PodSearch

ATP

607: The Structure and Vibe of a Podcast

 

00:00:00   I installed my first Windows malware in a long time.

00:00:02   - Oh, well that's fun.

00:00:04   - Like a real malware or a sarcastic malware?

00:00:07   - No, well, I don't know the extent of it yet.

00:00:10   So there was some saga with my son's gaming PC.

00:00:14   In trying to figure out what was going on

00:00:17   with his laptop's cooling system or thermals or whatever,

00:00:22   I wanted to know like what do people use on Windows

00:00:26   to show CPU and GPU temperatures to themselves?

00:00:30   And this is one thing, honestly,

00:00:31   I have found the web in general

00:00:34   to be absolutely horrific at this,

00:00:36   but ChatGPT to be pretty good

00:00:38   at recommending stuff like this.

00:00:39   Like what do people use for software type X?

00:00:42   That would be something I would normally just search

00:00:45   the app store of the device on,

00:00:47   which I tried and there's nothing,

00:00:49   or search the web and it's useless garbage constantly.

00:00:54   So I actually got pretty good results.

00:00:55   And so there's a program called CPU ID,

00:00:58   HW monitor or something that everybody uses.

00:01:00   And I'm like, okay, I remember that

00:01:02   from my old hard OCP days.

00:01:03   That still exists, okay, great, I'll download that.

00:01:06   And it's one of those things where like the download link

00:01:09   opens up like an overlay on the page

00:01:12   that looks like a download link,

00:01:13   but it's actually an ad that is made

00:01:15   to look like a download link, but it's--

00:01:16   - It's like trying to download Minecraft mods.

00:01:18   - Yeah, it's constant just like,

00:01:20   okay, here's the real download link, download now,

00:01:22   but it's like that's not really the download link.

00:01:23   You have to close the ad,

00:01:24   the download's behind it or something, anyway.

00:01:26   Through all the logistics of trying to find

00:01:28   the real download link to this app,

00:01:30   I had one wrong try and I installed apparently PC App Store,

00:01:35   which messed up all of his browser search parameters

00:01:41   and stuff, it was a whole thing.

00:01:42   So now I gotta figure out like how do I get rid of this now?

00:01:45   Like of course Windows Defender is like everything's fine.

00:01:47   It's like no, trust me, everything's not fine.

00:01:49   So now I have to like do something else.

00:01:51   I guess like malware bytes?

00:01:53   It's like what do people do?

00:01:55   Do you know like what do people do on Windows now?

00:01:58   - I've already forgotten.

00:01:59   What was the name of the thing

00:02:00   that caused the big downtime recently?

00:02:02   CrowdStrike. - CrowdStrike.

00:02:04   Yeah, so no, we're not gonna do CrowdStrike.

00:02:06   No, that's, it seems like a bad idea.

00:02:09   (laughing)

00:02:11   Also, isn't that like expensive enterprise-y stuff?

00:02:14   I don't know. - I don't know.

00:02:15   Maybe it's a free trial.

00:02:15   - All of these secure, all these like PC security things

00:02:18   are all like guys with guns in the desert.

00:02:20   I'm just like I don't wanna, you know,

00:02:23   it's very easy to make a wrong step here.

00:02:26   Anyway, so I think I've removed some of it.

00:02:29   I would love recommendations on what people,

00:02:30   like what do people who are not guys with guns in deserts,

00:02:33   what do you use to just keep malware off of Windows PCs

00:02:37   that your kid is using for gaming?

00:02:39   - I think people just live with it

00:02:40   and have 800 toolbars in their browser.

00:02:42   - Yeah, and you know, and he also like,

00:02:44   he'll install stuff like, you know,

00:02:45   from random, you know, discords that tell him,

00:02:48   oh, use this auto-clicker tool to cheat in this game

00:02:50   so like God knows what else is on this PC.

00:02:53   So I just, but like I just,

00:02:54   I want something that just like is a little bit decent.

00:02:57   Like I don't know.

00:02:58   - I'm sorry, I moved to the Mac roundabouts of 2008

00:03:03   and I think that's right

00:03:07   and I was still a Windows developer by trade until,

00:03:12   oh geez, 2016 or so,

00:03:15   but I don't think I've spent more than five minutes

00:03:17   using Windows since I left, since I left that job,

00:03:21   not the most recent job,

00:03:23   since when I got my most recent job.

00:03:24   So I haven't really used Windows since 2016.

00:03:27   It's been almost 10 years and it's glorious.

00:03:30   It's so great 'cause I don't have to worry about this.

00:03:33   I just don't care, do not care.

00:03:34   And I know this is coming for me

00:03:36   because there's probably gonna be a gaming PC in my future,

00:03:38   little do I know, but right now, ignorance is less.

00:03:42   Oh, it's so great.

00:03:43   - And the thing is like after not using Windows for so long,

00:03:46   I too, I thought, I assumed like,

00:03:48   surely things have gotten a lot better

00:03:50   and like they're a little bit different.

00:03:52   I wouldn't say they're better.

00:03:54   They're just different.

00:03:55   - All right, let's do some follow up

00:04:00   and we have to start with a genuine and heartfelt thank you

00:04:03   to our ATP listeners.

00:04:06   It is no longer September.

00:04:08   So it is no longer Childhood Cancer Awareness Month.

00:04:10   However, during the month of September,

00:04:13   Relay and ATP, but mostly Relay,

00:04:16   raised over $1 million.

00:04:21   As I sit here tonight, $1,061,652.04.

00:04:24   And that is truly incredible.

00:04:30   The last year record,

00:04:32   last year was the previous record for Relay

00:04:34   and that was somewhere to the order of $776,000.

00:04:38   Here we are a year later, over a million dollars.

00:04:43   And I want to say from the bottom of my heart,

00:04:45   and I know I speak for you too,

00:04:47   thank you so much to everyone who gave $1, $5, $10,

00:04:51   doesn't matter, any amount of money.

00:04:52   Thank you to all of you.

00:04:53   Look at what we have accomplished together.

00:04:57   Truly, we have accomplished this together

00:04:59   and that's something to be extremely, extremely proud of.

00:05:01   And I hope that anyone who donated

00:05:03   feels some amount of ownership over this

00:05:04   because you do have some amount of ownership over this.

00:05:07   I will, as a final note for this year,

00:05:09   I will remind you that corporate matching is a thing.

00:05:12   And if you go to St. Jude.org/Relay,

00:05:16   there's a little bit of information about employer matching

00:05:18   and how you can get credit or how Relay can get credit

00:05:21   for an employer match perhaps based on your own donation.

00:05:25   So please check it out.

00:05:26   But don't feel like you can't donate

00:05:29   for the rest of the year or the beginning of next year.

00:05:30   You certainly can, that's fine.

00:05:32   Nobody's gonna complain.

00:05:33   But genuinely, thank you so very much

00:05:35   for the incredible amount of money that we all raised.

00:05:38   I am incredibly proud of all of us

00:05:40   and thankful to all of you.

00:05:41   So thank you.

00:05:43   We have some anonymous feedback

00:05:44   with regard to the hardwired camera indicator light

00:05:47   from years past.

00:05:49   Anonymous writes, when the first built-in camera

00:05:51   was designed for the first Intel iMac,

00:05:53   user notification was designed into the hardware.

00:05:56   The camera board was separate,

00:05:57   not integrated into the computing board.

00:06:00   At the specific direction of a key individual,

00:06:02   the light was hardwired directly

00:06:03   into the board's power circuit.

00:06:05   If the board was receiving power, the light was turned on.

00:06:08   If the board was not receiving power, the light was off.

00:06:10   No software was involved.

00:06:12   This design was passed on to the laptop team.

00:06:15   And yeah, this is just anti-laptop propaganda.

00:06:17   I don't want to read the rest of this.

00:06:19   The design was passed on to the laptop team.

00:06:21   Don't extrapolate that laptops are bad

00:06:22   just from this one example.

00:06:23   I can hear Jon-

00:06:24   - That's not an inclusion I drew.

00:06:25   I feel like you're getting defensive for no reason.

00:06:27   - Because I know you.

00:06:29   - I didn't write this.

00:06:31   - This design was passed on to the laptop team.

00:06:33   Much later, news of the camera light hack

00:06:35   mentioned on the previous episode of ATP went around Apple.

00:06:38   Alarms went off, circuit designs were laid out on tables,

00:06:40   and a lot of shouting happened.

00:06:41   Turns out the laptop team had later quote unquote

00:06:44   improved the design,

00:06:47   accidentally making this hack possible.

00:06:49   It's amusing to think that this quote unquote

00:06:51   secure exclave is a return to the spirit

00:06:53   of the original design requirement.

00:06:55   - This is big companies, you know.

00:06:57   It's hard to make sure that things are communicated

00:07:01   across groups, you know, across years,

00:07:04   across different hardware platforms.

00:07:05   So it is interesting to know that the design initially,

00:07:09   at least according to this person, was sound.

00:07:11   It just sort of got,

00:07:12   the soundness kind of got lost in translation,

00:07:14   and eventually they shipped a thing

00:07:16   that was supposed to be hack proof,

00:07:17   but was in fact hackable.

00:07:19   - Indeed.

00:07:20   Yeah, it's a bummer, but like you said,

00:07:22   that's big business for you.

00:07:24   Wayne Dixon writes with regard to AirPods 4,

00:07:27   the base on the AirPods 4 with ANC

00:07:29   is definitely heavier than the AirPods 3, according to Wayne.

00:07:32   I have no personal experience.

00:07:33   I'll take Wayne's word on this.

00:07:35   Wayne continues, also the new MagSafe Puck

00:07:37   does not align itself with the AirPods 4 case either,

00:07:40   despite being slightly smaller than the old Puck.

00:07:42   - Oh yeah, and Marco was asking

00:07:43   how to tell the difference between the two of them.

00:07:44   Someone wrote in to say that the new ones

00:07:46   have braided cables and the old ones don't.

00:07:47   I'm not sure if that's true,

00:07:48   but that was a suggestion from a listener.

00:07:51   - A friend of the show, Quinn Nelson,

00:07:52   with regard to the ear sensors in AirPods 4.

00:07:57   This is quoting from a YouTube video,

00:07:59   which we will link in the show notes.

00:08:00   These buds use Apple's old optical detection sensor.

00:08:04   So anything opaque that modifies light to this spot

00:08:07   will pause and resume music.

00:08:09   Apple does appear to be using the onboard accelerometers

00:08:11   to prevent music from being resumed

00:08:13   when the buds are at opposing angles.

00:08:16   So you would think that it might be okay in your pocket,

00:08:18   but it's not bulletproof.

00:08:20   Placing one or both earbuds in my pocket

00:08:21   will often resume music unexpectedly.

00:08:24   This was a solved problem.

00:08:25   The outgoing AirPods 3 had a sensor

00:08:26   that only responded to capacitive skin.

00:08:29   It's a real bummer of a downgrade

00:08:31   and a compromise that I hope was only made

00:08:33   for that thinner fitment comfort

00:08:34   rather than to save a buck

00:08:35   or to artificially segment the lineup.

00:08:38   - For whatever it's worth,

00:08:38   I have this problem on the AirPods Pros.

00:08:42   I think the AirPods Pro don't have skin sensing.

00:08:45   I could be wrong, but I will often have,

00:08:49   I'll put 'em in my pants pocket

00:08:50   for a minute as I'm going in a building or something,

00:08:52   and I will sometimes find out

00:08:54   that it has been playing in my pocket.

00:08:56   So I don't know if this is just a rumor or not.

00:08:58   - You can do an experiment and use your finger

00:08:59   versus covering it with a piece of cardboard or something.

00:09:01   - Yeah, that's too much work.

00:09:03   - Wow.

00:09:05   - John, do you wanna tell us about discoveries

00:09:06   with regard to the A18 and A18 Pro, please?

00:09:09   - So the real hardware folks are finally getting

00:09:12   to give us the hardware answers that we crave

00:09:14   in these next two items.

00:09:15   The first one is something that we talked about

00:09:17   when these phones were announced.

00:09:18   Based on the specs that Apple gave,

00:09:20   it was like, boy, the A18 and the A18 Pro

00:09:22   seem very similar.

00:09:24   And some people were speculating that the A18 Pro,

00:09:27   A18 might be just a binned version of the A18 Pro

00:09:29   based on like, oh, you know,

00:09:30   the A18 Pro has six GPU cores and the A18 has five.

00:09:33   Maybe they're just binned.

00:09:34   And I went through all the differences

00:09:36   on the announcement show and the differences were many

00:09:39   besides just the GPU cores.

00:09:41   And I was like, technically,

00:09:42   it could technically be a binned one,

00:09:44   but there's so much that is different about the A18 Pro

00:09:47   that it seems it would be totally unprecedented

00:09:50   for them to be intentionally disabling so much of the chip.

00:09:54   So now we have actual die shots of someone

00:09:56   who cut the A18 and the A18 Pro open

00:09:58   and lo and behold, they are different chips.

00:10:00   They look pretty similar, but they're not the same chip.

00:10:03   So no, the A18 is not a binned A18 Pro.

00:10:05   They're just two similar chips.

00:10:07   And you can look, this is from chipwise.tech.

00:10:10   You can look at their die shots.

00:10:12   And then Fabian Haussler also put in

00:10:14   like a sort of a markup interpretation,

00:10:16   labeling the parts of the chips to see what they are,

00:10:19   and then put in an M4 for reference as well.

00:10:22   So A18 and A18 Pro, two separate chips.

00:10:25   - Well, and this actually,

00:10:27   I didn't mention this when we first were talking about these

00:10:28   but I kind of regretted afterwards not mentioning it,

00:10:31   that like if you look at why they might be doing this,

00:10:34   like the A18 being its own special chip,

00:10:37   it's now the smallest and most likely therefore cheapest

00:10:41   chip in Apple's lineup that can run Apple intelligence.

00:10:45   So this is not just going to be in the iPhone 16.

00:10:48   Like it is most likely going to also be

00:10:52   in all upcoming Apple products

00:10:54   that don't have a need for massive CPU power otherwise,

00:10:58   but want to run Apple intelligence.

00:11:00   So think about things like future home pods,

00:11:03   like the rumored home pod with the screen

00:11:04   or the robot arm thing, whatever that's going to be,

00:11:06   like you know, that kind of thing.

00:11:08   Low-end iPads, maybe possibly the next Apple TV, who knows?

00:11:12   Like there's lots of products across Apple's lineup

00:11:15   that they're going to want to put Apple intelligence in,

00:11:19   you know, maybe because they are Siri-based,

00:11:20   like a home pod or things like that.

00:11:22   Like they're going to want that

00:11:23   across as much of their product line as possible

00:11:26   as quickly as possible.

00:11:27   So I'm guessing the base A18 is most likely

00:11:31   going to be the next chip in lots of different things,

00:11:34   probably all releasing over the following year or two.

00:11:36   And we'll probably find out first

00:11:38   when we get an update to the low-end iPad,

00:11:40   'cause I bet it'll be powering that.

00:11:42   - I hope that's true, and I know Apple probably says

00:11:44   that the A18 is the minimum chip

00:11:45   that can run Apple intelligence,

00:11:46   but I don't think the neural engine in the A18

00:11:48   is actually any faster than the 17 or maybe even the 16

00:11:52   when we're looking at the TFLOPS or whatever.

00:11:54   I forget if there was a big difference.

00:11:57   Obviously the GPU is slower,

00:11:58   the CPUs are slower, whatever.

00:11:59   It just seems to me that RAM is the real limiting factor,

00:12:02   'cause it's not like you can't run Apple intelligence

00:12:04   on older chips, it will just obviously be slower.

00:12:05   The limiting factor that would make it

00:12:07   so you literally can't is RAM.

00:12:09   But you know, practically speaking,

00:12:10   they might just say A18 is the minimum spec going forward,

00:12:13   and yeah, these chips tend to live on for a long time.

00:12:15   And the ones that live on are not the pro chips.

00:12:17   So yeah, A18 hopefully is in our future.

00:12:20   I mean, I'm saying hopefully,

00:12:21   but I don't want them to like,

00:12:23   like historically the home pod line has not received

00:12:26   the cream of the crop of chips.

00:12:29   And even though A18 is the, you know,

00:12:31   maybe is Apple's current minimum spec for Apple intelligence

00:12:34   due to the RAM associated with it

00:12:36   and whatever stuff they claim about the minimum speed

00:12:38   required for the GPU and neural engine and CPU,

00:12:42   I can see them shipping like, for example,

00:12:43   that robot arm thing with a chip older than the A18.

00:12:46   I hope I'm wrong, I hope they don't do that, but we'll see.

00:12:49   - And in the same spirit,

00:12:50   it turns out there is a tiny hardware difference

00:12:54   between the two of these AirPods.

00:12:56   So John, what's going on here?

00:12:58   - iFixit took apart the AirPods 4 painfully

00:13:01   'cause they do not come apart easily.

00:13:03   And here's what they had to say in a video

00:13:04   we will link in the show notes.

00:13:06   Both versions, talking about both versions of the AirPods 4

00:13:08   are the ones with and without ANC.

00:13:10   Both versions have the exact same system and package

00:13:12   or SIP housing the brains.

00:13:13   In fact, they said we won't be tearing down the AirPods 4

00:13:16   with ANC because the only difference between the two AirBuds

00:13:18   appears to be a single outward facing microphone,

00:13:21   the ANC version having a bigger beefier mic.

00:13:24   So we'll link to the video and you can look.

00:13:27   These products, as far as iFixit can tell,

00:13:30   are identical right down to the number of microphones.

00:13:33   The only difference is the AirPods 4 with ANC,

00:13:35   one of the microphones is bigger

00:13:37   than it is in the AirPods 4.

00:13:39   Which if this is true, I mean,

00:13:40   obviously they can't tell every single minute component,

00:13:42   but they can tell the SIP, they can tell,

00:13:45   they can count the things that are in it.

00:13:46   They have whatever this weird scanning microscope thing

00:13:49   that shows them all the guts or whatever.

00:13:51   Like now I'm looking at it and I'm thinking,

00:13:52   why didn't Apple make the hardware the same?

00:13:55   Like they estimated,

00:13:56   I don't know if it's a sarcastic thing,

00:13:57   estimated as a $2 part, that's the difference between them.

00:14:00   And I guess maybe that adds up like,

00:14:02   and they said it's a $2 part.

00:14:03   So maybe the other one in the AirPods 4 is a $1 part.

00:14:05   So it's a $1 difference.

00:14:06   I suppose when you're making millions and millions of things

00:14:08   that $1 really does add up.

00:14:09   So they should make them separate, but wow.

00:14:12   Like these really are, you know, for the $50 difference,

00:14:15   you get a different case, which we'll get to in a second.

00:14:18   And you get a slightly bigger microphone

00:14:20   in one of the places, pretty amazing.

00:14:22   I mean, maybe they did it this way

00:14:24   so that it wouldn't be some big scandal

00:14:26   that it's just like a software lockout kind of thing.

00:14:28   - Yeah, yeah.

00:14:29   - Oh, that's an interesting point.

00:14:30   - I mean, again, it could just be that $1 difference

00:14:32   that, you know, I don't know, iFixit's off end comment.

00:14:35   One or $2 difference times millions of AirPods

00:14:39   is millions of dollars.

00:14:40   So there's that.

00:14:41   - And then additionally from iFixit,

00:14:43   if we take a look at the X-rays

00:14:45   of the ANC version of the case,

00:14:47   we can again see the exact same PCB,

00:14:50   but with a speaker inside the housing.

00:14:53   This is another component that contributes

00:14:54   to the extra $50 you'd pay for the ANC version.

00:14:57   As far as I can tell, those are the only two differences.

00:15:00   - So they kept the guts of the case the same too,

00:15:02   except for obviously, I mean, the case itself,

00:15:05   I think is different 'cause it's got holes for the speaker.

00:15:07   So there's one hardware difference.

00:15:08   And the second one is, hey,

00:15:09   there's a speaker behind those holes.

00:15:10   And so, you know, for the $50 for the AirPods for the ANC,

00:15:14   you get, one of the microphones is bigger in each earbud

00:15:18   and you get a single speaker component

00:15:20   that is not, and the three holes

00:15:21   that it talks through in the case.

00:15:23   And that's it.

00:15:24   Everything else about them is the same.

00:15:26   Good profit margins on the high-end product.

00:15:28   What else is new from Apple?

00:15:31   - All right, and then Tom's Hardware or Tom's Guide,

00:15:33   whatever they're calling themselves these days,

00:15:34   did a large test of the iPhone's 16 battery life.

00:15:39   And they have a summary table that Jon has been kind enough

00:15:43   to put in the show notes for me.

00:15:44   - They didn't have a summary table.

00:15:45   I made a summary table.

00:15:46   They just had a bunch of numbers.

00:15:48   - And that's the thing.

00:15:50   When these people do reviews, it always boggles my mind

00:15:52   that they spend all the time to do these tests.

00:15:54   They do all this hard work

00:15:55   and they have all these measurements

00:15:56   and they put them in a bunch of tables.

00:15:58   And it's like, you gotta do the final step,

00:16:01   which is like, sum it up, tell me what this means.

00:16:05   Don't make me do the math, which I had to do for all of this

00:16:07   to find out the actual important information.

00:16:10   - Here it was, I was trying to credit you

00:16:11   and apparently I did not give you sufficient credit.

