own.
02:07:01
◼
►
- Precisely.
02:07:02
◼
►
- That's definitely not the recipe.
02:07:02
◼
►
- It's about discovering what brings you joy in the kitchen.
02:07:05
◼
►
Cooking shouldn't feel like a chore,
02:07:06
◼
►
it should be a celebration of flavors--
02:07:07
◼
►
- This is just again from Wikipedia
02:07:08
◼
►
or other recipe pages.
02:07:10
◼
►
- And on that note,
02:07:11
◼
►
I think we've given our listeners plenty to chew on today.
02:07:14
◼
►
- Chew on, huh?
02:07:15
◼
►
- Chew on the nuances of San Marzano tomatoes,
02:07:17
◼
►
the importance of low and slow cooking,
02:07:20
◼
►
the magic of a whole onion and the empowering realization
02:07:23
◼
►
that even a basic pasta sauce
02:07:25
◼
►
can be a platform for culinary exploration.
02:07:28
◼
►
- Who knew there was so much to unpack
02:07:30
◼
►
in a simple tomato sauce?
02:07:32
◼
►
A huge thank you to our expert
02:07:33
◼
►
for guiding us through this delicious deep dive.
02:07:36
◼
►
- The pleasure was all mine.
02:07:37
◼
►
- And to our listeners,
02:07:38
◼
►
we hope this episode inspires you
02:07:39
◼
►
to approach all your culinary endeavors
02:07:41
◼
►
with a newfound appreciation for the process,
02:07:44
◼
►
the details and the joy
02:07:45
◼
►
of creating something truly delicious.
02:07:48
◼
►
Until next time, happy cooking.
02:07:50
◼
►
- Happy cooking, Jon.
02:07:54
◼
►
- You're so miserable.
02:07:55
◼
►
- It just like, it makes things worse.
02:07:57
◼
►
It's the magic power of like making anything worse
02:08:00
◼
►
by having those people try to explain it.
02:08:03
◼
►
- But see, there is a market for like,
02:08:05
◼
►
talk to me about this thing for a few minutes.
02:08:07
◼
►
- Nobody wants that, they just want the recipe.
02:08:09
◼
►
You know, even when they go to the recipe,
02:08:10
◼
►
they don't wanna hear the big story.
02:08:11
◼
►
It's like, just give me the ingredients and the directions.