674: A Reliable, Boring Partner
00:00:00
◼
►
Gentlemen, I got to tell you, Ubiquity giveth and Ubiquity taketh away.
00:00:03
◼
►
Oh no, what happened?
00:00:04
◼
►
So we're doing a very abridged birthday trip for Michaela. She turned eight on Sunday, which is impossible, but here we are. And we're going out of town for a couple of nights over the weekend. And I did the thing that I love to do when we go out of town, which is I go to one of the local libraries and I borrow a hotspot.
00:00:23
◼
►
And as I've said many times on the show, our actual library offers T-Mobile hotspots that you can borrow. And a neighboring county, which is like a little under half an hour drive from me, offers Verizon hotspots. And these counties have reciprocity with each other for library cards and things like that.
00:00:40
◼
►
And so if I have the time and the inclination, I'll usually go to the further away county to get the Verizon hotspot. And I did that. And Erin went with me a couple of days ago. We got her library card at the other library. So now I can like stage two different hotspots on hold, like ready and waiting to go. I'm very excited about this.
00:00:56
◼
►
This is what makes me happy, right? Especially around football season, because I use these hotspots, you know, to get internet to the TV and whatnot when we're tailgating.
00:01:04
◼
►
Anyways, I get home and I have the opportunity, I guess this was yesterday, and I have the opportunity to try out the hotspot with my shiny new Ubiquity travel router that I'm so excited about, right?
00:01:20
◼
►
And this travel router has worked no sweat with tethering to my phone. It has worked no sweat tethering to my iPad. All has been good so far.
00:01:29
◼
►
And I connect it to the Verizon hotspot, and it says, can you please plug in the internet?
00:01:36
◼
►
I did. I did plug in the internet. Now, admittedly, this was while Verizon was dying. So I thought, oh, perhaps that's the problem.
00:01:46
◼
►
But it turns out, I tried again today, after Verizon rose from the dead, and it still is asking, please connect the internet.
00:01:53
◼
►
So I was so excited to have my sweet new Ubiquity travel router to bring with me, and I still will, and it still works, and it can still rebroadcast the hotspot's Wi-Fi.
00:02:04
◼
►
But I was connecting it via USB-C, which I prefer for a bunch of unimportant reasons, and it didn't freaking work, and I'm having a sad.
00:02:11
◼
►
Does it have an Ethernet jack on the hotspot or no?
00:02:14
◼
►
Not on the hotspot, unfortunately. There are hotspots where this exists. In fact, you might have or did have one, if I remember.
00:02:19
◼
►
Okay, there you go. This is a Verizon Jetpack, I think. I don't remember the model number.
00:02:24
◼
►
But it's actually not a bad hotspot, and it has USB-C on it, in contrast to most of the T-Mobile ones that I get, which have, what is it, micro-USB?
00:02:32
◼
►
The god-awful one that won't go away.
00:02:35
◼
►
And so that's very annoying. But then I plugged the same hotspot into one of my GL iNet travel router things, and it worked no problem.
00:02:45
◼
►
So I'm sure this is a software problem with Ubiquity travel router. I'm sure it will get resolved at some point, but probably not before my trip this weekend.
00:02:52
◼
►
So all is really fine in the grand scheme of things, but it's the little things, gentlemen. It's the little things.
00:02:57
◼
►
I was so excited for my shiny new white plastic toy, and it's not going to work the way I want it to.
00:03:03
◼
►
It'll still work. Like I said, I can rebroadcast the hotspot's Wi-Fi, but ugh.
00:03:07
◼
►
I mean, that's not going to be your limiting factor, especially with Verizon being down for a day.
00:03:12
◼
►
Yeah, exactly.
00:03:12
◼
►
No, that's too bad. So I have the Netgear, whatever the second most recent Netgear AT&T 5G router is, and it's fine.
00:03:26
◼
►
It functions as a piece of consumer electronics. It's garbage.
00:03:32
◼
►
But the function of a portable 5G hotspot that creates Wi-Fi or over Ethernet broadcast, wherever you are, I have so many uses for this all the time.
00:03:45
◼
►
And in fact, since the iPhone 17 Pro has broken iPhone tethering for me, which is still not fixed, I've been using it more and more.
00:03:54
◼
►
Oh my God, yeah.
00:03:54
◼
►
It's working fine for me. I'm not trying to say you're wrong by any stretch. I'm just saying it's not everyone, apparently, because it works fine for me.
00:03:59
◼
►
Yeah, I'm very annoyed, but I, you know, so in the meantime, I've just been carrying this hotspot wherever and whenever I like, you know, go anywhere outside of the house and want to use my laptop.
00:04:08
◼
►
And it's fine. The only thing is like, so the hotspot, it's kind of like an Apple watch where like if you need to reboot it, you just, you know, go do something else for a while.
00:04:18
◼
►
And the thing is, unfortunately, almost any kind of configuration change requires a reboot.
00:04:24
◼
►
If you want to like take the battery out and switch it to just a hardwire only connection, reboot.
00:04:30
◼
►
If you want to go the other direction, like, oh, I'm on an unhardwire this and, you know, put the battery back in, reboot.
00:04:36
◼
►
If you want to, you know, convert it from like bridge mode where it just passes the IP address through the Ethernet port to Wi-Fi broadcasting mode, reboot.
00:04:45
◼
►
And each of those reboots, oh, and, you know, just when you're done using it and you turn it off, you know, next time you go to use it, you turn it back on again.
00:04:51
◼
►
You know, that's the boot.
00:04:52
◼
►
So it, it takes a while.
00:04:54
◼
►
And, and like, you know, the battery charging, like it has USB-C.
00:05:00
◼
►
Except that it does not support even remotely fast charging.
00:05:04
◼
►
So no matter what wattage charge you give it, it's going to charge at like three watts.
00:05:11
◼
►
And so if it's, if it, if the battery's dead, you can plug it in like 10 minutes later, it'll be at 2%.
00:05:17
◼
►
Like it's, so like as, as a device, it is not good.
00:05:22
◼
►
But having a hotspot when you have crappy tethering situations is really nice.
00:05:31
◼
►
So it's, it's frustrating.
00:05:33
◼
►
And also, and like the, the plan is not good either.
00:05:36
◼
►
The plan from AT&T for a hotspot is something like $55 a month.
00:05:41
◼
►
And, and there, there is a data cap.
00:05:44
◼
►
It's not, it's not too awful.
00:05:45
◼
►
I think that's for like 20 or 50 gigs.
00:05:47
◼
►
It's, it's a good amount of data, but for, and then this is kind of why I'm concerned.
00:05:50
◼
►
Like, I wonder if, you know, we've been waiting all these years for Apple to make a cellular
00:05:56
◼
►
MacBook of some kind.
00:05:58
◼
►
I'm, I'm afraid that the plans might end up sucking for them.
00:06:02
◼
►
Like that, that they might be really expensive plans.
00:06:04
◼
►
Cause like an iPad plan is what?
00:06:06
◼
►
20, 25 bucks a month.
00:06:07
◼
►
It's anywhere like minus 10 because I get like some sort of bundle, but I think typically,
00:06:12
◼
►
yeah, they're like 20 to 40 generally speaking.
00:06:15
◼
►
In that range.
00:06:17
◼
►
But like a hotspot plan is 50 or 60.
00:06:20
◼
►
I, I wonder where they would put, like, I know, I guess PC laptops exist.
00:06:23
◼
►
I guess we can look, just look this up.
00:06:24
◼
►
Um, but I do worry like that, that eventually Apple will give us a cellular MacBook and AT&T
00:06:30
◼
►
will want 60 bucks a month for it.
00:06:32
◼
►
But anyway, uh, yeah, mobile hotspots, they're what amazing capability in such crappy electronic
00:06:43
◼
►
They usually are straight up trash.
00:06:45
◼
►
That's why it would be so great to just have this built into the device.
00:06:48
◼
►
You're trying to get it into in which 99% of the time for me is my computer.
00:06:53
◼
►
Occasionally like now it, it isn't, you know, when I'm going traveling or whatever, but generally
00:06:57
◼
►
I would just like to be able to get on my, uh, get on the internet on my computer, easy
00:07:01
◼
►
Uh, another thing I've been looking at because I don't want a recurring hotspot bill because
00:07:06
◼
►
I generally only need it kind of regularly in the fall for football.
00:07:09
◼
►
And then outside of that, I don't really ever need it.
00:07:12
◼
►
And if I do, I can just borrow one from the library, but I've been looking, I don't know
00:07:16
◼
►
anything about this, but Solis, S-O-L-I-S, at least here in the state, I don't know, I think
00:07:19
◼
►
it's worldwide.
00:07:20
◼
►
Um, it seems to offer hardware that you have to buy for like a couple hundred bucks, but
00:07:25
◼
►
then you can buy data either as like a day pass or as like in chunks of, you know, 50 gigs
00:07:33
◼
►
or a hundred gigs or whatever the case may be.
00:07:34
◼
►
And I haven't spoken with anyone that has actually used this.
00:07:38
◼
►
So if you have used this and you're listening, please reach out.
00:07:40
◼
►
Um, I think this, the, their hotspots on the States anyway, we'll kind of go back and
00:07:45
◼
►
forth between T-Mobile and AT&T and T-Mobile around where I am is generally trash.
00:07:50
◼
►
But AT&T is really good.
00:07:51
◼
►
So I'm very curious if, if maybe this would be a good answer if I decide to stop doing
00:07:57
◼
►
the rotating library borrowing dance, if doing this wouldn't be so bad.
00:08:01
◼
►
Cause I don't mind paying a couple hundred bucks for the hardware, but I don't want to
00:08:04
◼
►
pay 50, 60 to your point, $70 or whatever a month, every month forever.
00:08:08
◼
►
And I looked briefly, God help me at, you know, could I get like a Starlink mini or something?
00:08:13
◼
►
Cause that would be nice.
00:08:14
◼
►
But not only is it hilariously expensive when service is turned on, which I mean, to a degree
00:08:19
◼
►
I get, but they, have you looked recently?
00:08:21
◼
►
Cause again, they turned off the like, um, pause, the free pause feature, whatever it is.
00:08:26
◼
►
Well, they did, but also, I mean, I, again, person who runs it is awful, but Starlink dropped
00:08:32
◼
►
their rates considerably, uh, last year.
00:08:34
◼
►
Um, so like the, the monthly rates for Starlink are a lot lower than they used to be.
00:08:38
◼
►
Oh, maybe I'll have to look again, but as a wife, a 5g hotspot is still cheaper though.
00:08:42
◼
►
Well, and that's the thing.
00:08:43
◼
►
And I don't need that kind of bandwidth, right?
00:08:45
◼
►
I don't need whatever Starlink provides.
00:08:47
◼
►
But anyways, uh, I really am interested in the soulless edge thing or soulless service, because
00:08:52
◼
►
like I said, I think you can get like a day pass, which would be sufficient.
00:08:55
◼
►
And, uh, or, you know, I could buy like 50 gigs or whatever the case may be.
00:08:58
◼
►
So reach out if you ever used it.
00:08:59
◼
►
The other, the other thing that I will, that I will advocate for, for, for 5g hotspots, which
00:09:04
◼
►
is way better than tethering, um, is that when you have a hotspot, like in your backpack and
00:09:10
◼
►
you open up your laptop,
00:09:13
◼
►
Because the hotspot is broadcasting a wifi network.
00:09:15
◼
►
So it's like wifi.
00:09:17
◼
►
So when you open up your laptop, it's online, like just immediately it's on, it's really nice.
00:09:24
◼
►
Like that's, you know, it's, you know, the, the boot up time for the hotspot is not great.
00:09:28
◼
►
As I was saying, if it, if it isn't on, but if you're like going in and out of stuff all
00:09:32
◼
►
day and you have one in your bag, that's, that's just sitting there on all day.
00:09:35
◼
►
It's like all of your devices are on wifi all the time.
00:09:39
◼
►
So it also helps, for instance, if you have some other device that, you know, that hasn't,
00:09:43
◼
►
that needs wifi, like if you have a Kindle, uh, if you have a room, a remarkable tablet,
00:09:47
◼
►
you know, any, any other kind of device, one of the, if you have one of these stupid new
00:09:51
◼
►
AI gadgets, if you have anything like that, if you have a hotspot on your person somewhere,
00:09:57
◼
►
those things are just online always.
00:10:00
◼
►
So it's, it actually is like, it scales well in terms of if you have multiple devices or if
00:10:06
◼
►
you're again, traveling with fame, like you were saying, traveling with family,
00:10:09
◼
►
everybody has their own devices.
00:10:10
◼
►
They don't probably all have cellular plans.
00:10:12
◼
►
Um, like, you know, like your kids, iPads and everything, you know, that's not going to
00:10:15
◼
►
have cellular plans.
00:10:15
◼
►
But like, if you just have a thing where everyone is just always online on, you know, some road
00:10:21
◼
►
trip you're on, like, that's really nice.
00:10:24
◼
►
Uh, and so I would say, Casey, you know, given, given your, you know, the, the things that you do
00:10:30
◼
►
and, and what you value, I think you would really enjoy owning a hotspot with a stupid $55 a month
00:10:40
◼
►
Oh, I'm way too cheap for that.
00:10:41
◼
►
I don't think you will ever do it.
00:10:43
◼
►
And I don't think there is any number of ATP members that could sign up to make you do it.
00:10:49
◼
►
Because it isn't that you can't find $55.
00:10:52
◼
►
It's the principle of the matter.
00:10:54
◼
►
And I get that because it is, it is kind of a stupid amount of money for the utility that
00:10:57
◼
►
most people would get out of it.
00:10:59
◼
►
But I think if you ever wanted to like really treat yourself one year, be like, you know
00:11:04
◼
►
what, maybe like when you turn 50, I don't know, like, I'm going to sell, I'm going to
00:11:09
◼
►
celebrate Casey this year.
00:11:10
◼
►
It's going to be all me all the time.
00:11:12
◼
►
Cause I, I'm a great person.
00:11:14
◼
►
I'm a great dad.
00:11:15
◼
►
I'm a successful podcaster.
00:11:17
◼
►
I'm going to treat myself.
00:11:18
◼
►
I'm going to get myself a $55 a month tethering.
00:11:21
◼
►
At that point, it'll be a hundred bucks a month.
00:11:25
◼
►
It'll be too much.
00:11:26
◼
►
Uh, no, I, I hear you.
00:11:27
◼
►
And I mean, the thing of it is, is that generally speaking, I don't really need it.
00:11:31
◼
►
Like I said, I, I travel maybe at most once a quarter.
00:11:35
◼
►
And I would say that's even aggressive, you know, generally speaking, I really, truly don't
00:11:39
◼
►
need it, which is why I balk so much at the monthly fee.
00:11:41
◼
►
The only time I kind of sort of needed a lot is between, I don't know, the very end of August
00:11:45
◼
►
and late November when we're going to UVA football games every couple of weekends.
00:11:51
◼
►
But outside of that, it's kind of a waste 99% of the time.
00:11:55
◼
►
So you're not wrong.
00:11:56
◼
►
I mean, I'm sure I would put it to use if it was here, you know, if I was already committed,
00:12:00
◼
►
I'm sure I would use it more often, but it's certainly, well, I mean, it's never really
00:12:04
◼
►
I shouldn't say need it, but you know what I'm saying.
00:12:06
◼
►
And so, um, it's only a want, you know, a couple of times between January and August and then
00:12:13
◼
►
semi-frequently between August and November.
00:12:16
◼
►
Certainly like some kind of like, you know, day or week pass arrangement makes a lot of
00:12:20
◼
►
sense for a lot of people, probably you included.
00:12:22
◼
►
Although there is one other thing.
00:12:23
◼
►
If you have one and you have a ubiquity router, you can make it a backup internet connection.
00:12:28
◼
►
That is true.
00:12:30
◼
►
That way, which would be very appealing to me.
00:12:32
◼
►
And now I'm going to totally jinx myself.
00:12:33
◼
►
Watch as I don't make it through the following recording.
00:12:36
◼
►
But generally speaking, Fios is freaking bulletproof.
00:12:40
◼
►
And yes, I understand that's Verizon, but this is Verizon Communications, not Verizon Wireless.
00:12:44
◼
►
Very different.
00:12:45
◼
►
Which is very, very different.
00:12:46
◼
►
So anyways, that went on longer than I intended and I apologize, but it's, it's just, it made
00:12:52
◼
►
me sad that my shiny new toy didn't do what I wanted to do.
00:12:55
◼
►
Not yet anyway.
00:12:56
◼
►
But we got to do some follow-up because even though I'm having a small sad, John, you're having
00:13:03
◼
►
a very big sad.
00:13:04
◼
►
Oh, we already talked about this, but as the other shoe dropping, I got the email from Verizon
00:13:09
◼
►
Fios telling me that my cable card is, I don't know, not long for this world.
00:13:15
◼
►
It's as we saw last time when people sent us images of their emails, I got this basically
00:13:19
◼
►
the same email and it's, I mean, it's the end.
00:13:22
◼
►
They're saying it's the end, but they leave out one very important piece of information.
00:13:25
◼
►
So here reading from their email, recent technology advancements now allow us to deliver your Fios
00:13:31
◼
►
TV service using internet protocol, parentheses, IP delivery.
00:13:36
◼
►
Recent technology advancements.
00:13:37
◼
►
I'm excited about this.
00:13:38
◼
►
This sounds so additive.
00:13:39
◼
►
This is exciting as it allows for a more improved viewing experience and increased flexibility.
00:13:46
◼
►
Increased flexibility.
00:13:48
◼
►
What does this mean for you?
00:13:50
◼
►
Your Fios TV digital adapters and or cable cards will no longer work and require an
00:13:54
◼
►
immediate upgrade to avoid a service interruption.
00:13:56
◼
►
Once your new equipment is in place, you can choose what to do with your old equipment.
00:14:00
◼
►
You will not be charged if it's not returned to Verizon.
00:14:02
◼
►
They don't even want the cable cards back.
00:14:04
◼
►
They're like, just, you know, recycle it.
00:14:06
◼
►
They're like, you don't have to bring it back to us.
00:14:08
◼
►
You don't have to bring it back to a Verizon store.
00:14:10
◼
►
You don't have to ship it to us.
00:14:11
◼
►
We don't want it.
00:14:12
◼
►
We don't care what you do with it.
00:14:13
◼
►
Just do something responsible with it.
00:14:15
◼
►
Cable cards are garbage.
00:14:16
◼
►
They are dead to us.
00:14:17
◼
►
There is no date or deadline in this email.
00:14:20
◼
►
Googling led me to just a bunch of other Verizon customers saying, I got this email, but it
00:14:24
◼
►
doesn't say what the date is.
00:14:25
◼
►
I mean, I imagine they have to be doing this rollout slowly just because, let's say, some
00:14:31
◼
►
large percentage of their customers decide to upgrade.
00:14:34
◼
►
That's a lot of service calls.
00:14:35
◼
►
So it's not like they're going to turn them off tomorrow because, you know, people, you
00:14:39
◼
►
know, the customers say, oh, I don't want to lose my TV.
00:14:42
◼
►
Come to my house and swap my cable cards for your crappy stuff.
00:14:45
◼
►
Some number of their customers are going to do that.
00:14:47
◼
►
And they have to wait for those people to make an appointment, get the service call, get it
00:14:51
◼
►
all working.
00:14:52
◼
►
And that's why they're spreading these emails out.
00:14:53
◼
►
It's a slow rollout.
00:14:54
◼
►
So I don't think this is going to happen immediately, but I don't know when it's going to happen.
00:14:59
◼
►
So now start your timer.
00:15:01
◼
►
At some point, I'm going to go pull up my TiVo and it's going to say, I have no signal.
00:15:06
◼
►
And that's when I know it will be over.
00:15:08
◼
►
And at that point, I will cancel my Fios TV subscription and not replace it with anything.
00:15:14
◼
►
Probably at first, if it turns out, I have to replace it with something that, as I said,
00:15:17
◼
►
last time we discussed this, I'll look at YouTube TV or the stuff like that.
00:15:20
◼
►
But that's my plan.
00:15:20
◼
►
Wait until it stops working.
00:15:22
◼
►
It's some unknown point in the future, which I will mention on the show, I'm sure.
00:15:26
◼
►
And when that happens, call Verizon and say, please cancel my extremely expensive cable
00:15:31
◼
►
television package.
00:15:32
◼
►
And then I think this is a good time to give a salute to my TiVo Romeo Pro.
00:15:38
◼
►
It's still working.
00:15:38
◼
►
Cable cards are still working, but it has 12 years of service under my main TV.
00:15:43
◼
►
I think it's probably the best TiVo they ever made before they really started screwing them
00:15:47
◼
►
up hardware-wise.
00:15:48
◼
►
It has more recording capacity than any TiVo device they sold after that, I believe.
00:15:54
◼
►
And it is 12 years old, and it's still going strong.
00:15:58
◼
►
So goodbye, TiVo, whenever, at some point in the unknown future.
00:16:03
◼
►
I'm so sorry, John.
00:16:05
◼
►
I truly am, because I know that as much as I give you a hard time, and justifiably, for
00:16:11
◼
►
your obsession with TiVo, I know that it is something that's very important to you, and
00:16:15
◼
►
I know that this is something that you and I have both been dreading.
00:16:18
◼
►
I have not yet received this email.
00:16:20
◼
►
It's coming.
00:16:20
◼
►
It's only a matter of time.
00:16:21
◼
►
Yeah, sometime soon.
00:16:22
◼
►
And again, it's some kind of gradual rollout.
00:16:24
◼
►
Your time will come.
00:16:25
◼
►
Yeah, I'm very sad about this.
00:16:26
◼
►
And this is a good time for me to replug that I was on Downstream with our friend Jason talking
00:16:31
◼
►
about what to do after this comes for me.
00:16:35
◼
►
And there were no strong conclusions reached, but he had some really fascinating insights.
00:16:39
◼
►
So if you're in a similar boat, you might want to check that out.
00:16:42
◼
►
We'll put a link in the show notes.
00:16:44
◼
►
Temporal dithering.
00:16:46
◼
►
Kyle Foreman writes, well, John's description of how temporal dithering is implemented was
00:16:50
◼
►
pretty spot on.
00:16:51
◼
►
How we perceive the colors is actually even more analog and cooler, in my opinion.
00:16:55
◼
►
The visual cortex does all sorts of cool processing to fill in gaps when you blink, for example,
00:16:59
◼
►
or during eye saccades, saccades, I'm not sure how to pronounce that.
00:17:02
◼
►
I should have looked it up.
00:17:04
◼
►
Anyway, super quick movements that you don't even notice.
00:17:06
◼
►
But for temporal dithering, a lot of it happens all the way down at the photoreceptor level.
00:17:10
◼
►
You have three different types of cones that react differently to wavelengths of light.
00:17:13
◼
►
However, the cones aren't instantaneous detectors, but rather slowly responding gauges that are laggy
00:17:19
◼
►
because they're opening ion channels to create an electrical potential that gets red downstream
00:17:23
◼
►
as inputs to the color system.
00:17:26
◼
►
So the cells in your eyes themselves are basically implementing a low-pass filter on the colors
00:17:30
◼
►
you see long before your brain smushes anything together.
00:17:32
◼
►
Pretty cool.
00:17:34
◼
►
I just, for people that don't know what a low-pass filter is, uh, well, you're lucky you didn't
00:17:38
◼
►
have to take signals and systems in college.
00:17:40
◼
►
And don't write a podcast app.
00:17:42
◼
►
It's a, it's a filter that allows, um, doesn't allow low, low frequencies to go by.
00:17:47
◼
►
Um, I just don't know how high frequencies go, right?
00:17:49
◼
►
It allows low, low frequencies.
00:17:50
◼
►
I always get like nearsighted and farsighted.
00:17:53
◼
►
It always gets confused.
00:17:54
◼
►
So what this is saying is, let's say there's a high frequency signal, like a light that turns
00:17:59
◼
►
on and off and on and off real, real fast.
00:18:00
◼
►
That's high frequency.
00:18:01
◼
►
Because each time the light hit, hitting your cones changes, it takes them a while.
00:18:07
◼
►
It's like a laggy gauge.
00:18:08
◼
►
It's like, oh, different level of light.
00:18:10
◼
►
I'm opening up an ion channel.
00:18:11
◼
►
I'm going or whatever.
00:18:12
◼
►
As it's going through that process up now, the light has changed again.