00:16:13   So I apologize.

00:16:14   - You didn't yell at Tom's Guide enough.

00:16:17   - Okay, I see.

00:16:18   Follow-up copyright 2011, Jon Sarcusa.

00:16:20   So anyway, battery size for the iPhone 16, it's up 6.3%.

00:16:25   Battery life up almost 15%.

00:16:29   Battery size for the 16 Plus up almost 7%.

00:16:33   Battery life up almost 16%.

00:16:36   16 Pro gets about 9% and 30% increased battery life.

00:16:41   16 Pro Max, 6% battery size increase.

00:16:45   And again, about 30% battery life increase.

00:16:48   That is quite impressive.

00:16:49   - Yeah, and so the reason why this,

00:16:50   these are the things you should put in,

00:16:52   like this is sort of the bottom line,

00:16:53   sum it up for me, is how much bigger did the battery get?

00:16:56   And yeah, I did the math on like how many milliamp hours

00:16:58   or whatever, but you really wanna know percentage-wise.

00:17:01   Yeah, and this is all versus its predecessors.

00:17:02   So it's 16 versus 15, 16 Plus versus 15 Plus,

00:17:05   16 Pro versus, you know,

00:17:06   it's directly versus their predecessors

00:17:09   'cause there are direct predecessors for all these phones.

00:17:11   It's like, what percentage bigger did the battery get?

00:17:14   And then for that increase in battery size,

00:17:17   what percentage better is the battery life?

00:17:19   And Tom's Hardware is in a position to do that.

00:17:20   They put the numbers in for these different phones

00:17:22   because presumably they ran the same test on all the 15s

00:17:25   that they did on the 16s.

00:17:26   And they come up with the number that's, you know,

00:17:28   representative of whatever their test is.

00:17:31   So in all these cases, the battery got some percent bigger,

00:17:34   but the battery life increased much more

00:17:37   than the battery size increase.

00:17:39   So, you know, again, the 16 Pro got a 10% bigger battery,

00:17:43   but 30% bigger battery life.

00:17:45   That is huge.

00:17:46   And then I put the absolute values here.

00:17:47   It's like, what does that even mean?

00:17:48   So the increased battery life in terms of wall clock time,

00:17:51   for the iPhone 16 is an hour 38.

00:17:53   For the 16 Plus, it's two hours and 15 minutes.

00:17:56   16 Pro is three hours and 14 minutes.

00:17:58   And 16 Pro Max is four hours and four minutes.

00:18:00   These are not small battery increases.

00:18:02   Like, oh, you get extra 10 minutes to 30 minutes.

00:18:04   Again, how representative is this Tom's Guide test?

00:18:07   Like, is it light web browsing?

00:18:09   Is it representative of how you use your phones?

00:18:11   But they made all the batteries bigger

00:18:13   by a significant percentage,

00:18:15   and the battery life got way bigger

00:18:17   than the percentage increase.

00:18:19   And you will feel those for most of these things,

00:18:22   'cause they're measured in,

00:18:23   only one of them is a single hour,

00:18:24   and all the other ones are in multiple hours.

00:18:26   And this brings me to the next topic.

00:18:28   I have a 16 Pro, which apparently gets 30% better

00:18:32   battery life than the 15 Pro did,

00:18:34   which equates to an extra three hours and 14 minutes

00:18:37   of battery life in the Tom's test.

00:18:40   What I did, after having my phone for a day or two,

00:18:42   was I put on the 80% battery limit.

00:18:45   I said, I don't think I need to charge this thing to 100%.

00:18:49   So in the battery, this is the first time

00:18:50   I've had a phone that supports this setting,

00:18:51   'cause my 14 Pro didn't support it.

00:18:53   So I went into battery or whatever and I said,

00:18:55   never charge yourself more than 80%.

00:18:57   And then for the next several days,

00:18:58   I intentionally did not charge my phone during the day,

00:19:01   even though I could have, like I could plug it in

00:19:03   when I'm doing dishes or whatever.

00:19:04   I intentionally didn't do that just to see,

00:19:06   is 80% enough to get me through a regular day?

00:19:09   And right now on a brand new 16 Pro,

00:19:11   80% is more than enough, intentionally not charging,

00:19:14   like I would normally would during the day.

00:19:17   And so I'm currently on the 80% plan.

00:19:20   And there's been lots of debate about this.

00:19:22   People saying, oh, that's a waste.

00:19:24   You're never getting the full capacity of your phone.

00:19:25   You should charge it to 100%.

00:19:27   Don't worry about it or whatever.

00:19:29   But if I don't need to charge it to 100%,

00:19:31   I am making my battery last longer,

00:19:34   especially since I keep my phone for two years

00:19:36   than if I did otherwise.

00:19:37   So that's my plan.

00:19:39   And we'll put a link in the show notes

00:19:40   to some sort of anecdotal from Nick here

00:19:43   who had like a survey of like 100 people and said,

00:19:45   hey, are you charging to 80%?

00:19:47   And if so, you know, how's it going for you or whatever?

00:19:50   I think this is something people should at least consider

00:19:55   might be a possibility for them.

00:19:56   And you know, everyone knows your own life.

00:19:57   If you're on a commute and you have no place to charge

00:19:59   during the day and you barely make it through 100%,

00:20:01   charge to 100%, like by all means.

00:20:03   But I thought I could make it with 80% and so far I can.

00:20:07   And so I'm gonna keep it there.

00:20:07   And if it turns out I can't make it with 80%,

00:20:10   I'll probably crank it to 90 and then go up to 100.

00:20:13   And we'll see at the end of my two years

00:20:14   how my battery life is doing.

00:20:15   - Can you crank it to 90 or 100?

00:20:17   I thought it was either 80 or nothing.

00:20:18   - Yeah, it's like a slider.

00:20:19   Like maybe you can even go by fives, I don't remember.

00:20:22   But yeah, there's like a little slider bar in the settings.

00:20:25   - Well, for some reason, I thought it was the same.

00:20:27   I think the laptops are 80 or 100

00:20:29   and I thought it was the same on the phone.

00:20:30   So I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm wrong.

00:20:32   I just, I didn't realize.

00:20:33   - Yeah, and on laptops, people always recommend this

00:20:35   and I forget to write it down.

00:20:35   But there are programs for the Mac

00:20:37   that give you even more control over this,

00:20:39   that like not just the OS things.

00:20:41   What does that one call this?

00:20:42   Maybe it's coconut battery, maybe it's something else.

00:20:43   There's a bunch of Mac OS programs

00:20:45   that let you do the same thing for your laptop battery

00:20:48   and choose what you wanna limit to

00:20:49   and do all these fancy stuff.

00:20:51   - Al dente is the one that I think most people recommend.

00:20:54   A-L-D-E-N-T-E, I will put it in the show notes.

00:20:58   David Schaub has some input or correction really.

00:21:03   We were talking last episode or the episode before

00:21:06   about the glue that becomes not so sticky

00:21:10   when you apply a voltage to it.

00:21:12   And remind me what exactly we said would happen

00:21:15   if you reverse polarity.

00:21:16   - Yeah, I was trying to remember what happened

00:21:18   if you reverse the polarity and I misinterpreted the,

00:21:20   or misremembered the iFixit video that was explaining this.

00:21:24   So David wrote in with the correction.

00:21:25   - So David writes, "When making the positive

00:21:27   and negative electrical connections

00:21:28   to release an iPhone 16 battery,

00:21:29   the polarity determines which side the glue residue

00:21:32   is left on when it unsticks.

00:21:33   If you mistakenly reverse the positive

00:21:36   and negative connections, the residue is left on the chassis

00:21:39   which is hard to clean instead of the battery

00:21:41   which is where you want it."

00:21:42   - Yeah, so it's like the sticky gunk.

00:21:44   Apparently there is sticky gunk

00:21:45   and you get to choose where it's left

00:21:46   and you don't want it to be in the phone.

00:21:47   So that's why you have to be careful about the polarity

00:21:49   but it will not like re-stick.

00:21:51   - Indeed.

00:21:52   And then Eric Westland writes in to corroborate your story

00:21:55   with regard to Verizon activation problems.

00:21:58   Eric writes, "I bought my iPhone unlocked from Apple."

00:22:00   As did I.

00:22:01   "I had the exact same experience as John.

00:22:03   My last phone was three years ago

00:22:04   and I had the same problem then too.

00:22:05   Verizon just stinks at this."

00:22:07   I will interject as me now.

00:22:08   Hi, this is Casey.

00:22:09   - Wow, keep cut.

00:22:12   - I'll say that for me, I think we talked last week

00:22:16   about how it did not, my phone did not activate initially.

00:22:21   And then if memory serves, it was like once I got

00:22:23   to the standard Springboard iOS screen,

00:22:26   I think it was at that point, it was like,

00:22:27   "Hey, you're not activated.

00:22:28   You want to do it again?"

00:22:29   I said, "Yeah."

00:22:31   And then it worked no problem the second time.

00:22:33   For Aaron's phone, I did the exact same stuff

00:22:36   that I did on my phone and it worked no sweat.

00:22:38   Now hers was Tuesday or Wednesday after release,

00:22:42   I think it was, whereas I was doing it the Sunday,

00:22:44   the weekend of release.

00:22:46   So I would imagine things were still a bit busy

00:22:48   on both the carrier and Apple sides of things.

00:22:50   So maybe it was just that it was,

00:22:52   things were overwhelmed when John was trying to do it

00:22:54   and Eric apparently, but who knows?

00:22:55   - Yeah, I'm sure that's what it was.

00:22:56   Like I always, I'm doing it like the phones are arriving

00:22:58   at people's doorsteps that day, right?

00:23:00   And so it's the worst possible time to do it.

00:23:01   But yeah, Verizon is apparently very bad at this.

00:23:03   And by the way, I think Eric said

00:23:05   he did it in two different states.

00:23:06   I think one, like Massachusetts and Iowa

00:23:08   had the same problem.

00:23:09   So yeah, the moral of the story is,

00:23:11   even if you get an unlock phone from Verizon,

00:23:13   if you get it on day one and you try to do activation,

00:23:15   good luck.

00:23:16   - We are brought to you this episode by QA Wolf.

00:23:20   If slow QA processes bottleneck you

00:23:23   or your software engineering team

00:23:24   and you're releasing slower because of it,

00:23:26   you need to check out QA Wolf at qawolf.com/atp.

00:23:31   QA Wolf gets engineering teams to 80%

00:23:34   automated end-to-end test coverage

00:23:36   and helps them ship five times faster

00:23:38   by reducing QA cycles from hours to minutes.

00:23:42   With over 100 five-star reviews on G2

00:23:44   and customer testimonials from Salesloft,

00:23:46   Drada, Autotrader and many more,

00:23:49   you're in good hands with QA Wolf.

00:23:50   Check it out today at qawolf.com/atp

00:23:55   to see if QA Wolf can help you squash your QA bottleneck.

00:23:59   Thank you so much to QA Wolf for sponsoring our show.

00:24:02   - John, I believe this is your case review

00:24:08   that we would like to talk about next.

00:24:09   - And Marco's got the same case.

00:24:10   We can both talk about it.

00:24:11   But yeah, I got the leather bull strap case

00:24:13   with the open bottom on it.

00:24:15   We'll put a link in the show notes.

00:24:16   This is the one that has a hole for the camera control

00:24:19   as do nearly all, but not all third-party cases.

00:24:23   Previously, I was using the Beats case,

00:24:24   which I talked about on the earlier show.

00:24:26   And so here's my review of the bull strap case.

00:24:29   Leather is nicer than the material

00:24:32   for as far as I'm concerned than the Beats case.

00:24:36   I do think this one, the corners had some wrinkles on them.

00:24:38   That's a little bit unpleasing,

00:24:40   but you know, it's a artisanal product.

00:24:42   Everyone is a little bit different.

00:24:44   Everything about it is the same as my iPhone 14 Pro case,

00:24:46   obviously, except for the camera control cutout.

00:24:49   Marco talked about the peak design camera control cutout,

00:24:52   which had sort of like a sloping on all sides

00:24:54   to get down to the camera control,

00:24:55   and that was not pleasing to him.

00:24:57   Bull strap has decided to try to avoid that problem,

00:25:00   which I think is smart of them,

00:25:02   by not making it so there's like sloping things on all sides

00:25:05   so you have to kind of shove your fleshy finger

00:25:07   into this little valley to get to the thing.

00:25:09   They decided one of the sides is not going to exist.

00:25:13   So if you look at the phone from the front,

00:25:14   it's just a regular, you know,

00:25:16   you see the case going all the way around.

00:25:17   But if you look at the phone from the back,

00:25:18   you see part of the sidewall of the case

00:25:20   has been notched out, right?

00:25:22   So it's not symmetrical.

00:25:23   It is not a symmetrical hole in the side of your case.

00:25:26   There is a wall on the screen side,

00:25:28   then there's the hole for the camera button,

00:25:29   and there's no wall on the other side.

00:25:31   Like basically the bottom of the case

00:25:32   just comes to an end and that's it.

00:25:34   And it's not really,

00:25:36   it doesn't really center the camera control either.

00:25:39   So it's interesting.

00:25:40   There is, it feels flimsier on that side.

00:25:43   It feels like there's a gigantic notch

00:25:45   taken out of the side of the phone,

00:25:46   because there is a gigantic notch

00:25:47   taken out of the side of the phone.

00:25:48   The sort of little stick or pole or whatever

00:25:52   that is the front of the sidewall over the camera control

00:25:57   seems delicate and fidgety and creaky.

00:26:01   And I just generally hate this.

00:26:03   I don't like the hole in the side of the case at all.

00:26:07   I can get to the camera control, I can press it,

00:26:10   but it is annoying to do so.

00:26:12   And now, well, so I'm going to leave this on the phone,

00:26:16   because I'm like, I don't know if I can handle this.

00:26:17   Maybe I'm gonna go back to the Beats case.

00:26:18   But after having it for like a week or so,

00:26:20   I've decided the advantages of the leather,

00:26:23   the grippiness of the leather,

00:26:25   outweigh the terribleness of this hole

00:26:28   in the side of the thing.

00:26:29   So I'm going to keep this on until or unless it breaks.

00:26:32   But as of right now, what I am looking for

00:26:35   is basically this case, a leather case with an open bottom,

00:26:39   but with the pass-through camera control.

00:26:42   And third parties, I think there's like two or three

00:26:45   or maybe four third-party case manufacturers

00:26:48   that do have pass-through.

00:26:49   One of them I saw doesn't even use the quartz thing.

00:26:52   It uses a piece of plastic

00:26:53   with a bunch of little copper wires going through it

00:26:55   to do the conductance thing.

00:26:58   Look, whatever you gotta do with third-party cases.

00:27:01   But I'm out here saying, "Bullstrap, Ryan London,"

00:27:04   and then the five other manufacturers

00:27:05   who apparently sell this exact same case

00:27:07   for differing prices.

00:27:09   I know you had to do the thing with the hole on day one.

00:27:11   You couldn't, maybe you couldn't figure it,

00:27:12   like everyone else had to do too.

00:27:13   I get it.

00:27:14   I bought your case at great expense.

00:27:15   I'm using it on my phone.

00:27:16   But please, somebody, somebody out there,

00:27:19   make a leather open bottom case

00:27:23   with a quartz pass-through for the camera control.

00:27:25   That's what I want.

00:27:26   And until then, I'm just gonna have a gigantic wound

00:27:28   in the side of my phone that I feel every day

00:27:31   and it makes it slightly less satisfying.

00:27:33   Marco, what do you think of the Bullstrap case?

00:27:35   - After however many weeks it's been,

00:27:38   one, two, of using the Apple silicone case,

00:27:41   I actually also switched to my Bullstrap case

00:27:44   a couple of days ago

00:27:46   because the silicone case,

00:27:47   it's just too hard getting in and out of jeans pockets.

00:27:51   It pulls the whole pocket liner out with it, you know?

00:27:54   So I wanted to try this.

00:27:56   And yeah, the leather does feel a lot better.

00:27:58   Bullstrap's leather is very, very good.

00:28:01   But yeah, I too hate the camera cutout.

00:28:05   It doesn't feel good, it doesn't work well.

00:28:08   It certainly doesn't look good.

00:28:10   And I too worry about the longevity

00:28:12   of that little thin piece of leather

00:28:14   that comes down across the front edge of it.

00:28:17   This, look, this is all,

00:28:20   no one's gonna have this design next year.

00:28:22   By the time everyone makes their cases

00:28:24   for next year's phones,

00:28:26   no one will be using this design on a good case.

00:28:28   And there's a reason for that.

00:28:28   It's not a good design.

00:28:30   They did what they had to do with day one unknowns.

00:28:32   But yeah, like Jon, I'm hoping for a better version

00:28:37   of this case in the future that has a button cover

00:28:39   for the camera control that works.

00:28:41   - Do you agree that their decision

00:28:43   to omit one of the side walls surrounding the camera control

00:28:47   makes it more comfortable to you

00:28:48   than the Peak Design version of the hole?

00:28:50   - I think it's only more comfortable

00:28:52   because leather is softer than hard plastic.

00:28:55   'Cause here, I'll pull, I got the Peak Design one right here.

00:28:58   Like the Peak Design one,

00:28:59   it actually has about the same indentation shape.

00:29:03   Like it is just as thin on that little skinny piece

00:29:07   in front of the camera control button.

00:29:08   - But look at the other side of the camera control.

00:29:10   There's no wall there.

00:29:11   - You mean like the back of the phone?

00:29:12   - Yeah, yeah, there's not equal size walls

00:29:15   on the front and the back of the phone

00:29:18   in terms of surrounding the camera control.

00:29:19   Do you see what I mean?

00:29:20   - I see what you mean.

00:29:21   It's pretty subtle.

00:29:22   The Peak Design one is symmetric.

00:29:23   But that's a pretty subtle difference.

00:29:25   I don't think that matters.

00:29:27   I think what I didn't like about the Peak Design

00:29:29   is merely that their plastic is harder than leather.

00:29:33   And neither one of these feels good.

00:29:35   But I'm tolerating the bull strap case

00:29:38   because it is the smallest number of bad trade-offs

00:29:43   that I have found yet.

00:29:43   I also have the Apple Clear case.

00:29:46   I thought that would solve my problems.

00:29:48   And it does not.

00:29:50   The Apple Clear case, I found to have very bad buttons.

00:29:54   Like the ones, especially the sleep/wake button,

00:29:56   it's much harder to push than the other cases I have.

00:29:59   And it doesn't have good feedback.

00:30:02   So I think it's just like a lower quality

00:30:04   or maybe it's a materials thing.

00:30:06   So far, the Apple silicone case works the best

00:30:09   and feels the best in use.

00:30:12   It just sucks at going in and out of pockets.

00:30:14   Which is the problem they've always had.

00:30:15   Whereas the bare bottom bull strap case

00:30:20   is the nicest leather case that I have found so far.

00:30:23   But with the exception of that giant thing

00:30:25   that Jon completed about the giant camera cut out.

00:30:27   - By the way, if Apple made an open bottom silicone case,

00:30:29   I would probably be using it instead of the leather one.

00:30:31   Because I don't have so many problems

00:30:32   with getting in and out of pockets.

00:30:34   And I'm desperate to not have this giant hole

00:30:37   in the side of my phone.

00:30:38   It feels like a chicken pox scar.

00:30:40   - Yeah, I hope in a few months,

00:30:42   people have remade these cases with better designs.

00:30:46   - I'm so afraid they're gonna be like,

00:30:47   ah, we'll do that for the next phone.

00:30:49   This phone, tough luck, right?

00:30:50   I really hope that they come out with version two.

00:30:52   It's like, well, we couldn't have them in day one.

00:30:54   But now everyone knows how to do the quartz pads through.

00:30:56   So here's, I'll buy a second case bull strap.

00:30:58   Just put it out.

00:31:00   I don't want them to be like,

00:31:01   well, we can never figure it out for the 16 line.

00:31:03   But for the 17, we'll have the quartz pads through.

00:31:05   That doesn't help me 'cause I'm not cutting a 17.

00:31:07   - Yeah, I hope they do.

00:31:08   I hope they do.

00:31:09   - You say that, and I agree with you in principle.

00:31:11   But last year when I was casting about for a case

00:31:14   for my 15 Pro Max,

00:31:17   I had gotten a peel case, which I loved.

00:31:20   But it had a cutout for the action button,

00:31:23   which at the time most cases were doing.

00:31:25   And I hated that.

00:31:27   And I'm currently going caseless, caseless

00:31:30   on the iPhone 16 that I have.

00:31:32   And I'll probably continue to do that.

00:31:34   But I was looking and I was wondering,

00:31:35   hey, I wonder if since last year did Peak end up doing,

00:31:40   I think it's, no, Peel.

00:31:41   I'm sorry, Peel.

00:31:42   Did Peel end up doing an action button

00:31:45   and how have they handled the camera control?

00:31:48   And the answer is they did not do an action button

00:31:50   and they just have a hole for the camera control

00:31:52   as they do for all of the buttons.

00:31:54   And it's too bad because like the way I remember it,

00:31:57   this was a year ago now,

00:31:58   but the way I remember it, the case felt great.

00:32:00   It was thin because I don't want,

00:32:02   I'm not an OtterBox kind of person.

00:32:04   Like I want something thin, but more than zero

00:32:06   if I'm gonna do a case at all.

00:32:08   And the key to the Peel,

00:32:10   and they say it as a piece of marketing as they should,

00:32:14   say it with me, gentlemen, no branding, no branding.

00:32:17   And I loved that.

00:32:19   And what I ended up doing was returning that case

00:32:21   because I hated the lack of like a fake button,

00:32:24   if you will, for the action button.

00:32:26   And I got a Toras, T-O-R-R-A-S,

00:32:28   which also doesn't have any outward facing branding,

00:32:32   but the case was fine.

00:32:35   Like I didn't like it near as much as I liked the Peel,

00:32:38   but I could not abide by the gaps for the buttons.

00:32:43   And I was hoping so much that by the 16,

00:32:46   they would at least have an action button,

00:32:47   even if they punted on the camera control.

00:32:49   And from everything that I can tell,

00:32:50   nope, it's just a bunch of holes.

00:32:53   Just like your Mac Pro.

00:32:54   - I really hope they update these cases.

00:32:57   If not, I don't know what I'm gonna do.

00:32:58   It was like, if that little delicate thing does break,

00:33:00   what am I gonna go back to the Beats case,

00:33:02   buy a second one of these at great expense?

00:33:04   Although honestly, because all I get on Instagram now

00:33:06   are ads for phone cases, as you can imagine,

00:33:09   I'm really seeing how many different people

00:33:13   resell this exact same Ryan London bull strap,

00:33:16   like I forgot what the other brand I started recently.

00:33:18   It's like at least three or four,

00:33:20   maybe even five different brands

00:33:21   that are clearly selling the same case

00:33:23   that some manufacturer makes in China somewhere, right?

00:33:25   And so we say, oh, bull straps, leather is good.

00:33:27   It's not bull straps, leather.

00:33:28   What they do is stamp the little bull thing on it

00:33:30   and put it in a pretty box and sell it to us

00:33:32   for way more money than everyone else does,

00:33:33   which is fine, like, whatever, I'll take it.

00:33:36   They were the first ones that shipped,

00:33:37   so that's why they got my money.

00:33:38   But please, somebody out there,

00:33:41   open bottom, I'm asking for a lot.

00:33:42   Nobody cares about open bottom but me, right?

00:33:45   Open bottom, leather, quartz, camera control.

00:33:48   Otherwise, I'm gonna be using this weird

00:33:50   scarred case for two years.

00:33:52   (laughing)

00:33:54   - It's sad times.

00:33:55   Part of me wonders if we should try to design a case

00:33:59   that makes all of us happy,

00:34:00   and then I immediately decide

00:34:02   that that's a terrible, terrible, terrible decision.

00:34:04   - Can you imagine trying to design a case

00:34:06   that would please John?

00:34:08   - No.

00:34:08   - It wouldn't actually be that hard,

00:34:09   but the problem is most we'd ever be able to sell,

00:34:14   assuming we sold this as a product to our listeners,

00:34:16   is like a few hundred cases at best, right?

00:34:19   And no one's gonna manufacture you anything

00:34:21   with those kind of small numbers.

00:34:22   That's probably why these companies

00:34:23   are not gonna make a new case

00:34:25   'cause they have to pre-order like millions,

00:34:27   not millions, but like thousands and thousands of them

00:34:29   to get whatever good price they get on them,

00:34:31   and they can't afford to say, you know,

00:34:34   let's design a whole new case

00:34:36   and buy a few thousand of those.

00:34:37   They have to sell through all these ones

00:34:38   that they made and paid for,

00:34:39   and then by then, it's time for a new phone.

00:34:41   - I mean, hey, we did it for the chicken hat.

00:34:43   Can be done.

00:34:44   - Yeah, I think the chicken hat

00:34:45   is a little bit easier to manufacture

00:34:46   than something that has to be precisely

00:34:48   fit around an iPhone.

00:34:49   - Yeah, and first of all,

00:34:50   imagine if we had to make the chicken hat,

00:34:52   but we didn't know where people's ears would be

00:34:54   or how big their heads would be

00:34:56   until after they were all made.

00:34:58   And by the way, we did know where people's ears are,

00:35:00   we did know how big people's heads are,

00:35:02   and we still had a lot of fit complaints

00:35:05   about the chicken hat, let's be honest.

00:35:07   - Well, the chicken hat was,

00:35:08   well, the good thing about the chicken hat was,

00:35:10   first of all, the manufacturer that was making it for us

00:35:11   was in the US and had a short turnaround time.

00:35:14   And second of all, we had a prototype,

00:35:16   which is my actual chicken hat,

00:35:18   and the chicken hats we sold,

00:35:19   if you lay them down on top of my actual chicken hat,

00:35:22   they pretty much nailed it.

00:35:23   I've bought several of these hats that we sold,

00:35:25   and I have the original,

00:35:27   and I can just lay them on top of each other.

00:35:28   They're constructed the same way,

00:35:30   they're the same size,

00:35:31   like pretty much down to the millimeter.

00:35:33   Now, again, they ended up being too small

00:35:35   for a lot of people's heads,

00:35:36   because my chicken hat is too small

00:35:37   for a lot of people's heads,

00:35:38   but what you got with the chicken hat

00:35:41   was exactly what we were selling,

00:35:42   which is as close a clone as possible

00:35:44   as we could get to my chicken hat.

00:35:45   And so, I think we did a pretty good job with that,

00:35:48   but yeah, trying to do something like that

00:35:51   with a complicated product like this manufactured,

00:35:53   not in the U.S., with six months turnaround time,

00:35:56   not gonna happen.

00:35:57   But somebody out there, somebody, somebody, please,

00:36:00   find this manufacturer in China

00:36:02   that's making these cases for all these,

00:36:03   and if they sell one with a quartz pass-through on it,

00:36:07   somebody buy 10,000 of those and start selling them,

00:36:09   I will buy one, and then step three, profit?

00:36:12   I don't know.

00:36:13   - Only 9,999 left.

00:36:15   This is the complaint about the Apple Store corner.

00:36:19   Eli Liebman writes, I was planning to upgrade

00:36:22   to the Series 10 watch, but wasn't sure which size to get

00:36:24   and wanted to see them in person before purchasing.

00:36:27   After confirming online that both sizes were available

00:36:29   for pickup at my local store,

00:36:30   I made my way there to choose and purchase my new watch.

00:36:33   I found an employee and asked to purchase the watch.

00:36:35   The conversation went like this.

00:36:37   Marco, actually, would you mind playing the role of Apple

00:36:39   in this little skit for me, please?

00:36:42   - Sure, hold on, let me, wait, should I play it cool?

00:36:45   - Here we go, I'd like to buy this watch, please.

00:36:48   - Do you have an appointment?

00:36:49   - No, I didn't know which one I wanted,

00:36:52   and I wanted to see them before I purchased it.

00:36:55   - All of our new products require an online order

00:36:58   and an appointment to pick it up.

00:37:00   - Huh, I didn't know that, is the watch in stock?

00:37:04   - Yes.

00:37:05   - Jesus, so can I buy it?

00:37:08   - No, first you need to make an appointment.

00:37:11   - Okay, when's the next appointment?

00:37:13   - In two and a half hours.

00:37:15   - So even though the item's in stock,

00:37:18   and I'm standing right here,

00:37:20   I need to come back in two and a half hours

00:37:22   in order to purchase it.

00:37:23   - Exactly.

00:37:24   - Thank you, Marco, very well done.

00:37:26   Yeah, so Eli writes, so I left and ordered the watch

00:37:28   on Amazon where it was delivered to me later that same day.

00:37:31   (laughing)

00:37:32   It's just terrible.

00:37:34   Anyway, Eli continues, I can't think of another store

00:37:36   where this would be acceptable.

00:37:37   If they were busy, sure, I wouldn't expect to be helped

00:37:39   before folks who made an appointment,

00:37:41   but the store was empty.

00:37:42   Why is it acceptable to tell a customer

00:37:44   to come back in a few hours to purchase an item

00:37:45   that is in stock?

00:37:47   It seems like they don't value their customer's time.

00:37:49   I have things to do.

00:37:50   I already took time away from work to come to the store.

00:37:52   I've been buying Apple products for almost 20 years,

00:37:54   and this is the first time I've had a negative

00:37:55   in-store experience when trying to purchase something.

00:37:58   What used to be magical, watching the employee

00:38:00   pull out a receipt from under the table was delightful,

00:38:03   is now simply inconvenient.

00:38:04   I truly believed Apple solved the retail experience,

00:38:07   but not anymore.

00:38:08   - Yeah, this is the danger when saying like,

00:38:09   we're re-imagining the experience of retail.

00:38:11   You always picture in your head

00:38:13   that what you're gonna be doing is not accepting

00:38:16   sort of the status quo for all the bad things,

00:38:18   and saying people just accept X, Y, and Z

00:38:20   are just the way stores have to be.

00:38:22   Well, we don't think that way.

00:38:23   Everything's on the table.

00:38:24   We're re-imagining the whole experience,

00:38:26   but if you're not careful,

00:38:27   and you just stick to that philosophy,

00:38:29   and you're like, we're re-imagining the experience,

00:38:31   what you can end up doing

00:38:32   is removing some of the good things,

00:38:34   and re-imagining them to be way, way worse,

00:38:36   and one of the good things is if you walk into a store,

00:38:40   and they have a product in stock,

00:38:41   you can give someone money for it,

00:38:43   and then walk out of the store.

00:38:45   Like, you can buy it.

00:38:46   Like, do you have this product?

00:38:47   Is it in stock?

00:38:48   I'm here, and you're here, and the product is here.

00:38:51   My money is here.

00:38:52   Let's make this happen in an empty store,

00:38:55   and when they say to you,

00:38:56   no, please make an appointment on the app,

00:38:59   and the first appointment is two hours from now,

00:39:01   that is re-imagining the retail experience,

00:39:03   so you are following your philosophy

00:39:04   of re-imagining the retail experience,

00:39:06   but for the worse,

00:39:07   that you get into just ridiculous territory.

00:39:10   Like, I would, you know, we've complained that even

00:39:11   the whole, like, oh, there are no lines

00:39:13   is an example of re-imagining that maybe isn't positive,

00:39:15   but this is definitely not positive.

00:39:17   Like, you should be able to go in there and buy something.

00:39:19   It's like, I have money.

00:39:20   You have product.

00:39:21   Let's make this happen, but they're like,

00:39:23   no, make an appointment.

00:39:24   Come back in two hours.

00:39:25   That's no good.

00:39:26   - It's so bad, and I know that some of this

00:39:29   is just the east coaster in me coming out.

00:39:30   I want a line.

00:39:31   I want a queue.

00:39:32   I want a order.

00:39:33   I want everything to be ordered.

00:39:35   I want to get in, get out as quickly as possible,

00:39:37   but that being said, ugh, it's just,

00:39:40   it's unnecessarily complicated,

00:39:41   and this is the sort of thing that we would just eviscerate

00:39:44   a Microsoft store for, and here it is, Apple doing it.

00:39:47   - I mean, if there was ever too many people

00:39:49   in a Microsoft store that would require

00:39:50   such a system like this.

00:39:51   - Well, that's true.

00:39:52   - Yeah, like, it's just, as I pointed out,

00:39:54   it doesn't value the customer's time.

00:39:56   They drove to the store, came to the place,

00:39:58   brought their money and their wallet,

00:39:59   and they want to, like, look at it and buy a thing,

00:40:01   and you're like, no, make an appointment

00:40:04   for two hours from now?

00:40:05   That doesn't value the time of the person

00:40:07   who made the trip to it, especially if the Apple store

00:40:09   is, like, far away from them.

00:40:10   It's just not acceptable.

00:40:11   - We are sponsored this episode by Squarespace,

00:40:15   the all-in-one website platform for entrepreneurs

00:40:18   to stand out and succeed online.

00:40:20   Whether you're just starting out or managing

00:40:21   a growing brand, Squarespace makes it easy

00:40:23   to create a beautiful website, engage with your audience,

00:40:26   and sell anything from products to content to your time,

00:40:29   all in one place and all on your terms.

00:40:32   Squarespace is the best place to build websites,

00:40:35   and they have so many great features

00:40:37   they're adding all the time.

00:40:38   They actually recently introduced

00:40:40   Design Intelligence from Squarespace.

00:40:42   This combines two decades of industry-leading

00:40:44   design expertise with cutting-edge AI tech

00:40:46   to unlock your strongest creative potential.

00:40:49   Design Intelligence empowers anyone

00:40:51   to build a beautiful, more personalized website

00:40:53   tailored to their unique needs,

00:40:55   and craft a bespoke digital identity

00:40:58   to use across one's entire online presence.

00:41:01   And of course, Squarespace really specializes recently

00:41:03   in all these amazing commerce features,

00:41:05   and Squarespace Payments is the easiest way

00:41:08   to manage your payments in one place.

00:41:10   Onboarding is fast and simple.

00:41:12   You get started in just a few clicks,

00:41:13   and you can start receiving payments right away.

00:41:16   And this gives your customers more ways to pay than ever,

00:41:18   with popular methods like Klarna, ACH Direct Debit,

00:41:21   Apple Pay, Afterpay, Clearpay,

00:41:24   and so many more they're adding all the time.

00:41:26   And you don't have to be a nerd to use Squarespace.

00:41:28   You don't even have to ask nerds.

00:41:30   If you are a nerd, you can set people up with this,

00:41:32   and they don't have to ask you.

00:41:33   It's wonderful.

00:41:34   It really empowers people to build their own site

00:41:36   for their own business their way,

00:41:38   without having some computer gatekeeper in their way.

00:41:40   So go to squarespace.com to try it out for a free trial.

00:41:45   When you're ready to launch, squarespace.com/atp,

00:41:48   and you'll save 10% off your first purchase

00:41:50   of a website or domain.

00:41:51   So once again, squarespace.com, start that free trial.

00:41:54   When you're ready to launch, squarespace.com/atp

00:41:57   for 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain.

00:42:00   I strongly recommend Squarespace

00:42:02   for all your website needs.

00:42:03   Check it out today.

00:42:03   Once again, squarespace.com.

00:42:05   Thank you so much to Squarespace for sponsoring our show.

00:42:08   (jazzy music)

00:42:11   I have a small request for two apps that I can't find.

00:42:17   - So build 'em, man.

00:42:19   Come on.

00:42:20   - It's tempting, honestly.

00:42:22   But I have a bit on my plate right now

00:42:23   with the app I do have.

00:42:25   So I don't have time to make these right now.

00:42:28   I assume someone has made them, but I cannot find them.

00:42:31   So number one, I recently started sleep tracking.

00:42:34   I'm just wearing the Apple Watch to bed.

00:42:36   I even discovered the sleep focus mode,

00:42:38   which I'm finally using,

00:42:39   because it makes the screen turn off at night.

00:42:41   I tried, the funny thing is,

00:42:42   before, like I hadn't been using the sleep focus mode

00:42:45   for whatever reason.

00:42:46   I just use auto do not disturb at night.

00:42:48   And I was trying to figure out

00:42:50   how do I make the watch screen turn off while I'm sleeping,

00:42:53   'cause it was bothering my wife, and so I'm like all right.

00:42:56   - Theater mode.

00:42:57   - That's what I tried, theater mode.

00:42:59   Guess what theater mode turns off?

00:43:01   Alarms.

00:43:02   - Does it?

00:43:03   - Yep, sure does.

00:43:04   - Remember when the alarm went off

00:43:06   when the person was in the theater?

00:43:06   Do you remember that whole controversy?

00:43:08   - Oh, yes I do, yes, yes, yes.

00:43:10   - So one night of that, I'm like okay,

00:43:11   well that's not the answer.

00:43:13   - This is like the equivalent of the shoe bomber.

00:43:16   25 years later, theater mode still

00:43:18   doesn't let the alarms go off.

00:43:19   - Yeah, anyways, yeah, theater mode's not it.

00:43:21   But this turns out the sleep focus does that.

00:43:24   So all I want to do is I want an app

00:43:27   that every morning I can tag the sleep

00:43:31   I had the night before with arbitrary tags that I input.

00:43:35   Things like whether I stayed up too late

00:43:37   or maybe I had a late meal, or maybe I was sleeping alone

00:43:42   'cause I was at the beach by myself or something.

00:43:45   I want to have tags that I can tag my sleep.

00:43:48   Late coffee, alcohol consumption, things like that.

00:43:52   And then I want to be able to see in the future,

00:43:55   like I want to be able to pick a tag

00:43:56   and see like okay, with this tag,

00:43:59   your sleeps with this one are 12% better on average

00:44:02   than sleeps that don't have this tag, or 12% worse.

00:44:05   - Remember that app that Merlin always talks about

00:44:07   and makes fun of?

00:44:08   - Yeah, yeah.

00:44:09   - It's like when you were in Washington,

00:44:10   you sleep worse, like you weigh more, but sleep worse.

00:44:14   - So I have been looking for apps to do this.

00:44:18   And I have, so thanks to some Chad GPT research,

00:44:23   I installed the top couple of sleep apps.

00:44:26   They have been like super disasters of just gross,

00:44:31   like massive privacy invasion, huge suites of functionality

00:44:35   doing all sorts of stuff I don't need.

00:44:37   There was one app, this is one of the top rated sleep apps

00:44:41   in the App Store that first of all puts you through

00:44:45   a in-app purchase flow immediately

00:44:48   and with no way to get around it.

00:44:50   So I'm pretty sure that actually violates the App Store rule

00:44:53   against minimum functionality.

00:44:55   But the App Store rules are not being enforced here

00:44:57   in lots of ways.

00:44:58   And this is like one, there's like a handful of top

00:45:01   sleep apps in the App Store and this is one of them.

00:45:04   One of them offered me to pay $40 a year

00:45:08   for premium features including I can listen to recordings

00:45:12   of my own farts from my sleep the next morning.

00:45:15   - Nice. - Oh cool.

00:45:16   - And I learned when I saw that for $40 a year,

00:45:19   not only have we really hit App Store bottom here,

00:45:23   but that's when I decided I think I should probably

00:45:24   raise the overcast subscription price,

00:45:27   which is currently a quarter of that.

00:45:29   - How many farts does overcast let you hear?

00:45:31   - None, well it depends, I mean what do people generate?

00:45:33   - Say you know you gotta up your fart game

00:45:35   if you're gonna compete in those leagues.

00:45:37   - Obviously, yeah, maybe I'm just tackling

00:45:39   the wrong feature set apparently.

00:45:40   - We started out with fart apps on the App Store

00:45:42   and we've come full circle, now you have to supply the farts.

00:45:44   - Exactly, real time follow up by the way,

00:45:47   apparently exist.io is the app that Merlin always

00:45:49   talks about, yes I remember that now, so thank you

00:45:51   to people in chat who said that.

00:45:52   But yeah, so anyways, I just want a simple app to do it,

00:45:54   and these apps, they wanna give you a meditation routine

00:45:59   and be custom alarms and tie into,

00:46:02   lay your phone on the pillow and subscribe to our service

00:46:06   so we can life coach your partner, and it's like

00:46:08   oh my god, let me just tag my sleep and see data,

00:46:11   that's it, that's all I want.

00:46:12   So far I have not found anything to do with it.

00:46:14   - Doesn't Underscore have a sleep app?

00:46:16   - Yeah, sleep plus plus.

00:46:17   - Yes, I don't believe it has that feature though.

00:46:19   - Well I think you have a direct line

00:46:20   to getting that feature added.

00:46:21   - Yeah, that's probably easier than making it myself.

00:46:24   Anyway, so that's one thing I want.

00:46:26   The second thing I want, I finally set up

00:46:28   the rest of my Sonos system, I finally moved

00:46:30   my Sonos speakers out of my office, downstairs

00:46:33   to where they were originally purchased for,

00:46:35   the living room TV, so I have the ARC sound bar,

00:46:37   two ERA 300s as the surrounds, and a sub.

00:46:40   - Good god.

00:46:42   - It is a very nice system, however, the one challenge

00:46:47   with setting up a Sonos sound bar stuff is audio delay.

00:46:52   There, you know, any Sonos input introduces latency,

00:46:56   because of the way their system, you know,

00:46:58   buffers and processes things and has network Wi-Fi stuff,

00:47:00   there's always latency on the input, on the audio.

00:47:03   And TVs have ways to adjust the audio sync.

00:47:06   The Apple TV also has a built-in way,

00:47:09   something like calibrate wireless audio sync,

00:47:11   where if you're using home pods or anything else,

00:47:13   it'll, it's like, alright, place your phone

00:47:15   in front of the Apple TV and we'll figure out

00:47:16   your audio sync for you, which seems to change things,

00:47:21   but not correctly.

00:47:23   Anyway, so, you know, I'm trying to like watch TV

00:47:25   and everyone's lips aren't matching up to their audio,

00:47:26   which is infuriating, and so I'm trying to align it.

00:47:28   My TV also has a built-in control, but it's, you know,

00:47:31   like negative five through positive three or something,

00:47:34   it's, you know, these units make no sense.

00:47:36   And so I'm like, alright, well what is it?

00:47:38   And I've been adjusting it, trying to figure out what it is.

00:47:41   Eventually, I looked at my, there has to be an app

00:47:44   to like automatically like use my phone and the TV

00:47:47   to tell me like, alright, you're 50 milliseconds behind,

00:47:50   you're 30 milliseconds behind, like, you know,

00:47:51   show me an actual number, like play something on the TV,

00:47:55   use the phone to show me an actual number.