00:18:16
◼
►
So high frequency signals, like something that goes on and off real fast, don't actually
00:18:21
◼
►
even get through to your brain because the cones take too long to respond to changes.
00:18:25
◼
►
If it's a low frequency thing, like light goes on for three seconds and then off for three
00:18:29
◼
►
That's plenty of time for your cones to react.
00:18:30
◼
►
Light goes on.
00:18:31
◼
►
It's on for three seconds.
00:18:32
◼
►
Your cone's like, oh, lights change.
00:18:34
◼
►
Let me open my ion channels.
00:18:35
◼
►
And that happens.
00:18:36
◼
►
And it's like, hey, light's still on, light's still on, light's still on.
00:18:38
◼
►
And then it goes off.
00:18:39
◼
►
That's low frequency and that low frequency signals are allowed to pass.
00:18:42
◼
►
That's why things like CRTs, plasma televisions, movies, stuff like that.
00:18:47
◼
►
That's why they work for us because you can flash an image on the screen real fast.
00:18:51
◼
►
And as long as it's like bright and there for a second, you can have blackness for a while
00:18:56
◼
►
and it doesn't matter because your eyes are still reacting to the stimulus that they got
00:19:00
◼
►
as long as by the time they're, you know, you don't, as long as you don't allow them to
00:19:04
◼
►
linger too long, the next flash of light, they don't care that nothing happened in between.
00:19:09
◼
►
And same thing like plasma, where plasma TVs would like, some of the old ones would show
00:19:13
◼
►
just like the red and the green and then some blue.
00:19:15
◼
►
Like, I don't actually even know what system they were using, but if you took a slow-mo video
00:19:18
◼
►
of a plasma TV, you'd see that it doesn't even flash the whole image.
00:19:21
◼
►
It flashes pieces of the image individually, like a dot of these colors and a dot of like
00:19:25
◼
►
at the same spot.
00:19:26
◼
►
But that would just be combined.
00:19:27
◼
►
And it's not combined by our brain.
00:19:29
◼
►
It's because our eyeballs themselves are slow to react, the cones in our eyeballs, which
00:19:33
◼
►
is the thing that I didn't know.
00:19:34
◼
►
So thank you, Kyle, for writing in with that information.
00:19:37
◼
►
And I forget what this is in the context of, I think it was like,
00:19:39
◼
►
was it monitor technology?
00:19:42
◼
►
Oh, no, it was temporal dithering.
00:19:43
◼
►
That's right.
00:19:43
◼
►
It was the people complaining about screen flickering or whatever.
00:19:46
◼
►
That's why most monitors can get away with temporal dithering, because they are flipping
00:19:52
◼
►
a light on and off fast enough at a high enough frequency that the low-pass filters that are
00:19:57
◼
►
the cones in our eyes only allow lower frequency changes to go through to our brain.
00:20:02
◼
►
And that high-frequency one just smushes into a medium before it even gets to our brain.
00:20:08
◼
►
We are sponsored this episode by Guru.
00:20:10
◼
►
When you're working with AI, there's one thing you figure out pretty quickly.
00:20:14
◼
►
It's really good at giving you answers, infinite answers, whether they are correct or not.
00:20:19
◼
►
And inside most companies, the hard part isn't generating more information.
00:20:23
◼
►
It's trusting it.
00:20:25
◼
►
You got documents over here, tickets over there, conversations scattered everywhere, and somehow
00:20:29
◼
►
AI is supposed to make sense of all that?
00:20:31
◼
►
That is why they built Guru.
00:20:33
◼
►
Guru is your AI source of truth.
00:20:36
◼
►
It connects all the things your company already knows and turns them into clear, explainable
00:20:41
◼
►
answers you can trust.
00:20:42
◼
►
Think of it as the knowledge layer your AI should have had all along, rounded in actual systems,
00:20:48
◼
►
transparent about where information comes from, and consistent for everyone who needs it.
00:20:53
◼
►
When teams and their AIs all pull from the same trusted foundation, work gets done faster,
00:20:59
◼
►
decisions get made better, and there's a lot less, wait, where did this come from?
00:21:03
◼
►
Questions in your Slack.
00:21:04
◼
►
So in a world full of confident but wrong answers, Guru keeps everyone aligned on what's actually true.
00:21:12
◼
►
See what Guru is doing for companies like Spotify, DHL, Stripe, and more at GetGuru.com.
00:21:19
◼
►
That's GetGuru.com.
00:21:21
◼
►
Thanks to Guru for sponsoring our show.
00:21:23
◼
►
John, you were shaking your fist and shouting at clouds with regard to too many screens and
00:21:33
◼
►
So we have a lot of this from CES.
00:21:36
◼
►
Do you want to tell me about it?
00:21:38
◼
►
I mean, this is just a coincidence.
00:21:39
◼
►
I was complaining.
00:21:40
◼
►
I was mostly complaining about that tiny little anchor charging brick with one USB-C port on
00:21:45
◼
►
it, and they put a screen on it.
00:21:46
◼
►
I'm like, no, too far.
00:21:47
◼
►
It's too much.
00:21:47
◼
►
This is tangentially related.
00:21:50
◼
►
At CES, they're putting screens on too many things.
00:21:53
◼
►
Two examples.
00:21:55
◼
►
One, this is an MSI computer.
00:21:58
◼
►
Obviously, gaming PCs, they're all fancy and RGB lights, and they have clear sides and water
00:22:03
◼
►
cooling or whatever.
00:22:04
◼
►
They've had screens on them for a while, but now there's a little bit of an arms race.
00:22:08
◼
►
This MSI MEG Vision X tower computer essentially has a screen on the entire front of the tower
00:22:15
◼
►
of the computer.
00:22:16
◼
►
An LCD screen, like full height on the front of the computer.
00:22:19
◼
►
It kind of reminds me of those, you know, like, I guess a nanoraptor type, you know, fake
00:22:25
◼
►
drawings of like, take a tower computer and say it's an all-in-one because you put a screen
00:22:28
◼
►
on the front.
00:22:29
◼
►
The screen is not for you to run Windows or whatever.
00:22:31
◼
►
What's on the screen is some gamer-y looking thing that lets you look at settings inside
00:22:37
◼
►
your PC or whatever.
00:22:38
◼
►
It is literally a screen for your PC, which I think is dumb, but fine, whatever.
00:22:43
◼
►
Let's go up one more level.
00:22:45
◼
►
Also from MSI, there's a lot of MSI content in this episode.
00:22:49
◼
►
The MSI Lightning RTX 5090 is an extremely expensive, no price announced video card.
00:22:56
◼
►
It's the Nvidia 5090 with like a 17-pound copper heat sink and liquid cooling going through tubes
00:23:03
◼
►
to a giant fan assembly.
00:23:04
◼
►
It's going to be really expensive.
00:23:05
◼
►
It's super-duper overclocked.
00:23:06
◼
►
And guess what?
00:23:07
◼
►
This video card has a screen on it.
00:23:13
◼
►
It's inside your computer.
00:23:14
◼
►
I know the cases are clear, but like, it's literally inside your computer.
00:23:19
◼
►
What's next?
00:23:20
◼
►
CPUs with screens on them, but RAM with screens on it, screens are on too many things.
00:23:26
◼
►
No, they even mentioned in the video I watched about this that like, in case you're wondering
00:23:30
◼
►
why it's not an OLED screen, it's merely an LCD screen on your horrendously expensive video
00:23:35
◼
►
It's because the OLED screen gave off too much heat.
00:23:37
◼
►
Maybe don't put a screen on your video card.
00:23:41
◼
►
Yeah, imagine that.
00:23:43
◼
►
Anyway, screens are on too many things.
00:23:45
◼
►
Gamers have bad taste.
00:23:46
◼
►
You tell me about it.
00:23:49
◼
►
Last episode, we were talking because Abraham Vague wrote to tell us that the channel selection
00:23:55
◼
►
and channel size are the most important part of setting up a good Wi-Fi network.
00:23:58
◼
►
And John, you have thoughts.
00:24:00
◼
►
I meant to talk about this when I was talking about my new Eero setup in both the pro and
00:24:06
◼
►
That's exactly why I put Abraham's thing in there about selecting channel size and also location,
00:24:12
◼
►
all the other stuff.
00:24:13
◼
►
In theory, one of the benefits of Eero is that if you don't know how to do that, you
00:24:20
◼
►
don't know how to select the right channel and how big it should be.
00:24:23
◼
►
You don't know how or when to tweak that or tell whether you've done a good job.
00:24:26
◼
►
Eero does that for you.
00:24:28
◼
►
It figures out what channels are free, what channels have the least congestion.
00:24:31
◼
►
And amongst all the little mesh nodes, it sets everything automatically for you.
00:24:35
◼
►
Now, if you Google about, all right, well, so how well does that work?
00:24:39
◼
►
You'll find some people saying, it's great.
00:24:41
◼
►
I never have to worry about this stuff.
00:24:42
◼
►
It just does it automatically.
00:24:43
◼
►
And it's great.
00:24:44
◼
►
And then you'll find other people saying, I want to manually select the channel on the
00:24:48
◼
►
And Eero won't let me do it because it's all automatic.
00:24:50
◼
►
I wish I had, quote unquote, real networking hardware that would let me select this stuff
00:24:54
◼
►
I fall down on the side of, I don't ever want to know or care about this stuff.
00:24:58
◼
►
And I just want Eero to do something smart.
00:24:59
◼
►
As far as I'm aware, Eero is doing something smart.
00:25:03
◼
►
My only evidence is that I have solid Wi-Fi connection everywhere.
00:25:06
◼
►
And that every time I upgrade to fancier Eero gear, my signal and my speeds get better.
00:25:11
◼
►
But if you are a network expert, this is another trade-off with Eero.
00:25:14
◼
►
If you want manual control, oval channel size and selection, I don't think Eero gives you
00:25:19
◼
►
that option in any way.
00:25:20
◼
►
But if you don't know what channel size or selection are, maybe Eero is the right product
00:25:26
◼
►
And then continuing with Wi-Fi, let's talk about Wi-Fi 7.
00:25:30
◼
►
I'm sorry, Wi-Fi 8, because apparently it's happening.
00:25:33
◼
►
So Steve Bonifield at The Verge writes, the first Wi-Fi 8 routers and chips made a surprise
00:25:39
◼
►
appearance at CES 2026 and could launch this year, only a couple of years ahead, or excuse
00:25:43
◼
►
me, after Wi-Fi 7 debuted.
00:25:45
◼
►
Rather than focusing on speed upgrades, Wi-Fi 8 promises improved stability.
00:25:49
◼
►
It offers the high speeds and bandwidth of Wi-Fi 7, but with improved power efficiency, higher
00:25:53
◼
►
throughput, and better peer-to-peer communication between devices.
00:25:56
◼
►
Wi-Fi 8 is also better at maintaining fast, stable connections when the users are moving
00:26:00
◼
►
devices around or moving them further away from their router.
00:26:03
◼
►
As a result, Wi-Fi 8 users will experience less dropping out or freezing and better streaming
00:26:08
◼
►
and gaming performance.
00:26:09
◼
►
See, our past discussion about how long it actually takes for a Wi-Fi standard to trickle out through
00:26:14
◼
►
the hardware and get the good version of the standard with all the features.
00:26:17
◼
►
So it'll be a while, but it is funny that we chose this time to start talking about Wi-Fi
00:26:21
◼
►
7 and Wi-Fi 8 is already here, where here is in scare quotes.
00:26:25
◼
►
All right, so since we're already talking about CES, we are now done with follow-up because
00:26:30
◼
►
John has some new news he would like to share with us.
00:26:33
◼
►
And John, it appears that you have virtually strolled the CES floor and have some discoveries
00:26:38
◼
►
you'd like to share with the class.
00:26:39
◼
►
Yeah, there'll probably be more from CES in future episodes, but I just wanted to give a
00:26:42
◼
►
few items that kind of ties into earlier discussions about Apple monitors and stuff.
00:26:48
◼
►
My usual disclaimers about CES apply at CES, they show things, some of which may never
00:26:54
◼
►
Hopefully like that video card with the screen on it.
00:26:57
◼
►
One of the things they almost, almost never do at CES is announce prices.
00:27:02
◼
►
Like they'll show you the products and they'll say, yeah, it'll probably be around this price.
00:27:05
◼
►
Nudge, nudge, wink, wink, but nothing official, blah, blah, blah.
00:27:07
◼
►
Sometimes it's just no price at all.
00:27:09
◼
►
But I did manage to find some items that look like they're real and are going to ship and
00:27:13
◼
►
actually have announced prices.
00:27:15
◼
►
And the reason I want to highlight these is to continue to show just how far behind Apple
00:27:21
◼
►
is in the monitor race.
00:27:24
◼
►
Well, I mean, you'll see.
00:27:25
◼
►
So the only place Apple's ahead is in monitor naming.
00:27:30
◼
►
I think I've made fun of this before, like in the monitors unboxed guy.
00:27:32
◼
►
I forget what his name is, but he is an expert at rattling off the alphabet soup that are these
00:27:38
◼
►
monitor names.
00:27:39
◼
►
He just, he's really good at it.
00:27:40
◼
►
He says them over and over.
00:27:41
◼
►
I don't know if he practices or something, but he commented in his YouTube video on this
00:27:45
◼
►
particular monitor that some of the letters in the middle of this jumbled product name
00:27:49
◼
►
actually spelled a word and he just pronounced it as a word.
00:27:51
◼
►
And he's like, I wonder if they're doing that to try to make the names easier to pronounce.
00:27:54
◼
►
No, I think it's just random.
00:27:56
◼
►
Anyway, this is the MSI MPG 271KRAW16.
00:28:02
◼
►
Or the 271KRAW16.
00:28:06
◼
►
I don't think that's an improvement.
00:28:07
◼
►
Anyway, it's a 27 inch 5K monitor.
00:28:10
◼
►
It's the exact same resolution as the Apple studio display.
00:28:12
◼
►
It's a mini LED IPS LCD, which means that has a backlight with a bunch of little LEDs that
00:28:16
◼
►
you can turn on and off.
00:28:17
◼
►
It's glossy.
00:28:17
◼
►
It's got an adjustable stand, 165 Hertz or 330 Hertz in 1440 mode, which is a gamer thing
00:28:23
◼
►
where they double the refresh rate by having the resolution or whatever, or quartering
00:28:26
◼
►
it, whatever.
00:28:26
◼
►
Can I pull on that thread just for a moment, please?
00:28:29
◼
►
You play first person shooters and you play games that I believe are the sorts of games
00:28:36
◼
►
that a gamer would want, like no latency, you know, instant refreshing on their monitors.
00:28:42
◼
►
Does that actually freaking matter?
00:28:45
◼
►
It totally does.
00:28:46
◼
►
The problem is I'm playing on a PlayStation 5, which mostly maxes out at 60 Hertz.
00:28:51
◼
►
I can play Destiny at 120, but only on my big TV because my monitor is so old.
00:28:56
◼
►
It only does 60 Hertz.
00:28:57
◼
►
But it makes a difference in your ability to like play the game well, the difference
00:29:01
◼
►
between 60 and 120 Hertz?
00:29:03
◼
►
Because like the input lag is lower and the motion is smoother.
00:29:07
◼
►
And maybe in a future episode, I'll talk about Nvidia's new backlight strobing thing,
00:29:11
◼
►
which is another big update this year in terms of motion clarity.
00:29:14
◼
►
But yes, it does make a difference.
00:29:16
◼
►
I mean, there's diminishing returns, obviously.
00:29:18
◼
►
So this one, like I said, it's 165 Hertz and it does have a doubling mode where you
00:29:22
◼
►
can do 330 Hertz at 1440p mode.
00:29:25
◼
►
The mini LED backlight has 2,304 local dimming zones.
00:29:28
◼
►
The Pro Display XDR for $7,000 or whatever has 576 dimming zones, which is way less on
00:29:36
◼
►
a way bigger area.
00:29:36
◼
►
The 16-inch MacBook Pro has 2,554 dimming zones.
00:29:40
◼
►
Supposedly, that's the best number I could come up by searching.
00:29:43
◼
►
Apple doesn't give it announced, doesn't give that number, I believe.
00:29:46
◼
►
The studio display has one zone and no dimming at all.
00:29:52
◼
►
This MPG 5K monitor is 1,400 nits on an 8% window.
00:29:57
◼
►
The XDR and the MacBook Pro are 1,600 nits.
00:29:59
◼
►
I don't know what window size.
00:30:00
◼
►
The studio display is 600 nits.
00:30:03
◼
►
This monitor is G-Sync compatible, if you care.
00:30:06
◼
►
It's got HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1, two USB-C with 98 watts power delivery, two USB-A at
00:30:12
◼
►
five gigabits, one USB-B at five gigabits, and one headphone port.
00:30:17
◼
►
This monitor is essentially a 5K monitor, like the Apple Studio display, but it is brighter.
00:30:24
◼
►
It is 165 hertz.
00:30:26
◼
►
It has 2,300 local dimming zones, and it is $900.
00:30:33
◼
►
So, like, I'm just reading, just as we're recording this show, there's, like, another rumor leak
00:30:39
◼
►
of, like, oh, FCC things for, like, the studio display successor and the XDR successor, where,
00:30:44
◼
►
you know, those things aren't out yet and don't exist yet, but, like, oh, maybe the studio,
00:30:47
◼
►
maybe the XDR will have, the studio display will have local dimming now or whatever.
00:30:50
◼
►
This is what they're competing against.
00:30:53
◼
►
165 hertz, 27-inch, 5K, you know, 2,000 local dimming zones, $900, adjustable stand included.
00:31:02
◼
►
Now, next monitor.
00:31:03
◼
►
Before you move on, though, I have to say, stats-wise, this is incredible, and you, we were just talking
00:31:09
◼
►
about how I'm cheap, I mean, frugal, I mean, I spend money wisely, and-
00:31:13
◼
►
No, you don't.
00:31:14
◼
►
A hundred, no, with, I don't know, for $900-
00:31:17
◼
►
You have a Vision Pro!
00:31:19
◼
►
All right, well, fair enough.
00:31:19
◼
►
Occasionally frugal and occasionally cheap.
00:31:21
◼
►
Selectively frugal.
00:31:23
◼
►
Selectively frugal.
00:31:24
◼
►
For $900, this is an incredible deal.
00:31:26
◼
►
This is incredible, except-
00:31:27
◼
►
Because it is better, it is better than the studio display in every possible spec that you
00:31:32
◼
►
can care about.
00:31:34
◼
►
Except, go ahead.
00:31:34
◼
►
You have to look at it, and it is not pretty.
00:31:37
◼
►
It's not that bad.
00:31:38
◼
►
I mean, the stand is, like, if you look at it from the side, it's pretty tasteful.
00:31:41
◼
►
That little chin on the front, I think, they put motion detectors there sometimes on the
00:31:46
◼
►
OLEDs to make them turn off when you're not sitting in front of them, which is cool.
00:31:49
◼
►
Um, it could be worse.
00:31:51
◼
►
Look, this is a gaming monitor.
00:31:53
◼
►
It could be worse.
00:31:53
◼
►
Oh, it could be way worse!
00:31:55
◼
►
And actually, I think if you Visa mount this, it wouldn't be too bad, to your point.
00:31:58
◼
►
But, yeah, I mean, you've still got to look at it.
00:32:01
◼
►
And I would suffer through.
00:32:02
◼
►
I mean, I'm looking at two LG 5Ks, which are not exactly pretty either.
00:32:05
◼
►
And so, I would be able to suffer through, but-
00:32:08
◼
►
This is better than those.
00:32:09
◼
►
It's like a mini XDR.
00:32:11
◼
►
It's because the dynamic backlight makes a huge difference.
00:32:14
◼
►
You can have true blacks on it.
00:32:15
◼
►
And it has way more zones than the XDR.
00:32:17
◼
►
So, this is a good display.
00:32:19
◼
►
So, what's the next one?
00:32:20
◼
►
The next one is the MSI MAG271KPD7.
00:32:24
◼
►
Rolls off the tongue.
00:32:25
◼
►
Are these Sony headphone names?
00:32:27
◼
►
This is the other worst.
00:32:28
◼
►
The monitors are worse than Sony headphone names, believe it or not.
00:32:30
◼
►
Um, because there's so frigging many of them.
00:32:33
◼
►
This is another 27-inch 5K display.
00:32:35
◼
►
Like, these are Mac-relevant things.
00:32:36
◼
►
IPS LCD, matte finish, adjustable stand, 75 hertz, not 60, 75 hertz, or up to 300 hertz
00:32:43
◼
►
in 1440p mode.
00:32:44
◼
►
This is the guy's name.
00:32:45
◼
►
Tim Scheisser?
00:32:48
◼
►
What do you think about that?
00:32:50
◼
►
Tim Scheisser from Monitor's Unboxed.
00:32:52
◼
►
Here's a quote from his video.
00:32:53
◼
►
He's looking at this monitor, and this is what he said in the video, talking about the
00:32:57
◼
►
75 hertz refresh rate.
00:32:58
◼
►
That's a little unusual.
00:32:59
◼
►
75 hertz is quite a low refresh rate for a modern display.
00:33:03
◼
►
I tend to think of 120 hertz as being the minimum these days, so I thought, why are they
00:33:07
◼
►
making this monitor?
00:33:08
◼
►
He's questioning the existence of this monitor because it's only 75 hertz.
00:33:11
◼
►
All of Apple's monitors are 60.
00:33:15
◼
►
G-Sync compatible.
00:33:17
◼
►
Display HDR 400, which is only 400 nits, and the studio to display is 600 nits, which isn't
00:33:21
◼
►
great, but whatever.
00:33:21
◼
►
HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a, USB-C with 15 watts delivery, two USB-A with 5 gigabits, one
00:33:28
◼
►
USB-B with 5 gigabits, headphone out.
00:33:31
◼
►
This is a studio display equivalent with the only thing that gives up over the studio display
00:33:37
◼
►
is 200 nits versus, yeah, it's 400 versus 600 nits.
00:33:41
◼
►
The studio display nanotexture upgrade is $300.
00:33:45
◼
►
The studio display adjustable sand upgrade is $400.
00:33:48
◼
►
Just upgrading from the, taking away a non-adjustable stand and replacing it with an adjustable
00:33:53
◼
►
one is $400.
00:33:54
◼
►
This entire monitor with an adjustable stand is $500.
00:33:57
◼
►
Say you wanted to have two 5K displays, $500 each.
00:34:03
◼
►
You could have this thing.
00:34:04
◼
►
And it's 75 hertz, which is still better than studio display.
00:34:06
◼
►
So, and the other thing is, I think it might have been MSI or maybe another one, had a monitor
00:34:12
◼
►
aimed at Mac users, but they obviously have no idea what Mac users want because I believe
00:34:16
◼
►
it was 4K, 27 inch.
00:34:18
◼
►
It's like, oh no.
00:34:22
◼
►
The whole point, it looked like Mac, white and kind of Mac-y and it had a special mode where
00:34:27
◼
►
it's like exactly calibrated to how the Apple studio display is.
00:34:30
◼
►
So it'll match like the laptop monitors or whatever.
00:34:32
◼
►
Anyway, all I'm saying is if you want a cheaper 5K display, the gaming world, where apparently
00:34:38
◼
►
all the action is in external monitors, has finally come around to 5K, 27 inch displays.
00:34:44
◼
►
And now you have your choice.
00:34:45
◼
►
What do you want?
00:34:46
◼
►
What kind of features do you want?
00:34:47
◼
►
And they're all so much cheaper than the studio display.
00:34:49
◼
►
So it is a great time to be looking at 5K displays.
00:34:52
◼
►
And it's just about time if these FCC rumors that maybe we'll talk about next week are real
00:34:56
◼
►
for Apple to finally update its monitors.
00:34:57
◼
►
Will it update them to still be worse than the monitors I described here?
00:35:02
◼
►
They will certainly be more expensive.
00:35:05
◼
►
You can be guaranteed that.
00:35:07
◼
►
And then one more quick one.
00:35:09
◼
►
LG, so it's not as gamery, 27 inch 4K RGB stripe tandem OLED panel.
00:35:15
◼
►
This is a lot of words.
00:35:18
◼
►
RGB stripe means the subpixels are red, green, and blue stripes.
00:35:22
◼
►
We'll put a link in the show notes to an image I finally found that shows the subpixels.
00:35:25
◼
►
Not like a drawing of it, but literally a photo of the subpixels.