00:47:58   And there's even videos on YouTube that will,

00:48:00   that show you like, it like plays beep, beep,

00:48:04   every few seconds, beep, and it shows you like

00:48:05   a little bar going across when it hits the middle,

00:48:07   right when the beep happens, so you can tell

00:48:09   if you use your own phone to shoot video of the TV screen

00:48:14   and then slow-mo through the video to find

00:48:17   where does the beep happen if you can see the waveform.

00:48:20   So here's how I did this.

00:48:21   - Oh, by the way, this all sounds familiar to you listeners

00:48:23   because we talked about this in episode 297 of ATP

00:48:26   when I set up my AV setup, including the,

00:48:29   probably the exact video that Marco was looking at

00:48:31   and me recording on my phone in slow motion

00:48:33   and seeing the waveform in iMovie.

00:48:35   So we'll put a link in the show notes to that episode of ATP

00:48:38   and also to the two apps/videos that I used for that.

00:48:43   - I did the same thing but with Final Cut,

00:48:45   'cause I didn't have iMovie on my computer,

00:48:47   but I had Final Cut still, so my God,

00:48:48   and this is like such a ridiculous, like overuse of a tool.

00:48:53   Like Final Cut is not, this is not what this is for.

00:48:56   It fights you at every turn.

00:48:57   It should not be doing this, and yet, you know,

00:49:00   that's what I was able to see where the waveform

00:49:03   of the video is while looking at the other--

00:49:05   - And then you still have to make the choice,

00:49:06   like I said, in episode 297.

00:49:08   Then you still have to decide, all right,

00:49:10   so when the little bar is in the middle in the video,

00:49:13   should that be just as the waveform

00:49:15   goes from silent to not silent?

00:49:17   Should it be the peak of the waveform

00:49:19   where the volume, the amplitude is the highest?

00:49:21   You have to make all these judgment calls,

00:49:22   but I can tell you from experience

00:49:24   that no matter how you make the judgment calls,

00:49:26   as long as you do something reasonable,

00:49:27   you can get it so close to being perfect

00:49:29   that you won't notice it anymore.

00:49:31   - Yeah, but what I want,

00:49:32   like this process would be very easy.

00:49:34   So here's what this process should be.

00:49:37   The phone plays a video over AirPlay to the Apple TV,

00:49:42   or you just have a YouTube video

00:49:45   that you can point your app to and say,

00:49:46   play this video on the Apple TV,

00:49:49   and then the phone uses its camera and microphone

00:49:52   to watch for a big white flash on the video

00:49:56   and listen to the microphone and listen to the beep,

00:49:59   and you can see those impulses on the input video

00:50:03   and on the input audio,

00:50:04   and the app should be able to tell you.

00:50:06   Every time it sees flash beep,

00:50:08   every time it should be able to tell you,

00:50:09   you're 35 milliseconds behind.

00:50:11   It can tell you that, that's not hard to write.

00:50:13   I could write it, I just shouldn't write it.

00:50:15   - The tricky part of that is when you get down

00:50:17   to these kind of timings,

00:50:19   that the time between when a photon hits the camera

00:50:23   and the time when an app registered that that took place

00:50:26   is probably a handful of milliseconds,

00:50:28   and you have to account for that,

00:50:29   and it might vary from phone to phone,

00:50:31   so that's a little bit tricky.

00:50:32   - I'm guessing that's probably less than a frame

00:50:35   of time.

00:50:36   - Maybe.

00:50:37   I mean, but again, maybe it varies by device.

00:50:39   Like, it's not something that comes up normally,

00:50:41   like when you're recording video or something like that.

00:50:43   Like, oh, how much lag is there?

00:50:44   How much lag between, again,

00:50:46   photons hitting the lens of the camera

00:50:47   and a program that is watching for that

00:50:49   knowing that that happened?

00:50:50   But yeah, it would definitely be better

00:50:52   than doing it the manual way, which is very annoying.

00:50:55   And why Marco was using Final Cut

00:50:58   and why I was using iMovie

00:50:59   is because you need a visual representation of the audio.

00:51:02   You need to be able to see a waveform,

00:51:04   and I don't think there,

00:51:06   or at least there was no apps that I knew of on the phone

00:51:07   that did that that were not full-fledged video editors,

00:51:10   and honestly, I'd rather just do it on the Mac.

00:51:11   So I was recording videos, coming back to the Mac,

00:51:14   opening the video in iMovie,

00:51:17   watching the slow-motion thing, going frame by frame,

00:51:19   seeing where the waveform is,

00:51:21   and then adjusting the delay until I dialed it in.

00:51:26   And I did that in 2022 and haven't touched a sync,

00:51:28   and it's been great.

00:51:29   So I believe in you, Mark.

00:51:30   You can get over this hump.

00:51:31   (laughing)

00:51:32   Like, I have it set up that it seems okay now,

00:51:36   but it still doesn't seem quite right,

00:51:38   but I think it's so close,

00:51:40   and I have it between negative three

00:51:42   and negative four on my TV,

00:51:44   and if I put it on the next one over, it looks too wrong.

00:51:48   So I think this is about as good as it's gonna get,

00:51:50   but this process took me 40 minutes,

00:51:53   and it could have taken me four minutes.

00:51:55   - Yeah, and the tricky part for you is,

00:51:58   I don't know, maybe it's not tricky.

00:51:59   Maybe it'll be the same,

00:52:00   but what you hope is you get some scenario

00:52:02   where you're tweaking it, right?

00:52:04   And you get it, so you get it right there.

00:52:05   You're like, okay, it's right.

00:52:07   Is it right for all video sources and all output types

00:52:10   and all, for example, if you did it through AirPlay,

00:52:12   does that apply to things you play on Apple TV?

00:52:14   Does that apply to things you watch over regular TV?

00:52:16   If you have any other video source connected,

00:52:18   if you have a video game system connected,

00:52:20   you're hoping that you'll be able to configure this

00:52:23   in one place and it will apply to any picture

00:52:25   that ever shows on your TV,

00:52:26   but you have to be careful of where you're doing it.

00:52:28   For example, if you're doing it on the Apple TV,

00:52:30   it's not going to apply when you're playing a video game

00:52:32   'cause the Apple TV is not involved

00:52:33   if you're playing like Nintendo Switch or something.

00:52:35   It's not gonna be involved in that.

00:52:36   And so now you have a second place

00:52:37   where you have to dial it in.

00:52:39   And this is one of the places where it comes in handy

00:52:41   to have something like a receiver,

00:52:42   which is the central meeting point

00:52:44   for all the audio and the video.

00:52:45   And that's where I made my adjustment

00:52:47   and everything that goes on my TV screen

00:52:48   goes through my receiver

00:52:49   and my receiver applies the delay

00:52:51   and so far so good for me.

00:52:53   - Yes, but everything else about having a receiver sucks

00:52:54   and I will accept no other contrary arguments.

00:52:57   Anyway, I should note that in the Sonos app,

00:52:59   if you go to the gear in the upper right

00:53:01   and then go to your living room or whatever,

00:53:03   set up and then scroll, scroll, scroll, scroll, scroll,

00:53:06   way down in the home theater section,

00:53:09   there's TV dialog sync.

00:53:11   And I have mine cranked to five seconds

00:53:13   for my 2019 LG OLED.

00:53:16   - Five seconds?

00:53:18   - Or five units, sorry, sorry, sorry, five units.

00:53:20   I think I said seconds, five units.

00:53:23   It's zero to five, I believe.

00:53:25   Anyways, and that has worked for me across Switch,

00:53:29   across Wii, across TV.

00:53:31   - I'll have to look at that.

00:53:32   I assume that would,

00:53:33   'cause it's only like a positive offset.

00:53:36   - Correct.

00:53:36   - I assume that would change it in the wrong direction.

00:53:39   - I mean, give it a shot.

00:53:39   You may not have the good experience I did,

00:53:42   but it can't hurt to try.

00:53:43   - 'Cause what has to happen

00:53:44   is the TV has to hold the video back.

00:53:47   The TV has to buffer the video for a few milliseconds

00:53:50   while the audio catches up

00:53:52   because the audio is where Sonos is introducing latency.

00:53:54   - But yeah, but the TVs also have latency as well,

00:53:57   so it depends on which, adding more latency

00:53:59   and you gotta kind of match them up.

00:54:00   But the audio advice video,

00:54:02   it's a YouTube video that I use to do my adjustment,

00:54:04   has helpful labels on the plus and minus sign

00:54:07   where it says basically like,

00:54:08   it says audio early, increase the delay,

00:54:11   and then audio late, decrease the delay.

00:54:13   But bottom line is,

00:54:14   once you have something that you can measure on,

00:54:16   you just push the delay to the maximum and minimum value

00:54:19   and see which side of the zero it's at,

00:54:21   and then you know which direction you need to adjust it

00:54:23   to get it in.

00:54:24   Mine, I think, was on,

00:54:25   I can't even see it in this picture, it's too blurry.

00:54:27   Mine was like 120, is that milliseconds?

00:54:31   Maybe it's milliseconds, maybe it's microseconds.

00:54:33   - No, it's milliseconds.

00:54:34   - Anyway, 120 milliseconds is what mine is set to

00:54:37   in this image from the show notes from episode 297.

00:54:41   - You said 297, it's actually 497, isn't it?

00:54:44   - 297, oh yeah, 497, sorry, typo, yes.

00:54:47   497, August 25th, 2022.

00:54:50   - There you go.

00:54:51   All right, we have some breaking-ish news

00:54:54   from a few days ago.

00:54:56   If you remember our friends at Massimo

00:54:59   that do the blood oxygen detection thing

00:55:02   and have a patent for it,

00:55:03   and oh boy, we've patented it,

00:55:05   and so they have been in a bitter fight with Apple

00:55:10   to the point that it went to the courts.

00:55:12   The court said that Apple cannot enable

00:55:15   the blood oxygen detection in new Apple watches,

00:55:19   including the one on my wrist right now,

00:55:21   and they've been battling it out for a while now.

00:55:23   Personally, I don't understand why Apple

00:55:25   doesn't just pay them all the money and make them go away.

00:55:28   Not to say that they're wrong, but just make them go away.

00:55:30   You have all the money in the world.

00:55:31   You have infinite money,

00:55:33   less the 15 billion you just gave to Ireland,

00:55:35   but you have infinite money, just make them go away.

00:55:37   It'll be fine, but here we are.

00:55:40   Anyways, the breaking news a few days ago,

00:55:42   actually a couple weeks ago now, or maybe a week ago,

00:55:44   is that the founder and CEO has resigned

00:55:47   after he was removed from the board.

00:55:49   So Reuters writes, "Massimo said that on September 25,

00:55:53   "founder Joe Chiani has decided to step down

00:55:56   "as the medical device maker CEO days after shareholders

00:55:59   "voted to remove him from the company's board

00:56:01   "following a bitter proxy battle

00:56:03   "with activist hedge fund Politan Capital Management."

00:56:07   - So the answer to your question of like,

00:56:09   I don't understand why Apple doesn't pay this,

00:56:11   one of the rumors is that it's because the CEO

00:56:13   was being unreasonable and would just not accept

00:56:15   any kind of reasonable offer.

00:56:17   And this hedge fund thing here,

00:56:19   like again, I don't know any truth to this,

00:56:20   but some of the things I've heard swirling

00:56:23   as people speculating was that like,

00:56:25   oh, this hedge fund is actually,

00:56:27   the hedge fund and the shareholders,

00:56:28   and basically everybody who's not the CEO were like,

00:56:31   Massimo, take the money.

00:56:33   You've got you won, you've got Apple over a barrel.

00:56:36   They have to pay you.

00:56:37   Maybe they're even offering to pay you.

00:56:39   We as the people who are either current shareholders

00:56:43   and board members of the company,

00:56:44   or speculative shareholders who want to invest

00:56:47   these hedge fund things wherever we, you know, whatever.

00:56:49   Like we think, if you let us be in charge of the company,

00:56:52   we could make you more money,

00:56:53   because we wouldn't be dummies like your CEO,

00:56:55   and we would just take the Apple money and make us all rich.

00:56:57   And so I don't know if any of that is,

00:57:00   if that's just speculation or rumors or whatever,

00:57:02   but it sure looks like from the outside

00:57:05   that there may have been one person,

00:57:06   and one person only, who was stopping this

00:57:09   from being resolved with large amounts of money,

00:57:11   and that was the founder and CEO, and he is out.

00:57:15   And there's more from Matt Levine in Bloomberg,

00:57:17   if you want to read about this.

00:57:19   We'll find out in the coming weeks and months if,

00:57:23   oh, suddenly there's a Massimo deal

00:57:24   between Apple and Massimo, and they get a lot of money.

00:57:27   We'll see if that happens.

00:57:28   It seems like, again, from the outside looking in,

00:57:30   it seems like finally the way is clear

00:57:33   for large amounts of money to change hands.

00:57:36   But if he gets kicked out, and still we go years and years,

00:57:39   and Apple still can't enable this feature in the US,

00:57:41   then I'm out of ideas.

00:57:43   - I mean, it sure seems like Apple

00:57:45   just didn't want to pay anything for it.

00:57:47   So I don't know that this was the problem here,

00:57:50   but we'll find out.

00:57:51   - There's also some news over the last week or so,

00:57:55   Meta, Meta, Meta, whatever you want to call them.

00:57:58   - Meta?

00:57:58   Are you saying Meta?

00:58:00   Does anyone pronounce it that way?

00:58:02   - Sorry, that rhymes.

00:58:03   - Oh my God. - Well, I do sometimes.

00:58:05   Anyways, that company that's Facebook but not,

00:58:10   they have released, or not released, I shouldn't say,

00:58:12   but have demoed some AR glasses

00:58:16   that they're calling Orion.

00:58:17   And apparently this stuff is really freaking slick.

00:58:21   There's a wrap up at The Verge for Meta Connect,

00:58:25   which is their kind of equivalent of WWDC.

00:58:28   There's also a post where one of their authors,

00:58:31   whose name I don't have in front of me, I am so sorry,

00:58:33   Alex Heath, actually got to demo the Orion glasses

00:58:38   in part with Mark Zuckerberg.

00:58:40   And there's also a post over, a couple of posts,

00:58:43   I think over at Stratechery with our friend Ben Thompson.

00:58:47   I will try to dig up a link for the show notes

00:58:49   for at least one of those.

00:58:50   But anyways, everything, I haven't read a lot on this,

00:58:53   but everything I've read on this is,

00:58:55   oh my, this is the future, the Vision Pro is a mistake.

00:58:58   When can we have this?

00:59:00   And the answer is, well, probably not soon.

00:59:02   So let me read some stuff.

00:59:03   So from The Verge, Meta, not Meta,

00:59:06   has revealed its Orion augmented reality glasses.

00:59:09   And they look almost like a trendy pair of frames

00:59:11   you could pick up without all the tech inside.

00:59:13   Orion uses micro LED projectors inside the frame

00:59:15   and beams images in front of your eyes

00:59:17   via wave guides in the lenses.

00:59:20   The glasses pair with a wireless compute puck

00:59:23   and a neural wristband you wear on your arm

00:59:26   that responds to gestures like pinches.

00:59:28   Again, this from the Orion review now.

00:59:32   Orion, Meta's first pair of augmented reality glasses,

00:59:35   was supposed to be a product you could buy.

00:59:37   When the glasses graduated from a Skunk Works project

00:59:39   in Meta's research division back in 2018,

00:59:41   the goal was to start shipping them

00:59:42   in the low tens of thousands by now.

00:59:44   But in 2022, amidst a phase of broader belt tightening

00:59:47   across the company, Zuckerberg made the call

00:59:49   to shelve its release.

00:59:50   As Meta's executives retell it,

00:59:52   the decision to shelve Orion mostly came down

00:59:54   to the device's astronomical cost to build,

00:59:56   which allegedly is in the ballpark of $10,000 per unit.

01:00:00   Most of that cost is due to how difficult and expensive

01:00:02   it is to reliably manufacture the silicon carbide lenses.

01:00:05   When it started designing Orion,

01:00:06   Meta expected the material to become more commonly used

01:00:08   across the industry and therefore cheaper,

01:00:10   but that didn't happen.

01:00:11   Quote, "You can't imagine how horrible the yields are,"

01:00:13   says Meta's CTO, Andrew Bosworth of Lenses.

01:00:16   Instead, the company pivoted to making about 1,000 pairs

01:00:19   of the Orion glasses for internal development

01:00:20   and external demos.

01:00:22   Quote, "It's probably turned out significantly better

01:00:24   than our 50/50 estimates of what it would be,

01:00:26   but we didn't get there on everything we wanted to."

01:00:28   Zuckerberg says to the device, quote,

01:00:30   "We still want it to be a little smaller, a little brighter,

01:00:33   a little bit higher resolution, and a lot more affordable

01:00:35   before we put it out there as a product.

01:00:36   And look, we have a line of sight to all those things."

01:00:40   - This has really shaken up the tech press world

01:00:42   over the last week because--

01:00:43   - And I don't understand why.

01:00:45   - Well-- - That's, I mean,

01:00:46   I'm sure people have had that take, but I said,

01:00:48   "I agree with you that this is like,

01:00:49   the tech press is all over this," and people were like,

01:00:51   "Oh my God, it's this, it's that," but like,

01:00:54   honestly, people, like, there is no new anything here

01:00:59   that changes anything as far as I'm concerned.

01:01:02   - Well, I don't know.

01:01:03   I mean, so what they've shown, this is,

01:01:05   first of all, this is very smart by Meta, I think,

01:01:07   because this goes along with, first of all,

01:01:10   with their overall, you know, pretty, pretty,

01:01:14   I would say successful rebranding efforts.

01:01:18   We are the last people calling them Facebook.

01:01:20   They've rebranded themselves as Meta.

01:01:21   They've dropped their terrible baggage

01:01:23   from the Facebook name to almost everybody.

01:01:26   Mark Zuckerberg is out there, like, rebranding himself

01:01:28   as this, like, cool, normal guy somehow.

01:01:31   - Good luck with that.

01:01:32   - It's working!

01:01:33   - You know, I don't know, man, it's working.

01:01:35   - No, I disagree.

01:01:36   - Rebrands work, like, that's why people do them,

01:01:39   because you can hold on as much as you can to the old one,

01:01:42   but the rest of the world moves on and listens to it.

01:01:45   Like, they work.

01:01:46   - No, the renaming, I think it's going better

01:01:49   than Alphabet, for sure, 'cause everyone just keeps

01:01:51   calling them Google, but like, the whole Meta renaming

01:01:54   was about the Metaverse, which bombed,

01:01:55   and so now they're just a company who doesn't want

01:01:58   to be associated with one product called Facebook,

01:02:00   and so they're renaming themselves Meta, it's fine,

01:02:02   but like, the Metaverse still is not a thing,

01:02:04   and they're the leader in glasses, but they were

01:02:06   before they renamed themselves, too,

01:02:07   because they bought Oculus.

01:02:09   - Well, yeah, but the thing is, well, I mean, that's true,

01:02:11   but I would say, in the same way that, like, yes,

01:02:14   they bought Instagram, they didn't make it from scratch,

01:02:16   but Instagram is way more Facebook now than it's Instagram,

01:02:20   like, you know, in that same way, like, you know,

01:02:23   their VR products are way more Meta

01:02:25   than they were Oculus at this point.

01:02:27   But anyway, they show a very different approach

01:02:30   to AR and VR than what we see from Apple.

01:02:34   What we see, and Microsoft and everyone else who's tried it,

01:02:37   you know, what we see from Meta has been pretty successful

01:02:42   at the low-end gaming market for VR headsets

01:02:45   with some basic pass-through features,

01:02:47   and we see, you know, using that foundation

01:02:50   to slowly build towards something like this.

01:02:54   And what we see from Apple is really,

01:02:56   is like the total opposite approach

01:02:58   with Vision Pro platform and product,

01:03:00   which is like, you know, Apple had,

01:03:02   Apple started at the extraordinarily high-end

01:03:06   with no gaming to speak of, no software to speak of,

01:03:11   really not, seemingly not putting, you know,

01:03:13   much faith in this being a consumer product at all,

01:03:16   but for some reason putting it out there,

01:03:19   which I continue to doubt at this point.

01:03:22   But anyway, Meta is, you know, doing great at the low-end

01:03:26   and the mid-range with their gaming stuff,

01:03:29   and they're not even touching the high-end anymore.

01:03:31   They had a brief time trying to make the Quest Pro happen,

01:03:34   it didn't happen, they backed off of it.

01:03:36   They had a high-end one planned that they canceled

01:03:38   because they saw a Vision Pro and they're like,

01:03:40   "Eh, nah, no thanks."

01:03:42   They're doing fine at the low-end with VR stuff,

01:03:44   with gaming and with kids and everything,

01:03:46   and now they're demoing kind of where they think

01:03:49   the high-end can go, and all of the tech demo,

01:03:52   or all the demos from the people who had them,

01:03:55   the people come away being blown away by them.

01:03:57   Like everyone's like, "Oh my God, this is the future."

01:03:59   Now granted, it's a tech demo, it's not a shipping product.

01:04:02   That is a massive difference, obviously.

01:04:06   But this kind of shows where there is huge value to this

01:04:11   is in the AR glasses format,

01:04:15   in that kind of physical product format.

01:04:17   AR glasses are a thing that people think is very cool

01:04:20   and has a lot of promise.

01:04:21   VR headsets are a different thing

01:04:24   that people also think is cool and has promise,

01:04:27   but for very different reasons

01:04:29   and in very different use cases.

01:04:31   You can kind of see the two companies

01:04:33   trying to solve this from two different ways,

01:04:35   but I think Meta's approach is more likely to succeed,

01:04:39   to be honest.

01:04:40   There are so many physical challenges around these products,

01:04:43   so many technical challenges,

01:04:46   so many fashion and just coolness challenges,

01:04:50   and so many practicality challenges to these products.

01:04:53   Apple took a really big swing

01:04:55   and I think has almost completely missed.

01:04:57   I think they went down almost every wrong path possible

01:05:01   and shipped it out there.

01:05:03   And I think part of the reason

01:05:05   why we're hearing all these rumors

01:05:08   around the Vision Pro launch

01:05:09   that maybe some people in the company

01:05:10   weren't really supportive of it

01:05:12   or they weren't sure if they should release it

01:05:14   or it was divisive within the company,

01:05:15   we've heard that for a long time.

01:05:18   I think we see why.

01:05:19   It's a really hard area to get right.

01:05:22   And the Vision Pro didn't get it right.

01:05:25   And what Meta's showing here doesn't exist yet.

01:05:29   But they're going towards that

01:05:32   and I think what everyone is kind of seeing is,

01:05:34   oh, they have a pretty good chance

01:05:38   of doing something good here.

01:05:40   Whereas what we're seeing from Apple

01:05:42   has not really led us in that direction yet.

01:05:46   At this point, I would be surprised

01:05:50   if we ever saw another Vision hardware release from Apple.

01:05:54   Like, that's how I think the platform

01:05:58   has gotten off on such a wrong foot.

01:06:00   I honestly would be surprised if we ever see a sequel to it.

01:06:03   If they do anything in this space,

01:06:05   I think it will be radically different.

01:06:06   Not the same thing but a little bit better

01:06:09   and a little bit cheaper.

01:06:09   I think it'll be radically different if at all.

01:06:12   And not soon.

01:06:14   But what we see from Meta is like,

01:06:15   they're already succeeding in the VR market

01:06:20   better than anybody else ever has.

01:06:21   They're doing great in that market.

01:06:23   It's still a small market but they're doing great in it.

01:06:25   And they might be doing this thing at the high end.

01:06:28   That's why everyone's excited

01:06:29   'cause everyone sees it and they're like,

01:06:30   huh, it has some trade-offs, some pretty big trade-offs.

01:06:34   And with the largest asterisk being

01:06:36   it literally is not shipping and is not buyable

01:06:38   and will never ship in this form.

01:06:40   So this is literally just a tech demo.

01:06:42   However, people like it and they're excited by it.

01:06:46   Now that being said, I don't think AR and VR,

01:06:50   even in a great form like this,

01:06:53   I don't think that's going to replace the smartphone.

01:06:56   I don't think it's going to be nearly as big

01:06:59   or as important as a lot of people think

01:07:00   or hope that it will.

01:07:02   What we're seeing with the actual products

01:07:04   that exist in this category is they're fun,

01:07:08   they're useful to certain people,

01:07:10   they're not replacing phones,

01:07:11   they're not replacing game consoles,

01:07:13   they're not replacing TVs in any kind of meaningful numbers.

01:07:16   I think the whole investment in this area is interesting

01:07:21   and in certain ways it's exciting,

01:07:23   but I don't think it's the future of computing.

01:07:25   I think it's the future of more wearables

01:07:28   to add to our lives.

01:07:29   In the same way that the Apple Watch and wearables like it

01:07:31   didn't replace smartphones, they just added to them.

01:07:35   I think AR glasses will add to our computing lives as well.

01:07:38   I don't think they will be replacing nearly anything.

01:07:41   However, if they are to succeed,

01:07:43   the approach Meta is taking,

01:07:45   and they already have the Ray-Ban glasses

01:07:47   that are pretty successful.

01:07:49   I think that approach, like what Meta's doing,

01:07:52   slowly adding things that people will add

01:07:54   to their computing lives, not replace things with,

01:07:57   that's working.

01:07:58   And this is the latest demo of where that's going.

01:08:00   That's working.

01:08:02   And I think what Apple's doing is not working.

01:08:05   - Here's why I think this is a non-story

01:08:10   and I'm very disappointed in the press

01:08:11   for how they've handled this.

01:08:13   Ever since we've been talking about this topic at all

01:08:17   on the show or in the Apple world

01:08:18   or in the entire tech world,

01:08:21   everyone has known that some kind of glasses thing

01:08:25   would be amazing, but it's too bad we can't build that.

01:08:28   And years ago when the rumors were

01:08:30   about Apple's headset thing, it was like,

01:08:32   Apple's not gonna do a headset, they're gonna do glasses

01:08:34   because they know headsets are big and clunky and crappy.

01:08:37   And Tim Cook would just constantly,

01:08:40   anytime he's asked about this for years,

01:08:41   he'd be like, we're interested in AR, not VR.

01:08:44   We're all about augmenting reality.

01:08:46   Have you seen all the AR features we've added

01:08:48   to our phones and iPads over the years?

01:08:50   We don't want to be closed off inside a VR headset.

01:08:53   We're all about augmented reality, right?

01:08:55   The reason Apple was into that,

01:08:58   it's not just like, oh, Apple thought AR would be good.

01:09:00   Everybody thinks AR is good.

01:09:01   Everyone thinks glasses,

01:09:02   where they could let you magically see the world,

01:09:03   but also stuff laid on top of it is a great idea.

01:09:06   It's in science fiction books.

01:09:07   It's in our culture.

01:09:08   It's baked into everything,

01:09:09   and that is an Apple strategy from day one.

01:09:11   When we eventually heard,

01:09:13   actually Apple's gonna ship a VR headset.

01:09:15   You're like, well, what about all that stuff

01:09:16   that Tim Cook's been saying about the glasses?

01:09:17   And the basically consensus was,

01:09:19   well, nobody can make the glasses.

01:09:22   So Apple's gonna ship something.

01:09:24   And what they did ship was their attempt to say,

01:09:26   you know, in typical Apple fashion,

01:09:28   super expensive VR headset, but look, we do,

01:09:32   one of the reasons it's so expensive

01:09:34   is we're trying to give you that AR glasses experience

01:09:37   of like, look, the pass-through is magical.

01:09:38   It's like, you don't even know you're looking

01:09:39   through cameras or whatever,

01:09:40   but of course it's not an AR thing.

01:09:42   You're not actually looking at the room.

01:09:44   We're just applying technology and money

01:09:46   to try to get something out there

01:09:48   that has some desirable attributes

01:09:50   that are better than the competitors

01:09:51   that we try to spin as a computing device and blah, blah,

01:09:53   you get into the whole thing.

01:09:54   But the bottom line is Apple didn't wait

01:09:57   until they could ship glasses.

01:09:59   They shipped a headset that they kind of sort of tried

01:10:03   to push in the AR direction, but wasn't really that.

01:10:05   And setting the Vision Pro aside and all its failures

01:10:07   or whatever, that's what they did.

01:10:09   But at no point during this, did anyone say,

01:10:12   Apple doesn't think AR is the future,

01:10:14   or they shouldn't have said that.

01:10:15   That it was just simply the fact that no one has technology

01:10:19   to ship something that looks like

01:10:21   what the Vision Pro looks like,

01:10:23   but as a pair of glasses that you could see the room through.

01:10:25   That doesn't exist, right?

01:10:28   So here's Facebook and they're like,

01:10:30   they come out with this thing.

01:10:31   Now, first of all, AR glasses have existed for a while.

01:10:33   There was Magic Leap, there was the HoloLens,

01:10:35   one and two, it's very difficult to do this.

01:10:37   Obviously the screen technology is not great.

01:10:40   They come out with their thing and they're like,

01:10:42   look, it's glasses that you can see through.

01:10:45   But it doesn't really change anything

01:10:47   about everything I just laid out.

01:10:48   Everyone knows glasses are gonna be awesome someday.

01:10:50   Everyone also knows we can't actually currently do them.

01:10:53   And I would say a $10,000 device

01:10:55   that doesn't look as good as the Vision Pro

01:10:57   is an example of not being able to do them.

01:10:59   I mean, it's not, you can't ship this to people.

01:11:01   It's not a product and it's not even as good,

01:11:04   it doesn't even look as good as Vision Pro

01:11:06   in terms of the graphics, setting aside the room

01:11:08   that you're actually looking at or whatever, right?

01:11:11   So this is the type of thing I would imagine

01:11:14   that Apple would have and say, well, we can't ship this.

01:11:16   It's not a shippable product.

01:11:17   The only difference is Facebook says, well, okay,

01:11:20   we have something that's not a shippable product.

01:11:21   Let's show it to the world to try to basically

01:11:23   get our investors off our back

01:11:24   because we're spending all this money

01:11:26   and they think we're just burning it

01:11:27   because the metaverse didn't happen

01:11:28   and we're just selling a bunch of Quest headsets

01:11:30   and why do we keep burning these billions of dollars?

01:11:31   And Facebook's gotta come out there and say,

01:11:33   this is why we're burning billions of dollars

01:11:34   'cause we think someday we'll be able

01:11:36   to make something like this only good and shippable.

01:11:39   And as Zuckerberg says, we have a line of sight on that.

01:11:43   If they had come up with a product that you could buy

01:11:45   that did this stuff, maybe we could say

01:11:47   they're ahead of everybody else.

01:11:48   Apple couldn't find anything that they could ship

01:11:49   but Facebook could.

01:11:51   But they can't ship this.

01:11:52   It's not a shippable thing and even if it was shippable,

01:11:54   certain attributes aren't even as good

01:11:56   as Vision Pro fidelity-wise.

01:11:58   So I don't think this is anything other than Facebook

01:12:02   trying to get some good press out of a thing

01:12:05   that is essentially on par with what everyone else has

01:12:07   in the industry but everyone knows that it's not shippable

01:12:10   and when Apple has something that's not shippable,

01:12:12   they don't talk about it, right?

01:12:14   Now, since we know nothing about what's going on

01:12:16   inside Apple, it is possible that Apple at some point

01:12:19   three years ago diverted all of their resources

01:12:22   into Vision Pro and left their glasses efforts

01:12:26   dying on the vine and Facebook really is ahead of them.

01:12:28   But we don't know that, just like we don't know anything

01:12:31   about what goes on inside Apple.

01:12:32   So we can't say by Facebook showing us this prototype,

01:12:35   they're ahead of Apple, Apple's never gonna catch up.

01:12:37   Apple doesn't have glasses like this.

01:12:39   We just don't know the answer to that question.

01:12:41   I would imagine that if Apple, if you went into an Apple lab

01:12:44   and wanted to get the same experience,

01:12:46   although they might not look as nice as these

01:12:48   with the little frame around them or whatever,

01:12:49   you could probably get something similar

01:12:51   if Apple had continued their AR thing

01:12:53   but we don't know if they continued it.

01:12:55   If you look at this product though, one of the things

01:12:57   that it does seem to take from Vision Pro

01:12:59   is the idea of eye tracking and pinching as your interface.

01:13:02   But interestingly, it doesn't use cameras

01:13:04   to track your hands, it uses the little wristband.

01:13:06   This is something that Apple could maybe see

01:13:09   how that works out, try the prototype,

01:13:11   see how it goes if they haven't already been trying this.

01:13:13   Choosing how you are going to do eye tracking and pinching

01:13:17   is kind of like an implementation detail

01:13:19   versus deciding eye tracking and pinching

01:13:21   is how you should interact with things.

01:13:23   Like in other words, they're not saying,

01:13:24   Orion, it comes with Quest hand controllers.

01:13:26   Quest hand control is great for games,

01:13:28   maybe not so great for what you would imagine

01:13:31   you would do something that's more like a pair of glasses.

01:13:33   These things seem to have like,

01:13:34   the wristband has like a little electrical conductor

01:13:37   sensor thingies that catch your nerve signals or whatever.

01:13:40   It's a nice way to do it that doesn't require you

01:13:43   to have line of sight on your fingers

01:13:45   and doesn't require like these glasses frames

01:13:47   to be bristling with even more cameras

01:13:50   that are tracking where your fingers are

01:13:51   as opposed to the ones that are just tracking your eyeballs.

01:13:54   But anyway, like I don't, like people saying this

01:13:58   and say, were there people out there who were like,

01:14:00   previously, I didn't think augmented reality glasses

01:14:03   would be a good idea,

01:14:04   but now that I've been able to try a prototype,

01:14:06   I do think they're a good idea?

01:14:07   I suppose there are people like this,

01:14:08   but like read a sci-fi book.

01:14:10   We all want magic glasses that you put them on

01:14:12   and they cover the world with information

01:14:14   and you can see all the things

01:14:15   and your walking directions go like that

01:14:17   and as we said, there's a name tag over people's heads

01:14:19   and there's that whole story about like the Ray-Ban glasses

01:14:22   that do like image lookups for people

01:14:23   and like docks them as you walk around.

01:14:24   Yeah, that's the sci-fi future, dystopian and utopian,

01:14:27   that we're all talking about here, right?

01:14:28   And there's gonna be a lot of problems with it,

01:14:30   but like first things first,

01:14:31   we gotta figure out how to get the screens

01:14:34   and by the way, the way these things work

01:14:35   is like they have like a little tiny screen

01:14:37   that projects a little image into the lenses

01:14:40   and the lenses try to bounce the image from the screen

01:14:45   off of the lenses and into your eyes

01:14:46   so they focus on the back of your eye

01:14:48   and yes, that is as annoyingly hard as you can imagine it is

01:14:51   because it's not like you can put a big mirror in there

01:14:53   'cause that would block your view of the outside world.

01:14:55   So these wave guides are essentially taking the image

01:14:57   of a tiny little screen that's projecting

01:14:59   like from the side on an angle into the lens

01:15:03   and internally bouncing it inside the last lens

01:15:05   until it exits the lens at just the right angle

01:15:07   so it focuses on your eye.

01:15:08   It is as complicated and apparently very expensive

01:15:12   to manufacture as you would think

01:15:13   and in the end, still doesn't have the fidelity

01:15:16   of a very expensive closed-in VR headset

01:15:19   where you don't have to worry about all that business.

01:15:21   You can just literally project the screen

01:15:22   right into their eyeballs

01:15:23   because you're not worried about them

01:15:24   seeing through it to the outside world.

01:15:27   Final thing I'll say about this

01:15:28   is the way the hardware is implemented,

01:15:30   having the little, I don't know, puck stick thing

01:15:34   where the compute is is, you know,

01:15:37   if you want something that's like glasses,

01:15:39   don't put all the computer stuff inside the glasses, right?

01:15:41   So they didn't, they put the computer stuff inside a puck

01:15:43   and I've seen a lot of people look at that puck and say,

01:15:46   well, the future is gonna be,

01:15:47   that puck will just be your phone.

01:15:49   Maybe the distant future but the near future, no,

01:15:53   because in the near future,

01:15:56   A, you're not going to want to literally

01:15:58   destroy your phone's battery

01:16:00   by getting two hours of AR glasses out of this thing

01:16:02   and B, the hardware that you would wanna put in that puck

01:16:06   is gonna have to be,

01:16:08   it's on the ragged edge of what's possible.

01:16:10   It's gonna have to be so purpose-built

01:16:12   and so like high-end for a portable thing.

01:16:15   Phones have to do so much different stuff.

01:16:18   They have to have their cameras

01:16:19   and the battery life for that

01:16:21   and it's for web browsing, all the Wi-Fi radios,

01:16:23   whatever and this is a purpose-built device

01:16:25   that the first one of these that actually ships somewhere

01:16:27   needs to just be a thing that feeds these glasses.

01:16:31   Eventually, yes, why have a separate thing, right?

01:16:33   But that's gonna be when we have

01:16:34   so much excess computing capacity

01:16:36   that it's no problem for our phones to do

01:16:37   and I would say today, it is not no problem

01:16:40   for our phones to do what that little puck is doing.

01:16:42   So I suspect whoever gets to be the first one

01:16:45   to ship something like this and again,

01:16:46   arguably Magic Leap and HoloLens

01:16:48   already did ship something like this,

01:16:49   albeit a much lower fidelity

01:16:50   without the same Apple Vision Pro-inspired UI.

01:16:54   It's gonna be a separate puck

01:16:55   and I think it'll be a separate puck for many years,

01:16:57   which is fine and is the right move

01:16:59   and it is much better than hanging off a giant computer

01:17:01   with a metal case off your face

01:17:02   like the Apple Vision Pro does

01:17:04   but for now, I would expect there to be a puck.

01:17:07   Now, we'll find out in a few years or many years

01:17:11   when the tell-all things come out

01:17:12   and it's like, oh, Apple abandoned AR

01:17:14   because someone was convinced that there was no way

01:17:16   they were gonna do it within the next 50 years

01:17:17   so we should stop and they didn't see

01:17:19   these silicon carbide lenses coming or whatever

01:17:22   but I would hope that inside Apple,

01:17:25   all the technology you just saw Facebook demonstrate

01:17:28   was also known to them

01:17:29   and had been experimented with them

01:17:31   and they realized that for the next X number of years,

01:17:36   it's not a viable product

01:17:37   so they're gonna try this Vision Pro thing

01:17:39   and it's not going great for them

01:17:40   but I don't think philosophically anything,

01:17:44   I don't actually think there's a philosophical difference

01:17:46   when it comes to the long-term view of AR

01:17:49   between Meta and Apple.

01:17:52   I think they both believe glasses are the future

01:17:54   and they wanna get there as fast as they possibly can.

01:17:56   The only difference is, how does that manifest?

01:17:58   For Facebook, it manifests with tech demos

01:18:00   of $10,000 headsets.

01:18:01   For Apple, it manifests for saying nothing

01:18:03   and shipping an entirely different product

01:18:05   that they can actually manufacture

01:18:07   and hoping that works out.

01:18:08   - I don't, I both agree and disagree

01:18:12   with basically everything that you guys just said.

01:18:14   I'm not so disappointed in the tech press as Jon is.

01:18:18   I concur that it's been obvious to anyone

01:18:21   who's paid even the tiniest bit of attention

01:18:23   that this is what Apple is angling for,

01:18:26   that they want something that looks,

01:18:28   maybe not aesthetically but in principle,

01:18:31   functionally looks, if you will, like Orion,

01:18:33   that you don't have pass-through

01:18:36   because you're already looking at the real world

01:18:38   and you're just augmenting that,

01:18:40   hence Tim saying over and over again,

01:18:42   AR is very interesting to us.

01:18:43   It's clear that's what Apple wants

01:18:45   and I think a reasonable way to get there,

01:18:48   maybe not the best way to get there,

01:18:50   but a reasonable way to get there is to say,

01:18:52   well, let's make some hyper, hyper great-looking

01:18:57   internal pass-through inside these goggles

01:19:00   that lock you away from the world

01:19:01   to get us used to what it'll be like

01:19:03   when we don't have to have pass-through,

01:19:05   when the pass-through is the real world.

01:19:07   Hopefully I'm making sense here.

01:19:08   And to get ahead of that

01:19:10   and to hopefully build a developer story around that,

01:19:13   you just fake it until you make it.

01:19:15   And that's what Apple's done.

01:19:16   Now the problem is they haven't really made it, right,

01:19:18   in the sense that developers are mostly ignoring it

01:19:20   and I think that Apple is largely,

01:19:23   mostly ignoring the Vision Pro.

01:19:26   But I don't think it's unreasonable for Ben

01:19:30   and others in the tech press to say,

01:19:32   oh my God, this was amazing.

01:19:33   Oh my God, this is the future today.

01:19:35   I don't think that's unreasonable.

01:19:36   Now it should be couched and there should be asterisks

01:19:40   and daggers and double daggers saying,

01:19:41   well, yes, this is the future today,

01:19:43   but you can't buy it because it is what?

01:19:45   The future.

01:19:46   - I don't fault them for being impressed

01:19:48   by a cool tech demo.

01:19:50   I fault the people, and it's not Ben,

01:19:51   but it's not Ben knows what's up,

01:19:53   but it's other people saying basically like,

01:19:54   this shows that Apple is going in the wrong direction

01:19:57   and Meta knows what's up.

01:19:59   They're both going in exactly the same direction long-term.

01:20:02   They both have VR headsets,

01:20:04   albeit very different ones, right?

01:20:06   And I think they both have AR headsets.

01:20:08   It's just that Facebook is showing you there

01:20:10   is that they can't ship and Apple is not showing you there

01:20:12   that they can't ship, you know what I mean?

01:20:13   And again, we don't know that's true.

01:20:15   I'm speculating 'cause Apple doesn't say anything,

01:20:16   but like the people who are citing this

01:20:19   as like a condemnation of Apple has dropped the ball.

01:20:22   They've taken the eye off the ball.

01:20:24   They shouldn't be bothering with VR headsets.

01:20:26   Meta is also bothering with VR headsets.

01:20:29   There's a difference in strategy there,

01:20:30   which we've talked about at length

01:20:31   between how they're doing with VR headsets,

01:20:33   but VR headsets is what we can make now.

01:20:35   And you know, they have differing opinions

01:20:37   about how to do that,

01:20:37   but that's the difference in their strategy

01:20:39   is like Apple has taken one direction of VR

01:20:42   and Facebook is taking the other.