00:35:29
◼
►
Do you see this in the document when you scroll down?
00:35:30
◼
►
Yeah, so like normally OLEDs for like ever since they've been out have had what I believe
00:35:34
◼
►
used to be called the pen tile arrangement of pixels, right?
00:35:37
◼
►
No, the pen tile arrangement is on phones where neighboring pixels share like the green subpixel.
00:35:42
◼
►
But on big displays, they haven't used that.
00:35:45
◼
►
But if you look at the picture, you can see like this shows a couple of generations of cutie OLEDs and then LCD.
00:35:51
◼
►
But look at all the cutie OLEDs.
00:35:53
◼
►
It's like there's a red and a green and a blue for every pixel, but they're kind of in like a triangle or a diamond, right?
00:36:00
◼
►
Which is fine.
00:36:01
◼
►
And it's perfect for a TV, I think, because you want it to be kind of dithered and fuzzy on a TV.
00:36:05
◼
►
But especially if you're using windows with subpixel anti-aliasing, this totally screws it up.
00:36:10
◼
►
But now they have RGB stripe displays of various kinds, including OLEDs.
00:36:17
◼
►
So LG has a 27-inch 4K RGB stripe tandem OLED.
00:36:22
◼
►
Tandem OLED is a thing that Apple puts in its iPads where it's like got another light emitting layer, which makes the screen brighter with lower power, blah, blah, blah.
00:36:30
◼
►
This is the Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27 UCWM, not to be confused with the PG27 UCDM, which is, believe it or not, an alphabet soup that I've memorized because it's a very popular monitor.
00:36:43
◼
►
No white subpixel.
00:36:44
◼
►
So this is the first time, this generation is the first time that there has been a non-QD OLED without a white subpixel.
00:36:51
◼
►
So that is exciting.
00:36:53
◼
►
I don't know if the iPad has a white subpixel or not.
00:36:56
◼
►
I've never looked into that.
00:36:57
◼
►
But anyway, this is a monitor.
00:36:58
◼
►
And I'm looking at this as a gaming monitor.
00:36:59
◼
►
Why do I care about 27-inch 4K?
00:37:01
◼
►
Not for my Mac, but my gaming monitor.
00:37:03
◼
►
I currently use on my PlayStation a 4K 27-inch monitor.
00:37:06
◼
►
That's the size and resolution I want for PlayStation games.
00:37:09
◼
►
This is a tandem OLED.
00:37:11
◼
►
It's basically like, take my iPad that I love and make it 27-inch and make these subpixels be vertical stripe.
00:37:18
◼
►
Glossy finish, 240 hertz, 1,000 nits max brightness, which isn't that much, but it's way higher than my current one, which probably is like 300 nits.
00:37:26
◼
►
Adjustable stand, of course.
00:37:28
◼
►
Display port 2.1a, HDMI 2.1.
00:37:31
◼
►
USB-C with 90 watts power delivery.
00:37:32
◼
►
Headphone out.
00:37:33
◼
►
No price announced.
00:37:35
◼
►
That's good specs, though.
00:37:38
◼
►
Yeah, and the stand is disgusting and I hate it.
00:37:40
◼
►
But to Casey's point, like, you can do something about the stand.
00:37:45
◼
►
Anyway, all I'm saying is that the time for me getting a new gaming monitor, it's getting closer.
00:37:51
◼
►
It's looking closer.
00:37:52
◼
►
I love these specs.
00:37:52
◼
►
I'm sure the price will be great.
00:37:54
◼
►
And this would be a huge upgrade over my current monitor.
00:37:57
◼
►
Yeah, well, I mean, we'll see what happens and whether any of this ships, but it's definitely looking promising.
00:38:03
◼
►
I'm really pleased that the PC industry has finally embraced 5K monitors because, you know, basically up until now, there was Apple's and then there have been other options, but they're few and far between.
00:38:15
◼
►
There's the LG Ultra Fine.
00:38:16
◼
►
Dell, for like 10 seconds, had one years and years ago.
00:38:19
◼
►
No, I think they still do.
00:38:20
◼
►
There's a couple.
00:38:21
◼
►
We've talked about a whole bunch of them, but like they're they're kind of aimed at like creative professional type things.
00:38:26
◼
►
So they're priced a little bit higher and they have different they have different things that they're shooting for.
00:38:32
◼
►
But this year at CES, not only I just listed some 5K and 4K things, there are 6K gaming monitors.
00:38:38
◼
►
And I think part of the reason is the DLSS and other sort of frame generation stuff that we've talked about on past shows is really, really sort of coming into its own.
00:38:45
◼
►
And people, gamers are really accepting it, essentially, like run the game at a, you know, it would normally run at an unacceptably low frame rate.
00:38:53
◼
►
But don't worry, the video card will add frames in between the real frames.
00:38:56
◼
►
And so now you can potentially game at 5K.
00:38:59
◼
►
Maybe you can't game at 6K.
00:39:00
◼
►
But like it's it is these monitors are suddenly somewhat relevant to gaming, not super relevant.
00:39:08
◼
►
Everyone's like, can you run any real games at a good frame rate at 5K?
00:39:11
◼
►
And people like, oh, I need 500 frames per second.
00:39:13
◼
►
Nothing can run.
00:39:14
◼
►
And, you know, even that liquid cooled video card with the screen on it can't run 5K at 500 frames per second.
00:39:20
◼
►
But it's it's happening.
00:39:23
◼
►
The gaming world is discovering retina resolution and monitors are being made.
00:39:28
◼
►
And that benefits Mac users as long as you can stand the cases.
00:39:32
◼
►
We are sponsored this episode by Gusto.
00:39:37
◼
►
If you run a small business and you have payroll and employee filings and paperwork to deal with, you know, this often means figuring a lot of stuff out on your own and doing a lot of extra work.
00:39:47
◼
►
You don't have to do that anymore with Gusto.
00:39:48
◼
►
Gusto handles all that so you can spend your time on the parts of your business you actually love.
00:39:53
◼
►
Gusto is online payroll and benefits software built for small businesses.
00:39:58
◼
►
It's all in one remote friendly and incredibly easy to use.
00:40:02
◼
►
So you can pay, hire, onboard and support your team from anywhere.
00:40:06
◼
►
Gusto has all sorts of great features.
00:40:08
◼
►
Things like automatic payroll tax filing, simple direct deposit, support for health benefits, commuter benefits, workers comp, 401k.
00:40:15
◼
►
You name it.
00:40:16
◼
►
Gusto makes it simple.
00:40:17
◼
►
And they have options to fit nearly every budget.
00:40:19
◼
►
You get unlimited payroll ones for one monthly price.
00:40:22
◼
►
There's no hidden fees, no surprises.
00:40:24
◼
►
And there's great automated tools built right in to help you with what you might need.
00:40:28
◼
►
Offer letters, onboarding materials, direct deposit, and more.
00:40:31
◼
►
If you have any kind of tough HR situations, they have direct access to certified HR experts to help support you through them.
00:40:39
◼
►
And switching to Gusto is quick and easy.
00:40:40
◼
►
You can just transfer your existing data to it to get up and running quickly.
00:40:43
◼
►
And you don't pay a cent until you run your first payroll.
00:40:47
◼
►
Gusto has been rated the number one payroll software according to G2 for fall 2025.
00:40:52
◼
►
And it's trusted by over 400,000 small businesses.
00:40:55
◼
►
Try Gusto today at gusto.com slash ATP and get three months free when you run your first payroll.
00:41:03
◼
►
That's three months of free payroll at gusto.com slash ATP.
00:41:08
◼
►
One more time, gusto.com slash ATP.
00:41:11
◼
►
Thanks to Gusto for sponsoring our show.
00:41:18
◼
►
So let's talk some directly Apple stuff.
00:41:21
◼
►
And within the last 24 or 48 hours as we record this, Apple has announced Creator Studio.
00:41:26
◼
►
And so what is this?
00:41:28
◼
►
Final Cut Pro, Logic Pro, Pixelmator Pro, Motion, Compressor, and Mainstage, plus new AI features and premium content in Keynote, Pages, and Numbers, come together in a single subscription.
00:41:38
◼
►
Apple Creator Studio will be available on the App Store beginning Wednesday, January 28th for $12.99 a month or $130 per year with a one-month free trial,
00:41:46
◼
►
which includes access to Final Cut Pro, Logic Pro, and Pixelmator Pro on Mac and iPad.
00:41:51
◼
►
Motion Compressor and Mainstage on Mac.
00:41:53
◼
►
And AI features and premium content for Keynote, Pages, Numbers, and later free form for iPhone, iPad, and Mac.
00:42:00
◼
►
If you're a college student or an educator, you can do it for $3 a month or $30 a year.
00:42:04
◼
►
Up to six family members can share all the apps and content included in the Apple Creator Studio with family sharing, unless you got it through the student discount, which case, tough nuts.
00:42:13
◼
►
Yeah, that was my plan.
00:42:15
◼
►
I was like, this is great.
00:42:16
◼
►
I have two college student children.
00:42:17
◼
►
They'll just get it for $30 a year, and they'll share it with their six family members, you know, and it'll be great.
00:42:24
◼
►
No, not allowed to do that, which sucks.
00:42:25
◼
►
Blomp, blomp.
00:42:26
◼
►
Alternatively, users can also choose to purchase the Mac versions of Final Cut Pro, Pixelmator Pro, Logic Pro, Motion Compressor, Mainstage individually as a one-time purchase in the Mac App Store.
00:42:36
◼
►
John has been kind enough to put notes in the show notes for me to read to you.
00:42:39
◼
►
Final Cut Pro, $300, Logic Pro, $200, Pixelmator Pro, $50, Motion, $50, Compressor, $50, Mainstage, $30.
00:42:47
◼
►
Mainstage turns the Mac into an instrument, voice processor, or guitar rig.
00:42:52
◼
►
I'd never even heard of that app, had you?
00:42:54
◼
►
No, nor had I heard of Motion or Compressor, to be honest with you.
00:42:57
◼
►
No, I've heard of Motion or Compressor.
00:42:58
◼
►
It's been around for a while.
00:42:59
◼
►
I have Compressor.
00:43:00
◼
►
Mainstage is just, maybe it's a new app, or maybe it's just a blind spot because I'm not a musician using my Mac.
00:43:07
◼
►
So, two things before we continue with the story.
00:43:09
◼
►
One, I'm kind of surprised that they continue to have the one-time purchase things.
00:43:14
◼
►
And two, it kind of reminds me of those infomercials from our youth where it's like, you know, you're getting all this.
00:43:21
◼
►
Look at the value.
00:43:22
◼
►
Because when you add up the individual price of like, okay, well, it's, you know, $130 a year.
00:43:28
◼
►
But if I actually wanted to buy all those apps individually and I add $300 plus $200 plus $50 plus $50 plus $50 plus $30, it adds up so fast.
00:43:35
◼
►
What a deal it is to get it for $130 a year.
00:43:39
◼
►
Anyway, we'll talk about pricing a little bit more.
00:43:41
◼
►
But like, it does surprise me they did that, but they did do it.
00:43:44
◼
►
So, if you hate subscriptions, you can still, for now, buy these apps standalone.
00:43:50
◼
►
Yeah, which, and these, I believe those were all the prices they already were.
00:43:54
◼
►
Yeah, I don't think they changed it.
00:43:56
◼
►
So, with that in mind, Apple says you can use either version of the apps.
00:44:00
◼
►
You can have both versions of these apps installed on your Mac.
00:44:03
◼
►
To make it easier to distinguish versions, the apps in Apple Creator Studio have unique icons.
00:44:08
◼
►
Yeah, we can talk about the icons now.
00:44:09
◼
►
So, what they're saying is, if you buy or have purchased in the past, say, the standalone version of Final Cut Pro, but then you get Creator Studio, no problem.
00:44:18
◼
►
You can have them both installed.
00:44:20
◼
►
Every one of these apps that's available as part of the Creator Studio and available standalone, you can have both.
00:44:25
◼
►
And they distinguish them because the old apps have the icons that they have now.
00:44:30
◼
►
And the new apps all have a set of icons that kind of make a family.
00:44:35
◼
►
Kind of like how all the Adobe apps are.
00:44:37
◼
►
Well, I figure what they're looking at.
00:44:38
◼
►
Like, now it's like a, they're just round racks with letters in them or something.
00:44:41
◼
►
Or the Office, Microsoft Office apps always have like a family resemblance where they pick a theme and they make Word and Excel and PowerPoint or whatever look, you know, fit in the theme.
00:44:50
◼
►
So, these icons are Tahoe-style icons.
00:44:53
◼
►
They have black backgrounds and they're little round racks on the Mac.
00:44:56
◼
►
And then they have kind of liquid, glassy, frosty, glassy elements.
00:45:01
◼
►
I don't even know if the, I don't think they actually are the, you know, like the Icon Composer frosty things.
00:45:07
◼
►
I think they're like bitmaps or something.
00:45:09
◼
►
Because I don't think you can do those effects with Icon Composer.
00:45:13
◼
►
But who knows?
00:45:13
◼
►
Maybe they're using a new version of Icon Composer that we don't have.
00:45:15
◼
►
But anyway, they're kind of modern Microsoft Office style, abstract blobs on a black background.
00:45:24
◼
►
Lots of people are giving these icons crap.
00:45:26
◼
►
And I have to say, I think as a family, they don't look terrible.
00:45:30
◼
►
They're Tahoe icons.
00:45:32
◼
►
They're boring.
00:45:32
◼
►
They all kind of look the same.
00:45:33
◼
►
They're very abstract or whatever.
00:45:35
◼
►
But I think this family is actually reasonably well executed.
00:45:39
◼
►
If every other icon on the Mac didn't look like butt and we just saw these, we'd be like, oh, what a refreshing change.
00:45:44
◼
►
But as it stands, they're kind of part of a larger movement that I hate.
00:45:48
◼
►
But individually, I don't hate this, you know, collectively, I don't hate this family.
00:45:53
◼
►
Individually, some of the icons are a significant downgrade from the icons that came before them.
00:45:58
◼
►
And some of them are kind of nonsensical.
00:45:59
◼
►
Like the main stage one is supposed to look like a slider or something, but it is a little bit off.
00:46:05
◼
►
Final Cut Pro is always a really cool icon and now it's boring.
00:46:08
◼
►
But, you know, the Pages one, I kind of like the little gradient pencil.
00:46:11
◼
►
Pixelmator, I don't know what it's going for, but it's kind of cool.
00:46:14
◼
►
I don't like Pixelmator Pros at all.
00:46:17
◼
►
It's like a round rect that's just an outline over a round rect that's filled in.
00:46:22
◼
►
I guess it's supposed to show layers with like three dots beneath it connected with lines.
00:46:27
◼
►
So that's the little grab handles on like a Bezier curve, you know.
00:46:30
◼
►
I don't like that one at all.
00:46:31
◼
►
Yeah, some of them are better than others.
00:46:33
◼
►
I like Final Cut Pro.
00:46:34
◼
►
I like Logic Pro.
00:46:35
◼
►
Do you like the McDonald's icon?
00:46:36
◼
►
Motion is basically two-thirds of a McDonald's icon.
00:46:40
◼
►
Motion is either McDonald's or follow the bouncing ball.
00:46:42
◼
►
Freeform was already like this.
00:46:44
◼
►
So Freeform is like, yeah, that looks like the Freeform.
00:46:46
◼
►
And Numbers was already the middle finger like bar chart.
00:46:48
◼
►
So remember when Keynote was like a cool like wooden pillar stand and then, you know, like now it's just kind of, you know, this is basically like imagine abstract shapes drawn with a strip of frosted glass.
00:47:01
◼
►
Like even the Keynote one, it's supposed to look like one continuous strip.
00:47:04
◼
►
So it goes down and then to the left and then wraps to the back.
00:47:06
◼
►
Do you see it at the bottom?
00:47:07
◼
►
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:47:09
◼
►
I don't mind them that much, but lots of people are giving them hate.
00:47:12
◼
►
But anyway, I think when I see them, I say, yeah, this is an application suite.
00:47:16
◼
►
This is a family and that's what they're going for.
00:47:18
◼
►
You know, the one thing that I will say that really made me laugh is that somebody put together, and I don't think I'll be able to find it for the show notes, but somebody put together.
00:47:25
◼
►
You know where I'm going with this, a tweet or whatever, where they showed the evolution of icon design, but from current to original.
00:47:34
◼
►
And the comment, the caption, whatever, was something along the lines of looking at these icons in reverse is like watching an icon designer get incredibly good at their job or something like that, which was very funny.
00:47:45
◼
►
Basically, and it was and it was showing the pages icon because pages is this super abstract like pencil and like as you go backwards in time, it gets more and more detailed and beautiful looking all the way down to one of everyone's favorite icon was like the pages icon.
00:47:59
◼
►
It was like a really cool semi photo real illustration of an inkwell with like a fountain pen next to it.
00:48:05
◼
►
Yeah, it's a very funny tweet.
00:48:07
◼
►
These icons, like some of them are not that different from what we had.
00:48:12
◼
►
So, you know, like numbers, free form, like those are not that different.
00:48:15
◼
►
Even the pages were like not that different.
00:48:17
◼
►
I think the I mean, some of them are bad.
00:48:19
◼
►
I think Pixelmator is a terrible representation of anything.
00:48:23
◼
►
Logic is really a real downgrade from the cool platinum record.
00:48:26
◼
►
Logic Pro, I think, looks like a robot breast from an Elon Musk movie.
00:48:30
◼
►
And as a user of logic, I'm not looking forward to when this is pushed on me.
00:48:33
◼
►
But I think the entire idea of distilling the icon style down to an essence and having it be simpler, more abstract shapes and then layering on top of that, we want these to all look like a family.
00:48:50
◼
►
So we're going to have them all look somewhat similarly styled and have they're all going to have the same like, you know, simple flat backgrounds, basically single color, you know, neon glass looking shape on top.
00:49:04
◼
►
What that does by that uniformity and having them look like a part of a family that serves the corporation and their branding guidelines.
00:49:14
◼
►
But that doesn't really serve users because what that does when you have them all follow a very simple kind of template style, it makes them less distinguishable from one another at a quick glance.
00:49:26
◼
►
And the entire purpose, like when you're using an app icon, either in some kind of launcher capacity, like, you know, like a phone home screen or on the Mac in the case of like looking at things in the dock, what you want, what you need is for those icons to be very different from each other so that you can quickly and easily visually locate the app you're looking for and distinguish it from other similar apps.
00:49:49
◼
►
Now, when when companies do this thing where all of our things look similar, you know, all the big tech companies do this.
00:49:55
◼
►
Google does this with all their rainbow icons that all look exactly the same.
00:49:58
◼
►
You know, Adobe has all their weird like, you know, letter icons for the creative suite apps, which is obviously trying to rip off like the big companies all do this.
00:50:06
◼
►
They make all their apps look the same and they are serving their own goal of uniformity.
00:50:10
◼
►
And that, again, I don't think users are asking for that, first of all, or really benefit much from that.
00:50:17
◼
►
It's in the same way that like, you know, Apple has always in the in the Alan Dye modern era.
00:50:23
◼
►
Apple has talked to and Johnny, I've talked about like unifying the platform so that you have a consistent user interface across the Mac and the iPhone and the iPad.
00:50:33
◼
►
And like that often does not serve those platforms or their users.
00:50:37
◼
►
It's just it's one of those things that to a designer or to a company's like, you know, marketing and branding teams, those sound really good.
00:50:45
◼
►
It sounds good to have a unified, consistent style.
00:50:49
◼
►
But in most cases, the results of that suck in some unnecessary ways.
00:50:55
◼
►
And I wish that I wish they would eventually maybe realize that.
00:51:00
◼
►
And like there and there's a time and a place for consistent branding.
00:51:02
◼
►
But I think all of your icons and all of your UIs are not necessarily that place because what it actually does is make the icons work worse at one of their most important jobs.
00:51:15
◼
►
Well, see, I'm with you on the Google one because they basically use the rainbow kind of gradient and a couple of different shapes.
00:51:21
◼
►
But I think Apple has made some smart choices here and Adobe kind of, too, because.
00:51:26
◼
►
So, first of all, Apple, due to its own stupidity, has forced every icon on the Mac to be the same shape with the round rack, which immediately cuts off one one for one form of identification, which is different icon shapes.
00:51:38
◼
►
OK, to get around that kind of this creator studio suite of icons all use a black background, which and they even put it on on a black background on the web page.
00:51:49
◼
►
Like the round rack is black.
00:51:51
◼
►
And yeah, it's got the stupid highlights on the edges, whatever.
00:51:53
◼
►
And then they put it on a black web page.
00:51:56
◼
►
And all that is to say, let's try to make the background of our icons fade away instead of making the backgrounds white or a lighter color.
00:52:02
◼
►
Let's make them black.
00:52:03
◼
►
I guess it only works if you have a darker desktop pattern.
00:52:05
◼
►
No, wait, is this but aren't is this liquid glass icons where like if you have a light mode home screen, they will have light background.
00:52:11
◼
►
I don't know because I haven't like it's not out yet.
00:52:13
◼
►
So I haven't run them.
00:52:13
◼
►
I don't actually know how opaque they are.
00:52:15
◼
►
But in there in the media literature that they've provided, I think Steve Trout and Smith dug up some screenshots from some videos where like somebody had a light mode doc and they were showing like they do have.
00:52:25
◼
►
So I think for now, let's assume that they're that they actually might color shift with different themes.
00:52:29
◼
►
Yeah, but but either way, like they're it's trying to be uniform and then there's bold colors on top of it.
00:52:34
◼
►
And the bold colors are trying to provide a shape.
00:52:36
◼
►
Logic Pro is round pages is pointy into the right.
00:52:39
◼
►
Keynote is the little podium.
00:52:40
◼
►
Final cut is, you know, a rectangle with an antenna coming out of it, whatever.
00:52:45
◼
►
And then finally, they didn't make unlike Google, they didn't make every single one the same color.
00:52:50
◼
►
So Pixelmator Pro is the red icon.
00:52:51
◼
►
Final cut Pro is the purple one.
00:52:53
◼
►
Keynote is blue.
00:52:54
◼
►
They kind of run out of colors because freeform Keynote and Logic.
00:52:56
◼
►
They're all kind of shades of blue.
00:52:57
◼
►
But pages is clearly orange.
00:52:59
◼
►
Numbers is green.
00:53:00
◼
►
Motion is pink.
00:53:01
◼
►
Compressor is yellow.
00:53:03
◼
►
I think they're trying to avoid what you just said, which is like, oh, no, they made all the icons look the same.
00:53:08
◼
►
Now, granted, they're working within a system that demands they use the same art style for all of them, which isn't that bad.
00:53:13
◼
►
We used to use the same art style when they were all photorealistic, too.
00:53:15
◼
►
But anyway, there's a little bit more sameness in an abstract design system than there is in a photoreal one because photoreal objects look different in real life.
00:53:23
◼
►
So they can be distinguished in that way.
00:53:24
◼
►
Whereas no matter what you draw with this liquid glass frost, it looks like liquid glass frost.
00:53:28
◼
►
But I think they did as good a job as they could do while still using the abstract liquid glass thing by distinguishing them in silhouette shape and major primary color.
00:53:41
◼
►
I still like the old icon style better, but I do give them some credit.
00:53:44
◼
►
And Adobe, the same thing.
00:53:46
◼
►
Like their stupid icons are like letters like PS for Photoshop and LR for Lightroom and blah, blah, blah.
00:53:51
◼
►
You can't you're not going to read the letters or whatever, but they do make their stupid round rack icons all different colors.
00:53:58
◼
►
Now, are the colors different enough when you have a certain number of apps in your icon suite and you run out of primary and secondary colors?
00:54:03
◼
►
Then you're into like tertiary colors and it's like, yeah, but they're trying they're trying to distinguish the icons.
00:54:09
◼
►
It's going to be a change for some people, but I have a feeling if you're a video editor, you'll be reaching for that purple rectangle pretty quickly and it won't be as terrible as you made it out to be.
00:54:18
◼
►
So, again, this is this is a challenge of Apple's own making.
00:54:21
◼
►
And I think whoever would design these icons tried their best to surpass it and was only somewhat successful.
00:54:28
◼
►
Where did we leave off?
00:54:29
◼
►
Let's see the the AI features like we're not going to list every single one here.
00:54:35
◼
►
But like you mentioned before, like that if you get the subscription, you get a bunch of intelligent features or whatever in keynote pages and numbers or whatever.
00:54:43
◼
►
It's like, well, what are they what are they adding?
00:54:44
◼
►
And I just pulled out two examples of like features that didn't exist before in these apps that are AI powered or whatever.
00:54:52
◼
►
So with transcript search on Mac and iPad, users can now easily find the perfect soundbite in hours of footage simply by typing phrases into the search bar to to see exact or related results.
00:55:03
◼
►
That is legitimately super cool.
00:55:05
◼
►
I really like an AI transcription with full text search.
00:55:08
◼
►
That's a good feature to add to your apps.
00:55:10
◼
►
Looking for a specific video clip also gets an intelligent assist with a visual search.
00:55:15
◼
►
Now users can quickly pinpoint exact moments across all footage by searching for an object or action.
00:55:19
◼
►
And I forget what the marketing image had for this, but it was something like they searched for going upstairs or something along those lines.
00:55:25
◼
►
And you see a bunch of clips of a person walking in front of steps.
00:55:27
◼
►
Yeah, it's like a pop up menu that says, are you looking for a thing or something that happens?
00:55:31
◼
►
If you're looking for action, you say, you know, person falls down, car races by or whatever.
00:55:35
◼
►
You're looking for an object, you say tree or house or rug or whatever.
00:55:39
◼
►
Again, a way to find stuff using, you know, image recognition in your video clips.
00:55:44
◼
►
Advanced image creation and editing tools let users create high quality images from text or transform existing images using generative models from OpenAI.
00:55:52
◼
►
Hey, OpenAI, still working with Apple.
00:55:55
◼
►
The Content Hub is a new space where users can find curated high quality photos, graphics and illustrations.
00:56:01
◼
►
A subscription also unlocks new premium templates and themes in keynote pages and numbers.
00:56:06
◼
►
This is kind of an Adobe type move of like, well, we have some stock art for you and we have some, you know, new templates and new themes and, you know, premium stuff that you get if you sign up for our subscription that is essentially content for our apps.
00:56:19
◼
►
The Content Hub is interesting.
00:56:20
◼
►
I wonder how much they'll expand that or is it just going to be the same set of 100 pictures three years from now?
00:56:25
◼
►
But we'll see.
00:56:25
◼
►
It's a very familiar strategy from the Adobe side of things.
00:56:29
◼
►
Pixelmator Pro for iPad is compatible with iPad models with the A16, A17 Pro or M1 chip or later running iPadOS 26 or later.
00:56:37
◼
►
Apple Creator Studio version of Pixelmator Pro requires Mac OS 26.
00:56:41
◼
►
The one-time purchase version of Pixelmator Pro requires Mac OS 12 or later.
00:56:45
◼
►
That's a big difference there.
00:56:47
◼
►
Like, so Pixelmator Pro, again, there's the subscription one and there's the one-time purchase one and the OS difference is Mac OS 12 versus Mac OS 26.
00:56:54
◼
►
And I know that that's not, you know, they skipped numbers there, but Mac OS 12 is pretty darn old.
00:56:58
◼
►
So, like, that's essentially like the Pixelmator that Apple bought.
00:57:01
◼
►
It works all the way back to Mac OS 12.
00:57:02
◼
►
The Creator Studio subscription one, nope, 26 or nothing.
00:57:07
◼
►
So, that's another thing, potentially keeping people on the standalone versions is if you don't want to upgrade to 26.
00:57:12
◼
►
Or if you do really want the new version of this app, you have to upgrade to 26.
00:57:16
◼
►
And then Keynote Pages numbers in free form will remain free for all users to create, edit, and collaborate with others, including Apple Creator Studio subscribers.
00:57:23
◼
►
These apps will continue receiving updates with the latest versions adopting the beautiful new visual design language with liquid glass on all platforms and supporting the new windowing and menu bar improvements on iPadOS 26.
00:57:34
◼
►
However, Pixelmator Classic for iOS, released in 2014 as a companion app to the now discontinued Pixelmator Classic for Mac, provides basic image editing features such as cropping, color adjustments, and effects.
00:57:45
◼
►
It remains a functional app, but is no longer being updated.
00:57:47
◼
►
Another one bites the dust.
00:57:48
◼
►
And then Chris Welch pointed out,
00:57:51
◼
►
Photomator is not included in Creator Studio, but will remain available for $8 a month or $30 a year.
00:57:57
◼
►
It's anyone's guess how much development attention the app will receive as a standalone item outside the new bundle.
00:58:02
◼
►
If you're unfamiliar, Pixelmator Pro was the company's answer to Photoshop, and Photomator was more Lightroom-ish.
00:58:07
◼
►
So that one's still around, and it's still a subscription, so I feel like it'll be getting some kind of work on it,
00:58:13
◼
►
because otherwise they would have, like, made it free or said it was going to be discontinued,
00:58:16
◼
►
because now is the time to discontinue everything.
00:58:17
◼
►
But anyway, looking at this whole suite of apps,
00:58:20
◼
►
my first impression upon looking at this and seeing, like, availability pricing and what's included is,
00:58:26
◼
►
this is a really, really good deal.
00:58:28
◼
►
Subsidized by the whole rest of Apple's business, but still, it's a really good deal,
00:58:32
◼
►
especially if you just need to use, like, Final Cut for one project that takes you, like, a month.
00:58:37
◼
►
Previously, you didn't have an option like this.
00:58:41
◼
►
You could either buy Final Cut or, you know, whatever.
00:58:45
◼
►
And buying it for $300, like, oh, do I really want to buy it,
00:58:47
◼
►
or should I just try to use iMovie or do I use another app?
00:58:50
◼
►
This is now, like, a no-brainer.
00:58:51
◼
►
Like, $13 for a one-month-long Final Cut Pro product.
00:58:55
◼
►
And by the way, you don't just get Final Cut Pro for $13.
00:58:57
◼
►
You get Logic Pro, Pixelmator Pro, Keynote, Pages, Numbers, Freeform, Motion, Compressor, and Mainstage,
00:59:03
◼
►
all for that $13.
00:59:05
◼
►
And it's all through Apple's subscription system, and it's very flexible.
00:59:08
◼
►
$130 a year is also really reasonable.
00:59:09
◼
►
They're super-duper undercutting Adobe.
00:59:11
◼
►
Again, because Apple doesn't just sell a suite of applications.
00:59:15
◼
►
Now, Apple could have made all these free,
00:59:17
◼
►
because, again, they have a large other business that makes tons and tons of money.
00:59:21
◼
►
But I think they did a pretty good job of finding the right way to position this in the market.
00:59:29
◼
►
Because if it was free, it would be like, great,
00:59:31
◼
►
Apple is destroying all possible third-party applications.
00:59:34
◼
►
Who wants to compete with a free version of Final Cut,
00:59:36
◼
►
a free version of Logic, a free version of Pixelmator Pro?
00:59:38
◼
►
Like, who wants to compete with that?
00:59:40
◼
►
Free is no good.
00:59:41
◼
►
Plus, free also makes us think they're never going to update it.
00:59:43
◼
►
Like Photos for the Mac, for example.
00:59:45
◼
►
Or Music for the Mac.
00:59:46
◼
►
Or any other apps that are free on the Mac.
00:59:48
◼
►
Apparently, Apple has lost interest in updating its free applications,
00:59:51
◼
►
unless it is to make them work, like Contacts on Tahoe.
00:59:54
◼
►
Or make them worse, rather, like Contacts on Tahoe.
00:59:56
◼
►
So, I think what they've done is,
00:59:58
◼
►
we're going to charge you money,
01:00:00
◼
►
and we're going to charge enough money
01:00:02
◼
►
that third-party apps, in theory, could potentially still exist.
01:00:08
◼
►
It's going to be hard for them.
01:00:09
◼
►
It's going to be hard for them to exist.
01:00:11
◼
►
But they could, maybe.
01:00:13
◼
►
Because, again, Apple is still selling standalone ones.
01:00:15
◼
►
So, if you want to sell a $50 image editing application,
01:00:18
◼
►
you probably still could,
01:00:20
◼
►
because you're competing with an app that's $13 a month or $130 a year.
01:00:24
◼
►
Now, granted, it's not just that app.
01:00:26
◼
►
Again, you get a whole suite.
01:00:27
◼
►
But if someone just wants an image editor,
01:00:28
◼
►
maybe your $50 image editor looks attractive
01:00:31
◼
►
compared to $13 a month or $130 a year.
01:00:34
◼
►
Charging some amount of money also makes me think
01:00:38
◼
►
maybe they'll possibly be able to fund teams
01:00:40
◼
►
to provide updates to these applications and make them better.
01:00:44
◼
►
On the other hand,
01:00:45
◼
►
$13 a month or $130 a year is not enough money
01:00:48
◼
►
to actually fully fund the teams that work on these applications.
01:00:50
◼
►
It's not even enough to fund the team that works on Pixelmator,
01:00:52
◼
►
let alone Final Cut and all those other apps.
01:00:54
◼
►
So, they're not pricing it to cover their costs.
01:00:57
◼
►
But, you know, as a customer,
01:01:00
◼
►
I suddenly have access to better apps for less money than I did before.
01:01:05
◼
►
And as someone who cares about the Mac ecosystem,
01:01:07
◼
►
Apple is not 100% decimating the third-party market for applications.
01:01:13
◼
►
I mean, this doesn't do that much for me,
01:01:17
◼
►
in part because the one thing in this bundle,
01:01:20
◼
►
or the two things, I guess, in this bundle
01:01:22
◼
►
that I think I'd be interested in
01:01:23
◼
►
are Pixelmator Pro for doing, like, touch-up on photos and stuff,
01:01:27
◼
►
which actually you can do in the Photos app now.
01:01:29
◼
►
But Pixelmator Pro has always been really good at that.
01:01:31
◼
►
in Final Cut Pro, because occasionally
01:01:34
◼
►
I will do some manipulation to videos,
01:01:36
◼
►
and I'm sure I could use a different app for it.
01:01:38
◼
►
But thanks to my brief stint as a very unsuccessful YouTuber,
01:01:42
◼
►
I've gotten fairly familiar with Final Cut Pro.
01:01:44
◼
►
We've all been there.
01:01:45
◼
►
Yeah, right?
01:01:46
◼
►
It's a rite of passage, I tell you.
01:01:48
◼
►
So, anyways, I really dig that
01:01:52
◼
►
the point that you made earlier, John,
01:01:54
◼
►
about you could do this, like, dip in for a month and then cancel.
01:01:57
◼
►
Because I remember when I wanted to do this YouTube thing,
01:02:00
◼
►
just being really, really concerned
01:02:03
◼
►
that spending the $300, whatever it was,
01:02:06
◼
►
for Final Cut Pro,
01:02:07
◼
►
is this worth it?
01:02:08
◼
►
Is this a good way to spend my money?
01:02:10
◼
►
Is this going to be something that I use
01:02:12
◼
►
for more than 10 minutes?
01:02:13
◼
►
And as it turns out, I'm glad I did buy it,
01:02:15
◼
►
because even today, like I was saying,
01:02:17
◼
►
I'll occasionally do some video manipulations
01:02:18
◼
►
and use Final Cut Pro.
01:02:19
◼
►
On that topic, by the way, Stephen Robles was saying,
01:02:21
◼
►
I think that when he wanted to get Final Cut to be a YouTuber
01:02:25
◼
►
and wasn't sure it was worth it or whatever,
01:02:27
◼
►
it was $1,300 and he couldn't afford it.
01:02:29
◼
►
So, he got Final Cut Express.
01:02:31
◼
►
Remember that?
01:02:31
◼
►
Remember Final Cut Express?
01:02:32
◼
►
I do not, actually.
01:02:33
◼
►
It was like the cheaper version of Final Cut Pro.
01:02:35
◼
►
Obviously, a really good investment for Stephen,
01:02:37
◼
►
but just, yeah, it's worked out well there.
01:02:39
◼
►
That's the thing that a lot of people feel.
01:02:40
◼
►
And I do think that it's kind of weird,
01:02:42
◼
►
speaking of Final Cut,
01:02:43
◼
►
it is kind of weird that like Final Cut,
01:02:45
◼
►
due to various reasons,
01:02:46
◼
►
like the big Final Cut Pro 10 kerfuffle
01:02:48
◼
►
about them dropping features and doing stuff
01:02:50
◼
►
and other industry forces
01:02:51
◼
►
that have essentially made Final Cut
01:02:53
◼
►
less popular in the world
01:02:55
◼
►
of professional audio production
01:02:57
◼
►
for television and movies.
01:02:58
◼
►
Video, video production.
01:02:59
◼
►
Yeah, right, video production.
01:03:01
◼
►
But for whatever reason, again,
01:03:04
◼
►
maybe because of the influence of the iPhone
01:03:06
◼
►
and Apple's brand,
01:03:07
◼
►
my impression is that Final Cut Pro
01:03:09
◼
►
is much more popular with YouTubers
01:03:11
◼
►
than it is with people
01:03:12
◼
►
who make television and movies.
01:03:13
◼
►
I have no earthly idea.
01:03:16
◼
►
I can't speak to that.
01:03:16
◼
►
I mean, I don't know.
01:03:17
◼
►
That may not be true.
01:03:17
◼
►
It may just be the YouTubers that I watch,
01:03:20
◼
►
but because they're like Mac and Apple people
01:03:22
◼
►
or whatever.
01:03:23
◼
►
But I feel like if you want it,
01:03:25
◼
►
like it's a shame that Apple seems
01:03:26
◼
►
to have lost so much ground
01:03:28
◼
►
in the old school TV movie video editing market
01:03:32
◼
►
to Avid and Premiere and stuff like that.
01:03:34
◼
►
But if you're looking for a market
01:03:37
◼
►
that is like the future of video editing,
01:03:39
◼
►
you know, YouTube is not bad.
01:03:42
◼
►
I guess maybe like TikToks are even better
01:03:44
◼
►
and there's dedicated apps for them
01:03:45
◼
►
that Apple does not make,
01:03:46
◼
►
you know, setting aside clips or whatever
01:03:47
◼
►
that I think was canceled.
01:03:49
◼
►
I believe that's right.
01:03:51
◼
►
I think Final Cut Pro
01:03:54
◼
►
is not necessarily doomed.
01:03:56
◼
►
No, certainly not.
01:03:58
◼
►
It's a ringing endorsement.
01:03:59
◼
►
But yeah, I mean,
01:04:00
◼
►
this is interesting.
01:04:01
◼
►
I'm glad that you can still buy stuff outright,
01:04:04
◼
►
at least for now,
01:04:05
◼
►
because again,
01:04:06
◼
►
I don't think I would ever buy Logic Pro
01:04:08
◼
►
unless suddenly Marco decided
01:04:09
◼
►
he didn't want to edit the show,
01:04:11
◼
►
in which case I guess I would.
01:04:12
◼
►
that's only going to happen
01:04:14
◼
►
when the show ends
01:04:15
◼
►
or Marco dies.
01:04:16
◼
►
So, you know,
01:04:17
◼
►
and Logic Pro is not a,
01:04:18
◼
►
as you can see
01:04:20
◼
►
from every new version of Logic Pro
01:04:21
◼
►
they put out,
01:04:22
◼
►
it's not a podcast.
01:04:23
◼
►
It's for music.
01:04:24
◼
►
It's so for music.
01:04:26
◼
►
They're like,
01:04:26
◼
►
look at all these great features
01:04:27
◼
►
we have for beat matching
01:04:28
◼
►
and chord identification.
01:04:30
◼
►
doesn't help at all.
01:04:31
◼
►
Probably hurts
01:04:33
◼
►
because everything in that UI
01:04:34
◼
►
you're making a song.
01:04:35
◼
►
It's really not made for this
01:04:39
◼
►
and it never lets us forget it.
01:04:41
◼
►
And as each new version comes out,
01:04:43
◼
►
it just keeps going farther
01:04:44
◼
►
from being made for podcasts.
01:04:47
◼
►
But all in all,
01:04:48
◼
►
I think this is a pretty good idea.
01:04:50
◼
►
I like that they're charging money for it.
01:04:52
◼
►
I like that they're doing a subscription.
01:04:53
◼
►
I like that they updated their apps.
01:04:54
◼
►
That's great.
01:04:55
◼
►
They don't do that
01:04:56
◼
►
with most of their apps.
01:04:58
◼
►
So all in all,
01:04:59
◼
►
I think this is good.
01:04:59
◼
►
I don't know,
01:05:00
◼
►
I feel like you've been a little quieter.
01:05:01
◼
►
Any thoughts on this?
01:05:02
◼
►
I think it's,
01:05:04
◼
►
it mostly doesn't affect me
01:05:05
◼
►
because it's,
01:05:06
◼
►
it's a bunch of apps
01:05:07
◼
►
that I mostly don't use.
01:05:08
◼
►
But I think anything
01:05:09
◼
►
that makes these apps
01:05:11
◼
►
more accessible to people
01:05:13
◼
►
with small budgets
01:05:16
◼
►
And this does that.
01:05:20
◼
►
you had situations like,
01:05:22
◼
►
you'd have to buy Final Cut Express.
01:05:23
◼
►
You have to buy the small version
01:05:25
◼
►
or use some free tools
01:05:26
◼
►
or use some tools
01:05:28
◼
►
that are not like
01:05:28
◼
►
what the pros are using
01:05:30
◼
►
back in our day,
01:05:31
◼
►
just pirate all the big tools.
01:05:32
◼
►
But I think it's harder now.
01:05:37
◼
►
at the end of the day,
01:05:38
◼
►
these tools,
01:05:39
◼
►
if you're going to buy these
01:05:40
◼
►
in the previous arrangements,
01:05:42
◼
►
they were way more money,
01:05:47
◼
►
and if you were going to,
01:05:47
◼
►
if you were,
01:05:48
◼
►
just thinking like,
01:05:49
◼
►
let me try to learn,
01:05:51
◼
►
Final Cut or Logic or whatever,
01:05:52
◼
►
there really wasn't a good path
01:05:54
◼
►
for you to go from,
01:05:55
◼
►
I think I want to try learning this,
01:05:58
◼
►
to go between that
01:05:59
◼
►
and I'm going to spend
01:06:00
◼
►
hundreds of dollars on this.
01:06:02
◼
►
Now there's a path for that.
01:06:04
◼
►
That's great.
01:06:05
◼
►
I think that is wonderful.
01:06:06
◼
►
There are a lot of details about this
01:06:09
◼
►
that I think
01:06:09
◼
►
don't make a lot of sense.
01:06:11
◼
►
I don't think keynote pages
01:06:13
◼
►
and free forms
01:06:13
◼
►
should be included.
01:06:14
◼
►
Those are what I think
01:06:16
◼
►
used to be free iWork apps
01:06:18
◼
►
and now it's like,
01:06:18
◼
►
are they free?
01:06:19
◼
►
they're still free.
01:06:20
◼
►
that's one of the things
01:06:21
◼
►
that people are complaining about.
01:06:22
◼
►
I didn't link to it,
01:06:22
◼
►
but Jason just posted a thing
01:06:23
◼
►
to Six Colors saying,
01:06:25
◼
►
so keynote pages and numbers
01:06:26
◼
►
are still free,
01:06:27
◼
►
but they're freemium
01:06:29
◼
►
because if you pay
01:06:31
◼
►
for like the subscription version of them,
01:06:32
◼
►
it's the same app,
01:06:34
◼
►
but also now you get
01:06:35
◼
►
certain special AI features
01:06:37
◼
►
or access to like the content,
01:06:40
◼
►
that content hub thing,
01:06:41
◼
►
stuff like that.
01:06:42
◼
►
And so it's kind of,
01:06:42
◼
►
people are worried
01:06:43
◼
►
it's a slippery slope
01:06:44
◼
►
you just have the free version
01:06:46
◼
►
but you don't have the cool thing
01:06:48
◼
►
where you can,
01:06:49
◼
►
find a slide by describing it
01:06:50
◼
►
or something like that.
01:06:51
◼
►
And I agree that that's not great,
01:06:53
◼
►
I also kind of think that like,
01:06:56
◼
►
Apple providing like a mail client,
01:06:57
◼
►
a notes app,
01:06:58
◼
►
like there's some amount
01:07:00
◼
►
of platform like basics
01:07:01
◼
►
that Apple has to provide
01:07:03
◼
►
and they should provide them
01:07:04
◼
►
in a high quality way
01:07:05
◼
►
about while also leaving room
01:07:06
◼
►
for third parties.
01:07:07
◼
►
But when they get into office suites,
01:07:09
◼
►
like what used to be called iWork,
01:07:10
◼
►
where it's like,
01:07:11
◼
►
this is kind of like
01:07:11
◼
►
Microsoft Office type stuff.
01:07:13
◼
►
Should Apple provide
01:07:13
◼
►
all those for free too?
01:07:14
◼
►
Does it want to foreclose
01:07:15
◼
►
the entire market
01:07:16
◼
►
for office style applications?
01:07:17
◼
►
And at one point
01:07:19
◼
►
it would have said yes
01:07:20
◼
►
because Apple will do them better.
01:07:21
◼
►
But now we've learned
01:07:22
◼
►
Apple won't do them better
01:07:23
◼
►
Apple will never freaking update them.
01:07:25
◼
►
their competition is free.
01:07:26
◼
►
It's Google apps.
01:07:27
◼
►
Like that's the,
01:07:29
◼
►
there was some point of that
01:07:30
◼
►
in the chat room too.
01:07:30
◼
►
That DaVinci Resolve
01:07:32
◼
►
is the free competition
01:07:33
◼
►
for Final Cut Pro
01:07:35
◼
►
and Adobe Premiere
01:07:36
◼
►
and all that stuff.
01:07:37
◼
►
So it's a changing landscape
01:07:39
◼
►
and I think it is a little bit confused
01:07:40
◼
►
that those apps
01:07:41
◼
►
are in this bundle,
01:07:42
◼
►
but they're also still outside it
01:07:45
◼
►
So it seems Apple is trying
01:07:46
◼
►
to like hedge all of its bets here.
01:07:49
◼
►
But so I think,
01:07:50
◼
►
there's a lot of ways
01:07:51
◼
►
this can go in the future
01:07:53
◼
►
that I think could be
01:07:56
◼
►
relatively negative
01:07:58
◼
►
or mediocre.
01:08:01
◼
►
no one's happy to see
01:08:02
◼
►
Apple push more
01:08:03
◼
►
into services revenue.
01:08:04
◼
►
That's not healthy for them.
01:08:07
◼
►
I don't know if I would call
01:08:08
◼
►
this services revenue.
01:08:08
◼
►
This is just a subscription model
01:08:11
◼
►
which is different than services.
01:08:14
◼
►
you can ask like,
01:08:15
◼
►
why are they doing this?
01:08:17
◼
►
there's some good reasons
01:08:18
◼
►
and there's some cynical reasons.
01:08:20
◼
►
We'll see how it goes over time.
01:08:23
◼
►
Apple's track record
01:08:25
◼
►
for keeping these apps updated
01:08:28
◼
►
and keeping them competitive
01:08:29
◼
►
has been kind of spotty.
01:08:31
◼
►
Some of them do well.
01:08:33
◼
►
Some of them are laughing stocks.
01:08:35
◼
►
Some of them are ignored.
01:08:36
◼
►
Some of them get frequent updates.
01:08:37
◼
►
They're kind of all over the place.
01:08:40
◼
►
If this is something
01:08:42
◼
►
that they're kind of trying
01:08:43
◼
►
to plant a flag on the ground
01:08:45
◼
►
and say like,
01:08:45
◼
►
we're going to start doing this better
01:08:47
◼
►
or being more consistent about it
01:08:49
◼
►
or these apps are going to,
01:08:50
◼
►
be updated more frequently
01:08:51
◼
►
and they're going to compete better
01:08:53
◼
►
with their competition,
01:08:54
◼
►
that's a good thing.
01:08:56
◼
►
I don't think we have that here.
01:08:58
◼
►
I think this is a rebranding
01:08:59
◼
►
with a new subscription model
01:09:00
◼
►
and that's fine.
01:09:01
◼
►
there's again,
01:09:02
◼
►
pluses and minuses to that.
01:09:03
◼
►
And most importantly,
01:09:05
◼
►
I'm happy that
01:09:07
◼
►
I don't need to subscribe
01:09:08
◼
►
to the apps in this bundle
01:09:09
◼
►
that I've already bought.