01:20:43   A difference in their strategy is not

01:20:45   that Meta thinks AR is the future and Apple does not.

01:20:48   That's insanity and that's what I can't handle.

01:20:50   From free entry like Apple doesn't think AR is the future,

01:20:53   but Meta does and Meta is showing Apple how it's done.

01:20:55   No, that is absolutely not the case

01:20:58   based on public statements from the CEO of the company.

01:21:01   - Yeah, I would agree with that.

01:21:02   I don't know.

01:21:03   And I also, I know it's fun for everyone,

01:21:06   including sometimes me, to slag on the Vision Pro.

01:21:09   And I'll be honest with you,

01:21:10   I don't use my Vision Pro very often.

01:21:13   And if it wasn't purchased for my job,

01:21:16   like if I'd done this just because I thought it was neat

01:21:19   and I wanted one, I would really, really regret

01:21:22   spending all the money I did on it.

01:21:24   That being said, I've maintained that for specific things,

01:21:29   the Vision Pro was really incredible.

01:21:31   It is not an all things to all people device,

01:21:33   if you ask me, even though I think

01:21:34   that's what Apple wanted it to be.

01:21:36   If you were to look at keynotes

01:21:37   when it was announced and whatnot.

01:21:39   But I cannot say enough good things

01:21:43   about the immersive video that Apple has put out.

01:21:47   Now, admittedly, they've put out very little of it

01:21:50   and it's coming in at a snail's pace,

01:21:52   but it is unlike anything I've ever experienced.

01:21:56   It is so much better than any other cinema-like experience

01:22:00   I've ever had.

01:22:01   It is truly, truly phenomenal.

01:22:03   And they are releasing more stuff.

01:22:06   It is way too slow, but they are doing it.

01:22:08   And I believe there's going to be an immersive film,

01:22:10   I don't know if it's a short film or a film film,

01:22:12   sometime either late this year or early next year.

01:22:14   And I'm really excited to watch it

01:22:15   because I think it'll be super cool.

01:22:18   Additionally, when I went to Memphis a couple of weeks ago,

01:22:21   I did travel with the Vision Pro,

01:22:23   but because both of my flights were so darn short,

01:22:25   I didn't bother using it on the plane,

01:22:28   but on occasions that I have used it on a plane,

01:22:31   leaving aside that you are 1 trillion percent that guy

01:22:36   if you don't mind being that guy, it's unreal

01:22:40   because you're in an incredible movie theater.

01:22:42   You're not in a plane.

01:22:43   You're in an incredible movie theater by yourself.

01:22:45   Nobody's around you and it's amazing.

01:22:48   Additionally, when I was in Memphis,

01:22:50   I did get the Vision Pro out

01:22:51   because I did have a little bit of downtime to do work.

01:22:53   And you know what the Vision Pro is?

01:22:54   It's a giant ass screen that doesn't take up

01:22:57   a giant ass amount of space in your bag.

01:22:59   Well, it doesn't take up a small amount of space in your bag

01:23:01   but you know what I mean.

01:23:02   - I was gonna say, pretty big space in a bag actually.

01:23:04   - No, you know what I mean.

01:23:05   But--

01:23:06   - It doesn't take up a lot of length and width.

01:23:07   I wonder volume-wise if it would actually be the same

01:23:10   as a very thin screen.

01:23:11   - Yeah, maybe.

01:23:13   But you know, I mean, we're snarking,

01:23:15   but you know exactly what I'm saying.

01:23:16   And it was really great for that.

01:23:17   It really truly was.

01:23:19   I was in this actually very small hotel room

01:23:21   and yes, it had a mediocre TV

01:23:24   that I think I probably could have hooked up to my laptop,

01:23:27   but it was so much nicer to use the Vision Pro

01:23:29   because I was suddenly in a different space

01:23:32   and I've got this huge screen in front of me

01:23:34   and especially with the developer strap,

01:23:36   it is basically lag-free.

01:23:37   I think the fidelity of it,

01:23:38   admittedly my eyes are not perfect,

01:23:40   but the fidelity of it is great.

01:23:41   Like there are times the Vision Pro is incredible.

01:23:44   I do not argue that it is,

01:23:46   to my eyes it appears that it is a flop.

01:23:49   Now we don't know what Apple's expectations were.

01:23:52   Maybe they expected to sell three of them,

01:23:54   in which case, mission accomplished.

01:23:56   But I suspect they wanted to sell

01:23:58   a whole heck of a lot more.

01:23:59   Certainly the rumblings we've heard in the press

01:24:00   is that they wanted to sell a whole heck of a lot more

01:24:03   and they haven't.

01:24:04   So it is a flop by most measures,

01:24:06   but if you have an obscene amount of money

01:24:09   to burn and light on fire

01:24:11   and have these specific use cases,

01:24:13   I don't wanna continue to slag on the Vision Pro

01:24:16   because in certain circumstances,

01:24:17   it's unlike and better than everything else I've ever tried.

01:24:20   Admittedly, those circumstances are few and far between,

01:24:23   but they do exist.

01:24:24   And I do think that this is a really solid precursor

01:24:27   to something like AR glasses.

01:24:29   It's gonna look way different,

01:24:31   both inside, outside, in every way,

01:24:33   it's gonna look different than the Vision Pro does,

01:24:35   but I think it is a reasonable precursor.

01:24:37   And those who have embraced the Vision OS and Vision Pro,

01:24:41   their AR experience when designing stuff for Apple glasses,

01:24:46   they're gonna be ahead of the game

01:24:47   'cause they've already done it.

01:24:48   The same way that Underscore was way ahead of the game

01:24:51   for widgets on iOS because all the APIs

01:24:53   were basically just ripped from watchOS

01:24:56   for complications and stuff.

01:24:57   I think I have that right,

01:24:58   but you get the idea either way.

01:25:00   Underscore is way ahead of the game

01:25:01   'cause he's basically already done that.

01:25:02   And so that's part of the reason I think that Widget Smith

01:25:05   was there on day one and was so good

01:25:08   is because he had so much experience

01:25:09   in a slightly different context,

01:25:11   but using basically the same APIs.

01:25:13   And I think that people who really and truly embrace

01:25:16   the Vision Pro and Vision OS,

01:25:18   I would say I have reluctantly shown it

01:25:21   a small amount of attention.

01:25:22   I would not say I've embraced it,

01:25:24   but anyways, those who have really embraced it,

01:25:26   I think there'll be way ahead of the game.

01:25:27   And I think that everyone would agree

01:25:29   that something that's like Orion

01:25:33   is the future if we can get there.

01:25:35   - Yeah, I think your point about the Vision Pro

01:25:37   being like, oh, well, we can't do AR glasses,

01:25:40   but just if you get used to this as a platform extension,

01:25:42   like if we build this platform over many years

01:25:45   inside these stupid goggles,

01:25:47   this platform doesn't look that much different

01:25:50   than the platform we would build for AR glasses.

01:25:52   And I'm sure Meta's doing exactly the same thing.

01:25:54   They've got the Quest headsets,

01:25:55   which are addressing a different market in a different way,

01:25:58   but whatever interface and APIs and compatibility

01:26:02   they're building up there,

01:26:03   even though they don't emphasize passthrough as much,

01:26:05   I would imagine that as they extend into AR glasses,

01:26:08   it will be an expansion of their existing VR platforms

01:26:12   if they're smart, rather than just saying,

01:26:14   oh, here's all new platform,

01:26:15   nothing you did on the Quest headsets

01:26:16   is applicable at all to this.

01:26:18   I hope they don't do that.

01:26:19   Now, Apple, I think, has a little bit of a headstart in this

01:26:22   because their VR headset is so focused

01:26:25   on pretending it's an AR headset and the quests are not.

01:26:28   Even like I said, down to the choice of how to do the UI,

01:26:32   Vision Pro does eye tracking and you use your fingers

01:26:34   to pinch and do stuff, right?

01:26:36   So does Orion, but Quest does not.

01:26:39   Quest does not lean that heavily on that type of interface.

01:26:42   On the other hand, Quest uses the wristband

01:26:44   instead of cameras to track,

01:26:45   but it was still like the whole idea of like,

01:26:47   how would you want to use sci-fi type of AR glasses?

01:26:52   You probably wouldn't wanna have hand controllers

01:26:55   'cause that kind of defeats the purpose of like,

01:26:56   oh, they're just like regular glasses, you put 'em on.

01:26:58   Where do the hand controllers fit in that?

01:27:00   So it's gonna probably have to be,

01:27:01   oh, how do I do stuff?

01:27:03   Well, how about if you looked at it

01:27:04   and did gestures with your hands?

01:27:05   And then it's just a question of how do we implement that?

01:27:08   Looking at stuff, eye tracking, that seems to be obvious.

01:27:10   Gestures with your hands,

01:27:12   you could look at your hands with cameras,

01:27:13   you could have a wristband,

01:27:14   you could do both at the same time,

01:27:15   you could use your Apple Watch.

01:27:17   Like there's all sorts of like platform synergies.

01:27:19   That's where the, I think I heard Ben and Gruber

01:27:21   talking about like, what if your Apple Watch

01:27:24   was like the nerve checking thing

01:27:28   and what if your phone was like the puck for the glasses

01:27:31   and it's like, yeah, maybe eventually

01:27:34   let's hold your horses in that.

01:27:35   'Cause like I said, I feel like AR glasses

01:27:38   are going to be so close to the edge

01:27:39   of what's even possible for so many years

01:27:42   that there's gonna have to be dedicated hardware for it.

01:27:44   And like I said, you wouldn't want to destroy

01:27:46   your phone's battery on this.

01:27:47   Like it's not okay, but it is the status quo

01:27:51   that the Vision Pro gets like two hours of battery life.

01:27:54   Orion gets two hours of battery life.

01:27:56   Your phone, you do not want to have two hours of battery life

01:27:59   so let's wait on this.

01:28:01   It's $10,000, doesn't look as good as Vision Pro.

01:28:03   The battery lasts two hours.

01:28:05   We'll get there eventually.

01:28:06   But yes, there are platform synergies

01:28:08   that Apple is well-positioned to take advantage of.

01:28:11   But Apple is not going to show you their AR glasses,

01:28:13   demo things until they actually have a product they can ship.

01:28:16   And we've been talking about Vision Pro

01:28:18   and we haven't been like, oh boy,

01:28:19   I can't wait until next year

01:28:20   when Apple ships the glasses.

01:28:21   No, we don't think that's coming next year.

01:28:23   And guess what, it's not coming next year from META either.

01:28:25   Despite Zuckerberg's, we have a line of sight on that.

01:28:28   I'll believe it when I see it.

01:28:30   Again, you should look at it, I'm surprised,

01:28:31   I haven't seen many people talk about this,

01:28:32   HoloLens and Magikleap, whatever the hell

01:28:35   the other things are.

01:28:35   There have been AR glasses that have shipped

01:28:37   as actual shipping products over many years

01:28:39   from both Microsoft and Magikleap startup.

01:28:43   And they didn't look great and they weren't popular

01:28:45   and they made slightly different choices,

01:28:47   but they have existed.

01:28:48   So it's not like we don't know like real shipping products

01:28:51   that you could buy with less than $10,000 worth of money

01:28:54   that would let you see the room

01:28:55   and also see images projected on it.

01:28:57   Many of them have existed.

01:28:58   It's just like the people looked at them and said,

01:29:01   they're not very good yet.

01:29:02   And even Orion, I mean, it's the best,

01:29:04   it's the most impressive that anyone has seen

01:29:06   outside of development labs inside Apple or wherever.

01:29:10   But still it's like, okay, but this is not,

01:29:12   I can't buy this.

01:29:13   And if I could, it would cost too much money.

01:29:15   And even if I could, even if it didn't cost a lot of money

01:29:17   and I could buy it, it still has limitations compared to,

01:29:21   let's say the best images you can see inside Vision Pro

01:29:24   or whatever.

01:29:25   So we'll get there eventually.

01:29:26   But I really think this is a perhaps very shrewd PR move

01:29:29   from Facebook to satisfy the people who are upset

01:29:32   that Facebook is spending billions of dollars

01:29:34   on the metaverse.

01:29:35   And they have to say, no, no,

01:29:37   like we're not spending millions of dollars in that thing

01:29:40   where people with no legs talk to each other in meetings.

01:29:42   What we're actually trying to do is this.

01:29:44   And we haven't actually done it yet,

01:29:46   but let's show you like what we've got so far.

01:29:49   So you know, we're not just like making the Quest 3S

01:29:52   and we think that's all we're doing with these billions.

01:29:55   - Yeah, I was listening to Upgrade

01:29:57   and they had a really good turn of phrase for it

01:29:59   and which I've already forgotten,

01:30:00   but they were saying another thing

01:30:02   that this might accomplish is kind of like

01:30:04   reverse Osborne-ing anything that Apple's doing, right?

01:30:07   Because now it's like, look, the Vision Pro is lame

01:30:11   'cause you got to put this thing on

01:30:12   that keeps you away from the world.

01:30:14   - Do they need to do that to the Vision Pro?

01:30:15   Is it selling so much it needs to be tamped down?

01:30:17   (laughing)

01:30:19   - You're not wrong.

01:30:19   - Like, look, look, if they're Osborne-ing anything,

01:30:21   they could be Osborne-ing their own,

01:30:23   actually, you know, well-selling the Quest heads.

01:30:26   I don't think anyone sees a product that they can't even buy

01:30:28   and like no one who's playing Beat Saber is like,

01:30:30   I want those $10,000 glasses where I can't play Beat Saber.

01:30:33   No, like it's a tech demo that shows

01:30:38   how far, how close are we to AR glasses?

01:30:40   The answer is closer than we were,

01:30:42   but still not really that close.

01:30:43   Anyway, back to your VR stuff.

01:30:45   And like, if Vision Pro had been selling like crazy,

01:30:49   I can see how this working is like, like you said,

01:30:51   like, hey, stop going gaga over Vision Pro.

01:30:55   That's not the goal.

01:30:57   The goal is this and we're closer to it than Apple,

01:30:59   but like, I don't think they need to stop Vision Pro

01:31:02   from selling, I don't think there's any juggernaut

01:31:05   that needs to be tamped down.

01:31:07   - All right, the other bit of breaking news

01:31:08   over the last few days is that Google will,

01:31:12   I'm a little fuzzy on the details here,

01:31:13   but apparently you can point Notebook LM,

01:31:17   which is I think a preexisting product of theirs

01:31:20   that I was not previously familiar with,

01:31:22   and you can, I guess it's like a data management thing

01:31:26   or like a knowledge management thing.

01:31:27   - It's like a research tool.

01:31:29   I haven't looked too much into Notebook LM itself,

01:31:31   but it's like, you know, you like add your documents

01:31:34   and stuff that you're researching on this topic

01:31:36   to Notebook LM and it can tell you stuff

01:31:37   using LMs about your documents.

01:31:40   - You guys have like study guides too,

01:31:41   is this the same product?

01:31:42   - I think so, yeah, you can put in like PDFs

01:31:45   or websites and things like that

01:31:46   and it'll tell you stuff about them.

01:31:48   - It'll be canceled in five years, don't worry about it.

01:31:49   - Oh, less than that, but what's interesting about this

01:31:52   is they introduced this feature called Audio Overview,

01:31:55   which auto-generates podcasts about whatever you put in,

01:32:00   and so of course people have been having

01:32:01   a lot of fun with this, however, before I begin,

01:32:04   have either of you heard one of these podcasts yet?

01:32:07   - I sure have. - Same.

01:32:09   - In this case, this won't be as much of a surprise to you,

01:32:11   but I'd like to welcome to our show some guests.

01:32:14   - Oh no.

01:32:15   - So we get pitched all the time for guests for our show,

01:32:19   it's just from PR spam.

01:32:21   - I would be worried about what you're about to do

01:32:22   causing that to increase, but it's so clear

01:32:24   that those people never listen to our show, so it's fine.

01:32:27   - Yeah, no, they definitely don't.

01:32:28   I listened to one of the podcasts

01:32:32   that was generated by Notebook LM

01:32:34   and it kind of blew my mind.

01:32:37   - Agreed.

01:32:38   - It was not anything that made me scared about us

01:32:41   and our future as a show, however,

01:32:43   I think this is worth hearing.

01:32:45   So now I'd like to play, what I fed Notebook LM

01:32:47   for this guest appearance here was John's post

01:32:51   on Hypercritical entitled I Made This.

01:32:54   - Oh gosh, oh gosh.

01:32:56   - So this is a podcast that Notebook LM generated,

01:32:58   it's seven minutes long, I'll chapterize it,

01:33:00   if you wanna skip it you can, listeners,

01:33:01   but I suggest you listen to it.

01:33:03   Now I have not heard this one yet.

01:33:05   I saved this for the three of us to listen to

01:33:08   live on the show.

01:33:09   So here is this AI podcast discussing John's post

01:33:14   about AI creation entitled I Made This.

01:33:16   - Hey everyone, welcome back.

01:33:18   We're gonna be diving into some pretty fascinating

01:33:20   territory today.

01:33:21   AI art, you guys sent in some really interesting questions

01:33:24   about John Siracusa's blog post, I Made This.

01:33:27   - I mispronounced my name, brutal.

01:33:28   - And to be honest, it's got us thinking

01:33:30   pretty hard over here too.

01:33:32   - Yeah, it really gets into some thorny territory fast.

01:33:34   - It does, it does.

01:33:35   So, I mean, everybody's sort of played around

01:33:37   with those early AI art generators by now, right?

01:33:41   But Siracusa is kind of digging deeper here.

01:33:43   He's asking like who actually creates AI art.

01:33:46   - It's a great question, because on the one hand

01:33:48   you've got these AI systems that are basically

01:33:50   like giant sponges just soaking up all this data, right?

01:33:53   - Great images, styles.

01:33:54   - Exactly, and they can pump out these crazy

01:33:57   realistic images in seconds.

01:33:58   - Which is mind blowing in itself.

01:33:59   - Totally, but Siracusa is really wrestling

01:34:02   with something more fundamental, I think.

01:34:03   He's trying to figure out if we can even call it creation

01:34:06   when it comes to AI.

01:34:07   - Right, like are we just talking about

01:34:09   fancy algorithms here, or is there something more going on?

01:34:11   - And that's where it gets interesting,

01:34:12   because he uses this analogy of emailing an artist

01:34:16   and asking them to paint a polar bear

01:34:19   wearing a cowboy hat riding a unicycle.

01:34:22   - Right, I'm already intrigued.

01:34:23   - Is that accurate?

01:34:24   I thought my demo was different.

01:34:25   - The artist goes and paints it, beautiful masterpiece.

01:34:27   They own the copyright, no problem.

01:34:29   - Makes sense.

01:34:29   - But what if you swap out the artist with an AI?

01:34:32   - Right, you just type that same request into a text box

01:34:35   and boom, you've got your polar bear unicyclist.

01:34:37   - Exactly, so then who's the creator in that scenario?

01:34:40   - No, you missed the middle part,

01:34:41   where you asked an artist to do it.

01:34:42   - Or is it the company that made the AI?

01:34:44   - That was the important part.

01:34:45   - Because it's their technology.

01:34:47   - Finally, we get the experience of yelling at a podcast.

01:34:49   (laughing)

01:34:52   - Before we can even begin to untangle the whole question

01:34:55   of ownership, like who owns the copyright to AI art,

01:34:59   we need to grapple with this more fundamental question

01:35:01   of who or what is the creator in the first place?

01:35:04   - Because if we don't know who the creator is,

01:35:07   how can we say who owns it?

01:35:08   - Precisely, and that's where things start

01:35:10   to get really interesting and complicated.

01:35:13   - And I think that's what makes this such a big deal, right?

01:35:15   It's not just some theoretical debate happening in a vacuum.

01:35:18   This stuff has real world implications.

01:35:20   - Absolutely, I mean, you think about

01:35:22   all the different fields that could be impacted,

01:35:23   photography, graphic design, music,

01:35:26   even things like writing and filmmaking.

01:35:28   I mean, the potential here is huge

01:35:30   and it's already happening.

01:35:32   - Right, like it's not even a question

01:35:33   of if AI will disrupt these industries,

01:35:35   it's already starting to end.

01:35:36   - Exactly, and that raises a whole host of questions

01:35:39   about jobs and livelihoods and copyright law

01:35:42   is scrambling to catch up with all of this.

01:35:44   - Which is a whole other can of worms.

01:35:45   - Oh, totally, but beyond even the economic

01:35:48   and legal questions,

01:35:49   Syracuse makes this really interesting point

01:35:51   about the impact of all this on human creativity.

01:35:54   Like what happens to us, what happens to art

01:35:57   when suddenly anyone with an internet connection

01:36:00   can crank out something that looks like a masterpiece.

01:36:03   - I don't think I made that point at all.

01:36:04   - If you don't have to struggle,

01:36:05   if you don't have to hold your craft

01:36:06   over years and years of practice,

01:36:08   does that diminish the drive to create in the first place?

01:36:11   - Right, like you think about your own creative pursuits,

01:36:14   whatever they might be.

01:36:14   - No, I definitely didn't talk about this.

01:36:15   - There's a certain satisfaction

01:36:16   that comes from the process itself,

01:36:19   from pushing through those frustrating moments,

01:36:21   those creative blocks and coming out the other side

01:36:23   with something you're proud of,

01:36:24   something that's uniquely yours.