01:09:11
◼
►
I can continue using them
01:09:13
◼
►
as a customer.
01:09:14
◼
►
and that being said also,
01:09:16
◼
►
once Apple switched
01:09:19
◼
►
to the Mac app store
01:09:20
◼
►
and put all these apps in it,
01:09:25
◼
►
never charged an upgrade fee.
01:09:28
◼
►
So I bought Logic
01:09:30
◼
►
for I think $200.
01:09:33
◼
►
like 10 years ago
01:09:34
◼
►
and I've never paid
01:09:36
◼
►
for another copy of Logic.
01:09:37
◼
►
I bought Final Cut.
01:09:38
◼
►
Final Cut Pro.
01:09:39
◼
►
Final Cut I think was $300.
01:09:41
◼
►
I bought that years ago.
01:09:43
◼
►
Never paid for an upgrade.
01:09:45
◼
►
fortunately,
01:09:45
◼
►
I never use it
01:09:46
◼
►
because I also
01:09:46
◼
►
failed at YouTube pretty hard.
01:09:50
◼
►
they've never charged
01:09:52
◼
►
an upgrade fee
01:09:52
◼
►
in large part
01:09:54
◼
►
because the Mac app store can't.
01:09:55
◼
►
I do kind of,
01:09:58
◼
►
on one hand,
01:09:59
◼
►
I've gotten some good value
01:10:01
◼
►
and you know,
01:10:02
◼
►
I'm glad to have bought
01:10:04
◼
►
these tools a thousand years ago.
01:10:05
◼
►
On the other hand,
01:10:06
◼
►
as both somebody
01:10:07
◼
►
who sells software
01:10:08
◼
►
through a subscription
01:10:12
◼
►
somebody who recognizes
01:10:13
◼
►
business realities here,
01:10:14
◼
►
I think the days
01:10:16
◼
►
of my perpetual
01:10:18
◼
►
one-time purchase license
01:10:21
◼
►
even working
01:10:22
◼
►
and getting the new version,
01:10:23
◼
►
let alone being available
01:10:24
◼
►
to new purchasers,
01:10:25
◼
►
those days might be numbered.
01:10:26
◼
►
But we'll see,
01:10:29
◼
►
as it is right now,
01:10:31
◼
►
this looks purely additive
01:10:35
◼
►
we get more options,
01:10:37
◼
►
there's some new updates
01:10:39
◼
►
and the icons all got weird
01:10:40
◼
►
and a little bit worse.
01:10:44
◼
►
it's pretty good.
01:10:46
◼
►
We are sponsored
01:10:49
◼
►
on this episode
01:10:49
◼
►
by 1Password.
01:10:51
◼
►
It's easy to assume
01:10:52
◼
►
that if you have
01:10:52
◼
►
a small business,
01:10:54
◼
►
will let you fly
01:10:55
◼
►
under the radar.
01:10:55
◼
►
But the reality is
01:10:56
◼
►
that small businesses
01:10:57
◼
►
are targeted more and more
01:10:59
◼
►
by bad actors
01:11:00
◼
►
through cybercrime
01:11:00
◼
►
and the criminals know
01:11:02
◼
►
that lean teams
01:11:03
◼
►
often lack the resources
01:11:05
◼
►
to security breaches.
01:11:06
◼
►
But the good news is
01:11:08
◼
►
even the smallest teams
01:11:09
◼
►
can foil cybercrime
01:11:11
◼
►
with 1Password.
01:11:12
◼
►
1Password provides
01:11:13
◼
►
simple security
01:11:14
◼
►
to help small teams
01:11:16
◼
►
manage the number one risk
01:11:17
◼
►
that bad actors exploit,
01:11:18
◼
►
weak passwords.
01:11:21
◼
►
compromised passwords,
01:11:22
◼
►
it's a huge problem.
01:11:23
◼
►
It's always been
01:11:23
◼
►
a huge problem.
01:11:24
◼
►
A password manager
01:11:25
◼
►
should be the first
01:11:26
◼
►
security purchase
01:11:27
◼
►
you make for your team.
01:11:28
◼
►
And it has to be
01:11:30
◼
►
easy to administer
01:11:31
◼
►
and easy to use.
01:11:32
◼
►
people won't use it.
01:11:34
◼
►
1Password knows this.
01:11:35
◼
►
They have grown over time.
01:11:36
◼
►
I've been a 1Password
01:11:37
◼
►
user and customer
01:11:38
◼
►
for a long time,
01:11:39
◼
►
since long before
01:11:40
◼
►
they were a sponsor.
01:11:41
◼
►
They're not paying me
01:11:42
◼
►
to say this.
01:11:42
◼
►
They can't pay me
01:11:42
◼
►
to say this.
01:11:43
◼
►
I like it a lot.
01:11:44
◼
►
I use it for both
01:11:45
◼
►
and for my business.
01:11:47
◼
►
In both cases,
01:11:48
◼
►
we need to share
01:11:49
◼
►
passwords a lot,
01:11:50
◼
►
have some kind of
01:11:50
◼
►
centralized login.
01:11:52
◼
►
It goes beyond passwords.
01:11:53
◼
►
You can have any kind
01:11:54
◼
►
of sensitive information
01:11:56
◼
►
things like that.
01:11:57
◼
►
And I use it
01:11:57
◼
►
for all that stuff
01:11:58
◼
►
and it's great.
01:11:59
◼
►
whether you're an individual
01:12:00
◼
►
or a small business
01:12:02
◼
►
or a family,
01:12:02
◼
►
they have products
01:12:04
◼
►
to cover all of those needs
01:12:05
◼
►
and they are great.
01:12:06
◼
►
And small businesses,
01:12:07
◼
►
this is perfect for you
01:12:08
◼
►
because it's easy
01:12:09
◼
►
for a small business
01:12:10
◼
►
to administer.
01:12:11
◼
►
As your business grows
01:12:12
◼
►
and you get maybe
01:12:13
◼
►
more security requirements,
01:12:14
◼
►
1Password's there
01:12:15
◼
►
every step of the way
01:12:16
◼
►
to grow with you.
01:12:17
◼
►
They have all these
01:12:18
◼
►
different compliance
01:12:19
◼
►
compatibilities
01:12:20
◼
►
and everything.
01:12:20
◼
►
so no matter
01:12:21
◼
►
what you need
01:12:21
◼
►
from 1Password,
01:12:22
◼
►
they have it
01:12:23
◼
►
for your business.
01:12:24
◼
►
It is a fantastic product.
01:12:26
◼
►
Take the first step
01:12:28
◼
►
to better security
01:12:30
◼
►
your team's credentials.
01:12:31
◼
►
Find out more
01:12:32
◼
►
at 1Password.com
01:12:35
◼
►
and start securing
01:12:36
◼
►
every login.
01:12:38
◼
►
That's 1Password.com
01:12:41
◼
►
Thanks to 1Password
01:12:42
◼
►
for sponsoring our show.
01:12:48
◼
►
Apple and Google
01:12:49
◼
►
are sitting in a tree,
01:12:51
◼
►
K-I-S-S-I-N-G.
01:12:52
◼
►
They have decided
01:12:53
◼
►
that they are going to,
01:12:55
◼
►
or that Google Gemini
01:12:55
◼
►
will be the backing technology
01:12:58
◼
►
behind Siri in the future.
01:13:00
◼
►
So let me read
01:13:00
◼
►
Google's entire press release.
01:13:04
◼
►
Apple and Google
01:13:05
◼
►
have entered into
01:13:05
◼
►
a multi-year collaboration
01:13:06
◼
►
under which the next generation
01:13:08
◼
►
of Apple Foundation models
01:13:09
◼
►
will be based on
01:13:09
◼
►
Google Gemini models
01:13:10
◼
►
and cloud technology.
01:13:12
◼
►
These models will help
01:13:13
◼
►
power future
01:13:14
◼
►
Apple intelligence features
01:13:15
◼
►
including a more
01:13:15
◼
►
personalized Siri
01:13:16
◼
►
coming this year.
01:13:17
◼
►
After careful evaluation,
01:13:18
◼
►
Apple determined
01:13:19
◼
►
that Google's AI technology
01:13:20
◼
►
provides the most capable
01:13:21
◼
►
foundation for Apple
01:13:22
◼
►
Foundation models
01:13:22
◼
►
and is excited
01:13:23
◼
►
about the innovative
01:13:24
◼
►
new experiences
01:13:25
◼
►
it will unlock
01:13:26
◼
►
for Apple users.
01:13:27
◼
►
Apple intelligence
01:13:28
◼
►
will continue to run
01:13:29
◼
►
on Apple devices
01:13:29
◼
►
and private cloud compute
01:13:30
◼
►
while maintaining
01:13:31
◼
►
Apple's industry-leading
01:13:32
◼
►
privacy standards.
01:13:34
◼
►
That is the entire thing
01:13:35
◼
►
that Google submitted.
01:13:36
◼
►
And it is supposedly
01:13:37
◼
►
a joint statement,
01:13:38
◼
►
but I believe it is only
01:13:39
◼
►
on Google's website.
01:13:40
◼
►
Yeah, and they gave it
01:13:41
◼
►
to Jim Cramer.
01:13:44
◼
►
interesting things here.
01:13:47
◼
►
that I highlighted
01:13:48
◼
►
in the notes.
01:13:48
◼
►
Apple Foundation models
01:13:50
◼
►
will be based on
01:13:50
◼
►
Google's Gemini models
01:13:52
◼
►
and cloud technology.
01:13:54
◼
►
I don't know
01:13:55
◼
►
what the and cloud
01:13:55
◼
►
technology means.
01:13:56
◼
►
Their foundation models
01:13:58
◼
►
will be based on Gemini.
01:13:59
◼
►
Yeah, that's the rumor.
01:14:00
◼
►
this is the headline
01:14:01
◼
►
and this is Apple
01:14:02
◼
►
and Google make it official.
01:14:03
◼
►
The rumor has been
01:14:03
◼
►
that Apple is,
01:14:05
◼
►
that Gemini is providing
01:14:06
◼
►
models to Apple,
01:14:07
◼
►
that Apple likes them,
01:14:08
◼
►
that they're the front-runner
01:14:09
◼
►
official announcement.
01:14:10
◼
►
They got it.
01:14:11
◼
►
Gemini won the bake-off.
01:14:12
◼
►
They are going to be
01:14:13
◼
►
because Apple
01:14:14
◼
►
can't do its own models.
01:14:16
◼
►
that being said,
01:14:16
◼
►
I don't believe
01:14:17
◼
►
were indicating
01:14:19
◼
►
that it would also
01:14:19
◼
►
include on-device models.
01:14:21
◼
►
I think that's new here.
01:14:22
◼
►
No, that's not new.
01:14:23
◼
►
They had that as well.
01:14:24
◼
►
part of it was
01:14:25
◼
►
getting Gemini
01:14:26
◼
►
down to that size.
01:14:27
◼
►
There was a rumor
01:14:27
◼
►
about, like,
01:14:28
◼
►
making smaller ones
01:14:29
◼
►
that could fit on-device.
01:14:30
◼
►
There was two bits
01:14:32
◼
►
isn't Google
01:14:32
◼
►
already doing that
01:14:33
◼
►
for Android phones?
01:14:34
◼
►
It's not unreasonable.
01:14:36
◼
►
Google makes a whole bunch
01:14:37
◼
►
of Gemini models
01:14:38
◼
►
of various shapes and sizes,
01:14:39
◼
►
so it wasn't unreasonable.
01:14:41
◼
►
most of these stories
01:14:41
◼
►
are talking about
01:14:42
◼
►
the extra work
01:14:43
◼
►
that Google had to do
01:14:44
◼
►
to get their stuff
01:14:44
◼
►
to run on private cloud compute,
01:14:45
◼
►
not to get it
01:14:46
◼
►
to run on the phone.
01:14:47
◼
►
But, you know,
01:14:47
◼
►
I'm sure they're tweaking it
01:14:48
◼
►
for both of them.
01:14:49
◼
►
they're going to be
01:14:51
◼
►
the, you know,
01:14:53
◼
►
the, what is it,
01:14:54
◼
►
the Apple Foundation models
01:14:55
◼
►
will be based on
01:14:55
◼
►
Google Gemini models
01:14:56
◼
►
and cloud technology?
01:14:58
◼
►
What is the cloud technology?
01:15:00
◼
►
Now, there's a couple
01:15:02
◼
►
of ways this could happen.
01:15:03
◼
►
I mean, they emphasize,
01:15:05
◼
►
Apple stuff,
01:15:06
◼
►
it's going to run
01:15:06
◼
►
either on your device
01:15:07
◼
►
or on private cloud compute,
01:15:08
◼
►
which is a special,
01:15:09
◼
►
secure, privacy-preserving way,
01:15:11
◼
►
we've talked about
01:15:11
◼
►
in the past, right?
01:15:12
◼
►
That's where it's going to run.
01:15:13
◼
►
But private cloud compute
01:15:16
◼
►
it's a combination
01:15:16
◼
►
of Apple hardware
01:15:17
◼
►
and supposedly
01:15:18
◼
►
their M5-based server chips
01:15:20
◼
►
are coming sometime soon,
01:15:20
◼
►
but they've got the M2 Ultras
01:15:21
◼
►
that they've been using.
01:15:22
◼
►
it's a special hardware
01:15:24
◼
►
and software thing
01:15:25
◼
►
and that live
01:15:27
◼
►
in a data center somewhere.
01:15:28
◼
►
I assume Apple
01:15:30
◼
►
has its own data centers
01:15:31
◼
►
where it houses this stuff.
01:15:32
◼
►
I guess they could host
01:15:34
◼
►
this hardware
01:15:35
◼
►
in a Google data center
01:15:36
◼
►
and then they'd be using cloud.
01:15:38
◼
►
Like, what is the cloud technology?
01:15:39
◼
►
I might be missing it.
01:15:40
◼
►
This is something
01:15:40
◼
►
Matt and Reese brought up
01:15:41
◼
►
in a Slack that ran
01:15:42
◼
►
and I was like,
01:15:42
◼
►
I don't know.
01:15:43
◼
►
I don't know what the answer,
01:15:44
◼
►
maybe it's just a badly
01:15:44
◼
►
written press release
01:15:45
◼
►
and I don't know
01:15:46
◼
►
what the cloud technology is,
01:15:49
◼
►
Anyway, there's that.
01:15:50
◼
►
And then the second bit,
01:15:51
◼
►
after careful evaluation,
01:15:53
◼
►
Apple determined
01:15:54
◼
►
that Google's AI technology
01:15:55
◼
►
provides the most
01:15:56
◼
►
capable foundation.
01:15:56
◼
►
Well, you know,
01:15:58
◼
►
in these competitions,
01:15:59
◼
►
capability is not
01:16:01
◼
►
the only factor
01:16:02
◼
►
in who wins the competition.
01:16:04
◼
►
The rumored price
01:16:07
◼
►
for this from Gurman
01:16:08
◼
►
was that it's
01:16:09
◼
►
a billion dollars a year,
01:16:10
◼
►
which is not,
01:16:11
◼
►
which is peanuts for Apple
01:16:13
◼
►
and is a good deal.
01:16:14
◼
►
That's a steal.
01:16:15
◼
►
Like, for what Apple
01:16:18
◼
►
and for how badly
01:16:19
◼
►
Apple needed it,
01:16:20
◼
►
that's a steal.
01:16:23
◼
►
And supposedly
01:16:24
◼
►
the rumor is
01:16:24
◼
►
that Anthropik
01:16:25
◼
►
wanted more.
01:16:27
◼
►
apparently was a factor.
01:16:28
◼
►
Another thing
01:16:29
◼
►
that might be a factor,
01:16:30
◼
►
a rumor that was out today,
01:16:31
◼
►
also late breaking,
01:16:32
◼
►
I don't have a link,
01:16:33
◼
►
but it was that
01:16:35
◼
►
familiar with blah,
01:16:37
◼
►
OpenAI essentially
01:16:40
◼
►
we're not interested
01:16:41
◼
►
in being Apple's
01:16:43
◼
►
model provider
01:16:44
◼
►
in this way.
01:16:48
◼
►
the most capable
01:16:49
◼
►
just the best choice
01:16:51
◼
►
because the price
01:16:53
◼
►
the technology
01:16:54
◼
►
was good enough?
01:16:55
◼
►
Maybe OpenAI
01:16:56
◼
►
had better tech,
01:16:58
◼
►
had better tech,
01:16:59
◼
►
didn't want to do it
01:17:00
◼
►
and Anthropik
01:17:00
◼
►
wanted too much money
01:17:02
◼
►
as we've talked
01:17:02
◼
►
about in the past,
01:17:03
◼
►
is a reliable,
01:17:04
◼
►
boring partner
01:17:05
◼
►
has worked with before.
01:17:06
◼
►
So they win,
01:17:08
◼
►
but the price release
01:17:08
◼
►
doesn't say that.
01:17:09
◼
►
The price release
01:17:09
◼
►
says the most capable
01:17:12
◼
►
it's a price release.
01:17:13
◼
►
It's a joint statement,
01:17:16
◼
►
that's fine.
01:17:18
◼
►
so the information
01:17:19
◼
►
had a post about this
01:17:20
◼
►
and there's some
01:17:21
◼
►
interesting tidbits in there.
01:17:23
◼
►
I'm going to read
01:17:23
◼
►
some very short passages.
01:17:24
◼
►
In November,
01:17:26
◼
►
Bloomberg reported
01:17:27
◼
►
that Apple would pay
01:17:28
◼
►
about $1 billion
01:17:29
◼
►
annually to Google
01:17:31
◼
►
to power Siri.
01:17:32
◼
►
incredible deal.
01:17:33
◼
►
These servers,
01:17:35
◼
►
according to a person
01:17:37
◼
►
who has been involved
01:17:38
◼
►
in the project,
01:17:39
◼
►
the Gemini-based AI
01:17:40
◼
►
will run directly
01:17:41
◼
►
on Apple devices
01:17:42
◼
►
or its private cloud system,
01:17:43
◼
►
which is powered
01:17:44
◼
►
by Apple's own server chips
01:17:45
◼
►
rather than running
01:17:45
◼
►
on Google servers.
01:17:46
◼
►
That's what we were
01:17:47
◼
►
talking about earlier.
01:17:49
◼
►
I just really made me
01:17:50
◼
►
raise an eyebrow.
01:17:51
◼
►
Another common set
01:17:52
◼
►
of questions that Siri
01:17:53
◼
►
has historically struggled
01:17:54
◼
►
with involved
01:17:55
◼
►
emotional support,
01:17:56
◼
►
such as when a customer
01:17:57
◼
►
tells a voice assistant
01:17:58
◼
►
it's feeling lonely
01:17:59
◼
►
or disheartened.
01:18:00
◼
►
In the Gemini-based version,
01:18:01
◼
►
Siri will give more
01:18:02
◼
►
thorough conversational responses
01:18:03
◼
►
the way ChatGPT
01:18:04
◼
►
and Gemini do,
01:18:04
◼
►
this person said.
01:18:07
◼
►
As terrible as Siri is
01:18:10
◼
►
at trying to do
01:18:12
◼
►
its crappy humor
01:18:12
◼
►
at the worst possible time,
01:18:15
◼
►
the failure mode
01:18:17
◼
►
of LLM-based agents
01:18:19
◼
►
when discussing
01:18:21
◼
►
things like this.
01:18:22
◼
►
There's lots of stories
01:18:26
◼
►
about how Apple
01:18:27
◼
►
will be able
01:18:27
◼
►
to tweak this
01:18:28
◼
►
and guardrails this
01:18:28
◼
►
and safety that
01:18:29
◼
►
or whatever,
01:18:30
◼
►
but this is the tricky bit.
01:18:31
◼
►
We always talked about
01:18:32
◼
►
how is Apple...
01:18:32
◼
►
Back when we had some faith
01:18:34
◼
►
that Apple would
01:18:35
◼
►
actually integrate
01:18:36
◼
►
LLMs into Siri,
01:18:37
◼
►
we were like,
01:18:37
◼
►
how are they going to do it
01:18:38
◼
►
in an Apple way
01:18:38
◼
►
that doesn't cause harm?
01:18:39
◼
►
And it turns out
01:18:40
◼
►
they're just not going
01:18:41
◼
►
to do it at all for years
01:18:41
◼
►
so we didn't have to worry
01:18:42
◼
►
But everyone else
01:18:43
◼
►
who has done it,
01:18:44
◼
►
you hear all the stories
01:18:47
◼
►
oh, you know,
01:18:48
◼
►
I was just talking
01:18:49
◼
►
and all of a sudden
01:18:49
◼
►
it's telling me
01:18:50
◼
►
to pound nails
01:18:51
◼
►
into my forehead
01:18:51
◼
►
or whatever.
01:18:53
◼
►
We'll see how this goes.
01:18:54
◼
►
But that is...
01:18:56
◼
►
It's true that Siri
01:18:57
◼
►
is bad at that.
01:18:58
◼
►
It's true that an LLM-based,
01:19:00
◼
►
a Gemini-based one
01:19:01
◼
►
could be better at it,
01:19:02
◼
►
but it also can be
01:19:03
◼
►
much, much worse.
01:19:04
◼
►
One set of answers
01:19:06
◼
►
Apple hopes to improve
01:19:08
◼
►
is the ones related
01:19:09
◼
►
to so-called world knowledge
01:19:10
◼
►
or factual questions
01:19:11
◼
►
such as describing
01:19:12
◼
►
the population of a country
01:19:13
◼
►
or scientific information.
01:19:14
◼
►
The new system
01:19:15
◼
►
will give a conversational answer
01:19:17
◼
►
and cite where
01:19:17
◼
►
the answers came from,
01:19:19
◼
►
similar to the way
01:19:20
◼
►
Google's Gemini chatbot
01:19:21
◼
►
or OpenAI's ChatGPT
01:19:22
◼
►
answers certain questions.
01:19:23
◼
►
Devil's in the details
01:19:24
◼
►
in this one.
01:19:25
◼
►
one of the things
01:19:26
◼
►
that I had liked
01:19:27
◼
►
about the pre-LLM days
01:19:29
◼
►
of voice assistants
01:19:30
◼
►
is if you asked
01:19:31
◼
►
something like
01:19:32
◼
►
the population
01:19:32
◼
►
of a country
01:19:35
◼
►
or something,
01:19:36
◼
►
you knew that
01:19:37
◼
►
the only way
01:19:37
◼
►
they could give you
01:19:38
◼
►
is they probably
01:19:39
◼
►
had some kind
01:19:40
◼
►
that they're
01:19:41
◼
►
looking the stuff up
01:19:42
◼
►
in because they
01:19:42
◼
►
weren't smart enough
01:19:43
◼
►
to essentially
01:19:44
◼
►
just look at a free text,
01:19:45
◼
►
a body of free text
01:19:46
◼
►
and derive the answer.
01:19:47
◼
►
And in the case of Siri,
01:19:49
◼
►
they often didn't
01:19:50
◼
►
have a database
01:19:50
◼
►
and would be like,
01:19:51
◼
►
I don't know,
01:19:51
◼
►
here's what I found
01:19:52
◼
►
on the web, right?
01:19:52
◼
►
That's the joke
01:19:53
◼
►
with the Siri thing.
01:19:54
◼
►
But things like,
01:19:55
◼
►
the Amazon Assistant
01:19:56
◼
►
they would have
01:19:57
◼
►
little databases
01:19:58
◼
►
of things that people
01:19:59
◼
►
and they would just like,
01:20:00
◼
►
they would find out
01:20:01
◼
►
are asking about
01:20:01
◼
►
and they would say,
01:20:02
◼
►
we just need a list
01:20:03
◼
►
of all that stuff.
01:20:04
◼
►
We need a calendar tool
01:20:05
◼
►
that can tell people
01:20:06
◼
►
what day Easter is on
01:20:07
◼
►
and what day
01:20:09
◼
►
one of those holidays
01:20:10
◼
►
that doesn't always
01:20:10
◼
►
fall on a Sunday
01:20:13
◼
►
they would make
01:20:14
◼
►
essentially little tools
01:20:15
◼
►
for these dumber
01:20:15
◼
►
systems to look stuff up
01:20:17
◼
►
and that was limiting
01:20:18
◼
►
and annoying
01:20:19
◼
►
but it also meant
01:20:20
◼
►
that when they told you
01:20:21
◼
►
what's the population
01:20:22
◼
►
of this country,
01:20:22
◼
►
you're like,
01:20:23
◼
►
that's a number
01:20:24
◼
►
they looked up
01:20:24
◼
►
and it may not be exact
01:20:26
◼
►
and it may be
01:20:26
◼
►
a little out of date
01:20:27
◼
►
but it's not going
01:20:27
◼
►
to be horrendously wrong.
01:20:30
◼
►
you ask them
01:20:30
◼
►
a facts-based question
01:20:31
◼
►
and they'll give you
01:20:32
◼
►
an answer that looks plausible,
01:20:33
◼
►
you have no freaking idea
01:20:34
◼
►
where it came from
01:20:34
◼
►
so you're like,
01:20:35
◼
►
that could be right
01:20:36
◼
►
but like the whole reason
01:20:37
◼
►
is I have no idea.
01:20:38
◼
►
If you have some idea
01:20:39
◼
►
what's the population
01:20:41
◼
►
and they said
01:20:42
◼
►
you're like,
01:20:42
◼
►
that's probably wrong,
01:20:43
◼
►
But if they say
01:20:45
◼
►
something plausible,
01:20:45
◼
►
you're like,
01:20:46
◼
►
is that the population
01:20:47
◼
►
So now we get,
01:20:49
◼
►
cite your sources.
01:20:50
◼
►
It's an LLM-powered thing,
01:20:52
◼
►
it's going to get the answer
01:20:53
◼
►
and it's going to say,
01:20:54
◼
►
here's where I got it from.
01:20:55
◼
►
I got it from Wikipedia.
01:20:56
◼
►
I got it from this website.
01:20:58
◼
►
I got it according
01:20:58
◼
►
to this New York Times article
01:21:00
◼
►
by this person
01:21:00
◼
►
or whatever.
01:21:01
◼
►
You can do that well
01:21:03
◼
►
by giving these
01:21:04
◼
►
sort of thinking models
01:21:05
◼
►
to essentially do
01:21:06
◼
►
what the old dumb models did
01:21:08
◼
►
look this up in a database
01:21:09
◼
►
but you can also do it poorly
01:21:12
◼
►
just look at this document
01:21:15
◼
►
and extract the information
01:21:17
◼
►
LLMs are notoriously bad
01:21:19
◼
►
at that task
01:21:20
◼
►
summarize this thing,
01:21:22
◼
►
extract the relevant
01:21:23
◼
►
piece of information
01:21:24
◼
►
from this larger text.
01:21:25
◼
►
People think they're
01:21:25
◼
►
really good at it
01:21:26
◼
►
because their summaries
01:21:27
◼
►
look plausible
01:21:27
◼
►
that every time
01:21:28
◼
►
they've tested this
01:21:29
◼
►
they're like,
01:21:30
◼
►
summarize the scientific paper
01:21:31
◼
►
and it's like,
01:21:32
◼
►
your summary is the wrong conclusion.
01:21:35
◼
►
it's the opposite
01:21:35
◼
►
of what this paper says
01:21:36
◼
►
or tell me the population
01:21:37
◼
►
of this country
01:21:38
◼
►
based on this Wikipedia page.
01:21:39
◼
►
The number's right there,
01:21:40
◼
►
we can see it
01:21:40
◼
►
but they pull out
01:21:41
◼
►
a different number
01:21:42
◼
►
because they get confused
01:21:43
◼
►
and it's a plausible number
01:21:45
◼
►
and it's near
01:21:46
◼
►
where it's supposed to be
01:21:47
◼
►
and you can see
01:21:47
◼
►
how it would have got confused
01:21:48
◼
►
because maybe it's talking
01:21:49
◼
►
about population migrations
01:21:50
◼
►
and deltas or whatever
01:21:51
◼
►
but it gives you a number
01:21:53
◼
►
and it's like,
01:21:53
◼
►
and I got it
01:21:54
◼
►
from this Wikipedia page.
01:21:55
◼
►
When you're talking
01:21:57
◼
►
the population of Belgium
01:21:58
◼
►
is 7 million,
01:21:59
◼
►
should you trust it?
01:22:01
◼
►
How many times
01:22:03
◼
►
do you have to verify
01:22:04
◼
►
that information
01:22:05
◼
►
I got this from Wikipedia.
01:22:06
◼
►
How many times
01:22:06
◼
►
do you have to look
01:22:07
◼
►
Wikipedia yourself
01:22:08
◼
►
from the Belgium Wikipedia page
01:22:09
◼
►
before you trust it?
01:22:10
◼
►
Without knowing
01:22:12
◼
►
how it's getting that number
01:22:13
◼
►
it's a little bit tricky.
01:22:14
◼
►
Now maybe it doesn't matter
01:22:14
◼
►
for things like
01:22:15
◼
►
trivia and age of actors
01:22:17
◼
►
and you know,
01:22:17
◼
►
you should just build
01:22:18
◼
►
an element to call sheet,
01:22:21
◼
►
or build an app intent
01:22:23
◼
►
or whatever.
01:22:23
◼
►
Like maybe it doesn't matter
01:22:24
◼
►
too much for that stuff
01:22:25
◼
►
but like we are
01:22:27
◼
►
in this still
01:22:27
◼
►
in this uncomfortable time
01:22:28
◼
►
where systems like this,
01:22:30
◼
►
how many cups
01:22:31
◼
►
or whatever,
01:22:34
◼
►
of unit conversion
01:22:35
◼
►
in our country
01:22:35
◼
►
because things
01:22:36
◼
►
aren't nice and even
01:22:37
◼
►
so we have no idea
01:22:38
◼
►
how many teaspoons
01:22:39
◼
►
are in a pint
01:22:42
◼
►
my Google Voice Assistant
01:22:43
◼
►
that and I was more confident
01:22:45
◼
►
before I was LLM powered
01:22:46
◼
►
that it was giving me
01:22:46
◼
►
the right answer
01:22:47
◼
►
because I knew it had
01:22:47
◼
►
to be a dumb calculator
01:22:48
◼
►
and now I worry
01:22:49
◼
►
that it is just like
01:22:50
◼
►
the same way
01:22:52
◼
►
when you ask these
01:22:52
◼
►
like voice assistants
01:22:53
◼
►
to do any kind of math
01:22:54
◼
►
or sum things up
01:22:55
◼
►
or even if you just say
01:22:56
◼
►
here is a tab
01:22:57
◼
►
delimited text document
01:22:58
◼
►
with numbers in them
01:22:58
◼
►
please sum them up
01:22:59
◼
►
and it doesn't get
01:23:01
◼
►
the correct sum
01:23:02
◼
►
it really shakes
01:23:04
◼
►
in computers
01:23:05
◼
►
this is the one thing
01:23:06
◼
►
computers are supposed
01:23:07
◼
►
to be good at
01:23:07
◼
►
I really want to be certain
01:23:08
◼
►
and so I'm glad
01:23:09
◼
►
that they're trying
01:23:10
◼
►
to go in that direction
01:23:11
◼
►
but I'm still
01:23:13
◼
►
cautious about
01:23:14
◼
►
because they don't tell
01:23:15
◼
►
you the implementation
01:23:16
◼
►
I'm still cautious
01:23:17
◼
►
about it because
01:23:17
◼
►
and the reason I am
01:23:18
◼
►
is I use these
01:23:18
◼
►
assistants all the time
01:23:19
◼
►
and they increasingly
01:23:21
◼
►
do the little citation link
01:23:22
◼
►
like the little
01:23:22
◼
►
gray link icon
01:23:24
◼
►
I think Jepardt
01:23:25
◼
►
I both do this
01:23:26
◼
►
and I follow that icon
01:23:28
◼
►
and I look at that web page
01:23:29
◼
►
and so many times
01:23:30
◼
►
that sentence
01:23:32
◼
►
is not from this web page
01:23:34
◼
►
like you made that up
01:23:35
◼
►
nothing in this web page
01:23:37
◼
►
says anything like that
01:23:38
◼
►
and then really shakes
01:23:40
◼
►
your faith in their citations
01:23:41
◼
►
so we'll see how this goes
01:23:47
◼
►
finally old versus new Siri
01:23:49
◼
►
while certain common Siri tasks
01:23:50
◼
►
such as setting a timer
01:23:52
◼
►
or sending a specific
01:23:53
◼
►
text message
01:23:54
◼
►
to a phone contact
01:23:55
◼
►
will continue to be powered
01:23:57
◼
►
by technology stored
01:23:58
◼
►
on Apple devices
01:23:59
◼
►
the new version of Siri
01:23:59
◼
►
would also be able
01:24:00
◼
►
to handle instances
01:24:01
◼
►
in which the customer's
01:24:03
◼
►
question isn't clearly understood
01:24:05
◼
►
and I think they gave
01:24:06
◼
►
an example in the article
01:24:07
◼
►
if I'm not mistaken
01:24:08
◼
►
send my mom a text
01:24:10
◼
►
telling her I'll be home
01:24:11
◼
►
in 10 minutes
01:24:11
◼
►
but you don't have
01:24:13
◼
►
any clearly defined mom
01:24:15
◼
►
in your like contact card
01:24:16
◼
►
or whatever the case may be
01:24:17
◼
►
it will try to figure out
01:24:19
◼
►
via context clues
01:24:22
◼
►
and take a stab
01:24:22
◼
►
at sending her the right
01:24:23
◼
►
and I hope it gets it right
01:24:25
◼
►
or you're going to send
01:24:25
◼
►
some awkward messages
01:24:26
◼
►
so like the good version
01:24:27
◼
►
of this is making me think
01:24:28
◼
►
this is exactly what
01:24:29
◼
►
we were asking for
01:24:30
◼
►
put an LLM in front of Siri
01:24:31
◼
►
make Siri figure out
01:24:32
◼
►
what you want
01:24:33
◼
►
and then make the LLM
01:24:34
◼
►
formulate the Siri
01:24:36
◼
►
approved stupid syntax
01:24:37
◼
►
that it can understand
01:24:39
◼
►
to do the task
01:24:40
◼
►
the bad version of this
01:24:42
◼
►
from the same paragraph
01:24:43
◼
►
is actually what will happen
01:24:44
◼
►
is the bad old Siri
01:24:46
◼
►
will get a first crack
01:24:47
◼
►
at all your commands
01:24:48
◼
►
and be stupid and dumb
01:24:49
◼
►
but in the case
01:24:51
◼
►
where the bad old Siri
01:24:52
◼
►
100% throws up its hands
01:24:53
◼
►
and says it has no idea
01:24:54
◼
►
we will throw the bad old Siri aside
01:24:56
◼
►
and pass it off to the LLM
01:24:58
◼
►
and cross our fingers
01:24:58
◼
►
that's not the system I want
01:25:00
◼
►
but you know
01:25:01
◼
►
this is again
01:25:03
◼
►
we'll have to try the product
01:25:05
◼
►
the ingredients
01:25:07
◼
►
an improved meal
01:25:09
◼
►
I think these ingredients
01:25:10
◼
►
can make something better
01:25:11
◼
►
than the current Siri
01:25:12
◼
►
but if you put them
01:25:13
◼
►
in the wrong order
01:25:14
◼
►
in the wrong proportions
01:25:14
◼
►
or have asking
01:25:15
◼
►
to do the wrong things
01:25:16
◼
►
it might actually be worse
01:25:18
◼
►
because I don't
01:25:18
◼
►
I don't want
01:25:19
◼
►
essentially anything
01:25:21
◼
►
directly from me
01:25:22
◼
►
to the old Siri
01:25:23
◼
►
I always want
01:25:25
◼
►
and like the tools
01:25:27
◼
►
that it's using
01:25:27
◼
►
on the background
01:25:28
◼
►
because I have faith
01:25:29
◼
►
that the LLM
01:25:30
◼
►
will parse what I'm saying
01:25:31
◼
►
and capture my intent
01:25:33
◼
►
and then I want
01:25:33
◼
►
a bunch of tools
01:25:34
◼
►
that I can rely on
01:25:35
◼
►
that are used
01:25:37
◼
►
to do the stuff
01:25:39
◼
►
that reliably
01:25:40
◼
►
can find the mom contact
01:25:42
◼
►
I don't need the LLM
01:25:43
◼
►
mine is labeled
01:25:45
◼
►
that can send the message
01:25:47
◼
►
that can do unit conversion
01:25:49
◼
►
a calculator tool
01:25:50
◼
►
that can sum numbers
01:25:50
◼
►
like that's what
01:25:51
◼
►
I want to happen
01:25:52
◼
►
but they're not
01:25:54
◼
►
going to tell me
01:25:54
◼
►
how it's implemented
01:25:55
◼
►
so the only thing
01:25:56
◼
►
I'll have to go by
01:25:57
◼
►
is I will pick up my phone
01:25:57
◼
►
and talk to it
01:25:58
◼
►
and see the results
01:26:00
◼
►
finally for tonight
01:26:02
◼
►
Chase has been
01:26:04
◼
►
officially announced
01:26:05
◼
►
as the new issuer
01:26:06
◼
►
for Apple Card
01:26:07
◼
►
or at least will be
01:26:08
◼
►
in two years
01:26:09
◼
►
or something
01:26:11
◼
►
reading from Apple
01:26:12
◼
►
Newsroom today
01:26:13
◼
►
which was January 7th
01:26:14
◼
►
Apple and Chase
01:26:15
◼
►
announced that Chase
01:26:15
◼
►
will become the new issuer
01:26:16
◼
►
of Apple Card
01:26:17
◼
►
with an expected transition
01:26:18
◼
►
in approximately 24 months
01:26:20
◼
►
during this transition
01:26:21
◼
►
Apple Card users
01:26:21
◼
►
can continue to use
01:26:22
◼
►
their card as they normally do
01:26:23
◼
►
more information
01:26:24
◼
►
including FAQs
01:26:25
◼
►
is available at a link
01:26:26
◼
►
we'll put in the show notes
01:26:26
◼
►
additional details
01:26:28
◼
►
will be shared with users
01:26:29
◼
►
as the transaction date
01:26:31
◼
►
MasterCard will remain
01:26:33
◼
►
the payment network
01:26:33
◼
►
for Apple Card
01:26:36
◼
►
from Mac Rumors
01:26:37
◼
►
reports began circulating
01:26:38
◼
►
over two years ago
01:26:38
◼
►
that Goldman Sachs
01:26:39
◼
►
was looking to end
01:26:40
◼
►
its partnership with Apple
01:26:41
◼
►
as a part of an effort
01:26:41
◼
►
to scale back
01:26:42
◼
►
on consumer banking products
01:26:43
◼
►
amid steep losses
01:26:44
◼
►
according to the
01:26:45
◼
►
Wall Street Journal
01:26:46
◼
►
Goldman Sachs
01:26:48
◼
►
is unloading
01:26:50
◼
►
of outstanding
01:26:50
◼
►
Apple Card balances
01:26:51
◼
►
at a discount
01:26:52
◼
►
of more than
01:26:54
◼
►
for co-branded
01:26:55
◼
►
account deals
01:26:56
◼
►
but higher than
01:26:57
◼
►
average delinquency
01:26:57
◼
►
rates and high
01:26:58
◼
►
exposure to subprime
01:27:00
◼
►
made it difficult
01:27:00
◼
►
for Goldman Sachs
01:27:01
◼
►
to find a buyer
01:27:02
◼
►
yeah so this has been
01:27:03
◼
►
I pulled up stuff
01:27:05
◼
►
from the show notes
01:27:06
◼
►
from like years ago
01:27:07
◼
►
that we had down there
01:27:09
◼
►
like the very first
01:27:09
◼
►
story we had
01:27:10
◼
►
was like Apple Card
01:27:10
◼
►
it's moving from
01:27:11
◼
►
Goldman Sachs
01:27:12
◼
►
it's totally moving
01:27:13
◼
►
yeah it's definitely
01:27:14
◼
►
moving and then like
01:27:14
◼
►
months later
01:27:15
◼
►
yep Apple Card is moving
01:27:16
◼
►
eventually like
01:27:17
◼
►
Apple Card is probably
01:27:19
◼
►
moving right
01:27:19
◼
►
it was just years
01:27:20
◼
►
and years of this
01:27:21
◼
►
I deleted all of that
01:27:22
◼
►
it's like guess what
01:27:24
◼
►
Chase has got it
01:27:24
◼
►
and we'll put a link
01:27:26
◼
►
in the show notes
01:27:27
◼
►
to the Wall Street
01:27:27
◼
►
Journal story
01:27:28
◼
►
that gives more
01:27:29
◼
►
of this saga
01:27:29
◼
►
but Apple Card
01:27:31
◼
►
is essentially
01:27:31
◼
►
like it's not a hot
01:27:33
◼
►
potato it's a rotten
01:27:34
◼
►
nobody wants it
01:27:35
◼
►
it's a money loser
01:27:37
◼
►
Goldman Sachs is losing
01:27:38
◼
►
money on credit
01:27:39
◼
►
on a credit card
01:27:40
◼
►
which is not
01:27:41
◼
►
what you want
01:27:42
◼
►
when you're running
01:27:43
◼
►
a credit card
01:27:43
◼
►
you want it to make money
01:27:45
◼
►
become a partner
01:27:47
◼
►
they've been trying
01:27:47
◼
►
to get rid of it
01:27:48
◼
►
and Apple has
01:27:50
◼
►
all the demands
01:27:51
◼
►
about who's going
01:27:52
◼
►
but like nobody
01:27:54
◼
►
like because anybody
01:27:55
◼
►
who might be interested
01:27:56
◼
►
Apple comes and says
01:27:56
◼
►
but you got to do this
01:27:57
◼
►
you got to do that
01:27:58
◼
►
you got to do that
01:27:58
◼
►
and they're like
01:27:58
◼
►
oh no I'm not interested
01:27:59
◼
►
so that's why it's
01:28:00
◼
►
it's taking so long
01:28:00
◼
►
for somebody to take this
01:28:02
◼
►
Goldman Sachs is so
01:28:03
◼
►
desperate to get rid
01:28:04
◼
►
they're just going
01:28:05
◼
►
to take a loss
01:28:05
◼
►
of a billion dollars
01:28:06
◼
►
and say here
01:28:07
◼
►
it's not our
01:28:08
◼
►
problem anymore
01:28:08
◼
►
and it's still
01:28:09
◼
►
going to take
01:28:10
◼
►
two years to do it
01:28:11
◼
►
the Wall Street Journal
01:28:12
◼
►
story has more
01:28:14
◼
►
of this saga
01:28:14
◼
►
but like the few
01:28:15
◼
►
things we've heard
01:28:16
◼
►
about on the outside
01:28:16
◼
►
is that one of the
01:28:17
◼
►
things that immediately
01:28:18
◼
►
tripped up Goldman
01:28:19
◼
►
is that Apple
01:28:19
◼
►
decided that everybody's
01:28:21
◼
►
bill should be due
01:28:22
◼
►
on the first of the month
01:28:23
◼
►
which is a totally
01:28:24
◼
►
Apple style thing to do
01:28:25
◼
►
like oh it's consistent
01:28:26
◼
►
you never know when
01:28:27
◼
►
you never wonder
01:28:28
◼
►
when your bill date is
01:28:28
◼
►
it's the first of the
01:28:29
◼
►
month and then any
01:28:31
◼
►
credit card issuer
01:28:31
◼
►
could have told them
01:28:32
◼
►
don't do that because
01:28:33
◼
►
that means all your
01:28:34
◼
►
customer support will be
01:28:35
◼
►
concentrated around the
01:28:36
◼
►
first of the month
01:28:37
◼
►
instead of being spread
01:28:38
◼
►
evenly over the entire
01:28:39
◼
►
month and sure enough
01:28:40
◼
►
it destroyed Goldman's
01:28:41
◼
►
ability to do customer
01:28:41
◼
►
support and it's been
01:28:43
◼
►
an ongoing problem
01:28:43
◼
►
the other thing is
01:28:44
◼
►
apparently Apple or
01:28:46
◼
►
whoever decides what
01:28:47
◼
►
card whether you're not
01:28:48
◼
►
you get an Apple card
01:28:49
◼
►
has been too permissive
01:28:50
◼
►
so tons of people have
01:28:51
◼
►
it who have like really
01:28:52
◼
►
bad credit and don't
01:28:52
◼
►
pay their bills so
01:28:54
◼
►
that's another reason
01:28:56
◼
►
it's a money loser so
01:28:57
◼
►
I mean I'm I'm
01:28:58
◼
►
I have an Apple card
01:28:59
◼
►
I basically only use
01:29:00
◼
►
it to buy Apple things
01:29:01
◼
►
to try to get cash
01:29:02
◼
►
back or whatever but
01:29:04
◼
►
unlike Apple pay this
01:29:06
◼
►
has been out for a
01:29:07
◼
►
while and has not been
01:29:08
◼
►
a ringing success and
01:29:09
◼
►
Apple is lucky they
01:29:11
◼
►
found somebody who's
01:29:12
◼
►
willing to take it off
01:29:14
◼
►
Goldman's hands
01:29:14
◼
►
yep very much so
01:29:16
◼
►
so from the Wall
01:29:18
◼
►
Street Journal article
01:29:19
◼
►
still Murray Abrams one
01:29:21
◼
►
of Capital One's most
01:29:22
◼
►
senior executives met
01:29:23
◼
►
with Goldman around
01:29:24
◼
►
early June and this is
01:29:25
◼
►
relevant for a couple
01:29:26
◼
►
of reasons first of all
01:29:27
◼
►
Capital One didn't win
01:29:28
◼
►
the bid and secondly
01:29:29
◼
►
Capital One is
01:29:30
◼
►
effectively based here
01:29:31
◼
►
in Richmond privately
01:29:32
◼
►
Capital One executives
01:29:33
◼
►
viewed Apple's outreach
01:29:34
◼
►
as an attempt by the
01:29:35
◼
►
tech giant to try to
01:29:36
◼
►
squeeze more favorable
01:29:37
◼
►
favorable terms out of
01:29:39
◼
►
JP Morgan classic tactic
01:29:40
◼
►
but I think it's quite
01:29:41
◼
►
funny more than a year
01:29:43
◼
►
ago Johnson told
01:29:43
◼
►
employees that those
01:29:44
◼
►
who stay until last
01:29:45
◼
►
day of the Apple
01:29:46
◼
►
program will be eligible
01:29:47
◼
►
for a lump sum payment
01:29:49
◼
►
equal to their 2023
01:29:50
◼
►
compensation this is for
01:29:52
◼
►
the Goldman Sachs
01:29:53
◼
►
employees they're getting
01:29:54
◼
►
an entire year's pay if
01:29:56
◼
►
I understand this right
01:29:57
◼
►
to stay until the ship
01:29:58
◼
►
has finally sunk that
01:29:59
◼
►
is something else yeah
01:30:00
◼
►
because I mean obviously
01:30:01
◼
►
all those people like oh
01:30:02
◼
►
fine well we're losing the
01:30:03
◼
►
card so I'm gonna lose my
01:30:03
◼
►
job I better start looking
01:30:04
◼
►
for new and like no stay
01:30:05
◼
►
it's gonna be to your
01:30:06
◼
►
transition you just stay
01:30:07
◼
►
we'll pay you lots of
01:30:08
◼
►
money yeah that like Apple
01:30:10
◼
►
was talking to everybody and
01:30:11
◼
►
trying to make it seem like
01:30:12
◼
►
everybody's in the game and
01:30:14
◼
►
you know play everybody off
01:30:15
◼
►
against each other we're
01:30:15
◼
►
also still being super
01:30:16
◼
►
demanding it just seems
01:30:18
◼
►
like like not a not an
01:30:21
◼
►
exciting winner like I'm I
01:30:22
◼
►
don't even know if Apple
01:30:23
◼
►
is excited about Apple
01:30:24
◼
►
card anymore but nobody
01:30:26
◼
►
wants to do to run the
01:30:28
◼
►
card to do the stuff that
01:30:29
◼
►
Apple doesn't want to do
01:30:30
◼
►
there's also rumors they
01:30:31
◼
►
were gonna move from the
01:30:32
◼
►
MasterCard to the Visa
01:30:32
◼
►
payment network but that
01:30:33
◼
►
also didn't happen
01:30:34
◼
►
there's also some
01:30:36
◼
►
uncertainty about the
01:30:37
◼
►
savings accounts like they
01:30:39
◼
►
have Apple has like a
01:30:40
◼
►
savings account for I
01:30:41
◼
►
figure what it's like it
01:30:42
◼
►
was originally like high
01:30:43
◼
►
interest savings account
01:30:44
◼
►
that you can put your
01:30:45
◼
►
Apple you know cash that
01:30:46
◼
►
you get back on things
01:30:47
◼
►
you can put it into our
01:30:48
◼
►
high interest savings
01:30:48
◼
►
account and over the
01:30:50
◼
►
course of like year or so
01:30:51
◼
►
that high interest savings
01:30:51
◼
►
account was out the
01:30:53
◼
►
interest rate of the
01:30:54
◼
►
high interest has gone
01:30:55
◼
►
down and down they just
01:30:56
◼
►
kept announcing it's gone
01:30:57
◼
►
down another half percent
01:30:58
◼
►
now I mean it's not just
01:30:59
◼
►
Apple doing that like it's
01:30:59
◼
►
the whole financial world
01:31:01
◼
►
but like it just it just
01:31:04
◼
►
aside from having a really
01:31:05
◼
►
cool physical card that no
01:31:06
◼
►
one should ever use and
01:31:08
◼
►
aside from giving you I
01:31:08
◼
►
think six percent back on
01:31:10
◼
►
Apple purchases is six
01:31:12
◼
►
anyway and having a cool
01:31:14
◼
►
icon in the wallet app it
01:31:16
◼
►
just doesn't seem like a
01:31:17
◼
►
very successful or exciting
01:31:19
◼
►
product but it is still a
01:31:20
◼
►
product in their lineup and
01:31:21
◼
►
soon it will be a product
01:31:22
◼
►
in Chase's lineup as an
01:31:24
◼
►
aside if you permit me to
01:31:25
◼
►
fuss and whine for a
01:31:27
◼
►
moment I was trying to put
01:31:29
◼
►
together a link to the
01:31:30
◼
►
Wall Street Journal article
01:31:31
◼
►
from Apple news because if
01:31:33
◼
►
you're an Apple one
01:31:33
◼
►
subscriber you get some of
01:31:36
◼
►
the Wall Street Journal for
01:31:36
◼
►
free I think I think all
01:31:37
◼
►
of it maybe all of it I
01:31:39
◼
►
don't know one way or
01:31:39
◼
►
another but I went and I
01:31:42
◼
►
tried to copy a bit of the
01:31:44
◼
►
text to put here in the
01:31:46
◼
►
show notes for us to talk
01:31:47
◼
►
about and I did this on my
01:31:49
◼
►
Mac in the Apple news app
01:31:52
◼
►
right it freaking hijacked
01:31:54
◼
►
my you want or whatever I
01:31:56
◼
►
clipboard hijacked whatever
01:31:57
◼
►
the term is where I copied a
01:31:59
◼
►
little bit from the text but
01:32:00
◼
►
what ended up on my clipboard
01:32:01
◼
►
was the text and then well
01:32:04
◼
►
first of all was the text with
01:32:05
◼
►
quotes although they were
01:32:06
◼
►
curly quotes I guess they got
01:32:07
◼
►
that for going for them and
01:32:09
◼
►
then after that excerpt from
01:32:11
◼
►
behind the unraveling of
01:32:12
◼
►
yada yada yada by so-and-so