01:36:26   - Absolutely, I mean, I was working on this song a while back

01:36:30   and I hit this wall just totally stuck.

01:36:33   Couldn't figure out where to go with it, almost gave up,

01:36:36   but then I don't know, something clicked

01:36:38   and I finally broke through it.

01:36:39   And that feeling of having wrestled with it

01:36:42   and finally found the solution, I mean, it's just incredible.

01:36:45   And I can't imagine getting that same feeling

01:36:47   from just typing a few words into a computer.

01:36:49   - Yeah, it really makes you question

01:36:51   what it is we value about art in the first place.

01:36:54   Is it purely about the end result

01:36:56   or is there something inherently valuable

01:36:58   about the human element, the intention,

01:36:59   the struggle, the imperfections even

01:37:03   that go into the creative process?

01:37:05   - Is it even possible for AI to replicate that experience?

01:37:08   And if it is, do we want it to?

01:37:10   I mean, it's a lot to unpack.

01:37:10   So where do we even go from here?

01:37:12   We've got this potential decline in human creativity,

01:37:14   this legal minefield around ownership.

01:37:17   What's the next step?

01:37:18   - Well, Syracuse doesn't pretend to have all the answers,

01:37:20   but he does offer this really intriguing what if.

01:37:23   He suggests that maybe trying to force AI art

01:37:26   into our existing copyright law

01:37:28   is kind of like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.

01:37:31   - What's the square peg?

01:37:32   - Is that what you said?

01:37:33   - No, absolutely not.

01:37:34   - It's this idea that creation has to be

01:37:36   this single definable act by a single entity, right?

01:37:40   Which has always been the basis of copyright law.

01:37:43   You can pinpoint the creator

01:37:44   and therefore you can determine ownership.

01:37:46   - It's the whole thing about hiring someone to do it,

01:37:48   which is like the key to this whole article.

01:37:50   - But AI throws a wrench in that whole system

01:37:51   because it's not always so clear cut.

01:37:53   Is the creator the programmer who wrote the AI's code

01:37:57   or is it the user who typed in the prompt?

01:37:59   Or is it somehow the data that the AI was trained

01:38:02   on all those millions of images and text snippets?

01:38:04   - It's like this weird blend of human

01:38:06   and machine creativity where it's almost impossible

01:38:09   to separate the two.

01:38:10   - Right, and so Syracuse's point is that

01:38:12   maybe instead of trying to cram AI art

01:38:15   into this outdated framework,

01:38:16   maybe we need to rethink the whole concept

01:38:18   of creation and ownership for the digital age.

01:38:21   - So instead of black and white,

01:38:22   it's more like shades of gray.

01:38:23   - Precisely.

01:38:24   - He's suggesting that maybe we need to embrace the ambiguity

01:38:27   and complexity that AI brings to the table

01:38:30   instead of trying to erase it.

01:38:31   - It's like AI is making us rethink like centuries

01:38:35   of assumptions about what art is

01:38:37   and who gets to be called an artist.

01:38:39   - Yeah, and that can be a little unsettling for some people.

01:38:41   Like it's challenging these deeply held beliefs

01:38:44   about human exceptionalism.

01:38:45   - Deeply held beliefs?

01:38:47   - Totally, but for others, it's like this really exciting

01:38:49   time, this explosion of possibilities.

01:38:51   Like we're on the verge of something totally new

01:38:54   and uncharted.

01:38:55   - Exactly, and I think Syracuse captures

01:38:56   that tension really well.

01:38:57   He doesn't shy away from the hard questions.

01:38:59   - No, he definitely doesn't.

01:39:01   And speaking of hard questions,

01:39:02   he leaves us with a pretty big one.

01:39:05   - Go on.

01:39:05   - He says, instead of just asking, you know,

01:39:07   who made this when it comes to AI art,

01:39:10   maybe we should be asking,

01:39:12   how do we want to define made in a world

01:39:15   where AI is becoming this powerful creative force?

01:39:18   - I love that question because it shifts the focus away

01:39:21   from trying to find the one true creator

01:39:23   and it puts the emphasis on what kind of future

01:39:26   we're trying to create.

01:39:27   - Exactly, like it's not about assigning blame

01:39:30   or credit anymore, it's about taking responsibility

01:39:32   for the tools we're building and the impact they're having.

01:39:35   - And it's about recognizing that AI

01:39:36   isn't just this neutral technology.

01:39:38   It's shaped by our values, our biases,

01:39:41   the choices we make as a society.

01:39:42   - It makes you think about the ethical implications,

01:39:44   all the unintended consequences

01:39:46   that we might not even be able to foresee right now.

01:39:48   - Absolutely, it's like opening Pandora's box in a way,

01:39:51   but instead of just fearing what might come out,

01:39:54   maybe we can try to steer it

01:39:56   in a direction that benefits humanity.

01:39:58   - So it's not just a technological challenge anymore, right?

01:40:01   It's a philosophical one, a social one, an ethical one.

01:40:04   - Totally, it's about figuring out what it means

01:40:06   to be human in an age of intelligent machines

01:40:09   and what role creativity will play in all of this.

01:40:12   - Yeah, and I don't think there are any easy answers here,

01:40:16   but I do think Syracuse gives us a good place to start

01:40:19   by asking the right questions. - But this is the end.

01:40:21   - We didn't get anywhere.

01:40:21   - It's about having those difficult conversations,

01:40:24   being willing to challenge our own assumptions

01:40:26   and being open to new perspectives.

01:40:28   - And I think that's something we've tried to do here today

01:40:30   to really grapple with the complexities of AI art.

01:40:32   - Is it?

01:40:33   - Are we gonna do a Squarespace ad now?

01:40:35   - Absolutely, and I think it's a conversation

01:40:38   that's only gonna become more important,

01:40:39   more urgent as AI continues to evolve.

01:40:43   - So on that note, I wanna thank you all for joining us

01:40:45   for this deep dive into the world of AI art.

01:40:47   It's been quite a journey.

01:40:48   - It really has, and I think it's just the beginning.

01:40:51   - Definitely. - Yeah.

01:40:52   - So until next time, keep those creative sparks flying,

01:40:55   whether they're human or artificial.

01:40:57   - Here to that.

01:40:58   - And we'll see y'all in the next one.

01:41:00   - Here to that.

01:41:02   - To quote a famous line from a nerdy show,

01:41:05   the line being, "Maybe I use too many monkeys,

01:41:07   "maybe they use too many cliches when they drain this LLM,"

01:41:11   because wow, there was, like the whole thing was just,

01:41:14   how many different cliches can we work in at the same time?

01:41:16   It missed the main point of my article,

01:41:18   which is not a great, I mean, you would think

01:41:21   people are like, "Oh, LLMs are great at summarizing."

01:41:23   Not if you missed the main, most important point.

01:41:26   Even when they were parroting back the beginning

01:41:28   and the part of whatever they trained it on was like,

01:41:31   this is the part where we're gonna go over the article.

01:41:33   They did not get the crux of it,

01:41:34   and when they sort of did verbatim

01:41:36   the example I had in the middle,

01:41:37   they missed the important part of the example,

01:41:39   which was the similarity between typing a prompt

01:41:43   and then typing an email to an artist who makes it for you.

01:41:46   They omitted that entirely, and the only two examples

01:41:48   they had were typing a prompt and you making it yourself,

01:41:51   and that's not, there's nothing interesting, oh my God.

01:41:53   Anyway, this was a bad podcast that if I heard a person

01:41:57   doing a podcast like this, I would be,

01:41:58   to quote another famous line, Woody Allen, whatever,

01:42:01   what was this, was it Andy Hall?

01:42:04   "You know nothing of my work.

01:42:06   "Boy, if only life were really like this."

01:42:08   Oh, people know what I'm talking about.

01:42:09   Anyway, yeah, they know nothing of my work.

01:42:11   The LLMs did not get it, it's a shame,

01:42:14   and they talked in circles a lot,

01:42:16   and they used so many cliches,

01:42:18   and it's obvious that they've trained on a lot of information

01:42:20   surrounding AI and stuff, which is not surprising,

01:42:22   so they can riff, freeform riff on it,

01:42:25   but as an example of trying to look at an article

01:42:30   and talk about what the article is talking about, they fail.

01:42:35   As an example of natural sounding voices

01:42:40   speaking text generated by an LLM,

01:42:42   these things are actually pretty okay.

01:42:44   You can still tell the AI if you've heard a few of them,

01:42:46   because there's kind of a sameness to what they do,

01:42:49   but honestly, there's kind of a sameness

01:42:50   to what a lot of humans do in certain things anyway.

01:42:53   I bet if you trained an LLM on our hundreds

01:42:56   and hundreds of hours, they could do a pretty good job

01:42:59   of simulating us, but I think they'd make us say

01:43:01   even dumber things than we already say.

01:43:03   - Well, what's interesting about this,

01:43:06   so to me, when I hear the podcast generated by NotebookLM,

01:43:11   they don't sound that ridiculous to me.

01:43:13   They don't sound that bad. - No, absolutely not.

01:43:15   - The words that they're saying

01:43:16   or the voice that they're saying them in,

01:43:18   because it's two different things.

01:43:19   - The actual content is not nearly as bad

01:43:22   as I expected it to be.

01:43:23   - Well, but I think that the actual content

01:43:25   is very similar to the actual content of text

01:43:27   that comes out of an LLM.

01:43:29   When you type in the chat GPT and it gives you a big answer

01:43:31   and you read the text, it's coherent, right?

01:43:33   That's the whole point.

01:43:34   That's why people are always so impressed by it.

01:43:36   That's why it fools so many people

01:43:37   into thinking that it's actually intelligent,

01:43:38   because the text is, like, it makes sense.

01:43:41   Like, the sentences join to one another or whatever.

01:43:43   Now, maybe the sentences are filled with made-up stuff

01:43:45   or whatever, but the sentences themselves join.

01:43:47   So I think the most impressive thing about these

01:43:49   is taking that text that you would see in chat GPT

01:43:52   and then reading it in the style of a podcaster

01:43:55   with the same umms and oohs and pauses

01:43:59   and emphasis or whatever.

01:44:01   And that is the more impressive thing from my perspective.

01:44:04   - And that is what they're doing.

01:44:06   This is still based on modern LLM generation techniques

01:44:09   and summarization and things like that.

01:44:10   And obviously, they're then forming it into a podcast

01:44:14   with these kind of podcast formats of people saying,

01:44:18   hey, what about this?

01:44:19   Hey, welcome back, guys.

01:44:21   That's a good point.

01:44:22   But to me, this shows, I think, the immense power

01:44:26   of generative AI to actually replace

01:44:31   a bunch of mediocre media.

01:44:34   Like, what this sounds like to me

01:44:36   is a lot of real podcasts that are out there.

01:44:39   Nothing that I really listen to,

01:44:41   but it sounds like a lot of podcasts out there.

01:44:43   And in many ways, the style of speaking

01:44:46   where they're very prepared and professional

01:44:49   and yet there's no personality being shown whatsoever.

01:44:52   Hey, that's a good point, Jane.

01:44:54   It sounds a lot like news anchors talking to each other

01:44:58   and trying to appear human.

01:45:00   - Or like what a news anchor or a host

01:45:03   or I don't know, a presenter you would call them in the UK,

01:45:06   what they're asked to do, what part of their job is

01:45:09   is to fake interest in things that they have no interest in.

01:45:12   If you're like a news anchor,

01:45:13   you can't have interest in every news story,

01:45:15   but it's your job to pretend that you are interested

01:45:18   in this bake sale or the school budget committee

01:45:22   or whatever.

01:45:23   Your job is to make it sound interesting and engaging,

01:45:26   but you as an actual newscaster

01:45:29   can't possibly be interested in all those things,

01:45:30   which is why we read newscasters, for example,

01:45:34   as having their interest.

01:45:35   Or like I put them on a morning show

01:45:36   and they're talking about,

01:45:37   oh, so you won the pie competition, tell me about that.

01:45:39   We know they're not actually interested

01:45:41   in the pie competition or the fact that these people won,

01:45:43   but it's their job to pretend they're interested,

01:45:45   which is why they read as fake to many of us.

01:45:48   But morning shows are popular.

01:45:50   People like seeing that.

01:45:51   And so that artificiality is essentially

01:45:54   what we're paying those people for.

01:45:55   And it is a service that people like to consume.

01:45:57   And I think this provides the same thing

01:46:00   in that we listen to it and we're like,

01:46:01   okay, well, there's no actual person

01:46:03   who's actually interested in anything here,

01:46:04   but is it that much different

01:46:06   than the hosts of Good Morning America

01:46:07   feigning interest in the world's biggest ball of yarn?

01:46:10   I don't think it is.

01:46:11   - Right.

01:46:12   And the thing is, what I am into podcasts for

01:46:15   is people and the personalities

01:46:17   and the chemistry between hosts

01:46:19   and how people just interact with each other

01:46:22   and have interesting conversations.

01:46:23   And this is not that

01:46:25   and doesn't sound like it will ever be that.

01:46:27   However, there's also a lot of people out there

01:46:30   who just want information digest.

01:46:33   Here is like what happened today in X,

01:46:36   or whatever my industry or interest is.

01:46:39   I wanna hear the latest in that.

01:46:41   Summarize the news headlines for me

01:46:43   and give me a little bit of context for each of those

01:46:45   that I can listen to every day on my jog or whatever.

01:46:49   There is a large market for

01:46:54   utilitarian mediocrity.

01:46:56   And that's what this delivers.

01:46:58   It's not gonna replace like due by Friday,

01:47:01   but it is gonna replace a lot of mediocrity that's out there

01:47:06   because a lot of people,

01:47:07   and especially 'cause you can make something

01:47:09   that is specialized to one thing.

01:47:13   If you're the only person who wants to hear

01:47:15   a summary podcast of Topic X, you can do that here.

01:47:19   And I think that's very powerful.

01:47:21   You really individualize your media.

01:47:24   It's like this is exactly what you want

01:47:27   even if no one else wants to hear this

01:47:29   or is interested in this

01:47:30   or it's about something that's like private documentation

01:47:33   that only you have for whatever reason

01:47:35   or like your own content.

01:47:37   You can listen to that kind of thing.

01:47:39   You can use it as a learning tool.

01:47:41   It can be a summarization tool.

01:47:42   It can be like get me up to date.

01:47:45   Give me a quick refresher on the notes for my presentation

01:47:48   before I give my presentation in an hour

01:47:50   like I'm on my drive to work.

01:47:52   - Well, now you're getting into things

01:47:53   where accuracy might be required

01:47:54   and I would be wary about that.

01:47:56   - Sure, okay, yeah, but like--

01:47:58   - 'Cause on the test,

01:47:59   they're gonna want you to get the answer right

01:48:00   not just well, I told you what my LLM told me.

01:48:03   - But this blew my mind because yeah,

01:48:06   this does not sound as good as a good podcast

01:48:10   but it sounds better than a lot of bad podcasts

01:48:12   that I've heard from actual people.

01:48:14   I would rather listen to these

01:48:16   than a lot of actual podcasts I have heard.

01:48:19   - Did you hear that Facebook's going to

01:48:20   one of the things they're proposing or slash implementing

01:48:23   is in the Facebook, I don't know, the news feed,

01:48:26   the feed that is personalized for you

01:48:28   where they take stuff from your social network on Facebook

01:48:32   while they also throw stuff in your face

01:48:34   that they think you might be interested in

01:48:35   based on what they know about you

01:48:37   and then the third leg of that stool is going to be

01:48:40   and also we will AI generate stuff

01:48:42   that we think you might be interested in.

01:48:43   - Oh yeah.

01:48:45   - Because like the old way was like

01:48:46   stuff from people you follow who are in your network

01:48:48   and then it was like but also stuff that our algorithm

01:48:51   you might think should be interested

01:48:52   but all that stuff is stuff

01:48:53   that presumably humans were creating

01:48:55   and now it's like you know what,

01:48:56   there's a third leg which is stuff that we create

01:48:59   out of thin air based on LM stuff

01:49:02   and we'll put that in your feed too

01:49:03   and to Marco's point, do you think people will notice

01:49:08   that that is not different

01:49:10   than the stuff they're being algorithmically fed

01:49:12   and the stuff that is from people in their network?

01:49:15   Like depending on what the stuff is,

01:49:17   lots of things created by humans

01:49:19   have that same look and feel

01:49:21   and if Facebook AI generates something

01:49:24   that's unbeknownst to you is specifically

01:49:26   for like you or a tiny slice of the population

01:49:29   but it looks just like the thing they fed you

01:49:31   from People Magazine, as far as you're concerned

01:49:33   that you'd never be able to distinguish

01:49:36   the AI generated like the average person

01:49:38   never be able to distinguish the AI generated content

01:49:40   from the real People Magazine content

01:49:41   because they are really kind of at the same level

01:49:44   and they both fulfill the same need.

01:49:45   The problem of course is if the AI generated thing

01:49:47   is just completely made up BS that is filled with lies

01:49:51   or for example a podcast discussing an article

01:49:54   that misses all the major points of the article,

01:49:56   that's not great but maybe people won't notice.

01:49:59   - But still I think a large effect

01:50:03   that we are already having with generative AI and LLMs

01:50:08   that will continue to get even more severe in the future

01:50:12   is there's a lot of media out there

01:50:16   that is formulaic and low personality

01:50:21   and is mostly being used to just generate stuff

01:50:27   for people to consume in mediocrity.

01:50:30   I think there will be a lot of AI stuff

01:50:33   that will replace that, like a lot of AI generation

01:50:36   will replace a lot of that mediocrity

01:50:37   and this is gonna be a large theme of the AI age in general

01:50:42   that there's a huge amount of mediocrity out there

01:50:46   that can be easily automated

01:50:48   and the results will be good enough or better.

01:50:51   And I think this blew my mind when I heard it

01:50:54   'cause it's way better than I would have guessed.

01:50:58   It's not great but it's way better

01:51:00   than I thought it could be at this stage.

01:51:02   - Yeah, I very much agree.

01:51:04   Yeah, when I heard the one that somebody had done,

01:51:08   I forgot, we'll put a link in the show notes,

01:51:09   but somebody had done one of these

01:51:10   about a subject that I knew nothing about

01:51:12   and I only listened to the first couple minutes

01:51:14   and I was gobsmacked by how real it sounded.

01:51:18   And yes, if you really pay attention

01:51:21   and if you really listen,

01:51:22   if you do active listening or whatever,

01:51:24   you can tell that it's probably not real.

01:51:27   But note that I said probably

01:51:29   because genuinely, if I didn't know

01:51:33   that I was listening to AI,

01:51:35   I would have thought that these were typical

01:51:37   but not terribly skilled podcasters.

01:51:40   And the ums and the inflections, or maybe they weren't ums,

01:51:44   but the inflections and the--

01:51:46   - There are ums, they insert them.

01:51:49   - There you go, and there's not,

01:51:51   it's not just monotone, right?

01:51:53   And they play off each other well

01:51:55   and it sounds real, certainly at a glance.

01:51:59   And I would argue, unless you're really,

01:52:01   really, really paying attention, it sounds real.

01:52:03   I was stunned at how real it sounds.

01:52:06   I could not, and I still can't believe it.

01:52:08   And yes--

01:52:09   - Well, that part isn't new, by the way.

01:52:10   They've been able to do people speaking like this

01:52:13   and obviously the texts from LLMs,

01:52:14   that's all been around for a while now.

01:52:17   The new thing that I think is impressive about this

01:52:19   is understanding of the podcast format.

01:52:21   How do I make, and I know it sounds nice,

01:52:23   how do I make a podcast out of this?

01:52:24   It's clear that this has been trained

01:52:26   on how podcasts are structured,

01:52:28   right down to, hey, we're gonna talk about this article.

01:52:30   First, we're gonna talk about,

01:52:32   we'll give you an overview of the article,

01:52:33   then we're gonna get into some of the details,

01:52:34   and then after that, we're gonna spin off

01:52:36   into a more freeform discussion on ideas from the,

01:52:39   that is the structure of a podcast discussion,

01:52:41   and that's what this model knows.

01:52:43   And if you haven't heard voices like this before,

01:52:45   you're impressed by the intonation,

01:52:46   or whatever, but previously,

01:52:47   this same type of voice would be saying things,

01:52:49   but it wouldn't sound like a podcast,

01:52:51   because it would just be like,

01:52:52   look, we can make this voice recite this passage

01:52:54   from the book, and it sounds very expressive,

01:52:56   and it does um's and ah's, and aren't you fooled by it?

01:52:58   This is the whole origin of all the deepfake stuff

01:53:00   that's out there, but this one is like,

01:53:02   I mean, I guess they just fed it the transcripts

01:53:04   or the audio of podcasts, however they did it,

01:53:06   it definitely gets the structure and the vibe of a podcast,

01:53:10   despite the content being terrible.

01:53:13   - But the thing, like, you know,

01:53:14   obviously you're gonna be, I think,

01:53:16   a more critical evaluator than many.

01:53:18   - John?

01:53:19   - But that's the thing about all these,

01:53:20   like when Casey was saying he listened to one

01:53:21   that was about a topic he didn't know about,

01:53:23   that's the danger of these,

01:53:24   this whole, the whole thing of LMs is like, you know,

01:53:27   like pets and many other things,

01:53:29   it's so easy to fool humans into thinking

01:53:32   that like, there's a spirit living in the tree,

01:53:34   or the chair, or whatever,

01:53:35   like we will personify anything.