01:32:13
◼
►
the Wall Street Journal link
01:32:14
◼
►
this material may be
01:32:15
◼
►
protected by copyright all
01:32:17
◼
►
of that landed in my
01:32:18
◼
►
freaking clipboard I hate
01:32:20
◼
►
that so much and the reason
01:32:22
◼
►
I use Apple products is so
01:32:24
◼
►
I don't have to deal with
01:32:25
◼
►
this freaking bullshit and
01:32:26
◼
►
yet here I am dealing with
01:32:28
◼
►
it I'm so mad and it's so
01:32:31
◼
►
unbecoming of Apple news now
01:32:35
◼
►
I probably just need to wake
01:32:36
◼
►
up and embrace the fact that
01:32:37
◼
►
Apple is not the company that
01:32:38
◼
►
I think it is and want it to
01:32:39
◼
►
be but why are we doing this
01:32:41
◼
►
I hate it are you sure it's
01:32:43
◼
►
an Apple news thing because
01:32:44
◼
►
tons of websites do that I
01:32:45
◼
►
imagine it's a Wall Street
01:32:46
◼
►
Journal thing well that's the
01:32:47
◼
►
thing is that I think it's
01:32:48
◼
►
actually that Apple news is
01:32:49
◼
►
just rendering some you know
01:32:50
◼
►
web kit something or other
01:32:52
◼
►
because tons of websites do
01:32:53
◼
►
this like right you can see
01:32:55
◼
►
how it's sometimes it's
01:32:56
◼
►
useful like oh I get the link
01:32:57
◼
►
and the because I'm probably
01:32:58
◼
►
going to want the link
01:32:59
◼
►
anyway I get the text and the
01:33:00
◼
►
citation all at the same
01:33:01
◼
►
time but it's not what you
01:33:03
◼
►
expect when you when you
01:33:04
◼
►
highlight some text and copy
01:33:05
◼
►
and paste it you expect what
01:33:06
◼
►
you paste to be what you
01:33:07
◼
►
copied and not have extra
01:33:09
◼
►
stuff stuck on the end of it
01:33:10
◼
►
but uh yeah I annoying
01:33:13
◼
►
expensive newsy website
01:33:15
◼
►
stented to this I'm I'm
01:33:16
◼
►
currently going to blame this
01:33:17
◼
►
on the Wall Street Journal
01:33:18
◼
►
and not on Apple news but
01:33:19
◼
►
Apple news itself is a not a
01:33:21
◼
►
nice app the only reason I
01:33:22
◼
►
ever use Apple news by the
01:33:23
◼
►
way is to read the Wall
01:33:24
◼
►
Street Journal quote unquote
01:33:25
◼
►
for free because I'm an
01:33:27
◼
►
Apple news plus subscriber
01:33:27
◼
►
because it's part of my
01:33:28
◼
►
bundle so I go to the Wall
01:33:30
◼
►
Street Journal article on my
01:33:32
◼
►
Apple web browser Safari on
01:33:34
◼
►
the phone or whatever and
01:33:36
◼
►
then I share to Apple news if
01:33:37
◼
►
you don't have Apple news in
01:33:38
◼
►
your list of like frequently
01:33:39
◼
►
sharing do it because if
01:33:40
◼
►
you share to Apple news when
01:33:42
◼
►
you're on a Wall Street
01:33:43
◼
►
Journal article on their
01:33:44
◼
►
website it will take you to
01:33:46
◼
►
your ability to see it inside
01:33:48
◼
►
the Apple news app and the
01:33:49
◼
►
Apple news app is worse than
01:33:50
◼
►
your web browser and this
01:33:52
◼
►
may be one of the ways that
01:33:53
◼
►
it's worse but I bet the
01:33:54
◼
►
website does the same thing
01:33:55
◼
►
yeah and I think it is
01:33:57
◼
►
ultimately ultimately the
01:33:58
◼
►
Wall Street Journal's fault
01:33:59
◼
►
but I hate that Apple didn't
01:34:01
◼
►
put the kibosh on this it
01:34:02
◼
►
just it's gross they're not
01:34:03
◼
►
telling people how to modify
01:34:04
◼
►
their websites like I think
01:34:05
◼
►
they learned the lesson of
01:34:06
◼
►
like don't try to ask
01:34:07
◼
►
people who are in Apple
01:34:09
◼
►
news to like specially
01:34:10
◼
►
format stuff or make a
01:34:11
◼
►
special Apple news version
01:34:12
◼
►
they're like look we'll just
01:34:13
◼
►
show your website we'll just
01:34:14
◼
►
let people see your website
01:34:15
◼
►
yeah all right thank you to
01:34:17
◼
►
our sponsors this episode
01:34:18
◼
►
one password guru and
01:34:21
◼
►
gusto and thanks to our
01:34:22
◼
►
members who support us
01:34:23
◼
►
directly you can join us at
01:34:24
◼
►
atp.fm slash join one of
01:34:27
◼
►
the many perks of ATP
01:34:29
◼
►
membership is ATP overtime our
01:34:32
◼
►
weekly bonus topic members get
01:34:34
◼
►
a weekly topic every week
01:34:35
◼
►
that is just for them plus
01:34:37
◼
►
all the other stuff you know
01:34:38
◼
►
the ad free feed the boot
01:34:39
◼
►
leg the membership discounts on
01:34:41
◼
►
on merchandise the exclusive
01:34:43
◼
►
content like member specials
01:34:45
◼
►
but also every single week
01:34:47
◼
►
extra topic called overtime this
01:34:49
◼
►
week on overtime we'll be
01:34:50
◼
►
talking about the continuing
01:34:52
◼
►
disaster over at X and
01:34:55
◼
►
Grok and all that stuff so
01:34:58
◼
►
stay tuned for that fun bit if
01:34:59
◼
►
you're a member if you want to
01:35:01
◼
►
hear it join atp.fm slash join
01:35:03
◼
►
thanks everybody and we'll
01:35:04
◼
►
talk to you next week
01:35:06
◼
►
now the show is over they
01:35:11
◼
►
didn't even mean to begin
01:35:13
◼
►
because it was accidental
01:35:15
◼
►
oh it was accidental
01:35:17
◼
►
John didn't do any research
01:35:21
◼
►
Marco and Casey wouldn't let
01:35:23
◼
►
him because it was accidental
01:35:25
◼
►
who is accidental and you can
01:35:30
◼
►
find the show notes at atp.fm and
01:35:35
◼
►
if you're into mastodon you can
01:35:38
◼
►
follow them at c-a-s-e-y-l-i-s-s so
01:35:44
◼
►
the nba immersive experience so this
01:36:12
◼
►
was announced a while ago and
01:36:15
◼
►
then Apple had their first
01:36:17
◼
►
instance of it I think this past
01:36:19
◼
►
weekend and what this is is you
01:36:23
◼
►
put your vision pro on your face
01:36:24
◼
►
and if you are a Los Angeles
01:36:28
◼
►
Lakers fan and you pay for the
01:36:30
◼
►
spectrum like app or whatever or
01:36:33
◼
►
if you pay for the nba app then
01:36:35
◼
►
you can watch depending on if
01:36:37
◼
►
you're in the home home region you
01:36:39
◼
►
can either watch this live or you
01:36:40
◼
►
can watch it like the next day if
01:36:43
◼
►
you're not from the Los Angeles
01:36:44
◼
►
area I love how we have all this
01:36:46
◼
►
modern technology in the VR headset
01:36:47
◼
►
and yet we still can't escape the
01:36:49
◼
►
Byzantine rules of rights
01:36:51
◼
►
ownership of how and where and when I
01:36:53
◼
►
can watch a sports yep so what this
01:36:56
◼
►
is is it's the entire basketball game
01:36:58
◼
►
filmed specifically for the vision pro
01:37:00
◼
►
it has a announcing team that's
01:37:03
◼
►
specifically for the vision pro it had
01:37:05
◼
►
a on-the-court reporter specifically
01:37:07
◼
►
for the vision pro this is a very
01:37:10
◼
►
very bespoke experience and I have a
01:37:15
◼
►
lot of thoughts about how this is done
01:37:18
◼
►
and what they're doing and how they're
01:37:20
◼
►
doing it but before I get into the
01:37:22
◼
►
nitty-gritty I'd like to kind of give
01:37:25
◼
►
my overall thoughts and I'd like to kind
01:37:27
◼
►
of indirectly respond to our good friend
01:37:29
◼
►
Ben Thompson over at Stratechery and
01:37:31
◼
►
Dithering who is very fired up about
01:37:34
◼
►
this and Ben's thesis I think in in the
01:37:39
◼
►
the Stratechery article was actually a
01:37:41
◼
►
freebie for this week or last week
01:37:43
◼
►
whenever it was if Ben would permit me
01:37:46
◼
►
a summary of his thesis I think his
01:37:48
◼
►
thesis is never move the camera is
01:37:51
◼
►
basically what it boils down to which I
01:37:53
◼
►
and I've also said on the show like I
01:37:55
◼
►
want that to be an option like for all
01:37:57
◼
►
of the vision pro immersive stuff I am
01:38:00
◼
►
frequently very disoriented by the
01:38:02
◼
►
changing cameras and everything and
01:38:03
◼
►
what I always ask for like man wouldn't
01:38:05
◼
►
it be great if there was an immersive
01:38:07
◼
►
camera like in a really good seat
01:38:10
◼
►
equivalent in like a concert or a stage
01:38:13
◼
►
production you know and in the case of
01:38:15
◼
►
sports it's you know it's a little more
01:38:17
◼
►
complicated but like a similar I think
01:38:19
◼
►
value of there of like just make me feel
01:38:22
◼
►
like I am there and the way I think I
01:38:25
◼
►
would want to do that is just give me a
01:38:27
◼
►
fixed camera like in or maybe above a
01:38:30
◼
►
really good seat but that being said
01:38:33
◼
►
Apple has not yet delivered that so we
01:38:35
◼
►
don't actually know if that's what we
01:38:37
◼
►
want but it sure would be nice to like
01:38:39
◼
►
to try well but they sort of have so
01:38:42
◼
►
here's the thing so the way the
01:38:44
◼
►
broadcast was was they had you know a
01:38:47
◼
►
big wide shot to start then they had
01:38:50
◼
►
some on-the-court reporting and then
01:38:52
◼
►
when the game started they basically
01:38:54
◼
►
had a camera at the half-court line so
01:38:58
◼
►
on the middle of the court long ways and
01:39:01
◼
►
they just sat there that's that's what
01:39:03
◼
►
you did you had and you had almost the
01:39:06
◼
►
entire court in your field of view the
01:39:07
◼
►
very extreme edge like the the the three
01:39:11
◼
►
point area right against the out-of-bounds
01:39:13
◼
►
line you couldn't quite see because field
01:39:15
◼
►
of view wasn't quite enough but and that's
01:39:17
◼
►
on either end but by and large you could
01:39:20
◼
►
see the entire court and up until and I
01:39:22
◼
►
actually wrote this down the first shot
01:39:25
◼
►
that I saw that wasn't the half-court live
01:39:28
◼
►
shot was halfway through the first quarter
01:39:31
◼
►
with eight minutes and 14 seconds game
01:39:33
◼
►
time remaining and I loved this view that
01:39:38
◼
►
they had where you're basically sitting
01:39:40
◼
►
court side dead center and you can twist
01:39:43
◼
►
your head left and right in order to watch
01:39:46
◼
►
the action and you know the announcers will
01:39:48
◼
►
occasionally say you know look to your
01:39:49
◼
►
right to see this look you'll have to see
01:39:50
◼
►
that I don't want to get into the nitty
01:39:53
◼
►
gritty right now but another thing that
01:39:55
◼
►
was very cool was I didn't see a score
01:39:57
◼
►
bug you know the thing which shows how
01:39:59
◼
►
what who what the scores are and how much
01:40:00
◼
►
time is left and blah blah blah and it
01:40:02
◼
►
wasn't until after the first couple of
01:40:04
◼
►
minutes that I realized oh I need to look
01:40:06
◼
►
down because they don't have to have it in
01:40:09
◼
►
the middle of you know the action they can
01:40:12
◼
►
have it below the action and when I would
01:40:14
◼
►
like to see the score I look down extremely
01:40:17
◼
►
clever love it after the eight minute and
01:40:21
◼
►
14 second mark what they started to do
01:40:23
◼
►
from time to time was have a view basically
01:40:27
◼
►
behind the backboard remember the backboard
01:40:29
◼
►
is glass and behind the backboard and it
01:40:31
◼
►
was looking down the court the long way and
01:40:34
◼
►
in and of itself this view was incredible I
01:40:37
◼
►
loved this view because you got a much
01:40:39
◼
►
clearer shot of the action however they flip
01:40:43
◼
►
flopped back and forth between the two
01:40:45
◼
►
extreme ends of the court and if if the
01:40:48
◼
►
person with the ball or the thing that
01:40:50
◼
►
you're looking at really is what it boils
01:40:52
◼
►
down to the thing you're looking at is
01:40:54
◼
►
approximately in the center line of the
01:40:56
◼
►
court laterally the short way then it was
01:40:59
◼
►
fine but if you think about it if you're
01:41:01
◼
►
watching the ball and the person and the
01:41:03
◼
►
players dribbling let's say on the extreme
01:41:05
◼
►
left-hand side of your view when they flip
01:41:08
◼
►
180 degrees that person is now on the
01:41:11
◼
►
extreme right-hand side of your view and it
01:41:14
◼
►
is off-putting to Ben's point now with that
01:41:17
◼
►
said I don't think I would want to watch an
01:41:19
◼
►
entire two-and-a-half-hour experience just
01:41:23
◼
►
stapled to the to the you know I almost said
01:41:26
◼
►
the 50-yard line to mid-court I don't think
01:41:29
◼
►
I would want to do that and that's what Ben
01:41:30
◼
►
is dying for I violently disagree with him
01:41:34
◼
►
there I think just being stuck there forever
01:41:36
◼
►
would be awful now I will say however that I
01:41:39
◼
►
agree with you Marco the option to be stuck
01:41:42
◼
►
there forever I'm good with that and in a
01:41:45
◼
►
perfect world I think some amount of control
01:41:46
◼
►
and I don't know how you would do this but
01:41:48
◼
►
some amount of control of what view and what
01:41:49
◼
►
camera angle you have would be great
01:41:52
◼
►
because then it's not off-putting because
01:41:54
◼
►
you're not being whipped through space
01:41:55
◼
►
suddenly it's that you're you're you're
01:41:59
◼
►
choosing when to get through space and I was
01:42:01
◼
►
actually talking to my friend John who does
01:42:02
◼
►
channels and he pointed out you know it's
01:42:05
◼
►
like when you're in a car and the driver
01:42:07
◼
►
breaks suddenly the driver's head stays still
01:42:09
◼
►
because they know what's about to happen the
01:42:11
◼
►
passengers heads are all whipping forward
01:42:13
◼
►
because they didn't expect the driver to
01:42:14
◼
►
stand on the brake right and it's kind of
01:42:16
◼
►
sort of like that but I thought overall I
01:42:20
◼
►
only watched the first quarter I watched a
01:42:21
◼
►
bit of halftime and I watched the very end
01:42:23
◼
►
of the game and I'm gonna go through some
01:42:25
◼
►
specific thoughts in a moment but overall this
01:42:30
◼
►
was incredible I have quibbles but it was
01:42:35
◼
►
incredible now I don't know that this would
01:42:37
◼
►
work too well for soccer or football or maybe
01:42:39
◼
►
even wouldn't even work too great for hockey
01:42:42
◼
►
because these are all bigger fields or you
01:42:45
◼
►
know courts or what have you I think hockey
01:42:47
◼
►
is the best chance it would have but something
01:42:49
◼
►
like football or it would be that American or
01:42:52
◼
►
soccer you know what no matter how you slice
01:42:54
◼
►
it I don't think football slash football would
01:42:57
◼
►
be a good fit because you're gonna have to whip
01:42:59
◼
►
around the field you know the camera angles
01:43:01
◼
►
will have to change but golly I'm not a
01:43:04
◼
►
particular basketball fan anymore I used to
01:43:06
◼
►
be years and years ago but I only want to
01:43:08
◼
►
watch games this way and goodness knows if my
01:43:11
◼
►
if my preferred team had a had gave me the
01:43:14
◼
►
ability to do this especially if I'm out of
01:43:16
◼
►
market and do this every time take all of
01:43:19
◼
►
my money take every bit of money I have I
01:43:21
◼
►
can't get a hotspot Marco because I'm giving
01:43:23
◼
►
all my money to this phantom Apple Vision
01:43:25
◼
►
Pro thing that will let me watch my favorite
01:43:27
◼
►
NBA team you know courtside give me all the
01:43:30
◼
►
money how much is a courtside seat the Lakers
01:43:31
◼
►
50 grand 100 grand I mean suddenly the vision
01:43:35
◼
►
pro seems positively cheap before I go through
01:43:38
◼
►
my line-by-line things John you also tried
01:43:41
◼
►
this tell me what you thought yeah I got a
01:43:43
◼
►
vision pro so I thought I'd give it a try I
01:43:45
◼
►
also heard Ben's big complaint and I think
01:43:48
◼
►
his his core issue here which he didn't
01:43:50
◼
►
really I mean he said it by he implied it but
01:43:53
◼
►
he didn't explicitly say it which is that he
01:43:56
◼
►
likes being in person at sporting events
01:44:00
◼
►
particularly basketball games he likes that
01:44:02
◼
►
so obviously if he could reproduce the
01:44:05
◼
►
experience that he likes of you know sitting
01:44:08
◼
►
half court at a basketball game courtside
01:44:10
◼
►
seats that would be great and that's what he
01:44:13
◼
►
wants he's like why won't you do why won't
01:44:14
◼
►
you give me this thing that I like but here's
01:44:16
◼
►
the thing not everybody either likes or if
01:44:20
◼
►
they do like it even prefers the experience
01:44:23
◼
►
of being at sporting events live a good
01:44:26
◼
►
example is the Super Bowl the most popular
01:44:28
◼
►
sporting event in our country it is an
01:44:30
◼
►
experience to be there in person I'm sure
01:44:32
◼
►
but if you are very into the game you just
01:44:36
◼
►
get a much better view and understanding of
01:44:38
◼
►
the game not being in person and watching the
01:44:40
◼
►
broadcast because they have 500 cameras and
01:44:43
◼
►
you get to see everything and every replay
01:44:44
◼
►
and every little bit and and honestly that's
01:44:47
◼
►
how most people experience American football
01:44:49
◼
►
is by watching it on TV and they've done a
01:44:53
◼
►
good job of perfecting that art and when
01:44:55
◼
►
you're there in person it's a different
01:44:57
◼
►
experience but I bet a lot of people would
01:44:58
◼
►
say you know what if I really care about the
01:45:00
◼
►
teams and the minutia of individual plays
01:45:02
◼
►
or whatever I kind of would rather see it
01:45:05
◼
►
on a TV not everybody feels that way but I
01:45:08
◼
►
think for lots of sporting events being
01:45:11
◼
►
there in person as exciting as it is it's
01:45:13
◼
►
exciting as kind of like a change of pace
01:45:15
◼
►
it's not like live music versus recorded
01:45:18
◼
►
music where it's like you know they're
01:45:21
◼
►
they're close enough to each other and it's
01:45:23
◼
►
mostly an auditory experience and it's only
01:45:24
◼
►
purely additive because televised sports
01:45:27
◼
►
with a bazillion cameras and cutting and a
01:45:30
◼
►
team announcing or whatever is just it's
01:45:33
◼
►
experienced by millions and millions and
01:45:34
◼
►
millions of people all the time every single
01:45:36
◼
►
day live sports is only experienced by the
01:45:39
◼
►
people who can fit in the freaking stadium it's
01:45:41
◼
►
a very small number of people and a lot of
01:45:43
◼
►
those people have terrible seats and can't
01:45:45
◼
►
see anything and even if you have the very
01:45:47
◼
►
best seat still if the exciting play happens
01:45:50
◼
►
far away from where you are it's not great
01:45:52
◼
►
so I get where Ben's coming from but he
01:45:55
◼
►
should basically say I want a live sports
01:45:58
◼
►
simulator which I agree should be a thing and
01:46:01
◼
►
would cost less money but I'm not sure I
01:46:03
◼
►
could make the argument to Apple that a live
01:46:05
◼
►
sports simulator is the best use of their
01:46:09
◼
►
budget because I don't think it's appeal is
01:46:12
◼
►
as wide as trying to find a good way to give
01:46:16
◼
►
the good parts of being in person at a
01:46:18
◼
►
sporting event while also giving the good
01:46:21
◼
►
parts of being in a virtual reality headset
01:46:23
◼
►
where you can have crap floating around you
01:46:24
◼
►
and do cuts and stuff like that because when
01:46:26
◼
►
you're sitting on the sideline yeah you can
01:46:28
◼
►
look up at the stupid fuzzy screen on the
01:46:31
◼
►
top of the stadium and see all the stupid
01:46:32
◼
►
advertisements blaring in your face but you
01:46:34
◼
►
can have a bunch of like floating views or
01:46:36
◼
►
like in your F1 app of seeing the view from
01:46:38
◼
►
the car and seeing the map it's like you can
01:46:39
◼
►
do that in VR so I feel like whether or not
01:46:43
◼
►
Apple has been successful with its current
01:46:45
◼
►
product I don't agree that they should say
01:46:47
◼
►
our only ambition is to simulate the live
01:46:49
◼
►
experience that should be one of their
01:46:51
◼
►
ambitions that should be a thing that they
01:46:53
◼
►
offer but I don't think that has the
01:46:55
◼
►
widest appeal of all the things they could
01:46:57
◼
►
potentially do for sporting events and
01:46:59
◼
►
watching I only watch like the first quarter
01:47:01
◼
►
of this game and then just jumped around
01:47:03
◼
►
because I don't care about the teams
01:47:03
◼
►
watching this stuff in the vision pro did
01:47:08
◼
►
nothing to dissuade me from that I didn't
01:47:10
◼
►
find that the cutting and jumping to be
01:47:11
◼
►
that big in fact like you said Casey I was
01:47:13
◼
►
kind of surprised they kept the view for as
01:47:14
◼
►
long as they did unfortunately for the
01:47:17
◼
►
vision pro and basketball sitting you know
01:47:21
◼
►
in the center of the half court line on
01:47:23
◼
►
the on the sideline with the vision pro is
01:47:27
◼
►
worse than sitting there in real life in
01:47:29
◼
►
one super duper important way which is I
01:47:31
◼
►
mean you noted that the field of vision
01:47:32
◼
►
doesn't get you all the way around but the
01:47:34
◼
►
real problem is the vision pro and the
01:47:36
◼
►
vision pro cameras have much more
01:47:38
◼
►
resolution and detail in the center and
01:47:41
◼
►
yes you can turn your head to look at the
01:47:44
◼
►
basket on one end of the quarter or the
01:47:45
◼
►
other but the camera doesn't turn which
01:47:47
◼
►
means that when you're watching the part
01:47:50
◼
►
where the action happens towards one side
01:47:52
◼
►
of the court or the other where the
01:47:53
◼
►
baskets are you are looking at the worst
01:47:55
◼
►
possible edges of the film's footage the
01:48:00
◼
►
part with the least resolution the part
01:48:01
◼
►
with the most warping the part that's the
01:48:03
◼
►
softest that's what you're looking at all
01:48:04
◼
►
the time if you want to see the tip off
01:48:06
◼
►
boy that's great best resolution it's
01:48:08
◼
►
perfect but like but when you're sitting
01:48:10
◼
►
there in real life you just turn your
01:48:11
◼
►
head and then you're getting full
01:48:12
◼
►
resolution when you look at the basket on
01:48:14
◼
►
either side right not ideal for basketball
01:48:17
◼
►
in that position the in the under the
01:48:20
◼
►
basket and position thing that's cool
01:48:22
◼
►
because you can see the people closer
01:48:23
◼
►
but it's also kind of hard to see what
01:48:24
◼
►
the ball's doing yeah the backboard is
01:48:26
◼
►
clear but like it has a frame and
01:48:27
◼
►
there's paint on it and there's a big you
01:48:29
◼
►
know the big arm that holds out the
01:48:31
◼
►
backboard I felt like that was kind of
01:48:33
◼
►
like an obstructed view I felt like I was
01:48:34
◼
►
kind of like I was sitting behind a beam
01:48:35
◼
►
in like a you know Fenway Park or
01:48:37
◼
►
something I don't know if I had the
01:48:39
◼
►
beams some places happen anyway when I
01:48:44
◼
►
was watching this the only thing I could
01:48:45
◼
►
think of course is a sport that I like
01:48:46
◼
►
better which is tennis if you watch a
01:48:49
◼
►
televised tennis match because the court
01:48:51
◼
►
is small and there's only two people
01:48:53
◼
►
most tennis matches like there's the
01:48:55
◼
►
master shot of a tennis match which is
01:48:57
◼
►
essentially like above and behind one of
01:49:01
◼
►
the players so you see the entire court
01:49:03
◼
►
and you see both players that's not the
01:49:06
◼
►
same as being there live I've been to
01:49:08
◼
►
many tennis matches live being there live
01:49:10
◼
►
you don't get that sort of bird's eye
01:49:12
◼
►
view type thing but you can still pretty
01:49:14
◼
►
much see the entire court and it feels
01:49:16
◼
►
more like you're you know like like you're
01:49:18
◼
►
on the court with them kind of like
01:49:19
◼
►
being court side you're on the court
01:49:20
◼
►
with the basketball players so I feel
01:49:23
◼
►
like tennis there's a good chance they
01:49:24
◼
►
should do that they wouldn't they should
01:49:26
◼
►
never put a camera on the net or even
01:49:31
◼
►
with the net to do VR tennis because that
01:49:33
◼
►
the whole you know cliche of watching
01:49:35
◼
►
people in the stands at a tennis match
01:49:36
◼
►
turning their head side to side as the
01:49:37
◼
►
balls go back and forth that's not
01:49:38
◼
►
enjoyable you don't want those seats you
01:49:40
◼
►
want to be behind one player or the
01:49:42
◼
►
other and on that front on the like what
01:49:46
◼
►
can you bring to vision pro that that
01:49:49
◼
►
brings like the advantages of being
01:49:50
◼
►
there live I think the the uh the vision
01:49:54
◼
►
pro lakers game brought a lot of that
01:49:56
◼
►
part of it is being kind of like you're
01:49:59
◼
►
on the same floor it's one of the unique
01:50:02
◼
►
things about basketball you were literally
01:50:03
◼
►
on the same floor as the players there's
01:50:06
◼
►
no step down there's no wall there's no
01:50:07
◼
►
barrier you're just on a little folding
01:50:08
◼
►
chair next to spike lee who's getting up
01:50:11
◼
►
and getting all excited and there are the
01:50:13
◼
►
players right in front of you you can hear
01:50:15
◼
►
them trash talking each other you know
01:50:16
◼
►
stuff you wouldn't hear on TV because the
01:50:18
◼
►
microphones are far away and because they
01:50:19
◼
►
mute it but you can hear and see them all
01:50:21
◼
►
talking and doing stuff right uh to your
01:50:23
◼
►
point Casey about looking on the mid
01:50:25
◼
►
court thing I don't is it half court I
01:50:27
◼
►
don't think it's mid court anyway and on
01:50:29
◼
►
the on the half court line looking to the
01:50:32
◼
►
left and the right the coach of uh
01:50:34
◼
►
doc rivers yeah was getting in the way
01:50:38
◼
►
blocking your view yeah that's what it
01:50:40
◼
►
would be like if you were in that seat
01:50:41
◼
►
what are you gonna do tell the coach to
01:50:42
◼
►
sit down that's part of the experience
01:50:44
◼
►
of being there in person is like he's he's
01:50:47
◼
►
out there he's going on I feel like there
01:50:49
◼
►
should be like penalties of like isn't
01:50:50
◼
►
there like penalties in football like the
01:50:52
◼
►
people can't you can't have like too many
01:50:54
◼
►
players in the field if they like go over
01:50:55
◼
►
the line or whatever he was literally on
01:50:57
◼
►
the basketball court I guess they don't
01:50:58
◼
►
care it's just like they don't call
01:50:59
◼
►
traveling anymore but like he's blocking
01:51:01
◼
►
your view he's getting on the field and
01:51:02
◼
►
that's just part of being there and
01:51:04
◼
►
that's it's annoying because now he's
01:51:06
◼
►
obscuring your view because he's a big
01:51:07
◼
►
guy right but it is it is like being
01:51:11
◼
►
there is an experience you would
01:51:12
◼
►
never get on TV so I did it I did
01:51:14
◼
►
appreciate that part of it but I came
01:51:16
◼
►
away thinking that again if I really
01:51:18
◼
►
cared about this game I probably would
01:51:20
◼
►
have preferred to see it on a 2d
01:51:21
◼
►
broadcast but it was definitely an
01:51:24
◼
►
interesting experience to feel like the
01:51:26
◼
►
people were right there in front of me
01:51:28
◼
►
and to get a little bit of that and
01:51:29
◼
►
again going back to tennis one of the
01:51:31
◼
►
best things about seeing tennis live is
01:51:33
◼
►
the sort of a visceral and auditory
01:51:38
◼
►
experience that you don't get on TV
01:51:39
◼
►
because I don't know if you've ever
01:51:41
◼
►
seen like I'm sure you have now
01:51:43
◼
►
unfortunately like filmed gunshots like
01:51:45
◼
►
because they're so loud they essentially
01:51:47
◼
►
clip on the the microphones that are
01:51:49
◼
►
recording them and they sound kind of
01:51:50
◼
►
like these muffled little things
01:51:51
◼
►
whereas when you're there in real life
01:51:53
◼
►
very close to them they don't clip
01:51:55
◼
►
quite as much when you watch a tennis
01:51:56
◼
►
match in person it sounds like gunshots
01:51:59
◼
►
are going off like you really get the
01:52:00
◼
►
impression of like oh these people are
01:52:02
◼
►
hitting tennis ball harder than I've had a
01:52:04
◼
►
tennis ball in my life and they do it
01:52:05
◼
►
every single time they hit it yeah and
01:52:08
◼
►
it is shocking to be like oh like I you
01:52:11
◼
►
know you you see them on TV and there's a
01:52:13
◼
►
little ball going back and forth yeah but
01:52:14
◼
►
if you see that if you're like three feet
01:52:15
◼
►
away from them and you're seeing their
01:52:16
◼
►
hit it's like you cannot believe how hard
01:52:19
◼
►
and how accurately these people hit every
01:52:20
◼
►
single ball and it is terrifying and you
01:52:23
◼
►
only get that when you're there quote
01:52:25
◼
►
unquote in person and I feel like the
01:52:26
◼
►
vision pro could potentially deliver that
01:52:28
◼
►
as well so I give the broadcast mostly a
01:52:31
◼
►
thumbs up I don't agree with Ben that live
01:52:35
◼
►
sports is the one and only and best thing
01:52:38
◼
►
with the broadest appeal but I do agree
01:52:39
◼
►
with him and both of you that it should be
01:52:41
◼
►
an option yeah so quickly going through
01:52:44
◼
►
some line items that I took notes on when
01:52:46
◼
►
I was watching in the beginning
01:52:48
◼
►
particularly and including during the
01:52:50
◼
►
starting lineup they were feeding in the
01:52:52
◼
►
stadium audio which was very very weird
01:52:56
◼
►
instead of getting you know audio piped
01:52:58
◼
►
like soundboard soundboard audio they
01:53:01
◼
►
basically were taking the ambient audio
01:53:02
◼
►
from the microphones on the camera which
01:53:05
◼
►
was barely intelligible for me I really
01:53:07
◼
►
didn't understand that choice maybe it
01:53:09
◼
►
was noops I don't know and speaking of
01:53:11
◼
►
during the replay there were times that
01:53:12
◼
►
it was just straight up silent for a few
01:53:15
◼
►
seconds like the video was working but
01:53:16
◼
►
there was zero audio not even like
01:53:18
◼
►
ambient just chitter-chatter from the
01:53:20
◼
►
stadium it was literally silent very very
01:53:23
◼
►
weird but at one point during the game I
01:53:25
◼
►
heard a kid shouting over my left shoulder
01:53:27
◼
►
when I was sitting courtside which was
01:53:28
◼
►
pretty cool so I dug that then for with
01:53:32
◼
►
regard to the video the you already
01:53:36
◼
►
mentioned the Doc Rivers thing getting
01:53:37
◼
►
in the way but the thing that was most
01:53:39
◼
►
striking to me we already talked about
01:53:40
◼
►
all the other stuff I had but the thing
01:53:42
◼
►
that was most striking to me was that
01:53:44
◼
►
when they would show an instant replay
01:53:46
◼
►
what would happen is it would they would
01:53:47
◼
►
there was like a graphic that would swoop
01:53:49
◼
►
in and it would say like instant replay
01:53:52
◼
►
with like the NBA logo or whatever and then
01:53:54
◼
►
instead of any sort of like wipe or
01:53:57
◼
►
transition or anything it was just a
01:54:00
◼
►
hard cut to the replay so they had the
01:54:03
◼
►
graphic which you can see through like
01:54:06
◼
►
it wasn't taking up the entire view and
01:54:08
◼
►
then back to the replay and then because
01:54:10
◼
►
there was no swipe or anything to give
01:54:11
◼
►
you a clue that you're getting going back
01:54:13
◼
►
to the actual action as it's happening
01:54:14
◼
►
then they would have a different but
01:54:16
◼
►
similar transition or not even really
01:54:18
◼
►
transition but but thing on the screen
01:54:20
◼
►
adornment that said back to live or back
01:54:23
◼
►
to live action or something like that
01:54:24
◼
►
which I get you know intellectually but
01:54:28
◼
►
was really freaking weird like I don't
01:54:30
◼
►
understand why we can't do some sort of
01:54:32
◼
►
swipe maybe there's a perfectly
01:54:33
◼
►
legitimate reason they don't I think you
01:54:35
◼
►
mean wipe not swipe but yeah I think I
01:54:37
◼
►
think they don't have we don't yet have a
01:54:39
◼
►
vocabulary for building a VR broadcast in
01:54:44
◼
►
this way we don't have the vocabulary we
01:54:45
◼
►
have the vocabulary like 2d broadcasts of
01:54:47
◼
►
like you know all the transitions we
01:54:49
◼
►
have the different camera angles how we
01:54:51
◼
►
cut between them it's kind of like like
01:54:53
◼
►
crossing the 180 degree line or whatever
01:54:54
◼
►
like when filming filming a movie with
01:54:57
◼
►
dialogue you don't want to cross over
01:54:58
◼
►
the line because it gets confused about
01:54:59
◼
►
who is on what side and who's talking
01:55:01
◼
►
where or whatever and they do that in
01:55:02
◼
►
these sporting events there's different
01:55:04
◼
►
vocabulary for doing sporting events
01:55:05
◼
►
to like not get people confused about
01:55:07
◼
►
where the ball is and where the players
01:55:08
◼
►
are right but we have all those rules
01:55:10
◼
►
for 2d television only yeah yeah in
01:55:13
◼
►
this VR space where suddenly there's a
01:55:16
◼
►
new degree of freedom where the person
01:55:17
◼
►
can be looking not where you expect them
01:55:19
◼
►
to be looking we don't have vocab for
01:55:20
◼
►
that and I feel like I maybe I'm wrong
01:55:23
◼
►
about this but I feel like some of the
01:55:25
◼
►
solution has to kind of be to
01:55:28
◼
►
essentially put virtual 2d screens into
01:55:31
◼
►
the 3d world that the person watching
01:55:33
◼
►
has some control over just because like
01:55:37
◼
►
it's it's like an analog of like you know
01:55:41
◼
►
oh it's like you you can look you're
01:55:42
◼
►
looking at a computer screen inside your
01:55:44
◼
►
VR headset that's so dumb it's like but
01:55:45
◼
►
yeah but these screens I can literally
01:55:47
◼
►
put anywhere like that I'm not
01:55:48
◼
►
constrained in the way the physical world
01:55:50
◼
►
is and then within those screens all of
01:55:52
◼
►
our 2d vocabulary exists right so the
01:55:54
◼
►
instant replay thing I kind of almost
01:55:56
◼
►
feel like if a thing had come into my
01:55:58
◼
►
field of view that is the place where
01:56:00
◼
►
the instant replay would happen and the
01:56:02
◼
►
instant replay was in 2d but I can
01:56:04
◼
►
immerse myself in it if I wanted to you
01:56:06
◼
►
know I don't I don't know the answer I'm
01:56:07
◼
►
just I'm just spitballing here but I
01:56:08
◼
►
like it's so hard to because I think
01:56:11
◼
►
our vocabulary is so limited when you
01:56:13
◼
►
say the only thing we can do is throw
01:56:15
◼
►
small things in front of you like the
01:56:17
◼
►
score bug and stuff like that or take
01:56:19
◼
►
over your entire field of view with a
01:56:20
◼
►
thing you didn't choose which a lot of
01:56:23
◼
►
people feel is jarring more jarring than
01:56:25
◼
►
2d cuts in TV so TBD and we're still
01:56:28
◼
►
experimenting and trying stuff out I have
01:56:31
◼
►
to feel like there is a solution here but
01:56:32
◼
►
we haven't found it yet yeah and I mean I
01:56:35
◼
►
get it I get how they landed here and I
01:56:37
◼
►
think you're right I think there's
01:56:38
◼
►
something better out there we just
01:56:39
◼
►
haven't figured it out just a couple
01:56:42
◼
►
other quick notes at the end of the
01:56:43
◼
►
national anthem I almost clapped
01:56:45
◼
►
because my brain was like that's what
01:56:47
◼
►
you do now you're there you should
01:56:49
◼
►
clap and so that's I almost did and
01:56:52
◼
►
that was a very very weird feeling to
01:56:54
◼
►
have not a bad one but a very weird
01:56:55
◼
►
one additionally I really do think that
01:56:58
◼
►
if you're going to cut behind the
01:56:59
◼
►
basket which I think should happen on
01:57:01
◼
►
occasion the best possible time to do
01:57:03
◼
►
that is during an instant replay because
01:57:04
◼
►
then you get a close-up of the thing
01:57:06
◼
►
you just watched and that was really
01:57:08
◼
►
good and really well done and plus
01:57:10
◼
►
you're already getting ripped out of
01:57:12
◼
►
what's currently happening anyway
01:57:14
◼
►
because you're going back in time why
01:57:16
◼
►
wouldn't you get the best possible
01:57:18
◼
►
view and that's what they did a lot of
01:57:19
◼
►
the time it was really great they need
01:57:20
◼
►
those NFL sky cams though like I was
01:57:22
◼
►
begging for different camera angle I
01:57:24
◼
►
know it's I mean it's hard the camera
01:57:25
◼
►
the VR cameras are even though they're
01:57:27
◼
►
smaller than they used to be there it's
01:57:29
◼
►
a big like but just I was kind of I was
01:57:33
◼
►
wishing for some cameras like that's
01:57:35
◼
►
the problem with being there in
01:57:36
◼
►
person is sometimes you don't have a
01:57:37
◼
►
great view and the problem with
01:57:39
◼
►
cameras that simulate being there in
01:57:40
◼
►
person is sometimes they don't have a
01:57:42
◼
►
great view the the cameras for the
01:57:44
◼
►
2d broadcast get every angle and have
01:57:45
◼
►
amazing zooms on them which is another
01:57:47
◼
►
thing that you can't do as easily with
01:57:48
◼
►
these VR cameras which is like well
01:57:50
◼
►
those cameras are all around the
01:57:51
◼
►
stadium and some of them have amazing
01:57:53
◼
►
telephoto lenses so you get the
01:57:54
◼
►
instant replay from seven different
01:57:55
◼
►
angles you can see right was this
01:57:57
◼
►
person fouled you know were both
01:57:59
◼
►
these feet inbound before we cut the
01:58:01
◼
►
bolt like like that stuff you can see
01:58:03
◼
►
because they have so many cameras
01:58:04
◼
►
from so many different angles and the
01:58:06
◼
►
VR one is like you have like three
01:58:08
◼
►
choices and that's it yep well and
01:58:11
◼
►
they had basically you had behind the
01:58:13
◼
►
baskets and then the half court but
01:58:15
◼
►
occasionally they would put I guess
01:58:17
◼
►
one of these immersive doodads on a
01:58:19
◼
►
tripod and bring it on the court as an
01:58:21
◼
►
example the Laker girls did the
01:58:22
◼
►
halftime show and of course you know
01:58:24
◼
►
we had to get a close-up view of that
01:58:25
◼
►
and but anyways I think in the end this
01:58:29
◼
►
was an incredible experience I would
01:58:31
◼
►
love to experience any sporting or
01:58:33
◼
►
concert event in a similar fashion
01:58:34
◼
►
again I I get Ben's point about you
01:58:39
◼
►
know keeping me stationary and never
01:58:40
◼
►
moving me or only moving me under my
01:58:41
◼
►
own control I I genuinely just do not
01:58:45
◼
►
agree and the whole thing for me is
01:58:46
◼
►
look and John you were saying this
01:58:48
◼
►
earlier this could be a courtside seat
01:58:52
◼
►
but it doesn't have to be it can be so
01:58:54
◼
►
much more than that so make it more if
01:58:58
◼
►
nothing else do the instant replays
01:59:00
◼
►
from behind the basket figure out other
01:59:02
◼
►
ways to get us other views or do other
01:59:04
◼
►
things I I don't I feel like I get where
01:59:07
◼
►
Ben's coming from but I couldn't disagree
01:59:09
◼
►
more and also the announcers like whether
01:59:11
◼
►
you're like these announcers or not again
01:59:12
◼
►
most people's experience of sports is with
01:59:14
◼
►
someone essentially guiding them through
01:59:15
◼
►
the event it helps people who aren't
01:59:17
◼
►
familiar with the sport get up to speed
01:59:18
◼
►
on it helps it the announcers tell you
01:59:21
◼
►
things you don't know all baseball or
01:59:23
◼
►
whatever statistics this player usually
01:59:24
◼
►
does this well against this pitcher
01:59:25
◼
►
this thing has never happened in 20
01:59:28
◼
►
years of this franchise the last time a
01:59:30
◼
►
Super Bowl team was down by this amount
01:59:31
◼
►
of this time was bubble like the
01:59:33
◼
►
announcers give that info you don't get
01:59:35
◼
►
that when you're there live unless you
01:59:36
◼
►
have a very knowledgeable person sitting
01:59:37
◼
►
next to you they're different
01:59:38
◼
►
experiences and most people watch
01:59:41
◼
►
sports not the live way they watch it
01:59:44
◼
►
the way with knowledgeable announcers
01:59:45
◼
►
and the team cutting a few different
01:59:47
◼
►
angles and instant replay and and all
01:59:49
◼
►
that stuff and I think that's how that
01:59:52
◼
►
is the that is the mass market product
01:59:53
◼
►
that they're trying to imitate here
01:59:55
◼
►
despite how much the non mass market
01:59:58
◼
►
product of you know ten thousand
01:59:59
◼
►
dollar courtside Laker tickets are
02:00:01
◼
►
exciting and exclusive and cool there's
02:00:04
◼
►
also another thing that I think they
02:00:05
◼
►
shouldn't simulate which is those really
02:00:07
◼
►
expensive boxes that don't have a view
02:00:08
◼
►
of the game but you just eat the food
02:00:09
◼
►
and hang out with the rich right yeah
02:00:11
◼
►
like they could do that in Apple Vision
02:00:13
◼
►
Pro 2 and it would suck if you're
02:00:14
◼
►
interested in the game you don't want
02:00:15
◼
►
to be in one of those rooms they have a
02:00:16
◼
►
bad view like so you know I I this is
02:00:21
◼
►
not an either or they should offer the
02:00:24
◼
►
option for Ben to make him happy I agree
02:00:26
◼
►
but I don't think that's going to solve
02:00:27
◼
►
their problem I think their problem is
02:00:28
◼
►
all the stuff that you were talking
02:00:29
◼
►
about Casey but just like this could
02:00:31
◼
►
this has lots of really cool aspects to
02:00:33
◼
►
it but it's still not even as good as
02:00:35
◼
►
the 2d one in terms of competence and
02:00:36
◼
►
confidence in how it works so it's like
02:00:38
◼
►
amazing you know amazing parts of this
02:00:41
◼
►
experience and then a bunch of
02:00:43
◼
►
crappier ones that are worse than
02:00:44
◼
►
watching in a 2d yeah but for me two
02:00:47
◼
►
thumbs very high up it's not perfect
02:00:49
◼
►
but it is really good and really cool
02:00:52
◼
►
and I cannot stress enough if the
02:00:54
◼
►
Lakers were my team and if I cared about
02:00:56
◼
►
the NBA and neither of those things is
02:00:58
◼
►
true I would absolutely be buying a
02:01:01
◼
►
Vision Pro yesterday because it is that
02:01:04
◼
►
freaking cool and that freaking great
02:01:06
◼
►
it's sloppy basketball in that game
02:01:08
◼
►
too I didn't watch the whole match but
02:01:09
◼
►
yes there was some not great plays
02:01:10
◼
►
there I don't know yeah I mean I
02:01:12
◼
►
haven't watched the NBA since the
02:01:13
◼
►
bowls were really good so that's 30
02:01:15
◼
►
years ago now something like that but
02:01:17
◼
►
it's been a long time but no it was
02:01:20
◼
►
it was some rough basketball for sure
02:01:22
◼
►
beep beep beep