01:53:37   And so it's so easy to fool us into thinking

01:53:42   that that's a real person expressing real things

01:53:44   and blah, blah, blah.

01:53:45   And it's the worst when the content is in,

01:53:49   it has no rhyme or reason other than

01:53:51   just a bunch of statistical probabilities.

01:53:53   And so you end up listening to a podcast

01:53:54   about a topic you knew nothing about,

01:53:56   and at the end of it, your head is filled

01:53:57   with completely false information,

01:53:59   because the accuracy of the podcast

01:54:01   is not really important at all.

01:54:04   And you're like, well, it was a person saying

01:54:05   it to me, so I really totally believe it,

01:54:07   so I guess that's the truth.

01:54:08   And it's like, no, not even close.

01:54:10   And that's why, that's why I feel like it's,

01:54:13   the utility is potentially somewhat limited.

01:54:16   It's like we talked about the summarization of notifications.

01:54:20   Once you rely on this, or like studying for a test,

01:54:23   once there's like a, once there is a measurement to,

01:54:27   like that you compare against, like, okay,

01:54:29   but the summary of my notifications has to be accurate,

01:54:31   otherwise it's useless.

01:54:32   Okay, but the study guide needs to tell me

01:54:34   the correct capital of Minnesota,

01:54:36   because when I enter it on the test,

01:54:37   if it's wrong, I can't say, well,

01:54:39   that's what the LLM said, because there actually

01:54:41   is a right answer, and the purpose of the study guide

01:54:43   is to let me know the right answer.

01:54:45   The purpose of the study guide is not

01:54:46   to fool me into thinking that this is a good study guide,

01:54:49   'cause I thought that right up to the point

01:54:50   until I took the test.

01:54:51   And so I would say, podcasts are somewhere in the middle.

01:54:54   Like, do you care if this podcast

01:54:56   about avocados is full of lies?

01:54:58   I bet there's plenty of real podcasts

01:54:59   about avocados that are full of lies.

01:55:01   Maybe it doesn't matter.

01:55:02   But right until you get to the point of like,

01:55:04   even something as simple as, oh, iPhone,

01:55:07   summarize my notifications, and that's not accurate,

01:55:10   the stakes are still low, but suddenly now you're mad,

01:55:13   and now you're not impressed by the intonation

01:55:15   and the ums of the voice that was reading the other thing.

01:55:17   You're like, well, what the hell?

01:55:18   If you're not gonna be accurate about the summaries

01:55:20   of my thing, I'm just gonna turn this feature off.

01:55:22   - Well, I'll tell you what.

01:55:23   I've been living with the notification summaries

01:55:25   on 18.1 for the last week or whatever.

01:55:27   I find them very useful.

01:55:29   Even when they are not always right,

01:55:30   I find them very useful, and when I listen

01:55:33   to NotebookLM-generated podcasts about things

01:55:35   I do know about, I find their error rate

01:55:38   to be about the same as people podcasts

01:55:40   covering the same topics.

01:55:42   I really do.

01:55:43   It's not, this is closer than you think to human accuracy.

01:55:47   - Well, like I said, podcasts are somewhere in the middle.

01:55:50   You're not being tested on them, and in the end,

01:55:52   you knowing false information of avocados

01:55:54   isn't that big a deal, but notifications,

01:55:57   that's an annoyance question of whether you're annoyed

01:55:59   when it gets things wrong, but study guides,

01:56:01   now we're starting to get into, it actually kinda matters

01:56:04   if it gets it right, because I don't wanna study

01:56:05   incorrect information, that's just gonna make me mad,

01:56:08   and then obviously you crank that up into like,

01:56:11   let this LOM control the surgery machine, yeah.

01:56:14   - No, by this point, my only problem with Apple's,

01:56:17   Apple's summarization on Apple Intelligence Beta so far,

01:56:21   and this is a big problem, is that there is no API.

01:56:25   - For you to, as a app developer,

01:56:28   to try to make the summaries better?

01:56:30   - For me to use them at all in my app, like, for example.

01:56:33   - Yeah, it's applied to you or not, yeah.

01:56:35   - Yeah, in mail, it can show in the table list there

01:56:38   a summary of each message.

01:56:40   I can't do that in my app.

01:56:41   And the most infuriating thing, Apple sent a developer email

01:56:45   like two weeks ago saying, bring Apple Intelligence

01:56:48   to your apps, and every single thing the email suggests

01:56:52   that you do is not Apple Intelligence.

01:56:54   They're just using that to brand like,

01:56:56   here's our ML features that we've had for years.

01:56:58   Use this, here's Spotlight, try to use that, we guess.

01:57:02   All of the Apple Intelligence features

01:57:04   that they're advertising everywhere else

01:57:05   as Apple Intelligence are not available in any APIs

01:57:08   to any developers right now.

01:57:10   - But by doing like the Spotlight thing,

01:57:11   that feeds into their semantic model

01:57:14   on the phone and everything, right?

01:57:15   - No, not yet, it doesn't.

01:57:16   It might someday.

01:57:17   - I know, but you've gotta do it, it's chicken egg.

01:57:18   They want you to do it, so when they roll that out,

01:57:21   the data's there.

01:57:22   - This is like the biggest Apple development on iOS,

01:57:25   in iOS's history, that only Apple can use.

01:57:29   They have opened up zero of it.

01:57:31   There's no API for any of it,

01:57:33   and that makes me very angry.

01:57:34   Anyway, but besides that, I like them,

01:57:37   but that's a big thing that I will keep harping on.

01:57:41   - And by the way, we talked about this on past shows,

01:57:43   you can disable those summaries,

01:57:45   both on an individual app basis,

01:57:47   and I think also globally if you don't like them.

01:57:49   - Honestly, I live with them for a couple days

01:57:52   before you do.

01:57:53   I have found them to be very useful,

01:57:54   and accurate enough to be useful.

01:57:57   - Oh, you know I'm gonna.

01:57:58   I'm the one who asked my three different voice assistants

01:58:00   the same questions today.

01:58:00   You know I'm gonna make them enabled,

01:58:02   but I just, I'd question the utility

01:58:04   for people who aren't doing what I'm doing.

01:58:07   - All right, thank you to our sponsors this week,

01:58:09   Squarespace and QA Wolf, and thanks to our members

01:58:12   who support us directly.

01:58:13   You can join at atp.fm/join.

01:58:15   One of the member perks is ATP Overtime,

01:58:18   a weekly bonus segment that is available exclusively

01:58:21   to members.

01:58:21   This week's Overtime, we'll be talking about

01:58:24   school cell phone bans, and kids and cell phones,

01:58:27   and kind of the parenting and school decisions

01:58:29   and legal decisions around whether your kid

01:58:32   should have a phone in school.

01:58:33   We'll talk about that in Overtime.

01:58:34   You can join a list at atp.fm/join.

01:58:37   Thanks for listening everybody,

01:58:38   and we'll talk to you next week.

01:58:41   (upbeat music)

01:58:44   ♪ Now the show is over ♪

01:58:46   ♪ They didn't even mean to begin ♪

01:58:48   ♪ 'Cause it was accidental ♪

01:58:50   ♪ Accidental ♪

01:58:51   ♪ Oh it was accidental ♪

01:58:53   ♪ Accidental ♪

01:58:54   ♪ John didn't do any research ♪

01:58:56   ♪ Margo and Casey wouldn't let him ♪

01:58:59   ♪ 'Cause it was accidental ♪

01:59:01   ♪ Accidental ♪

01:59:02   ♪ Oh it was accidental ♪

01:59:03   ♪ Accidental ♪

01:59:04   ♪ And you can find the show notes at atp.fm ♪

01:59:09   ♪ And if you're into Mastodon ♪

01:59:12   ♪ You can follow them at C-A-S-E-Y-L-I-S-S ♪

01:59:19   ♪ So that's Casey Liss M-A-R-C-O-A-R-M ♪

01:59:23   ♪ Auntie Margo Arman S-I-R-A-C ♪

01:59:28   ♪ U-S-A-C-R-A-Q-S-A ♪

01:59:31   ♪ It's accidental ♪

01:59:32   ♪ It's accidental ♪

01:59:34   ♪ They didn't mean to accidental ♪

01:59:37   ♪ Accidental ♪

01:59:39   ♪ Tech podcast so long ♪

01:59:42   - Right, get ready to fire up those stoves,

01:59:46   because today we're diving into something

01:59:48   seemingly simple, but surprisingly nuanced,

01:59:52   John Siracusa's legendary basic pasta sauce.

01:59:57   You wouldn't think a simple tomato sauce

01:59:58   would require such a deep dive,

02:00:00   but trust me, Siracusa approaches this recipe

02:00:04   with almost philosophical reverence.

02:00:06   - What's fascinating is how he breaks it down

02:00:08   into this sauce.

02:00:09   - No, you sure don't.

02:00:10   - Emphasizing that the ingredients, the process,

02:00:13   and the time all hold equal weight.

02:00:15   He argues you can't just nail one of these elements,

02:00:18   you have to treat them all with equal importance.

02:00:20   - Okay, so it's like three-legged stool,

02:00:22   neglect one leg, and the whole thing collapses.

02:00:25   So let's start with the foundation ingredients.

02:00:27   - Don't sound like me.

02:00:28   - And Siracusa doesn't hold back

02:00:30   on his thoughts about tomatoes.

02:00:31   - Oh no, he goes deep,

02:00:32   especially on the San Marzano tomatoes.

02:00:34   - He could have just said, "Use canned tomatoes,"

02:00:37   but no, he practically wrote a dissertation

02:00:40   on finding the perfect San Marzano.

02:00:42   - For those of us who haven't quite reached

02:00:44   that level of tomato enthusiasm, what is it

02:00:48   about these San Marzanos?

02:00:49   What makes them so special?

02:00:51   - They have this unique combination

02:00:53   of low acidity, a natural sweetness, and a meaty texture,

02:00:58   which makes them ideal for a well-balanced flavorful sauce.

02:01:02   However, Siracusa is also realistic.

02:01:04   He knows finding truly authentic San Marzanos

02:01:08   can be a challenge.

02:01:09   He even links to this hilarious video

02:01:11   where he's case testing different brands.

02:01:13   - I'm sorry, what?

02:01:15   - Oh man, I've got to see this video.

02:01:16   It's like finding out your favorite band has been-

02:01:18   - Yeah, me too, I know I made a video.

02:01:20   - Can they generate that for us?

02:01:21   - But he does say a good San Marzano style tomato

02:01:23   you enjoy is better than an authentic one you don't.

02:01:25   Exactly, and that actually ties into his whole philosophy.

02:01:28   - Wait, is that two different people, same voice?

02:01:31   - Sometimes it's the third person.

02:01:32   - And ultimately trusting your own judgment.

02:01:34   - There's that trust element again,

02:01:36   just like with the sauce trinity.

02:01:37   You have to trust your gut, which leads us perfectly-

02:01:39   - They're really adding a lot to this,

02:01:41   'cause this is not that much text.

02:01:43   - And Syracuse gets real about the anxiety

02:01:45   of burning the sauce.

02:01:47   - He does, he even points to a clean pot

02:01:49   as a mark of success. - People stop being polite,

02:01:50   start getting real about burning the sauce.

02:01:52   Reference acknowledged.

02:01:53   - Low and slow cooking.

02:01:55   - He says a burned sauce ruins the entire batch,

02:01:57   which let's be honest is a fear

02:01:59   we've all experienced in the kitchen.

02:02:01   - I hope you have all experienced it.

02:02:01   - But what's the science behind this low and slow approach?

02:02:04   - Low heat allows the flavors to develop slowly-

02:02:06   - Now they're just reading from Wikipedia again

02:02:08   about low heat. - Without that harshness

02:02:09   you get from high heat.

02:02:10   And it prevents burning,

02:02:11   which can ruin the flavor of the whole sauce.

02:02:14   He's also a stickler for stirring,

02:02:16   not just letting it simmer on its own.

02:02:18   - So it's about being engaged in the process,

02:02:20   not just letting it simmer-

02:02:21   - This is so-

02:02:22   - He doesn't want us to just go off and watch TV

02:02:24   while the sauce simmer. - You don't need to go back.

02:02:26   - Definitely not.

02:02:27   - You want a shot- - I'm so angry.

02:02:28   - Of keeping an eye on things.

02:02:29   - If someone wrote like this and this is like top of mind,

02:02:31   'cause my daughter is doing college essays.

02:02:32   - This is not a set it and forget it kind of sauce.

02:02:33   - Just get out the red pen for this one.

02:02:34   - Now, speaking of being present and engaged,

02:02:36   let's talk about Syracuse's very specific instructions

02:02:40   on fresh herbs.

02:02:41   - Oh yes, the fresh factor,

02:02:43   as I like to call it.

02:02:44   He's very clear about wanting us to use only fresh parsley

02:02:47   and basil chopped right before they go into the pot.

02:02:50   - He is, and I love how he emphasizes

02:02:52   not refrigerating the basil, saying it dulls the flavor.

02:02:55   It's like he wants to capture the essence of these herbs

02:02:58   at the peak.

02:02:59   - And that little tip about storing parsley

02:03:00   in a glass of water, like a bouquet of flowers.

02:03:03   So simple yet brilliant.

02:03:05   - So brilliant.

02:03:06   - I'm the first person to ever think of that.

02:03:08   - He would argue, and I'd have to agree

02:03:10   that it makes a world of difference.

02:03:12   See, fresh herbs have these volatile oils.

02:03:15   - Oh my God, they're eating from Wikipedia again.

02:03:17   - Almost nuanced flavor,

02:03:18   which you just don't get with dried herbs.

02:03:19   - I love this method of torture for John.

02:03:21   Like have somebody poorly summarize your own content

02:03:25   back to you.

02:03:26   - I know, right.

02:03:26   - And expand on it in the most kind of like,

02:03:29   what is this whole thing about low heat?

02:03:32   I expect them to start quoting thermodynamics.

02:03:34   - It instructs us to add a whole peeled onion to the sauce,

02:03:37   but then we just discard it at the end.

02:03:40   - Spoiler alert.

02:03:41   - It's like a culinary magic trick.

02:03:43   - No, John.

02:03:44   (laughing)

02:03:45   - It infuses the sauce

02:03:46   with this really subtle depth of flavor.

02:03:48   - So it's like a secret ingredient that disappears

02:03:50   leaving behind its essence.

02:03:51   - It's not a secret, it's an ingredient.

02:03:53   - It's a classic technique to add-

02:03:54   - It's all literally in the recipe.

02:03:56   - Without overpowering the other flavors.

02:03:58   Think of it like using a bay leaf.

02:04:00   You don't eat it, but it subtly enhances the overall taste.

02:04:04   - Mind blown.

02:04:06   (laughing)

02:04:08   - Jesus.

02:04:10   - Even when it comes to something as basic as an onion.

02:04:13   Now his actual cooking process seems pretty straightforward.

02:04:16   Wouldn't you say?

02:04:17   - It is, but straightforward doesn't mean foolproof.

02:04:19   - This is longer than the recipe.

02:04:21   - And it brings us to the final piece

02:04:22   of the sauce training puzzle. - Way longer.

02:04:23   - Yeah, it is.

02:04:23   - Time.

02:04:24   - Ah, yes, the simmer.

02:04:25   He does have some specific guidelines about that, right?

02:04:27   - He does.

02:04:28   He recommends simmering for one to two hours,

02:04:30   which seems pretty standard for a good tomato sauce.

02:04:33   But then he throws in this interesting curve ball.

02:04:35   He says he often finds less is more.

02:04:37   - Wait, hold on.

02:04:38   - Interesting curve ball.

02:04:39   - It's not like baking where you absolutely

02:04:40   need to follow the recipe to the letter.

02:04:42   You're telling me he's cool with me eyeballing it.

02:04:44   - That's classic Syracuse. - Not you, AI voice.

02:04:46   - The man could explain the nuances of drying herbs

02:04:49   and make it sound like a suspense thriller.

02:04:51   - No.

02:04:52   (laughing)

02:04:53   - He emphasizes the sauce as it simmers

02:04:54   because over cooking can make it bland.

02:04:57   - Wow.

02:04:58   - Wow.

02:04:59   - Wow.

02:05:00   (laughing)

02:05:01   - The more you cook it, the more flavorful it gets.

02:05:02   - That's what's so great about Syracuse's approach.

02:05:04   He encourages you to trust your instincts,

02:05:06   not just the clock. - You're instincts.

02:05:08   - No, I definitely do not encourage that.

02:05:09   - And start adding those optional meat additions.

02:05:12   - Right, we briefly touched on the meatballs

02:05:14   and sausage before.

02:05:15   - Yeah.

02:05:16   - How does simmering time come into play

02:05:17   when you're adding those to the mix?

02:05:18   - Well, now you're not just simmering for flavor,

02:05:20   you're also making sure those meats are cooked through.

02:05:23   And of course, your acusa has some very specific thoughts

02:05:25   on this as well.

02:05:26   - I bet he does.

02:05:27   Does he have a size guideline for the meatballs?

02:05:29   - He does.

02:05:30   He actually compares them to sports equipment.

02:05:32   He says they should be bigger than a golf ball but smaller

02:05:34   than a tennis ball. - I think I have a weight.

02:05:35   Use the weight. - Ball with the failure ball

02:05:36   being the absolute maximum size.

02:05:38   - Only Syracuse could use sports equipment

02:05:41   as a meatball size guide.

02:05:43   - Oh.

02:05:43   - What's the reasoning behind this?

02:05:44   - It all comes back to that final element

02:05:47   of the sauce trinity time.

02:05:49   The larger the meatball,

02:05:50   the longer it will take to cook through.

02:05:52   - 3.5 ounce balls.

02:05:53   - You don't wanna end up with undercooked meat in your sauce.

02:05:55   - Safety first.

02:05:56   So it's all about finding that balance between simmering

02:06:00   long enough to develop those deep, rich flavors

02:06:02   but not so long that you end up with a bland or even worse

02:06:06   undercooked sauce.

02:06:07   It's a delicate dance but clearly--

02:06:08   - Undercooked?

02:06:09   Why would cooking it so long make it undercooked?

02:06:10   - It really highlights how even a seemingly simple sauce

02:06:12   requires a certain level of attention and care.

02:06:16   - It does.

02:06:17   And that's what makes Syracuse's approach so fascinating.

02:06:19   He doesn't just throw a recipe at you.

02:06:21   He guides you through the process

02:06:23   and encourages you to understand--

02:06:24   - Someone needs to feed this model more podcasts

02:06:26   where they trash something?

02:06:27   'Cause they're always so positive.

02:06:29   (laughing)

02:06:30   - Absolutely.

02:06:30   It's about trusting your sense of your instincts.

02:06:31   - You can tell they're not friends in our show.

02:06:34   - Yeah, exactly.

02:06:35   - And on that note, what final thoughts

02:06:36   would you leave our listeners with

02:06:38   as they embark on their own pasta making adventures?

02:06:41   - I'd say use this recipe as a starting point,

02:06:44   a foundation upon which to build

02:06:45   your own culinary masterpiece.

02:06:47   Don't be afraid to experiment with tomatoes,

02:06:50   maybe try and mix up herbs

02:06:52   or even adjust the simmering time to suit your taste.

02:06:54   - So just like he trusts us to find the perfect San Marzano,

02:06:57   he's also giving us permission to make this recipe our own.

02:07:01   - Precisely.

02:07:02   - That's definitely not the recipe.

02:07:02   - It's about discovering what brings you joy in the kitchen.

02:07:05   Cooking shouldn't feel like a chore,

02:07:06   it should be a celebration of flavors--

02:07:07   - This is just again from Wikipedia

02:07:08   or other recipe pages.

02:07:10   - And on that note,

02:07:11   I think we've given our listeners plenty to chew on today.

02:07:13   - Indeed.

02:07:14   - Chew on, huh?

02:07:15   - Chew on the nuances of San Marzano tomatoes,

02:07:17   the importance of low and slow cooking,

02:07:20   the magic of a whole onion and the empowering realization

02:07:23   that even a basic pasta sauce

02:07:25   can be a platform for culinary exploration.

02:07:28   - Who knew there was so much to unpack

02:07:30   in a simple tomato sauce?

02:07:32   A huge thank you to our expert

02:07:33   for guiding us through this delicious deep dive.

02:07:36   - The pleasure was all mine.

02:07:37   - And to our listeners,

02:07:38   we hope this episode inspires you

02:07:39   to approach all your culinary endeavors

02:07:41   with a newfound appreciation for the process,

02:07:44   the details and the joy

02:07:45   of creating something truly delicious.

02:07:48   Until next time, happy cooking.

02:07:50   - Happy cooking, Jon.

02:07:52   - Mm-hmm.

02:07:53   (laughing)

02:07:54   - You're so miserable.

02:07:55   - It just like, it makes things worse.

02:07:57   It's the magic power of like making anything worse

02:08:00   by having those people try to explain it.

02:08:03   - But see, there is a market for like,

02:08:05   talk to me about this thing for a few minutes.

02:08:07   - Nobody wants that, they just want the recipe.

02:08:09   You know, even when they go to the recipe,

02:08:10   they don't wanna hear the big story.

02:08:11   It's like, just give me the ingredients and the directions.

02:08:14   (beeping)